Keynote by Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President European Commission

26 May 2026 14:00h - 14:30h

Keynote by Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President European Commission

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The session began with Florence Ranson introducing a “mini-session” to let participants meet each other and to prepare for a direct dialogue with the European Commission’s Executive Vice-President, Henna Virkkunen [1][3-9]. After a quick poll of the audience’s age, experience and nationality, Ranson explained that questions could be submitted via Slido and that about twenty minutes would be reserved for the Q&A [6-9][10-12].


Virkkunen opened her remarks by celebrating the 20-year anniversary of the .eu domain, noting that it is now the ninth-largest country-code top-level domain and has provided a pan-European digital identity that strengthens the single market [28-33][34-35]. She emphasized that the internet’s two core foundations-global interconnectivity and a multi-stakeholder governance model-remain essential, even as the environment has shifted toward concentration of power, strategic dependencies and hostile online threats [42-45][48-51]. Europe’s vision for the next decade, according to Virkkunen, is an open, global, interoperable internet that respects human rights, diversity and fair opportunities, and she linked this to the WSIS + 20 outcome that reaffirms the multi-stakeholder approach and the permanent mandate of the Internet Governance Forum [54-57][58-63].


While Europe has led in digital regulation through the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act, Virkkunen warned that reliance on foreign-controlled technologies creates economic, security and strategic vulnerabilities, making technological sovereignty a priority [67-73][74-79]. She announced a forthcoming “tech sovereignty package” that will include an updated GIPSAX 2.0 for semiconductors, a Cloud and AI Development Act to create a sovereign cloud, and an EU open-source strategy to boost autonomy and openness [83-86][143-145].


In the Q&A, Virkkunen highlighted that Europe’s strength in quantum research must be matched by market access and financing for startups, and that the Commission is working on a “quantum act” and capital-markets union to support scaling [105-111]. She named Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the UK and Brazil as trusted partners for building digital-sovereignty capacity and resilient supply chains [114-119]. Regarding security, she said the Commission is revising cyber-security rules to address risks in critical infrastructure across sectors such as 5G, energy and health, and that the upcoming tech-sovereignty package will define a sovereign cloud with data localisation for sensitive services [122-129]. To boost AI competitiveness, the Commission is investing in “AI factories” that provide computing power, high-quality data sets and talent to European startups and SMEs, while also supporting AI uptake in the public sector and industry [133-139]. On open source, Virkkunen confirmed it will be a key element of the tech-sovereignty package, aiming to strengthen home-grown technologies through a strategic open-source action plan [143-145]. She noted that Europe has over €30 trillion in private savings but that mobilising these funds for investment requires tax incentives and encouraging institutional investors to favour European markets rather than the United States [148-155][158-160].


The discussion concluded with Ranson thanking Virkkunen and inviting .eu and EURID colleagues on stage, underscoring the collective effort needed to shape the future of the internet and European digital sovereignty [166-170].


Keypoints

Major discussion points


.eu domain anniversary and its role in European digital identity – The Vice-President highlighted that .eu turned 20 years old, is now the ninth-largest country-code TLD and provides a pan-European digital identity that strengthens the single market and offers reliable, resilient services. [28-33]


Preserving an open, global internet while confronting new challenges – She noted that the internet’s core principles (global inter-operability and multi-stakeholder governance) remain essential, but the environment has shifted dramatically with concentration of power, strategic dependencies and hostile online threats, requiring proactive action. [46-53][55-57]


European technological sovereignty and the forthcoming “tech-sovereignty package” – Technological sovereignty is framed as the ability to develop, control and scale critical technologies (semiconductors, cloud, AI) without isolation. The package to be presented includes GIPSAX 2.0 for semiconductors, a Cloud and AI Development Act, and an EU open-source strategy, all aimed at reinforcing autonomy while staying open. [70-80][83-86]


Concrete measures to boost innovation and investment in key sectors – Examples given were the need to scale quantum-related startups and provide market access and financing ([105-111]), the creation of “AI factories” that combine computing capacity, high-quality data and talent to support 8 000 AI startups ([133-139]), and the promotion of open-source technologies as a strategic asset ([143-145]).


Security, critical-infrastructure protection and international cooperation – Revised cybersecurity rules, a sovereign cloud with data localisation, and risk-vendor mitigation are being pursued to safeguard critical sectors ([122-129]). The EU also seeks partnerships with like-minded countries (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, UK, Brazil, enlargement states) to build resilience in supply chains and share expertise ([114-119]).


Mobilising private capital for digital sovereignty – With over €30 trillion in European savings, the challenge is to channel household and institutional funds into European tech ventures, reduce reliance on non-EU markets, and support large-scale financing for growth-stage companies ([148-164]).


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The session was designed to (1) celebrate the .eu milestone, (2) inform participants about the EU’s upcoming digital and tech-sovereignty agenda, (3) gather and answer audience questions for Vice-President Henna Virkkunen, and (4) reinforce the multi-stakeholder, collaborative approach needed to shape Europe’s future internet governance, security, and innovation landscape.


Tone of the discussion


Opening: upbeat, inclusive, and celebratory, emphasizing community (“under-30”, “old timers”, “broad geographical spread”) and the significance of the .eu anniversary.


Mid-section: shifts to a more serious, policy-focused tone, outlining challenges (concentration of power, security threats) and the urgency of action.


Later part: becomes technical and solution-oriented, detailing concrete initiatives (quantum, AI factories, open-source strategy) while remaining optimistic and collaborative.


Closing: returns to a constructive, forward-looking tone, thanking participants and encouraging continued joint effort across Europe and global partners.


Overall, the tone moves from celebratory to urgent policy discussion and ends on a hopeful, cooperative note.


Speakers

Florence Ranson – Moderator and session host for the EuroDIG mini‑session, facilitating audience interaction and managing the Q&A process.


Henna Virkkunen – Executive Vice President of the European Commission, in charge of tech sovereignty, security and democracy; expertise in digital policy, internet governance, and European digital strategy.


Additional speakers:


João – Technical moderator responsible for monitoring audience questions submitted through Slido.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The session opened with Florence Ranson framing a “mini-session” as an ice-breaker and a chance for participants to learn who sits beside them in the room. She quickly gauged the audience’s composition – age, repeat attendance and national origin – to illustrate the broad geographical spread and to underline that the ensuing discussion would have a truly global relevance [1][3-9]. Ranson then announced that the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission, Henna Virkkunen, would join the meeting and invited attendees to submit questions via the Slido platform, reserving roughly twenty minutes of the half-hour for a direct dialogue with the Vice-President [6-9][10-12]. After the brief housekeeping, Florence introduced Vice President Virkkunen, who delivered the keynote address.


Virkkunen began by celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the .eu domain, noting that it is now the ninth-largest country-code top-level domain worldwide and that it has provided a pan-European digital identity which strengthens the single market and offers reliable, resilient services [27-33][34-35]. She thanked the .eu community and presented the anniversary as both a milestone and the start of a new chapter for European internet governance [36-38]. Virkkunen then reminded the audience of the two core foundations of the Internet – a global network of interoperable systems and a multi-stakeholder governance model – and argued that these have served Europe well, even though the surrounding environment has shifted dramatically. Concentration of power, strategic dependencies in semiconductors, cloud and AI, and an increasingly hostile online climate (cyber-threats, disinformation, harmful content) now demand proactive action [42-45][46-53]. She outlined Europe’s vision for the next decade: an open, global, interoperable Internet that respects human rights, protects diversity, fosters innovation and guarantees fair opportunities [54-57].


Virkkunen highlighted the recent WSIS + 20 outcome, which reaffirmed the multi-stakeholder model and gave the Internet Governance Forum a permanent mandate [58-63]. She stressed that while Europe has already led the world in digital regulation through the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act – setting global benchmarks for a safer, fairer digital environment – regulation alone is insufficient. The EU remains overly dependent on critical technologies that are developed and controlled outside Europe, creating economic, security and strategic vulnerabilities [67-73]. Technological sovereignty, she explained, is not isolationist; it means Europe must be able to develop, maintain, control and scale critical technologies while remaining open to cooperation [74-79].


To operationalise this ambition, Virkkunen announced a “tech-sovereignty package” to be presented on 3 June. The package will comprise an updated GIPSAX 2.0 to reinforce the semiconductor ecosystem and supply-chain resilience, a Cloud and AI Development Act to create a sovereign European cloud, and an EU open-source strategy to boost technological autonomy while remaining open [83-86].


Virkkunen stressed that technological sovereignty does not mean Europe will close itself off. The Union will continue to cooperate with trusted, like-minded partners – Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the UK and Brazil – to build capacity, enhance supply-chain resilience and share expertise [114-119]. She also outlined the EU’s security-focused measures: a revision of EU cyber-security rules that will assess and mitigate risks across 18 identified sectors, identify high-risk vendors, and, through the sovereign cloud concept, keep data for sensitive services within Europe [122-129].


The Q&A began with a question on how the EU will keep pace with “emergency” technologies such as quantum [102-104]. Virkkunen replied that Europe already leads in quantum research, but the challenge lies in moving innovations from the lab to the market. She called for better market access, financing and the removal of cross-border obstacles, linking these needs to the Capital Markets Union and the competitiveness compass [105-112].


A follow-up question asked about the EU’s strategy for cooperation with other countries on digital sovereignty [113]. Virkkunen listed the same partner states – Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the UK and Brazil – and explained that joint projects will focus on building capacity, strengthening supply-chain resilience and sharing expertise [114-119].


When asked how the EU is fostering digital sovereignty to protect national security interests [120-121], Virkkunen described the ongoing revision of cyber-security rules that will identify high-risk vendors in 18 critical-infrastructure sectors (including 5G, energy, water, health) and outline mitigation measures. She also noted that the upcoming tech-sovereignty package will define a sovereign cloud, ensuring that data for critical services is stored and controlled in Europe [122-129].


The discussion then turned to AI. After a question on combining EU data and services and on AI competitiveness versus AI sovereignty [131-132], Virkkunen highlighted that Europe hosts roughly 8,000 AI startups, many of which lack sufficient computing capacity. She announced the creation of “AI factories” – a network of 19 facilities that will provide European startups and SMEs with high-performance computing capacity, high-quality data sets and talent to boost AI innovation and support AI uptake across the public sector, industry and SMEs [133-139].


Open-source software and standards were next on the agenda. Ranson asked whether they are important for Europe’s digital resilience [140-142]; Virkkunen confirmed that an open-source strategy will be a key element of the tech-sovereignty package, arguing that strategic use of open-source can strengthen home-grown technologies and enhance the EU’s competitive edge [143-145].


Finally, Ranson queried how private capital can be mobilised for digital sovereignty [146-147]. Virkkunen pointed out that Europe holds more than €30 trillion in household savings [148-150], but that mobilisation requires tax incentives, supportive pension-fund policies and a Savings & Investments Union to redirect savings and institutional investment from non-EU markets into European tech projects. She acknowledged the difficulty of securing large-ticket financing for growth-stage companies and pledged to work on mechanisms that will enable such investments [160-164].


The session concluded with Ranson thanking Vice-President Virkkunen for her answers, noting that a few additional questions remained unanswered, and inviting .eu and EURID colleagues to join a group photo on stage [166-170]. The overall tone moved from an upbeat, inclusive opening, through a serious policy-focused middle, to a hopeful closing that reinforced the need for collaborative, multi-stakeholder effort to shape Europe’s digital future [96-98].


In sum, the mini-session served to (1) celebrate the .eu domain as a tangible example of European digital identity, (2) outline the EU’s vision for an open yet sovereign Internet, (3) present concrete legislative tools – GIPSAX 2.0, the Cloud & AI Development Act and an open-source strategy – and (4) gather stakeholder questions that highlighted the importance of scaling quantum and AI innovations, securing critical infrastructure, fostering international partnerships and mobilising private capital. The dialogue exemplified the EU’s commitment to a multi-stakeholder, inclusive approach to internet governance and digital sovereignty.


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Florence Ranson

we have uh we promised a a mini session so a mini session it will be indeed but um we’re going to have a little exchange of information with you a couple of points first of all we’d like to get to know you better but and we also thought it was a good opportunity for you to know one another better know your neighbors to the left to the right who’s in front who’s at the back what’s the general picture like in our room so i’m going to ask a couple of questions and ask you for a show of hands so how many of you here are under 30 hey look at this all the youth day crowd we heard it’s the 19th edition of euro dig so who’s here for the first time not just the younger crowd but yeah great well done who’s here for the second or third time few less who’s been here more than five times already five times or more yes that’s right i was gonna say the old timers with absolutely i mean take it from me that’s all right i can say that so and uh who is from eu so who’s from an eu member state vast majority okay who’s from an european country but non -eu hey very good to have you on board and who’s not from europe very good a pretty broad geographical spread then which means also that all the exchanges that we’re having are all the more valid because it brings us back to the conversation we were having earlier about the global impact of what we do.

So let’s move on to what lies ahead now. As you know, we’re going to welcome the Executive Vice President of the Commission, Henna Virkkunen and we’d like for you to ask her questions. She’s taken up the challenge of having a dialogue with you because this is the way this event is built, as I said, not just another conference. So she’s decided to give you the chance of having a direct dialogue with her. And to do so, we’re going to invite you to send your questions through Slido so that questions are short and to the point, and we give the same chance to those of you in the room and those of you online. So the QR code is you can test your connection to the website or not to the website, to the Slido side so that when the time comes, you can ask her questions.

And we’re going to try and set aside about 20 minutes for questions out of our half hour. So we rely on you. It’s your chance. And it’s your chance to target questions at the highest political level. And we heard this morning from some of our speakers what lies ahead in the commission, what lies ahead in terms of future plans. We heard some very interesting points also when it came to the quantum space and what lies ahead in that field as well. So all these topics. future plans, future developments, positioning of the EU, the trust, the future developments of .eu, all these questions are of course open. So I’m getting some news here that I can, the vice president has just entered the building, so she will be with us in a minute.

So practice your questions, rehearse, take them down as she speaks, but also put them down, stepping from the experience of what we’ve heard so far, and we definitely rely on you for a strong exchange. We rely on you online as well. João is there, he’s going to be monitoring the questions. Same rules apply, either you send your questions, no, you’re not going to be able to speak on this time, I was going to say something stupid, you’re not going to be able to speak on this time, you don’t send the questions in the chat, preferably send them through Slido. If by mistake you send them in the chat, we’re going to try and pick them up.

But please use Slido like all the audience here in the room. So it’s a pleasure to now welcome our keynote speaker for this afternoon. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Vice President Virkkunen who’s in charge of the tech sovereignty, security and democracy at the European Commission. Good afternoon, Madam Vice President and welcome. We were waiting for you. I was kind of speaking on until you joined. So that’s perfect. In the last

Henna Virkkunen

Thank you very much, honourable guests, ladies and gentlemen. And happy birthday to .eu. 20 years ago, .eu was launched as a digital symbol of European unity. And today, it is the ninth largest country code top -level domain in the world. It has given our businesses, citizens and organizations a truly pan -European digital identity. So I think it’s a great occasion today to celebrate this achievement. And it’s clear that it has also strengthened our single market. And importantly, it has also done so with a very remarkable reliability, resilience and security. And this is not a small achievement. So I want to warmly thank your read, your dig and all those who have helped make .eu a success story for Europe.

Because this is not only an anniversary for us. This is also and it’s a beginning of a new chapter. For internet governance. If my 20 years younger self could see today’s internet, she would barely recognize it. Because as we remember, in 2006, Wi -Fi was still something very luxury, and public hotspots were very rare, and personal blogs felt cutting edge during that time. And today we see that internet, of course, is everywhere. It underpins our economies, our democracies, also our security, our societies, and increasingly also our daily lives. And yet, for all that has changed, two core foundations remain very essential. First, the internet remains a global network of interconnected and interoperable systems. And second, its governance has been strongest when built through the multi -stakeholder model.

And these foundations, they have served us very well. But the environment around them has changed very dramatically. The internet was meant to be open and also meant to be decentralized and full of opportunity. Yet today we see increasing concentration of power, wealth and technological capability. Also persistent digital devices, which many still exclude from meaningful connectivity. And also we see growing strategic dependencies in critical technologies such as semiconductors, cloud or AI. And an increasingly hostile online environment we see also from cyber threats and disinformation to very harmful content affecting children and young people. And this means that preserving the internet’s openness cannot mean that we are standing still. It really requires our action. Europe’s vision for the next decade is very clear.

We want an internet that remains open, remains global and remains interoperable. An internet where human rights are respected, also diversity is protected, innovation can flourish and fair opportunities exist for all. And that brings me to why WSIS plus 20. The conclusion of these negotiations last year, it was an important milestone for all of us. This decision to reaffirm the multi -stakeholder model and to give the Internet Governance Forum a permanent mandate matters greatly. Because Internet Governance works best when governments, industry, our civil society, academia and the technical community work all together. And regional and national dialogues matter too. As the WSIS plus 20 outcome rightly recognizes, forums like YouTube, EURODIG are very essential. because they build trust, they also enable open exchange, and they ensure that Internet governance remains inclusive, grounded, and legitimate.

It’s very important to underline that Europe remains fully committed to the multi -stakeholder model of Internet governance. And I encourage European stakeholders, including country -code top -level domain operators and the .eu community to remain active and ambitious in these processes. Because Europe must continue to help shape the global conversation. But there is also another reality we must confront. Europe has been very strong in shaping digital rules. The Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act, they are setting global benchmarks for a safer and fairer digital environment. And I think that’s very important. But we also see that regulation is not enough. Europe remains too dependent on technological and technologies developed and controlled elsewhere than in Europe.

And this is clearly an economic vulnerability, a security vulnerability and increasingly also a strategic vulnerability for us. And this is why technological sovereignty also matters. Technological sovereignty is not about isolation. It’s not about closing ourselves off. It is about Europe having the capability to develop and to maintain and to control and scale the critical technologies and infrastructures on which our economy, our security and our democracy depend. It’s also preserving our ability to make strategic choices. And it’s about ensuring that our values are reflected in the digital systems we rely on. And in this sense, .eu. is more than a domain name. It is a very concrete example of European digital sovereignty in practice. A trusted European digital infrastructure, a competitive European asset, and a proof that sovereignty and openness can reinforce each other.

This same thinking will guide the next phase of Europe’s digital agenda. On the 3rd of June, or next week, I will present our tech sovereignty package designed to strengthen Europe’s capabilities in critical technologies. And this package will include, first, Gipsax 2 .0 to reinforce Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem and supply chain resilience. Second, a Cloud and AI Development Act to strengthen Europe’s sovereign digital infrastructure. And third, an EU open source strategy, including for our institutions, to reinforce technological autonomy and openness. But I want to very much stress one final point for you. Because technological sovereignty does not mean doing everything alone. It’s very important to underline that Europe remains open. We believe in cooperation. We believe in trusted partnerships.

And we believe that a more competitive, more diverse, more choice -driven digital ecosystem benefits everybody. Because reducing unhealthy dependencies does not weaken the open Internet. It makes it more resilient. Ladies and gentlemen, dear participants, the future of the Internet will not be shaped by technology alone. It will be shaped by choices, by governance, by cooperation, and by whether we remain faithful to the principles that made the Internet such a transformative force in the first place. So I want to thank everybody for being part of this conversation here in Brussels and also online, because we know that Europe voice really matters and the future of the Internet is something we must shape all together. So thank you and congratulations for all of you.

Florence Ranson

So as I announced, please take a seat. As I announced, Vice President Virkkunen has very kindly agreed to take your questions and we have already received several. So I’m going to raise the questions we have received online. As you probably know, we had a session this morning discussing quantum and we heard that you’re going to have a meeting tomorrow discussing it further. So we have a question here asking, how are we going to manage? How are we going to make sure we keep up with emergencies technologies like quantum?

Henna Virkkunen

yeah i think let’s see yes it works yes i think especially when we speak about quantum of course this is certainly a field where europe is very strong so you know very well that our researchers and scientists they are world top when it comes to quantum and our researchers they are they are leading in the scientific publications on quantum but then now we have to really make sure that all our great innovations on quantum that they can enter to the markets in the european union and also that our very promising startups which are working on quantum that they are able to scale up their businesses in europe often it has happened that we are creating great innovations in europe so we are not having a gap on innovations but we have really problem on scaling up the businesses so so to make sure that our innovations they have access to markets and access to financing so these are the most important things that we are able to do and i think that’s a really important thing important priorities for this commission And that’s why we are working with our competitiveness compass also to create better capital markets union, to give better funding opportunities for our businesses.

And also we want to remove the obstacles between our member states to really also use the full potential of our digital single market. But these are clearly also the challenges we have been identifying. So we see that we have many strengths in the European Union. I think we have great basis because we have so excellent science and research and also so huge potential in our startups. But now really the areas where we have to work is to give opportunities to scale up the businesses in Europe, to enter to the markets in the European Union and also to have access to finance in the European Union. Because otherwise we are losing too many of our very promising innovations to other markets.

And quantum is certainly something where we are now working very closely with the stakeholders towards our quantum act.

Florence Ranson

And what is the EU strategy for closer cooperation with other like -minded countries in Europe and globally on digital sovereignty?

Henna Virkkunen

Yes, our very clear partners when it comes to digital sovereignty are, of course, the countries with whom we have already digital partnerships. So I would like to mention countries like Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada. They are very close partners for us and we are working closely with them to look also the challenges all of us are facing nowadays globally. So we want to build up our own capacity and also better resilience for our supply chains. And of course, also all our enlargement countries next to us are very important partners. UK as well, Brazil, for example. there is several countries all over the world who are very willing to work together with European Union and in the same time when we see clearly that we have to build up our own capacity we want to also work very closely with our trusted partners especially when we look at different supply chains which are nowadays very global so to build better resilience there and also share expertise together with our partners.

Florence Ranson

Building up on the digital sovereignty question we have another one that asks in what way is the EU fostering digital sovereignty to protect national security interests? I suppose that refers to national as the EU as a whole.

Henna Virkkunen

We are now living in the world that we have to always look to security aspects. We have to look to economic security that we don’t have that kind of risky dependencies which can be like weaponized against us but we have to also look the overall security aspects. Of each initiative what we are making especially when it comes to digital domain already in this year we have adopted and proposed our our legislation to to revise our cyber security rules and there we were addressing also our critical infrastructure that we were proposing as a commission that we will look now all the fields of our critical infrastructure which is uh uh totally 18 different areas defined in our niche two directive uh that what kind of risky components we have there uh and how we are able also to to assess and mitigate those risks what what uh um these different stakeholders there and companies are posing so really to look that we don’t have high risk vendors inside in our critical infrastructure and if there’s high risk vendors what are the critical components and how we are mitigating those risks so we are looking all the rest we have been already focusing during the last years to 5g networks but now we are also looking at the critical fields of our critical infrastructure and how we are mitigating those risks so we are looking all the fields like financing energy water uh health care so all this sector, that what kind of risks there could be in this value chain, this ICT supply chain, and how we are mitigating those risks.

And also on next week, when we will propose our tech sovereignty package, one important part of that is AI and Cloud Development Act. And there we are also defining a sovereign cloud, that what does it mean to have a sovereign cloud. And we see that clearly there is that kind of very sensitive areas in our economy, very critical sectors, where it’s important, for example, that the cloud is controlled by Europeans and also that the data is localized in Europe. It’s not the case in all the services, of course, but when we speak about very critical services of our economies, we have to be also, we have to look that we are able to control always the information and data and their services in all circumstances.

So we are working on that. Thank you.

Florence Ranson

And how do you believe we can combine the data and the services of the European Union? Thank you. And how do you believe we can combine AI competitiveness with AI sovereignty?

Henna Virkkunen

can we uh i think we can so i’m i’m also uh i’m very sure that we have everything what is needed also to be very competitive in ai and in all technologies because like i said earlier that we have excellent research and science and we have so much potential in our startups and also we have very strong industrial bases as well but now we have to really boost the innovations and investments in the european union especially when it comes to ai we have there for example 8 000 startups which are developing and training ai and there’s huge potential but one big obstacle for them has been that they haven’t had access to computing capacity and that’s why together with our member states we are investing now into 19 ai factories to give this computing capacity for our startups and for our smes to train and develop ai created in europe And the idea around AI factories is really to bring together not only the computing capacity to train and develop AI, but also high quality data sets and also to talent and excellence of AI.

Because in the same time when we are working to develop our European AI, which is created by European content, by our languages, also it’s important to support all our businesses to uptake AI. In last year, already 50 % more businesses were using AI than a year before. So it has been increasing very fast, but still there’s big differences between the member states and between different industries and public sector. So we have very clear like two parts where we are now working. One is really to boost innovations and investments in AI, especially we are fostering this with the investments to computing capacity and also to building the competence and talent. But then another important sector is really to support our public sector, industries and SMEs to uptake AI.

Florence Ranson

Thank you. Then on to a different topic now. Do you think that open source and open standards are important for Europe’s digital resilience? And if so, how are you going to support them in practice?

Henna Virkkunen

Yes, it will be a very key part of our next week’s tech sovereignty package, our open source strategy, because we see that while using open source technologies, we can really boost our own homegrown technologies and our companies in European Union, they can get a great boost by that. So we should use it also more strategically. And next week, we will also propose our strategy and action plan on that.

Florence Ranson

How do we bring, we’re back to digital sovereignty, I take questions in the order in which they come. How do we bring private capital on board on digital sovereignty concretely and not just the big finance, but also large EU company and incumbents?

Henna Virkkunen

Yeah, the good news is that we have a lot of capital in the European Union. So we know that we have more than 30 trillion euros only in the bank accounts in the European Union. But of course, one main question is that we should really mobilize all these savings to investments. And one challenge is really our households, because European families and households, they tend to keep their savings on the bank accounts instead of investing them. There’s big differences between member states. In Nordics, more than 50 percent of the households, they are investing. They are investing to stock markets or to funds their savings. But in many big member states, it’s only a few percent of the households who are doing that.

So there we have to really also support our member states, because this is very much up to taxation. For example, in different member states, it’s how much they are encouraging, for example, citizens to really invest. savings. But then also when we speak about institutional investors and pension funds, there’s a lot of work we have to really do with them, that they are also investing more to European markets, because too often it happens that they are investing to USA markets instead of European Union. So we are working now with our savings and investments union package together with our Commissioner Albuquerque. We have also a very ambitious plan there, and I see that this is the most important part of our tech sovereignty, really to make sure that we are able to really mobilize now the capital also to support these investments which are needed.

I think nowadays it’s quite, we can’t maybe say that it’s easy, but there is much better opportunities now for the startup companies to get very early stage support. But when investments more than 50 million euros, 100 million euros are needed, it’s still very difficult to get that from Europe. And when we speak about technology companies, it’s crucial often for them to have big, big tickets. And there we have to work also that we are able to also give these opportunities for growth for those companies. Thank you very much.

Florence Ranson

Now, thanks a lot for answering our questions. I know there were maybe one or two more questions, but I’ve taken as many as possible. And I understand we’re now asking for a family photo with some of our colleagues. So I’ll leave, I’ll make room, and I’ll ask our .eu colleagues and EURID colleagues to join us on stage, please, together with you, Madam Vice President, and thank you very much for answering our questions. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (35)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (5)
Confirmedhigh

“Henna Virkkunen is the Executive Vice‑President of the European Commission for Technological Sovereignty, Security and Democracy.”

The opening ceremony transcript identifies Ms. Henna Virkkunen as the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission for Technological Sovereignty, Security and Democracy [S9].

Confirmedhigh

“After the brief housekeeping, Florence introduced Vice President Virkkunen, who delivered the keynote address.”

The same transcript shows Virkkunen delivering a keynote speech following the opening remarks, confirming she was introduced and spoke as the keynote speaker [S9].

Additional Contextmedium

“Virkkunen highlighted the recent WSIS + 20 outcome, which reaffirmed the multi‑stakeholder model and gave the Internet Governance Forum a permanent mandate.”

The knowledge base notes the EU’s continued support for the WSIS + 20 review and the multi-stakeholder approach, and references the WSIS + 20 outcome, though it does not explicitly state a permanent IGF mandate [S30] and [S9].

Confirmedhigh

“The EU has just adopted, earlier this month, a new international digital strategy implemented with partners worldwide.”

Virkkunen’s speech explicitly mentions that the European Union adopted a new international digital strategy earlier in the month [S9].

Additional Contextmedium

“Europe has led the world in digital regulation through the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, setting global benchmarks for a safer, fairer digital environment.”

EU digital policy documents reference the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act as flagship regulations, illustrating the EU’s leading role in digital regulation, though the knowledge base does not quantify a “global benchmark” status [S30].

External Sources (105)
S1
Florence N Bangalie — Florence N Bangalie
S2
Work for a brighter future — Professor General for Human Resources and Social Policy Chung has also served as Member of the UN …
S3
BREAK OUT ROOM 2: The Declaration for the Future of the Internet: Principles to Action — Catherine Townsend Speech speed 176 words per minute …
S4
Päivi Tynninen — Päivi Tynninen
S5
Sini Paukkunen — Sini Paukkunen
S6
Su Sonia Herring — https://diplo-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/2023/10/Su-Sonia.jpg Ms Su Sonia Herring completed her BA in Lin…
S7
A digital rEUnion for Europe — A European rEUnion is the concept under which Malta’s EU presidency took off on January 1. The smallest EU country will …
S8
Conference on Building Trust in Digital Identities — More and more governments around the world are implementing or exploring the implementation of digital identity (e-ID) s…
S9
Opening Ceremony — Also, no country is sidelined and that we can come together, work together, to build a consensual digital governance arc…
S10
Turbulent times in Internet governance: it’s time to think about the current model — Jean-Marie Chenou and Roxana Radu, authors of the book The Evolution of Global Internet Governance: Principles and Polic…
S11
Multistakeholder Model – Driver for Global Services and SDGs | IGF 2023 Open Forum #89 — The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is another entity that can benefit from the multi-stakeholder model. By embracing th…
S12
The Future of the Internet — A multi-stakeholder approach that facilitates the engagement and participation of all groups, including the civil societ…
S13
Digital sovereignty: The end of the open internet as we know it? (Part 1) — In the context of an offensive and chauvinist turn in US policy, the popular magazine The Economist suggested a range of…
S14
Digital sovereignty stack: Infrastructure, services, data, and AI knowledge — However, the less national governments have authority over the digital realm, the more digital sovereignty shifts to tec…
S15
EC proposes Chips Act to strengthen EU’s tech sovereignty — The EC has proposed a package of measures under the umbrella term ‘European Chips Act’ ‘to ensure the EU’s security of s…
S16
20 Keywords for the Digital 2020s: A Digital Policy Prediction Dictionary — Policymakers must recognise it too, and respond with cross-silo policy approaches.  Multilevel approaches should br…
S18
Critical infrastructure — The policies pertaining to Information Infrastructure are often called Critical Information Infrastructure Protection (C…
S19
UNIDIR 2022: Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Context of International Cyber Security — Date: Tuesday, 5th July (14:40–15:45 UTC | 16:40–17:45 CEST) Place: Geneva and online The session ‘Critical Infrastructu…
S20
Policy Meets Tech: Quantum computing — The fifth event in the ‘Policy Meets Tech’ series will be dedicated to quantum computing. Today’s computing systems, a…
S21
AI and international peace: A new kid on the UN Security Council block — Four, AI (especially with the support of upcoming quantum computing capabilities) will enhance breakthroughs in other fi…
S22
AI and Digital in 2023: From a winter of excitement to an autumn of clarity — In the words of president and CEO of the Connectivity Standards Alliance Tobin Richards: ‘Matter also raises the bar for…
S23
Shared code, shared risk: How are security responsibilities allocated? — Security and governance of open source software: Geneva Dialogue Masterclass #1 Description Cyber stability is incre…
S24
WS #81 Universal Standards for Digital Infrastructure Resiliency — I think we would be able to be in a situation where we don’t suffer from these threats. Alaa Abdulaal: If you allow …
S25
High Level Session 2: Digital Public Goods and Global Digital Cooperation — And we saw a short video here of Aten as well. And the Alten code, if anyone wants to use the Alten code, it’s possible …
S26
AI for Good Global Summit — And you can make your own judgment where things stand in that regard. Let me give you a second example, much earlier, a …
S27
Let’s design the next Global Dialogue on Ai & Metaverses | IGF 2023 Town Hall #25 — I think what Antoine presentation is quite clear about what the global dialogue on internet is happen. From my experienc…
S28
Citizen engagement: We lack ambition in design, not technology — “Whenever I am asked about the role of social media and new technologies for citizen engagement, I like to show the firs…
S29
World report on internationalised domain names — . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 5.1.3 Calm before the storm? New gTLD growth in …
S30
An International Digital Strategy for the European Union — Future activities may include institutionalising mechanisms to swiftly mobilise cybersecurity experts in case of cyber-a…
S31
European Commission: Public Consultation on the Evaluation and Revision of the .eu Top-Level Domain Regulations — The European Commission has launched a public consultation on the evaluation and revision of the Regulations for the .eu…
S32
The Declaration for the Future of the Internet: Principles to Action — However, this doesn’t diminish the inherent capacity of the Internet to enhance people’s trust in governmental instituti…
S33
Europe’s rush to innovate — Investors should be allowed the freedom to decide where to innovate, rather than being overly regulated. Greater control…
S34
Shaping Investment: Spurring Investment in Cyber Sector Start-Ups — Startups effectively adjust to these changing dynamics and help address existing and emerging threats. Topics: cyber…
S35
The open-source gambit: How America plans to outpace AI rivals by democratising tech — Most likely, this provision will affect states like California that have moved forward with AI regulatory frameworks. It…
S36
EU Digital Diplomacy: Geopolitical shift from focus on values to economic security  — Joint research initiatives are slated (quantum, semiconductor programs with Japan, Canada, South Korea). Australia Cy…
S37
Cybersecurity public-private partnerships in healthcare – Part 2 — Best practices and recommendations for public-private partnerships to protect health critical infrastructure Cybers…
S38
The Future of the Internet — A multi-stakeholder approach that facilitates the engagement and participation of all groups, including the civil societ…
S39
WS #209 Multistakeholder Best Practices: NM, GDC, WSIS & Beyond — Major Discussion Point The relationship between multi-stakeholder and multilateral processes Differed with Flavia …
S40
Public policy and the Internet – case studies of Enhanced Cooperation – — Public policy and the Internet – a timely study has recently been published on enhancing multistakeholder participation,…
S41
Digital Cooperation and Empowerment: Insights and Best Practices for Strengthening Multistakeholder and Inclusive Participation — Examples like internationalized domain names show how theory can be translated into practical results. Evidence Exam…
S42
An International Digital Strategy for the European Union — To increase connectivity and trade with the Eastern Partnership region, the EU will support targeted investments in digi…
S43
Europe’s rush to innovate — Investors should be allowed the freedom to decide where to innovate, rather than being overly regulated. Greater control…
S44
The geopolitics of digital standards: China’s role in standard-setting organisations — Box 22. Chinese-German cooperation on AV standards Besides its participation in international standardisation, China i…
S45
Shared code, shared risk: How are security responsibilities allocated? — Security and governance of open source software: Geneva Dialogue Masterclass #1 Description Cyber stability is incre…
S46
Digital sovereignty: The end of the open internet as we know it? (Part 1) — Although some tech companies are benefiting from a convergence of interests – AI companies provide an example – others a…
S47
EU Digital Diplomacy: Geopolitical shift from focus on values to economic security  — Moldova Security connectivity- Alignment with EU 5G Cybersecurity ToolboxDigital identities/DPI- Preparation for integra…
S48
Main Topic 3: Europe at the Crossroads: Digital and Cyber Strategy 2030 — Market diversity is particularly important for maintaining system resilience during conflicts. Evidence Some element…
S49
The strategic imperative of open source AI — c. 1995: TCP/IP emerges as the de facto global standard, having won the “Protocol Wars” through widespread, bottom-up ad…
S50
Connecting open code with policymakers to development | IGF 2023 WS #500 — Supporting facts: A strong European policy exists on open source There is a network of open source officers in…
S51
[WebDebate #46 summary] Unpacking the EU’s digital diplomacy and foreign policy — Foreign policies have for many years served as countries’ compass in their relations with each other. With the fast digi…
S52
A digital rEUnion for Europe — A European rEUnion is the concept under which Malta’s EU presidency took off on January 1. The smallest EU country will …
S53
World report on internationalised domain names — . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 5.1.3 Calm before the storm? New gTLD growth in …
S54
An International Digital Strategy for the European Union — Future activities may include institutionalising mechanisms to swiftly mobilise cybersecurity experts in case of cyber-a…
S55
European Commission: Public Consultation on the Evaluation and Revision of the .eu Top-Level Domain Regulations — The European Commission has launched a public consultation on the evaluation and revision of the Regulations for the .eu…
S56
Closing plenary: multistakeholderism for the governance of the digital world — Central to this vision is the pledge to enable free, safe, and open involvement for all participants, emphasising the cr…
S57
The Future of the Internet — A multi-stakeholder approach that facilitates the engagement and participation of all groups, including the civil societ…
S58
‘Our Common Agenda’ | Report of the UN Secretary-General — The Internet has provided access to information for billions, thereby fostering collaboration, connection and sustainabl…
S59
OPENING STATEMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS — Recent global events, like the COVID-19 pandemic, have underscored how vital the internet is in our modern age. It has b…
S60
Digital sovereignty stack: Infrastructure, services, data, and AI knowledge — However, the less national governments have authority over the digital realm, the more digital sovereignty shifts to tec…
S61
EC proposes Chips Act to strengthen EU’s tech sovereignty — The EC has proposed a package of measures under the umbrella term ‘European Chips Act’ ‘to ensure the EU’s security of s…
S62
Digital sovereignty: The end of the open internet as we know it? (Part 1) — Although some tech companies are benefiting from a convergence of interests – AI companies provide an example – others a…
S63
EU sets new rules for cloud sovereignty framework — The European Commission has launched its Cloud Sovereignty Framework to assess the independence of cloud services. The i…
S64
EC proposes Chips Act to strengthen EU’s tech sovereignty — The EC has proposed a package of measures under the umbrella term ‘European Chips Act’ ‘to ensure the EU’s security of s…
S65
The open-source gambit: How America plans to outpace AI rivals by democratising tech — Most likely, this provision will affect states like California that have moved forward with AI regulatory frameworks. It…
S66
A Vision for Quantum Technologies in the UK — This should be presented in a spanning the breadth of fundamental research, coordinated way across the…
S67
AI supremacy: One, two, three, go! — Legend has it that in the 13th century Dominican friar Albertus Magnus built an artificial ‘brazen head’ that could talk…
S68
United Kingodm’s National AI Strategy — Shown on a logarithmic scale. Source: OpenAI Access to computing power is essential to the development and use of AI, …
S69
EU Digital Diplomacy: Geopolitical shift from focus on values to economic security  — Joint research initiatives are slated (quantum, semiconductor programs with Japan, Canada, South Korea). Australia Cy…
S70
Cybersecurity public-private partnerships in healthcare – Part 2 — Unlike in the USA, where there is a tradition of big companies being the key business players, in the EU SMEs are repres…
S72
An overview of ‘People’s Money: Harnessing Digitalization to Finance a Sustainable Future’ — In the context of barriers, it suggests a people-centric approach that empowers citizens, and to that end favours digita…
S73
Opening — So technical progress must not be a zero-sum game where every winner creates a loser. Together we must fight for a digit…
S74
Opening of the EuroDIG2024 and Baltic Domain Days — And it’s my absolute pleasure to welcome you here in Vilnius today. And I’m really, absolutely amazed that we are gettin…
S75
Laying the foundations for AI governance — So that takes us back to governance. There you need to create the bodies that work with industry over time to share info…
S76
Mid-year review of digital policy: When technology meets humanity — 4. (2) Cybersecurity geopolitics: The search for new governance mechanisms In 2017, cybersecurity featured high in the…
S77
Living in an Unruly World: The Challenges We Face — Divisions run deep. The world in which we live was shaped by the principles of Western Europe, the core of which is the …
S78
Ten major trends in Internet governance (2017 mid-year review) — China, for example, who has long supported research in the field of AI, has recently released a national AI development …
S79
From summer disillusionment to autumn clarity: Ten lessons for AI — The model’s open-weight design meant researchers and developers worldwide could inspect and fine-tune it freely. DeepSee…
S80
AI optimism in geopolitically pessimistic Davos — In the serene backdrop of the Swiss Alps, the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos stands as a barometer for the year’s t…
S81
Quantum for Good: Shaping the future of quantum – What happens next? — At the same time, understanding nitrogen fixation, this is nowadays, this is relevant for fertilizers, for ammonia, and …
S82
Closing remarks – Charting the path forward — ### Environmental Sustainability Environmental considerations were highlighted as an integral part of AI governance, not…
S83
Day 4 of the 9th IGF in Istanbul — It’s over. The 9th IGF has come to a close and by now, most of Diplo’s team are back home or en route. It’s been a very …
S84
WSIS Forum 2017: Summary of Day 5 — The last day at the WSIS Forum 2017  featured discussions of topics such as access and connectivity, emerging technologi…
S85
Closing Remarks — The closing ambiance was a blend of introspection, celebration, and progressive thought, eagerly looking to the promise …
S86
Closing Plenary of Global Roundtable — It’s not intended as a criticism that things are not moving fast. It is not intended as a criticism that country X or co…
S87
IGF Bali: Day 0 — Hot and humid Balinese weather greeted the Diplo team as they touched down for the start of the 2013 Internet Governance…
S88
Online conference ‘The Future of Meetings’ — Watch the video Behaviour: Psychology | Culture | Emotions Track lead: Dr Tereza Horejsova (Director, Project Developmen…
S89
Meeting Spot for CSIRT Practitioners: Share Your Experiences | IGF 2023 Networking Session #44 — later, not kicking off at 8.30 in the morning. Anyway, I don’t want to spend too much time on me speaking. So now I’d li…
S90
The demography of the Internet Governance Forum — The IGF, like any other ecosystem, has its own demography. As can be seen in the illustration, the IGF ecosystem radiate…
S91
Intercultural communication conference — Attended by 70 participants from 36 different countries, the ‘International Conference on Intercultural Communication an…
S92
OPEN MIC – Taking Stock | IGF 2023 — This signifies a commitment to involving stakeholders in decision-making processes and fostering collaboration for furth…
S93
How to ensure the functional continuity of global diplomacy in time of crisis — In times of crisis, global cooperation is essential. Yet, COVID-19 has grounded global diplomacy with the cancellation o…
S94
The EU’s New Commission: Digital Policy in the Limelight (Briefing Paper #13) — The paper underlines that: In relation to technology and digital policy, there are ten key areas of relevance, includ…
S95
Technology and human rights in times of crisis — As our life shifts online and our daily functioning becomes increasingly dependent on technology, our online rights beco…
S96
ccTLD registries in the battle over the Internet: from ‘putting to sleep’ to ‘waking up’ — From the CENTR meeting, Brussels, 4 October 2012 The 48th General Assembly of CENTR, the European association of ccTLD r…
S97
Keynote address by Dr Jovan Kurbalija at the 10th Caribbean Ministerial Strategic Seminar (organised by the CTU) — The 10th Ministerial Strategic Seminar “The International ICT Agenda: Partnering for Regional Action” will focus on the …
S98
The Internet: an exceptional global public resource — Report from the first panel of the conference The Internet as a Global Public Resource (29‒30 April 2015): Official welc…
S99
Europe’s role in shaping the future of the Internet — The European Commission is undoubtedly a very active player in the Internet governance (IG) process. One of the most rec…
S100
Keynote: Ms Mariya Gabriel — https://dig.watch/wp-content/uploads/EuroDIG-LogoDEF-WEB_small-1.png [Read more session reports and live updates from th…
S101
Webinar digest: The European Commission and Internet governance — The European Commission is one of the long-standing actors in the Internet governance process. It shares its competence …
S102
[Briefing #51] Internet governance forecast for 2019 — The size, market power, and influence of giant companies have made policymakers (especially in the EU) very uncomfortabl…
S103
Next Steps for Digital Worlds — One speaker suggested that the focus should be on giving people an informed choice about the content they are addressing…
S104
Keynotes — And in other words, he must engage the challenges of, and I quote, human dignity, justice and labour. Now, Pope Leo has …
S105
The Pact for the Future (Final text) — 21. We commit by, 2030, to: (a) Foster an open, fair, inclusive and non-discriminatory digital environment for all tha…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
H
Henna Virkkunen
8 arguments148 words per minute2730 words1101 seconds
Argument 1
Celebration of the .eu domain and European digital identity
EXPLANATION
Henna marked the 20‑year anniversary of the .eu domain, presenting it as a symbol of European unity and a practical tool that gives businesses, citizens and organisations a pan‑European digital identity. She linked the domain’s success to the strengthening of the EU single market and highlighted its high reliability and security.
EVIDENCE
Henna explained that .eu was launched 20 years ago and is now the ninth largest country-code top-level domain worldwide, providing a truly pan-European digital identity for businesses, citizens and organisations. She emphasized that this has reinforced the single market and noted the domain’s remarkable reliability, resilience and security, thanking all contributors to its success [28-33].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of trusted digital identities is discussed in the Conference on Building Trust in Digital Identities [S8] and reinforced in the EU’s international digital strategy which highlights trusted digital identities [S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Celebrating .eu domain
Argument 2
Internet governance, multi‑stakeholder model and emerging challenges
EXPLANATION
Henna argued that the internet’s openness and interoperability are best protected through a multi‑stakeholder governance model, reaffirmed by the WSIS+20 outcome. She warned that growing concentration of power, strategic dependencies and a hostile online environment require proactive EU action.
EVIDENCE
She stated that the internet remains a global network of interoperable systems and that its governance works best when built through a multi-stakeholder model, a principle reaffirmed by the WSIS+20 decision granting a permanent mandate to the Internet Governance Forum [43-45][58-62]. She then described emerging challenges such as increasing concentration of power, strategic dependencies in semiconductors, cloud and AI, and a hostile online environment including cyber threats and disinformation, concluding that preserving openness requires active measures [46-52].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The multi-stakeholder model is reaffirmed in the IGF opening speech [S9] and examined for its legitimacy and challenges in recent analyses of internet governance [S10][S11]; concerns about its future are also raised in scholarly work on turbulent times for the model [S10].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Multi‑stakeholder internet governance
AGREED WITH
Florence Ranson
Argument 3
Technological sovereignty: definition and EU strategic package
EXPLANATION
Henna defined technological sovereignty as Europe’s ability to develop, control, scale and maintain critical technologies without isolating itself. She announced a forthcoming tech‑sovereignty package that includes GIPSAX 2.0, a Cloud and AI Development Act, and an Open‑Source strategy.
EVIDENCE
She clarified that technological sovereignty is not about isolation but about Europe having the capability to develop, control, scale and maintain critical technologies, ensuring strategic choices and value-aligned digital systems [74-78]. She then outlined the upcoming package: GIPSAX 2.0 to reinforce the semiconductor ecosystem, a Cloud and AI Development Act to strengthen sovereign digital infrastructure, and an Open-Source strategy for institutions to boost autonomy and openness [83-86].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The EU’s tech-sovereignty agenda aligns with the European Chips Act proposal that targets semiconductor capacity and strategic autonomy [S15]; broader discussions of digital sovereignty stacks provide context for the definition and scope of sovereignty [S14]; critical perspectives on the risks of a securitised digital sovereignty are presented in [S13].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
EU tech‑sovereignty package
Argument 4
International cooperation on digital sovereignty
EXPLANATION
Henna highlighted that the EU works closely with like‑minded countries such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the UK and Brazil to build capacity, enhance supply‑chain resilience and address shared digital challenges.
EVIDENCE
She listed partner countries-Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the United Kingdom and Brazil-stating that cooperation with these trusted partners aims to build capacity, improve supply-chain resilience and tackle common global challenges [114-119].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The EU’s international digital strategy stresses deepening partnerships with like-minded countries such as Japan, South Korea and Canada [S9]; the Chips Act framework explicitly includes cooperation with partner countries to ensure chip-supply continuity [S15].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Global digital‑sovereignty partnerships
AGREED WITH
Florence Ranson
Argument 5
Security and critical‑infrastructure protection
EXPLANATION
Henna announced revisions to EU cybersecurity rules that will assess and mitigate risks from high‑risk vendors across 18 critical‑infrastructure sectors. She also stressed the need for a sovereign cloud and data localisation for especially sensitive services.
EVIDENCE
She described the Commission’s proposal to revise cybersecurity rules, targeting 18 defined critical-infrastructure sectors to identify and mitigate risks from high-risk vendors, covering areas such as 5G, energy, water, health care and ICT supply chains [122-124]. She added that the forthcoming tech-sovereignty package will define a sovereign cloud, ensuring that critical services are controlled by Europeans and that data are localised within the EU for heightened security [125-128].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
EU critical-infrastructure protection policies are outlined in the European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection and related directives [S17][S18]; the UNIDIR conference on critical infrastructure highlights international approaches to cyber-security for essential sectors [S19]; standards for cybersecurity and resilience further support the EU’s measures [S22].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
EU cyber‑security and sovereign cloud
AGREED WITH
Florence Ranson
Argument 6
Supporting emerging technologies: quantum and AI
EXPLANATION
Henna explained that Europe’s strong quantum research must be linked to market uptake through financing, the Capital Markets Union and removal of cross‑border barriers. For AI, she introduced “AI factories” that will provide computing power, high‑quality data and talent to accelerate startups and SME adoption.
EVIDENCE
She noted that Europe leads in quantum research and publications, but to bridge innovation to market the EU needs better access to financing, a stronger Capital Markets Union and removal of obstacles between member states, emphasizing the importance of scaling up startups [105-112]. Regarding AI, she announced the creation of AI factories that will supply computing capacity, curated data sets and talent, aiming to boost AI startups and help public sector, industry and SMEs adopt AI, citing that AI uptake has already risen by 50 % in the past year [133-139].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy-oriented discussions on quantum computing and its policy implications are featured in the ‘Policy Meets Tech’ series [S20]; AI’s societal risks and governance challenges are examined in the AI and International Peace analysis [S21] and in AI-focused global dialogues [S27].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Quantum and AI development support
AGREED WITH
Florence Ranson
Argument 7
Open source and open standards for digital resilience
EXPLANATION
Henna stated that an open‑source strategy will be part of the upcoming tech‑sovereignty package, helping EU companies strengthen home‑grown technologies and overall digital resilience.
EVIDENCE
She affirmed that the forthcoming open-source strategy will boost home-grown technologies and enhance EU resilience, and that a concrete action plan will be presented in the next week’s tech-sovereignty package [143-145].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The EU’s commitment to open-source strategies is highlighted in the opening speech [S9]; security responsibilities of open-source software are analysed in the Geneva Dialogue masterclass [S23] and reinforced by calls for diversity and open-source resilience in critical infrastructure discussions [S24]; digital public-goods initiatives also stress open-source as a safety and security pillar [S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
EU open‑source strategy
AGREED WITH
Florence Ranson
Argument 8
Mobilising private capital for digital sovereignty
EXPLANATION
Henna highlighted that Europe holds around €30 trillion in household savings that need to be mobilised into tech investments, calling for policies that encourage household and institutional investment, and referencing the Savings & Investments Union as a vehicle for large‑scale funding.
EVIDENCE
She pointed out that the EU has over €30 trillion in bank-account savings, but most households keep these funds idle; she contrasted high household investment rates in the Nordics with low rates elsewhere, and called for tax-policy measures to stimulate investment [148-155]. She also mentioned the need to engage institutional investors and pension funds, noting that they often favour US markets, and described the Savings & Investments Union, coordinated with Commissioner Albuquerque, as a tool to channel capital into European tech projects [156-164].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Channeling EU savings into tech
AGREED WITH
Florence Ranson
F
Florence Ranson
1 argument140 words per minute1101 words470 seconds
Argument 1
Participatory dialogue and audience engagement
EXPLANATION
Florence explained that the session uses Slido to collect questions, ensuring equal participation for both in‑room and online attendees and giving them direct access to the Vice President. She also described the mini‑session as a networking opportunity to foster shared understanding among a diverse audience.
EVIDENCE
She instructed participants to submit questions via Slido so that both in-room and online audiences have the same chance to address the Vice President, emphasizing the 20-minute Q&A format and the role of a moderator to monitor submissions [6-21]. Earlier she described the mini-session as a chance for attendees to learn about each other, see who is sitting where, and build a broader picture of the room, thereby encouraging networking and diverse perspectives [1].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Digital dialogues and participatory engagement methods are explored in discussions on scaling citizen participation and digital deliberation [S26] and in analyses of citizen-engagement design that stress inclusive, interactive processes [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Interactive Q&A via Slido
AGREED WITH
Henna Virkkunen
Agreements
Agreement Points
Both speakers stress the importance of inclusive, multi‑stakeholder participation in shaping internet policy.
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
Internet governance, multi‑stakeholder model and emerging challenges Participatory dialogue and audience engagement
Henna argues that the internet’s openness and interoperability are best protected through a multi-stakeholder governance model and cites the WSIS+20 outcome [43-45][58-62]. Florence explains that the session uses Slido to give equal participation to in-room and online attendees, ensuring a direct dialogue with the Vice President [6-21].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This consensus mirrors the multi‑stakeholder principles enshrined in the WSIS outcomes and the IGF’s push for inclusive participation, as discussed in S38 and S39, and reinforced by recent best‑practice reports (S40, S41).
Both speakers highlight the need for international cooperation with like‑minded countries to advance EU digital sovereignty.
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
International cooperation on digital sovereignty EU strategy for closer cooperation with other like‑minded countries in Europe and globally on digital sovereignty
Henna lists partner countries such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the UK and Brazil as strategic allies for building capacity and supply-chain resilience [114-119]. Florence asks the Vice President about the EU’s strategy for such cooperation [113] and receives the same list in the answer [114-119].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The call for cooperation with like‑minded states reflects the EU’s external digital strategy that promotes joint investments and secure connectivity with partners such as the Eastern Partnership and Central Asia (S42), and aligns with the digital sovereignty discourse in S46 and the EU digital diplomacy framework outlined in S47 and S51.
Both speakers agree that Europe must actively support emerging technologies (quantum and AI) through financing, market access and dedicated infrastructure.
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
Supporting emerging technologies: quantum and AI How are we going to manage? How are we going to make sure we keep up with emergencies technologies like quantum?
Henna notes Europe’s strength in quantum research but stresses the need for market access, financing and removal of cross-border barriers, and introduces AI factories to provide computing capacity, data and talent for startups [105-112][133-139]. Florence asks how the EU will keep up with quantum and AI challenges [102-104][131-132].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
EU policy documents such as the AI Continent Action Plan and the quantum joint‑research initiatives with Japan, Korea and Canada demonstrate the financing, market‑access and infrastructure commitments described (S42); the strategic importance of quantum standards is further detailed in S44.
Both speakers see mobilising private capital as essential for achieving digital sovereignty.
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
Mobilising private capital for digital sovereignty How do we bring private capital on board on digital sovereignty concretely and not just the big finance, but also large EU company and incumbents?
Henna points out the €30 trillion of household savings in the EU and the need to channel them, together with institutional investors, into tech projects via the Savings & Investments Union [148-164]. Florence explicitly asks how private capital can be brought on board for digital sovereignty [146-147].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The emphasis on mobilising private capital echoes the European Innovation Council’s push for private‑sector financing (S43) and the broader discussion of public‑private partnerships for strategic infrastructure in S46 and S48.
Both speakers emphasize the need to protect security and critical infrastructure as part of digital sovereignty.
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
Security and critical‑infrastructure protection In what way is the EU fostering digital sovereignty to protect national security interests?
Henna describes revisions to EU cybersecurity rules targeting 18 critical-infrastructure sectors and the definition of a sovereign cloud with data localisation for sensitive services [122-128]. Florence asks how the EU protects national security interests within digital sovereignty [120-121].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Protecting security and critical infrastructure is a core element of the EU’s digital sovereignty agenda, reflected in the open‑source security governance work of the Geneva Dialogue (S45), the neo‑mercantilist framing of digital security in S46, and concrete cybersecurity initiatives in S47 and resilience planning in S48.
Both speakers consider open‑source software and open standards a strategic pillar for EU digital resilience.
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
Open source and open standards for digital resilience Do you think that open source and open standards are important for Europe’s digital resilience?
Henna states that an open-source strategy will be part of the upcoming tech-sovereignty package to boost home-grown technologies and resilience [143-145]. Florence asks whether open source and standards are important and how they will be supported [140-142].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Open‑source software and open standards are highlighted as strategic pillars in EU policy, with the French law mandating open‑source public software (S50), the Geneva Dialogue’s analysis of OSS security responsibilities (S45), and the broader strategic case for open‑source AI (S49).
Similar Viewpoints
Both see inclusive, multi‑stakeholder participation as essential for a trustworthy and effective internet governance framework, with Henna emphasizing the model’s proven success and Florence implementing it through Slido‑based Q&A to give equal voice to all participants [43-45][58-62][6-21].
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
Internet governance, multi‑stakeholder model and emerging challenges Participatory dialogue and audience engagement
Both agree that the EU must build strategic partnerships with like‑minded nations (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, UK, Brazil) to strengthen capacity and supply‑chain resilience for digital sovereignty [113][114-119].
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
International cooperation on digital sovereignty EU strategy for closer cooperation with other like‑minded countries in Europe and globally on digital sovereignty
Both concur that Europe’s leadership in quantum research and AI must be translated into market uptake through financing, infrastructure (AI factories) and removal of cross‑border barriers [102-104][105-112][131-132][133-139].
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florance Ranson
Supporting emerging technologies: quantum and AI How are we going to manage? How are we going to make sure we keep up with emergencies technologies like quantum?
Unexpected Consensus
The pivotal role of open‑source software in achieving digital resilience
Speakers: Henna Virkkunen, Florence Ranson
Open source and open standards for digital resilience Do you think that open source and open standards are important for Europe’s digital resilience?
While the moderator’s question could have been limited to a technical preference, both participants treat open-source as a strategic, policy-level instrument for EU digital sovereignty and resilience, indicating a deeper alignment than might be anticipated [140-145].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The pivotal role of open‑source software for digital resilience is reinforced by the EU’s open‑source mandate (S50) and the strategic imperative outlined in S49 and S45, which stress OSS as essential for security, interoperability and innovation.
Overall Assessment

The discussion reveals strong convergence between the Vice President and the moderator on several core pillars: inclusive multi‑stakeholder governance, international cooperation for digital sovereignty, active support for emerging technologies (quantum and AI), mobilisation of private capital, security of critical infrastructure, and the strategic use of open‑source. These points of agreement span internet governance, the enabling environment for digital development, financial mechanisms, security, AI and open‑source topics.

High consensus – the speakers consistently reinforce each other’s positions, suggesting that EU policy on digital sovereignty and internet governance is likely to move forward with a unified, multi‑dimensional strategy that combines regulatory action, investment, international partnership and technological openness.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Unexpected Differences
Overall Assessment

The session was largely collaborative, with the moderator posing questions and the Vice President providing detailed answers. No overt conflict emerged; instead, the speakers shared common objectives—strengthening EU digital sovereignty, advancing emerging technologies, ensuring security, promoting open source, and mobilising capital—while offering different implementation pathways.

Low level of disagreement; the dialogue reflects consensus on goals with nuanced differences in proposed methods, suggesting constructive alignment rather than contention, which bodes well for coordinated policy development.

Partial Agreements
Both speakers share the goal of strengthening EU digital sovereignty through cooperation with like‑minded countries, but Florence asks for the overall EU strategy while Henna outlines specific partner countries and the nature of the cooperation, indicating different views on how to operationalise the goal [113][114-119].
Speakers: Florence Ranson, Henna Virkkunen
International cooperation on digital sovereignty International cooperation on digital sovereignty
Both agree that Europe must stay ahead in quantum technologies, yet Florence’s question seeks a concrete management plan for “emergencies” in quantum, whereas Henna focuses on scaling, financing and market access as the primary means, showing differing approaches to achieving the same objective [102-104][105-112].
Speakers: Florence Ranson, Henna Virkkunen
Supporting emerging technologies: quantum and AI Supporting emerging technologies: quantum and AI
Both aim to protect national security through digital sovereignty; Florence asks how the EU fosters this protection, while Henna responds with revisions to cybersecurity rules, a sovereign cloud and data localisation, indicating different pathways to the shared security goal [120-121][122-128].
Speakers: Florence Ranson, Henna Virkkunen
Security and critical‑infrastructure protection Security and critical‑infrastructure protection
Both recognize the importance of open source for resilience; Florence asks whether it is important and how it will be supported, while Henna confirms its strategic role and promises an upcoming action plan, differing on the stage of implementation rather than the goal itself [140-142][143-145].
Speakers: Florence Ranson, Henna Virkkunen
Open source and open standards for digital resilience Open source and open standards for digital resilience
Both agree that private capital is essential for digital sovereignty; Florence asks how to bring private capital on board, whereas Henna emphasizes the existence of large savings, the need to mobilise them, and specific policy tools such as the Savings & Investments Union, showing different perspectives on the mechanisms required [146-147][148-164].
Speakers: Florence Ranson, Henna Virkkunen
Mobilising private capital for digital sovereignty Mobilising private capital for digital sovereignty
Takeaways
Key takeaways
The .eu domain marks 20 years of a pan‑European digital identity and has helped strengthen the EU single market. Internet governance works best through a multi‑stakeholder model, reaffirmed by WSIS+20, but faces challenges from concentration of power, strategic dependencies and hostile online activity. Technological sovereignty is defined as Europe’s ability to develop, control, scale and secure critical technologies, not as isolation, and will be advanced through a forthcoming tech‑sovereignty package (GIPSAX 2.0, Cloud & AI Development Act, Open‑Source strategy). International cooperation with like‑minded partners (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, UK, Brazil, etc.) is essential for building capacity and supply‑chain resilience. Security of critical infrastructure is being addressed via revised cybersecurity rules, a sovereign cloud concept and data‑localisation for sensitive services. Support for emerging technologies: quantum innovation will be bridged to market through financing, capital‑markets union and removal of cross‑border barriers; AI factories will provide computing power, data sets and talent to boost AI startups and SME uptake. Open source and open standards are seen as a key pillar of digital resilience and will be promoted through a dedicated EU strategy. Mobilising private capital (household savings, institutional investors, pension funds) is crucial to fund large‑scale tech projects; the Savings & Investments Union will facilitate this. The mini‑session used Slido to ensure equal participation of in‑room and online attendees, fostering networking and direct dialogue with the Vice President.
Resolutions and action items
Presentation of the EU tech‑sovereignty package on 3 June, including GIPSAX 2.0, Cloud & AI Development Act and Open‑Source strategy. Launch of AI factories to provide EU AI startups and SMEs with computing capacity, high‑quality data sets and talent. Revision of EU cybersecurity rules to assess and mitigate high‑risk vendors across 18 critical‑infrastructure sectors. Implementation of a sovereign cloud and data‑localisation framework for critical public services. Strengthening the Capital Markets Union and Savings & Investments Union to channel private savings into European tech investments. Continued engagement with international partners (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, UK, Brazil, etc.) on digital‑sovereignty initiatives. Encouragement of .eu community and ccTLD operators to stay active in multi‑stakeholder internet‑governance processes.
Unresolved issues
Specific mechanisms and timelines for scaling quantum startups from research to market remain undefined. Details on how the sovereign cloud will be operationalised, including data‑localisation requirements and governance, were not fully explained. Concrete steps to mobilise the €30 trillion of household savings into tech investments, especially in member states with low investment rates, were not detailed. The exact scope and funding model for the AI factories, and how they will be made accessible to SMEs across all member states, were not fully addressed. How partnerships with non‑EU countries will translate into concrete supply‑chain resilience actions was left open.
Suggested compromises
Emphasising that technological sovereignty does not mean isolation but relies on trusted international partnerships. Balancing openness (multi‑stakeholder governance, open source) with security measures (sovereign cloud, vendor risk mitigation). Encouraging private capital investment while acknowledging the need for supportive tax and regulatory frameworks at the member‑state level.
Thought Provoking Comments
The internet remains a global network of interconnected and interoperable systems, and its governance has been strongest when built through the multi‑stakeholder model.
This statement reframes internet governance as a collaborative, inclusive process rather than a top‑down regulatory exercise, reminding the audience of the foundational principle that has underpinned the internet’s success.
It set the tone for the rest of the speech, leading to a deeper discussion of how Europe can continue to champion the multi‑stakeholder approach (e.g., WSIS+20 outcome) and positioning the upcoming tech‑sovereignty package as an extension of that model.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
Technological sovereignty is not about isolation. It is about Europe having the capability to develop, maintain, control and scale the critical technologies and infrastructures on which our economy, our security and our democracy depend.
The comment clarifies a common misconception—that sovereignty means cutting off from the world—by emphasizing capability building and strategic autonomy while retaining openness.
This pivot shifted the conversation from a defensive stance to a proactive, collaborative vision, paving the way for later remarks about trusted partnerships and the upcoming package of measures.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
.eu is more than a domain name; it is a concrete example of European digital sovereignty in practice – a trusted European digital infrastructure, a competitive European asset, and proof that sovereignty and openness can reinforce each other.
By linking the symbolic .eu domain to tangible digital‑sovereignty outcomes, the speaker turns an abstract celebration into a case study that illustrates how policy can manifest in everyday digital tools.
This reinforced the relevance of the event (EURODIG) for participants, encouraging them to see their own roles in the broader sovereignty agenda and motivating the subsequent Q&A on scaling innovations.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
We want an internet that remains open, remains global and remains interoperable – where human rights are respected, diversity is protected, innovation can flourish and fair opportunities exist for all.
The statement broadens the technical discussion to include values‑based criteria (human rights, diversity), reminding the audience that digital policy is also a social‑political project.
It prompted participants to frame their questions (e.g., about AI, open source, quantum) within a values‑centric lens, deepening the analysis beyond pure technology.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
Regulation is not enough. Europe remains too dependent on technologies developed and controlled elsewhere, which is an economic, security and strategic vulnerability.
This candid admission highlights the limits of current policy tools and underscores the urgency of building internal capabilities, challenging any complacent belief that existing regulations suffice.
It led to a shift toward concrete solutions (the tech‑sovereignty package) and spurred questions about financing, scaling startups, and international partnerships.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
Technological sovereignty does not mean doing everything alone. Europe remains open, we believe in cooperation, trusted partnerships, and a more competitive, diverse, choice‑driven digital ecosystem benefits everybody.
The comment balances the earlier sovereignty narrative with a collaborative outlook, pre‑empting criticism that Europe might become protectionist.
It opened the floor for questions about cooperation with like‑minded countries and set a constructive tone for discussing international partnerships later in the Q&A.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
On 3 June we will present our tech‑sovereignty package: GIPSAX 2.0 to reinforce the semiconductor ecosystem, a Cloud and AI Development Act, and an EU open‑source strategy – all designed to strengthen Europe’s capabilities in critical technologies.
This concrete roadmap translates abstract goals into specific legislative actions, giving participants clear reference points for future engagement.
It generated a series of focused questions (quantum scaling, AI factories, open‑source support, private‑capital mobilisation) and anchored the discussion in upcoming policy milestones.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
Europe has more than €30 trillion in household savings, yet mobilising that private capital for tech‑sovereignty projects is difficult; we need tax incentives, pension‑fund engagement, and better investment vehicles to channel funds into large‑scale European tech ventures.
By highlighting the financing gap, the speaker brings economic reality into the sovereignty debate, pointing out a critical bottleneck that many policymakers overlook.
This prompted a deeper conversation about the role of private capital, the challenges of large‑ticket investments, and the need for a Savings and Investments Union, adding a financial dimension to the previously technology‑focused dialogue.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
We have excellent research and world‑leading scientists in quantum, but the real challenge is scaling startups and giving them market access and financing within the EU.
The comment shifts the focus from scientific excellence to market‑level implementation, exposing a gap between innovation and commercialization.
It steered the Q&A toward practical measures (capital markets union, financing mechanisms) and highlighted the importance of the EU’s competitiveness compass, enriching the discussion with actionable policy levers.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
Overall Assessment

The discussion was shaped by a series of strategic pivots introduced by Vice President Virkkunen. Early remarks reaffirming the multi‑stakeholder model and the values underpinning the internet established a collaborative baseline. Subsequent clarifications that technological sovereignty is about capability, not isolation, and that regulation alone is insufficient, reframed the conversation from defensive protectionism to proactive capacity‑building. By presenting concrete elements of the upcoming tech‑sovereignty package and exposing practical bottlenecks—such as scaling quantum startups and mobilising private capital—the speaker moved the dialogue from abstract celebration to concrete policy action. Each of these insightful comments acted as a turning point, prompting new lines of questioning, deepening the analysis, and aligning participants around a shared vision of an open yet sovereign European digital future.

Follow-up Questions
What are the specific provisions and implementation timeline of the upcoming Quantum Act to support scaling up European quantum startups and market entry?
Understanding the legislative framework is essential to translate Europe’s strong research base into commercial success and prevent loss of innovation to non‑EU markets.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
What are the detailed components of the Tech Sovereignty Package to be presented on 3 June, including GIPSAX 2.0, the Cloud and AI Development Act, and the EU Open Source Strategy?
Clarifying these measures will allow stakeholders to prepare for compliance, investment opportunities, and to assess the package’s impact on European technological autonomy.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
How will the concept of a ‘sovereign cloud’ be defined and operationalised, particularly regarding data localisation requirements for critical services?
Defining sovereign cloud parameters is crucial for ensuring security of sensitive data while maintaining openness and interoperability of the Internet.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
What mechanisms will the EU use to mobilise the estimated €30 trillion of private household savings towards investments in digital‑sovereignty projects?
Activating private capital is a key pillar of the tech‑sovereignty agenda; without effective mobilisation, large‑scale projects may lack necessary funding.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
How will the EU encourage institutional investors and pension funds to increase allocations to European tech markets rather than defaulting to US markets?
Redirecting institutional capital is vital for building a robust European tech ecosystem and reducing reliance on external financing sources.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
What are the specifics of the ‘AI factories’ initiative – in terms of computing capacity, access to high‑quality data sets, talent development, and governance structures?
AI factories are central to boosting AI competitiveness and sovereignty; detailed information is needed to assess their effectiveness and accessibility for SMEs and startups.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
How will the revised EU cybersecurity rules address risks across the 18 identified critical‑infrastructure sectors, and what concrete mitigation measures will be enforced?
Ensuring the resilience of critical infrastructure is a security priority; clarity on risk assessment and mitigation is required for industry compliance.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
How will the EU’s open‑source strategy be operationalised to strengthen digital resilience, and what concrete support mechanisms will be provided to European companies?
Open source can enhance autonomy and innovation, but practical support (funding, standards, governance) is needed to realise its potential.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
What concrete steps will be taken to deepen cooperation with like‑minded countries (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, UK, Brazil) on digital sovereignty and supply‑chain resilience?
International partnerships are essential for reducing strategic dependencies and building a secure, diversified technology supply chain.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
How will the EU measure and evaluate the impact of the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act as global benchmarks for a safer and fairer digital environment?
Assessing the effectiveness of these regulations informs future policy adjustments and demonstrates EU leadership in digital governance.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
What data and metrics are needed to quantify the EU’s current dependence on non‑EU technologies in semiconductors, cloud, and AI, and how will reduction strategies be prioritised?
Accurate measurement of technological dependencies is a prerequisite for targeted policy actions to achieve true tech sovereignty.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
How will the multi‑stakeholder model of internet governance be maintained and strengthened in future regional and national dialogues?
Sustaining inclusive, multi‑stakeholder participation is vital for legitimate and effective internet governance worldwide.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
What metrics will be used to evaluate the success of the Digital Single Market in facilitating the scaling of startups across member states and removing market entry obstacles?
Monitoring market integration helps identify remaining barriers and guides further policy interventions to support European innovators.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen
How will the EU ensure that AI development aligns with human‑rights standards, diversity protection, and fair opportunity principles as outlined in its vision for the next decade?
Embedding ethical considerations into AI policy is essential to maintain public trust and to differentiate European AI from less regulated alternatives.
Speaker: Henna Virkkunen

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.