Welcome speeches

26 May 2026 12:00h - 12:30h

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The opening session of EURODIG marked the 20th anniversary of the .eu domain and set the tone for a two-day dialogue on the future of European internet governance [1-9]. Florence Ranson emphasized that both in-room and online participants are expected to contribute comments and questions throughout the event [12-15].


Thibault Liner highlighted that the Internet’s core principles of openness, global, cooperative and multistakeholder governance, first agreed more than two decades ago, must be constantly reaffirmed [26-28]. He noted that 2.2 billion people remain offline and that authoritarian models threatening openness are emerging, which Europe must oppose [46-52]. Liner described the EU’s response as a “digital sovereignty” agenda that combines empowerment with investment in cybersecurity, cloud, chips, AI and digital skills, while avoiding protectionism [59-66][77-78]. He also pointed to the Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act and competition policy as tools to protect openness and fair markets [71-74]. Liner stressed that EURODIG provides a vital multistakeholder space for Europe to influence the global IGF and must evolve to become more visible, impactful and connected to the technical community [90-96][98-100].


Peter Janssen then underlined that the .eu top-level domain is a trusted piece of European digital infrastructure whose stewardship requires security, accessibility and fairness [122-128]. He linked this trust to the concept of technical sovereignty, arguing that autonomy over core services and open standards are essential to reduce dependency risks and ensure resilience [132-140]. Janssen further argued that personal digital sovereignty is achieved when individuals and organisations own their domain names, giving them control over identity and the freedom to switch providers [144-158].


Sandra Hoferichter argued that multistakeholder dialogue platforms like EURODIG are crucial for legitimacy, allowing diverse interests to be heard and fostering consensus on complex internet issues [195-203][206-214]. She warned that national isolation and low acceptance of EU legislation risk undermining this legitimacy, and called for well-resourced, inclusive platforms to bridge global and local perspectives [209-219][220-224].


Thomas Schneider added that rapid AI developments, geopolitical tensions and concentration of digital power create unprecedented risks, but Europe’s collective potential can be harnessed through stronger pan-European cooperation and funding of multistakeholder bodies [226-236][237-244][250-257]. He urged reinforcement of EURODIG as a central forum for inclusive decision-making and invited interested parties to propose future host cities [250-263].


The session concluded with Florence announcing the start of the first exchange session, signalling the transition from opening remarks to substantive discussion [264-267].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Celebrating the 20-year anniversary of the .eu domain and its impact on European digital identity.


The opening remarks highlight the milestone and the role of .eu in giving Europe a clear online presence, supporting the internal market, multilingualism and security. [6-9][23-24][38-42][122-129]


Reaffirming the multi-stakeholder model and EURODIG’s central role in internet-governance dialogue.


Speakers stress that EURODIG provides an open space for public authorities, private sector and youth, and must become more visible, impactful and well-resourced to sustain inclusive governance. [90-96][99-101][195-204][250-254]


Preserving an open, secure Internet while building European digital/technical sovereignty.


Concerns are raised about the growing concentration of power in a few tech actors, the need to protect openness, and the EU’s policy toolbox (Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act, competition policy) together with investments in cloud, AI, chips and cybersecurity. [45-53][67-74][75-78][132-140]


Calling for European unity and collective action amid geopolitical and technological pressures.


The dialogue underscores the urgency of coordinated European responses to geopolitical tensions, rapid AI-driven change, and the risk of fragmented national approaches, urging stronger pan-European cooperation and trust-building. [51-56][228-236][237-244][245-250]


Promoting personal and organisational digital sovereignty through .eu domain ownership.


Owning a .eu domain is presented as a practical way to secure digital identity, ensure continuity across providers and empower citizens and SMEs in the single market. [144-152][155-160]


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The session was convened to mark the 20-year anniversary of the .eu top-level domain while using the occasion to launch a forward-looking agenda for European internet governance. It aimed to (i) celebrate past achievements, (ii) highlight the importance of the multi-stakeholder dialogue embodied by EURODIG, (iii) identify current challenges-such as digital sovereignty, market concentration and geopolitical risks-and (iv) mobilise European institutions, civil society and the private sector to cooperate on shaping an open, secure and trustworthy Internet for the next decade.


Overall tone and its evolution


The conversation began with a warm, celebratory and optimistic tone, emphasizing gratitude for the full house and the historic .eu milestone. [1][4][6] As speakers progressed, the tone shifted to a more analytical and urgent register, outlining concrete challenges to openness, digital sovereignty and geopolitical pressures. [45-53][67-74][228-236] Towards the end, the tone returned to a constructive, forward-looking optimism, urging unity, cooperation and concrete actions through EURODIG and EU policy instruments. [90-96][132-140][250-254] Throughout, the discourse remained respectful and collaborative, reflecting the multi-stakeholder ethos it promotes.


Speakers

Florence Ranson – Moderator/host of the EURODIG opening session; facilitates dialogue on European internet governance.


Thibault Liner – Director for Future Networks at DG Connect, European Commission; focuses on digital sovereignty, open Internet principles, and future network policy.


Peter Janssen – General Manager of EURID; oversees the .eu top-level domain registry and its role in European digital infrastructure.


Sandra Hoferichter – Secretary General of the EURODIG Support Association; works on multi-stakeholder dialogue platforms and European internet governance.


Thomas Schneider – Ambassador and Director of International Affairs at the Swiss Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); President of the EuroDIG Support Association; expert on digital governance, AI policy, WSIS + 20 review, and multistakeholder processes [S4][S5][S6].


Additional speakers:


Fabrizia Benigni – Mentioned as a senior EURID staff member retiring after 34 years; no speaking role recorded.


Henna Virkkunen – Executive Vice-President of the European Commission, referenced for a later talk; no speaking role recorded.


Martina Barbero – EURID team member thanked for support; no speaking role recorded.


Hans Seeuws – Briefly introduced in a follow-up exchange; no speaking role recorded.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The EURODIG plenary opened with Florence Ranson welcoming participants for their punctuality and noting that a full audience-both in-room and online-would keep the two-day programme on schedule and set a constructive tone for the dialogue on Europe’s internet future [1-9][12-15]. She emphasized that every attendee, whether present physically or remotely, was expected to comment, ask questions and help shape the discussions [13-15].


Thibault Liner, Director for Future Networks at DG CONNECT, began by marking the 20-year anniversary of the .eu domain as a symbol of a European online identity [23-30]. He recalled the WSIS + 20 review, which reaffirmed the Internet’s core principles-openness, global reach, cooperative and multistakeholder governance-and warned that these principles must be reaffirmed daily because they underpin the Internet’s distributed, interoperable and cooperative nature [26-30].


Liner then outlined the .eu top-level domain’s achievements: over 3.8 million registrations, support for multilingualism and a record-low level of DNS abuse, positioning .eu as one of the world’s largest country-code domains and a trusted element of European digital infrastructure [40-43][41]. He linked these results to the original goal of giving Europe a clear online identity to boost the internal market, e-commerce and citizen-to-business interaction [38-40].


Addressing current challenges, Liner highlighted that 2.2 billion people remain offline, a gap the EU must collectively close [46-48]. He warned that authoritarian, state-controlled internet models are emerging, threatening the openness Europe defends [49-53]. In response, the Commission is preparing a “tech-sovereignty” package that combines empowerment with strategic investment in cybersecurity, cloud, chips, artificial intelligence and digital skills, explicitly distancing the agenda from protectionism [59-66][77-78].


To safeguard openness and fair markets, Liner cited the EU’s regulatory toolbox-the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act and competition policy-as instruments already being used to curb concentration among a few global actors that control cloud infrastructure, operating systems, data flows and emerging AI capabilities [71-74][68-70]. He stressed that these rules must be applied from a position of strength, requiring reduced dependency on external providers [75-78].


Liner also argued that Europe must act internationally, leveraging mechanisms such as the Global Digital Compact, the Internet Governance Forum and the Global Gateway funding programme to support regions most in need and to promote a collaborative, rules-based internet [79-80].


He concluded that the next phase of the Internet will be shaped by AI, cloud, data, virtual worlds and digital public infrastructures, and that Europe must help steer these technologies so they generate opportunities rather than tools for excessive control [81-85][86-88].


Peter Janssen, General Manager of EURID, then turned to .eu’s stewardship. He reminded the audience that EURID operates the .eu namespace in the public interest, safeguarding its integrity, accessibility, security and fair use for millions of users [122-130]. He introduced “technical sovereignty”, arguing that autonomy over core services-starting with registry autonomy-and architectural choices that reduce dependency risks are essential for digital resilience [132-140][136-140].


Janssen linked technical sovereignty to personal digital sovereignty, explaining that owning a .eu domain gives individuals and organisations control over their digital identity, the freedom to change email or hosting providers without losing their address, and thus supports business continuity, independence and competitiveness across the single market [144-158][155-160][161-162].


Sandra Hoferichter, Secretary General of the EURODIG Support Association, reinforced the importance of multistakeholder dialogue for legitimacy. She argued that a bottom-up approach, where diverse interest groups set the agenda and engage in respectful, constructive exchanges, strengthens the legitimacy of European institutions and improves acceptance of legislation [195-203][206-214]. Hoferichter warned that EU-level laws are sometimes perceived as irrelevant or over-regulating at national level, and that regional and national IGFs can act as intermediaries to adapt global norms to local contexts [209-219][220-224].


Thomas Schneider, President of the EURODIG Support Association, highlighted the rapid pace of AI and other emerging technologies, heightened geopolitical tensions and the concentration of digital power in a few actors as unprecedented risks [226-236]. He called for stronger pan-European cooperation, noting that no single country can face these challenges alone, and urged the EU to unite its industrial, research and defence capabilities [237-244]. Schneider also stressed that multistakeholder platforms like EURODIG must be well-funded and politically supported to remain effective, citing Swiss contributions to the EURODIG secretariat and inviting cities to propose hosting the 20th edition [250-257][260-263].


Across the opening remarks, a clear consensus emerged: all speakers affirmed that genuine multistakeholder dialogue-embodied in EURODIG-is the cornerstone for shaping Europe’s internet future, building legitimacy and ensuring inclusive decision-making [11-16][90-96][195-203][250-254]. They also agreed that openness, open standards and a diversified supplier landscape are vital for a resilient and trustworthy European digital ecosystem [27-30][138-144]. Moreover, both Liner and Janssen stressed the strategic priority of digital sovereignty, albeit from different angles-Liner focusing on EU-wide regulatory and investment measures, Janssen on technical autonomy and personal domain ownership [71-78][145-160].


A few nuanced disagreements were noted. While Liner presented digital sovereignty as a regulatory and investment-driven package aimed at reducing market concentration, Janssen framed sovereignty primarily as technical autonomy of the .eu registry and as empowerment through individual domain ownership, revealing divergent emphases on the pathways to the same overarching goal [71-78][145-160].


Thought-provoking comments punctuated the session. Liner’s reframing of digital sovereignty as “empowerment, not protectionism” challenged common misconceptions [59-66]; his warning that “a few actors control access, cloud, operating systems, data flows, cybersecurity, DNS service and emerging AI capabilities” highlighted concentration risk [68-70]. Hoferichter’s critique that EU legislation is often seen as “irrelevant or over-regulating” at national level underscored the legitimacy gap [209-214]. Schneider’s observation that “powers … are dividing us so that we do not get stronger together” placed the digital-governance debate within a broader geopolitical struggle [245-250]. Janssen’s practical illustration that “personal digital sovereignty is achieved by owning your own domain name” translated abstract policy into everyday benefit [144-152]. Finally, Liner’s reminder that “the multi-stakeholder model is only credible if it is alive in practice” called for continuous, not token, engagement [90-92].


The session closed with Florence Ranson signalling the shift from opening remarks to substantive discussion, announcing the start of the first exchange session and inviting participants to move from celebration to active dialogue [264-267].


Overall, the opening plenary celebrated two decades of the .eu domain, reaffirmed the multistakeholder ethos of EURODIG, identified pressing challenges-digital exclusion, authoritarian models, market concentration and geopolitical tension-and outlined a forward-looking agenda that combines regulatory tools, technical autonomy and inclusive dialogue to shape a secure, open and sovereign European internet for the next twenty years.


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Florence Ranson

Thank you very much for being so punctual. We love audiences like this because it means we are not running late from the start of the afternoon. So that gives us hope for the rest of the day. So welcome. Welcome back. If you were with us this morning, welcome. If you are joining only now for EURODIG and you didn’t have the opportunity to join us this morning for the pre -sessions celebrating the 20th anniversary of .eu. But this is an ongoing celebration, so we’re going to continue throughout the rest of today and also tomorrow. So welcome to this new edition of EURODIG, the European Dialogue on Internet Governance. The event is hosted by EURID, and as I said, it is the celebration of the 20th anniversary of .eu, we also will focus on the very specificity of EURODIG.

It is not just another conference. you can attend in certain circumstances. EURODIG is a dialogue. So you all have a role to play, whether you’re here in the room with us, and it’s a full house, delighted to see that. But it works also for those of you who are following us online, and there are quite a few of you connected. So whether in the room or online, we will be relying on you to make comments, ask questions, and interact throughout the whole event, whether it’s today or tomorrow. And of course, we have set up some structure to do that, but there will also be open sessions for open questions as we go. We will be, during these two days, we will be listening to European voices for the future of the internet.

And we will celebrate. the 20 years of .eu but also the beginning of a new internet governance era quite an ambitious program and to set the scene for that event and welcome you all properly i would like to give the floor to representatives of the three organizations behind that ambitious program so please welcome our first speaker this afternoon please welcome a Thibault Liner who’s director for future networks at DG connect at the European Commission good afternoon and please.

Thibault Liner

Good afternoon nice to see so many familiar faces very happy to have a full house today and a full program indeed so indeed the Peter, Sandra ,Thomas excellencies distinguished guests dear friends of the European and global Internet landscape. I mean, today is our day. We will hear later on around 4 o ‘clock from the Executive Vice President of the Commission, Henna Virkkunen. But today I wanted to welcome you very warmly to this event. It’s a special event, not every day, that we have such an opportunity to join between the various participants. We are celebrating, indeed, 20 years of .eu, 20 years of European identity online. And this is also a special time because we are meeting just after the WSIS Plus 20 review, where, again, we had the opportunity to reassert the importance of the Internet and also when we made it possible for the Internet Governance Forum to be given a permanent place .

So if we go back in time, more than 20 years ago, the world had already decided to agree on some core principles for the Internet. And this matters still today. The Internet must be open and its governance must be global, cooperative, and multi -stakeholder. This may sound easy, but actually these principles every day have to be reaffirmed, reasserted, because they are the cardinal principles reflecting the nature of the Internet. The Internet is distributed, it’s interoperable, and it’s also cooperative. And we should never forget this, because this vision has brought so much benefits to the world. And this approach is very much… This approach aligns also to what the EU is all about. As an organization, we also are driven by principles.

We are driven by unity, but also by cooperation, and we are driven by the objective to make the world a better place. So the single market, which is our greatest achievement, needs not only open connectivity, it needs also to have global users and global markets reaching out and coming to Europe to make great things together. Citizens, researchers, inventors, we all want that people choose EU, choose Europe. And this is what is behind also the .eu as a domain name. When it was established, the aim was to give Europe a clear online identity to support the internal market increase, user choice, but also promote e -commerce at a time where it was accelerating, and also allow citizens across Europe.

The member states and businesses to present themselves as European online immediately, even through the name of their website. And 20 years later, we have more than 3 .8 million registered domain names. So .eu is actually one of the world’s largest country code top domain name. And it supports multilingualism, and it contributes significantly to security with the lowest level of DNS abuse cases. Not a small achievement. But today, we cannot just look at the past. If the first phase of the Internet governance was about building and expanding the open Internet, today’s challenge is to keep it open and accessible. And according to the ITU, there are still many people that are not online. 2 .2 billion people remain not connected to the Internet.

Can you believe it? We cannot accept that. And we need to do better collectively. And at the same time, if you look at the dynamics and the economics of the Internet, openness itself is under pressure. State -controlled or authoritarian models of the Internet have emerged, where technology is about controlling citizens instead of empowering them. Where shutting down connectivity, shutting down the Internet, blocking platforms, or restricting information flows is the name of the game. This is not what Europe stands for. We want to make sure that we provide a world where freedom of choice, where democracy, where equality, where the rule of law are preserved also online. And this is what we want also to achieve when we promote digital sovereignty.

Not a way to close down, but a way to empower and to give technology to those that need it. This is the digital transformation that we work for in the EU. This is about human -centric, and it’s about every individual having rights to benefit from technology. So next week, actually, the EU is about to propose a tech sovereignty package. You’ll hear more from the executive vice president. But here we want to make sure that we develop technologies that make freedom possible online. Where dependencies do not equate to becoming a kind of a tech colony of some kind, because you cannot control the products and the services that you develop yourself. Importantly, this is not about protectionism.

It’s about, again, empowerment. It’s about developing your capabilities. And most importantly, in the European vision, this technological, this digital sovereignty is something that we want to share with others, where we can collectively develop our capacities. Today, indeed, we cannot ignore the pressure from economic and private concentration on the digital world. A few actors only control access, control cloud infrastructure, control operating systems, data flows, cybersecurity, DNS service, and emerging AI capabilities. If this doesn’t mean that we all have access to these key elements, this is not anymore an open Internet. And this is a matter of attention we have now in the EU. We want to make sure that we will promote our digital rulebook as a way to protect openness and fair markets.

We have developed tools from competition policy to data protection to the Digital Markets Act. And the Digital Services Act. All of these are being used today to protect what we cherish. and to make sure that we also can continue with an Internet that is open and markets that are fair. But it’s not enough to have global rules. You need to be able to implement them from a position of strength because you are not fully dependent on a few of these companies. And this is why the EU is investing to reduce precisely our dependencies, to make sure that we invest in our own cybersecurity, in connectivity, in cloud, in chips technologies, in AI, and first and foremost in digital skills.

And we also want to act internationally so that we work with partners through the WISIS, but also through the Global Digital Compact, through the IGF, and through Global Gateway to also provide funding when it’s most needed. So what we believe is that we can do it. We believe that the next phase of the Internet is very exciting. But it also contains certain risks if we are not able to open up and maintain these foundations. We believe that AI, cloud, data, virtual worlds, cybersecurity, and digital public infrastructures will shape the future. But we need to shape it together. We need to make sure that these technologies will create opportunities and not be used to control excessively our initiatives.

Today, the EU is very pleased that we are on a post -Y6 plus 20 landscape where we can decisively work together. We want to explore new frameworks with international communities, many of you in the room. We want to make sure that we will promote these shared goals. And we want to make sure that with a permanent IGF, we can reach very concrete results. The global multi -stakeholder, we believe, is only credible if it is alive in practice, and not just something that you invoke when you need it. And actually, this is why EURODIG is so important. For years, EURODIG has provided Europe with an open space for dialogue. It has connected public authorities, private sector, but also the youth.

Very important. It has helped Europe to contribute to the global IGF and to the broader Internet governance system. But here as well, the landscape is changing, and EURODIG has to also change and evolve. It’s not just about a simple agenda, it’s about delivering on important promises. So we need to make sure that with this, EURODIG can become even more visible, more impactful, more sustainable. and more connected to the European technical community. This is where we have also things to discuss together. And also it is where European institutions, EuroID, the CCTLD community and other partners can support an evolution and make EURODIG a central piece in a new IGF. So in Europe, we believe in the multi -stakeholder model.

We believe in unity through diversity. And we believe that we can invest in spaces where our strength and hopes will live for a long time. 20 years ago, .eu gave Europe a clearer identity online. Today, we have a lesson learned. It means that we can build together trusted digital infrastructure without fragmenting the Internet. We believe that sovereignty is not a subject. If you design it well, it is an opportunity for all of us to share our capabilities and to become stronger. And it is an opportunity to make EURODIG really the place where we will meet again to deserve and prepare our contributions to the next 20 years of Internet governance. So if I have just one minute, and if I may, I also would like to pay tribute today to a very special lady.

Fabrizia Benigni, who is just here on the first row, because she is actually the initiator of of also the event today, and she had this great idea of combining our efforts, but also it’s a special moment for her because next week she actually will retire from our institution after something like 34 years of a brilliant career. So I wanted really to pay tribute to Fabrizia. Thank you also for being here with us. And if I may, I would like to ask you to join me with a round of applause for Fabrizia. Thank you. So dear colleagues, excellencies, I think today is a special day, but I think we also have a special conference. So please, I would invite you now to continue the exchanges and make sure that we can deliver for the period to come.

Thank you.

Florence Ranson

Thank you very much and i’d like now to give the floor to Peter Janssen general manager of Eurid.

Peter Janssen

Distinguished guests colleagues friends welcome to the european voices for the future of the Internet. Thank you for being here to celebrate 20 years of .eu and to look ahead at the beginning of a new era in Internet governance. I’m proud that we host this conference in close cooperation with the European Commission, and I’m grateful to everyone who has helped to make this gathering possible. Europe’s Internet future is shaped through dialogue, through shaped responsibility, and through the ability to turn principles into practical outcomes. I would also like to express a special word of thanks to the team Future Internet at DG Connect for its unwavering support in organizing this conference in this fantastic venue, and in particular to Martina Barbero for her relentless drive, who’s also in the first seat, for her relentless drive, professionalism, and commitment throughout this process.

So thank you very much, Martina. Europe has been entrusted to operate the .eu top -level domain in the public interest. We steward a piece of Europe’s digital infrastructure that millions of people and organizations rely on. That role comes with a clear duty to safeguard integrity, accessibility, security, and fair use. Every day, quietly and reliably. Over 20 years, .eu has earned its place as a trusted European space online. It serves citizens, entrepreneurs, civil society, and public institutions. It has helped organizations express who they are and where they belong in the European single market. This anniversary gives us reason to celebrate. but also reminds us of the responsibility to act with ambition, as the internet we depend on continues to evolve rapidly.

When Hewitt hosted EURODIG in Brussels in 2016, then Commissioner for Digital Economy and Society, Günther Oettinger already emphasized in his keynote that trust is key to realizing the full potential of the digital era. A decade later, those words resonate even more strongly. To understand what this responsibility means in practice, we can look at the concept of technical sovereignty. Technical sovereignty means continuity. It means autonomy in the systems that underpin our digital lives. It means being able to keep essential services running, even when circumstances change. For .eu, that starts with registry autonomy. The It requires architectural choices that reduce dependency risks and enhance control and responsibility for core services. A clear part of this work is building an approach that supports openness and ecosystem diversity.

Open standards, interoperability, and a healthy supplier landscape strengthen resilience. This approach matters all the more because the broader context around us is increasingly international. Infrastructure markets are concentrating. Dependency risks grow when too much becomes tied to too few providers. In that environment, digital resilience becomes a strategic necessity. But sovereignty also exists on a personal level. In the freedom to choose and control your own digital identity. The most powerful yet simplest tool for that. is owning your own domain name. A .du domain name gives people and organizations a European digital identity that spans borders. It works across the single market. It travels with you. It also unlocks personal digital sovereignty in a very concrete way. When you own your domain name, you own your online coordinates.

You can create your own email addresses on your own domain. You can use your own website address in every communication. And your email and your web address represent you, your name, your organization, your purpose. And with that ownership comes freedom of choice. You can change email providers without changing your email identity. You can change hosting providers without changing your web address. You can upgrade services, switch to better options, or diversify suppliers while keeping the identity that people own. How do you know and trust? This is a practical form of sovereignty that citizens and organizations can adopt immediately, here, today, and now. It supports business continuity for organizations, it supports independence for individuals, and it supports competitiveness for SMEs that work across borders.

But technology only works when people trust it, and that trust is built through security, through reliability, and through the confidence that the systems we depend on are aligned with values we share. This is where Europe has a unique role to play. Europe stands for an Internet that remains open, free, secure, and trustworthy. An Internet where citizens and organizations can participate. Where they can participate with confidence, knowing that their rights, their identity, and their data are protected. And that is also the responsibility behind .eu. For 20 years, .eu has provided stable and trusted digital infrastructure for millions of users across borders, not only as a technical service, but as part of a broader European digital ecosystem built on resilience, cooperation, and trust.

And in a time of growing geopolitical uncertainty and increasing digital dependency, trusted European infrastructure matters more than ever. People want to participate confidently in digital life. Organizations want to grow across borders without fragility in the foundations they rely on. Communities want an Internet that remains open, secure, and aligned with democratic values. Europe’s single market was built to give people and organizations the freedom to operate across borders. A European digital identity should offer the same freedom online. A domain name is not only a technical label, it is a statement of presence, it is a decision to participate, it is a way to take control of your digital identity. That is what .eu represents. So on this anniversary we celebrate 20 years of a trusted European namespace.

For 20 years, Europe has helped build a home on the internet where all European citizens and organizations can thrive in a single market. As former Czech President Václav Havel once said, vision is not enough, it must be combined with venture. It is not enough to stair up the steps, we must step up the stairs. Europe is ready to climb those steps, together with all of you. I wish you a productive and inspiring conference. Thank you.

Florence Ranson

Thank you very much. I’d like now to give the floor to Sandra Hoferichter and Thomas Schneider, respectively Secretary General and President of EURODIG Support Association. Welcome to both.

Sandra Hoferichter

Dear participants, dear distinguished experts, colleagues, teams from the European Commission DT Connect and the team from EURID. Welcome to this IG Fest. This was our working title for this joint endeavor of EURID, the European Commission and EURODIG. For EURODIG, it’s the 19th edition in a row and next year we are celebrating the 20th anniversary and we are proud of it. But this year, the spotlight is on .eu as we celebrate two decades of commitment to a European identity. Happy birthday, EURID. And thank you for including us in your celebrations. A big thanks also to the European Commission, in particular colleagues from DigiConnect, for engaging over the last months as institutional partner, offering your house, and also for contributing in shaping the program.

And last but not least, our thanks and appreciation goes to the program committee, to the focal points, the organizing team that have worked on the session details in multi-stakeholder groups already, and the sponsors that are supporting us over the many years. Despite global tendencies in big politics where a few people try to decide for all others, in daily politics in Europe, multi-stakeholder participation is on the rise. In many areas where public policy is shaped, the involvement of various interest groups is increasingly demanded. The bottom-up approach in setting the agenda combined with equal participation of all stakeholders promises to strengthen the legitimacy of European institutions and promote greater acceptance of legislation. However, multi-stakeholder dialogue platforms like EuroDIC are not very common in all areas, and network of regional and national IGFs across all continents only exists for the emerging technologies as a result of the UN VISUS process and rooted in the nature of the shared responsibility in governing the Internet.

This is a great value and must be defended. Thank you. Gaining legitimacy is complex, needs commitment from all stakeholders, and they must be given the opportunity to present their views, identify problems, engage in critical but constructive and always respectful exchanges. Ideally, the outcome of such process is a shared consensus on a specific issue, or at least clarity about the obstacles and the commitment to overcome them. The aim is not to present quick solutions, but first to get a common understanding among all stakeholders of what the issue is and discuss the different perspectives. This might not be considered an issue for one stakeholder, might be a challenge for another group. Listening and understanding the perspective of other stakeholders is essential.

And this is exactly what you can expect from the next two days. I was recently asked if multi-stakeholder dialogue platform can reshape legitimacy in Europe. Well, Europe has a tradition of consensus building, and the European Union is an example of how consensus can be achieved across national borders in a fairly large region. The European Union is an example of how consensus can be achieved across national borders in a fairly large region. The European Union is an example of how consensus can be achieved across national borders in Today, however, we are seeing a growing trend towards national isolation. For example, legislation developed at the EU level seems to be less accepted at national levels. It’s often seen as irrelevant to the region, disconnected from the needs of the citizens, over-regulating, or it’s simply not understood.

A multi-stakeholder dialogue could complement legislative procedures. Regional and national initiatives are closer to the people. They create more accessible spaces for non-state actors to get involved in policy discussions. Language, cultural references, and contextual understanding make participation more relevant. In a global agenda that is often dominated by a few powerful voices, regional dialogues ensure that local perspectives are not lost but strengthened. All too often, global frameworks are not the same. They are disconnected from the realities of local implementation. Regional and national processes can act as intermediaries, adapting global norms to local context and enriching the global agenda with practical knowledge based on the lived experience of regions. Looking ahead, we should invest in European multi-stakeholder dialogue platforms that are inclusive, well-resourced and politically supported.

The bottom-up approach can address the growing legitimacy gap in Europe’s publicy-making. But bringing together all stakeholders on equal footing, they create inclusive spaces for understanding complex issues, reconciling diverse perspectives and building trust to continuous respectful engagement. While these platforms do not aim to replace parliamentary or legislative processes, they can meaningfully complement them by acting as early warning systems, barometers of societal needs and bridges between global and local realities. You are here to make that impact and I wish you two days of inspiring talks, unexpected insights and a lot of new valuable contacts. Thank you very much.

Thomas Schneider

Dear friends, first of all thanks for your time. for, after exactly 10 years, getting us back to Brussels again for the second time. It’s always a pleasure to be here. We know that AI and other new technologies are transforming our world at a higher pace than all previous technologies, and that there are unprecedented opportunities and risks. People are struggling to cope with these rapid developments. And in addition, if that wasn’t enough, we have rising tensions on geopolitical levels. Some leaders of big economic and military powers think that they can ignore existing rules just because they are big and powerful enough to do so. There’s a lot of uncertainty, and people are nervous, and many look for guidance.

Some people are hoping for easy solutions and are willing to follow people that promise such easy solutions, which may unfortunately lead to even more problems. More polarization and not necessarily solutions in our societies. So Europe is under growing pressure on all levels. Economic, defense, innovation capabilities, all this is put into questions. But I think that in Europe we do have an enormous potential, but we need to better use it in order to defend our values and interests and to maintain our freedom to act in a sovereign way. We need to understand that every country in Europe is too small to fight alone. So all Europeans need to unite and cooperate more closely on all fields mentioned above.

Of course, such cooperation is not easy. As we’ve already heard, Europe is a very diverse continent with many different cultures, diverse histories and diverse circumstances. So it is not enough to just cooperate among governments. We need to convince the majority of the people in the industries in every single country in Europe that working together constructively, pragmatically and respectfully is our best option. And we know that there are powers that have an interest in the European Union and in the European Union. And they are dividing us so that we do not get stronger together. I think we should not do these powers this favor and let them divide us. But this means that we need to work hard to earn the trust of our stakeholders on national and European levels so that they support a stronger pan -European cooperation.

We need to make sure that the legitimate issues of concerns of our people and industries are heard and properly addressed. And we need to prove that we are able to develop solutions that offer perspective to all Europeans. Multi -stakeholder dialogue platforms, in particular EURODIG, play a central role in this regard. EURODIG allows us to identify opportunities and challenges and pave the way towards decisions that actually make things better and not worse. I’m also aware that there are voices out there that say in times where the big actors ignore rules and decide over our heads, we should also act more top -down and less inclusively. But given the democratic nature of our societies and the freedom that we want to give to our people and our industries, I do not think that this is a good idea to move away from multistakeholder cooperation.

To the contrary, we need to reform and strengthen our multistakeholder structures to make them more inclusive and more effective and more politically visible at the same time. Multistakeholder cooperation is not for free. It means work, and it requires resources. This is why my government, the Swiss government, has contributed to the funding and the secretariat of the EURODIG Secretariat since its very first days. In this regard, I would like to thank all other supporters of EURODIG for their longstanding commitments. And of course, I would like to thank all the hosts of the 19 EURODIG meetings so far. In this regard, I would like to thank again the European Commission and EURODIG, but also the Council of Europe for their support, and host for host, hosting EURODIG twice in Brussels and twice in Strasbourg.

Talking about hosts, and I’ll end with this. If you are interested in hosting the 20th EURODIG… next year in your city, please contact us because we are still open to interesting ideas. Thank you very much.

Florence Ranson

Thank you very much. I’m sure some of you will pick up on that call from Thomas, so I’m sure you will be getting some interesting offers maybe before the end of the event itself. So we have set the scene, or rather our opening speakers have set the scene. The time has come for our first exchange session.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (19)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (6)
Confirmedhigh

“The WSIS + 20 review reaffirmed the Internet’s core principles of openness, global reach, cooperative and multistakeholder governance.”

The knowledge base notes that WSIS values and principles, including multistakeholder governance, have been reaffirmed and remain central to Internet policy discussions [S89].

Additional Contextmedium

“.eu is one of the world’s largest country‑code domains, supports multilingualism and has a strong reputation for security and trust.”

EURid’s description of the .eu ccTLD highlights its role in European Internet ecosystems, multilingual support through IDNs and a concentrated but trusted registrar market, confirming its status as a major European ccTLD [S37] and [S64].

!
Correctionhigh

“2.2 billion people remain offline, a gap the EU must collectively close.”

EU-wide figures show about 58 million citizens are non-users, far fewer than 2.2 billion; the larger figure refers to the global digital divide, not the EU context [S93].

Confirmedhigh

“Authoritarian, state‑controlled internet models are emerging, threatening the openness Europe defends.”

The EU’s digital strategy explicitly opposes state-controlled internet architectures and commits to defending an open, interoperable Internet [S63].

Confirmedmedium

“Europe must act internationally, leveraging mechanisms such as the Global Digital Compact, the Internet Governance Forum and the Global Gateway funding programme to support regions most in need and promote a collaborative, rules‑based internet.”

The EU’s international digital strategy lists the Global Digital Compact, the IGF and the Global Gateway as key instruments for external engagement and support [S63].

Additional Contextlow

“The EU’s regulatory toolbox—the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act and competition policy—is already being used to curb concentration among a few global actors that control cloud infrastructure, operating systems, data flows and emerging AI capabilities.”

EU policy documents describe a broad regulatory approach, including competition policy and sector-specific rules, aimed at reducing dependency on external providers and ensuring fair markets, aligning with the claim though specific acts are not enumerated in the knowledge base [S63].

External Sources (94)
S1
Florence N Bangalie — Florence N Bangalie
S2
Work for a brighter future — Professor General for Human Resources and Social Policy Chung has also served as Member of the UN …
S3
BREAK OUT ROOM 2: The Declaration for the Future of the Internet: Principles to Action — Catherine Townsend Speech speed 176 words per minute …
S4
Thomas Schneider — Thomas Schneider is ambassador and director of International Affairs at the Swiss Federal Office of Communications (OFCO…
S5
Main Topic 3 – Innovation and ethical implication  — These ethics are envisioned to establish a framework that enhances the beneficial facets of AI while mitigating its inhe…
S6
Lightning Talk #22 Eurodig Inviting Global Stakeholders — But if you would like to engage with us on any other topic, we are very flexible here. And without further ado, I hand o…
S7
Sandra Gillespie — Sandra Gillespie
S8
Heike Schroeder — Heike Schroeder
S9
Su Sonia Herring — https://diplo-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/2023/10/Su-Sonia.jpg Ms Su Sonia Herring completed her BA in Lin…
S10
Laurent Ferrali — Laurent Ferrali
S11
Linnet Taylor — Linnet Taylor is Professor of International Data Governance at the Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (T…
S12
Philippe Laurent — Philippe Laurent
S13
Peter A. G. van Bergeijk — Peter A. G. van Bergeijk
S14
Peter van Ham — Peter van Ham
S15
Peter M. Haas — Peter M. Haas
S16
EuroDIG 2015 — The 8th EuroDIG will take place in Sofia, Bulgaria (Kempinski Hotel Zografski) on 4-5 June 2015. EuroDIG 2015 is hosted …
S17
2020: The year of online participation — When Greta Thunberg travelled by boat and train to attend the recent UN Climate Change Summit in 2019, she sent a wake-u…
S18
EuroDIG 2012 Remote Hub Belgrade — On 6 June, at the Republic Agency for Electronic Communication in Serbia, a Remote Participation HUB was convened for th…
S19
Ready for the future? Germany’s emerging AI strategy — Last Friday, the German newspaper Die Zeit organised its third Artificial Intelligence (AI) conference. I was born in Ge…
S20
Advancing Swiss AI Trinity: Zurich’s entrepreneurship, Geneva’s governance, and communal subsidiarity — Switzerland can chart a unique path in the global AI race by combining three strengths: Zurich’s innovative entrepreneur…
S21
EuroDIG 2019: Highlights from The Hague — While generally, the discussions around the need for more regulations and norms about the Internet were much divided, op…
S22
Stakeholders? On tap – not on top! — Kwetching about ‘multi-stakeholderism’ “Multi-stakeholderism” – addressing issues and solving problems in internationa…
S23
Ensuring that civil society’s voice is heard in ICANN — The latter is in the process of being articulated across ICANN. As pointed out in the discussion, there is also a need t…
S24
Legitimacy of multistakeholderism in IG spaces | IGF 2023 — The remaining group with clear access tends to be much more homogenous than the wider Internet community they seek to re…
S25
The Future of the Internet — A multi-stakeholder approach that facilitates the engagement and participation of all groups, including the civil societ…
S26
Turbulent times in Internet governance: it’s time to think about the current model — Jean-Marie Chenou and Roxana Radu, authors of the book The Evolution of Global Internet Governance: Principles and Polic…
S27
Digital sovereignty: The end of the open internet as we know it? (Part 1) — Countries that are still taking the initial steps in developing their infrastructure have the right to sovereignty, as m…
S28
Global Digital Governance & Multistakeholder Cooperation for WSIS+20 — So, we try to accommodate that as well. And as you all know, the agenda and the program of the WSIS Forum is built throu…
S29
A view on digital divide and economic development — When considering the great technological changes that humanity is facing, it is generally assumed that the Fourth Indust…
S30
Internet and Development: A Reality-Check — This post was originally published at the Huffington Post blog channel. By Constance Bommelaer de Leusse and Tereza Hore…
S31
Digital sovereignty stack: Infrastructure, services, data, and AI knowledge — However, the less national governments have authority over the digital realm, the more digital sovereignty shifts to tec…
S32
Upcoming digital identity initiatives impacting your live — Session webpage https://eurodigwiki.org/wiki/Upcoming_digital_identity_initiatives_impacting_your_live_%E2%80%93_FA_03_S…
S33
German Strategy for International Digital Policy — At the same time, we protect intellectual property and trade secrets as the foundations of our prosperity. We also take …
S34
10 points for the EU’s future digital policy — But, at the same time, he makes a strong and clear request to the USA that European data must be protected in accordance…
S35
A digital rEUnion for Europe — A European rEUnion is the concept under which Malta’s EU presidency took off on January 1. The smallest EU country will …
S36
Celebrating 20 years of DiploNews — Over the years, Diplo’s alumni base grew to over 6,000 professionals from 201 countries. Our websites, home to the lates…
S37
World report on internationalised domain names — . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 5.1.3 Calm before the storm? New gTLD growth in …
S38
European Commission: Public Consultation on the Evaluation and Revision of the .eu Top-Level Domain Regulations — The European Commission has launched a public consultation on the evaluation and revision of the Regulations for the .eu…
S39
European Dialogue on Internet Governance: EuroDIG 2024 — The European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG) 2024 is scheduled to take place from June 17–19 in Vilnius, Lithu…
S40
Opening plenary: Global Internet Governance processes Table of contents Knowledge Graph of Debate Session report Speakers D…
S41
European Dialogue on Internet Governance — EuroDIG is a Pan-European multi-stakeholder forum focused on Internet Governance. It is a regional sub-forum of the glob…
S42
Digital sovereignty – is Europe going in the right direction to keep Internet infrastructure secure and open? — The session discussed the different ways in which ‘digital sovereignty’ has been embodied by governments and the intenti…
S43
How to Project Europe’s Power / Davos 2025 How to Project Europe’s Power / Davos 2025 Session report …
S44
EU Digital Diplomacy: Geopolitical shift from focus on values to economic security  — Moldova Security connectivity- Alignment with EU 5G Cybersecurity ToolboxDigital identities/DPI- Preparation for integra…
S45
Digital sovereignty: The end of the open internet as we know it? (Part 1) — In the context of an offensive and chauvinist turn in US policy, the popular magazine The Economist suggested a range of…
S46
Digital sovereignty stack: Infrastructure, services, data, and AI knowledge — However, the less national governments have authority over the digital realm, the more digital sovereignty shifts to tec…
S47
European Dialogue on Internet Governance: EuroDIG 2024 — The European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG) 2024 is scheduled to take place from June 17–19 in Vilnius, Lithu…
S48
Legitimacy of multistakeholderism in IG spaces | IGF 2023 — So here are just a few examples. Using the Pyramid of Participation and interviews with European participants from EURID…
S49
European Dialogue on Internet Governance — EuroDIG is a Pan-European multi-stakeholder forum focused on Internet Governance. It is a regional sub-forum of the glob…
S50
Main Topic 1: Why the WSIS+20 Review Matters and How National and Regional IGFs Can Enhance Stakeholder Participation — She recommended it as a key resource for anyone needing arguments or evidence for the WSIS review process. Evidence …
S51
German Strategy for International Digital Policy — At the same time, we protect intellectual property and trade secrets as the foundations of our prosperity. We also take …
S52
Main Topic 3: Europe at the Crossroads: Digital and Cyber Strategy 2030 — And by that we ensure that Internet remains global. Our perspective today is shaped by our commitment to promoting open …
S53
Open/secure 5G and supplier diversification — Topics: Open RAN, Secure and Stable Internet, Supplier Ecosystem Introduction of new interfaces by openRAN can pose…
S54
Effectiveness of multistakeholderism: the Kenya ICT Review 2016 — Collective decision making is not alien to African culture. In many traditional societies, decisions were made by a coun…
S55
Multistakeholder platform regulation and the Global South | IGF 2023 Town Hall #170 — Power dynamics between various stakeholders also play a crucial role in shaping the type of participation observed. The …
S56
Multistakeholderism and Internet governance in Cameroon — The same actors will not have the same impact or mastery in all spheres, so it is important to understand, integrate and…
S57
Four seasons of AI:  From excitement to clarity in the first year of ChatGPT — How to address AI risks   There are three main types of AI risks that should shape AI regulations:  the immediate a…
S58
Review of AI and digital developments in 2024 — Existing risks are more specific and concrete affecting jobs, education, and media, among others. Exclusion risks are be…
S59
The open-source gambit: How America plans to outpace AI rivals by democratising tech — On 23 July, the United States announced an AI Action Plan with 103 policy recommendations. It does not bring many surpri…
S60
Celebrating 20 years of DiploNews — Over the years, Diplo’s alumni base grew to over 6,000 professionals from 201 countries. Our websites, home to the lates…
S61
A digital rEUnion for Europe — A European rEUnion is the concept under which Malta’s EU presidency took off on January 1. The smallest EU country will …
S62
Celebrating 15 years of DiploFoundation and 25 years of research and training — I started the year knowing that we were nearing another milestone. In November 2017, we celebrate 15 years of DiploFound…
S63
An International Digital Strategy for the European Union — Future activities may include institutionalising mechanisms to swiftly mobilise cybersecurity experts in case of cyber-a…
S64
EURid — EURid vzw is the nonprofit organisation appointed by the European Commission as the domain name registry that operates t…
S65
Opening plenary: Global Internet Governance processes Table of contents Knowledge Graph of Debate Session report Speakers D…
S66
European Dialogue on Internet Governance: EuroDIG 2024 — The European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG) 2024 is scheduled to take place from June 17–19 in Vilnius, Lithu…
S67
EuroDIG 2019: Highlights from The Hague — While generally, the discussions around the need for more regulations and norms about the Internet were much divided, op…
S68
European Dialogue on Internet Governance — EuroDIG is a Pan-European multi-stakeholder forum focused on Internet Governance. It is a regional sub-forum of the glob…
S69
DiploFoundation and Digital Watch on EuroDIG 2016 — The European Dialogue on Internet Governance is an open platform for informal and inclusive discussions on public policy…
S70
Digital sovereignty: The end of the open internet as we know it? (Part 1) — Countries that are still taking the initial steps in developing their infrastructure have the right to sovereignty, as m…
S71
Digital sovereignty – is Europe going in the right direction to keep Internet infrastructure secure and open? — The session discussed the different ways in which ‘digital sovereignty’ has been embodied by governments and the intenti…
S72
How to Project Europe’s Power / Davos 2025 How to Project Europe’s Power / Davos 2025 Session report …
S73
Living in an Unruly World: The Challenges We Face — Europe’s position is strong, notably because of its greatest economic achievement, a common market of more than 500 mill…
S74
2025 State of the Union: Tech sovereignty amid geopolitical pressure — The European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, delivered her 2025 State of the Union address to the European P…
S75
EU Digital Diplomacy: Geopolitical shift from focus on values to economic security  — Joint research initiatives are slated (quantum, semiconductor programs with Japan, Canada, South Korea). Australia Cy…
S76
Digital sovereignty stack: Infrastructure, services, data, and AI knowledge — However, the less national governments have authority over the digital realm, the more digital sovereignty shifts to tec…
S77
Digital sovereignty: From users’ empowerment to technological leadership — Moderated by Mr Olivier Bringer (Head of Unit, Next Generation Internet, Directorate-General for Communications Networks…
S78
[WebDebate #46 summary] Unpacking the EU’s digital diplomacy and foreign policy — The fourth is to tackle the sovereignty/multilateralism dilemma which the EU will face, as a flip side of its digitally …
S79
EuroDIG kicks off in Belgrade — The fourth EuroDIG meeting kick-starts today in Belgrade, Serbia. Diplo is co-organising the two-day meeting, together w…
S80
Fourth EuroDIG conference takes place in Belgrade — The fourth European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG) conference, which took place on 30-31 May in Belgrade, Ser…
S81
Participate remotely at the 6th IGF meeting — If you are unable to attend the 6th IGF in Kenya in September, there is no excuse! You can still participate remotely: f…
S82
Guest blog: Being there: where’s there? — Deirdre Williams writes: For at least the last twenty years I have been aware of people talking about ‘paradigms’ and ‘p…
S83
Geneva Engage in videos — We heard speakers from the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) (Nigel Hickson, Vice President, G…
S84
E-participation is not just remote observation — Thousands of groups meet online or by tele-conference daily, saving not only time and Euros but carbon footprint impact …
S85
Europe’s role in shaping the future of the Internet — The European Commission is undoubtedly a very active player in the Internet governance (IG) process. One of the most rec…
S86
Create your digital future: Transforming lives and businesses in Europe — Ms Katrin Ohlmer (CEO, Dotzon GmbH) took the floor and mentioned some important points for digitalisation: Universal ac…
S87
 Network Evolution: Challenges and Solutions  — Miguel González-Sancho: Okay, I am Miguel Gonzalez-Sancho. I am head of unit at the European Commission in DigiConnect o…
S88
Ilias Iakovidis — Advisor, Green digital transformation, DG CONNECT, European CommissionIlias Iakovidis https://www.diplomacy.edu/wp-conte…
S89
15 years of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) — Many countries, as a result of the geopolitical suspicion after the Iraq War in the early 2000s, requested the internati…
S91
E-Residency: potential for boosting e-commerce — Nevertheless, it seems to be a tool most frequently used by developed nations. For example, the top 10 countries with th…
S92
HLPF 2020: Leaving the digital behind? — Austria, which has incorporated digitalisation as one of its three focus areas, launched the ‘fit4Internet’ initiative t…
S93
Bridging the digital divide in the EU — These two Digital Agenda targets seem unlikely to be achieved by 2020. According to European Commission reports, growth …
S94
OPENING STATEMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS — This approach allows for the involvement of various stakeholders in shaping internet policies and decisions. Internet go…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
F
Florence Ranson
1 argument137 words per minute468 words204 seconds
Argument 1
Active participation from both in‑room and online attendees is essential for shaping the future of the Internet through EURODIG.
EXPLANATION
Florence stresses that every participant, regardless of location, must comment, ask questions and interact, because EURODIG is designed as a dialogue rather than a conventional conference. This inclusive engagement is presented as the foundation for a meaningful European internet governance discussion.
EVIDENCE
She explains that EURODIG is a dialogue and that the event relies on participants to make comments, ask questions and interact, whether they are present in the room or connected online, and that open sessions will be provided for this purpose [11-16].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
EuroDIG’s design includes remote participation hubs and online contribution mechanisms, as described in the EuroDIG 2015 process and the 2012 Remote Hub example, confirming the need for both in-room and online engagement [S16][S18].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive multistakeholder participation
AGREED WITH
Thomas Janssen, Sandra Hoferichter, Thibault Liner
T
Thomas Schneider
2 arguments162 words per minute708 words260 seconds
Argument 1
The rapid transformation driven by AI and other emerging technologies creates unprecedented opportunities and risks that Europe must address collectively.
EXPLANATION
Thomas points out that AI and new technologies are changing the world faster than any previous wave, bringing both great potential and serious threats, especially amid rising geopolitical tensions. He argues that Europe needs to harness its potential while defending its values and sovereignty.
EVIDENCE
He notes that AI and other new technologies are transforming the world at a higher pace than before, creating unprecedented opportunities and risks, and that rising geopolitical tensions add uncertainty and pressure on Europe [228-236].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The German AI strategy highlights the rapid AI-driven transformation and the need for a collective European response, while the Swiss AI Trinity underscores similar opportunities and risks, providing concrete examples of the challenges described [S19][S20].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven opportunities and risks
Argument 2
EURODIG and other multistakeholder platforms are central to identifying challenges and fostering inclusive decision‑making, and they must be strengthened and adequately funded.
EXPLANATION
Thomas emphasizes the pivotal role of EURODIG in providing a space to surface opportunities and challenges, and he highlights the need for resources and political visibility to make multistakeholder cooperation effective.
EVIDENCE
He states that EURODIG allows identification of opportunities and challenges and that the Swiss government has contributed funding to the EURODIG secretariat, while also thanking other supporters and hosts for their longstanding commitments [250-257].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
EuroDIG’s history of remote participation and the call for resources to support youth delegates illustrate the platform’s reliance on adequate funding to sustain multistakeholder work [S16][S6].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Strengthening multistakeholder platforms
AGREED WITH
Thomas Janssen, Sandra Hoferichter
S
Sandra Hoferichter
2 arguments129 words per minute784 words362 seconds
Argument 1
Multi‑stakeholder dialogue platforms increase the legitimacy of European policy making by involving diverse interest groups.
EXPLANATION
Sandra argues that involving public authorities, private sector, civil society and other stakeholders in platforms like EURODIG builds legitimacy for European institutions and leads to broader acceptance of legislation.
EVIDENCE
She explains that the bottom-up approach and equal participation of all stakeholders promises to strengthen the legitimacy of European institutions and promote greater acceptance of legislation [195-203].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
EuroDIG’s role in fostering multistakeholder legitimacy is emphasized in the 2019 EuroDIG report and in discussions on inclusive participation within WSIS+20 processes, showing how diverse stakeholder involvement strengthens policy legitimacy [S21][S28][S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Legitimacy through multistakeholder participation
AGREED WITH
Florence Ranson, Thomas Janssen, Thibault Liner
Argument 2
Investing in inclusive, well‑resourced multistakeholder platforms is necessary to close the legitimacy gap and ensure local perspectives are heard in global debates.
EXPLANATION
Sandra calls for political support and resources for European multistakeholder platforms, arguing that they can act as intermediaries that adapt global norms to local contexts and enrich the global agenda.
EVIDENCE
She calls for investment in European multistakeholder dialogue platforms that are inclusive, well-resourced and politically supported, highlighting the need for bottom-up approaches to address the growing legitimacy gap [220-227].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The Lightning Talk on YouthDIG funding needs and the broader EuroDIG resource challenges demonstrate the importance of investing in well-resourced platforms to close legitimacy gaps [S6][S21][S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Funding inclusive dialogue platforms
AGREED WITH
Thomas Janssen
T
Thibault Liner
3 arguments127 words per minute1685 words791 seconds
Argument 1
The Internet must remain open, global, cooperative and multistakeholder, and these core principles need continual reaffirmation.
EXPLANATION
Thibault stresses that openness, global reach, cooperation and multistakeholder governance are the cardinal principles of the Internet, and that they must be constantly reasserted to preserve the Internet’s nature and benefits.
EVIDENCE
He states that the Internet must be open and its governance must be global, cooperative and multistakeholder, and that these principles must be reaffirmed daily because they reflect the Internet’s cardinal nature [27-30].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
EuroDIG’s foundational principles of openness and multistakeholder governance are reiterated in its procedural documents and in analyses of multistakeholder legitimacy, confirming the need for continual reaffirmation [S16][S21][S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Reaffirming open‑Internet principles
AGREED WITH
Peter Janssen
Argument 2
A digital divide of 2.2 billion people still offline represents a major development challenge that must be tackled collectively.
EXPLANATION
Thibault highlights the magnitude of the digital divide, noting that billions remain unconnected, and argues that the international community cannot accept this situation and must act together to close the gap.
EVIDENCE
He cites ITU data that 2.2 billion people remain not connected to the Internet, declares that this cannot be accepted and calls for collective action to do better [46-49].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
ITU-based estimates of 2.2 billion people offline are discussed in recent analyses of the digital divide and its development implications, underscoring the collective challenge [S29][S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Closing the digital divide
Argument 3
The EU is advancing digital sovereignty through regulatory tools (DMA, DSA) and strategic investments to reduce dependence on a few tech actors, thereby protecting openness and fair markets.
EXPLANATION
Thibault outlines how the EU’s digital rulebook—competition policy, data protection, the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act—protects openness, while investments in cybersecurity, cloud, chips and AI aim to lessen reliance on dominant providers.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the EU promotes its digital rulebook (competition policy, DMA, DSA) to protect openness and fair markets, and that the EU is investing to reduce dependencies in cybersecurity, connectivity, cloud, chips and AI, and to act internationally through mechanisms such as the Global Digital Compact [71-78].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The EU’s Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act and related investment programmes are detailed in EU digital policy reviews, illustrating the regulatory toolbox aimed at preserving openness while reducing tech-gatekeeper dependence [S31][S34][S33].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
EU digital sovereignty and regulatory protection
AGREED WITH
Peter Janssen
DISAGREED WITH
Peter Janssen
P
Peter Janssen
2 arguments119 words per minute990 words497 seconds
Argument 1
The .eu domain provides both technical and personal digital sovereignty, enabling users to control their digital identity and ensure continuity across borders.
EXPLANATION
Peter explains that owning a .eu domain gives individuals and organisations a European digital identity that can be transferred across providers, supporting business continuity, independence and competitiveness.
EVIDENCE
He describes how a .eu domain gives people and organisations a European digital identity, allows them to own their online coordinates, create personal email addresses, change providers without losing identity, and thus supports business continuity and competitiveness [145-160].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Discussions on European digital identity initiatives, including the .eu domain as a tool for personal digital sovereignty, are presented in the EuroDIG digital identity session overview, linking the domain to user-controlled identity [S32].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Personal digital sovereignty via .eu
AGREED WITH
Thibault Liner
DISAGREED WITH
Thibault Liner
Argument 2
Openness, open standards and a diverse supplier landscape are essential for digital resilience and trust in European infrastructure.
EXPLANATION
Peter argues that open standards, interoperability and a healthy supplier ecosystem strengthen resilience, especially as infrastructure markets concentrate and dependency risks grow.
EVIDENCE
He states that open standards, interoperability and a healthy supplier landscape strengthen resilience, and that these measures matter more as infrastructure markets concentrate and dependency risks increase [138-144].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
German and EU commitments to open standards and transparent standard-setting processes are outlined in policy briefs, highlighting the role of standards and a diverse supplier ecosystem for resilient infrastructure [S33][S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open standards for digital resilience
AGREED WITH
Thibault Liner
Agreements
Agreement Points
Multistakeholder participation and dialogue (EURODIG) is essential for European Internet governance and legitimacy.
Speakers: Florence Ranson, Thomas Janssen, Sandra Hoferichter, Thibault Liner
Active participation from both in‑room and online attendees is essential for shaping the future of the Internet through EURODIG. EURODIG and other multistakeholder platforms are central to identifying challenges and fostering inclusive decision‑making, and they must be strengthened and adequately funded. Multi‑stakeholder dialogue platforms increase the legitimacy of European policy making by involving diverse interest groups. The Internet must remain open, global, cooperative and multistakeholder, and these core principles need continual reaffirmation.
All four speakers stress that a genuine multistakeholder dialogue – embodied in EURODIG – is the cornerstone for shaping Europe’s Internet future, building legitimacy and ensuring inclusive decision-making. They call for active involvement of all participants, whether in-room or online, and for the continual reaffirmation of multistakeholder principles [11-16][27-30][195-203][250-257].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
EuroDIG is defined as an open multistakeholder platform that feeds messages to policymakers and the UN IGF, underscoring its role in legitimacy and governance [S47][S49]. Research on participation barriers highlights the need for inclusive structures and political backing to sustain legitimacy [S48]. The WSIS+20 review also stresses multistakeholder participation as a cornerstone for legitimacy in internet governance [S50]. Historical practice of collective decision-making in Kenya illustrates the long-standing relevance of multistakeholder dialogue [S54].
Multistakeholder platforms need adequate funding and political support to be effective.
Speakers: Thomas Janssen, Sandra Hoferichter
EURODIG and other multistakeholder platforms are central to identifying challenges and fostering inclusive decision‑making, and they must be strengthened and adequately funded. Investing in inclusive, well‑resourced multistakeholder platforms is necessary to close the legitimacy gap and ensure local perspectives are heard in global debates.
Both speakers underline that without sufficient financial resources and political backing, multistakeholder initiatives like EURODIG cannot fulfil their role in legitimising policy and surfacing challenges. They call for stronger investment and visibility [250-257][220-227].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Studies of EuroDIG participation note structural obstacles such as time-zone and career constraints, implying a need for sustained funding and political commitment [S48]. Analyses of platform regulation in the Global South stress capacity-building and tailored support as essential for effective multistakeholder outcomes [S55]. Cameroon’s national IG steering committee proposal highlights the role of state backing and resources for platform effectiveness [S56].
Openness, open standards and a diverse supplier landscape are vital for digital resilience and trustworthy European infrastructure.
Speakers: Thibault Liner, Peter Janssen
The Internet must remain open, global, cooperative and multistakeholder, and these core principles need continual reaffirmation. Openness, open standards and a diverse supplier landscape are essential for digital resilience and trust in European infrastructure.
Both speakers argue that openness – in governance, standards and market structure – underpins a resilient, secure and trustworthy Internet ecosystem in Europe. They stress the need for interoperable standards and a healthy supplier ecosystem to mitigate concentration risks [27-30][138-144].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The German International Digital Policy strategy promotes open standards, FAIR data principles and open research data to strengthen European digital resilience [S51]. The EU Digital and Cyber Strategy 2030 reiterates that openness and open standards are key to a secure, resilient internet and calls for diversified supplier ecosystems [S52]. Open RAN discussions illustrate how transparent specifications and a broader supplier base enhance security and competition [S53]. The digital sovereignty literature also frames openness as a safeguard against concentration of power [S45].
Digital sovereignty – both at the EU level and for individual users – is a strategic priority to ensure control, continuity and openness.
Speakers: Thibault Liner, Peter Janssen
The EU is advancing digital sovereignty through regulatory tools (DMA, DSA) and strategic investments to reduce dependence on a few tech actors, thereby protecting openness and fair markets. The .eu domain provides both technical and personal digital sovereignty, enabling users to control their digital identity and ensure continuity across borders.
Both speakers highlight that digital sovereignty, whether expressed through EU-wide regulatory frameworks or through personal ownership of a .eu domain, is essential to maintain control, reduce dependencies and preserve an open Internet. They link regulatory action with individual empowerment [63-66][71-78][145-160].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
EU-wide initiatives such as the Berlin Declaration on European Digital Sovereignty and the four-vector sovereignty stack place digital sovereignty at the centre of EU strategy [S46]. Germany’s digital policy explicitly lists digital sovereignty as a strategic priority for the Union and its citizens [S51]. Academic analysis warns that sovereignty claims can be co-opted by securitising state bureaucracies, underscoring the need for socially anchored approaches [S45].
Similar Viewpoints
Both see EURODIG as a pivotal platform that requires stronger funding and political backing to close a legitimacy gap in European policy making [250-257][220-227].
Speakers: Thomas Janssen, Sandra Hoferichter
EURODIG and other multistakeholder platforms are central to identifying challenges and fostering inclusive decision‑making, and they must be strengthened and adequately funded. Investing in inclusive, well‑resourced multistakeholder platforms is necessary to close the legitimacy gap and ensure local perspectives are heard in global debates.
Both stress that openness – in governance and technical standards – is fundamental to a resilient, trustworthy Internet ecosystem [27-30][138-144].
Speakers: Thibault Liner, Peter Janssen
The Internet must remain open, global, cooperative and multistakeholder, and these core principles need continual reaffirmation. Openness, open standards and a diverse supplier landscape are essential for digital resilience and trust in European infrastructure.
Both underline that a truly open, multistakeholder process requires active participation from all stakeholders, whether present physically or remotely [11-16][27-30].
Speakers: Florence Ranson, Thibault Liner
Active participation from both in‑room and online attendees is essential for shaping the future of the Internet through EURODIG. The Internet must remain open, global, cooperative and multistakeholder, and these core principles need continual reaffirmation.
Unexpected Consensus
Openness as a safeguard against emerging AI‑driven risks.
Speakers: Thomas Janssen, Peter Janssen
The rapid transformation driven by AI and other emerging technologies creates unprecedented opportunities and risks that Europe must address collectively. Openness, open standards and a diverse supplier landscape are essential for digital resilience and trust in European infrastructure.
While Thomas focuses on AI-related opportunities and risks, and Peter on openness and standards, both converge on the idea that an open, standards-based Internet is a key defence against the uncertainties and concentration risks posed by fast-moving AI technologies, a link not explicitly stated but evident from their positions [228-236][138-144].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The digital sovereignty discussion highlights openness as a protective measure against AI-driven threats, arguing that transparent, open ecosystems reduce concentration of AI power [S45]. AI risk governance literature calls for transparent trade-offs and open data to mitigate short- and mid-term AI risks [S57][S58].
Overall Assessment

The speakers show strong convergence on four main themes: the centrality of multistakeholder dialogue (EURODIG) for governance and legitimacy; the need for adequate funding and political support for such platforms; the foundational role of openness, open standards and a diverse supplier ecosystem; and the strategic importance of digital sovereignty at both the EU and individual level.

High consensus – virtually all speakers endorse the multistakeholder model, openness and investment in digital sovereignty, indicating a unified European stance that can facilitate coordinated policy actions and reinforce the credibility of EURODIG as a core venue for future Internet governance.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Different approaches to achieving digital sovereignty
Speakers: Thibault Liner, Peter Janssen
The EU is advancing digital sovereignty through regulatory tools (DMA, DSA) and strategic investments to reduce dependence on a few tech actors, thereby protecting openness and fair markets. The .eu domain provides both technical and personal digital sovereignty, enabling users to control their digital identity and ensure continuity across borders.
Both speakers aim to strengthen European digital sovereignty, but Thibault focuses on EU-level regulatory frameworks and large-scale investments to curb concentration of tech power [71-78], whereas Peter emphasizes technical autonomy of the .eu registry and personal domain ownership as the concrete expression of sovereignty [145-160]. Their differing emphasis on regulatory versus technical/individual mechanisms reveals a disagreement on the primary path to achieve the same overarching goal.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Scholarly debate contrasts neo-mercantilist, state-centric models with cooperative, multi-vector approaches that balance economic security and openness [S45][S46]. The EU’s 2030 digital strategy stresses partnership-based sovereignty rather than full self-sufficiency [S52].
Unexpected Differences
Scope of digital sovereignty – collective strategic autonomy vs personal digital identity
Speakers: Peter Janssen, Thomas Schneider
The .eu domain provides both technical and personal digital sovereignty, enabling users to control their digital identity and ensure continuity across borders. Europe must defend its values and interests and maintain freedom to act in a sovereign way, emphasizing collective European power and cooperation.
Peter frames sovereignty at the individual level through domain ownership and personal digital identity [145-160], whereas Thomas discusses sovereignty as a collective, strategic capability of Europe that requires unified action and resources [236-242]. The contrast between an individual-centric view and a nation-centric view of sovereignty was not anticipated given the overall consensus on multistakeholder cooperation.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Analyses of digital sovereignty differentiate between collective strategic autonomy (state-level control) and personal digital identity systems such as national e-ID, stressing the need to balance both dimensions [S45]. The infrastructure vector of sovereignty includes identity infrastructure, illustrating this tension [S46].
Overall Assessment

The speakers largely share a common vision of an open, multistakeholder‑driven Internet and recognize the importance of platforms like EURODIG. The principal disagreements centre on the preferred pathway to digital sovereignty—whether to prioritize EU‑wide regulatory and investment strategies (Thibault) or to focus on technical autonomy and personal domain ownership (Peter). There is also an unexpected tension between individual‑level and collective‑level conceptions of sovereignty.

Moderate. While consensus exists on overarching goals (openness, multistakeholder legitimacy), the divergence in methods for achieving digital sovereignty could affect policy coordination, requiring careful alignment of regulatory, technical, and user‑centric initiatives to avoid fragmented approaches.

Partial Agreements
All three speakers agree that multistakeholder platforms like EURODIG are essential for legitimacy and effective governance, but they differ on the emphasis: Sandra calls for political support and resources to close the legitimacy gap [195-203][220-227]; Thomas stresses the need for concrete funding and visibility, highlighting Swiss contributions and the importance of resources [250-257]; Thibault underlines the strategic importance of EURODIG as a global multistakeholder arena but does not detail funding mechanisms [90-96].
Speakers: Sandra Hoferichter, Thomas Schneider, Thibault Liner
Multi‑stakeholder dialogue platforms increase the legitimacy of European policy making by involving diverse interest groups. EURODIG and other multistakeholder platforms are central to identifying challenges and fostering inclusive decision‑making, and they must be strengthened and adequately funded. EURODIG is important and provides Europe with an open space for dialogue; it must evolve to stay impactful.
Both speakers champion openness as a foundational principle. Thibault stresses the cardinal principles of an open, global, cooperative Internet that must be reaffirmed daily [27-30], while Peter focuses on open standards, interoperability and a diverse supplier ecosystem as practical means to sustain resilience and trust [138-144]. Their agreement on openness is expressed through different layers—principle versus implementation.
Speakers: Thibault Liner, Peter Janssen
The Internet must remain open, global, cooperative and multistakeholder, and these core principles need continual reaffirmation. Openness, open standards and a diverse supplier landscape are essential for digital resilience and trust in European infrastructure.
Takeaways
Key takeaways
EURODIG is a central multi‑stakeholder dialogue platform that must become more visible, impactful, sustainable and better linked to the European technical community. Multi‑stakeholder dialogue is essential for legitimacy, complementing legislative processes, and bridging global norms with local realities. The EU is preparing a tech‑sovereignty package to reduce dependence on a few global providers and to invest in cybersecurity, cloud, chips, AI and digital skills. Technical sovereignty includes registry autonomy, open standards, a diversified supplier landscape and personal digital sovereignty through ownership of .eu domain names. .eu has grown to over 3.8 million domains, supports multilingualism, low DNS abuse and serves as a trusted European digital identity and infrastructure. Authoritarian internet models and rising geopolitical tensions threaten openness; Europe must unite to defend democratic values, the rule of law and strategic autonomy.
Resolutions and action items
Commitment to strengthen EURODIG’s visibility, impact and sustainability, including closer collaboration with the European technical community. Call for increased resources and political support for multi‑stakeholder platforms like EURODIG. Invitation for cities to submit proposals to host the 20th EURODIG meeting. EU institutions will move forward with the forthcoming tech‑sovereignty package and related investments in cybersecurity, cloud, chips, AI and digital skills.
Unresolved issues
Specific implementation details of the EU tech‑sovereignty package and how it will be funded. Concrete mechanisms to reduce dependency on a small number of global providers and to ensure open, fair market access. How to operationalise greater resource allocation for EURODIG while maintaining inclusive, bottom‑up participation. Ways to overcome national isolation and improve acceptance of EU‑level legislation at the member‑state level. Detailed governance reforms needed to make EURODIG more politically visible and effective.
Suggested compromises
Maintain a multi‑stakeholder, bottom‑up approach while providing additional resources and political backing, rather than shifting to a top‑down model. Combine technical sovereignty with openness by promoting open standards and ecosystem diversity alongside investment in European capabilities. Use EURODIG as a bridge between legislative processes and civil society, complementing rather than replacing formal law‑making.
Thought Provoking Comments
Digital sovereignty is not a way to close down, but a way to empower and give technology to those that need it – it is not protectionism, but empowerment and shared capability development.
Reframes a frequently misunderstood concept (digital sovereignty) by distinguishing it from protectionism and positioning it as a tool for empowerment, which challenges the narrative that sovereignty equals isolation.
Set the thematic foundation for the rest of the opening remarks. It prompted Peter Janssen to illustrate the idea with a concrete example (owning a .eu domain) and reinforced Sandra and Thomas’s calls for a stronger, well‑resourced multi‑stakeholder ecosystem.
Speaker: Thibault Liner
A few actors control access, cloud infrastructure, operating systems, data flows, cybersecurity, DNS service and emerging AI capabilities. If we do not ensure broad access to these key elements, the Internet is no longer open.
Highlights the concentration of power in the digital ecosystem and directly challenges the assumption that market forces alone guarantee openness, introducing a critical lens on current industry dynamics.
Shifted the conversation from celebration of past achievements to a warning about present risks. It led Peter Janssen to stress the need for technical sovereignty and diversification of suppliers, and it underpinned Sandra’s argument about the legitimacy gap caused by such concentration.
Speaker: Thibault Liner
Legislation developed at the EU level is often seen as irrelevant or over‑regulating at national level; multi‑stakeholder dialogue platforms can complement legislative procedures by providing a bottom‑up, locally‑relevant space.
Introduces a nuanced critique of the top‑down EU legislative model and proposes a concrete alternative – regional and national multi‑stakeholder platforms – thereby expanding the discussion beyond high‑level policy to implementation realities.
Created a turning point where the focus moved from abstract principles to practical governance mechanisms. Thomas Schneider later echoed this by calling for stronger, better‑funded multi‑stakeholder structures, and the audience was primed to consider how EURODIG can bridge EU‑level decisions and national realities.
Speaker: Sandra Hoferichter
There are powers that have an interest in the European Union and are dividing us so that we do not get stronger together; we must not give them that favor.
Frames the digital‑governance debate within a broader geopolitical struggle, adding urgency and a defensive posture to the discussion of sovereignty and cooperation.
Introduced a political dimension that deepened the conversation, prompting listeners to view technical and governance issues as part of a larger contest of values. It reinforced the earlier calls for unity (by Thibault and Peter) and justified the need for a resilient, collaborative European digital space.
Speaker: Thomas Schneider
Personal digital sovereignty is achieved by owning your own domain name; it gives you freedom of choice, continuity and independence – you can change providers without losing your identity.
Translates the abstract notion of digital sovereignty into a tangible, everyday benefit for citizens and businesses, making the concept accessible and actionable.
Bridged the gap between high‑level policy (Thibault’s sovereignty talk) and user‑level experience, reinforcing the relevance of .eu for individuals. It also set the stage for later discussions on how EURODIG can promote such practical tools.
Speaker: Peter Janssen
The multi‑stakeholder model is only credible if it is alive in practice, not just invoked when you need it.
Calls out tokenistic use of multi‑stakeholder rhetoric and demands continuous, operational commitment, challenging participants to move beyond symbolic gestures.
Served as a catalyst for the subsequent speakers (Sandra, Thomas) to stress the need for resources, political support, and concrete outcomes from EURODIG, shaping the overall tone toward actionable collaboration.
Speaker: Thibault Liner
Overall Assessment

The opening remarks were anchored by a series of insightful interventions that moved the discussion from a celebratory overview to a critical examination of Europe’s digital future. Thibault Liner’s reframing of digital sovereignty and his warning about market concentration introduced the central tension between openness and control. Sandra Hoferichter and Thomas Schneider expanded this tension into the realm of legitimacy and geopolitical pressure, highlighting the gap between EU‑level legislation and national realities and warning against external forces seeking to fragment Europe. Peter Janssen grounded the abstract debate in a concrete user‑centric example—owning a .eu domain—as a practical expression of personal digital sovereignty. Together, these comments redirected the conversation toward concrete challenges (concentration of power, legitimacy gaps, geopolitical threats) and concrete solutions (multi‑stakeholder platforms, technical autonomy, resource investment). The cumulative effect was to set a purposeful, problem‑oriented agenda for the rest of the conference, ensuring that subsequent sessions would be framed around empowerment, resilience, and genuine multi‑stakeholder engagement rather than mere celebration of past milestones.

Follow-up Questions
How can the EU and its partners reduce the 2.2 billion people who remain offline?
Liner highlighted the large number of unconnected people and called for collective action, indicating a need for research into outreach, infrastructure and policy solutions.
Speaker: Thibault Liner
What measures can address the growing economic and private concentration in the digital ecosystem (e.g., control of cloud, operating systems, AI)?
He warned that a few actors dominate key digital services, which threatens an open Internet, suggesting further investigation into competition policy and market diversification.
Speaker: Thibault Liner
How can global Internet governance rules be implemented from a position of strength to reduce dependency on a limited set of providers?
Liner stressed the importance of implementing rules while maintaining strategic autonomy, pointing to a research gap on resilience and supply‑chain diversification.
Speaker: Thibault Liner
In what ways can digital sovereignty be pursued without turning into protectionism?
He described digital sovereignty as empowerment rather than protectionism, prompting inquiry into policy designs that balance security, innovation and openness.
Speaker: Thibault Liner
How can EURODIG become more visible, impactful, sustainable and better connected to the European technical community?
Liner called for an evolution of EURODIG’s role, indicating a need to study outreach models, governance structures and partnerships with technical stakeholders.
Speaker: Thibault Liner
How can multi‑stakeholder dialogue platforms reshape legitimacy in Europe’s policy‑making?
She questioned the capacity of platforms like EURODIG to enhance legitimacy, suggesting research on their influence on legislative processes and public trust.
Speaker: Sandra Hoferichter
What mechanisms can bridge the gap between EU‑level legislation and its acceptance at national levels?
She noted that EU laws are sometimes seen as irrelevant or over‑regulating nationally, indicating a need to explore adaptation processes and stakeholder engagement strategies.
Speaker: Sandra Hoferichter
What resources and political support are required to make multi‑stakeholder platforms inclusive, well‑resourced and effective?
She emphasized the need for investment and political backing, pointing to a research area on funding models and governance frameworks for such platforms.
Speaker: Sandra Hoferichter
How can regional and national IGFs adapt global Internet governance norms to local contexts while enriching the global agenda?
She highlighted the role of regional dialogues as intermediaries, suggesting study of best practices for contextual adaptation and knowledge transfer.
Speaker: Sandra Hoferichter
How can multistakeholder structures be reformed and strengthened to become more inclusive, effective and politically visible?
He called for reforms to multistakeholder cooperation, indicating a need for analysis of governance reforms, participation mechanisms and visibility strategies.
Speaker: Thomas Schneider
What concrete solutions can address the rising geopolitical tensions and their impact on digital governance?
He mentioned uncertainty caused by geopolitical pressures, implying a need for research into policy responses, resilience strategies and diplomatic coordination.
Speaker: Thomas Schneider
What are the criteria, processes and best practices for hosting future EURODIG events?
He invited interested parties to propose hosting the 20th EURODIG, suggesting a need for guidelines and evaluation frameworks for future hosts.
Speaker: Thomas Schneider
How does ownership of a .eu domain contribute to personal digital sovereignty, business continuity and competitiveness for SMEs?
Janssen described the practical benefits of domain ownership, indicating a research avenue to assess its impact on digital identity and market performance.
Speaker: Peter Janssen
How effective are the EU’s Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act in preserving openness and fair markets?
He referenced these legislative tools as means to protect openness, prompting evaluation of their real‑world outcomes and enforcement challenges.
Speaker: Thibault Liner

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.