AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance

20 Feb 2026 10:00h - 11:00h

AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The session, convened by Maharashtra’s government, focused on using artificial intelligence to enhance food security and climate resilience in agriculture [8-10]. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis warned that climate volatility, water scarcity, soil degradation and fragile supply chains threaten food systems, and argued that AI can deliver hyper-local advisories, credit scoring and traceable supply chains-but only if built on trusted data and ethical governance [42-48][53-55]. He announced the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029, an open, interoperable, ecosystem-driven framework that has already deployed the Mahavistar platform to over 2.5 million farmers with multilingual advisories, pest alerts and scheme access [20-24][61-63]. The policy also includes the Maha AgEx data-exchange architecture to aggregate diverse datasets for predictive governance, such as early-warning alerts for cotton growers [26][65-66].


Dr Devesh Chaturvedi outlined the national Agri-STEC framework and the launch of Bharatvistar, an integrated AI-based service that consolidates farmer IDs, crop surveys, weather, pest and market information on a single app, with plans to expand language coverage and deliver personalized advice [123-130][136-140][148-152]. He emphasized that farmer IDs, akin to a digital UPI, enable seamless verification and delivery of services, reducing bureaucratic “digital red-tapism” and allowing AI to tailor recommendations based on location, crop and soil data [141-146][149-151].


Panelists stressed inclusive design, noting that most women lack land titles and risk exclusion from data-driven services; therefore, early incorporation of women’s data and feedback loops is essential [227-233][236-240]. Dr Soumya Swaminathan added that AI must augment, not replace, human extension services and called for rigorous evaluation, bias checks and “human-in-the-loop” mechanisms to ensure equitable outcomes for women and marginalised farmers [245-251][255-256].


World Bank Vice-President Johannes Jutt described the Bank’s role in financing innovative AI applications, providing credibility checks and just-in-time technical assistance to public and private actors, citing a Moroccan tomato-watering app as an example [184-190][202-205]. He highlighted the need for open standards, interoperable public infrastructure and capacity building to reach farmers with limited digital literacy or basic smartphones [184-193][199-202].


Shankar Maruwada linked the current AI push to historic agricultural breakthroughs, arguing that open, interoperable “digital rails” can diffuse innovations rapidly while preserving inclusion and sustainability [272-279][304-307]. He illustrated how Mahavistar was designed for illiterate users with feature-phone voice interaction in local dialects, demonstrating a collaborative effort among government, academia and industry to create scalable, low-cost AI services [289-294][298-302].


The discussion concluded with a consensus to move from pilots to platform-scale deployments, to strengthen data governance, gender-responsive design and global-south knowledge exchange, and to showcase solutions at the upcoming AI for Agri 2026 conference in Mumbai [100-103][207-210][321-326].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Scaling AI in agriculture through state-level policy and platforms – Maharashtra has launched the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029 and deployed AI-powered services such as Mahavistar, which already serves over 2.5 million farmers with multilingual advisories, pest alerts and market information, moving the sector from pilots to full-scale projects[20-27][61-66].


Building trustworthy, interoperable digital public infrastructure (DPI) – The dialogue stressed the creation of a unified farmer-ID system, a statewide agriculture data exchange built on open standards, and the integration of AI with this DPI to deliver personalized, consent-driven advisories while avoiding “digital red-tapism”[68-71][124-133][140-148].


Ensuring gender-inclusive AI solutions – Panelists highlighted that women farmers often lack land titles and digital footprints, risking exclusion from AI services. They called for early incorporation of women’s data, design of AI tools that reduce drudgery, and continuous feedback loops with women’s farmer groups to guarantee equitable outcomes[84-86][224-236][245-255].


Global partnership and South-South knowledge exchange – The World Bank, international development funds, and the AI Impact Summit were presented as mechanisms to share financing, technical assistance, and best-practice AI use-cases across the Global South, positioning India’s experience as a model for other developing regions[74-78][170-176][211-218].


Governance, ethics and human-in-the-loop safeguards – Speakers repeatedly emphasized that AI must be built on trusted data, transparent and auditable algorithms, and must retain human oversight to prevent bias, ensure safety and maintain employment for rural communities[54-56][79-82][185-188][245-248].


Overall purpose / goal


The session was designed to move “from vision to implementation” by outlining how AI can be institutionalized within India’s agricultural ecosystem at population scale, while guaranteeing inclusion (especially of women and smallholders), establishing interoperable and trustworthy data foundations, and fostering collaborative partnerships between central and state governments, international agencies, academia and the private sector[112-121][118-122].


Overall tone


The discussion began with a formal, optimistic tone celebrating policy milestones and the potential of AI for food and climate resilience. As the conversation progressed, it became more technical and problem-focused, addressing data fragmentation, digital literacy gaps, and governance challenges. Mid-session the tone shifted toward caution and inclusivity, stressing gender equity, ethical safeguards, and the need for human oversight. The closing remarks returned to an upbeat, collaborative tone, urging collective action and envisioning a future of widespread, responsible AI impact[9-16][52-56][84-86][245-255][311-317].


Speakers


Vikas Chandra Rastogi – Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of Maharashtra [S1][S2]


Expertise: Agricultural policy, AI integration in agriculture, climate resilience.


Johannes Zutt – Regional Vice President, World Bank [S3][S4]


Expertise: International development finance, agricultural innovation, AI for development.


Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi – Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare [S5][S6]


Expertise: Digital agriculture strategy, AI-enabled extension services, national agricultural policy.


Dr. Soumya Swaminathan – Chairperson, Dr. M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation [S7][S8]


Expertise: Agricultural research, women’s empowerment in farming, sustainable agriculture, scientific evaluation of technologies.


Shankar Maruwada – Co-Founder and CEO, Agestep Foundation (ECSTEP)


Expertise: Open-source digital public infrastructure, AI ecosystem design, interoperable agricultural platforms.


Devendra Fadnavis – Honorable Chief Minister of Maharashtra [S12][S13]


Expertise: State leadership on AI policy for agriculture, climate-smart farming initiatives.


Additional speakers:


Ramesh Chaturvedi – Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (mentioned in opening remarks)


Expertise: Agricultural administration, policy implementation.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Opening & Theme – Vikas Chandra Rastogi welcomed the participants, introduced the Honourable Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and other dignitaries, and framed the session “Using AI for Food and Climate Resilience” as a pivotal moment for Indian agriculture amid climate stress, resource limits and volatile markets [8-13].


Chief Minister’s Vision


– Emphasised AI as essential for food-security, nutrition, farmer incomes and economic stability, warning that climate volatility, falling water tables, soil degradation, fragile supply chains and unpredictable markets are straining food systems [42-47].


– Presented a four-pillar framework for AI in agriculture: (i) transparency, auditability & explainability; (ii) open, interoperable digital infrastructure; (iii) innovation & investment for scaling; (iv) inclusion & gender equity [52-55].


– Announced the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029, an ecosystem-driven, open-interoperable model that has moved from pilots to full-scale projects such as Mahavistar (multilingual, voice-enabled advisories for >2.5 million farmers in Marathi and the tribal language Bili) and AgriStrike (seamless scheme access) [45-48][61-63].


– Described Maha AgEx, a consent-driven, federated data-exchange architecture that aggregates pest, weather, market and soil-health data to enable predictive governance (e.g., early-warning alerts for cotton growers) [26-27][68-71].


– Unveiled a publicly-available traceability DPI blueprint (www.fema.gov) for end-to-end visibility across value chains [71-74].


– Highlighted the global AI-use-case call and the release of the AI-for-Agri 2026 compendium on 17 Feb 2026, showcasing deployments from Africa, Asia and Latin America [74-78][115-116].


– Stressed that Agri-2026 is the International Year of Women in Agriculture and reiterated gender-inclusive design as a core pillar [83-86].


– Invited venture capital, impact investors, multilateral development banks, corporate innovators and philanthropic foundations to partner; announced a partnership with the United States and reaffirmed Maharashtra’s role as a partner of the International Development Fund[86-89][95-96][115-119].


Panel Introduction – Rastogi asked Dr Devesh Chaturvedi how central-state collaboration can align AI deployments with the national architecture while preserving state-level flexibility, and how such collaboration can be institutionalised for population-scale impact [118-122].


Dr Devesh Chaturvedi – National Framework


– Outlined the Agri-STEC framework and the launch of Bharatvistar, an integrated AI platform that consolidates farmer IDs, digital crop surveys, weather, pest, market and scheme information on Android and feature-phone interfaces [123-130][136-138].


– Diagnosed “digital red-tapism” caused by fragmented ministry apps and explained that a single platform will provide a “click-of-a-button” or voice-based experience [131-136].


– Described the farmer-ID (digital UPI) that links land, crops, soil-health cards and scheme eligibility, enabling consent-based personalised advisories within 3-6 months [141-148][149-152].


– Reported successful predictive models tested with 3.8 crore farmers using a century of IMD data, and announced plans to expand weather and market forecasts to improve productivity and reduce input costs [154-158].


– Emphasised AI as a complement-not a replacement-to human extension services [159-162].


Rastogi – Mahavistar Feedback Loop – Confirmed that Mahavistar’s feedback mechanism incorporates user input and noted ongoing collaboration with the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation on women-farmers’ rights, bio-happiness and nutritional security [165-168][257-264].


Johannes Jutt – Role of Development Partners


– Re-affirmed the World Bank’s long-standing partnership with India/Maharashtra and the need for agile, just-in-time support to enable experimentation, iteration and responsible scaling of AI solutions [166-168][172-179].


– Outlined government responsibilities: AI governance, interoperability, digital-literacy (including low-literacy and feature-phone users), and ensuring scientifically credible advice [184-188].


– Highlighted private-sector creativity (“a thousand flowers”) and cited the Moroccan tomato-watering app that determines water needs from a simple photo [199-204].


– Described the World Bank’s role in financing, providing foundational AI infrastructure and “truth-testing” AI outputs [204-206].


– Stressed that solving AI challenges in India (multilingual, diverse agro-ecologies) yields spill-over learnings for other developing countries and positioned India as a hub for South-South knowledge exchange[210-218].


Dr Soumya Swaminathan – Gender-Equitable AI


– Noted that most women lack land titles (≈ 25 % have joint or sole ownership according to the latest census) and warned that data-driven services could exclude them unless women’s land-ownership data are captured early [227-230].


– Stressed that AI should reduce women’s drudgery, especially in tribal millet-producing regions, and proposed gender-specific impact indicators [235-238].


– Called for clinical-trial-like evaluation of AI tools, including bias detection, risk assessment and continuous feedback loops [239-247].


– Re-affirmed the human-in-the-loop principle to preserve rural employment and contextual judgement; cited the Fisher-Women app (UN Tech-for-Nature award) as an example where gender-responsive design was essential [241-247].


– Urged inclusion of women farmers on advisory committees for co-design and iterative improvement [250-255].


Shankar Maruwada – Historical Analogy & Architectural Vision


– Compared today’s AI push to the Haber-Bosch breakthrough and the diffusion of synthetic fertilisers in the US and China, arguing that India stands at a similar inflection point [272-289].


– Presented open “digital rails” (e.g., the Beacon protocol) as the backbone for AI services, analogous to India’s railway network [304-307].


– Described Mahavistar’s voice-based design for illiterate users on feature phones, a nine-month co-development effort involving government, academia, the World Bank, Google and others [289-302].


– Advocated a minimum-viable-product approach: launch a basic system and iteratively improve data, models and usage [304-307][310-314].


– Set a vision of 100 diffusion pathways by 2030, each created by diverse stakeholders across continents to achieve safe, scalable AI impact [315-319].


Closing – Rastogi thanked the Chief Minister for his visionary address, reaffirmed the Agriculture Department’s commitment to serving over 15 million Maharashtra farmers, and announced the conclusion of the panel discussion [324-326].


Action Items


– Scale Mahavistar to additional regional and tribal languages and expand voice-based advisory capabilities [24-26][61-63].


– Deploy Maha AgEx as a consent-driven data-exchange to support AI model training [68-71].


– Roll out personalised Bharatvistar advisories within the next 3-6 months [149-152].


– Accelerate saturation of farmer-ID and digital crop-survey databases nationwide [140-148].


– Co-develop traceability DPI modules with the United States and the International Development Fund [71-74][95-96].


– Publish and showcase the AI-use-case compendium at the AI for Agri 2026 conference [115-116].


– Embed women’s land-ownership data and gender-responsive design in AI pipelines; institutionalise “human-in-the-loop” governance and clinical-trial-style evaluation [227-230][239-247][258-260].


– Promote open-protocol “digital rails” (Beacon) to ensure interoperability and trust across public and private AI solutions [304-307].


– Mobilise venture capital, impact investors, multilateral development banks and philanthropic foundations to fund agri-tech startups and capacity-building programmes [86-89][194-199].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Vikas Chandra Rastogi

Mr. Ramesh Chaturvedi, Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Sir, please come onto the stage. Our Honourable Chief Minister, Mr. David Rupadnavi is here. Good morning, sir, and welcome. May I also invite Mr. Johannes Jutt, Regional Vice President, World Bank, onto the stage, please. Honourable Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Mr. Devendra Fadnavis, Honourable Minister. Shri Ashish Elarji, Shri Nitesh Raneji, our distinguished guests from India and around the world. Very good morning. On behalf of the government of Maharashtra, I welcome you to the session on Using AI for Food and Climate Resilience. Agriculture is at a turning point. Climate change is making farming riskier, resources are limited and markets are changing quickly. However, there is an opportunity.

Digital tools and AI are advancing fast. Our goal is not just to use AI tools. We must build intelligence into our public systems to help everyone. For India, the change is essential. It is the key to food and nutrition security, higher farmer incomes and a stable economy. India is a country with a strong economy. India has shown that digital systems work when they are open and well -governed. Our next step is to bring AI into this framework in a responsible way. Under the leadership of Honorable Chief Minister of Maharashtra, the state has launched the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025 -2029. This policy uses AI for pharma advisory services, market information, data exchange, product traceability, innovation and research, and creating capacities of stakeholders.

We are moving beyond pilots to projects at full scale. Mahavistar is the country’s first AI -powered network and information and advisory services. Today, Mahavistar is being used by more than 2 .5 million farmers to get advisories in Marathi language, and recently the first tribal language in the country, Bili, has also been integrated into Mahavistar. AgriStrike is helping to bring AI into the market. It is helping farmers to get seamless access to various schemes and services. the Maha AgEx which is an open federated and consent driven architecture for data exchange it is helping us to bring diverse data sets together to get us a big picture. Agriculture is now a key part of India AI mission. We are proud to work with the government of India to lead this change.

I want to thank the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Agriculture Extra Foundation, the World Bank, MS Swaminathan Research Foundation, the Gates Foundation and all our partners for their support. It is now my duty to invite our Honourable Chief Minister to the stage. He will share his vision for using AI to strengthen our food systems and protect our climate. After the address of Honourable Chief Minister, we have a panel discussion with our distinguished panelists. Welcome.

Devendra Fadnavis

A very good morning to all of you. Shri Devesh Chaturvedi ji, Rajesh Agarwal ji, Vikas Rastogi ji. Mr. Jonas Jett, Srimati Swaminathan, Shushankar Maruwada, my colleagues, Shriashi Shailar ji, Nitesh Rane ji. All the dignitaries present here, namaskar and good morning to everyone. It is my privilege to address this distinguished gathering at the India AI Impact Summit. And this important session. On AI in agriculture. We meet at a very defining moment across the world. Food systems are under strain. Climate volatility is intensifying. Water tables are falling. Soil health is deteriorating. Supply chains are fragile. And global markets are unpredictable. For countries from the global south, agriculture is not merely an economic sector. It is livelihood, social stability and national security.

India understands this very deeply. And under the visionary leadership of our Honorable Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has placed digital public infrastructure and responsible infrastructure at the center stage of national development. The India AI mission is about using technology to deliver inclusion, transparency and scale Today, agriculture must sit at the heart of this mission Over half a billion Indians depend directly or indirectly on agriculture Yet, smallholders face fragmented information, rising input costs, climate uncertainty and limited access to credit and markets Traditional extension systems, however committed, cannot match the scale and the speed required Artificial intelligence changes this equation AI can provide hyperlocalization It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture It can be used to predict and predict the future of agriculture credit scoring based on crop intelligence, transparent traceable supply chains, real -time market advisories.

But let me emphasize, AI is not a magic. As Honorable PM said in his inaugural session, AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, and public accountability. Without trust, scale will not happen. Last year, Maharashtra made a very clear and decisive strategic decision. AI in agriculture must not remain confined to demonstrations or pilots. It must reach millions. Under our Maha Agri AI policy 2025 -2029, we adopted Maha Agri AI policy 2025 -2029, we adopted a policy -led, ecosystem -driven model. built on openness and interoperability. Allow me to share what this has meant in practice. As rightly told by our Secretary Mahavistar, our AI -powered mobile platform delivers multilingual personalized advisories, market intelligence, pest alerts, and access to government services more than 2 .5 million downloads, acting as a digital friend to all these farmers.

This demonstrates one thing very clearly. Farmers are ready for AI when AI is designed for them. AI -based pest surveillance, crop sap integration is our mantra. By integrating, geospatial analytics, With post -surveillance, we have delivered early warnings to cotton -growing farmers, reducing crop vulnerability and finance risk. This is predictive governance in action. Agriculture data exchange is also one thing which is defining this step. We are building a statewide interoperable agriculture data exchange based on open standards and strong data governance. Data must empower farmers, not exploit them. Traceability digital public infrastructure in today’s global markets, the transparency is a mantra. We are unveiling a blueprint. For more information, visit www .fema .gov. a traceability DPI that will ensure end -to -end visibility across value chains enhancing food safety, export competitiveness and consumer trust and this is not proprietary.

It is being designed as a replicable public infrastructure model for India and the entire global south. In partnership with India AI Mission the government of Maharashtra, the World Bank and the Wadhwani AI, we launched a global call for AI use cases in agriculture. The resulting compendium of real world AI applications in agriculture was released in Delhi on 17th February 2026. This compendium documents successful AI deployments from Africa, Asia, Latin America and beyond. India is convening global knowledge for the benefit of the global south. As we move towards AI for Agri -2026 in Mumbai, our vision rests on four pillars. AI must be transparent, auditable and explainable. Open and interoperable digital infrastructure. Innovation cannot scale in silos.

Investment and scaling. Technology without capital remains just a theory. And inclusion and gender equity is also a mantra. Agri -2026. Is the international year of women in agriculture. AI solutions must be designed. with women farmers, not merely for them. Maharashtra today presents one of the most compelling agri -innovation ecosystems globally. 150 lakh hectares of cultivated land, diverse agro -climatic conditions, leading agriculture universities and AI research centres, a vibrant start -up ecosystem, a clear regulatory framework, and single -window facilitation for investors. We invite venture capital funds, impact investors, multilateral development banks, corporate innovation arms, and philanthropic foundations to partner with us. And in this partnership, we initiate a global partnership between Maharashtra and the United States to develop and leverage the technology to create a future for all.

Maharashtra is a partner of the International Development Fund. Maharashtra is a partner of the International Development Fund. Maharashtra is a partner of the International Development Fund. Maharashtra is a partner of the International Development Fund. Maharashtra is a partner of the International Development Fund. Maharashtra is a partner of the International Development Fund. Maharashtra is a partner of the International Development Fund. co -developing traceability DPI modules, investing in agri -tech startups, supporting digital literacy, especially among women farmers, building capacity in the rural AI ecosystems. When you invest in Maharashtra, you invest in scalable solutions for engaging economies worldwide, food security, climate resilience and AI governance are deeply connected. Countries that master AI -enabled agriculture will secure farmer incomes and strategic stability.

India has the scale, DPI and democratic governance model to demonstrate how AI can be deployed responsibly at population scale. Maharashtra is proud to be laboratory of that ambition. Friends, this satellite session is a declaration. We will move from pilots to platforms, from fragmented data to interoperable systems, from experimentation to execution, from intention to investment. The government of Maharashtra stands ready to collaborate with the government of India, with states, with global institutions, investors, researchers and farmer organizations. Let us ensure that AI becomes a force for

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

Thank you. Thank you, sir, for your visionary address. You always continue to inspire us to aim higher and achieve better. And under your leadership, I can assure you the Agriculture Department will rise to the challenge and serve the aspirations of more than 15 million farmers of the state of Maharashtra. Thank you so much, sir. We will now start the panel discussion in a few moments. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Once again. Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi, he is the Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare Dr. Chaturvedi leads our national effort in agriculture and farmers welfare Mr. Johannes Jett, he is the Regional Vice President, World Bank Mr. Jett brings a vital global perspective on development and finance from the World Bank Ms.

Soumya Swaminathan, she is the Chairperson of Dr. M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation Dr. Swaminathan is a global leader in science, a champion for sustainable research and a strong advocate for mainstreaming women farmers’ role in agriculture Mr. Shankar Maruwala, he is the Co -Founder and CEO of Agestep Foundation He is a pioneer in building digital public infrastructure that empowers women farmers to develop their own agriculture and empowers people at scale and I am very proud to say that the Government of Maharashtra and Agestep Foundation together have brought out Mahavistar, which more than 2 .5 million farmers are using today to get the advisories and information that they need on a daily basis. The objective of this panel discussion is to move from vision to implementation.

Specifically, we will deliberate on how to institutionalize AI within agriculture systems at scale, how to ensure inclusion, especially of women farmers and smallholders, how to build interoperable, trustworthy and sustainable AI governance ecosystems, and how to strengthen collaboration between the center, states, global institutions, industry and academia. The session is also an important precursor to AI for Agri 2026 Global Conference, where we will continue these deliberations in greater operational depth with governments, investors, investors. innovators and development partners. AI for Agri conference is being held in Mumbai on 22nd and 23rd of February at Jio World Convention Centre. With this context, let’s begin our discussion. My first question is to Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi. Sir, under your leadership, the ministry has taken significant steps in advancing the digital agriculture mission and operationalizing the Agri -STEC framework.

You are laying a strong digital foundation for the sector. As we now look at integrating AI more systematically into agriculture, how do you envision the central state collaboration framework, specifically to ensure that AI deployments are aligned with national architecture while allowing states the flexibility to innovate based on local agro -climatic and socio -economic context? And finally, how can we institutionalize this collaboration? to achieve population scale impact while mentoring interoperability and data trust. Thank you.

Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi

A lot of questions in the same question. So what I’ll do is I’ll just first take you through the initiatives. First of all, we deeply appreciate the leadership taken by Maharashtra under obviously the leadership of a vulnerable chief minister and with the agriculture department. They have done exceptional work in digital agriculture mission by developing farmer IDs and digital crop survey. And also they launched Mahavistar as a precursor of Bharatvistar. And recently on 17th, government of India have also launched one of the first integrated AI -based system for the farmers, which is Bharatvistar, which presently is undertaking, providing services, which is work through the app. Android based app as well as through mobile telephony on weather advisories ICR based crop advisories, pest advisories market information regarding various agriculture produced, traded in the Mondays and lastly the government schemes of government of India.

Now why is this important, AI is important in agriculture? Like we did a lot of, we started with digitalization of services, different services we had DBT we had online systems of applying for various common person, applying to the common service centers or through the mobile apps but what was felt was that while we had initiated this process to ensure that the bureaucratic red tapism is removed, what we were moving towards was a sort of digital red tapism because within our ministry different schemes had different apps and they had different ways of selection and within the state also horticulture had a different database of farmers, agriculture had a different database, animal husbandry has a different database, crop insurance has a different database.

So basically a farmer who has to avail so many services was, we felt that he or she was getting lost in which app to use and which one to use. And sometimes it becomes more difficult to avail the services through online systems or to get advisories than to go to a person and say, okay, tell me how to do it. So the whole idea was that once we have this AI -based system, we have a same platform for different applications and different advisories at a click of the button or maybe just as a voice. So that is the whole idea of shifting towards AI -based solutions. So now what we have initially in the first phase in the artificial intelligence system, the Bharat Vistar or the Mahavistar of Maharashtra, is that the advisories, the crop advisories, the weather advisories, schemes information about how to apply and what is the status of that application, and also the Monday rates.

All these have been put in the one platform. You can just make a – presently it is working in English and Hindi, but in the next three to six months we’ll be taking it towards all the Bhashani -related languages. And the next step is, as we mentioned, that the states are working together with us for the digital public infrastructure. So close to 9 crore farmer IDs have been developed. So what is a farmer ID? And you must have read the statement of Honourable Finance Minister, that DPI is the new UPI. So what is the basic – this agri -stack, which is a part of DPI, is that for agriculture is that we have – each farmer has a unique farmer ID with the back end of all the crops the person has sown, what is the land available to that person, all the data with the share of the land and the crops sown and the soil health card details if the soil health has been given.

So with these basic details available on the system, it empowers the farmer through that ID to avail services because it is already approved by the relevant authorities in the government. So the person does not have to or the authorities who are giving the services are not required to cross -verify the credentials of the farmer based on the record of rights or maybe the Girdhavari or whatever it was in the different states. So every state and Maharashtra is one of the leading states here. We are working together to have a saturation of farmer IDs and crop survey. And once this is there, then this AI will further transform into a very, very tailored advisory. So a person calls or gives the farmer ID or Aadhaar.

And at the back end, we will, based on the consent, access the details of where the farmer is from, what is the crop being grown, what is soil health conditions. And very targeted advisories will be given, which will be made operational in the next three to six months. So instead of pushing data which may not be of interest of the farmers, very specific, tailored, data for that farmer will be available based on integration. of digital public infrastructure with Bharat Vistar. And the third aspect will come when we do the predictive models. And we tried that and you must have remembered in the inaugural session when Google CEO mentioned about that predictive model which we did with about 3 .8 crore farmers.

We used 100 years data of IMD and a model to predict a monsoon for the next one month and for next week. And that prediction was fairly accurate and farmers we got the feedback to farmers did take the decision to sow and to irrigate based on the predictive model which was sent. And now we will expand the predictive models to ensure that we get more advisories of the market situation, of the weather situation which will help improving the decision making of the farmers and so that they can increase their productivity, reduce the cost. So that is the whole idea of AI in agriculture. And we hope that more and more farmers will adopt it and it will be a lot and it will be a lot exactly a replacement but a sort of additional to the human, we can say, extension services, which we find is not able to reach to the farmers because of the resource constraints of each state.

The extension machinery, the KVKs, all our state extension machineries, it’s very difficult to reach each and every farmer because of the fact that we can’t have a person sitting in each village reaching to each farmer. But AI, along with digital public infrastructure, along with the mobile and internet penetration in the various rural areas, will ensure that that gap is removed and we get more and more access to the farmers on services and advisors. That is the whole idea of having center and state interoperability. But I hope I have answered most of the questions which

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

As you rightly mentioned. AI systems are acting like a digital friend of the farmer so they are available at any point of time through multiple channels and in a language they understand in FEDSAR with ministries assistance we were able to get access to multiple images of pest and disease and with IIT Bombay we have been able to develop models where farmers can take a picture and they can find out what pest and disease is it and then ultimately what is to be done based on the knowledge created by agriculture universities and ICR institutions so I think there is a great opportunity for us the national government has the scale and the states have their own specific skill sets and knowledge together if they combine I think we can reach out to each and everybody in the farming sector.

Thank you sir I will move on to Mr. Johannes Jutt now the regional vice president of the World Bank the World Bank has been a long standing partner to both the government of India and the government of Maharashtra we have multiple projects going on concurrently as well as we have had in past as well. And these projects have been aimed at strengthening agriculture systems, climate resilience, and institutional capacity. As we move into the era where AI technologies are evolving at unprecedented speed, how can development partnership adapt to remain agile and responsive? In particular, how can we structure programs and technical assistance model that provide just -in -time support to central and state governments, enabling them to experiment, iterate, and scale AI solutions responsibly?

Johannes Zutt

to be here today. So we’re on the cusp of a major revolution in how support to farmers and agriculture is happening. I actually grew up on a farm. I worked on a farm from the ages 10 to 21. I think every hour I wasn’t in school that I was actually at home. I was working in a farm. In some ways it feels paleolithic because we didn’t have computers. We had telephones that were connected to wires and our ability to get information about what was happening around us was extremely limited. We spent a lot of time trying to find out the things that today you can find out very, very quickly using small AI for agriculture. And that’s truly revolutionarily empowering for farmers.

But to make that work for farmers, there’s a lot of things that need to go right. And I think it’s worth reflecting a little bit about on the different roles that we have. Thank you. actors in the ecosystem have, starting obviously with government. My colleague mentioned a number of these things earlier. The government’s responsibility is principally on foundations, things like the governance of AI, the interoperability, accessibility, obviously ensuring that educational programs include appropriate types of skilling in the use of digital services. This is a big challenge in countries like India, where frankly there are still people who don’t have sufficient literacy to read what comes over a basic smartphone. Ensuring that the research and extension that is provided through these small AI platforms, is credible, is trustworthy, is backed by science.

I think that’s also extremely important. Of course, farmers will find out if they aren’t. but at high expense, right? So we want to make sure that they’re not being advised to do things that are negative for them. And then also looking at the cost of service, the connectivity, what does the farmer actually need to be able to link into these different types of platforms that give information? Because, of course, we’re often also talking about farmers who have very, very few assets and who may be essentially unable to stay permanently connected or even easily connected to the Internet. They’re going to have very basic smartphones, et cetera. So the government has a lot of work to do in all of those areas.

Then you can look at what can the private sector do. Now, one thing that the government needs to do is encourage, crowd in private sector capacity and capital. But once we turn to the private sector, what is the private sector’s principle? advantage. I think that there’s a lot of creativity in the private sector. So the actual applications that are being developed are being developed by individuals in the private sector with a passion for specific sorts of issues that are constraining farmer success. And, you know, that creativity will result in a number of different applications that will be aimed, in most cases, to help farmers overcome certain hurdles that they face. And, you know, we can kind of let a thousand flowers bloom there and see what actually takes root.

And it’s amazing what you start to see. Just yesterday, I was learning about an application in Morocco developed by a tomato farmer who was able to give advice about how much water tomato plants need simply by taking a picture. of the current tomato plant. Take a picture and it tells you how much water you actually need to give this plant, which obviously in a water -stressed environment is vital, vital information. And then, you know, there are roles for institutions like my own, the World Bank Group, which can help to provide some of the financing that helps develop these applications, and also the foundational backbone for artificial intelligence. And we can also play a role at the advisory end, where we are helping to truth -test, if you like, the information that’s coming through different applications that are coming out of the AI sandbox in different contexts to make sure that it’s actually providing information that’s useful to the end beneficiary and enhancing from a productivity perspective at the farm level.

Thanks.

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

I think you have rightly pointed out the role of innovation and research and what we see is we require high quality robust data to actually build upon that and as Honourable Chief Minister mentioned, MahaEGX is one step in that direction wherein we bring diverse data sets and make them accessible to researchers, academic institutions, departments and also start -ups and many of these start -ups we will see they are showcasing their innovations in AI for Agri conference in Mumbai. So we request all of you to please come there and see for themselves what kind of excitement they have and what kind of solutions are envisaged. I have one supplementary question to you. How do you see a platform such as AI Impact Summit as well as AI for Agri global conference contributing to deeper global collaboration and south -south knowledge exchange in this domain?

Johannes Zutt

Thank you for that additional question. I mean, obviously, India is in a great position to lead the development of AI, particularly for developing countries where there are still significant challenges helping poor people to escape poverty permanently. India has demonstrated digital innovation for a long period of time already. It’s got an enormous population with a huge variety. The challenges of bringing farmer -appropriate data to the farmer’s fingertips in India are – I was going to say India is a microcosm of the rest of the world. It’s hardly a microcosm. It’s so huge. But because you have so many languages, so many different regions, so many different types of crops, and the starting conditions at the farm level are so incredibly varied, figuring out how to make AI at the farm level work, in India will automatically have a large number of spillover learnings for other countries around the world.

and because India after China and the United States is the country in the world that is best positioned actually to push all of this work forward and because it is itself a developing country, it’s very, very clear that it will have a central role to play in South -South learning for those reasons.

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

Thank you so much. I move on to Dr. Swaminathan. Dr. Swaminathan, your father, Professor M .S. Swaminathan, played a historic role in shaping India’s agriculture transformation during the Green Revolution, ensuring food security at a critical juncture in our history. Today, as we speak of a new phase of transformation driven by AI, we are again at an inflection point. You have consistently championed science -based policy, sustainability and the empowerment of women farmers. With 2026 being recognized internationally, as the year of women farmers, how can we ensure that AI -led agriculture transformation strengthens women’s agency? knowledge access and climate resilience and what institutional safeguards and design principles must be embed today so that this new technological revolution becomes equitable farmer centric and grounded in scientific integrity

Dr. Soumya Swaminathan

Thank you very much for that question Vikasji not only is this year the international year of women farmer but we know that agriculture itself is increasingly being feminized with many men actually leaving farming to the women and migrating out to the cities for other opportunities so it is really essential to put women at the center of all that we are discussing and I think the chief minister today gave us a wonderful vision of what can be the future provided of course like you said that there are the guardrails there are the institutions there are the safeguards and the design principles that we think about from the very beginning so my father professor MS Parminathan used to say that the green revolution was not only about the seeds, of course the seeds played a very big role you know the high yielding varieties but it was about the entire ecosystem and the institutions that were developed at that time which included the outreach you know later on the Krishi Vigyan Kendras of course were developed but also the access to credit, the water, the fertilizers, the education, the empowerment and ultimately became a success because farmers realized the potential of it and took it on.

So what he used to say is that you know every technology, no technology is pro -poor or pro -rich or pro -woman or against women, it’s how we use that technology so it’s really like you said the inflection point today is how do we use this very powerful technology that’s come to us. So I think there are a few points here, you know, to make sure particularly that women farmers are not left behind. The first important fact is that women in India, the minority of them who have their name on the land document, so mostly it is in the man’s name, and Deveshji was telling me today that this is improving and that the latest census shows that perhaps at least a quarter of the properties are also in the name of women, either jointly or, but that still means that, you know, three -fourths of them don’t have.

And a system that operates basically on publicly available data will then leave out those whose data sets are not available. So I think it would be really important at the early stages itself to think about how women’s data can be incorporated because the algorithms are fed by the data we have. And so all of these advisories may be very suitable for a man who’s operating a tractor on a farm, but not at all relevant for a woman who’s still working with outdated instruments and trying to, you know, till her land. And particularly when we look at more remote areas, tribal areas, where women do a lot of the agriculture like millets, for example. Mostly it is women who grow millets.

And there’s still a lot of mechanization which is absent completely. It is all still very much done using traditional methods and tools, and it involves a lot of drudgery. So I would say that, you know, one of the benchmarks that I would look at is, is it reducing the drudgery and the workload on women farmers? Is AI helping to do that? So I think we also need to look at certain indicators for success. And you mentioned science. I mean, I’m a medical researcher, and the way that we evaluate products is by doing clinical trials, by examining the data and the evidence. And then recommending it for wider use. so again a note of caution would be to as we roll it out we need innovation certainly we also need to do the evaluation looking at inherent biases looking at who’s being excluded looking at are there unanticipated risks or side effects that we didn’t know about but most of all it’s this inclusion I think we don’t want those who are already left behind to be further left out so I think the ongoing research and data collection and feedback loops and most importantly having the voices of those for whom we are developing all these I think in the room I don’t think we have any farmers or women farmers so we are all discussing from what we know but if you are the farmer like you were saying working there and you know the constraints under which you are working so I think the women farmers and farmers in general must have a role they must be part of these committees that evaluate or make recommendations or make suggestions on improvement it has to be an iterative process I think any technology is as good as the application for which it’s developed I’ll give you one example of an app that the MS Farminathan Research Foundation developed for fisher women.

We had very successful app for fisher men called the Fisher Friendly Mobile App that won the UN Tech for Nature award last year. But fisher women were as usual left out and so the Women Connect app actually gives them on a tablet information that they need to sell because once the fishermen have come back from seeds, the women who have to do all of the post harvest and the same is true for crops or fruits or vegetables as well. So that connection to the market, of course information about pests and pathogens and when to buy what and what inputs to use but also being able to organize themselves. And I think women, there are many FPOs now and FPCs and SHGs made of women farmers, empowering them and giving them the knowledge and tools.

And the last thing I would say is we still need humans in the loop. I don’t think we should think that completely making everything run by machines is going to solve our problems. I think it’s risky there. And in a country like India, we also need employment. And so we should think of, and I don’t know how many of you have seen this film called Humans in the Loop. But it’s a tribal woman from Jharkhand who actually raises questions about the algorithm. It’s a very thought -provoking film. So I think Humans in the Loop is going to be important. We have our Krishis, Sakhis and so on. We need to empower them with these. So I think AI and all these digital tools, if they’re used in addition to the traditional knowledge and wisdom that people have and augment it and give them at the right time, at the right place, the knowledge they need, I think we can go a very long way.

Thank you.

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

Thank you, madam. You have rightly pointed out the need to be more sensitive and while developing systems for inclusivity. and to ensure that for whom they are being developed and they are in the loop and they are being consulted. In fact, the feedback mechanism that we have developed in Mahavista takes care of those requirements. I’m also very happy to share that Government of Maharashtra and Dr. M .S. Swaminathan Research Foundation are working together on some of these issues in terms of how to bring women’s right in farming at the center stage. How do we create bio -happiness using our universities and educational systems? And what kind of nutritional security we must look for? Because we have food security, but it’s the nutritional security that we must aspire for.

So we are happy to have support and assistance from MSSRF in that direction. My final question is to Mr. Shankar Maruwada. Mr. Shankar, ECSTEP has played a role. A foundational role in shaping India’s DPI landscape through open source platforms such as Sunbird. which has powered large -scale systems like Diksha, Mahavistar and Open Network Initiative built on backend protocol. These efforts have demonstrated how open standards and interoperable architecture can enable population -scale transformation that we are already seeing today. As we now enter the era of AI -driven public systems, how should we think about standardizing AI -based ecosystem in a similar spirit? How can we bring DPI into AI? And what architecture and governance principles are required to ensure interoperability, trust and sustainability in AI deployments across sectors such as agriculture?

Shankar Maruwada

Again, a whole lot of questions, but let me make my best attempt to answer those. More than 100 years ago, the world faced what was known as a Malthusian crisis, where Malthus, the economist, predicted that if we continue to grow, in the same way we’ll run out of land, we’ll run out of soil. We were a billion and a half then. We are 8 billion. Most of us may not even have heard of the Malthusian crisis. What happened? Someone called Haber and someone called Bosch created a miracle. Haber synthesized ammonia using high pressure and temperature and Bosch put it into an industrial process. That phenomena is now historically known as pulling bread out of air. It took a lot of effort and as Soumya said, creation of a massive ecosystem.

Germany, which pioneered this, lost that race to US. Because US did a better job of diffusing the technology safely to the farmers. They created the discipline of agriculture engineering. They created institutions like the Fertilizer Development Center. They helped. technology demonstrations to farmers to show them how synthetic ammonia could be used. By the way, 50 % of the nitrogen in our body comes from synthetic nitrate ammonia. That’s a fact. So we owe a lot to Haber and Bosch. China then took it on in 80s by buying 10 big plants from Kellogg, training 300 million farmers, showing them how to use synthetic fertilizers. And they went on to be the global leaders in agriculture. India is at a point where if we learn the lessons from such past things, our green revolution, our DPI experience, we are at a pivotal point where the equivalent of pulling bread out of thin air is pulling intelligence from the earth and providing it to the farmer.

this is again not science fiction Mahavistar, the pioneer along with Bharatvistar have taken the first steps to this so when a Mahavistar was designed to build off what Swami has said, it was designed with inclusion in mind inclusion diversity was not an afterthought because to solve for not just Maharashtra’s problems for India’s scale and diversity we need to think of the last person, the most discriminated in the remotest part of India and design systems that work for them we call that DPI now let me give you a specific example of this in Bharatvistar right from the beginning the design specs was we need an illiterate farmer to build off John’s point about digital literacy with a feature phone, not a smartphone, to be able to talk in his or her native language and native dialect.

Marathi itself has many dialects, right? Talk on the phone, like the way she is comfortable talking to another person. Ask the question, have a conversation, get a bunch of answers. That process took us the better part of nine months. Why? Because it’s not just AI. It’s data. It’s processes. It’s training the farm extension workers. It is having trust on will this work? What about the costing? Will I blow up my entire stage budget on a model, right? Do I have autonomy? Can I switch models out, in and out? These are very, very difficult questions. It took us in partnership with a whole lot of people. I mean, government of Maharashtra led the effort, but IndiAI mission, Bhashini, IIT Madras, IIIT Hyderabad, World Bank, Google many other providers everybody chipped in the little part of the solution now here is the best part because we all collaboratively invested in figuring out a solution there that solution could be deployed in Bharat Vistar with more confidence easily again the same challenges that secretary Chaturvedi talked about do we have the data he used a very nice phrase digital red tapism our data is in different formats what matters is the intent of the government of India which triggered the process which allowed Bharat Vistar to be launched the day before it’s a start data will get better, the systems will get better, usage will improve that will generate more data and then over time years the ecosystem will be built this we know from our experience what makes this happen what is that secret sauce the design principles it is the same as DPI what worked for DPI we are taking those same principles one open interoperable systems think networks and not just portals and platforms and siloed and fragmented systems what’s the best example of this the railways in India we have such a vast landscape but the rails are common every state can decide what it wants to move private public defense farming the Indian railways is just providing a backbone that allows everyone to do this there was a time when we had different rail gauges right now that sounds so silly but there was a time like that But India is showing that we don’t have to repeat those early mistakes in digital also.

By creating interoperable networks based on open protocols like Beacon, by collaborating with each other, one of us is bringing in data, somebody is bringing in technology, somebody is bringing in policy, somebody is bringing in research. These collaborative open networks and with the launch of Bharat Vistar puts India in a very unique and responsible position. Unique because we have these open rails, we have the experience of DPI. Responsible because it is a start. Unlike the technologies of the past where you perfect the technology and then deploy AI, you deploy something minimum to start and then evolution, models get better, data gets better, usage gets better. And then it gets better and better over time. that is the unique junction we are in in India what will that mean?

when I -CAR plugs into this network with its weather and pricing data that network makes it available to any state that wishes to turn on the supply from I -CAR when a private sector comes out with a very innovative app let’s say the tomato example that John talked about any state can say I like that I think I will have that made available to my farmers for the farmers they anyway trust the state they can go to the same app and now see this also there if the tomato app person wants they can go directly to each farmer very very expensive so Shared Rails allows us to spread innovation diffuse it very quickly through society keeping in mind both inclusion and inclusion and inclusion and rewarding innovation because innovation has to be rewarded.

And I want to end with a very simple analogy. When Edmund Hillary climbed Mount Everest, he made a lot of people believe it is possible. When Mahavistar was launched, it made the country believe that it is possible to make AI serve the farmer. And to that extent, the responsibility that Mahavistar, Maharashtra government and government of India has is to create these pathways for the rest of the country for the other states. At XTEP Foundation, Nandan Elekani, we made a declaration two days ago. We would like to see a world by 2030 where there are 100 such diffusion pathways, each created by a different set of people in different sectors, in different countries and continents, but each inspiring.

different AI pathways to safe impact at scale. And it’s a very exciting vision. It’s a very collaborative vision. If you all get together, we can also create miracles in our own lifetime. Thank you.

Vikas Chandra Rastogi

With that profound thought, we’ll conclude today’s panel discussion. I thank all the panelists. They have really opened a new vision in front of all of us. And we’ll invite all of you to AI for Agree conference in Mumbai on 22nd. Thank you so much. We don’t have question actually. Time for question. The next session is about to start.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (19)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (4)
Confirmedhigh

“The four‑pillar framework for AI in agriculture includes transparency, auditability & explainability; open, interoperable digital infrastructure; innovation & investment for scaling; inclusion & gender equity.”

The discussion of transparency, auditability and open architecture as essential adoption accelerators matches the first two pillars described in the report [S73] and the emphasis on trust infrastructure aligns with the fourth pillar [S74].

Confirmedhigh

“Maha AgEx provides early‑warning alerts for cotton growers through a federated data‑exchange architecture.”

AI-based pest surveillance and geospatial analytics have already delivered early warnings to cotton-growing farmers, as noted in the source [S5].

Additional Contextmedium

“A publicly‑available traceability DPI blueprint (www.fema.gov) will give end‑to‑end visibility across value chains.”

Digital public infrastructure can raise exclusion risks for marginalized users, a nuance highlighted in the analysis of DPI challenges [S58]; additionally, the FarmerZone open-source data platform exemplifies publicly-owned agricultural data systems that support traceability [S75].

Confirmedmedium

“Trust and institutional safeguards (transparency, auditability, explainability) are critical for scaling AI in food systems.”

The importance of trust infrastructure, alongside transparency and auditability, is emphasized as a prerequisite for scaling AI in climate-resilient food systems [S74].

External Sources (81)
S1
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — -Vikas Chandra Rastogi: Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of Maharashtra – leads the …
S2
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — -Vikas Chandra Rastogi- Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of Maharashtra (moderator/ho…
S3
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — -Johannes Zutt- Regional Vice President, World Bank
S4
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — -Johannes Zutt: World Bank representative (referred to as “John” in the discussion)
S5
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-meets-agriculture-building-food-security-and-climate-resilien — May I invite Dr. Devish Chaturvedi, Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. Sir, please come onto the s…
S6
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — A very good morning to all of you. Shri Devesh Chaturvedi ji, Rajesh Agarwal ji, Vikas Rastogi ji. Mr. Jonas Jett, Srima…
S7
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — Dr. Chaturvedi leads our national effort in agriculture and farmer’s welfare. Mr. Johannes Jett, he is the Regional Vice…
S8
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — -Dr. Soumya Swaminathan: Chairperson of Dr. M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation – global leader in science, champion fo…
S9
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-meets-agriculture-building-food-security-and-climate-resilien — Dr. Chaturvedi leads our national effort in agriculture and farmer’s welfare. Mr. Johannes Jett, he is the Regional Vice…
S10
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-for-agriculture-scaling-intelegence-for-food-and-climate-resiliance — So we are happy to have support and assistance from MSSRF in that direction. My final question is to Mr. Shankar Maruwad…
S11
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — – Dr. Soumya Swaminathan- Shankar Maruwada Dr. Swaminathan advocates for a cautious, medical research-style evaluation …
S12
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — -Devendra Fadnavis- Honorable Chief Minister of Maharashtra
S13
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — – Devendra Fadnavis- Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
S14
Harnessing Collective AI for India’s Social and Economic Development — Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Data governance Professo…
S15
Scaling AI for Billions_ Building Digital Public Infrastructure — “Because trust is starting to become measurable, right, through provenance, through authenticity, as well as verificatio…
S16
Building Inclusive Societies with AI — When asked about government initiatives, Manisha Verma, Additional Chief Secretary of Maharashtra’s SEED Department, out…
S17
Global Perspectives on Openness and Trust in AI — “It was this project that brought together over a thousand researchers … to try and create an open source large langua…
S18
Transforming Agriculture_ AI for Resilient and Inclusive Food Systems — 1 ,000 hectares in some big island of Indonesia in order to get the safe efficiency in the next five years. And then we …
S19
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — Ante este panorama, los países del sur global debemos priorizar estrategias y normativas para un uso ético y responsable…
S20
Leveraging AI to Support Gender Inclusivity | IGF 2023 WS #235 — Audience:Thank you very much for all the sharing. It’s really interesting. So I have a bit of a specific question. So it…
S21
WS #98 Universal Principles Local Realities Multistakeholder Pathways for DPI — Rasmus Lumi: Thank you very much. Well, maybe I should start by saying that when in the beginning, when you introduced m…
S22
DPI+H – health for all through digital public infrastructure — An insightful observation was made that the private sector can viably contribute to DPI components within a secure frame…
S23
Digital Public Infrastructure, Policy Harmonisation, and Digital Cooperation – AI, Data Governance,and Innovation for Development — An audience member emphasized the importance of thorough research in policy formulation. This point resonated with the p…
S24
Open Forum #37 Her Data,Her Policies:Towards a Gender Inclusive Data Future — Bonnita Nyamwire: Thank you so much, Christelle. So a gender-inclusive data is one that is representative of all genders…
S25
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI — “India, surely for the vast amount of experience and scale and heterogeneity that it has, offers excellent evidence on w…
S26
Open Forum #82 Catalyzing Equitable AI Impact the Role of International Cooperation — Cina Lawson: Thank you very much, so the first comment I make is that AI has to work for us. It means that we have to ma…
S27
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — Algorithmic transparency is a critical topic discussed in various sessions, notably in the9821st meetingof the AI Securi…
S28
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — The roadmap is built upon core principles including “human and planetary welfare, accountability and transparency, inclu…
S29
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance — Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S30
9821st meeting — At the heart of the development and use of artificial intelligence systems, human beings and their dignity must always b…
S31
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — In conclusion, the discussions highlighted the importance of fostering transparency and accountability in AI systems. En…
S32
Harnessing Collective AI for India’s Social and Economic Development — Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Data governance Professo…
S33
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — The roadmap is built upon core principles including “human and planetary welfare, accountability and transparency, inclu…
S34
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services — Resilience, data control, and secure compute are core prerequisites for trustworthy AI. Systems must stay operational an…
S35
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — The World Bank’s Johannes Zutt stressed the importance of collaborative ecosystems where government provides foundationa…
S36
Fostering Global Digital Cooperation for Prosperity — Dima Al-Khatib, Director of UN Office of South-South Cooperation, highlighted South-South and Triangular Cooperation as …
S37
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — A very good morning to all of you. Shri Devesh Chaturvedi ji, Rajesh Agarwal ji, Vikas Rastogi ji. Mr. Jonas Jett, Srima…
S38
The fading of human agency in automated systems — In practice, however, being “in the loop” frequently means supervising outputs under conditions that make meaningful jud…
S39
Driving Social Good with AI_ Evaluation and Open Source at Scale — Human-in-the-loop evaluation must be done rigorously, especially when putting stamps of approval on model behavior
S40
Diplomatic policy analysis — Overreliance on technology:While machine learning and analytics are powerful tools, they are not infallible. Overdepende…
S41
Ethical AI_ Keeping Humanity in the Loop While Innovating — It was adopted back in 2021 by 193 member states of UNESCO, and it calls for human oversight, non -discrimination, respe…
S42
Leveraging AI to Support Gender Inclusivity | IGF 2023 WS #235 — By engaging users and technical communities, policymakers can gain valuable insights and perspectives, ultimately leadin…
S43
Open Forum #17 AI Regulation Insights From Parliaments — Amira Saber: Yeah, thank you so much. And it’s a pleasure to be talking on this panel amid esteemed colleagues. Actually…
S44
Balancing innovation and oversight: AI’s future requires shared governance — At IGF 2024, day two in Riyadh, policymakers, tech experts, and corporate leaders discussed one of the most pressing dil…
S45
Open Forum #58 Collaborating for Trustworthy AI an Oecd Toolkit and Spotlight on AI in Government — This comment reinforced the toolkit approach discussed in the first segment by validating the need for flexible, adaptiv…
S46
Open Forum #64 Local AI Policy Pathways for Sustainable Digital Economies — Economic | Human rights principles Quote from UNDP Human Development Report 2025 stating that innovation incentives fav…
S47
The WSIS Moon Shot: Celebrating 20 years and crystal-balling the next 20! — **Private Sector Investment:** Maria Fernanda Garza from the International Chamber of Commerce acknowledged the private …
S48
Rewriting Development / Davos 2025 — Lord Nicholas Stern: I think we now have an imperative around investment, the investment necessary to build a sustaina…
S49
[Parliamentary Session 3] Researching at the frontier: Insights from the private sector in developing large-scale AI systems — While both speakers acknowledge the importance of governance, there’s an unexpected difference in their emphasis on who …
S50
WS #214 AI Readiness in Africa in a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape — She explains that private sector will invest in expensive compute facilities, but government and donor organizations mus…
S51
Transforming Agriculture_ AI for Resilient and Inclusive Food Systems — The tone was consistently optimistic yet pragmatic throughout the conversation. Speakers maintained an encouraging outlo…
S52
Secure Finance Risk-Based AI Policy for the Banking Sector — -India’s Strategic AI Positioning: Discussion centered on how India should position itself globally in AI governance, le…
S53
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — Maharashtra’s strategic approach represents a shift from pilot projects to population-scale implementation. The state’s …
S54
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis presented Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029, emphasizing the shift from demon…
S55
Digital solutions for sustainability: ICT’s role in GHG reduction and biodiversity protection — **Scaling Beyond Pilots**: Moving from successful pilot projects to global implementation, particularly in resource-cons…
S56
Creating digital public infrastructure that empowers people | IGF 2023 Open Forum #168 — Aishwarya Salvi:you you you you hello everyone, a warm welcome to you all who have joined us in this room and also to ev…
S57
Empowering People with Digital Public Infrastructure — 1. Ensuring DPI systems are built on data that represents currently underserved communities, including data that isn’t y…
S58
A digital public infrastructure strategy for sustainable development – Exploring effective possibilities for regional cooperation (University of Western Australia) — However, there are concerns that need to be addressed when implementing DPI. One major concern is the risk of exclusion …
S59
Leveraging AI to Support Gender Inclusivity | IGF 2023 WS #235 — As AI models continue to grow in size, selecting appropriate training data becomes increasingly challenging. This recogn…
S60
DC-Inclusion & DC-PAL: Transformative digital inclusion: Building a gender-responsive and inclusive framework for the underserved — Hu highlights the significant gender gap in the development of frontier technologies like AI and quantum computing. She …
S61
Can AI help achieve gender equality? — UNESCO in Brazillaunchedthe Portuguese version of the report ‘The Effects of AI on the Working Lives of Women’, which wa…
S62
WS #270 Understanding digital exclusion in AI era — The discussion underscored the urgency of taking action to prevent further widening of the digital divide as AI technolo…
S63
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI — “India, surely for the vast amount of experience and scale and heterogeneity that it has, offers excellent evidence on w…
S64
Building Scalable AI Through Global South Partnerships — India’s AI mission offers several innovations for global sharing. The country has created compute infrastructure availab…
S65
Open Forum #82 Catalyzing Equitable AI Impact the Role of International Cooperation — Cina Lawson: Thank you very much, so the first comment I make is that AI has to work for us. It means that we have to ma…
S66
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — Ante este panorama, los países del sur global debemos priorizar estrategias y normativas para un uso ético y responsable…
S67
Agentic AI in Focus Opportunities Risks and Governance — -Enterprise Guardrails and Risk Management: Panelists emphasized the critical importance of implementing robust safety m…
S68
WS #31 Cybersecurity in AI: balancing innovation and risks — Melodena Stephens: So this is a tough one, right? Because when I look at ethics, I think ethics are great. The line b…
S69
9821st meeting — At the heart of the development and use of artificial intelligence systems, human beings and their dignity must always b…
S70
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — Algorithmic transparency is a critical topic discussed in various sessions, notably in the9821st meetingof the AI Securi…
S71
WS #236 Ensuring Human Rights and Inclusion: An Algorithmic Strategy — Abeer Alsumait: Thank you. So I think this question actually relates to what Dr. Lopez mentioned. The keywords here a…
S72
AI for Good – food and agriculture — ## Major Discussion Points Dongyu Qu: Excellencies, ladies, gentlemen, good morning. A year ago, we all gathered for th…
S73
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development — Transparency, auditability, grievance redress, open architecture are not compliance burdens. They’re adoption accelerato…
S74
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — Trust infrastructure is as critical as technical infrastructure, requiring institutional safeguards, transparency, and e…
S75
© 2019, United Nations — India offers an experiment in publicly-owned data platforms. Proposals for FarmerZone, a cloud-based, open-…
S76
From data to impact: Digital Product Information Systems and the importance of traceability for global environmental governance — – Integrating DPI systems into e-waste management technical regulations and Extended Producer Responsibility frameworks …
S77
Development of Cyber capacities in emerging economies | IGF 2023 Open Forum #6 — Audience:Okay, my name is James Ndolufuyi from Abuja, Nigeria. I have a comment and then a question. First to Chris, on …
S78
Increasing routing security globally through cooperation | IGF 2023 WS #339 — Katsuyasu Toyama:Next is Katsuyasu Toyama from JPNAP and APIX. Probably more technical perspective. Yeah, thank you very…
S79
DC-DNSI: Beyond Borders – NIS2’s Impact on Global South — – AI governance frameworks and policies emerging in different regions of the global majority (e.g. Africa, Latin America…
S80
Measuring Gender Digital Inequality in the Global South — In conclusion, the Equals Coalition, along with partners such as KAIST and Professor Michael Best, is actively working t…
S81
EQUAL Global Partnership Research Coalition Annual Meeting | IGF 2023 — A paradox exists where women, despite being motivated to learn advanced skills, face limited career advancement due to g…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
D
Devendra Fadnavis
3 arguments106 words per minute1101 words619 seconds
Argument 1
AI is essential to secure food, nutrition, farmer incomes and economic stability in India
EXPLANATION
Fadnavis argues that AI is a critical tool to address the mounting pressures on food systems, climate volatility, and economic stability, ensuring food and nutrition security as well as higher farmer incomes across India.
EVIDENCE
He outlines the multiple stresses on agriculture, including climate volatility, falling water tables, deteriorating soil health, fragile supply chains and unpredictable markets, which together threaten food security [41-48]. He then emphasizes that AI can provide hyper-localised solutions such as predictive credit scoring, transparent supply chains and real-time market advisories to meet these challenges [52-53].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The significance of AI for food security, farmer incomes and economic stability is highlighted in the AI Meets Agriculture discussion and the AI for agriculture scaling initiative [S2] [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Strategic priority of AI for food and climate resilience
AGREED WITH
Vikas Chandra Rastogi
Argument 2
AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, transparency, auditability and public accountability
EXPLANATION
Fadnavis stresses that without trustworthy data and robust ethical frameworks, AI cannot achieve scale or public confidence, and therefore governance, transparency and accountability are non‑negotiable foundations.
EVIDENCE
He states that AI is not magic and must be built on trusted data, ethical governance and public accountability, warning that without trust scaling will not happen [53-56].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Fadnavis’ call for trusted data, ethical governance and public accountability is echoed in sources on collective AI and trust frameworks, as well as the AI for agriculture overview [S14] [S15] [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance, trust, ethics and responsible AI deployment
AGREED WITH
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Shankar Maruwada
DISAGREED WITH
Johannes Zutt
Argument 3
Maharashtra invites venture capital, impact investors, multilateral banks and philanthropic foundations to fund and scale agri‑tech startups
EXPLANATION
Fadnavis calls on a broad range of private and public capital providers to partner with Maharashtra’s agri‑innovation ecosystem, highlighting the need for investment to move AI solutions from pilots to scalable platforms.
EVIDENCE
He explicitly invites venture capital funds, impact investors, multilateral development banks and philanthropic foundations to collaborate with Maharashtra’s agri-innovation ecosystem [86-89].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Role of private sector, innovation and global collaboration
AGREED WITH
Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
V
Vikas Chandra Rastogi
4 arguments110 words per minute1813 words985 seconds
Argument 1
Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025‑2029 operationalises AI across advisory, market, traceability and research services
EXPLANATION
Rastogi describes the state’s AI policy as a comprehensive framework that embeds AI into public agricultural systems, covering advisory services, market information, product traceability, research and capacity building.
EVIDENCE
He notes the launch of the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029 and lists its uses for pharma advisory services, market information, data exchange, product traceability, innovation, research and stakeholder capacity building [20-22]. He also cites Mahavistar’s multilingual advisory reach and the AgriStrike platform that links farmers to schemes, as concrete implementations of the policy [23-26].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The launch and scope of the Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029 were presented by the Chief Minister and detailed in the AI Meets Agriculture session and the scaling intelligence briefing [S2] [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI as a strategic priority for food and climate resilience
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis
Argument 2
Open, federated, consent‑driven data exchange (Maha AgEx) creates a “big picture” for AI models and predictive governance
EXPLANATION
Rastogi explains that the Maha AgEx architecture aggregates diverse agricultural datasets in a consent‑based, open and federated manner, enabling comprehensive AI modelling and early‑warning predictive governance.
EVIDENCE
He describes Maha AgEx as an open, federated and consent-driven architecture that brings diverse data sets together to provide a big picture for AI models and predictive governance [26-27]. He later refers to predictive governance in action through early warnings for cotton growers that reduce crop vulnerability and financial risk [66-67].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building digital public infrastructure and data ecosystems
AGREED WITH
Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi, Shankar Maruwada
Argument 3
Partnerships with MSSRF aim to embed women’s rights and nutritional security into AI‑enabled agricultural systems
EXPLANATION
Rastogi highlights collaboration with the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation to ensure that AI‑driven agricultural platforms address women’s rights and broader nutritional outcomes, integrating gender considerations into system design.
EVIDENCE
He mentions a feedback mechanism in Mahavistar that addresses inclusivity and notes ongoing joint work with MSSRF on bringing women’s rights to the centre of farming and on creating bio-happiness and nutritional security through university and educational systems [257-264].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Collaboration with the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation on women’s rights and nutritional security is noted in the AI for agriculture summary [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ensuring inclusion, gender equity and empowerment of women farmers
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
DISAGREED WITH
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
Argument 4
AI Impact Summit and AI for Agri 2026 conference will catalyse South‑South knowledge exchange and showcase scalable solutions
EXPLANATION
Rastogi points to upcoming global events as platforms for sharing AI‑for‑agriculture innovations, fostering South‑South collaboration and demonstrating scalable solutions to a wider audience.
EVIDENCE
He invites participants to the AI for Agri conference in Mumbai and frames the panel discussion as a precursor to deeper deliberations at the AI for Agri 2026 Global Conference, emphasizing the role of these gatherings in operationalising AI at scale [207-210].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Role of private sector, innovation and global collaboration
AGREED WITH
Johannes Zutt
D
Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi
2 arguments163 words per minute1127 words414 seconds
Argument 1
Central‑state collaboration must align AI deployments with national architecture while allowing local innovation
EXPLANATION
Chaturvedi stresses the need for a coordinated framework where AI solutions adhere to a common national architecture yet retain flexibility for state‑specific agro‑climatic and socio‑economic contexts.
EVIDENCE
He outlines that the central and state governments are working together on a digital public infrastructure, emphasizing alignment with national architecture while permitting states to innovate based on local conditions [140-148].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for coordinated central-state alignment of AI with a common national architecture, while permitting local innovation, is outlined in the discussion on digital public infrastructure involving both levels of government [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI as a strategic priority for food and climate resilience
Argument 2
Farmer IDs, digital crop surveys and a unified platform (Bharatvistar/Mahavistar) eliminate “digital red‑tapism” and enable personalized, multilingual advisories
EXPLANATION
Chaturvedi describes how unique farmer IDs, comprehensive crop surveys and a single AI‑powered platform consolidate fragmented services, removing bureaucratic duplication and delivering tailored, multilingual advice to farmers.
EVIDENCE
He explains that prior fragmented apps created a “digital red-tapism” where farmers struggled to navigate multiple services, and that a unified AI-based platform now provides weather, crop, pest, market and scheme advisories in multiple languages, reducing the need for multiple applications [131-138]. He also details the creation of nearly 9 crore farmer IDs that link land, crops, soil health and enable personalized, consent-based advisories [140-148].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The unified Bharatvistar/Mahavistar platform, farmer ID system and the elimination of digital red-tapism are highlighted in the scaling intelligence briefing and the AI Meets Agriculture report [S1] [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building digital public infrastructure and data ecosystems
AGREED WITH
Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Shankar Maruwada
D
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
3 arguments173 words per minute1125 words388 seconds
Argument 1
Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk excluding them from AI‑driven services; data collection must deliberately capture women’s information
EXPLANATION
Swaminathan warns that because most land titles remain in men’s names, women farmers risk being omitted from AI‑based services unless data systems are deliberately designed to capture women’s ownership and activity data.
EVIDENCE
She notes that only a minority of women have land in their name, citing recent census data showing about a quarter of properties now include women, but the majority remain excluded, which would cause AI systems relying on public data to miss them [227-230].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Gender gaps in land ownership and the risk of women’s exclusion from AI services are discussed, with reference to census data and AI bias concerns in the AI Meets Agriculture session and gender-inclusivity workshop materials [S2] [S20].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ensuring inclusion, gender equity and empowerment of women farmers
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
DISAGREED WITH
Vikas Chandra Rastogi
Argument 2
AI solutions should reduce women’s drudgery, be co‑designed with women, and keep humans in the loop for safety and employment
EXPLANATION
She advocates that AI tools must be designed to lessen the physical workload of women farmers, involve women in the design process, and retain human oversight to ensure safety, prevent bias and preserve rural employment.
EVIDENCE
She lists benchmarks such as reducing drudgery for women, co-designing solutions, and maintaining humans in the loop, emphasizing the need for iterative feedback, bias checks and evaluation to avoid unintended harms [235-247].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Benchmarks for reducing women’s drudgery, co-designing AI tools with women, and maintaining human oversight are emphasized in stakeholder feedback and gender-inclusivity discussions [S5] [S20].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ensuring inclusion, gender equity and empowerment of women farmers
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
Argument 3
Continuous evaluation, bias checks and feedback loops are required to keep AI services reliable and farmer‑centric
EXPLANATION
Swaminathan calls for ongoing scientific evaluation of AI applications, including bias detection, risk assessment and feedback mechanisms, to ensure that AI remains effective, inclusive and trustworthy for farmers.
EVIDENCE
She draws on her experience as a medical researcher to stress the importance of clinical-trial-like evaluation, monitoring for bias, unanticipated risks and ensuring that farmer voices are part of advisory committees, highlighting the need for iterative improvement and human oversight [239-247].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Calls for ongoing evaluation, bias detection, risk assessment and feedback mechanisms align with research on trust, provenance and responsible AI governance [S15] [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance, trust, ethics and responsible AI deployment
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Shankar Maruwada
DISAGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis
S
Shankar Maruwada
2 arguments133 words per minute1259 words567 seconds
Argument 1
Interoperable, open‑standard networks (e.g., Beacon protocol) are the backbone for scaling AI across sectors
EXPLANATION
Maruwada explains that open, interoperable network protocols such as Beacon enable different stakeholders to share data and services seamlessly, providing the infrastructure needed for AI to scale across agriculture and other sectors.
EVIDENCE
He describes collaborative open networks built on open protocols like Beacon, noting that these enable data sharing among governments, academia and private innovators, forming the backbone for scaling AI applications [305-306].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The Beacon protocol as an open-standard, interoperable network for scaling AI is referenced in the AI for agriculture scaling intelligence document [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building digital public infrastructure and data ecosystems
AGREED WITH
Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi
Argument 2
Open, interoperable DPI models provide the governance framework to prevent data exploitation and ensure scalability
EXPLANATION
Maruwada argues that the same open, interoperable principles that underpinned India’s Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) can be applied to AI, ensuring data is shared responsibly, preventing exploitation and allowing solutions to scale nationally.
EVIDENCE
He references the experience of DPI, emphasizing open, interoperable systems that avoid “digital red-tapism” and enable scalable, trustworthy AI deployments, likening the approach to India’s railway network as a shared backbone [304-307].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Open, interoperable Digital Public Infrastructure models for trustworthy data sharing and scalable AI are discussed in the trust and DPI literature and the AI for agriculture overview [S15] [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance, trust, ethics and responsible AI deployment
AGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
J
Johannes Zutt
2 arguments143 words per minute907 words377 seconds
Argument 1
Private‑sector creativity fuels diverse AI applications (e.g., pest detection, water‑use advice) that can be “crowd‑in” through supportive policies
EXPLANATION
Zutt highlights that private innovators develop a wide range of AI tools for farmers, and that policy frameworks should encourage this creativity by providing financing and a regulatory environment that allows many solutions to emerge and be tested.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the private sector brings creativity, producing applications such as pest detection and water-use advice, and that governments should “crowd-in” this capacity through supportive policies [194-199]. He gives a concrete example of a Moroccan tomato farmer’s app that estimates water needs from a photo, illustrating the type of innovation that can be financed and scaled [202-204].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Private-sector innovation, including examples like a Moroccan tomato farmer’s water-use app, is highlighted in the AI Meets Agriculture session as a case for crowd-in policies [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Role of private sector, innovation and global collaboration
DISAGREED WITH
Devendra Fadnavis
Argument 2
AI Impact Summit and AI for Agri 2026 conference will catalyse South‑South knowledge exchange and showcase scalable solutions
EXPLANATION
Zutt argues that India’s leadership in AI for agriculture positions it to drive South‑South learning, and that global summits provide a venue for sharing best practices, scaling solutions and fostering international partnerships.
EVIDENCE
He states that because India is a large, diverse developing country, its experience will generate spill-over learnings for other nations, making it a central hub for South-South knowledge exchange [211-218].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Role of private sector, innovation and global collaboration
AGREED WITH
Vikas Chandra Rastogi
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI is positioned as a strategic priority to secure food, nutrition, farmer incomes and economic stability in India
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
AI is essential to secure food, nutrition, farmer incomes and economic stability in India Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025‑2029 operationalises AI across advisory, market, traceability and research services
Both speakers stress that AI is a critical tool for strengthening India’s food systems, improving farmer livelihoods and underpinning economic stability, and they present concrete policy and platform initiatives that embed AI at scale [41-48][52-53][20-22][23-26].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The World Bank emphasizes AI’s role in India’s food security and calls for collaborative ecosystems where government provides foundational infrastructure while private innovation drives applications [S35]; India’s AI strategy highlights leveraging its digital public infrastructure (UPI, digital ID) to achieve strategic AI positioning for inclusive growth [S52]; recent discussions on transforming agriculture underscore AI’s potential for resilient, inclusive food systems [S51].
AI systems must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, transparency, auditability and public accountability
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Shankar Maruwada
AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, transparency, auditability and public accountability Continuous evaluation, bias checks and feedback loops are required to keep AI services reliable and farmer‑centric Open, interoperable DPI models provide the governance framework to prevent data exploitation and ensure scalability
All three emphasize that without trustworthy data and robust ethical frameworks AI cannot scale; they call for transparent, auditable systems, ongoing scientific evaluation and open-interoperable DPI to safeguard against misuse [53-56][239-247][304-307].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
UN Security Council resolutions stress transparency, explainability and accountability as core to trustworthy AI [S31]; the AI policy roadmap lists accountability, transparency and ethical governance among its core principles [S33]; UNESCO’s AI ethics recommendations call for human oversight, non-discrimination and public accountability [S41]; the UN-DP report on critical AI infrastructure underlines the need for trusted data and auditability [S34].
Open, interoperable data exchange and digital public infrastructure are essential backbones for scaling AI in agriculture
Speakers: Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi, Shankar Maruwada
Open, federated, consent‑driven data exchange (Maha AgEx) creates a “big picture” for AI models and predictive governance Farmer IDs, digital crop surveys and a unified platform (Bharatvistar/Mahavistar) eliminate “digital red‑tapism” and enable personalized, multilingual advisories Interoperable, open‑standard networks (e.g., Beacon protocol) are the backbone for scaling AI across sectors
The speakers converge on the need for open, consent-based data sharing architectures, unified farmer-centric platforms and open-standard networks to provide the comprehensive data foundation required for AI-driven predictive governance and large-scale deployment [26-27][66-67][131-138][140-148][305-306][304-307].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AI as critical infrastructure requires open, interoperable data and sovereign control to be trustworthy [S34]; the World Bank notes that government-provided digital public infrastructure is a prerequisite for scaling AI-driven agricultural services [S35]; India’s strategic AI positioning leverages its existing digital public infrastructure to support AI rollout in agriculture [S52]; OECD’s flexible governance toolkit highlights interoperable data exchange as a key enabler for trustworthy AI deployment [S45].
Ensuring gender equity and women’s inclusion in AI‑enabled agricultural services
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
Maharashtra invites venture capital, impact investors, multilateral banks and philanthropic foundations to fund and scale agri‑tech startups Partnerships with MSSRF aim to embed women’s rights and nutritional security into AI‑enabled agricultural systems Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk excluding them from AI‑driven services; data collection must deliberately capture women’s information AI solutions should reduce women’s drudgery, be co‑designed with women, and keep humans in the loop for safety and employment
All three highlight the importance of gender-focused policies: Fadnavis calls for investment with gender equity as a mantra, Rastogi notes collaboration with MSSRF to embed women’s rights, and Swaminathan warns that land-ownership gaps could exclude women unless data systems are designed to capture their information and reduce their workload [83-86][257-264][227-236][242-247].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
IGF 2023 highlighted AI-driven gender inclusivity measures, urging stakeholder engagement to create policies that address diverse needs and promote equality [S42]; the AI policy roadmap stresses inclusivity and diversity as foundational principles for equitable AI outcomes [S33]; UNESCO’s AI ethics framework calls for non-discrimination and respect for cultural diversity, supporting gender-focused interventions [S41].
International conferences (AI Impact Summit, AI for Agri 2026) as platforms for South‑South knowledge exchange and scaling solutions
Speakers: Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Johannes Zutt
AI Impact Summit and AI for Agri 2026 conference will catalyse South‑South knowledge exchange and showcase scalable solutions AI Impact Summit and AI for Agri 2026 conference will catalyse South‑South knowledge exchange and showcase scalable solutions
Both speakers point to the AI Impact Summit and the upcoming AI for Agri 2026 conference as key venues for sharing best practices, fostering South-South collaboration and demonstrating scalable AI applications in agriculture [207-210][211-218].
Similar Viewpoints
Both underline the pivotal role of private‑sector innovation and the need for financing mechanisms that enable a multitude of AI solutions to be developed, tested and scaled for farmers [86-89][194-199][202-204].
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Johannes Zutt
Maharashtra invites venture capital, impact investors, multilateral banks and philanthropic foundations to fund and scale agri‑tech startups Private‑sector creativity fuels diverse AI applications (e.g., pest detection, water‑use advice) that can be “crowd‑in” through supportive policies
Both stress that reliable, trustworthy data foundations (farmer IDs, unified platforms) are essential for responsible AI deployment and for achieving scale in agricultural services [53-56][131-138][140-148].
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi
AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, transparency, auditability and public accountability Farmer IDs, digital crop surveys and a unified platform (Bharatvistar/Mahavistar) eliminate “digital red‑tapism” and enable personalized, multilingual advisories
Both advocate for open, interoperable network architectures as the technical backbone that enables AI models to access comprehensive data and scale across regions and sectors [26-27][305-306][304-307].
Speakers: Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Shankar Maruwada
Open, federated, consent‑driven data exchange (Maha AgEx) creates a “big picture” for AI models and predictive governance Interoperable, open‑standard networks (e.g., Beacon protocol) are the backbone for scaling AI across sectors
Unexpected Consensus
Human‑in‑the‑loop oversight and rigorous evaluation of AI tools
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, transparency, auditability and public accountability Continuous evaluation, bias checks and feedback loops are required to keep AI services reliable and farmer‑centric
A senior political leader and a medical researcher converge on the need for scientific, human-centered oversight of AI applications-an alignment that bridges policy and health-science perspectives and was not explicitly anticipated [53-56][239-247].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Research on human agency warns that meaningful human-in-the-loop oversight can be compromised under pressure, underscoring the need for robust evaluation frameworks [S38]; best-practice guidelines stress rigorous human-in-the-loop evaluation before granting model approvals [S39]; UNESCO’s principles explicitly require human oversight to safeguard ethical AI deployment [S41].
Overall Assessment

The discussion shows strong convergence across political, administrative, research and private‑sector participants on four core pillars: (1) AI as essential for food security and farmer prosperity; (2) the necessity of trusted data, ethical governance and continuous evaluation; (3) the centrality of open, interoperable digital public infrastructure and data exchange; (4) gender‑inclusive design and South‑South knowledge sharing through global forums.

High consensus – the overlapping arguments indicate a shared vision that can translate into coordinated policy actions, investment strategies and collaborative research, thereby strengthening the momentum for responsible, inclusive AI deployment in agriculture.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Approach to ensuring trustworthy AI governance versus fostering rapid private‑sector innovation
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Johannes Zutt
AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, transparency, auditability and public accountability Private‑sector creativity fuels diverse AI applications (e.g., pest detection, water‑use advice) that can be “crowd‑in” through supportive policies
Fadnavis stresses that AI cannot scale without trusted data and strong ethical governance, calling for transparent, auditable systems before large-scale deployment [53-56]. Zutt, while acknowledging the government’s role in governance, emphasizes the need to quickly crowd-in private-sector innovators and provide financing and agile support, focusing on rapid experimentation and scaling rather than detailed pre-deployment governance frameworks [184-190][194-199]. This reflects a tension between a precautionary, governance-first approach and a more innovation-driven, market-led approach.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
IGF 2024 debates highlighted the tension between fostering large-scale AI innovation and maintaining ethical governance, calling for shared, adaptive oversight models [S44]; OECD’s toolkit advocates flexible, context-specific governance rather than one-size-fits-all, reflecting this trade-off [S45]; UNDP’s 2025 report warns that innovation incentives often prioritize speed over transparency and inclusion, illustrating the governance-first versus rapid-deployment dilemma [S46]; parliamentary versus private-sector leadership discussions further expose divergent views on who should steer AI governance [S49].
How to guarantee women farmers’ inclusion in AI‑driven services
Speakers: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Vikas Chandra Rastogi
Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk excluding them from AI‑driven services; data collection must deliberately capture women’s information Partnerships with MSSRF aim to embed women’s rights and nutritional security into AI‑enabled agricultural systems
Swaminathan points out that because most land titles remain in men’s names, women are likely to be omitted from AI services unless data systems are deliberately designed to capture women’s ownership and activity data [227-230]. Rastogi mentions collaboration with the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation to bring women’s rights to the centre of AI systems but does not specify mechanisms for addressing the land-ownership data gap, focusing instead on broader partnership goals and nutritional security [257-264]. The disagreement lies in the level of concrete data-capture measures required versus broader partnership commitments.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The IGF 2023 workshop on gender inclusivity outlines concrete policy levers-such as participatory design and targeted outreach-to ensure AI services reach women farmers [S42]; broader AI policy frameworks stress inclusivity and diversity as essential for equitable outcomes [S33]; UNESCO’s ethics guidelines reinforce the need for non-discriminatory design, directly relevant to women’s agricultural participation [S41].
Necessity of systematic, scientific evaluation of AI tools
Speakers: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Devendra Fadnavis
Continuous evaluation, bias checks and feedback loops are required to keep AI services reliable and farmer‑centric AI is not magic. As Honorable PM said in his inaugural session, AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, and public accountability
Swaminathan calls for ongoing, clinical-trial-like evaluation of AI applications, including bias detection, risk assessment, and farmer feedback loops to ensure reliability and inclusivity [239-247]. Fadnavis emphasizes the need for trusted data and ethical governance but does not articulate a structured, continuous evaluation regime, focusing instead on scaling and investment [53-56]. This creates a divergence on whether rigorous, systematic evaluation should be a core pillar of AI deployment.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Human-in-the-loop evaluation must be conducted rigorously to avoid premature certification of AI behavior, as highlighted in recent AI evaluation best-practice discussions [S39]; literature on overreliance warns that without systematic scientific assessment, AI outputs can be biased or incomplete, especially in complex domains [S40]; the challenges of maintaining meaningful human judgment further support the call for structured evaluation protocols [S38].
Unexpected Differences
Emphasis on large‑scale private investment versus cautious, governance‑first rollout
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Johannes Zutt
Maharashtra invites venture capital, impact investors, multilateral banks and philanthropic foundations to fund and scale agri‑tech startups Private‑sector creativity fuels diverse AI applications (e.g., pest detection, water‑use advice) that can be “crowd‑in” through supportive policies
While both speakers support private-sector involvement, Fadnavis frames it within a structured, policy-driven investment drive emphasizing accountability and large-scale funding [86-89], whereas Zutt advocates a more flexible, rapid “crowd-in” of private innovators with less emphasis on pre-defined governance structures [194-199]. The contrast between a formal, investment-heavy approach and a more agile, experimental partnership model was not anticipated given the overall consensus on public-private collaboration.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
UNDP’s 2025 report notes that private-sector driven AI investments often sideline transparency, fairness and social inclusion, underscoring the need for governance-first approaches [S46]; the International Chamber of Commerce stresses that while private investment is vital, public policies must encourage responsible deployment rather than deter it [S47]; blended financing models advocated for African AI ecosystems recommend combining private compute resources with public early-stage funding to balance speed and oversight [S50]; IGF discussions on balancing innovation and oversight echo this tension [S44].
Overall Assessment

The panel largely shares a common vision that AI is crucial for India’s food security, climate resilience, and farmer livelihoods, and that open, interoperable digital public infrastructure is the foundation for scaling. However, clear points of contention emerge around (i) the balance between strict, governance‑first frameworks and rapid, private‑sector‑driven innovation; (ii) the concrete mechanisms for ensuring women’s inclusion, especially data capture of land ownership; and (iii) the extent to which systematic, scientific evaluation should be embedded in AI deployment.

Moderate disagreement – the divergences are primarily about implementation pathways rather than fundamental goals. These differences could affect the speed, inclusivity, and trustworthiness of AI roll‑out in agriculture, requiring careful negotiation to align governance standards with innovation incentives and gender‑inclusive data policies.

Partial Agreements
All speakers concur that AI is a strategic priority for transforming Indian agriculture and that open, interoperable digital infrastructure is essential for scaling solutions. They differ mainly in emphasis—policy design (Rastogi), governance (Fadnavis), central‑state coordination (Chaturvedi), private‑sector innovation (Zutt), and technical standards (Maruwada)—but share the common goal of deploying AI at population scale [41-48][20-22][140-148][194-199][305-306].
Speakers: Devendra Fadnavis, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi, Johannes Zutt, Shankar Maruwada
AI is essential to secure food, nutrition, farmer incomes and economic stability in India Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025‑2029 operationalises AI across advisory, market, traceability and research services Central‑state collaboration must align AI deployments with national architecture while allowing local innovation Private‑sector creativity fuels diverse AI applications (e.g., pest detection, water‑use advice) that can be “crowd‑in” through supportive policies Interoperable, open‑standard networks (e.g., Beacon protocol) are the backbone for scaling AI across sectors
All three agree on the importance of gender inclusion and the need for open, inclusive data systems, though Swaminathan stresses specific data‑capture mechanisms, Rastogi highlights partnership initiatives, and Maruwada focuses on the broader DPI governance framework to protect against exploitation [227-230][257-264][304-307].
Speakers: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Vikas Chandra Rastogi, Shankar Maruwada
Women’s land‑ownership gaps risk excluding them from AI‑driven services; data collection must deliberately capture women’s information Partnerships with MSSRF aim to embed women’s rights and nutritional security into AI‑enabled agricultural systems Open, interoperable DPI models provide the governance framework to prevent data exploitation and ensure scalability
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI is positioned as a strategic priority for achieving food security, nutrition, farmer income stability and climate resilience in India. Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025‑2029 operationalises AI across advisory services, market information, traceability, research and capacity building, moving from pilots to full‑scale deployments. A unified digital public infrastructure—farmer IDs, digital crop surveys, and the Bharatvistar/Mahavistar platform—eliminates fragmented “digital red‑tapism” and enables personalized, multilingual, consent‑driven advisories. Open, federated and interoperable data exchange mechanisms (Maha AgEx, Beacon protocol) are essential to create a “big picture” for AI models and predictive governance. Inclusion and gender equity are critical; women’s land‑ownership gaps and digital literacy barriers must be addressed, and AI solutions should be co‑designed with women farmers and keep humans in the loop. Responsible AI deployment requires trusted data, ethical governance, transparency, auditability, and continuous bias and impact evaluation. Private‑sector innovation, venture capital, multilateral financing and philanthropic support are needed to scale agri‑tech solutions, with Maharashtra inviting global partners and investors. Global platforms such as the AI Impact Summit and AI for Agri 2026 conference are envisioned as catalysts for South‑South knowledge exchange and collaborative scaling of AI solutions.
Resolutions and action items
Scale Mahavistar to >2.5 million farmers, add additional regional languages (including tribal language Bili) and expand multilingual voice‑based advisory capabilities. Deploy the Maha AgEx consent‑driven, federated data exchange to integrate diverse datasets (pest images, weather, market, soil health) for AI model training. Complete rollout of Bharatvistar/Mahavistar predictive advisory services (weather, pest, market, scheme status) within the next 3‑6 months. Accelerate farmer‑ID and digital crop‑survey saturation across states to underpin AI‑driven personalized services. Co‑develop traceability DPI modules with the United States and other partners, making them open, replicable public‑infrastructure assets. Launch a global call for AI use‑cases in agriculture (already done) and publish the compendium of successful deployments. Invite venture capital, impact investors, development banks and philanthropic foundations to fund agri‑tech startups and capacity‑building programmes. Partner with MSSRF to embed women’s rights, nutritional security and bio‑happiness considerations into AI‑enabled agricultural systems. Establish continuous feedback loops, bias‑checking mechanisms and “human‑in‑the‑loop” governance structures for AI services. Organise and promote participation in the AI for Agri 2026 conference (22‑23 Feb, Mumbai) to deepen global collaboration.
Unresolved issues
How to systematically capture and integrate women farmers’ land‑ownership and other gender‑disaggregated data into the national AI ecosystem. Ensuring reliable connectivity and affordable smart‑phone/feature‑phone access for the most resource‑constrained farmers. Detailed operational framework for data privacy, consent management and preventing “digital red‑tapism” at scale. Specific mechanisms for ongoing bias detection, impact assessment and accountability of AI recommendations. Sustainable financing models for long‑term maintenance and scaling of AI platforms beyond initial pilot funding. Clear delineation of responsibilities and coordination mechanisms between central and state ministries for AI governance. Strategies to balance rapid AI deployment with the need for rigorous scientific validation and field testing.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a hybrid model where AI augments, rather than replaces, traditional extension services—maintaining human expertise while leveraging AI speed and scale. Implement consent‑driven, open‑standard data exchange (Maha AgEx) that respects farmer privacy while enabling interoperability across states and private providers. Design AI platforms to work on both smartphones and basic feature phones, ensuring inclusion of low‑asset farmers. Encourage private‑sector innovation (“let a thousand flowers bloom”) while using public DPI as a common backbone to avoid fragmented proprietary solutions. Combine gender‑focused co‑design processes with broader system rollout to ensure women’s needs are addressed without delaying overall deployment.
Thought Provoking Comments
AI is not a magic. As Honorable PM said in his inaugural session, AI must be built on trusted data, ethical governance, and public accountability. Without trust, scale will not happen.
It reframes AI from a hype‑driven technology to a public‑good that requires rigorous data stewardship and governance, setting a foundational principle for the entire dialogue.
This remark anchored the subsequent discussion on data trust, interoperability and governance. It prompted Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi to describe the problem of “digital red‑tapism” and led other panelists to stress transparency, auditability and ethical safeguards.
Speaker: Devendra Fadnavis
We felt that while we had initiated this process to ensure that the bureaucratic red‑tapism is removed, what we were moving towards was a sort of digital red‑tapism because within our ministry different schemes had different apps… The whole idea was that once we have this AI‑based system, we have a same platform for different applications and different advisories at a click of the button.
He identifies a concrete systemic bottleneck—fragmented digital services—and proposes a unified AI‑driven platform as the solution, turning a high‑level vision into an actionable design problem.
His explanation shifted the conversation from abstract benefits of AI to the practical need for a single, interoperable architecture. It gave context for the Maha AgEx data‑exchange initiative and reinforced the trust‑building theme introduced earlier.
Speaker: Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi
We can kind of let a thousand flowers bloom there and see what actually takes root… Just yesterday, I was learning about an application in Morocco developed by a tomato farmer who could take a picture of a plant and get the exact water requirement.
The metaphor of “a thousand flowers” encourages a pluralistic, market‑driven innovation ecosystem, while the concrete example shows how low‑cost AI can solve a pressing climate‑water problem.
This comment opened the floor to discussions on private‑sector participation, financing, and rapid prototyping. It influenced Shankar Maruwada’s later emphasis on open, shared rails that allow diverse applications to plug in.
Speaker: Johannes Zutt
Women in India, the minority of them who have their name on the land document, are often left out of publicly available data sets. We must think about how women’s data can be incorporated early, keep humans in the loop, and evaluate AI like clinical trials to avoid bias.
She links gender equity to data architecture and algorithmic bias, framing inclusion as a technical as well as a social requirement, and introduces the idea of rigorous, evidence‑based evaluation.
Her remarks redirected the dialogue toward gender‑focused design, prompting Vikas Rastogi to mention ongoing collaborations on women’s rights and reinforcing the inclusion pillar of the AI‑for‑Agriculture agenda.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
What matters is the intent of the government of India which triggered the process which allowed Bharat Vistar to be launched… we deploy something minimum to start and then evolution, models get better, data gets better… Like the railways, we need open rails for AI.
He provides a clear architectural metaphor—open, interoperable “rails”—and advocates a minimum‑viable‑product approach, tying together past DPI successes with future AI scaling.
This analogy became a turning point, giving participants a concrete model for standardising AI ecosystems. It reinforced earlier calls for openness, guided the discussion on shared data standards, and culminated in his vision of 100 diffusion pathways by 2030.
Speaker: Shankar Maruwada
Because you have so many languages, so many different regions, so many different types of crops, figuring out how to make AI at the farm level work in India will automatically have a large number of spillover learnings for other countries.
He positions India as a global test‑bed, linking domestic AI deployment to South‑South knowledge exchange and emphasizing the international relevance of the Indian experience.
This comment broadened the scope of the panel from a state‑level initiative to a global learning platform, leading Vikas to ask about the role of the AI Impact Summit in fostering South‑South collaboration.
Speaker: Johannes Zutt
Overall Assessment

The discussion was steered by a handful of pivotal insights that moved it from a ceremonial launch to a substantive roadmap. Early emphasis on trust and governance set a normative baseline, which was then grounded by Dr. Chaturvedi’s diagnosis of fragmented digital services. The private‑sector’s creative potential was highlighted by Zutt’s ‘thousand flowers’ metaphor, while Swaminathan’s focus on gender‑inclusive data and human‑in‑the‑loop safeguards added depth to the equity dimension. Maruwada’s rail‑analogy and MVP approach supplied a concrete architectural vision, tying together openness, interoperability and scalability. Together, these comments reshaped the conversation, aligning stakeholders around four pillars—trust, openness, inclusion, and collaborative innovation—and framing India’s AI‑for‑agriculture effort as both a national priority and a model for global South‑South learning.

Follow-up Questions
How can we envision a central‑state collaboration framework for AI deployments that aligns with the national architecture while allowing states flexibility, and how can this collaboration be institutionalized to achieve population‑scale impact and data trust?
Coordinating AI across India requires clear governance structures that balance national standards with local innovation, ensuring interoperability, trust, and scalability of AI services for farmers.
Speaker: Vikas Chandra Rastogi (to Dr. Devesh Chaturvedi)
How can development partnerships adapt to remain agile and responsive, specifically structuring programs and technical assistance to provide just‑in‑time support to central and state governments for experimenting, iterating, and scaling AI solutions responsibly?
Timely, flexible financing and technical support are essential for governments to pilot, refine, and scale AI tools without bureaucratic delays, maximizing impact on agriculture and climate resilience.
Speaker: Vikas Chandra Rastogi (to Johannes Jutt)
How can platforms such as the AI Impact Summit and the AI for Agri global conference contribute to deeper global collaboration and South‑South knowledge exchange in AI‑driven agriculture?
International forums can facilitate sharing of best practices, lessons learned, and collaborative research, accelerating adoption of AI solutions across developing countries.
Speaker: Vikas Chandra Rastogi (to Johannes Jutt)
How can AI‑led agriculture transformation strengthen women’s agency, knowledge access, and climate resilience, and what institutional safeguards and design principles must be embedded to ensure equity and scientific integrity?
Ensuring gender‑inclusive AI systems prevents widening existing disparities and guarantees that women farmers benefit equally from technological advances.
Speaker: Vikas Chandra Rastogi (to Dr. Soumya Swaminathan)
How should we think about standardizing AI‑based ecosystems in the spirit of Digital Public Infrastructure, bring DPI principles into AI, and what architecture and governance principles are required to ensure interoperability, trust, and sustainability across sectors such as agriculture?
Establishing open standards and governance frameworks is critical for scaling AI solutions safely and efficiently across diverse regions and stakeholders.
Speaker: Vikas Chandra Rastogi (to Shankar Maruwada)
What research is needed to develop high‑quality, robust datasets that can underpin reliable AI models for pest, disease, and climate advisories?
Accurate AI predictions depend on comprehensive, clean data; gaps or biases in data can lead to ineffective or harmful recommendations for farmers.
Speaker: Vikas Chandra Rastogi
How can women’s land‑ownership and tenancy data be systematically incorporated into AI platforms to avoid exclusion of women farmers from services?
Without proper representation of women’s land rights, AI algorithms may overlook a large segment of the farming population, perpetuating gender bias.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
What methodologies should be employed to evaluate AI models for inherent biases, unintended risks, and side‑effects before large‑scale deployment?
Rigorous testing ensures that AI tools do not inadvertently disadvantage certain farmer groups or produce harmful agronomic advice.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
What digital‑literacy programs and capacity‑building initiatives are required to enable low‑literacy and feature‑phone users to effectively access AI‑driven advisory services?
Adoption of AI tools hinges on farmers’ ability to understand and use them; tailored training can bridge the literacy gap.
Speaker: Johannes Zutt
How can affordable connectivity solutions be designed and delivered to reach smallholder farmers in remote or underserved areas?
Limited internet access restricts the reach of AI platforms; innovative connectivity models are needed to ensure equitable service delivery.
Speaker: Johannes Zutt
What processes should be established to ‘truth‑test’ AI‑generated advisories, ensuring scientific credibility and farmer trust?
Independent validation of AI recommendations protects farmers from inaccurate advice and builds confidence in digital services.
Speaker: Johannes Zutt
What indicators should be used to measure whether AI interventions reduce drudgery and workload for women farmers?
Quantifying gender‑specific impact helps assess whether AI tools are delivering on promises of empowerment and workload reduction.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
How can ‘human‑in‑the‑loop’ frameworks be integrated into AI systems to preserve employment and provide oversight in agricultural decision‑making?
Balancing automation with human expertise safeguards jobs and ensures contextual judgment in complex farming scenarios.
Speaker: Dr. Soumya Swaminathan
What open, interoperable AI standards and protocols (akin to railway networks) are needed to enable seamless sharing of models, data, and services across states and private providers?
Standardized interfaces prevent siloed solutions and accelerate diffusion of innovative AI applications nationwide.
Speaker: Shankar Maruwada
How can feedback mechanisms within platforms like Mahavistar be enhanced to continuously incorporate farmer input and improve AI recommendations?
Iterative feedback loops ensure that AI services remain relevant, accurate, and responsive to evolving farmer needs.
Speaker: Vikas Chandra Rastogi
What evaluation frameworks are required to assess the impact of AI‑enabled traceability DPI modules on food safety, export competitiveness, and consumer trust?
Understanding the economic and safety outcomes of traceability systems informs policy and encourages broader adoption.
Speaker: Devendra Fadnavis (referenced in speech)

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.