AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities

20 Feb 2026 10:00h - 11:00h

AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The panel examined the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence in Indian healthcare, using Max Hospital’s digital journey as a case study [1][28]. Abhay explained that Max built a 15-year patient data lake and began embedding digital technology years before AI became a buzzword, enabling real-time analytics such as predictive bed occupancy and automated data capture from clinician apps [14][22-24]. He noted early setbacks, including a search engine that returned no results due to language limitations and difficulties tagging data to ICD-11 standards, which forced the team to rely on costly external solutions [18][42-45]. Vikalp asked whether AI adoption has become a key performance indicator for hospitals and how regulation such as NABH or ABDM influences it [30-32].


Abhay replied that while there is widespread desire for AI, reality brings frequent failures that are treated as learning opportunities, especially in mapping patient data to WHO ICD-11 codes [34-38][40-44]. He emphasized that healthcare demands strict supervision because errors can affect patient safety and data privacy, limiting tolerance for variance [52-57]. According to Abhay, AI is now driven by changing consumer behavior-patients search for providers online-and by low-hanging efficiency gains such as predictive room availability and freeing clinicians from routine history-taking [69-73][80-87]. He illustrated the safety potential with a chest-pain case where an AI-assisted ECG could prompt admission, preventing a missed heart attack, positioning AI as an assistive safety tool rather than a replacement for clinicians [113-118][119-124].


Looking ahead, Abhay argued that India’s youthful demographic will soon create a doctor-shortage, making predictive health, home-care delivery and AI-enabled scaling indispensable [128-138][139-144]. Dr Gupta highlighted the creation of 860 million ABHA IDs and a federated digital infrastructure that can be leveraged for universal health coverage, while noting that policy now addresses both public and private sectors [184-190][312-314]. Nikhil stressed that Indian models must be trained on local data and consider multilingual, voice-first interfaces to avoid bias and to serve rural populations effectively [208-213][218-224].


Jigar pointed out that trust involves accurate results, contextual relevance, and feedback loops, and that voice translation across languages can dramatically improve access [219-224][327-332]. Tanvi added that AI’s personalization can bridge equity gaps, but successful deployment requires education, continuous engagement and transformation beyond a one-time pilot [277-284][288-295]. Padmini warned that AI must be designed with equity in mind, starting with remote-first readiness frameworks to ensure provider trust and inclusive outcomes [319-324].


The discussion concluded that AI adoption is no longer optional but a necessary, carefully supervised strategy to meet India’s future health demands while maintaining trust and ethical standards [128-145][52-57][410-414].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Current state of AI adoption in hospitals is mixed: enthusiasm meets reality, with many early failures that are viewed as learning opportunities. The speakers note a strong desire for AI but “desire does meet reality” and that “failures… are welcome” ([34-39]). They also stress that AI implementations must be heavily supervised because “patient safety, data privacy… have very little standard deviation” and require “a large extent of supervision” ([52-58]).


Concrete AI use-cases are already improving efficiency and safety, especially in workflow automation and clinical decision support. Examples include predictive bed-availability analytics ([22-23]), automated data capture that reduces clinician time spent on history taking ([24-27]), and AI-assisted ECG triage that can prevent missed heart attacks ([113-118]). These applications are framed as “low-hanging fruits” that enhance efficiency, accessibility, and patient experience ([85-88]).


Institutional readiness hinges on culture, leadership, and trust rather than just technology. The need for a “circumspect” approach, extensive internal learning, and leadership-driven habit change is highlighted ([90-102]). Trust is identified as the most critical factor for both patients and clinicians when adopting AI solutions ([105-108]; [119-124]).


Policy, digital infrastructure, and public-private alignment are essential for scaling AI in India’s health system. The discussion references the ABDM framework, the creation of 860 million ABHA IDs, and the shift in national health policy to address both private and public sectors ([176-188]; [312-314]). Regional perspectives stress the need for equity-focused AI readiness frameworks that start with remote settings and adapt to higher-resource sites ([316-324]).


Future outlook: demographic pressure makes AI a necessity for delivering care at scale, with a focus on predictive health and system-wide transformation over the next 3-5 years. The speakers argue that “adoption… is becoming an absolute necessity” due to an aging population and limited infrastructure, and that “predictive health… before the patient comes to the hospital” will be central ([128-145]).


Overall purpose / goal


The panel aimed to share experiences, challenges, and strategic insights on AI adoption within Indian healthcare-covering technical implementations, operational impacts, cultural and trust issues, policy frameworks, and the long-term vision for scaling AI to meet the country’s growing health-care demand.


Overall tone


The conversation began with optimism about AI’s potential, shifted to a realistic appraisal of setbacks, failures, and the need for rigorous supervision, then moved toward a cautious but hopeful stance emphasizing trust, leadership, and policy alignment. By the end, the tone became forward-looking and collaborative, emphasizing collective responsibility to build an equitable, AI-enabled health ecosystem.


Speakers

Abhay Soi – Leader at Max Healthcare (CEO/MD). Expertise: Healthcare AI integration, digital health transformation.


Vikalp Sahni – Partner / Co‑founder at Eka (AI health‑tech startup) [​S17]​. Expertise: Digital health adoption, AI strategy in hospitals.


Nikhil Dhongari – Health‑tech strategist involved in ABDM implementation and AI model development. Expertise: AI for public‑sector health, federated architectures.


Padmini Vishwanath – Researcher, WHO SEARO. Expertise: Health equity, digital‑health policy, AI ethics and normative guidance [​S3]​.


Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta – Advisor to the Health Minister; key architect of ABDM and National Health Policy. Expertise: Health‑policy design, digital health standards, public‑private health integration [​S4]​.


Jigar Halani – Director, Enterprise Solutions Architecture & Engineering, NVIDIA South Asia. Expertise: AI infrastructure, cloud & edge computing for health [​S10]​.


Deepak Tuli – Panel moderator (Eka). Expertise: AI in healthcare, facilitation of multi‑stakeholder discussions [​S12]​.


Tanvi Lall – Analyst, PeoplePlus (initiative of Aikstep). Expertise: AI adoption trends, transformation design for health, education & agriculture [​S19]​.


Announcer – Director IT, National Health Authority (leads Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission). Expertise: National health‑IT architecture, large‑scale digital health programmes [​S20]​.


Audience member 1 – Unnamed participant (questioner). Role/Expertise: Not specified.


Audience member 2 – Dentist pursuing an MBA in analytics. Role/Expertise: Dental practice, health analytics.


Additional speakers: None.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The session opened with Abhay Soi welcoming the audience and describing Max Hospital as a micro-cosm of the Indian health system, noting that patient trust underpins its performance and that its occupancy rates are 10-15 % higher than competitors [1-5]. He then outlined Max’s digital foundation: five to six years ago the organisation embedded digital technology at its core, creating a 15-year-spanning patient data lake that now powers real-time electronic medical records [14-15].


Early technical setbacks were recounted. An attempt to build a “closed-loop” system similar to Google’s search failed because the engine could not return results in native Indian languages [18-20]. Mapping historic records to the new ICD-11 taxonomy also proved difficult; off-the-shelf solutions were either ineffective or prohibitively expensive, forcing Max to develop in-house capabilities and accept a high failure rate as part of the learning curve [42-47].


When asked about the broader AI landscape, Abhay highlighted a gap between enthusiasm and reality: “desire does meet reality” only sporadically, and the journey is marked by frequent, welcomed failures that sharpen future outcomes [34-39]. He stressed that health-care tolerates virtually no variance in safety or privacy, demanding extensive supervision for any AI deployment [52-58].


Two principal drivers now push AI forward. First, changing consumer behaviour-patients increasingly search for providers online and evaluate doctors through digital assets, which pressures hospitals to improve ESG scores and online presence [69-74]. Second, low-hanging efficiency gains such as predictive room-availability models and workflow automation are delivering tangible benefits [80-88]. These drivers have made AI an important strategic focus for senior leadership, as Abhay noted when asked whether AI is a priority for CEOs [60-66].


Concrete clinical examples illustrate the safety-first approach. Max uses AI to predict vacant beds, enhancing operational efficiency [22-23]. More critically, an AI-supported ECG interpretation can flag subtle abnormalities that a human cardiologist might miss, prompting admission and potentially averting missed heart attacks [113-124]. Such assistive systems are presented as augmentations rather than replacements for clinicians, reinforcing the need for human oversight [52-58].


Institutional readiness, according to Abhay, hinges on culture and leadership rather than technology alone. He described a “circumspect” stance, a steep learning curve for thousands of staff, and a schedule now filled with meetings with technology vendors-about 30 % of his meetings involve people from a technology background-to evaluate solutions that could improve outcomes [90-102]. This cultural shift aligns with Jigar Halani’s observation that the biggest barrier is a mindset change: moving from scepticism to belief that AI can solve long-standing problems [333-337].


Trust emerged as a recurring theme. Vikalp Sahni warned that patients trust their doctors more than any new gadget, raising the question of how AI can coexist with that trust [105-108]. Abhay responded with the ECG example, arguing that AI can enhance safety without eroding the doctor-patient bond [113-124]. Jigar added that trust is built on accurate, context-aware results and continuous feedback loops [219-237], while Tanvi Lall stressed that education, stakeholder engagement and transformation beyond one-off pilots are essential to embed AI into workflows [286-295][327-332].


Policy and digital infrastructure were highlighted by Dr Rajendra Pratap Gupta, who recounted the evolution of the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) from a 2014 manifesto idea to a nationwide backbone now supporting 860 million ABHA IDs [184-190]. He noted that the latest National Health Policy explicitly addresses both public and private sectors, signalling a move away from siloed approaches [312-314]. Nikhil Dhungari linked this federated architecture to the need for Indian-specific AI models that avoid bias and can be trained on local data [203-210].


Looking ahead, Abhay argued that AI is becoming an absolute necessity due to India’s demographic dividend: a youthful population will age over the next 15 years, creating a doctor-shortage that cannot be met by expanding physical infrastructure alone [128-138]. He envisages predictive health that intervenes before patients become ill, home-care delivery, and the replication of clinical expertise through AI-enabled tools [139-144]. Padmini Vishwanath reinforced this forward-looking view, noting a shift from purely quantitative metrics to qualitative dimensions such as empathy, dignity and caregiver-patient interaction, especially in palliative-care pilots [353-356].


The panel presented several different viewpoints. Vikalp asked whether AI adoption should be accelerated, implying a “crazy” rush [30-33], while Abhay cautioned that premature rollout without supervision leads to failures and safety risks [34-39][52-58]. Dr Gupta identified unethical prescribing practices as the chief barrier to AI uptake [407-414], whereas Abhay focused on technical challenges and the need for supervised AI [52-59]. A further contrast emerged between Padmini’s call for qualitative outcome measurement [353-356] and the efficiency-oriented narratives of Abhay and Tanvi, who highlighted predictive analytics and workflow gains [22-23][84-88]. Finally, Vikalp stressed that patient-doctor trust must precede AI, while Jigar argued that trust can be earned through model accuracy and feedback loops [105-108][219-237].


Potential next steps discussed by the panel


– Treat AI adoption as a formal strategic priority, with senior leaders allocating resources and oversight [60-66].


– Mandate electronic capture of clinical data to feed AI pipelines, building on Max’s data-lake approach [14-15].


– Prioritise safety-critical AI pilots (e.g., AI-supported ECG interpretation) before scaling to efficiency use-cases [113-124].


– Develop voice-first, multilingual solutions to address language barriers identified in early closed-loop attempts [18-20].


– Foster public-private data-sharing partnerships to expand the ABDM ecosystem and enable Indian-centric models [184-190][203-210].


– Launch ongoing AI literacy programmes for clinicians, nurses and administrators, echoing Tanvi’s emphasis on education [286-295].


Unresolved issues remain around definitive regulatory standards for AI validation, the optimal balance between cloud and edge deployment for cost, latency and data sovereignty, and mechanisms to enforce ethical prescribing through AI-enabled monitoring.


In conclusion, the panel converged on the view that AI is indispensable for meeting India’s future health-care demand, but its success depends on a coordinated ecosystem that blends strong data infrastructure, rigorous governance, trust-building cultural change and policy frameworks that keep pace with technological advances. The discussion charted a roadmap from early, supervised safety tools toward a broader, equity-focused transformation of the Indian health system.


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Abhay Soi

Thank you very much for having me here. at this very, very prestigious event. I just came in from Mumbai in the morning, and what I see over here is, I mean, I think it seems to be the microcosm of the globe, in fact. So thank you very much. Yes, I think, you know, I take all these compliments on behalf of Max, and I think it starts and ends with the trust which is sort of reposed by patients at our hospital system. Today, our occupancy is at least 10 % to 15 % better than the next best player in the hospital system. And, you know, one of the things that I want to point out is, you know, AI seems to be sort of the buzzword, of course, today.

But five or six years ago, when we started our journey, we started bringing digital technology at that point in time to the core. And what you see today, what you experience, and, you know, you mentioned better outcomes, and perhaps… patient services. But that is what you experience. What you don’t see is the technology behind it. And I think that is the true test of technology, and that will be the true test of AI as well. When you don’t interface with technology, but the experiences are improved. Having said that, I think, you know, like I said, we started this journey a few years ago. We started by creating a common -size data lake for all the patients which have been through our doors over the last 15 years, and which are doing so on a real -time basis today.

Having said that, you know, these were our attempts. We tried to sort of create a closed -loop system, like Google, so to say, for our doctors and our patients. But, you know, we, like many people, faced very early, very big setbacks because we didn’t have the technology. Because when we used to do search results, we used to get zero results. in the search engine because it wasn’t sort of native to the language, and that’s stuff that we’ve been playing with. But having said that, I think the early days of AI are going to impact tasks rather than, although one is moving towards institutional, adopting it from an ecosystem standpoint, from inculcating it within the institution, so it becomes an intrinsic part of the institution.

But I think today it’s affecting our tasks. It’s affecting tasks of efficiency. You know, we’ve already started doing predictive analysis of beds which are vacant and available and so on. It’s working on safety measures. I think though the early sort of wins that we have, especially with respect to patient satisfaction of the risks and so on, I think clinical support, you know, it’s data collection, a lot of… time by clinicians was being spent in the past to collect data. now a lot of that data is being collected through forms which are in our apps today. And you can speak to them. It kind of collates in a particular manner. So the clinician actually spends less time in perhaps gathering history than in providing a little more value of the value chain.

Vikalp Sahni

Great. And I think, Max, I mean, as you mentioned, there is this data lake that you have created is quite ahead in terms of digital adoption. And I’m sure when you would be starting, and this is a term that we use and see quite a lot, that adoption of digital in a hospital. So is that what is also happening on top of this large data lake and the EMR solutions that you have created on, for Max, is there like a AI adoption wave that is happening? And do you think, like, when the digital adoption happened, things such as NABH, ABDM, many of these things started coming up, talking about policy, talking about regulation. In AI adoption, are there any challenges, any things that you see that can help in this adoption to be much more faster?

Or you see that people are just going all crazy on getting AI adopted in the hospital settings?

Abhay Soi

I think, you know, there is a desire all across, you know. But having said that, desire does meet reality. I would say more than occasionally. And that comes in the form of failures, which are welcome, sort of. I mean, we quite welcome it, actually, because the more you try, the more you will fail, and the more you will sort of have better outcomes coming into the future as well. So we’ve had a lot of failures, I can tell you. You know, whether it is the longitudinal data of. Patient or. looking at, you know, ICD -11 norms, you know, tagging our data with respect to the WHO. I mean, we’ve been failing left, right, and center.

We’ve been reasonably successful as far as ICD -10 is concerned, but I think 11, you know, most sort of layers that are available in the market don’t work. The ones which work are very, very expensive. You know, so we’ve started, you know, we’ve been in -housing a lot of this. So we’re toying around with it. I have no doubt that the speed at which we are failing and the amount of failures that we have, shortly we will run out of all excuses and failures, and it will be like Edison, right? You would have found out every way to fail, and I think perhaps the only way to succeed will be in front of us. So, yes, there is a lot of enthusiasm, you know, towards adopting it.

We see this as a future. I think everybody does. There is, we, of course, have to be very, very careful. Because unlike, you know, let’s say something like education, where if you’re imparting. perhaps incorrect information, you know, it can be resolved. But this is healthcare. I think patient safety, data privacy, these things are right up there. We have very, very little, you know, standard deviation possible in what we do. And so it requires a large extent of supervision, I would say. And perhaps it will continue to for years to come. Although it makes life easy for most, but, you know, at least from a clinical prescription outcome, it will require a lot more supervision to come as well.

Vikalp Sahni

Sorry. So is it now the priority for hospitals? For example, when the digitization adoption happened, it used to be a priority for CEOs that, okay, you have to make sure that all the billings are online. You have to have all the JCIA. You have to have all the discussions and UHS. ID created and so on and so forth. Is this a priority today, adopting AI at hospitals and as a KRAs for your CEOs or operators? Is that what, has AI reached that level today at hospitals?

Abhay Soi

No, I think clearly, clearly it has. And it’s really out of, I think, two sort of drivers that I find at least, and you know, this is at a very, very, at the outset level. I think one is the way the world, the consumer behavior itself is changing. I mean, a lot of the searches used to happen on Google, a lot of the searches now are happening through different platforms altogether. And the way they sort of seek, whether it’s their thought about your website or, you know, when they’re looking at, if you simply ask which is the best cardiologist in Delhi, you know, there’s a different way of people reading into that early and there’s a different way of people.

So you have to, whether it’s your collateral, whether it’s your digital. assets and so on and so forth. You have to make those changes. Information, I mean, if I look at ESG, if I look at investor ESG, how do I improve my ESG score? I mean, it’s like an encyclopedia out there, right? You just ask it any question, it tells you to do so. How should I present my annual report? How should I present myself? I think, you know, pretty much, you know, it is intrinsic to now everything that we do from that standpoint. Second is how can I use it as a tool to improve efficiency? And these are low -hanging fruits. I’m talking about the low -hanging fruits before we even, I mean, kind of, you know, absorb the entire ecosystem or create that ecosystem or participate in that ecosystem.

Make it a part of institutional habits, right? I think even prior to that, when we’re looking at it as a task stage, you know, how is it that I can improve? Now, you know, if I have a particular waiting for my patients, okay, how can I do predictive analysis of room availability? When I’m looking at discharge, how can I sort of this thing? When it comes to patient summary, how do I get, how do I unlock the time that my doctor spent on patient sort of history and so on and so forth. That all improves efficiency all improves outcomes see eventually the lens we are looking at it from is efficiency is accessibility is safety, is clinical support and finally to the experience I mean it’s quite a bit of breadth that you’re looking at AI

Vikalp Sahni

but a little bit more on generic terms everybody says that technology is moving very fast or things are changing so fast AI is also changing so fast and we also keep doing that like we want our businesses our operations, our sales also run very fast is more your internal feeling how are you feeling? how are you feeling? how are you feeling? health institutions moving as fast as the technology is moving even people in the organization be it doctors be it nurse staff all of them are looking at it and a lot of this is about India AI Summit as well because government is looking for educating people on how fast things are changing and we should all be ready for it so what are your views on your institutional readiness people in your institute and in general on this whole AI moving fast

Abhay Soi

so I think first and foremost also depends on you know the institutional culture we are very clear about one thing that we have to be more sort of circumspect about it than anything else we must go up the learning curve as far as AI is concerned things are changing very very fast we have close to 43 3000 healthcare workers which provide healthcare. You know, that means there are thousands, if not hundreds and thousands of work processes. For us to adopt AI in any task means, you know, you have to change huge amount of attendant work processes, even if this layer sits on top. And having said that, okay, is there something else which is better out there?

Is there something which will disrupt this further and so on? Should we wait for something to be adopted by and large to see, sorry, to see what the efficacy of that is and see what the, you know, see once it’s sort of established before adopting it. To me, look, having the first mover advantage in this is not going to do anything. But getting it right is. I think because we can’t afford to get it wrong. These are human lives, these are people. So I think there’s a huge amount of learning within the organization which is happening and I meet you know phenomenal people people across the board, okay, for various aspects. I think since the morning of today, if I look at my sort of schedule, 30 % of my meetings would be people, you know, from a technology background, pitching various sort of applications where our lives can be improved and outcomes can be improved and efficiency can be improved and so on and so forth.

But, you know, at the very least, you have to be very, very circumspect about what you’re going to adopt and what you’re going to roll out.

Vikalp Sahni

No, and I think you touched a very important point that we learned at Eka. We were earlier did a travel startup, me and Deepak. What we realized that in health, there is obviously innovation that people are looking for, but trust is the most important thing. I can bring a cool idea or there could be a cool way of doing a diagnosis at a clinic, but I as a person would trust only the doctor that I have spoken to or I have spoken to. been talked about. So there is this and that’s the reality that we learned when we started doing health that yes, innovation is definitely important, but trust is key. And I think Max has been trusted over the years.

And to be very honest, we also don’t know how to balance that out. The trust that has been created for institutions, for doctors, and now these technologies that are coming in, where it asks questions to the patients and gives relevant next suggestions. This trust factor is kind of getting a little sort of changed. Any views that you have, especially when it comes to patients, people trusting doctors to AI to institutes, any change that you see, and even doctors looking for AI solution and whether they feel that this is right now not as good?

Abhay Soi

So, you know, I’ll give you one example. At most hospitals, at least once every couple of months, you will have a patient who will come in, okay, with a pain in the chest. You do the ECG, and the ECG to the doctor seems sort of normal. He speaks to the cardiologist, okay, and the cardiologist says, okay, I don’t see anything wrong with it. And the patient is sent home, and he has a heart attack, right? Because ECGs, although they’re extremely, extremely common, okay, can be very, very nuanced. So, an expert cardiologist, okay, may be able to catch a particular movement there, okay, while somebody else may not. But even the expert cardiologist on a good day may be able to catch a particular movement.

able to catch it on a bad day not right now I’m not saying AI in its sort of this thing is complete but when a patient comes to ER okay I think it’s absolutely necessary to use that tool okay because that tool says requires admission okay whether the patient doctor sees it on admit him okay look by the end of the day you may admit 150 instead of 100 actual patients but don’t let that one go I think that’s the important thing you’re able to if you’re able to use this as assistive tool to augment your capabilities okay and I think that is what is emerging today you know I think it’s little too far out to say whether it will replace the clinician or not okay but I think right now clearly that is a very very essential tool that you can use and let’s start with safety before we go to efficiency or anything else you know so I think a very simple example like this okay and it depends it starts with leadership moves to institutional sort of habits okay to be able to adopt something like that change your work processes because the umpteen amount of work processes which have to change okay doctor when a patient comes where do you move when this sort of ecg report you move him to the cath lab okay and which is a 13 minute sort of this thing but that’s also preparatory time right you’re doing it within the golden hours you sort of move him into uh you know the icu how do you sort of interact with the doctor you have to call the doctor let’s say it happens at three o ‘clock at night okay the doctor the cardiologist has to come from his home and so on and so forth so the entire dance starts right okay but you have to make sure that you know you you can use this tool to err on the side of caution but i think at the very least that’s what you need to

Vikalp Sahni

and i think you touched upon um like these this complex healthcare process and uh when we look at it from a technology perspective this is what ai can solve for these extremely complex process that today there’s a multiple human touch point very simple such as doing an emergency call to a specific doctor with giving all the respective which today can be optimized, which can save lives. So that’s the sort of things that we keep discussing about during our board meetings and discussions. But a lot of these, and maybe health and non -health as well, what’s your view how the next five years, next six years, yesterday there was this conversation with Sam where AGI will be there by 2028.

What is your view on how next three years to five years? Now we can’t even say a decade, right? It seems like we don’t know what all will happen in a decade. But how do you see next three to five years changing in your hospitals or in general health care?

Abhay Soi

I think dramatically. Adoption of, and it’s not because hospitals or health care providers desire it, I think it’s becoming… absolute necessity for the country. One of the things, and perhaps one of the major things that propels our country forward is the demographic dividend. You know, the average age is 29, 28, 29, whatever. But make no mistake, 15 years down the line, it will be very, very close to the European age. And that’s the time people will require medical intervention. There just isn’t enough infrastructure and doctors available in the country. Okay, barely, barely sort of, it’s actually not even enough for the population today. I can certainly tell you 15 years down the line, there isn’t enough infrastructure which can possibly be built.

There isn’t enough money over here. Or, I mean, we’re just behind the curve a little too much, right? And if we have to solve this equation as far as healthcare is concerned, you know, you have no choice. But you have to, it has to be about predictive health. It has to be about, you know, sort of, before even patient comes to the hospital, falls sick, to be able to predict that he’s going to fall sick. and make amends there. Reaching out to people, unclog the hospital infrastructure, home care and so on and so forth. Okay, be able to replicate capabilities, skill sets of doctors to be able to take them to patients and so on.

I think all of that is a necessity. Without that, we will fail the future generation. So there’s no question of us. I think, you know, this is here. I mean, the future is here today.

Vikalp Sahni

And especially the whole vision of making India a developed country, we have to leapfrog. And many of these technologies can help us in leapfrogging the way you were explaining. But thank you so very much, Abhay, for your deep insights. I think we all love Max and the kind of work that you are doing. And we see more and more AI coming together at Max to solve for doctors, patients, and all of us. Thank you very much.

Abhay Soi

That is entirely mine. Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you.

Announcer

as Director IT at the National Health Authority where he leads the technical architecture and implementation of flagship national initiatives including the Ayushman Bharat Digital Machine and Ayushman Bharat PMG. We welcome you sir. We have with us Ms. Padmini Vishwanath, Researcher at the WHO SEARO, Southeast Asian Regional Office, bringing a regional lens to health equity, digital health policy and evidence -based transformation in low and middle income countries. We welcome you Ms. Padmini. And last but not the least, we have Mr. Jigarth Halani, Director, Enterprise Solutions Architecture and Engineering at NVIDIA South Asia, a 20 -year technology veteran driving innovation in supercomputing, big data and AI infrastructure and a trusted advisor to government and industry on AI strategy.

I now hand over to Duy. Deepak to lead the panel discussion. I think we are short of space, so I’ll manage to standing high.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much. It was a great session, Vikalp and Abhay just left. We have a short of time, so I will try to leave maybe 5 -10 minutes at the end for everyone to have questions. I would like to start this session with Dr. Gupta. Dr. Gupta, we were talking last night. You were instrumental in defining the whole first white paper around ABDM, how did it all started. There is obviously a lot of progress from when you conceptualized way back in 2019 -2020 to today. What do you really think has really worked towards seeing the reality and what are the challenges? How do you see going forward? How do this whole documentation moving from? Between patient and interoperability will start impacting the clinical decision making for the physician.

going forward.

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

Thank you Deepak and thank you Vikal for this wonderful session and giving me the opportunity. So it started actually in 2014. It was in BJP’s manifesto where I wrote and then in National Health Policy in 2016 and eventually when I was advisor to Health Minister. So you know, firstly we should compliment the ABDM team. There is no precedent. There is no precedent to create records for a billion population. How do you go about doing it? But I think people like Vikal and you every time you know you take a bold step, there are nurses who will say Bijli nahi aati, aap kese karoge. Today we have 860 million ABHA IDs. So I think if I look at the reality today and I know I am sitting on the right of the Director IT.

We have created the digital infrastructure. Now we have to leverage that to empower the people who are going to use it. I see a future where we will not have people using multiple schemes. That was our biggest problem internally. I can tell you why this got you know created and there are more reasons to but eventually technology will allow us to optimally use resources to clinically be precise in treating people remove redundancies and also my boss who is still the unit health minister we agreed fundamentally it will be tough to send doctors to relay they study for 12 years to make their life better not to go of course we want them it will take time to have that infrastructure where they can stay in rural areas but we believe that digital health digital solutions will be able to leverage this backbone that we have created to serve people in the areas where they need them the most I think that golden hour to platinum minutes to I think finally what I believe will be the digital health standards that in a minute you could get to what you need at least for primary care so I am very optimistic and we call was right the decade is not we used to talk decade at 2013 -14 now we talk three years max few months is better to talk So I think it’s a time where we should be really optimistic of the vision that we were able to build thanks to people like who had implemented.

You know, we had COVID at our hand, you know, when we looked at 2 .2 billion people, you know, getting vaccinated, not calling up people, just going to the app and getting it done. So I think the creators are in the room. The implementers are in the room. So ideators don’t need to worry much. Thank you.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much. That’s very nice. So moving to your left, Nikhil. Nikhil, you guys have done a phenomenal job in, you know, deploying adoption of ABDM in public sector today. But we see a lack in the private sector, definitely. What have you been learning? How do you think this whole learning from ABDM deploying at a large scale PSU where obviously there is obviously massive, massive load of patients walking in and very limited physician and staff to support. Digitizing appointment has done a great way. do you see it going forward moving into private sector how do you see it going forward getting into the workflows even deeper which will really help better outcomes

Nikhil Dhongari

which can be developed by IKAK and other health startups. Where ABDM created the federated architecture, where the model can go there and they can be tried. Because the simple making algorithm doesn’t make a solution in the health sector. Just now as the max safety is very much important. So what is missing in the foreign models, which is not tried in the Indian data, especially we can’t neglect the population, the rural population, small hospitals where most of the people go there. Where ABDM created HMI solutions, where we have access to the longitude records of the patients, where our Indian models can be tried, and where we can get the success actually. The ground is fertile enough right now to pitch in for the Indian startups to come in and try.

in your models especially because of federal drugs you don’t need LLMs you just need SLMs and some random models to come and do it so that the model cannot be biased because the biasness I can’t see only from the technical angle here you have to keep both clinicians and technologies so that the context data is available from across the India and across the population where the subject is the billion clinical realities and where and the AI model should be not only transactional they should be conversational where the literacy rate is very low so now is a fertile ground for the Indian startups to come in and show the brand value of the Indian startups so where I can see it.

Thank you.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much Nikhil insightful you touched upon cloud infrastructure and we have Jigar here. So Jigar cloud infrastructure has made AI scale. We all are using, everyone is using chat GPT today. Infrastructure, sovereignty and trust are hot things. We’ve been hearing about these words for last five days like I don’t know n number of times. It becomes super, super relevant for health as we heard in the last session, the trust. How do you think the models or the companies building in India bring that trust factor so that physicians and the operator like Abhay would trust the solutions and then start implementing which will really help, you know, people like Nikhil in building those models for the country.

Jigar Halani

So I think it’s a deep question. Trust has many aspects if you ask me honestly, right. Trust in my language could be the most accurate results and I’m happy because I’m a fast moving guy, IT professional, right. So we are known for it. The event gets over today and Monday we are going to do it. We are back to work and we know we are going to hog again for next five days to make sure that we are something better and bigger right trust for my mom could be a very different storyline right because for her everything on priority line is health nothing else essentially right for me plus or minus 1 % 3 % 5 % 10 % is also okay for her nothing is right and trust for a mother who has just a newborn in her hand it’s gonna be completely different right so it I personally feel it has many years but a fundamental layer if you ask me honestly model builders what they’re trying to do is trying to still accumulate the knowledge which is still available on the web right what we haven’t gone back and that’s where I would borrow if India is achieving these numbers which I was not aware I knew about pretty well I have it from myself as well although I have not used it yet but a but I am a registered user I won’t myself get enrolled into everything but I am a registered user I won’t myself get enrolled into everything scheme that government is coming of it just to make sure that to understand where all connectivities possible essentially right but I’m not even a willing one yeah but but but I’m saying that once we have this data how do we make use of this data better so that I bring not just the context of India which is so important and what a couple is trying to do just on the language side of the story which we all understand that language is so important to us but imagine the you know the the the the environmental changes that I have from you know place to place and basis which the changes that I have in my body structure and basis which what medicine helps me better and so on and so forth right it has its own subsequent you know chain of things that that is it how do I bring that data more into the ecosystem thereby I make those model more and more efficient better and in the lingo of what India understand not just in language but also in the lingo of health which is important acting that particular like for example I come from Gujarat but I stay in back Bangalore, I know for sure that environment is not suitable to me, right?

And I keep sneezing for the poll reason, of course, many of the moment I go back to Gujarat, I’m absolutely normal, right? Whether it is extreme cold, whether it is extreme hot, it’s raining, doesn’t matter at all. I never sneeze. I think things work in Gujarat. I go, I come daily, I don’t get sneezing at all. I’m just another example, right? So how do I bring that data more into the ecosystem, number one? And then number two, how do I train those models more efficiently and serve them back to the users? So that’s one aspect of it, right? The second aspect of it is I think unlike language, in the healthcare, we need a very large momentum of citizens to participate and help us to have a lot of feedback ecosystem in what they are pursuing from these models which they are inferring it.

Right? Thank you. like, for example, in your solution, which I’ve seen the demo because now it’s been a number of times in the demo booth I’ve seen this. If a patient is talking, right, and, you know, going through your recordings, let’s say, which he or she has just done, for him or her, it’s the most important thing. For the doctor, it’s like the next patient, right? How do I go to the next? But the patient will definitely go back and check the recording. Patient will definitely go back, as we all do, and for the rightful reasons. We check the second opinion with the doctor, right? But that information is only with me. What did the second doctor told me, right?

I check with you as a doctor, and then I say, all right, it’s a big operation. I should take a second opinion. And I go to her. I take another opinion, and then both they say the same thing. And I then still Google, right, and I take the opinion there. And I say, you know what? Looks to be that I need to get operated. But we’ll wait. And then five days. It’s free consulting. Four days later. will come to the doctor. There are four questions. So I think the user also need to put the feedback back in the ecosystem by using these models and then getting democratized. I think that’s how the trust layer is growing.

This is at a very high level. Policy level, things are going to be very, very different and I’m sure it’s a topic by itself. Some other day we’ll work on it and I’m

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much. This Google doctor has been very, very popular in clinics. When we meet a doctor, they hate it. I have seen a board many, many times outside the physician’s cabin. No Google doctor, please. Okay. So we discussed, so next question to tell me, we’ve been talking about private hospital infrastructure. There’s a mass of high quality infrastructure available in the country with really great physicians. On the other side, we have PSC, massive pressure, less number of physicians. How do you think, you know, builders, when they think of building solutions for both of these perspectives? Should they think of a single solution? So I think the answer is yes. So I think the answer is yes.

So I think the answer is yes. What do you think of two different solutions? What do you think how it’s going forward?

Tanvi Lall

Yeah, so at PeoplePlus, which is an initiative of Aikstep, we do a lot of analysis on what are the adoption trends and for high need populations. So basically for people who are building in healthcare, education, agriculture, right? What’s the uptake? Who’s building what? Who’s not taking third -party solutions and trying to build internally? And there are a couple of points that have emerged in that thesis. I think the first is because AI is meant to be personalized and context -specific. It can deal with multilinguality and voice. There’s firstly a lot of opportunity to bridge some of these inequity gaps that exist. So the first thing is that today you can imagine as a builder solutions that are in some very, very regional, low -resource languages for the different beneficiaries.

And you can design them to be voice first, which in a way is inducing trust because now they are speaking to someone and they’re just not reading or… an answer and they don’t know who’s behind that solution. So the first aspect is that AI is meant to be personalized. So when you’re building solutions or, you know, I’m going to go a step further. I’m going to say it’s beyond a solution. It’s a transformation. You can create very customized transformations. That’s number one. I think the second thing over here is that when, you know, because it’s a very fragmented value chain, right? In the case of healthcare, like someone is paying, someone is using the technology, someone’s ultimately benefiting from it.

What we’ve realized is when you’re designing these transformations, a big part of a builder’s journey is not just making the tech stack, but spending time with people who will be adopting it, educating them at different levels to explain how this tech could get consumed or improve their life, right? So many times, and I mean, there are 700 plus healthcare startups in India who are doing all kinds of pilots and demos right now. And what we’ve realized… is that the demo phase goes really well. Like three months, six months. Because there is adopters who could be hospitals or other institutions sometimes play from a place of either fear or hype. Like I want to be aware of what’s going on and I’ll do the demo.

But after three months, this is just going to be a side window on my browser which I never go back to because it was never thought of as a solution that I would embed into my workflow. So you have to think from the start of this as a journey and not just a one -time switch. That I get that one -time contract or that one -time demo and imagine that that will convert into some kind of impact. Now to build that trust, it’s very different in a private hospital which is maybe much more urban, much more aware of what’s going on versus a PHC, right? And the people in the PHC. So I think a tech stack and the solution is one piece of it.

But when you’re designing the transformation which comes with education, awareness, trust -building activities, creating safety and maybe feedback and evals that may be a little bit more make sense for a PHC versus a hospital which might be very different. So when you’re thinking of the… Transformation stack, it has to be very different. And transformation is about much more than tech. And I think that’s where people should be spending a lot more time as builders. It’s just not about cracking that first pilot or that first deployment, but saying what will it take to go from pilot to population scale, right? What will that take? Because that is a very different journey. That’s a systems journey. That’s not a tech journey always.

Deepak Tuli

No, that’s super helpful. Continuing the same discussion, Dr. Gupta, when you look at policymaking, do you look at these two segments very differently or you think when you look at policy like private sector, PSC, you think health is one single sector or do you start defining, saying, okay, how will it work in public, how will it work in private sectors?

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

So if you look at the national health policy, this is the first time where I actually wrote the line both for private and public sector. In 2002, it was mostly written and even implied that it was only meant for public sector. I think if you really want to deliver care, you have to break that. barrier between private and public that’s how you will deliver care when patients has a problem it doesn’t see whether is the private or public should I get it the first hospital they get it so I think that was the thinking behind it and that’s what the policy is like

Deepak Tuli

oh that’s great learn something I move on to Padmini from your regional vantage point how should AI system be designed differently to reflect the diversity of context capabilities and care relative across countries

Padmini Vishwanath

yeah thank you first of all thank you so much for having us today WH was very glad to be representing the work that we do and you know listening to my co -panelists it’s interesting to hear about you know the the importance of tailoring because interesting and a little how do I say anxiety in using for me because the you know the work that we do is on the other end of the spectrum which is how do we create norms right how do we create norms and normative guidance to ensure that AI is equitable and moving in the right direction. And so I’ll talk from the regional perspective. And, you know, of course, we work with eight countries across CRO, and all of these countries and systems are at very, very varying levels of digital maturity, right?

But what we often find is the AI tools are developed for the most advanced, most connected tertiary institutions. And then adapted later for the most more remote settings, right? But we are finding that some of the countries, you know, pilots are looking at reversing this logic, which means that we start developing readiness frameworks for the most remote settings, understanding the frontline capabilities, device availabilities, all the factors that matter in AI readiness. You know, developing a framework, a framework for that level of remoteness. and then scaling it. And we do see that in contexts where we do that, there is higher provider trust, there is more equity. So I think that is, from our experience, we feel that maybe we need to slow down a little bit and look at how we can modernize existing legacy systems rather than kind of building on and adding new systems.

Yeah, I’ll stop there for now.

Deepak Tuli

Please, Annie. So maybe starting from here.

Jigar Halani

I’ll go first. I think voice. It’s a common factor. I think it is horizontal, not vertical, but it’s very, very important for the country, right? If I understand what Tamil doctor is speaking with the patient and convert it into Hindi and have that deployed in Delhi and Gujarat, I think I’m home essentially, right? I’m solving many problems for years together that has been prolonging in the country essentially. I think it’s by itself is a reward to the country and we should be fully liberating it. One thing that I’m very happy about is the mindset change. You know, that’s going to be the biggest thing. It’s not a technology problem. It’s a mindset problem. And that’s what I’ve seen every single person, you know, talking to, they started more believing in the fact that, you know, the time has arrived.

Nikhil Dhongari

I will tell two things. One thing is product. So I am very happy that a lot of discussion is going on about AI. So for any technology, anything to encourage the public, the thought process is very much important. That impact submitted created that impact to discuss things on AI basically. Now everyone will discuss on AI, like you beat a very rickshaw puller to the CEO, that discussion is happening. That is very much important to build systems, that thought process. Second thing, I visited few of the special start -ups. So very happy to see some start -ups are doing really great, like Eka scribe. So where the TVDM can use basically small clinics to reduce the burden of the clinicians from the non -clinical worker work.

So and there is one company and they are doing very great work on data anonymization. Because for many people, they have models to train after the advent of the technology. DPDP act so the data privacy and patient consent is very much important so they are working very really good in India so I’m very happy to such companies are there and they’re doing really wonderful so I’m very fed

Tanvi Lall

I think for me it would be the emphasis on AI ready data systems because this is across sectors everyone is realizing that AI is only as good as the data for the model and application layer that it has access to and I really want to give you guys credit for that because you are pioneers in terms of putting out data and making it available to that MCP server that came out in fact we cite that as an example we are working very closely with Mosby right now and they want to make their statistical data sets available to the world they have put out their first MCP about a week ago but just the fact that you are you know institutions are just not extractive when it comes to data but they want to give it back so that others can build on top of it is very important so in health it’s crucial that happens because otherwise there is no personalization happening.

Padmini Vishwanath

So I would say I think so far we have looked at a lot of quantitative measures of adopting AI in health, diagnosis, accuracy, number of patient visits, et cetera. But I think this time around we are seeing more discussions around the qualitative dimensions, right, empathy, dignity, care. And, you know, it’s interesting because in one of the pilots we are conducting on palliative care, we, you know, we didn’t even think about it, but a caregiver and a patient, palliative care patient visiting a nurse, you know, that’s their only source of human connection during that week. And so how does AI kind of change that dynamic of caregiving, right, in those little moments they spend together in the clinic?

So I think. The increased conversation around this. and just acknowledgement of not just the quantitative but also the qualitative dimensions is something that I’m personally really looking forward to.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you. The objective of this question was not to get the promotion for Eka, just a disclaimer. I will… No, but thank you. This was super insightful. Audience, any question?

Audience member 1

Sir, I just had a question. You said a voice language is not as new. So that mostly 90 % of them are on the cloud. So that needs to be on the edge only or on the cloud or hybrid?

Jigar Halani

No, no, of course. I think… Do you use ChatGPT? Yes. One of the servers I hosted over in India. No, I’m just saying there’s cost factor is also there and they have data privacy also there, so… The moment you add cost, as long as it is in India, I think we are home. I don’t think so we could be… Ever cheaper.

Audience member 1

So I was just… I’m asking a suggestion from you, so like what model should, like someone who’s creating such solution for voice and translation, multilingual, let’s just target 22 languages. So where should the MCV or the influencer or the activity server should be hosted? On the edge, on a gadget, like a mobile phone or something, audio recorder, or, you know, hybrid?

Jigar Halani

I would say, I would say it depends on the use case. If you have a very particular use case, very tiny one in a remote place, edge would be the solution. You don’t have a choice. You will lack behind the connectivity and few other aspects as well.

Audience member 1

It will synchronize once a month or once a week or once a day?

Jigar Halani

No, voice is something you need to have connectivity in play.

Audience member 1

Okay.

Jigar Halani

You can’t be having offline things. That’s my view at least. People are trying. I think Saboom had something on, on the device. 90 % we should go for.

Audience member 1

Connecting with the cloud or the server?

Jigar Halani

Yes.

Audience member 1

Even if it’s a local India hosted server?

Jigar Halani

That’s correct.

Audience member 2

Hello everyone, we have seen a lot of stalls in the expo showing AI powered documentation and diagnosis. I am a dentist and I am currently pursuing MBA in analytics. So I am curious how far this AI, Indian based AI tools are relying on Indian data rather than global data sets.

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

Depends on what they are claiming that’s first. And the other side I also represent the Mayo Clinic strategy in India. So as Mayo Clinic platform we are opening in partnership with some of our data sets to look at but also collaborating with hospitals inside to leverage each other’s anonymized data sets. So I think important. Thank you. point to note is the culture of data is missing. I mean, we still have to get the culture of data to get to have those AI systems that are based on Indian population. I think this is still far away. I think with ABDM sitting next to we have 860 million of IDs, but if the number of records on ABDM, if you check, they are not what we want to be.

So I think we’re still not there in terms of if someone makes a claim, be careful. Thank you.

Deepak Tuli

That’s great. We talked about what we really like, what we’ve seen the change fundamentally. But do you guys also think there are still few items we’re lacking behind as a country, as a health, where we should have been already seen? Or you think we are on the right path? And if we are on the right path, then what do you think would be the great outcomes in next year?

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

My answer is very frankly, even at the cost of obesity. See, the issue is not about the usefulness of technology or the use case. It’s about ethics and doing the right things. Most of the people are not using, not because the UX, UI, technology, outcomes, everyone knows that. How many doctors would actually want to tell what they charge for a prescription, how many prescriptions they may, and why they write three antibiotics for one case. So I think it is about regulating that unethical part, the way they were able to crack it, you’ll be seeing the mass adoption. The challenge lies in the medical practices and medical ethics, not on the solutions per se. Otherwise, we would be the most adopted nation in terms of digital technologies.

Deepak Tuli

The great, last night, we were having this conversation where in China, I was surprised to hear this, that in the real time, when a physician, is writing a prescription there’s a data going back and if there are errors it’s coming back and the doctors are getting flagged if they continuously do this thing and then that’s the way one way of controlling what you really said and you know think of us we are still in metros literate but think of people in tier two tier three having three antibiotics at the same time i have seen in bombay a chemist saying as you throw my religion yeah we pop up so i think it’s an issue about practice medical practices good good pharmacy practices good prescription practices to follow i mean you could have given a cold and a cup syrup that would have made him money too

Nikhil Dhongari

i want to give as if you had a point just want to add and she asked one question how many models are training on indian data so you said now that where we are lagging behind so we want to say like the behavioral change is very much important so we have solutions even And we gave very, with CDAC, we gave one e -shift flight, which is almost free to small hospitals. And all the government hospitals, including Ames, having the HMI solution where they can create the language records. But some of the docs are not ready to do, because they said that we are very much accustomed to writing on the paper only. So still they are doing, and we are accepting.

So where we are losing the context data from the major public hospitals. So where we need some tough stance, because I am now working in National Tadati, but before I was in Railways. Now Railways totally stopped physical prescription. Because they took a decision that no more physical prescription. They are doing only now online prescription, everything, even lab record, everything integrated. So they took one decision. They retested. So we need some tough decisions, and also we need some behavioral change, where we have to go for creating language records. then only we can give some context data to the Indian startups where our models can be deployed and trained then we can get rid of it.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much you have been a great panel thank you very much for all your insight and I am sorry in the interest of time we will have to wrap up but before we close this session a sincere gratitude and thank you to all our panelists I request Deepak to just present a moment to from our behalf thank you Thank you. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (14)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (3)
Additional Contextmedium

“An attempt to build a “closed‑loop” system similar to Google’s search failed because the engine could not return results in native Indian languages.”

The knowledge base notes that indigenous-language technology barriers are largely structural, political and ethical, and that while the technology exists it cannot be delivered effectively due to platform restrictions, which aligns with the reported difficulty in returning results in native Indian languages [S99].

Additional Contexthigh

“Health‑care tolerates virtually no variance in safety or privacy, demanding extensive supervision for any AI deployment.”

Privacy concerns around AI-enhanced functionalities are highlighted as intensifying, and broader discussions stress the need for careful, evidence-based engagement with AI to manage safety and privacy risks, providing additional context to the claim about strict supervision requirements [S106] and the mismatch between public fear and measured impact of AI [S57].

Additional Contextlow

“There is a gap between enthusiasm and reality: “desire does meet reality” only sporadically.”

Analyses of AI adoption note a mismatch between public expectations (or enthusiasm) and the measured impact of AI technologies, underscoring that optimism often outpaces practical outcomes, which adds nuance to the reported gap between desire and reality [S57].

External Sources (109)
S1
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — – Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta- Nikhil Dhongari
S2
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — – Abhay Soi- Padmini Vishwanath – Vikalp Sahni- Abhay Soi Despite both being from the same organization (Eka), they sh…
S3
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — – Abhay Soi- Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta- Padmini Vishwanath – Abhay Soi- Jigar Halani- Padmini Vishwanath
S4
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — -Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta- Advisor to Health Minister, instrumental in defining ABDM white paper, involved in National …
S5
DC-DH: Health Digital Health & Selfcare – Can we replace Doctors in PHCs — – Rajendra Pratap Gupta: Chairman of the board for HIMSS India, moderator of the discussion Rajendra Pratap Gupta: Fan…
S6
Conversational AI in low income & resource settings | IGF 2023 — Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Health Parliament – Private Sector – India Prof. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Health Parliament …
S7
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — -Audience member 1- Founder of Corral Inc -Audience member 6- Role/title not mentioned
S8
Day 0 Event #82 Inclusive multistakeholderism: tackling Internet shutdowns — – Nikki Muscati: Audience member who asked questions (role/affiliation not specified)
S9
Building the Workforce_ AI for Viksit Bharat 2047 — -Audience- Role/Title: Professor Charu from Indian Institute of Public Administration (one identified audience member), …
S11
From KW to GW Scaling the Infrastructure of the Global AI Economy — – Ankush Sabharwal- Jigar Halani- Nitin Gupta – Peter Panfil- Jigar Halani- Sanjay Kumar Sainani
S12
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — -Deepak Tuli- Panel discussion moderator
S13
Nepal Engagement Session — -Ms. Deepika: Mentioned at the end to felicitate Mr. Alok, specific role or title not mentioned
S14
Global Perspectives on Openness and Trust in AI — -Audience member 2- Part of a group from Germany
S15
Day 0 Event #82 Inclusive multistakeholderism: tackling Internet shutdowns — – Nikki Muscati: Audience member who asked questions (role/affiliation not specified)
S16
The Arc of Progress in the 21st Century / DAVOS 2025 — – Paula Escobar Chavez: Audience member asking a question (specific role/title not mentioned)
S18
Transforming Health Systems with AI From Lab to Last Mile — – Vikalp Sahni- Richard Rukwata
S19
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — – Tanvi Lall- Padmini Vishwanath Tanvi Lall argues for different transformation approaches for different settings (priv…
S20
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Giordano Albertazzi — -Announcer: Role/Title: Event announcer/moderator; Area of expertise: Not mentioned
S21
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Takahito Tokita Fujitsu — -Announcer: Role as event announcer/host, expertise/title not mentioned
S22
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Cristiano Amon — -Announcer: Role/Title: Event announcer/moderator; Areas of expertise: Not mentioned
S23
CEOs unprepared for impact of generative AI, reveals Deloitte survey — A globalsurvey conducted by Deloitte’s AI institutereveals that top executives still need to prepare to handle the impac…
S24
Keynote by Naveen Tewari Founder & CEO, inMobi India AI Impact Summit — “the third is is a very disproportionate rate of growth of economic prosperity because of all the factors that the level…
S25
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session — What AI can do. Having said that. On the investment side, India is just a wonderful area for us. We were one of the earl…
S26
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-for-bharats-health_-addressing-a-billion-clinical-realities — But I think today it’s affecting our tasks. It’s affecting tasks of efficiency. You know, we’ve already started doing pr…
S27
Digital Health at the crossroads of human rights, AI governance, and e-trade (SouthCentre) — However, while reaping the benefits of digital health technology, it is crucial to address privacy and security concerns…
S28
WS #162 Overregulation: Balance Policy and Innovation in Technology — Tercova emphasizes that patient privacy, data protection, and minimizing bias in algorithms are non-negotiable aspects o…
S29
Rethinking learning: Hope, solutions, and wisdom with AI in the classroom — But this adaptation won’t happen without effort. It requires educators willing to experiment with new approaches even wh…
S30
Comprehensive Report: AI’s Impact on the Future of Work – Davos 2026 Panel Discussion — Ng emphasized that whilst efficiency gains from AI point solutions might yield modest improvements, transformative workf…
S31
AI innovations reshape food assistance in India — The UN World Food Programme’s (WFP) Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit in New Delhishowcased innovations transforming…
S32
AI and the future of digital global supply chains (UNCTAD) — In conclusion, AI has emerged as a powerful tool that can significantly impact trade logistics. It can optimize routes a…
S33
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — – Amin Nasser- Julie Sweet – Julie Sweet- Amin Nasser Development | Economic Focus on outcomes and value creation rat…
S34
Panel Discussion AI in Healthcare India AI Impact Summit — If you think about certainly one of the biggest challenges in the U.S., India has this too, Sangeeta mentioned some of t…
S35
Comprehensive Report: China’s AI Plus Economy Initiative – A Strategic Discussion on Artificial Intelligence Development and Implementation — Gradual integration approach focusing on augmenting human capabilities rather than immediate replacement
S36
How nonprofits are using AI-based innovations to scale their impact — Very low disagreement level with high collaborative spirit. The few disagreements were primarily tactical rather than st…
S37
AI-Driven Enforcement_ Better Governance through Effective Compliance & Services — The symposium demonstrated remarkably high consensus among speakers on fundamental AI principles, implementation goals, …
S38
How to make AI governance fit for purpose? — Legal and regulatory | Development The speed of AI development creates uncertainty and challenges that exceed current c…
S39
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Multiple sessions emphasized the importance of avoiding one-size-fits-all approaches. InMain Session 2, Mlindi Mashologu…
S40
AI-assisted multi-disease CT scans launched in Beijing hospital — Beijing United Family Hospital and Alibaba DAMO Academyhave launched a joint effortto bring advanced AI screening into c…
S41
Harmonizing High-Tech: The role of AI standards as an implementation tool — Philippe Metzger:Thank you, Bilel. Maybe to be as succinct as possible, just would like to mention four areas, which I t…
S42
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — The level of disagreement is moderate but significant for implementation. While speakers share fundamental goals of resp…
S43
MedTech and AI Innovations in Public Health Systems — Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development Clinical Decision Support & Care Coordination
S44
Shaping AI to ensure Respect for Human Rights and Democracy | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #51 — Björn Berge:Thank you very much, Ambassador Schneider, and a very good afternoon to all of you. It’s really great to be …
S45
Keynote-Roy Jakobs — This comment introduces a systems-thinking perspective that acknowledges the complexity of AI implementation beyond just…
S46
Conversation: 02 — This reframes trust from a soft concept to a foundational technical requirement, positioning it as critical infrastructu…
S47
Keynote-Martin Schroeter — “Reliability, governance, and human integration are not features, they are prerequisites”[14]. “The work ahead is hard, …
S48
Unleashing Digital Trade and Investment for Sustainable Development (UN ESCAP) — It is essential to have the proper infrastructure, regulations, and policy dialogue between the private and public secto…
S49
Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech — According to the information provided, Latin America is predicted to become an ageing society by 2053, with the number o…
S50
Ethics and AI | Part 6 — Even if the Act itself does not make direct reference to “ethics”, it is closely tied to the broader context of ethical …
S51
The fading of human agency in automated systems — To address concerns about automation, policy and governance discussions often invoke the concept of ‘human-in-the-loop’ …
S52
WS #162 Overregulation: Balance Policy and Innovation in Technology — Tercova emphasizes that patient privacy, data protection, and minimizing bias in algorithms are non-negotiable aspects o…
S53
WS #283 AI Agents: Ensuring Responsible Deployment — User control and human oversight are essential safeguards, particularly for high-impact decisions that are difficult to …
S54
How to make AI governance fit for purpose? — Legal and regulatory | Development The speed of AI development creates uncertainty and challenges that exceed current c…
S55
From Human Potential to Global Impact_ Qualcomm’s AI for All Workshop — Moderate disagreement level with significant implications for AI deployment strategies. The disagreements reflect differ…
S56
Why science metters in global AI governance — The discussion revealed surprisingly few fundamental disagreements among speakers, with most conflicts arising around im…
S57
The mismatch between public fear of AI and its measured impact — Inmedicine and science, AI has shown promise in pattern recognition and data analysis. Deployment is cautious, as clinic…
S58
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — “And the regulations have to be agile because the technology is moving at such a fast pace that you cannot anchor the re…
S59
Keynote-Roy Jakobs — This comment introduces a systems-thinking perspective that acknowledges the complexity of AI implementation beyond just…
S60
Policymaker’s Guide to International AI Safety Coordination — This comment crystallizes the fundamental tension at the heart of AI governance – the misalignment between market incent…
S61
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — Jigar highlights that trust encompasses accuracy, data privacy, and transparent model governance. Trust, safety and pat…
S62
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — Alex Moltzau: Yes, thank you so much. My name is Alex Maltzau. And I work as a second national expert in the European AI…
S63
People trust doctors more than AI — New research shows that most peopleremain cautious about using ChatGPT for diagnosesbut view AI more favourably when it …
S64
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges — “Trustability because we need to trace the systems, the models, the data that we use for AI.”[49]. “Verifiability is the…
S65
The Intelligent Coworker: AI’s Evolution in the Workplace — Christoph Schweizer advocated for new measurement approaches, emphasising “adoption and usage,” “employee satisfaction s…
S66
Open Forum #64 Local AI Policy Pathways for Sustainable Digital Economies — Sarah Nicole: Please share your thoughts with us on this issue. Yeah, thank you very much for the invitation to give thi…
S67
Building the Future STPI Global Partnerships & Startup Felicitation 2026 — This challenges the metrics-driven approach to measuring startup ecosystem success, emphasizing qualitative ecosystem de…
S68
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development — -Infrastructure and Energy Challenges: Significant discussion around the massive infrastructure requirements for AI depl…
S69
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — Decision-making should be pushed to network level for security and optimization, with limited cases going to edge or reg…
S70
HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTE FOR DEMOCRATIZING ACCESS TO AI — So I’ll keep it brief. I think what I’m looking forward to with all the conversations here and in other parts of the wor…
S71
Democratizing AI Building Trustworthy Systems for Everyone — I think open source is going to be in my mind a critical aspect of it. You’ll have to see how far open source movement t…
S72
Safeguarding Children with Responsible AI — Cultural, contextual, and inclusion considerations
S73
Press Conference: Closing the AI Access Gap — Data strategies are another critical aspect in the AI era. Countries need robust data strategies that include sharing fr…
S74
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services — Human factors such as fear of replacement and communication style are major barriers to AI adoption. Simple, clear messa…
S75
A Digital Future for All (morning sessions) — Aerts argues that AI and digital tools have the potential to significantly improve healthcare outcomes and reduce health…
S76
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — Development | Infrastructure Examples include tumor board preparation, holistic patient data aggregation, post-discharg…
S77
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — I think dramatically. Adoption of, and it’s not because hospitals or health care providers desire it, I think it’s becom…
S78
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-for-bharats-health_-addressing-a-billion-clinical-realities — I think dramatically. Adoption of, and it’s not because hospitals or health care providers desire it, I think it’s becom…
S79
AI could save billions but healthcare adoption is slow — AI is being hailed as atransformative force in healthcare, with the potential to reduce costs andimprove outcomesdramati…
S80
The mismatch between public fear of AI and its measured impact — Inmedicine and science, AI has shown promise in pattern recognition and data analysis. Deployment is cautious, as clinic…
S81
Panel Discussion AI in Healthcare India AI Impact Summit — Chris Ciauri provided concrete examples of AI applications already showing results. Banner Health’s use of Claude to sum…
S82
MedTech and AI Innovations in Public Health Systems — The discussion revealed a critical challenge: most AI solutions are looking for problems rather than addressing specific…
S83
Shaping AI to ensure Respect for Human Rights and Democracy | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #51 — Björn Berge:Thank you very much, Ambassador Schneider, and a very good afternoon to all of you. It’s really great to be …
S84
Keynote-Martin Schroeter — This comment identifies trust as the fundamental prerequisite for AI adoption, synthesizing the technical, operational, …
S85
Keynote-Roy Jakobs — This comment introduces a systems-thinking perspective that acknowledges the complexity of AI implementation beyond just…
S86
Conversation: 02 — This reframes trust from a soft concept to a foundational technical requirement, positioning it as critical infrastructu…
S87
Collaborative AI Network – Strengthening Skills Research and Innovation — This comment shifted the discussion from technical implementation to governance and trust frameworks. It influenced othe…
S88
Scaling AI for Billions_ Building Digital Public Infrastructure — Both government and private sector initiatives are developing these capabilities, with emphasis on making frameworks acc…
S89
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — Roy Jakobs envisions a future where AI agents handle complete healthcare tasks, from scheduling and data aggregation to …
S90
Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech — According to the information provided, Latin America is predicted to become an ageing society by 2053, with the number o…
S91
Multistakeholder Dialogue on National Digital Health Transformation — Sean Blaschke: Thanks, Leah. I’m going to try to apply the same architecture framework to legislation, policy, complia…
S92
Contents — To take one example where there is growing energy and innovation: digital identity can transform healthcare systems. As …
S93
Assessing the Promise and Efficacy of Digital Health Tool | IGF 2023 WS #83 — Ravindra Gupta:Second, I don’t think that technology at any time failed. Actually, it proved that it was ready. So wheth…
S94
WSIS Action Line C7: E-health – Fostering foundations for digital health transformation in the age of AI — ## Next Steps and Future Initiatives 1. **Electronic Health Records**: Comprehensive patient data management systems A…
S95
Acknowledgements — Militaries first developed UAVs early in the 20 th century. However, various technological obstacles constrained what …
S96
Informal Stakeholder Consultation Session — Sorry, I mean, there were some technical issues before. Well, thank you very much, Ambassador, for this opportunity for …
S97
Accessible e-learning experience for PWDs-Best Practices | IGF 2023 WS #350 — Gonola:Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and for those online, good morning, good afternoon and good evening. This ses…
S98
Technology in a Turbulent World — He recounted an instance where the board too small and they didn’t have the level of experience needed were not addresse…
S99
Open Forum #73 Indigenous Peoples Languages in a Digital Age — Indigenous language technology barriers are primarily structural, political, and ethical rather than technical – the tec…
S100
Apple’s quiet race to replace Google Search with its own AI — Apple occasionally seems out of step with public sentiment, particularly when it comes to AI. A revealing example, highl…
S101
RESEARCH PAPERS — The ability to seek out and identify relevant information on the internet has been a crucial innovation. It has relied l…
S102
29, filed Jan. 22, 2010, at 9-10. — – Better treatment evaluations. Therapeutic drugs are not tested across all relevant populations. For example, pharmaceu…
S103
Connecting open code with policymakers to development | IGF 2023 WS #500 — Henri Verdier:It totally takes a point. And that’s interesting, because if you do observe the story of governments, they…
S104
AI & Diplomacy: Managing New Frontiers – ADF 2024 — The discussion concluded that although regulatory frameworks recognise the importance of these issues, the gap between i…
S105
How African knowledge and wisdom can inspire the development and governance of AI — There is a palpable desire to bridge the gap between theoretical discussion and on-the-ground realities. This demand for…
S106
Privacy concerns intensify as Big Tech announce new AI-enhanced functionalities — Apple, Microsoft, and Google arespearheadinga technological revolution with their vision of AI smartphones and computers…
S107
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-climate-resilient-systems-with-ai — It looks like the slides are not there. There’s a certain, turning on the screen. There it goes. I will say that while w…
S108
Democrats shift stance on GENIUS Act — Senators voted 66-32 to advance theGENIUS Act, a bill aimed at regulating stablecoins. Sixteen Democrats joined Republic…
S109
Main Session | Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence — Brando Benifei: Yes. So obviously there have been around four important resolutions this year regarding AI. One was pr…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
A
Abhay Soi
8 arguments149 words per minute2428 words975 seconds
Argument 1
AI as a CEO KPI driven by consumer behavior, ESG, and efficiency
EXPLANATION
Abhay explains that AI adoption is being driven by changing consumer expectations, the need to improve ESG scores, and the pursuit of operational efficiency. He sees AI as a low‑hanging fruit that can enhance hospital performance without being a full ecosystem overhaul.
EVIDENCE
He describes how patients now search for doctors on various platforms, influencing hospitals to improve digital collateral, and notes that ESG considerations push institutions to adopt AI tools that can answer strategic questions. He also points to specific efficiency gains such as predictive bed availability and reduced clinician time spent on data entry as examples of low-hanging fruits [67-82].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Consumer-driven adoption and efficiency gains are highlighted in [S24], while Deloitte’s survey shows CEOs need to embed AI in performance metrics [S23]; workflow efficiency and KPI alignment are discussed in [S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI as a CEO KPI driven by consumer behavior, ESG, and efficiency
Argument 2
Creation of a 15‑year patient data lake and real‑time EMR to enable AI
EXPLANATION
Abhay outlines that Max has built a comprehensive data lake aggregating fifteen years of patient records, which is continuously updated in real time. This foundation supplies the high‑quality data needed for AI applications across the hospital system.
EVIDENCE
He states that the organization created a common-size data lake covering all patients over the last fifteen years and that it operates on a real-time basis today, forming the backbone for AI initiatives [14-15].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Creation of a 15‑year patient data lake and real‑time EMR to enable AI
AGREED WITH
Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Nikhil Dhongari
Argument 3
AI must operate under strict supervision to ensure patient safety and data privacy
EXPLANATION
Abhay emphasizes that, unlike less critical domains, healthcare AI requires rigorous oversight because errors can directly affect patient outcomes and privacy. Continuous supervision is necessary until AI tools are proven safe and reliable.
EVIDENCE
He notes that healthcare has very little tolerance for deviation, requiring extensive supervision to safeguard patient safety and data privacy, and that AI must be closely monitored for years to come [52-59].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Privacy and security requirements for digital health are emphasized in [S27]; the need to balance regulation with innovation is outlined in [S28]; broader AI governance considerations are covered in [S37].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI must operate under strict supervision to ensure patient safety and data privacy
AGREED WITH
Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
DISAGREED WITH
Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
Argument 4
Institutional culture requires circumspection, learning curves, and redesign of work processes for AI integration
EXPLANATION
Abhay argues that successful AI adoption depends on a cautious institutional mindset, extensive learning, and the re‑engineering of existing clinical workflows. He stresses that hospitals must not rush adoption without understanding the impact on processes.
EVIDENCE
He describes the need for circumspection, a steep learning curve, and the necessity to redesign many work processes before AI can be rolled out, citing internal discussions with technology teams and the importance of getting it right the first time [90-98].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The difficulty of workflow redesign and the need for careful change management are discussed in [S30]; a gradual, learning-oriented integration approach is described in [S35]; the “make haste slow” principle reinforces cautious adoption in [S38].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Institutional culture requires circumspection, learning curves, and redesign of work processes for AI integration
AGREED WITH
Jigar Halani, Tanvi Lall
Argument 5
Demographic dividend makes AI essential for predictive health and scaling care delivery
EXPLANATION
Abhay points out that India’s youthful population will age over the next decade, creating a massive demand for healthcare that cannot be met by existing infrastructure. AI is presented as a necessary tool for predictive health, remote care, and scaling doctor expertise.
EVIDENCE
He explains that the average age will rise to European levels in 15 years, leading to insufficient hospitals and doctors, and argues that AI-enabled predictive health and remote care are essential to meet future needs [128-144].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
India’s demographic dividend and its impact on future health demand are detailed in [S1]; the productivity boost from consumer-intelligence-driven AI is noted in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Demographic dividend makes AI essential for predictive health and scaling care delivery
Argument 6
AI enhances operational efficiency by providing predictive analytics for bed availability and safety monitoring.
EXPLANATION
Abhay describes how AI tools are used to forecast vacant beds and support safety measures, helping hospitals manage resources more effectively and improve patient flow.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the organization has started doing predictive analysis of vacant beds and is working on safety measures [22-23].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Predictive analysis of vacant beds is reported in [S26]; reductions in administrative burden that improve efficiency are highlighted in [S34].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven predictive analytics improve hospital operational efficiency
Argument 7
AI reduces clinicians’ administrative burden by automating data capture through digital forms, allowing more time for patient care.
EXPLANATION
He explains that clinical data that previously required manual entry is now collected via app‑based forms, decreasing the time clinicians spend gathering histories and increasing the value they can provide.
EVIDENCE
Abhay states that data collection is now done through forms in their apps, which collates information and lets clinicians spend less time gathering history and more on value-adding tasks [24-27].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The shift from paperwork to digital forms that frees clinician time is described in [S34]; task-level AI improvements that streamline workflows are covered in [S33].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Automation of data collection frees clinician time for higher‑value care
Argument 8
Early AI adoption focuses on improving specific tasks rather than full institutional integration.
EXPLANATION
He points out that the initial impact of AI is seen at the task level—enhancing efficiency and safety—before it becomes embedded in the broader institutional ecosystem.
EVIDENCE
Abhay remarks that the early days of AI affect tasks of efficiency and safety, and that full ecosystem adoption is still forthcoming [19-21].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Early task-level wins and the need for broader ecosystem integration are discussed in [S33]; workflow redesign challenges that precede full adoption are noted in [S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Task‑level AI improvements precede comprehensive institutional adoption
V
Vikalp Sahni
1 argument138 words per minute877 words378 seconds
Argument 1
Need to balance rapid AI adoption with policy and regulatory challenges
EXPLANATION
Vikalp raises concerns that while AI adoption is accelerating, it must be aligned with emerging policies, standards, and regulatory frameworks such as NABH and ABDM. He asks how hospitals can navigate these constraints without stalling innovation.
EVIDENCE
He questions whether the wave of AI adoption is being accompanied by policy and regulation, specifically mentioning NABH, ABDM, and the need for faster adoption while respecting regulatory requirements [30-33].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The tension between fast AI rollout and over-regulation is explored in [S28]; broader AI regulatory frameworks are examined in [S39]; technical and policy challenges for large-scale model training are highlighted in [S18].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Need to balance rapid AI adoption with policy and regulatory challenges
AGREED WITH
Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Nikhil Dhongari
DISAGREED WITH
Abhay Soi
D
Deepak Tuli
1 argument141 words per minute947 words402 seconds
Argument 1
AI should be a core KRA for hospital leadership, not just a hype project
EXPLANATION
Deepak asks whether AI adoption has become a priority KPI for CEOs, similar to earlier digitisation goals like online billing and accreditation. He seeks confirmation that AI is now embedded in leadership performance metrics.
EVIDENCE
He inquires if AI adoption is now a key result area for hospital CEOs, comparing it to past priorities such as online billing and JCIA compliance [60-66].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Deloitte’s survey shows CEOs are still unprepared for AI’s impact, underscoring the need for KPI integration [S23]; productivity gains from AI that justify leadership focus are noted in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI should be a core KRA for hospital leadership, not just a hype project
D
Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
4 arguments192 words per minute849 words264 seconds
Argument 1
ABDM’s digital ID ecosystem provides interoperable backbone for nationwide health data
EXPLANATION
Dr. Gupta explains that the ABDM initiative has generated over 860 million ABHA IDs, creating a unified digital identity that enables interoperable health records across the country. This infrastructure is the foundation for nationwide data exchange.
EVIDENCE
He cites the creation of 860 million ABHA IDs and the establishment of a digital infrastructure that can be leveraged to empower users and eliminate redundant schemes [184-186].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The creation of 860 million ABHA IDs and the interoperable digital health backbone are documented in [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
ABDM’s digital ID ecosystem provides interoperable backbone for nationwide health data
AGREED WITH
Abhay Soi, Nikhil Dhongari
Argument 2
Ethical prescribing practices and regulation are the main barriers to wider AI uptake
EXPLANATION
Dr. Gupta argues that the biggest obstacle to AI adoption is not technology but unethical medical practices, especially irrational prescribing. He calls for stronger regulation and ethical standards to enable broader AI use.
EVIDENCE
He notes that unethical prescribing, such as over-use of antibiotics, and lack of regulation are the primary barriers, emphasizing that addressing medical ethics is essential for mass AI adoption [407-414].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ethical and regulatory concerns that can hinder AI deployment are discussed in [S28]; broader AI governance and regulatory considerations are covered in [S39].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical prescribing practices and regulation are the main barriers to wider AI uptake
AGREED WITH
Abhay Soi
DISAGREED WITH
Abhay Soi
Argument 3
Digital health timelines are accelerating; three‑year horizons are now realistic
EXPLANATION
Dr. Gupta observes that policy discussions have shifted from decade‑long horizons to three‑year plans, indicating a rapid acceleration in digital health implementation and expectations.
EVIDENCE
He points out that the national health policy now references three-year timelines rather than a decade, reflecting faster progress in digital health initiatives [312-314].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Digital health timelines are accelerating; three‑year horizons are now realistic
AGREED WITH
Vikalp Sahni, Nikhil Dhongari
Argument 4
A strong data‑sharing culture is essential for effective AI deployment, but current practices lack sufficient data openness.
EXPLANATION
Gupta emphasizes that without a culture of data sharing, the vast number of ABHA IDs cannot be leveraged for AI, limiting the availability of high‑quality Indian health records needed for model training.
EVIDENCE
He observes that the culture of data is missing, noting that despite 860 million IDs, the records are not yet usable for AI development [398-401].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data culture and openness are prerequisites for AI success in health
N
Nikhil Dhongari
4 arguments151 words per minute707 words279 seconds
Argument 1
Federated architecture enables Indian‑specific AI models and reduces bias
EXPLANATION
Nikhil describes how ABDM’s federated architecture allows AI models to be trained on Indian data, ensuring relevance to local clinical realities and minimizing bias that can arise from foreign datasets.
EVIDENCE
He explains that the federated architecture lets Indian startups develop models on local data, avoiding bias and ensuring contextual relevance for the Indian population [203-210].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
India’s sovereign AI model and federated approach that keep training data local are described in [S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Federated architecture enables Indian‑specific AI models and reduces bias
AGREED WITH
Abhay Soi, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
Argument 2
Behavioral change, mandatory data capture, and tough policy decisions are needed to feed AI pipelines
EXPLANATION
Nikhil stresses that without a shift in clinician behavior toward digital data capture and decisive policy actions (e.g., moving to online prescriptions), AI pipelines will lack the necessary high‑quality data for training and deployment.
EVIDENCE
He cites examples such as the transition to online prescriptions in the Railways, the need for mandatory language-record capture, and the resistance of some doctors to abandon paper, highlighting the importance of behavioral change and strong policy mandates [416-426].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Mandatory digital data capture and policy levers such as online prescriptions are highlighted in [S18]; the need for strong policy to support AI pipelines is emphasized in [S28]; workflow redesign requirements are discussed in [S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Behavioral change, mandatory data capture, and tough policy decisions are needed to feed AI pipelines
AGREED WITH
Vikalp Sahni, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
Argument 3
Scaling AI requires robust Indian data, public‑private collaboration, and continuous model refinement
EXPLANATION
Nikhil argues that to scale AI across India, a strong foundation of Indian health data, collaboration between public and private sectors, and ongoing model improvement are essential.
EVIDENCE
He references the federated architecture and the need for Indian-specific models, emphasizing that robust local data and public-private partnerships are critical for scaling AI solutions [203-210].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Scaling AI beyond pilots and the importance of data sharing are covered in [S33]; investment in Indian AI ecosystems and public-private partnerships are noted in [S25]; the need for a data-sharing culture is mentioned in [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Scaling AI requires robust Indian data, public‑private collaboration, and continuous model refinement
AGREED WITH
Abhay Soi, Vikalp Sahni, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
Argument 4
Developing Indian‑centric models avoids bias and aligns AI with local clinical realities
EXPLANATION
Nikhil highlights that AI models built on Indian clinical data avoid the bias inherent in models trained on foreign datasets and better reflect the nuances of local patient populations.
EVIDENCE
He notes that Indian models, trained on local longitudinal records and language data, reduce bias and are more suitable for the Indian clinical context [207-210].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The sovereign AI model that trains on Indian data to avoid bias is discussed in [S25]; the relevance of locally-trained models for Indian clinical contexts is reinforced in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Developing Indian‑centric models avoids bias and aligns AI with local clinical realities
J
Jigar Halani
4 arguments190 words per minute1209 words380 seconds
Argument 1
Cloud vs. edge deployment decisions affect cost, privacy, and latency for AI services
EXPLANATION
Jigar explains that the choice between cloud and edge computing depends on the specific use case, with edge being necessary for remote, low‑connectivity scenarios, while cloud offers scalability but raises cost and privacy considerations.
EVIDENCE
He states that for tiny remote use cases edge is required, whereas cloud is generally used, and mentions cost and data-privacy implications of hosting models in India versus abroad [365-381].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Privacy, data-sovereignty, and cost considerations for cloud vs. edge are examined in [S28]; the “make haste slow” principle warns of rushed deployment choices in [S38]; cost-impact of deployment architectures is noted in [S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Cloud vs. edge deployment decisions affect cost, privacy, and latency for AI services
Argument 2
Trust is built on model accuracy, contextual relevance, and continuous citizen feedback
EXPLANATION
Jigar argues that trust in AI stems from delivering accurate results, being contextually appropriate for Indian users, and incorporating feedback loops from citizens and clinicians to continuously improve models.
EVIDENCE
He discusses trust as accurate outcomes, contextual relevance, and the need for citizen feedback, illustrating with examples of second-opinion workflows and the importance of feedback for model refinement [219-233].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Trust is built on model accuracy, contextual relevance, and continuous citizen feedback
DISAGREED WITH
Vikalp Sahni
Argument 3
A shift in mindset—from skepticism to acceptance—is critical for AI adoption across staff
EXPLANATION
Jigar notes that moving from doubt to belief among healthcare staff is essential for AI uptake, emphasizing that the change is cultural rather than purely technological.
EVIDENCE
He observes a growing belief among professionals that the time for AI has arrived, describing the transition from skepticism to acceptance as a mindset shift [333-337].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Gradual cultural adoption and the need for mindset change are described in [S35]; workflow redesign that includes staff buy-in is discussed in [S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
A shift in mindset—from skepticism to acceptance—is critical for AI adoption across staff
AGREED WITH
Abhay Soi, Tanvi Lall
Argument 4
Voice translation across regional languages is a key lever for nationwide AI accessibility
EXPLANATION
Jigar highlights that converting speech from regional languages into a common language (e.g., Hindi) can dramatically improve access to AI services across diverse linguistic regions in India.
EVIDENCE
He gives the example of translating a Tamil doctor’s speech into Hindi for use in Delhi and Gujarat, illustrating how language conversion can solve longstanding accessibility problems [330-332].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multilingual AI challenges and the need for language-agnostic models are highlighted in [S18]; consumer-intelligence-driven AI that addresses language diversity is noted in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Voice translation across regional languages is a key lever for nationwide AI accessibility
A
Audience member 2
1 argument121 words per minute52 words25 seconds
Argument 1
Concern that many Indian AI tools rely on global datasets rather than Indian patient data
EXPLANATION
The audience member questions the extent to which Indian AI solutions are trained on domestic health data versus imported global datasets, highlighting a potential gap in relevance and accuracy.
EVIDENCE
He asks how much Indian-based AI relies on Indian data as opposed to global data sets, seeking clarification on data provenance for Indian AI tools [390-392].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The push for sovereign, India-specific AI models that avoid reliance on foreign datasets is discussed in [S25]; the importance of local data relevance is emphasized in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Concern that many Indian AI tools rely on global datasets rather than Indian patient data
P
Padmini Vishwanath
4 arguments143 words per minute451 words188 seconds
Argument 1
AI evaluation should include qualitative dimensions such as empathy, dignity, and care
EXPLANATION
Padmini stresses that beyond quantitative metrics, AI systems should be assessed for their impact on empathy, dignity, and the human aspects of care, especially in sensitive areas like palliative care.
EVIDENCE
She notes a shift toward evaluating AI on qualitative outcomes such as empathy and dignity, citing a palliative-care pilot that examines how AI changes caregiver-patient dynamics [353-356].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI evaluation should include qualitative dimensions such as empathy, dignity, and care
DISAGREED WITH
Abhay Soi, Tanvi Lall
Argument 2
Upcoming focus on qualitative outcomes, such as AI‑supported palliative care, will shape future deployments
EXPLANATION
Padmini foresees that future AI projects will increasingly prioritize qualitative impacts, using palliative‑care pilots as a model for integrating empathy and human connection into AI assessments.
EVIDENCE
She references the same palliative-care pilot, emphasizing the importance of qualitative dimensions like caregiver-patient interaction in future AI deployments [353-356].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Upcoming focus on qualitative outcomes, such as AI‑supported palliative care, will shape future deployments
Argument 3
AI frameworks should start with remote, low‑resource settings to ensure equity and trust
EXPLANATION
Padmini argues that AI readiness should be built first for the most remote and low‑resource health settings, developing frameworks that consider limited infrastructure, which in turn fosters trust and equity when later scaled up.
EVIDENCE
She describes developing readiness frameworks for remote settings, assessing frontline capabilities and device availability, which leads to higher provider trust and equity when scaled [320-324].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI frameworks should start with remote, low‑resource settings to ensure equity and trust
Argument 4
Normative frameworks and guidance are required to ensure AI is deployed equitably and ethically across diverse health settings.
EXPLANATION
Padmini stresses the need to create standards and normative guidance that address equity, ethics, and contextual relevance, especially when adapting AI tools from high‑resource to low‑resource environments.
EVIDENCE
She mentions the work of developing norms and normative guidance to ensure AI is equitable and moves in the right direction, particularly for remote settings [316-319].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ethical AI governance and the need for adaptive regulation are discussed in [S28] and [S39]; the principle of cautious, purpose-driven AI rollout is reinforced in [S38].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Establishing norms and guidelines is key to equitable AI deployment
T
Tanvi Lall
4 arguments190 words per minute810 words254 seconds
Argument 1
Education and stakeholder engagement are essential to build trust in AI solutions
EXPLANATION
Tanvi highlights that building trust requires systematic education, awareness‑raising, and continuous engagement with end‑users, not just one‑off demos, to embed AI into everyday workflows.
EVIDENCE
She explains that successful adoption involves educating stakeholders, providing ongoing support, and moving beyond pilot projects that are abandoned after a few months, emphasizing a transformation journey rather than a single demo [286-295].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Effective AI rollout requires staff training and stakeholder buy-in as part of workflow redesign [S30]; building trust through iterative scaling is highlighted in [S33].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education and stakeholder engagement are essential to build trust in AI solutions
AGREED WITH
Abhay Soi, Jigar Halani
DISAGREED WITH
Padmini Vishwanath, Abhay Soi
Argument 2
Successful AI adoption demands education, awareness, and transformation beyond a one‑time demo
EXPLANATION
Tanvi reiterates that AI implementation must be treated as a long‑term transformation, requiring continuous education and stakeholder buy‑in rather than isolated pilot demonstrations.
EVIDENCE
She points out that many pilots succeed initially but are later ignored because they are not integrated into workflows, underscoring the need for sustained education and awareness [286-295].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Sustained education and continuous improvement are needed to move beyond pilot projects, as described in scaling AI beyond pilots [S33]; workflow redesign that embeds learning is noted in [S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Successful AI adoption demands education, awareness, and transformation beyond a one‑time demo
Argument 3
Voice‑first, multilingual AI solutions can bridge equity gaps in underserved populations
EXPLANATION
Tanvi argues that AI designed to be voice‑first and support multiple low‑resource languages can address inequities by reaching populations with limited literacy or digital access.
EVIDENCE
She notes that AI can be built for regional, low-resource languages and designed as voice-first, which helps build trust and bridges equity gaps for underserved beneficiaries [278-283].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multilingual, voice-first AI designs for low-resource settings are discussed in [S18]; consumer-intelligence-driven AI that addresses language diversity supports equity in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Voice‑first, multilingual AI solutions can bridge equity gaps in underserved populations
Argument 4
AI‑ready data infrastructure and open data sharing are critical for scaling AI solutions and fostering collaboration among stakeholders.
EXPLANATION
Tanvi highlights that making high‑quality health data available to partners, such as Mosby, enables broader AI development and prevents data silos, which is essential for personalization and large‑scale impact.
EVIDENCE
She points out that institutions are providing data back to the community, citing the example of Mosby making statistical datasets publicly available, which supports AI personalization [351-353].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Open, AI-ready data ecosystems that enable scaling are highlighted in [S33]; the need for a data-sharing culture to support AI is mentioned in [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open, AI‑ready data ecosystems enable scalable and collaborative AI innovation
A
Audience member 1
1 argument186 words per minute135 words43 seconds
Argument 1
Edge deployment is necessary for low‑connectivity AI use cases, while cloud offers scalability but raises cost and data‑privacy concerns; hosting AI services within India can address data‑sovereignty issues.
EXPLANATION
The audience member questions whether AI models for voice and multilingual translation should run on edge devices or in the cloud, highlighting that remote scenarios need edge processing, whereas cloud provides broader capabilities but introduces higher costs and privacy risks. They also suggest that locating servers in India would help with data‑sovereignty.
EVIDENCE
The participant asks if voice-language solutions should be on-edge or cloud, mentions cost and privacy considerations, and wonders about hosting models on Indian servers to keep data local [361-382][365-381].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Privacy and data-sovereignty concerns for cloud deployments are examined in [S28]; the “make haste slow” principle advises careful architectural choices in [S38].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Deployment architecture (edge vs cloud) affects cost, privacy, and data sovereignty for AI services
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI is essential to meet future healthcare demand and improve operational efficiency
Speakers: Abhay Soi, Vikalp Sahni, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Nikhil Dhongari
AI enhances operational efficiency by providing predictive analytics for bed availability and safety monitoring AI must be a core KRA for hospital leadership, not just a hype project Digital health timelines are accelerating; three‑year horizons are now realistic Scaling AI requires robust Indian data, public‑private collaboration, and continuous model refinement
All speakers agree that AI adoption is becoming a strategic priority to handle increasing health needs, improve efficiency (e.g., predictive bed management) and must be embedded in leadership goals, especially as demographic pressures rise and timelines shorten [128-144][60-66][312-314][203-210].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This view aligns with discussions at the World Economic Forum highlighting AI as critical infrastructure for health service continuity and with research emphasizing AI’s potential to reduce health inequalities and improve outcomes [S75][S76].
Robust data infrastructure is the foundation for effective AI in health
Speakers: Abhay Soi, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Nikhil Dhongari
Creation of a 15‑year patient data lake and real‑time EMR to enable AI ABDM’s digital ID ecosystem provides interoperable backbone for nationwide health data Federated architecture enables Indian‑specific AI models and reduces bias
Abhay describes a 15-year data lake feeding real-time EMR, Dr. Gupta highlights 860 million ABHA IDs forming an interoperable backbone, and Nikhil points to the federated architecture that lets Indian models be trained locally, showing consensus on the need for strong, shared data foundations [14-15][184-186][203-210].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Emphasized in reports on massive infrastructure needs for AI, calling for robust data strategies, protection measures, and scalable compute resources to support health AI deployments [S68][S73][S52].
AI deployment must be governed by strict supervision, ethical oversight, and patient‑safety safeguards
Speakers: Abhay Soi, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
AI must operate under strict supervision to ensure patient safety and data privacy Ethical prescribing practices and regulation are the main barriers to wider AI uptake
Both speakers stress that without rigorous oversight-covering safety, privacy, and ethical prescribing-AI cannot be widely adopted, emphasizing the need for supervision and regulation [52-59][407-414].
Trust, cultural acceptance, and stakeholder education are critical for AI adoption
Speakers: Abhay Soi, Jigar Halani, Tanvi Lall
Institutional culture requires circumspection, learning curves, and redesign of work processes for AI integration A shift in mindset—from skepticism to acceptance—is critical for AI adoption across staff Education and stakeholder engagement are essential to build trust in AI solutions
Abhay notes the need for a cautious learning curve, Jigar highlights a mindset shift toward acceptance, and Tanvi underscores continuous education and stakeholder engagement as essential to build trust, indicating shared view on cultural factors [90-98][333-337][286-295].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Recognized as key barriers in healthcare AI adoption, where trust, clear communication, and cultural acceptance are essential for stakeholder uptake [S57][S74][S59].
Policy and regulatory frameworks must evolve in step with AI adoption to balance speed and safety
Speakers: Vikalp Sahni, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Nikhil Dhongari
Need to balance rapid AI adoption with policy and regulatory challenges Digital health timelines are accelerating; three‑year horizons are now realistic Behavioral change, mandatory data capture, and tough policy decisions are needed to feed AI pipelines
Vikalp raises the need for policy alignment, Dr. Gupta notes faster policy cycles, and Nikhil stresses decisive policy actions and behavioral change, all agreeing that enabling environments must keep pace with AI rollout [30-33][312-314][416-426].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Reflects the need for agile yet deliberate regulation, balancing rapid innovation with cautious governance as highlighted in multiple policy debates [S54][S58][S56][S60].
Similar Viewpoints
Both emphasize that a comprehensive, longitudinal data foundation—whether a centralized data lake or a federated architecture—is essential for building relevant AI models for India [14-15][203-210].
Speakers: Abhay Soi, Nikhil Dhongari
Creation of a 15‑year patient data lake and real‑time EMR to enable AI Federated architecture enables Indian‑specific AI models and reduces bias
Both agree that ethical oversight and strong regulatory mechanisms are prerequisite for safe AI deployment in healthcare [52-59][407-414].
Speakers: Abhay Soi, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
AI must operate under strict supervision to ensure patient safety and data privacy Ethical prescribing practices and regulation are the main barriers to wider AI uptake
Both highlight that building trust requires cultural change, education, and ongoing stakeholder engagement rather than one‑off pilots [333-337][286-295].
Speakers: Jigar Halani, Tanvi Lall
A shift in mindset—from skepticism to acceptance—is critical for AI adoption across staff Education and stakeholder engagement are essential to build trust in AI solutions
Both recognize that policy cycles are speeding up and must be aligned with AI rollout to avoid bottlenecks [30-33][312-314].
Speakers: Vikalp Sahni, Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
Need to balance rapid AI adoption with policy and regulatory challenges Digital health timelines are accelerating; three‑year horizons are now realistic
Unexpected Consensus
Trust and equity must be built through both technical accuracy and qualitative human‑centred evaluation
Speakers: Jigar Halani, Padmini Vishwanath
Trust is built on model accuracy, contextual relevance, and continuous citizen feedback AI evaluation should include qualitative dimensions such as empathy, dignity, and care
A technical leader (Jigar) and a WHO researcher (Padmini) converge on the idea that trust is not only about algorithmic performance but also about qualitative human outcomes, an alignment that bridges technical and policy/ethical domains [219-233][353-356].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Consistent with EU’s human-centric AI principles and calls for verifiable, transparent models that ensure equity and trust through both quantitative performance and qualitative assessment [S50][S61][S64].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong convergence on several fronts: the necessity of AI for future health system efficiency, the centrality of robust data infrastructures, the imperative of ethical oversight and supervision, the pivotal role of trust and stakeholder education, and the need for policy frameworks that keep pace with technological change.

High consensus across clinical, technical, policy, and research perspectives, indicating a shared understanding that AI can only succeed if data, governance, trust, and regulatory environments are simultaneously advanced.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Speed of AI adoption versus need for cautious, supervised rollout
Speakers: Vikalp Sahni, Abhay Soi
Need to balance rapid AI adoption with policy and regulatory challenges AI must operate under strict supervision to ensure patient safety and data privacy
Vikalp asks whether AI adoption can be accelerated and questions if hospitals are “going crazy” on AI, implying a push for faster rollout [30-33]. Abhay counters that AI adoption is still early, marked by many failures and requires extensive supervision and careful implementation before scaling [34-39][52-59].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ongoing tension noted in governance discussions, emphasizing “make haste slowly” and the structural mismatch between market speed and policy deliberation [S54][S56][S58][S60].
Primary barrier to AI uptake: ethical prescribing practices versus technological readiness
Speakers: Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Abhay Soi
Ethical prescribing practices and regulation are the main barriers to wider AI uptake AI must operate under strict supervision to ensure patient safety and data privacy
Dr. Gupta argues that unethical medical practices, especially irrational prescribing, are the biggest obstacle and that stronger regulation is needed for AI adoption [407-414]. Abhay focuses on technical challenges, failures, and the need for supervision of AI tools, without highlighting prescribing ethics as a primary barrier [52-59].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ethical considerations such as bias, privacy, and responsible prescribing are highlighted as non-negotiable constraints that can outweigh technical readiness in health AI deployment [S52][S50].
Evaluation focus: quantitative efficiency gains versus qualitative human‑centred outcomes
Speakers: Padmini Vishwanath, Abhay Soi, Tanvi Lall
AI evaluation should include qualitative dimensions such as empathy, dignity, and care AI enhances operational efficiency by providing predictive analytics for bed availability and safety monitoring Education and stakeholder engagement are essential to build trust in AI solutions
Padmini stresses the need to assess AI on empathy, dignity and care, especially in palliative-care pilots [353-356]. Abhay and Tanvi primarily discuss efficiency gains, predictive analytics, and workflow improvements, focusing on quantitative benefits [22-23][84-88][286-295].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Debates on measurement approaches stress the importance of qualitative metrics like user satisfaction and human-centred impact alongside traditional efficiency metrics [S65][S64][S59].
Sources of trust in AI: doctor‑patient trust versus model accuracy and feedback loops
Speakers: Vikalp Sahni, Jigar Halani
Trust is the most important factor; innovation must be balanced with existing doctor‑patient trust Trust is built on model accuracy, contextual relevance, and continuous citizen feedback
Vikalp highlights that patients trust doctors more than new technologies and questions how to balance this trust with AI solutions [106-112]. Jigar argues that trust comes from accurate results, contextual relevance, and feedback mechanisms, emphasizing a shift in mindset rather than existing trust structures [219-237][333-337].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Survey evidence shows patients place higher trust in clinicians than AI, while trust in AI hinges on accuracy, transparency, and feedback mechanisms [S63][S61][S64].
Unexpected Differences
Qualitative versus quantitative metrics for AI success
Speakers: Padmini Vishwanath, Abhay Soi, Tanvi Lall
AI evaluation should include qualitative dimensions such as empathy, dignity, and care AI enhances operational efficiency by providing predictive analytics for bed availability and safety monitoring Education and stakeholder engagement are essential to build trust in AI solutions
Most participants focus on efficiency, predictive analytics, and workflow improvements, while Padmini uniquely emphasizes qualitative outcomes like empathy and dignity, revealing an unexpected split in evaluation priorities [353-356][22-23][286-295].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Calls for broader success criteria that include adoption rates, satisfaction surveys, and ecosystem development beyond pure productivity numbers [S65][S67][S64].
Edge versus cloud deployment for AI services
Speakers: Audience member 1, Jigar Halani
Edge deployment is necessary for low‑connectivity AI use cases, while cloud offers scalability but raises cost and data‑privacy concerns Cloud vs. edge deployment decisions affect cost, privacy, and latency for AI services
The audience raises a technical deployment question about where to host multilingual voice models [361-382][365-381], while Jigar provides a nuanced answer that depends on use case, highlighting a nuanced disagreement not anticipated in the broader strategic discussion.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Decision-making between edge and cloud is framed around privacy, latency, and scalability, with recommendations to distribute compute across devices and edge nodes [S69][S70][S55].
Overall Assessment

The discussion reveals several points of contention: the desired speed of AI rollout versus the need for careful, supervised implementation; differing views on whether ethical prescribing or technical readiness is the main barrier; contrasting emphases on quantitative efficiency gains versus qualitative human‑centred outcomes; and varied perspectives on how trust should be built (doctor‑patient trust versus model accuracy and feedback). While participants share common goals—improving healthcare delivery through AI, building robust data infrastructures, and fostering trust— they diverge on the pathways to achieve them.

Moderate to high. The disagreements are substantive enough to affect policy and implementation strategies (e.g., pacing, regulatory focus, evaluation metrics), but they do not fracture the overall consensus that AI is essential for future healthcare. The implications are that coordinated governance, clear regulatory frameworks, and balanced metrics will be needed to align stakeholders and move forward effectively.

Partial Agreements
Deepak asks if AI is now a KPI for CEOs, and Abhay confirms it is clearly a priority [60-66][67-68].
Speakers: Deepak Tuli, Abhay Soi
AI should be a core KRA for hospital leadership, not just a hype project
Both emphasize the importance of a robust, long‑term data foundation – Abhay describes a 15‑year data lake [14-15], while Nikhil points to ABDM’s federated architecture for local model training [203-210].
Speakers: Abhay Soi, Nikhil Dhongari
Creation of a 15‑year patient data lake and real‑time EMR to enable AI Federated architecture enables Indian‑specific AI models and reduces bias
Both note that without a culture of data sharing and mandatory digital capture, AI pipelines will lack quality data – Gupta mentions missing data culture despite 860 million IDs [398-401]; Nikhil stresses the need for behavioral change and policy mandates for data capture [416-426].
Speakers: Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Nikhil Dhongari
A strong data‑sharing culture is essential for effective AI deployment, but current practices lack sufficient data openness Behavioral change, mandatory data capture, and tough policy decisions are needed to feed AI pipelines
Tanvi argues that continuous education and stakeholder engagement are needed to move beyond one‑off demos [286-295]; Jigar observes a cultural shift where staff are increasingly believing AI is ready, highlighting the importance of mindset change [333-337].
Speakers: Tanvi Lall, Jigar Halani
Education and stakeholder engagement are essential to build trust in AI solutions A shift in mindset—from skepticism to acceptance—is critical for AI adoption across staff
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI is moving from a buzzword to a strategic priority and should be embedded as a core KPI for hospital leadership. Robust digital foundations—such as a 15‑year patient data lake, real‑time EMR, and the ABDM digital ID ecosystem—are essential enablers for AI in healthcare. Trust, safety, and ethical supervision are non‑negotiable; AI must augment clinicians rather than replace them, especially in high‑risk decisions like emergency triage. Institutional culture and mindset shifts are required; AI adoption demands redesign of work processes, extensive staff education, and continuous feedback loops. Future scaling of AI hinges on demographic pressures, predictive health models, and public‑private collaboration to extend care beyond existing infrastructure. Localization, multilingual voice interfaces, and equity‑first design (starting with low‑resource settings) are critical to ensure AI serves all population segments. Qualitative outcomes—empathy, dignity, patient‑caregiver interaction—are gaining attention alongside traditional quantitative metrics.
Resolutions and action items
Hospitals should elevate AI adoption to a formal KRA for CEOs and senior leadership. Accelerate collection of Indian patient data and mandate electronic capture of clinical information to feed AI pipelines. Implement AI solutions first as assistive safety tools (e.g., predictive ECG alerts) before expanding to efficiency‑driven use cases. Develop and deploy voice‑first, multilingual AI interfaces to improve accessibility in remote and low‑resource settings. Encourage public‑private partnerships to share anonymized datasets and co‑develop Indian‑centric AI models. Institute continuous education programs for clinicians, nurses, and administrators to build AI literacy and trust.
Unresolved issues
Clear regulatory frameworks and standards for AI validation, supervision, and liability remain under‑developed. How to balance rapid AI rollout with stringent patient‑privacy and data‑security requirements, especially regarding cloud vs. edge deployment. The extent to which existing AI tools rely on global datasets versus Indian data is unclear; mechanisms to ensure Indian‑centric model training are needed. Strategies for enforcing ethical prescribing practices and reducing over‑prescription through AI‑enabled monitoring are not yet defined. Operational pathways for integrating AI alerts into existing clinical workflows without causing alert fatigue were not fully addressed. Funding models and incentives for sustained AI adoption across both public and private sectors were not concretized.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a phased approach: prioritize safety‑critical AI applications with strong supervision, then expand to efficiency and patient‑experience use cases. Use AI as an assistive decision‑support tool rather than a replacement for clinicians, maintaining human oversight while leveraging algorithmic insights. Combine cloud infrastructure for heavy model training with edge processing for latency‑sensitive, low‑bandwidth scenarios, balancing cost, privacy, and performance. Encourage pilot projects with clear exit criteria and pathways to scale, ensuring that demos transition into embedded workflow solutions. Implement mandatory data capture policies while providing transitional support for clinicians accustomed to paper‑based processes.
Thought Provoking Comments
When you don’t interface with technology, but the experiences are improved – that is the true test of AI.
Highlights the ideal of seamless AI integration where users benefit without noticing the underlying complexity, shifting focus from flashy tech to real patient outcomes.
Set the tone for the discussion on practical AI adoption, prompting Vikalp to ask about real‑world challenges and leading others to emphasize hidden‑technology benefits rather than visible hype.
Speaker: Abhay Soi
We’ve had a lot of failures… like Edison, we’ll run out of excuses and failures before we finally succeed.
Frames failure as a necessary step toward innovation, encouraging a culture of experimentation rather than fearing setbacks.
Encouraged participants to share their own setbacks (e.g., ICD‑11 tagging) and opened the conversation to talk about the learning curve and the need for resilience in AI projects.
Speaker: Abhay Soi
Trust is the most important thing. Innovation is important, but patients will only trust the doctor they know.
Introduces the human‑centric barrier to AI adoption, shifting the debate from technology capability to patient‑doctor relationship dynamics.
Prompted Abhay to discuss safety‑first AI use cases (ECG example) and led to later remarks about building trust through transparent, context‑specific solutions.
Speaker: Vikalp Sahni
An ECG AI tool could flag a patient for admission even when the cardiologist sees a normal ECG – it can prevent missed heart attacks.
Provides a concrete, high‑stakes clinical scenario where AI augments clinician judgment, illustrating the safety‑first approach.
Shifted the conversation from abstract benefits to a tangible use‑case, reinforcing the earlier point about trust and safety, and influencing later discussion on regulatory oversight.
Speaker: Abhay Soi
The national health policy now explicitly mentions both private and public sectors – we must break the barrier between them to deliver care.
Marks a policy turning point, showing governmental recognition that health delivery is a unified ecosystem, not siloed.
Redirected the dialogue toward systemic integration, prompting participants to consider how AI solutions should serve both sectors and influencing later comments on unified standards.
Speaker: Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
We are moving from purely quantitative AI metrics to discussing qualitative dimensions like empathy, dignity, and care.
Expands the evaluation of AI beyond accuracy and efficiency to human values, urging a more holistic assessment of technology impact.
Broadened the scope of the discussion, leading to reflections on patient experience, trust, and the ethical design of AI systems.
Speaker: Padmini Vishwanath
AI must be personalized, context‑specific, and voice‑first; building transformation means educating users and embedding solutions into workflows, not just one‑off pilots.
Emphasizes that successful AI adoption requires cultural change, user education, and deep integration, not just technical deployment.
Steered the conversation toward implementation challenges, influencing later remarks about data readiness, behavioral change, and the need for sustained engagement.
Speaker: Tanvi Lall
Overall Assessment

The discussion pivoted around three core insights: the invisible yet impactful nature of AI, the centrality of trust and safety, and the necessity of systemic, policy‑driven integration. Abhay’s remarks about seamless experience and learning from failure laid the groundwork for Vikalp’s trust‑centric challenge, which in turn prompted concrete safety examples and policy reflections from Dr. Gupta. Padmini’s shift to qualitative outcomes and Tanvi’s focus on personalization and workflow integration deepened the conversation, moving it from hype to actionable strategy. Collectively, these key comments redirected the panel from abstract enthusiasm to a nuanced, human‑focused roadmap for AI adoption in Indian healthcare.

Follow-up Questions
Is there an AI adoption wave happening in hospitals, and what challenges (regulatory, policy, implementation) are hindering faster adoption?
Understanding barriers to AI adoption is crucial for creating strategies that accelerate integration of AI into healthcare systems.
Speaker: Vikalp Sahni
Is AI now a priority (KRA) for hospital CEOs and operators, similar to earlier digitization priorities like billing and accreditation?
Clarifying AI’s strategic importance will influence leadership focus, resource allocation, and governance.
Speaker: Vikalp Sahni
How ready are health institutions (clinicians, nurses, staff) to keep pace with the rapid evolution of AI technology?
Assessing institutional readiness helps identify training, cultural, and process changes needed for successful AI deployment.
Speaker: Vikalp Sahni
What are the expected changes in Indian hospitals and healthcare over the next three to five years regarding AI adoption and impact?
Projecting near‑term developments guides planning, investment, and policy decisions.
Speaker: Vikalp Sahni
How did the ABDM (Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission) originate, what has worked, what challenges remain, and how will digital documentation affect clinical decision‑making?
Learning from ABDM’s evolution can inform future digital health initiatives and interoperability efforts.
Speaker: Deepak Tuli (to Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta)
How can the lessons from ABDM implementation in the public sector be translated to the private sector, and how can AI be embedded deeper into private hospital workflows?
Bridging public‑private gaps is essential for nationwide AI impact and consistent patient experiences.
Speaker: Deepak Tuli (to Nikhil Dhongari)
What approaches can Indian AI model builders use to build trust among physicians and operators so that solutions are adopted in practice?
Trust is a key barrier; identifying mechanisms to earn it will improve uptake of AI tools.
Speaker: Deepak Tuli (to Jigar Halani)
Should voice‑based AI services (e.g., multilingual translation) be deployed on the cloud, on‑device (edge), or via a hybrid architecture, and what are the implications for cost, latency, and data privacy?
Infrastructure decisions affect scalability, accessibility in low‑resource settings, and compliance with data sovereignty rules.
Speaker: Audience member 1 (prompted by Deepak)
For a multilingual voice‑translation AI solution covering 22 Indian languages, where is the optimal hosting location (edge device, mobile, hybrid, or local Indian cloud) and what synchronization strategy should be used?
Choosing the right deployment model is critical for performance, user experience, and regulatory compliance.
Speaker: Audience member 1
To what extent do Indian AI healthcare tools rely on Indian patient data versus global datasets, and how can the reliance on locally sourced data be increased?
Local data improves model relevance and reduces bias; understanding current reliance informs data‑collection strategies.
Speaker: Audience member 2
Are we lagging behind as a country in digital health, and what major outcomes should we expect in the next year if current trajectories continue?
Evaluating national progress helps set realistic goals and identify policy or investment gaps.
Speaker: Deepak Tuli
How many AI models are currently being trained on Indian health data, and what behavioral changes among clinicians are needed to generate sufficient high‑quality data for model training?
Quantifying model development and addressing clinician adoption are essential for building effective, unbiased AI systems.
Speaker: Nikhil Dhongari
How can AI tools be designed to reflect the diversity of contexts, capabilities, and care models across different countries and regions, especially for low‑resource settings?
Ensuring AI equity requires adaptable designs that consider varied infrastructure, language, and cultural factors.
Speaker: Padmini Vishwanath
What research is needed to develop affordable, accurate ICD‑11 tagging solutions for Indian health records?
Current ICD‑11 tools are expensive or ineffective; affordable solutions would enable better coding, analytics, and reimbursement.
Speaker: Abhay Soi
What governance, supervision, and safety frameworks are required to ensure AI‑driven clinical decision support maintains patient safety and data privacy?
Healthcare AI must operate within strict safety and privacy standards to protect patients and gain regulatory approval.
Speaker: Abhay Soi
How does the introduction of AI affect patient trust in doctors and institutions, and what strategies can maintain or enhance that trust?
Trust is foundational in healthcare; understanding AI’s impact on trust informs communication and implementation strategies.
Speaker: Vikalp Sahni (also discussed by Abhay Soi)
What are effective methods to create AI‑ready data ecosystems, including data sharing, anonymization, and feedback loops, to support model development and continuous improvement?
High‑quality, accessible data is the backbone of AI; establishing robust pipelines is essential for scalability.
Speaker: Tanvi Lall (also Jigar Halani)
How can AI be leveraged for predictive health, home‑care, and scaling doctor expertise to meet future demographic demands in India?
Predictive and remote care can address the looming shortage of healthcare infrastructure and workforce.
Speaker: Abhay Soi
What qualitative dimensions (empathy, dignity, caregiver‑patient interaction) should be measured when evaluating AI interventions in health, especially in sensitive areas like palliative care?
Beyond accuracy, AI’s effect on human aspects of care is critical for ethical and patient‑centered implementation.
Speaker: Padmini Vishwanath
How should policy differentiate or unify approaches for public versus private healthcare sectors regarding AI integration and digital health standards?
Policy that bridges public‑private divides can ensure consistent standards and equitable access to AI benefits.
Speaker: Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
What are the cost, connectivity, and privacy considerations for deploying voice AI solutions in remote, low‑resource environments, and is edge‑only deployment feasible?
Understanding practical constraints informs technology choices that can reach underserved populations.
Speaker: Jigar Halani (also audience)
How can unethical prescribing practices be detected and regulated using AI, and what governance mechanisms are needed to enforce ethical behavior?
AI can flag prescribing anomalies, but effective regulation is required to improve clinical practice.
Speaker: Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
What strategies can encourage clinicians to shift from paper‑based to digital documentation, and what policy or enforcement actions are needed to ensure data capture for AI training?
Digital data capture is essential for AI; behavioral and policy interventions are needed to overcome resistance.
Speaker: Nikhil Dhongari

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.