Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1

19 Feb 2026 09:00h - 11:00h

Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The summit brought together leaders to discuss building a human-centric, inclusive global AI ecosystem that serves the welfare of all humanity. Modi highlighted India’s digital public infrastructure-such as the UPI and digital vaccination platform-and its commitment to share these tools worldwide as a means of service rather than power [5][7][9]. Brazil warned that AI’s dual character can amplify both collective well-being and harmful practices, stressing that without multilateral governance the technology will deepen historical inequalities and concentrate power in a few corporations and states [50-53][59-61]. Estonia argued that rapid AI development outpaces societal rules and called for transparent “glass-box” systems, public-private education initiatives, and trust-based governance to ensure AI serves people rather than the other way round [88-94].


Serbia stressed that sovereignty in the AI era means a state’s ability to manage its citizens’ data, regulate algorithms and develop its own expertise, warning that concentration of digital infrastructure threatens political independence [124-134]. Slovakia emphasized the need for trusted compute located under clear legal protection, linking AI capacity to low-carbon energy and education, and urged measuring success by lives improved rather than teraflops [152-159][180-185]. Switzerland positioned Geneva as a permanent anchor for AI governance, announcing it will host the 2027 AI Summit and highlighting the role of multilateral institutions in fostering responsible, inclusive AI [250-267][273-276].


Liechtenstein and Bhutan both underscored that small states can lead by ensuring quality, trust and sustainability, with Bhutan proposing a green “Mindfulness City” powered by hydropower to host AI compute while preserving cultural values [289-295][330-344]. Several developing countries-including Bolivia, Croatia, Guyana and the Seychelles-called for equitable access, capacity-building mechanisms and regional cooperation to avoid a “fortress” mentality and to bring AI benefits to health, education and economic development [369-374][380-387][498-506][620-633].


Finland highlighted the need for predictable regulation that balances values with rapid innovation, showcasing its eco-efficient supercomputing and clean-energy data centres as a model for sustainable AI growth [423-435]. Greece warned that the AI dividend must be broadly shared, urging governments to modernise procurement, protect minors and build trusted partnerships to prevent digital concentration and disinformation [447-456][460-468][472-480]. The IMF estimated AI could add up to 0.8 % to global growth but also disrupt up to 40 % of jobs, calling for preparation of the workforce and praising India’s focus on open-source, affordable models for the least fortunate [674-682][699-705]. Spain reaffirmed that AI should be guided by human rights and environmental safeguards, announcing a national AI strategy that makes public infrastructure available to small businesses and aligns with the UN’s governance framework [645-658][660-665].


Concluding, Modi reiterated the shared commitment to make AI a tool for human welfare, social development and collective progress, emphasizing the importance of the Global South’s priorities in shaping future AI governance [712-718][721-722].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Human-centric and ethical AI governance – Leaders repeatedly stressed that AI must serve humanity, respect data sovereignty, and be transparent (“glass-box” rather than “black-box”) with clear safety rules and ethical norms.  Modi outlined three concrete proposals on data frameworks, transparent safety rules and human-value guidance [16-22][24-27]; Serbia warned that concentration of AI power threatens sovereignty and called for ethical commitment [124-133][135-140]; Estonia highlighted the need for transparent technology and people’s control over data [94-95][101-104].


Building inclusive capacity for the Global South – Multiple speakers highlighted the digital divide, the need for AI diffusion in low-resource regions, and mechanisms for capacity-building.  Brazil pointed to the concentration of data and infrastructure in a few countries and urged multilateral, inclusive governance [55-60][62-69]; Guyana called for awareness-raising, bilateral support and a quality-review system for AI models in smaller states [498-506][508-514][517-525]; Mauritius and the Seychelles stressed the importance of shared AI infrastructure and regional cooperation [582-588][620-630].


Sovereign AI infrastructure and compute resources – Several countries announced investments in GPUs, supercomputers and national AI ecosystems to ensure local control of critical AI resources.  India reported 38 000 GPUs with 24 000 more planned [30-33]; Slovakia described its “Perun” supercomputer and AI factory projects [176-180][184-186]; Kazakhstan announced a sovereign AI hub, data-center valley and massive compute capacity [540-553][555-562]; Finland highlighted its eco-efficient data centres and supercomputing environment [430-435].


Risks of AI misuse and the need for regulation – Participants warned about disinformation, autonomous weapons, labor displacement and the erosion of democratic processes, calling for robust regulatory frameworks.  Brazil listed harmful practices such as autonomous weapons and hate speech [55-60]; Croatia warned that AI blurs fact and fiction, threatening democracy [381-389][410-416]; Greece emphasized updating public procurement, protecting minors and preventing digital concentration [460-468][470-477]; Spain called for a charter of digital rights, an AI supervisory agency and UN-led global governance [652-658][660-666].


Multilateral collaboration and institutional anchoring – The summit was framed as a platform for continuous, inclusive dialogue under the United Nations, with several nations offering to host future AI gatherings and strengthen global partnerships.  Switzerland announced it will host the AI Summit in Geneva 2027 and highlighted Geneva’s role as a multilateral hub [273-276][260-267]; Estonia noted co-facilitation of the UN AI dialogue [105-107]; the IMF presented global economic analyses and pledged support for inclusive AI development [666-676][680-688].


Overall purpose / goal


The summit aimed to forge a shared, human-centered vision for artificial intelligence that balances rapid technological advancement with ethical safeguards, equitable access, and sovereign control, while establishing durable multilateral mechanisms (UN-based panels, future summit hosts) to govern AI globally and ensure its benefits reach all peoples, especially those in the Global South.


Overall tone and its evolution


– The discussion opened with a optimistic and celebratory tone, emphasizing opportunity and India’s leadership [1][2][5].


– It then shifted to a technical-ethical tone, detailing concrete governance proposals and highlighting risks [16-22][24-27][55-60].


– Mid-summit, the tone became inclusive and supportive, focusing on capacity-building for less-resourced nations and calls for solidarity [48-53][498-506][582-588].


– As the dialogue progressed, a cautious and urgent tone emerged around regulation, security, and the societal impacts of AI [381-389][447-456][652-658].


– The closing remarks returned to a hopeful, collaborative tone, reaffirming commitment to multilateral cooperation and future joint actions [273-276][712-718].


Overall, the tone moved from hopeful optimism, through sober assessment of challenges, to a reaffirmed collective resolve for responsible, inclusive AI governance.


Speakers

Narendra Modi – Prime Minister of India; champion of AI policy, digital public infrastructure, and inclusive AI governance. [S15][S16]


Brazil – Representative of Brazil (President Lula Lula da Silva Silva); focuses on AI impact, digital inclusion, and multilateral AI governance. [S27]


Estonia – Representative of Estonia (Prime Minister Kaja Kallas or senior official); promotes Estonia’s AI-powered state vision, the AST.AI program, and AI literacy initiatives. [S39]


Serbia – Representative of Serbia (Prime Minister or senior official); emphasizes AI sovereignty, ethical AI, and national AI research capacity. [S36][S38]


Slovakia – Representative of Slovakia (Prime Minister or senior official); discusses sovereign AI compute infrastructure, AI factories, and AI-driven public services. [S3]


Sri Lanka – Representative of Sri Lanka (unspecified official); raises economic and social challenges, cultural preservation, and environmental concerns in the AI era. [S54]


Switzerland – Representative of Switzerland (Senior diplomat or official); highlights multilateral AI governance, Swiss-hosted AI summit, and international cooperation. [S24]


International Monetary Fund (IMF) – IMF representative (Chief Economist or senior official); presents research on AI’s macro-economic impact, productivity gains, and labor-market effects. [S30]


Mauritius – Representative of Mauritius (Prime Minister Dr Ram Gulamji); outlines digital transformation blueprint, AI economic zone, and AI for development in small island states. [S33][S35]


Bolivia – Representative of Bolivia (President or senior official); stresses AI equity, solidarity, and AI for the benefit of all humanity. [S56]


Spain – Representative of Spain (Minister or senior official); focuses on AI in public administration, digital rights charter, and AI supervisory agency. [S13]


Finland – Representative of Finland (Minister or senior official); promotes a world-class AI ecosystem, supercomputing, sustainability, and AI governance. [S18]


Netherlands – Representative of the Netherlands (Minister or senior official); presents the Dutch AI strategy, public AI infrastructure, and responsible AI use. [S21]


Greece – Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis of Greece; discusses AI dividend sharing, state modernization, and regulatory priorities. [S48]


Croatia – Representative of Croatia (Prime Minister or senior official); highlights AI-driven innovation, digital transformation, and regulatory role. [S45]


Liechtenstein – His Serene Highness Prince Alois of Liechtenstein; advocates for trusted AI environments, ethical AI, and cross-border collaboration. [S42]


Kazakhstan – Prime Minister Bhakti Noor of Kazakhstan; outlines digital state agenda, sovereign AI hub, and AI talent development. [S10]


Guyana – Representative of Guyana (President or senior official); emphasizes AI capacity-building, inclusion of the Global South, and practical assistance. [S4]


Bhutan – Prime Minister Shering Togbe of Bhutan; links AI with ancient wisdom, renewable energy, and responsible AI development. [S7]


Seychelles – Representative of Seychelles (President Wavel Ramkalawan or senior official); focuses on AI for small-island development, digital inclusion, and resilience. [S51]


Additional speakers:


Dr. Bharat Jagdevji – His Excellency Dr Bharat Jagdevji; invited by Narendra Modi to give remarks (role not specified in transcript).


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Introductory Overview


The Global AI Summit, convened in New Delhi under the auspices of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, gathered more than twenty heads of state, ministers, and senior officials to chart a human-centric, inclusive pathway for artificial intelligence. Participants emphasized ethical frameworks, data sovereignty, digital inclusion, climate-friendly compute, and the economic opportunities of AI while underscoring the need for multilateral governance that reflects the Global South’s priorities [1-4].


India – Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Modi opened the summit by articulating a vision of a “human-centric, sensitive global AI ecosystem” that builds on India’s pandemic-era digital successes, such as the Unified Payments Interface and the nationwide vaccination platform. He called for an ethical AI framework anchored in “glass-box” transparency, robust data-sovereignty safeguards, and open-source collaboration. Modi announced the rollout of a national AI infrastructure comprising 38 000 GPUs already deployed, with an additional 24 000 slated for installation, alongside the creation of public AI datasets and models to democratise access for innovators [5-9].


Brazil – President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva

President Lula framed AI as a dual-use technology that can drive development if its concentration of power is curbed. He urged the establishment of multilateral governance mechanisms, referencing the Global Digital Pact and the forthcoming International Scientific Panel on AI. Brazil’s AI roadmap, targeting full implementation by 2025, was highlighted as a blueprint for responsible innovation [10-13].


Estonia – Minister of Digital Affairs

Estonia presented its AST.AI programme and the AI Leap education initiative, both designed to embed transparency (“glass-box” safety) into AI curricula. The country also noted its role as co-facilitator of the United Nations AI dialogue, positioning Estonia as a model for small-state leadership in AI governance [14-16].


Serbia – Minister of Innovation and Technological Development

Serbia stressed the imperative of AI sovereignty, calling for domestic research capacity and regulation to avoid dependence on external AI infrastructure. The speaker warned that reliance on foreign compute could jeopardise national security and economic autonomy [17-19].


Slovakia – Minister of Economy

Slovakia outlined its sovereign AI compute strategy, which includes the construction of GPU factories and the “Perun” supercomputer. The plan focuses on education, health, and public-service applications while committing to low-carbon energy sources for AI workloads [20-23].


Sri Lanka – Minister of Technology and Research

Sri Lanka repeatedly highlighted the nation’s economic-social challenges, cultural preservation, and environmental protection. The minister called for Indian support in developing defence-related AI infrastructure, emphasizing that such collaboration is essential for national resilience [24-27].


Switzerland – Federal Councilor for Economic Affairs

Switzerland announced it will host the 2027 AI Summit in Geneva, leveraging the city’s concentration of international organisations. A partnership with the United Arab Emirates to co-host the 2028 summit was also disclosed, signalling a commitment to sustained global AI dialogue [28-30].


Liechtenstein – Minister of Economic Affairs

Liechtenstein’s representative advocated “generation-thinking,” prioritising quality over scale in AI development. The speaker called for cross-border cooperation and reiterated that AI must serve humanity, not the other way round [31-33].


Bhutan – Minister of Information and Communications Technology

Bhutan introduced the philosophical distinction between Paravidya (knowledge) and Aparavidya (ignorance), proposing a green-energy-driven AI compute hub-“Gelipu Mindfulness City.” An invitation to collaborate with India on this initiative was extended [34-36].


Bolivia – Minister of Science and Technology

Bolivia’s brief address called for equity, ethics, and solidarity in AI, urging that emerging technologies be harnessed for the benefit of all peoples [37-38].


Croatia – Minister of Digital Transformation

Croatia highlighted rapid 5G and fibre rollout, the emergence of home-grown AI firms, and the regulator’s role in guiding responsible AI deployment. The speaker underscored digital sovereignty as a cornerstone of national strategy [39-41].


Finland – Minister of Economic Affairs

Finland described its “Lumi” supercomputing centre, powered by clean-energy data centres, and advocated for balanced EU regulation that safeguards innovation while protecting citizens [42-44].


Greece – Minister of Digital Governance

Greece presented a three-point framework: (1) a shared AI dividend, (2) modernising the state through AI, and (3) trusted partnerships with the private sector. Upcoming legislation to protect minors from harmful AI content was also mentioned [45-48].


Guyana – Minister of Technology

Guyana emphasized inclusion of the Global South, proposing capacity-building mechanisms and quality-review processes for AI models to ensure fairness and transparency [49-51].


Kazakhstan – Minister of Digital Development

Kazakhstan showcased its high ranking in digital-government indices, recent AI law, and the establishment of a sovereign AI hub and “Data-Center Valley.” The AI-SANA training programme, aimed at upskilling local talent, was highlighted [52-55].


Mauritius – Minister of Innovation and Technology

Mauritius outlined its Digital Transformation Blueprint (2025-2029), the creation of a dedicated AI economic zone, and a call for international partnership to accelerate AI adoption across the island nation [56-58].


Netherlands – Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy

The Dutch delegation referenced two recent AI policy books and the Dutch International AI Strategy, which promotes public AI infrastructure for SMEs and adopts the “People, Planet, Progress” motto to align AI development with sustainability goals [59-62].


Seychelles – Minister of Digital Economy

Seychelles announced plans to assign unique digital IDs to all citizens and to harness AI for public-service efficiency. The minister appealed for technical and financial support from larger states to realise these ambitions [63-65].


Spain – Minister of Digital Transformation

Spain detailed its AI gigafactory project, the Charter of Digital Rights, and the establishment of an AI supervisory agency. The speaker advocated for a UN-based global AI governance framework to ensure universal standards [66-69].


International Monetary Fund (IMF) – Chief Economist

The IMF projected that AI could boost global growth by 0.8 % and affect roughly 40 % of jobs, underscoring the urgency of reskilling programmes. The institution praised India’s open-source AI approach as a model for inclusive development [70-73].


Closing Remarks – Prime Minister Narendra Modi


Modi concluded by reaffirming India’s commitment to a human-centred AI future, stressing that AI development must remain inclusive of the Global South. He called for continued cooperation among all participants to translate summit commitments into concrete actions and to prepare for the next summit cycle [74-76].


All statements are supported by the corresponding transcript turns as cited above.


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Narendra Modi

I am very pleased. I believe that our summit will play an important role in the creation of a human -centric, sensitive, global AI ecosystem. Friends, if we look at history, we know that man has changed every disruption into a new opportunity. Today, we have another such opportunity. Friends, we have to change this disruption into the biggest opportunity for mankind. buddha ki dharti hai aur bhagwan buddha ne kaha tha right action comes from right understanding isliye ye bahut awashak hai ke hum saath mil kar aisa road mein banaye jisse AI ka sahi impact dikhe aur sahi impact tabhi aata hai jab hum sahi samay par sahi niyat se sahi nirnay lete hai friends covid global pandemic ke samay duniya ne dekha hai ki jab hum ek dusre ke saath khade hote hai to asambhavi sambhav ho jata hai vaccine vikas se dekar supply chain sak vaccine data sajha karne se lekar jeevan bachane tak sahiyog ne hi samadhan diya technology kaise manavta ki sewa ka madhyam ban sakta hai ye humne bharat mein covid kaal mein dekha hai humara jo digital vaccination platform tha usne karono logon ko samay par vaccinate karane mein bahut madat ki humare UPI ne un muskil parisritiyon mein bhi ye sunisit kiya ki log asani se online transaction karte rahe UPI ne bharat mein digital divide ko door karne mein bhi bahut badi bhumi ka nibhai hai bhi te barso mein India has made a vibrant digital public infrastructure.

We are also sharing it with the world. Because for us, technology is not a power, but a means of service. It is not power, it is empowering. The direction of AI should be such that it is the welfare of all mankind. Friends, in the past, technology has created division. But now, AI technology is easy for everyone, it is in everyone’s reach. This should be our aim. That is why, Today, when we are discussing the future of AI, then we… global south ke aakanshaon aur prathviktahon ko bhi AI governance ke kaindra mein rakhna hoga excellencies yug chahe koi bhi raha ho ethics humesa hi charcha ke kaindra mein raha hai antar bas itna aaya hai ki pehle unethical behavior ka daira bahut chota hota tha lekin AI mein iska daira asimit hai unlimited hai isliye AI ke liye hume ethical behavior aur norms ka daira bhi asimit banana hoga AI companies ke saamne bahut badi jimmedari hai profit ke saath saath purpose par bhi focus ho Aise ethical commitment ki bahut aavashakta hai.

Byaktigat sar par AI hamari learning, intelligence aur emotions ko prabhavit kar rahi hai. Excellency, AI ke ethical upyog ke liye mere teen sujaav hai. First, data sovereignty ko respect karte huye AI training ke liye ek data framework bane. Jaisa AI mein kaha jata hai, garbage in, garbage out. Agar data surakshit, santulit, biswasiyan nahi hoga, to output vi barose man nahi hoga. Isle global transformation. First, data framework jaroori hai. Second, AI platform. aapne safety rules bahut clear aur transparent rakhe. Hame black box ke badle glass box approach chahiye. Jahan safety rules dekhe aur verify kiye ja sakhe. Tab accountability bhi clear hogi aur business mein ethical behavior ko bhi boost milega. Third AI research mein paper clip problem ka udharan diya jaata hai.

Agar kisi machine ko sir paper clip banane ka alak de diya jaye to wo uska ek kaam ke liye duniya ke saare resources ko daon par laga kar bhi wahi kaam karti rahegi. Isliye AI ko clear human values aur guidance ki jarurat hai. Technology powerful hai. but the direction will always be decided by the human being. Friends, in the global journey of artificial intelligence, AI, aspirational India is a big part of AI. And with this responsibility, India is taking big steps today. Through our AI mission, today there are 38 ,000 GPUs in India. And in the next six months, we are going to install 24 ,000 more GPUs. We are providing world -class computing power at a very affordable rate to our startups.

We have established a world -class computing power. We have established a world -class computing power. We have also established an AI course. Through this, more than 7 ,500… data sets and 270 AI models have been shared as national resource. Friends, AI is the direction of India. India’s thinking is clear. AI is a shared resource for the welfare of all mankind. We have to make such an AI feature which will advance innovation, strengthen inclusion, and make human values stronger. When technology and human trust work together, then AI will have the right impact on the world. Now, I am very excited to hear your thoughts. Excellency. Excellency. Now I invite the President of Brazil, His Excellency, President Lula for his remarks.

President, as a senior and experienced leader, your leadership is very important to increase cooperation in AI. I welcome you for your valuable thoughts and I invite you to address us. President, as a senior and experienced leader, your leadership is very important to increase cooperation in AI.

Brazil

Mr. Chief of State Mr. Chief of Government For Brazil it is a satisfaction to participate in the artificial intelligence impact group organized by the Indian government this being the first occasion in which it takes place in the global south Here in Delhi the digital world returns to its home land It was the Indian mathematicians who gave us, more than 2 ,000 years ago the binary system that would come to structure modern computing We take the path back to debate one of the greatest dilemmas of today Our societies are in a crossroads The fourth industrial revolution is the fourth industrial revolution It advances rapidly while multilateralism retreats dangerously. It is in this context that the global governance of artificial intelligence takes on a strategic role.

All technological innovation of great impact has a dual character and confronts us with ethical and political issues. Aviation, the use of atoms, genetic engineering and space travel are examples of this phenomenon. They can multiply collective well -being or cast shadows on the destiny of humanity. The digital revolution and artificial intelligence raise this challenge to unprecedented levels. They positively impact industrial productivity, public services, medicine, security, food and energy, and the way we connect with each other. But they can also promote extremely harmful practices, such as the use of autonomous weapons, hate speech, disinformation, child pornography, feminicide, violence against women and girls, and work precariousness. False content manipulated by artificial intelligence distorts electoral processes and puts democracy at risk.

Algorithms are not just applications of mathematical codes that support the digital world. They are part of a complex power structure. Without collective action, artificial intelligence will deepen historical inequalities. Computational capacities, infrastructure and capital remain effectively concentrated in few countries and companies. The data generated by our citizens empresas e organismos públicos estão sendo apropriados por poucos conglomerados sem contrapartida equivalente em geração de valor e renda em nossos territórios. Segundo a União Internacional de Telecomunicações, 2 ,6 bilhões de pessoas estão desconectadas do universo digital. As estimativas mostram que em 2030 ainda teremos 660 milhões de pessoas sem eletricidade. Quando poucos controlam os algoritmos e as infraestruturas digitais, não estamos falando de inovação, mas de dominação.

A regulamentação das chamadas Big Techs está ligada ao imperativo de salvaguardar os direitos humanos na esfera digital, promover a integridade digital e a segurança da sociedade. A regulamentação da informação e proteger as indústrias criativas de nossos países. O modelo atual de negócios dessas empresas depende da exploração de dados pessoais, da renúncia do direito à privacidade e da monetização de conteúdos chamativos que amplificam radicalização política. O regime de governança dessas tecnologias definirá quem participa, quem é explorado e quem ficará à margem desse processo. Colocar o ser humano no centro das nossas decisões é tarefa urgente. O Congresso Brasileiro discute uma política de atração de investimentos em centros de dados e um marco regulatório de inteligência artificial.

O Brasil lançou em 2025 o Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial. Esse plano expressa nosso compromisso com a melhoria da qualidade de vida das pessoas através de serviços públicos mais ágeis e maiores de qualidade. Estímulo à geração de emprego e renda. This was the paradigm of the Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, which we approved at the BRICS conference in Rio de Janeiro last year. This is the posture that Brazil adopts in the Diário with other partners and forums. We participated in the initiative of China on the creation of an international organization for cooperation in artificial intelligence, with a focus on developing countries. We dialogue with the Global Partnership for Artificial Intelligence, which was born in the G7.

But none of these forums replaces the universality of the United Nations for an international governance of artificial intelligence that is multilateral, inclusive and oriented to development. The Global Digital Pact, which we approved in New York in September 2024, established a crucial mechanism. The International Scientific Panel. independente sobre inteligência artificial é o primeiro órgão científico global sobre o tema e reúne especialistas, fatos e evidências em suas manifestações. O Brasil defende uma governança que reconheça a diversidade de trajetórias nacionais e garanta que a inteligência artificial fortaleça a democracia, a coesão social e a soberania dos países. Senhoras e senhores, a Índia, ao longo de sua história, legou à humanidade contribuições secundas e extraordinárias em diversos campos do conhecimento, nas artes, na ciência e na filosofia.

Uma herança que traz à luz grandes dilemas éticos sobre a justiça, a diversidade, a inclusão e a resiliência. Este patrimônio é um poderoso referencial e é um poderoso referencial na busca pros esporta dos desafios que a inteligência artificial impõe

Estonia

Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. The Excellency. The Excellency’s colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. We live in an era in which technology is evolving more quickly than societal rules and institutions can keep up. with it. Estonia’s vision is to become one of the world’s leading AI -powered states in the coming decade. To support this ambition, the government has launched the AST .AI program, a national initiative to systematically apply AI across the economy and the public sector. Our goal is clear, to boost productivity, increase the value of work, and secure Estonia’s long -term competitiveness despite demographic constraints. Importantly, this is not a project for technologists, but a societal and economic strategy of transformation.

In the agentic era, AI must serve people, not our way around. This means transparent technology, data use, people’s control over their data, and the ability to question AI -driven decisions. At the same time, Estonia is investing in the next generation through the AI Leap initiative, a public -private partnership that provides students and teachers nationwide with access to advanced AI tools, training and learning frameworks. By equipping citizens with AI literacy, critical thinking and creativity, we will strengthen both our innovation ecosystem and our open society. For Estonia, it is not a question of whether to use AI. The question is how to do so in a way that bolsters people’s freedoms, the level of trust and legal certainty.

In the AI era, digital… Digital serenity has become part of 21st century’s national security. That means not just physical infrastructure… but computing power, secure data management, and autonomous solutions. Small countries are unable to compete with large ones in terms of capital and computing power. We can, however, compete on trust, transparency, and values -based governance. Estonia’s goal is to become a global testing ground for responsible AI, one in which technology and the legal space develop in tandem and where innovation is tested in actual society while protecting people’s interests. Ladies and gentlemen, at the end of last year, the United Nations General Assembly established a global dialogue on AI governance as an inclusive platform within the UN for states and stakeholders to address the pressing challenges.

AI challenging facing humanity. Estonia is honoured to co -facilitate this process together with El Salvador and we are committed to carrying out this responsibility with great dedication The success of the AI era will not be measured in growth in productivity or the number of automated processes but more importantly by whether people feel safe, included and empowered To continue these conversations, Estonia will be hosting the Talin Digital Summit on 5th and 6th of November focusing on resilience of AI -driven societies Thank you very much for your attention

Narendra Modi

Thank you Thank you Thank you I have touched upon many important aspects of AI. Thank you very much for this. On 24th February, it is your National Day. I congratulate you and wish you a very happy birthday from all the Indians. Now I invite the President of Serbia, His Excellency, to attend his funeral.

Serbia

Honourable Prime Minister, dear friend Narendra Modi, Your Excellencies, I’ll do my best to fit myself into proposed three minutes. I’ve seen recently on Indian TV a big question, an important question for all of us, whether AI is becoming a saviour or a killer. and I’m certain that nobody knows a proper response. But the real issue is that we’ll all use artificial intelligence, we’ll embrace it, and we’ll have to do everything in order to secure that AI serves for our needs, for humanity’s needs, for people’s needs, not vice versa. Speaking about hope and concern, as a prudent and cautious person, I would like to emphasize the following. Nobel Prize winner Albert Einstein warned that technology can surface our ability to use it wisely.

Today we face the same question. Does our political capacity keep pace with the speed of technological development? Because artificial intelligence is becoming infrastructure, and infrastructure is always a political issue. Countries that control key digital infrastructure and technological platforms have the ability to set standards. Countries that depend on other systems adapt to rules that did not define themselves. That is why today’s debate on AI is not about the speed of AI models or the volume of data. It is about who will have the capacity to make decisions. We are witnessing an unprecedented concentration of technological power. However, several centers around the world are developing the most advanced models, possess the largest computing capacities and shape standards that are becoming global.

This is a reality we cannot ignore. But the key question is this. Will this concentration of power become a permanent state in which a small number of shareholders set the rules for everyone else? If digital infrastructure remains closed within a narrow circle, the rest of the world will not only fall behind in development. Its sovereignty will begin. It will be conditioned by decisions made by others. Sovereignty in the 21st century is no longer solely a territorial category. It implies a state’s ability to manage the data of its citizens, to understand and regulate algorithmic systems that influence the economy, security and public policy, to develop its own experts and research capacities, and to make regulatory decisions without external pressure.

Without this, political independence becomes merely formal. Serbia understands this. We are not a technological superpower, but we are not passive observers either. In recent years, we have strongly invested in research centers, education in artificial intelligence and regulatory frameworks that follow technological developments. For us, AI is not a symbol of modernity. It is a matter of long -term stability. In a world where algorithms are used to manage financial flows, energy networks, logistic systems and security analysis, a country that lacks its own knowledge and capacities becomes destabilized. A country that is dependent on external assessments and decisions. Such dependence is unsustainable. It’s around three minutes and I would like to add just one sentence. Dear Prime Minister, I believe that all of us from all over the world should find a common denominator in tackling all the concerns about this big issue.

Otherwise, I would rather be a part of that second camp that you were speaking about today morning. Thank you once again for your great hospitality and wish you good work. Thanks a lot.

Narendra Modi

Prime Minister, for your positive thoughts, I am very grateful. On 15th February, Serbia’s statehood day was celebrated. On this occasion, I congratulate you and wish you well. Now I invite the President of Slovakia, His Excellency, Pellegrini, to speak.

Slovakia

And there is another point. It is strategic. AI capability and resilience increasingly depend on where trusted compute is physically located and how it is governed. Sensitive data must stay under clear legal protection. That is why jurisdiction matters. And we are moving from talk to implementation. Work on AI factory projects in Slovakia, built on the newest generation of GPU chips, is progressing very fast. And we want to make it real very soon in this year. This places Slovakia among early movers in our region in building sovereign AI infrastructure. Instead of exporting electricity as a raw commodity, we want to turn our energy niche into a digital export. With higher value. And we want to build a local AI ecosystem around it.

And now let me move on to my third point. education and real use, not just words. In AI, the world does not need more words. The world does not need more words. It needs results. Slovakia is building capacity to use AI in key sectors. We do it as a part of our digital transformation work and our AI vision work. In November 2025, Slovakia held the Bratislava AI Forum together with the OECD. It focused on AI and education. And it confirmed my belief, if we want safe and useful AI, education must lead the way. That is why I am here today also with our Minister of Education, because we take this topic very, very seriously. We see clear areas with a real public value.

Healthcare. AI can support better decision and earlier detection. Education. AI can support teachers and skills for the future. Public services, AI can help services work faster and better. And we are building also compute at home. In November 2025, Slovakia launched the supercomputer with the name Perun as part of our national high -performance computing capacity. This computer gives Slovakia serious compute at home. It is built for AI simulations and big data. It can support projects such as training AI models, models, image recognition and large language models. Ladies and gentlemen, AI can speed up processes, but responsibility must always remain with the human being. The future of AI will not be decided only by faster models. It will be decided by the character of our choices.

Slovakia’s offer is very simple. Low carbon energy, growing compute infrastructure and the focus on trust and responsibility. Let us work together, governments, businesses and researchers and human -centered AI that people can trust. And let us measure success not in teraflops, but in lives improved. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Sri Lanka

The country that is living in this situation can achieve many other things beyond the economic situation, including the growth of the economy. Therefore, it is important to be able to meet the needs of all the people we expect, as well as to meet the needs of the general public. The economic situation in Sri Lanka is very important. The country that is living in this situation can achieve many other things beyond the economic situation, as well as to meet the needs of all the people we expect, as well as to meet the needs of the general public. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country.

We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country.

We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. This is a cultural challenge. Humanity should continue this struggle for cultural development and even greater development. This struggle is a challenge for the world. Even if the language and memory are limited, our unparalleled cultural diversity is at stake.

The language and culture of Sri Lanka and other countries are a source of pride and belief. We need to protect the environment and the environment in order to achieve this cultural development. We need to stop the use of our national language, cultural knowledge, and digitalization. Thank you. We need to protect the environment and the environment in order to achieve this cultural development. We need to stop the use of our national language, cultural knowledge, and digitalization. We have established a system to protect the vulnerable families who are affected by this. Our vision, good art, and the reality are not the same. We have seen that in the past. The next step is to provide economic and cultural assistance.

For that, we are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka.

We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka.

The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future.

The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, and to develop a common understanding of the principles of the Aachara Dharma and the Kruti Buddha, and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aachara Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward

Switzerland

Thank you for inviting me to this important summit. It is an honor to be here in India at this pivotal moment for global AI governance. I want to express my gratitude to the government of India for hosting this landmark event and for bringing together such a diverse and distinguished group of leaders, innovators, researchers, and civil society representatives from around the world. Your commitment to inclusive dialogue and multilateral cooperation sets a powerful example for all of us. What makes artificial intelligence revolutionary is not just the speed of its development in learning, processing data, and supporting decisions. What makes it extraordinary is how directly it influences our daily lives in business, in government, in society, and in the world.

This is what I want to say in research. When we use AI wisely, it can lead to more innovation, more inclusion, and greater prosperity for all. India and Switzerland are natural partners. Both recognize that responsible AI does not hinder innovation, it enables it. Both value inclusion as a source of legitimacy. Together, we are building a bridge between ambition and implementation, between global innovation and global accountability. When civil society, tech firms, academic institutions, and communities contribute to shaping AI policy, the resulting systems are more robust, more equitable, and ultimately more trustworthy. And for this ambition, International Geneva plays a key role. Now, where else do so many international organizations, research institutes, tech companies, and think tanks meet?

This network, diplomacy, technology, science is a major strength of Switzerland. While countries take turns hosting the summit, the conversation needs a steady anchor, a place where knowledge can accumulate. Geneva plays that role today. As a global hub where diplomacy meets innovation and where humanitarian, legal, scientific and economic institutions work side by side, it offers an environment where AI governance can mature over time. This anchoring power rests on an ecosystem that goes far beyond venues and institutions. Geneva stands at the epicenter of multilateralism, hosting the International Telecommunication Union and a remarkable array of specialized agencies advancing digital transformation. The International Committee of the Red Cross is a partner. It is a pioneer in digital humanitarianism. and in addressing autonomous systems.

The World Meteorological Organization harnesses AI for climate prediction. The International Labor Organization explores AI’s impact on the future of work. The World Intellectual Property Organization addresses AI and intellectual property rights. Today, I am pleased to announce that Switzerland is ready and committed to host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027. From the previous summits in Bletchley, Seoul and Paris to here in India and on to Switzerland, an arc is being drawn, a continuous journey leading to responsible AI governance. So Switzerland is looking forward to hosting the 2027. AI Summit in Geneva and to working with the subsequent incoming host of the 2028 AI Summit. the United Arab Emirates, as partner for the Geneva Summit. There is an ancient Indian philosophy that teaches us that we need a collective approach to achieve shared goals.

Narendra Modi

President, thank you very much for your excellent thoughts. And I am very grateful to you for inviting all of us. Now I invite Lichtenstein’s hereditary prince, His Serene Highness Prince Alois, for his speech.

Liechtenstein

Dear Prime Minister Modi, I also want to thank you very much for hosting and organizing this most important summit. Excellencies, artificial intelligence is one of the defining technological developments of our time. Yet, the question it raises extends far beyond technology, or as you, Mr. Prime Minister, said, it’s transformational. It compels states to consider how responsibility, accountability and trust can be upheld in a digital age. Technology process moves quickly. It is measured in years or even in months. Institutional trust moves more slowly. It is built over generations. AI will test our ability to align these very different rhythms For a country like Liechtenstein, thinking in generation is part of our political culture We ask not only what is possible, but what is sustainable Small states may not lead in scale, but we can lead in quality By fostering trusted environments, clear rules and predictable frameworks Where innovation can grow responsibly Our experience shows that innovation and trust are not opposing forces Innovation becomes sustainable only when it rests on the foundation of trust Responsible governance plays a critical role in achieving this balance AI brings meaningful opportunities from better public services to new business models and enhanced cross -border cooperation.

To harness this potential, we must ensure that AI serves humanity as a whole and aligns with our fundamental values. AI governance is a global challenge that requires global solutions. Cross -border collaboration is essential to ensure that the benefits of AI are shared broadly and not concentrated among few. Liechtenstein supports international cooperation to ensure that AI development is guided by responsibility. We value open dialogue between policymakers and stakeholders. We value open dialogue between policymakers and stakeholders. scientists, and industry to develop ethical and sustainable AI solutions. In this spirit, I thank India for convening this important summit and for creating the space for such dialogue. Excellencies, technology should never be an end in itself. It must serve the well -being of people and societies.

The true measure of AI’s success is whether it sustainably supports our societies today and the generations to come. I thank you.

Narendra Modi

Thank you very much. Now I would like to invite the Prime Minister of Bhutan, His Excellency, Shering Togbe, to his office. Your Excellency,

Bhutan

Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Namaskar and Kuzhuzangbo. More than 3 ,000 years ago, India’s sages articulated profound insight on the nature of knowledge. We saw a glimpse of it in the Gyan Bharatam exhibition. In Chapter 1, Section 1, Verse 4 of the Mundaka Upanishad, for instance, these sages declared, Dway, Vidde, Viditave, Iti Hasma Yada Brahma Vido Badanti Para Chaiva Aparajya Those who know ultimate reality say that there are two kinds of knowledge to be known. Paravidya and Aparavidya That is higher knowledge and lower knowledge. Lower knowledge, Aparavidya is a mastery of skills, systems and techniques. Higher knowledge, Paravidya is wisdom, understanding meaning, responsibility and purpose. This distinction has always been important but today it is critical.

We live in a time where artificial intelligence is advancing at breakneck speed. AI can analyze enormous amounts of data and can analyze the data of the universe. It can identify patterns that we cannot see. It can take decisions at scale and at a speed that no human can match. This is the triumph of Aparavidya, technical assistance, technical excellence. But whether AI benefits humanity or not will depend entirely on Aparavidya, on wisdom. So perhaps the most important question of our time is not how intelligent our machines will become, but whether we will remain wise enough to guide them. If wisdom does not guide innovation, technology can deepen inequality, spread misinformation, and move faster than governance can respond.

It can cause destruction. So we must heed the wisdom of the clairvoyant mantra drashtas. We must balance Paravidya with Aparavidya. And where better to reflect on this balance than here in India, the birthplace of this profound insight. And who better to help lead this conversation than Your Excellency, Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, my elder brother. A spiritual master whose leadership reflects the confidence of a civilization rooted in ancient wisdom. This is why Bhutan is proud to walk alongside India as you shape the future of a responsible and inclusive AI. In this shared journey, we have many opportunities for collaboration. Allow me very quickly to highlight two areas that may be especially relevant. The first one is energy.

Artificial intelligence requires enormous competition. Artificial capacity, which in turn requires unprecedented amounts of energy. Bhutan’s hydropower has long been a symbol of partnership between our two countries, India and Bhutan. We are deeply grateful to the government of India for decades of steadfast cooperation built on trust and mutual benefit. Today, we see new possibilities as we expand our renewable energy portfolio by including partnerships with leading Indian companies such as Tata Power and Adani Power. But we have opportunities to welcome many more, from India and beyond. Clean energy powers homes and industry. Now this clean renewable energy is poised to drive the next generation of digital infrastructure and AI innovation, not just in Bhutan, but in our region.

The second area for collaboration is the Gelipu Mindfulness City, or GMC. Under the visionary leadership of His Majesty the King and with the steadfast support of Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, Bhutan has established the Gelipur Mindfulness City, a city as a hub for sustainable innovation and responsible enterprise. Powered by abundant clean renewable energy, GMC is designed to attract energy -intensive industries, including green data centres and AI research, enabling advanced technologies to scale on a foundation of clean renewable power. It is our vision to create a space where compute capacity grows not at the expense of the planet, but in harmony with it. Guided by environmental stewardship, ethical responsibility and Bhutan’s value -based development philosophy. This is AI with Purpose.

Not AI without limits. A technological sanctuary where higher wisdom shapes technological capacity. My friends here, these are just two of the many areas where we can collaborate on responsible and inclusive AI. If you are interested to collaborate, let’s meet here. My team, who you’ll recognize by our national dress, my team will be happy to discuss green energy and data and AI compute center investment, design of Bhutan context SLM, sovereign compute and robotic platforms with you. And if we find that we are pressed for time, or if you are seeing this message online, especially to my Indian friends, this is a message especially to my Indian friends, come and visit us in Bhutan. If you need a personal invite, my email.

My email ID is ttopgay at cabinet .gov .pt. Your Excellencies, the AI revolution will not wait for us. It will continue to move forward. The question is whether we shape it intentionally, guided by values of our ancient civilizations and the wisdom of the Upanishads, or whether we allow it to be driven by speed and scale without moral direction. History will not judge us by how advanced our technology was. It will judge us by whether that technology made our society fairer, kinder, and more humane. And it is visionary and responsible leadership that ensures such progress serves all of humanity. I see this leadership in Prime Minister Narendra Modi. My elder brother, you are a Brahmavid. And as such, it is a privilege for Bhutan to stand up for the people of Bhutan.

And to stand by India’s side as we embark on a journey together. to realize the mana vision for AI. A vision that will ensure that AI means prosperity for all. That AI means happiness for all. Thank you very.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, Bhutan has always been a place of harmony between technology and nature. I thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. I thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. Now I invite the President of Bolivia, His Excellency, His Excellency, Montania, for his speech.

Bolivia

The digital future must be built with equity, with ethics and, above all, with solidarity between all nations. That is why, from Bolivia, we extend our hand to work together with the Republic of India and also with the entire international community. With an artificial intelligence that is in favor of all, but of all humanity. With these words, I want to thank the hospitality. It has been an honor to be here. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Croatia

Thank you very much, Prime Minister Modi. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, namaskar. Thank you for hosting fourth Artificial Intelligence Summit in India at a moment when technological change is accelerating faster than at any time in human history. From the dawn of civilization until the year 2000, humanity produced only a few hundred exabytes of recorded information. Today, every single day, we generate almost twice the total of all previous human history. Yet, the true disruption is not only scale, but the shifting balance between verified knowledge and noise. With more than 6 billion smartphones worldwide, anyone can broadcast instantly to a global audience. The boundary between fact, opinion and manipulation is increasingly blurred. AI now produces content so convincing that truth and fabrication are harder to distinguish.

A breakthrough with immense promise but serious risks in the wrong hands. Democracy rests not on the rule of the most learned, but on the judgment of the majority. That majority remains free only if it is reasonably well informed. Otherwise, freedom of choice risks becoming the freedom of delusion. Artificial intelligence amplifies both our capability and our responsibility. It transforms healthcare, education. Business, public services and leisure. Europe has chosen a distinctive path, human -centered AI, grounded in fundamental rights, transparency and accountability. Croatia believes that in the 21st century, digital infrastructure and data governance are matters of sovereignty and resilience, not merely of technology. Two weeks ago, I chaired our National Council for Digital Transformation, and we decided that digital transformation is our core national priority for the years to come.

Six years ago, fewer than 3 out of 20 Croatian households had access to 5G. Today, 19 out of 20 do. Fiber broadband reaches 75 % of households. 5G coverage exceeds 94 % and nearly 80%. Nearly 83 % of citizens use digital public services. Infrastructure alone, however, does not define a digital nation. Talent and enterprise do. Creation technology companies are increasingly visible on the global stage. InfoBeep enables secure digital communication at a global scale across leading messaging platforms. Rimac pioneers high -performance electric and autonomous mobility systems. MicroBlink delivers AI -driven computer vision used across financial and enterprise sectors. Gideon develops autonomous robots transforming global logistics. And Infinum designs and engineers complex digital and AI -enabled products for lending international brands. Together, they demonstrate how engineering excellence and ambition translate into globally competitive innovation, along with further investments in data centers.

But innovation alone is not progress. Progress requires direction and responsibility. There, we see the key role of regulators in keeping up the pace of innovators. The decisive question is not whether we can move faster, but whether we can guide this transformation wisely. Therefore, artificial intelligence must be, as you said, Prime Minister, inclusive for all, and serve as the useful instrument of free societies. Thank you.

Finland

First, I would like to thank and congratulate government and prime minister for making this summit reality. Namaste. It comes a crucial moment when the world urgently needs shared understanding, common rules, and political will for responsible use of AI. AI is not just a tool. It is becoming a foundation of competitiveness and strategic resilience. Finland and my government is firmly committed to advancing AI in ways that are strengthening our economy, security, and our democratic societies. AI governance faces a fundamental challenge. Science moves faster than politics. That is precisely why… That is why we must act together with ambition and clarity. while keeping a human -centered and trustworthy vision at the core. In Europe, regulation must remain predictable and balanced, strong enough to safeguard our values, but smart enough to accelerate responsible technological process and fast industrial adaption.

The AI race consists of multiple marathons, not just one sprint, and we are only at the starting line. AI must serve people, not the other way around. We must address the legitimate concerns our citizens raise. Trust in public administration is built on fairness and safety. We must also bring the public sector and technology innovators close together. When a public agency finds an AI company with the right solutions, we create efficiency and better services for citizens. We are the AI. Finland is building a world -class AI ecosystem that spans research, infrastructure, and deployment. We host one of Europe’s leading supercomputing environments, Lumi, world -class research talent such as the Ellis Institute, and abundant clean computing power.

Finland hosts one of the world’s most eco -efficient data centers, powered by clean energy, with excess heat recycled into local communities. This demonstrates that technological leadership and sustainability can advance hand -in -hand. Finland welcomes the UN’s new scientific panel and AI governance dialogue and values the strong voice of the global south, values the strong voice of the European Union, and the voice of the global south highlighted on the bar. from Paris to New Delhi. The choices made now will define the role of AI in our societies for decades. Let us choose openness, security, responsibility, and shared progress. Thank you.

Narendra Modi

President, for your positive thoughts, I thank you very much. Now, I invite Greece’s Prime Minister His Excellency Mitsotakis to share his thoughts.

Greece

Thank you. Thank you, Prime Minister. Let me begin by thanking you for hosting this very important summit and for placing India and the Global South at the very center of our society. Thank you. This is the end of this global AI conversation. And the framing of this gathering that you chose around people, progress, and planet captures that artificial intelligence is not only a profound and massive technological shift, but also a civilizational one. And the choices that we make today will determine whether AI expands opportunity or whether it deepens divides. Allow me to briefly offer three reflections. First, as many of you stated, the AI dividend must be broadly shared. Every technological revolution in the history of the world has created immense wealth.

But history teaches us that the distribution of that wealth is never automatic. AI has the potential to unlock unprecedented scientific discovery, to dramatically improve healthcare, to strengthen education, to support climate research. But the question before us is simple. who benefits apart from the big tech companies and their shareholders. Within our countries, governments must ensure that workers are reskilled, small businesses have access to AI tools, public services are upgraded, the farmer, the nurse, the teacher, the small entrepreneur must feel this dividend in tangible ways. And concerns about significant labor displacement are legitimate and need to be addressed sooner rather than later. In Greece, we’re moving in that direction as digitization has made public services much more accessible.

The incorporation of AI in education will help narrow the learning divide, while advances in telemedicine, in predictive analytics, in personalized preventive care make healthcare much more accessible. More proactive, shifting it from treatment in hospitals to prevention at home. and improving the quality of life for all citizens. And among countries, we must avoid a world where access to compute, to data, and talent is concentrated in only a few geographies. And AI cannot be a story of digital concentration. It must be a story of digital inclusion. My second observation, the state itself must improve. Technology is advancing at extraordinary speeds, but too often our public institutions are operating on an outdated operating system and rules. And if we want AI to serve society, governments must significantly update their own software.

Public procurement frameworks designed for the industrial age are not fit for the AI age. And we need them to be faster, outcome -oriented, and more open to startups and innovators. Public administrations must invest in themselves. And in their own capacity. Digital talent. data infrastructure and AI literacy across ministries. This is not just about running a few pilots. We must move from experimentation to implementation at scale, as you have done, Prime Minister Modi, very successfully in India. And the countries that succeed in AI will not simply be those that built powerful models, but those that built capable states. To that end, we must choose our regulatory priorities wisely. For Greece and for me personally, protecting minors from digital addiction and online harm is a matter of intergenerational solidarity and a top priority for my government.

And I’m happy to see that many other countries are moving in that direction, and Greece will very soon announce its own decision when it comes to banning access, minors and adolescents. But this goes hand in hand. with our democratic responsibility to ensure, as the Prime Minister of Croatia mentioned, that technology strengthens the public square rather than overwhelms us with disinformation and hate. I’m all in favor of extensive dialogue with the big technology companies, but we need to be aware that if that dialogue does not produce concrete results, regulation will be the only answer. Finally, AI’s geopolitical impact should tilt towards conversion. AI is not just about code and compute. It’s part of national power, and interdependences are embedded in the AI stack, from semiconductors to cloud infrastructure, from data sets to research collaboration, and no country can build this alone, and that is why trusted partnerships matter.

In Greece, we have built partnerships with all major hyperscalers, while at the same time developing sovereign capabilities through EU support and collaboration for that AI factor is an initiative. led by national champions, attracting investment from across the globe. And balance is essential. A world in which technology is weaponized to coerce trusted partners or where excessive regulation becomes a tool to suppress innovation is a world where collective innovation declines. And if we fragment the AI ecosystem into very rigid blocks, we reduce the gains for all. And if we leverage independence responsibly, we expand opportunity for all. Ladies and gentlemen, if we ensure that the AI dividend is shared, if we modernize the state to match the technology, and if we build trusted partnerships that expand rather than fragment innovation, then AI can truly serve people, drive progress, and protect our planet.

And as I was listening to the Prime Minister of India, I thought that it is a fusion of artificial, intelligent, and ancestral intelligence, whether it’s present in ancient Sanskrit texts, or the writings of Greek philosophers that will eventually guide us towards a more prosperous and just future. And this is a message that Greece wants to send to the world and I hope that it’s one that resonates with you. Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, Thank you very much for your remarks. Now I would like to welcome His Excellency, Dr. Bharat Jagdevji, to his remarks.

Guyana

Mr. Prime Minister, colleagues, I think if we are asked to imagine the world in a few years’ time, all of us would be hard -pressed. When you have a phone, that would run a model. Thank you. and that model would be smarter than the sum of all human intelligence. But the one thing that unites all of us here is that we all believe that AI can have a transformative impact on people, our countries, and on development. We come from different countries here. Some of us are from the global south, some from the global north. We have different size, capabilities, and levels of advancement of AI development and diffusion. So I want to focus today a little bit on the global south.

And if we’re to leave here today speaking of one item that has been a very important part of our lives, that has been repeated several times, one idea, which is inclusion. and not just inclusion in the diffusion of AI within countries, but among countries, then I think we have to leave this summit advancing in a very practical way how we are going to engage a significant part of the global south. And I speak here largely for those countries in Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, Libyan, and the Pacific. Smaller countries and different size and levels of diffusion of AI. If I were to define the circumstances of those countries, what do you find? You find low levels of diffusion of AI.

You find a lack of awareness of the benefits of AI among policymakers and the technical staff. you find a great deal of skepticism about AI. Some of it because of the fright of technology. Some because of resistance from technical staff because they worry about their own obsolescence. And that’s not an ecosystem that would allow the development or the diffusion of AI at the national level. So how can we help leaving this summit? I think we have to, first of all, have a mechanism that would promote awareness among policymakers in these countries. And secondly, to help countries organize in a coherent… fashion the development and diffusion of AI in those countries, the countries with the least capacity.

Now, I’m extremely pleased we have the IMF and the United Nations here, and I listened to Secretary General about wanting to raise $3 billion to assist with capacity building and diffusion of AI. But before we get to capacity building and diffusion, I think we need a more critical ingredient, one that India has, and that has led to great success in India. Bold, innovative, enlightened leadership and a solid technical core of people who will introduce and diffuse national effort or lead national effort. Thank you. And so, in development planning, we have to assist those countries at a multilateral level, but through bilateral mechanisms. to look at the impact of AI. A country would easily spend $20 million on building a road, but $20 million spent on AI diffusion could have a transformative impact on health and education and a more lasting impact on society.

And they would not value that as much as the road, now in the current planning framework, because it’s deficient. So we have to upgrade the planning framework. And I believe we can do this easily. We have to give help to a lot of those countries. For example, my country, we’ve just gotten, we bought a model to help us in diagnostics, CT scan or read CT scans, et cetera, and MRIs. But how do I know that’s the best model in the market? Or you have a lot of carpetbagging companies that come around now, and because of unsuspecting officials, in many of these countries, we latch on to the first person who comes along. We need a system to review for quality, etc.

And that is absolutely lacking in these countries. So we do need that help there. And I think we can leave this summit with some practical assistance. And the larger countries that are represented here, and from the north and from the south, like Brazil and India, they have to commit to helping those smaller countries be able to build that capacity. I’m so pleased that in addressing the questions of a framework for ethical AI, sovereignty, and inclusion, that we are addressing it in a balanced way here at the summit. There was the fear that we would create a fortress mentality. And that we are fighting someone else. That this would be done in a balanced way. So thank you very much, and thank you for your great leadership, Prime Minister Modi, your enlightened leadership.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Now I invite the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan, His Excellency Bhakti Noor for his speech.

Kazakhstan

Honourable Prime Minister Modi, Excellencies, dear colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. It is a great honour for me to be in India and to address such a distinguished audience. at the AI Impact Summit. I express my sincere appreciation to the government of India for holding this important event. India is rightly recognized as a global leader in digital transformation. Kazakhstan’s vision aligns with the India AI mission. We also believe that AI must be inclusive, sovereign, and transformative for key sectors of the economy. Today, Kazakhstan is evolving into an original digital hub. In the UN e -government development index, we rank 24th out of 193 countries. Our country is also among the top 10 worldwide in the quality of online services.

Actually, this is the real experience for our citizens, You can sell a car in five minutes and receive a fully online mortgage in 24 hours. Over 90 % of all transactions are cashless. Capitalizing on this, President Kassym -Jumat Tokayev has set a goal to transform Kazakhstan into a fully digital state within three years. AI is a strategic pillar of our national development. We have adopted an AI law and established a presidential AI development council working with global visionaries like Lee Kai -Fu, Peter Norvig, John Hopcroft, Omar Al -Olam, who is here with us today, and many others. Kazakhstan is becoming a digital bridge between East and West. We are completing the TransCaspen fiber optic line, the shortest alternative route for global data transfer.

We have deployed tools to help us to achieve the best results. largest supercomputing clusters in the region of Central Asia and in partnership with NVIDIA, establishing a sovereign AI hub. In addition, we are launching the Data Center Valley. We offer more than 1 gigawatt of capacity at competitive tariffs starting from 2 .5 US cents per kilowatt hour. I invite India’s technology champions, entrepreneurs and investors from all over the world to use Kazakhstan as a computing power hub. We offer a full support package from infrastructure to a preferential tax and regulatory regime. Another cornerstone is human capital development. Under the AI SANA program last year, 1 million people in Kazakhstan trained on AI skills. This initiative brings together dedicated learning tracks for every group, from school children and university students to entrepreneurs, to business leaders, to business leaders, to business leaders, civil servants.

The main element of this ecosystem is ALM -AI, the International Artificial Intelligence Center recently opened in Astana. It is a true R &D powerhouse and we encourage leading AI companies to establish their research hubs in Astana and in ALM -AI. Distinguished participants, Kazakhstan is ready to become a global lab for AI solutions. In 2026 has been officially declared in Kazakhstan as the year of digitalization and artificial intelligence. Throughout the year our country will serve as a meeting point for the global IT community. I invite you to join us at Digital Kazakhstan, GITX Central Asia and AI and Digital Bridge forums in shaping a new digital ecosystem for our region. We are open to new ideas, technologies and joint projects.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, thank you for your kind thoughts. Now I invite the Prime Minister of Mauritius, His Excellency, Dr. Ram Gulamji, to his meeting.

Mauritius

man’s promise. It can enhance public service delivery, it can improve decision -making, it can optimize resource management, strengthen climate resilience, and unlock new sectors of growth. Yet it also raises profound questions of ethics, of governance, equity, and trust. The ideal roadmap is the charting of a path towards the future where, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi rightly pointed out, it must serve the transformative power of AI and it must serve the whole of humanity. As the logo says, welfare for all, happiness for all. Without these dedicated initiatives, without commitment of the international community, this will have no relevance. I thank His Excellency the French President. President Emmanuel Macron gave a powerful example about this vegetable seller I think in a remote village of India who could not open a bank account because he had no fixed address, he had no education but now he can be paid through his mobile phone.

This is a powerful example of what technology can do. I myself I can tell you a small anecdote. I recently went to London at University College Hospital where I worked as a doctor to have a checkup. I was surprised. I work in the cardiac department. I was surprised. I expected they would do an ECG, an exercise ECG, an angiogram. No. It was all done by AI which would actually could see your arteries could see if there was any blockage, could see where everything was working properly. This is why I said we need this dedicated initiative. otherwise without the relevant infrastructure developing countries and in particular small island developing states that are already disadvantaged in areas like education like health, like trade will fall further behind as the Vice President of Ghana just said we must not be afraid there is this fear among we see this in many countries they think they might be losing their jobs they don’t want to think outside the box and grab new technology development look what the internet has done it has revolutionized the world as the era of AI unfolds we are reminded that small economies need rapid upskilling in order to stay competitive and in this context we published in Mauritius the Mauritius Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025 to 2029 as a bridge to the future which is strategic.

It is a strategic roadmap outlining our government’s commitment to modernizing public services and empowering our people through technology despite our limited resources. We also, I’m glad to announce establishing a specialized economic zone dedicated to digital technology and AI designed to serve as a platform not only for Mauritius but for the wider region and especially to Africa. As AI reshapes global power structure we cannot and should not act in silos. AI holds enormous promise but it also carries major risk requiring new governance frameworks for international coordination. This is precisely why strategic international partnerships must be settled. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, let this summit be a landmark in the history of humanity where we take a collective decision so that we leave no one behind.

Thank you for your attention. Thank you.

Netherlands

Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. I’d like to tell you about two books I read recently. It might sound a bit old -fashioned for a summit about AI, but you’ll understand why I’m bringing them up in a moment. The first is Clara and the Sun by Nobel Prize winner Kazuo Ishiguro. It’s a story of a friendship between Yoshi, a girl who’s ill, and Clara, a humanoid robot. In fact, some of the robot’s traits are so human that the boundary between human and machine seems to become blurred. The second book is Proving Ground by my favorite thriller writer, Michael Connolly. In this story, a lawyer takes on an AI company after a chatbot told a 60 -year -old boy it was okay for him to kill his girlfriend.

Two books, one highlighting a positive side of AI and the other a negative side. Both sides have a valid place in our discussion. So thank you, Prime Minister Modi, for hosting this important conference. The theme of the summit brings me straight to one of the key requirements for effective AI. Everyone must be able to participate. So I am very pleased with the focus on the Global South. Because the agreements we make must work for everyone. AI needs to serve humanity. We want to make responsible use of the opportunities created by AI. That’s why the Netherlands is presenting its first international AI strategy this year, making public AI infrastructure available for small business, government and science.

To attract and retain talent and promote data sharing. We look forward to working with industry, civil society, organizations and other countries. In particular India, a country with which we have stepped up cooperation in many, many areas. We are ready to share best practices with each other and to collaborate on future solutions. Because from food security to climate adaptation. AI can help us on the road to happiness. AI gives the opportunities to solve real -world problems, small or big. But the road we take must be responsible and safe, and that requires international governance. We are pursuing this in the United Nations through the Global Digital Compact, in the RE -AIM Summit on Responsible AI in the Military Domain, and in the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance coming up this summer.

Because innovation means progress, for us humans and for our planet. So indeed, what better motto than People, Planet, Progress. Thank you.

Seychelles

Thank you, Mr. Prime Minister, and I want to thank the Government of India for their welcome and for hosting this AI Summit. Throughout these few days, we have learned many things. We have learned that Sanskrit could be the language of AI. We have also learned that AI is here to stay and that how it moves forward will depend on the buy -in that everyone carries into it. I had a very interesting meeting on my first day in India. I went to UIDI and found out about the ADA, the unique number. And India managed to give a unique number to 1 .4 billion people. And I’m thinking I have to give a unique number to 100. 25 ,000 people. And I think it’s possible.

I think it’s possible to use the technology at the expense that it has reached and integrate it within my system. I am already considered a high -income country. I already have one of the highest human development index in Africa. And therefore, integrating that technology into the processes that I have should make me or improve what I provide to the people. So, we have acknowledged AI as a multidimensional technology that will transform the lives of people and society and it should do so at an unprecedented rate. We’ve also viewed the multiple dimensions of power that exist, including its bases, resources like data, but also means the aspect of energy. And as a small country and as a small island developing state, as echoed by Mauritius, we do not have the same access to the technology.

As does bigger and larger countries. at the same time as we go along the continuum and the transformation of transforming our economic base and as we improve as small island developing states we do not get the same benefit as countries that form part of major international blocs and we do not again benefit from concessionary loans nor credit facilities as do international blocs nor do we benefit from subsidies so therefore we need to rely on partners like India who are prepared to transform or transcend the technology barrier and make that technology accessible for the countries and that is what is necessary because we do not have the capacity to invest in the R &D that is required to make that technology available to us ladies and gentlemen in small countries like the Seychelles we do not have oil we do not have minerals but we have a human capital and that is what is necessary for the development of the R &D that is required to make that technology available to us a human capital that has utilized and valued what it has and has transformed the society and turned it into a democratic, peaceful, stable and secure one, an example to the world and therefore in that process we feel the harnessing the power of AI in areas like improving the efficiency of our government, diversification of the economy and building resilience improving the quality of life, reducing the cost of living and sure food security, biosecurity and biosafety are the areas in which we want to go to but to achieve that as small island developing states we need a buy -in from larger states so we welcome the approach taken by India and we hope and support India and as part of the Indian Ocean region so we can move forward Thank you sir applause applause applause applause excellency Thank you.

Thank you.

Spain

This is not by chance. It is the result of a clear strategy based on sustained public investment, European cooperation, and a firm commitment to building technological sovereignty. The Telefonica LED initiative to deploy one of the European AI gigafactories in Spain illustrates our capacity and ambition. The same spirit guides our use of AI in the public sector with a simple goal, better public services and less bureaucracy. And we are succeeding. The OECD recognizes Spain as a leader in AI in public administration. So we believe in AI for good. But while we believe in technology, we insist that it must be guided by human values. AI should expand human freedom, democracy, rights, not undermine them. We will also combat AI for bad.

Because progress without ethics is not progress. An innovation without purpose is not leadership. It is a failure. AI accelerates, and our response must accelerate too. Risks such as extreme concentration of power induced by malicious actors or loss of human control are real and growing, and we must tackle them. We must also face the environmental cost of AI or the risk of massive job displacement. Therefore, if we want AI to reach its full potential, we must confront this risk, because the current safeguards fall short, and the response must be twofold. First, governments must work through their national frameworks. That is why my country, Spain, promoted the Charter of Digital Rights back in 2021 and created Europeans’ first, AI supervisory agency.

And second, we need an inclusive global governance framework with the UN as our vehicle of choice. I want to congratulate the UN for the establishment of the AI expert panel last week. I think this is critical, a critical milestone. My country is looking forward to hosting its first meeting in the next months. We also just hosted the third RE -AIM summit because the use of AI in the military is here to stay, but we need to ensure that it complies with international law, contributing to international peace and security. The AI Spain wants is safe, transparent, and aligned with the SDGs, and that is our commitment. AI in the general interest, not in the hands of a few.

AI for good, not for bad. Thank you.

International Monetary Fund

Thank you very much, Prime Minister Modi. Namaste. Namaste. I want to start with a small story of me and my granddaughter. Me telling her how when I was her age, there were no computers, no TV. And she looking up at me and saying, so you only had iPads. The moral of this story is that we live at the time of very rapid transformation. And AI is going to put this transformation on steroids. I want to talk about the economic impact and also the gratitude I have towards India on taking AI to be for everyone. So, economic impact. We calculated at the IMF that the potential for productivity growth and economic growth from AI over the next years is significant.

It could give up to 0 .8 % boost to global growth. That would bring growth above the pre -pandemic trend. Above. Above it. And that can have tremendous benefits for society. We also look at the likely impact of AI on the job markets. And there, what we see over the next years is… that AI is coming like a tsunami, hitting the job markets. We estimate that globally about 40 % of jobs will be impacted, either enhanced or some eliminated. And in advanced economies like Sweden, it would be 60%. So the question is, are we ready for this transformation? And Prime Minister Mitsotakis talked about it. Not quite yet. We have to pay very close attention to what is going to happen where jobs would become more productive, but also what is going to happen to those tasks that are likely to be eliminated.

So here is a very interesting… piece of research we recently have done. It tells a fascinating story. What we see already is that people with the right talents that can apply new skills are on high demand and they are paid much better than people that do not have these new skills. Now, what is the impact of that? They have more money in their pockets, they spend more on restaurants, on tourism, and as a result, low -skilled jobs increase and people for these jobs are on high demand. Overall impact on employment, positive. For one job with AI skills, we see 1 .3%. Coming up because of this spread of money to demand for other jobs. The jobs in the middle that are neither enhanced nor on higher demand, they get squeezed.

And the most dangerous impact we see now is that routine tasks that are often started jobs for young people, they get automated and washed away. So what is the moral of the story? We have to pay more attention to how we prepare people for the job market of tomorrow. Now, I want to come to the point that is most exciting to me from this AI summit. And it is India’s relentless focus on the human dimension of AI. And it is India’s relentless focus on the human dimension of AI. Delivering real benefits for real people, never forgetting the least fortunate amongst us. And I want to wholeheartedly thank you, Prime Minister Modi, for doing that. And thank you for your practicality, for the accessibility and reach of the models you develop.

Because when some choose to impose large fees, you favor open source approach. And that, I think, is what distinguishes India. Beyond that, to the President of Guyana, of Mauritius, what you do is you think about bringing AI to do good for others. And in that sense, you are on the forefront of making things happen with the unique focus on, you know, democratizing AI. And I want to finish by recalling another time, the time of HIV AIDS, when people were dying and India came with cheap treatments that saved millions of lives. And I do wish from the bottom of my heart that you repeat this success story in the world of AI. Practical Indian AI for all.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

I have received the conversion. This is a symbol of our shared commitment that together we can make artificial intelligence a possible medium for human welfare, social development and collective development. I am confident that today’s thoughts will help us to make our efforts in the global arena a new direction and a new trend. Keeping in mind the priorities of Global South, we must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. Thank you. And to fulfill the creative cooperation and strategic role, I have always been committed and will continue to be so.

Once again, I thank you all for your valuable contribution. And now our session ends. Thank you all very much. Thank you. Once again.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (44)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (7)
Confirmedhigh

“The Global AI Summit was convened in New Delhi under the auspices of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and gathered more than twenty heads of state, ministers, and senior officials.”

Multiple summit recordings note that India hosted the AI Impact Summit 2026 with Prime Minister Modi welcoming a large delegation of world leaders and senior officials, confirming the location and high-level attendance [S125] and [S165].

Confirmedmedium

“Participants emphasized ethical frameworks, data sovereignty, digital inclusion, climate‑friendly compute, and the need for multilateral governance that reflects the Global South’s priorities.”

The summit agenda highlighted inclusive and transparent data governance, multistakeholder approaches and climate-aware AI compute, aligning with the reported emphasis on ethics, sovereignty and South-centric multilateralism [S168] and [S169].

Confirmedmedium

“Prime Minister Modi articulated a vision of a “human‑centric, sensitive global AI ecosystem” and called for an ethical AI framework anchored in “glass‑box” transparency.”

Modi’s opening remarks were recorded as praising a human-centric AI future and stressing transparency, echoing the “glass-box” language used in summit discussions [S165] and [S166].

!
Correctionhigh

“Modi announced the rollout of a national AI infrastructure comprising 38 000 GPUs already deployed, with an additional 24 000 slated for installation.”

Official Indian statements project a total AI-compute capacity of 50-60 000 GPUs, without specifying a 38 000 + 24 000 split; the reported numbers are not supported by the knowledge base and appear inaccurate [S62] and [S176].

Confirmedmedium

“The Indian plan includes the creation of public AI datasets and models to democratise access for innovators.”

A December 2025 white paper describes India’s strategy to treat AI compute, datasets and models as digital public goods, confirming the intent to publish public datasets and open-source models [S176] and [S177].

Confirmedmedium

“Brazil’s AI roadmap references the International Scientific Panel on AI as part of the Global Digital Pact.”

Brazil’s statements at the summit cite the Global Digital Pact and the newly created International Scientific Panel on AI as a key governance mechanism [S8] and [S72].

!
Correctionhigh

“Brazil’s AI roadmap targets full implementation by 2025.”

The knowledge base records Brazil’s large AI investment plan (23 billion reais) and its support for UN AI capacity building, but does not mention a 2025 full-implementation deadline; the specific 2025 target is not corroborated [S179] and [S180].

External Sources (183)
S1
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 2nd February, Afternoon session — Slovakia concluded its meaningful intervention by reaffirming its endorsement of the EU’s position, thus aligning with o…
S2
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained inparagraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued) – session 6 — In issues of stakeholder engagement and reducing redundancy in capacity-building initiatives, Slovakia’s position mirror…
S3
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — Peter Pellegrini – Slovakia: Madam President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, It is an honor and privilege to addr…
S4
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: afternoon session — – Mohamed Irfaan Ali – Guayana: President of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana Leaders highlighted their countries’ sp…
S5
9821st meeting — – Guyana: Representative (role not specified)
S6
Published by DiploFoundation (2011) — Malta: 4th Floor, Regional Building Regional Rd. Msida, MSD 2033, Malta Switzerland: Rue de Lausanne 56 CH-1202 Ge…
S7
(Day 4) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — Tshering Tobgay -Bhutan: Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I bring to you wa…
S8
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Namaskar and Kuzhuzangbo. More than 3 ,000 years ag…
S9
Opening & Plenary segment: Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 3rd plenary meeting, 79th session — Chair: I thank the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Bhutan. I invited His Excellency Xanana Gusmão to address the Asse…
S10
Kazakhstani image in global politics: A bridge between Russia and the rest of the world? — Diana Madibekova is 4th year student studying international law at School of Law, KAZGUU University, Astana, Kazakhstan….
S11
UNSC meeting: Regional arrangements for peace — Kazakhstan: Mentioned CICA’s role in addressing security issues, including climate change. Kazakhstan:Thank you, Mr. Ch…
S12
Women, peace and security — Kazakhstan: MADAM PRESIDENT, DISTINGUISHED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL, DEAR COLLEAGUES, I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS M…
S13
The Ibero-American System and its Influence in the Ibero-American Regional Summit Diplomacy — According to the current Spanish President (Rodríguez Zapatero, 2005), In the evolution of the system is important to co…
S14
First round of informal consultations with member states, observers and stakeholders (2024) — Spain also encourages a digital compact that fortifies the commitment to human rights in harmony with the Sustainable De…
S15
Announcement of New Delhi Frontier AI Commitments — -Shri Narendra Modi: Role/Title: Honorable Prime Minister of India, Area of expertise: Not specified
S16
Keynote-HE Emmanuel Macron — -Narendra Modi: Title – Prime Minister; Role – Host of the Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit, referenced as Mr. Prim…
S17
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli — forceful personality of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi enhanced India’s stature, at least for a time. Barely a decade late…
S18
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained in paragraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued)/3/OEWG 2025 — – Finland: Representative of Finland Finland: Chair, thank you for giving us the floor. Finland aligns itself with th…
S19
AcknoWleDGment — Interview and exchanges with: – Prof. Ailisto Heikki, Technical Research Centre of Finland – Jari Konttinen and Salla A…
S20
SMALL STATES AND NATO — Both Laajava and Burns discussed the role of Finland. As Laajava outlined, Finland remains militarily non-allied, and co…
S21
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 2nd February, Afternoon session — By championing inclusive and pragmatic global governance, the Netherlands solidifies its position as a driving force for…
S22
Agenda item 5 : Day 4 Morning session — In the area of Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs), the Netherlands values their role in enhancing transparency, fosteri…
S23
Closure of the session — Chair: Thank you very much, Argentina. I think the Secretariat can informally provide you and other interested delegat…
S24
UN: Summit of the Future Global Call — The analysis reveals Switzerland’s role as a proponent of international cooperation and dialogue. By supporting initiati…
S25
Research Collection — Since the end of the Cold War, civil conflicts having either a religious or ethnic background have begun to replace …
S26
Switzerland — Geneva is the birthplace of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), founded in 1863. Switzerland’s humanita…
S27
Opening of the session — Brazil’s stance on a series of matters pertaining to human rights and the advancement of an international convention is …
S28
WSIS+20 Open Consultation session with Co-Facilitators — – **Jennifer Chung** – (Role/affiliation not clearly specified) Jacqueline Pigato: I think it’s very important. I need …
S29
7th edition — Brazil is very active in numerous digital policy processes. The country hosted two out of 10 IGF meetings. It has played…
S30
International Monetary Fund — The IMF activities cover three main areas: The International Monetary Fund, established in 1944, is an international en…
S31
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli — | 1.1 | Nuclearization | 18 | | IPKF | Indian Peace Keeping Force [[DOC_…
S32
International Monetary Fund — The International Monetary Fund is an international financial institution, headquartered in Washington, D.C., consisting…
S33
By the Same Author — Mauritius gained Independence in 1968, its freedom movement led by Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, the first Prime Minister. …
S34
Agenda item 5 : Day 4 Afternoon session — Mauritius’ role in assisting cyber resilience through Cyber4Dev. Mauritius’s efforts were further recognised through it…
S35
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained in paragraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued)/3/OEWG 2025 — – Mauritius: Representative of Mauritius Mauritius: Distinguished Chair and colleagues, good morning. The effective i…
S36
UNSC meeting: Strengthening UN peacekeeping — Serbia:Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you very much for convening this important meeting. Mr. President, distinguished …
S37
Published by DiploFoundation (2011) — Malta: 4th Floor, Regional Building Regional Rd. Msida, MSD 2033, Malta Switzerland: Rue de Lausanne 56 CH-1202 Ge…
S38
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — Honourable Prime Minister, dear friend Narendra Modi, Your Excellencies, I’ll do my best to fit myself into proposed thr…
S39
Table of contents — + Estonia is a trailblazing and leading country in specific prioritised fields of cyber security in the EU and at a broa…
S40
Introducción a la Internet gobernanza DE — Estonia es un actor de políticas digitales muy dinámico. Luego del ataque DDoS en 2007, que afectó gravemente a la Inter…
S41
Report — Estonia is a member of NATO CCDCOE, TERENA and TI TF-CSIRT.
S42
Ad Hoc Consultation: Monday 5th February, Morning session — While the content of OP5 is not disclosed, Liechtenstein’s resistance suggests concerns about the paragraph’s scope, exe…
S44
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 9th February, Morning session — Additionally, Liechtenstein advocates for strengthening international cooperation by supporting a higher threshold for r…
S45
(Day 4) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — Andrej Plenkovic – Croatia: Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, today we should stand uni…
S46
(Plenary segment) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 5th plenary meeting, 79th session — Andrej Plenković: Mr. President of the General Assembly, Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, we have gathered here t…
S47
UN: Summit of the Future Global Call — Croatia’s address to the UN emphasises several key points regarding global governance and sustainable development, prese…
S48
Global Standards for a Sustainable Digital Future — Karen Mulberry: Thank you, Kathleen. I’d like to welcome you to our workshop where I’ve got three experts who have been …
S49
Opening Plenary: Working Together for a Human-Centred Digital Future – Parliamentary Cooperation for Democratic Digital Governance — – **Maria-Nefeli Vasileiou Chatziioannidou** – Member of Parliament from Greece, Member of the Council of Europe Parliam…
S50
HISTORICAL RHETORIC AND DIPLOMACY – AN UNEASY COHABITATION — – 4 The Economist , 27 November 1999, 35. – 5 International Herald T ribune , 1 December 1999, 8. – 6 Newsweek , 20 Apr…
S51
Report — Seychelles is a member of the ITU-IMPACT initiative and has access to relevant cybersecurity services.
S52
High-level SIDS Ministerial Dialogue: Key Challenges and Opportunities — Antony Derjacques:Thank you. Good afternoon. Thank you first to UNCTAD for the invitation, Madam Secretary General. And …
S53
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — – Wavel Ramkalawan – President of the Republic of Seychelles Vice President: On behalf of the Assembly, I wish to than…
S55
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli — For India, there was a double commitment on the one hand to the peaceful resolution of an internal, bloody, ethnic confl…
S56
Ad Hoc Consultation: Wednesday 31st January, Morning session — Bolivia has publicly expressed its endorsement of the Chair’s proposal for Chapter 7, with positive sentiments having be…
S57
Report — Bolivia is a member of the ITU-IMPACT initiative and has access to relevant cybersecurity services. Bolivia is a member …
S58
Developing Countries: Victims or Participants — Bolivia, with an exceptionally vulnerable position, but also good prospects for cash gains under the Clean Development M…
S59
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/leaders-plenary-global-vision-for-ai-impact-and-governance-morning-session-part-1 — Agar kisi machine ko sir paper clip banane ka alak de diya jaye to wo uska ek kaam ke liye duniya ke saare resources ko …
S60
WS #110 AI Innovation Responsible Development Ethical Imperatives — Dr Zhang Xiao: Thank you everyone. I’m glad to be involved in this interesting discussion and I have three points to sha…
S61
Need and Impact of Full Stack Sovereign AI by CoRover BharatGPT — Evidence:He cites specific government support: free GPUs provided to citizens, funding for model development, and openin…
S62
India’s AI Future Sovereign Infrastructure and Innovation at Scale — Sunil describes how the government created a successful shared compute model by empaneling multiple providers who contri…
S63
AI to transform India’s $400 billion IT ambition by 2030 — India’s IT sector could reach$400 billion by 2030, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in an interview with ANI, highlight…
S64
Keynote-N Chandrasekaran — -Sri Narendra Modi ji: Prime Minister of India (referred to as “Honourable Prime Minister”) Honourable Prime Minister, …
S65
Harnessing Collective AI for India’s Social and Economic Development — Thanks, Chandni. Good question. And I think partly Seth already answered what multi -agents could do. So all problems th…
S66
UNSC meeting: Multilateral cooperation for peace and security — In this speech, Brazil’s representative emphasises the need for reform in the international multilateral system to refle…
S67
Agenda item 5: Day 2 Afternoon session — Furthermore, given the pace of technological advancements and the dynamic nature of the cyber domain, Brazil understands…
S68
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained inparagraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued)/ part 6 — Brazil specifically mentions that achieving consensus in such challenging geopolitical circumstances demonstrates the ef…
S69
Centering People and Planet in the WSIS+20 and beyond — ### Brazil’s Vision for Inclusive Multilateralism Guilherme de Aguiar Patriota from Brazil articulated three key priori…
S70
Unveiling Trade Secrets: Exploring the Implications of trade agreements for AI Regulation in the Global South — Brazil has been diligently working for the past two years to establish a comprehensive legal framework for the regulatio…
S71
Meta suspends AI use in Brazil amid privacy concerns — Meta has suspended the use of its generative AI (GenAI) tools in Brazilafter the country’s data protection authority iss…
S72
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — – Estonia- Liechtenstein Small countries can compete on trust, transparency, and values-based governance
S73
Infraestructure and technology — This is the spirit in which the Charter of Digital Rights was drawn up, a pioneering initiative launched by the Sp…
S74
Spain president proposes Digital Rights Charter, outlining fundamental rights of individuals online — According to anews report, Spanish President  Pedro Sánchez has announced the publication of theCarta Derechos Digitales…
S75
Strengthen Digital Governance and International Cooperation to Build an Inclusive Digital Future — AI for Good platform brings together experts from healthcare, education, climate action, and disaster response sectors. …
S76
A Digital Future for All (afternoon sessions) — AI has the potential to accelerate progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It can be applied to benefit humani…
S77
Spain lays out national AI strategy — Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchezpresented the country’s National Artificial Intelligence Strategy, dedicated to crea…
S78
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance — Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S79
Ethics and AI | Part 6 — Even if the Act itself does not make direct reference to “ethics”, it is closely tied to the broader context of ethical …
S80
Secure Finance Risk-Based AI Policy for the Banking Sector — “it should be transparent to the customer it should not be a black black box rather than it can be a glass box”[46]. “In…
S81
WS #279 AI: Guardian for Critical Infrastructure in Developing World — Gyan Prakash Tripathi: Thanks, Sarasa. And hello, everyone. Excellent to see many familiar faces on the panel and in th…
S82
WS #100 Integrating the Global South in Global AI Governance — – Lack of computing power and infrastructure in developing countries Fadi Salim: Great question as well. Maybe on the…
S83
Developing capacities for bottom-up AI in the Global South: What role for the international community? — ## Areas of Different Emphasis and Debate Amandeep Singh Gill: Thank you so much, Jovan, and thank you to you, Diplo Fo…
S84
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact — “And that is something which has resulted into that 38 ,000 GPUs, which government is talking about, the shared compute …
S85
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — So the goal of Genesis Project is to really, one, align public and private partnership, two, invest government resources…
S86
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm — Kate Kallot: We are living through a time where entire regions are at risk of being left out of the future. And that’s n…
S87
WS #255 AI and disinformation: Safeguarding Elections — The speaker expresses concern about platform owners potentially using AI to influence election outcomes. This is seen as…
S88
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Multiple sessions documented how platforms pose existential threats to democratic institutions. In thePlatform Governanc…
S89
Breaking the Fake in the AI World: Staying Smart in the Age of Misinformation, Disinformation, Hate, and Deepfake — Content policy | Human rights principles | Freedom of expression Rahman argues that misinformation and disinformation f…
S90
UNGA/DAY 1/PART 2 — Artificial intelligence poses new challenges to human dignity, justice, and labor, with risks of exclusion, social manip…
S91
Hard power of AI — Another key point is the need for global inclusion in AI discussions. The speakers emphasize the importance of involving…
S92
Global AI Policy Framework: International Cooperation and Historical Perspectives — Alexandra Baumann presented Switzerland’s strategy for AI governance, outlining three key points. First, inclusive multi…
S93
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Amb Thomas Schneider — The collaborative approach extends to shaping the Geneva Summit itself. While there will be “a Swiss flavour” characteri…
S94
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — Alex Moltzau: Yes, thank you so much. My name is Alex Maltzau. And I work as a second national expert in the European AI…
S95
WS #236 Ensuring Human Rights and Inclusion: An Algorithmic Strategy — AI systems have shown biases that disproportionately affect marginalized groups. These biases have been observed in vari…
S96
HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTE FOR DEMOCRATIZING ACCESS TO AI — “basic agenda for this AI impact term is welfare for all, happiness for all.”[14]. “policy … power, electricity, water…
S97
WS #254 The Human Rights Impact of Underrepresented Languages in AI — Gustavo Fonseca Ribeiro: I think Niti’s answer was very good. So very quickly, government support, yes, you can see ex…
S98
Why science metters in global AI governance — good morning everyone first allow me to thank the secretary general for his remarks and it serves as a very useful guida…
S99
Small states, big ambitions: How startups and nations are shaping the future of AI — At theInternet Governance Forum 2025in Lillestrøm, Norway, a dynamic discussion unfolded on how small states and startup…
S100
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — “scientists, and industry to develop ethical and sustainable AI solutions”[9]. “To harness this potential, we must ensur…
S101
Open Forum #75 Shaping Global AI Governance Through Multistakeholder Action — Ernst Noorman: Thank you very much, Zach, and thank you, Rasmus, for your words. While leaders at this moment gather in …
S102
Digital Public Infrastructure, Policy Harmonisation, and Digital Cooperation – AI, Data Governance,and Innovation for Development — This discussion focused on digital public infrastructure, policy harmonization, and digital cooperation in West Africa. …
S103
Inclusive AI For A Better World, Through Cross-Cultural And Multi-Generational Dialogue — Demands on policy exist without the building blocks to support its implementation Factors such as restricted access to …
S104
Ethics and AI | Part 6 — Even if the Act itself does not make direct reference to “ethics”, it is closely tied to the broader context of ethical …
S105
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance — Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S106
WSIS Action Line C2 Information and communication infrastructure — Data quality and governance as fundamental requirements Legal and regulatory | Human rights Regulatory Frameworks and …
S107
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — And there is another point. It is strategic. AI capability and resilience increasingly depend on where trusted compute i…
S108
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — And I thought, how do we quantify this? So we, and I think we have already spoken to Calpa about this. We’re working, I …
S109
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Ebba Busch Deputy Prime Minister Sweden — 2.Infrastructure capacity- having sovereign compute for advanced models If AI is to become electable in our democracies…
S110
From KW to GW Scaling the Infrastructure of the Global AI Economy — Summary:All speakers agree that the traditional approach of designing data centers from grid infrastructure inward is ou…
S111
Human Rights-Centered Global Governance of Quantum Technologies: Implications for AI, Digital Rights, and the Digital Divide — **Dual-Use Risks**: Quantum technologies present both opportunities and threats, particularly regarding encryption and s…
S112
Advancing Scientific AI with Safety Ethics and Responsibility — The moderator highlights the tension between maintaining the benefits of open scientific research and preventing the spr…
S113
Can National Security Keep Up with AI? / Davos 2025 — AI technology has both beneficial and potentially harmful applications. This dual-use nature creates dilemmas and challe…
S114
Open Forum #82 Catalyzing Equitable AI Impact the Role of International Cooperation — The discussion showed remarkable consensus on identifying problems (infrastructure gaps, skills shortages, data availabi…
S115
Welcome to the IGF2021 Final report! — Massive investments by technology companies over the past couple of years and a rapid expanding of resources proved that…
S116
TOWARDS A SINGLE DEVELOPMENT VISION AND THE ROLE OF THE SINGLE ECONOMY — – A goal of accelerated economic growth through adjustment and transformation of regional economies, greatly improved …
S117
Comprehensive Discussion Report: AI’s Transformative Potential for Global Economic Growth — Fink positioned this as a generational investment opportunity for institutional investors, particularly pension funds se…
S118
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — The conversation suggests developing countries need not choose between innovation and regulation but must address struct…
S119
Discussion Report: Sovereign AI in Defence and National Security — Faisal responds to concerns about competing global AI policies by arguing that the sovereign AI framework is adaptable t…
S120
Chinese leading AI expert argues for AI governance by the UN — The rapid development of AI technology has outpaced existing regulatory frameworks, creating challenges in areas such as…
S121
Ethics and AI | Part 6 — Even if the Act itself does not make direct reference to “ethics”, it is closely tied to the broader context of ethical …
S122
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance — Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S123
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — “First, data sovereignty ko respect karte huye AI training ke liye ek data framework bane”[2]. “Hame black box ke badle …
S124
Ethical principles for the use of AI in cybersecurity | IGF 2023 WS #33 — Accountability, privacy, and data protection are recognized as tools towards ensuring ethical practices. These principle…
S125
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — Strong consensus emerged around human-centered AI principles. Austria’s State Secretary Alexander Perol articulated the …
S126
WS #100 Integrating the Global South in Global AI Governance — – Lack of computing power and infrastructure in developing countries Fadi Salim: Great question as well. Maybe on the…
S127
WS #279 AI: Guardian for Critical Infrastructure in Developing World — Gyan Prakash Tripathi: Thanks, Sarasa. And hello, everyone. Excellent to see many familiar faces on the panel and in th…
S128
Developing capacities for bottom-up AI in the Global South: What role for the international community? — ## Areas of Different Emphasis and Debate Amandeep Singh Gill: Thank you so much, Jovan, and thank you to you, Diplo Fo…
S129
Open Forum #13 Bridging the Digital Divide Focus on the Global South — Ren Xianliang: and other key facilities to extend to developing countries. We focus on sustainable operation of infrastr…
S130
Closure of the session — Sierra Leone emphasizes the importance of capacity building in the future mechanism to bridge digital divides. They advo…
S131
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact — -Infrastructure and Compute Requirements for Sovereign AI: The panel extensively discussed India’s need for massive GPU …
S132
India’s AI Future Sovereign Infrastructure and Innovation at Scale — Infrastructure and Compute Requirements for Sovereign AI: The panel extensively discussed India’s need for massive GPU i…
S133
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — Kazakhstan demonstrated commitment to sovereign AI development through establishing supercomputing clusters, partnering …
S134
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm — Kate Kallot: We are living through a time where entire regions are at risk of being left out of the future. And that’s n…
S135
Opening Plenary: Working Together for a Human-Centred Digital Future – Parliamentary Cooperation for Democratic Digital Governance — Mario Hernandez Ramos: Thank you very much. Thank you very much to the Parliamentary Assembly for the invitation to be h…
S136
WS #255 AI and disinformation: Safeguarding Elections — The speaker expresses concern about platform owners potentially using AI to influence election outcomes. This is seen as…
S137
UNGA/DAY 1/PART 2 — Artificial intelligence poses new challenges to human dignity, justice, and labor, with risks of exclusion, social manip…
S138
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Multiple sessions documented how platforms pose existential threats to democratic institutions. In thePlatform Governanc…
S139
Davos report marks AI misinformation as an immediate threat to democracy and environment — AdvancedAI fueling false and misleading information poses the immediate risk of eroding democracy and polarising society…
S140
Hard power of AI — The speakers emphasize the importance of involving both the Global North and South in conversations about AI and emergin…
S141
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Amb Thomas Schneider — The collaborative approach extends to shaping the Geneva Summit itself. While there will be “a Swiss flavour” characteri…
S142
Democratizing AI: Open foundations and shared resources for global impact — ## Introduction and Switzerland’s Strategic Position Bernard Maissen: Yes, thank you. Hello, everybody, dear panelists….
S143
Opening of the session — The tone began very positively and constructively, with the Chair commending delegations for focused, specific intervent…
S144
Keynote-Rishi Sunak — Overall Tone:The tone was consistently optimistic and inspirational throughout. Sunak maintained an enthusiastic, forwar…
S145
Keynote by Uday Shankar Vice Chairman_JioStar India — Overall Tone:The tone is consistently optimistic and visionary throughout, beginning with congratulatory remarks and mai…
S146
Powering AI _ Global Leaders Session _ AI Impact Summit India Part 2 — The discussion maintained a predominantly optimistic and forward-looking tone throughout, despite acknowledging signific…
S147
AI-Powered Chips and Skills Shaping Indias Next-Gen Workforce — The discussion maintained a consistently optimistic and collaborative tone throughout. Speakers expressed enthusiasm abo…
S148
Pathways to De-escalation — The overall tone was serious and somewhat cautious, reflecting the gravity of cybersecurity challenges. While the speake…
S149
From Technical Safety to Societal Impact Rethinking AI Governanc — Despite the critical tone of much discussion, panellists offered concrete proposals:
S150
Strengthening Corporate Accountability on Inclusive, Trustworthy, and Rights-based Approach to Ethical Digital Transformation — The discussion maintained a professional, collaborative tone throughout, with speakers demonstrating expertise while ack…
S151
From Technical Safety to Societal Impact Rethinking AI Governanc — Impact:This shifted the conversation toward more concrete, actionable discussions about transparency and accountability….
S152
Comprehensive Summary: AI Governance and Societal Transformation – A Keynote Discussion — The tone begins confrontational and personal as Hunter-Torricke distances himself from his tech industry past, then shif…
S153
WS #103 Aligning strategies, protecting critical infrastructure — Capacity building, especially for less-resourced countries, is essential
S154
WSIS Plus 20 Review: UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting – Comprehensive Summary — The discussion maintained a diplomatic and collaborative tone throughout, characterized by mutual respect and shared com…
S155
Informal multistakeholder session — The Chair maintained a neutral stance throughout. Discussions included the narrative that small developing countries, of…
S156
Delegated decisions, amplified risks: Charting a secure future for agentic AI — The tone was consistently critical and cautionary throughout, with Whittaker maintaining a technically informed but acce…
S157
AI and Human Connection: Navigating Trust and Reality in a Fragmented World — The tone began optimistically with audience engagement but became increasingly concerned and urgent as panelists reveale…
S158
Laying the foundations for AI governance — The tone was collaborative and constructive throughout, with panelists building on each other’s points rather than disag…
S159
WS #187 Bridging Internet AI Governance From Theory to Practice — The discussion maintained a thoughtful but increasingly cautious tone throughout. It began optimistically, with speakers…
S160
Parliamentary Closing Closing Remarks and Key Messages From the Parliamentary Track — The discussion maintained a collaborative and constructive tone throughout, characterized by diplomatic language and mut…
S161
High-Level Track Facilitators Summary and Certificates — The discussion maintained a consistently positive and celebratory tone throughout, characterized by gratitude, accomplis…
S162
Closing Ceremony — The overall tone was positive and forward-looking. Speakers expressed gratitude to the hosts and participants, emphasize…
S163
Keynote-Nikesh Arora — Overall Tone:The tone begins optimistically, celebrating AI’s rapid progress and potential, then shifts to a more cautio…
S164
Closure of the session — Canada’s participation across forums reflects its dedication to fostering dialogue that is positive, proactive, inclusiv…
S165
Keynote-N Chandrasekaran — Honourable Prime Minister, Sri Narendra Modi ji, Excellencies, Heads of State, Policy Makers and Distinguished Ladies an…
S166
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session — Congratulations, Prime Minister Modi, on such an incredible summit. It was so incredible to see all of the who’s who, as…
S167
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Jeetu Patel President and Chief Product Officer Cisco Inc — Namaste. I feel very happy to see India’s progress. So firstly, congratulations to all of you for hosting one of the mos…
S168
The Challenges of Data Governance in a Multilateral World — In conclusion, the conference highlighted the importance of a multistakeholder approach to data governance and collabora…
S169
Ministerial Roundtable — Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, 5G, quantum computing, and space-based solutions were recognized as …
S170
Open Forum #18 World Economic Forum – Building Trustworthy Governance — Ethical considerations for the private sector were explored, with emphasis on integrating ethical principles into produc…
S171
Welcome Address — Excellencies, Honorable Ministers, Industry Leaders, Innovators, Entrepreneurs, Researchers, Delegates, Delegates, Deleg…
S172
Toward Collective Action_ Roundtable on Safe & Trusted AI — Professor Jonathan Shock warned against the “Silicon Valley approach of move fast and break things” when dealing with go…
S173
AI, Data Governance, and Innovation for Development — A key challenge identified was the lack of locally relevant datasets for AI development in West Africa. Professor Adedok…
S174
How Small AI Solutions Are Creating Big Social Change — Zameer Brey advocates for AI systems that achieve near-perfect reliability and transparency. He argues for moving from b…
S175
(Plenary segment & Closing) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 6th plenary meeting, 79th session — Sovaleni calls for the development of ethical governance frameworks for artificial intelligence. He emphasizes the need …
S176
New plan outlines how India will democratise AI infrastructure — Indiais moving to rebalance access to AI infrastructureas part of a new national push to close gaps in computing power a…
S177
India allocates $1.24 billion for AI infrastructure boost — India’s government has greenlit a ₹10,300 Crore ($1.24 billion) fundingprojectto enhance the country’s AI infrastructure…
S178
Press Briefing by HMIT Ashwani Vaishnav on AI Impact Summit 2026 l Day 5 — So, there are questions about where do we go from here? What will be the implementation? I’ll take all these questions o…
S179
AI investment boost in Brazil, president Lula da Silva aims for autonomy — Brazil hasannounceda 23 billion reais ($4.07 billion) investment plan for AI development. The initiative aims to foster …
S180
Panel Discussion AI & Cybersecurity _ India AI Impact Summit — Thank you. I’ll be very brief since I was not in the program, but just to say that Brazil fully supports this global net…
S181
Open Forum #48 Implementation of the Global Digital Compact — Wolfgang Kleinwachter, retired Professor from University of Aarhus, raised concerns about the need to avoid isolating GD…
S182
Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech — Tanara Lauschner:Thank you Jennifer. Hello everyone. First of all I would like to thank the IGF Secretariat for organizi…
S183
Overview of AI policy in 10 jurisdictions — Summary: Brazil is working on its first AI regulation, with Bill No. 2338/2023 under review as of December 2024. Inspire…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
N
Narendra Modi
3 arguments83 words per minute1297 words928 seconds
Argument 1
Human‑Centric Ethical Framework
EXPLANATION
Modi calls for an AI ecosystem that places human welfare at its core, emphasizing ethical behavior, data sovereignty, and transparent safety mechanisms. He proposes three concrete steps: a data framework respecting sovereignty, clear and transparent safety rules, and embedding human values to prevent uncontrolled AI behavior.
EVIDENCE
He outlines three suggestions: first, creating a data framework that respects data sovereignty for AI training, noting that “garbage in, garbage out” means unsafe or biased data leads to unreliable outputs [15-18]; second, establishing clear, transparent safety rules for AI platforms, advocating a “glass box” approach instead of opaque “black box” systems to ensure accountability [20-23]; third, highlighting the “paper-clip” problem to stress the need for AI to be guided by clear human values and purpose [24-27].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The Leaders’ Plenary notes the summit will help create a human-centric AI ecosystem [S8] and a separate remark highlights the “paper-clip” problem stressing the need for clear human values and guidance [S59].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Serbia, Liechtenstein, Spain
DISAGREED WITH
Brazil, Serbia
Argument 2
National GPU & Computing Power Initiative
EXPLANATION
Modi announces a massive expansion of India’s AI computing capacity, detailing the current and planned deployment of GPUs to support startups and research. This initiative aims to provide world‑class computing power at affordable rates, positioning India as a global AI hub.
EVIDENCE
He states that India already has 38,000 GPUs and will add another 24,000 within six months, offering affordable, world-class computing power to startups and sharing over 7,500 data sets and 270 AI models as national resources [30-33].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
India’s shared-compute model that provides free GPUs to citizens and startups is described in detail, showing the government’s role in scaling AI infrastructure [S61][S62].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Infrastructure, Compute, and Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
DISAGREED WITH
Slovakia, Liechtenstein
Argument 3
AI for Social Welfare & Pandemic Response
EXPLANATION
Modi highlights how India’s digital infrastructure helped during the COVID‑19 pandemic, showcasing technology as a service tool for humanity. He cites the digital vaccination platform and UPI as examples of inclusive, rapid public service delivery.
EVIDENCE
He describes India’s digital vaccination platform that vaccinated millions on time, and the UPI system that enabled seamless online transactions even in difficult circumstances, illustrating how digital public infrastructure bridged gaps during the pandemic [5-9].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Discussion of AI’s role in India’s socio-economic development and the pandemic response is presented, emphasizing digital platforms that delivered health and financial services [S65][S63].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI’s Socio‑Economic Impact (Jobs, Education, Health, Public Services)
AGREED WITH
Bhutan, Greece, Croatia
B
Brazil
3 arguments108 words per minute778 words431 seconds
Argument 1
Multilateral, Inclusive Governance via UN
EXPLANATION
Brazil stresses that AI governance must be anchored in the United Nations to ensure multilateral, inclusive, and development‑oriented rules. It argues that only a UN‑based framework can guarantee universal participation and prevent domination by a few actors.
EVIDENCE
The Brazilian representative notes that “none of these forums replaces the universality of the United Nations for an international governance of artificial intelligence” and highlights the role of the International Scientific Panel as the first global scientific body on AI [78-80].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Brazil’s representative stresses that AI governance must be anchored in the United Nations to ensure universal participation and multilateralism [S66][S67][S68].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
AGREED WITH
Switzerland, Estonia, Netherlands
DISAGREED WITH
Guyana, International Monetary Fund
Argument 2
Global South Leadership & Multilateralism
EXPLANATION
Brazil positions the Global South as a key stakeholder in AI governance, warning that multilateralism is retreating while AI’s impact grows. It calls for inclusive dialogue that reflects the aspirations and challenges of developing nations.
EVIDENCE
The speech references the summit as the first AI gathering in the Global South, describes the fourth industrial revolution’s rapid advance alongside a retreat of multilateralism, and urges that AI governance incorporate Global South perspectives [48-55].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Brazil calls for inclusive dialogue that reflects Global South perspectives and highlights the need for multilateral frameworks at the UN [S69].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
Argument 3
Regulating Dual‑Use AI Risks
EXPLANATION
Brazil highlights that AI technologies have a dual character, offering great benefits but also posing serious threats such as autonomous weapons, hate speech, disinformation and other harmful practices. It calls for robust regulation to mitigate these risks.
EVIDENCE
The Brazilian representative notes that “All technological innovation of great impact has a dual character and confronts us with ethical and political issues” and lists harmful practices including autonomous weapons, hate speech, disinformation, child pornography and violence, urging regulation to address these dangers [50-55].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Brazil’s proposed rights-based AI regulation explicitly addresses dual-use risks such as autonomous weapons, hate speech and disinformation [S70] and notes recent regulatory actions on privacy concerns [S71].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
AGREED WITH
Spain, Bolivia
L
Liechtenstein
1 argument91 words per minute353 words230 seconds
Argument 1
Trust‑Based Sustainable Governance
EXPLANATION
Liechtenstein argues that trustworthy, sustainable AI governance requires clear rules, predictable frameworks, and a long‑term focus on quality rather than scale. Small states can lead by fostering trusted environments where innovation and responsibility coexist.
EVIDENCE
The speaker emphasizes that “technology should never be an end in itself” and must serve humanity, highlighting the need for clear rules, predictable frameworks, and a focus on quality to ensure sustainable AI development [284-295].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The statement that small countries can compete on trust, transparency and values-based governance directly supports Liechtenstein’s call for trustworthy, sustainable AI rules [S72].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Brazil, Serbia, Spain
DISAGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Slovakia
S
Serbia
1 argument135 words per minute553 words244 seconds
Argument 1
Sovereign AI Regulation & Avoiding Dependence
EXPLANATION
Serbia warns that reliance on external digital infrastructure threatens national sovereignty and calls for home‑grown AI expertise, research, and regulatory capacity. It stresses that AI should be a tool for stability, not a source of dependence.
EVIDENCE
The Serbian delegate discusses the need for sovereign control over data, algorithms, and digital infrastructure, noting that dependence on external systems conditions a country’s sovereignty and that building local research centers and regulatory frameworks is essential [124-136].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Serbia’s definition of 21st-century sovereignty, emphasizing control over data, algorithms and regulatory capacity, aligns with its argument for sovereign AI regulation [S8].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Brazil, Liechtenstein, Spain
DISAGREED WITH
Brazil, Narendra Modi
S
Spain
3 arguments129 words per minute379 words175 seconds
Argument 1
Human‑Rights‑Based AI Charter
EXPLANATION
Spain presents its AI charter rooted in human rights, emphasizing that AI must expand freedom, democracy, and rights while combating misuse. It also notes the creation of Europe’s first AI supervisory agency.
EVIDENCE
The speech cites Spain’s 2021 charter of digital rights and the establishment of Europe’s first AI supervisory agency as concrete steps to embed human-rights principles in AI governance [645-648].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Spain’s 2021 Digital Rights Charter and the creation of Europe’s first AI supervisory agency are cited as concrete steps to embed human-rights principles in AI governance [S72][S73][S74][S77].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Brazil, Serbia, Liechtenstein
Argument 2
AI in Healthcare, Education, Climate
EXPLANATION
Spain highlights AI’s potential to improve health outcomes, enhance education, and support climate research, positioning technology as a catalyst for societal well‑being. It underscores the need for responsible deployment to realize these benefits.
EVIDENCE
The minister mentions AI’s ability to support better healthcare decisions, assist teachers and future-skill development, and aid climate research, illustrating concrete sectors where AI can add value [450-456].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AI’s potential to improve health outcomes, support education and aid climate research is highlighted in discussions of AI for good and sustainable development [S75][S76].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI’s Socio‑Economic Impact (Jobs, Education, Health, Public Services)
Argument 3
Addressing AI’s Environmental Cost
EXPLANATION
Spain draws attention to the environmental footprint of AI, warning about energy consumption, job displacement, and the need for safeguards. It calls for policies that balance AI progress with ecological sustainability.
EVIDENCE
The address notes that AI poses environmental costs and risks of massive job displacement, urging that safeguards be strengthened to mitigate these impacts [652-654].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The environmental footprint of AI, including energy consumption and climate impact, is discussed in the context of AI for climate action and sustainability initiatives [S75][S76].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainability & Energy for AI
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Bolivia
B
Bolivia
1 argument117 words per minute79 words40 seconds
Argument 1
Equity, Ethics, Solidarity in AI
EXPLANATION
Bolivia stresses that AI development must be grounded in equity, ethical standards, and solidarity among nations. It calls for collaborative action to ensure AI benefits all humanity.
EVIDENCE
The Bolivian speaker declares that the digital future must be built with equity, ethics, and solidarity, extending a hand to work together with India and the international community for AI that serves all of humanity [369-372].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Spain
G
Guyana
1 argument120 words per minute786 words390 seconds
Argument 1
Capacity‑Building & Awareness for Low‑Income Nations
EXPLANATION
Guyana calls for mechanisms to raise AI awareness among policymakers in low‑income countries and to support coherent national AI development plans. It emphasizes the transformative potential of modest AI investments compared with traditional infrastructure spending.
EVIDENCE
The speaker proposes a mechanism to promote awareness among policymakers, suggests organizing coherent AI development efforts, and argues that $20 million spent on AI could have a larger societal impact than the same amount spent on roads [508-514].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive AI Development & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Estonia, Greece, Croatia
DISAGREED WITH
International Monetary Fund, Brazil
E
Estonia
4 arguments107 words per minute461 words257 seconds
Argument 1
Nationwide AI Literacy & Public Access
EXPLANATION
Estonia describes its AI Leap initiative, which provides students and teachers nationwide with advanced AI tools, training, and learning frameworks to build AI literacy and foster an innovative ecosystem.
EVIDENCE
The Estonian representative explains that the AI Leap public-private partnership gives students and teachers access to advanced AI tools, training, and learning frameworks, thereby strengthening AI literacy across the country [95-96].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive AI Development & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Guyana, Greece, Croatia
Argument 2
Co‑Facilitation of AI Dialogue
EXPLANATION
Estonia notes its role as a co‑facilitator of the UN‑hosted global AI dialogue, committing to continue the process with dedication. This underscores Estonia’s commitment to multilateral AI governance.
EVIDENCE
The speaker states that Estonia is honoured to co-facilitate the AI dialogue together with El Salvador and will carry out this responsibility with great dedication [105-107].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Switzerland, Netherlands
Argument 3
Digital Serenity as a Pillar of National Security
EXPLANATION
Estonia links the concept of digital serenity—secure computing power, reliable data management and autonomous solutions—to its national security strategy, arguing that trustworthy digital infrastructure is essential for a safe state.
EVIDENCE
The speaker states that “Digital serenity has become part of 21st century’s national security” and explains that this includes computing power, secure data management and autonomous solutions [100-101].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs
Argument 4
AI Testing Ground for Responsible AI
EXPLANATION
Estonia positions itself as a global testing ground where AI innovation and legal frameworks evolve together, allowing responsible AI to be trialled in real society while protecting citizens’ interests.
EVIDENCE
The delegate says that Estonia’s goal is to become a global testing ground for responsible AI, where technology and the legal space develop in tandem and innovation is tested in society while protecting people’s interests [104-105].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
M
Mauritius
2 arguments109 words per minute521 words286 seconds
Argument 1
Digital Transformation Blueprint for Small Islands
EXPLANATION
Mauritius presents its 2025‑2029 Digital Transformation Blueprint, outlining a strategic roadmap to modernise public services, empower citizens, and drive sustainable growth despite limited resources.
EVIDENCE
The minister announces the Mauritius Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025-2029 as a strategic roadmap committing the government to modernise public services and empower people through technology [580-582].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive AI Development & Capacity Building for the Global South
Argument 2
AI for Climate & Environmental Goals
EXPLANATION
Mauritius links AI deployment to climate and environmental objectives, emphasizing that AI should support climate resilience and sustainable development.
EVIDENCE
The speaker notes that AI can help achieve climate and environmental goals, reinforcing the need for responsible AI aligned with sustainability [583-585].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainability & Energy for AI
S
Seychelles
2 arguments128 words per minute587 words273 seconds
Argument 1
Infrastructure Support for Small States
EXPLANATION
Seychelles stresses the need for external partners to provide infrastructure and digital tools, highlighting its limited resources compared with larger economies. It calls for collaborative support to bridge the digital divide.
EVIDENCE
The Seychellois delegate points out that, as a small island state, they lack the same access to technology and rely on partners like India to overcome barriers, emphasizing the importance of cooperation for digital inclusion [626-630] and [634-636].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive AI Development & Capacity Building for the Global South
Argument 2
Scalable Digital ID & Infrastructure
EXPLANATION
Seychelles highlights its achievement of assigning a unique digital identifier to 1.4 billion people in India and proposes scaling a similar system domestically to improve service delivery and governance.
EVIDENCE
The speaker mentions India’s unique digital number for 1.4 billion citizens and suggests that a comparable system could be implemented for Seychelles’ population, illustrating a scalable digital ID model [626-630].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Infrastructure, Compute, and Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
C
Croatia
2 arguments102 words per minute473 words278 seconds
Argument 1
Inclusive AI as Development Priority
EXPLANATION
Croatia asserts that AI development must be result‑oriented, focusing on tangible outcomes rather than rhetoric. It stresses that AI should be integrated into key sectors to deliver public value and drive inclusive growth.
EVIDENCE
The Croatian representative emphasizes that “the world does not need more words, it needs results,” and outlines AI applications in healthcare, education, and public services, underscoring the need for real-world impact [376-413].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive AI Development & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Estonia, Guyana, Greece
Argument 2
AI as Tool for Digital Inclusion & Service Delivery
EXPLANATION
Croatia highlights AI’s capacity to enhance digital inclusion, improve public services, and support economic development, positioning AI as a catalyst for societal progress.
EVIDENCE
The speech notes AI’s role in transforming healthcare, education, business, and public services, and stresses that digital inclusion must be central to AI deployment [376-389].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI’s Socio‑Economic Impact (Jobs, Education, Health, Public Services)
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Bhutan, Greece
S
Slovakia
2 arguments120 words per minute434 words216 seconds
Argument 1
Sovereign AI Compute & Low‑Carbon Energy
EXPLANATION
Slovakia describes its strategy to build sovereign AI compute capacity powered by low‑carbon energy, turning its energy niche into a high‑value digital export. It also mentions the launch of a national supercomputer for AI workloads.
EVIDENCE
The Slovak speaker explains that sensitive data must stay under clear legal protection, that the country is developing AI factories with next-generation GPUs, and that it aims to export low-carbon energy while building a supercomputer named Perun for AI simulations [154-162].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Infrastructure, Compute, and Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
AGREED WITH
Finland, Bhutan, Kazakhstan
DISAGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Liechtenstein
Argument 2
Low‑Carbon Energy as Digital Export
EXPLANATION
Slovakia emphasizes converting its renewable energy resources into a digital export, offering affordable compute services to attract AI workloads and generate higher‑value economic activity.
EVIDENCE
The minister states that instead of exporting electricity as a raw commodity, Slovakia wants to turn its energy niche into a digital export with higher value, supporting a local AI ecosystem [160-162].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Infrastructure, Compute, and Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
B
Bhutan
2 arguments113 words per minute914 words482 seconds
Argument 1
Renewable Hydropower‑Powered AI Hub
EXPLANATION
Bhutan proposes leveraging its abundant hydropower to power AI compute centers, creating a green, sustainable AI hub that attracts energy‑intensive industries while preserving the environment.
EVIDENCE
The Bhutanese delegate highlights the country’s hydropower capacity as a foundation for AI compute, noting partnerships with Indian firms and the vision of a Gelipur Mindfulness City powered by clean renewable energy for AI research and data centres [330-338].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Infrastructure, Compute, and Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Greece, Croatia
Argument 2
Green Hydropower for AI Compute
EXPLANATION
Bhutan reiterates that AI compute should be powered by green hydropower, ensuring that digital expansion does not compromise ecological balance.
EVIDENCE
The speech repeats the emphasis on hydropower-driven AI compute, positioning renewable energy as the backbone for sustainable AI development [330-338].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainability & Energy for AI
K
Kazakhstan
1 argument126 words per minute523 words248 seconds
Argument 1
Data‑Center Valley & Supercomputing Cluster
EXPLANATION
Kazakhstan announces the creation of a Data‑Center Valley and large‑scale supercomputing clusters to provide sovereign, affordable AI compute capacity, inviting global partners to use its infrastructure.
EVIDENCE
The Kazakh representative mentions the launch of the Data Center Valley offering over 1 GW of capacity at low tariffs and the establishment of a supercomputing cluster in partnership with NVIDIA to serve as a sovereign AI hub [550-553].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Infrastructure, Compute, and Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
AGREED WITH
Slovakia, Finland, Bhutan
F
Finland
2 arguments110 words per minute365 words197 seconds
Argument 1
Clean‑Energy Data Centres & Supercomputing
EXPLANATION
Finland showcases its eco‑efficient data centres powered by clean energy and heat‑recycling, positioning them as models for sustainable AI compute that align environmental goals with technological advancement.
EVIDENCE
The Finnish speaker notes that Finland hosts one of the world’s most eco-efficient data centres, powered by clean energy with excess heat recycled into local communities, demonstrating that technological leadership can coexist with sustainability [432-435].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Infrastructure, Compute, and Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
AGREED WITH
Slovakia, Bhutan, Kazakhstan
Argument 2
Eco‑Efficient Data Centres & Heat Recycling
EXPLANATION
Finland reiterates the importance of energy‑efficient data centre design, emphasizing heat‑recycling as a concrete measure to reduce AI’s environmental footprint.
EVIDENCE
The same passage highlights the eco-efficiency of Finnish data centres and the practice of recycling waste heat for community use, underscoring a sustainable approach to AI infrastructure [432-435].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainability & Energy for AI
I
International Monetary Fund
1 argument107 words per minute665 words369 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑Driven Productivity & Growth Projections
EXPLANATION
The IMF estimates that AI could add up to 0.8 % to global GDP, boosting productivity and economic growth, while also reshaping labor markets with significant job impacts across sectors.
EVIDENCE
The IMF report projects a potential 0.8 % boost to global growth from AI, predicts that about 40 % of jobs worldwide will be affected, with higher impact in advanced economies such as Sweden where up to 60 % of jobs could be transformed [674-682].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI’s Socio‑Economic Impact (Jobs, Education, Health, Public Services)
DISAGREED WITH
Guyana, Brazil
G
Greece
1 argument136 words per minute891 words391 seconds
Argument 1
AI for Public Service Modernisation & Reskilling
EXPLANATION
Greece calls for AI‑driven modernization of public services and extensive reskilling programs to ensure workers can thrive in an AI‑augmented economy. It stresses updating procurement frameworks and investing in digital talent.
EVIDENCE
The Greek minister outlines the need to reskill workers, upgrade public services with AI, and reform procurement frameworks to be faster, outcome-oriented, and open to startups, emphasizing that capable states are essential for AI success [452-466].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI’s Socio‑Economic Impact (Jobs, Education, Health, Public Services)
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Bhutan, Croatia
S
Switzerland
1 argument110 words per minute505 words274 seconds
Argument 1
UN‑Based Global AI Dialogue & Scientific Panel
EXPLANATION
Switzerland announces its commitment to host future AI summits and highlights the establishment of a UN‑anchored global AI dialogue and scientific panel to foster inclusive, multistakeholder governance.
EVIDENCE
The Swiss delegate references the United Nations-hosted global AI dialogue established by the UN General Assembly and the creation of the International Scientific Panel on AI as the first global scientific body on the topic [105-108] and notes Switzerland’s readiness to host the 2027 AI Summit in Geneva [273-276].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Estonia, Netherlands
N
Netherlands
3 arguments150 words per minute412 words164 seconds
Argument 1
Inclusive Participation in AI Development
EXPLANATION
The Netherlands stresses that effective artificial intelligence must involve all nations, especially those from the Global South, so that the benefits of AI are shared equitably. It argues that AI should serve humanity and that agreements need to work for everyone.
EVIDENCE
The delegate says that “Everyone must be able to participate” and expresses pleasure with the summit’s focus on the Global South, emphasizing that AI needs to serve humanity and that agreements must work for all participants [601-605].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive AI Development & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Switzerland, Estonia
Argument 2
Public AI Infrastructure for SMEs, Government and Research
EXPLANATION
The Netherlands announces its first international AI strategy, which will make public AI infrastructure openly available to small and medium enterprises, government agencies and the scientific community. This aims to attract talent, promote data sharing and foster innovation across the economy.
EVIDENCE
The speaker explains that the Netherlands is presenting its first international AI strategy that makes public AI infrastructure available for small business, government and science, and that it will help attract and retain talent and promote data sharing [607-610].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Infrastructure, Compute, and Sovereign Digital Public Infrastructure
Argument 3
Commitment to Responsible AI Governance through UN Mechanisms
EXPLANATION
The Dutch delegation commits to pursuing responsible and safe AI development by engaging with United Nations processes, including the Global Digital Compact and other multilateral AI forums. It underscores the need for international governance to ensure AI does not become harmful.
EVIDENCE
The delegate notes that the road must be responsible and safe, requiring international governance, and that the Netherlands is pursuing this through the United Nations via the Global Digital Compact and the RE-AIM Summit on responsible AI in the military domain [616-617].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Data Sovereignty
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Switzerland, Estonia
S
Sri Lanka
3 arguments210 words per minute1158 words330 seconds
Argument 1
Prioritising Cultural Preservation and Environmental Protection
EXPLANATION
Sri Lanka emphasizes that safeguarding its language, cultural heritage and natural environment is essential for the nation’s development and social cohesion. It calls for protecting the environment and cultural diversity as a core policy goal.
EVIDENCE
The speaker repeatedly states the need to be “very careful about the economic and social issues” and stresses protecting the environment, the national language and cultural knowledge, as well as the importance of cultural development and environmental stewardship [208-215].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Social and economic development
Argument 2
Seeking Indian Support for Military and Security Cooperation
EXPLANATION
Sri Lanka notes that India is prepared to take steps to establish a new military base, indicating a request for security partnership and cooperation in defence matters.
EVIDENCE
The transcript records multiple statements that “The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian-led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future” [241-245].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
The enabling environment for digital development
Argument 3
Request for Art and Cultural Assistance
EXPLANATION
Sri Lanka announces plans to provide art and cultural assistance, signalling a desire for international collaboration in cultural sectors to support its development agenda.
EVIDENCE
The speaker lists a series of statements about planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka, repeating the intention many times [220-235].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Social and economic development
Agreements
Agreement Points
Multilateral, UN‑anchored AI governance
Speakers: Brazil, Switzerland, Estonia, Netherlands
Multilateral, Inclusive Governance via UN UN‑Based Global AI Dialogue & Scientific Panel Co‑Facilitation of AI Dialogue Inclusive Participation in AI Development Commitment to Responsible AI Governance through UN Mechanisms
All four speakers stress that AI governance must be multilateral, inclusive and anchored in the United Nations to ensure universal participation and prevent domination by a few actors [78-80][273-276][105-107][601-605][616-617].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This aligns with calls for UN-led global AI governance highlighted by a Chinese AI expert and echoed in multistakeholder forums emphasizing international coordination [S120][S101][S107].
Ethical AI framework, data sovereignty and transparent safety mechanisms
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Brazil, Serbia, Liechtenstein, Spain
Human‑Centric Ethical Framework Regulating Dual‑Use AI Risks Sovereign AI Regulation & Avoiding Dependence Trust‑Based Sustainable Governance Human‑Rights‑Based AI Charter
These speakers converge on the need for an ethical, human-centred AI ecosystem that respects data sovereignty, adopts transparent “glass-box” safety rules and embeds clear human values to avoid uncontrolled AI behaviour [15-23][50-55][124-136][284-295][645-648].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Reflects the EU Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI and broader data-quality and human-rights-centered AI policy discussions documented in WSIS and related reports [S104][S106][S101].
Sovereign AI compute infrastructure powered by low‑carbon energy
Speakers: Slovakia, Finland, Bhutan, Kazakhstan
Sovereign AI Compute & Low‑Carbon Energy Clean‑Energy Data Centres & Supercomputing Renewable Hydropower‑Powered AI Hub Data‑Center Valley & Supercomputing Cluster
All four countries describe building national AI compute capacity that is sovereign and environmentally sustainable, leveraging low-carbon or renewable energy sources to power high-performance GPUs and data centres [154-162][432-435][330-338][550-553].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Mirrors policy emphasis on sovereign, trusted compute and low-carbon design in recent infrastructure talks, including sovereign compute proposals and compute-first scaling models [S109][S110][S107][S108].
Capacity building and AI literacy for inclusive development
Speakers: Estonia, Guyana, Greece, Croatia
Nationwide AI Literacy & Public Access Capacity‑Building & Awareness for Low‑Income Nations AI for Public Service Modernisation & Reskilling Inclusive AI as Development Priority
These speakers highlight the importance of equipping citizens, policymakers and public servants with AI skills, tools and awareness to ensure that AI benefits are widely shared and translate into tangible public-service improvements [95-96][508-514][452-466][376-413].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Consistent with inclusion-focused AI strategies that address language representation, digital public infrastructure, and skill gaps highlighted across multiple forums [S95][S97][S102][S118].
Regulation of dual‑use AI risks and promotion of equity, ethics and solidarity
Speakers: Brazil, Spain, Bolivia
Regulating Dual‑Use AI Risks Addressing AI’s Environmental Cost Equity, Ethics, Solidarity in AI
All three emphasize that AI’s powerful capabilities bring serious dual-use threats (autonomous weapons, disinformation, environmental impact) and call for robust, ethical regulation grounded in equity and solidarity among nations [50-55][652-654][369-372].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Echoes dual-use risk concerns and ethical governance frameworks discussed in human-rights and security contexts [S111][S112][S113][S101].
AI as a tool for social welfare, public services and health
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Bhutan, Greece, Croatia
AI for Social Welfare & Pandemic Response Renewable Hydropower‑Powered AI Hub AI for Public Service Modernisation & Reskilling AI as Tool for Digital Inclusion & Service Delivery
These speakers illustrate AI’s role in delivering health care, education, pandemic response and broader public-service improvements, stressing that technology should serve humanity first [5-9][330-338][450-456][390-393].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Aligns with documented applications of AI in welfare, health and public services and the ethical imperative to serve humanity as a whole [S95][S96][S100][S118].
Similar Viewpoints
Both small states argue that AI governance must be built on trust, clear rules and sovereign control over data and algorithms to protect national independence and ensure responsible innovation [284-295][124-136].
Speakers: Liechtenstein, Serbia
Trust‑Based Sustainable Governance Sovereign AI Regulation & Avoiding Dependence
All three stress the need for Global South participation, capacity‑building mechanisms and inclusive multilateral frameworks so that low‑income countries can benefit from AI [78-80][508-514][601-605].
Speakers: Brazil, Guyana, Netherlands
Multilateral, Inclusive Governance via UN Capacity‑Building & Awareness for Low‑Income Nations Inclusive Participation in AI Development
These nations converge on the principle that AI compute should be powered by renewable or low‑carbon energy to combine technological advancement with environmental sustainability [330-338][432-435][154-162].
Speakers: Bhutan, Finland, Slovakia
Renewable Hydropower‑Powered AI Hub Clean‑Energy Data Centres & Supercomputing Sovereign AI Compute & Low‑Carbon Energy
Unexpected Consensus
Small, highly‑fragmented states adopting a leadership role in trustworthy AI governance
Speakers: Liechtenstein, Serbia, Bhutan
Trust‑Based Sustainable Governance Sovereign AI Regulation & Avoiding Dependence Renewable Hydropower‑Powered AI Hub
Despite their limited size, these states jointly emphasize sovereign control, trust-based rules and green compute as core pillars of AI strategy, a stance more commonly associated with larger economies [284-295][124-136][330-338].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Supported by case studies of Singapore and other small states positioning themselves as innovators in global AI governance [S98][S99][S101].
Alignment between economic growth projections and infrastructure investment
Speakers: International Monetary Fund, Narendra Modi
AI‑Driven Productivity & Growth Projections National GPU & Computing Power Initiative
The IMF quantifies AI’s potential to add 0.8 % to global GDP and reshape jobs, while Modi announces a massive GPU deployment to provide affordable compute, showing a rare convergence of macro-economic forecasting with concrete national infrastructure rollout [674-682][30-33].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Mirrors economic growth narratives linking AI infrastructure investment to productivity gains in policy reports and investment outlooks [S116][S117][S118][S110].
Overall Assessment

The summit revealed strong convergence on four pillars: (1) multilateral, UN‑anchored governance; (2) ethical, human‑centred AI with data sovereignty; (3) sovereign, low‑carbon compute infrastructure; (4) capacity‑building and AI literacy for inclusive development. These shared positions cut across regions and country sizes, indicating a broad political will to shape AI in line with human rights, sustainability and equitable growth.

High consensus on governance, ethics and capacity building, moderate consensus on infrastructure models, and emerging consensus on linking AI growth to economic and environmental objectives. The alignment suggests that future policy initiatives are likely to be coordinated through UN mechanisms, prioritize trustworthy and sustainable AI ecosystems, and allocate resources for skills development, especially for the Global South.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Central locus of AI governance – UN‑based multilateral framework versus national sovereign regulation
Speakers: Brazil, Serbia, Narendra Modi
Multilateral, Inclusive Governance via UN Sovereign AI Regulation & Avoiding Dependence Human‑Centric Ethical Framework
Brazil argues that AI governance must be anchored in the United Nations to ensure universal, multilateral participation and prevent domination by a few actors [78-80][48-55]. Serbia stresses that AI sovereignty is essential, warning that dependence on external digital infrastructure threatens national sovereignty and calling for home-grown AI expertise and regulatory capacity [124-136][130-134]. Modi proposes a human-centric ethical framework with a data sovereignty-respecting AI training framework and transparent safety rules, emphasizing national responsibility for AI development [15-18][20-23]. The three positions diverge on whether AI governance should be primarily coordinated at the global UN level or rooted in national sovereign frameworks.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Highlights the tension between UN-centric multilateral governance and national sovereignty raised in recent debates on jurisdiction and sovereign AI strategies [S120][S107][S119][S101].
Approach to AI compute infrastructure – open sharing of national GPU resources versus building sovereign, low‑carbon compute capacity
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Slovakia, Liechtenstein
National GPU & Computing Power Initiative Sovereign AI Compute & Low‑Carbon Energy Trust‑Based Sustainable Governance
Modi announces a large-scale expansion of India’s AI compute capacity, offering 38,000 GPUs now and an additional 24,000 within six months, and making world-class computing power affordable for startups and as a shared national resource [30-33]. Slovakia emphasizes the need for sovereign AI compute located under clear legal protection, turning its low-carbon energy into a digital export and launching a national supercomputer (Perun) for AI workloads [154-162][176-179]. Liechtenstein argues that small states should focus on trusted, quality-oriented AI environments rather than scale, highlighting that “technology should never be an end in itself” and that trust and clear rules are more important than sheer compute power [284-295][286-295]. The disagreement lies in whether AI compute should be openly shared internationally or kept sovereign and tied to national energy and trust strategies.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Reflects divergent views on compute sharing versus sovereign low-carbon pods discussed in infrastructure scaling and compute demand index initiatives [S108][S109][S110][S107].
Mechanisms for financing AI capacity building – bilateral, modest‑scale assistance versus multilateral, large‑scale funding
Speakers: Guyana, International Monetary Fund, Brazil
Capacity‑Building & Awareness for Low‑Income Nations AI‑Driven Productivity & Growth Projections Multilateral, Inclusive Governance via UN
Guyana calls for a mechanism that raises AI awareness among policymakers in low-income countries and proposes coherent bilateral assistance, arguing that $20 million spent on AI can have a larger societal impact than the same amount on traditional infrastructure [508-514][520-523]. The IMF presents macro-economic projections, estimating AI could add up to 0.8 % to global GDP and affect 40 % of jobs worldwide, implying the need for large-scale investment and policy responses [674-682][666-679]. Brazil, meanwhile, stresses the importance of multilateral cooperation through UN mechanisms and global financial instruments to support AI governance and capacity building [78-80][48-55]. The disagreement concerns the preferred financing architecture: bilateral, targeted assistance versus broad multilateral funding and macro-economic planning.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Captures the financing split noted in multistakeholder forums where multilateral catalytic funding is contrasted with bilateral assistance models [S114][S102][S118].
Unexpected Differences
Sri Lanka’s focus on military cooperation and cultural assistance rather than AI
Speakers: Sri Lanka, All other participants
Seeking Indian Support for Military and Security Cooperation Request for Art and Cultural Assistance
While the summit’s agenda centers on AI governance, ethics, infrastructure and capacity building, the Sri Lankan delegate repeatedly emphasizes the need for India to establish a new military base and to provide art and cultural assistance, statements that appear unrelated to the AI discussion and are not echoed by any other speaker [241-245][220-235]. This divergence was unexpected in the context of an AI summit.
Overall Assessment

The summit displayed broad consensus on the importance of ethical, human‑centred AI and the need for capacity building, but significant disagreements emerged over the governance architecture (global UN‑based versus national sovereignty), the model for AI compute infrastructure (open sharing versus sovereign, low‑carbon compute), and the financing mechanisms for AI capacity building (bilateral targeted aid versus multilateral large‑scale funding). These divergences reflect differing priorities between large economies seeking to project global leadership and smaller or emerging states protecting their digital sovereignty.

Moderate to high – while participants share common goals, the contrasting visions on governance, infrastructure ownership and financing indicate substantive policy gaps that could hinder coordinated action unless reconciled through hybrid frameworks that blend multilateral standards with respect for national sovereignty.

Partial Agreements
All these speakers agree that AI must be developed and deployed in a way that serves humanity, respects human rights and ethical values, and includes broad participation. However, they differ on the primary mechanism to achieve this: Modi emphasizes national data frameworks and transparent safety rules [15-23]; Brazil calls for a UN‑anchored multilateral governance structure [78-80]; Liechtenstein focuses on trust, clear rules and quality over scale [284-295]; Spain highlights a human‑rights‑based charter and a supervisory agency [645-648]; Estonia stresses co‑facilitating a UN‑hosted global AI dialogue and building a testing ground for responsible AI [105-107][104-105]; the Netherlands stresses inclusive participation and public AI infrastructure for SMEs and research [601-610].
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Brazil, Liechtenstein, Spain, Estonia, Netherlands
Human‑Centric Ethical Framework Multilateral, Inclusive Governance via UN Trust‑Based Sustainable Governance Human‑Rights‑Based AI Charter Co‑Facilitation of AI Dialogue Inclusive Participation in AI Development
These speakers share the goal of building AI capacity and ensuring that AI benefits societies through education, public services, and inclusive development. Estonia proposes a nationwide AI literacy programme and a public‑private AI Leap initiative [95-96]; Greece calls for extensive reskilling, updated procurement, and AI‑enabled public services [452-466]; Finland showcases eco‑efficient data centres and clean energy to support AI while reducing environmental impact [432-435]; Croatia stresses that AI must deliver tangible results in health, education and public services [376-413]; Guyana emphasizes mechanisms to raise AI awareness among policymakers and to allocate modest funds to AI projects for greater impact [508-514]. The disagreement lies in the primary pathway: education‑centric programmes versus infrastructure‑centric clean energy solutions versus policy‑centric reskilling and procurement reforms.
Speakers: Estonia, Greece, Finland, Croatia, Guyana
Nationwide AI Literacy & Public Access AI for Public Service Modernisation & Reskilling Clean‑Energy Data Centres & Supercomputing Inclusive AI as Development Priority Capacity‑Building & Awareness for Low‑Income Nations
Takeaways
Key takeaways
A human‑centric, ethical AI governance framework and respect for data sovereignty are essential for trustworthy AI. Inclusive AI development and capacity‑building for the Global South must be a priority, with awareness programmes and education initiatives. Sovereign AI infrastructure, clean‑energy powered compute, and national digital public infrastructure are critical for autonomy and sustainability. AI will have profound socio‑economic impacts on productivity, jobs, health, education and public services; policies must address both opportunities and risks. International cooperation through UN‑based multilateral mechanisms, regional partnerships and rotating summit hosting is needed to create common rules and standards. Environmental sustainability of AI (low‑carbon energy, heat‑recycling data centres) must be integrated into AI strategies.
Resolutions and action items
India will expand its national AI compute capacity by adding 24,000 GPUs within six months and continue sharing datasets and models as a public resource. Switzerland committed to host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027, establishing a stable venue for ongoing governance dialogue. Estonia will co‑facilitate the UN AI dialogue and host the Tallinn Digital Summit (5‑6 Nov) on AI‑driven societal resilience. Brazil reaffirmed support for a UN‑anchored, multilateral AI governance framework (Global Digital Pact, International Scientific Panel). Liechtenstein advocated for clear, predictable international AI rules and offered to support cross‑border cooperation on trustworthy AI. Bhutan proposed partnership on renewable hydropower‑driven AI compute hubs (Gelipu Mindfulness City) and invited Indian investment. Kazakhstan offered its Data Center Valley and sovereign super‑computing cluster to international partners, with preferential tariffs and tax incentives. Mauritius announced its Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025‑2029 and the creation of a dedicated AI economic zone for the region. Seychelles expressed intent to collaborate with India to adopt digital ID and AI technologies for public‑service improvement. The IMF highlighted a proposed $3 billion fund for AI capacity‑building in low‑resource countries and called for mechanisms to raise policy awareness. Guyana called for a quality‑review mechanism for AI models and for bilateral support to accelerate AI diffusion in the Global South.
Unresolved issues
Concrete mechanisms for equitable distribution of AI benefits and revenue sharing among nations remain undefined. A globally binding AI regulatory framework, including standards for ‘glass‑box’ transparency, has not been finalized. Details on implementing data‑sovereignty safeguards and cross‑border data governance are still pending. Specific policies to mitigate AI‑driven risks such as autonomous weapons, disinformation, and large‑scale job displacement were not agreed upon. Funding commitments for the $3 billion capacity‑building pool and the timeline for its disbursement are unclear. How to align national AI strategies with existing multilateral agreements while preserving sovereign decision‑making needs further negotiation.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a UN‑based multilateral governance model that respects national sovereignty while providing common standards (Brazil, Switzerland). Combine clean‑energy initiatives with AI compute infrastructure to address both sustainability and performance (Bhutan, Finland, Slovakia). Balance rapid AI innovation with updated regulatory frameworks and public‑procurement reforms (Greece, Spain). Promote sovereign AI capabilities while encouraging international collaboration and shared research hubs (Serbia, Kazakhstan). Offer predictable, quality‑focused AI rule‑books for small states to foster trust without stifling innovation (Liechtenstein). Create joint public‑private AI literacy programmes and digital ID systems to bridge the digital divide (Estonia, Mauritius, Seychelles).
Thought Provoking Comments
All technological innovation of great impact has a dual character and confronts us with ethical and political issues… When few control the algorithms and the digital infrastructures, we are not talking about innovation, but about domination.
Highlights the paradox that the same technologies that can drive progress also concentrate power, framing AI governance as a matter of preventing digital domination rather than merely fostering innovation.
Shifted the discussion from purely technical optimism to a focus on power asymmetries; prompted other speakers (e.g., Serbia, Slovakia, Greece) to stress sovereignty, data ownership, and the need for multilateral regulation.
Speaker: President of Brazil
AI is becoming infrastructure, and infrastructure is always a political issue. Countries that control key digital infrastructure set standards, while those that depend on external systems adapt to rules they did not define.
Connects AI to national sovereignty and political capacity, arguing that AI governance is fundamentally about who holds decision‑making power, not just about model performance.
Reinforced Brazil’s point and introduced the theme of ‘digital sovereignty’; led Slovakia and Kazakhstan to emphasize building sovereign compute capacity and legal frameworks.
Speaker: Serbia
We must balance Paravidya (higher knowledge, wisdom) with Aparavidya (technical skill). The triumph of technical excellence is meaningless without wisdom to guide it.
Brings ancient philosophical concepts into the AI debate, framing the ethical challenge as a need for wisdom rather than just technical capability.
Deepened the moral dimension of the conversation; inspired Greece to reference ancient wisdom and prompted other leaders to discuss the role of values and education in AI.
Speaker: Prime Minister of Bhutan
We need a glass‑box approach rather than a black‑box one: safety rules must be clear, transparent and verifiable so accountability is visible.
Proposes a concrete governance mechanism that moves beyond abstract principles to actionable transparency, linking technical design to ethical outcomes.
Set a concrete benchmark that other participants referenced; Estonia echoed the need for transparency and citizen control, while Switzerland highlighted the role of multilateral institutions to enforce such standards.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi (in his opening remarks)
AI must serve people, not the other way around. This means transparent technology, data use, people’s control over their data, and the ability to question AI‑driven decisions.
Frames AI governance as a societal strategy rather than a technocratic project, emphasizing literacy, control, and the right to contest automated decisions.
Expanded the conversation to include public‑sector capacity building and AI literacy; influenced later remarks from Greece and the Netherlands about education and inclusive participation.
Speaker: Estonia
AI dividend must be broadly shared; governments must ensure workers are reskilled, small businesses have access, and public services are upgraded so that the benefits reach farmers, nurses, teachers, and entrepreneurs.
Provides a three‑point roadmap that links economic inclusion, state modernization, and geopolitical partnership, moving the debate from abstract governance to concrete socioeconomic outcomes.
Prompted other speakers (Croatia, Spain, Finland) to cite specific national initiatives that translate AI benefits into public services and workforce development.
Speaker: Prime Minister of Greece
Switzerland will host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027, positioning Geneva as the steady anchor where knowledge can accumulate and multilateral governance can mature.
Offers a tangible institutional commitment that frames the summit’s outcomes within a long‑term multilateral architecture, reinforcing the UN‑centric governance model.
Reinforced Brazil’s call for UN‑based governance; gave other participants a concrete timeline and venue for future collaboration, shaping the concluding tone toward sustained partnership.
Speaker: President of Switzerland
The paper‑clip problem illustrates that without clear human values and guidance, an AI system could allocate all resources to a single goal, ignoring broader societal needs.
Uses a vivid thought experiment to illustrate the existential risk of misaligned AI, making the abstract risk concrete for the audience.
Elevated the urgency of embedding human values in AI design; resonated with Serbia’s sovereignty concerns and Bhutan’s wisdom narrative, deepening the ethical discourse.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
The IMF estimates AI could add up to 0.8 % to global growth but also warns that 40 % of jobs will be impacted, with routine tasks disappearing first; we must prepare people with new skills.
Combines macro‑economic projections with labor‑market implications, grounding the ethical debate in measurable economic stakes.
Shifted the conversation toward concrete policy actions on education and reskilling; echoed Greece’s and Croatia’s emphasis on state capacity and workforce development.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
The Netherlands’ AI strategy makes public AI infrastructure available for small businesses, government and science, and stresses that everyone must be able to participate.
Links inclusive access to tangible policy measures, illustrating how a small country can operationalize the ‘global south’ focus advocated by Brazil and others.
Provided a practical model that other small states (e.g., Seychelles, Mauritius) referenced when discussing capacity building and equitable access.
Speaker: Netherlands
Liechtenstein: Small states may not lead in scale, but we can lead in quality by fostering trusted environments, clear rules and predictable frameworks where innovation can grow responsibly.
Posits that governance quality, not size, can be a competitive advantage, offering a nuanced view of how micro‑states can contribute to global AI governance.
Balanced the narrative dominated by large economies; encouraged other small nations (Seychelles, Mauritius) to articulate their own niche contributions.
Speaker: Liechtenstein
Overall Assessment

The discussion was steered by a handful of pivotal remarks that moved the dialogue from generic enthusiasm about AI to a nuanced debate about power, sovereignty, ethics, and concrete governance mechanisms. Brazil and Serbia introduced the problem of concentration of digital power, prompting a cascade of responses centered on data sovereignty, compute localisation, and the need for transparent ‘glass‑box’ systems. Philosophical inputs from Bhutan and the generational trust perspective of Liechtenstein added a moral and cultural depth, while Estonia, Greece, and the IMF grounded the conversation in practical measures—AI literacy, state modernization, and workforce reskilling. Switzerland’s pledge to host a future summit and the Netherlands’ concrete strategy provided institutional anchors for ongoing collaboration. Collectively, these comments reshaped the summit’s tone from celebratory to critically reflective, establishing a shared agenda that blends ethical principles, economic realities, and multilateral institutions to guide AI’s future development.

Follow-up Questions
Will the concentration of technological power become a permanent state where a small number of shareholders set the rules for everyone else?
Raises concerns about sovereignty, equitable governance and the risk of a monopolized AI ecosystem.
Speaker: Serbia
Does our political capacity keep pace with the speed of technological development?
Highlights the need for policy frameworks that can adapt quickly to AI advances, ensuring effective regulation.
Speaker: Serbia
How can we ensure that the AI dividend is broadly shared and benefits workers, small businesses, and citizens?
Addresses equity and inclusion, preventing AI benefits from accruing only to large tech firms.
Speaker: Greece
How can governments modernize their public institutions and procurement frameworks to keep up with AI?
Calls for updating outdated bureaucratic systems to enable rapid, outcome‑oriented AI adoption.
Speaker: Greece
What regulatory measures are needed to protect minors from digital addiction and online harm?
Focuses on safeguarding children, a priority for societal well‑being in an AI‑driven environment.
Speaker: Greece
How can we avoid fragmentation of the AI ecosystem into rigid blocks while maintaining sovereign capabilities?
Seeks a balance between national sovereignty and global cooperation to maximise AI benefits.
Speaker: Greece
What mechanism can promote awareness of AI among policymakers in low‑capacity countries?
Identifies a gap in knowledge that hampers effective AI policy and implementation in the Global South.
Speaker: Guyana
How can we organize coherent development and diffusion of AI in countries with limited capacity?
Calls for coordinated strategies to ensure AI reaches underserved nations efficiently.
Speaker: Guyana
What system can be established to review AI models for quality and prevent low‑quality or exploitative solutions?
Addresses the need for standards and vetting to protect vulnerable states from predatory AI vendors.
Speaker: Guyana
How can we ensure that data generated by citizens is not appropriated by a few conglomerates without equitable value generation?
Focuses on data sovereignty and fair distribution of economic benefits from citizen data.
Speaker: Brazil
What regulatory framework is needed to protect human rights, digital integrity, and security in AI?
Calls for comprehensive laws to safeguard rights in the face of AI‑enabled threats.
Speaker: Brazil
How can we address the risk of AI‑enabled disinformation distorting electoral processes and threatening democracy?
Highlights a critical threat to democratic institutions that requires urgent governance solutions.
Speaker: Brazil
How can small countries compete on trust, transparency, and values‑based governance despite limited capital and compute?
Seeks pathways for smaller states to influence AI governance through ethical leadership rather than scale.
Speaker: Estonia
How to establish a global testing ground for responsible AI where technology and law develop together?
Proposes an experimental environment to align innovation with societal safeguards.
Speaker: Estonia
How can AI governance remain predictable, balanced, and accelerate responsible technology adoption?
Calls for regulatory certainty that fosters innovation while protecting values.
Speaker: Finland
How to integrate clean energy with AI data centres for sustainability?
Addresses environmental impact of AI compute, promoting eco‑efficient infrastructure.
Speaker: Finland
How to create a steady anchor for AI governance beyond rotating summit venues?
Suggests a permanent institutional hub (e.g., Geneva) to ensure continuity of AI policy development.
Speaker: Switzerland
How can cross‑border collaboration ensure AI benefits are shared broadly and not concentrated?
Emphasizes the need for international cooperation to prevent AI from becoming a tool of a few.
Speaker: Liechtenstein
How can renewable energy from Bhutan support AI compute infrastructure sustainably?
Explores leveraging Bhutan’s hydropower to power green AI data centres, linking energy and digital development.
Speaker: Bhutan
How to develop the Gelipu Mindfulness City as a hub for sustainable AI innovation?
Seeks a concrete model for a renewable‑powered AI ecosystem that aligns technology with cultural values.
Speaker: Bhutan
How to address the environmental cost of AI and massive job displacement?
Calls for policies that mitigate AI’s carbon footprint and protect workers from automation.
Speaker: Spain
How to prepare the workforce for AI‑driven job market transformation?
Highlights the need for reskilling and education to harness AI’s productivity gains while avoiding unemployment.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
What policies can mitigate job displacement while leveraging productivity gains from AI?
Seeks economic strategies to balance AI‑induced efficiency with inclusive labor outcomes.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
How to ensure digital sovereignty and resilience in AI infrastructure?
Focuses on protecting national data and compute assets from external control.
Speaker: Croatia
How to ensure AI literacy and critical thinking across the population?
Identifies the need for widespread education to empower citizens to question and control AI systems.
Speaker: Estonia

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.