Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI

20 Feb 2026 11:00h - 12:00h

Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The panel convened to explore how artificial intelligence can be mobilised to address the intertwined challenges of development, a sustainable planet, and climate-change mitigation and adaptation [11-16]. Organisers highlighted the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL) as a not-for-profit effort to create a collaborative ecosystem linking academia, industry, philanthropy and governments to align AI advances with climate and development goals [30-32][54-55][64-68]. They noted a historic lack of interaction between the AI research community and emissions-intensive sectors, with few exceptions, underscoring the need for joint initiatives [47-52]. Although data centres add 0.5-1.4 Gt of CO₂ annually, the potential AI-driven emissions reductions of 3.5-5.4 Gt outweigh this impact, justifying a focus on AI’s net climate benefit [60-63].


The inaugural GRAIL summit gathered 200 participants from 115 organisations, producing an online platform, government engagements, and sector-specific taxonomies to identify win-win decarbonisation opportunities [71-78]. Subsequent collaborations involve McKinsey’s cost-curve analysis, a partnership with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development covering 26 % of global GHGs, and work with UNESA to double clean-power capacity by 2030 [82-89][90-95].


David Sandalow reported that AI can contribute both incremental efficiency gains and transformational breakthroughs, but its climate impact is currently less than 1 % of total emissions, aligning with Grantham and IEA estimates [146-153][155-158]. He identified data scarcity, talent gaps and trust as primary barriers, urging every climate-focused organisation to dedicate AI expertise [158-164]. Sandalow illustrated AI capabilities-detecting methane from satellites, predicting weather for renewables, optimising power flows and simulating battery chemistry-as essential tools for the power sector, which accounts for 28 % of global emissions [170-188][196-199]. He also warned that real-time AI operations can introduce safety risks, requiring careful governance [205-208].


Google’s Vrushali Gaud described internal climate operations that use AI to improve data-centre efficiency, optimise water and electricity use, and open-source Earth-AI datasets such as flood-risk maps, while launching a Climate Tech Centre in India to foster actionable research across low-carbon steel, aviation fuel and green-skill development [250-267][280-291][298-305]. Spencer Low added that AI-driven satellite analysis now delineates smallholder farm boundaries and crop types, feeding into India’s Krishi DSS and enabling NGOs and startups to deliver climate-smart agronomic advice [311-329][330-338]. Nalin Agarwal and Dan Travers highlighted AI-enabled grid modernisation programmes that pair startups with utilities, pilot AI tools for solar forecasting and asset scheduling, and aim to prevent costly blackouts and emissions-intensive backup generation [364-389][392-401][418-421].


Academic partners such as UCL and the Alan Turing Institute showcased AI applications ranging from campus energy optimisation to emissions-cutting shipping and HVAC solutions, emphasising that rapid, collaborative action is essential to scale these gains [476-485][527-531]. Uday Khemka closed by reiterating that the session demonstrated numerous business opportunities and life-saving deployments, and called for “radical collaboration” to translate AI innovations into large-scale climate impact [533-540].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Urgent call for radical, cross-sector collaboration – The opening remarks stress that the “triple challenge” of development, climate mitigation and adaptation must be tackled together and that the session is an “invitation for radical action-oriented collaboration” [11-13][18-20][28]. The GRAIL network is presented as a “collaborative network of great academic institutions, commercial institutions, AI companies, industrial companies…bringing them all together with governments” [64-66][71-78]. Throughout the panel the speakers repeatedly urge participants to join the effort and co-create solutions [73-78][84-89][533-540].


AI’s potential and concrete use-cases for climate mitigation and adaptation – David Sandalow outlines the findings of the AI-for-climate report: AI can deliver “incremental gains such as improving efficiency” and “transformational gains” in new tech and materials [146-154]. He notes that AI’s own emissions are < 1 % of total GHGs [155-158] but that the main barriers are “lack of data and a lack of trained personnel” [158-162]. He then illustrates specific capabilities – pattern detection (e.g., methane leaks), prediction (weather for solar/wind), optimization (power flows) and simulation (battery chemistry) [170-186] – and warns of emerging risks from real-time AI deployment [206-208].


Google’s operational AI initiatives and data-centric climate tools – Vrushali Gaud describes Google’s “full-stack” approach, from carbon-free data-center operations to water-leak detection and grid optimisation [250-285]. She highlights the open-source “Earth AI” data sets, the Flood Hub for flood-risk prediction, and the partnership with the Indian government to launch a Google Center of Climate Tech that will pilot low-carbon steel, sustainable aviation fuel and “green skills” programmes [288-306][304-305].


AI-driven transformation of the power grid and startup ecosystems – Nalin Agarwal and Dan Travers discuss the bottleneck of grid modernization, the need for AI to handle the new variability from distributed renewables, EVs and data-centers, and the creation of an open-innovation platform that has already generated dozens of pilots with utilities in the Global South [364-382][386-393][398-405][410-416][418-420].


Institutional pilots, research hubs and scaling frameworks – Additional speakers (UCL, Alan Turing Institute, McKinsey) showcase university-led Grand Challenges, AI-enabled building and cement optimisation, and McKinsey’s effort to quantify economic and emissions impact of AI solutions [469-485][514-529][430-466]. All stress the need to move from “knowledge on the shelf” to deployed, scalable climate actions [472-475][492-494].


Overall purpose / goal


The discussion is designed to mobilise a high-level, international coalition around the GRAIL initiative to accelerate the development, deployment and scaling of AI-driven solutions that simultaneously address climate mitigation and adaptation while supporting global development goals. Speakers present evidence of AI’s impact, showcase concrete projects, and repeatedly invite participants to join collaborative platforms, pilots and research programmes to turn ideas into rapid, large-scale climate action.


Overall tone and its evolution


Opening (Uday Khemka) – Highly enthusiastic, urgent, and motivational, emphasizing “exciting sessions,” “tremendous importance,” and a “call for radical collaboration” [1-7][11-13][28].


Middle (David Sandalow, Google, power-grid speakers) – Shifts to a more technical and evidence-based tone, presenting data, specific use-cases, and acknowledging challenges such as data gaps and safety risks [146-158][170-186][398-405]. The mood remains optimistic but grounded.


Later (institutional pilots, closing remarks) – Returns to a forward-looking, collaborative tone, highlighting successes, partnerships, and a strong call-to-action, while still acknowledging the “very little time” and the need for “radical collaboration” [430-466][533-540].


Overall, the conversation maintains a positive, high-energy atmosphere, punctuated by moments of sober realism about barriers and time pressure, but consistently steering toward collective, solution-focused momentum.


Speakers

Speakers from the provided list


Uday Khemka


– Expertise: Climate-AI collaboration, development-climate nexus, convening multi-stakeholder panels


– Role/Title: Moderator / Host, involved with the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL)


– Affiliation: GRAIL (non-profit based in London)


– Source: [S18]


David Sandalow


– Expertise: Climate policy, AI for climate mitigation & adaptation, author of AI-climate report


– Role/Title: Professor, former senior U.S. government official, AI-climate thought leader


– Affiliation: (Former) U.S. Government, author of AI-climate publication


– Source: [S3]


Spencer Low


– Expertise: AI applications in agriculture, digital public goods, satellite-imagery-based farm monitoring


– Role/Title: Google representative (AI for agriculture & food systems)


– Affiliation: Google


Vrushali Gaud


– Expertise: Corporate climate operations, decarbonization, water & circularity, data-center sustainability


– Role/Title: Global Director of Climate Operations


– Affiliation: Google


– Sources: [S7], [S8], [S9]


Adam Sobey


– Expertise: AI for sustainability, environmental forecasting, climate-focused AI research


– Role/Title: Director for Sustainability


– Affiliation: The Alan Turing Institute (UK’s National AI Institute)


– Sources: [S10], [S11]


Dan Travers


– Expertise: AI for grid management, renewable integration, open-source climate-tech solutions


– Role/Title: Founder / Representative, Open Climate Fix (non-profit AI-for-grid startup)


– Affiliation: Open Climate Fix


– Sources: [S12], [S13], [S14]


Ankur Puri


– Expertise: AI consulting, quantum analytics, sector-wide AI impact assessment (energy, built environment, materials)


– Role/Title: Partner, leads Quantum Black (McKinsey’s AI practice) in India


– Affiliation: McKinsey & Company


– Sources: [S15], [S16]


Speaker 1 (identified as Rob)


– Expertise: AI integration across university research, climate Grand Challenges, AI-enabled sustainability projects


– Role/Title: Speaker / Representative, University College London (UCL)


– Affiliation: University College London


– (Information from transcript)


Nalin Agarwal


– Expertise: Climate-tech incubation, grid modernization, AI-driven power sector innovation in the Global South


– Role/Title: Founding Partner, Climate Collective


– Affiliation: Climate Collective (partnered with UNESA)


– Sources: [S19], [S20]


Additional speakers (not in the provided list)


Sean – Briefly mentioned as the person who negotiated extra time for the panel; no speaking role or title detailed.


(No other speakers were identified beyond those listed above.)


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The session opened with Uday Khemka framing the “triple challenge” of fostering development, creating a sustainable planet, and tackling climate-change mitigation and adaptation simultaneously [11-13]. He warned that the limited time allotted for the panel was a metaphor for the shrinking window to act on climate and clarified that the format was “not a real panel, there will be no discussion, just rapid ‘boom-boom-boom’ updates and a switch-eroo of speakers” [17-20][28]. Khemka positioned the meeting as an invitation for radical, action-oriented collaboration [17-20][28] and announced a partnership between GRAIL, McKinsey, and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), which brings together 250 companies representing roughly 26 % of global GHG emissions and 24 % of world revenues [31-34].


GRAIL overview


Khemka described the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL) as a not-for-profit initiative that aims to align rapid AI advances with development and climate agendas by creating a collaborative network of leading academic institutions, commercial firms, AI companies, industrial players, and governments [64-66]. The first GRAIL summit in London convened 200 participants from 115 organisations, produced an online collaborative platform, engaged governments, and generated sector-specific taxonomies to identify “win-win” decarbonisation opportunities [71-78].


AI-for-climate report


David Sandalow presented the AI-for-climate report, noting that it was authored by a 25-expert team that includes Song Lee, former head of the IPCC, underscoring its credibility [150-152]. He contrasted the Grantham Institute’s estimate of 0.5-1.4 Gt CO₂e from data-centre operations with a potential 3.5-5.4 Gt CO₂e reduction enabled by AI-driven climate solutions, arguing that AI’s net benefit is substantial [60-63]. Sandalow highlighted that AI emissions are “less than 1 % of total greenhouse-gas emissions” [155-158] and outlined four high-level AI functions [170-176][184-185][186-188][186-187]:


1. Detect patterns (e.g., methane leaks from satellite data)


2. Predict outcomes (e.g., weather for solar and wind farms)


3. Optimize processes (e.g., power-flow optimisation)


4. Simulate systems (e.g., battery chemistry).


He warned that real-time AI deployment can introduce security and safety risks-especially with generative AI-and that “trust is essential” for organisations to adopt AI solutions [206-208][161-162]. The main barriers identified were data scarcity, a shortage of trained personnel, and the need for trustworthy models [158-162][164].


Google’s full-stack approach


Vrushali Gaud illustrated Google’s “full-stack” strategy, which moves beyond search to optimise data-centre energy use, secure carbon-free electricity, reduce water-tap leaks, and improve grid utilisation [250-277]. Google is open-sourcing large climate-relevant datasets, including Earth AI satellite imagery and the Flood Hub flood-risk maps that serve insurers, real-estate developers, and other stakeholders [288-295]. The company announced a Climate Tech Centre in India to incubate pilots in low-carbon steel, sustainable aviation fuel, and “green-skill” programmes for tier-two cities [303-305]; further details are available on sustainabilitygoogle.com [350-353]. Spencer Low expanded the conversation to agriculture, noting that “30 % or more of greenhouse gases are in some way related to the food system” [311-313] and describing AI-driven tools that delineate smallholder farm boundaries, classify crops from multispectral imagery, and detect agronomic events such as sowing or harvest [314-328]. This data feeds India’s Krishi DSS and state-level platforms, enabling NGOs and startups to provide climate-smart advice to farmers [330-338][332-334].


Power-grid focus


Nalin Agarwal introduced the Climate Collective’s AI-for-Power Innovation Platform, a six-year programme partnered with Graylon that pairs startups with 22 utilities across the Global South, runs a high-conversion pilot programme (≈30 % of proposals become deployments), and maintains an online solution database [365-367][386-393]. Dan Travers added that the modern grid now faces three primary sources of variability-demand, wind speed, and cloud cover-while additional loads from EVs and data centres increase the complexity of real-time balancing [398-401][402-405]. He warned that without AI-driven scheduling, dynamic line rating, and optimal power-flow analyses, costly gas-fired backup generation and blackouts could undermine public support for the green transition [406-410]. Travers also highlighted Open Climate Fix’s collaborations with Indian utilities Adani and the Rajasthan Grid Operator to open-source a solar-forecasting model that outperforms UK forecasts by 20-30 % and is being transferred to India [399-402][417-420].


McKinsey’s taxonomy


Ankur Puri presented McKinsey’s strategic taxonomy that groups AI opportunities into four challenge categories: operational improvement, strategic intelligence, transformation, and autonomous operations [444-453]. His team is quantifying both economic and emissions impact for each use case to ensure scarce resources are directed toward the highest-value interventions [464-467]. This impact-focused approach complements GRAIL’s agenda of rapidly scaling solutions while securing funding from grants, venture capital, and corporate sources [68-69].


Academic contributions


Rob [LastName] from University College London (UCL) highlighted the institution’s AI heritage-UCL holds three Nobel Prizes, is the birthplace of DeepMind, and its Grand Challenges span all 11 faculties [480-483]. The Grand Challenges embed AI across the university, delivering projects such as campus-wide energy-demand forecasting, a carbon-reduction digital twin for cement production, a partnership with PGM Real Estate for AI-enabled sustainable buildings, short-term AI interventions for aviation emissions, and long-term research on electrification and hydrogen propulsion for aviation [486-492]. An open-source sea-ice classification tool for Inuit communities was also showcased [476-485].


Adam Sobey from the Alan Turing Institute framed the Institute’s work around five “missions”: environment, sustainability, defence & security, health, and foundational research [520-523]. Concrete emissions cuts demonstrated include an 18 % reduction in shipping emissions, a 42 % cut in building HVAC emissions, and a renewable-powered underground urban farm [527-531][514-529].


Consensus and points of tension


Across the panel there was strong consensus that immediate, radical collaboration is essential, that AI’s net climate benefit far outweighs its own carbon footprint, and that multi-stakeholder platforms are the most effective way to scale solutions [11-13][28][30-32][64-66][71-78][146-154][250-285][311-329][364-393][444-453][476-485]. Speakers repeatedly invited participants to join the GRAIL online platform, contribute to open-source data assets, and engage in pilot programmes.


Moderate disagreements emerged. While Khemka urged rapid deployment to match the climate timeline [17-20], both Sandalow and Travers cautioned that real-time AI can introduce security and safety risks and that trust must be built before widespread adoption [161-162][206-208]. Data availability was another point of tension: Sandalow highlighted data scarcity as a primary barrier [158-160], whereas Gaud presented Google’s open-source initiatives as a solution, and Khemka acknowledged ongoing gaps despite the new collaborative platform [73-75][288-295][350-353]. Finally, preferred scaling models varied-Travers advocated open-source, transferable tools; Agarwal promoted a structured startup-utility pilot ecosystem; Puri called for rigorous impact quantification before scaling; and Gaud focused on internal corporate optimisation coupled with external partnerships [417-420][364-393][464-467][250-285].


Closing and next steps


Khemka concluded by reiterating that the panel had demonstrated “hundreds of examples of opportunities where businesses can save money or increase revenues while massively improving their emissions profiles” [535-536] and highlighted existing deployments that are already saving lives [537-538]. He called once more for “radical collaboration” to translate AI innovations into large-scale climate impact [539-540]. The session ended with a clear set of next steps: join the GRAIL platform, expand open-source climate data, accelerate pilot programmes in power, agriculture, and industry, and develop governance frameworks that address trust, security, and data-quality challenges while maintaining the urgency demanded by the climate emergency [354-357][422-426][533-540].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Uday Khemka

Very exciting sessions. I’ll just wait. Guys. So we are meeting for a tremendously important subject. And this has been a great summit. I know you’re all energized, inspired, excited and exhausted at the same time. And we will get a moment when this subject becomes a room of 5 ,000. So that’s what we’re going to work towards. But you’re here today. We’re delighted to have an absolutely tremendous panel with us today. I’m deeply honored, flown across from the U .S., from Europe, from Singapore and so forth. And we have a lot of material to cover. I should say that the triple challenge that we are dealing with in this panel is perhaps the most important challenge any of us will face in our lives.

Which is to promote development on the one side. While dealing with the creation of a sustainable planet. and in terms of climate change, your self -selecting group, you’re all here with us and there’s a reason for that. You already know about climate change. You already know about AI. Is that, as you know, we are not necessarily winning the battle on climate as yet and so we need to deal with both mitigation and adaptation and this panel will address both of those two things. We have very little time in the panel so I am going to speed along but that’s a good metaphor for the very little time we have to do something about climate change.

So we’re in action mode. It’s a call for collaboration. We’re not going to be, I apologize to our speakers and panelists for a number of things. One, this is not a real panel. We’re not going to be having discussions. This is just boom, boom, boom, talking to you about what everyone’s doing. Secondly, there’s going to be a kind of switcheroo moment when some other speakers come up and some of us are replaced up here. Apologies for that. It’s just the intensity of the panel and for all those things I apologize in advance but I don’t apologize. for the incredible quality of our panelists today. These are amazing people. And I would just end by saying that this is not a normal session.

This is an invitation for radical action -oriented collaboration with all of you. On that basis, let me begin by talking a little bit about a summit we held last year in London and the background to it and an organization that some of us are very deeply involved with and almost everyone here is a friend of called the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network. You will immediately note it has the cutesy acronym of GRAIL, like the Holy Grail. And what we’re trying to do is really see what the synergy is between the development agenda and the climate agenda through the application of AI. I’m going to speed through this. We’re going to then move to Professor David Sandelow, who actually anchored our summit last year, which is the first major global summit on the application of AI, to climate change.

and has very kindly flown in from Colombia. I’m going to ask our speakers one more favor, which is instead of my coming up and introducing all of you, if you don’t mind introducing yourselves, that will speed us along the way. So let’s go through this. So as you all know, and perhaps Professor Sandler will talk about it, the IPCC gave us a target, 43 % decarbonization from 2019 levels to 2030 levels. We were meant to reduce GHG emissions by that amount. In 2021, some of us at COP26 in Glasgow had a meeting to look at the likelihood of that happening. And we came to the conclusion that the likelihood was very low. And therefore, traditional approaches to climate mitigation and adaptation needed to be enhanced with new solutions.

And we thought, what was J -curving as fast as climate change was J -curving? And the only thing… There was nothing we could think of. There was nothing we could think of. There was nothing we could think of. was the application of AI, this great new suite of technologies, including, of course, quantum and all the other things that go with it. And we started to talk to people, and we talked to a whole bunch of people in the AI community, a whole bunch of people in the industrial and power, automotive, all the different sectors that produce emissions. And we said, are you talking to each other? And shockingly, people were not talking to each other.

There’s very little going on with some honorable exceptions at Google. Very few people were really in the AI community focusing on downstream issues around climate change. And similarly, the big industrial domains were not really focused on the use of AI for decarbonization and economic value creation. So with that lens, think about this session as throwing one J curve against another J curve. Can we throw the crazy increase in AI technology represented by this great summit against the world’s greatest challenge? That’s the purpose of the Grail organization, which is a not -for -profit based in London. It’s a vast terrain. We don’t have time to cover it all. It’s obviously mitigation. It’s obviously adaptation. We have to hit both.

And within that, there are endless taxonomies of all the wonderful things that AI can do. And, of course, you’ll be worried about the increased Gs from data centers, but that’s not the primary focus of our session today. That has been quantified. The Grantham Institute did a quantification last year of 0 .5 to 1 .4 gigatons of extra GHGs from data centers, but that’s from every kind of utilization against the potential benefit of 3 .5 to 5 .4 gigatons being sucked out of extra GHG emissions. So there’s clearly a very strong balance towards what AI can do to helping the planet in its shift towards a clean and green economy. Grail, what’s Grail? Grail is an attempt to create… …to create a collaborative network.

of great academic institutions, commercial institutions, AI companies, industrial companies, philanthropic institutions, private sector sustainability networks like WBCSD, bringing them all together with governments to try and create massive collaboration. In the next slide at the bottom, you see that same group of institutions. Bottom right, the ideas and deal flow. Going back into Grail, bottom left, the fact that this becomes a collaborative community to get all these solutions scaling at speed and at the top, then getting that deal flow funded through grants, through government programs, through venture capital, corporate funds, but to move the agenda to real solutions at massive scale as quickly as we possibly can. All of this led to a summit that occurred that I mentioned earlier last year.

Sean, will you keep me real on the time? Thank you. Okay. And that led to… 200 people. 115 organizations, including all the organizations represented here today, 60 speakers, and we looked at AI for power, AI for building materials, AI for everything you could think of vertically and horizontally, looking at the issues of materials innovation, looking at the issues of value chains, looking at carbon markets, and so forth. What has happened after the summit? Three things. One, we’ve created an online collaborative platform, and we invite all of you to join it, to co -create those solutions that can make a difference. Second, we’ve started to engage with governments around the world. Imagine a summit like this that was focused, yes, on development, but with a central climate focus as well.

How amazing would that be? And most importantly, we’re focusing on taxonomies that lead to massive calls for action from the innovation community. So we started to work on taxonomies for a variety of sectors, the energy sector, the built environment, materials innovation, and we worked with groups of AI experts and power experts and figured out what the big wins were, what are the big opportunities for companies to create economic value while at the same time massively decarbonizing. And this was an intellectual process, including many experts, some of whom are here today, that led to this astonishing work and identified the big win -win opportunities for economic value creation and decarbonization. On the bottom right, the teams from academia, industry, industry associations, a variety of other people and countries, eight country teams as well were involved in various ways.

So where’s this all going? Well, thank you to McKinsey for your very kind collaboration to after we had done all that work saying, hey, we want to help and kicking in and working with us to further refine those offerings and look at cost benefits and cost curves and all sorts of things. Delighted about it. And then there are, apart from working on the power sector, to look at generally what we can do, apart from working on the built environment, generally what we can do, apart from looking at materials innovation, generally what we can do to accelerate solutions for decarbonization through AI. We have two big partnerships that are emerging. One, and I want to slow down here.

Okay, 250 companies are part of the World Business Council, their network. That represents, in scope one, two, and three, 26 % of World GHGs. They’ve realized that that’s mainly in supply chains who are going into a partnership, so is McKinsey, so are other partners, to look at what are the AI opportunities to take startup and scale -ups into these decarbonization opportunities at massive scale with the 250 largest companies in the world representing 24 % of world revenues and 26 % of World GHGs. Finally, working with coalitions of energy companies, and Nalin, you’ll hear, and we’ll hear from later on, and we’re deeply partnered with Nalin. on this and others on this. How can we take this into accelerating? For example, UNESA has 71 energy companies, 750 gigawatts of clean power.

They want to go to 1 ,500 gigawatts of clean power by the end of the decade. How can we help them with AI? It’s a very practical lens. We invite you to join us and be part of this. On that note, I would like to briefly to invite to introduce Professor David Sandlow. David, I’m not going to go through your very distinguished background to take the whole panel to do that, except to say that you have worked in every different field, most importantly in the past in very senior positions in government, but now, of course, you’ve been the luminary on AI solutions on climate. That is the worst introduction you’ve ever got. I’m sorry about that, just in the interest of time, but I’m…

Really very honored that you’ve flown all the way to come here, and I’m handing them over to you. to you.

David Sandalow

Thank you so much. Uday. Uday, thank you. Your energy, your enthusiasm, your passion, they’re all infectious. And your intellect is remarkable. What you’re driving forward in this area is world changing. You are not just an inspiration, you’re a gravitational force that are pulling people together to work on this, so thank you so much. Your, what you did in London was remarkable. What you’re doing here is incredible and I’m looking forward to being part of what you’re doing in the future. So I’ve, it’s been my privilege to lead some teams that have been working on these issues over the course of the past couple of years and I’m going to talk about one of the projects that we’ve done.

It looks like the slides are not there. There’s a certain, turning on the screen. There it goes. I will say that while we wait, I’ll say that I really like the metaphor that you had, Uday, about two hockey sticks. And this is just a remarkable convergence of two of the most important trends that are happening in human history right now. One of them is, alas, the increase in greenhouse gas emissions, which is happening at such an astonishing pace. But the second is the exponential growth of the capacities of artificial intelligence. What’s driving me is we need to find a way to make sure that that second trend, artificial intelligence, helps to solve the first problem.

And that’s the study that we did, which we brought together a team of 25 experts. Just wonderful people. One of them was . Song Lee, the head of the IP, last head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and some top experts. And the question we asked was, it was very simple, how do you use artificial intelligence to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? There it is. It came up on the screen. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. And so it’s a very simple question. How do you use AI to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases? We came up with 17 chapters. We wanted to do more than just provide analysis. We wanted to provide actionable ideas for what to do.

So every chapter has recommendations. You can find a print version available on Amazon, and free downloads of the entire volume, including chapter -by -chapter versions, are available at these websites. I want to thank the government of Japan, including NITO and MEDI, for supporting this work. They’ve been very important supporters of work on AI and clean energy more broadly. Oh, I’m going to promote my podcast later. But I have a podcast that’s talking about this topic as well. But so here’s our – Here’s our – Here’s the table of contents for our work. We talked – We have introductions to both AI and climate change in this volume. One of the things we’re trying to do is target this both to experts and to people who are beginners in this topic.

And, you know, Uday talked about bringing together different communities. One of our basic conclusions was we need to bring together experts in climate change and experts in AI. And there are a lot of people who know a lot about climate change but don’t know a lot about AI. A lot of people who know a lot about AI, they don’t know about climate change. So we decided to have primers on each of those topics. And then we talk about eight different sectors and a number of cross -cutting topics. So we have five key takeaways. This was an interesting exercise with all of our authors taking 300 pages and trying to distill it into five key takeaways. But here’s what we came up with.

The first one, I mean, this is a kind of bottom line, but it’s important. AI does have significant potential to contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. And we categorized it with two categories. One is climate change. It’s incremental gains such as just improving efficiency. It’s output itself. And then we have the other category, which is the environmental impact. solar farms, building energy efficiency. There are lots of incremental gains that can be made, but also transformational gains. In particular, new tech, new materials and other things. We looked at whether greenhouse gas emissions are causing increases in, or greenhouse gas emissions are increasing as a result of computing operations. We decided, based on the available evidence, that the best estimate is less than 1 percent and maybe much less than 1 percent of greenhouse gas emissions are currently coming from AI.

That tracks with the Grantham study that Uday talked about. That tracks with what the IEA has said as well. The main barriers to AI’s impact in reducing greenhouse gas emissions are a lack of data and a lack of trained personnel. There’s other barriers as well, but obviously you need data. A lot of places we don’t have the data for this purpose and you need people. Trust is essential. People aren’t going to use AI unless they trust it. And then every organization with a role in climate change mitigation should consider opportunities for AI. And we need AI to contribute to its work. I think as AI grows in the public… consciousness at summits like this that’s becoming less and less of a kind of radical recommendation.

But it’s just so important. I think if you’re working in climate mitigation, you need to have a team dedicated to AI and how AI can help. So I’ll just run through quickly because we only have a little bit of time, some of our chapters. We have a chapter on the introduction to AI, and if you’re a climate person that doesn’t know a lot about AI, this might be helpful to you. And one of the things we did is we broke down AI capabilities into four basic categories at a very high level. The first thing AI can do is detect patterns. And how can that be helpful in climate change mitigation? Well, one example is detecting methane emissions from satellite data.

You know, some of you probably know this, but I mean, we know much, much more today than we did 10 years ago about methane emissions. And that has helped us dramatically to begin to reduce methane emissions. That’s entirely dependent upon the optical sensing process. And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. So, you know, we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. So, you know, we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. So, you know, we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years.

And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. impact so far. AI can also predict, such as weather patterns at solar and wind farms. It can optimize, such as power flows on transmission lines. And it can simulate, such as battery chemistry action. So I think for me, in fact, I’m teaching a course at Columbia right now where we’re emphasizing this framework of detecting, predicting, optimizing, and simulating. And those are, broadly speaking, the capabilities that AI brings to the table. A lot to say about climate change, but just for those who aren’t paying attention, atmospheric concentrations of heat -trapping gases are now higher than any time in human history. In fact, higher than any time in the past three million years.

And July 22nd, 2024, was the warmest day ever recorded. 2024 was the warmest year ever recorded by far. And the warmest 11 years ever recorded were in the last 11 years. So we are living in an era of climate change. We do deep dives into a number of different sectors. I’m just going to talk about a few of them. Power sector is… is maybe the most important just because it’s already 28 % of greenhouse gas emissions, and our strategy for reaching decarbonization requires us to electrify lots of things. So we need to grow the power sector and decarbonize the sector at the same time. I don’t think we’re going to be able to do that without AI tools. AI is already helping decarbonize the power sector, optimizing location of generation transmission, increasing output at solar farms, but it can do much more.

Dynamic line rating is optimal power flow analyses. But to do this, we need standardized data. We need trained personnel. The utility business model is a challenge. So this is a really important area that requires a lot of attention and work. Oh, and a final point, the last bullet on this slide. Using AI in real -time operations can cause real security and safety risks. So we need to be very careful about generative AI in context. So even as we look to deploy AI to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we need to be very attentive to these risks. risks. I kind of find it amazing how few people pay attention sometimes to food systems and climate change, that 30 percent or more of greenhouse gases are in some way related to the food system, and the food system has, is threatened by climate change.

AI can do a lot to improve both mitigation and resilience in the food system. We just, there’s a few examples here, integrating data from soil sensors to create fertilizer management plans, creating virtual farms. There’s lots of things that can be done here. But coming back to this issue of lack of data, it’s a huge problem, especially in the Global South. So the efforts to build up a digital public infrastructure that are happening here in India are so important in this regard. I’m going to go quickly here. We look at buildings where there’s tremendous potential. I think materials innovation is one of the most important areas. And, you know, 150 years ago, when Thomas Edison invented the modern light bulb, he literally spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, running electricity through dozens, I think hundreds of different filaments to figure out how much light and heat would be produced.

So today, we can simulate a million of those interactions in a second. And there’s already tremendous advances in the pace of innovation in battery chemistry and some other areas using AI tools. And for me, this is one of the most promising areas in terms of transformational gains in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Extreme weather response is extremely important from a resilient standpoint, and we don’t have a lot of time to get into it, but I think that the AI ML -enabled forecasting is transformational because it’s so much cheaper, for example. I mean, at really 1 ,000x the cost, 1 ,000x less the cost, we can run AI ML weather prediction tools and make a big difference on extreme weather response.

We have findings and recommendations throughout this report. You can see it here, again. We just did a new report in the same series on sustainable data centers. And our main message is there are that with this data center construction boom happening now, this is the time to be paying attention to data and sustainability. We are investing right now in multi -decade assets. We need to be paying attention to this. Smart siting is a key. And finally, here’s a plug for my podcast. It started about a year ago. I’ve had some great guests, Jensen Huang, Dami Lola, Ogunbi, the head of sustainable energy, for all Jennifer Granholm, the U .S. Energy Secretary under Biden. Listen, as they say, available on all major podcast platforms.

Uday, once again, thank

Uday Khemka

I feel horrified we’ve got speakers of this caliber and so little time. So thank you so much for your leadership. May I invite both of you to speak? You can speak from here if you prefer. We’ve got two great leaders from Google. Obviously, you know, in the sphere. of corporate AI leadership on climate, there is no one that parallels all of you and we look forward to hearing from you your thoughts. Thank you.

Vrushali Gaud

Thank you very much for hosting this. I don’t know if that’s a privilege or that’s pressure when you start with that sentence about the leadership position Google has. I just want a quick question. Raise of hands, how many of you have used Google today for either maps or searching something? Thank you. So you know who we are. This is my car. I’m Vrushali Gaud. I’ll introduce myself and then Spencer you can answer that. I lead Google’s in a nutshell decarbonization water and circularity strategy for the company. Essentially what that means is I’m responsible for quite a few things that you had in your slide that we should be doing and a good way to introduce myself is also I like getting things done and so I feel like my inner calling around this is we’ve had a lot of conversations we’ve had a lot of playbooks and research and things But it’s almost like, how do you act on it?

How do you execute on it? How do you start delivering the outcome that I think we all are looking for? So that’s the kind of space that I come from. And a privilege to be at Google, who allows us to kind of expand that space. So the reason I asked you all to show your hands, most of you know Google as a search or map and similar pieces, information source. One of the other things Google is now, I think, as a company, is a full -stack company. And when I say full -stack, that means the search and the information is a top layer of it. But underneath that sits the entire physical infrastructure that drives that.

And so that’s data centers. That’s the way you operate that. That’s the networks that feed into all of the applications. And so when we look at climate, and my title actually is Global Director of Climate Operations. So I say that out of humility because when we look at climate, we’re trying to put it across our operations the best we can. Thank you. So we, and good examples of that, I’ll start with data centers. The big topic right now, how do we operationalize them? Where do we cite them? The location, what impact it has on the community, what impact it has on the infrastructure there. Citing is a big part of it. Access to clean energy is something we’re looking at, and pretty much we have a carbon -free energy goal.

So I think for us, if you look at climate, a big portion of climate is emissions. How do we impact emissions? It’s from electricity. What do we do with electricity? Shift to clean energy. Or renewables. And so that’s the spectrum that we look at. And so a lot of our investments are in carbon -free energy and how we think about it. And it also is more not just take from the grid or expect the government or, you know, sort of the infrastructure to get you there, but how do we invest and bring more clean energy to the grid? I think that’s a big piece of, I think, what companies can do at the speed at which we are all moving is, how do we take these sort of bigger picture systems problems and embrace them and solve them?

So one is big, one is small. is generation of clean electricity, and the other is grid, and how do you solve the grid problems? So that’s the infrastructure of AI. Then using AI, I think that’s going to some of the other things, Professor, you were saying is, we look at how we could use AI to drive our operations more efficiently. It’s very boring pieces. It’s not really shiny superstar things, but a lot of the impact comes just in general. I look at water taps, and I remember the amount of leakages we have on water taps, the amount of electricity wires that are not connected, just the inefficient use of resources is a big one, and how can we use AI to sort of optimize, whether it’s optimizing within the use of our chips, optimizing the grid, optimizing which applications run from where.

That’s a big part of our strategy. And then the third piece is, what do you use AI, and how do you use it for climate? Now, clearly, our business is information and search, but which means we also have access to a lot of data. And so one of the ways we consider, as what you can do in AI is, how do you use these large data sets? A, find a way to open source them, encourage different use of them, but also incubate certain initiatives that can help to show the light to others. So Earth AI is a big one in which we you’ve got satellite images, you’ve got weather data, you’ve got all of these big chunks of information that we can put out there.

And then there’s an application layer, which I think is of interest to you in terms of resiliency or mitigation. So one of the things, you know, which you probably haven’t heard of as much is Flood Hub. So we have a lot of information put out there as to flood risks of different region, which then other companies can use for whatever products they’re launching, whether it’s insurance, whether it’s real estate, fire sat, wildfire risks. How do you do prediction around it? Something all utilities companies, especially from in California, where I’m based, is we’re very passionate about using that for prediction. I can go on about the list of sort of what data can be used and how it can be leveraged.

The thing I think I’m going to go back to the, you know, crux of what you had in this is. is we’re in the timeframe of two hockey sticks. One is the impact on emissions, and I completely appreciate that the tech companies, hyperscalers, data centers are at a scale contributing to it, which we want to obviously help mitigate or replace with clean electricity as much as we can. And then the other is, how do you use the innovation curve on this? And I think we’ve just scratched the surface. And there’s, of course, like, you know, there’ll be trials and errors, but the surface around how do we democratize data, how do we encourage innovation, and how do we scale it very quickly?

Because I think those are the three, the trifecta of how do you drive this change? And so one of the ways I’ll end with saying I’m super proud of what we’ve done this week, trying to bridge those two gaps is we’re working with the Principal Scientific Advisory of the Government of India to launch a Google Center of Climate Tech. We call it Climate Tech because it does, those are the two hockey sticks that you’re trying to get in, right? The tech scale and the climate impact. and we are our goal is to encourage academic research but research that is actionable so five pilots first of all kinds and how you can scale um and there’s a lot of uh you know focus already on electricity so we are trying to do the non -electricity pieces in that which is around low carbon steel low carbon materials built environments um low carbon sustainable aviation fuel and then the biggest one we don’t talk we talk about what i think is a big lever across everything is green skills you need to embed this sort of a thinking which is green climate first across every domain and how can we encourage that in in india and especially the tier two cities so super excited about those two hockey sticks and how we’ve as a company can bridge those gaps

Spencer Low

Intensity of what is produced in this part of the world actually is really important globally. But what’s really distinctive about APAC is actually the third major topic, which is livelihoods. As I mentioned, this is the part of the world which has a lot of developmental ambitions, and livelihoods are key. So my colleague touched on, Vushali touched on Chapter 3, power systems. Actually, I would like to touch on agriculture and food systems, which is your Chapter 4. So agriculture and other land use is actually the largest employment sector in the Asia -Pacific. I mean, I believe in India it’s about 46 % of jobs. And for the region, it’s the largest sector, about the same as the next two sectors added together, which are actually manufacturing and wholesale and retail trade.

Add those together, you get the same number of jobs as in agriculture. Now, over 80%. 80 % of farms around the world, and especially in India and the rest of the global south, are smallholder farms. farmers. And that creates an issue because a lot of the technology for agriculture is developed for large commercial farms, satellite imagery, et cetera. So this is one example I’d just like to delve into in terms of what Google is doing to contribute to the data, the digital public goods that Rushali spoke of. So if you want to use satellite imagery and actually understand agriculture so you can do things with it, you need to find the boundaries of your individual farms. That’s your individual unit and often less than two hectares, if not smaller.

And so you can do that with people poring over maps or satellite imagery, but that’s not scalable. But this is a really interesting problem for AI. And so for those of you who’d like to know more about this, there’s actually an exhibit at the Expo at the Google Pavilion. But this is what we call agricultural landscape understanding and agricultural monitoring and event detection. So we’ve trained AI to actually digitally enhance the environment. The field boundary. and you can say, well, that’s interesting because you can zoom into India and look at the Indo -Gangetic plain and see all the field boundaries. We’ve also trained the model to distinguish what crops are being grown through multispectral imagery.

And with that, we can detect events like tillage, sowing, harvest, et cetera. And all this data is now available. It is part of the Krishi DSS. So it’s contributing to the digital public infrastructure of the Indian government through the Ministry of Agriculture, through state governments, for example, like that of Telangana and the ADEX system. And what this does is it allows NGOs, government bodies, et cetera, to actually give advice to farmers because you now understand what’s going on on the ground, which is a critical driver for mitigation benefits, but also adaptation as actually the planting and the growing of crops. So we’re seeing best practices for planting. and what to plant is actually changing over time with climate change.

So do find out more at the pavilion. But one thing that I like to double -click on, as we say, is actually the innovation part of it. This digital public infrastructure is only helpful if it can be really used. And it’s not just governments and NGOs. It’s also startups. They’re innovating and finding new ways of using this information. So companies like Carbon Farm, they’re in France. They’re using this data. Varaha, which is a social startup, entrepreneurship. But also, Wadwani AI is another startup that we are supporting as well in terms of driving innovation in the agricultural space. So this is really all going to be accelerated through the use of AI, and we’re very excited to contribute to that.

Thanks.

Uday Khemka

Wonderful. You can see – I’m going to just grab one of these. Thank you. So, hello. Yeah, you can see that Google represents the convergence of the two themes we were talking about. And I think you have a wonderful web. At least I’ve seen access to materials about your sustainability strategy online. So if people want to know more, I’m sure they can go there.

Vrushali Gaud

Yeah, I’ll make a plug. Website, sustainabilitygoogle .com. It has all of our information. And the expo booth has all of our information. So thank you very, very much.

Uday Khemka

Now, we are inevitably vastly behind schedule as we are with climate change. However, we’re going to keep going with great focus. And we’re going to turn to the energy and power sector. Now, this is a bit embarrassing because we have to do a little bit of a switchover of people. But we don’t have time to put up the new names here. So we’re just going to announce them and listen with great attention. So we have two fantastic speakers from the energy sector, which, as you know, is one, if not the most important sector. Do you want to come closer, Nalim? And we can just be together here. I would ask, obviously the decarbonization of the energy sector is absolutely critical without that nothing happens so I’m going to hand over straight away first to you if I may Nalin, to set the stage a little bit and what you’re trying to do with Climate Collective and UNESA and then Dan more specifically to what you’re up to so over to both of you and obviously introduce yourself sorry I haven’t done it for you

Nalin Agarwal

no, thank you I understand we are short on time so I’ll keep very brief I’m Nalin Agarwal, one of the founding partners of the Climate Collective I think we’ll have the slides up soon great, so today I’m just going to talk about very quickly a program that we’ve been running for 6 years and where we partnered with Graylon to really drive decarbonization and grid modernization starting with India but across the global south so if I can move on who’s operating that? let me go there to you I’ll do it. Okay, just quick snapshots. We are an ESO enterprise support organization, largest in the global south, about 1 ,500 startups supported. Key partnerships, UNESA is a key one. I don’t want to spend too much time here, but that’s what we’re going to spend some time on as well.

We do a lot of work in AI, in power but beyond. So next week we’re doing the Delhi Climate Innovation Week. In fact, Google is a sponsor and partner there, and of course, Grail is as well. But happy to chat about this later. Here’s what we’re trying to do. I think what’s happening is that a lot of the challenges on renewables are being solved. They will be solved. I think one of the increasing recognitions is that the grid is a key bottleneck now, and we need to really work on grid transformation. That includes both decarbonization and modernization. So that’s what we’re working towards. So we work with utilities. There’s about 22 of those that we’ve worked with so far.

Work on a problem statement approach. Get startups to apply. Select startups. Get them to create business cases and pilot plans and eventually lead to pilots, right? So there’s 22 utilities that have participated and have led to about 20 pilots, a subset of which have become large deployments, right? So it’s a very unique program in the global south, actually. It’s the only one, right? High conversion ratio, so about 30 % of the pilots that have been proposed have come in. Key partners, I mean, 22 utilities and all the people that are working in power sector reform are part of this program. I mean, again, I won’t spend too much time, but there’s a lot of this information available online. All the startups that are vetted, ready to deploy, are available for utilities to engage with.

we have a bunch of case studies also but the key point is this we are now developing this along with Grail into a global AI for power innovation platform which has three components the open innovation program which is electron wipe on the top there is the knowledge hub which is basically a peer sharing platform where we do convenings co -located at COPS at climate weeks etc and then there is an online solution database of pre -wetted solutions. I’ll stop there and hand it over to Dan

Dan Travers

Thanks. Thanks Nalan I’m going to stand up too because I like to stand up and talk so my name is Dan Travers I’m from Open Climate Fix we are a startup doing AI for grid. I’m going to dive a little bit into the grid area which has been talked about a bit in order to get to net zero we need to electrify we need to green the grid and we need to electrify everything the grid of the past had Usually in each country there was tens of generators and the grid operator would know those people on a first -name basis and they would ring them up and tell them when to turn up and down.

We’ve now got millions of generators with solar panels, wind turbines everywhere. The grid of the past had variability from just demand. We’ve now got variability from demand and the wind speed and the clouds, right, so three sources of variability. The grid of the past had a normal demand that we understood well. We’ve now got data centres, we’ve got EVs, we’ve got batteries, we’ve got AC, so the demand is changing shape incredibly. How are you possibly going to address this balancing of this grid with a bunch of people in a room, right? You need AI solutions. You need a highly digital grid. You need something which can schedule and marshal all of these assets in a digital at sort of AI speed.

So… That’s really important. And why is it important… It’s important because if we don’t do it, we’ll have blackouts, and if we don’t do it, we’ll have costs increasing because the way that grid operators are currently dealing with this challenge is they’re actually scheduling a lot of backup generation. It’s usually gas -fired generation. It’s very expensive, so bills are going up. And if you look around what’s happening now, there’s a push back against the green revolution. If we don’t address these problems, we’re going to have a democratic pushback, and we will have a reversal. So AI solutions can really help us in fighting the battle for hearts and minds as well as the actual physical battle.

So myself, I came from sort of banking tech space. Jack, my co -founder, came from Google DeepMind, who the name keeps coming up. We both saw there was a big gap between the amazing tech that was available in some of these industries and grid operators and the electricity industry, which is by nature very risk -averse. It has to be worried about things failing all the time. So we saw the gap between those two, and we formed Open Climate Fix to really try and address that gap. to bridge that, to take sort of moonshot ideas and actually build a rocket ship that is going to fly to the moon and actually implement something and give data to researchers.

The company’s non -profit, we’re open source, and that’s about the scaling, which I think is a key part of the title of this talk. So we’ve built the best solar forecast in the UK, we think, by about 20 % or 30%, like quite a long way. We now want to take that, we are starting to take that to India. We’re working with Adani, we’re working with Rajasthan Grid Operator, and with a combination of open source plus commercial sort of expansion, we see the AI tools as super transferable across grids. So I’m really excited that we can take tools from one grid and apply them to all the grids in the world and use AI to solve climate change.

Thank you.

Uday Khemka

Thank you so much. You can imagine if we had more time, we would have had a panel on the built environment, a panel on industrial decarbon, a panel on transportation. We don’t have the time. But thank you for that fantastic presentation. A couple of interventions. Now we turn to the last segment. We have three very distinguished institutions with us, all involved at the strategic level. with Grail and with this process. And I’ll start, Ankur, with you at McKinsey, who have been close partners.

Ankur Puri

Thanks a lot. Another race against time. So what would I like to… I should say that Sean went out of the room and negotiated five minutes more for us in the room. So… Okay. So, while the slides come up, it’s firstly a privilege to be here. And thank you for the opportunity for McKinsey to be part of the journey that you are leading, Uday. And thank you all for being here and shaping this in your own special way, at your own scale. I’m Ankur. I’m a partner based out of our India office. I lead Quantum Black in India, which is our AI team. And I work across sectors, because that’s really… a lot of fun.

And part of my work has been in energy. Part of my work has been in the built environment. Thank you. but I’m representing the team which is quite global that has had the privilege to work with the GRAIL effort. So I’d like to just talk about how this little effort with us is shaping the larger movement that GRAIL represents. So everybody’s talking about the impact of AI, so I’m not going to talk more about that, but the promise of AI, let’s just be clear. I think the way large global efforts have sort of found shape is to focus around a few challenges. So one of the big pieces that the GRAIL work has been about is shaping these four challenges and articulating them.

They’re about operational improvement in our current way of working. Big consulting words, strategic intelligence and foresight, basically better planning. Okay, build things better. Transformation, innovation. So can we do new things that don’t exist? That will help the future. And the last one is autonomous operations, which is essentially do you do current operations in a very different way? Use drones instead of people to go see how the wiring is in a large electric plant. and create more impact. Several of the examples you heard about will fit into this across energy -built environment materials and this can keep expanding food systems perhaps. Now, there’s a huge amount of work going on in just collecting the knowledge on each of those challenges.

Then you think about those fields of play, the energy -built environment. Within that, there are stakeholders. So for each stakeholder, what’s relevant? And then for each stakeholder, let’s say if you talk about system operators here as an example, there’s network planning is a domain to think about. Asset management is a domain to think about. Delivery is a domain to think about. Field force execution. Think of this as you’re now bringing in the language of the industry into this knowledge base so that if someone manages a power plant, they’ll be like, okay, what’s my library of things I need to look at? Tomorrow, that can then connect it to people who are innovating or providing these solutions.

One important gap in the middle is, okay, how valuable is it? each of these ideas when it comes to cost, when it comes to emissions. And the work’s not yet ready to be unveiled, but we are quite privileged to work with the Grail team and, of course, global experts to start to now quantify, both in terms of economic impact, but also in terms of direct emissions impact, what each of these applications could be worth. Because then our scarce resources and limited time can be focused on the most important problems. And I think that’s what’s coming up ahead, and I look forward to all of you pushing the boundary further, and it’s a privilege to be part of this.

Thank you.

Speaker 1

Okay, I will kick off. So as a metaphor for the climate, we’re drastically running out of time, and I can see a clock ticking down in front of me. So I’m Rob. I’m from University College London. 200 years ago, University College London was founded with a… a purpose to drive… change to be impactful and to create useful knowledge. That’s really important for the climate because we no longer have the ability to let knowledge sit on the shelf when it comes to climate. So in 2026 at UCL, the way that we bring our community together is through what we call the Grand Challenges. These are a self -funded, cross -university way of tackling problems that are too complex for any one discipline.

Climate crisis at UCL sits alongside challenges like mental health and well -being and data -empowered societies, and they’re found in all 11 of UCL’s faculties, from engineering to health and arts and humanities. So where does AI come into this? Well, AI at UCL is not seen as a single discipline, but as an enabling layer embedded across the entire institution. It builds on our heritage in AI. We’ve got three Nobel Prizes, we’re the birthplace of Google DeepMind, we’ve got several Nobel Prizes, we’ve got the Nobel Prize for the companies all at unicorn valuations. Four quick examples at UCL at the moment. Starting at home we use our own campus as a living lab we’ve got sensor data from across our estate that forecasts energy demand and detects unusual patterns across UCL’s buildings and we turn that into insights for practical intervention.

Second example we’ve got our spin -out Carbon Re which uses deep reinforcement learning and digital twin optimization to cut fuel use and emissions in energy intensive processes like cement production. Third example is a partnership UCL Center for sustainability and real tech innovation is created in partnership with PGM real estate it links computer science to the built environment and accelerates AI enabled sustainability in the real estate it drives impact on the environment but also value for the real estate investors. And then we’ve got our digital innovation center which uses deep reinforcement learning and digital twin optimization to cut fuel use and emissions in energy intensive processes like cement production. Third example is a partnership UCL’s center for sustainability and real tech innovation is created in partnership with PGM real estate it links computer science to the built environment and accelerates AI enabled sustainability in the real estate it drives impact on the environment but also value for the real estate investors.

And fourth UCL Grand Challenges has supported an inclusive and AI tool that transforms satellite and drone imagery into accessible web -based sea ice classification that’s being used to support safer travel for Inuit communities. Aviation is another frontier for us. It’s a grand challenge in its own right. And in there, we are looking at short -term and long -term interventions. AI is used to create short -term interventions that drive down its impact on the climate, while engineering is undertaking long -term technology transform in electrification and hydrogen propulsion. And finally, for UCL, convening really matters. In April 2025, as Uday mentioned, UCL, along with GRAIL, hosted our International Summit on AI Solutions for Climate Change, exploring sectors like energy and the built environment, and moving from discussions and pilots to deployment and impact.

I’ll finish with a quick call to action, which is that the grand challenges created by the U .S. government have been the greatest challenge for us. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past.

We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of

Adam Sobey

Cheers, and we’re properly into Alex Ferguson overtime now. So hopefully not with the climate change, so I’ll try and leave a little bit of time for Uday. So I’m Adam Sobey, I’m from the Alan Turing Institute. This is the UK’s National AI Institute. We focus on five missions across environment, which is focused on environmental forecasting and climate change, on sustainability, on defence and security, on health, and on foundational research. And as the Director for Sustainability, obviously I think that’s the most important mission, and that’s why I’m here. But we believe that the time for action is now. is literally on fire. We saw fires in the US which have been linked heavily to climate change.

We are seeing droughts in India which is affecting the food and people’s lives. We’re seeing pollution in Southeast Asia which is affecting health. We cannot wait for new fuels for the energy transition to occur. We need to do something immediately starting today. And we believe that AI can play that role. We know this because we’ve, as a part of our institute, have applied AI and data science to shipping and reduced emissions by 18%. We have done this in buildings where we’ve improved HVAC optimisation to reduce emissions by 42%. And we’ve created an underground urban farm that works entirely off renewable energies in the UK, allowing us to grow crops without using any CO2. However, I think we’ve done some relatively impressive things for a relatively small institute.

We’ve done some really impressive things for a relatively small institute. We can’t do this alone. we realised that this is a global problem and the Sustainability Missions chief funder is Lloyd’s Register Foundation which is a global charity heavily focused on the global south and so we think that it’s really important that we work together both within the UK and outside of the UK to solve these problems and that’s why we’re really pleased to be part of Braille to look for global solutions to global problems so thank you very much

Uday Khemka

It’s a tribute to all our speakers that they managed to put extraordinary quality into this ridiculously short time frame. I’ll just end on three words. One word is that we have come through our work together to find hundreds of examples of opportunities where businesses for example can save money or increase revenues, improve their economic value while at the same time massively improving their emissions profiles on the mitigation side. On the adaptation side… to your points. There are many examples from Google to all of your institutions where these technologies are already being deployed to save lives at a big scale. And the last point I’d make, apart from I’d ask you to thank our speakers with a big round of applause, is first to say that again and again you’ve heard one theme coming out of this group, which is radical collaboration.

Work with us to make the difference that we all believe and know can be made through the application of AI solutions to climate change. So maybe we could give our speakers a round of applause. Thank you very, very much.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (28)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (4)
Confirmedhigh

“The session was not a real panel; there would be no discussion, just rapid “boom‑boom‑boom” updates.”

The knowledge base explicitly states the format was not a real panel and would consist of quick updates without discussion [S8].

Additional Contextmedium

“Uday Khemka framed a “triple challenge” of development, a sustainable planet, and climate‑change mitigation and adaptation.”

Multiple UN General Assembly sources note that speakers emphasized the intertwined importance of climate action, sustainable development, and addressing inequalities, providing broader context for the “triple challenge” framing [S87] and [S89].

Additional Contextmedium

“AI can detect patterns, predict outcomes, optimise processes, and simulate systems to aid climate action.”

The knowledge base highlights AI’s role in optimizing electricity supply and demand, reducing energy waste, and supporting climate-related decision-making, which aligns with the described AI functions [S24].

Additional Contextmedium

“AI emissions are less than 1 % of total greenhouse‑gas emissions and AI‑driven solutions could achieve multi‑gigaton CO₂e reductions.”

Other sources indicate AI could help mitigate 5-10 % of global GHG emissions by 2030 and note rising energy demand from AI models, adding nuance to the emission share and potential impact figures [S97] and [S98].

External Sources (98)
S1
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — – David Sandalow- Spencer Low – Uday Khemka- David Sandalow- Vrushali Gaud- Spencer Low- Adam Sobey- Dan Travers
S2
The reality of science fiction: Behind the scenes of race and technology — ‘Every desireis an endand every endis a desirethenthe end of the worldis a desire of the worldwhat type of end do you de…
S3
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — – David Sandalow- Dan Travers- Nalin Agarwal – David Sandalow- Spencer Low – Uday Khemka- David Sandalow- Adam Sobey …
S4
Keynote-Martin Schroeter — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not specified, Area of expertise: Not specified (appears to be an event moderator or host introd…
S5
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning — -Speaker 1: Role/title not specified – appears to be a student or child participant in educational videos/demonstrations…
S6
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups &amp; Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vijay Shekar Sharma Paytm — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not mentioned, Area of expertise: Not mentioned (appears to be an event host or moderator introd…
S7
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — -Vrushali Gaud- Global Director of Climate Operations at Google, leads Google’s decarbonization, water and circularity s…
S8
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — And so that’s data centers. That’s the way you operate that. That’s the networks that feed into all of the applications….
S9
The Innovation Beneath AI: The US-India Partnership powering the AI Era — -Vrushali Gaud- Global Director of Climate Operations at Google
S10
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — Cheers, and we’re properly into Alex Ferguson overtime now. So hopefully not with the climate change, so I’ll try and le…
S11
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — Cheers, and we’re properly into Alex Ferguson overtime now. So hopefully not with the climate change, so I’ll try and le…
S12
AI for Good Impact Awards — – **Dan Travers** – Representative from Open Climate Fix
S13
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — So myself, I came from sort of banking tech space. Jack, my co -founder, came from Google DeepMind, who the name keeps c…
S14
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — Power and Energy Systems: Dan Travers provided compelling insights into grid transformation challenges, explaining how t…
S15
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — – Nalin Agarwal- Ankur Puri
S16
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — And part of my work has been in energy. Part of my work has been in the built environment. Thank you. but I’m representi…
S17
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — -Ankur Vora- Chief Strategy Officer and President of the Africa and India Office at the Gates Foundation -Co-Moderator-…
S18
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — -Uday Khemka- Moderator/Host, involved with the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL) organization
S19
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — -Nalin Agarwal- Founding partner of Climate Collective, works with UNESA (utilities association), focuses on enterprise …
S20
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — I don’t want to spend too much time here, but that’s what we’re going to spend some time on as well. We do a lot of work…
S21
Open Forum #27 Make Your AI Greener a Workshop on Sustainable AI Solutions — Legal and regulatory | Sustainable development | Development Reports consistently identify governance of artificial int…
S22
Survival Tech Harnessing AI to Manage Global Climate Extremes — Low to moderate disagreement level with high convergence on goals but some divergence on methods. The implications are p…
S23
AI and Data Driving India’s Energy Transformation for Climate Solutions — Coming to the electric vehicles also, in mobility transition, the similar challenges are aired. In ISD, we have a separa…
S24
Climate change and Technology implementation | IGF 2023 WS #570 — One argument suggests that the internet and technology can enable innovative solutions by using artificial intelligence …
S25
Green AI and the battle between progress and sustainability — AI is increasingly recognised for its transformative potential and growing environmental footprint across industries. Th…
S26
Workshop 6: Perception of AI Tools in Business Operations: Building Trustworthy and Rights-Respecting Technologies — The discussion revealed a striking acceleration in AI adoption across business sectors, with usage rates increasing from…
S27
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services — Human adoption challenges center on fear of replacement, communication gaps, and the need for quality-focused rather tha…
S28
Public-Private Partnerships in Online Content Moderation | IGF 2023 Open Forum #95 — In addition to public-private partnerships, the analysis emphasizes the need for collaboration among the data, tech, and…
S29
Navigating the Double-Edged Sword: ICT’s and AI’s Impact on Energy Consumption, GHG Emissions, and Environmental Sustainability — Antonia Gawel:I mean, I think very much a focus on decarbonization of the power sector is a critical input and a signifi…
S30
ICT and green skills crucial for EU’s climate targets and green economy transition, stakeholders say — Industry representatives and policymakersemphasised that the ICT sector and green digital skills are crucial for the Eur…
S31
Parallel Session A9: Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience-Building and DRR for Ports (continued) — In summary, the refined overview elevates the dialogue surrounding climate and disaster resilience, portraying an insigh…
S32
Green and digital transitions: towards a sustainable future | IGF 2023 WS #147 — Professor Liu shared insights on the key challenges faced by governments in driving sustainable development, emphasising…
S33
GC3B: Mainstreaming cyber resilience and development agenda | IGF 2023 Open Forum #72 — Another noteworthy observation was the importance of collaboration among countries. By working together and sharing thei…
S34
WS #466 AI at a Crossroads Between Sovereignty and Sustainability — Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva: Yeah, thank you very much, José Renato, Alexandra, and also other colleagues in the panel. It…
S35
Google’s AI data centre in Saudi Arabia raises climate concerns — Google has announced plans to open a new AI-focused data centre in Saudi Arabia, aligning with Saudi Arabia’s Public Inv…
S36
AI energy demand accelerates while clean power lags — Data centres are driving asharp rise in electricity consumption, putting mounting pressure on power infrastructure that …
S37
Powering AI _ Global Leaders Session _ AI Impact Summit India Part 2 — The discussion acknowledged environmental and social challenges, including impacts from increased electricity generation…
S38
Open Forum #53 AI for Sustainable Development Country Insights and Strategies — Aubra Anthony: Yeah, thanks, Yuping. And, yeah, a very auspicious time, really. I mentioned earlier some of the issues t…
S39
Empowering the Ethical Supply Chain: steps to responsible sourcing and circular economy (Lenovo) — In conclusion, the analysis of the speakers’ perspectives on sustainability and responsible consumption reveals importan…
S40
Making Climate Tech Count — The discussion underscored the urgency of climate action while acknowledging the complexities of transforming global ene…
S41
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — “This is an invitation for radical action -oriented collaboration with all of you.”[1]. “It’s a call for collaboration.”…
S42
78th Session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA 78) — In hisvision statement, Francis affirms that multilateralism offers better chances of finding global consensus to tackle…
S43
Networking Session #50 AI and Environment: Sustainable Development | IGF 2023 — Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies have the potential to significantly contribute to creating greener cities and …
S44
Navigating the Double-Edged Sword: ICT’s and AI’s Impact on Energy Consumption, GHG Emissions, and Environmental Sustainability — Antonia Gawel:I mean, I think very much a focus on decarbonization of the power sector is a critical input and a signifi…
S45
MIT explores AI solutions to reduce emissions — Rapid growth in AI data centres israising global energy use and emissions, prompting MIT scientists to cut the carbon fo…
S46
AI Meets Cybersecurity Trust Governance &amp; Global Security — The main disagreements center on the role of regulation versus industry pressure, the urgency of action versus deliberat…
S47
How to make AI governance fit for purpose? — Legal and regulatory | Development The speed of AI development creates uncertainty and challenges that exceed current c…
S48
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — The collaborative approach involving multiple stakeholders allows solutions to be deployed with confidence across differ…
S49
AI and Data Driving India’s Energy Transformation for Climate Solutions — The expert panel discussion emphasized critical enabling conditions for scaling these solutions beyond pilot projects. K…
S50
AI for Safer Workplaces &amp; Smarter Industries Transforming Risk into Real-Time Intelligence — There was unexpected consensus that fear about AI is widespread across different age groups and demographics, but this f…
S51
UN warns AI poses risks without proper climate oversight — AI can help tackle the climate crisis, butgovernments must regulate itto ensure positive outcomes, says UN climate chief…
S52
AI climate benefits overstated says new civil society report — Environmental groups, including Beyond Fossil Fuels and Stand.earth,have publisheda report challenging claims that AI wi…
S53
Challenging the status quo of AI security — AI technology has two sides: it can enhance security measures and help improve existing security systems, but it also in…
S54
The Innovation Beneath AI: The US-India Partnership powering the AI Era — Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. this infrastructure right now and closing the gap between commitments and capacity. Thi…
S55
Google expands Earth AI for disaster response and environmental monitoring — The US tech giant, Google,has expandedaccess to Earth AI, a platform built on decades of geospatial modelling combined w…
S56
Climate change and Technology implementation | IGF 2023 WS #570 — One argument suggests that the internet and technology can enable innovative solutions by using artificial intelligence …
S57
Survival Tech Harnessing AI to Manage Global Climate Extremes — So if we define why we are creating models, what decision we are going to guide based on that data -to -decision framewo…
S58
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — The policy adopts a government‑led, ecosystem‑driven approach to foster AI solutions for agriculture across Maharashtra….
S59
All hands on deck to connect the next billions | IGF 2023 WS #198 — Additionally, Joe Welch affirms the value of a multilateral, multistakeholder approach. He emphasizes the need for colla…
S60
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — “Grail is an attempt to create… …to create a collaborative network.”[16]. “Going back into Grail, bottom left, the f…
S61
The Purpose of Science / DAVOS 2025 — Collaboration between academic institutions and industry can lead to innovative solutions
S62
Next-Gen Industrial Infrastructure / Davos 2025 — The discussion also touched on the challenges of sustainability, with emphasis on the need for green energy infrastructu…
S63
Parallel Session A9: Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience-Building and DRR for Ports (continued) — It suggests that resilience can only be achieved through collaborative efforts, an imperative for ensuring the sturdines…
S64
Open Forum #27 Make Your AI Greener a Workshop on Sustainable AI Solutions — Sustainable development | Infrastructure | Development The moderator emphasized the paradoxical nature of AI technology…
S65
Networking Session #50 AI and Environment: Sustainable Development | IGF 2023 — Artificial intelligence (AI) is improving the ways we live, work and solve problems. It can also help us fight climate c…
S66
(Interactive Dialogue 3) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session — Jonas Gahr Støre emphasizes the potential of AI and digital tools in addressing climate change. He argues that these tec…
S67
The Innovation Beneath AI: The US-India Partnership powering the AI Era — India Energy Stack implementation enabling peer-to-peer energy trading for data centers to source power from distributed…
S68
Google’s AI data centre in Saudi Arabia raises climate concerns — Google has announced plans to open a new AI-focused data centre in Saudi Arabia, aligning with Saudi Arabia’s Public Inv…
S69
AI and Data Driving India’s Energy Transformation for Climate Solutions — Two detailed case studies demonstrated practical applications of this approach. Arthur Global presented research on heat…
S70
Powering AI _ Global Leaders Session _ AI Impact Summit India Part 2 — . in five years in certain areas, and the households are feeling that pinch. There is an issue of reliability. Grids wer…
S71
Networking Session #60 Risk &amp; impact assessment of AI on human rights &amp; democracy — – David Leslie: Director of Ethics and Responsible Research Innovation at the Alan Turing Institute, Professor of Ethics…
S72
Upskilling for the AI era: Education’s next revolution — The tone is consistently optimistic, motivational, and action-oriented throughout. The speaker maintains an enthusiastic…
S73
Opening of the session — The tone was generally constructive and collaborative, with delegates emphasizing the need for cooperation and shared co…
S74
Friday Opening Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days — The overall tone was inspirational, hopeful and energetic. Speakers aimed to motivate and empower youth attendees while …
S75
Opening of the session — This comment provided crucial leadership by acknowledging the difficulty of the remaining negotiations while maintaining…
S76
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups &amp; Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Hemant Taneja General Catalyst — The tone is consistently optimistic, inspirational, and forward-looking throughout the speech. The speaker maintains an …
S77
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — The tone was notably optimistic yet pragmatic, described as representing “hope” rather than the “fear” that characterize…
S78
Session — The tone was primarily analytical and forward-looking, with the speaker presenting evidence-based predictions while ackn…
S79
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — The discussion maintained a consistently optimistic yet pragmatic tone throughout. Panelists were enthusiastic about AI’…
S80
Safe and Responsible AI at Scale Practical Pathways — The tone was collaborative and solution-oriented, with industry experts and government representatives working together …
S81
AI: Lifting All Boats / DAVOS 2025 — The tone was largely optimistic and solution-oriented, with speakers acknowledging challenges but focusing on opportunit…
S82
Parliamentary Closing Closing Remarks and Key Messages From the Parliamentary Track — The discussion maintained a collaborative and constructive tone throughout, characterized by diplomatic language and mut…
S83
Closing remarks – Charting the path forward — The tone throughout was consistently formal, diplomatic, and optimistic. It maintained a collaborative and forward-looki…
S84
Leaders TalkX: Partnership pivot: rethinking cooperation in the digital era — The discussion maintained a professional, collaborative, and forward-looking tone throughout. Despite the moderator’s ac…
S85
Building the Future STPI Global Partnerships &amp; Startup Felicitation 2026 — The tone was consistently optimistic, collaborative, and forward-looking throughout the session. It maintained a formal …
S86
Closing Ceremony — The discussion maintains a consistently positive and collaborative tone throughout, characterized by gratitude, celebrat…
S87
(Day 5) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: afternoon session — Several speakers stressed the importance of addressing climate change, achieving sustainable development goals, and prov…
S88
(Day 3) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: afternoon session — Several speakers emphasized the importance of addressing climate change, particularly through financial support for deve…
S89
Opening &amp; Plenary segment: Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 3rd plenary meeting, 79th session — – Importance of addressing climate change, sustainable development, and reducing inequalities
S90
(Day 1) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: afternoon session — Sadyr Zhaparov – Kyrgyzstan: Mr. Secretary General, Mr. President, distinguished heads of delegations, ladies and gentl…
S91
 Network Evolution: Challenges and Solutions  — Audience:Not really a question, but just a comment that this workshop is not well designed in terms of timing because th…
S92
(Plenary segment) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 5th plenary meeting, 79th session — Emomali Rahmon: Excellency Chairperson, Excellency Secretary-General, ladies and gentlemen, I’d like to first of all e…
S93
How to make digital transformation inclusive, responsible and sustainable (United Kingdom) — It aims to align with the wider global agenda, particularly the SDGs. It aims to align with the wider global agenda, pa…
S94
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — During the9821st meetingof the Artificial Intelligence Security Council, a key discussion centered around whether existi…
S95
Will science diplomacy survive? — Science in diplomacyis about using scientific evidence and advice for foreign policy decision-making. In these cases, so…
S96
Embracing AI for Good: Insights and practices — Development | Infrastructure First zero-carbon big data center in Qinghai Province powered by 100% clean energy, base s…
S97
Taking the pulse of the planet — Despite this, AI has the potential to be a formidable force in battling climate change. It can aid in mitigating between…
S98
Is AI the key to nuclear renaissance? — There is a direct correlation between the exponential increase in model parameters and the increase in the computational…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
U
Uday Khemka
3 arguments167 words per minute2437 words871 seconds
Argument 1
Triple‑challenge framing: development, climate, and AI must be tackled together (Uday Khemka)
EXPLANATION
Uday frames the discussion as a triple challenge that links development goals, climate mitigation and adaptation, and the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence. He argues that addressing these three pillars simultaneously is essential for meaningful progress.
EVIDENCE
Uday states that the panel’s “triple challenge … is perhaps the most important challenge any of us will face” and explains it involves “promote development on the one side while dealing with the creation of a sustainable planet and climate change” [11-14]. He also notes that the panel will address both mitigation and adaptation, underscoring the need for integrated action [16].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The triple-challenge framing aligns with reports that place AI governance, climate change and resource management (energy, water) together as top global challenges [S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Triple‑challenge framing
Argument 2
GRAIL network unites academia, industry, NGOs, governments and investors to accelerate AI‑driven climate projects (Uday Khemka)
EXPLANATION
Uday describes the GRAIL (Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network) as a collaborative platform that brings together diverse stakeholders to scale AI‑based climate solutions. The network aims to connect research, industry, philanthropy and policy to move ideas into implementation quickly.
EVIDENCE
He outlines GRAIL as “a collaborative network of great academic institutions, commercial institutions, AI companies, industrial companies, philanthropic institutions, private sector sustainability networks … bringing them all together with governments” and explains its structure of deal flow, funding and scaling on slides [64-68]. He also mentions the summit that gathered 200 people from 115 organizations, illustrating the network’s breadth [71-73].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Uday’s description of GRAIL aligns with the panel’s mention of collaborating with the GRAIL effort in Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
GRAIL collaborative network
AGREED WITH
Vrushali Gaud, Nalin Agarwal, Ankur Puri, Spencer Low
Argument 3
Time pressure on climate action demands rapid, radical collaboration and scaling of AI initiatives (Uday Khemka)
EXPLANATION
Uday repeatedly emphasizes the urgency of climate action, likening the limited time for the panel to the limited time we have to address climate change. He calls for radical, action‑oriented collaboration among all participants.
EVIDENCE
He notes “we have very little time in the panel … that’s a good metaphor for the very little time we have to do something about climate change” and later says “we are short on time … this is an invitation for radical action-oriented collaboration” [17-20][28-29].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Uday’s urgency mirrors the record-breaking heat observations and the pressing need for climate action highlighted in the Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI discussion [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Urgency and radical collaboration
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow, Adam Sobey
D
David Sandalow
3 arguments189 words per minute2021 words639 seconds
Argument 1
AI can deliver both incremental efficiency gains and transformational breakthroughs, with net climate benefit far outweighing its own emissions (< 1 %) (David Sandalow)
EXPLANATION
David argues that AI offers both small, incremental improvements and large, transformational advances that together provide a net positive climate impact. He stresses that the emissions from AI itself are negligible compared with the potential reductions it can enable.
EVIDENCE
He categorises AI impacts as “incremental gains such as improving efficiency” and “transformational gains … new tech, new materials” and cites that “less than 1 % of greenhouse gas emissions are currently coming from AI” which aligns with the Grantham study and IEA data [147-156].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
While David argues that AI’s net climate benefit exceeds its emissions, the Green AI report points out the substantial energy and carbon costs of large AI models, offering a contrasting perspective on AI’s environmental footprint [S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI’s net climate benefit
Argument 2
The AI‑Climate report provides a taxonomy and actionable recommendations, urging every climate organisation to create dedicated AI teams (David Sandalow)
EXPLANATION
David presents the AI‑Climate report as a practical guide that organises AI use‑cases into a taxonomy and supplies concrete recommendations. He calls on climate organisations to establish dedicated AI teams to implement these ideas.
EVIDENCE
He mentions that the report contains 17 chapters, each with recommendations, and that it includes primers on AI and climate to help both experts and beginners, urging organisations to “consider opportunities for AI” and to have a dedicated AI team [124-138].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑Climate report and AI teams
Argument 3
Critical gaps: lack of high‑quality data, skilled personnel and trust hinder AI adoption in climate work (David Sandalow)
EXPLANATION
David identifies three main barriers to effective AI deployment for climate: insufficient data, a shortage of trained experts, and a lack of trust in AI outputs. Overcoming these gaps is essential for scaling AI‑driven climate solutions.
EVIDENCE
He states that “the main barriers to AI’s impact … are a lack of data and a lack of trained personnel” and adds that “trust is essential. People aren’t going to use AI unless they trust it” [158-162].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The identified barriers mirror findings on skill shortages, governance gaps and data silos in AI adoption reported in workshops on AI tools [S26], organizational barriers and data silos [S27], and data gaps highlighted in public-private partnership discussions [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Barriers to AI adoption
AGREED WITH
Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low, Nalin Agarwal
V
Vrushali Gaud
4 arguments203 words per minute1354 words398 seconds
Argument 1
Deploying AI to optimise internal operations—energy use, water, grid routing—creates measurable emissions reductions (Vrushali Gaud)
EXPLANATION
Vrushali explains that Google applies AI to improve efficiency across its own operations, such as reducing water leaks, optimizing electricity use, and managing grid routing. These internal optimisations translate into tangible emissions cuts.
EVIDENCE
She describes using AI to “optimize … water taps, electricity wires that are not connected, optimizing the grid, optimizing which applications run from where” and notes that these efficiency gains are a major part of Google’s climate strategy [284-286].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven internal optimisation
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow, Dan Travers, Ankur Puri
Argument 2
Google’s Climate Tech Center in India and open‑source data assets (Earth AI, Flood Hub) foster public‑good AI research and deployment (Vrushali Gaud)
EXPLANATION
Vrushali highlights Google’s initiative to launch a Climate Tech Center in India, which will support academic research and open‑source data platforms like Earth AI and Flood Hub. These resources aim to democratise climate data and spur innovation.
EVIDENCE
She mentions “we’re working with the Principal Scientific Advisory of the Government of India to launch a Google Center of Climate Tech” and describes Earth AI (satellite images, weather data) and Flood Hub (flood risk information) as public data assets [303-304][290-295].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Climate Tech Center and open data
Argument 3
Data‑center decarbonisation, clean‑energy procurement and AI‑optimised resource use across Google’s operations (Vrushali Gaud)
EXPLANATION
Vrushali outlines Google’s strategy to decarbonise its data centres, secure carbon‑free electricity, and use AI to optimise resource consumption throughout the company’s infrastructure. This holistic approach targets emissions from both the physical and digital layers of Google’s business.
EVIDENCE
She discusses data-center emissions, the goal of “carbon-free energy”, and the need to “operationalise” data-center location, community impact and clean-energy procurement, noting that AI helps optimise chips, grid routing and resource use [260-277][284-286].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Google’s focus on data-center decarbonisation and AI-optimised resource use is echoed in discussions of data-center climate operations [S8] and the broader need for AI-driven power-sector decarbonisation [S29].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Google’s data‑center and operations strategy
Argument 4
Need for green skills development and inclusive training to embed climate‑first thinking across all domains (Vrushali Gaud)
EXPLANATION
Vrushali stresses the importance of building “green skills” so that climate considerations become integral to every sector, especially in emerging economies and tier‑two cities. Training and inclusive education are presented as essential levers for systemic change.
EVIDENCE
She says the goal is “to embed this sort of a thinking which is green climate first across every domain and how can we encourage that in India and especially the tier two cities” [303-305].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The emphasis on green skills matches calls for ICT-related green digital skills in the EU Green Deal [S30] and the identification of green skills as a key lever in Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Green skills and training
S
Spencer Low
3 arguments163 words per minute638 words234 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑driven detection, prediction, optimisation and simulation are essential for agriculture, food security and climate resilience (Spencer Low)
EXPLANATION
Spencer argues that AI’s core capabilities—detecting patterns, predicting outcomes, optimizing processes, and simulating scenarios—are crucial for improving agricultural productivity, ensuring food security, and enhancing climate resilience in the Asia‑Pacific region.
EVIDENCE
He explains that AI is used for “agricultural landscape understanding”, detecting field boundaries, classifying crops, and identifying events such as tillage or harvest, which feeds into digital public services for farmers and supports both mitigation and adaptation [322-328][329-332].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Spencer’s claim that AI detection and prediction are vital for agriculture is supported by examples of AI-driven environmental sensing for climate mitigation presented in the IGF workshop on technology implementation [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI capabilities for agriculture
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow, Adam Sobey
Argument 2
Building a digital public infrastructure for agriculture enables governments, NGOs and startups to deliver climate‑smart services (Spencer Low)
EXPLANATION
Spencer describes a digital public good that aggregates satellite and sensor data, making it accessible to governments, NGOs, and private innovators. This infrastructure underpins climate‑smart advisory services for smallholder farmers.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the data is part of “Krishi DSS”, shared with Indian ministries and state governments, allowing NGOs and startups to give advice to farmers and improve planting practices in response to climate change [329-332][333-338].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Digital public infrastructure for agriculture
AGREED WITH
Uday Khemka, Vrushali Gaud, Nalin Agarwal, Ankur Puri
Argument 3
AI for precise farm‑boundary mapping, crop classification and event detection to support smallholder farmers in Asia‑Pacific (Spencer Low)
EXPLANATION
Spencer details how AI models can automatically delineate individual farm plots, identify the crops grown, and detect key agricultural events, thereby scaling services that were previously manual and unscalable.
EVIDENCE
He describes training AI to “digitally enhance the environment … field boundary” and to distinguish crops via multispectral imagery, detecting tillage, sowing and harvest, with the outputs made available through public platforms [322-328].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑enabled farm mapping
D
Dan Travers
4 arguments192 words per minute614 words191 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑enabled grid forecasting and real‑time dispatch are vital to balance renewable generation and avoid costly backup generation (Dan Travers)
EXPLANATION
Dan emphasizes that modern grids, with millions of distributed generators, need AI‑driven forecasting and real‑time dispatch to manage variability from renewables and demand. Without such tools, reliance on expensive backup generation would increase.
EVIDENCE
He outlines the shift from a few generators to “millions of generators” and the resulting three sources of variability, stating that “you need AI solutions … to schedule and marshal all of these assets in a digital … AI speed” to avoid blackouts and rising costs [393-401].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The necessity of AI for real-time grid forecasting and dispatch aligns with the importance of AI in power-sector decarbonisation described in discussions of grid balancing [S29] and collaborative approaches noted in public-private partnership analyses [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for grid balancing
AGREED WITH
Vrushali Gaud, David Sandalow, Ankur Puri
Argument 2
Open Climate Fix offers open‑source grid‑forecasting tools and collaborates with commercial partners to spread solutions worldwide (Dan Travers)
EXPLANATION
Dan presents Open Climate Fix as an open‑source, non‑profit initiative that provides high‑accuracy solar forecasting tools, initially for the UK and now expanding to India, partnering with commercial entities to ensure scalability.
EVIDENCE
He states that they have built “the best solar forecast in the UK … by about 20-30 %” and are now taking it to India, working with Adani and Rajasthan Grid Operator, leveraging open-source and commercial expansion to transfer tools globally [416-420].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open‑source grid forecasting
Argument 3
Advanced solar‑forecasting models and open‑source tools that can be transferred across national grids (Dan Travers)
EXPLANATION
Dan highlights the portability of AI‑based solar forecasting models, asserting that tools developed for one grid can be adapted for others, accelerating global decarbonisation efforts.
EVIDENCE
He mentions the solar forecast’s performance improvement and the intention to deploy it in India, illustrating the cross-grid applicability of the technology [417-420].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Transferable solar forecasting
Argument 4
Real‑time AI deployment can introduce security and safety risks; careful governance of generative AI is needed (Dan Travers)
EXPLANATION
Dan warns that using AI in real‑time grid operations may create new security and safety vulnerabilities, especially with generative AI, and calls for stringent governance to mitigate these risks.
EVIDENCE
He notes that “using AI in real-time operations can cause real security and safety risks” and stresses the need for caution with generative AI in this context [206-208].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Concerns about security and safety risks of real-time AI echo the governance and risk considerations highlighted in workshops on AI tools and governance frameworks [S26] and the organizational barriers discussed in adoption-risk studies [S27].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI security and safety risks
A
Ankur Puri
4 arguments168 words per minute618 words219 seconds
Argument 1
Quantifying AI’s economic and emissions impact helps focus scarce resources on the highest‑value climate solutions (Ankur Puri)
EXPLANATION
Ankur argues that measuring both the cost‑benefit and emissions impact of AI use‑cases enables prioritisation of investments, ensuring limited resources target the most effective climate interventions.
EVIDENCE
He explains that McKinsey is “quantifying both in terms of economic impact, but also in terms of direct emissions impact” to guide scarce resource allocation [464-467].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Impact quantification for prioritisation
Argument 2
McKinsey’s knowledge hub quantifies cost‑benefit and emissions impact of AI use cases, guiding investment decisions (Ankur Puri)
EXPLANATION
Ankur describes McKinsey’s role in creating a knowledge hub that evaluates AI projects across sectors, providing data on economic returns and emission reductions to inform funding choices.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the hub “quantifies both in terms of economic impact, but also in terms of direct emissions impact” and that this helps focus scarce resources on the most important problems [464-467].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
McKinsey knowledge hub
Argument 3
AI applications across energy, built environment, materials and autonomous operations identified by McKinsey’s challenge framework (Ankur Puri)
EXPLANATION
Ankur outlines a framework of four challenge areas—operational improvement, strategic intelligence, transformation, and autonomous operations—through which AI can be applied to sectors such as energy, the built environment, and materials.
EVIDENCE
He lists the four challenges and connects them to sectors like energy, built environment, materials, and food systems, providing examples such as using drones for plant inspections [447-455].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
McKinsey challenge framework
Argument 4
Quantifying economic and emissions impact of AI solutions is essential to prioritize investments (Ankur Puri)
EXPLANATION
Ankur reiterates that systematic measurement of AI’s economic and carbon outcomes is crucial for directing investment toward the most impactful solutions.
EVIDENCE
He repeats that “the work’s not yet ready to be unveiled, but we are privileged … to start to now quantify, both in terms of economic impact, but also in terms of direct emissions impact” [464-467].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Need for impact quantification
N
Nalin Agarwal
2 arguments162 words per minute496 words182 seconds
Argument 1
Climate Collective’s AI‑for‑Power Innovation Platform links startups with utilities, delivering pilots and large‑scale deployments in the Global South (Nalin Agarwal)
EXPLANATION
Nalin explains that the Climate Collective runs an AI‑for‑Power platform that connects vetted startups with utilities, resulting in pilots and some large‑scale deployments, especially across the Global South.
EVIDENCE
He describes the program’s structure: “22 utilities … about 20 pilots … a subset have become large deployments” and notes the platform includes an open-innovation program, knowledge hub, and solution database [380-393].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The platform’s model of connecting startups with utilities reflects the public-private partnership and data-collaboration themes discussed in the IGF public-private partnership forum [S28] and the US-India AI partnership aimed at scaling solutions [S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑for‑Power platform
Argument 2
AI‑driven grid modernization, pilot programmes with 22 utilities and a global startup pipeline to overcome grid bottlenecks (Nalin Agarwal)
EXPLANATION
Nalin highlights the need to modernise the electricity grid, noting that the Climate Collective’s program works with 22 utilities to run pilots that address grid bottlenecks, leveraging AI‑driven solutions.
EVIDENCE
He states that “the grid is a key bottleneck now” and outlines the process of startups applying, being selected, creating business cases and pilots, leading to large deployments, with a high conversion rate of about 30 % [376-388].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The focus on grid modernization and AI-driven pilots aligns with the broader discussion of AI’s role in decarbonising power grids and addressing bottlenecks [S29] and the need for collaborative data-driven solutions [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Grid modernization pilots
A
Adam Sobey
3 arguments162 words per minute346 words127 seconds
Argument 1
Proven AI applications have cut emissions in shipping (‑18 %), building HVAC (‑42 %) and enabled renewable‑powered urban farming (Adam Sobey)
EXPLANATION
Adam cites concrete examples where AI has already delivered measurable emissions reductions: an 18 % cut in shipping emissions, a 42 % reduction in building HVAC emissions, and the creation of a renewable‑powered underground urban farm.
EVIDENCE
He reports that “AI and data science … reduced emissions by 18 % in shipping, 42 % in HVAC, and enabled an underground urban farm that runs entirely on renewable energy” [527-530].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Demonstrated AI emission cuts
Argument 2
The Alan Turing Institute partners globally, leveraging Lloyd’s Register Foundation funding to scale AI climate work beyond the UK (Adam Sobey)
EXPLANATION
Adam describes the Institute’s collaborative model, noting its partnership with the Lloyd’s Register Foundation and its focus on global cooperation to expand AI‑driven climate solutions beyond the UK.
EVIDENCE
He mentions that “the Sustainability Missions chief funder is Lloyd’s Register Foundation … we think it’s important that we work together both within the UK and outside of the UK to solve these problems” [520-527].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Global partnership and funding
Argument 3
AI‑enhanced shipping routes, building HVAC optimisation and renewable‑powered vertical farms as sector pilots (Adam Sobey)
EXPLANATION
Adam expands on sector‑specific pilots, illustrating how AI improves shipping logistics, optimises building climate control systems, and powers innovative urban agriculture, showcasing the breadth of AI’s climate impact.
EVIDENCE
He details the same three examples-shipping emissions cut, HVAC optimisation, and an underground urban farm powered by renewables-as evidence of sector-specific AI pilots [527-530].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sector pilots for AI
S
Speaker 1
3 arguments237 words per minute778 words196 seconds
Argument 1
University‑wide AI initiatives embed climate solutions across disciplines, from energy demand forecasting to satellite‑based sea‑ice monitoring (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 outlines how UCL integrates AI throughout the university, using it for campus energy forecasting, cement‑process optimisation, real‑estate sustainability, and sea‑ice classification, demonstrating interdisciplinary climate action.
EVIDENCE
He lists examples such as “sensor data from across our estate that forecasts energy demand”, “Carbon Re … deep reinforcement learning … cut fuel use in cement production”, “partnership with PGM real estate for AI-enabled sustainability”, and “sea-ice classification from satellite and drone imagery” [480-486][486-492].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
UCL’s campus-wide AI climate projects correspond to the cross-institutional AI-climate work highlighted in Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI [S1] and the integrated governance of AI, climate and development identified in the sustainable AI workshop [S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
University‑wide AI climate work
Argument 2
UCL’s Grand Challenges convene interdisciplinary teams, host international summits and translate research into real‑world climate impact (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 describes the Grand Challenges framework at UCL, which brings together cross‑faculty teams to tackle complex problems, including climate, and notes the institution’s role in hosting an international AI‑climate summit.
EVIDENCE
He explains that Grand Challenges are “self-funded, cross-university way of tackling problems” and that they hosted “the International Summit on AI Solutions for Climate Change” in April 2025, linking research to deployment [473-492].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The Grand Challenges framework mirrors the cross-faculty collaborative approach described in Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI [S1] and the emphasis on multi-stakeholder networks in the sustainable AI governance discussion [S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Grand Challenges model
Argument 3
Campus‑wide energy demand forecasting, cement‑process optimisation, real‑estate sustainability and sea‑ice classification projects at UCL (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 provides concrete project examples where AI is applied at UCL: forecasting campus energy use, optimising cement production, improving real‑estate sustainability, and classifying sea‑ice, illustrating tangible climate benefits.
EVIDENCE
He cites the sensor-based energy demand forecasts, Carbon Re’s deep reinforcement learning for cement, the partnership with PGM real estate for AI-enabled sustainability, and the sea-ice classification tool used by Inuit communities [480-486][486-492].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Specific AI projects at UCL
Agreements
Agreement Points
Urgency of climate action and need for rapid, radical collaboration
Speakers: Uday Khemka, David Sandalow, Adam Sobey
Time pressure on climate action demands rapid, radical collaboration and scaling of AI initiatives (Uday Khemka) The time for action is now; climate impacts are already severe (David Sandalow) We need to do something immediately starting today (Adam Sobey)
All three speakers stress that climate change is happening now and that immediate, coordinated action-especially leveraging AI-is essential, likening the limited time for the panel to the limited time we have to address climate change [17-20][28-29][520-525].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This consensus mirrors calls for urgent climate action and multilateral collaboration articulated in UNGA 78 and highlighted in recent climate-tech forums, such as the “Making Climate Tech Count” report and the AI-focused summit urging radical, collaborative action [S40][S41][S42].
AI can deliver both incremental efficiency gains and transformational breakthroughs, with net climate benefit far outweighing its own emissions
Speakers: Uday Khemka, David Sandalow
AI offers incremental gains and transformational breakthroughs that together provide a net positive climate impact (Uday Khemka) AI does have significant potential to contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions; its own emissions are less than 1 % of total GHGs (David Sandalow)
Both speakers argue that AI’s climate benefits (efficiency and breakthrough innovations) exceed the small emissions footprint of AI itself, citing studies that estimate AI-related emissions at under 1 % while potential reductions are several gigatons [62-63][147-156].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Evidence of AI’s efficiency gains in energy systems and data-centre operations is documented in the IGF AI-environment networking session and MIT’s research on reducing data-centre emissions, supporting the view that AI’s net climate benefit can exceed its own footprint [S43][S45].
Multi‑stakeholder collaborative networks are essential to scale AI‑driven climate solutions
Speakers: Uday Khemka, Vrushali Gaud, Nalin Agarwal, Ankur Puri, Spencer Low
GRAIL network unites academia, industry, NGOs, governments and investors to accelerate AI‑driven climate projects (Uday Khemka) Google’s Climate Tech Center and open‑source data assets foster public‑good AI research and deployment (Vrushali Gaud) Climate Collective’s AI‑for‑Power Innovation Platform links startups with utilities for pilots and large‑scale deployments (Nalin Agarwal) McKinsey’s knowledge hub quantifies economic and emissions impact of AI use cases, guiding investment (Ankur Puri) Building a digital public infrastructure for agriculture enables governments, NGOs and startups to deliver climate‑smart services (Spencer Low)
All speakers describe collaborative structures-GRAIL, Google’s Climate Tech Center, the Climate Collective platform, McKinsey’s knowledge hub, and a digital public agriculture infrastructure-that bring together diverse actors to develop, test and scale AI climate solutions [64-68][71-73][303-304][380-393][464-467][322-332].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple initiatives stress the importance of cross-sector partnerships, from the AI-climate summit invitation to agriculture-AI collaborations and India’s AI-energy scaling roadmap, underscoring a preferred multi-stakeholder model for scaling solutions [S41][S48][S49][S58].
Data availability and skilled personnel are critical barriers; open data and public‑good resources are needed
Speakers: David Sandalow, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low, Nalin Agarwal
Critical gaps: lack of high‑quality data, skilled personnel and trust hinder AI adoption in climate work (David Sandalow) Google’s open‑source data assets (Earth AI, Flood Hub) and Climate Tech Center aim to democratise climate data (Vrushali Gaud) A digital public infrastructure aggregates satellite and sensor data for agriculture, making it accessible to governments, NGOs and startups (Spencer Low) The AI‑for‑Power platform provides an online solution database and knowledge hub for utilities and startups (Nalin Agarwal)
Speakers converge on the view that insufficient data and expertise limit AI’s climate impact, and that open-source datasets and shared platforms are essential to overcome these barriers [158-162][290-295][303-304][322-332][380-393].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Calls for standardized data architectures, open interoperable ecosystems, and public-good AI tools appear in India’s AI-energy scaling plan, IGF discussions on real-time environmental data, and Google’s Earth AI release, highlighting data openness as a policy priority [S49][S56][S55].
AI‑driven operational optimisation (energy, water, grid, data centres) can generate measurable emissions reductions
Speakers: Vrushali Gaud, David Sandalow, Dan Travers, Ankur Puri
Deploying AI to optimise internal operations—energy use, water, grid routing—creates measurable emissions reductions (Vrushali Gaud) AI can improve efficiency (incremental gains) such as power flow optimisation and water leak detection (David Sandalow) AI‑enabled grid forecasting and real‑time dispatch are vital to balance renewable generation and avoid costly backup generation (Dan Travers) Operational improvement is one of the four challenge areas where AI can be applied (Ankur Puri)
All four speakers highlight that applying AI to optimise existing systems-whether Google’s internal infrastructure, grid operations, or broader industrial processes-delivers concrete emission cuts and efficiency gains [284-286][260-277][147-151][393-401][447-452].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Studies presented at the AI-environment networking session, analyses of ICT/AI impacts on power-sector decarbonisation, and MIT’s data-centre efficiency work all provide policy-relevant evidence of measurable emissions cuts from AI-enabled operational optimisation [S43][S44][S45].
AI applications in agriculture and food systems are crucial for mitigation and adaptation
Speakers: Spencer Low, David Sandalow, Adam Sobey
AI‑driven detection, prediction, optimisation and simulation are essential for agriculture, food security and climate resilience (Spencer Low) Food systems are a major source of emissions and AI can improve both mitigation and resilience (David Sandalow) AI‑enhanced shipping, HVAC and renewable‑powered urban farming demonstrate sector‑specific climate benefits (Adam Sobey)
Speakers agree that AI tools-such as farm-boundary mapping, crop classification, and climate-smart farming-are vital to reduce emissions and increase resilience in agriculture and food sectors [322-328][329-332][209-212][527-530].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Agriculture-AI panels emphasize multi-stakeholder deployment for climate-resilient food systems, and government-led ecosystem approaches in Maharashtra illustrate policy frameworks supporting AI in agriculture [S48][S58].
Similar Viewpoints
Both emphasize that AI’s climate benefits (efficiency and breakthrough innovations) exceed the modest emissions footprint of AI itself, citing studies showing AI‑related emissions are under 1 % while potential reductions are several gigatons [62-63][147-156].
Speakers: Uday Khemka, David Sandalow
AI can deliver both incremental efficiency gains and transformational breakthroughs, with net climate benefit far outweighing its own emissions (Uday Khemka, David Sandalow)
Both stress the importance of open, publicly available climate data platforms to enable governments, NGOs and startups to develop climate‑smart services [290-295][303-304][322-332].
Speakers: Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
Google’s open‑source data assets (Earth AI, Flood Hub) and the digital public agriculture infrastructure provide shared climate data for broader use (Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low)
Both highlight that without trust and proper security safeguards, AI solutions for critical infrastructure (e.g., grid operations) cannot be reliably deployed [161-162][206-208].
Speakers: Dan Travers, David Sandalow
Trust and security are essential for AI adoption in real‑time climate operations (Dan Travers, David Sandalow)
Unexpected Consensus
Both a private‑sector AI leader (Dan Travers) and an academic policy expert (David Sandalow) stress the need for trustworthy, secure AI in real‑time grid operations
Speakers: Dan Travers, David Sandalow
Real‑time AI deployment can cause security and safety risks; careful governance is needed (Dan Travers) Trust is essential; people won’t use AI unless they trust it (David Sandalow)
While Dan focuses on technical security risks and David on user trust, both converge on the necessity of trustworthy AI for critical climate infrastructure-a convergence not obvious given their different roles [161-162][206-208].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for trustworthy AI in grid management is reflected in AI-cybersecurity governance debates and UN statements warning of AI risks without proper oversight, reinforcing the call for secure, reliable AI in energy infrastructure [S44][S46][S51].
Academic institution (Speaker 1) and Google (Vrushali Gaud) both promote open‑source, public‑good AI tools for climate (e.g., satellite data, sea‑ice classification, Earth AI)
Speakers: Speaker 1, Vrushali Gaud
UCL’s Grand Challenges and digital innovation centre provide open AI tools for climate (Speaker 1) Google’s Earth AI and Flood Hub are open data assets for climate research (Vrushali Gaud)
Despite representing academia and a large tech corporation, both emphasize releasing AI-driven datasets and tools as public goods to accelerate climate action, showing an unexpected alignment of open-data philosophy [486-492][290-295][303-304].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Google’s expansion of Earth AI as a public-good platform exemplifies the push for open-source climate AI tools, a theme also echoed in collaborative AI-climate summits advocating open, shared resources [S55][S41].
Overall Assessment

There is strong consensus among the participants that urgent, collaborative action is required; AI offers significant climate benefits that outweigh its own emissions; multi‑stakeholder networks, open data, and capacity building are critical enablers; and AI can be applied both to operational efficiency and sector‑specific challenges such as agriculture and grid management.

High consensus across most speakers, indicating a shared understanding that coordinated AI‑driven initiatives, supported by open data and capacity development, are essential to accelerate climate mitigation and adaptation. This alignment suggests momentum for concrete joint programmes, funding mechanisms and policy support to scale AI solutions globally.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Speed of action versus need for security and trust in AI deployment
Speakers: Uday Khemka, Dan Travers, David Sandalow
Urgency and radical collaboration (Uday Khemka) Real‑time AI can cause security and safety risks (Dan Travers) Trust is essential; people won’t use AI unless they trust it (David Sandalow)
Uday stresses that climate action must be rapid, calling the limited panel time a metaphor for the urgency of climate work and urging radical, fast collaboration [17-20][28-29]. Dan warns that deploying AI in real-time grid operations introduces security and safety risks, urging caution especially with generative AI [206-208]. David highlights that lack of trust is a major barrier to AI adoption and that building trust is essential for effective use [161-162]. The speakers therefore diverge on how quickly AI solutions should be rolled out versus the safeguards required before widespread deployment.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The tension between rapid AI deployment and the need for security governance is a central theme in AI-cybersecurity trust discussions and literature on fit-for-purpose AI governance, which call for balanced, non-impulsive action [S46][S47][S50].
Extent of data availability for climate AI projects
Speakers: David Sandalow, Vrushali Gaud, Uday Khemka
Lack of high‑quality data is a main barrier (David Sandalow) Google is releasing open‑source data assets (Earth AI, Flood Hub) and launching a Climate Tech Center (Vrushali Gaud) GRAIL created an online collaborative platform but data gaps remain (Uday Khemka)
David identifies insufficient data as a primary obstacle to AI’s climate impact [158-160]. Vrushali counters by describing Google’s open-source initiatives-Earth AI, Flood Hub, and a Climate Tech Center in India-to democratise climate data and support research [290-295][303-304]. Uday notes the creation of a GRAIL collaborative platform while also acknowledging the need for more data and digital public infrastructure [73-75]. This reflects a disagreement on whether data scarcity is a critical bottleneck or can be rapidly addressed through corporate open-data efforts.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Debates over data availability are highlighted in India’s AI-energy scaling roadmap, which stresses standardized data architectures, and in IGF sessions that examine challenges of accessing real-time environmental datasets [S49][S56].
Preferred model for scaling AI‑driven climate solutions
Speakers: Dan Travers, Nalin Agarwal, Ankur Puri, Vrushali Gaud
Open‑source, transferable tools for grid forecasting (Dan Travers) Startup‑utility pilot platform linking innovators to utilities (Nalin Agarwal) Quantify economic and emissions impact before scaling (Ankur Puri) Internal corporate optimisation and partnership‑driven deployment (Vrushali Gaud)
Dan promotes open-source solar-forecasting tools that can be transferred across national grids [417-420]. Nalin describes a structured program that matches AI startups with utilities to run pilots and scale deployments [380-393]. Ankur stresses the need to first quantify cost-benefit and emissions impact to prioritize investments [464-467]. Vrushali focuses on using AI internally at Google to optimise resources and on partnerships to drive outcomes [284-286][303-304]. The speakers share the goal of scaling AI for climate but disagree on the most effective pathway-open-source diffusion, structured pilot programs, impact quantification, or corporate-centric optimisation.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Various scaling models-from multi-stakeholder networks to government-led ecosystem approaches-are contrasted in AI-energy scaling panels and agriculture AI policy frameworks, illustrating ongoing policy deliberations about the optimal model [S49][S58][S41].
Unexpected Differences
Security risks of AI versus optimism about AI’s net climate benefit
Speakers: Dan Travers, David Sandalow
Real‑time AI can cause security and safety risks (Dan Travers) AI’s net climate benefit far outweighs its own emissions (<1 % GHG) (David Sandalow)
While David emphasizes that AI’s emissions are negligible and its climate upside is large, Dan raises concerns that deploying AI in real-time grid operations could introduce new security and safety vulnerabilities, suggesting a more cautious stance than the overall optimism expressed elsewhere [155-156][206-208].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The dual narrative of AI’s security challenges versus its climate promise appears in UN security warnings, civil-society critiques that question overstated climate benefits, and analyses of AI’s double-edged impact on security and emissions [S46][S51][S52][S53].
Overall Assessment

The panel largely converges on the promise of AI to aid climate mitigation and adaptation, but key tensions arise around the speed of deployment versus the need for security and trust, the perceived scarcity of high‑quality data, and the optimal model for scaling solutions (open‑source, pilot‑based, or impact‑driven). These disagreements are moderate rather than fundamental, indicating that while participants share common goals, they differ on implementation pathways and risk management.

Moderate disagreement; implications suggest that coordinated governance frameworks and clear data‑sharing strategies will be needed to reconcile urgency with safety and to align scaling approaches across corporate, open‑source, and public‑private partnership models.

Partial Agreements
All agree that the power sector must be decarbonised, but differ on the mechanism: Dan stresses real‑time AI tools for grid balancing; Nalin proposes a startup‑utility pilot ecosystem; Ankur calls for rigorous impact quantification before scaling; Uday calls for radical collaboration via GRAIL to accelerate solutions [196-201][393-401][380-393][464-467].
Speakers: Uday Khemka, Dan Travers, Nalin Agarwal, Ankur Puri
Decarbonise the power sector (Uday Khemka) AI‑enabled grid forecasting and real‑time dispatch are vital (Dan Travers) AI‑for‑Power Innovation Platform links startups with utilities (Nalin Agarwal) Quantify AI’s economic and emissions impact to focus resources (Ankur Puri)
All aim to democratise climate data and tools, yet differ in delivery: Vrushali highlights Google’s Earth AI and Flood Hub as open data assets; Spencer describes the Krishi DSS digital public good for agriculture; David proposes a comprehensive AI‑Climate report with primers for both climate and AI audiences. Each proposes a different format for making data and knowledge accessible [290-295][329-332][124-138].
Speakers: Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low, David Sandalow
Open‑source climate data platforms (Vrushali Gaud) Digital public infrastructure for agriculture (Spencer Low) AI‑Climate report with primers and recommendations (David Sandalow)
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI is seen as a pivotal lever to address the triple challenge of development, climate mitigation, and adaptation, delivering both incremental efficiency gains and transformational breakthroughs while its own emissions are negligible (< 1 %). Collaboration across academia, industry, NGOs, governments, and investors—exemplified by the GRAIL network, Google’s Climate Tech Center, Climate Collective, and the Alan Turing Institute—is essential to scale AI‑driven climate solutions quickly. Sector‑specific AI opportunities were highlighted: data‑center decarbonisation, clean‑energy procurement, grid forecasting and real‑time dispatch, agricultural mapping and crop monitoring for smallholders, materials and cement optimisation, shipping route optimisation, HVAC optimisation, and satellite‑based climate monitoring. Quantifying the economic and emissions impact of AI use cases (McKinsey, GRAIL taxonomy) is critical to prioritize scarce resources and direct investment toward the highest‑value interventions. Key barriers remain: lack of high‑quality data (especially in the Global South), shortage of skilled personnel, trust in AI outputs, and governance of real‑time or generative AI to avoid security and safety risks. Urgency was repeatedly stressed: climate action timelines are far shorter than the development curve of AI, demanding rapid, radical, and coordinated collaboration.
Resolutions and action items
Launch and invite all participants to join the GRAIL online collaborative platform for co‑creating AI‑climate solutions. Google to operationalise its Climate Tech Center in India, focusing on pilots in electricity, low‑carbon materials, sustainable aviation fuel, and green‑skills training for tier‑2 cities. Climate Collective and Grail to develop a global AI‑for‑Power Innovation Platform (open‑innovation program, knowledge hub, solution database) linking startups with utilities, with pilots already underway in 22 utilities. Open Climate Fix to open‑source its solar‑forecasting tool and expand deployment from the UK to India and other grids, partnering with commercial entities (e.g., Adani, Rajasthan Grid Operator). McKinsey’s Quantum Black team to continue quantifying cost‑benefit and emissions impact of identified AI use cases, feeding the results back into GRAIL’s prioritisation framework. All climate‑focused organisations were urged to create dedicated AI teams and embed AI considerations into mitigation and adaptation strategies. The Alan Turing Institute to leverage Lloyd’s Register Foundation funding to scale AI climate work globally and to partner with other GRAIL participants.
Unresolved issues
Standardised, high‑resolution data sets for many sectors (especially agriculture and grid operations in the Global South) remain insufficient. Developing and scaling green‑skill training programmes to create a workforce capable of deploying AI for climate across diverse regions. Establishing robust governance frameworks for real‑time and generative AI applications to mitigate security, safety, and trust concerns. Quantitative validation of the projected emissions reductions (e.g., 3.5‑5.4 Gt CO₂e saved vs 0.5‑1.4 Gt from data‑centres) is still ongoing. Integration of AI solutions across fragmented industry silos (power, built environment, materials, food systems) lacks a unified implementation roadmap.
Suggested compromises
Accepting a modest increase in AI‑related emissions from data‑centres (0.5‑1.4 Gt CO₂e) in exchange for a much larger net reduction (3.5‑5.4 Gt CO₂e) from AI‑enabled climate actions. Balancing focus between mitigation (efficiency, emissions cuts) and adaptation (resilience, flood mapping) to address both immediate and long‑term climate risks. Combining corporate‑scale clean‑energy procurement with open‑source data and public‑good tools to accelerate both internal decarbonisation and external climate services. Prioritising high‑impact, low‑data‑requirement use cases first while continuing to develop data‑intensive solutions as data infrastructure improves.
Thought Provoking Comments
We are dealing with a triple challenge – development, a sustainable planet, and climate change – and we have very little time, so we must move into action mode.
Frames the entire discussion around three interlinked imperatives and stresses urgency, setting a high‑stakes context for all subsequent contributions.
Established the overarching narrative, prompting speakers to position their solutions as addressing all three pillars and creating a sense of collective urgency that shaped the tone of the panel.
Speaker: Uday Khemka
We talked to the AI community and the industrial sectors and found that *people were not talking to each other* – very few AI experts were focused on downstream climate issues, and vice‑versa.
Identifies a critical systemic barrier – siloed expertise – that explains why existing AI tools have not been leveraged for climate mitigation.
Triggered a shift from abstract enthusiasm to concrete calls for cross‑sector collaboration, leading speakers like David Sandalow and Vrushali Gaud to discuss bridging these gaps.
Speaker: Uday Khemka
The Grantham Institute quantified data‑center emissions at 0.5–1.4 Gt CO₂e, while AI could enable the removal of 3.5–5.4 Gt CO₂e – a clear net benefit.
Provides empirical evidence that counters the common criticism that AI’s own carbon footprint outweighs its benefits.
Gave credibility to the argument for scaling AI, prompting David Sandalow to acknowledge the small share of emissions from AI (<1%) and reinforcing the panel’s pro‑AI stance.
Speaker: Uday Khemka
Based on available evidence, less than 1 % of global GHG emissions currently come from AI, and the main barriers are lack of data, trained personnel, and trust.
Offers a balanced, data‑driven perspective that tempers optimism with realistic challenges, grounding the discussion in practical terms.
Shifted the conversation from hype to actionable priorities, leading participants to emphasize data sharing, capacity building, and trust mechanisms.
Speaker: David Sandalow
AI capabilities can be grouped into four high‑level functions: detect patterns, predict outcomes, optimize processes, and simulate scenarios.
Provides a clear conceptual framework that helps participants map AI tools to specific climate applications across sectors.
Guided later speakers (e.g., Spencer Low on agriculture, Dan Travers on grids) to structure their examples around these functions, deepening the technical discussion.
Speaker: David Sandalow
Using AI in real‑time operations can cause security and safety risks; we must be very careful about generative AI in this context.
Introduces a nuanced risk perspective that balances the earlier optimism about AI’s potential.
Prompted a more cautious tone, influencing Dan Travers to mention the need for reliability in grid AI and encouraging the panel to consider governance and safety measures.
Speaker: David Sandalow
Google is a *full‑stack* company – beyond search we operate data centers, grids, water, and circularity; our climate work is about operationalizing decarbonisation across all these layers.
Expands the definition of corporate climate responsibility from product‑level to infrastructure‑level, illustrating how a tech giant can influence emissions holistically.
Shifted the discussion toward systemic corporate actions, leading to concrete examples like the Google Center of Climate Tech and inspiring other participants to think beyond narrow use‑cases.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
We are launching a *Google Center of Climate Tech* in India to incubate five pilots in low‑carbon steel, sustainable aviation fuel, and green skills for tier‑two cities.
Shows a tangible, region‑specific initiative that operationalises the earlier call for collaboration and addresses both the technology and skills gaps.
Served as a turning point that moved the panel from abstract collaboration to concrete programmatic action, prompting interest from other speakers about scaling pilots.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
Smallholder farms (often <2 ha) are the majority in the Global South, yet most agri‑tech is built for large farms; we’ve trained AI to map field boundaries and detect crops to enable digital public infrastructure for these farmers.
Highlights a specific, underserved segment and demonstrates how AI can be adapted to local contexts, addressing equity and scalability concerns.
Introduced agriculture as a critical sector, broadening the panel’s focus beyond energy and prompting discussion on data democratization and startup involvement.
Speaker: Spencer Low
The grid now has millions of distributed generators and variable demand; without AI we risk blackouts, higher costs, and democratic push‑back against the green transition.
Articulates the systemic complexity of modern grids and frames AI as essential for both technical reliability and social acceptance of decarbonisation.
Steered the conversation toward grid modernization, reinforcing the urgency expressed earlier and linking technical needs to political risk, which resonated with Ankur Puri’s prioritisation framework.
Speaker: Dan Travers
We have identified four challenge categories – operational improvement, strategic intelligence, transformation, and autonomous operations – and we are now quantifying economic and emissions impact to focus scarce resources on the highest‑value problems.
Provides a strategic prioritisation lens that moves the discussion from idea generation to impact measurement and resource allocation.
Encouraged participants to think about metrics and ROI, influencing later remarks about pilots, scaling, and the need for evidence‑based investment.
Speaker: Ankur Puri
At UCL AI is not a single discipline but an *enabling layer* embedded across all faculties; our Grand Challenges bring together engineers, artists, and health experts to tackle climate together.
Demonstrates a cross‑disciplinary institutional model that operationalises the earlier call for collaboration and shows how AI can be a unifying tool.
Reinforced the theme of interdisciplinary collaboration, inspiring other speakers to consider broader institutional partnerships and adding depth to the conversation about scaling AI for climate.
Speaker: Speaker 1 (UCL)
Overall Assessment

The discussion was shaped by a series of pivotal comments that moved the panel from a high‑level framing of the climate‑AI‑development triple challenge to concrete, sector‑specific applications and strategic frameworks. Uday Khemka’s opening set the urgent, collaborative tone, while his identification of silos and the data‑center emissions balance provided a factual foundation. David Sandalow’s balanced appraisal and capability framework introduced nuance and a practical roadmap, prompting participants to address data, talent, trust, and safety concerns. Corporate and academic leaders (Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low, Dan Travers, Ankur Puri, and the UCL representative) each contributed concrete initiatives—full‑stack climate action, farmer‑focused AI, grid modernization, impact‑focused prioritisation, and cross‑disciplinary Grand Challenges—that transformed the dialogue into a catalogue of actionable pathways. Collectively, these insightful remarks redirected the conversation from abstract optimism to measurable, collaborative action, highlighting both opportunities and the systemic barriers that must be overcome to realise AI‑driven climate solutions.

Follow-up Questions
How can we build and share data infrastructure in the Global South to enable AI‑driven climate solutions?
All three highlighted the lack of data in the Global South as a major barrier to applying AI for mitigation and adaptation.
Speaker: David Sandalow, Spencer Low, Vrushali Gaud
What safeguards and risk‑mitigation strategies are needed for the use of generative AI in real‑time grid operations?
He warned that generative AI can create security and safety risks in grid control and called for careful safeguards.
Speaker: David Sandalow
How can trust be established in AI tools among climate‑mitigation organisations?
Trust was identified as essential for adoption; without it organisations will not use AI solutions.
Speaker: David Sandalow
What methodologies can be used to quantify the economic and emissions impact of AI applications across sectors?
He noted a gap in valuing AI ideas in terms of cost and emissions, suggesting the need for robust quantification frameworks.
Speaker: Ankur Puri
How can AI models be adapted for smallholder farms and integrated into local decision‑making?
He pointed out that most agri‑AI tools are built for large farms, leaving smallholders underserved.
Speaker: Spencer Low
What approaches can democratize climate data and accelerate AI‑driven innovation at scale?
She asked how to open‑source large datasets and incubate initiatives so that more actors can build on them.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
What effective strategies can develop green climate skills in tier‑two Indian cities?
She highlighted the need for skill‑building programmes to embed climate‑first thinking beyond major metros.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
What is the net climate impact of AI data centres when considering both their emissions and the emissions reductions they enable?
Uday cited Grantham estimates; David reiterated the need to balance data‑centre GHGs against AI‑driven mitigation benefits.
Speaker: Uday Khemka, David Sandalow
What data standards are needed to enable AI applications in the power sector?
He stressed that standardized, high‑quality data is a prerequisite for AI‑driven grid optimisation.
Speaker: David Sandalow
How transferable are AI grid‑forecasting models across different national grids?
He described success in the UK and plans for India, raising the question of cross‑regional model portability.
Speaker: Dan Travers
What is the impact of AI‑driven flood‑risk platforms (e.g., Flood Hub) on mitigation and adaptation outcomes?
She mentioned Flood Hub as a tool for risk mapping, prompting evaluation of its real‑world effectiveness.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
How can AI be applied to low‑carbon steel production, sustainable aviation fuel and other non‑electricity sectors?
She noted these sectors as major levers and asked for AI‑enabled pathways to decarbonise them.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
How can AI be used to detect and reduce water‑infrastructure leaks?
She cited water‑tap leakage as a low‑hanging‑fruit for AI optimisation.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
How can AI optimise chip usage and data‑centre energy consumption?
She referenced internal Google efforts to improve efficiency of chips and data‑centre operations.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
What are best practices for integrating AI into extreme‑weather forecasting and response?
He highlighted AI/ML‑enabled weather prediction as transformational for resilience, needing further study of implementation best practices.
Speaker: David Sandalow

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.