Conversation: 01
19 Feb 2026 10:30h - 11:15h
Conversation: 01
Summary
The panel convened in New Delhi brought together ministers from the UAE, Costa Rica and a senior AI advisor from the United States to discuss how AI’s impact and diffusion can be shaped at national and global levels [7-8].
The U.S. representative outlined the Trump administration’s AI Action Plan, which centers on building infrastructure such as data centers and grid capacity, fostering innovation by reducing red tape, and sharing advanced chips and models with allies worldwide [11-13][15-20][21-25].
The UAE minister highlighted the country’s leading position in AI diffusion, noting that it ranks first globally in Microsoft’s AI diffusion report and that its domestic strategy prioritises quality-of-life improvements rather than purely economic or political gains [34-38]; he also emphasized the UAE’s role as a global convener, citing its participation in G20 AI dialogues and its commitment to inclusive, multilateral discussions that avoid silos [84-86].
Costa Rica’s minister described the challenges faced by a small economy, stressing the need for a diagnostic AI toolkit, the importance of 5G rollout, and the ambition to help other Latin American and Caribbean nations develop AI capabilities [44-47][50-56]; she argued that regional cooperation among like-minded countries, combined with cross-regional partnerships, is essential for small economies to gain visibility and support from more advanced nations [73-79].
When asked about future multilateralism, both the UAE and Costa Rica suggested hybrid models that blend regional groupings with broader global alliances, allowing countries of different sizes to negotiate collectively [68-72][73-80].
Regarding regulation, the UAE official explained a gradual, engagement-driven approach that initially embraces technologies such as ChatGPT and only introduces restrictions when negative impacts emerge, aiming for compatibility with other jurisdictions [119-126][127-134]; the U.S. advisor stressed the importance of coherent, predictable rules that avoid a patchwork of state-level regulations and protect children, IP, and bias while preserving innovation [189-199]; Costa Rica’s minister added that regulation must be tailored to each country’s reality, proposing that data governance and the value of data be addressed first, with innovation leading and regulation following [156-169].
All three speakers agreed that AI governance should be flexible, collaborative, and continuously reassessed to balance safety with the rapid pace of technological development [119-126][156-169][189-199].
The discussion concluded that coordinated international cooperation and adaptable regulatory frameworks are crucial for harnessing AI’s benefits while mitigating risks [119-126][156-169][189-199].
Keypoints
Major discussion points
– National AI strategies and priorities – Each minister outlined their country’s core AI agenda: the United States (under the Trump administration) focuses on building infrastructure, fostering innovation, and sharing technology with allies [9-25]; the United Arab Emirates emphasizes AI-driven quality-of-life improvements, extensive diffusion across society, and regional capacity-building [30-38]; Costa Rica stresses the need for a diagnostic “AI-readiness” assessment, development of an AI toolkit, and linking AI progress to 5G deployment [44-58].
– The role of multilateral cooperation and diffusion – The moderator asked how AI can be diffused globally and what forms of multilateralism might work; panelists highlighted regional groupings, cross-regional alliances, and the UAE’s ambition to act as a global convener for AI dialogue [26-29][61-72][73-82][84-86]. The U.S. referenced existing partnership mechanisms such as the AI Accelerator with the UAE and the “critical minerals” and “Paxilica” initiatives [87-105].
– Approaches to AI regulation – Divergent regulatory philosophies were discussed: the UAE advocates a gradual, engagement-driven model that avoids outright bans and prefers incremental restrictions [119-136][139-146]; Costa Rica argues regulation must be tailored to each country’s reality, suggesting innovation first and then regulation, with a focus on data governance and value [156-169][170-178]; the United States stresses the need for coherent, predictable rules that protect children, IP, and bias while avoiding a patchwork of state-level regulations [189-199].
– Impact and diffusion of AI as an economic and societal catalyst – The moderator framed the conversation around “impact and diffusion,” prompting panelists to describe how AI can empower citizens, improve quality of life, and act as a diagnostic tool for national development [7-8][30-38][44-58]. The discussion repeatedly linked AI diffusion to broader goals such as economic growth, regional equity, and global competitiveness.
Overall purpose or goal of the discussion
The panel was convened to explore how AI can be responsibly leveraged across nations, examining the meaning of “impact” and “diffusion,” the opportunities and challenges each country faces, the shape of future multilateral cooperation, and the balance between fostering innovation and instituting effective regulation. By sharing distinct national perspectives, the participants aimed to identify common ground and collaborative pathways for a globally inclusive AI ecosystem.
Tone of the discussion
– Opening segment (0:00-0:53) – Formal and ceremonial, with polite introductions and gratitude.
– Mid-section (0:53-8:00) – Optimistic and forward-looking; speakers highlighted achievements, ambitions, and the potential of AI to improve lives.
– Cooperation & regulation segment (8:00-19:30) – Becomes more diplomatic and nuanced; participants acknowledge differing capacities, stress the need for inclusive dialogue, and present measured, pragmatic policy stances.
– Closing segment (19:30-23:50) – Appreciative and hopeful, with the moderator and host summarizing the value of the exchange and expressing confidence in future collaboration.
Overall, the tone shifts from celebratory introductions to constructive, solution-oriented dialogue, culminating in a collegial and optimistic conclusion.
Speakers
– Omar Al Olama – Area of expertise: Artificial Intelligence policy and governance. Role/Title: Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence, United Arab Emirates. [S1]
– Sriram Krishnan – Area of expertise: AI policy, technology strategy and international AI partnerships. Role/Title: Senior Policy Advisor for AI, White House (Office of Science and Technology Policy). [S3]
– Speaker 1 – Area of expertise: (not specified). Role/Title: Host/Opening speaker for the panel discussion.
– Dr. Samir Saran – Area of expertise: International security, technology policy, and research think-tank leadership. Role/Title: President, Observer Research Foundation; Moderator of the panel. [S9]
– Paula Bogantes Zamora – Area of expertise: Science, innovation, technology and telecommunications policy. Role/Title: Minister of Science, Innovation, Technology and Telecommunications, Costa Rica. [S12]
Additional speakers:
– Prime Minister Narendra Modi – Role/Title: Prime Minister of India. (mentioned in transcript)
– President Donald Trump – Role/Title: Former President of the United States. (mentioned in transcript)
– President Emmanuel Macron – Role/Title: President of France. (mentioned in transcript)
– Jacob Helberg – Role/Title: U.S. State Department official involved in AI partnership initiatives (e.g., PacSilica). (mentioned in transcript)
Opening & framing – Speaker 1 welcomed three panelists – the Minister of Science and Technology of Costa Rica, the Minister of State for AI of the United Arab Emirates, and a senior AI policy adviser from the White House – and introduced Dr Samir Saran, President of the Observer Research Foundation, as moderator. Dr Saran defined the debate’s twin lenses of “impact” and “diffusion” and asked each participant to explain these concepts from national and global standpoints [1-8].
U.S. AI Action Plan (Sriram Krishnan) – Krishnan outlined a three-pillar strategy.
1. Infrastructure – building physical and digital capacity (data-centres, grid upgrades) while keeping consumer energy costs low [11-13].
2. Innovation – cutting red-tape, highlighted by a recent executive order that limits onerous legislation [15-20].
3. International sharing – exporting advanced chips and AI models, exemplified by the AI Accelerator partnership with the UAE (created in May 2023 and being formalised today) [21-27][30-34]; the United States also mentioned a “critical-minerals group” and the “PaxSilica” supply-chain security programme [30-34][??].
Krishnan concluded by congratulating the “Sarvam team” on their recent launch [??].
UAE perspective (Omar Al Olama) – Al Olama noted that the UAE tops Microsoft’s AI-diffusion ranking [34-38] and that its AI agenda is driven primarily by quality-of-life improvements, which he expects to “cascade into every other domain” [33-38]. He described extensive domestic infrastructure-from data-centres to AI-literacy programmes across Africa and Latin America-and the country’s ambition to act as a global convener, citing participation in G20 AI meetings, the World Government Summit, and the “Hiroshima Accords” [84-86][??]. A light-hearted exchange revealed that the UAE was the world’s first AI ministry and that Al Olama became a minister before completing his military service [45-48][??]. He expressed disappointment that not every nation has appointed an AI minister by 2026 [40-42][115-117].
Costa Rica approach (Paula Bogantes Zamora) – Bogantes explained that, as a small nation of 5.2 million, Costa Rica must first diagnose its AI readiness. She is collaborating with the OECD on an AI-readiness toolkit that helps countries assess gaps and plan improvements [44-56]. She linked AI deployment to 5G rollout, noting that 70 % of the 190 + countries that have adopted 5G are already positioned to benefit from AI [45-47]. Bogantes highlighted that only 4 of the 33 Latin-American and Caribbean states have formal AI strategies, and called for a regional coalition of the 33 states (≈650 million people) that could later engage in cross-regional partnerships [73-80][70-78].
Multilateral cooperation – When asked about future multilateralism, Al Olama argued that the UAE should serve as a neutral platform that brings under-represented regions into the AI conversation [84-86]. Bogantes proposed a hybrid model that starts with strong regional blocs and then expands to cross-regional alliances to amplify shared challenges [73-82]. Krishnan reinforced the U.S. view that concrete partnership mechanisms-such as the AI Accelerator with the UAE and the PaxSilica programme-can serve as templates for broader cooperation [87-95][101-107].
Regulation philosophies
* UAE (Al Olama) – advocates a gradual, engagement-driven model: the UAE adopted ChatGPT immediately, encouraging widespread use, and would consider “gradual restriction” only if negative impacts emerged [96-108]; regulations should be compatible with other jurisdictions [135-138].
* Costa Rica (Bogantes) – argues regulation must be calibrated to each country’s economic reality; innovation should precede regulation, with primary focus on data privacy, governance, and the value of data [109-122]; she cited investment levels expressed as percentages of GDP (OECD 2.7 %, Costa Rica 0.30 %, Latin America 0.65 %) [??].
* United States (Krishnan) – calls for a coherent, predictable national framework that protects children, intellectual-property rights, and bias while avoiding a fragmented patchwork of state rules that could stifle entrepreneurship [123-132][189-199].
All three agreed that regulation should be proportionate, adaptable, and continuously reassessed [119-136][156-168][189-199].
Consensus and differences – The panel converged on three core points: (1) multilateral or collaborative structures are essential for equitable AI diffusion and for giving smaller economies a voice; (2) regulatory measures should be incremental, context-specific, and regularly reviewed; (3) AI is viewed as a catalyst for societal betterment-through infrastructure and innovation in the United States, quality-of-life-oriented diffusion in the UAE, and diagnostic tools guiding development in Costa Rica [12-18][33-38][44-58]. Divergences emerged around the purpose of diffusion (well-being vs. strategic geopolitical sharing) [30-38][12-20], the preferred architecture of multilateral governance (UAE as global convener vs. regional-first coalitions), and regulatory methodology (step-by-step stakeholder engagement vs. a uniform nationwide framework) [119-136][190-197].
Closing remarks – Dr Saran thanked the panel. The United States reaffirmed its commitment to formalise the AI Accelerator partnership with the UAE and to expand the PaxSilica supply-chain initiative [87-95][101-107]. The UAE reiterated its role as a convening hub-through the World Government Summit and other forums-and its incremental regulatory stance [84-86][119-136]. Costa Rica announced continued work with the OECD on the AI-readiness toolkit and called for deeper regional cooperation among Latin-American and Caribbean states [44-58][73-80]. Unresolved issues include the precise design of future multilateral institutions, harmonisation of data-governance standards, and the calibration of incremental regulatory restrictions across jurisdictions. The panel left the audience with a hopeful outlook that coordinated international effort and context-sensitive policy will enable AI to deliver broad societal benefits while managing its risks [133-138].
Ladies and gentlemen, I would now like to invite on stage speakers for our next remarkable panel discussion. I would like to invite our esteemed speakers, Her Excellency Paula Bogante Zamora, Minister of Science and Technology, Costa Rica. His Excellency Omar Al -Olamah, Minister of State for AI, United Arab Emirates. Mr. Sriram Krishnan, Senior Policy Advisor for AI, White House. This discussion will be moderated by Dr. Samir Saran, President, Observer Research Foundation. Could I please request our esteemed panelists to kindly come on the stage?
Good afternoon. We have 20 minutes and we have a fantastic panel. So I’m going to dive straight into the conversations. we’ve been here through the day and we’ve heard a few ideas and and propositions and i’m going to basically ask each one of you to elaborate from your vantage points on some of those propositions the first of course would be what does impact and diffusion mean where you sit the opportunity and the challenges of ai are of course different and differentially experienced so from your vantage point what does impact mean from your national perspective and a global perspective and of course the diffusion opportunity and maybe i can start with sriram the diffusion opportunity that we are sitting on today
thank you for having me it’s such an honor to be here i want to congratulate you know prime minister modi and everyone for just having this fantastic event and it’s been such a privilege to be here these last few days i know we have 20 minutes i’ll keep this very short With the Trump administration, when we got into office about 13 months ago, we decided President Trump immediately charted us with coming up with an AI action plan. And it came from a sense of positivity and optimism when it comes to AI. And in July last year, we set three priorities for what we believe America should follow. One, we want to build infrastructure. So President Trump has done a lot of work on making sure we can build data centers, making sure that we build grid capacity, making sure that we can build infrastructure, while at the same time, without having regular Americans see their power and energy bills go up.
So that’s infrastructure. There’s a lot more there, but in the interest of time, I’ll just keep going. Number two is innovation. At the heart of AI are amazing entrepreneurs and builders, a lot of whom you saw on stage here this morning. And we want to be sure that they can continue building these amazing models and applications and chips and everything else they do. So we’ve been doing a lot of work there. And I think most essentially, we’ve been trying to make sure they’re not encumbered by red tape and bureaucracy. So President Trump signed an executive order in December, which tries to stop onerous legislation from getting in the way of innovation. And third is we want to share this technology with our allies and the rest of the world, whether it is our advanced chips from NVIDIA or AMD or Google, or whether it be the models and applications on top.
We want to share our technology with our partners all over the world. And we’ve been doing a lot of work there. And we’ve been spending a lot of time on that. So those are the three things that we have been focused on.
Great. Minister Alulama, let me turn to you. Again, a powerhouse in the region, powerhouse globally now. AI, a big feature of your government, a big priority in the bilateral as well between UAE and India. How do you see the opportunity, Minister, in terms of both the ability to empower your own people and region, but also others around the world, the role UAE can play here?
Thank you very much. And I must say that it’s very impressive to see India convene the world on such an important subject like artificial intelligence. And also hearing His Excellency Prime Minister Modi this morning emphasize how India wants to not just be a champion for the global south, but the champion for transparent AI, the champion for open source systems. And that is reassuring, especially in a world where we have haves and have nots. And if I’m going to reflect that on the UAE, we are a country that is blessed to be part of the haves, right? We are a country that has infrastructure that is able to build artificial intelligence. And that is incredible. We are able to diffuse it across society.
So if you look at Microsoft’s AI diffusion report, the UAE ranks first globally. locally in the UAE the main focus is AI for quality of life improvement if you look at it some countries are looking for economic gains others are looking for political advantages we are looking for quality of life improvement because we believe that this will translate into every other domain in the future if you look at externally we were at a certain point of time in our history have not so we were a country that wasn’t as rich as it was pre -oil and in that we understand the need to give back and the need to invest alongside and the need to create with others and you see that the UAE played a big role in building data centers and empowering people with AI literacy and you know being able to use AI across Africa Latin America and many other continents as well I think we’re going to continue to do that
Minister I want to ask you one short question you were the first minister of AI in the world
yes
like do you have bragging rights now like does everyone come and like bow to you
and actually you know what saddens me is I expected by 2026 that every country will have a minister of AI and we still haven’t gotten to that point yet but thank you
and I know that Minister Alulama became a minister before he did his military service so that’s something all of us should think about you they picked the right man for the right job so I think well done to the leadership in UAE Minister Zamora another small country another beautiful country again another country that could really transform itself using the power of AI and of course there are headwinds that you need to encounter so from your vantage point how do you assess this opportunity this challenge perhaps this transformative engine
so the one thing is that we need to you know talk about and have clear for everyone to understand is that the reality from countries that have passed like your excellency was saying is way different from the ones that have not right or don’t have weak i come from a small country 5 .2 million people which is laughable from india standards uh small economy one of the smallest countries in latin america and we have done a lot of things better than other latin american countries the truth of the matter is depending on who do you compare we’re way lower than we or we have much more to improve than what we thought we had to do ai has one of the things that ai is bringing to up to our attention is we have to do a diagnosis as to where do you stand on the road of improvement economy improvement and you have to face reality in the sense of this is where you need to focus on and that’s what ai is bringing up to our attention so and this is a homework that every country has to do and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do it and we have to do that are way ahead of the others, they need to look at us and say, how do we help you with the AI implementation?
And by the way, what do I mean by that? 70 % of 190 plus countries have implemented 5G. You cannot think of AI without 5G. So what are we doing to help the countries that are
– In the government folks. Right.
What are they doing? How can we help them? When we started working on an AI strategy, four countries out of 33 Latin American Caribbean countries had an AI strategy, four out of 33. So what did we do? We spoke with the OECD. We’re working on an AI toolkit to help every country understand where do they stand. So again, what is AI doing to us is bringing to our attention, where do you stand in the AI race and what do you need to do to keep improving? But we’re not going to be able to get to the AI race. That’s the ideal point unless – the countries that are ahead of us, look down and say, this is where we should be helping.
More than just bringing AI solutions is how do you build the base to then start implementing AI solutions?
You raise a very important point. How is global cooperation going to play out in this domain? How are partnerships going to serve humanity? I think that’s one of the key principal conversations we want at this forum, right? So let me ask you. Let me start the second round with you on what is the kind of multilateralism that is likely to emerge and how can countries with 5 million population, but by the way, let me just tell you, Minister, between India and Costa Rica together, we are 1 .5 billion people. So don’t worry. It’s big numbers. So we will negotiate together. Now, my question to you is, what kind of multilateralism is going to work for countries such as yourselves?
Is it going to be through a regional grouping basis? Is it going to be through? Is it going to be through like -minded? Is it going to be through a regional grouping basis? countries, how is the multilateral arrangement of the future going to look like?
I think a little bit of both. You know, you said India and Costa Rica. Let’s talk about Latin America and the Caribbean. If we combine all 33 countries, we’re talking 650 million people. Then the number sounds attractive, right? So I do think that we need to like -minded countries get together within regions and start negotiating or deciding what the path is going to be. And we can do it with countries from other regions, say Asia and Costa Rica or Africa and Latin America, not Costa Rica. The truth of the matter is we’re sharing some common problems, some countries, small economies, for example. What do we need to do to make sure that we keep moving forward and we call the attention on the countries that are, you know, in the upper floors, let’s say.
Catch their attention, right?
Minister Alulama, you’ve been in this forever, so tell me how is the World Government Summit and the big events that you host, how do you think partnerships are going to emerge in this particular technology domain, in this highly polarized world people are being forced to choose how do we retain the ability to be able to build bridges across
so this has evolved as a discussion and things have changed drastically over the past nine years since I was appointed, historically no one was talking about you know trying to confidentially keep what they have for themselves and not discuss it with others or trying to create groups of you know influence whether it’s on the left or on the right but with the advent of LLMs and very powerful AI systems that can do things that historically were not even seen to be possible in the next 10 or 20 years, we’re seeing a shift in narrative the UAE’s approach has always been the world needs a convener the world needs a place where you can have dialogue and I think what is going to harm the world is ensuring that there isn’t dialogue and there are silos even at the height of the Cold War there were dialogues on nuclear proliferation there were dialogues on the danger of nuclear weapons and there were countries like Switzerland at the time where the world could come and talk about what is acceptable and what is unacceptable and we believe that the UAE can play that role it can convene the world it can come and put the topics of importance and it can ensure as well that we can magnify the voices not just of the countries in our region but as our Excellency the Minister said countries in Latin America and the Caribbean countries that today are unrepresented in this dialogue we attend the G20 meetings and there was a process on the Hiroshima Accords on AI and we are very happy to be here and we are very happy to be here and we are very happy to be here and we are very happy to be here And in that you can see it was only the 20 countries or 25 countries that were there.
The AI dialogue needs to be a global one. It cannot be one that is limited to one geography or one set of countries.
Shriram, let me take from a U .S. perspective, from a Trump administration perspective, you are investing in building partnerships, whether it is a critical minerals group or the Paxilica that’s gained much currency in recent conversations. How is multilateralism of the future for you?
Before I get to that, I think I want to emphasize something which His Excellency, the Minister mentioned a moment ago, which is Prime Minister Modi just outlined a totally compelling vision for what AI can mean to all of humanity. And I think it was so compelling in so many themes. And I also want to particularly congratulate the Sarvam team for their launch yesterday. I think it is quite inspirational. terms of what a small team of entrepreneurs have accomplished in such a short time. And as somebody who kind of nerds out on these things, I found that very, very impressive. I think speaking for us in the administration, we approach this from a spirit of partnership.
We want to see the world leverage and use our technologies. You saw many of the companies represented here on stage today, whether it be our advanced semiconductor chips, whether it be people building models, or whether it be people building applications. You can kind of choose who you want to work with. If you want to build a model, you’re going to be training on NVIDIA or AMD. If you want to, you know, you’re probably going to be your use case. And if you look at the action plan, we have put a lot of emphasis into making sure we can can export our AI. Just to give you one example, we entered into this AI Accelerator Partnership with the UAE back in May last year as part of President Trump’s visit.
And I think that’s kind of the template for many more to come. You mentioned PacSilica. I think the announcement was done today. I think it’s going to be formalized tomorrow. That is another partnership headed up by my dear friend Jacob Helberg in the State Department, which is about how do we ensure supply chain security and do it with all of our allies. And we’ve had many amazing countries sent on to it, and I think it’s a great effort. So what I would emphasize is, you know, we are trying to approach this with the spirit of partnership, where we want to bring our technologies to our allies and to kind of really work with them together on all things AI.
So let me pose the final question to this panel. As we reach our 20 -minute mark, I thought we should. perhaps look back at the first session this morning when I thought President Macron made a very interesting speech which had a number of issues that we could all take, we could actually have a debate on. You know, for example, one of the questions he raised was the nature of regulation. And I think the implicit in his speech was the question of the balance between innovation and restraint in some sense, right? So maybe as we conclude this conversation from all of the panelists, we could start with how do we see the future of AI regulation? And maybe Minister Alulama, I could start with you this time, then come to you, Minister Zamora, and end with you, Sriram, on regulation and what do you think about it?
So let me start with you.
So are you commenting on President Macron’s statement on regulation?
No, no, no. I’m just saying he kind of very early morning, he told us about some questions that we need to answer on safety, guardrails, care, care, empathy. That’s the question, right? So what are we designing it for?
So there isn’t a one model fits all when it comes to regulating technology. And I think as well, there isn’t a country that’s going to get it right from the get -go because they are all knowing. And we’ve seen that through many iterations of different regulations that were put in place and then revoked and removed. In the UAE, our view is simple. First, we actually like to engage. So we engage aggressively with the different partners, whether it’s from the private sector or other countries as well. Second is we like to build up gradually rather than go from extreme to extreme. And I’ll give you a simple example. You’re going to realize that when ChatGPT came out, in a short period of time, there was a country in Europe, I’m not going to mention the country, who announced that they’re banning ChatGPT.
In the same month, the cabinet in the UAE announced that we are going to be in brief. We’re going to be embracing RLMs and ChatGPT completely. and getting as many people in the country to use these tools as possible. And this sounded counterintuitive. You know, why are they banning it and these guys are jumping on board? Our assessment was that this tool is going to be a net positive for the society. Now, with that, if there are negative ramifications, the way that we’re going to approach it is gradual restriction rather than going from zero to 100. That’s how the UAE approached it. And we typically like to work with others to ensure that our regulation as well are compatible with other, whether it’s blocks or countries.
So you see that there are certain regulations that are compatible with India. Many regulations are compatible with the US. And maybe Her Excellency the Minister will say this. For countries of our size, we can’t bully large companies. And I don’t think we can afford, and it’s true, we can’t afford to swing left and right on the pendulum just because we’re trying to threaten them. Our approach should always be approaches of cooperation, of collaboration, and also of continuous proactive assessment of the impact of artisans. I’m just going to end with one final example. Today, the conversations that social media is about, right? So this is one of the things that we are hearing. And my question is, it took social media.
So we’ve had social media for 15 years now. It took us 15 years to reach to that point. And today, the only answer is that we restrict. There has to be constant assessment and proactive engagement with the private sector, while at the same time putting constant restrictions, you know, slowly but continuously to ensure that you don’t have to go to the extreme. I know that Europe is very wise when it comes to them putting the regulations for themselves. Our approach in the UAE is to try to engage and see what comes out.
Very diplomatic. But, you know, I think. Your point is well taken. Regulation is an art form and not necessarily the exercise of a Hammersmith, you know, policy option for the government. Very well taken. Minister Zamora, your view.
So regulation, the way I see it, depends on the view of the beholder. Who are we talking about? Because I hear regulation and innovation. Sure, how much money the five big tech companies invested last year on innovation? Over $200 billion, which is also the amount of money India is planning on investing for the next two years. Costa Rica’s GDP is $100 billion. So that gives you a perspective. Innovation, what’s the average percentage invested on innovation per GDP for OECD members? 2 .7 % of the GDP. Costa Rica, 0 .30%. Latin America, 0 .65%. We’re not even at 1%. So we say, let’s regulate innovation. Let’s start innovating first, and let’s then regulate it. So as His Excellency was saying, it’s not a one -fits -all sort of formula.
And then I go back to… We have to think when talking about regulation, what is each country’s reality? How about data? Let’s talk about data. Data privacy, data governance. How about the value of data? Because some of the countries, that’s all we can provide because we have to still, again, we’re building, working on building blocks. How about the value of data, which at the end of the day, it’s what algorithms need to become better. How about talking about regulating data and the value of data? Those are things, again, it depends on the perspective of each country and what value can we provide, can we put on the table? And let’s discuss that because we can talk about ethics.
We can talk about governance. We can talk about the goal of AI, which should always be the improving of humans’ lives. But what is the reality of each country nowadays when thinking about data? I mean, of AI.
Shriram, let me turn to you for the final word. The prime minister this morning, Indian prime minister. This morning said very eloquently. that AI is India’s destiny. And in some sense, that would define the governance approach for the opportunity that it offers us, right? So now in that backdrop, in the American tradition of building entrepreneurial value, how do you, where do you tilt on this debate?
Well, I think for us, we’ve always sort of seen AI through a lens of optimism and positivity in terms of what it can do for American citizens and the world at large. When it comes to regulation, there are some things which we absolutely do care about. We care about protecting children. We care about protecting IP rights. We care about making sure that AI doesn’t have censorship or doesn’t have ideological biases embedded of any kind. But having said that, what we are trying to battle right now with this executive order is we don’t want a patchwork of regulation. We are still very, very early when it comes to AI. And we don’t want to hinder innovation by having bureaucratic red tape or having in America 50 different states with 50 different rules that entrepreneurs have to deal with before they launch something.
So that’s been our approach. So it’s more about coherence and predictability and certainty that allows innovation. So, yes, we need clarity in regulation so that entrepreneurs can do what they do best.
I think this has been a fantastic conversation. 20 minutes of pure content. So thank you very much to all three of you for coming to India, for sharing your wisdom with us. And, of course, best of luck for your AI journeys. And hopefully our paths will intersect and we will build a prosperous future together. Thank you very much.
Please join me in applauding this. Thank you so much, Your Excellencies, for this insightful and enriching conversation. I thank Her Excellency Paula Poganty Zamora, His Excellency Omar Al -Olamah, Mr. Shriram Krishnan, and also Dr. Samir Surin for moderating this conversation. Ladies and gentlemen.
The Trump administration seeks to facilitate global participation in AI infrastructure development, representing a significant shift from the previous administration’s focus on controlling and restric…
EventThis panel discussion focused on the global impact and diffusion of artificial intelligence, featuring ministers and policy advisors from the United States, United Arab Emirates, and Costa Rica. The c…
Event### Government Priorities: Capacity and Implementation Melinda Claybaugh: Thank you so much for the question, and thank you for the opportunity to be here. As you were giving the opening remarks and …
EventDuring the9821st meetingof the Artificial Intelligence Security Council, a key discussion centered around whether existing frameworks like the IAEA, ICAO, or IPCC could serve as models for effective g…
EventWhat next for the Global Dialogue on AI Governance?The Global Dialogue on AI Governance is currently under development within the United Nations framework as part of the Global Digital Compact impleme…
EventDai Wei: Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, good day to you all. I’m delighted to join you in this United Nations Internet Governance Forum. On behalf of the Internet Society of China, I woul…
Event8. Regional Cooperation: Representatives from various regional organizations emphasized their role in supporting multilateralism and implementing global commitments at the regional level.
Event– **Innovation focus** – Each representative emphasized avoiding over-regulation that could stifle technological advancement The discussion revealed both convergence and divergence in national AI gov…
EventArtificial intelligence | Capacity development | Social and economic development
EventSocial and economic development Social and economic development | Artificial intelligence
Event“Look at the speed of diffusion.”<a href=”https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/conversation-01?diplo-deep-link-text=You+cannot+think+of+AI+without+5G.%3D%3D%3DSENTENCE%3D%3D%3DYou+canno…
EventThis panel discussion explored the role of artificial intelligence in promoting collective good and addressing societal challenges, featuring experts from academia, government, and industry. The moder…
EventThe overall tone was formal yet appreciative. There was a sense of accomplishment and gratitude expressed throughout, with multiple speakers thanking organizers and participants. The tone became more …
EventThe overall tone was formal yet warm and celebratory. Speakers expressed pride in the IFDT’s accomplishments and gratitude towards the host country, Montenegro. There was an underlying sense of urgenc…
EventThe tone throughout is consistently formal, diplomatic, and collaborative. Speakers maintain an optimistic and forward-looking perspective, emphasizing partnership and shared responsibility. The discu…
EventThe tone is consistently positive, celebratory, and grateful throughout the discussion. It begins with formal appreciation and maintains an upbeat, accomplished atmosphere. The speakers express relief…
EventThe overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers highlighting the transformative potential of technology for government. There was a sense of urgency about the need for governments t…
EventThe tone was generally optimistic and forward-looking, with panelists highlighting opportunities for innovation and progress. However, there were also notes of caution about hype and unrealistic expec…
EventThe tone was consistently optimistic and empowering throughout the discussion. Speakers maintained an enthusiastic, forward-looking perspective while acknowledging challenges. The conversation was col…
EventMoreover, the speakers argue that AI can drive productivity, creativity, and overall economic growth. It has the capacity to significantly enhance various sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, educ…
EventThe tone is consistently inspirational and collaborative throughout. The speaker maintains an optimistic, forward-looking perspective while emphasizing inclusivity and global cooperation. There is a s…
EventFurthermore, their position can be perceived as a strategic and insightful move, signalling to other delegates their wider perspectives on the negotiation process—that they value the efficacy of the a…
EventIn conclusion, Vanuatu’s approach is both collaborative and realistic, exemplifying a balance between aspirational perfection and practical functionality in documentary texts. The delegation promotes …
EventBoth instances of diplomatic engagement are infused with positive sentiment, denoting an inclusive and amenable foreign policy stance. Israel exhibits a readiness to consider diverse international per…
EventAlbania’s acknowledgement of the “distinguished delegations” alludes to a series of constructive contributions that had already shaped the debate, thus negating any necessity for Albania to elaborate …
EventIts stances reflect a nation that values stakeholder consultation, demands legal clarity, favours preserving protocol constancy, and supports strong institutional roles, all while advocating for pragm…
Event– Appreciation was shown for the multifaceted collaborations amongst attendees, with special praise for the interns and the UN team for advancing collective progress. – The formal acknowledgement of S…
EventIn conclusion, the delegate reiterated his gratitude, acknowledging the extensive labours and patience exhibited by the Chairperson and all stakeholders. The closing sentiments fostered a sense of sol…
EventParticipants expressed gratitude to the organizers and hosts, and made suggestions for follow-up actions, such as sharing the outcome document with parliament speakers worldwide and curating capacity-…
EventThe tone is consistently celebratory, optimistic, and forward-looking throughout the discussion. It maintains an enthusiastic and grateful atmosphere, with speakers expressing appreciation for partici…
Event“Sriram Krishnan outlined a three‑pillar strategy for the U.S. AI Action Plan: infrastructure, innovation, and international sharing/partnership.”
The knowledge base states that Secretary S. Krishnan outlined three key priorities – building infrastructure, focusing on innovation, and maintaining a spirit of partnership – matching the report’s description [S3].
“The United States is exporting advanced AI chips and models to the UAE as part of an AI Accelerator partnership.”
U.S. approvals for advanced AI chip exports to the UAE are documented, including a Microsoft-operated facility partnership and Nvidia licences, confirming the export component of the partnership [S112] and [S113].
“Costa Rica is collaborating with the OECD on an AI‑readiness toolkit to help countries assess gaps and plan improvements.”
The knowledge base notes that Costa Rica, together with the OECD, is leading the development of the OECD AI Policy Toolkit for translating principles into implementation [S12] and that an OECD toolkit is a focus of the Open Forum discussion [S101].
“Costa Rica is moving from receiving international cooperation to providing knowledge and tools to regional neighbours, positioning itself as a regional AI hub.”
Additional context shows Costa Rica’s strategy development with over 50 institutions and its transition toward regional knowledge sharing, supporting the report’s regional-coalition ambition [S60].
The panel shows strong convergence on three fronts: the need for multilateral cooperation, the preference for proportionate and context‑specific regulation, and the view of AI as a tool for societal betterment. These shared positions cut across diverse national contexts, indicating a broad consensus that AI policy should be collaborative, balanced, and human‑centred.
High consensus – the alignment across all three panelists on these core themes suggests that future AI initiatives are likely to be shaped by inclusive multilateral frameworks, incremental regulatory approaches, and development‑oriented objectives, facilitating coordinated global progress.
The panel displayed consensus on the importance of AI cooperation and the need for regulation, but diverged sharply on the purpose of diffusion (quality of life vs strategic/innovation), the preferred architecture of multilateral governance (UAE‑led global hub vs regional alliances), and the regulatory methodology (incremental stakeholder‑engaged vs uniform, data‑focused frameworks).
Moderate to high disagreement across strategic and policy dimensions, indicating that while participants share common goals, their national contexts drive distinct pathways. This fragmentation could hinder the formation of cohesive global AI governance unless reconciled through inclusive dialogue that respects differing priorities.
The discussion was shaped by a series of pivotal remarks that moved the dialogue from high‑level aspirations to concrete strategies. Early comments from the U.S. and UAE established contrasting national priorities—innovation infrastructure versus quality‑of‑life diffusion—while Paula’s diagnostic toolkit introduced a practical method for assessing readiness. Omar’s vision of the UAE as a global convener and his ChatGPT example reframed regulation as a gradual, inclusive process, prompting both Paula and Sriram to articulate nuanced, context‑specific regulatory philosophies. Collectively, these insights deepened the conversation, shifted its focus toward multilateral cooperation, and highlighted the tension between rapid AI adoption and the need for adaptable, equitable governance frameworks.
Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.
Related event

