Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI

20 Feb 2026 11:00h - 12:00h

Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The panel was convened to explore how artificial intelligence can be harnessed to address the intertwined challenges of development, climate mitigation and adaptation, which Uday described as “the triple challenge” [11-13]. He introduced the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL) as a not-for-profit effort to create a collaborative network linking academia, industry, governments and philanthropies to scale AI-driven climate solutions [29-32][54-55]. The urgency was emphasized by comparing the limited time of the session to the narrow window for climate action [17-19].


David Sandalow highlighted that AI already shows significant potential to cut greenhouse-gas emissions, estimating that AI-related computing accounts for less than 1 % of total emissions [155-157]. He categorized AI impacts into incremental efficiency gains and transformational advances such as new materials and battery chemistry [148-154]. The main barriers he identified were lack of high-quality data, shortage of trained personnel and the need for trust in AI systems [158-162]. He also warned that real-time AI deployment can introduce safety and security risks that must be managed [206-208].


Google’s climate director described how the company is using AI to improve internal operations-optimizing water leaks, electricity use and data-center energy, and to open-source large satellite and weather datasets for public use such as flood-risk mapping [284-292][298-301]. Spencer Low explained that AI models are being trained to delineate smallholder farm boundaries and identify crops, feeding into India’s digital public-goods platforms for advisory services and climate-resilient agriculture [322-331][332-336]. Nalin Agarwal and Dan Travers outlined programs that pair AI startups with utilities to modernize grids, run pilots, and provide open-source forecasting tools that can reduce reliance on expensive backup generation [366-384][400-408]. Ankur Puri from McKinsey noted that GRAIL is framing AI challenges around operational improvement, strategic foresight, transformation and autonomous operations, and is beginning to quantify both economic and emissions impact of AI solutions [446-466].


Representatives from the Alan Turing Institute and University College London added that AI has already delivered measurable emission reductions in sectors such as shipping, HVAC and cement, and that interdisciplinary “Grand Challenges” are being used to embed AI across campuses and accelerate climate-focused research [527-533][476-485]. Across all speakers there was consensus that scaling AI for climate requires open data, cross-sector collaboration and rapid deployment of pilots, echoing Uday’s call for “radical action-oriented collaboration” [28][538-540]. The discussion concluded that, while time is limited, coordinated AI-driven initiatives can simultaneously create economic value and decarbonize multiple sectors, underscoring the significance of the collaborative effort [533-540].


Keypoints

Major discussion points


The “triple challenge” – development, climate, and AI – and the birth of the GRAIL network – Uday frames the panel around promoting development while creating a sustainable planet and leveraging AI, calling it “perhaps the most important challenge” [11-16]. He then introduces the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL) as the vehicle to explore synergies between the development agenda and the climate agenda through AI [30-33][31-33].


A critical lack of cross-sector dialogue and the need for a collaborative ecosystem – Participants note that AI researchers, industrial emitters, and climate experts were “not talking to each other” [46-52]. GRAIL is presented as a “collaborative network” that brings together academia, industry, philanthropy, and governments to scale solutions [64-68]. The 2022 summit gathered 200 people from 115 organisations, produced taxonomies for high-impact sectors, and sparked partnerships with entities such as McKinsey, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, and national coalitions [71-79][84-89].


AI’s quantified climate impact, its modest carbon footprint, and the barriers to wider adoption – The report cited by David Sandalow finds that AI can deliver “significant potential to contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions” while its own emissions are estimated at “less than 1 percent of total GHGs” [146-158][154-156]. The main obstacles are “lack of data, lack of trained personnel, and trust” [158-162].


Sector-specific AI use cases highlighted by the speakers


Power and grid: AI can detect methane, predict weather for renewables, optimise power flows, and simulate battery chemistry; the grid’s growing variability demands AI-driven scheduling [170-188][196-204].


Agriculture & food systems: Google’s AI maps farm boundaries, identifies crops, and detects events (tillage, harvest) to feed public-good platforms for governments and NGOs [306-332].


Data-center and infrastructure decarbonisation: Google’s carbon-free energy goal, optimisation of water and electricity use, and open-sourcing of satellite and flood-risk data [260-270][285-292].


Materials and built environment: AI-accelerated simulation of battery chemistry and material discovery, with transformational gains cited [218-221].


A urgent call for “radical, action-oriented collaboration” – The moderator repeatedly stresses the limited time to act on climate (“very little time we have to do something about climate change”) [17-20] and frames the session as “an invitation for radical action-oriented collaboration” [28-29]. This urgency is reiterated later (“we are inevitably vastly behind schedule… we will keep going with great focus”) [355-357] and closed with a plea for collective effort [538-540].


Overall purpose / goal


The panel is designed to catalyse rapid, large-scale collaboration among AI researchers, industry leaders, governments, and NGOs to develop and deploy AI-driven solutions that simultaneously advance economic development and achieve climate mitigation and adaptation. By showcasing the GRAIL initiative, sector-specific pilots, and partnership models, the discussion aims to move from analysis to concrete, scalable action.


Overall tone


The conversation is high-energy, enthusiastic, and forward-looking, with frequent expressions of excitement and gratitude (“very exciting sessions,” “your energy… infectious”). It carries a strong sense of urgency (“very little time,” “we are behind schedule”) and a collaborative spirit (“radical collaboration,” “we’re all in this together”). While the tone remains optimistic about AI’s potential, it also acknowledges challenges (data gaps, trust issues) and uses occasional humor (“apology… I don’t apologize”) to keep the mood lively despite the time pressure.


Speakers

Uday Khemka – Moderator/Host; involved with the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL) and championing AI-climate collaboration [S21][S22].


David Sandalow – Professor; former senior government official now focused on AI solutions for climate change; speaker on AI-climate mitigation and adaptation [S7].


Ankur Puri – Partner, McKinsey & Company (India); leads Quantum Black (McKinsey’s AI practice) and works across energy, built environment and other sectors [S1][S2][S3].


Adam Sobey – Director for Sustainability, Alan Turing Institute (UK’s National AI Institute); leads the institute’s sustainability mission and AI-for-environment research [S4][S5][S6].


Dan Travers – Founder/Representative, Open Climate Fix (non-profit AI-for-grid startup); focuses on AI-driven grid modernization and renewable integration [S8][S9].


Vrushali Gaud – Global Director of Climate Operations, Google; leads Google’s decarbonisation, water and circularity strategy and oversees climate work across data-centres, clean-energy procurement and AI-enabled sustainability initiatives [S14][S15][S16].


Spencer Low – Google representative (likely in the Agriculture & Food Systems team); works on AI-driven agricultural landscape understanding, digital public goods and climate-resilient farming solutions [S17].


Nalin Agarwal – Founding Partner, Climate Collective; partners with UNESA and supports AI-enabled grid modernization and startup incubation across the Global South [S18][S19].


Speaker 1 (Rob) – Representative from University College London (UCL); discusses UCL’s Grand Challenges, AI-enabled sustainability research across campus, built environment, cement, aviation and sea-ice classification [transcript].


Additional speakers:


Sean – Mentioned as a time-keeper/organiser; no specific role or expertise detailed in the transcript.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The session opened with Uday Khemka framing the discussion as a response to the “triple challenge” of development, a sustainable planet and artificial intelligence (AI)-“perhaps the most important challenge any of us will face in our lives”-and warning that the panel’s brief time mirrored the narrow window for climate action, a point he illustrated with a “two-hockey-sticks” metaphor describing the rapid rise of AI alongside accelerating climate risks [11-13][17-19]. He positioned the gathering as “an invitation for radical action-oriented collaboration” [28-29].


Khemka then introduced the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL), a not-for-profit initiative that seeks to uncover synergies between development and climate agendas through AI [30-33]. He explained that GRAIL aims to create a “collaborative network of great academic institutions, commercial institutions, AI companies, industrial companies, philanthropic institutions, private-sector sustainability networks… bringing them all together with governments” [64-68]. The 2022 summit that preceded the panel brought together 200 participants from 115 organisations, produced taxonomies for high-impact sectors and forged partnerships with entities such as McKinsey, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (representing 24 % of world revenues and 26 % of global GHGs) and national coalitions [71-79].


A recurring theme was the historic lack of dialogue between AI researchers, industrial emitters and climate experts. Khemka noted that “people were not talking to each other” despite extensive outreach to both the AI community and heavy-emitting sectors, with only a few exceptions such as Google [46-52].


Uday Khemka presented the Grantham Institute’s estimate that data-centre emissions amount to 0.5-1.4 Gt CO₂e, while AI-enabled solutions could avoid 3.5-5.4 Gt CO₂e, indicating a net-positive balance [62-63]. David Sandalow later observed that this study “tracks with” his own analysis that AI-related computing accounts for less than 1 percent of global greenhouse-gas emissions [146-156][155-157].


Sandalow outlined a four-pillar AI capability framework-detect, predict, optimise and simulate-and showed how each function can be applied to climate challenges. He illustrated pattern detection for methane leaks, weather prediction for renewable generation, optimisation of power-flow and simulation of battery chemistry [170-188]. He also warned that real-time AI deployment can cause security and safety risks, and cautioned that generative AI in grid contexts requires particular care [206-208].


Sector highlights


Power & grid: AI can detect methane emissions from satellite data, forecast weather for solar and wind farms, optimise transmission flows and simulate battery behaviour [170-188][196-204][400-408]. Dan Travers stressed that the modern grid’s variability-driven by millions of distributed generators, electric vehicles and data-centre loads-requires AI-driven real-time scheduling to avoid blackouts and costly backup generation [400-408].


Agriculture: Spencer Low described AI models that delineate smallholder farm boundaries, identify crops and detect events such as sowing or harvest; these outputs now feed India’s Krishi DSS and state-level platforms, enabling NGOs and governments to provide climate-smart advisory services [318-332][322-329]. He highlighted the open-source nature of the data as a “digital public-goods” resource for innovators [335-338].


Built environment & materials: AI-accelerated simulation enables rapid testing of battery chemistries and novel materials, offering transformational gains that could dramatically cut emissions [218-221]. Rob (University College London) explained that UCL’s Grand Challenges programme-a self-funded, cross-faculty initiative spanning all 11 UCL faculties-embeds AI across campus energy management, cement-process optimisation, real-estate sustainability and sea-ice monitoring [476-485][486-492].


Google’s Global Director of Climate Operations, Vrushali Gaud, announced the launch of a Google Center of Climate Tech in partnership with the Principal Scientific Advisory of the Government of India, targeting low-carbon steel, sustainable aviation fuel and green-skill development in tier-2 cities [350-353]. Internally, Google pursues a “carbon-free energy” goal for its data-centres, optimises water-leak detection, electricity use and grid interactions, and seeks to site facilities with minimal community impact [260-276][284-289][298-304]. Externally, it open-sources large satellite and weather datasets (e.g., Earth AI, Flood Hub) that enable flood-risk mapping and other climate-resilient services [292-295][290-295]. The partnership with UNESA adds 71 energy companies representing 750 GW of clean power with a target of 1 500 GW by 2030 [298-304].


Nalin Agarwal, co-founder of the Climate Collective, described an “open-innovation programme” that pairs AI startups with utilities across the Global South. Since its inception, the programme has engaged 22 utilities, generated roughly 20 pilots (with a 30 % conversion to large-scale deployments), and is evolving into a three-component platform-an open-innovation pipeline, a knowledge hub and an online solution database-forming an AI-for-Power Innovation Platform [364-390].


Dan Travers of Open Climate Fix argued for fully open-source, non-profit AI tools to ensure transferability across grids. He reported that his team has built what they consider the best solar-forecasting model in the UK (20-30 % more accurate) and are now deploying it in India with partners such as Adani and the Rajasthan Grid Operator [416-420][418-420]. This open-source stance contrasts with Google’s more selective data-sharing approach, hinting at a tension over the degree of openness required for rapid scaling [284-289][416-420].


McKinsey’s Ankur Puri framed GRAIL’s work around four strategic challenges-operational improvement, strategic intelligence, transformation and autonomous operations-and announced ongoing efforts to quantify both economic and emissions impact of AI use-cases. By attaching monetary and carbon-value metrics, McKinsey aims to direct scarce resources toward the highest-impact interventions [446-466].


The Alan Turing Institute’s Adam Sobey provided concrete evidence of AI’s near-term climate benefits: an 18 % emissions reduction in shipping, a 42 % cut in building HVAC emissions and the creation of a renewable-energy-powered underground urban farm [527-530]. He stressed that these achievements are possible only through global collaboration, noting support from the Lloyd’s Register Foundation for work in the Global South [518-525][531-532].


Across the panel, several points of agreement emerged. Both Khemka and Sandalow affirmed that AI’s net climate benefit exceeds its own emissions [62-63][146-156]; multiple speakers highlighted the necessity of “radical, action-oriented collaboration” [28-29][355-357]; and the four AI capabilities (detect, predict, optimise, simulate) were repeatedly cited as the technical backbone for sectoral applications [170-188][400-408][318-332][284-289]. Disagreements centered on openness and sector prioritisation: Travers advocated fully open-source tools, whereas Google’s strategy remains partly proprietary; Khemka called for a broad, multi-sector effort, while Low foregrounded agriculture, Travers emphasised grid reliability and Puri urged data-driven prioritisation rather than a fixed sector focus [54-59][311-332][400-408][464-467].


Thought-provoking remarks shaped the dialogue. Khemka’s observation that “people were not talking to each other” exposed a systemic silo problem [46-52]; the Grantham Institute’s emissions balance countered common criticism of AI’s carbon cost [62-63]; Sandalow’s concise AI capability taxonomy provided a memorable framework [170-173]; his identification of data, talent and trust as key barriers shifted attention to capacity-building [158-162]; Gaud’s description of Google as a “full-stack” climate actor illustrated how a tech giant can embed sustainability across its value chain [260-276]; Low’s demonstration of AI-driven farm-boundary mapping linked climate mitigation to livelihoods [318-332]; Travers’s warning that without AI the grid will face blackouts and public backlash highlighted the social dimension of technical solutions [400-408]; and Puri’s emphasis on quantifying impact introduced a disciplined, measurement-first approach [446-466].


The panel concluded with actionable recommendations: participants were urged to join GRAIL’s online collaborative platform, deepen engagement with governments, scale the Climate Collective’s AI-for-Power Innovation Platform, and finalise McKinsey’s economic-emissions quantifications [354-360][364-390][446-466]. Google committed to operationalise its Center of Climate Tech in India, focusing on low-carbon steel, sustainable aviation fuel and green-skill development for tier-2 cities [298-304][350-353]. Open Climate Fix pledged to expand its open-source solar-forecasting tools to additional grids [416-420]. Unresolved issues include securing standardised high-quality data for the Global South, building a scalable pipeline for AI-climate talent, establishing governance for generative-AI safety, and developing sector-specific roadmaps for the built environment, industry and transport [158-162][298-304][322-329][400-408][464-467].


Follow-up questions that chart a roadmap for the collaborative effort: optimal siting of data-centres to minimise community impact (Gaud); mechanisms to democratise data and accelerate AI scaling (Gaud); strategies for embedding green skills in tier-2 Indian cities (Gaud); approaches to address data scarcity in the Global South (Sandalow); pathways for training AI-climate personnel (Sandalow); methods to build trust and explainability in AI models (Sandalow); standards for power-sector data to enable AI tools such as dynamic line rating (Sandalow); security and safety safeguards for real-time AI grid operations, especially generative AI (Sandalow); scalable farm-boundary mapping techniques (Low); frameworks for evaluating economic and emissions impact of AI solutions (Puri); design of an AI-for-Power Innovation Platform (Agarwal); integration of AI into the built environment, materials and transport (Khemka); and expansion of AI-driven flood-risk mapping (Gaud) and solar-forecasting tools (Travers) [298-304][322-329][350-353][158-162][206-208][311-332][464-467][416-420].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Uday Khemka

Very exciting sessions. I’ll just wait. Guys. So we are meeting for a tremendously important subject. And this has been a great summit. I know you’re all energized, inspired, excited and exhausted at the same time. And we will get a moment when this subject becomes a room of 5 ,000. So that’s what we’re going to work towards. But you’re here today. We’re delighted to have an absolutely tremendous panel with us today. I’m deeply honored, flown across from the U .S., from Europe, from Singapore and so forth. And we have a lot of material to cover. I should say that the triple challenge that we are dealing with in this panel is perhaps the most important challenge any of us will face in our lives.

Which is to promote development on the one side. While dealing with the creation of a sustainable planet. and in terms of climate change, your self -selecting group, you’re all here with us and there’s a reason for that. You already know about climate change. You already know about AI. Is that, as you know, we are not necessarily winning the battle on climate as yet and so we need to deal with both mitigation and adaptation and this panel will address both of those two things. We have very little time in the panel so I am going to speed along but that’s a good metaphor for the very little time we have to do something about climate change.

So we’re in action mode. It’s a call for collaboration. We’re not going to be, I apologize to our speakers and panelists for a number of things. One, this is not a real panel. We’re not going to be having discussions. This is just boom, boom, boom, talking to you about what everyone’s doing. Secondly, there’s going to be a kind of switcheroo moment when some other speakers come up and some of us are replaced up here. Apologies for that. It’s just the intensity of the panel and for all those things I apologize in advance but I don’t apologize. for the incredible quality of our panelists today. These are amazing people. And I would just end by saying that this is not a normal session.

This is an invitation for radical action -oriented collaboration with all of you. On that basis, let me begin by talking a little bit about a summit we held last year in London and the background to it and an organization that some of us are very deeply involved with and almost everyone here is a friend of called the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network. You will immediately note it has the cutesy acronym of GRAIL, like the Holy Grail. And what we’re trying to do is really see what the synergy is between the development agenda and the climate agenda through the application of AI. I’m going to speed through this. We’re going to then move to Professor David Sandelow, who actually anchored our summit last year, which is the first major global summit on the application of AI, to climate change.

and has very kindly flown in from Colombia. I’m going to ask our speakers one more favor, which is instead of my coming up and introducing all of you, if you don’t mind introducing yourselves, that will speed us along the way. So let’s go through this. So as you all know, and perhaps Professor Sandler will talk about it, the IPCC gave us a target, 43 % decarbonization from 2019 levels to 2030 levels. We were meant to reduce GHG emissions by that amount. In 2021, some of us at COP26 in Glasgow had a meeting to look at the likelihood of that happening. And we came to the conclusion that the likelihood was very low. And therefore, traditional approaches to climate mitigation and adaptation needed to be enhanced with new solutions.

And we thought, what was J -curving as fast as climate change was J -curving? And the only thing… There was nothing we could think of. There was nothing we could think of. There was nothing we could think of. was the application of AI, this great new suite of technologies, including, of course, quantum and all the other things that go with it. And we started to talk to people, and we talked to a whole bunch of people in the AI community, a whole bunch of people in the industrial and power, automotive, all the different sectors that produce emissions. And we said, are you talking to each other? And shockingly, people were not talking to each other.

There’s very little going on with some honorable exceptions at Google. Very few people were really in the AI community focusing on downstream issues around climate change. And similarly, the big industrial domains were not really focused on the use of AI for decarbonization and economic value creation. So with that lens, think about this session as throwing one J curve against another J curve. Can we throw the crazy increase in AI technology represented by this great summit against the world’s greatest challenge? That’s the purpose of the Grail organization, which is a not -for -profit based in London. It’s a vast terrain. We don’t have time to cover it all. It’s obviously mitigation. It’s obviously adaptation. We have to hit both.

And within that, there are endless taxonomies of all the wonderful things that AI can do. And, of course, you’ll be worried about the increased Gs from data centers, but that’s not the primary focus of our session today. That has been quantified. The Grantham Institute did a quantification last year of 0 .5 to 1 .4 gigatons of extra GHGs from data centers, but that’s from every kind of utilization against the potential benefit of 3 .5 to 5 .4 gigatons being sucked out of extra GHG emissions. So there’s clearly a very strong balance towards what AI can do to helping the planet in its shift towards a clean and green economy. Grail, what’s Grail? Grail is an attempt to create… …to create a collaborative network.

of great academic institutions, commercial institutions, AI companies, industrial companies, philanthropic institutions, private sector sustainability networks like WBCSD, bringing them all together with governments to try and create massive collaboration. In the next slide at the bottom, you see that same group of institutions. Bottom right, the ideas and deal flow. Going back into Grail, bottom left, the fact that this becomes a collaborative community to get all these solutions scaling at speed and at the top, then getting that deal flow funded through grants, through government programs, through venture capital, corporate funds, but to move the agenda to real solutions at massive scale as quickly as we possibly can. All of this led to a summit that occurred that I mentioned earlier last year.

Sean, will you keep me real on the time? Thank you. Okay. And that led to… 200 people. 115 organizations, including all the organizations represented here today, 60 speakers, and we looked at AI for power, AI for building materials, AI for everything you could think of vertically and horizontally, looking at the issues of materials innovation, looking at the issues of value chains, looking at carbon markets, and so forth. What has happened after the summit? Three things. One, we’ve created an online collaborative platform, and we invite all of you to join it, to co -create those solutions that can make a difference. Second, we’ve started to engage with governments around the world. Imagine a summit like this that was focused, yes, on development, but with a central climate focus as well.

How amazing would that be? And most importantly, we’re focusing on taxonomies that lead to massive calls for action from the innovation community. So we started to work on taxonomies for a variety of sectors, the energy sector, the built environment, materials innovation, and we worked with groups of AI experts and power experts and figured out what the big wins were, what are the big opportunities for companies to create economic value while at the same time massively decarbonizing. And this was an intellectual process, including many experts, some of whom are here today, that led to this astonishing work and identified the big win -win opportunities for economic value creation and decarbonization. On the bottom right, the teams from academia, industry, industry associations, a variety of other people and countries, eight country teams as well were involved in various ways.

So where’s this all going? Well, thank you to McKinsey for your very kind collaboration to after we had done all that work saying, hey, we want to help and kicking in and working with us to further refine those offerings and look at cost benefits and cost curves and all sorts of things. Delighted about it. And then there are, apart from working on the power sector, to look at generally what we can do, apart from working on the built environment, generally what we can do, apart from looking at materials innovation, generally what we can do to accelerate solutions for decarbonization through AI. We have two big partnerships that are emerging. One, and I want to slow down here.

Okay, 250 companies are part of the World Business Council, their network. That represents, in scope one, two, and three, 26 % of World GHGs. They’ve realized that that’s mainly in supply chains who are going into a partnership, so is McKinsey, so are other partners, to look at what are the AI opportunities to take startup and scale -ups into these decarbonization opportunities at massive scale with the 250 largest companies in the world representing 24 % of world revenues and 26 % of World GHGs. Finally, working with coalitions of energy companies, and Nalin, you’ll hear, and we’ll hear from later on, and we’re deeply partnered with Nalin. on this and others on this. How can we take this into accelerating? For example, UNESA has 71 energy companies, 750 gigawatts of clean power.

They want to go to 1 ,500 gigawatts of clean power by the end of the decade. How can we help them with AI? It’s a very practical lens. We invite you to join us and be part of this. On that note, I would like to briefly to invite to introduce Professor David Sandlow. David, I’m not going to go through your very distinguished background to take the whole panel to do that, except to say that you have worked in every different field, most importantly in the past in very senior positions in government, but now, of course, you’ve been the luminary on AI solutions on climate. That is the worst introduction you’ve ever got. I’m sorry about that, just in the interest of time, but I’m…

Really very honored that you’ve flown all the way to come here, and I’m handing them over to you. to you.

David Sandalow

Thank you so much. Uday. Uday, thank you. Your energy, your enthusiasm, your passion, they’re all infectious. And your intellect is remarkable. What you’re driving forward in this area is world changing. You are not just an inspiration, you’re a gravitational force that are pulling people together to work on this, so thank you so much. Your, what you did in London was remarkable. What you’re doing here is incredible and I’m looking forward to being part of what you’re doing in the future. So I’ve, it’s been my privilege to lead some teams that have been working on these issues over the course of the past couple of years and I’m going to talk about one of the projects that we’ve done.

It looks like the slides are not there. There’s a certain, turning on the screen. There it goes. I will say that while we wait, I’ll say that I really like the metaphor that you had, Uday, about two hockey sticks. And this is just a remarkable convergence of two of the most important trends that are happening in human history right now. One of them is, alas, the increase in greenhouse gas emissions, which is happening at such an astonishing pace. But the second is the exponential growth of the capacities of artificial intelligence. What’s driving me is we need to find a way to make sure that that second trend, artificial intelligence, helps to solve the first problem.

And that’s the study that we did, which we brought together a team of 25 experts. Just wonderful people. One of them was . Song Lee, the head of the IP, last head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and some top experts. And the question we asked was, it was very simple, how do you use artificial intelligence to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? There it is. It came up on the screen. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. And so it’s a very simple question. How do you use AI to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases? We came up with 17 chapters. We wanted to do more than just provide analysis. We wanted to provide actionable ideas for what to do.

So every chapter has recommendations. You can find a print version available on Amazon, and free downloads of the entire volume, including chapter -by -chapter versions, are available at these websites. I want to thank the government of Japan, including NITO and MEDI, for supporting this work. They’ve been very important supporters of work on AI and clean energy more broadly. Oh, I’m going to promote my podcast later. But I have a podcast that’s talking about this topic as well. But so here’s our – Here’s our – Here’s the table of contents for our work. We talked – We have introductions to both AI and climate change in this volume. One of the things we’re trying to do is target this both to experts and to people who are beginners in this topic.

And, you know, Uday talked about bringing together different communities. One of our basic conclusions was we need to bring together experts in climate change and experts in AI. And there are a lot of people who know a lot about climate change but don’t know a lot about AI. A lot of people who know a lot about AI, they don’t know about climate change. So we decided to have primers on each of those topics. And then we talk about eight different sectors and a number of cross -cutting topics. So we have five key takeaways. This was an interesting exercise with all of our authors taking 300 pages and trying to distill it into five key takeaways. But here’s what we came up with.

The first one, I mean, this is a kind of bottom line, but it’s important. AI does have significant potential to contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. And we categorized it with two categories. One is climate change. It’s incremental gains such as just improving efficiency. It’s output itself. And then we have the other category, which is the environmental impact. solar farms, building energy efficiency. There are lots of incremental gains that can be made, but also transformational gains. In particular, new tech, new materials and other things. We looked at whether greenhouse gas emissions are causing increases in, or greenhouse gas emissions are increasing as a result of computing operations. We decided, based on the available evidence, that the best estimate is less than 1 percent and maybe much less than 1 percent of greenhouse gas emissions are currently coming from AI.

That tracks with the Grantham study that Uday talked about. That tracks with what the IEA has said as well. The main barriers to AI’s impact in reducing greenhouse gas emissions are a lack of data and a lack of trained personnel. There’s other barriers as well, but obviously you need data. A lot of places we don’t have the data for this purpose and you need people. Trust is essential. People aren’t going to use AI unless they trust it. And then every organization with a role in climate change mitigation should consider opportunities for AI. And we need AI to contribute to its work. I think as AI grows in the public… consciousness at summits like this that’s becoming less and less of a kind of radical recommendation.

But it’s just so important. I think if you’re working in climate mitigation, you need to have a team dedicated to AI and how AI can help. So I’ll just run through quickly because we only have a little bit of time, some of our chapters. We have a chapter on the introduction to AI, and if you’re a climate person that doesn’t know a lot about AI, this might be helpful to you. And one of the things we did is we broke down AI capabilities into four basic categories at a very high level. The first thing AI can do is detect patterns. And how can that be helpful in climate change mitigation? Well, one example is detecting methane emissions from satellite data.

You know, some of you probably know this, but I mean, we know much, much more today than we did 10 years ago about methane emissions. And that has helped us dramatically to begin to reduce methane emissions. That’s entirely dependent upon the optical sensing process. And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. So, you know, we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. So, you know, we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. So, you know, we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years.

And we’ve been able to do that over the last 10 years. impact so far. AI can also predict, such as weather patterns at solar and wind farms. It can optimize, such as power flows on transmission lines. And it can simulate, such as battery chemistry action. So I think for me, in fact, I’m teaching a course at Columbia right now where we’re emphasizing this framework of detecting, predicting, optimizing, and simulating. And those are, broadly speaking, the capabilities that AI brings to the table. A lot to say about climate change, but just for those who aren’t paying attention, atmospheric concentrations of heat -trapping gases are now higher than any time in human history. In fact, higher than any time in the past three million years.

And July 22nd, 2024, was the warmest day ever recorded. 2024 was the warmest year ever recorded by far. And the warmest 11 years ever recorded were in the last 11 years. So we are living in an era of climate change. We do deep dives into a number of different sectors. I’m just going to talk about a few of them. Power sector is… is maybe the most important just because it’s already 28 % of greenhouse gas emissions, and our strategy for reaching decarbonization requires us to electrify lots of things. So we need to grow the power sector and decarbonize the sector at the same time. I don’t think we’re going to be able to do that without AI tools. AI is already helping decarbonize the power sector, optimizing location of generation transmission, increasing output at solar farms, but it can do much more.

Dynamic line rating is optimal power flow analyses. But to do this, we need standardized data. We need trained personnel. The utility business model is a challenge. So this is a really important area that requires a lot of attention and work. Oh, and a final point, the last bullet on this slide. Using AI in real -time operations can cause real security and safety risks. So we need to be very careful about generative AI in context. So even as we look to deploy AI to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we need to be very attentive to these risks. risks. I kind of find it amazing how few people pay attention sometimes to food systems and climate change, that 30 percent or more of greenhouse gases are in some way related to the food system, and the food system has, is threatened by climate change.

AI can do a lot to improve both mitigation and resilience in the food system. We just, there’s a few examples here, integrating data from soil sensors to create fertilizer management plans, creating virtual farms. There’s lots of things that can be done here. But coming back to this issue of lack of data, it’s a huge problem, especially in the Global South. So the efforts to build up a digital public infrastructure that are happening here in India are so important in this regard. I’m going to go quickly here. We look at buildings where there’s tremendous potential. I think materials innovation is one of the most important areas. And, you know, 150 years ago, when Thomas Edison invented the modern light bulb, he literally spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, he spent a year, running electricity through dozens, I think hundreds of different filaments to figure out how much light and heat would be produced.

So today, we can simulate a million of those interactions in a second. And there’s already tremendous advances in the pace of innovation in battery chemistry and some other areas using AI tools. And for me, this is one of the most promising areas in terms of transformational gains in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Extreme weather response is extremely important from a resilient standpoint, and we don’t have a lot of time to get into it, but I think that the AI ML -enabled forecasting is transformational because it’s so much cheaper, for example. I mean, at really 1 ,000x the cost, 1 ,000x less the cost, we can run AI ML weather prediction tools and make a big difference on extreme weather response.

We have findings and recommendations throughout this report. You can see it here, again. We just did a new report in the same series on sustainable data centers. And our main message is there are that with this data center construction boom happening now, this is the time to be paying attention to data and sustainability. We are investing right now in multi -decade assets. We need to be paying attention to this. Smart siting is a key. And finally, here’s a plug for my podcast. It started about a year ago. I’ve had some great guests, Jensen Huang, Dami Lola, Ogunbi, the head of sustainable energy, for all Jennifer Granholm, the U .S. Energy Secretary under Biden. Listen, as they say, available on all major podcast platforms.

Uday, once again, thank

Uday Khemka

I feel horrified we’ve got speakers of this caliber and so little time. So thank you so much for your leadership. May I invite both of you to speak? You can speak from here if you prefer. We’ve got two great leaders from Google. Obviously, you know, in the sphere. of corporate AI leadership on climate, there is no one that parallels all of you and we look forward to hearing from you your thoughts. Thank you.

Vrushali Gaud

Thank you very much for hosting this. I don’t know if that’s a privilege or that’s pressure when you start with that sentence about the leadership position Google has. I just want a quick question. Raise of hands, how many of you have used Google today for either maps or searching something? Thank you. So you know who we are. This is my car. I’m Vrushali Gaud. I’ll introduce myself and then Spencer you can answer that. I lead Google’s in a nutshell decarbonization water and circularity strategy for the company. Essentially what that means is I’m responsible for quite a few things that you had in your slide that we should be doing and a good way to introduce myself is also I like getting things done and so I feel like my inner calling around this is we’ve had a lot of conversations we’ve had a lot of playbooks and research and things But it’s almost like, how do you act on it?

How do you execute on it? How do you start delivering the outcome that I think we all are looking for? So that’s the kind of space that I come from. And a privilege to be at Google, who allows us to kind of expand that space. So the reason I asked you all to show your hands, most of you know Google as a search or map and similar pieces, information source. One of the other things Google is now, I think, as a company, is a full -stack company. And when I say full -stack, that means the search and the information is a top layer of it. But underneath that sits the entire physical infrastructure that drives that.

And so that’s data centers. That’s the way you operate that. That’s the networks that feed into all of the applications. And so when we look at climate, and my title actually is Global Director of Climate Operations. So I say that out of humility because when we look at climate, we’re trying to put it across our operations the best we can. Thank you. So we, and good examples of that, I’ll start with data centers. The big topic right now, how do we operationalize them? Where do we cite them? The location, what impact it has on the community, what impact it has on the infrastructure there. Citing is a big part of it. Access to clean energy is something we’re looking at, and pretty much we have a carbon -free energy goal.

So I think for us, if you look at climate, a big portion of climate is emissions. How do we impact emissions? It’s from electricity. What do we do with electricity? Shift to clean energy. Or renewables. And so that’s the spectrum that we look at. And so a lot of our investments are in carbon -free energy and how we think about it. And it also is more not just take from the grid or expect the government or, you know, sort of the infrastructure to get you there, but how do we invest and bring more clean energy to the grid? I think that’s a big piece of, I think, what companies can do at the speed at which we are all moving is, how do we take these sort of bigger picture systems problems and embrace them and solve them?

So one is big, one is small. is generation of clean electricity, and the other is grid, and how do you solve the grid problems? So that’s the infrastructure of AI. Then using AI, I think that’s going to some of the other things, Professor, you were saying is, we look at how we could use AI to drive our operations more efficiently. It’s very boring pieces. It’s not really shiny superstar things, but a lot of the impact comes just in general. I look at water taps, and I remember the amount of leakages we have on water taps, the amount of electricity wires that are not connected, just the inefficient use of resources is a big one, and how can we use AI to sort of optimize, whether it’s optimizing within the use of our chips, optimizing the grid, optimizing which applications run from where.

That’s a big part of our strategy. And then the third piece is, what do you use AI, and how do you use it for climate? Now, clearly, our business is information and search, but which means we also have access to a lot of data. And so one of the ways we consider, as what you can do in AI is, how do you use these large data sets? A, find a way to open source them, encourage different use of them, but also incubate certain initiatives that can help to show the light to others. So Earth AI is a big one in which we you’ve got satellite images, you’ve got weather data, you’ve got all of these big chunks of information that we can put out there.

And then there’s an application layer, which I think is of interest to you in terms of resiliency or mitigation. So one of the things, you know, which you probably haven’t heard of as much is Flood Hub. So we have a lot of information put out there as to flood risks of different region, which then other companies can use for whatever products they’re launching, whether it’s insurance, whether it’s real estate, fire sat, wildfire risks. How do you do prediction around it? Something all utilities companies, especially from in California, where I’m based, is we’re very passionate about using that for prediction. I can go on about the list of sort of what data can be used and how it can be leveraged.

The thing I think I’m going to go back to the, you know, crux of what you had in this is. is we’re in the timeframe of two hockey sticks. One is the impact on emissions, and I completely appreciate that the tech companies, hyperscalers, data centers are at a scale contributing to it, which we want to obviously help mitigate or replace with clean electricity as much as we can. And then the other is, how do you use the innovation curve on this? And I think we’ve just scratched the surface. And there’s, of course, like, you know, there’ll be trials and errors, but the surface around how do we democratize data, how do we encourage innovation, and how do we scale it very quickly?

Because I think those are the three, the trifecta of how do you drive this change? And so one of the ways I’ll end with saying I’m super proud of what we’ve done this week, trying to bridge those two gaps is we’re working with the Principal Scientific Advisory of the Government of India to launch a Google Center of Climate Tech. We call it Climate Tech because it does, those are the two hockey sticks that you’re trying to get in, right? The tech scale and the climate impact. and we are our goal is to encourage academic research but research that is actionable so five pilots first of all kinds and how you can scale um and there’s a lot of uh you know focus already on electricity so we are trying to do the non -electricity pieces in that which is around low carbon steel low carbon materials built environments um low carbon sustainable aviation fuel and then the biggest one we don’t talk we talk about what i think is a big lever across everything is green skills you need to embed this sort of a thinking which is green climate first across every domain and how can we encourage that in in india and especially the tier two cities so super excited about those two hockey sticks and how we’ve as a company can bridge those gaps

Spencer Low

Intensity of what is produced in this part of the world actually is really important globally. But what’s really distinctive about APAC is actually the third major topic, which is livelihoods. As I mentioned, this is the part of the world which has a lot of developmental ambitions, and livelihoods are key. So my colleague touched on, Vushali touched on Chapter 3, power systems. Actually, I would like to touch on agriculture and food systems, which is your Chapter 4. So agriculture and other land use is actually the largest employment sector in the Asia -Pacific. I mean, I believe in India it’s about 46 % of jobs. And for the region, it’s the largest sector, about the same as the next two sectors added together, which are actually manufacturing and wholesale and retail trade.

Add those together, you get the same number of jobs as in agriculture. Now, over 80%. 80 % of farms around the world, and especially in India and the rest of the global south, are smallholder farms. farmers. And that creates an issue because a lot of the technology for agriculture is developed for large commercial farms, satellite imagery, et cetera. So this is one example I’d just like to delve into in terms of what Google is doing to contribute to the data, the digital public goods that Rushali spoke of. So if you want to use satellite imagery and actually understand agriculture so you can do things with it, you need to find the boundaries of your individual farms. That’s your individual unit and often less than two hectares, if not smaller.

And so you can do that with people poring over maps or satellite imagery, but that’s not scalable. But this is a really interesting problem for AI. And so for those of you who’d like to know more about this, there’s actually an exhibit at the Expo at the Google Pavilion. But this is what we call agricultural landscape understanding and agricultural monitoring and event detection. So we’ve trained AI to actually digitally enhance the environment. The field boundary. and you can say, well, that’s interesting because you can zoom into India and look at the Indo -Gangetic plain and see all the field boundaries. We’ve also trained the model to distinguish what crops are being grown through multispectral imagery.

And with that, we can detect events like tillage, sowing, harvest, et cetera. And all this data is now available. It is part of the Krishi DSS. So it’s contributing to the digital public infrastructure of the Indian government through the Ministry of Agriculture, through state governments, for example, like that of Telangana and the ADEX system. And what this does is it allows NGOs, government bodies, et cetera, to actually give advice to farmers because you now understand what’s going on on the ground, which is a critical driver for mitigation benefits, but also adaptation as actually the planting and the growing of crops. So we’re seeing best practices for planting. and what to plant is actually changing over time with climate change.

So do find out more at the pavilion. But one thing that I like to double -click on, as we say, is actually the innovation part of it. This digital public infrastructure is only helpful if it can be really used. And it’s not just governments and NGOs. It’s also startups. They’re innovating and finding new ways of using this information. So companies like Carbon Farm, they’re in France. They’re using this data. Varaha, which is a social startup, entrepreneurship. But also, Wadwani AI is another startup that we are supporting as well in terms of driving innovation in the agricultural space. So this is really all going to be accelerated through the use of AI, and we’re very excited to contribute to that.

Thanks.

Uday Khemka

Wonderful. You can see – I’m going to just grab one of these. Thank you. So, hello. Yeah, you can see that Google represents the convergence of the two themes we were talking about. And I think you have a wonderful web. At least I’ve seen access to materials about your sustainability strategy online. So if people want to know more, I’m sure they can go there.

Vrushali Gaud

Yeah, I’ll make a plug. Website, sustainabilitygoogle .com. It has all of our information. And the expo booth has all of our information. So thank you very, very much.

Uday Khemka

Now, we are inevitably vastly behind schedule as we are with climate change. However, we’re going to keep going with great focus. And we’re going to turn to the energy and power sector. Now, this is a bit embarrassing because we have to do a little bit of a switchover of people. But we don’t have time to put up the new names here. So we’re just going to announce them and listen with great attention. So we have two fantastic speakers from the energy sector, which, as you know, is one, if not the most important sector. Do you want to come closer, Nalim? And we can just be together here. I would ask, obviously the decarbonization of the energy sector is absolutely critical without that nothing happens so I’m going to hand over straight away first to you if I may Nalin, to set the stage a little bit and what you’re trying to do with Climate Collective and UNESA and then Dan more specifically to what you’re up to so over to both of you and obviously introduce yourself sorry I haven’t done it for you

Nalin Agarwal

no, thank you I understand we are short on time so I’ll keep very brief I’m Nalin Agarwal, one of the founding partners of the Climate Collective I think we’ll have the slides up soon great, so today I’m just going to talk about very quickly a program that we’ve been running for 6 years and where we partnered with Graylon to really drive decarbonization and grid modernization starting with India but across the global south so if I can move on who’s operating that? let me go there to you I’ll do it. Okay, just quick snapshots. We are an ESO enterprise support organization, largest in the global south, about 1 ,500 startups supported. Key partnerships, UNESA is a key one. I don’t want to spend too much time here, but that’s what we’re going to spend some time on as well.

We do a lot of work in AI, in power but beyond. So next week we’re doing the Delhi Climate Innovation Week. In fact, Google is a sponsor and partner there, and of course, Grail is as well. But happy to chat about this later. Here’s what we’re trying to do. I think what’s happening is that a lot of the challenges on renewables are being solved. They will be solved. I think one of the increasing recognitions is that the grid is a key bottleneck now, and we need to really work on grid transformation. That includes both decarbonization and modernization. So that’s what we’re working towards. So we work with utilities. There’s about 22 of those that we’ve worked with so far.

Work on a problem statement approach. Get startups to apply. Select startups. Get them to create business cases and pilot plans and eventually lead to pilots, right? So there’s 22 utilities that have participated and have led to about 20 pilots, a subset of which have become large deployments, right? So it’s a very unique program in the global south, actually. It’s the only one, right? High conversion ratio, so about 30 % of the pilots that have been proposed have come in. Key partners, I mean, 22 utilities and all the people that are working in power sector reform are part of this program. I mean, again, I won’t spend too much time, but there’s a lot of this information available online. All the startups that are vetted, ready to deploy, are available for utilities to engage with.

we have a bunch of case studies also but the key point is this we are now developing this along with Grail into a global AI for power innovation platform which has three components the open innovation program which is electron wipe on the top there is the knowledge hub which is basically a peer sharing platform where we do convenings co -located at COPS at climate weeks etc and then there is an online solution database of pre -wetted solutions. I’ll stop there and hand it over to Dan

Dan Travers

Thanks. Thanks Nalan I’m going to stand up too because I like to stand up and talk so my name is Dan Travers I’m from Open Climate Fix we are a startup doing AI for grid. I’m going to dive a little bit into the grid area which has been talked about a bit in order to get to net zero we need to electrify we need to green the grid and we need to electrify everything the grid of the past had Usually in each country there was tens of generators and the grid operator would know those people on a first -name basis and they would ring them up and tell them when to turn up and down.

We’ve now got millions of generators with solar panels, wind turbines everywhere. The grid of the past had variability from just demand. We’ve now got variability from demand and the wind speed and the clouds, right, so three sources of variability. The grid of the past had a normal demand that we understood well. We’ve now got data centres, we’ve got EVs, we’ve got batteries, we’ve got AC, so the demand is changing shape incredibly. How are you possibly going to address this balancing of this grid with a bunch of people in a room, right? You need AI solutions. You need a highly digital grid. You need something which can schedule and marshal all of these assets in a digital at sort of AI speed.

So… That’s really important. And why is it important… It’s important because if we don’t do it, we’ll have blackouts, and if we don’t do it, we’ll have costs increasing because the way that grid operators are currently dealing with this challenge is they’re actually scheduling a lot of backup generation. It’s usually gas -fired generation. It’s very expensive, so bills are going up. And if you look around what’s happening now, there’s a push back against the green revolution. If we don’t address these problems, we’re going to have a democratic pushback, and we will have a reversal. So AI solutions can really help us in fighting the battle for hearts and minds as well as the actual physical battle.

So myself, I came from sort of banking tech space. Jack, my co -founder, came from Google DeepMind, who the name keeps coming up. We both saw there was a big gap between the amazing tech that was available in some of these industries and grid operators and the electricity industry, which is by nature very risk -averse. It has to be worried about things failing all the time. So we saw the gap between those two, and we formed Open Climate Fix to really try and address that gap. to bridge that, to take sort of moonshot ideas and actually build a rocket ship that is going to fly to the moon and actually implement something and give data to researchers.

The company’s non -profit, we’re open source, and that’s about the scaling, which I think is a key part of the title of this talk. So we’ve built the best solar forecast in the UK, we think, by about 20 % or 30%, like quite a long way. We now want to take that, we are starting to take that to India. We’re working with Adani, we’re working with Rajasthan Grid Operator, and with a combination of open source plus commercial sort of expansion, we see the AI tools as super transferable across grids. So I’m really excited that we can take tools from one grid and apply them to all the grids in the world and use AI to solve climate change.

Thank you.

Uday Khemka

Thank you so much. You can imagine if we had more time, we would have had a panel on the built environment, a panel on industrial decarbon, a panel on transportation. We don’t have the time. But thank you for that fantastic presentation. A couple of interventions. Now we turn to the last segment. We have three very distinguished institutions with us, all involved at the strategic level. with Grail and with this process. And I’ll start, Ankur, with you at McKinsey, who have been close partners.

Ankur Puri

Thanks a lot. Another race against time. So what would I like to… I should say that Sean went out of the room and negotiated five minutes more for us in the room. So… Okay. So, while the slides come up, it’s firstly a privilege to be here. And thank you for the opportunity for McKinsey to be part of the journey that you are leading, Uday. And thank you all for being here and shaping this in your own special way, at your own scale. I’m Ankur. I’m a partner based out of our India office. I lead Quantum Black in India, which is our AI team. And I work across sectors, because that’s really… a lot of fun.

And part of my work has been in energy. Part of my work has been in the built environment. Thank you. but I’m representing the team which is quite global that has had the privilege to work with the GRAIL effort. So I’d like to just talk about how this little effort with us is shaping the larger movement that GRAIL represents. So everybody’s talking about the impact of AI, so I’m not going to talk more about that, but the promise of AI, let’s just be clear. I think the way large global efforts have sort of found shape is to focus around a few challenges. So one of the big pieces that the GRAIL work has been about is shaping these four challenges and articulating them.

They’re about operational improvement in our current way of working. Big consulting words, strategic intelligence and foresight, basically better planning. Okay, build things better. Transformation, innovation. So can we do new things that don’t exist? That will help the future. And the last one is autonomous operations, which is essentially do you do current operations in a very different way? Use drones instead of people to go see how the wiring is in a large electric plant. and create more impact. Several of the examples you heard about will fit into this across energy -built environment materials and this can keep expanding food systems perhaps. Now, there’s a huge amount of work going on in just collecting the knowledge on each of those challenges.

Then you think about those fields of play, the energy -built environment. Within that, there are stakeholders. So for each stakeholder, what’s relevant? And then for each stakeholder, let’s say if you talk about system operators here as an example, there’s network planning is a domain to think about. Asset management is a domain to think about. Delivery is a domain to think about. Field force execution. Think of this as you’re now bringing in the language of the industry into this knowledge base so that if someone manages a power plant, they’ll be like, okay, what’s my library of things I need to look at? Tomorrow, that can then connect it to people who are innovating or providing these solutions.

One important gap in the middle is, okay, how valuable is it? each of these ideas when it comes to cost, when it comes to emissions. And the work’s not yet ready to be unveiled, but we are quite privileged to work with the Grail team and, of course, global experts to start to now quantify, both in terms of economic impact, but also in terms of direct emissions impact, what each of these applications could be worth. Because then our scarce resources and limited time can be focused on the most important problems. And I think that’s what’s coming up ahead, and I look forward to all of you pushing the boundary further, and it’s a privilege to be part of this.

Thank you.

Speaker 1

Okay, I will kick off. So as a metaphor for the climate, we’re drastically running out of time, and I can see a clock ticking down in front of me. So I’m Rob. I’m from University College London. 200 years ago, University College London was founded with a… a purpose to drive… change to be impactful and to create useful knowledge. That’s really important for the climate because we no longer have the ability to let knowledge sit on the shelf when it comes to climate. So in 2026 at UCL, the way that we bring our community together is through what we call the Grand Challenges. These are a self -funded, cross -university way of tackling problems that are too complex for any one discipline.

Climate crisis at UCL sits alongside challenges like mental health and well -being and data -empowered societies, and they’re found in all 11 of UCL’s faculties, from engineering to health and arts and humanities. So where does AI come into this? Well, AI at UCL is not seen as a single discipline, but as an enabling layer embedded across the entire institution. It builds on our heritage in AI. We’ve got three Nobel Prizes, we’re the birthplace of Google DeepMind, we’ve got several Nobel Prizes, we’ve got the Nobel Prize for the companies all at unicorn valuations. Four quick examples at UCL at the moment. Starting at home we use our own campus as a living lab we’ve got sensor data from across our estate that forecasts energy demand and detects unusual patterns across UCL’s buildings and we turn that into insights for practical intervention.

Second example we’ve got our spin -out Carbon Re which uses deep reinforcement learning and digital twin optimization to cut fuel use and emissions in energy intensive processes like cement production. Third example is a partnership UCL Center for sustainability and real tech innovation is created in partnership with PGM real estate it links computer science to the built environment and accelerates AI enabled sustainability in the real estate it drives impact on the environment but also value for the real estate investors. And then we’ve got our digital innovation center which uses deep reinforcement learning and digital twin optimization to cut fuel use and emissions in energy intensive processes like cement production. Third example is a partnership UCL’s center for sustainability and real tech innovation is created in partnership with PGM real estate it links computer science to the built environment and accelerates AI enabled sustainability in the real estate it drives impact on the environment but also value for the real estate investors.

And fourth UCL Grand Challenges has supported an inclusive and AI tool that transforms satellite and drone imagery into accessible web -based sea ice classification that’s being used to support safer travel for Inuit communities. Aviation is another frontier for us. It’s a grand challenge in its own right. And in there, we are looking at short -term and long -term interventions. AI is used to create short -term interventions that drive down its impact on the climate, while engineering is undertaking long -term technology transform in electrification and hydrogen propulsion. And finally, for UCL, convening really matters. In April 2025, as Uday mentioned, UCL, along with GRAIL, hosted our International Summit on AI Solutions for Climate Change, exploring sectors like energy and the built environment, and moving from discussions and pilots to deployment and impact.

I’ll finish with a quick call to action, which is that the grand challenges created by the U .S. government have been the greatest challenge for us. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past.

We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of challenges in the past. We’ve had a lot of

Adam Sobey

Cheers, and we’re properly into Alex Ferguson overtime now. So hopefully not with the climate change, so I’ll try and leave a little bit of time for Uday. So I’m Adam Sobey, I’m from the Alan Turing Institute. This is the UK’s National AI Institute. We focus on five missions across environment, which is focused on environmental forecasting and climate change, on sustainability, on defence and security, on health, and on foundational research. And as the Director for Sustainability, obviously I think that’s the most important mission, and that’s why I’m here. But we believe that the time for action is now. is literally on fire. We saw fires in the US which have been linked heavily to climate change.

We are seeing droughts in India which is affecting the food and people’s lives. We’re seeing pollution in Southeast Asia which is affecting health. We cannot wait for new fuels for the energy transition to occur. We need to do something immediately starting today. And we believe that AI can play that role. We know this because we’ve, as a part of our institute, have applied AI and data science to shipping and reduced emissions by 18%. We have done this in buildings where we’ve improved HVAC optimisation to reduce emissions by 42%. And we’ve created an underground urban farm that works entirely off renewable energies in the UK, allowing us to grow crops without using any CO2. However, I think we’ve done some relatively impressive things for a relatively small institute.

We’ve done some really impressive things for a relatively small institute. We can’t do this alone. we realised that this is a global problem and the Sustainability Missions chief funder is Lloyd’s Register Foundation which is a global charity heavily focused on the global south and so we think that it’s really important that we work together both within the UK and outside of the UK to solve these problems and that’s why we’re really pleased to be part of Braille to look for global solutions to global problems so thank you very much

Uday Khemka

It’s a tribute to all our speakers that they managed to put extraordinary quality into this ridiculously short time frame. I’ll just end on three words. One word is that we have come through our work together to find hundreds of examples of opportunities where businesses for example can save money or increase revenues, improve their economic value while at the same time massively improving their emissions profiles on the mitigation side. On the adaptation side… to your points. There are many examples from Google to all of your institutions where these technologies are already being deployed to save lives at a big scale. And the last point I’d make, apart from I’d ask you to thank our speakers with a big round of applause, is first to say that again and again you’ve heard one theme coming out of this group, which is radical collaboration.

Work with us to make the difference that we all believe and know can be made through the application of AI solutions to climate change. So maybe we could give our speakers a round of applause. Thank you very, very much.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (16)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (3)
Confirmedhigh

“Uday Khemka framed the discussion as an urgent, radical, action‑oriented partnership that brings together development, a sustainable planet and AI.”

The knowledge base records that Uday urges an urgent, radical, action-oriented partnership linking development and climate agendas through AI [S1].

Confirmedmedium

“Khemka warned that the panel’s brief time mirrored the narrow window for climate action.”

The discussion was described as urgent with speakers emphasizing the limited time available to address climate change, confirming the narrow-window analogy [S2].

Additional Contextlow

“The session maintained high energy and optimism about AI’s potential while acknowledging the gravity of the climate crisis.”

S2 adds that the tone was high-energy and optimistic about AI’s potential, providing additional nuance to the report’s description of the panel’s atmosphere [S2].

External Sources (91)
S1
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — – Nalin Agarwal- Ankur Puri
S2
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — Speakers:Nalin Agarwal, Ankur Puri Speakers:Uday Khemka, David Sandalow, Nalin Agarwal, Ankur Puri, Speaker 1
S3
https://app.faicon.ai/ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — And part of my work has been in energy. Part of my work has been in the built environment. Thank you. but I’m representi…
S4
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — Cheers, and we’re properly into Alex Ferguson overtime now. So hopefully not with the climate change, so I’ll try and le…
S5
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — Cheers, and we’re properly into Alex Ferguson overtime now. So hopefully not with the climate change, so I’ll try and le…
S6
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — Cheers, and we’re properly into Alex Ferguson overtime now. So hopefully not with the climate change, so I’ll try and le…
S7
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — – David Sandalow- Dan Travers- Nalin Agarwal – David Sandalow- Spencer Low – Uday Khemka- David Sandalow- Adam Sobey …
S8
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — How are you possibly going to address this balancing of this grid with a bunch of people in a room, right? You need AI s…
S9
AI for Good Impact Awards — – **Dan Travers** – Representative from Open Climate Fix
S10
https://app.faicon.ai/ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — So myself, I came from sort of banking tech space. Jack, my co -founder, came from Google DeepMind, who the name keeps c…
S11
Keynote-Martin Schroeter — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not specified, Area of expertise: Not specified (appears to be an event moderator or host introd…
S12
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning — -Speaker 1: Role/title not specified – appears to be a student or child participant in educational videos/demonstrations…
S13
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vijay Shekar Sharma Paytm — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not mentioned, Area of expertise: Not mentioned (appears to be an event host or moderator introd…
S14
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — 1354 words | 203 words per minute | Duration: 398 secondss Thank you very much for hosting this. I don’t know if that’s…
S15
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — -Vrushali Gaud- Global Director of Climate Operations at Google, leads Google’s decarbonization, water and circularity s…
S16
The Innovation Beneath AI: The US-India Partnership powering the AI Era — -Vrushali Gaud- Global Director of Climate Operations at Google
S17
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — – David Sandalow- Spencer Low – Uday Khemka- David Sandalow- Vrushali Gaud- Spencer Low- Adam Sobey- Dan Travers
S18
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — no, thank you I understand we are short on time so I’ll keep very brief I’m Nalin Agarwal, one of the founding partners …
S19
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — -Nalin Agarwal- Founding partner of Climate Collective, works with UNESA (utilities association), focuses on enterprise …
S20
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — I don’t want to spend too much time here, but that’s what we’re going to spend some time on as well. We do a lot of work…
S21
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — -Uday Khemka- Moderator/Host, involved with the Green Artificial Intelligence Learning Network (GRAIL) organization
S22
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — Speakers:Uday Khemka, David Sandalow Speakers:Uday Khemka, David Sandalow, Adam Sobey Speakers:Uday Khemka, David Sand…
S23
Planetary Limits of AI: Governance for Just Digitalisation? | IGF 2023 Open Forum #37 — Atsuko Okuda:Asko. Thank you very much for giving… Thank you. First of all, I would like to thank the organizer to inv…
S24
Green AI and the battle between progress and sustainability — AI is increasingly recognised for its transformative potential and growing environmental footprint across industries. Th…
S25
UN warns AI poses risks without proper climate oversight — AI can help tackle the climate crisis, butgovernments must regulate itto ensure positive outcomes, says UN climate chief…
S26
Panel Discussion AI and the Creative Economy — The speaker emphasizes the need to efficiently use the limited 30-minute timeframe by jumping directly into substantive …
S27
Panel Discussion Summary: AI Governance Implementation and Capacity Building in Government — – Albina Ovcearenco- Fadila Leturcq Evidence building phase needed across sectors and regions to move beyond principle-…
S28
Sandboxes for Data Governance: Global Responsible Innovation | IGF 2023 WS #279 — Climate change requires collaborative efforts through a shared space for potential solutions.
S29
High-Level sessions: Setting the Scene – Global Supply Chain Challenges and Solutions — The convocation is envisioned as a multidisciplinary forum, gathering voices from sectors ranging from insurance to fina…
S30
Networking Session #50 AI and Environment: Sustainable Development | IGF 2023 — Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies have the potential to significantly contribute to creating greener cities and …
S31
Safe and Responsible AI at Scale Practical Pathways — Guardrails, Human‑in‑the‑Loop, and Risk‑Assessment Mechanisms Are Essential for Reliable Deployment
S32
Generative AI presents the biggest data-risk challenge in history — Cybersecurity specialistswarnthat generative AI systems, such as large language models, are creating a data risk frontie…
S33
Main Session on Artificial Intelligence | IGF 2023 — Seth Center:IAEA is an imperfect analogy for the current technology and the situation we faced for multiple reasons. One…
S34
Open Forum #27 Make Your AI Greener a Workshop on Sustainable AI Solutions — Sustainable development | Infrastructure | Development The moderator emphasized the paradoxical nature of AI technology…
S35
Using AI to tackle our planet’s most urgent problems — Development | Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory Examples of systems processing vast amounts of data in real-time, f…
S36
Open Forum #53 AI for Sustainable Development Country Insights and Strategies — Anshul argues that AI can be a potential big equalizer, like electricity, that can change everything when properly imple…
S37
(Re)-Building Trust Online: A Call to Action | IGF 2023 Launch / Award Event #144 — The launch of the task force and its principles were seen as an opportunity to pave a strategic path forward and to coor…
S38
Climate change and Technology implementation | IGF 2023 WS #570 — Speaker:Thank you, Millennium. I’m Sakura Takahashi from Japan. I’m speaking here today on behalf of Climate Youth Japan…
S39
AI’s impact on environment — The rapid rise of AIhas raisedconcerns about its environmental impact, particularly in data centres. It is projected tha…
S40
Global AI Governance: Reimagining IGF’s Role & Impact — Paloma Lara-Castro: Thank you, Liz. Hi, everyone. Thank you for the space. I’m representing Derechos Digitales. We are a…
S41
Exploring the Intersections of Grassroots Movements — Additionally, the discussions shed light on the use of technology as a tool to combat institutional and environmental ra…
S42
The future of Digital Public Infrastructure for environmental sustainability — Yolanda Martinez:Yes, definitely. First of all, congratulations. I thoroughly agree that it’s not easy to put together t…
S43
Cooperation for a Green Digital Future | IGF 2023 — In the analysis, several key points are highlighted by different speakers. Firstly, it is underscored that a significant…
S44
Empowering the Ethical Supply Chain: steps to responsible sourcing and circular economy (Lenovo) — Collaboration, education, and awareness are identified as crucial factors in driving sustainability efforts. However, ch…
S45
Open Forum: Liberating Science — While climate advocacy is seen as necessary, it is also an exhausting undertaking that requires dedicated effort and per…
S46
AI and Data Driving India’s Energy Transformation for Climate Solutions — Creating sustainable funding and governance models for long-term maintenance of data infrastructure Establishing clear …
S47
AI and Data Driving India’s Energy Transformation for Climate Solutions — “So I’m hearing sort of ensuring coordination between departments, ensuring thinking about the data strategy.”[58]. “But…
S48
Climate change and Technology implementation | IGF 2023 WS #570 — Artificial intelligence and improved sensors can provide real-time environmental data, shaping climate research and poli…
S49
Open Forum #70 the Future of DPI Unpacking the Open Source AI Model — Major barriers include skills gaps, capacity constraints, infrastructure limitations, and need for localized datasets
S50
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — “The main barriers to AI’s impact in reducing greenhouse gas emissions are a lack of data and a lack of trained personne…
S51
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — Sandalow breaks down AI capabilities into four fundamental categories that directly apply to climate challenges. Each ca…
S52
Survival Tech Harnessing AI to Manage Global Climate Extremes — It is not possible to map each and every, the hill in the vulnerable areas. So this is where the complications arise. An…
S53
High-Level Session 3: Exploring Transparency and Explainability in AI: An Ethical Imperative — Li discusses the potential of AI-driven models in climate prediction and resource mobilization. He highlights the import…
S54
Networking Session #50 AI and Environment: Sustainable Development | IGF 2023 — Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies have the potential to significantly contribute to creating greener cities and …
S55
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — This discussion focused on the integration of artificial intelligence in agriculture to enhance food security and climat…
S56
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — A very good morning to all of you. Shri Devesh Chaturvedi ji, Rajesh Agarwal ji, Vikas Rastogi ji. Mr. Jonas Jett, Srima…
S57
Transforming Agriculture_ AI for Resilient and Inclusive Food Systems — Discussion point:Food security and supply chain resilience Discussion point:Policy and governance frameworks
S58
Green AI and the battle between progress and sustainability — AI is increasingly recognised for its transformative potential and growing environmental footprint across industries. Th…
S59
AI climate benefits overstated says new civil society report — Environmental groups, including Beyond Fossil Fuels and Stand.earth,have publisheda report challenging claims that AI wi…
S60
AI’s growing role in environmental sustainability — AIis expandingrapidly, driving rising electricity and water consumption, which has fuelled concerns about environmental …
S61
Navigating the Double-Edged Sword: ICT’s and AI’s Impact on Energy Consumption, GHG Emissions, and Environmental Sustainability — Antonia Gawel:Well it’s great to be here and to see everybody in this discussion which is indeed an important one and I …
S62
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis presented Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029, emphasizing the shift from demon…
S63
Open Forum #27 Make Your AI Greener a Workshop on Sustainable AI Solutions — Development | Human rights | Sustainable development Funding and Policy Mechanisms Mark Gachara emphasized that climat…
S64
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges — Evidence:Focus on climate resilience, agriculture, and energy as priority sectors; consideration of countries with limit…
S65
Open Forum #27 Make Your AI Greener a Workshop on Sustainable AI Solutions — Sustainable development | Infrastructure | Development The moderator emphasized the paradoxical nature of AI technology…
S66
Networking Session #50 AI and Environment: Sustainable Development | IGF 2023 — Patrick:Thank you. I did put you a little bit on the spot there, but I will alleviate a little bit the burden of you and…
S67
Using AI to tackle our planet’s most urgent problems — Development | Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory Examples of systems processing vast amounts of data in real-time, f…
S68
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — “Grail is an attempt to create… …to create a collaborative network.”[16]. “Going back into Grail, bottom left, the f…
S69
WS #283 AI Agents: Ensuring Responsible Deployment — The discussion maintained a balanced, thoughtful tone throughout, combining cautious optimism with realistic concern. Pa…
S70
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — All three industry leaders emphasized the need for collaborative, ecosystem-wide approaches rather than proprietary solu…
S71
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges — Unexpected consensus across telecom, research, and governance sectors on the need for collaborative ecosystem approaches…
S72
Building Climate-Resilient Systems with AI — Evidence:At COP26 in Glasgow in 2021, they concluded the likelihood of achieving 43% decarbonization from 2019 to 2030 l…
S73
Climate change and Technology implementation | IGF 2023 WS #570 — Speaker:Thank you, Millennium. I’m Sakura Takahashi from Japan. I’m speaking here today on behalf of Climate Youth Japan…
S74
The future of Digital Public Infrastructure for environmental sustainability — Yolanda Martinez:Yes, definitely. First of all, congratulations. I thoroughly agree that it’s not easy to put together t…
S75
HIGH LEVEL LEADERS SESSION IV — Artificial Intelligence is used in many fields
S76
Global AI Governance: Reimagining IGF’s Role & Impact — Paloma Lara-Castro: Thank you, Liz. Hi, everyone. Thank you for the space. I’m representing Derechos Digitales. We are a…
S77
WS #145 Revitalizing Trust: Harnessing AI for Responsible Governance — Pellerin Matis: I think government can really learn from the private sector because there is lots of technologies and …
S78
What policy levers can bridge the AI divide? — ## Sector-Specific Applications
S79
(Interactive Dialogue 4) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session — The dialogue underscored the importance of intergenerational solidarity and the need to consider the long-term impacts o…
S80
Open Forum: Liberating Science — While climate advocacy is seen as necessary, it is also an exhausting undertaking that requires dedicated effort and per…
S81
Opening of the session — Singapore: Thank you Mr. Chair on behalf of my delegation I’d like to express our thanks to you and your team for the p…
S82
Report on the Transforming Education Summit — 2022) and ‘ Futures of Education briefing notes ‘ were all prepared to support consultations. In the majority of cases …
S83
High-Level session: Building and Financing Resilient and Sustainable Global Supply chains and the Role of the Private Sector — Gender diversity is integrated into their approach beyond tokenism The manifesto promotes creating efficient and resili…
S84
Kingdom of Cambodia — CTX-2022 was an exceptional event that brought together an impressive lineup of participants from various sectors, as…
S85
High-Level Session 4: From Summit of the Future to WSIS+ 20 — Junhua Li: Thank you. Certainly, UN believes digital transformation is one of the strategic vehicles for almost all…
S86
Laying the foundations for AI governance — ### Persistent Disagreements Key tensions remained around:
S87
(Day 1) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — This transcript covers speeches from world leaders at the 79th United Nations General Assembly, focusing on global chall…
S88
Advancing Scientific AI with Safety Ethics and Responsibility — Thank you, Shyam. I think this is a very important question. And it’s also a topic that I’m really passionate about as w…
S89
Is AI the key to nuclear renaissance? — There is a direct correlation between the exponential increase in model parameters and the increase in the computational…
S90
Greener economies through digitalisation — Furthermore, greater stakeholder participation, particularly of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), should be …
S91
Digital solutions for sustainability: ICT’s role in GHG reduction and biodiversity protection — Laura Cyron: It’s a small question with minor, well, very sub points. OK, so thank you very much, first of all, for havi…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
U
Uday Khemka
5 arguments167 words per minute2437 words871 seconds
Argument 1
The net climate benefit of AI far exceeds the emissions from data‑center operations, showing a positive overall balance
EXPLANATION
Uday argues that although AI technologies consume energy, the overall greenhouse‑gas reductions they enable outweigh the emissions from data‑center operations. He cites a study that quantifies both the emissions from data centres and the potential emissions avoided through AI applications.
EVIDENCE
Uday references the Grantham Institute’s quantification, which estimates that data centres add between 0.5 and 1.4 gigatons of CO₂ annually, while AI-driven solutions could remove between 3.5 and 5.4 gigatons, indicating a net positive climate impact [62-63].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI net climate benefit
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow
Argument 2
GRAIL creates a global, cross‑sector partnership platform that links academia, industry, governments and funders to accelerate AI‑driven climate action
EXPLANATION
Uday describes GRAIL as a not‑for‑profit network that brings together universities, companies, NGOs, and governments to co‑create and scale AI solutions for climate mitigation and adaptation. The platform coordinates deal flow, funding, and collaborative projects to move ideas to implementation quickly.
EVIDENCE
He outlines GRAIL’s structure, noting its collaborative community of academic, commercial, philanthropic, and governmental institutions, the flow of ideas and deals, and its role in funding and scaling solutions through grants, venture capital, and government programs [54-68].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
External descriptions of GRAIL as a collaborative network that brings together academia, industry, philanthropic and governmental institutions are provided in [S2], which aligns with Khemka’s characterization.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
GRAIL collaborative network
AGREED WITH
Ankur Puri, Nalin Agarwal, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
Argument 3
The climate‑development‑AI triple challenge demands immediate, large‑scale collaboration; the panel serves as an invitation to radical, action‑oriented partnership
EXPLANATION
Uday frames the intersection of development, climate, and AI as the most pressing challenge and calls the session an invitation for radical, collaborative action. He emphasizes that only coordinated, large‑scale efforts can meet the urgency of the problem.
EVIDENCE
He calls the session “an invitation for radical action-oriented collaboration” and stresses the importance of the triple challenge of development, climate, and AI as the most important challenge we face [27-29].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The panel’s framing of the climate-development-AI triple challenge as the most urgent problem is highlighted in the discussion summary that notes the urgency and multidisciplinary nature of the challenge [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Urgent triple‑challenge collaboration
AGREED WITH
Ankur Puri, Nalin Agarwal, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
Argument 4
Time is limited; the panel stresses the need to move from discussion to deployment of AI solutions across sectors
EXPLANATION
Uday highlights the scarcity of time both for the panel and for climate action, urging participants to shift from talking to implementing AI‑driven solutions. He uses the metaphor of a short panel to illustrate the urgency.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the panel has “very little time” and likens it to the limited time we have to act on climate change, calling for “action mode” and a move away from mere discussion [17-19].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The limited time and action-oriented tone of the session are emphasized in the panel summary that describes the discussion as urgent and focused on moving quickly to implementation [S1] and in the guidance to prioritize substantive questions over background material [S26].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Limited time for action
AGREED WITH
Ankur Puri, Nalin Agarwal, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
Argument 5
Participants are urged to join the collaborative platforms, co‑create solutions and scale them quickly to meet climate targets
EXPLANATION
Uday invites attendees to engage with the online collaborative platform created after the summit, to work with governments, and to contribute to taxonomies that drive massive AI‑enabled climate action. He stresses rapid scaling of solutions.
EVIDENCE
He mentions three post-summit actions: an online collaborative platform for co-creation, engagement with governments, and development of sector-specific taxonomies to drive large-scale AI climate solutions [73-78].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Post-summit actions, including an online collaborative platform for co-creation, government engagement, and sector-specific taxonomies, are outlined as part of GRAIL’s rollout in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Call to join collaborative platforms
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow, Dan Travers, Nalin Agarwal
D
David Sandalow
4 arguments189 words per minute2021 words639 seconds
Argument 1
AI can deliver both incremental efficiency gains and transformational breakthroughs that significantly cut greenhouse‑gas emissions
EXPLANATION
David asserts that AI offers both modest efficiency improvements and major technological breakthroughs that can substantially reduce emissions. He categorises AI impacts into incremental and transformational gains across sectors.
EVIDENCE
He states that AI has “significant potential to contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions” and distinguishes between incremental gains such as efficiency improvements and transformational gains like new materials and technologies [146-154].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Sandalow’s categorisation of AI impacts into incremental improvements and transformational breakthroughs is documented in the panel notes that describe these two categories of climate impact [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI potential for emission cuts
AGREED WITH
Dan Travers, Nalin Agarwal
Argument 2
AI’s core capabilities—detecting patterns, predicting outcomes, optimizing processes, and simulating scenarios—are directly applicable to climate solutions
EXPLANATION
David outlines four fundamental AI functions—pattern detection, prediction, optimization, and simulation—and explains how each can be leveraged to address climate challenges, from methane detection to battery chemistry modeling.
EVIDENCE
He describes AI’s abilities to detect patterns (e.g., methane emissions from satellite data) [170-173], predict weather for solar and wind farms [184], optimize power flows [185-186], and simulate battery chemistry [186-188] as core tools for climate mitigation and adaptation [170-188].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The four fundamental AI capabilities and their climate applications (pattern detection, prediction, optimisation, simulation) are detailed in the discussion summary [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Core AI capabilities for climate
AGREED WITH
Dan Travers, Spencer Low, Vrushali Gaud
Argument 3
Major obstacles include insufficient high‑quality data, a shortage of trained AI‑climate specialists, and a lack of trust in algorithmic outputs
EXPLANATION
David identifies three key barriers to AI’s climate impact: limited access to high‑quality data, a deficit of personnel skilled at both AI and climate science, and low trust in AI outputs among potential users.
EVIDENCE
He notes that “the main barriers to AI’s impact … are a lack of data and a lack of trained personnel” and that “trust is essential” for organizations to adopt AI solutions [158-162].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Barriers such as lack of standardised data, limited skilled personnel, and trust issues are highlighted in the evidence-building and scaling challenges noted in the panel summary [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Barriers to AI deployment
AGREED WITH
Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
Argument 4
Standardised data sets, skilled personnel and careful governance of generative‑AI risks are required for safe, large‑scale deployment
EXPLANATION
David stresses the need for standardized, high‑quality datasets, a trained workforce, and robust governance—especially around generative AI—to ensure safe and effective scaling of AI climate tools.
EVIDENCE
He emphasizes the need for “standardised data” and “trained personnel” and warns that “real-time AI operations can cause security and safety risks,” highlighting the importance of governing generative AI use [201-208].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Guidance on safe AI deployment, including standardised data, trained workforce, and governance of generative-AI risks, is provided in the responsible-AI frameworks and sandbox discussions [S31], [S32], and [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Enablers and risk governance
A
Adam Sobey
1 argument162 words per minute346 words127 seconds
Argument 1
Real‑world AI projects at the Alan Turing Institute have already reduced emissions in shipping, building HVAC, and urban farming
EXPLANATION
Adam reports concrete emissions‑reduction outcomes from AI applications developed at the Alan Turing Institute, demonstrating the technology’s immediate impact across transport, buildings, and food production.
EVIDENCE
He cites a shipping AI project that cut emissions by 18% [527], an HVAC optimisation effort that reduced building emissions by 42% [528], and an underground urban farm powered entirely by renewables that eliminates CO₂ emissions from food production [529-530].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven emissions reductions
A
Ankur Puri
1 argument168 words per minute618 words219 seconds
Argument 1
McKinsey is quantifying the economic and emissions impact of AI use‑cases to prioritize high‑value interventions
EXPLANATION
Ankur explains that McKinsey is working with the GRAIL effort to assess both the cost‑benefit and emissions impact of AI applications, enabling resources to be focused on the most valuable climate solutions.
EVIDENCE
He states that McKinsey is “quantifying … both in terms of economic impact, but also in terms of direct emissions impact, what each of these applications could be worth” to guide scarce resources toward the most important problems [464-467].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Quantifying AI impact
N
Nalin Agarwal
2 arguments162 words per minute496 words182 seconds
Argument 1
The Climate Collective’s AI‑for‑power program connects startups with utilities across the Global South, delivering pilots and building an open‑innovation platform
EXPLANATION
Nalin outlines the Climate Collective’s initiative that matches AI‑focused startups with utility partners, runs pilots, and creates an open‑innovation platform to accelerate grid decarbonisation in emerging economies.
EVIDENCE
He describes a six-year program supporting 1,500 startups, partnering with 22 utilities, generating about 20 pilots (30% conversion), and building an AI-for-power platform comprising an open-innovation program, knowledge hub, and solution database [364-390].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Nalin Agarwal’s role as founding partner of the Climate Collective and the focus on AI-for-power collaborations are mentioned in the panel participant list and overview [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑for‑power open‑innovation
AGREED WITH
Uday Khemka, Ankur Puri, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
Argument 2
Participants are urged to join the collaborative platforms, co‑create solutions and scale them quickly to meet climate targets
EXPLANATION
Nalin echoes the call for rapid co‑creation and scaling of AI climate solutions, urging stakeholders to engage with the Climate Collective’s platforms and partnerships to accelerate impact.
EVIDENCE
He references the same post-summit actions-online collaborative platform, government engagement, and sector taxonomies-that were highlighted earlier, emphasizing the need for swift collective action [73-78].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Post-summit actions, including an online collaborative platform for co-creation, government engagement, and sector-specific taxonomies, are outlined as part of GRAIL’s rollout in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Call to join collaborative platforms
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow, Dan Travers
V
Vrushali Gaud
3 arguments203 words per minute1354 words398 seconds
Argument 1
Google’s Climate Tech Center in India and its open‑source data initiatives (Earth AI, Flood Hub) aim to democratize climate data and build green‑skill capacity
EXPLANATION
Vrushali explains that Google is establishing a Climate Tech Center in India to foster actionable climate research, while open‑source projects like Earth AI and Flood Hub provide free satellite and weather data to support innovation and skill‑building.
EVIDENCE
She notes the launch of a Google Center of Climate Tech in partnership with the Indian government’s Principal Scientific Advisory, the Earth AI dataset of satellite and weather information, and the Flood Hub platform that supplies flood-risk maps for communities and businesses [298-304].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open‑source climate data and skills
Argument 2
Google applies AI to improve data‑center energy use, water‑leak detection, and to provide flood‑risk mapping for communities
EXPLANATION
Vrushali outlines how AI is used internally at Google to reduce emissions from its infrastructure and externally to support community resilience through flood‑risk information.
EVIDENCE
She cites AI-driven optimisation of data-center electricity consumption, detection of water-tap leakages, and the Flood Hub platform that supplies flood-risk maps to insurers, real-estate firms, and other stakeholders [284-289][290-295].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Operational AI for climate impact
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow, Dan Travers, Spencer Low
Argument 3
Building “green skills” and embedding climate‑first thinking across all domains are essential for lasting impact
EXPLANATION
Vrushali stresses that beyond technology, developing green competencies and a climate‑first mindset throughout organisations and societies is crucial to achieve sustainable outcomes.
EVIDENCE
She mentions the goal of the Climate Tech Center to “encourage academic research that is actionable” and to develop green skills, especially in tier-two Indian cities, as a lever across sectors [298-305].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Green skills development
S
Spencer Low
2 arguments163 words per minute638 words234 seconds
Argument 1
AI models that delineate smallholder farm boundaries and identify crops enable precision agriculture and climate‑resilient advisory services
EXPLANATION
Spencer describes AI techniques that map individual farm plots and classify crops, providing granular data that can be used for targeted advice, mitigation, and adaptation in smallholder agriculture.
EVIDENCE
He explains that Google’s AI can detect field boundaries, distinguish crop types via multispectral imagery, and identify events such as tillage or harvest, feeding this data into India’s Krishi DSS and state-level systems to guide farmers [318-332].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for smallholder agriculture
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow, Dan Travers, Vrushali Gaud
Argument 2
Open‑source tools and publicly available satellite imagery are critical to lower entry barriers for innovators and startups
EXPLANATION
Spencer argues that making AI tools and satellite data openly accessible enables startups and NGOs to develop climate solutions without prohibitive costs, fostering broader innovation.
EVIDENCE
He points to the availability of AI-enhanced agricultural landscape data, field-boundary models, and crop-type classifiers as part of a public digital infrastructure that supports NGOs, governments, and startups like Carbon Farm and Wadwani AI [322-329].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open‑source data for innovation
AGREED WITH
David Sandalow, Vrushali Gaud
D
Dan Travers
1 argument192 words per minute614 words191 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑enabled grid forecasting, optimization and real‑time control are essential to integrate variable renewables and avoid costly blackouts
EXPLANATION
Dan emphasizes that modern electricity grids, with millions of distributed generators and variable demand, require AI for forecasting, optimal power flow, and real‑time control to maintain reliability and keep costs low.
EVIDENCE
He notes that AI is needed to “schedule and marshal all of these assets at AI speed,” to prevent blackouts and expensive backup generation, and to manage the new variability from solar, wind, data centres, EVs, and batteries [400-408].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of AI for grid reliability, including forecasting, handling power fluctuations, and predicting demand to support greener cities, is discussed in the networking session notes on AI for energy systems [S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for grid reliability
S
Speaker 1
1 argument237 words per minute778 words196 seconds
Argument 1
UCL leverages AI across campus energy management, cement‑process optimisation, real‑estate sustainability and sea‑ice monitoring, illustrating interdisciplinary impact
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 showcases how University College London integrates AI throughout its institution, from campus energy forecasting to industrial process optimisation and environmental monitoring, demonstrating AI’s cross‑disciplinary climate relevance.
EVIDENCE
He lists examples such as campus sensor data for energy demand forecasting, the Carbon Re spin-out using deep reinforcement learning for cement emissions, a partnership with PGM Real Estate for AI-enabled real-estate sustainability, and a sea-ice classification tool that aids Inuit communities [480-486][486-492].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
UCL interdisciplinary AI climate work
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI’s net climate benefit outweighs the emissions from data‑center operations
Speakers: Uday Khemka, David Sandalow
The net climate benefit of AI far exceeds the emissions from data‑center operations, showing a positive overall balance AI does have significant potential to contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions
Both speakers argue that, although AI technologies consume energy, the greenhouse-gas reductions enabled by AI are larger than the emissions from the data centres that run AI models, resulting in a net positive climate impact [62-63][146-156].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The claim sits within a broader policy debate: Green-AI reports stress the need to balance AI’s carbon footprint with its climate gains, while civil-society analyses argue the benefits are overstated, informing emerging sustainable-AI guidelines [S58][S59][S60][S61].
Urgent, large‑scale, cross‑sector collaboration is essential to accelerate AI‑driven climate action
Speakers: Uday Khemka, Ankur Puri, Nalin Agarwal, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
GRAIL creates a global, cross‑sector partnership platform that links academia, industry, governments and funders to accelerate AI‑driven climate action The climate‑development‑AI triple challenge demands immediate, large‑scale collaboration; the panel serves as an invitation to radical, action‑oriented partnership Time is limited; the panel stresses the need to move from discussion to deployment of AI solutions across sectors Participants are urged to join the collaborative platforms, co‑create solutions and scale them quickly to meet climate targets The Climate Collective’s AI‑for‑power program connects startups with utilities across the Global South, delivering pilots and building an open‑innovation platform Google’s Climate Tech Center in India and its open‑source data initiatives (Earth AI, Flood Hub) aim to democratise climate data and build green‑skill capacity Open‑source tools and publicly available satellite imagery are critical to lower entry barriers for innovators and startups
All these speakers emphasize that the climate-development-AI challenge can only be met through rapid, coordinated action across academia, industry, governments and civil society, using platforms such as GRAIL, the Climate Collective, and open-source data initiatives to co-create and scale solutions [27-29][430-447][364-390][298-304][322-329].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This aligns with Indian policy discussions that call for coordinated data strategies, standards, and incentives across ministries to sustain AI tools for climate, as highlighted in data-access and governance forums [S46][S47][S63].
Core AI capabilities – pattern detection, prediction, optimisation and simulation – are directly applicable to climate mitigation and adaptation
Speakers: David Sandalow, Dan Travers, Spencer Low, Vrushali Gaud
AI’s core capabilities—detecting patterns, predicting outcomes, optimizing processes, and simulating scenarios—are directly applicable to climate solutions AI‑enabled grid forecasting, optimisation and real‑time control are essential to integrate variable renewables and avoid costly blackouts AI models that delineate smallholder farm boundaries and identify crops enable precision agriculture and climate‑resilient advisory services Google applies AI to improve data‑center energy use, water‑leak detection, and to provide flood‑risk mapping for communities
The speakers concur that the four fundamental AI functions (detect, predict, optimise, simulate) underpin a wide range of climate applications-from methane detection and weather forecasting to grid management, precision agriculture and infrastructure resilience [170-188][400-408][318-332][284-289].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Expert frameworks break AI functions into these four categories and map them to climate challenges, a view echoed in IGF sessions on AI-driven climate prediction and optimisation [S51][S53][S54].
Data availability and skilled personnel are the main barriers; open data and capacity‑building are needed to unlock AI’s climate potential
Speakers: David Sandalow, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
Major obstacles include insufficient high‑quality data, a shortage of trained AI‑climate specialists, and a lack of trust in algorithmic outputs Google’s Climate Tech Center and open‑source initiatives aim to democratise climate data and build green‑skill capacity Open‑source tools and publicly available satellite imagery are critical to lower entry barriers for innovators and startups
All three speakers highlight that limited, standardised datasets and a shortage of AI-climate expertise hinder progress, and they stress the importance of open-source data platforms and capacity-development programmes to overcome these challenges [158-162][298-304][322-329].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple reports identify lack of standardized, open datasets and a skills gap as key obstacles, and call for policies that improve data accessibility and invest in capacity-building [S46][S49][S50].
AI can deliver both incremental efficiency gains and transformational breakthroughs for emissions reductions
Speakers: David Sandalow, Dan Travers, Nalin Agarwal
AI can deliver both incremental efficiency gains and transformational breakthroughs that significantly cut greenhouse‑gas emissions AI‑enabled grid forecasting, optimisation and real‑time control are essential to integrate variable renewables and avoid costly blackouts Participants are urged to join the collaborative platforms, co‑create solutions and scale them quickly to meet climate targets
The speakers agree that AI offers a spectrum of impact-from modest efficiency improvements (e.g., HVAC optimisation) to disruptive innovations (e.g., new materials, grid-scale AI tools)-and that scaling these solutions through collaborative platforms is crucial [146-154][400-408][73-78].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Case studies show AI improving energy efficiency, demand forecasting, and resource optimisation, illustrating both modest gains and potential transformative impacts on emissions [S54][S58][S60].
Similar Viewpoints
All five speakers stress that coordinated, cross‑sector networks and open‑access platforms are the fastest route to scale AI‑driven climate solutions, urging participants to engage with these collaborative ecosystems immediately [27-29][430-447][364-390][298-304][322-329].
Speakers: Uday Khemka, Ankur Puri, Nalin Agarwal, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low
GRAIL creates a global, cross‑sector partnership platform that links academia, industry, governments and funders to accelerate AI‑driven climate action The climate‑development‑AI triple challenge demands immediate, large‑scale collaboration; the panel serves as an invitation to radical, action‑oriented partnership Time is limited; the panel stresses the need to move from discussion to deployment of AI solutions across sectors Participants are urged to join the collaborative platforms, co‑create solutions and scale them quickly to meet climate targets The Climate Collective’s AI‑for‑power program connects startups with utilities across the Global South, delivering pilots and building an open‑innovation platform Google’s Climate Tech Center in India and its open‑source data initiatives (Earth AI, Flood Hub) aim to democratise climate data and build green‑skill capacity Open‑source tools and publicly available satellite imagery are critical to lower entry barriers for innovators and startups
These speakers converge on the idea that the four fundamental AI functions underpin practical climate applications across energy, agriculture and infrastructure sectors [170-188][400-408][318-332][284-289].
Speakers: David Sandalow, Dan Travers, Spencer Low, Vrushali Gaud
AI’s core capabilities—detecting patterns, predicting outcomes, optimizing processes, and simulating scenarios—are directly applicable to climate solutions AI‑enabled grid forecasting, optimisation and real‑time control are essential to integrate variable renewables and avoid costly blackouts AI models that delineate smallholder farm boundaries and identify crops enable precision agriculture and climate‑resilient advisory services Google applies AI to improve data‑center energy use, water‑leak detection, and to provide flood‑risk mapping for communities
Unexpected Consensus
AI’s role in food and agriculture systems
Speakers: David Sandalow, Spencer Low, Vrushali Gaud
AI can do a lot to improve both mitigation and resilience in the food system AI models that delineate smallholder farm boundaries and identify crops enable precision agriculture and climate‑resilient advisory services Google applies AI to improve data‑center energy use, water‑leak detection, and to provide flood‑risk mapping for communities
While each speaker approached the topic from different angles (policy, agricultural mapping, and operational resilience), they all highlighted AI as a key lever for enhancing food system sustainability and climate resilience, a convergence not explicitly foregrounded in the agenda but emerging across the discussion [209-212][318-332][284-289].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Several agriculture-focused AI initiatives-including the India AI Impact Summit, Maharashtra’s AI-for-agriculture policy, and international dialogues on AI for food security-highlight the sector as a climate priority [S55][S57][S62][S64].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong consensus that AI can deliver a net positive climate impact, that its core technical capabilities are directly applicable across sectors, and that rapid, cross‑sector collaboration—through platforms like GRAIL, the Climate Collective and open‑source data initiatives—is essential to scale solutions. Shared concerns about data scarcity, skills gaps and governance reinforce the call for capacity‑building and standardised data frameworks.

High consensus: most speakers align on the urgency of collaboration, the dual nature of AI impact (incremental and transformational), and the need to address data and talent barriers. This unified stance suggests a solid foundation for coordinated policy and investment actions to accelerate AI‑enabled climate mitigation and adaptation.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Openness of AI tools and data for climate solutions
Speakers: Dan Travers, Vrushali Gaud
Dan Travers argues that AI tools should be open-source and non-profit to ensure transferability across grids and rapid scaling [416-420]. Vrushali Gaud describes Google’s AI applications as largely internal (optimising data-centre energy use, water-leak detection) while offering some open-source data initiatives (Earth AI, Flood Hub) but does not commit to fully open-source tools [284-289][290-295][298-304].
Dan promotes a fully open-source model for AI climate tools, whereas Google emphasizes internal optimisation and selective open data, indicating a divergence on how openly AI solutions should be shared and deployed [416-420][284-289][290-295][298-304].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Debates centre on establishing clear data-access policies that balance openness with safeguards for critical infrastructure, and on skill gaps that hinder open-source AI adoption [S46][S49][S63].
Prioritisation of sectors for immediate AI‑driven climate action
Speakers: Uday Khemka, Spencer Low, Dan Travers, Ankur Puri
Uday calls for rapid, cross-sector collaboration covering power, built environment, materials, carbon markets, etc., urging participants to join the GRAIL platform and scale solutions quickly [54-59][70-78]. Spencer focuses on agriculture and smallholder farms, highlighting AI for field-boundary mapping and crop classification as a priority for climate-resilient food systems [311-332]. Dan stresses the grid as the critical bottleneck, arguing AI-enabled forecasting, optimisation and real-time control are essential to integrate variable renewables and avoid blackouts [400-408]. Ankur emphasises quantifying economic and emissions impact of AI use-cases to allocate scarce resources to the highest-value interventions, without committing to a specific sector [464-467].
All speakers agree AI is vital for climate mitigation, but they diverge on which sector should receive immediate focus-Uday advocates a broad, multi-sector approach, Spencer prioritises agriculture, Dan prioritises grid reliability, and Ankur stresses data-driven prioritisation rather than sectoral preference [54-59][70-78][311-332][400-408][464-467].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Bilateral programs and policy briefs identify climate-resilient agriculture, energy, and industry as priority sectors for AI deployment, informing discussions on sector selection [S64][S62][S55].
Unexpected Differences
Degree of openness in AI climate solutions
Speakers: Dan Travers, Vrushali Gaud
Dan’s stance that AI tools should be fully open-source and non-profit for maximal transferability [416-420]. Google’s approach of leveraging internal AI optimisation while providing selective open-source datasets, without a blanket open-source commitment for its tools [284-289][290-295][298-304].
While both parties aim to accelerate climate action, the contrast between a fully open-source philosophy and a more proprietary, internal-focused model was not anticipated given the overall collaborative tone of the session, revealing a hidden tension over data and tool accessibility [416-420][284-289][290-295][298-304].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy dialogues stress the need for governance models that protect security while enabling shared AI tools, reflecting calls for a balanced approach to openness in climate AI solutions [S46][S49][S63].
Overall Assessment

The panel displayed strong consensus on the urgency of the climate‑development‑AI challenge and the need for collaborative action, but disagreements emerged around the preferred sectoral focus and the openness of AI tools and data. These divergences reflect differing institutional priorities—broad multi‑sector platforms (Uday), sector‑specific pilots (Spencer, Dan), impact‑driven resource allocation (Ankur), and varying openness strategies (Dan vs Google).

Moderate: While there is no outright conflict on the overarching goal, the differing strategic preferences could affect coordination and speed of implementation. Aligning on a shared roadmap that balances sectoral priorities and openness policies will be crucial to translate the collective enthusiasm into concrete climate outcomes.

Partial Agreements
All participants concur that AI is essential for climate mitigation and that collaborative, multi‑stakeholder platforms are needed, but they differ on the primary mechanism to achieve this—Uday’s GRAIL network, Google’s internal and open‑data initiatives, the Climate Collective’s startup‑utility model, open‑source tools, or McKinsey’s impact quantification—reflecting varied pathways to the same overarching goal [27-29][54-68][146-154][158-162][527-530][364-390][284-289][298-304][311-332][416-420][464-467].
Speakers: Uday Khemka, David Sandalow, Adam Sobey, Nalin Agarwal, Vrushali Gaud, Spencer Low, Dan Travers, Ankur Puri
Uday frames the climate-development-AI triple challenge as an urgent call for radical, collaborative action and promotes the GRAIL network as the vehicle for rapid co-creation [27-29][54-68]. David highlights AI’s potential (incremental and transformational) and stresses the need for data, trained personnel and trust to realise that potential [146-154][158-162]. Adam reports concrete AI-driven emissions reductions in shipping, HVAC and urban farming, underscoring immediate impact [527-530]. Nalin describes the Climate Collective’s open-innovation platform that connects startups with utilities to pilot AI-for-power solutions in the Global South [364-390]. Vrushali outlines Google’s internal AI optimisation and open-source data initiatives (Earth AI, Flood Hub) to democratise climate data and build green skills [284-289][290-295][298-304]. Spencer emphasizes open-source agricultural data and tools to empower NGOs and startups for smallholder farms [311-332][322-329]. Dan stresses open-source, non-profit AI tools for grid reliability and transferability across regions [416-420]. Ankur discusses quantifying economic and emissions impact of AI use-cases to focus scarce resources on high-value interventions [464-467].
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI can deliver both incremental efficiency improvements and transformational breakthroughs that can substantially reduce greenhouse‑gas emissions across multiple sectors. The net climate benefit of AI far outweighs the emissions from AI infrastructure (data‑centres), making AI a net positive tool for climate action. Core AI capabilities—pattern detection, prediction, optimisation, and simulation—are directly applicable to climate mitigation and adaptation (e.g., methane detection, renewable‑grid forecasting, material discovery, extreme‑weather response). Collaborative, cross‑sector networks such as GRAIL, the Climate Collective, and open‑source initiatives are essential to scale AI‑driven climate solutions quickly. Sector‑specific pilots demonstrate impact: grid‑level forecasting and optimisation (Open Climate Fix), precision agriculture for smallholder farms (Google/Spencer Low), campus energy management and cement‑process optimisation (UCL), emissions reductions in shipping, HVAC and urban farming (Alan Turing Institute). Key barriers to wider AI deployment are lack of high‑quality data, shortage of AI‑climate talent, and trust/governance concerns, especially around generative AI in real‑time operations. Urgent, radical collaboration is required; the panel serves as an invitation to move from discussion to deployment at scale.
Resolutions and action items
Invite all participants to join the GRAIL online collaborative platform to co‑create and scale AI‑climate solutions. Continue engagement with governments worldwide to embed AI‑climate initiatives into policy frameworks (as outlined by GRAIL). Scale the Climate Collective’s AI‑for‑Power open‑innovation program, including its three‑component platform (open‑innovation pipeline, knowledge hub, solution database). McKinsey to finalize quantification of economic and emissions impact for identified AI use‑cases to prioritize high‑value interventions. Google to operationalise its Climate Tech Center in India, focusing on non‑electricity decarbonisation (low‑carbon steel, sustainable aviation fuel) and green‑skill capacity building. Open Climate Fix to deploy its proven solar‑forecasting model to the Indian grid and expand open‑source tools for other regions. Make publicly available the datasets and tools referenced (Earth AI, Flood Hub, Krishi DSS) to enable startups and NGOs to build climate‑resilient services. Encourage each organisation to establish dedicated AI‑climate teams as a standard practice.
Unresolved issues
How to secure standardized, high‑quality climate data for the Global South and integrate disparate data sources into usable AI models. Developing a scalable pipeline for training and retaining AI‑climate specialists across academia, industry, and government. Establishing robust governance frameworks for the safe use of generative AI in real‑time grid and infrastructure operations. Funding mechanisms and long‑term financing for large‑scale pilots and subsequent commercial deployment. Detailed sector‑specific roadmaps for built environment, industrial decarbonisation, and transportation, which were omitted due to time constraints. Mechanisms for measuring and verifying the actual emissions reductions achieved by AI‑driven pilots at scale.
Suggested compromises
Accepting a limited discussion format (switch‑eroo, rapid introductions) to maximise the number of contributors despite time pressure. Balancing the focus between AI’s own emissions (data‑centre GHG) and its larger climate mitigation potential, acknowledging both concerns. Prioritising both mitigation (efficiency, emissions cuts) and adaptation (flood mapping, resilient agriculture) within the same collaborative agenda. Emphasising incremental gains where quick wins are possible while simultaneously pursuing longer‑term transformational research.
Thought Provoking Comments
We talked to a whole bunch of people in the AI community, a whole bunch of people in the industrial and power, automotive sectors… are you talking to each other? Shockingly, people were not talking to each other.
This observation exposed a critical silo‑problem that prevents AI innovations from reaching the sectors that need them most, highlighting a systemic barrier rather than a technical one.
It shifted the conversation from describing AI capabilities to diagnosing why those capabilities have not been deployed at scale, prompting later speakers (e.g., Vrushali, Spencer, Dan) to discuss concrete platforms and collaborations that bridge those gaps.
Speaker: Uday Khemka
The Grantham Institute quantified 0.5‑1.4 Gt of extra GHG from data centers, but AI could potentially remove 3.5‑5.4 Gt of emissions – a clear net positive balance.
Provides a data‑driven counter‑argument to the common criticism that AI’s energy use outweighs its benefits, grounding the debate in quantitative evidence.
Set a factual baseline that allowed David Sandalow and others to discuss AI’s net impact without being sidetracked by concerns over data‑center emissions, keeping the focus on scaling solutions.
Speaker: Uday Khemka
AI does have significant potential to contribute to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions… less than 1 % of current emissions come from AI itself.
Reinforces the earlier point with an independent source, while also framing AI’s contribution as a small fraction of the problem, which alleviates fears about AI’s carbon footprint.
Validated Uday’s earlier claim, encouraging the panel to move quickly toward actionable ideas rather than debating AI’s environmental cost.
Speaker: David Sandalow
We broke down AI capabilities into four basic categories: detect, predict, optimize, and simulate.
Offers a clear, memorable framework that translates abstract AI concepts into concrete climate‑action levers, making the technology accessible to non‑technical stakeholders.
Provided a structural lens that other speakers referenced (e.g., Vrushali’s discussion of optimization, Dan’s grid scheduling), aligning diverse examples under a common taxonomy.
Speaker: David Sandalow
The main barriers to AI’s impact are lack of data, lack of trained personnel, and trust – organizations won’t use AI unless they trust it.
Identifies non‑technical, systemic obstacles that are often overlooked, shifting the dialogue toward capacity‑building and governance rather than pure technology.
Prompted Vrushali to talk about Google’s role in democratizing data and building trustworthy tools, and led Ankur to mention quantifying value to prioritize investments.
Speaker: David Sandalow
Google is now a full‑stack company: we run the data‑center infrastructure, we aim for carbon‑free energy, and we use AI to optimize everything from water leaks to grid operations.
Expands the notion of corporate climate responsibility beyond offsets to systemic operational changes, illustrating how a tech giant can embed sustainability across its entire value chain.
Moved the conversation from abstract AI potential to concrete corporate practices, inspiring other panelists to discuss how their organizations can adopt similar full‑stack approaches.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
We’ve trained AI to digitally enhance field boundaries, identify crops, and detect events like sowing or harvest – data now feeds into India’s Krishi DSS and supports NGOs, governments, and startups.
Highlights a tangible, scalable AI application that directly benefits smallholder farmers, linking climate mitigation with livelihood improvement in the Global South.
Introduced agriculture as a critical sector (previously under‑represented), prompting a shift toward discussing food‑system resilience and the need for digital public goods.
Speaker: Spencer Low
The grid is now a massive, highly variable system with millions of distributed generators; we need AI‑driven, real‑time scheduling or we face blackouts and soaring costs.
Frames grid modernization as an urgent, concrete problem where AI is not optional but essential, and ties technical challenges to social and political risks (public backlash).
Steered the dialogue toward power‑system specifics, reinforcing the earlier “four AI capabilities” framework and leading Ankur to discuss quantifying economic and emissions impact.
Speaker: Dan Travers
We are shaping four challenges – operational improvement, strategic intelligence, transformation, and autonomous operations – and we are beginning to quantify both economic and emissions impact to focus scarce resources on the most important problems.
Moves the conversation from idea generation to prioritization and measurement, introducing a disciplined, impact‑oriented methodology for scaling AI‑climate solutions.
Provided a roadmap for moving from pilots to large‑scale deployment, influencing the closing remarks that emphasized “radical collaboration” and concrete next steps.
Speaker: Ankur Puri
AI reduced emissions by 18 % in shipping, 42 % in HVAC, and enabled an underground urban farm powered entirely by renewables – we can’t do this alone, we need global south partnerships.
Offers concrete success metrics that demonstrate AI’s immediate climate benefits, while stressing the necessity of inclusive, cross‑regional collaboration.
Reinforced the panel’s central theme of collaboration, and broadened the geographic scope, prompting acknowledgment from Uday and tying back to the earlier call for global partnership.
Speaker: Adam Sobey
Overall Assessment

The discussion was driven forward by a series of insight‑rich interventions that moved the panel from a high‑level framing of the AI‑climate nexus to concrete, actionable pathways. Early remarks about siloed communication and quantitative net‑benefit calculations created a problem‑definition foundation. David Sandalow’s four‑pillared AI framework and identification of data, talent, and trust gaps supplied a shared vocabulary and highlighted systemic barriers. Corporate and sector‑specific examples from Google, agriculture, and grid operators then illustrated how those barriers can be overcome in practice, while Ankur’s emphasis on quantifying impact introduced a disciplined prioritization step. Together, these comments shifted the tone from abstract optimism to focused, collaborative problem‑solving, culminating in a clear call for coordinated, measurable action across academia, industry, and the Global South.

Follow-up Questions
Where should data centers be sited to minimize community and infrastructure impact?
Determining optimal locations for data centers is crucial to reduce additional emissions and ensure positive social and environmental outcomes.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
How can we democratize data, encourage innovation, and scale AI solutions quickly?
Rapid, inclusive scaling of AI tools is needed to meet climate targets; understanding mechanisms for open data and fast innovation pipelines is essential.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
How can we embed green skills across all domains, especially in tier‑two cities in India?
Building a workforce with climate‑first thinking in emerging urban areas will sustain long‑term AI‑driven climate action.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
How can we address the lack of data, particularly in the Global South, for AI climate applications?
Data scarcity limits model training and deployment; research is needed to create digital public infrastructure and data sharing frameworks.
Speaker: David Sandalow
How can we develop trained personnel and build AI expertise for climate work?
A shortage of skilled staff hampers AI adoption; capacity‑building programs and curricula are required.
Speaker: David Sandalow
How can we establish trust and explainability in AI models used for climate mitigation?
Stakeholder confidence is essential for AI uptake; research into transparent, auditable AI methods is needed.
Speaker: David Sandalow
How can we standardize data for power‑sector AI tools such as dynamic line rating and optimal power flow?
Standardized, high‑quality data is a prerequisite for effective AI optimization in electricity grids.
Speaker: David Sandalow
What are the security and safety risks of real‑time AI deployment in grid operations, and how can they be mitigated?
Ensuring that AI does not introduce new vulnerabilities is vital for reliable, safe grid management.
Speaker: David Sandalow
How can AI be used to map smallholder farm boundaries and identify crops at scale?
Accurate, scalable farm mapping enables targeted climate‑smart agriculture interventions for the majority of global farmers.
Speaker: Spencer Low
How can we evaluate the economic and emissions impact of AI solutions across sectors to prioritize investments?
Quantifying cost‑benefit and carbon‑reduction potential helps allocate scarce resources to the most effective AI projects.
Speaker: Ankur Puri
How can a global AI‑for‑power innovation platform (open‑innovation program, knowledge hub, solution database) be built and scaled?
A coordinated platform can accelerate the diffusion of AI solutions in power systems, especially in the Global South.
Speaker: Nalin Agarwal
How can AI be integrated into the built environment, materials innovation, and transportation to accelerate climate impact?
Expanding AI applications beyond energy to other high‑emission sectors is needed for comprehensive decarbonization.
Speaker: Uday Khemka
What is the net climate impact of AI when accounting for both its emissions (e.g., data‑center GHGs) and its mitigation potential?
Understanding the balance between AI‑induced emissions and AI‑enabled reductions validates the overall benefit of AI for climate.
Speaker: Uday Khemka
How can AI‑driven flood‑risk mapping (e.g., Flood Hub) be expanded and adopted by utilities, insurers, and NGOs?
Scaling flood prediction tools can improve resilience and inform climate‑adaptation strategies for vulnerable communities.
Speaker: Vrushali Gaud
How can AI‑based solar forecasting tools be transferred and deployed across different national grids?
Portable, high‑accuracy forecasting reduces reliance on backup generation and supports renewable integration worldwide.
Speaker: Dan Travers
How can open‑source AI tools for grid optimization be commercialized and scaled while maintaining openness?
Balancing open collaboration with sustainable business models can accelerate widespread adoption of grid AI solutions.
Speaker: Dan Travers
How can AI improve mitigation and resilience in food systems, which account for ~30% of GHG emissions?
Targeted AI applications in agriculture can reduce emissions and enhance adaptation to climate impacts.
Speaker: David Sandalow
How can digital public infrastructure in India be expanded to support climate‑focused AI across sectors?
Robust, accessible data platforms are foundational for AI innovations in agriculture, energy, and beyond.
Speaker: Spencer Low

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.