Welcome speeches
26 May 2026 12:00h - 12:30h
Welcome speeches
Summary
The opening session of EURODIG marked the 20th anniversary of the .eu domain and set the tone for a two-day dialogue on the future of European internet governance [1-9]. Florence Ranson emphasized that both in-room and online participants are expected to contribute comments and questions throughout the event [12-15].
Thibault Liner highlighted that the Internet’s core principles of openness, global, cooperative and multistakeholder governance, first agreed more than two decades ago, must be constantly reaffirmed [26-28]. He noted that 2.2 billion people remain offline and that authoritarian models threatening openness are emerging, which Europe must oppose [46-52]. Liner described the EU’s response as a “digital sovereignty” agenda that combines empowerment with investment in cybersecurity, cloud, chips, AI and digital skills, while avoiding protectionism [59-66][77-78]. He also pointed to the Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act and competition policy as tools to protect openness and fair markets [71-74]. Liner stressed that EURODIG provides a vital multistakeholder space for Europe to influence the global IGF and must evolve to become more visible, impactful and connected to the technical community [90-96][98-100].
Peter Janssen then underlined that the .eu top-level domain is a trusted piece of European digital infrastructure whose stewardship requires security, accessibility and fairness [122-128]. He linked this trust to the concept of technical sovereignty, arguing that autonomy over core services and open standards are essential to reduce dependency risks and ensure resilience [132-140]. Janssen further argued that personal digital sovereignty is achieved when individuals and organisations own their domain names, giving them control over identity and the freedom to switch providers [144-158].
Sandra Hoferichter argued that multistakeholder dialogue platforms like EURODIG are crucial for legitimacy, allowing diverse interests to be heard and fostering consensus on complex internet issues [195-203][206-214]. She warned that national isolation and low acceptance of EU legislation risk undermining this legitimacy, and called for well-resourced, inclusive platforms to bridge global and local perspectives [209-219][220-224].
Thomas Schneider added that rapid AI developments, geopolitical tensions and concentration of digital power create unprecedented risks, but Europe’s collective potential can be harnessed through stronger pan-European cooperation and funding of multistakeholder bodies [226-236][237-244][250-257]. He urged reinforcement of EURODIG as a central forum for inclusive decision-making and invited interested parties to propose future host cities [250-263].
The session concluded with Florence announcing the start of the first exchange session, signalling the transition from opening remarks to substantive discussion [264-267].
Keypoints
Major discussion points
– Celebrating the 20-year anniversary of the .eu domain and its impact on European digital identity.
The opening remarks highlight the milestone and the role of .eu in giving Europe a clear online presence, supporting the internal market, multilingualism and security. [6-9][23-24][38-42][122-129]
– Reaffirming the multi-stakeholder model and EURODIG’s central role in internet-governance dialogue.
Speakers stress that EURODIG provides an open space for public authorities, private sector and youth, and must become more visible, impactful and well-resourced to sustain inclusive governance. [90-96][99-101][195-204][250-254]
– Preserving an open, secure Internet while building European digital/technical sovereignty.
Concerns are raised about the growing concentration of power in a few tech actors, the need to protect openness, and the EU’s policy toolbox (Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act, competition policy) together with investments in cloud, AI, chips and cybersecurity. [45-53][67-74][75-78][132-140]
– Calling for European unity and collective action amid geopolitical and technological pressures.
The dialogue underscores the urgency of coordinated European responses to geopolitical tensions, rapid AI-driven change, and the risk of fragmented national approaches, urging stronger pan-European cooperation and trust-building. [51-56][228-236][237-244][245-250]
– Promoting personal and organisational digital sovereignty through .eu domain ownership.
Owning a .eu domain is presented as a practical way to secure digital identity, ensure continuity across providers and empower citizens and SMEs in the single market. [144-152][155-160]
Overall purpose / goal of the discussion
The session was convened to mark the 20-year anniversary of the .eu top-level domain while using the occasion to launch a forward-looking agenda for European internet governance. It aimed to (i) celebrate past achievements, (ii) highlight the importance of the multi-stakeholder dialogue embodied by EURODIG, (iii) identify current challenges-such as digital sovereignty, market concentration and geopolitical risks-and (iv) mobilise European institutions, civil society and the private sector to cooperate on shaping an open, secure and trustworthy Internet for the next decade.
Overall tone and its evolution
The conversation began with a warm, celebratory and optimistic tone, emphasizing gratitude for the full house and the historic .eu milestone. [1][4][6] As speakers progressed, the tone shifted to a more analytical and urgent register, outlining concrete challenges to openness, digital sovereignty and geopolitical pressures. [45-53][67-74][228-236] Towards the end, the tone returned to a constructive, forward-looking optimism, urging unity, cooperation and concrete actions through EURODIG and EU policy instruments. [90-96][132-140][250-254] Throughout, the discourse remained respectful and collaborative, reflecting the multi-stakeholder ethos it promotes.
Speakers
– Florence Ranson – Moderator/host of the EURODIG opening session; facilitates dialogue on European internet governance.
– Thibault Liner – Director for Future Networks at DG Connect, European Commission; focuses on digital sovereignty, open Internet principles, and future network policy.
– Peter Janssen – General Manager of EURID; oversees the .eu top-level domain registry and its role in European digital infrastructure.
– Sandra Hoferichter – Secretary General of the EURODIG Support Association; works on multi-stakeholder dialogue platforms and European internet governance.
– Thomas Schneider – Ambassador and Director of International Affairs at the Swiss Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); President of the EuroDIG Support Association; expert on digital governance, AI policy, WSIS + 20 review, and multistakeholder processes [S4][S5][S6].
Additional speakers:
– Fabrizia Benigni – Mentioned as a senior EURID staff member retiring after 34 years; no speaking role recorded.
– Henna Virkkunen – Executive Vice-President of the European Commission, referenced for a later talk; no speaking role recorded.
– Martina Barbero – EURID team member thanked for support; no speaking role recorded.
– Hans Seeuws – Briefly introduced in a follow-up exchange; no speaking role recorded.
The EURODIG plenary opened with Florence Ranson welcoming participants for their punctuality and noting that a full audience-both in-room and online-would keep the two-day programme on schedule and set a constructive tone for the dialogue on Europe’s internet future [1-9][12-15]. She emphasized that every attendee, whether present physically or remotely, was expected to comment, ask questions and help shape the discussions [13-15].
Thibault Liner, Director for Future Networks at DG CONNECT, began by marking the 20-year anniversary of the .eu domain as a symbol of a European online identity [23-30]. He recalled the WSIS + 20 review, which reaffirmed the Internet’s core principles-openness, global reach, cooperative and multistakeholder governance-and warned that these principles must be reaffirmed daily because they underpin the Internet’s distributed, interoperable and cooperative nature [26-30].
Liner then outlined the .eu top-level domain’s achievements: over 3.8 million registrations, support for multilingualism and a record-low level of DNS abuse, positioning .eu as one of the world’s largest country-code domains and a trusted element of European digital infrastructure [40-43][41]. He linked these results to the original goal of giving Europe a clear online identity to boost the internal market, e-commerce and citizen-to-business interaction [38-40].
Addressing current challenges, Liner highlighted that 2.2 billion people remain offline, a gap the EU must collectively close [46-48]. He warned that authoritarian, state-controlled internet models are emerging, threatening the openness Europe defends [49-53]. In response, the Commission is preparing a “tech-sovereignty” package that combines empowerment with strategic investment in cybersecurity, cloud, chips, artificial intelligence and digital skills, explicitly distancing the agenda from protectionism [59-66][77-78].
To safeguard openness and fair markets, Liner cited the EU’s regulatory toolbox-the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act and competition policy-as instruments already being used to curb concentration among a few global actors that control cloud infrastructure, operating systems, data flows and emerging AI capabilities [71-74][68-70]. He stressed that these rules must be applied from a position of strength, requiring reduced dependency on external providers [75-78].
Liner also argued that Europe must act internationally, leveraging mechanisms such as the Global Digital Compact, the Internet Governance Forum and the Global Gateway funding programme to support regions most in need and to promote a collaborative, rules-based internet [79-80].
He concluded that the next phase of the Internet will be shaped by AI, cloud, data, virtual worlds and digital public infrastructures, and that Europe must help steer these technologies so they generate opportunities rather than tools for excessive control [81-85][86-88].
Peter Janssen, General Manager of EURID, then turned to .eu’s stewardship. He reminded the audience that EURID operates the .eu namespace in the public interest, safeguarding its integrity, accessibility, security and fair use for millions of users [122-130]. He introduced “technical sovereignty”, arguing that autonomy over core services-starting with registry autonomy-and architectural choices that reduce dependency risks are essential for digital resilience [132-140][136-140].
Janssen linked technical sovereignty to personal digital sovereignty, explaining that owning a .eu domain gives individuals and organisations control over their digital identity, the freedom to change email or hosting providers without losing their address, and thus supports business continuity, independence and competitiveness across the single market [144-158][155-160][161-162].
Sandra Hoferichter, Secretary General of the EURODIG Support Association, reinforced the importance of multistakeholder dialogue for legitimacy. She argued that a bottom-up approach, where diverse interest groups set the agenda and engage in respectful, constructive exchanges, strengthens the legitimacy of European institutions and improves acceptance of legislation [195-203][206-214]. Hoferichter warned that EU-level laws are sometimes perceived as irrelevant or over-regulating at national level, and that regional and national IGFs can act as intermediaries to adapt global norms to local contexts [209-219][220-224].
Thomas Schneider, President of the EURODIG Support Association, highlighted the rapid pace of AI and other emerging technologies, heightened geopolitical tensions and the concentration of digital power in a few actors as unprecedented risks [226-236]. He called for stronger pan-European cooperation, noting that no single country can face these challenges alone, and urged the EU to unite its industrial, research and defence capabilities [237-244]. Schneider also stressed that multistakeholder platforms like EURODIG must be well-funded and politically supported to remain effective, citing Swiss contributions to the EURODIG secretariat and inviting cities to propose hosting the 20th edition [250-257][260-263].
Across the opening remarks, a clear consensus emerged: all speakers affirmed that genuine multistakeholder dialogue-embodied in EURODIG-is the cornerstone for shaping Europe’s internet future, building legitimacy and ensuring inclusive decision-making [11-16][90-96][195-203][250-254]. They also agreed that openness, open standards and a diversified supplier landscape are vital for a resilient and trustworthy European digital ecosystem [27-30][138-144]. Moreover, both Liner and Janssen stressed the strategic priority of digital sovereignty, albeit from different angles-Liner focusing on EU-wide regulatory and investment measures, Janssen on technical autonomy and personal domain ownership [71-78][145-160].
A few nuanced disagreements were noted. While Liner presented digital sovereignty as a regulatory and investment-driven package aimed at reducing market concentration, Janssen framed sovereignty primarily as technical autonomy of the .eu registry and as empowerment through individual domain ownership, revealing divergent emphases on the pathways to the same overarching goal [71-78][145-160].
Thought-provoking comments punctuated the session. Liner’s reframing of digital sovereignty as “empowerment, not protectionism” challenged common misconceptions [59-66]; his warning that “a few actors control access, cloud, operating systems, data flows, cybersecurity, DNS service and emerging AI capabilities” highlighted concentration risk [68-70]. Hoferichter’s critique that EU legislation is often seen as “irrelevant or over-regulating” at national level underscored the legitimacy gap [209-214]. Schneider’s observation that “powers … are dividing us so that we do not get stronger together” placed the digital-governance debate within a broader geopolitical struggle [245-250]. Janssen’s practical illustration that “personal digital sovereignty is achieved by owning your own domain name” translated abstract policy into everyday benefit [144-152]. Finally, Liner’s reminder that “the multi-stakeholder model is only credible if it is alive in practice” called for continuous, not token, engagement [90-92].
The session closed with Florence Ranson signalling the shift from opening remarks to substantive discussion, announcing the start of the first exchange session and inviting participants to move from celebration to active dialogue [264-267].
Overall, the opening plenary celebrated two decades of the .eu domain, reaffirmed the multistakeholder ethos of EURODIG, identified pressing challenges-digital exclusion, authoritarian models, market concentration and geopolitical tension-and outlined a forward-looking agenda that combines regulatory tools, technical autonomy and inclusive dialogue to shape a secure, open and sovereign European internet for the next twenty years.
Thank you very much for being so punctual. We love audiences like this because it means we are not running late from the start of the afternoon. So that gives us hope for the rest of the day. So welcome. Welcome back. If you were with us this morning, welcome. If you are joining only now for EURODIG and you didn’t have the opportunity to join us this morning for the pre -sessions celebrating the 20th anniversary of .eu. But this is an ongoing celebration, so we’re going to continue throughout the rest of today and also tomorrow. So welcome to this new edition of EURODIG, the European Dialogue on Internet Governance. The event is hosted by EURID, and as I said, it is the celebration of the 20th anniversary of .eu, we also will focus on the very specificity of EURODIG.
It is not just another conference. you can attend in certain circumstances. EURODIG is a dialogue. So you all have a role to play, whether you’re here in the room with us, and it’s a full house, delighted to see that. But it works also for those of you who are following us online, and there are quite a few of you connected. So whether in the room or online, we will be relying on you to make comments, ask questions, and interact throughout the whole event, whether it’s today or tomorrow. And of course, we have set up some structure to do that, but there will also be open sessions for open questions as we go. We will be, during these two days, we will be listening to European voices for the future of the internet.
And we will celebrate. the 20 years of .eu but also the beginning of a new internet governance era quite an ambitious program and to set the scene for that event and welcome you all properly i would like to give the floor to representatives of the three organizations behind that ambitious program so please welcome our first speaker this afternoon please welcome a Thibault Liner who’s director for future networks at DG connect at the European Commission good afternoon and please.
Good afternoon nice to see so many familiar faces very happy to have a full house today and a full program indeed so indeed the Peter, Sandra ,Thomas excellencies distinguished guests dear friends of the European and global Internet landscape. I mean, today is our day. We will hear later on around 4 o ‘clock from the Executive Vice President of the Commission, Henna Virkkunen. But today I wanted to welcome you very warmly to this event. It’s a special event, not every day, that we have such an opportunity to join between the various participants. We are celebrating, indeed, 20 years of .eu, 20 years of European identity online. And this is also a special time because we are meeting just after the WSIS Plus 20 review, where, again, we had the opportunity to reassert the importance of the Internet and also when we made it possible for the Internet Governance Forum to be given a permanent place .
So if we go back in time, more than 20 years ago, the world had already decided to agree on some core principles for the Internet. And this matters still today. The Internet must be open and its governance must be global, cooperative, and multi -stakeholder. This may sound easy, but actually these principles every day have to be reaffirmed, reasserted, because they are the cardinal principles reflecting the nature of the Internet. The Internet is distributed, it’s interoperable, and it’s also cooperative. And we should never forget this, because this vision has brought so much benefits to the world. And this approach is very much… This approach aligns also to what the EU is all about. As an organization, we also are driven by principles.
We are driven by unity, but also by cooperation, and we are driven by the objective to make the world a better place. So the single market, which is our greatest achievement, needs not only open connectivity, it needs also to have global users and global markets reaching out and coming to Europe to make great things together. Citizens, researchers, inventors, we all want that people choose EU, choose Europe. And this is what is behind also the .eu as a domain name. When it was established, the aim was to give Europe a clear online identity to support the internal market increase, user choice, but also promote e -commerce at a time where it was accelerating, and also allow citizens across Europe.
The member states and businesses to present themselves as European online immediately, even through the name of their website. And 20 years later, we have more than 3 .8 million registered domain names. So .eu is actually one of the world’s largest country code top domain name. And it supports multilingualism, and it contributes significantly to security with the lowest level of DNS abuse cases. Not a small achievement. But today, we cannot just look at the past. If the first phase of the Internet governance was about building and expanding the open Internet, today’s challenge is to keep it open and accessible. And according to the ITU, there are still many people that are not online. 2 .2 billion people remain not connected to the Internet.
Can you believe it? We cannot accept that. And we need to do better collectively. And at the same time, if you look at the dynamics and the economics of the Internet, openness itself is under pressure. State -controlled or authoritarian models of the Internet have emerged, where technology is about controlling citizens instead of empowering them. Where shutting down connectivity, shutting down the Internet, blocking platforms, or restricting information flows is the name of the game. This is not what Europe stands for. We want to make sure that we provide a world where freedom of choice, where democracy, where equality, where the rule of law are preserved also online. And this is what we want also to achieve when we promote digital sovereignty.
Not a way to close down, but a way to empower and to give technology to those that need it. This is the digital transformation that we work for in the EU. This is about human -centric, and it’s about every individual having rights to benefit from technology. So next week, actually, the EU is about to propose a tech sovereignty package. You’ll hear more from the executive vice president. But here we want to make sure that we develop technologies that make freedom possible online. Where dependencies do not equate to becoming a kind of a tech colony of some kind, because you cannot control the products and the services that you develop yourself. Importantly, this is not about protectionism.
It’s about, again, empowerment. It’s about developing your capabilities. And most importantly, in the European vision, this technological, this digital sovereignty is something that we want to share with others, where we can collectively develop our capacities. Today, indeed, we cannot ignore the pressure from economic and private concentration on the digital world. A few actors only control access, control cloud infrastructure, control operating systems, data flows, cybersecurity, DNS service, and emerging AI capabilities. If this doesn’t mean that we all have access to these key elements, this is not anymore an open Internet. And this is a matter of attention we have now in the EU. We want to make sure that we will promote our digital rulebook as a way to protect openness and fair markets.
We have developed tools from competition policy to data protection to the Digital Markets Act. And the Digital Services Act. All of these are being used today to protect what we cherish. and to make sure that we also can continue with an Internet that is open and markets that are fair. But it’s not enough to have global rules. You need to be able to implement them from a position of strength because you are not fully dependent on a few of these companies. And this is why the EU is investing to reduce precisely our dependencies, to make sure that we invest in our own cybersecurity, in connectivity, in cloud, in chips technologies, in AI, and first and foremost in digital skills.
And we also want to act internationally so that we work with partners through the WISIS, but also through the Global Digital Compact, through the IGF, and through Global Gateway to also provide funding when it’s most needed. So what we believe is that we can do it. We believe that the next phase of the Internet is very exciting. But it also contains certain risks if we are not able to open up and maintain these foundations. We believe that AI, cloud, data, virtual worlds, cybersecurity, and digital public infrastructures will shape the future. But we need to shape it together. We need to make sure that these technologies will create opportunities and not be used to control excessively our initiatives.
Today, the EU is very pleased that we are on a post -Y6 plus 20 landscape where we can decisively work together. We want to explore new frameworks with international communities, many of you in the room. We want to make sure that we will promote these shared goals. And we want to make sure that with a permanent IGF, we can reach very concrete results. The global multi -stakeholder, we believe, is only credible if it is alive in practice, and not just something that you invoke when you need it. And actually, this is why EURODIG is so important. For years, EURODIG has provided Europe with an open space for dialogue. It has connected public authorities, private sector, but also the youth.
Very important. It has helped Europe to contribute to the global IGF and to the broader Internet governance system. But here as well, the landscape is changing, and EURODIG has to also change and evolve. It’s not just about a simple agenda, it’s about delivering on important promises. So we need to make sure that with this, EURODIG can become even more visible, more impactful, more sustainable. and more connected to the European technical community. This is where we have also things to discuss together. And also it is where European institutions, EuroID, the CCTLD community and other partners can support an evolution and make EURODIG a central piece in a new IGF. So in Europe, we believe in the multi -stakeholder model.
We believe in unity through diversity. And we believe that we can invest in spaces where our strength and hopes will live for a long time. 20 years ago, .eu gave Europe a clearer identity online. Today, we have a lesson learned. It means that we can build together trusted digital infrastructure without fragmenting the Internet. We believe that sovereignty is not a subject. If you design it well, it is an opportunity for all of us to share our capabilities and to become stronger. And it is an opportunity to make EURODIG really the place where we will meet again to deserve and prepare our contributions to the next 20 years of Internet governance. So if I have just one minute, and if I may, I also would like to pay tribute today to a very special lady.
Fabrizia Benigni, who is just here on the first row, because she is actually the initiator of of also the event today, and she had this great idea of combining our efforts, but also it’s a special moment for her because next week she actually will retire from our institution after something like 34 years of a brilliant career. So I wanted really to pay tribute to Fabrizia. Thank you also for being here with us. And if I may, I would like to ask you to join me with a round of applause for Fabrizia. Thank you. So dear colleagues, excellencies, I think today is a special day, but I think we also have a special conference. So please, I would invite you now to continue the exchanges and make sure that we can deliver for the period to come.
Thank you.
Thank you very much and i’d like now to give the floor to Peter Janssen general manager of Eurid.
Distinguished guests colleagues friends welcome to the european voices for the future of the Internet. Thank you for being here to celebrate 20 years of .eu and to look ahead at the beginning of a new era in Internet governance. I’m proud that we host this conference in close cooperation with the European Commission, and I’m grateful to everyone who has helped to make this gathering possible. Europe’s Internet future is shaped through dialogue, through shaped responsibility, and through the ability to turn principles into practical outcomes. I would also like to express a special word of thanks to the team Future Internet at DG Connect for its unwavering support in organizing this conference in this fantastic venue, and in particular to Martina Barbero for her relentless drive, who’s also in the first seat, for her relentless drive, professionalism, and commitment throughout this process.
So thank you very much, Martina. Europe has been entrusted to operate the .eu top -level domain in the public interest. We steward a piece of Europe’s digital infrastructure that millions of people and organizations rely on. That role comes with a clear duty to safeguard integrity, accessibility, security, and fair use. Every day, quietly and reliably. Over 20 years, .eu has earned its place as a trusted European space online. It serves citizens, entrepreneurs, civil society, and public institutions. It has helped organizations express who they are and where they belong in the European single market. This anniversary gives us reason to celebrate. but also reminds us of the responsibility to act with ambition, as the internet we depend on continues to evolve rapidly.
When Hewitt hosted EURODIG in Brussels in 2016, then Commissioner for Digital Economy and Society, Günther Oettinger already emphasized in his keynote that trust is key to realizing the full potential of the digital era. A decade later, those words resonate even more strongly. To understand what this responsibility means in practice, we can look at the concept of technical sovereignty. Technical sovereignty means continuity. It means autonomy in the systems that underpin our digital lives. It means being able to keep essential services running, even when circumstances change. For .eu, that starts with registry autonomy. The It requires architectural choices that reduce dependency risks and enhance control and responsibility for core services. A clear part of this work is building an approach that supports openness and ecosystem diversity.
Open standards, interoperability, and a healthy supplier landscape strengthen resilience. This approach matters all the more because the broader context around us is increasingly international. Infrastructure markets are concentrating. Dependency risks grow when too much becomes tied to too few providers. In that environment, digital resilience becomes a strategic necessity. But sovereignty also exists on a personal level. In the freedom to choose and control your own digital identity. The most powerful yet simplest tool for that. is owning your own domain name. A .du domain name gives people and organizations a European digital identity that spans borders. It works across the single market. It travels with you. It also unlocks personal digital sovereignty in a very concrete way. When you own your domain name, you own your online coordinates.
You can create your own email addresses on your own domain. You can use your own website address in every communication. And your email and your web address represent you, your name, your organization, your purpose. And with that ownership comes freedom of choice. You can change email providers without changing your email identity. You can change hosting providers without changing your web address. You can upgrade services, switch to better options, or diversify suppliers while keeping the identity that people own. How do you know and trust? This is a practical form of sovereignty that citizens and organizations can adopt immediately, here, today, and now. It supports business continuity for organizations, it supports independence for individuals, and it supports competitiveness for SMEs that work across borders.
But technology only works when people trust it, and that trust is built through security, through reliability, and through the confidence that the systems we depend on are aligned with values we share. This is where Europe has a unique role to play. Europe stands for an Internet that remains open, free, secure, and trustworthy. An Internet where citizens and organizations can participate. Where they can participate with confidence, knowing that their rights, their identity, and their data are protected. And that is also the responsibility behind .eu. For 20 years, .eu has provided stable and trusted digital infrastructure for millions of users across borders, not only as a technical service, but as part of a broader European digital ecosystem built on resilience, cooperation, and trust.
And in a time of growing geopolitical uncertainty and increasing digital dependency, trusted European infrastructure matters more than ever. People want to participate confidently in digital life. Organizations want to grow across borders without fragility in the foundations they rely on. Communities want an Internet that remains open, secure, and aligned with democratic values. Europe’s single market was built to give people and organizations the freedom to operate across borders. A European digital identity should offer the same freedom online. A domain name is not only a technical label, it is a statement of presence, it is a decision to participate, it is a way to take control of your digital identity. That is what .eu represents. So on this anniversary we celebrate 20 years of a trusted European namespace.
For 20 years, Europe has helped build a home on the internet where all European citizens and organizations can thrive in a single market. As former Czech President Václav Havel once said, vision is not enough, it must be combined with venture. It is not enough to stair up the steps, we must step up the stairs. Europe is ready to climb those steps, together with all of you. I wish you a productive and inspiring conference. Thank you.
Thank you very much. I’d like now to give the floor to Sandra Hoferichter and Thomas Schneider, respectively Secretary General and President of EURODIG Support Association. Welcome to both.
Dear participants, dear distinguished experts, colleagues, teams from the European Commission DT Connect and the team from EURID. Welcome to this IG Fest. This was our working title for this joint endeavor of EURID, the European Commission and EURODIG. For EURODIG, it’s the 19th edition in a row and next year we are celebrating the 20th anniversary and we are proud of it. But this year, the spotlight is on .eu as we celebrate two decades of commitment to a European identity. Happy birthday, EURID. And thank you for including us in your celebrations. A big thanks also to the European Commission, in particular colleagues from DigiConnect, for engaging over the last months as institutional partner, offering your house, and also for contributing in shaping the program.
And last but not least, our thanks and appreciation goes to the program committee, to the focal points, the organizing team that have worked on the session details in multi-stakeholder groups already, and the sponsors that are supporting us over the many years. Despite global tendencies in big politics where a few people try to decide for all others, in daily politics in Europe, multi-stakeholder participation is on the rise. In many areas where public policy is shaped, the involvement of various interest groups is increasingly demanded. The bottom-up approach in setting the agenda combined with equal participation of all stakeholders promises to strengthen the legitimacy of European institutions and promote greater acceptance of legislation. However, multi-stakeholder dialogue platforms like EuroDIC are not very common in all areas, and network of regional and national IGFs across all continents only exists for the emerging technologies as a result of the UN VISUS process and rooted in the nature of the shared responsibility in governing the Internet.
This is a great value and must be defended. Thank you. Gaining legitimacy is complex, needs commitment from all stakeholders, and they must be given the opportunity to present their views, identify problems, engage in critical but constructive and always respectful exchanges. Ideally, the outcome of such process is a shared consensus on a specific issue, or at least clarity about the obstacles and the commitment to overcome them. The aim is not to present quick solutions, but first to get a common understanding among all stakeholders of what the issue is and discuss the different perspectives. This might not be considered an issue for one stakeholder, might be a challenge for another group. Listening and understanding the perspective of other stakeholders is essential.
And this is exactly what you can expect from the next two days. I was recently asked if multi-stakeholder dialogue platform can reshape legitimacy in Europe. Well, Europe has a tradition of consensus building, and the European Union is an example of how consensus can be achieved across national borders in a fairly large region. The European Union is an example of how consensus can be achieved across national borders in a fairly large region. The European Union is an example of how consensus can be achieved across national borders in Today, however, we are seeing a growing trend towards national isolation. For example, legislation developed at the EU level seems to be less accepted at national levels. It’s often seen as irrelevant to the region, disconnected from the needs of the citizens, over-regulating, or it’s simply not understood.
A multi-stakeholder dialogue could complement legislative procedures. Regional and national initiatives are closer to the people. They create more accessible spaces for non-state actors to get involved in policy discussions. Language, cultural references, and contextual understanding make participation more relevant. In a global agenda that is often dominated by a few powerful voices, regional dialogues ensure that local perspectives are not lost but strengthened. All too often, global frameworks are not the same. They are disconnected from the realities of local implementation. Regional and national processes can act as intermediaries, adapting global norms to local context and enriching the global agenda with practical knowledge based on the lived experience of regions. Looking ahead, we should invest in European multi-stakeholder dialogue platforms that are inclusive, well-resourced and politically supported.
The bottom-up approach can address the growing legitimacy gap in Europe’s publicy-making. But bringing together all stakeholders on equal footing, they create inclusive spaces for understanding complex issues, reconciling diverse perspectives and building trust to continuous respectful engagement. While these platforms do not aim to replace parliamentary or legislative processes, they can meaningfully complement them by acting as early warning systems, barometers of societal needs and bridges between global and local realities. You are here to make that impact and I wish you two days of inspiring talks, unexpected insights and a lot of new valuable contacts. Thank you very much.
Dear friends, first of all thanks for your time. for, after exactly 10 years, getting us back to Brussels again for the second time. It’s always a pleasure to be here. We know that AI and other new technologies are transforming our world at a higher pace than all previous technologies, and that there are unprecedented opportunities and risks. People are struggling to cope with these rapid developments. And in addition, if that wasn’t enough, we have rising tensions on geopolitical levels. Some leaders of big economic and military powers think that they can ignore existing rules just because they are big and powerful enough to do so. There’s a lot of uncertainty, and people are nervous, and many look for guidance.
Some people are hoping for easy solutions and are willing to follow people that promise such easy solutions, which may unfortunately lead to even more problems. More polarization and not necessarily solutions in our societies. So Europe is under growing pressure on all levels. Economic, defense, innovation capabilities, all this is put into questions. But I think that in Europe we do have an enormous potential, but we need to better use it in order to defend our values and interests and to maintain our freedom to act in a sovereign way. We need to understand that every country in Europe is too small to fight alone. So all Europeans need to unite and cooperate more closely on all fields mentioned above.
Of course, such cooperation is not easy. As we’ve already heard, Europe is a very diverse continent with many different cultures, diverse histories and diverse circumstances. So it is not enough to just cooperate among governments. We need to convince the majority of the people in the industries in every single country in Europe that working together constructively, pragmatically and respectfully is our best option. And we know that there are powers that have an interest in the European Union and in the European Union. And they are dividing us so that we do not get stronger together. I think we should not do these powers this favor and let them divide us. But this means that we need to work hard to earn the trust of our stakeholders on national and European levels so that they support a stronger pan -European cooperation.
We need to make sure that the legitimate issues of concerns of our people and industries are heard and properly addressed. And we need to prove that we are able to develop solutions that offer perspective to all Europeans. Multi -stakeholder dialogue platforms, in particular EURODIG, play a central role in this regard. EURODIG allows us to identify opportunities and challenges and pave the way towards decisions that actually make things better and not worse. I’m also aware that there are voices out there that say in times where the big actors ignore rules and decide over our heads, we should also act more top -down and less inclusively. But given the democratic nature of our societies and the freedom that we want to give to our people and our industries, I do not think that this is a good idea to move away from multistakeholder cooperation.
To the contrary, we need to reform and strengthen our multistakeholder structures to make them more inclusive and more effective and more politically visible at the same time. Multistakeholder cooperation is not for free. It means work, and it requires resources. This is why my government, the Swiss government, has contributed to the funding and the secretariat of the EURODIG Secretariat since its very first days. In this regard, I would like to thank all other supporters of EURODIG for their longstanding commitments. And of course, I would like to thank all the hosts of the 19 EURODIG meetings so far. In this regard, I would like to thank again the European Commission and EURODIG, but also the Council of Europe for their support, and host for host, hosting EURODIG twice in Brussels and twice in Strasbourg.
Talking about hosts, and I’ll end with this. If you are interested in hosting the 20th EURODIG… next year in your city, please contact us because we are still open to interesting ideas. Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. I’m sure some of you will pick up on that call from Thomas, so I’m sure you will be getting some interesting offers maybe before the end of the event itself. So we have set the scene, or rather our opening speakers have set the scene. The time has come for our first exchange session.
Over the years, Diplo’s alumni base grew to over 6,000 professionals from 201 countries. Our websites, home to the latest information on all that we’ve been doing, have attracted thousands of monthly …
A European rEUnion is the concept under which Malta’s EU presidency took off on January 1. The smallest EU country will now lead the EU during these turbulent times. Digital is part of Malta’s uniquen…
I started the year knowing that we were nearing another milestone. In November 2017, we celebrate 15 years of DiploFoundation, and 25 years of research and training in the fields of diplomacy and the …
Future activities may include institutionalising mechanisms to swiftly mobilise cybersecurity experts in case of cyber-attacks and emergencies and capacity-building.Latin America and the CaribbeanCont…
EURid vzw is the nonprofit organisation appointed by the European Commission as the domain name registry that operates the .eu top-level domain and its variants in other scripts – .ею as of 1 June 201…
Table of contents Knowledge Graph of Debate Session report Speakers Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system aut…
The European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG) 2024 is scheduled to take place from June 17–19 in Vilnius, Lithuania. The event will be hosted by the Communications Regulatory Authority of Lit…
While generally, the discussions around the need for more regulations and norms about the Internet were much divided, opinions converged around the need for norms and frameworks regulating the develop…
EuroDIG is a Pan-European multi-stakeholder forum focused on Internet Governance. It is a regional sub-forum of the global Internet Governance Forum. It is an annual meeting with open participation an…
The European Dialogue on Internet Governance is an open platform for informal and inclusive discussions on public policy issues related to Internet Governance across Europe and integrates issues from …
Countries that are still taking the initial steps in developing their infrastructure have the right to sovereignty, as much as other countries have the duty to collectively ensure that this basic buil…
The session discussed the different ways in which ‘digital sovereignty’ has been embodied by governments and the intentions behind its usage. Panellists agreed that the European approach to digital so…
How to Project Europe’s Power / Davos 2025 Session report Speakers Knowledge Graph In-depth Analysis …
Europe’s position is strong, notably because of its greatest economic achievement, a common market of more than 500 million people. Its universities are among the best in the world. The average educat…
The European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, delivered her 2025 State of the Union address to the European Parliament in Strasbourg. The speech set out priorities for the coming year and w…
Joint research initiatives are slated (quantum, semiconductor programs with Japan, Canada, South Korea). Australia Cybersecurity- Cyber Dialogues: Exploration of Mutual Recognition Agreements (Cybe…
However, the less national governments have authority over the digital realm, the more digital sovereignty shifts to tech companies. Meta, Google, Microsoft, and other big platforms now control all fo…
Moderated by Mr Olivier Bringer (Head of Unit, Next Generation Internet, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (DG CONNECT), European Commission), the session address…
The fourth is to tackle the sovereignty/multilateralism dilemma which the EU will face, as a flip side of its digitally sovereign approach. In order to stand behind multilateralism, the EU will need t…
“The WSIS + 20 review reaffirmed the Internet’s core principles of openness, global reach, cooperative and multistakeholder governance.”
The knowledge base notes that WSIS values and principles, including multistakeholder governance, have been reaffirmed and remain central to Internet policy discussions [S89].
“.eu is one of the world’s largest country‑code domains, supports multilingualism and has a strong reputation for security and trust.”
EURid’s description of the .eu ccTLD highlights its role in European Internet ecosystems, multilingual support through IDNs and a concentrated but trusted registrar market, confirming its status as a major European ccTLD [S37] and [S64].
“2.2 billion people remain offline, a gap the EU must collectively close.”
EU-wide figures show about 58 million citizens are non-users, far fewer than 2.2 billion; the larger figure refers to the global digital divide, not the EU context [S93].
“Authoritarian, state‑controlled internet models are emerging, threatening the openness Europe defends.”
The EU’s digital strategy explicitly opposes state-controlled internet architectures and commits to defending an open, interoperable Internet [S63].
“Europe must act internationally, leveraging mechanisms such as the Global Digital Compact, the Internet Governance Forum and the Global Gateway funding programme to support regions most in need and promote a collaborative, rules‑based internet.”
The EU’s international digital strategy lists the Global Digital Compact, the IGF and the Global Gateway as key instruments for external engagement and support [S63].
“The EU’s regulatory toolbox—the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act and competition policy—is already being used to curb concentration among a few global actors that control cloud infrastructure, operating systems, data flows and emerging AI capabilities.”
EU policy documents describe a broad regulatory approach, including competition policy and sector-specific rules, aimed at reducing dependency on external providers and ensuring fair markets, aligning with the claim though specific acts are not enumerated in the knowledge base [S63].
The speakers show strong convergence on four main themes: the centrality of multistakeholder dialogue (EURODIG) for governance and legitimacy; the need for adequate funding and political support for such platforms; the foundational role of openness, open standards and a diverse supplier ecosystem; and the strategic importance of digital sovereignty at both the EU and individual level.
High consensus – virtually all speakers endorse the multistakeholder model, openness and investment in digital sovereignty, indicating a unified European stance that can facilitate coordinated policy actions and reinforce the credibility of EURODIG as a core venue for future Internet governance.
The speakers largely share a common vision of an open, multistakeholder‑driven Internet and recognize the importance of platforms like EURODIG. The principal disagreements centre on the preferred pathway to digital sovereignty—whether to prioritize EU‑wide regulatory and investment strategies (Thibault) or to focus on technical autonomy and personal domain ownership (Peter). There is also an unexpected tension between individual‑level and collective‑level conceptions of sovereignty.
Moderate. While consensus exists on overarching goals (openness, multistakeholder legitimacy), the divergence in methods for achieving digital sovereignty could affect policy coordination, requiring careful alignment of regulatory, technical, and user‑centric initiatives to avoid fragmented approaches.
The opening remarks were anchored by a series of insightful interventions that moved the discussion from a celebratory overview to a critical examination of Europe’s digital future. Thibault Liner’s reframing of digital sovereignty and his warning about market concentration introduced the central tension between openness and control. Sandra Hoferichter and Thomas Schneider expanded this tension into the realm of legitimacy and geopolitical pressure, highlighting the gap between EU‑level legislation and national realities and warning against external forces seeking to fragment Europe. Peter Janssen grounded the abstract debate in a concrete user‑centric example—owning a .eu domain—as a practical expression of personal digital sovereignty. Together, these comments redirected the conversation toward concrete challenges (concentration of power, legitimacy gaps, geopolitical threats) and concrete solutions (multi‑stakeholder platforms, technical autonomy, resource investment). The cumulative effect was to set a purposeful, problem‑oriented agenda for the rest of the conference, ensuring that subsequent sessions would be framed around empowerment, resilience, and genuine multi‑stakeholder engagement rather than mere celebration of past milestones.
Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.
Related event

