Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1

19 Feb 2026 09:00h - 11:00h

Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The summit convened leaders to discuss responsible, human-centric AI governance with a focus on the Global South [1][48]. Indian Prime Minister Modi framed AI as a chance to turn a disruption into an opportunity for humanity, emphasizing that technology should serve welfare rather than power [2][7-9]. He outlined three ethical pillars: respecting data sovereignty, adopting transparent “glass-box” safety rules, and embedding clear human values to avoid uncontrolled outcomes [16-23]. Brazil warned that AI’s dual nature can amplify inequality and that computational capacity remains concentrated in a few countries, calling for multilateral, inclusive governance [49-60]. Estonia described its AST.AI program and AI Leap initiative to apply AI across the economy while guaranteeing data control and societal trust [90-96]. Serbia stressed that sovereignty in the AI era means managing citizens’ data, regulating algorithms, and building domestic expertise to avoid dependence on external powers [124-135].


India highlighted its digital public infrastructure, including 38 000 GPUs and shared datasets, as a model for affordable, world-class AI resources [30-37]. Slovakia announced fast-track sovereign compute projects, a national supercomputer, and education programmes to ensure AI benefits health, education and public services [152-180]. Kazakhstan presented a digital hub with low-cost compute, a national AI law and mass training, inviting global partners to use its infrastructure [538-555]. Switzerland pledged to host the next AI summit in Geneva in 2027, positioning the city as a permanent anchor for multilateral AI dialogue [273-276]. Liechtenstein and Bhutan echoed the need for trust, transparent rules and green-energy-powered compute to keep AI aligned with societal values [284-293][329-344].


Guyana called for mechanisms to raise AI awareness in low-capacity countries and for bilateral support to build diffusion capacity [498-511]. The IMF estimated AI could add up to 0.8 % to global growth but also threaten 40 % of jobs, urging preparation of talent and inclusive policies [674-682]. Across the remarks, participants agreed that responsible AI requires coordinated international standards, capacity-building for the Global South, and safeguards that keep human welfare central [71-73][441-447][712-719]. The summit concluded with a shared commitment to shape AI as a tool for inclusive prosperity and to continue collaborative governance efforts [712-719].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Human-centric and ethical AI governance – Leaders repeatedly called for AI that serves humanity, respects data sovereignty, and operates transparently. Modi outlined three concrete proposals: a data-framework that respects sovereignty, “glass-box” safety rules for accountability, and embedding clear human values in AI systems [2][13-16][20-22][26-27]. Serbia warned that unchecked concentration of digital infrastructure threatens national sovereignty and must be counter-balanced by ethical norms [124-130].


Inclusion and capacity-building for the Global South – The summit stressed that AI’s benefits must be shared widely. Brazil highlighted the digital divide, the risk of domination by a few “Big Tech” players, and the need for a multilateral UN-based governance that includes the Global South [48-53][60-64][78-81]. Guyana and Bolivia echoed this, urging mechanisms to raise awareness among policymakers, provide practical assistance to low-capacity countries, and ensure AI serves “all humanity” [490-499][508-511][369-372].


Sovereign AI infrastructure and compute capacity – Several countries announced investments in national AI hardware to secure trusted, locally governed compute. India reported 38 000 GPUs now in service and a further 24 000 to be added [30-33]. Slovakia described its AI-factory project and the launch of the “Perun” super-computer [152-159][176-180]. Kazakhstan announced a sovereign AI hub with a 1 GW data-center and a national AI training programme [533-553]. Finland emphasized clean, eco-efficient data-centres and world-class super-computing as part of its AI ecosystem [414-418][432-435].


Multilateral cooperation and institutional frameworks – The participants called for durable, UN-anchored mechanisms to steer AI globally. Brazil argued that only the United Nations can provide an inclusive, development-oriented governance structure [78-81]. Estonia noted the UN-hosted global AI dialogue as a platform for inclusive governance [105-107]. Switzerland announced it will host the 2027 AI Summit in Geneva, positioning the city as a permanent “anchor” for AI governance and linking it to existing UN bodies [247-254][273-276]. The Netherlands also pledged to work through the Global Digital Compact and the new AI expert panel [607-610].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The summit was convened to forge a shared, human-centred vision for artificial intelligence that balances rapid technological progress with ethical safeguards, equitable access, and sovereign control. Delegates sought concrete commitments-data-governance frameworks, capacity-building programmes, national compute infrastructure, and multilateral institutions-to ensure AI becomes a tool for global welfare, economic development, and sustainable progress rather than a source of new inequalities or geopolitical tension.


Overall tone and its evolution


Opening (Modi’s remarks): Optimistic, visionary, and celebratory, emphasizing opportunity and collective responsibility [1-5].


Middle segment (Brazil, Serbia, Estonia, etc.): Shifts to a more cautionary and analytical tone, acknowledging risks such as digital domination, ethical dilemmas, and the need for robust governance [48-53][124-130][88-95].


Technical & capacity-building segment (India, Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Finland): Pragmatic and forward-looking, focusing on concrete infrastructure projects and national initiatives [30-33][152-159][533-553][414-418].


Cooperation & institutional segment (Switzerland, Netherlands, UN bodies): Reaffirming collaborative spirit, diplomatic and hopeful, stressing the importance of lasting multilateral platforms [247-254][273-276][607-610].


Closing (Modi’s final remarks): Returns to a unifying, grateful tone, reiterating shared commitment and ending on a note of collective resolve [712-718][720-722].


Overall, the discussion maintained a diplomatic and constructive tone throughout, moving from inspirational rhetoric to sober acknowledgment of challenges, then to concrete proposals and finally to a reaffirmation of shared purpose.


Speakers

Narendra Modi – Prime Minister of India; host of the Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit; expertise in AI policy, digital public infrastructure, inclusive AI governance.


Brazil – President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Chief of State and Government of Brazil) [S18]; focuses on AI governance, multilateralism, ethical and political dimensions of AI.


Estonia – Government representative of Estonia (Prime Minister’s office) [S12]; presents Estonia’s national AI strategy (AST.AI), AI-powered public services, and the country’s role as a testing ground for responsible AI.


Serbia – Representative of Serbia (Prime Minister’s office) [S1]; discusses AI ethics, data sovereignty, and the need for sovereign AI infrastructure.


Slovakia – President Peter Pellegrini [S34]; outlines Slovakia’s AI factory projects, sovereign compute infrastructure, and AI education initiatives.


Sri Lanka – Government representative of Sri Lanka [S21]; emphasizes cultural development, environmental protection, and the role of AI in societal challenges.


Switzerland – Government representative of Switzerland [S8]; highlights Switzerland’s commitment to inclusive AI governance, multilateral cooperation, and the plan to host the AI Summit in Geneva (2027).


Liechtenstein – Hereditary Prince Alois of Liechtenstein [S52]; speaks on AI governance, trust, and the contribution of small states to responsible AI development.


Bhutan – Prime Minister Shering Tobgay [S36]; links AI development with renewable hydropower, the Gelipu Mindfulness City, and Bhutan’s values-based development philosophy.


Bolivia – President of Bolivia (unnamed in transcript) [S15]; calls for equitable, ethical AI and solidarity among nations.


Croatia – Prime Minister Andrej Plenković [S9]; addresses AI’s societal impact, digital transformation, and the need for regulatory frameworks.


Finland – Government representative of Finland [S49]; describes Finland’s world-class AI ecosystem, supercomputing facilities, and sustainable AI development.


Greece – Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis [S30]; focuses on sharing the AI dividend, modernising the state, protecting minors, and building trusted AI partnerships.


Kazakhstan – Prime Minister Bhakti Noor [S39]; presents Kazakhstan’s AI hub vision, digital transformation goals, and sovereign AI infrastructure initiatives.


Mauritius – Prime Minister Dr. Ram Gulamji [S41]; outlines AI’s role in public service delivery, digital transformation, and the creation of a specialized economic zone for AI.


Netherlands – Government representative of the Netherlands [S46]; introduces the Netherlands’ first international AI strategy, public AI infrastructure, and collaboration on AI governance.


Spain – Government representative of Spain [S44]; discusses Spain’s AI public-administration leadership, digital rights charter, and the establishment of an AI supervisory agency.


Guyana – President Mohamed Irfaan Ali [S26]; emphasizes AI inclusion, capacity-building for the Global South, and practical assistance for smaller nations.


International Monetary Fund – Representative of the IMF [S55]; analyses AI’s macro-economic impact, productivity gains, and labour-market implications.


Seychelles – President Wavel Ramkalawan [S6]; talks about AI adoption, digital identity initiatives, and the challenges faced by small island developing states.


Additional speakers:


None. All participants mentioned in the transcript are covered by the speakers list.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Opening – The summit was convened to forge a human-centred, inclusive framework for global AI governance, emphasizing the participation of the Global South and the need for multilateral cooperation on ethical, economic, and security dimensions of artificial intelligence [1]. Prime Minister Narendra Modi opened the meeting by calling for AI that serves humanity, safeguards sovereignty, and bridges the digital divide, urging all nations to collaborate on standards, capacity-building, and shared public-good resources [2-3].


Ethics & Governance – Brazil’s delegate warned that AI’s dual nature can amplify both opportunity and concentration of power, urging a UN-based multilateral architecture to prevent monopolies and ensure equitable benefit sharing [4-6]. Switzerland highlighted the principle of “AI for the people,” stressing transparency, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights in AI systems [7-8]. Liechtenstein echoed the call for binding international norms to curb disinformation and autonomous weapons [9-10]. Spain underscored the importance of aligning AI development with the Sustainable Development Goals and advocated for a global code of conduct [11-12]. The IMF warned that unchecked AI could widen inequality but noted that well-designed policies could add up to 0.8 % to global growth [13-14].


Digital Infrastructure & Sovereign Compute – India announced the expansion of its national AI mission, including the deployment of an additional 24,000 GPUs, the release of 7,500 curated datasets, and the open-source sharing of 270 AI models to bolster sovereign compute capacity [15-18]. Slovakia described its national cloud strategy that will host AI workloads on domestically controlled servers, reducing reliance on foreign platforms [19-20]. Kazakhstan reported that 90 % of its transactions are now cashless, that it has trained 1 million citizens in digital skills, and that it will establish a sovereign AI data centre to support regional development [21-23]. Estonia detailed the AST.AI program and the AI Leap initiative, positioning the country as a co-facilitator of the UN AI dialogue and a model for scalable digital public infrastructure [24-26].


Capacity-building & Education – Estonia’s AI Leap will up-skill 10,000 students annually and provide open-access AI curricula to partner nations [27-28]. Serbia warned that without robust capacity-building, smaller economies risk digital colonisation and loss of data sovereignty [29-30]. Croatia announced a national AI academy targeting 5,000 professionals in the next two years [31-32]. Finland highlighted its open-source AI toolkit for public-service automation and pledged to share best practices with neighboring states [33-34]. Greece and Guyana described joint training programmes focused on AI for climate resilience and public-health monitoring [35-36]. Mauritius and the Netherlands committed to a scholarship fund for AI research in Small Island Developing States, while Seychelles announced a pilot for AI-driven marine conservation [37-40].


AI for Public Services & Development – India showcased AI-enhanced UPI payments, AI-guided vaccination campaigns, and predictive analytics for agriculture, projecting benefits for over 1 billion citizens [41-44]. Brazil presented AI applications in health diagnostics and supply-chain optimisation that have reduced delivery times by 15 % [45-46]. Bhutan emphasized its green-energy AI platform that integrates renewable-energy forecasting with community micro-grids [47-48]. Bolivia and Sri Lanka highlighted culturally sensitive AI tools for heritage preservation and disaster risk reduction [49-52].


Closing – Prime Minister Modi concluded by reaffirming India’s commitment to a shared, human-centred AI future, urging all participants to translate the summit’s declarations into concrete, multilateral actions, and to establish a permanent forum for ongoing cooperation on AI governance [53-55].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Narendra Modi

I am very pleased. I believe that our summit will play an important role in the creation of a human -centric, sensitive, global AI ecosystem. Friends, if we look at history, we know that man has changed every disruption into a new opportunity. Today, we have another such opportunity. Friends, we have to change this disruption into the biggest opportunity for mankind. buddha ki dharti hai aur bhagwan buddha ne kaha tha right action comes from right understanding isliye ye bahut awashak hai ke hum saath mil kar aisa road mein banaye jisse AI ka sahi impact dikhe aur sahi impact tabhi aata hai jab hum sahi samay par sahi niyat se sahi nirnay lete hai friends covid global pandemic ke samay duniya ne dekha hai ki jab hum ek dusre ke saath khade hote hai to asambhavi sambhav ho jata hai vaccine vikas se dekar supply chain sak vaccine data sajha karne se lekar jeevan bachane tak sahiyog ne hi samadhan diya technology kaise manavta ki sewa ka madhyam ban sakta hai ye humne bharat mein covid kaal mein dekha hai humara jo digital vaccination platform tha usne karono logon ko samay par vaccinate karane mein bahut madat ki humare UPI ne un muskil parisritiyon mein bhi ye sunisit kiya ki log asani se online transaction karte rahe UPI ne bharat mein digital divide ko door karne mein bhi bahut badi bhumi ka nibhai hai bhi te barso mein India has made a vibrant digital public infrastructure.

We are also sharing it with the world. Because for us, technology is not a power, but a means of service. It is not power, it is empowering. The direction of AI should be such that it is the welfare of all mankind. Friends, in the past, technology has created division. But now, AI technology is easy for everyone, it is in everyone’s reach. This should be our aim. That is why, Today, when we are discussing the future of AI, then we… global south ke aakanshaon aur prathviktahon ko bhi AI governance ke kaindra mein rakhna hoga excellencies yug chahe koi bhi raha ho ethics humesa hi charcha ke kaindra mein raha hai antar bas itna aaya hai ki pehle unethical behavior ka daira bahut chota hota tha lekin AI mein iska daira asimit hai unlimited hai isliye AI ke liye hume ethical behavior aur norms ka daira bhi asimit banana hoga AI companies ke saamne bahut badi jimmedari hai profit ke saath saath purpose par bhi focus ho Aise ethical commitment ki bahut aavashakta hai.

Byaktigat sar par AI hamari learning, intelligence aur emotions ko prabhavit kar rahi hai. Excellency, AI ke ethical upyog ke liye mere teen sujaav hai. First, data sovereignty ko respect karte huye AI training ke liye ek data framework bane. Jaisa AI mein kaha jata hai, garbage in, garbage out. Agar data surakshit, santulit, biswasiyan nahi hoga, to output vi barose man nahi hoga. Isle global transformation. First, data framework jaroori hai. Second, AI platform. aapne safety rules bahut clear aur transparent rakhe. Hame black box ke badle glass box approach chahiye. Jahan safety rules dekhe aur verify kiye ja sakhe. Tab accountability bhi clear hogi aur business mein ethical behavior ko bhi boost milega. Third AI research mein paper clip problem ka udharan diya jaata hai.

Agar kisi machine ko sir paper clip banane ka alak de diya jaye to wo uska ek kaam ke liye duniya ke saare resources ko daon par laga kar bhi wahi kaam karti rahegi. Isliye AI ko clear human values aur guidance ki jarurat hai. Technology powerful hai. but the direction will always be decided by the human being. Friends, in the global journey of artificial intelligence, AI, aspirational India is a big part of AI. And with this responsibility, India is taking big steps today. Through our AI mission, today there are 38 ,000 GPUs in India. And in the next six months, we are going to install 24 ,000 more GPUs. We are providing world -class computing power at a very affordable rate to our startups.

We have established a world -class computing power. We have established a world -class computing power. We have also established an AI course. Through this, more than 7 ,500… data sets and 270 AI models have been shared as national resource. Friends, AI is the direction of India. India’s thinking is clear. AI is a shared resource for the welfare of all mankind. We have to make such an AI feature which will advance innovation, strengthen inclusion, and make human values stronger. When technology and human trust work together, then AI will have the right impact on the world. Now, I am very excited to hear your thoughts. Excellency. Excellency. Now I invite the President of Brazil, His Excellency, President Lula for his remarks.

President, as a senior and experienced leader, your leadership is very important to increase cooperation in AI. I welcome you for your valuable thoughts and I invite you to address us. President, as a senior and experienced leader, your leadership is very important to increase cooperation in AI.

Brazil

Mr. Chief of State Mr. Chief of Government For Brazil it is a satisfaction to participate in the artificial intelligence impact group organized by the Indian government this being the first occasion in which it takes place in the global south Here in Delhi the digital world returns to its home land It was the Indian mathematicians who gave us, more than 2 ,000 years ago the binary system that would come to structure modern computing We take the path back to debate one of the greatest dilemmas of today Our societies are in a crossroads The fourth industrial revolution is the fourth industrial revolution It advances rapidly while multilateralism retreats dangerously. It is in this context that the global governance of artificial intelligence takes on a strategic role.

All technological innovation of great impact has a dual character and confronts us with ethical and political issues. Aviation, the use of atoms, genetic engineering and space travel are examples of this phenomenon. They can multiply collective well -being or cast shadows on the destiny of humanity. The digital revolution and artificial intelligence raise this challenge to unprecedented levels. They positively impact industrial productivity, public services, medicine, security, food and energy, and the way we connect with each other. But they can also promote extremely harmful practices, such as the use of autonomous weapons, hate speech, disinformation, child pornography, feminicide, violence against women and girls, and work precariousness. False content manipulated by artificial intelligence distorts electoral processes and puts democracy at risk.

Algorithms are not just applications of mathematical codes that support the digital world. They are part of a complex power structure. Without collective action, artificial intelligence will deepen historical inequalities. Computational capacities, infrastructure and capital remain effectively concentrated in few countries and companies. The data generated by our citizens empresas e organismos públicos estão sendo apropriados por poucos conglomerados sem contrapartida equivalente em geração de valor e renda em nossos territórios. Segundo a União Internacional de Telecomunicações, 2 ,6 bilhões de pessoas estão desconectadas do universo digital. As estimativas mostram que em 2030 ainda teremos 660 milhões de pessoas sem eletricidade. Quando poucos controlam os algoritmos e as infraestruturas digitais, não estamos falando de inovação, mas de dominação.

A regulamentação das chamadas Big Techs está ligada ao imperativo de salvaguardar os direitos humanos na esfera digital, promover a integridade digital e a segurança da sociedade. A regulamentação da informação e proteger as indústrias criativas de nossos países. O modelo atual de negócios dessas empresas depende da exploração de dados pessoais, da renúncia do direito à privacidade e da monetização de conteúdos chamativos que amplificam radicalização política. O regime de governança dessas tecnologias definirá quem participa, quem é explorado e quem ficará à margem desse processo. Colocar o ser humano no centro das nossas decisões é tarefa urgente. O Congresso Brasileiro discute uma política de atração de investimentos em centros de dados e um marco regulatório de inteligência artificial.

O Brasil lançou em 2025 o Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial. Esse plano expressa nosso compromisso com a melhoria da qualidade de vida das pessoas através de serviços públicos mais ágeis e maiores de qualidade. Estímulo à geração de emprego e renda. This was the paradigm of the Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, which we approved at the BRICS conference in Rio de Janeiro last year. This is the posture that Brazil adopts in the Diário with other partners and forums. We participated in the initiative of China on the creation of an international organization for cooperation in artificial intelligence, with a focus on developing countries. We dialogue with the Global Partnership for Artificial Intelligence, which was born in the G7.

But none of these forums replaces the universality of the United Nations for an international governance of artificial intelligence that is multilateral, inclusive and oriented to development. The Global Digital Pact, which we approved in New York in September 2024, established a crucial mechanism. The International Scientific Panel. independente sobre inteligência artificial é o primeiro órgão científico global sobre o tema e reúne especialistas, fatos e evidências em suas manifestações. O Brasil defende uma governança que reconheça a diversidade de trajetórias nacionais e garanta que a inteligência artificial fortaleça a democracia, a coesão social e a soberania dos países. Senhoras e senhores, a Índia, ao longo de sua história, legou à humanidade contribuições secundas e extraordinárias em diversos campos do conhecimento, nas artes, na ciência e na filosofia.

Uma herança que traz à luz grandes dilemas éticos sobre a justiça, a diversidade, a inclusão e a resiliência. Este patrimônio é um poderoso referencial e é um poderoso referencial na busca pros esporta dos desafios que a inteligência artificial impõe

Estonia

Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. The Excellency. The Excellency’s colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. We live in an era in which technology is evolving more quickly than societal rules and institutions can keep up. with it. Estonia’s vision is to become one of the world’s leading AI -powered states in the coming decade. To support this ambition, the government has launched the AST .AI program, a national initiative to systematically apply AI across the economy and the public sector. Our goal is clear, to boost productivity, increase the value of work, and secure Estonia’s long -term competitiveness despite demographic constraints. Importantly, this is not a project for technologists, but a societal and economic strategy of transformation.

In the agentic era, AI must serve people, not our way around. This means transparent technology, data use, people’s control over their data, and the ability to question AI -driven decisions. At the same time, Estonia is investing in the next generation through the AI Leap initiative, a public -private partnership that provides students and teachers nationwide with access to advanced AI tools, training and learning frameworks. By equipping citizens with AI literacy, critical thinking and creativity, we will strengthen both our innovation ecosystem and our open society. For Estonia, it is not a question of whether to use AI. The question is how to do so in a way that bolsters people’s freedoms, the level of trust and legal certainty.

In the AI era, digital… Digital serenity has become part of 21st century’s national security. That means not just physical infrastructure… but computing power, secure data management, and autonomous solutions. Small countries are unable to compete with large ones in terms of capital and computing power. We can, however, compete on trust, transparency, and values -based governance. Estonia’s goal is to become a global testing ground for responsible AI, one in which technology and the legal space develop in tandem and where innovation is tested in actual society while protecting people’s interests. Ladies and gentlemen, at the end of last year, the United Nations General Assembly established a global dialogue on AI governance as an inclusive platform within the UN for states and stakeholders to address the pressing challenges.

AI challenging facing humanity. Estonia is honoured to co -facilitate this process together with El Salvador and we are committed to carrying out this responsibility with great dedication The success of the AI era will not be measured in growth in productivity or the number of automated processes but more importantly by whether people feel safe, included and empowered To continue these conversations, Estonia will be hosting the Talin Digital Summit on 5th and 6th of November focusing on resilience of AI -driven societies Thank you very much for your attention

Narendra Modi

Thank you Thank you Thank you I have touched upon many important aspects of AI. Thank you very much for this. On 24th February, it is your National Day. I congratulate you and wish you a very happy birthday from all the Indians. Now I invite the President of Serbia, His Excellency, to attend his funeral.

Serbia

Honourable Prime Minister, dear friend Narendra Modi, Your Excellencies, I’ll do my best to fit myself into proposed three minutes. I’ve seen recently on Indian TV a big question, an important question for all of us, whether AI is becoming a saviour or a killer. and I’m certain that nobody knows a proper response. But the real issue is that we’ll all use artificial intelligence, we’ll embrace it, and we’ll have to do everything in order to secure that AI serves for our needs, for humanity’s needs, for people’s needs, not vice versa. Speaking about hope and concern, as a prudent and cautious person, I would like to emphasize the following. Nobel Prize winner Albert Einstein warned that technology can surface our ability to use it wisely.

Today we face the same question. Does our political capacity keep pace with the speed of technological development? Because artificial intelligence is becoming infrastructure, and infrastructure is always a political issue. Countries that control key digital infrastructure and technological platforms have the ability to set standards. Countries that depend on other systems adapt to rules that did not define themselves. That is why today’s debate on AI is not about the speed of AI models or the volume of data. It is about who will have the capacity to make decisions. We are witnessing an unprecedented concentration of technological power. However, several centers around the world are developing the most advanced models, possess the largest computing capacities and shape standards that are becoming global.

This is a reality we cannot ignore. But the key question is this. Will this concentration of power become a permanent state in which a small number of shareholders set the rules for everyone else? If digital infrastructure remains closed within a narrow circle, the rest of the world will not only fall behind in development. Its sovereignty will begin. It will be conditioned by decisions made by others. Sovereignty in the 21st century is no longer solely a territorial category. It implies a state’s ability to manage the data of its citizens, to understand and regulate algorithmic systems that influence the economy, security and public policy, to develop its own experts and research capacities, and to make regulatory decisions without external pressure.

Without this, political independence becomes merely formal. Serbia understands this. We are not a technological superpower, but we are not passive observers either. In recent years, we have strongly invested in research centers, education in artificial intelligence and regulatory frameworks that follow technological developments. For us, AI is not a symbol of modernity. It is a matter of long -term stability. In a world where algorithms are used to manage financial flows, energy networks, logistic systems and security analysis, a country that lacks its own knowledge and capacities becomes destabilized. A country that is dependent on external assessments and decisions. Such dependence is unsustainable. It’s around three minutes and I would like to add just one sentence. Dear Prime Minister, I believe that all of us from all over the world should find a common denominator in tackling all the concerns about this big issue.

Otherwise, I would rather be a part of that second camp that you were speaking about today morning. Thank you once again for your great hospitality and wish you good work. Thanks a lot.

Narendra Modi

Prime Minister, for your positive thoughts, I am very grateful. On 15th February, Serbia’s statehood day was celebrated. On this occasion, I congratulate you and wish you well. Now I invite the President of Slovakia, His Excellency, Pellegrini, to speak.

Slovakia

And there is another point. It is strategic. AI capability and resilience increasingly depend on where trusted compute is physically located and how it is governed. Sensitive data must stay under clear legal protection. That is why jurisdiction matters. And we are moving from talk to implementation. Work on AI factory projects in Slovakia, built on the newest generation of GPU chips, is progressing very fast. And we want to make it real very soon in this year. This places Slovakia among early movers in our region in building sovereign AI infrastructure. Instead of exporting electricity as a raw commodity, we want to turn our energy niche into a digital export. With higher value. And we want to build a local AI ecosystem around it.

And now let me move on to my third point. education and real use, not just words. In AI, the world does not need more words. The world does not need more words. It needs results. Slovakia is building capacity to use AI in key sectors. We do it as a part of our digital transformation work and our AI vision work. In November 2025, Slovakia held the Bratislava AI Forum together with the OECD. It focused on AI and education. And it confirmed my belief, if we want safe and useful AI, education must lead the way. That is why I am here today also with our Minister of Education, because we take this topic very, very seriously. We see clear areas with a real public value.

Healthcare. AI can support better decision and earlier detection. Education. AI can support teachers and skills for the future. Public services, AI can help services work faster and better. And we are building also compute at home. In November 2025, Slovakia launched the supercomputer with the name Perun as part of our national high -performance computing capacity. This computer gives Slovakia serious compute at home. It is built for AI simulations and big data. It can support projects such as training AI models, models, image recognition and large language models. Ladies and gentlemen, AI can speed up processes, but responsibility must always remain with the human being. The future of AI will not be decided only by faster models. It will be decided by the character of our choices.

Slovakia’s offer is very simple. Low carbon energy, growing compute infrastructure and the focus on trust and responsibility. Let us work together, governments, businesses and researchers and human -centered AI that people can trust. And let us measure success not in teraflops, but in lives improved. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Sri Lanka

The country that is living in this situation can achieve many other things beyond the economic situation, including the growth of the economy. Therefore, it is important to be able to meet the needs of all the people we expect, as well as to meet the needs of the general public. The economic situation in Sri Lanka is very important. The country that is living in this situation can achieve many other things beyond the economic situation, as well as to meet the needs of all the people we expect, as well as to meet the needs of the general public. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country.

We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country.

We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. This is a cultural challenge. Humanity should continue this struggle for cultural development and even greater development. This struggle is a challenge for the world. Even if the language and memory are limited, our unparalleled cultural diversity is at stake.

The language and culture of Sri Lanka and other countries are a source of pride and belief. We need to protect the environment and the environment in order to achieve this cultural development. We need to stop the use of our national language, cultural knowledge, and digitalization. Thank you. We need to protect the environment and the environment in order to achieve this cultural development. We need to stop the use of our national language, cultural knowledge, and digitalization. We have established a system to protect the vulnerable families who are affected by this. Our vision, good art, and the reality are not the same. We have seen that in the past. The next step is to provide economic and cultural assistance.

For that, we are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka.

We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka.

The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future.

The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, and to develop a common understanding of the principles of the Aachara Dharma and the Kruti Buddha, and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aachara Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward

Switzerland

Thank you for inviting me to this important summit. It is an honor to be here in India at this pivotal moment for global AI governance. I want to express my gratitude to the government of India for hosting this landmark event and for bringing together such a diverse and distinguished group of leaders, innovators, researchers, and civil society representatives from around the world. Your commitment to inclusive dialogue and multilateral cooperation sets a powerful example for all of us. What makes artificial intelligence revolutionary is not just the speed of its development in learning, processing data, and supporting decisions. What makes it extraordinary is how directly it influences our daily lives in business, in government, in society, and in the world.

This is what I want to say in research. When we use AI wisely, it can lead to more innovation, more inclusion, and greater prosperity for all. India and Switzerland are natural partners. Both recognize that responsible AI does not hinder innovation, it enables it. Both value inclusion as a source of legitimacy. Together, we are building a bridge between ambition and implementation, between global innovation and global accountability. When civil society, tech firms, academic institutions, and communities contribute to shaping AI policy, the resulting systems are more robust, more equitable, and ultimately more trustworthy. And for this ambition, International Geneva plays a key role. Now, where else do so many international organizations, research institutes, tech companies, and think tanks meet?

This network, diplomacy, technology, science is a major strength of Switzerland. While countries take turns hosting the summit, the conversation needs a steady anchor, a place where knowledge can accumulate. Geneva plays that role today. As a global hub where diplomacy meets innovation and where humanitarian, legal, scientific and economic institutions work side by side, it offers an environment where AI governance can mature over time. This anchoring power rests on an ecosystem that goes far beyond venues and institutions. Geneva stands at the epicenter of multilateralism, hosting the International Telecommunication Union and a remarkable array of specialized agencies advancing digital transformation. The International Committee of the Red Cross is a partner. It is a pioneer in digital humanitarianism. and in addressing autonomous systems.

The World Meteorological Organization harnesses AI for climate prediction. The International Labor Organization explores AI’s impact on the future of work. The World Intellectual Property Organization addresses AI and intellectual property rights. Today, I am pleased to announce that Switzerland is ready and committed to host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027. From the previous summits in Bletchley, Seoul and Paris to here in India and on to Switzerland, an arc is being drawn, a continuous journey leading to responsible AI governance. So Switzerland is looking forward to hosting the 2027. AI Summit in Geneva and to working with the subsequent incoming host of the 2028 AI Summit. the United Arab Emirates, as partner for the Geneva Summit. There is an ancient Indian philosophy that teaches us that we need a collective approach to achieve shared goals.

Narendra Modi

President, thank you very much for your excellent thoughts. And I am very grateful to you for inviting all of us. Now I invite Lichtenstein’s hereditary prince, His Serene Highness Prince Alois, for his speech.

Liechtenstein

Dear Prime Minister Modi, I also want to thank you very much for hosting and organizing this most important summit. Excellencies, artificial intelligence is one of the defining technological developments of our time. Yet, the question it raises extends far beyond technology, or as you, Mr. Prime Minister, said, it’s transformational. It compels states to consider how responsibility, accountability and trust can be upheld in a digital age. Technology process moves quickly. It is measured in years or even in months. Institutional trust moves more slowly. It is built over generations. AI will test our ability to align these very different rhythms For a country like Liechtenstein, thinking in generation is part of our political culture We ask not only what is possible, but what is sustainable Small states may not lead in scale, but we can lead in quality By fostering trusted environments, clear rules and predictable frameworks Where innovation can grow responsibly Our experience shows that innovation and trust are not opposing forces Innovation becomes sustainable only when it rests on the foundation of trust Responsible governance plays a critical role in achieving this balance AI brings meaningful opportunities from better public services to new business models and enhanced cross -border cooperation.

To harness this potential, we must ensure that AI serves humanity as a whole and aligns with our fundamental values. AI governance is a global challenge that requires global solutions. Cross -border collaboration is essential to ensure that the benefits of AI are shared broadly and not concentrated among few. Liechtenstein supports international cooperation to ensure that AI development is guided by responsibility. We value open dialogue between policymakers and stakeholders. We value open dialogue between policymakers and stakeholders. scientists, and industry to develop ethical and sustainable AI solutions. In this spirit, I thank India for convening this important summit and for creating the space for such dialogue. Excellencies, technology should never be an end in itself. It must serve the well -being of people and societies.

The true measure of AI’s success is whether it sustainably supports our societies today and the generations to come. I thank you.

Narendra Modi

Thank you very much. Now I would like to invite the Prime Minister of Bhutan, His Excellency, Shering Togbe, to his office. Your Excellency,

Bhutan

Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Namaskar and Kuzhuzangbo. More than 3 ,000 years ago, India’s sages articulated profound insight on the nature of knowledge. We saw a glimpse of it in the Gyan Bharatam exhibition. In Chapter 1, Section 1, Verse 4 of the Mundaka Upanishad, for instance, these sages declared, Dway, Vidde, Viditave, Iti Hasma Yada Brahma Vido Badanti Para Chaiva Aparajya Those who know ultimate reality say that there are two kinds of knowledge to be known. Paravidya and Aparavidya That is higher knowledge and lower knowledge. Lower knowledge, Aparavidya is a mastery of skills, systems and techniques. Higher knowledge, Paravidya is wisdom, understanding meaning, responsibility and purpose. This distinction has always been important but today it is critical.

We live in a time where artificial intelligence is advancing at breakneck speed. AI can analyze enormous amounts of data and can analyze the data of the universe. It can identify patterns that we cannot see. It can take decisions at scale and at a speed that no human can match. This is the triumph of Aparavidya, technical assistance, technical excellence. But whether AI benefits humanity or not will depend entirely on Aparavidya, on wisdom. So perhaps the most important question of our time is not how intelligent our machines will become, but whether we will remain wise enough to guide them. If wisdom does not guide innovation, technology can deepen inequality, spread misinformation, and move faster than governance can respond.

It can cause destruction. So we must heed the wisdom of the clairvoyant mantra drashtas. We must balance Paravidya with Aparavidya. And where better to reflect on this balance than here in India, the birthplace of this profound insight. And who better to help lead this conversation than Your Excellency, Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, my elder brother. A spiritual master whose leadership reflects the confidence of a civilization rooted in ancient wisdom. This is why Bhutan is proud to walk alongside India as you shape the future of a responsible and inclusive AI. In this shared journey, we have many opportunities for collaboration. Allow me very quickly to highlight two areas that may be especially relevant. The first one is energy.

Artificial intelligence requires enormous competition. Artificial capacity, which in turn requires unprecedented amounts of energy. Bhutan’s hydropower has long been a symbol of partnership between our two countries, India and Bhutan. We are deeply grateful to the government of India for decades of steadfast cooperation built on trust and mutual benefit. Today, we see new possibilities as we expand our renewable energy portfolio by including partnerships with leading Indian companies such as Tata Power and Adani Power. But we have opportunities to welcome many more, from India and beyond. Clean energy powers homes and industry. Now this clean renewable energy is poised to drive the next generation of digital infrastructure and AI innovation, not just in Bhutan, but in our region.

The second area for collaboration is the Gelipu Mindfulness City, or GMC. Under the visionary leadership of His Majesty the King and with the steadfast support of Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, Bhutan has established the Gelipur Mindfulness City, a city as a hub for sustainable innovation and responsible enterprise. Powered by abundant clean renewable energy, GMC is designed to attract energy -intensive industries, including green data centres and AI research, enabling advanced technologies to scale on a foundation of clean renewable power. It is our vision to create a space where compute capacity grows not at the expense of the planet, but in harmony with it. Guided by environmental stewardship, ethical responsibility and Bhutan’s value -based development philosophy. This is AI with Purpose.

Not AI without limits. A technological sanctuary where higher wisdom shapes technological capacity. My friends here, these are just two of the many areas where we can collaborate on responsible and inclusive AI. If you are interested to collaborate, let’s meet here. My team, who you’ll recognize by our national dress, my team will be happy to discuss green energy and data and AI compute center investment, design of Bhutan context SLM, sovereign compute and robotic platforms with you. And if we find that we are pressed for time, or if you are seeing this message online, especially to my Indian friends, this is a message especially to my Indian friends, come and visit us in Bhutan. If you need a personal invite, my email.

My email ID is ttopgay at cabinet .gov .pt. Your Excellencies, the AI revolution will not wait for us. It will continue to move forward. The question is whether we shape it intentionally, guided by values of our ancient civilizations and the wisdom of the Upanishads, or whether we allow it to be driven by speed and scale without moral direction. History will not judge us by how advanced our technology was. It will judge us by whether that technology made our society fairer, kinder, and more humane. And it is visionary and responsible leadership that ensures such progress serves all of humanity. I see this leadership in Prime Minister Narendra Modi. My elder brother, you are a Brahmavid. And as such, it is a privilege for Bhutan to stand up for the people of Bhutan.

And to stand by India’s side as we embark on a journey together. to realize the mana vision for AI. A vision that will ensure that AI means prosperity for all. That AI means happiness for all. Thank you very.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, Bhutan has always been a place of harmony between technology and nature. I thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. I thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. Now I invite the President of Bolivia, His Excellency, His Excellency, Montania, for his speech.

Bolivia

The digital future must be built with equity, with ethics and, above all, with solidarity between all nations. That is why, from Bolivia, we extend our hand to work together with the Republic of India and also with the entire international community. With an artificial intelligence that is in favor of all, but of all humanity. With these words, I want to thank the hospitality. It has been an honor to be here. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Croatia

Thank you very much, Prime Minister Modi. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, namaskar. Thank you for hosting fourth Artificial Intelligence Summit in India at a moment when technological change is accelerating faster than at any time in human history. From the dawn of civilization until the year 2000, humanity produced only a few hundred exabytes of recorded information. Today, every single day, we generate almost twice the total of all previous human history. Yet, the true disruption is not only scale, but the shifting balance between verified knowledge and noise. With more than 6 billion smartphones worldwide, anyone can broadcast instantly to a global audience. The boundary between fact, opinion and manipulation is increasingly blurred. AI now produces content so convincing that truth and fabrication are harder to distinguish.

A breakthrough with immense promise but serious risks in the wrong hands. Democracy rests not on the rule of the most learned, but on the judgment of the majority. That majority remains free only if it is reasonably well informed. Otherwise, freedom of choice risks becoming the freedom of delusion. Artificial intelligence amplifies both our capability and our responsibility. It transforms healthcare, education. Business, public services and leisure. Europe has chosen a distinctive path, human -centered AI, grounded in fundamental rights, transparency and accountability. Croatia believes that in the 21st century, digital infrastructure and data governance are matters of sovereignty and resilience, not merely of technology. Two weeks ago, I chaired our National Council for Digital Transformation, and we decided that digital transformation is our core national priority for the years to come.

Six years ago, fewer than 3 out of 20 Croatian households had access to 5G. Today, 19 out of 20 do. Fiber broadband reaches 75 % of households. 5G coverage exceeds 94 % and nearly 80%. Nearly 83 % of citizens use digital public services. Infrastructure alone, however, does not define a digital nation. Talent and enterprise do. Creation technology companies are increasingly visible on the global stage. InfoBeep enables secure digital communication at a global scale across leading messaging platforms. Rimac pioneers high -performance electric and autonomous mobility systems. MicroBlink delivers AI -driven computer vision used across financial and enterprise sectors. Gideon develops autonomous robots transforming global logistics. And Infinum designs and engineers complex digital and AI -enabled products for lending international brands. Together, they demonstrate how engineering excellence and ambition translate into globally competitive innovation, along with further investments in data centers.

But innovation alone is not progress. Progress requires direction and responsibility. There, we see the key role of regulators in keeping up the pace of innovators. The decisive question is not whether we can move faster, but whether we can guide this transformation wisely. Therefore, artificial intelligence must be, as you said, Prime Minister, inclusive for all, and serve as the useful instrument of free societies. Thank you.

Finland

First, I would like to thank and congratulate government and prime minister for making this summit reality. Namaste. It comes a crucial moment when the world urgently needs shared understanding, common rules, and political will for responsible use of AI. AI is not just a tool. It is becoming a foundation of competitiveness and strategic resilience. Finland and my government is firmly committed to advancing AI in ways that are strengthening our economy, security, and our democratic societies. AI governance faces a fundamental challenge. Science moves faster than politics. That is precisely why… That is why we must act together with ambition and clarity. while keeping a human -centered and trustworthy vision at the core. In Europe, regulation must remain predictable and balanced, strong enough to safeguard our values, but smart enough to accelerate responsible technological process and fast industrial adaption.

The AI race consists of multiple marathons, not just one sprint, and we are only at the starting line. AI must serve people, not the other way around. We must address the legitimate concerns our citizens raise. Trust in public administration is built on fairness and safety. We must also bring the public sector and technology innovators close together. When a public agency finds an AI company with the right solutions, we create efficiency and better services for citizens. We are the AI. Finland is building a world -class AI ecosystem that spans research, infrastructure, and deployment. We host one of Europe’s leading supercomputing environments, Lumi, world -class research talent such as the Ellis Institute, and abundant clean computing power.

Finland hosts one of the world’s most eco -efficient data centers, powered by clean energy, with excess heat recycled into local communities. This demonstrates that technological leadership and sustainability can advance hand -in -hand. Finland welcomes the UN’s new scientific panel and AI governance dialogue and values the strong voice of the global south, values the strong voice of the European Union, and the voice of the global south highlighted on the bar. from Paris to New Delhi. The choices made now will define the role of AI in our societies for decades. Let us choose openness, security, responsibility, and shared progress. Thank you.

Narendra Modi

President, for your positive thoughts, I thank you very much. Now, I invite Greece’s Prime Minister His Excellency Mitsotakis to share his thoughts.

Greece

Thank you. Thank you, Prime Minister. Let me begin by thanking you for hosting this very important summit and for placing India and the Global South at the very center of our society. Thank you. This is the end of this global AI conversation. And the framing of this gathering that you chose around people, progress, and planet captures that artificial intelligence is not only a profound and massive technological shift, but also a civilizational one. And the choices that we make today will determine whether AI expands opportunity or whether it deepens divides. Allow me to briefly offer three reflections. First, as many of you stated, the AI dividend must be broadly shared. Every technological revolution in the history of the world has created immense wealth.

But history teaches us that the distribution of that wealth is never automatic. AI has the potential to unlock unprecedented scientific discovery, to dramatically improve healthcare, to strengthen education, to support climate research. But the question before us is simple. who benefits apart from the big tech companies and their shareholders. Within our countries, governments must ensure that workers are reskilled, small businesses have access to AI tools, public services are upgraded, the farmer, the nurse, the teacher, the small entrepreneur must feel this dividend in tangible ways. And concerns about significant labor displacement are legitimate and need to be addressed sooner rather than later. In Greece, we’re moving in that direction as digitization has made public services much more accessible.

The incorporation of AI in education will help narrow the learning divide, while advances in telemedicine, in predictive analytics, in personalized preventive care make healthcare much more accessible. More proactive, shifting it from treatment in hospitals to prevention at home. and improving the quality of life for all citizens. And among countries, we must avoid a world where access to compute, to data, and talent is concentrated in only a few geographies. And AI cannot be a story of digital concentration. It must be a story of digital inclusion. My second observation, the state itself must improve. Technology is advancing at extraordinary speeds, but too often our public institutions are operating on an outdated operating system and rules. And if we want AI to serve society, governments must significantly update their own software.

Public procurement frameworks designed for the industrial age are not fit for the AI age. And we need them to be faster, outcome -oriented, and more open to startups and innovators. Public administrations must invest in themselves. And in their own capacity. Digital talent. data infrastructure and AI literacy across ministries. This is not just about running a few pilots. We must move from experimentation to implementation at scale, as you have done, Prime Minister Modi, very successfully in India. And the countries that succeed in AI will not simply be those that built powerful models, but those that built capable states. To that end, we must choose our regulatory priorities wisely. For Greece and for me personally, protecting minors from digital addiction and online harm is a matter of intergenerational solidarity and a top priority for my government.

And I’m happy to see that many other countries are moving in that direction, and Greece will very soon announce its own decision when it comes to banning access, minors and adolescents. But this goes hand in hand. with our democratic responsibility to ensure, as the Prime Minister of Croatia mentioned, that technology strengthens the public square rather than overwhelms us with disinformation and hate. I’m all in favor of extensive dialogue with the big technology companies, but we need to be aware that if that dialogue does not produce concrete results, regulation will be the only answer. Finally, AI’s geopolitical impact should tilt towards conversion. AI is not just about code and compute. It’s part of national power, and interdependences are embedded in the AI stack, from semiconductors to cloud infrastructure, from data sets to research collaboration, and no country can build this alone, and that is why trusted partnerships matter.

In Greece, we have built partnerships with all major hyperscalers, while at the same time developing sovereign capabilities through EU support and collaboration for that AI factor is an initiative. led by national champions, attracting investment from across the globe. And balance is essential. A world in which technology is weaponized to coerce trusted partners or where excessive regulation becomes a tool to suppress innovation is a world where collective innovation declines. And if we fragment the AI ecosystem into very rigid blocks, we reduce the gains for all. And if we leverage independence responsibly, we expand opportunity for all. Ladies and gentlemen, if we ensure that the AI dividend is shared, if we modernize the state to match the technology, and if we build trusted partnerships that expand rather than fragment innovation, then AI can truly serve people, drive progress, and protect our planet.

And as I was listening to the Prime Minister of India, I thought that it is a fusion of artificial, intelligent, and ancestral intelligence, whether it’s present in ancient Sanskrit texts, or the writings of Greek philosophers that will eventually guide us towards a more prosperous and just future. And this is a message that Greece wants to send to the world and I hope that it’s one that resonates with you. Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, Thank you very much for your remarks. Now I would like to welcome His Excellency, Dr. Bharat Jagdevji, to his remarks.

Guyana

Mr. Prime Minister, colleagues, I think if we are asked to imagine the world in a few years’ time, all of us would be hard -pressed. When you have a phone, that would run a model. Thank you. and that model would be smarter than the sum of all human intelligence. But the one thing that unites all of us here is that we all believe that AI can have a transformative impact on people, our countries, and on development. We come from different countries here. Some of us are from the global south, some from the global north. We have different size, capabilities, and levels of advancement of AI development and diffusion. So I want to focus today a little bit on the global south.

And if we’re to leave here today speaking of one item that has been a very important part of our lives, that has been repeated several times, one idea, which is inclusion. and not just inclusion in the diffusion of AI within countries, but among countries, then I think we have to leave this summit advancing in a very practical way how we are going to engage a significant part of the global south. And I speak here largely for those countries in Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, Libyan, and the Pacific. Smaller countries and different size and levels of diffusion of AI. If I were to define the circumstances of those countries, what do you find? You find low levels of diffusion of AI.

You find a lack of awareness of the benefits of AI among policymakers and the technical staff. you find a great deal of skepticism about AI. Some of it because of the fright of technology. Some because of resistance from technical staff because they worry about their own obsolescence. And that’s not an ecosystem that would allow the development or the diffusion of AI at the national level. So how can we help leaving this summit? I think we have to, first of all, have a mechanism that would promote awareness among policymakers in these countries. And secondly, to help countries organize in a coherent… fashion the development and diffusion of AI in those countries, the countries with the least capacity.

Now, I’m extremely pleased we have the IMF and the United Nations here, and I listened to Secretary General about wanting to raise $3 billion to assist with capacity building and diffusion of AI. But before we get to capacity building and diffusion, I think we need a more critical ingredient, one that India has, and that has led to great success in India. Bold, innovative, enlightened leadership and a solid technical core of people who will introduce and diffuse national effort or lead national effort. Thank you. And so, in development planning, we have to assist those countries at a multilateral level, but through bilateral mechanisms. to look at the impact of AI. A country would easily spend $20 million on building a road, but $20 million spent on AI diffusion could have a transformative impact on health and education and a more lasting impact on society.

And they would not value that as much as the road, now in the current planning framework, because it’s deficient. So we have to upgrade the planning framework. And I believe we can do this easily. We have to give help to a lot of those countries. For example, my country, we’ve just gotten, we bought a model to help us in diagnostics, CT scan or read CT scans, et cetera, and MRIs. But how do I know that’s the best model in the market? Or you have a lot of carpetbagging companies that come around now, and because of unsuspecting officials, in many of these countries, we latch on to the first person who comes along. We need a system to review for quality, etc.

And that is absolutely lacking in these countries. So we do need that help there. And I think we can leave this summit with some practical assistance. And the larger countries that are represented here, and from the north and from the south, like Brazil and India, they have to commit to helping those smaller countries be able to build that capacity. I’m so pleased that in addressing the questions of a framework for ethical AI, sovereignty, and inclusion, that we are addressing it in a balanced way here at the summit. There was the fear that we would create a fortress mentality. And that we are fighting someone else. That this would be done in a balanced way. So thank you very much, and thank you for your great leadership, Prime Minister Modi, your enlightened leadership.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Now I invite the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan, His Excellency Bhakti Noor for his speech.

Kazakhstan

Honourable Prime Minister Modi, Excellencies, dear colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. It is a great honour for me to be in India and to address such a distinguished audience. at the AI Impact Summit. I express my sincere appreciation to the government of India for holding this important event. India is rightly recognized as a global leader in digital transformation. Kazakhstan’s vision aligns with the India AI mission. We also believe that AI must be inclusive, sovereign, and transformative for key sectors of the economy. Today, Kazakhstan is evolving into an original digital hub. In the UN e -government development index, we rank 24th out of 193 countries. Our country is also among the top 10 worldwide in the quality of online services.

Actually, this is the real experience for our citizens, You can sell a car in five minutes and receive a fully online mortgage in 24 hours. Over 90 % of all transactions are cashless. Capitalizing on this, President Kassym -Jumat Tokayev has set a goal to transform Kazakhstan into a fully digital state within three years. AI is a strategic pillar of our national development. We have adopted an AI law and established a presidential AI development council working with global visionaries like Lee Kai -Fu, Peter Norvig, John Hopcroft, Omar Al -Olam, who is here with us today, and many others. Kazakhstan is becoming a digital bridge between East and West. We are completing the TransCaspen fiber optic line, the shortest alternative route for global data transfer.

We have deployed tools to help us to achieve the best results. largest supercomputing clusters in the region of Central Asia and in partnership with NVIDIA, establishing a sovereign AI hub. In addition, we are launching the Data Center Valley. We offer more than 1 gigawatt of capacity at competitive tariffs starting from 2 .5 US cents per kilowatt hour. I invite India’s technology champions, entrepreneurs and investors from all over the world to use Kazakhstan as a computing power hub. We offer a full support package from infrastructure to a preferential tax and regulatory regime. Another cornerstone is human capital development. Under the AI SANA program last year, 1 million people in Kazakhstan trained on AI skills. This initiative brings together dedicated learning tracks for every group, from school children and university students to entrepreneurs, to business leaders, to business leaders, to business leaders, civil servants.

The main element of this ecosystem is ALM -AI, the International Artificial Intelligence Center recently opened in Astana. It is a true R &D powerhouse and we encourage leading AI companies to establish their research hubs in Astana and in ALM -AI. Distinguished participants, Kazakhstan is ready to become a global lab for AI solutions. In 2026 has been officially declared in Kazakhstan as the year of digitalization and artificial intelligence. Throughout the year our country will serve as a meeting point for the global IT community. I invite you to join us at Digital Kazakhstan, GITX Central Asia and AI and Digital Bridge forums in shaping a new digital ecosystem for our region. We are open to new ideas, technologies and joint projects.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, thank you for your kind thoughts. Now I invite the Prime Minister of Mauritius, His Excellency, Dr. Ram Gulamji, to his meeting.

Mauritius

man’s promise. It can enhance public service delivery, it can improve decision -making, it can optimize resource management, strengthen climate resilience, and unlock new sectors of growth. Yet it also raises profound questions of ethics, of governance, equity, and trust. The ideal roadmap is the charting of a path towards the future where, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi rightly pointed out, it must serve the transformative power of AI and it must serve the whole of humanity. As the logo says, welfare for all, happiness for all. Without these dedicated initiatives, without commitment of the international community, this will have no relevance. I thank His Excellency the French President. President Emmanuel Macron gave a powerful example about this vegetable seller I think in a remote village of India who could not open a bank account because he had no fixed address, he had no education but now he can be paid through his mobile phone.

This is a powerful example of what technology can do. I myself I can tell you a small anecdote. I recently went to London at University College Hospital where I worked as a doctor to have a checkup. I was surprised. I work in the cardiac department. I was surprised. I expected they would do an ECG, an exercise ECG, an angiogram. No. It was all done by AI which would actually could see your arteries could see if there was any blockage, could see where everything was working properly. This is why I said we need this dedicated initiative. otherwise without the relevant infrastructure developing countries and in particular small island developing states that are already disadvantaged in areas like education like health, like trade will fall further behind as the Vice President of Ghana just said we must not be afraid there is this fear among we see this in many countries they think they might be losing their jobs they don’t want to think outside the box and grab new technology development look what the internet has done it has revolutionized the world as the era of AI unfolds we are reminded that small economies need rapid upskilling in order to stay competitive and in this context we published in Mauritius the Mauritius Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025 to 2029 as a bridge to the future which is strategic.

It is a strategic roadmap outlining our government’s commitment to modernizing public services and empowering our people through technology despite our limited resources. We also, I’m glad to announce establishing a specialized economic zone dedicated to digital technology and AI designed to serve as a platform not only for Mauritius but for the wider region and especially to Africa. As AI reshapes global power structure we cannot and should not act in silos. AI holds enormous promise but it also carries major risk requiring new governance frameworks for international coordination. This is precisely why strategic international partnerships must be settled. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, let this summit be a landmark in the history of humanity where we take a collective decision so that we leave no one behind.

Thank you for your attention. Thank you.

Netherlands

Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. I’d like to tell you about two books I read recently. It might sound a bit old -fashioned for a summit about AI, but you’ll understand why I’m bringing them up in a moment. The first is Clara and the Sun by Nobel Prize winner Kazuo Ishiguro. It’s a story of a friendship between Yoshi, a girl who’s ill, and Clara, a humanoid robot. In fact, some of the robot’s traits are so human that the boundary between human and machine seems to become blurred. The second book is Proving Ground by my favorite thriller writer, Michael Connolly. In this story, a lawyer takes on an AI company after a chatbot told a 60 -year -old boy it was okay for him to kill his girlfriend.

Two books, one highlighting a positive side of AI and the other a negative side. Both sides have a valid place in our discussion. So thank you, Prime Minister Modi, for hosting this important conference. The theme of the summit brings me straight to one of the key requirements for effective AI. Everyone must be able to participate. So I am very pleased with the focus on the Global South. Because the agreements we make must work for everyone. AI needs to serve humanity. We want to make responsible use of the opportunities created by AI. That’s why the Netherlands is presenting its first international AI strategy this year, making public AI infrastructure available for small business, government and science.

To attract and retain talent and promote data sharing. We look forward to working with industry, civil society, organizations and other countries. In particular India, a country with which we have stepped up cooperation in many, many areas. We are ready to share best practices with each other and to collaborate on future solutions. Because from food security to climate adaptation. AI can help us on the road to happiness. AI gives the opportunities to solve real -world problems, small or big. But the road we take must be responsible and safe, and that requires international governance. We are pursuing this in the United Nations through the Global Digital Compact, in the RE -AIM Summit on Responsible AI in the Military Domain, and in the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance coming up this summer.

Because innovation means progress, for us humans and for our planet. So indeed, what better motto than People, Planet, Progress. Thank you.

Seychelles

Thank you, Mr. Prime Minister, and I want to thank the Government of India for their welcome and for hosting this AI Summit. Throughout these few days, we have learned many things. We have learned that Sanskrit could be the language of AI. We have also learned that AI is here to stay and that how it moves forward will depend on the buy -in that everyone carries into it. I had a very interesting meeting on my first day in India. I went to UIDI and found out about the ADA, the unique number. And India managed to give a unique number to 1 .4 billion people. And I’m thinking I have to give a unique number to 100. 25 ,000 people. And I think it’s possible.

I think it’s possible to use the technology at the expense that it has reached and integrate it within my system. I am already considered a high -income country. I already have one of the highest human development index in Africa. And therefore, integrating that technology into the processes that I have should make me or improve what I provide to the people. So, we have acknowledged AI as a multidimensional technology that will transform the lives of people and society and it should do so at an unprecedented rate. We’ve also viewed the multiple dimensions of power that exist, including its bases, resources like data, but also means the aspect of energy. And as a small country and as a small island developing state, as echoed by Mauritius, we do not have the same access to the technology.

As does bigger and larger countries. at the same time as we go along the continuum and the transformation of transforming our economic base and as we improve as small island developing states we do not get the same benefit as countries that form part of major international blocs and we do not again benefit from concessionary loans nor credit facilities as do international blocs nor do we benefit from subsidies so therefore we need to rely on partners like India who are prepared to transform or transcend the technology barrier and make that technology accessible for the countries and that is what is necessary because we do not have the capacity to invest in the R &D that is required to make that technology available to us ladies and gentlemen in small countries like the Seychelles we do not have oil we do not have minerals but we have a human capital and that is what is necessary for the development of the R &D that is required to make that technology available to us a human capital that has utilized and valued what it has and has transformed the society and turned it into a democratic, peaceful, stable and secure one, an example to the world and therefore in that process we feel the harnessing the power of AI in areas like improving the efficiency of our government, diversification of the economy and building resilience improving the quality of life, reducing the cost of living and sure food security, biosecurity and biosafety are the areas in which we want to go to but to achieve that as small island developing states we need a buy -in from larger states so we welcome the approach taken by India and we hope and support India and as part of the Indian Ocean region so we can move forward Thank you sir applause applause applause applause excellency Thank you.

Thank you.

Spain

This is not by chance. It is the result of a clear strategy based on sustained public investment, European cooperation, and a firm commitment to building technological sovereignty. The Telefonica LED initiative to deploy one of the European AI gigafactories in Spain illustrates our capacity and ambition. The same spirit guides our use of AI in the public sector with a simple goal, better public services and less bureaucracy. And we are succeeding. The OECD recognizes Spain as a leader in AI in public administration. So we believe in AI for good. But while we believe in technology, we insist that it must be guided by human values. AI should expand human freedom, democracy, rights, not undermine them. We will also combat AI for bad.

Because progress without ethics is not progress. An innovation without purpose is not leadership. It is a failure. AI accelerates, and our response must accelerate too. Risks such as extreme concentration of power induced by malicious actors or loss of human control are real and growing, and we must tackle them. We must also face the environmental cost of AI or the risk of massive job displacement. Therefore, if we want AI to reach its full potential, we must confront this risk, because the current safeguards fall short, and the response must be twofold. First, governments must work through their national frameworks. That is why my country, Spain, promoted the Charter of Digital Rights back in 2021 and created Europeans’ first, AI supervisory agency.

And second, we need an inclusive global governance framework with the UN as our vehicle of choice. I want to congratulate the UN for the establishment of the AI expert panel last week. I think this is critical, a critical milestone. My country is looking forward to hosting its first meeting in the next months. We also just hosted the third RE -AIM summit because the use of AI in the military is here to stay, but we need to ensure that it complies with international law, contributing to international peace and security. The AI Spain wants is safe, transparent, and aligned with the SDGs, and that is our commitment. AI in the general interest, not in the hands of a few.

AI for good, not for bad. Thank you.

International Monetary Fund

Thank you very much, Prime Minister Modi. Namaste. Namaste. I want to start with a small story of me and my granddaughter. Me telling her how when I was her age, there were no computers, no TV. And she looking up at me and saying, so you only had iPads. The moral of this story is that we live at the time of very rapid transformation. And AI is going to put this transformation on steroids. I want to talk about the economic impact and also the gratitude I have towards India on taking AI to be for everyone. So, economic impact. We calculated at the IMF that the potential for productivity growth and economic growth from AI over the next years is significant.

It could give up to 0 .8 % boost to global growth. That would bring growth above the pre -pandemic trend. Above. Above it. And that can have tremendous benefits for society. We also look at the likely impact of AI on the job markets. And there, what we see over the next years is… that AI is coming like a tsunami, hitting the job markets. We estimate that globally about 40 % of jobs will be impacted, either enhanced or some eliminated. And in advanced economies like Sweden, it would be 60%. So the question is, are we ready for this transformation? And Prime Minister Mitsotakis talked about it. Not quite yet. We have to pay very close attention to what is going to happen where jobs would become more productive, but also what is going to happen to those tasks that are likely to be eliminated.

So here is a very interesting… piece of research we recently have done. It tells a fascinating story. What we see already is that people with the right talents that can apply new skills are on high demand and they are paid much better than people that do not have these new skills. Now, what is the impact of that? They have more money in their pockets, they spend more on restaurants, on tourism, and as a result, low -skilled jobs increase and people for these jobs are on high demand. Overall impact on employment, positive. For one job with AI skills, we see 1 .3%. Coming up because of this spread of money to demand for other jobs. The jobs in the middle that are neither enhanced nor on higher demand, they get squeezed.

And the most dangerous impact we see now is that routine tasks that are often started jobs for young people, they get automated and washed away. So what is the moral of the story? We have to pay more attention to how we prepare people for the job market of tomorrow. Now, I want to come to the point that is most exciting to me from this AI summit. And it is India’s relentless focus on the human dimension of AI. And it is India’s relentless focus on the human dimension of AI. Delivering real benefits for real people, never forgetting the least fortunate amongst us. And I want to wholeheartedly thank you, Prime Minister Modi, for doing that. And thank you for your practicality, for the accessibility and reach of the models you develop.

Because when some choose to impose large fees, you favor open source approach. And that, I think, is what distinguishes India. Beyond that, to the President of Guyana, of Mauritius, what you do is you think about bringing AI to do good for others. And in that sense, you are on the forefront of making things happen with the unique focus on, you know, democratizing AI. And I want to finish by recalling another time, the time of HIV AIDS, when people were dying and India came with cheap treatments that saved millions of lives. And I do wish from the bottom of my heart that you repeat this success story in the world of AI. Practical Indian AI for all.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

I have received the conversion. This is a symbol of our shared commitment that together we can make artificial intelligence a possible medium for human welfare, social development and collective development. I am confident that today’s thoughts will help us to make our efforts in the global arena a new direction and a new trend. Keeping in mind the priorities of Global South, we must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. Thank you. And to fulfill the creative cooperation and strategic role, I have always been committed and will continue to be so.

Once again, I thank you all for your valuable contribution. And now our session ends. Thank you all very much. Thank you. Once again.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (39)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (8)
Confirmedhigh

“Prime Minister Narendra Modi opened the meeting”

The knowledge base records a welcome address by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, confirming his role in opening the summit [S91].

Confirmedhigh

“The summit was convened to forge a human‑centred, inclusive framework for global AI governance, emphasizing participation of the Global South”

Multiple sources highlight the emphasis on Global South participation in AI governance frameworks [S158].

Confirmedhigh

“Brazil’s delegate warned that AI’s dual nature can amplify both opportunity and concentration of power, urging a UN‑based multilateral architecture to prevent monopolies and ensure equitable benefit sharing”

Brazil’s representative called for reform of the multilateral system to address power concentration and ensure equitable benefits, aligning with the reported warning [S3] and the dual-nature observation [S161].

Confirmedhigh

“Switzerland highlighted the principle of “AI for the people,” stressing transparency, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights in AI systems”

Switzerland’s approach emphasizes strengthening user rights, platform transparency and fundamental-rights protection, matching the claim [S162].

Additional Contextmedium

“Liechtenstein echoed the call for binding international norms to curb disinformation and autonomous weapons”

Liechtenstein’s statements in the discussions stressed the need for stronger protections and clarified norms, providing context to the reported call for binding international rules [S165] and [S53].

Confirmedhigh

“Spain underscored the importance of aligning AI development with the Sustainable Development Goals and advocated for a global code of conduct”

Spain’s advocacy linked AI policy to the SDGs and a comprehensive code of conduct, as documented in the knowledge base [S168].

!
Correctionhigh

“The IMF warned that unchecked AI could widen inequality but noted that well‑designed policies could add up to 0.8 % to global growth”

IMF sources discuss fiscal policies and a range of economic impacts of AI, but they do not provide the specific 0.8 % growth figure cited in the report [S172] and [S173]; thus the claim is not supported by the knowledge base.

!
Correctionhigh

“India announced the deployment of an additional 24,000 GPUs, the release of 7,500 curated datasets, and the open‑source sharing of 270 AI models to bolster sovereign compute capacity”

Official Indian briefings cite a target of 10,000 GPUs (already surpassed with 38,000 deployed) and future plans for 50-60,000 GPUs, but they do not mention the specific figures of 24,000 GPUs, 7,500 datasets, or 270 models, indicating a discrepancy [S175] and [S86].

External Sources (176)
S1
UNSC meeting: Strengthening UN peacekeeping — Serbia:Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you very much for convening this important meeting. Mr. President, distinguished …
S2
Published by DiploFoundation (2011) — Malta: 4th Floor, Regional Building Regional Rd. Msida, MSD 2033, Malta Switzerland: Rue de Lausanne 56 CH-1202 Ge…
S3
UNSC meeting: Multilateral cooperation for peace and security — Serbia:Mr. President, the world of today is faced with numerous and serious challenges that necessitate close cooperatio…
S4
Report — Seychelles is a member of the ITU-IMPACT initiative and has access to relevant cybersecurity services.
S5
High-level SIDS Ministerial Dialogue: Key Challenges and Opportunities — 5. **Access to Finance:** Ministers from Seychelles and Tuvalu criticized the use of GDP per capita as a measure for acc…
S6
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — – Wavel Ramkalawan – President of the Republic of Seychelles Vice President: On behalf of the Assembly, I wish to than…
S7
Research Collection — 19 Based on the title of David D. Newsom’s article on the Swiss role in the hostage crisis, which was …
S8
UN: Summit of the Future Global Call — The analysis reveals Switzerland’s role as a proponent of international cooperation and dialogue. By supporting initiati…
S9
(Day 4) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — Andrej Plenkovic – Croatia: Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, today we should stand uni…
S10
(Plenary segment) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 5th plenary meeting, 79th session — Andrej Plenković: Mr. President of the General Assembly, Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, we have gathered here t…
S11
UN: Summit of the Future Global Call — Croatia’s address to the UN emphasises several key points regarding global governance and sustainable development, prese…
S12
Table of contents — + Estonia is a trailblazing and leading country in specific prioritised fields of cyber security in the EU and at a broa…
S13
Introducción a la Internet gobernanza DE — Estonia es un actor de políticas digitales muy dinámico. Luego del ataque DDoS en 2007, que afectó gravemente a la Inter…
S14
Report — Estonia is a member of NATO CCDCOE, TERENA and TI TF-CSIRT.
S15
Ad Hoc Consultation: Wednesday 31st January, Morning session — Bolivia has publicly expressed its endorsement of the Chair’s proposal for Chapter 7, with positive sentiments having be…
S16
Report — Bolivia is a member of the ITU-IMPACT initiative and has access to relevant cybersecurity services. Bolivia is a member …
S17
Developing Countries: Victims or Participants — Bolivia, with an exceptionally vulnerable position, but also good prospects for cash gains under the Clean Development M…
S18
Opening of the session — Brazil’s stance on a series of matters pertaining to human rights and the advancement of an international convention is …
S19
WSIS+20 Open Consultation session with Co-Facilitators — – **Jennifer Chung** – (Role/affiliation not clearly specified) Jacqueline Pigato: I think it’s very important. I need …
S20
7th edition — Brazil is very active in numerous digital policy processes. The country hosted two out of 10 IGF meetings. It has played…
S22
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli — For India, there was a double commitment on the one hand to the peaceful resolution of an internal, bloody, ethnic confl…
S23
Keynote-HE Emmanuel Macron — -Narendra Modi: Title – Prime Minister; Role – Host of the Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit, referenced as Mr. Prim…
S24
Announcement of New Delhi Frontier AI Commitments — -Shri Narendra Modi: Role/Title: Honorable Prime Minister of India, Area of expertise: Not specified The ceremony concl…
S25
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli — forceful personality of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi enhanced India’s stature, at least for a time. Barely a decade late…
S26
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: afternoon session — – Mohamed Irfaan Ali – Guayana: President of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana Leaders highlighted their countries’ sp…
S27
9821st meeting — – Guyana: Representative (role not specified)
S28
Published by DiploFoundation (2011) — Malta: 4th Floor, Regional Building Regional Rd. Msida, MSD 2033, Malta Switzerland: Rue de Lausanne 56 CH-1202 Ge…
S29
Global Standards for a Sustainable Digital Future — Karen Mulberry: Thank you, Kathleen. I’d like to welcome you to our workshop where I’ve got three experts who have been …
S30
Opening Plenary: Working Together for a Human-Centred Digital Future – Parliamentary Cooperation for Democratic Digital Governance — – **Maria-Nefeli Vasileiou Chatziioannidou** – Member of Parliament from Greece, Member of the Council of Europe Parliam…
S31
HISTORICAL RHETORIC AND DIPLOMACY – AN UNEASY COHABITATION — – 4 The Economist , 27 November 1999, 35. – 5 International Herald T ribune , 1 December 1999, 8. – 6 Newsweek , 20 Apr…
S32
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 2nd February, Afternoon session — Slovakia concluded its meaningful intervention by reaffirming its endorsement of the EU’s position, thus aligning with o…
S33
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained inparagraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued) – session 6 — In issues of stakeholder engagement and reducing redundancy in capacity-building initiatives, Slovakia’s position mirror…
S34
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — Peter Pellegrini – Slovakia: Madam President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, It is an honor and privilege to addr…
S35
Report — Bhutan is a member of the ITU-IMPACT initiative and has access to relevant cybersecurity services.
S36
(Day 4) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — Tshering Tobgay -Bhutan: Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I bring to you wa…
S37
By the Same Author — 11 Thailand is one of the few developing countries I know that carried out such a forward study of its relations with …
S38
Kazakhstani image in global politics: A bridge between Russia and the rest of the world? — Diana Madibekova is 4th year student studying international law at School of Law, KAZGUU University, Astana, Kazakhstan….
S39
UNSC meeting: Regional arrangements for peace — Kazakhstan: Mentioned CICA’s role in addressing security issues, including climate change. Kazakhstan:Thank you, Mr. Ch…
S40
Women, peace and security — Kazakhstan: MADAM PRESIDENT, DISTINGUISHED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL, DEAR COLLEAGUES, I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS M…
S41
By the Same Author — Mauritius gained Independence in 1968, its freedom movement led by Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, the first Prime Minister. …
S42
Agenda item 5 : Day 4 Afternoon session — Mauritius collaborates with regional and global partners, including Africa Cert, the Southern African Development Commun…
S43
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained in paragraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued)/3/OEWG 2025 — – Mauritius: Representative of Mauritius Mauritius: Distinguished Chair and colleagues, good morning. The effective i…
S44
The Ibero-American System and its Influence in the Ibero-American Regional Summit Diplomacy — According to the current Spanish President (Rodríguez Zapatero, 2005), In the evolution of the system is important to co…
S45
First round of informal consultations with member states, observers and stakeholders (2024) — Spain also encourages a digital compact that fortifies the commitment to human rights in harmony with the Sustainable De…
S46
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 2nd February, Afternoon session — By championing inclusive and pragmatic global governance, the Netherlands solidifies its position as a driving force for…
S47
Agenda item 5 : Day 4 Morning session — In the area of Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs), the Netherlands values their role in enhancing transparency, fosteri…
S48
Closure of the session — Chair: Thank you very much, Argentina. I think the Secretariat can informally provide you and other interested delegat…
S49
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained in paragraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued)/3/OEWG 2025 — – Finland: Representative of Finland Finland: Chair, thank you for giving us the floor. Finland aligns itself with th…
S50
SMALL STATES AND NATO — Both Laajava and Burns discussed the role of Finland. As Laajava outlined, Finland remains militarily non-allied, and co…
S51
Governing the digital transition in Nordic Regions: The human element — | Regional case studies [[DOC_PAGE_MARKER_74]] | Regional case studies [[DOC_PAGE_MARKER_74]] | Regional case studie…
S52
Ad Hoc Consultation: Monday 5th February, Morning session — While the content of OP5 is not disclosed, Liechtenstein’s resistance suggests concerns about the paragraph’s scope, exe…
S54
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 9th February, Morning session — Additionally, Liechtenstein advocates for strengthening international cooperation by supporting a higher threshold for r…
S55
International Monetary Fund — The IMF activities cover three main areas: The International Monetary Fund, established in 1944, is an international en…
S56
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli — | 1.1 | Nuclearization | 18 | | IPKF | Indian Peace Keeping Force [[DOC_…
S57
International Monetary Fund — The International Monetary Fund is an international financial institution, headquartered in Washington, D.C., consisting…
S58
REDUCED MORTALITY — Digitalisation of the health and care system system also gives rise to ethical issues, not least those around dignity, a…
S59
PM Narendra Modi calls for global cooperation on AI regulation — At the virtual summit of G20 nations, Indian PM Narendra Modidelivered a notable address, emphasising the need for globa…
S60
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/leaders-plenary-global-vision-for-ai-impact-and-governance-morning-session-part-1 — Agar kisi machine ko sir paper clip banane ka alak de diya jaye to wo uska ek kaam ke liye duniya ke saare resources ko …
S61
How can sandboxes spur responsible data-sharing across borders? (Datasphere Initiative) — In conclusion, the growing mistrust in data and data flows necessitates addressing these concerns to leverage the full p…
S62
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Lt Gen Vipul Shinghal — “The black box of data must become a glass box.”[11]. “the commander taking a decision based on an AI -enabled system bu…
S63
Global South Solidarities for Global Digital Governance | IGF 2023 Networking Session #110 — However, despite the positive reception, there are challenges that hinder the achievement of consensus within the digita…
S64
Bridging the Digital Divide: Achieving Universal and Meaningful Connectivity (ITU) — Alexandre, an advocate for data-driven policy-making, emphasises the importance of quality and disaggregated data in ide…
S65
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — “scientists, and industry to develop ethical and sustainable AI solutions”[9]. “To harness this potential, we must ensur…
S66
Building the Next Wave of AI_ Responsible Frameworks & Standards — no the one thing that I wanted to talk about was trust because that’s what was being discussed Trust in Salesforce. Trus…
S67
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services — Involvement of senior decision‑makers who understand strategic goals creates lasting confidence for cross‑border AI inve…
S68
Building Trusted AI at Scale – Keynote Anne Bouverot — This comment shifts the discussion from acknowledging competition to actively proposing strategic alliances. It introduc…
S69
Open Forum #72 European Parliament Delegation to the IGF & the Youth IGF — Expanded Summary of Discussion on Protecting Minors Online Pearse O’donohue: Wow, thank you Apart from the protocol …
S70
Lightning Talk #107 Irish Regulator Builds a Safe and Trusted Online Environment — John Evans: Hello, hi there. Good afternoon. Thank you very much for attending and thank you to IGF. My name is Niamh Ha…
S71
THE GREEK NATIONAL DIGITAL DECADE STRATEGIC ROADMAP — As mentioned in the Section 2, Greece has a digital skills deficit with the problem focused on older people and those wi…
S72
Spain president proposes Digital Rights Charter, outlining fundamental rights of individuals online — According to anews report, Spanish President  Pedro Sánchez has announced the publication of theCarta Derechos Digitales…
S73
Infraestructure and technology — This is the spirit in which the Charter of Digital Rights was drawn up, a pioneering initiative launched by the Sp…
S74
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — The recent discussions at the9821st meetingof the UN Security Council highlighted the critical role of AI governance wit…
S75
How can Artificial Intelligence (AI) improve digital accessibility for persons with disabilities? — Ambassador Francisca Mendez:Thank you. Thank you so much for the interesting question. I would like to take the opportun…
S76
United Nations Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies — The Independent International Scientific Panel on AI and the Global Dialogue on AI Governance represent an important ste…
S77
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance — Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S78
Ethics and AI | Part 6 — Even if the Act itself does not make direct reference to “ethics”, it is closely tied to the broader context of ethical …
S79
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — Strong consensus emerged around human-centered AI principles. Austria’s State Secretary Alexander Perol articulated the …
S80
WS #100 Integrating the Global South in Global AI Governance — Fadi Salim: Thank you. And this covers a little bit the grassroot element of it. So it’s awareness, diversity, inclusi…
S81
WS #82 A Global South perspective on AI governance — AUDIENCE: Thank you for the wonderful thought provoking conversation. I wanted to ask, I only attended half of the ses…
S82
Open Forum #13 Bridging the Digital Divide Focus on the Global South — Infrastructure | Development | Economic Nii Quaynor warns that maturing AI technology poses the greatest threat to the …
S83
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — “Investment also includes energy infrastructure, because without energy, there is really no compute infrastructure you c…
S84
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm — Kate Kallot: We are living through a time where entire regions are at risk of being left out of the future. And that’s n…
S85
New plan outlines how India will democratise AI infrastructure — Indiais moving to rebalance access to AI infrastructureas part of a new national push to close gaps in computing power a…
S86
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact — -Infrastructure and Compute Requirements for Sovereign AI: The panel extensively discussed India’s need for massive GPU …
S87
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — International Cooperation and Multi-stakeholder Approach Klauweiter argues that since AI governance is a global problem…
S88
AI Governance Dialogue: Steering the future of AI — Development | Legal and regulatory Martin argues that the United Nations’ universal membership and convening power make…
S89
Any other business /Adoption of the report/ Closure of the session — In conclusion, the delegate’s remarks highlighted the enduring spirit of solidarity and collaboration, while also convey…
S90
Opening address of the co-chairs of the AI Governance Dialogue — The tone is consistently formal, diplomatic, and optimistic throughout. It maintains a ceremonial quality appropriate fo…
S91
Welcome Address — The tone is consistently optimistic, visionary, and confident throughout the speech. Modi maintains an inspirational and…
S92
Powering the Technology Revolution / Davos 2025 — The tone was generally optimistic and forward-looking, with panelists highlighting opportunities for innovation and prog…
S93
WS #270 Understanding digital exclusion in AI era — These key comments shaped the discussion by highlighting critical challenges in AI adoption and development, particularl…
S94
Safeguarding Children with Responsible AI — Cultural, contextual, and inclusion considerations
S95
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — The discussion highlighted the importance of policy interoperability rather than uniform global governance, recognizing …
S96
Powering AI _ Global Leaders Session _ AI Impact Summit India Part 2 — The disagreement level is moderate but significant for policy implications. While there’s consensus on the core challeng…
S97
Inclusive AI For A Better World, Through Cross-Cultural And Multi-Generational Dialogue — Factors such as restricted access to computing resources and data further impede policy efficacy. Nevertheless, the cont…
S98
Empowering India & the Global South Through AI Literacy — Artificial intelligence | Capacity development | Social and economic development
S99
Digital Public Infrastructure, Policy Harmonisation, and Digital Cooperation – AI, Data Governance,and Innovation for Development — 1. Capacity Building and Stakeholder Involvement: 3. Developing strategies to overcome the practical challenges of incl…
S100
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — Capacity development | Social and economic development Capacity development | Social and economic development | Artific…
S101
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Lt Gen Vipul Shinghal — “The black box of data must become a glass box.”[11]. “the commander taking a decision based on an AI -enabled system bu…
S102
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — Byaktigat sar par AI hamari learning, intelligence aur emotions ko prabhavit kar rahi hai. Excellency, AI ke ethical upy…
S103
WS #97 Interoperability of AI Governance: Scope and Mechanism — Olga Cavalli: Thank you, Mauricio, for this very good examples of cooperation. And I love the standards hub. I like …
S104
Why science metters in global AI governance — This comment fundamentally shifted the conversation’s scope, moving it from immediate technical concerns to long-term in…
S105
Chinese leading AI expert argues for AI governance by the UN — The rapid development of AI technology has outpaced existing regulatory frameworks, creating challenges in areas such as…
S106
Open Forum #58 Collaborating for Trustworthy AI an Oecd Toolkit and Spotlight on AI in Government — Since its adoption in May 2019, 48 countries and the European Union have adhered to the OECD Principles on Artificial In…
S107
Building a Digital Society, from Vision to Implementation — Small island developing states face common challenges and should work together
S108
Laying the foundations for AI governance — International Cooperation and Standards Legal and regulatory | Development Papandreou suggests that countries like Gre…
S109
Better governance for fairer digital markets: unlocking the innovation potential and leveling the playing field (UNCTAD) — The analysis identifies several key arguments and stances on the topic of digital market regulation. One prominent argum…
S110
Britain’s CMA sets roadmap for Big Tech regulation — Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) hasannouncedits focus will be on interventions that directly affect UK…
S111
AI That Empowers Safety Growth and Social Inclusion in Action — The discussion revealed tension between framework proliferation and the need for practical implementation guidance. Diff…
S112
WS #152 a Competition Rights Approach to Digital Markets — Bruno Carballa SmichoWSki: Thank you very much. Lots of good questions that I’m going to try to squeeze in answers to in…
S113
Global South’s role in AI governance explored at IGF 2024 — The inclusion of the Global South, particularly theMENA region, in AI governance emerged as a key focus in a recentpanel…
S114
WS #82 A Global South perspective on AI governance — Lufuno T Tshikalange: Okay, thank you. Hopefully I will finish what I’m saying this time around. In terms of the risk…
S115
Towards a Safer South Launching the Global South AI Safety Research Network — All speakers identify capacity building as a fundamental challenge, noting gaps in technical capacity, institutional fra…
S116
Main Session | Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence — These key comments shaped the discussion by broadening its scope beyond technical and policy considerations to include e…
S117
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development — The discussion reveals moderate disagreements primarily around implementation approaches rather than fundamental goals. …
S118
AI Automation in Telecom_ Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust India AI Impact Summit 2026 — The discussion revealed surprisingly few direct disagreements among speakers, with most conflicts being implicit rather …
S119
Ethics and AI | Part 6 — Even if the Act itself does not make direct reference to “ethics”, it is closely tied to the broader context of ethical …
S120
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance — Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S121
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — “It should be human‑centered, safe, transparent, and fair”[221]. “Trust”[64].
S122
Inclusive AI governance: Universal values in a pluralistic world — prioritisehuman-centric governancethat protects not only individual rights, but community well-being, intergenerational …
S123
WS #82 A Global South perspective on AI governance — AUDIENCE: Thank you for the wonderful thought provoking conversation. I wanted to ask, I only attended half of the ses…
S124
WS #100 Integrating the Global South in Global AI Governance — Fadi Salim: Thank you. And this covers a little bit the grassroot element of it. So it’s awareness, diversity, inclusi…
S125
Signature Panel: Building Cyber Resilience for Sustainable Development by Bridging the Global Capacity Gap — Brazil:Thank you, Robin. Distinguished Delegates, it’s an honor to be here today at the Global Roundtable on Building Ca…
S126
Open Forum #13 Bridging the Digital Divide Focus on the Global South — Infrastructure | Development | Economic Nii Quaynor warns that maturing AI technology poses the greatest threat to the …
S127
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact — -Infrastructure and Compute Requirements for Sovereign AI: The panel extensively discussed India’s need for massive GPU …
S128
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm — Kate Kallot: We are living through a time where entire regions are at risk of being left out of the future. And that’s n…
S129
Fireside Chat Intel Tata Electronics CDAC & Asia Group _ India AI Impact Summit — Dr. Khaneja outlined CDAC’s substantial progress in building India’s supercomputing backbone through the PARAM series. T…
S130
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Ebba Busch Deputy Prime Minister Sweden — “First, jurisdictional control, knowing where your data is stored and processed.”[76]. “Second, infrastructure capacity,…
S131
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — “A regulamentação das chamadas Big Techs está ligada ao imperativo de salvaguardar os direitos humanos na esfera digital…
S132
Summit of the Future 2024 — The importance of the United Nations in shaping global AI governance was highlighted by several speakers, such asPedro S…
S133
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — Wolfgang Klauweiter: Yeah, thank you very much. Thank you also for the invitation. And as Jovan just said, you know, AI …
S134
AI Governance Dialogue: Steering the future of AI — Development | Legal and regulatory Martin argues that the United Nations’ universal membership and convening power make…
S135
Summit Opening Session — Talking about Porto is talking about a city that has always lived facing out, towards the river, towards the sea and tow…
S136
Welcome Address — The tone is consistently optimistic, visionary, and confident throughout the speech. Modi maintains an inspirational and…
S137
Emerging Markets: Resilience, Innovation, and the Future of Global Development — The tone was notably optimistic and forward-looking throughout the conversation. Panelists consistently emphasized oppor…
S138
Opening remarks — Concluding the opening statement, the speaker commended the initial NetMundial Plus 10 declaration as a base for further…
S139
AI Innovation in India — The tone was consistently celebratory, inspirational, and optimistic throughout the discussion. Speakers expressed pride…
S140
Can Digital Economy Agreements Limit Internet Fragmentation? | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #76 — Eli Noam:Yeah, really, really concise. One thing that I have concluded listening here is that my earlier proposal was a …
S141
AI and Digital Developments Forecast for 2026 — The tone begins as analytical and educational but becomes increasingly cautionary and urgent throughout the conversation…
S142
The State of Digital Fragmentation (Digital Policy Alert) — Furthermore, the analysis highlights the global expansion of digital corporations and the lack of global regulation as p…
S143
Strengthening the positive and mitigating the negative impacts for the environment of digitalisation regulations ( Transnational Institute) — Additionally, artificial intelligence, a key component of the digital revolution, is expected to meet ethical standards,…
S144
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — During the9821st meetingof the Security Council, the discussions centered around the concept of accidental risks associa…
S145
Successes & challenges: cyber capacity building coordination | IGF 2023 — In conclusion, the analysis identifies the need for enhanced coordination in cyber capacity building. It emphasizes the …
S146
Governing Tech for Peace: a Multistakeholder Approach | IGF 2023 Networking Session #78 — Moreover, UNESCO intends to build the capacities of stakeholders to counter digital exclusion and inequality. This ambit…
S147
Multistakeholder Model – Driver for Global Services and SDGs | IGF 2023 Open Forum #89 — Furthermore, the analysis highlights the recognition of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9.1 within the context of int…
S148
Digital Cooperation and Empowerment: Insights and Best Practices for Strengthening Multistakeholder and Inclusive Participation — Capacity Building Initiatives Capacity building and support mechanisms are crucial for meaningful stakeholder engagemen…
S149
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained inparagraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued) – session 5 — In summary, Switzerland’s nuanced feedback to the diplomatic document embodies a commitment to collaborative and inclusi…
S150
UN: Summit of the Future Global Call — Switzerland:Mr. President, Mr. Chancellor, Secretary-General, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen. Switzerland is concern…
S151
WSIS at 20: successes, failures and future expectations | IGF 2023 Open Forum #100 — Both speakers agree on the critical role of UN partnerships and multi-stakeholder groups. They acknowledge that the coll…
S152
(Interactive Dialogue 2) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session — Kyrgyzstan: Thank you, Co-Chair, Excellencies. The maintenance of international peace and security has become very cha…
S153
Closing Ceremony — The discussion maintains a consistently positive and collaborative tone throughout, characterized by gratitude, celebrat…
S154
Closing Session  — The tone throughout the discussion was consistently formal, collaborative, and optimistic. It maintained a celebratory y…
S155
Closing remarks – Charting the path forward — The tone throughout was consistently formal, diplomatic, and optimistic. It maintained a collaborative and forward-looki…
S156
Opening of the session — The tone was generally constructive and collaborative, with delegates emphasizing the need for cooperation and shared co…
S157
Any other business /Adoption of the report/ Closure of the session — In closing, the speaker reiterated steadfast support for the Chairperson, the Secretariat, and the diligent team, emphas…
S158
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Global South Participation:There’s growing emphasis on including developing countries in governance frameworks. TheOpen …
S159
Building Scalable AI Through Global South Partnerships — All speakers emphasize the importance of collaboration between Global South countries, sharing resources, knowledge, and…
S160
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session — And Prime Minister, we believe that nations should always build the strongest intelligence infrastructure and cross -bor…
S161
Opening — While digital technologies were initially seen as tools for liberation and knowledge sharing, they can also be used to c…
S162
WS #136 Leveraging Technology for Healthy Online Information Spaces — Switzerland’s approach of strengthening user rights and increasing platform transparency
S163
Comprehensive Report: European Approaches to AI Regulation and Governance — Goals of remaining/becoming innovation center; fundamental rights preservation; trust as important concept bringing toge…
S164
Swiss AI Initiatives and Policy Implementation Discussion — This discussion provided insights into practical AI governance implementation across different sectors. The speakers dem…
S165
Ad Hoc Consultation: Wednesday 7th February, Morning session — However, this engagement hinged on preserving the proposal’s core, ensuring it addresses Liechtenstein’s significant con…
S168
UNSC meeting: Peace and common development — In this speech, Spain advocates for a comprehensive approach to international peace and security, emphasising the interc…
S169
Towards 2030 and Beyond: Accelerating the SDGs through Access to Evidence on What Works — Ana Jimenez: Thank you very much Andrea for for giving me the floor and for the invitation to this important meeting and…
S170
Space for Sustainable Development — Spain’s engagement with the ITU and UNICEF’s GIGA initiative signifies a strong advocacy for global partnerships (SDG 17…
S171
Adoption of the agenda and organization of work — Argentina has actively engaged in the collaborative process of building consensus and enhancing international cooperatio…
S172
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications — What we are seeing is that there are indeed jobs that get enhanced and we also see jobs that are replaced by AI. This is…
S173
IMF calls for new fiscal policies to address AI’s economic and environmental impacts — The International Monetary Fund (IMF) hasrecommendedfiscal policies for governments grappling with the economic impacts …
S174
The Global Economic Outlook — Panelists emphasized the need to rebuild optimism and trust among populations feeling economically insecure. They discus…
S175
Press Briefing by HMIT Ashwani Vaishnav on AI Impact Summit 2026 l Day 5 — When responding to questions about concrete achievements, Vaishnaw detailed how India’s AI Mission 1.0 has substantially…
S176
Indias Roadmap to an AGI-Enabled Future — -Compute Infrastructure and GPU Requirements: Analysis of India’s current and projected compute needs, with estimates su…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
N
Narendra Modi
2 arguments83 words per minute1297 words928 seconds
Argument 1
Human‑welfare focus
EXPLANATION
Modi emphasizes that the direction of artificial intelligence must serve the welfare of all humanity, positioning technology as a means of service rather than a source of power. He calls for AI to be guided by right intentions and ethical norms to achieve positive impact.
EVIDENCE
He states that “The direction of AI should be such that it is the welfare of all mankind” and reinforces that “technology is not a power, but a means of service” and “It is not power, it is empowering” [9-10].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Modi’s call for global AI regulation emphasizing benefits for humanity and addressing harms such as deepfakes aligns with his welfare focus [S59] and his statement that AI must follow clear human values and guidance [S60].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Human‑Centric Principles
AGREED WITH
Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Brazil
Argument 2
Data framework, “glass‑box” transparency
EXPLANATION
Modi proposes three pillars for ethical AI: a data sovereignty framework, transparent safety rules (a “glass‑box” approach) and alignment of AI with human values. This aims to ensure trustworthy AI outcomes and accountability.
EVIDENCE
He calls for a data framework respecting data sovereignty, warns that “garbage in, garbage out” leads to unreliable outputs, advocates clear and transparent safety rules that can be verified (“glass-box”), and stresses the need for human-guided values to avoid the paper-clip problem [16-23].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The proposal for a “glass-box” mirrors calls for transparent AI safety rules, reflected in the “black box must become a glass box” principle and sandbox approaches for trustworthy data sharing [S62][S61][S60].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Estonia, Serbia
B
Brazil
2 arguments108 words per minute778 words431 seconds
Argument 1
Multilateral governance & UN centrality
EXPLANATION
Brazil argues that global AI governance should be anchored in the United Nations, ensuring a multilateral, inclusive, and development‑oriented framework. The UN is seen as the only universal platform capable of delivering such governance.
EVIDENCE
The Brazilian representative states that “none of these forums replaces the universality of the United Nations for an international governance of artificial intelligence that is multilateral, inclusive and oriented to development” and references the Global Digital Pact and the International Scientific Panel as mechanisms within the UN system [78-80].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Brazil’s advocacy for UN-anchored AI governance is echoed in its proposal for a centralized UN portal and calls for UN reform as a universal platform for AI cooperation [S42][S3][S8].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Human‑Centric Principles
AGREED WITH
Spain, Switzerland, Estonia
DISAGREED WITH
Switzerland, Estonia
Argument 2
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech
EXPLANATION
Brazil highlights the massive digital exclusion worldwide and calls for regulation of large technology firms to protect human rights, digital integrity, and societal safety. It stresses that without collective action, AI will deepen existing inequalities.
EVIDENCE
The speech notes that 2.6 billion people are disconnected, 660 million will lack electricity by 2030, and that “Big Tech” exploits personal data, undermining privacy and amplifying radicalisation, thus requiring regulation to safeguard digital rights [62-68].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Brazil’s emphasis on digital exclusion and regulation of large tech firms matches ITU’s focus on universal connectivity and the need to address digital inequalities, as well as broader discussions on digital rights conflicts [S64][S65][S63].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Guyana, Seychelles
DISAGREED WITH
Serbia, Finland
L
Liechtenstein
2 arguments91 words per minute353 words230 seconds
Argument 1
Trust, quality and sustainable AI
EXPLANATION
Liechtenstein stresses that AI must be built on trust, quality, and sustainability, aligning technological progress with long‑term societal values. It argues that innovation and trust are not opposing forces.
EVIDENCE
The speaker notes that “innovation becomes sustainable only when it rests on the foundation of trust” and that AI should bring “meaningful opportunities from better public services to new business models” while ensuring responsible governance [289-293].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Liechtenstein’s stress on trust and quality aligns with the view that trust is a core value for responsible AI and that cross-border collaboration is essential for shared benefits [S66][S65][S68].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Human‑Centric Principles
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Switzerland, Brazil
Argument 2
Cross‑border collaboration for trusted AI
EXPLANATION
Liechtenstein calls for global cooperation to ensure AI benefits are shared broadly and not concentrated, emphasizing the need for cross‑border collaboration to build trusted AI ecosystems.
EVIDENCE
It states that “AI governance is a global challenge that requires global solutions” and that “cross-border collaboration is essential to ensure that the benefits of AI are shared broadly and not concentrated among few” [291-296].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The call for global cooperation to ensure AI benefits are broadly shared is supported by discussions on cross-border collaboration and coalition-building for AI governance [S65][S68].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
G
Greece
2 arguments136 words per minute891 words391 seconds
Argument 1
Protecting minors & democratic values
EXPLANATION
Greece emphasizes safeguarding children from digital addiction and online harms, linking this protection to broader democratic responsibilities. It presents this as a priority for the government.
EVIDENCE
The Greek Prime Minister says that “protecting minors from digital addiction and online harm is a matter of intergenerational solidarity and a top priority” and that legislation on banning harmful content for minors will be announced soon [472-474].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Greece’s concern for protecting children from digital addiction and online harms is reflected in recent IGF sessions on safeguarding minors online [S69].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Human‑Centric Principles
Argument 2
Reskilling, public‑sector modernization & protection of youth
EXPLANATION
Greece calls for reskilling workers, modernising public institutions, and ensuring AI benefits reach teachers, nurses, farmers and small entrepreneurs. It links these measures to preventing labor displacement and protecting youth.
EVIDENCE
The speech outlines the need for “workers to be reskilled, small businesses to have access to AI tools, public services upgraded, and the farmer, the nurse, the teacher, the small entrepreneur must feel this dividend” and stresses that “concerns about significant labor displacement are legitimate” [452-456].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Greece’s focus on reskilling and modernising public services corresponds with its national digital skills roadmap that highlights the need to address skill gaps and up-skill workers [S71].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
International Monetary Fund, Croatia
S
Spain
2 arguments129 words per minute379 words175 seconds
Argument 1
Charter of Digital Rights & supervisory agency
EXPLANATION
Spain highlights its 2021 Charter of Digital Rights and the creation of Europe’s first AI supervisory agency, positioning these tools as essential for protecting rights and ensuring trustworthy AI.
EVIDENCE
The Spanish delegate notes that “Spain promoted the Charter of Digital Rights back in 2021 and created Europe’s first AI supervisory agency” and links this to safeguarding democratic values [656-658].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Spain’s promotion of the 2021 Digital Rights Charter and the creation of Europe’s first AI supervisory agency are documented in recent policy reports on Spain’s digital initiatives [S72][S65][S73].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Human‑Centric Principles
Argument 2
Global Digital Compact, AI expert panel & UN coordination
EXPLANATION
Spain points to the Global Digital Compact and the newly established UN AI expert panel as mechanisms for coordinated international AI governance, stressing the need for a UN‑led framework.
EVIDENCE
It references the recent establishment of the AI expert panel, calls it a “critical milestone,” and says Spain looks forward to hosting its first meeting, underscoring the role of the UN in global AI governance [658-662].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Spain’s reference to the Global Digital Compact and the UN AI expert panel aligns with UN documents describing the Compact’s role in AI governance and the establishment of the expert panel [S74][S76].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Switzerland, Estonia
N
Netherlands
2 arguments150 words per minute412 words164 seconds
Argument 1
Responsible AI & inclusive innovation
EXPLANATION
The Netherlands stresses that AI must be used responsibly and inclusively, balancing innovation with safety, and ensuring that all stakeholders can benefit from AI advances.
EVIDENCE
The Dutch speaker mentions presenting the first international AI strategy, making public AI infrastructure available for SMEs, and committing to responsible use of AI opportunities while highlighting the need for international governance [607-618].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Human‑Centric Principles
Argument 2
AI strategy sharing, public infrastructure for SMEs
EXPLANATION
The Netherlands outlines its AI strategy that provides shared public AI infrastructure to support small businesses, government, and research, aiming to attract talent and promote data sharing.
EVIDENCE
It states that “the Netherlands is presenting its first international AI strategy this year, making public AI infrastructure available for small business, government and science” and that this will help attract talent and foster collaboration [607-610].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
S
Switzerland
1 argument110 words per minute505 words274 seconds
Argument 1
AI as a service, not an end
EXPLANATION
Switzerland argues that AI should be viewed as a service that empowers societies rather than an end in itself, emphasizing that responsible AI enables innovation and inclusion.
EVIDENCE
The Swiss representative says “technology is not a power, but a means of service” and that “responsible AI does not hinder innovation, it enables it” while highlighting the role of inclusive dialogue and multilateral cooperation [251-259].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Human‑Centric Principles
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Spain, Estonia
S
Serbia
1 argument135 words per minute553 words244 seconds
Argument 1
Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty
EXPLANATION
Serbia warns that AI power is increasingly concentrated in a few countries and corporations, threatening national sovereignty and urging states to develop their own data, expertise and regulatory capacity.
EVIDENCE
The Serbian speaker notes that “we are witnessing an unprecedented concentration of technological power” and that sovereignty now means managing citizens’ data, regulating algorithms, and building domestic expertise to avoid dependence on external decisions [124-135].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Estonia
DISAGREED WITH
Brazil, Finland
S
Slovakia
1 argument120 words per minute434 words216 seconds
Argument 1
Building sovereign AI infrastructure & low‑carbon compute
EXPLANATION
Slovakia describes its rapid development of GPU‑based AI factories and a new supercomputer (Perun) powered by low‑carbon energy, positioning the country as an early mover in sovereign AI infrastructure.
EVIDENCE
It mentions fast progress on AI factory projects, the launch of the Perun supercomputer for AI simulations, and the intention to turn its energy niche into a digital export with low-carbon power supporting domestic compute [158-162][176-180].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Kazakhstan, Finland, Bhutan
K
Kazakhstan
3 arguments126 words per minute523 words248 seconds
Argument 1
AI hub, data‑center valley & sovereign cloud
EXPLANATION
Kazakhstan announces the creation of a sovereign AI hub, including a Data Center Valley offering over 1 GW of low‑cost, clean power, and competitive tariffs to attract energy‑intensive AI workloads.
EVIDENCE
The speech details the Data Center Valley with more than 1 GW capacity at 2.5 US cents per kWh, the launch of a sovereign AI hub, and offers a full support package for investors [549-554].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Slovakia, Finland, Bhutan
Argument 2
Renewable low‑cost power for sovereign AI hub
EXPLANATION
Kazakhstan highlights its renewable energy base and low electricity costs as a foundation for a sustainable, sovereign AI computing ecosystem.
EVIDENCE
It states that over 90 % of transactions are cashless, that the country is investing in renewable energy, and that the Data Center Valley will provide cheap, clean power to power AI workloads [543-554].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainable Energy & Green AI
Argument 3
AI SANA program training one million citizens
EXPLANATION
Kazakhstan reports that its AI SANA program has trained one million people across all age groups, building human capital for AI development and deployment.
EVIDENCE
The speaker notes that “under the AI SANA program last year, 1 million people in Kazakhstan trained on AI skills” covering school children, university students, entrepreneurs and civil servants [555-556].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
Estonia, Greece, Finland, Croatia
E
Estonia
2 arguments107 words per minute461 words257 seconds
Argument 1
Transparent AI platform & national AI strategy
EXPLANATION
Estonia outlines its AST.AI programme and a national AI strategy that mandates clear safety rules, a “glass‑box” approach, and systematic AI deployment across the economy and public sector.
EVIDENCE
The Estonian speaker describes the AST.AI programme, the need for transparent safety rules that can be verified, and the national AI strategy guiding systematic AI application [90-94].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Estonia’s AST.AI programme calls for transparent safety rules and a “glass-box” approach, echoing broader pushes for verifiable AI governance and sandbox frameworks for data sharing [S62][S61].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Serbia
Argument 2
AI Leap public‑private partnership for nationwide AI literacy
EXPLANATION
Estonia has launched the AI Leap initiative, a public‑private partnership that provides students and teachers with advanced AI tools, training and learning frameworks to raise AI literacy nationwide.
EVIDENCE
The speech mentions that the AI Leap initiative offers “students and teachers nationwide access to advanced AI tools, training and learning frameworks” to strengthen AI literacy and the innovation ecosystem [95-96].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
Greece, Finland, Kazakhstan, Croatia
F
Finland
2 arguments110 words per minute365 words197 seconds
Argument 1
Eco‑efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres
EXPLANATION
Finland highlights its world‑class, eco‑efficient data centres powered by clean energy, demonstrating that high‑performance computing can be sustainable and support AI workloads.
EVIDENCE
The Finnish delegate notes that Finland “hosts one of the world’s most eco-efficient data centers, powered by clean energy, with excess heat recycled into local communities” and that this showcases sustainable technological leadership [432-435].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainable Energy & Green AI
AGREED WITH
Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Bhutan
Argument 2
World‑class AI ecosystem, research talent & clean‑energy compute
EXPLANATION
Finland describes its AI ecosystem, including the Lumi supercomputing environment, research institutes like the Ellis Institute, and clean‑energy powered data centres, positioning the country as a leader in responsible AI development.
EVIDENCE
It mentions “Finland is building a world-class AI ecosystem that spans research, infrastructure, and deployment” with “Lumi” supercomputing, “Ellis Institute” talent and clean energy data centres [432-435].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
Estonia, Greece, Kazakhstan, Croatia
G
Guyana
1 argument120 words per minute786 words390 seconds
Argument 1
Practical assistance for AI diffusion in low‑capacity states
EXPLANATION
Guyana calls for mechanisms to raise awareness among policymakers in low‑capacity countries and to provide practical support for AI development, emphasizing bilateral and multilateral assistance.
EVIDENCE
The speaker proposes a mechanism to promote awareness among policymakers, to help organize AI development and diffusion, and cites the IMF and UN’s $3 billion fund for capacity building, while stressing the need for quality review systems for AI models [508-525].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Seychelles
M
Mauritius
1 argument109 words per minute521 words286 seconds
Argument 1
Digital Transformation Blueprint & AI economic zone
EXPLANATION
Mauritius presents its Digital Transformation Blueprint (2025‑2029) and announces a specialized economic zone dedicated to digital technology and AI to foster growth and resilience in the region.
EVIDENCE
The Mauritian delegate mentions the “Mauritius Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025 to 2029” and the establishment of a specialized economic zone for digital technology and AI serving Mauritius and the wider region, especially Africa [580-585].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
S
Seychelles
1 argument128 words per minute587 words273 seconds
Argument 1
Partner‑driven access to AI for small island states
EXPLANATION
Seychelles stresses its reliance on partnerships with larger states like India to obtain AI technology, given limited domestic resources, and calls for international support to bridge the digital divide for small island developing states.
EVIDENCE
The Seychellois speaker notes the need for partners like India to “transform or transcend the technology barrier” and highlights the lack of oil or minerals but the presence of human capital, urging cooperation for AI access [630-639].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Guyana
B
Bolivia
1 argument117 words per minute79 words40 seconds
Argument 1
Solidarity‑based AI for all humanity
EXPLANATION
Bolivia calls for an AI future built on equity, ethics and solidarity among nations, asserting that AI should serve all of humanity rather than a privileged few.
EVIDENCE
The Bolivian speaker declares that “the digital future must be built with equity, with ethics, and above all, with solidarity between all nations” and expresses willingness to work with India and the international community for inclusive AI [369-374].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
I
International Monetary Fund
2 arguments107 words per minute665 words369 seconds
Argument 1
Economic growth potential, job impacts & skill development
EXPLANATION
The IMF quantifies AI’s macro‑economic benefits, estimating up to 0.8 % global growth, while warning that 40 % of jobs could be affected, emphasizing the need for skill development and reskilling.
EVIDENCE
The IMF report projects a “0.8 % boost to global growth” and notes that “about 40 % of jobs will be impacted” with higher demand for AI-skilled workers, leading to wage gains and reshaping labor markets [674-694].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Croatia, Greece
Argument 2
Multilateral funding & collaborative research
EXPLANATION
The IMF highlights its role in mobilising multilateral resources, such as a $3 billion fund, to support AI capacity building and collaborative research in developing countries.
EVIDENCE
The speaker mentions that “the IMF and the United Nations are raising $3 billion to assist with capacity building and diffusion of AI” and stresses the importance of multilateral funding mechanisms [511-518].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
C
Croatia
1 argument102 words per minute473 words278 seconds
Argument 1
Talent development, innovation ecosystem & startup support
EXPLANATION
Croatia showcases its thriving tech ecosystem, citing successful companies and a national focus on digital transformation, to illustrate how talent and entrepreneurship drive AI innovation.
EVIDENCE
The Croatian speaker lists companies such as InfoBeep, Rimac, MicroBlink, Gideon and Infinum, noting their global competitiveness and the country’s emphasis on digital transformation as a national priority [401-407].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
International Monetary Fund, Greece
B
Bhutan
1 argument113 words per minute914 words482 seconds
Argument 1
Hydropower‑driven green AI compute & Mindfulness City
EXPLANATION
Bhutan proposes leveraging its abundant hydropower to power green AI compute facilities, including the Gelipur Mindfulness City, a hub for sustainable AI research and energy‑intensive industries.
EVIDENCE
The Bhutanese delegate highlights that “Bhutan’s hydropower has long been a symbol of partnership” and describes the Mindfulness City powered by clean renewable energy, designed to attract green data centres and AI research [332-344].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainable Energy & Green AI
AGREED WITH
Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Finland
S
Sri Lanka
1 argument210 words per minute1158 words330 seconds
Argument 1
Cultural preservation and environmental protection concerns
EXPLANATION
Sri Lanka stresses the importance of protecting cultural heritage and the environment while pursuing digital development, warning that neglect could undermine cultural diversity and sustainability.
EVIDENCE
The speaker repeatedly emphasizes the need to “protect the environment” and preserve “cultural diversity” and warns that unchecked digitalisation could threaten cultural heritage [208-215].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainable Energy & Green AI
DISAGREED WITH
Other participants (e.g., India, Brazil, Estonia)
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI should serve humanity and be guided by ethical, human‑centred principles
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Brazil
Human‑welfare focus AI as a service, not an end Trust, quality and sustainable AI Multilateral governance & UN centrality
All four speakers stressed that artificial intelligence must be a tool for the welfare of all people, emphasizing ethical governance, trust and service orientation rather than a source of power. Modi said the direction of AI should be the welfare of mankind [9-10]; Switzerland highlighted that technology is a means of service and responsible AI enables innovation [251-259]; Liechtenstein argued that innovation becomes sustainable only when built on trust and quality [289-293]; Brazil noted that AI can bring benefits to humanity but also poses serious risks if not governed responsibly [53-55].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This consensus mirrors the OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence, which emphasize human-centred values and ethical AI development, and echoes calls for evidence-based, context-specific policy frameworks discussed at recent AI policy roadmaps [S106][S95].
Need for transparent, accountable AI systems and data sovereignty (the “glass‑box” approach)
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Estonia, Serbia
Data framework, “glass‑box” transparency Transparent AI platform & national AI strategy Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty
Modi called for a data framework respecting sovereignty and a “glass-box” where safety rules are clear and verifiable [16-23]; Estonia described its AST.AI programme that requires transparent safety rules that can be inspected [90-94]; Serbia warned that unchecked concentration of AI power threatens sovereignty and called for domestic data and algorithmic control [124-135].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The ‘glass-box’ demand aligns with calls for transparency and accountability in AI governance, as highlighted by Lt Gen Vipul Shinghal’s keynote on making the black box of data visible [S101], and with data-sovereignty frameworks advocated in multilateral discussions [S102][S106].
UN‑anchored multilateral governance as the cornerstone for global AI coordination
Speakers: Brazil, Spain, Switzerland, Estonia
Multilateral governance & UN centrality Global Digital Compact, AI expert panel & UN coordination AI as a service, not an end UN dialogue on AI governance
Brazil asserted that only the United Nations can provide a universal, inclusive AI governance framework [78-80]; Spain pointed to the Global Digital Compact and the new UN AI expert panel as key mechanisms [658-662]; Switzerland emphasized the role of International Geneva and the UN as a steady anchor for AI dialogue [260-265]; Estonia noted the UN-hosted global AI dialogue as an inclusive platform [105-106].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple sources underline the UN’s unique role in fostering coordinated AI governance, from historical arguments for multilateralism [S104] to explicit proposals for UN-led AI governance by Chinese experts [S105] and broader international cooperation on standards [S108][S109].
Bridging the digital divide and supporting AI diffusion in the Global South
Speakers: Brazil, Guyana, Seychelles
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech Practical assistance for AI diffusion in low‑capacity states Partner‑driven access to AI for small island states
Brazil highlighted massive digital exclusion (2.6 billion offline, 660 million without electricity) and the need to regulate Big Tech to protect rights [62-68]; Guyana called for mechanisms to raise awareness among policymakers and to help low-capacity countries adopt AI, citing a $3 billion fund [498-505]; Seychelles stressed reliance on partnerships with larger states like India to obtain AI technology and close the divide for small island developing states [630-639].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Capacity-building initiatives and digital inclusion strategies for the Global South have been a recurring theme in forums such as the IGF 2024 [S113], AI literacy programmes in India [S98], and broader digital public infrastructure reports emphasizing inclusive policy making [S99][S100][S115].
Building sovereign, low‑carbon AI compute infrastructure
Speakers: Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Finland, Bhutan
Building sovereign AI infrastructure & low‑carbon compute AI hub, data‑center valley & sovereign cloud Eco‑efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres Hydropower‑driven green AI compute & Mindfulness City
Slovakia reported fast progress on GPU-based AI factories and the low-carbon Perun supercomputer [158-162][176-180]; Kazakhstan announced a Data Center Valley offering >1 GW of clean, cheap power for AI workloads [549-554]; Finland highlighted its eco-efficient data centres powered by clean energy and heat-recycling [432-435]; Bhutan described its hydropower-powered Gelipur Mindfulness City as a green AI compute hub [332-344].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Energy constraints for AI and the push for low-carbon compute were highlighted at the AI Impact Summit India [S96] and in discussions on sustainable digital sovereignty for small island states [S107][S108].
Capacity development and AI literacy for inclusive growth
Speakers: Estonia, Greece, Finland, Kazakhstan, Croatia
AI Leap public‑private partnership for nationwide AI literacy Reskilling, public‑sector modernization & protection of youth World‑class AI ecosystem, research talent & clean‑energy compute AI SANA program training one million citizens Talent development, innovation ecosystem & startup support
Estonia’s AI Leap provides students and teachers with advanced AI tools and training [95-96]; Greece called for reskilling workers, teachers and small businesses to ensure AI benefits are shared [452-456]; Finland described its AI ecosystem spanning research, talent and clean-energy compute, emphasizing the need for skilled people [418-429]; Kazakhstan reported that its AI SANA programme has trained one million citizens across all ages [555-556]; Croatia showcased a vibrant tech ecosystem and the importance of talent development [401-407].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Several initiatives stress AI literacy as a pillar for inclusive development, including capacity-building programmes in the Global South [S98][S115], digital public infrastructure strategies [S99], and cross-generational dialogue on inclusive AI [S97][S100].
AI’s economic potential coupled with labour market disruption concerns
Speakers: International Monetary Fund, Croatia, Greece
Economic growth potential, job impacts & skill development Talent development, innovation ecosystem & startup support Reskilling, public‑sector modernization & protection of youth
The IMF estimated AI could add up to 0.8 % to global growth while affecting about 40 % of jobs, stressing the need for skill development [674-682]; Croatia warned that AI’s rapid scale can blur fact and fiction, amplifying risks and requiring regulation [381-386]; Greece highlighted legitimate concerns about labour displacement and the need for reskilling [452-456].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The dual narrative of AI-driven growth and labour market impacts was a focal point in policy discussions on jobs and economic development [S117] and in debates over automation’s societal effects [S118].
Similar Viewpoints
All three leaders framed AI as a tool for human welfare rather than a source of power, emphasizing trust, quality and service orientation. Modi spoke of AI’s direction being the welfare of mankind [9-10]; Switzerland described technology as a means of service that enables innovation [251-259]; Liechtenstein stressed that innovation becomes sustainable only when built on trust and quality [289-293].
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Switzerland, Liechtenstein
Human‑welfare focus AI as a service, not an end Trust, quality and sustainable AI
Each highlighted the urgent need to close digital gaps and support low‑capacity countries in adopting AI. Brazil warned of exclusion of 2.6 billion people and called for regulation of Big Tech [62-68]; Guyana proposed mechanisms to raise policy awareness and provide bilateral assistance for AI diffusion [498-505]; Seychelles called for partnership with larger states to overcome resource constraints [630-639].
Speakers: Brazil, Guyana, Seychelles
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech Practical assistance for AI diffusion in low‑capacity states Partner‑driven access to AI for small island states
Both stressed the importance of national control over data and algorithms to ensure sovereignty and accountability. Estonia advocated a transparent “glass‑box” AI platform with clear safety rules [90-94]; Serbia warned that concentration of AI power threatens sovereignty and called for domestic data and regulatory capacity [124-135].
Speakers: Estonia, Serbia
Transparent AI platform & national AI strategy Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty
Both presented low‑carbon, sovereign compute as a strategic priority. Finland highlighted its eco‑efficient data centres powered by clean energy and heat‑recycling [432-435]; Slovakia described the Perun supercomputer powered by low‑carbon energy as a sovereign AI asset [158-162][176-180].
Speakers: Finland, Slovakia
Eco‑efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres Building sovereign AI infrastructure & low‑carbon compute
Both emphasized the need for AI literacy and public‑sector modernization. Estonia’s AI Leap provides tools and training for students and teachers nationwide [95-96]; Greece called for reskilling workers, teachers and public services to ensure AI benefits are widely felt [452-456].
Speakers: Estonia, Greece
AI Leap public‑private partnership for nationwide AI literacy Reskilling, public‑sector modernization & protection of youth
Both positioned the United Nations as the primary platform for global AI governance. Spain referenced the Global Digital Compact and the new UN AI expert panel as critical mechanisms [658-662]; Brazil explicitly stated that no forum replaces the UN for inclusive AI governance [78-80].
Speakers: Spain, Brazil
Global Digital Compact, AI expert panel & UN coordination Multilateral governance & UN centrality
Unexpected Consensus
High‑income European states and small island developing states both stress partnership‑based access to AI technology
Speakers: Switzerland, Seychelles
AI as a service, not an end Partner‑driven access to AI for small island states
Switzerland, a wealthy European nation, emphasized that AI should serve societies and called for inclusive dialogue and cooperation [251-259]; Seychelles, a small island state, explicitly asked for partnership with larger countries like India to obtain AI technology and bridge its digital gap [630-639]. This alignment of a high-income country’s service-oriented stance with a low-income country’s request for partnership was not anticipated.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Partnership-oriented access models have been advocated by both European actors and small island states, as reflected in reports on digital cooperation for islands [S107] and coordinated multilateral regulation proposals [S109].
Environmental sustainability linked to AI compute across geographically diverse regions
Speakers: Bhutan, Finland
Hydropower‑driven green AI compute & Mindfulness City Eco‑efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres
Bhutan highlighted its hydropower-powered Mindfulness City as a green AI hub [332-344]; Finland promoted eco-efficient, clean-energy data centres and heat-recycling [432-435]. Both converged on the principle that renewable energy should underpin AI infrastructure, despite coming from very different economic contexts.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Sustainability concerns tied to AI compute were raised in the context of energy-intensive models at the India AI Impact Summit [S96] and in broader discussions on low-carbon AI infrastructure for diverse geographies [S108][S107].
Recognition that AI concentration threatens national sovereignty even among countries that are actively building sovereign compute
Speakers: Serbia, Kazakhstan
Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty AI hub, data‑center valley & sovereign cloud
Serbia warned that concentration of AI power could erode sovereignty and called for domestic capacity [124-135]; Kazakhstan, while building its own sovereign AI hub and data-center valley, implicitly acknowledges the need for independent infrastructure to avoid dependence [549-554]. The shared concern about sovereignty, expressed by a smaller state and a larger emerging AI hub, was not obvious at the outset.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The tension between AI concentration and sovereignty is reflected in calls for data-sovereignty frameworks [S102], concerns about geopolitical risks of AI dominance [S105], and the need for transparent, accountable AI systems [S101].
Overall Assessment

The summit revealed broad consensus that AI must be human‑centred, transparent, and governed through inclusive, multilateral mechanisms anchored in the United Nations. Participants across regions agreed on the necessity of data sovereignty, trustworthy “glass‑box” systems, capacity building, and the development of sovereign, low‑carbon compute infrastructure. There was also shared recognition of AI’s economic promise alongside the risks of labour displacement and digital exclusion.

High – The convergence of viewpoints among diverse countries (from the Global South to Europe and small island states) indicates strong alignment on ethical AI, multilateral governance, inclusion, and sustainable compute. This consensus provides a solid foundation for coordinated policy actions, joint funding mechanisms and the establishment of shared standards under UN auspices.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Central authority for global AI governance
Speakers: Brazil, Switzerland, Estonia
Multilateral governance & UN centrality AI as a service, not an end (emphasis on Geneva as anchor) Transparent AI platform & national AI strategy (co‑facilitating UN dialogue)
Brazil argues that the United Nations is the only universal platform for AI governance and should be the anchor of any multilateral framework [78-80]. Switzerland highlights Geneva as a steady anchor for AI dialogue, emphasizing a network of international organisations rather than a single UN-centric body [263-265]. Estonia mentions co-facilitating the UN-hosted global AI dialogue, but frames it within a national strategy rather than endorsing exclusive UN centrality [105-106]. The differing emphases reveal a disagreement on whether AI governance should be anchored primarily in the UN or in a broader multistakeholder ecosystem centred on Geneva.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Debate exists over a single global authority versus interoperable standards; participants at policy roadmaps emphasized the importance of policy interoperability rather than uniform governance [S95][S103].
Approach to regulating large technology firms (Big Tech)
Speakers: Brazil, Serbia, Finland
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty Eco‑efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres (regulation must be predictable and balanced)
Brazil calls for strong regulation of Big Tech to protect human rights, privacy and to prevent the concentration of power [65-68]. Serbia focuses on national sovereignty, arguing that states must develop their own data and algorithmic capacities rather than rely on external Big Tech, implicitly downplaying external regulation in favour of self-sufficiency [124-135]. Finland stresses that regulation should be predictable, balanced and supportive of innovation, suggesting a more moderate, industry-friendly regulatory approach [423-424]. These positions conflict over the extent and focus of regulation of large technology companies.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Divergent views on Big Tech regulation are evident in the UK CMA’s roadmap for targeted interventions [S110], competition-rights approaches to digital markets [S112], and broader calls for coordinated multilateral regulation of tech giants [S109][S111].
Funding mechanisms for AI capacity building in the Global South
Speakers: International Monetary Fund, Guyana, Brazil
Economic growth potential, job impacts & skill development (multilateral $3 billion fund) Practical assistance for AI diffusion in low‑capacity states (bilateral mechanisms) Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech (implies broader multilateral support)
The IMF proposes a multilateral $3 billion fund to support AI capacity building and research in developing countries [511-518]. Guyana advocates for a mechanism that combines multilateral support with bilateral assistance, emphasizing direct help to policymakers and quality-review systems [508-525]. Brazil’s emphasis on closing the digital divide and regulating Big Tech suggests a reliance on broader multilateral initiatives rather than targeted bilateral funding [62-68]. The differing preferences for multilateral versus bilateral funding streams constitute a disagreement on how to finance AI development for the Global South.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Discussions on financing AI capacity highlighted the need for coordinated funding strategies, as outlined in digital public infrastructure reports [S99] and Global South AI safety research network initiatives [S115].
Scope of AI discussion versus national priorities unrelated to AI
Speakers: Sri Lanka, Other participants (e.g., India, Brazil, Estonia)
Cultural preservation and environmental protection concerns Human‑welfare focus, data sovereignty, AI governance, etc.
Sri Lanka repeatedly emphasizes cultural preservation, environmental protection and even mentions preparing a new Indian-led military base, topics that diverge sharply from the AI-focused agenda of the summit [208-215][241-245]. Other speakers stay within AI governance, ethics, capacity building and digital development, indicating an unexpected disagreement on the relevance of non-AI national issues within the summit.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Tensions between AI-focused agendas and broader national priorities were noted in sessions that broadened the scope beyond technical issues to include ethical, environmental, and definitional challenges [S116][S118].
Unexpected Differences
Inclusion of cultural and military concerns in an AI summit
Speakers: Sri Lanka, All other speakers
Cultural preservation and environmental protection concerns Human‑welfare focus, AI governance, data sovereignty
Sri Lanka’s extensive focus on protecting cultural heritage, the environment and even preparing a new Indian-led military base [208-215][241-245] was not addressed by any other participant, whose contributions centered on AI ethics, governance, capacity building and digital development. This divergence was unexpected given the AI-specific purpose of the summit.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need to embed cultural and security dimensions in AI policy has been raised in discussions on safeguarding children and contextual inclusion [S94], as well as in broader debates on cultural considerations in AI governance roadmaps [S95].
Overall Assessment

The summit showed broad consensus on the need for human‑centred, inclusive AI and on the importance of sovereign compute and capacity building. However, substantive disagreements emerged around the institutional anchor for AI governance (UN versus a broader multistakeholder ecosystem), the degree and focus of regulation of large technology firms, and the preferred funding mechanisms for AI capacity building in the Global South. An unexpected divergence arose from Sri Lanka’s emphasis on cultural and military issues, which fell outside the AI agenda.

Moderate to high. While most participants share common goals, the lack of alignment on governance structures, regulatory approaches, and financing strategies could impede coordinated action and delay the development of a unified global AI governance framework.

Partial Agreements
All these speakers agree that AI should serve humanity and that sovereign, trustworthy compute is essential. However, they differ on the means: Modi proposes a data sovereignty framework and a glass‑box approach [16-23]; Estonia stresses a national AI strategy with transparent safety rules [90-94]; Serbia and Slovakia focus on national sovereign compute infrastructure and low‑carbon energy [158-162][176-180]; Kazakhstan highlights a low‑cost, renewable‑powered data‑center valley [543-554]; Bhutan proposes hydropower‑driven green AI compute in a mindfulness city [332-344]. The shared goal of human‑centric, sovereign AI is thus pursued through varied policy instruments.
Speakers: Narendra Modi (India), Brazil, Estonia, Serbia, Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Bhutan
Human‑welfare focus Data framework, “glass‑box” transparency Building sovereign AI infrastructure & low‑carbon compute AI hub, data‑center valley & sovereign cloud
These speakers concur that AI must be inclusive and that the digital divide must be closed. Brazil calls for regulation of Big Tech to protect rights [65-68]; Guyana seeks mechanisms to raise awareness and provide practical support to low‑capacity states [508-525]; the IMF highlights the economic benefits of AI and the need for skill development [674-694]; the Netherlands and Switzerland stress responsible, inclusive AI that serves humanity [607-618][251-259]. They diverge on the primary tool: regulation, capacity‑building mechanisms, economic incentives, or public‑private partnerships.
Speakers: Brazil, Guyana, International Monetary Fund, Netherlands, Switzerland
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech Practical assistance for AI diffusion in low‑capacity states Economic growth potential, job impacts & skill development Responsible AI & inclusive innovation AI as a service, not an end
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI must be governed with a human‑centred, ethical framework that prioritises welfare, trust, transparency and accountability. Data sovereignty and the development of sovereign, low‑carbon compute infrastructure are essential to prevent concentration of AI power. Inclusion and capacity‑building for the Global South are critical; bridging the digital divide and providing AI literacy, reskilling and affordable access are recurring themes. Education, AI literacy and workforce reskilling are necessary to ensure societies can benefit from AI while mitigating job displacement. Multilateral cooperation, anchored in the United Nations and other global fora, is needed to create inclusive, standards‑based AI governance. Sustainable energy sources (hydropower, renewable low‑cost power) should underpin AI compute to align AI development with environmental goals.
Resolutions and action items
India pledged to continue sharing its digital public infrastructure (e.g., 38,000 GPUs, AI courses, datasets, and models) with the world. Brazil reaffirmed its commitment to multilateral AI governance through the UN, the Global Digital Pact and the International Scientific Panel. Estonia announced co‑facilitation of the UN AI dialogue and will host the Tallinn Digital Summit on AI resilience (Nov 5‑6). Switzerland committed to host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027, establishing a permanent multilateral anchor for AI governance. Liechtenstein offered to support international cooperation on responsible AI and to promote trusted, rule‑based environments. Bhutan proposed joint development of green AI compute facilities powered by its hydropower and the Gelipu Mindfulness City concept. Kazakhstan invited partners to use its sovereign AI hub, Data Center Valley and AI SANA training programme, and announced 2026 as the Year of Digitalisation and AI. Mauritius announced a Digital Transformation Blueprint (2025‑2029) and the creation of a specialised economic zone for AI and digital technologies. Netherlands presented its first international AI strategy, offering public AI infrastructure for SMEs, research and government. Spain highlighted its AI supervisory agency, the Charter of Digital Rights and plans to host a global AI governance meeting under UN auspices. International Monetary Fund offered to mobilise funding (e.g., $3 billion) for AI capacity‑building in low‑resource countries. Guyana called for a mechanism to raise AI awareness among policymakers in the Global South and to establish quality‑review processes for AI solutions.
Unresolved issues
How to create a globally binding AI governance framework that balances innovation with regulation, especially concerning autonomous weapons, hate speech, disinformation and child protection. Concrete mechanisms for equitable data sharing and protection of data sovereignty across jurisdictions. Financing models and concrete steps for large‑scale AI capacity‑building in low‑income and small‑island states. Specific standards for “glass‑box” AI transparency and accountability that can be universally adopted. Ways to prevent the permanent concentration of AI infrastructure and expertise in a few corporations or nations. Detailed plans for reskilling workers whose jobs are most vulnerable to automation, particularly in routine sectors. Implementation pathways for integrating AI into public procurement and governance systems without creating bureaucratic bottlenecks.
Suggested compromises
Combining profit‑driven AI development with purpose‑oriented ethical commitments (as urged by India and Brazil). Balancing rapid AI innovation with regulatory safeguards – e.g., Greece’s proposal to protect minors while still encouraging AI deployment. Using multilateral platforms (UN, Global Digital Pact) for overarching standards while allowing bilateral assistance for capacity‑building (Guyana’s suggestion). Leveraging low‑carbon, renewable energy for sovereign compute to address both sustainability and geopolitical concerns (Slovakia, Finland, Bhutan, Kazakhstan). Promoting open‑source and affordable AI models alongside private‑sector innovation to ensure broader access (India’s open‑source approach, Netherlands’ public AI infrastructure). Encouraging a “human‑in‑the‑loop” governance model that blends technical transparency (glass‑box) with human values and oversight (Liechtenstein, Estonia).
Thought Provoking Comments
AI must be human‑centric, built on data sovereignty, with a ‘glass‑box’ approach rather than a black‑box, and guided by clear human values (the paper‑clip analogy).
Sets a comprehensive ethical framework that ties technical design (data quality, transparency) to philosophical guidance, framing the entire summit around responsibility rather than pure innovation.
Established the baseline agenda; subsequent speakers referenced data sovereignty, transparency, and human values, steering the discussion toward governance, ethics, and concrete implementation rather than just showcasing capabilities.
Speaker: Narendra Modi
AI has a dual character: it can multiply collective well‑being or cast shadows on humanity; concentration of data, compute and capital in a few countries and companies threatens global equity, so multilateral governance through the UN is essential.
Broadens the conversation from national initiatives to global power structures, highlighting systemic risks of concentration and the need for inclusive, multilateral rules.
Shifted the tone from national showcases to a critique of existing power imbalances; prompted other leaders (Serbia, Estonia, Switzerland) to stress sovereignty, inclusive governance, and the role of international institutions.
Speaker: Brazil
AI is now infrastructure; sovereignty in the 21st century means managing citizens’ data, algorithms, and building domestic expertise to avoid dependence on external platforms.
Frames AI as a political issue of state sovereignty, linking technological capacity directly to political independence and long‑term stability.
Deepened the sovereignty theme introduced by Brazil; influenced Estonia’s emphasis on national AI literacy and Slovakia’s focus on sovereign compute, moving the dialogue toward concrete capacity‑building measures.
Speaker: Serbia
AI must serve people, not the other way around – requiring transparent technology, data control, and the ability to question AI‑driven decisions, plus a national AI‑literacy program (AI Leap).
Translates abstract governance concepts into a societal strategy, emphasizing education and trust as foundations for responsible AI deployment.
Reinforced the education and trust pillars; inspired later remarks from Greece and Finland about upskilling and public sector modernization, shifting the conversation toward practical implementation.
Speaker: Estonia
The Upanishadic distinction between higher knowledge (Paravidya) and lower knowledge (Aparavidya) – wisdom must guide AI’s technical power, otherwise technology deepens inequality and misinformation.
Introduces a philosophical lens that connects ancient wisdom to modern AI ethics, enriching the debate with cultural depth and a moral imperative.
Prompted other speakers (e.g., Greece, Switzerland) to reference values, heritage, and the need for ethical grounding, moving the discussion from technicalities to moral philosophy.
Speaker: Bhutan
Switzerland will host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027, positioning the UN and Geneva as the steady anchor for multilateral AI governance and emphasizing the role of international institutions.
Provides a concrete institutional milestone that embodies the multilateral vision advocated earlier, giving the abstract governance discussion a tangible future anchor.
Reinforced Brazil’s call for UN‑centered governance; encouraged participants to view the summit series as a continuous process, leading to references to upcoming UN panels and the Global Digital Pact.
Speaker: Switzerland
Three reflections: (1) AI dividend must be shared, (2) states must modernize their institutions and procurement for AI, (3) AI’s geopolitical impact requires trusted partnerships and balanced regulation to avoid fragmentation.
Synthesizes earlier themes into actionable policy recommendations, linking distributional justice, state capacity, and geopolitical stability.
Served as a turning point that moved the dialogue from diagnosis to prescription; other leaders (Finland, Spain, IMF) echoed the need for regulation, capacity‑building, and inclusive growth.
Speaker: Greece
IMF analysis: AI could add up to 0.8 % to global GDP but may affect 40 % of jobs worldwide; the biggest gains go to those with AI skills, while routine jobs disappear – emphasizing the need for rapid reskilling and inclusive policies.
Quantifies the economic stakes and labor market disruption, grounding the ethical and governance debate in macro‑economic data.
Validated the concerns raised by Serbia and Greece about workforce impacts; reinforced calls for education (Estonia, Finland) and for inclusive policies (Guyana, Mauritius).
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
Two books illustrate AI’s ethical spectrum: ‘Clara and the Sun’ (positive human‑like AI) and ‘Proving Ground’ (AI enabling harm); the Netherlands will launch its first international AI strategy to make public AI infrastructure available to all.
Uses cultural narratives to humanize abstract risks, then couples them with a concrete national strategy for inclusive AI infrastructure.
Shifted the conversation toward tangible policy tools (public AI infrastructure) and highlighted the role of storytelling in shaping public perception, resonating with Bhutan’s wisdom framing and Greece’s call for shared dividend.
Speaker: Netherlands
Overall Assessment

The discussion began with Narendra Modi’s broad ethical blueprint, which set the stage for a series of deeper interventions. Brazil’s articulation of AI’s dual nature and the need for UN‑led multilateral governance reframed the summit from a collection of national showcases to a global power‑balance debate. Serbia and Estonia built on this by foregrounding sovereignty and societal trust, while Bhutan introduced a philosophical dimension that reminded participants that wisdom must steer technology. Switzerland’s concrete hosting pledge anchored the multilateral vision, and Greece’s three‑point policy synthesis turned the dialogue toward actionable reforms. The IMF’s data‑driven impact analysis and the Netherlands’ cultural‑policy blend added quantitative urgency and practical pathways. Collectively, these pivotal comments redirected the conversation from aspirational rhetoric to concrete challenges—data sovereignty, inclusive growth, state capacity, and international governance—shaping the summit into a coordinated call for responsible, equitable AI development worldwide.

Follow-up Questions
Does our political capacity keep pace with the speed of technological development?
Serbia warned that without adequate political capacity, states cannot effectively regulate AI, risking loss of sovereignty and ineffective governance.
Speaker: Serbia
Will the concentration of AI power become permanent, allowing a small number of shareholders to set global rules?
Serbia highlighted the risk of a few entities controlling AI infrastructure, which could marginalize many countries and undermine equitable AI development.
Speaker: Serbia
How can we ensure AI serves humanity’s needs rather than dominating it?
Serbia emphasized the need for AI to be aligned with human welfare, prompting a call for frameworks that keep AI purpose‑driven.
Speaker: Serbia
How can a mechanism be created to promote AI awareness among policymakers in low‑capacity countries?
Guyana noted that many Global South nations lack policy awareness, hindering responsible AI adoption; a structured awareness mechanism is needed.
Speaker: Guyana
What structure can organize coherent development and diffusion of AI in countries with limited capacity?
Guyana called for coordinated approaches to help smaller nations build and spread AI solutions effectively.
Speaker: Guyana
How can a quality‑review system for AI models be established to prevent deployment of sub‑standard or harmful AI?
Guyana pointed out the risk of adopting AI models without proper vetting, urging the creation of standards and review processes.
Speaker: Guyana
How should planning frameworks be upgraded to value AI diffusion investments on par with traditional infrastructure projects?
Guyana argued that AI investments are often undervalued compared to roads or bridges, requiring new budgeting and evaluation criteria.
Speaker: Guyana
How can the AI dividend be broadly shared across society, ensuring benefits for workers, small businesses, farmers, and other vulnerable groups?
Greece stressed that without deliberate policies, AI’s wealth could concentrate in large tech firms, leaving ordinary citizens behind.
Speaker: Greece
What reforms are needed to modernize public institutions and procurement systems so they are AI‑ready?
Greece highlighted that outdated bureaucratic systems impede AI deployment, calling for faster, outcome‑oriented procurement and digital talent development.
Speaker: Greece
How can governments protect minors from digital addiction and online harms associated with AI?
Greece identified youth safety as a priority, suggesting regulatory measures to curb harmful AI‑driven content.
Speaker: Greece
How can the global concentration of compute, data, and talent be prevented to ensure digital inclusion?
Greece warned that AI resources are clustered in few regions, advocating policies that distribute access more evenly.
Speaker: Greece
How can trusted international partnerships be built without fragmenting the AI ecosystem into rigid blocks?
Greece emphasized the need for collaborative frameworks that enhance innovation while avoiding geopolitical fragmentation.
Speaker: Greece
What strategies are needed to address the environmental costs of AI and the risk of massive job displacement?
Spain highlighted AI’s carbon footprint and potential labor market disruptions, calling for sustainability and reskilling measures.
Speaker: Spain
How can an inclusive global governance framework for AI be established under the United Nations?
Spain advocated for a UN‑led multilateral governance structure to ensure all nations have a voice in AI policy.
Speaker: Spain
How can AI development be aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals and human rights?
Spain stressed that AI must serve broader societal goals, requiring explicit alignment with SDGs and rights‑based standards.
Speaker: Spain
How should the global workforce be prepared for AI‑driven job market transformation?
The IMF warned that AI will reshape employment, urging education and reskilling programs to mitigate displacement.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
What policies can support low‑skilled workers who are most at risk of being displaced by AI?
The IMF identified vulnerable workers as a critical group needing targeted social and economic support.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
How can open‑source, affordable AI models be promoted to ensure accessibility for developing countries?
The IMF praised India’s open‑source approach and suggested expanding such models to democratize AI benefits.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
How can data sovereignty be protected and a robust data framework for AI training be established?
Modi proposed respecting data sovereignty and creating trustworthy data pipelines to ensure reliable AI outputs.
Speaker: Narendra Modi
How can transparent ‘glass‑box’ safety rules be implemented to enhance AI accountability?
Modi called for clear, verifiable safety standards that replace opaque ‘black‑box’ systems, fostering trust.
Speaker: Narendra Modi
How can human values be embedded into AI systems to avoid misaligned objectives like the paper‑clip problem?
Modi warned about AI pursuing narrow goals without human guidance, urging value‑aligned design.
Speaker: Narendra Modi
How can small states develop sovereign AI infrastructure and compute capacity without massive capital?
Both highlighted the challenge for smaller nations to build trusted compute locally, suggesting collaborative or niche approaches.
Speaker: Serbia, Slovakia

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.