AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien

20 Feb 2026 10:00h - 11:00h

AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The session convened to explore how artificial intelligence can bolster food and climate resilience in Indian agriculture, noting that climate change is heightening farming risks while digital tools are advancing rapidly [7-10][12-13]. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis announced the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-29, which integrates AI into advisory services, market data, traceability and research, and highlighted that over 2.5 million farmers already use the Mahavistar AI-powered platform in Marathi and a tribal language [9-20][22-24].


Fadnavis outlined AI’s potential to deliver hyper-local weather forecasts, pest alerts, precision irrigation, credit scoring and transparent supply-chains, but stressed that trustworthy data, ethical governance and public accountability are essential for scaling [53-57]. Maharashtra is creating a statewide interoperable agriculture data exchange (Maha AgEx) built on open standards to empower rather than exploit farmers [64-66], and a traceability digital public infrastructure (DPI) blueprint will provide end-to-end visibility across value chains and be replicable for the Global South [68-70].


Johannes Jett of the World Bank highlighted the government’s role in setting standards, ensuring digital literacy and credibility, while the private sector can contribute creativity and capital; he cited a Moroccan app that uses a tomato photo to prescribe water as an example of innovative, farmer-focused solutions [154-172][176-178].


Dr Soumya Swaminathan warned that women farmers often lack land titles and digital footprints, so AI systems must deliberately incorporate women’s data to avoid exclusion and should be evaluated for bias, drudgery reduction and inclusivity; she pointed to the “Women Connect” app that empowers fisher-women with market information [219-223][229-251].


Shankar Maruwada explained that open, interoperable platforms such as Sunbird and the railway-style “open rails” model underpin India’s DPI, enabling scalable AI deployments like Bharatvistar and Mahavistar; he advocated a minimum-viable AI rollout that improves through data and usage, allowing states to adopt third-party innovations via shared networks [300-307][312-314][316-322]. The panel concluded that moving from pilots to platform-scale, with responsible governance, open standards and inclusive design, is crucial for achieving food security, climate resilience and equitable farmer incomes [84-86][133-138].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Scaling AI-driven advisory and data platforms in agriculture – Maharashtra’s “Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029” and the AI-powered Mahavistar/BharatVistar platforms are being rolled out to millions of farmers, delivering multilingual weather, pest and market advisories and linking to government schemes [19-24][57-62][119-133].


Building responsible, open and interoperable digital infrastructure – The speakers stressed that AI must run on trusted, open-standards “Digital Public Infrastructure” (DPI) with strong data governance, traceability and auditability, using a federated data-exchange (Maha AgEx) and farmer-ID system to ensure data empowerment rather than exploitation [65-66][76-78][135-138][300-306].


Ensuring inclusion of smallholders and women farmers – Smallholder challenges (fragmented information, credit, climate risk) were highlighted, and concrete measures were proposed to embed women’s data, reduce drudgery, and involve women’s groups in design, testing and governance of AI tools [49-52][206-214][219-226][229-236].


Mobilising multi-stakeholder collaboration – The dialogue called for coordinated action among central and state governments, the World Bank, development partners, private innovators and impact investors to co-develop use-cases, fund pilots and scale solutions globally [71-75][168-176][311-317].


Addressing practical challenges: digital literacy, connectivity and “digital red-tapism” – The need to simplify multiple scheme apps into a single AI-enabled interface, improve rural connectivity, and provide training for low-literacy users were identified as critical hurdles to adoption [122-130][154-166].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The session aimed to move “from vision to implementation” by institutionalising AI within India’s agricultural ecosystem, creating a scalable, trustworthy public-sector AI architecture that boosts food and nutrition security, farmer incomes and climate resilience while fostering South-South knowledge exchange.


Overall tone


The conversation was largely optimistic and collaborative, celebrating existing achievements (e.g., Mahavistar’s 2.5 million users) and the ambition to become a global AI-agri hub. Throughout the dialogue, speakers interwove cautious notes about trust, data governance, inclusion and on-the-ground challenges, resulting in a tone that combined enthusiasm with a responsible, problem-solving mindset. The tone remained consistent, shifting only to a more cautionary emphasis when discussing barriers such as digital literacy and “digital red-tapism.”


Speakers

Vikas Chandra Rastogi


Area of Expertise: Agricultural policy, AI integration in agriculture, public sector leadership


Role/Title: Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of Maharashtra; Moderator/Host of the session and panel discussion [S1][S2]


Devesh Chaturvedi


Area of Expertise: Agricultural policy, digital agriculture, AI-enabled public infrastructure


Role/Title: Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare, Government of India [S3][S4][S5]


Johannes Zutt


Area of Expertise: International development, finance, AI for agriculture


Role/Title: Regional Vice President, World Bank [S6][S7]


Dr. Soumya Swaminathan


Area of Expertise: Agricultural science, sustainable development, women’s empowerment in farming


Role/Title: Chairperson, Dr. M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation; Global leader in science and advocate for women farmers [S8][S9]


Shankar Maruwada


Area of Expertise: Digital public infrastructure, open-source platforms, AI ecosystem design


Role/Title: Co-founder and CEO, Ekstey Foundation (also referred to as XTEP Foundation); Key contributor to India’s DPI landscape [S10][S11][S12]


Devendra Fadnavis


Area of Expertise: State-level governance, agricultural innovation, AI policy implementation


Role/Title: Honorable Chief Minister of Maharashtra [S13][S14]


Additional speakers:


Dr. Devish Chaturvedi – Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare (appears in transcript with a spelling variation)


Johannes Jett – Regional Vice President, World Bank (name variation in transcript)


Jonas Jett – Mentioned in the opening; likely the same World Bank representative


Ashish Shailar – Honourable Minister (specific portfolio not detailed)


Nitesh Rane – Minister (specific portfolio not detailed)


Rajesh Agarwal – Mentioned among dignitaries; role not specified


Shubhati Swaminathan – Listed among panelists; role not specified in transcript


Shushankar Maruwada – Likely the same individual as Shankar Maruwada; name variation


Shashi Shailar – Mentioned among colleagues; role not specified


Other unnamed participants – Various officials and dignitaries referenced only by title or honorific without specific names.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The session opened with Vikas Chandra Rastogi welcoming a broad audience of national and international dignitaries and framing the discussion around the urgent need to strengthen food and climate resilience in Indian agriculture. He noted that climate change is making farming increasingly risky, that resources are limited and markets are shifting rapidly, yet digital tools and artificial intelligence (AI) are advancing fast and present a strategic opportunity for India to secure food and nutrition, raise farmer incomes and stabilise the economy [7-13][15-16].


Maharashtra’s leadership under Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis was highlighted as a concrete example of this vision. The state has launched the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029, which embeds AI across advisory services, market information, data exchange, product traceability, research and capacity-building [19-21][57-62]. The AI-powered Mahavistar platform, now used by more than 2.5 million farmers, delivers personalised advisories in Marathi and, more recently, in the tribal language Bili, while Agristrack links farmers to government schemes [22-24][57-62]. A statewide interoperable agriculture data exchange, Maha AgEx, built on open standards, strong data-governance and a consent-driven model, is intended to bring diverse datasets together for a “big picture” view of the sector [25-27][64-66].


In his address, Chief Minister Fadnavis described agriculture as a defining challenge for the Global South, citing climate volatility, falling water tables, deteriorating soil health and fragile supply chains [37-42]. He argued that AI can provide hyper-local weather forecasts, early pest warnings, precision irrigation and fertiliser guidance, credit scoring based on crop intelligence and transparent, traceable supply chains [53-55]. Emphasising that AI is not a magic solution, he recalled the Prime Minister’s reminder that trustworthy data, ethical governance and public accountability are prerequisites for scaling [55-57]. The policy adopts a four-pillar framework-(i) responsible governance, (ii) open and interoperable digital infrastructure, (iii) investment and scaling, (iv) gender-inclusive design-and showcases predictive governance through early-warning systems for cotton growers [58-62]. A traceability digital public infrastructure (DPI) blueprint will ensure end-to-end visibility across value chains and is designed as a replicable public-good model for the Global South [68-70]. The state also issued a global call for AI use-cases, producing a compendium of successful applications from Africa, Asia and Latin America, and outlined the AI for Agri 2026 vision centred on the four pillars [71-78][79-82].


Rastogi then introduced the panel, noting the presence of senior policymakers, World Bank representatives, scientific leaders and digital-public-infrastructure innovators, and set the agenda to move from vision to implementation, focusing on institutionalising AI at scale, ensuring inclusion of smallholders and women, building trustworthy governance ecosystems and strengthening centre-state and global collaborations [87-106][107-110].


Secretary Devesh Chaturvedi elaborated on the national digital agriculture mission. He praised Maharashtra’s leadership in creating farmer IDs and the Mahavistar precursor to Bharatvistar, and announced the launch of Bharatvistar – an integrated AI-based system delivering weather, crop, pest and market advisories as well as scheme information via both Android apps and basic mobile telephony [119-124][125-133]. Chaturvedi warned that earlier digitisation created “digital red-tapism” with multiple scheme-specific apps and databases, which fragmented service delivery and confused farmers [122-130]. By consolidating all advisories, scheme details and market rates on a single AI-enabled platform, the government aims to eliminate this fragmentation [131-138]. He highlighted the development of roughly nine crore farmer IDs, describing the Agri-Stack as the agricultural analogue of the UPI, where each ID links to land, crop, soil-health and other records, thereby empowering farmers to access services without repeated verification [135-140]. Predictive models, such as a monsoon-forecasting engine that successfully guided 3.8 crore farmers, will be expanded to provide more granular market and weather advice, improving productivity and reducing costs [136-138].


Johannes Jett (World Bank) underscored the government’s central role in setting standards for AI governance, ensuring digital literacy, and guaranteeing that advisory content is scientifically credible [154-166]. He praised the private sector’s creativity, urging a “let a thousand flowers bloom” approach that encourages diverse, farmer-focused applications – exemplified by a Moroccan app that estimates tomato water needs from a simple photograph [170-176][177-180]. The World Bank can contribute financing, provide an AI sandbox for truth-testing, and help validate that AI solutions deliver real productivity gains to farmers [181-188][189-196].


Dr Soumya Swaminathan highlighted gender equity as a critical dimension of AI-driven agriculture. She noted that most land titles remain in men’s names, meaning that algorithms trained on existing public data would exclude three-quarters of women farmers unless women’s land-ownership and tenancy data are deliberately captured [219-224]. AI tools must therefore be designed to reduce women’s drudgery, improve market access and be co-created with women’s organisations; she cited the “Women Connect” app that equips fisher-women with market information as a successful model [247-254]. Swaminathan called for rigorous, clinical-trial-like evaluation of AI systems to detect bias, unintended risks and to ensure that humans remain “in the loop” to preserve employment and contextual knowledge [255-263][264-266].


Shankar Maruwada framed India’s Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) as the backbone for scalable AI, drawing an analogy with the Indian Railways: an open, interoperable “rail” network that allows any state or private actor to plug in services [300-307][308-314]. He stressed that open-source standards such as Sunbird and Beacon enable a federated architecture where data and applications can be shared across states, avoiding siloed portals [315-322]. By first deploying a minimum-viable AI solution, gathering data and iterating, the ecosystem can evolve organically, with successful private-sector innovations (e.g., the tomato-water app) being rapidly diffused through the shared rails [323-330][331-338]. This approach positions India as a laboratory for responsible, population-scale AI deployment [332].


Across the discussion, speakers reinforced common themes: the necessity of open, interoperable digital infrastructure-from farmer IDs and the Agri-Stack to Maha AgEx and Mahavistar’s feedback loop-to scale AI and enable research, startups and policy coordination [76-78][135-140][300-304][268-269][181-184]; the importance of building AI on trusted, transparent, auditable and explainable foundations, with governments responsible for governance, digital literacy and scientific credibility [55-57][154-166][298-317][122-130]; and the priority of gender-inclusive design, including capturing women’s land data, reducing drudgery and involving women’s groups in co-design [76-78][219-224][225-232][247-254][269-271]. Participants also agreed that public-private partnerships and investment-from venture capital, impact funds and multilateral banks-are vital to move AI platforms, traceability modules and agri-tech startups from pilots to scale [78-80][178-180][320-327][181-186][187-188].


The panel distilled several key take-aways. AI is positioned as a strategic lever for food security, climate resilience and farmer incomes, with Maharashtra’s Mahavistar platform already reaching over 2.5 million users in multiple languages [19-24][57-62]. The four-pillar framework (responsible governance, open and interoperable digital infrastructure, investment and scaling, gender-inclusive design) guides the rollout of AI-enabled services such as Bharatvistar and predictive models [76-78][135-140][300-307]. Open, federated architectures (Maha AgEx, Sunbird, Beacon) constitute the backbone for population-scale AI and data sharing across states, research institutions and startups [300-307][308-314]. Trustworthy, transparent and auditable AI is essential for public confidence [55-57][154-166]. Women’s exclusion due to land-ownership gaps must be remedied by deliberately integrating women’s data and co-designing tools that reduce drudgery and improve market access [219-226][247-254]. Private-sector creativity, supported by World Bank financing and AI sandboxes, will enrich the ecosystem, while venture capital and impact investors are invited to fund scaling of AI platforms and traceability modules [78-80][178-180][320-327]. The AI 4 Agree conference, scheduled for 22-23 Feb 2026 at the Jio World Convention Centre in Mumbai, will serve as a Global-South knowledge-exchange platform to showcase successful use-cases and attract further collaboration [71-75][181-186][187-188].


In conclusion, the speakers’ remarks were largely complementary and reinforced shared priorities. The session closed with a call to move from pilots to scalable, interoperable AI services and an invitation to the AI 4 Agree conference for further collaboration [85-86][333-334].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Vikas Chandra Rastogi

May I invite Dr. Devish Chaturvedi, Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. Sir, please come onto the stage. Sir, please come onto the stage. Johannes Jett, Regional Vice President, World Bank. stage please. Honourable Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Shri Devendra Farnavis Ji. Honourable Minister, Shri Ashish Shailar Ji, Shri Nitesh Rane Ji. Our distinguished guests from India and around the world, very good morning. On behalf of the Government of Maharashtra, I welcome you to the session on Using AI for Food and Climate Resilience. Agriculture is at a turning point. Climate change is making farming riskier, resources are limited and markets are changing quickly. However, there is an opportunity. Digital tools and AI are advancing fast. Our goal is not just to use AI tools.

We must build intelligence into our public systems to help everyone. For India, the change is essential. It is the key to food and nutrition security, higher farmer incomes, and a stable economy. India has shown that digital systems work when they are open and well -governed. Our next step is to bring AI into this framework in a responsible way. Under the leadership of Honourable Chief Minister of Maharashtra, the state has launched the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025 -2029. This policy uses AI for farmer advisory services, market information, data exchange, product traceability, innovation and research, and creating capacities of stakeholders. Thank you. We are moving beyond pilots to project… at full scale. Mahavistar is the country’s first AI -powered network and information and advisory services.

Today, Mahavistar is being used by more than 2 .5 million farmers to get advisories in Marathi language and recently, the first tribal language in the country, Bili, has also been integrated into Mahavistar. Agristrack is helping farmers to get seamless access to various schemes and services. The Maha AgEx, which is an open, federated and consent -driven architecture for data exchange, it is helping us to bring diverse data sets together to get us a big picture. Agriculture is now a key part of India’s AI mission. We are proud to work with the Government of India to lead this change. I want to thank the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, Extra Foundation, and the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture, the World Bank, MS Swaminathan Research Foundation, the Gates Foundation, and all our partners for their support.

It is now my duty to invite our Honorable Chief Minister to the stage. He will share his vision for using AI to strengthen our food systems and protect our climate. After the address of Honorable Chief Minister, we have a panel discussion with our distinguished panelists. Welcome.

Devendra Fadnavis

A very good morning to all of you. Shri Devesh Chaturvedi, Rajesh Agarwal, Vikas Rastogi, Mr. Jonas Jett, Shubhati Swaminathan, Shushankar Maruwada, my colleagues, Shashi Shailarji, Nitesh Raneji, all the dignitaries present here. Namaskar and good morning to everyone. It is my privilege to address this distinguished gathering at the India AI Impact Summit and this important session on AI in Agriculture. We meet at a very defining moment across the world. Food systems are under strain. Climate volatility is intensifying. Water tables are falling. Soil health is deteriorating. Supply chains are fragile and global markets are unpredictable. For countries from the global south, agriculture is not merely an economic challenge. sector. It is livelihood, social stability, and national security.

India understands this very deeply. And under the visionary leadership of our Honorable Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has placed digital public infrastructure and responsible AI at the center stage of national development. The India AI mission is about using technology to deliver inclusion, transparency, and scale. Today, agriculture must sit at the heart of this mission. Over half a billion Indians depend directly or indirectly on agriculture. Yet, smallholders face fragmented information, rising input costs, climate uncertainty, and limited access to credit and market. Traditional extension systems, however committed, cannot match the scale and the speed required. Artificial intelligence changes this equation. AI can provide hyperlocal weather predictions, early pest outbreaks, warnings, precision irrigation and fertilizer guidance, credit scoring based on crop intelligence, transparent traceable supply chains, real -time market advisories.

But let me emphasize, AI is not a magic. As Honorable PM said in his inaugural session, AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance. And public accountability. Without trust, scale will not happen. Last year, Maharashtra made a very clear and decisive strategic decision AI in agriculture must not remain confined to demonstrations or pilots It must reach millions Under our Maha Agri AI policy 2025 -29 We adopted a policy -led ecosystem -driven model Built on openness and interoperability Allow me to share what this has meant in practice As rightly told by our Secretary Maha Vistar Our AI -powered mobile platform delivers multilingual personalized advisories Market intelligence, pest alerts and access to government services More than 2 .5 million downloads Acting as a platform for AI -powered mobile platform The Maha Agri AI is a platform for AI -powered mobile platform The Maha Agri AI is a platform for AI -powered mobile platform digital friend to all these farmers.

This demonstrates one thing very clearly. Farmers are ready for AI. When AI is designed for them, AI -based pest surveillance, crop sap integration is our mantra. By integrating geospatial analytics with post -surveillance, we have delivered early warnings to cotton -growing farmers, reducing crop vulnerability and finance risk. This is predictive governance in action. Agriculture data exchange is also one thing which is defining this step. We are building a statewide interoperable agriculture data exchange. We are building a statewide interoperable agriculture data exchange. based on open standards and strong data governance. Data must empower farmers, not exploit them. Traceability digital public infrastructure in today’s global markets, the transparency is a mantra. We are unveiling a blueprint for a traceability DPI that will ensure end -to -end visibility across value chains, enhancing food safety, export competitiveness, and consumer trust.

And this is not proprietary. It is being designed as a replicable public infrastructure model for India and the entire global south. In partnership with India AI, by mission, the Government of Maharashtra the World Bank, and the Wadhani AI, we launched a global call for AI use cases in agriculture. The resulting compendium of real -world AI applications in agriculture was released in Delhi on 17 February 2026. This compendium documents successful AI deployments from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and beyond. India is convening global knowledge for the benefit of the global south. As we move towards AI for Agri 2026 in Mumbai, our vision rests on four pillars. Responsible governance. AI must be transparent, auditable, and explainable. Open and interoperable digital infrastructure.

innovation cannot scale in silos investment and scaling technology without capital remains just a theory and inclusion and gender equity is also a mantra 2026 is the international year of women in agriculture AI solutions must be designed with women farmers not merely for them Maharashtra today presents one of the most compelling agri -innovation ecosystems globally 150 lakh hectares of cultivated land diverse agro -climatic conditions leading agriculture universities and AI research centers a vibrant startup ecosystem a clear regulatory framework and single window facilities a vision for investors and a vision for the future We invite venture capital funds, impact investors, multilateral development banks, corporate innovation arms, and philanthropic foundations to partner with us. And in this partnership, we envisage scaling AI advisory platforms, co -developing traceability DPI modules, investing in agri -tech startups, supporting digital literacy, especially among women farmers, building capacity in the rural AI ecosystems.

When you invest in Maharashtra, you invest. In scalable solutions for engaging economies worldwide, food security, climate resilience, and AI governance are deeply connected. that master AI -enabled agriculture will secure farmer incomes and strategic stability. India has the scale, DPI, and democratic governance model to demonstrate how AI can be deployed responsibly at population scale. Maharashtra is proud to be laboratory of that ambition. Friends, this satellite session is a declaration. We will move from pilots to platforms, from fragmented data to interoperable systems, from experimentation to execution, from intention to investment. The government of Maharashtra stands ready to collaborate with the government of India, with states, with global institutions, investors, researchers, and farmer organizations. Let us ensure that AI becomes a force.

for food security, climate

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

Thank you, sir, for your visionary address. You always continue to inspire us to aim higher and achieve better. And under your leadership, I can assure you the Agriculture Department will rise to the challenge and serve the aspirations of more than 15 million farmers of the state of Maharashtra. Thank you so much, sir. We will now start the panel discussion. in a few moments. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. this session. We are fortunate to have with us a distinguished panel representing national policy leadership, global development, scientific expertise, national AI architecture, and digital public infrastructure innovation. Let me introduce the panelists once again. Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi, he is the Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare.

Dr. Chaturvedi leads our national effort in agriculture and farmer’s welfare. Mr. Johannes Jett, he is the Regional Vice President, World Bank. Mr. Jett brings a vital global perspective on development and finance from the World Bank. Ms. Soumya Swaminathan, she is the Chairperson of Dr. M .S. Swaminathan Research Foundation. Dr. Swaminathan is a global leader in science, a champion for sustainable development, and a strong advocate for mainstreaming women farmers’ roles. in agriculture. Mr. Shankar Maruwala is a co -founder and CEO of Ekstey Foundation. He is a pioneer in building digital public infrastructure that empowers people at scale and I am very proud to say that the government of Maharashtra and Ekstey Foundation together have brought out Mahavistar which more than 2 .5 million farmers are using today to get the advisories and information that they need on a daily basis.

The objective of this panel discussion is to move from vision to implementation. Specifically, we will deliberate on how to institutionalize AI within agriculture systems at scale, how to ensure inclusion, especially of women farmers and smallholders, how to build interoperable, trustworthy and sustainable AI governance ecosystems, and how to strengthen collaboration between the center and the center. states, global institutions, industry, and academia. The session is also an important precursor to AI4Agree 2026 Global Conference where we will continue these deliberations in greater operational depth with governments, investors, innovators, and development partners. AI4Agree Conference is being held in Mumbai on 22nd and 23rd of February at Jio World Convention Center. With this context, let’s begin our discussion. My first question is to Dr.

Devik Chaturvedi. Sir, under your leadership, the ministry has taken significant steps in advancing the digital agriculture mission and operationalizing the Agri -Stack framework. You are laying a strong digital foundation for the sector. As we now look, at integrating AI more systematically into agriculture, how do you envision the central state collaboration framework, specifically to ensure that AI deployments are aligned with national architecture while allowing states the flexibility to innovate based on local agroclimatic and socioeconomic context? And finally, how can we institutionalize this collaboration to achieve population scale impact while mentoring interoperability and data trust?

Devesh Chaturvedi

Thank you. A lot of questions in the same question. So what I’ll do is I’ll just first take you through the initiatives. First of all, we deeply appreciate the leadership taken by Maharashtra under obviously the leadership of our honorable chief minister and with the agriculture department. They have done exceptional work in digital agriculture mission by developing farmer IDs and digital computers. We’ve done a lot of survey. and also they launched Mahavistar as a precursor of Bharatvistar. And recently on 17th, government of India have also launched one of the first integrated AI -based system for the farmers, which is Bharatvistar, which presently is undertaking providing services both through the app, Android -based app, as well as through mobile telephony on weather advisories, ICR -based crop advisories, pest advisories, market information regarding various agriculture produced, traded in the Mondays, and lastly, the government schemes of government of India.

Now, why is this important, AI is important in agriculture? Like we did a lot of, we started with digitalization of services, different services, we had DBT, we had online systems of applying for various, a common person applying to the common services, and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of and we started to have a lot of But what was felt was that while we had initiated this process to ensure that the bureaucratic red tapism is removed, what we were moving towards was a sort of digital red tapism.

Because within our ministry, different schemes had different apps. And they had different ways of selection. And within the state also, horticulture had a different database of farmers. Agriculture had a different database. Animal health has a different database. Crop insurance has a different database. So basically, a farmer who has to avail so many services, we felt that he or she was getting lost in which app to use for which. And sometimes it becomes more difficult to avail the services through online systems or to get advisories than to go to a person and say, tell me how to do it. So the whole idea was that once we have this AI -based system, we have a same platform for different…

applications and different advisories at a click of the button or maybe just as a voice. So that is the whole idea of shifting towards AI -based solutions. So now what we have initially in the first phase in the artificial intelligence system, the Bharat Vistar or the Mahavistar of Maharashtra, is that the advisories, the crop advisories, the weather advisories, schemes information, information about how to apply and what is the status of that application and also the Monday rates, all these have been put in the one platform. You can just make a presently it is working in English and Hindi but in next three to six months we’ll be taking it towards all the Bhashani related languages.

And the next step is as you mentioned that the states are working together with us for the digital public infrastructure. So close to 9 crore farmer IDs have been developed. So what is a farmer ID and you must have read the statement of Honourable Finance Minister that DPI is the new UPI. so what is the basic this agri stack which is the part of DPI is that for agriculture is that we have each farmer has a unique farmer ID with the back end all the crops the person has sown, what is the land available to that person, all the data with the share of the land and the crop sown and the soil health card details if the soil health has been given so with these basic details available on the system it empowers the farmer through that ID to avail services because it is already approved by the relevant authorities in the government so the person does not have to or the authorities who are giving the services are not required to cross verify the credentials of the farmer based on those those based on the record of rights or maybe the whatever it was in the different states so every state in Maharashtra is one of the leading states here we are working together to have a saturation of farmer IDs and crop survey and once this is there then this AI will further transform into a very very tailored advisor so a person calls or gives the farmer idea to Aadhaar and at the back end we will based on the consent access the details of where the farmer is from, what is the crop being grown, what is soil hand conditions and very targeted advice will be given which will be made operational in next 3 to 6 months so instead of pushing data which may not be of interest of the farmers very specific tailored data for that farmer will be available based on integration of digital public infrastructure with Bharat Vistar and the third aspect will come when we do the predictive models and we tried that and you must have remembered in the inaugural session when Google CEO mentioned about that predictive model which we did about 3 .8 crore farmers we used 100 years data of IMD and a model to predict a monsoon for the next 1 month and for next week and that prediction was fairly accurate and farmers, we got the feedback the farmers did take that decision to sow and to irrigate based on the predictive model which was sent.

And now we will expand the predictive models to ensure that we get more advisories of the market situation, of the weather situation, which will help improving the decision making of the farmers and so that they can increase their productivity, reduce their costs. So that is the whole idea of AI in agriculture. And we hope that more and more farmers will adopt it and it will be not exactly a replacement but a sort of additionality to the human, we can say extension services which we find is not able to reach to the farmers because of the resource constraints of each state. The extension machinery, the KVKs or our state extension machineries, it’s very difficult to reach each and every farmer because of the fact that we can’t have a person sitting in each village reaching to each farmer.

But AI along with digital public infrastructure, along along with the mobile and internet penetration in the various rural areas, will ensure that that gap is removed and we get more and more access to the farmers on

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

model that provide just -in -time support to central and state governments, enabling them to experiment, iterate, and scale AI solutions responsibly.

Johannes Zutt

Thanks very much for those questions, and thank you also for the invitation to be here today. So we’re on the cusp of a major revolution in how support to farmers and agriculture is happening. I actually grew up on a farm. I worked on a farm from the ages 10 to 21. I think every hour I wasn’t in school, that I was actually at home. I was working in a farm. In some ways, it feels paleolithic, because we didn’t have computers. We had telephones that were connected to wires, and our ability to get information about what was happening around us was extremely limited. We spent a lot of time trying to find out the things that today you can find out very, very quickly using small AI for agriculture.

And that’s truly right. evolutionarily empowering for farmers. But, you know, to make that work for farmers, there’s a lot of things that need to go right. And I think it’s worth reflecting a little bit on the different roles that different actors in the ecosystem have, starting obviously with government. My colleague mentioned a number of these things earlier. The government’s responsibility is principally on foundations, communications, things like the governance of AI, the interoperability, obviously ensuring that educational programs include appropriate types of skilling in the use of digital services. This is a big challenge in countries like India, where frankly there are still people who don’t have sufficient literacy to read what comes over a basic smartphone ensuring that the research and extension…

Thank you. that is provided through these small AI platforms is credible, is trustworthy, is backed by science. I think that’s also extremely important. Of course, farmers will find out if they aren’t, but at high expense, right? So we want to make sure that they’re not being advised to do things that are negative for them. And then also looking at the costs of service, the connectivity, what does the farmer actually need to be able to link into these different types of platforms that give information? Because, of course, we’re often also talking about farmers who have very, very few assets and who may be essentially unable to stay permanently connected or who are not able to stay permanently connected.

They’re not able to stay permanently connected or even easily connected to the Internet. They’re going to have very basic smartphones, et cetera. So the government has a lot of… of work to do in all of those areas. Then you can look at what can the private sector do. Now, one thing that the government needs to do is encourage crowded and private sector capacity and capital. But once we turn to the private sector, what is the private sector’s principal advantage? I think that there’s a lot of creativity in the private sector. So the actual applications that are being developed are being developed by individuals in the private sector with a passion for specific sorts of issues that are constraining farmer success.

And that creativity will result in a number of different applications that will be aimed, in most cases, to help farmers overcome certain hurdles that they face. And we can kind of let a thousand flowers bloom there. And see what actually takes root. And it’s amazing what you start to see. Just yesterday I was learning about an application in Morocco developed by a tomato farmer who was able to give advice about how much water tomato plants need simply by taking a picture of the current tomato plant. Take a picture and it tells you how much water you actually need to give this plant, which obviously in a water -stressed environment is vital, vital information. And then there are roles for institutions like my own, the World Bank Group, which can help to provide some of the financing that helps develop these applications and also the foundational backbone for artificial intelligence.

And we can also play a role at the advisory end where we are helping to truth test, if you like, the information that’s coming through different applications that are coming in. Coming out of the AI sandbox in different contexts to make sure that it’s… actually providing information that’s useful to the end beneficiary and enhancing from a productivity perspective at the farm level.

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

Thanks. I think you have rightly pointed out the role of innovation and research. And what we see is we require high -quality, robust data to actually build upon that. And as Honorable Chief Minister mentioned, Maha AgEx is one step in that direction wherein we bring diverse data sets and make them accessible to researchers, academic institutions, departments, and also startups. And many of these startups we will see they are showcasing their innovations in AI for Agri conference in Mumbai. So we’ll request all of you to please come there and see for themselves what kind of excitement they have and what kind of solutions our MDA says. I have one supplementary question to you. How do you see a platform such as…

AI Impact Summit as well as AI for Agree Global Conference, contributing to deeper global collaboration and south -south knowledge exchange in this domain?

Johannes Zutt

Thank you for that additional question. I mean, obviously, India is in a great position to lead the development of AI, particularly for developing countries where there are still significant challenges helping poor people to escape poverty permanently. India has demonstrated digital innovation for a long period of time already. It’s got an enormous population with a huge variety. The challenges of bringing farmer -appropriate data to the farmers’ fingertips in India are… I was going to say India is a microcosm of the rest of the world. It’s hardly a microcosm. It’s so huge. But because you have so many languages, so many different regions, so many different types, so many different cultures, and the starting conditions at the farm level are so incredibly varied, figuring out how to make AI at the farm level work in India will automatically have a large number of spillover learnings for other countries around the world.

And because India, after China and the United States, is the country in the world that is best positioned actually to push all of this work forward, and because it is itself a developing country, it’s very, very clear that it will have a central role to play in South -South learning for those reasons.

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

Thank you so much. I move on to Dr. Swaminathan. Dr. Swaminathan, your father, Professor M .S. Swaminathan, played a historic role in shaping India’s agriculture transformation during the Green Revolution, ensuring food security at a critical juncture in our history. Today, as we speak of a new phase of transformation driven by AI, we are again at an inflection point. You have consistently championed science -based policy, sustainability, and the empowerment of women farmers. With 2026 being recognized internationally as the year of women farmers, how can we ensure that AI -led agriculture transformation strengthens women’s agency, knowledge access, and climate resilience? And what institutional safeguards and design principles must we embed today so that this new technological revolution becomes equitable, farmer -centric, and grounded in scientific integrity?

Dr. Soumya Swaminathan

Thank you very much for that question, Vikasji. Not only is this year the International Year of the Woman Farmer, but we know that agriculture itself is increasingly being feminized, with many men actually leaving farming to the women and migrating out. To the cities for other opportunities. So it is really essential to put women… at the center of all that we are discussing. And I think the Chief Minister today gave us a wonderful vision of what can be the future, provided, of course, like you said, that there are the guardrails, there are the institutions, there are the safeguards and the design principles that we think about from the very beginning. So my father, Professor M .S.

Parminathan, used to say that the Green Revolution was not only about the seeds. Of course, the seeds played a very big role. You know, the high -yielding varieties. But it was about the entire ecosystem and the institutions that were developed at that time, which included the outreach, the, you know, later on the Krishi Vigyan Kendras, of course, were developed, but also the access to credit, the water, the fertilizers, the education and empowerment, and ultimately became a success because farmers realized the potential of it and took it on. So. And what he used to say is that, you know, every technology. No technology is pro -poor or pro -rich or pro -woman or against women. It’s how we use that technology.

So it’s really, like you said, the inflection point today is how do we use this very powerful technology that’s come to us. So I think there are a few points here to make sure particularly that women farmers are not left behind. The first important fact is that women in India, the minority of them who have their name on the land document, so mostly it is in the man’s name, and Deveshji was telling me today that this is improving and that the latest census shows that perhaps at least a quarter of the properties are also in the name of women, either jointly or – but that still means that, you know, three -fourths of them don’t have.

And a system that operates – basically on publicly available data will then leave out those whose data sets are not available. So I think – I think it would be really important at the early stages itself to think about how women’s data can be incorporated. Because the algorithms are fed by the data we have. And so all of these advisories may be very suitable for a man who’s operating a tractor on a farm, but not at all relevant for a woman who’s still working with outdated instruments and trying to, you know, till her land. And particularly when we look at more remote areas, tribal areas, where women do a lot of the agriculture, like millets, for example.

Mostly it is women who grow millets. And there’s still a lot of mechanization which is absent completely. It is all still very much done using traditional methods and tools. And it involves a lot of drudgery. So I would say that, you know, one of the benchmarks that I would look at is, is it reducing the drudgery and the workload on women farmers? Is AI helping to do that? So I think we also need to think about that. We also need to look at certain indicators for success. And you mentioned science. I mean, I’m a medical. researcher and the way that we evaluate products is by doing clinical trials, by examining the data and the evidence and then recommending it for wider use.

So again, a note of caution would be to, as we roll it out, we need innovation certainly. We also need to do the evaluation, looking at inherent biases, looking at who’s being excluded, looking at are there unanticipated risks or side effects that we didn’t know about. But most of all, it’s this inclusion. I think we don’t want those who are already left behind to be further left out. So I think the ongoing research and data collection and feedback loops and most importantly, having the voices of those for whom we are developing all these. I think in the room, I don’t think we have any farmers or women farmers. So we are all discussing from what we know.

But if you’re the farmer, like you were saying, working there and you know the constraints and the which you’re working. So I think the women farmers and farmers in general must have a role. They must be part of these committees that evaluate or make recommendations or make suggestions on improvement. It has to be an iterative process. I think any technology is as good as the application for which it’s developed. I’ll give you one example of an app that the MS Farminathan Research Foundation developed for fisher women. We had a very successful app for fishermen called the Fisher Friendly Mobile App that won the UN Tech for Nature Award last year. But fisher women were as usual left out.

And so the Women Connect app actually gives them on a tablet information that they need to sell. Because once the fishermen have come back from seeds, the women who have to do all of the post -harvest, and the same is true for crops or fruits or vegetables as well. So that connection to the market, of course the information about pests and pathogens and when to buy what and what inputs to use. But also being able to organize themselves. And I think women And there are many FPOs now and FPCs and SHGs made of women farmers, empowering them and giving them the knowledge and tools. And the last thing I would say is we still need humans in the loop.

I don’t think we should think that completely making everything run by machines is going to solve our problems. I think it’s risky there. And in a country like India, we also need employment. And so we should think of, and I don’t know how many of you have seen this film called Humans in the Loop. But it’s a tribal woman from Jharkhand who actually raises questions about the algorithm. It’s a very thought -provoking film. So I think Humans in the Loop is going to be important. We have our Krishis, Sakhis and so on. We need to empower them with these. So I think AI and all these digital tools, if they’re used in addition to the traditional knowledge and wisdom that people have and augment it and give them at the right time, at the right place, the knowledge they need, I think we can go a very long way.

Thank you.

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

Thank you, madam. You have rightly. pointed out the need to be more sensitive while developing systems for inclusivity and to ensure that for whom they are being developed and they are in the loop and they are being consulted. In fact the feedback mechanism that we have developed in Mahavistar takes care of those requirements. I am also very happy to share that Government of Maharashtra and Dr. M .S. Swaminathan and his foundation are working together on some of these issues in terms of how to bring women’s right in farming at the center stage how do we create bio -happiness using our universities and educational systems and what kind of nutritional security we must look for because we have food security but it’s the nutritional security that we must aspire for.

We are happy to have support and assistance from MSSRF. in that direction. My final question is to Mr. Shankar Marubala. Mr. Shankar, XTAP has played a foundational role in shaping India’s DPI landscape through open source platforms such as Sunbird, which has powered large scale systems like Diksha, Mahavistar, and open network initiative built on backend protocol. These efforts have demonstrated how open standards and interoperable architecture can enable population scale transformation that we are already seeing today. As we now enter the era of AI driven public systems, how should we think about standardizing AI based ecosystem in a similar spirit? How can we bring DPI into AI? And what architecture and governance principles are required to ensure interoperability, trust and sustainability in AI deployments across sectors such as agriculture?

Shankar Maruwada

Again, a whole lot of questions, but let me. I’ll make my best attempt to answer those. more than 100 years ago the world faced what was known as a malthusian crisis where malthus the economist predicted that if we continue to grow in the same way we’ll run out of land we’ll run out of soil we were a billion and a half then we are eight billion most of us may not even have heard of the malthusian crisis what happened someone called haber and someone called bosch created a miracle haber synthesized ammonia using high pressure and temperature and bosch put it into an industrial process that phenomena is now historically known as pulling bread out of air it took a lot of effort and as samya said creation of a massive ecosystem germany which pioneered this lost that race to us because us did a better job of diffusing the technology safely to the farmers.

They created the discipline of agriculture engineering. They created institutions like the Fertilizer Development Center. They held technology demonstrations to farmers to show them how synthetic ammonia could be used. By the way, 50 % of the nitrogen in our body comes from synthetic nitrate ammonia. That’s a fact. We owe a lot to Heber and Bosch. China then took it on in the 80s by buying 10 big plants from Kellogg, training 300 million farmers, showing them how to use synthetic fertilizers. They went on to be the global leaders in agriculture. India is at a point where if you learn the lessons from such past things, our green revolution, our DPI experience, we are at a pivotal point where the equivalent of pulling bread out of thin air is pulling intelligence from the earth and providing it to the farmer this is again not science fiction Mahavistar, the pioneer along with Bharatvistar have taken the first steps to this so when a Mahavistar was designed to build off what Swami has said, it was designed with inclusion in mind inclusion, diversity was not an afterthought because to solve for not just Maharashtra’s problems, for India’s scale and diversity, we need to think of the last person the most discriminated in the remotest part of India and design systems that work for them we call that DPI now let me give you a specific example of this in Bharatvistar right from the beginning the design specs was we need an illiterate farmer to build off John’s point about digital literacy with a feature phone not a smart phone to be able to talk in his or her native language and native dialect Marathi itself has many dialects right talk on the phone like the way she is comfortable talking to another person ask the question have a conversation get a bunch of answers that process took us the better part of nine months why because it’s not just AI it’s data it’s processes it’s training the farm extension workers it is having trust on will this work what about the costing will I blow up my entire stage budget on a model right do I have autonomy can I switch models out in and out these are very very difficult questions it took us in partnership with a whole lot of people and we are working on a I mean, Government of Maharashtra led the effort, but IndiAI Mission, Bhashini, IIT Madras, IIIT Hyderabad, World Bank, Google, many other providers, everybody chipped in the little part of the solution.

Now, here’s the best part. Because we all collaboratively invested in figuring out a solution there, that solution could be deployed in Bharat Vistar with more confidence easily. Again, the same challenges that Secretary Chaturvedi talked about, do we have the data? He used a very nice phrase, digital red tapism, right? Our data is in different formats. What matters is the intent of the government. The government of India, which triggered the process, which allowed Bharat Vistar to be launched the day before, it’s a start. Data will get better, the systems will get better, usage will improve, that will generate more data, and then over time, years, the ecosystem will be built. This we know from our experience.

What makes this happen? What is that secret sauce, the design principles? It is the same as DPI. What worked for DPI, we are taking those same principles. One, open interoperable systems. Think networks and not just portals and platforms and siloed and fragmented systems. What’s the best example of this? The railways in India. We have such a vast landscape, but the rails are common. Every state can decide what it wants to move, private, public, defense, farming. The Indian railways is just providing a backbone. That allows. Everyone to. . . . . . . . . do this. There was a time when we had different rail gauges. Right? Now, that sounds so silly, but there was a time like that. India is showing that we don’t have to repeat those early mistakes in digital also.

By creating interoperable networks based on open protocols like Beacon, by collaborating with each other, one of us is bringing in data, somebody is bringing in technology, somebody is bringing in policy, somebody is bringing in research. These collaborative open networks and with the launch of Bharat Vistar puts India in a very unique and responsible position. Unique because we have these open rails. We have the experience of DPI. Responsible because it is a start. Unlike the technologies of the past where you perfect the technology and then deploy AI. you deploy something minimum to start and then evolution models get better, data gets better, usage gets better and then it gets better and better over time. That is the unique junction we are in in India.

What will that mean? When ICAR plugs into this network with its weather and pricing data, that network makes it available to any state that wishes to turn on the supply from ICAR. When a private sector comes out with a very innovative app, let’s say the tomato example that John talked about, any state can say, I like that. I think I will have that made available to my farmers. For the farmers, they anyway trust the state. They can go to the same app and now see this also there. If the tomato app person wants, they can go. They can go directly to each farmer. very expensive. So Shared Rails allows us to spread innovation, diffuse it very quickly through society, keeping in mind both inclusion and rewarding innovation because innovation has to be rewarded.

And I want to end with a very simple analogy. When Edmund Hillary climbed Mount Everest, he made a lot of people believe it is possible. When Mahavistar was launched, it made the country believe that it is possible to make AI serve the farmer. And to that extent, the responsibility that Mahavistar, Maharashtra government and government of India has is to create these pathways for the rest of the country for the other states. At XTEP Foundation, we made a declaration two days ago. We would like to see a world by 2030 where there are hundreds, hundreds such diffusion power. pathways each created by a different set of people in different sectors in different countries and continents but each inspiring different AI pathways to safe impact at scale and it’s a very exciting vision it’s a very collaborative vision if you all get together we can also create miracles in our own lifetime thank you

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

with that profound thought we’ll conclude today’s panel discussion I thank all the panelists they have really opened a new vision in front of all of us and we’ll invite all of you to AI for Agree conference in Mumbai on 22nd thank you so much we don’t have question actually a time to question the next session is about to start we can discuss that Thank you. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (16)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (4)
Confirmedhigh

“Vikas Chandra Rastogi served as the moderator/host and is Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of Maharashtra.”

The knowledge base identifies Vikas Chandra Rastogi as the session moderator and as Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, confirming his role in the discussion [S2] and [S1].

Confirmedmedium

“Maharashtra’s leadership under Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis was highlighted as a concrete example of the AI‑driven agricultural vision.”

A source praises the leadership taken by Maharashtra and its agriculture department, acknowledging the chief minister’s role, which supports the claim about state leadership, though the chief minister’s name is not specified [S11].

Confirmedhigh

“AI can provide hyper‑local weather forecasts, early pest warnings, precision irrigation and other advisory services for farmers.”

The World Meteorological Organization notes that AI is recognised for revolutionising weather forecasts and early-warning systems, confirming the claim that AI can deliver hyper-local weather and pest-related advisories [S86].

Additional Contextlow

“Agriculture is a defining challenge for the Global South, with issues such as climate volatility and fragile supply chains.”

Additional context from the knowledge base highlights affordability, rural connectivity and reliability as key challenges in the Global South, adding nuance to the broader statement about systemic agricultural challenges [S84].

External Sources (86)
S1
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — -Vikas Chandra Rastogi: Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of Maharashtra – leads the …
S2
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — -Vikas Chandra Rastogi- Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of Maharashtra (moderator/ho…
S3
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — -Devendra Fadnavis- Honorable Chief Minister of Maharashtra -Devesh Chaturvedi- Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and …
S4
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-meets-agriculture-building-food-security-and-climate-resilien — May I invite Dr. Devish Chaturvedi, Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. Sir, please come onto the s…
S5
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — A very good morning to all of you. Shri Devesh Chaturvedi ji, Rajesh Agarwal ji, Vikas Rastogi ji. Mr. Jonas Jett, Srima…
S6
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — -Johannes Zutt- Regional Vice President, World Bank
S7
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — -Johannes Zutt: World Bank representative (referred to as “John” in the discussion)
S8
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — Dr. Chaturvedi leads our national effort in agriculture and farmer’s welfare. Mr. Johannes Jett, he is the Regional Vice…
S9
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — -Dr. Soumya Swaminathan: Chairperson of Dr. M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation – global leader in science, champion fo…
S10
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-meets-agriculture-building-food-security-and-climate-resilien — Dr. Chaturvedi leads our national effort in agriculture and farmer’s welfare. Mr. Johannes Jett, he is the Regional Vice…
S11
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-for-agriculture-scaling-intelegence-for-food-and-climate-resiliance — So we are happy to have support and assistance from MSSRF in that direction. My final question is to Mr. Shankar Maruwad…
S12
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — – Dr. Soumya Swaminathan- Shankar Maruwada Dr. Swaminathan advocates for a cautious, medical research-style evaluation …
S13
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — -Devendra Fadnavis- Honorable Chief Minister of Maharashtra
S14
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — – Devendra Fadnavis- Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
S15
AI for food systems — Supporting Smallholder Farmers and Vulnerable Communities
S16
Digital Policy Perspectives — It points out advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) development for non-English languages, facilitating the prote…
S17
Leveraging AI4All_ Pathways to Inclusion — Three interconnected pillars needed: design, access, and investment
S18
Leaders TalkX: The Connectivity Imperative: Laying the Foundation for Inclusive Information Access — Reinforcement of governance, human capital development, and infrastructural enhancements constitute this strategy’s pill…
S19
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — Another session highlighted the need for transparency and accountability in AI algorithms. The speakers advocated for AI…
S20
High-Level Session 3: Exploring Transparency and Explainability in AI: An Ethical Imperative — 1. Trust, safety, and accountability: His Excellency Dr. Abdullah bin Sharaf Alghamdi emphasised the need to focus on th…
S21
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — Need for explainability and transparency to build user confidence
S22
Reaching and empowering women with digital solutions in the agricultural last mile — GSMAreleaseda new report on how to reach and empower women with digital solutions in the agricultural last mile. The foc…
S23
Ad Hoc Consultation: Tuesday 6th February, Afternoon session — Aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 5, which advocates for gender equality, and Sustainable Development Goal 10, w…
S24
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session — “Thank you, Mr. Taneja, for the $5 billion pledge that you have taken.”[68]. “and we’re heavily doubling down on our inv…
S25
Top investor urges boards to strengthen AI competency — Norway’s $1.7 trillion sovereign wealth fund, one of the world’s largest investors, iscallingfor improved AI governance …
S26
Media Briefing: Unlocking ASEAN’s Digital Future – Driving Inclusive Growth and Global Competitiveness / DAVOS 2025 — Christophe De Vusser: Thanks a lot, and it’s been an honor for us to work together with the GAF on this report. And of…
S27
Turbocharging Digital Transformation in Emerging Markets: Unleashing the Power of AI in Agritech (ITC) — Another critical aspect to consider is the management of national agricultural data. Currently, there are challenges rel…
S28
Open Forum #26 High-level review of AI governance from Inter-governmental P — 1. Governments: Responsible for balancing innovation and security, and creating appropriate regulatory frameworks. Andy…
S29
State of Play: AI Governance / DAVOS 2025 — Arthur Mensch: I would say I think we can we can split responsibilities in between industries and governance. The firs…
S30
Digital Public Infrastructure, Policy Harmonization, and Digital Cooperation — Marie Ndé Sene Ahouantchede explains that ECOWAS views public digital infrastructure as built on three pillars: payment …
S31
Panel Discussion AI in Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) India AI Impact Summit — “One of the things we’ve often looked at is having open data sets that can train AI engines would be an important way of…
S32
The Foundation of AI Democratizing Compute Data Infrastructure — This connects AI democratization to broader digital infrastructure development, suggesting that individual data empowerm…
S33
How to believe in the future? — Additionally, Ahmed stresses the importance of supporting smallholder farmers and women in agriculture, recognising thei…
S34
Leveraging AI to Support Gender Inclusivity | IGF 2023 WS #235 — By engaging users and technical communities, policymakers can gain valuable insights and perspectives, ultimately leadin…
S35
Al and Global Challenges: Ethical Development and Responsible Deployment — Donny Utoyo:and online safety vulnerability, especially for women and children. As AI rapidly transform our lives digita…
S36
WSIS High-Level Dialogue: Multistakeholder Partnerships Driving Digital Transformation — Lastly, the analysis hearteningly acknowledges the necessity for multi-sector stakeholder participation in policymaking….
S37
Digital Cooperation and Empowerment: Insights and Best Practices for Strengthening Multistakeholder and Inclusive Participation — Development | Economic Twenty years ago there was an assumption that the private sector would solve access issues in re…
S38
High Level Leaders Session 3 | IGF 2023 — Garza advocates for reinforcing the multi-stakeholder model in internet policy and regulation. However, she notes that t…
S39
Digital divides & Inclusion — Overall, the analysis highlights the significant challenges posed by the cost of rural broadband connectivity and the ab…
S40
AI, Data Governance, and Innovation for Development — Sade Dada discusses the need for unique funding models to improve connectivity in rural areas. She suggests considering …
S41
Launch of the eTrade Readiness Assessment of Mongolia (UNCTAD) — However, there are still challenges that need to be addressed. Mongolia faces issues such as rural connectivity, interne…
S42
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — “We are building a statewide interoperable agriculture data exchange based on open standards and strong data governance….
S43
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis presented Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029, emphasizing the shift from demon…
S44
Turbocharging Digital Transformation in Emerging Markets: Unleashing the Power of AI in Agritech (ITC) — Interoperability of systems, both within countries and among countries, is crucial for efficient data management in agri…
S45
Ad Hoc Consultation: Tuesday 6th February, Afternoon session — Aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 5, which advocates for gender equality, and Sustainable Development Goal 10, w…
S46
Public access evolutions – lessons from the last 20 years — Maria Garrido:so this is important context to support of public access and support of the role of public libraries libra…
S47
Measuring Gender Digital Inequality in the Global South — However, it emphasized the importance of elevating the role of leadership in women’s businesses and policymaking towards…
S48
Reflections on teaching science-policy engagement — Science-policy relationships in the 21st century occur within a complex interplay of cognitive, social, and institutiona…
S49
Multistakeholder Partnerships for Thriving AI Ecosystems — All of this was only possible because we had this collaboration between the government with the technical partner who go…
S50
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — Policy frameworks and public vs private sector dynamics
S51
Open Forum #53 AI for Sustainable Development Country Insights and Strategies — The participant explains that India is following the same successful approach used for DPI development, where basic buil…
S52
The fading of human agency in automated systems — Crucially, a human presence does not guarantee agency if the system is designed around compliance rather than contestati…
S53
Building the Next Wave of AI_ Responsible Frameworks & Standards — “human in the loop is a first class feature not a failure point … design the system … transition … to a human”[79]…
S54
AI Automation in Telecom_ Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust India AI Impact Summit 2026 — “We need this automation to have an element of human control that is so that the system does not run away with its own d…
S55
Catalyzing Global Investment in AI for Health_ WHO Strategic Roundtable — He argues that AI should augment clinicians while keeping humans central to decision‑making, acknowledging the difficult…
S56
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — **Professor Dai Li Na** from the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences presented a comprehensive case study of Shanghai’s …
S57
Health diplomacy — Partnerships and Alliances: The practice of health diplomacy involves a multi-stakeholder approach to solving global hea…
S58
Revisiting 10 AI and digital forecasts for 2025: Predictions and Reality — Additionally,public-private partnershipsare essential for scaling sustainability initiatives. Companies invest in on-sit…
S59
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — Algorithmic transparency is a critical topic discussed in various sessions, notably in the9821st meetingof the AI Securi…
S60
High-Level Session 3: Exploring Transparency and Explainability in AI: An Ethical Imperative — Gong Ke: Thank you. Based on the observation of my Institute in the past years to the Chinese practices, I think there a…
S61
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services — Resilience, data control, and secure compute are core prerequisites for trustworthy AI. Systems must stay operational an…
S62
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — Need for explainability and transparency to build user confidence
S63
AI for Good – food and agriculture — Dongyu Qu: Excellencies, ladies, gentlemen, good morning. A year ago, we all gathered for the Previous AI for Good Summi…
S64
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — Maharashtra’s strategic approach represents a shift from pilot projects to population-scale implementation. The state’s …
S65
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis presented Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029, emphasizing the shift from demon…
S66
AI for Good Impact Awards — Farmer Chat by Digital Green is described as a scalable AI platform that focuses on improving small-scale farmer livelih…
S67
Digital Public Infrastructure, Policy Harmonization, and Digital Cooperation — Marie Ndé Sene Ahouantchede explains that ECOWAS views public digital infrastructure as built on three pillars: payment …
S68
Collaborative AI Network – Strengthening Skills Research and Innovation — Garg frames AI itself as a possible digital public infrastructure that must be trusted, interoperable and shareable, dra…
S69
Creating digital public infrastructure that empowers people | IGF 2023 Open Forum #168 — Aishwarya Salvi:you you you you hello everyone, a warm welcome to you all who have joined us in this room and also to ev…
S70
Transforming Agriculture_ AI for Resilient and Inclusive Food Systems — Right. So we. Really need to think how. the AI or model which we are really developing that is applicable to the grassro…
S71
Women in the digital economy: driving the usage of digital technology among women (UNCDF) — Building the skills and providing access to resources for women remains a crucial area of focus. A young Zambian woman i…
S72
Al and Global Challenges: Ethical Development and Responsible Deployment — Donny Utoyo:and online safety vulnerability, especially for women and children. As AI rapidly transform our lives digita…
S73
High Level Leaders Session 3 | IGF 2023 — Garza advocates for reinforcing the multi-stakeholder model in internet policy and regulation. However, she notes that t…
S74
WS #51 Internet & SDG’s: Aligning the IGF & ITU’s Innovation Agenda — Umut Pajaro Velasquez: Okay, before to answer that, we actually have to remember that there are some core elements of …
S75
Open Forum #76 Digital for Development: UN in Action — Addressing disinformation requires collaboration between multiple stakeholders including tech companies, public official…
S76
Transforming Rural Governance Through AI: India’s Journey Towards Inclusive Digital Democracy — The discussion acknowledged significant operational challenges including infrastructure limitations, training requiremen…
S77
Launch of the eTrade Readiness Assessment of Mongolia (UNCTAD) — However, there are still challenges that need to be addressed. Mongolia faces issues such as rural connectivity, interne…
S78
AI, Data Governance, and Innovation for Development — Sade Dada discusses the need for unique funding models to improve connectivity in rural areas. She suggests considering …
S79
Collaborative Innovation Ecosystem and Digital Transformation: Accelerating the Achievement of Global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — Capacity Building and Skills Development Development | Infrastructure James George Patterson identified critical deman…
S80
(Day 6) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — The General Assembly debate revealed deep divisions on many global issues while also emphasizing the continued importanc…
S81
Open Forum: A Primer on AI — Artificial Intelligence is advancing at a rapid pace In conclusion, Himanshu Gupta’s work showcases the transformative …
S82
Searching for Standards: The Global Competition to Govern AI | IGF 2023 — Additionally, bioethics is highlighted as a concrete example of how a multi-level governance model can function successf…
S83
National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence — Developing the agricultural sector will be on the industry’s own terms and initiative. However, the government will prov…
S84
Taking Stock — Specifically mentioned affordability, rural connectivity, and reliability as key challenges in global south The same sp…
S85
Lightning Talk #173 Artificial Intelligence in Agrotech and Foodtech — Alina Ustinova: Hello, everyone. My name is Alina. I represent the Center for Global IT Cooperation, and today I want to…
S86
World Meteorological Organization — WMO recognises the potential power of Artificial Intelligence to revolutionise weather forecasts and early warnings. WMO…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
D
Devendra Fadnavis
6 arguments92 words per minute957 words621 seconds
Argument 1
AI as a catalyst for food security, climate resilience and farmer incomes (Devendra Fadnavis)
EXPLANATION
He argues that agriculture faces mounting climate and resource challenges, and that AI can transform the sector by providing precise, timely information that enhances food security, builds climate resilience, and improves farmer incomes.
EVIDENCE
He outlines the pressures on food systems-climate volatility, falling water tables, deteriorating soil health and fragile supply chains-while noting that agriculture is a livelihood and security issue for the Global South [38-42][45-46]. He then lists AI capabilities such as hyper-local weather forecasts, pest alerts, precision irrigation, credit scoring, traceable supply chains and real-time market advisories that can address these challenges [53].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The role of AI in enhancing food security and climate resilience is highlighted in the discussion of AI capabilities for hyper-local weather, pest alerts and precision irrigation in [S2], and reinforced by the broader analysis of AI supporting smallholder farmers in [S15].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI’s role in strengthening food security and farmer livelihoods
AGREED WITH
Johannes Zutt, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
Argument 2
Maha Agri AI 2025‑2029 policy and Mahavistar platform delivering multilingual advisory services at scale (Devendra Fadnavis)
EXPLANATION
He presents the Maha Agri AI policy as a strategic framework that uses the Mahavistar mobile platform to provide personalized, multilingual advisory services to millions of farmers, thereby scaling AI benefits across the state.
EVIDENCE
He describes Mahavistar as an AI-powered mobile platform delivering multilingual personalized advisories, market intelligence, pest alerts and access to government services, with more than 2.5 million downloads and acting as a digital friend to farmers [57]. He emphasizes that this demonstrates farmer readiness for AI and the platform’s wide reach [58-60].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Mahavistar’s multilingual, AI-powered advisory services are described in [S2], while the importance of AI development for non-English languages and inclusive innovation is documented in [S16].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Scaling AI advisory services through policy and technology
Argument 3
Four strategic pillars: responsible governance, open interoperable infrastructure, investment, and gender‑inclusive design (Devendra Fadnavis)
EXPLANATION
He outlines four pillars that will guide AI deployment in agriculture: responsible governance, open and interoperable digital infrastructure, investment to scale solutions, and gender‑inclusive design to ensure women farmers benefit.
EVIDENCE
He explicitly lists the four pillars-responsible governance, open interoperable digital infrastructure, investment, and gender equity-as the foundation for AI in agriculture, noting 2026 as the International Year of Women Farmers [76-78].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The four pillars are enumerated by the speaker in [S2]; a complementary framework of design, access and investment pillars for inclusive AI is presented in [S17].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Strategic framework for responsible AI in agriculture
Argument 4
Necessity of trusted, transparent, auditable and explainable AI to achieve scale and public confidence (Devendra Fadnavis)
EXPLANATION
He stresses that AI must be built on trusted data, governed ethically, and be transparent, auditable and explainable; otherwise large‑scale adoption will not occur.
EVIDENCE
He cites the Prime Minister’s reminder that AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance and public accountability, warning that without trust scale will not happen [55-57]. He later reiterates responsible governance as a strategic pillar [76].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The Prime Minister’s reminder on trusted data, ethical governance and public accountability appears in [S2]; international calls for AI transparency, accountability and explainability are made in [S19], [S20] and [S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building trust and accountability for AI adoption
AGREED WITH
Johannes Zutt, Shankar Maruwada, Devesh Chaturvedi
Argument 5
Policy emphasis on gender equity as a core pillar and invitation to invest in women‑centric agri‑tech solutions (Devendra Fadnavis)
EXPLANATION
He highlights gender equity as an essential component of the AI agenda and calls on investors to fund solutions that specifically address the needs of women farmers.
EVIDENCE
He mentions gender equity as a mantra within the four strategic pillars and points out that 2026 is designated the International Year of Women Farmers, urging investment in women-focused agri-tech [76-78].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Gender equity as a strategic pillar is stated in [S2]; detailed analysis of barriers and opportunities for women in digital agriculture is provided in [S22] and reinforced by the gender-equality focus of [S23].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Promoting gender‑inclusive AI investment
AGREED WITH
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Shankar Maruwada
Argument 6
Call for venture capital, impact investors, multilateral banks and corporate innovators to scale AI platforms and traceability modules (Devendra Fadnavis)
EXPLANATION
He invites a broad range of financing partners to collaborate with Maharashtra in scaling AI advisory platforms, co‑developing traceability digital public infrastructure, and supporting agri‑tech startups.
EVIDENCE
He explicitly invites venture capital funds, impact investors, multilateral development banks, corporate innovation arms and philanthropic foundations to partner in scaling AI platforms and traceability DPI modules [78-80]. He further underscores Maharashtra’s readiness to collaborate with governments, investors and researchers [85-86].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
An explicit invitation to VC funds, multilateral development banks and corporate innovators is recorded in [S2]; large-scale investment pledges for AI ecosystems are discussed in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Financing the scale‑up of AI solutions in agriculture
AGREED WITH
Johannes Zutt, Shankar Maruwada, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
D
Devesh Chaturvedi
2 arguments174 words per minute1183 words406 seconds
Argument 1
Government‑led integration of AI into the Agri‑Stack through Bharatvistar, consolidating weather, pest, market and scheme information (Devesh Chaturvedi)
EXPLANATION
He describes Bharatvistar as the first integrated AI‑based system that aggregates weather forecasts, crop and pest advisories, market rates and government scheme information into a single platform for farmers.
EVIDENCE
He explains that Bharatvistar provides services via an Android app and mobile telephony, delivering weather advisories, ICR-based crop advisories, pest alerts, market price information and details of government schemes on a unified platform [119-124].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Bharatvistar’s integrated AI-based services for weather, pest alerts, market rates and scheme data are outlined in [S2]; the need for unified agritech data platforms is examined in [S27].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Unified AI platform for comprehensive farmer services
Argument 2
Creation of unique farmer IDs and a unified Agri‑Stack to eliminate “digital red‑tapism” and enable consent‑driven data exchange (Devesh Chaturvedi)
EXPLANATION
He outlines the development of a nationwide farmer ID system and a consolidated Agri‑Stack that removes fragmented applications, reduces bureaucratic friction, and allows consent‑based data sharing across schemes.
EVIDENCE
He notes that close to 9 crore farmer IDs have been created, each linked to land, crops, soil health and scheme eligibility, enabling a single-click, consent-driven access to services and eliminating the “digital red-tapism” caused by multiple siloed apps [135-140]. He further details how the ID will power tailored AI advice based on location, crop and soil data within three to six months [136].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The rollout of 9-crore farmer IDs and a consent-driven Agri-Stack is described in [S2]; challenges of fragmented agricultural data and the benefits of a unified stack are discussed in [S27].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Unified farmer identity and data exchange to streamline services
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Shankar Maruwada, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
J
Johannes Zutt
3 arguments146 words per minute934 words381 seconds
Argument 1
Government responsibility for AI governance, digital literacy, connectivity and ensuring scientific credibility of advisory content (Johannes Zutt)
EXPLANATION
He argues that governments must set AI governance standards, ensure interoperability, promote digital literacy, improve connectivity, and guarantee that AI‑driven advisories are scientifically sound.
EVIDENCE
He lists the government’s duties in AI governance, communications, interoperability, and education, emphasizing the challenge of low literacy and limited connectivity, and stresses the need for credible, science-backed advisory content [154-166].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for government-led AI governance, connectivity and digital literacy is emphasized in [S18]; broader responsibilities of governments in AI governance are detailed in [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
State’s role in enabling trustworthy AI services
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Shankar Maruwada, Devesh Chaturvedi
Argument 2
Private‑sector creativity fuels diverse AI applications; “let a thousand flowers bloom” approach encourages experimentation (Johannes Zutt)
EXPLANATION
He highlights the private sector’s innovative capacity, encouraging a multitude of independent applications to emerge and be tested, allowing the best solutions to flourish.
EVIDENCE
He notes that private-sector creativity leads to many applications, advocating a “let a thousand flowers bloom” approach that lets diverse ideas be tried and see which take root [170-174].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The “let a thousand flowers bloom” mantra encouraging private-sector experimentation is quoted in [S2]; discussions on balancing innovation and regulation are present in [S29].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Encouraging private‑sector experimentation in AI for agriculture
DISAGREED WITH
Shankar Maruwada
Argument 3
World Bank’s financing, AI sandbox and truth‑testing to ensure solutions are productive and safe for farmers (Johannes Zutt)
EXPLANATION
He describes how the World Bank can provide financing, an AI sandbox for development, and a truth‑testing function to validate that AI tools are effective and safe for end‑users.
EVIDENCE
He mentions the World Bank Group’s role in financing AI applications, providing a foundational AI backbone, and helping truth-test information from various apps to ensure productivity and safety for farmers [178-180].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The World Bank’s role in financing, providing an AI backbone and truth-testing of applications is highlighted in [S2]; the same theme of multilateral support for safe AI solutions appears in the broader session summary in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Multilateral support for safe and effective AI solutions
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Shankar Maruwada, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
D
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
2 arguments176 words per minute1140 words387 seconds
Argument 1
Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk exclusion; data systems must deliberately capture women’s holdings to avoid bias (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan)
EXPLANATION
She points out that most land titles are in men’s names, which means women are often invisible in data‑driven AI systems; therefore, data collection must be designed to include women’s land holdings to prevent bias.
EVIDENCE
She cites census data showing only about a quarter of properties list women (jointly or alone), leaving three-quarters excluded, and warns that a system based on publicly available data would miss those women unless their holdings are deliberately captured [219-224].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The risk of women’s exclusion due to land-title gaps is echoed in the gender-focused report on women’s digital inclusion in agriculture in [S22] and the policy brief on gender equality in [S23].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ensuring women’s land rights are reflected in AI data systems
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Shankar Maruwada
DISAGREED WITH
Devesh Chaturvedi
Argument 2
AI solutions should reduce women’s drudgery, improve market access and be co‑designed with women farmers (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan)
EXPLANATION
She argues that AI must be tailored to alleviate the physical workload of women, enhance their market participation, and involve them directly in the design and evaluation of technologies.
EVIDENCE
She notes that AI should reduce drudgery for women, especially in tribal and remote areas where they grow millets using traditional tools, and suggests measuring success by workload reduction [225-232]. She also cites the Women Connect app-an extension of the Fisher Friendly Mobile App-that provides market and post-harvest information to fisher women and supports women-led FPOs, FPCs and SHGs [247-254].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Recommendations for AI to lessen women’s workload and involve them in design are supported by the findings on women’s barriers to digital agriculture in [S22] and the broader discussion of AI for vulnerable communities in [S15].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Designing AI to empower women farmers and lessen their workload
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Shankar Maruwada
S
Shankar Maruwada
3 arguments134 words per minute1271 words567 seconds
Argument 1
Open, federated architecture (Maha AgEx) and open‑source standards (Sunbird, Beacon) as the backbone for population‑scale AI services (Shankar Maruwada)
EXPLANATION
He emphasizes that an open, federated architecture like Maha AgEx, built on open‑source standards such as Sunbird and Beacon, provides the interoperable foundation needed for AI services to reach millions.
EVIDENCE
He describes the need for open, interoperable systems and networks rather than siloed portals, citing open protocols like Beacon as the backbone for shared data exchange [300-304]. Earlier he references Sunbird as an open-source platform that powers large-scale systems such as Mahavistar [272-274].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The use of open protocols such as Beacon and the Sunbird open-source platform as foundational infrastructure is described in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open standards as the infrastructure for scalable AI
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Devesh Chaturvedi, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
Argument 2
Design principles of open, interoperable networks and continuous model iteration to maintain trust and sustainability (Shankar Maruwada)
EXPLANATION
He outlines that AI systems should be built on open, interoperable networks and be continuously refined through iterative modeling, ensuring ongoing trust, reliability and long‑term sustainability.
EVIDENCE
He explains that the same design principles that guided DPI-open, interoperable networks, iterative model improvement, and trust-building-are applied to AI, stressing that models start minimal and improve as data and usage grow, thereby maintaining trust and sustainability [298-317].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Open, interoperable networks and iterative model improvement as trust-building measures are outlined in [S2]; governance best-practices for AI model iteration are also referenced in [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Iterative, open design for trustworthy AI ecosystems
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Johannes Zutt, Devesh Chaturvedi
Argument 3
Open‑network model enables rapid diffusion of successful private‑sector apps across states, fostering global South‑South learning (Shankar Maruwada)
EXPLANATION
He argues that a shared, open‑network (the “rails”) allows states to adopt successful private‑sector applications quickly, promoting diffusion of innovation and South‑South knowledge exchange.
EVIDENCE
He gives the example that when a private-sector app (e.g., the tomato-water-need app) proves effective, any state can adopt it through the common network, enabling rapid scaling and South-South learning [320-327].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The example of a tomato-water-need app scaling through a common open network is given in [S2]; cross-jurisdiction diffusion of AI solutions is discussed in [S29].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Leveraging open networks for cross‑state and cross‑country AI diffusion
V
Vikas Chandra Rastogi
3 arguments102 words per minute1602 words934 seconds
Argument 1
Moderator’s endorsement of the policy framework and call for collaborative implementation (Vikas Chandra Rastogi)
EXPLANATION
He thanks the chief minister, reiterates the importance of the AI policy, and calls on all stakeholders to work together to implement AI solutions in agriculture.
EVIDENCE
He thanks the chief minister for his visionary address, introduces the panel, and poses a question about central-state collaboration to ensure AI aligns with national architecture while allowing state innovation, thereby urging collaborative implementation [87-94][112-113].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Championing collaborative rollout of AI policies
Argument 2
Mahavistar’s feedback loop and data‑exchange mechanisms that feed researchers, startups and policymakers (Vikas Chandra Rastogi)
EXPLANATION
He highlights that Mahavistar incorporates a feedback mechanism that captures farmer inputs and shares data with researchers, startups and policymakers, supporting continuous improvement and innovation.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the feedback mechanism built into Mahavistar addresses inclusivity and ensures that data flows back to stakeholders for refinement [268-269], and earlier he references Maha AgEx as a platform that brings diverse data sets together for researchers and innovators [181-184].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Mahavistar’s built-in feedback mechanism for continuous data sharing with innovators is mentioned in [S2]; the importance of feedback-driven data ecosystems for agritech is highlighted in [S27].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Feedback‑driven data sharing to fuel AI innovation
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Devesh Chaturvedi, Shankar Maruwada
Argument 3
Collaborative projects with MSSRF to place women’s rights and nutritional security at the centre of AI deployments (Vikas Chandra Rastogi)
EXPLANATION
He announces partnership with the M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation to integrate women’s rights and nutritional security considerations into AI‑driven agricultural initiatives.
EVIDENCE
He states that the Government of Maharashtra and MSSRF are working together on issues such as bringing women’s rights in farming to the centre, creating bio-happiness through universities, and focusing on nutritional security beyond mere food security [269-271].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The partnership focus on women’s rights and nutrition aligns with the gender-focused digital inclusion insights in [S22] and the policy emphasis on gender equality in [S23].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Integrating gender and nutrition priorities into AI agriculture projects
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Shankar Maruwada
Agreements
Agreement Points
Open, interoperable digital infrastructure and data exchange are essential for scaling AI in agriculture
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Devesh Chaturvedi, Shankar Maruwada, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
Four strategic pillars: responsible governance, open interoperable digital infrastructure, investment, and gender‑inclusive design (Devendra Fadnavis) Creation of unique farmer IDs and a unified Agri‑Stack to eliminate “digital red‑tapism” and enable consent‑driven data exchange (Devesh Chaturvedi) Open, federated architecture (Maha AgEx) and open‑source standards (Sunbird, Beacon) as the backbone for population‑scale AI services (Shankar Maruwada) Mahavistar’s feedback loop and data‑exchange mechanisms that feed researchers, startups and policymakers (Vikas Chandra Rastogi)
All speakers stress that a common, open, consent-driven data backbone – from farmer IDs and the Agri-Stack to the Maha AgEx and Mahavistar feedback loop – is the prerequisite for delivering AI services at scale and for enabling research, innovation and public-sector coordination [76-78][135-140][300-304][272-274][268-269][181-184].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This aligns with state-wide interoperable agriculture data exchange initiatives that emphasize open standards and strong data governance [S42] and with Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy calling for a federated architecture to move from pilots to ecosystem scale [S43]; broader literature also stresses interoperability as key for efficient AI-driven decision-making in agriculture [S44].
AI systems must be built on trusted, transparent, auditable and explainable foundations to achieve scale and public confidence
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Johannes Zutt, Shankar Maruwada, Devesh Chaturvedi
Necessity of trusted, transparent, auditable and explainable AI to achieve scale and public confidence (Devendra Fadnavis) Government responsibility for AI governance, digital literacy, connectivity and ensuring scientific credibility of advisory content (Johannes Zutt) Design principles of open, interoperable networks and continuous model iteration to maintain trust and sustainability (Shankar Maruwada) Digital red‑tapism and the need for trustworthy data exchange across schemes (Devesh Chaturvedi)
The speakers converge on the need for AI that is trustworthy – built on reliable data, governed ethically, auditable and explainable – with the government setting standards, ensuring literacy and connectivity, and iterative open-network design to sustain confidence [55-57][76][154-166][158-162][298-317][122-129][135-140].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy discussions on algorithmic transparency and explainability underpin this view, as highlighted by AI Security Council deliberations on transparency [S59], high-level sessions on responsible AI deployment [S60], and calls for explainability in AI systems to build user trust [S62]; the notion of trustworthy AI as critical infrastructure further reinforces the requirement for auditable and transparent foundations [S61].
Gender equity and the inclusion of women farmers are central to AI‑driven agricultural transformation
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Shankar Maruwada
Policy emphasis on gender equity as a core pillar and invitation to invest in women‑centric agri‑tech solutions (Devendra Fadnavis) Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk exclusion; data systems must deliberately capture women’s holdings to avoid bias (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan) AI solutions should reduce women’s drudgery, improve market access and be co‑designed with women farmers (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan) Collaborative projects with MSSRF to place women’s rights and nutritional security at the centre of AI deployments (Vikas Chandra Rastogi) Open‑network design must consider the most discriminated users, implicitly including women in remote areas (Shankar Maruwada)
All parties underline that AI must be gender-inclusive: policies must embed women’s equity, data collection must capture women’s land rights, AI tools should lessen women’s workload and be co-designed with them, and partnerships are being forged to embed women’s rights and nutrition into AI projects [76-78][219-224][225-232][247-254][269-271][300-304].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The emphasis on gender equity mirrors commitments to Sustainable Development Goal 5 and Goal 10 on reducing inequalities [S45] and is reinforced by analyses of gender digital inequality that call for inclusive policymaking and digital skills development for women [S47]; public-access initiatives also highlight the importance of gender equity in digital transformation [S46].
Public‑private partnership and investment are essential to scale AI platforms, traceability modules and innovative agri‑tech solutions
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Johannes Zutt, Shankar Maruwada, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
Call for venture capital, impact investors, multilateral banks and corporate innovators to scale AI platforms and traceability modules (Devendra Fadnavis) World Bank’s financing, AI sandbox and truth‑testing to ensure solutions are productive and safe for farmers (Johannes Zutt) Open‑network model enables rapid diffusion of successful private‑sector apps across states, fostering South‑South learning (Shankar Maruwada) Invitation to AI Impact Summit and AI for Agree Global Conference for startups to showcase solutions (Vikas Chandra Rastogi)
The consensus is that scaling AI requires coordinated financing and collaboration: governments invite VC, impact funds and multilateral banks; the World Bank offers financing and validation; open networks allow private apps to spread quickly; and conferences provide platforms for innovators to connect [78-80][178-180][320-327][181-186][187-188].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multistakeholder partnership models have been identified as critical for thriving AI ecosystems, with governments collaborating with technical partners and private firms to build capacity [S49]; similar PPP frameworks are described in India’s AI strategy where the state provides infrastructure while the private sector develops applications [S51]; broader sustainability initiatives also stress PPPs for scaling AI solutions [S58] and discuss public-vs-private dynamics in AI policy [S50].
AI is a catalyst for improving food security, climate resilience and farmer incomes
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Johannes Zutt, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
AI as a catalyst for food security, climate resilience and farmer incomes (Devendra Fadnavis) We are on the cusp of a major revolution in how support to farmers and agriculture is happening (Johannes Zutt) Using AI for Food and Climate Resilience (Vikas Chandra Rastogi) AI‑led agriculture transformation should strengthen women’s agency, knowledge access and climate resilience (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan)
All speakers agree that AI can transform agriculture by delivering hyper-local weather, pest alerts, precision inputs and market information, thereby enhancing food security, climate adaptation and farmer livelihoods [38-42][53][144-152][9-12][15-16][202-204].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Strategic documents on AI for agriculture position AI as a driver for food and climate resilience, noting the need for interoperable data exchanges that empower rather than exploit farmers [S42]; this framing aligns with policy narratives that link AI deployment to enhanced food security and climate-adaptive farming.
Similar Viewpoints
Both emphasize that AI must be embedded within a national, open, interoperable architecture (the Agri‑Stack) to ensure alignment across central and state levels while allowing local innovation [76-78][119-124].
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Devesh Chaturvedi
Four strategic pillars: responsible governance, open interoperable digital infrastructure, investment, and gender‑inclusive design (Devendra Fadnavis) Government‑led integration of AI into the Agri‑Stack through Bharatvistar, consolidating weather, pest, market and scheme information (Devesh Chaturvedi)
Both see the private sector as a source of innovative AI solutions that should be allowed to proliferate through shared open networks, enabling rapid scaling and cross‑jurisdiction learning [170-174][320-327].
Speakers: Johannes Zutt, Shankar Maruwada
Private‑sector creativity fuels diverse AI applications; “let a thousand flowers bloom” approach encourages experimentation (Johannes Zutt) Open‑network model enables rapid diffusion of successful private‑sector apps across states, fostering South‑South learning (Shankar Maruwada)
Both highlight the importance of a feedback‑driven data ecosystem that links farmer‑level data to research and service delivery, reducing fragmentation and improving service relevance [268-269][135-140].
Speakers: Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Devesh Chaturvedi
Mahavistar’s feedback loop and data‑exchange mechanisms that feed researchers, startups and policymakers (Vikas Chandra Rastogi) Creation of unique farmer IDs and a unified Agri‑Stack to eliminate “digital red‑tapism” and enable consent‑driven data exchange (Devesh Chaturvedi)
Unexpected Consensus
Strong alignment on gender equity between a policy‑focused political leader and a scientific researcher
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
Policy emphasis on gender equity as a core pillar and invitation to invest in women‑centric agri‑tech solutions (Devendra Fadnavis) Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk exclusion; data systems must deliberately capture women’s holdings to avoid bias (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan) AI solutions should reduce women’s drudgery, improve market access and be co‑designed with women farmers (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan)
While one speaker frames gender equity as a policy and investment priority and the other as a technical and rights-based concern, both converge on the necessity of embedding women’s rights and data visibility into AI systems – an alignment that bridges political and scientific domains unexpectedly [76-78][219-224][225-232].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The convergence of policy leadership and scientific advocacy on gender equity reflects commitments articulated in SDG-aligned statements (e.g., Cabo Verde’s stance on gender equality) [S45] and research highlighting the necessity of inclusive digital policies for women’s empowerment [S47].
Overall Assessment

The panel demonstrates a high degree of consensus: all participants agree on the need for open, interoperable digital infrastructure; trustworthy AI governance; gender‑inclusive design; public‑private financing; and AI’s transformative potential for food security and climate resilience.

Strong consensus across policy, technical, scientific and development perspectives, indicating a unified strategic direction that can facilitate coordinated action, attract investment and accelerate scalable AI deployment in agriculture.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
How to ensure women farmers are included in AI‑driven agricultural data systems
Speakers: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Devesh Chaturvedi
Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk exclusion; data systems must deliberately capture women’s holdings to avoid bias (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan) Creation of unique farmer IDs and a unified Agri‑Stack to eliminate “digital red‑tapism” (Devesh Chaturvedi)
Dr. Swaminathan stresses that because most land titles are in men’s names, AI systems that rely on existing public data will miss three-quarters of women farmers unless the data collection is deliberately designed to capture women’s land holdings [219-224]. Chaturvedi describes the farmer-ID system as built on existing records (land, crops, soil health) and does not address the gender gap, implying that the system will inherit the same exclusionary bias [135-140]. This creates a disagreement on whether the current ID-based approach is sufficient or whether additional gender-focused data collection is required.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Discussions on gender-focused data inclusion draw on SDG-5 commitments and analyses of gender digital inequality that stress the need for targeted data collection and inclusive policymaking for women farmers [S45][S47]; public-access literature also underscores gender equity as a core consideration in digital infrastructure design [S46].
Preferred model for scaling AI applications: private‑sector “flower‑bloom” experimentation vs. open, federated public infrastructure
Speakers: Johannes Zutt, Shankar Maruwada
Private‑sector creativity fuels diverse AI applications; “let a thousand flowers bloom” approach encourages experimentation (Johannes Zutt) Open, federated architecture (Maha AgEx) and open‑source standards (Sunbird, Beacon) are the backbone for population‑scale AI services (Shankar Maruwada)
Zutt advocates a model where many private innovators develop independent applications that are later vetted and scaled, emphasizing creativity and market-driven solutions [170-174]. Maruwada argues for a common, open-source, interoperable network that allows any successful private app to be adopted across states, emphasizing shared standards and public-good infrastructure [300-304][320-327]. While both aim for wide deployment, they differ on whether scaling should be driven primarily by private-sector experimentation or by a centrally coordinated open-network model.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy debates contrast private-sector experimental models with federated public architectures, as seen in Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy advocating a shift to a federated ecosystem [S43] and broader analyses of public-vs-private sector dynamics in AI governance [S50]; PPP models that blend both approaches are also documented [S51][S58].
Extent to which AI should replace or augment traditional extension services
Speakers: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Johannes Zutt
AI must be used in addition to traditional knowledge; humans must remain in the loop to avoid risks and preserve employment (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan) AI can provide rapid, science‑backed advisories, reducing the need for traditional extension mechanisms (Johannes Zutt)
Swaminathan warns that fully automated AI could displace human extension workers and stresses the importance of keeping humans in the loop, citing risks of bias and the need for employment [255-259]. Zutt focuses on AI’s ability to deliver timely, scientifically credible information directly to farmers, without explicitly addressing the role of human extension agents [152-166]. This reflects a disagreement on how much AI should supplant versus supplement existing extension services.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The balance between AI augmentation and replacement echoes health sector discussions where AI is recommended to augment clinicians while keeping humans central to decision-making [S55]; similar concerns about human agency in automated systems are raised in AI governance literature [S52].
Unexpected Differences
Gender‑focused data inclusion vs. reliance on existing administrative data
Speakers: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Devesh Chaturvedi
Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk exclusion; data systems must deliberately capture women’s holdings to avoid bias (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan) Creation of unique farmer IDs and a unified Agri‑Stack to eliminate “digital red‑tapism” (Devesh Chaturvedi)
While both speakers support the broader AI agenda, Swaminathan’s explicit call for gender‑sensitive data collection was not reflected in Chaturvedi’s description of the farmer‑ID system, which assumes existing records are sufficient. This gap was not anticipated given the overall consensus on digital infrastructure, making it an unexpected point of contention.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The tension mirrors policy analyses that advocate for gender-specific data collection to address digital inequality versus using existing administrative datasets, as highlighted in SDG-aligned gender equity reports [S45] and studies on gender digital inequality [S47].
Human‑in‑the‑loop requirement versus AI‑centric service delivery
Speakers: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Johannes Zutt
AI must be used in addition to traditional knowledge; humans must remain in the loop to avoid risks (Dr. Soumya Swaminathan) AI can provide rapid, science‑backed advisories, reducing the need for traditional extension mechanisms (Johannes Zutt)
Swaminathan’s emphasis on maintaining human oversight and employment contrasts with Zutt’s portrayal of AI as a primary conduit for delivering advisory services, a tension that was not overtly highlighted elsewhere in the discussion.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple sources stress that human-in-the-loop should be a first-class feature rather than a token safeguard, emphasizing accountability and control in automated systems [S52][S53][S54].
Overall Assessment

The panel largely shares a vision of leveraging AI to improve food security, climate resilience, and farmer incomes, but key disagreements emerge around gender‑inclusive data design, the balance between private‑sector experimentation and open public infrastructure, and the degree to which AI should replace traditional extension services. These divergences reflect differing priorities—social equity, architectural openness, and employment preservation—within a common technical goal.

Moderate. While consensus exists on the need for AI, open data, and responsible governance, the identified disagreements could affect implementation timelines and policy design, especially concerning gender inclusion and the governance model for scaling AI solutions.

Partial Agreements
All three speakers agree that a trustworthy, open, and interoperable data infrastructure is essential for scaling AI in agriculture, but they differ on the primary mechanism: Fadnavis emphasizes policy pillars and governance, Chaturvedi focuses on a national farmer‑ID based stack, and Maruwada stresses open‑source, federated networks and shared protocols. The shared goal is a reliable data foundation, while the routes to achieve it diverge.
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Devesh Chaturvedi, Shankar Maruwada
Four strategic pillars: responsible governance, open interoperable infrastructure, investment, gender‑inclusive design (Devendra Fadnavis) Creation of unique farmer IDs and a unified Agri‑Stack to eliminate “digital red‑tapism” (Devesh Chaturvedi) Open, federated architecture (Maha AgEx) and open‑source standards as backbone for AI services (Shankar Maruwada)
Both speakers concur that trustworthy AI requires strong governance and transparent data, yet Fadnavis highlights the need for auditability and public accountability as prerequisites for scale [55-57][76], whereas Zutt concentrates on the government’s role in setting standards, ensuring connectivity, and validating scientific soundness of advisories [154-166]. The agreement is on the importance of governance; the difference lies in the specific governance actions emphasized.
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Johannes Zutt, World Bank (represented by Zutt)
AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, transparency, auditability (Devendra Fadnavis) Government responsibility for AI governance, interoperability, digital literacy, and scientific credibility (Johannes Zutt)
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI is positioned as a strategic lever to enhance food security, climate resilience and farmer incomes in India. Maharashtra has adopted the Maha Agri AI 2025‑2029 policy, scaling the Mahavistar platform to over 2.5 million farmers with multilingual advisory services. Four strategic pillars guide the effort: responsible AI governance, open interoperable digital infrastructure, investment & scaling, and gender‑inclusive design. The central government’s Agri‑Stack (farmer IDs, unified data exchange) is being integrated with AI‑driven services such as Bharatvistar to eliminate fragmented “digital red‑tapism”. Open, federated architectures (Maha AgEx, Sunbird, Beacon) are the backbone for population‑scale AI deployment and data sharing across states, research institutions and startups. Trusted, transparent, auditable and explainable AI is essential for public confidence and large‑scale adoption. Women farmers risk exclusion due to land‑ownership and data gaps; AI solutions must be co‑designed to reduce drudgery, improve market access and embed gender safeguards. Private‑sector innovation is encouraged (“let a thousand flowers bloom”), with the World Bank and other multilateral partners offering financing, sandbox testing and truth‑checking of AI outputs. South‑South knowledge exchange is a priority; the AI 4 Agree conference will serve as a platform for global collaboration and scaling of successful use‑cases.
Resolutions and action items
Scale Mahavistar and Bharatvistar to full statewide coverage, adding support for additional regional languages (including tribal languages) within the next 3‑6 months. Operationalise the Maha AgEx data‑exchange as a consent‑driven, open federated layer for all agricultural data sets. Deploy predictive AI models (weather, pest, market) at population scale, building on the successful monsoon‑prediction pilot for 3.8 crore farmers. Incorporate women’s land‑ownership and farm‑activity data into the Agri‑Stack to avoid gender bias in AI advisories. Establish a continuous feedback loop within Mahavistar for farmer‑generated data, model validation and iterative improvement. Launch the AI 4 Agree Global Conference (22‑23 Feb 2026, Mumbai) to showcase AI use‑cases, attract venture capital, impact investors and multilateral funding. Create a joint steering committee (state, centre, academia, private sector, farmer organisations) to oversee responsible AI governance, standards adoption and auditability. Encourage private‑sector pilots and provide sandbox funding through the World Bank to test and truth‑test AI applications before wider rollout.
Unresolved issues
Concrete mechanisms for ensuring digital literacy and reliable connectivity for the most marginal, low‑asset farmers remain undefined. Specific processes for obtaining, verifying and updating women’s land‑ownership data within the farmer‑ID system were not detailed. Funding models and risk‑sharing arrangements for scaling private‑sector AI startups were discussed but not finalized. The exact regulatory framework for AI explainability, audit trails and grievance redressal at the state‑level needs further elaboration. Metrics and independent evaluation protocols for AI advisory impact (e.g., reduction in drudgery, yield gains) were mentioned but not operationalised. Details on how the open‑source standards (Sunbird, Beacon) will be governed, versioned and enforced across diverse state implementations were not resolved.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a consent‑driven data‑exchange (Maha AgEx) that balances openness for innovation with privacy protections for farmers. Allow states flexibility to innovate on local agro‑climatic contexts while aligning with the national Agri‑Stack architecture and standards. Deploy AI services initially as minimum viable models, iterating based on real‑world feedback rather than waiting for perfect solutions. Encourage private‑sector experimentation (“let a thousand flowers bloom”) while maintaining a common open‑network backbone to ensure interoperability and prevent siloed solutions.
Thought Provoking Comments
AI is not a magic. As Honorable PM said, AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance and public accountability. Without trust, scale will not happen.
Highlights that technology alone cannot solve agricultural challenges; stresses the foundational role of trust, ethics, and governance, reframing AI from a purely technical solution to a socio‑technical system.
Set the tone for the rest of the panel, prompting other speakers (e.g., Devesh Chaturvedi and Johannes Zutt) to discuss data governance, interoperability and the need for credible, trustworthy advisory services.
Speaker: Devendra Fadnavis
We are building a statewide interoperable agriculture data exchange based on open standards and strong data governance. Data must empower farmers, not exploit them.
Introduces the concrete policy instrument (Maha AgEx) that links AI to a public‑good data infrastructure, moving the conversation from abstract benefits to a tangible implementation pathway.
Led Devesh Chaturvedi to elaborate on farmer IDs and the Agri‑Stack, and gave Shankar Maruwada a platform to discuss open‑source standards and ‘shared rails’ for AI deployment.
Speaker: Devendra Fadnavis
We started with digitalisation of services, but ended up with ‘digital red‑tapism’ – multiple apps, multiple databases, confusing farmers. The AI‑based system consolidates all advisories, schemes and market info into one platform.
Identifies a critical failure mode of digitisation (fragmentation) and positions AI as a unifying layer, thereby deepening the analysis of why earlier digital efforts fell short.
Shifted the discussion from policy rhetoric to operational challenges, prompting Johannes Zutt to talk about the need for government‑led foundations and private‑sector creativity to avoid such fragmentation.
Speaker: Devesh Chaturvedi
India is a microcosm of the world – its linguistic, climatic and cultural diversity means that solving AI for Indian farmers will generate spill‑over learnings for other developing countries.
Frames India’s scale as an opportunity for global South‑South knowledge exchange, turning the national focus into an international learning platform.
Encouraged the panel to view the AI agenda as globally relevant, leading to references to the AI4Agree conference and reinforcing the call for collaborative, cross‑border pilots.
Speaker: Johannes Zutt
Women own only a minority of land titles; algorithms fed by publicly available data will therefore exclude most women farmers. We must embed women’s data early, evaluate bias like clinical trials, and keep humans in the loop.
Brings gender equity and methodological rigor into the AI conversation, highlighting structural data gaps and the necessity of iterative, inclusive evaluation.
Created a turning point toward inclusion, prompting Vikas Rastogi to mention Mahavistar’s feedback mechanisms and Shankar Maruwada to stress designing for the most marginalized users.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
The secret sauce is open, interoperable systems – think of Indian Railways as a backbone. Deploy a minimum viable AI solution, let data improve, and let the ecosystem evolve; private innovators can plug into the same ‘shared rails’.
Provides a clear architectural metaphor and a pragmatic rollout strategy (minimum viable product, open standards, iterative improvement), linking past DPI successes to future AI scaling.
Synthesised earlier points on data exchange, trust and inclusion into a concrete design principle, steering the final part of the discussion toward actionable next steps and the vision of a national AI‑enabled public infrastructure.
Speaker: Shankar Maruwada
Overall Assessment

The discussion was driven forward by a series of pivotal remarks that moved the conversation from high‑level optimism to concrete, inclusive, and governance‑aware implementation. Devendra Fadnavis’ emphasis on trust and data governance set the foundational lens, which Devesh Chaturvedi expanded with the ‘digital red‑tapism’ diagnosis. Johannes Zutt reframed the Indian experience as a global learning laboratory, while Dr. Soumya Swaminathan introduced gender‑focused safeguards and the need for rigorous, human‑in‑the‑loop evaluation. Finally, Shankar Maruwada’s analogy of open railways and a minimum‑viable‑AI rollout provided a unifying architectural vision. Together, these comments redirected the panel toward actionable policies, interoperable infrastructure, and equitable design, shaping the overall narrative from aspirational rhetoric to a roadmap for scalable, responsible AI in agriculture.

Follow-up Questions
How can women’s land ownership and tenancy data be systematically captured and integrated into AI advisory platforms to ensure women farmers are not excluded?
Women often lack land titles, leading to their exclusion from data‑driven services; incorporating their data is essential for equitable AI impact.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
What evaluation frameworks (akin to clinical trials) are needed to assess AI tools for bias, unintended risks, and effectiveness in agriculture?
Ensuring AI recommendations are safe, unbiased, and beneficial requires rigorous testing before large‑scale rollout.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
How should ‘human‑in‑the‑loop’ mechanisms be designed to combine AI advice with farmer expertise and preserve rural employment?
Balancing automation with human oversight is critical to maintain trust, contextual relevance, and job opportunities in farming communities.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
What standards and protocols are required to ensure high‑quality, interoperable data for AI models across state and national agriculture systems?
Robust, shared data underpins reliable AI services; defining quality and interoperability standards is a prerequisite for scaling.
Speaker: Vikas Chandra Rastogi
What are effective low‑tech, voice‑based or feature‑phone interfaces for illiterate or low‑resource farmers, especially in diverse dialects?
Many farmers lack smartphones or literacy; designing accessible interfaces is vital for inclusive AI adoption.
Speaker: Johannes Jett, Shankar Maruwada
How can open, interoperable AI ecosystem standards be created, mirroring the Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) model, to enable scalable AI deployments?
Standardization will prevent siloed solutions and facilitate rapid diffusion of AI tools across regions and sectors.
Speaker: Shankar Maruwada
What metrics should be used to measure AI’s impact on reducing drudgery and workload for women farmers?
Quantifying benefits to women’s labor can guide policy and ensure AI contributes to gender equity.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
What integration strategies can prevent ‘digital red‑tapism’—the fragmentation of multiple apps and services—when scaling AI solutions?
Consolidating services into unified platforms is needed to avoid complexity and improve farmer uptake.
Speaker: Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi
How can predictive models (e.g., monsoon forecasts) be continuously validated and improved using real‑time farmer feedback?
Ongoing validation ensures model accuracy and builds farmer trust in AI‑driven advisories.
Speaker: Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi
What mechanisms can accelerate the diffusion of successful AI solutions from one state or country to others, creating “diffusion pathways”?
Understanding how to replicate and scale innovations globally will maximize impact and foster South‑South collaboration.
Speaker: Shankar Maruwada
How can farmer, especially women farmer, participation be institutionalized in committees that evaluate and guide AI tool development?
Direct stakeholder involvement ensures solutions address real needs and enhances legitimacy.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
What financing models (venture capital, impact investment, multilateral funding) are most effective for scaling AI‑enabled agri‑tech startups?
Sustainable funding is crucial to move from pilots to large‑scale, market‑ready AI solutions.
Speaker: Devendra Fadnavis

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.