Keynote by Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President European Commission
26 May 2026 14:00h - 14:30h
Keynote by Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President European Commission
Summary
The session began with Florence Ranson introducing a “mini-session” to let participants meet each other and to prepare for a direct dialogue with the European Commission’s Executive Vice-President, Henna Virkkunen [1][3-9]. After a quick poll of the audience’s age, experience and nationality, Ranson explained that questions could be submitted via Slido and that about twenty minutes would be reserved for the Q&A [6-9][10-12].
Virkkunen opened her remarks by celebrating the 20-year anniversary of the .eu domain, noting that it is now the ninth-largest country-code top-level domain and has provided a pan-European digital identity that strengthens the single market [28-33][34-35]. She emphasized that the internet’s two core foundations-global interconnectivity and a multi-stakeholder governance model-remain essential, even as the environment has shifted toward concentration of power, strategic dependencies and hostile online threats [42-45][48-51]. Europe’s vision for the next decade, according to Virkkunen, is an open, global, interoperable internet that respects human rights, diversity and fair opportunities, and she linked this to the WSIS + 20 outcome that reaffirms the multi-stakeholder approach and the permanent mandate of the Internet Governance Forum [54-57][58-63].
While Europe has led in digital regulation through the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act, Virkkunen warned that reliance on foreign-controlled technologies creates economic, security and strategic vulnerabilities, making technological sovereignty a priority [67-73][74-79]. She announced a forthcoming “tech sovereignty package” that will include an updated GIPSAX 2.0 for semiconductors, a Cloud and AI Development Act to create a sovereign cloud, and an EU open-source strategy to boost autonomy and openness [83-86][143-145].
In the Q&A, Virkkunen highlighted that Europe’s strength in quantum research must be matched by market access and financing for startups, and that the Commission is working on a “quantum act” and capital-markets union to support scaling [105-111]. She named Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the UK and Brazil as trusted partners for building digital-sovereignty capacity and resilient supply chains [114-119]. Regarding security, she said the Commission is revising cyber-security rules to address risks in critical infrastructure across sectors such as 5G, energy and health, and that the upcoming tech-sovereignty package will define a sovereign cloud with data localisation for sensitive services [122-129]. To boost AI competitiveness, the Commission is investing in “AI factories” that provide computing power, high-quality data sets and talent to European startups and SMEs, while also supporting AI uptake in the public sector and industry [133-139]. On open source, Virkkunen confirmed it will be a key element of the tech-sovereignty package, aiming to strengthen home-grown technologies through a strategic open-source action plan [143-145]. She noted that Europe has over €30 trillion in private savings but that mobilising these funds for investment requires tax incentives and encouraging institutional investors to favour European markets rather than the United States [148-155][158-160].
The discussion concluded with Ranson thanking Virkkunen and inviting .eu and EURID colleagues on stage, underscoring the collective effort needed to shape the future of the internet and European digital sovereignty [166-170].
Keypoints
Major discussion points
– .eu domain anniversary and its role in European digital identity – The Vice-President highlighted that .eu turned 20 years old, is now the ninth-largest country-code TLD and provides a pan-European digital identity that strengthens the single market and offers reliable, resilient services. [28-33]
– Preserving an open, global internet while confronting new challenges – She noted that the internet’s core principles (global inter-operability and multi-stakeholder governance) remain essential, but the environment has shifted dramatically with concentration of power, strategic dependencies and hostile online threats, requiring proactive action. [46-53][55-57]
– European technological sovereignty and the forthcoming “tech-sovereignty package” – Technological sovereignty is framed as the ability to develop, control and scale critical technologies (semiconductors, cloud, AI) without isolation. The package to be presented includes GIPSAX 2.0 for semiconductors, a Cloud and AI Development Act, and an EU open-source strategy, all aimed at reinforcing autonomy while staying open. [70-80][83-86]
– Concrete measures to boost innovation and investment in key sectors – Examples given were the need to scale quantum-related startups and provide market access and financing ([105-111]), the creation of “AI factories” that combine computing capacity, high-quality data and talent to support 8 000 AI startups ([133-139]), and the promotion of open-source technologies as a strategic asset ([143-145]).
– Security, critical-infrastructure protection and international cooperation – Revised cybersecurity rules, a sovereign cloud with data localisation, and risk-vendor mitigation are being pursued to safeguard critical sectors ([122-129]). The EU also seeks partnerships with like-minded countries (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, UK, Brazil, enlargement states) to build resilience in supply chains and share expertise ([114-119]).
– Mobilising private capital for digital sovereignty – With over €30 trillion in European savings, the challenge is to channel household and institutional funds into European tech ventures, reduce reliance on non-EU markets, and support large-scale financing for growth-stage companies ([148-164]).
Overall purpose / goal of the discussion
The session was designed to (1) celebrate the .eu milestone, (2) inform participants about the EU’s upcoming digital and tech-sovereignty agenda, (3) gather and answer audience questions for Vice-President Henna Virkkunen, and (4) reinforce the multi-stakeholder, collaborative approach needed to shape Europe’s future internet governance, security, and innovation landscape.
Tone of the discussion
– Opening: upbeat, inclusive, and celebratory, emphasizing community (“under-30”, “old timers”, “broad geographical spread”) and the significance of the .eu anniversary.
– Mid-section: shifts to a more serious, policy-focused tone, outlining challenges (concentration of power, security threats) and the urgency of action.
– Later part: becomes technical and solution-oriented, detailing concrete initiatives (quantum, AI factories, open-source strategy) while remaining optimistic and collaborative.
– Closing: returns to a constructive, forward-looking tone, thanking participants and encouraging continued joint effort across Europe and global partners.
Overall, the tone moves from celebratory to urgent policy discussion and ends on a hopeful, cooperative note.
Speakers
– Florence Ranson – Moderator and session host for the EuroDIG mini‑session, facilitating audience interaction and managing the Q&A process.
– Henna Virkkunen – Executive Vice President of the European Commission, in charge of tech sovereignty, security and democracy; expertise in digital policy, internet governance, and European digital strategy.
Additional speakers:
– João – Technical moderator responsible for monitoring audience questions submitted through Slido.
The session opened with Florence Ranson framing a “mini-session” as an ice-breaker and a chance for participants to learn who sits beside them in the room. She quickly gauged the audience’s composition – age, repeat attendance and national origin – to illustrate the broad geographical spread and to underline that the ensuing discussion would have a truly global relevance [1][3-9]. Ranson then announced that the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission, Henna Virkkunen, would join the meeting and invited attendees to submit questions via the Slido platform, reserving roughly twenty minutes of the half-hour for a direct dialogue with the Vice-President [6-9][10-12]. After the brief housekeeping, Florence introduced Vice President Virkkunen, who delivered the keynote address.
Virkkunen began by celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the .eu domain, noting that it is now the ninth-largest country-code top-level domain worldwide and that it has provided a pan-European digital identity which strengthens the single market and offers reliable, resilient services [27-33][34-35]. She thanked the .eu community and presented the anniversary as both a milestone and the start of a new chapter for European internet governance [36-38]. Virkkunen then reminded the audience of the two core foundations of the Internet – a global network of interoperable systems and a multi-stakeholder governance model – and argued that these have served Europe well, even though the surrounding environment has shifted dramatically. Concentration of power, strategic dependencies in semiconductors, cloud and AI, and an increasingly hostile online climate (cyber-threats, disinformation, harmful content) now demand proactive action [42-45][46-53]. She outlined Europe’s vision for the next decade: an open, global, interoperable Internet that respects human rights, protects diversity, fosters innovation and guarantees fair opportunities [54-57].
Virkkunen highlighted the recent WSIS + 20 outcome, which reaffirmed the multi-stakeholder model and gave the Internet Governance Forum a permanent mandate [58-63]. She stressed that while Europe has already led the world in digital regulation through the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act – setting global benchmarks for a safer, fairer digital environment – regulation alone is insufficient. The EU remains overly dependent on critical technologies that are developed and controlled outside Europe, creating economic, security and strategic vulnerabilities [67-73]. Technological sovereignty, she explained, is not isolationist; it means Europe must be able to develop, maintain, control and scale critical technologies while remaining open to cooperation [74-79].
To operationalise this ambition, Virkkunen announced a “tech-sovereignty package” to be presented on 3 June. The package will comprise an updated GIPSAX 2.0 to reinforce the semiconductor ecosystem and supply-chain resilience, a Cloud and AI Development Act to create a sovereign European cloud, and an EU open-source strategy to boost technological autonomy while remaining open [83-86].
Virkkunen stressed that technological sovereignty does not mean Europe will close itself off. The Union will continue to cooperate with trusted, like-minded partners – Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the UK and Brazil – to build capacity, enhance supply-chain resilience and share expertise [114-119]. She also outlined the EU’s security-focused measures: a revision of EU cyber-security rules that will assess and mitigate risks across 18 identified sectors, identify high-risk vendors, and, through the sovereign cloud concept, keep data for sensitive services within Europe [122-129].
The Q&A began with a question on how the EU will keep pace with “emergency” technologies such as quantum [102-104]. Virkkunen replied that Europe already leads in quantum research, but the challenge lies in moving innovations from the lab to the market. She called for better market access, financing and the removal of cross-border obstacles, linking these needs to the Capital Markets Union and the competitiveness compass [105-112].
A follow-up question asked about the EU’s strategy for cooperation with other countries on digital sovereignty [113]. Virkkunen listed the same partner states – Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, the UK and Brazil – and explained that joint projects will focus on building capacity, strengthening supply-chain resilience and sharing expertise [114-119].
When asked how the EU is fostering digital sovereignty to protect national security interests [120-121], Virkkunen described the ongoing revision of cyber-security rules that will identify high-risk vendors in 18 critical-infrastructure sectors (including 5G, energy, water, health) and outline mitigation measures. She also noted that the upcoming tech-sovereignty package will define a sovereign cloud, ensuring that data for critical services is stored and controlled in Europe [122-129].
The discussion then turned to AI. After a question on combining EU data and services and on AI competitiveness versus AI sovereignty [131-132], Virkkunen highlighted that Europe hosts roughly 8,000 AI startups, many of which lack sufficient computing capacity. She announced the creation of “AI factories” – a network of 19 facilities that will provide European startups and SMEs with high-performance computing capacity, high-quality data sets and talent to boost AI innovation and support AI uptake across the public sector, industry and SMEs [133-139].
Open-source software and standards were next on the agenda. Ranson asked whether they are important for Europe’s digital resilience [140-142]; Virkkunen confirmed that an open-source strategy will be a key element of the tech-sovereignty package, arguing that strategic use of open-source can strengthen home-grown technologies and enhance the EU’s competitive edge [143-145].
Finally, Ranson queried how private capital can be mobilised for digital sovereignty [146-147]. Virkkunen pointed out that Europe holds more than €30 trillion in household savings [148-150], but that mobilisation requires tax incentives, supportive pension-fund policies and a Savings & Investments Union to redirect savings and institutional investment from non-EU markets into European tech projects. She acknowledged the difficulty of securing large-ticket financing for growth-stage companies and pledged to work on mechanisms that will enable such investments [160-164].
The session concluded with Ranson thanking Vice-President Virkkunen for her answers, noting that a few additional questions remained unanswered, and inviting .eu and EURID colleagues to join a group photo on stage [166-170]. The overall tone moved from an upbeat, inclusive opening, through a serious policy-focused middle, to a hopeful closing that reinforced the need for collaborative, multi-stakeholder effort to shape Europe’s digital future [96-98].
In sum, the mini-session served to (1) celebrate the .eu domain as a tangible example of European digital identity, (2) outline the EU’s vision for an open yet sovereign Internet, (3) present concrete legislative tools – GIPSAX 2.0, the Cloud & AI Development Act and an open-source strategy – and (4) gather stakeholder questions that highlighted the importance of scaling quantum and AI innovations, securing critical infrastructure, fostering international partnerships and mobilising private capital. The dialogue exemplified the EU’s commitment to a multi-stakeholder, inclusive approach to internet governance and digital sovereignty.
we have uh we promised a a mini session so a mini session it will be indeed but um we’re going to have a little exchange of information with you a couple of points first of all we’d like to get to know you better but and we also thought it was a good opportunity for you to know one another better know your neighbors to the left to the right who’s in front who’s at the back what’s the general picture like in our room so i’m going to ask a couple of questions and ask you for a show of hands so how many of you here are under 30 hey look at this all the youth day crowd we heard it’s the 19th edition of euro dig so who’s here for the first time not just the younger crowd but yeah great well done who’s here for the second or third time few less who’s been here more than five times already five times or more yes that’s right i was gonna say the old timers with absolutely i mean take it from me that’s all right i can say that so and uh who is from eu so who’s from an eu member state vast majority okay who’s from an european country but non -eu hey very good to have you on board and who’s not from europe very good a pretty broad geographical spread then which means also that all the exchanges that we’re having are all the more valid because it brings us back to the conversation we were having earlier about the global impact of what we do.
So let’s move on to what lies ahead now. As you know, we’re going to welcome the Executive Vice President of the Commission, Henna Virkkunen and we’d like for you to ask her questions. She’s taken up the challenge of having a dialogue with you because this is the way this event is built, as I said, not just another conference. So she’s decided to give you the chance of having a direct dialogue with her. And to do so, we’re going to invite you to send your questions through Slido so that questions are short and to the point, and we give the same chance to those of you in the room and those of you online. So the QR code is you can test your connection to the website or not to the website, to the Slido side so that when the time comes, you can ask her questions.
And we’re going to try and set aside about 20 minutes for questions out of our half hour. So we rely on you. It’s your chance. And it’s your chance to target questions at the highest political level. And we heard this morning from some of our speakers what lies ahead in the commission, what lies ahead in terms of future plans. We heard some very interesting points also when it came to the quantum space and what lies ahead in that field as well. So all these topics. future plans, future developments, positioning of the EU, the trust, the future developments of .eu, all these questions are of course open. So I’m getting some news here that I can, the vice president has just entered the building, so she will be with us in a minute.
So practice your questions, rehearse, take them down as she speaks, but also put them down, stepping from the experience of what we’ve heard so far, and we definitely rely on you for a strong exchange. We rely on you online as well. João is there, he’s going to be monitoring the questions. Same rules apply, either you send your questions, no, you’re not going to be able to speak on this time, I was going to say something stupid, you’re not going to be able to speak on this time, you don’t send the questions in the chat, preferably send them through Slido. If by mistake you send them in the chat, we’re going to try and pick them up.
But please use Slido like all the audience here in the room. So it’s a pleasure to now welcome our keynote speaker for this afternoon. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Vice President Virkkunen who’s in charge of the tech sovereignty, security and democracy at the European Commission. Good afternoon, Madam Vice President and welcome. We were waiting for you. I was kind of speaking on until you joined. So that’s perfect. In the last
Thank you very much, honourable guests, ladies and gentlemen. And happy birthday to .eu. 20 years ago, .eu was launched as a digital symbol of European unity. And today, it is the ninth largest country code top -level domain in the world. It has given our businesses, citizens and organizations a truly pan -European digital identity. So I think it’s a great occasion today to celebrate this achievement. And it’s clear that it has also strengthened our single market. And importantly, it has also done so with a very remarkable reliability, resilience and security. And this is not a small achievement. So I want to warmly thank your read, your dig and all those who have helped make .eu a success story for Europe.
Because this is not only an anniversary for us. This is also and it’s a beginning of a new chapter. For internet governance. If my 20 years younger self could see today’s internet, she would barely recognize it. Because as we remember, in 2006, Wi -Fi was still something very luxury, and public hotspots were very rare, and personal blogs felt cutting edge during that time. And today we see that internet, of course, is everywhere. It underpins our economies, our democracies, also our security, our societies, and increasingly also our daily lives. And yet, for all that has changed, two core foundations remain very essential. First, the internet remains a global network of interconnected and interoperable systems. And second, its governance has been strongest when built through the multi -stakeholder model.
And these foundations, they have served us very well. But the environment around them has changed very dramatically. The internet was meant to be open and also meant to be decentralized and full of opportunity. Yet today we see increasing concentration of power, wealth and technological capability. Also persistent digital devices, which many still exclude from meaningful connectivity. And also we see growing strategic dependencies in critical technologies such as semiconductors, cloud or AI. And an increasingly hostile online environment we see also from cyber threats and disinformation to very harmful content affecting children and young people. And this means that preserving the internet’s openness cannot mean that we are standing still. It really requires our action. Europe’s vision for the next decade is very clear.
We want an internet that remains open, remains global and remains interoperable. An internet where human rights are respected, also diversity is protected, innovation can flourish and fair opportunities exist for all. And that brings me to why WSIS plus 20. The conclusion of these negotiations last year, it was an important milestone for all of us. This decision to reaffirm the multi -stakeholder model and to give the Internet Governance Forum a permanent mandate matters greatly. Because Internet Governance works best when governments, industry, our civil society, academia and the technical community work all together. And regional and national dialogues matter too. As the WSIS plus 20 outcome rightly recognizes, forums like YouTube, EURODIG are very essential. because they build trust, they also enable open exchange, and they ensure that Internet governance remains inclusive, grounded, and legitimate.
It’s very important to underline that Europe remains fully committed to the multi -stakeholder model of Internet governance. And I encourage European stakeholders, including country -code top -level domain operators and the .eu community to remain active and ambitious in these processes. Because Europe must continue to help shape the global conversation. But there is also another reality we must confront. Europe has been very strong in shaping digital rules. The Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act, they are setting global benchmarks for a safer and fairer digital environment. And I think that’s very important. But we also see that regulation is not enough. Europe remains too dependent on technological and technologies developed and controlled elsewhere than in Europe.
And this is clearly an economic vulnerability, a security vulnerability and increasingly also a strategic vulnerability for us. And this is why technological sovereignty also matters. Technological sovereignty is not about isolation. It’s not about closing ourselves off. It is about Europe having the capability to develop and to maintain and to control and scale the critical technologies and infrastructures on which our economy, our security and our democracy depend. It’s also preserving our ability to make strategic choices. And it’s about ensuring that our values are reflected in the digital systems we rely on. And in this sense, .eu. is more than a domain name. It is a very concrete example of European digital sovereignty in practice. A trusted European digital infrastructure, a competitive European asset, and a proof that sovereignty and openness can reinforce each other.
This same thinking will guide the next phase of Europe’s digital agenda. On the 3rd of June, or next week, I will present our tech sovereignty package designed to strengthen Europe’s capabilities in critical technologies. And this package will include, first, Gipsax 2 .0 to reinforce Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem and supply chain resilience. Second, a Cloud and AI Development Act to strengthen Europe’s sovereign digital infrastructure. And third, an EU open source strategy, including for our institutions, to reinforce technological autonomy and openness. But I want to very much stress one final point for you. Because technological sovereignty does not mean doing everything alone. It’s very important to underline that Europe remains open. We believe in cooperation. We believe in trusted partnerships.
And we believe that a more competitive, more diverse, more choice -driven digital ecosystem benefits everybody. Because reducing unhealthy dependencies does not weaken the open Internet. It makes it more resilient. Ladies and gentlemen, dear participants, the future of the Internet will not be shaped by technology alone. It will be shaped by choices, by governance, by cooperation, and by whether we remain faithful to the principles that made the Internet such a transformative force in the first place. So I want to thank everybody for being part of this conversation here in Brussels and also online, because we know that Europe voice really matters and the future of the Internet is something we must shape all together. So thank you and congratulations for all of you.
So as I announced, please take a seat. As I announced, Vice President Virkkunen has very kindly agreed to take your questions and we have already received several. So I’m going to raise the questions we have received online. As you probably know, we had a session this morning discussing quantum and we heard that you’re going to have a meeting tomorrow discussing it further. So we have a question here asking, how are we going to manage? How are we going to make sure we keep up with emergencies technologies like quantum?
yeah i think let’s see yes it works yes i think especially when we speak about quantum of course this is certainly a field where europe is very strong so you know very well that our researchers and scientists they are world top when it comes to quantum and our researchers they are they are leading in the scientific publications on quantum but then now we have to really make sure that all our great innovations on quantum that they can enter to the markets in the european union and also that our very promising startups which are working on quantum that they are able to scale up their businesses in europe often it has happened that we are creating great innovations in europe so we are not having a gap on innovations but we have really problem on scaling up the businesses so so to make sure that our innovations they have access to markets and access to financing so these are the most important things that we are able to do and i think that’s a really important thing important priorities for this commission And that’s why we are working with our competitiveness compass also to create better capital markets union, to give better funding opportunities for our businesses.
And also we want to remove the obstacles between our member states to really also use the full potential of our digital single market. But these are clearly also the challenges we have been identifying. So we see that we have many strengths in the European Union. I think we have great basis because we have so excellent science and research and also so huge potential in our startups. But now really the areas where we have to work is to give opportunities to scale up the businesses in Europe, to enter to the markets in the European Union and also to have access to finance in the European Union. Because otherwise we are losing too many of our very promising innovations to other markets.
And quantum is certainly something where we are now working very closely with the stakeholders towards our quantum act.
And what is the EU strategy for closer cooperation with other like -minded countries in Europe and globally on digital sovereignty?
Yes, our very clear partners when it comes to digital sovereignty are, of course, the countries with whom we have already digital partnerships. So I would like to mention countries like Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Canada. They are very close partners for us and we are working closely with them to look also the challenges all of us are facing nowadays globally. So we want to build up our own capacity and also better resilience for our supply chains. And of course, also all our enlargement countries next to us are very important partners. UK as well, Brazil, for example. there is several countries all over the world who are very willing to work together with European Union and in the same time when we see clearly that we have to build up our own capacity we want to also work very closely with our trusted partners especially when we look at different supply chains which are nowadays very global so to build better resilience there and also share expertise together with our partners.
Building up on the digital sovereignty question we have another one that asks in what way is the EU fostering digital sovereignty to protect national security interests? I suppose that refers to national as the EU as a whole.
We are now living in the world that we have to always look to security aspects. We have to look to economic security that we don’t have that kind of risky dependencies which can be like weaponized against us but we have to also look the overall security aspects. Of each initiative what we are making especially when it comes to digital domain already in this year we have adopted and proposed our our legislation to to revise our cyber security rules and there we were addressing also our critical infrastructure that we were proposing as a commission that we will look now all the fields of our critical infrastructure which is uh uh totally 18 different areas defined in our niche two directive uh that what kind of risky components we have there uh and how we are able also to to assess and mitigate those risks what what uh um these different stakeholders there and companies are posing so really to look that we don’t have high risk vendors inside in our critical infrastructure and if there’s high risk vendors what are the critical components and how we are mitigating those risks so we are looking all the rest we have been already focusing during the last years to 5g networks but now we are also looking at the critical fields of our critical infrastructure and how we are mitigating those risks so we are looking all the fields like financing energy water uh health care so all this sector, that what kind of risks there could be in this value chain, this ICT supply chain, and how we are mitigating those risks.
And also on next week, when we will propose our tech sovereignty package, one important part of that is AI and Cloud Development Act. And there we are also defining a sovereign cloud, that what does it mean to have a sovereign cloud. And we see that clearly there is that kind of very sensitive areas in our economy, very critical sectors, where it’s important, for example, that the cloud is controlled by Europeans and also that the data is localized in Europe. It’s not the case in all the services, of course, but when we speak about very critical services of our economies, we have to be also, we have to look that we are able to control always the information and data and their services in all circumstances.
So we are working on that. Thank you.
And how do you believe we can combine the data and the services of the European Union? Thank you. And how do you believe we can combine AI competitiveness with AI sovereignty?
can we uh i think we can so i’m i’m also uh i’m very sure that we have everything what is needed also to be very competitive in ai and in all technologies because like i said earlier that we have excellent research and science and we have so much potential in our startups and also we have very strong industrial bases as well but now we have to really boost the innovations and investments in the european union especially when it comes to ai we have there for example 8 000 startups which are developing and training ai and there’s huge potential but one big obstacle for them has been that they haven’t had access to computing capacity and that’s why together with our member states we are investing now into 19 ai factories to give this computing capacity for our startups and for our smes to train and develop ai created in europe And the idea around AI factories is really to bring together not only the computing capacity to train and develop AI, but also high quality data sets and also to talent and excellence of AI.
Because in the same time when we are working to develop our European AI, which is created by European content, by our languages, also it’s important to support all our businesses to uptake AI. In last year, already 50 % more businesses were using AI than a year before. So it has been increasing very fast, but still there’s big differences between the member states and between different industries and public sector. So we have very clear like two parts where we are now working. One is really to boost innovations and investments in AI, especially we are fostering this with the investments to computing capacity and also to building the competence and talent. But then another important sector is really to support our public sector, industries and SMEs to uptake AI.
Thank you. Then on to a different topic now. Do you think that open source and open standards are important for Europe’s digital resilience? And if so, how are you going to support them in practice?
Yes, it will be a very key part of our next week’s tech sovereignty package, our open source strategy, because we see that while using open source technologies, we can really boost our own homegrown technologies and our companies in European Union, they can get a great boost by that. So we should use it also more strategically. And next week, we will also propose our strategy and action plan on that.
How do we bring, we’re back to digital sovereignty, I take questions in the order in which they come. How do we bring private capital on board on digital sovereignty concretely and not just the big finance, but also large EU company and incumbents?
Yeah, the good news is that we have a lot of capital in the European Union. So we know that we have more than 30 trillion euros only in the bank accounts in the European Union. But of course, one main question is that we should really mobilize all these savings to investments. And one challenge is really our households, because European families and households, they tend to keep their savings on the bank accounts instead of investing them. There’s big differences between member states. In Nordics, more than 50 percent of the households, they are investing. They are investing to stock markets or to funds their savings. But in many big member states, it’s only a few percent of the households who are doing that.
So there we have to really also support our member states, because this is very much up to taxation. For example, in different member states, it’s how much they are encouraging, for example, citizens to really invest. savings. But then also when we speak about institutional investors and pension funds, there’s a lot of work we have to really do with them, that they are also investing more to European markets, because too often it happens that they are investing to USA markets instead of European Union. So we are working now with our savings and investments union package together with our Commissioner Albuquerque. We have also a very ambitious plan there, and I see that this is the most important part of our tech sovereignty, really to make sure that we are able to really mobilize now the capital also to support these investments which are needed.
I think nowadays it’s quite, we can’t maybe say that it’s easy, but there is much better opportunities now for the startup companies to get very early stage support. But when investments more than 50 million euros, 100 million euros are needed, it’s still very difficult to get that from Europe. And when we speak about technology companies, it’s crucial often for them to have big, big tickets. And there we have to work also that we are able to also give these opportunities for growth for those companies. Thank you very much.
Now, thanks a lot for answering our questions. I know there were maybe one or two more questions, but I’ve taken as many as possible. And I understand we’re now asking for a family photo with some of our colleagues. So I’ll leave, I’ll make room, and I’ll ask our .eu colleagues and EURID colleagues to join us on stage, please, together with you, Madam Vice President, and thank you very much for answering our questions. Thank you.
A European rEUnion is the concept under which Malta’s EU presidency took off on January 1. The smallest EU country will now lead the EU during these turbulent times. Digital is part of Malta’s uniquen…
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 5.1.3 Calm before the storm? New gTLD growth in 2015. . . . . . . . . . . 38 …
Future activities may include institutionalising mechanisms to swiftly mobilise cybersecurity experts in case of cyber-attacks and emergencies and capacity-building.Latin America and the CaribbeanCont…
The European Commission has launched a public consultation on the evaluation and revision of the Regulations for the .eu top-level domain (TLD) – the country-code TLD for the European Union. The cons…
Central to this vision is the pledge to enable free, safe, and open involvement for all participants, emphasising the creation of opportunities for traditionally marginalised groups, which is key to t…
A multi-stakeholder approach that facilitates the engagement and participation of all groups, including the civil society, women, and youth, will guarantee inclusiveness and address transformational d…
The Internet has provided access to information for billions, thereby fostering collaboration, connection and sustainable development. It is a global public good that should benefit everyone, everywhe…
Recent global events, like the COVID-19 pandemic, have underscored how vital the internet is in our modern age. It has become our lifeline, connecting us to essential information, education, and most …
However, the less national governments have authority over the digital realm, the more digital sovereignty shifts to tech companies. Meta, Google, Microsoft, and other big platforms now control all fo…
The EC has proposed a package of measures under the umbrella term ‘European Chips Act’ ‘to ensure the EU’s security of supply, resilience, and technological leadership in semiconductor technologies an…
Although some tech companies are benefiting from a convergence of interests – AI companies provide an example – others are being confronted with the clash between their economic interests (i.e. market…
The European Commission has launched its Cloud Sovereignty Framework to assess the independence of cloud services. The initiative defines clear criteria and scoring methods for evaluating how provider…
The EC has proposed a package of measures under the umbrella term ‘European Chips Act’ ‘to ensure the EU’s security of supply, resilience, and technological leadership in semiconductor technologies an…
Most likely, this provision will affect states like California that have moved forward with AI regulatory frameworks. It can set new tensions in the triangle between the White House, Silicon Valley, a…
This should be presented in a spanning the breadth of fundamental research, coordinated way across the landscape of bodies development and innovation – leveraging …
Legend has it that in the 13th century Dominican friar Albertus Magnus built an artificial ‘brazen head’ that could talk and answer any question asked. According to story, his student, philosopher Tho…
Shown on a logarithmic scale. Source: OpenAI Access to computing power is essential to the development and use of AI, and has been a dominant trend in AI breakthroughs of the past decade. The comput…
Joint research initiatives are slated (quantum, semiconductor programs with Japan, Canada, South Korea). Australia Cybersecurity- Cyber Dialogues: Exploration of Mutual Recognition Agreements (Cybe…
Unlike in the USA, where there is a tradition of big companies being the key business players, in the EU SMEs are representing almost all the business entities in the region. As ENISA suggests, increa…
In the context of barriers, it suggests a people-centric approach that empowers citizens, and to that end favours digital financial literacy programmes, improved access to information and greater tran…
So technical progress must not be a zero-sum game where every winner creates a loser. Together we must fight for a digital world where everyone is on the winning side. And this is possible. So we must…
And it’s my absolute pleasure to welcome you here in Vilnius today. And I’m really, absolutely amazed that we are getting back to the numbers that we saw before the pandemic. Last year, at the same ti…
So that takes us back to governance. There you need to create the bodies that work with industry over time to share information, reduce informational asymmetries, do iterative policy that doesn’t hamp…
4. (2) Cybersecurity geopolitics: The search for new governance mechanisms In 2017, cybersecurity featured high in the public space with the WannaCry attacks, the Microsoft Digital Geneva Convention…
Divisions run deep. The world in which we live was shaped by the principles of Western Europe, the core of which is the respect of the individual, of human rights and of the rule of law. China aspires…
China, for example, who has long supported research in the field of AI, has recently released a national AI development plan, intended to make the country the world leader in the field by 2030. As the…
The model’s open-weight design meant researchers and developers worldwide could inspect and fine-tune it freely. DeepSeek’s model sent shock waves through the industry, even triggering a ‘Sputnik mome…
In the serene backdrop of the Swiss Alps, the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos stands as a barometer for the year’s technological zeitgeist. Tracing back to 1996, when John Barlow’s proclamation of…
At the same time, understanding nitrogen fixation, this is nowadays, this is relevant for fertilizers, for ammonia, and this is done nowadays with the Haber process, that’s an industrial process that …
### Environmental Sustainability Environmental considerations were highlighted as an integral part of AI governance, not an afterthought. ## Future Commitments The speakers established commitments f…
It’s over. The 9th IGF has come to a close and by now, most of Diplo’s team are back home or en route. It’s been a very full week with lots of interesting sessions, engaging discussions, and fruitful …
The last day at the WSIS Forum 2017 featured discussions of topics such as access and connectivity, emerging technologies, cybersecurity, and trust. If used wisely, information and communications tec…
The closing ambiance was a blend of introspection, celebration, and progressive thought, eagerly looking to the promise held by technological advancements.The Secretary General’s renowned standing len…
It’s not intended as a criticism that things are not moving fast. It is not intended as a criticism that country X or country Y is not doing enough. I think let’s look at it all collectively. There’s …
“Henna Virkkunen is the Executive Vice‑President of the European Commission for Technological Sovereignty, Security and Democracy.”
The opening ceremony transcript identifies Ms. Henna Virkkunen as the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission for Technological Sovereignty, Security and Democracy [S9].
“After the brief housekeeping, Florence introduced Vice President Virkkunen, who delivered the keynote address.”
The same transcript shows Virkkunen delivering a keynote speech following the opening remarks, confirming she was introduced and spoke as the keynote speaker [S9].
“Virkkunen highlighted the recent WSIS + 20 outcome, which reaffirmed the multi‑stakeholder model and gave the Internet Governance Forum a permanent mandate.”
The knowledge base notes the EU’s continued support for the WSIS + 20 review and the multi-stakeholder approach, and references the WSIS + 20 outcome, though it does not explicitly state a permanent IGF mandate [S30] and [S9].
“The EU has just adopted, earlier this month, a new international digital strategy implemented with partners worldwide.”
Virkkunen’s speech explicitly mentions that the European Union adopted a new international digital strategy earlier in the month [S9].
“Europe has led the world in digital regulation through the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, setting global benchmarks for a safer, fairer digital environment.”
EU digital policy documents reference the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act as flagship regulations, illustrating the EU’s leading role in digital regulation, though the knowledge base does not quantify a “global benchmark” status [S30].
The discussion reveals strong convergence between the Vice President and the moderator on several core pillars: inclusive multi‑stakeholder governance, international cooperation for digital sovereignty, active support for emerging technologies (quantum and AI), mobilisation of private capital, security of critical infrastructure, and the strategic use of open‑source. These points of agreement span internet governance, the enabling environment for digital development, financial mechanisms, security, AI and open‑source topics.
High consensus – the speakers consistently reinforce each other’s positions, suggesting that EU policy on digital sovereignty and internet governance is likely to move forward with a unified, multi‑dimensional strategy that combines regulatory action, investment, international partnership and technological openness.
The session was largely collaborative, with the moderator posing questions and the Vice President providing detailed answers. No overt conflict emerged; instead, the speakers shared common objectives—strengthening EU digital sovereignty, advancing emerging technologies, ensuring security, promoting open source, and mobilising capital—while offering different implementation pathways.
Low level of disagreement; the dialogue reflects consensus on goals with nuanced differences in proposed methods, suggesting constructive alignment rather than contention, which bodes well for coordinated policy development.
The discussion was shaped by a series of strategic pivots introduced by Vice President Virkkunen. Early remarks reaffirming the multi‑stakeholder model and the values underpinning the internet established a collaborative baseline. Subsequent clarifications that technological sovereignty is about capability, not isolation, and that regulation alone is insufficient, reframed the conversation from defensive protectionism to proactive capacity‑building. By presenting concrete elements of the upcoming tech‑sovereignty package and exposing practical bottlenecks—such as scaling quantum startups and mobilising private capital—the speaker moved the dialogue from abstract celebration to concrete policy action. Each of these insightful comments acted as a turning point, prompting new lines of questioning, deepening the analysis, and aligning participants around a shared vision of an open yet sovereign European digital future.
Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.
Related event

