AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities

20 Feb 2026 10:00h - 11:00h

AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities

Session at a glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the implementation and future of artificial intelligence in healthcare, particularly within India’s healthcare system. Abhay Soi from Max Healthcare opened by describing how his organization began integrating digital technology five years ago, creating a comprehensive data lake for patient records and implementing AI solutions for predictive analytics, bed management, and clinical support. He emphasized that while AI adoption is driven by consumer behavior changes and efficiency needs, healthcare providers must be extremely cautious due to patient safety concerns and the critical nature of medical decisions.


The conversation highlighted India’s significant progress in digital health infrastructure, particularly through the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM), which has created 860 million digital health IDs. However, panelists noted challenges in adoption, especially regarding the transition from paper-based to digital record-keeping among healthcare providers. Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, who helped conceptualize ABDM, stressed that the infrastructure exists but emphasized the need for better utilization and ethical medical practices.


Key themes emerged around trust-building in AI healthcare solutions, with speakers noting that unlike other sectors, healthcare requires minimal margin for error. The discussion addressed the need for AI solutions to work differently in private hospitals versus public sector facilities, with considerations for varying resource levels and patient populations. Panelists emphasized the importance of voice-enabled, multilingual AI solutions to serve India’s diverse population effectively.


The conversation concluded with recognition that India’s demographic transition will necessitate AI adoption in healthcare, as the country faces an impending shortage of medical infrastructure and professionals as its population ages.


Keypoints

Major Discussion Points:

AI Implementation in Healthcare Infrastructure: Discussion of how hospitals like Max are integrating AI into their operations, from predictive bed analysis to clinical support systems, while emphasizing the importance of patient safety and the need for extensive supervision in healthcare AI applications.


ABDM (Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission) Progress and Challenges: Extensive coverage of India’s digital health infrastructure development, including the creation of 860 million ABHA IDs, the challenges of adoption in private vs. public sectors, and the need for better data culture and longitudinal patient records.


Trust and Safety in Healthcare AI: Multiple speakers emphasized that unlike other sectors, healthcare AI requires exceptional caution due to patient safety concerns, with discussions on how to balance innovation with the established trust patients have in traditional healthcare providers and institutions.


Data Sovereignty and Indian Context: Focus on the need for AI models trained on Indian data rather than global datasets, addressing India’s unique demographic, linguistic, and healthcare challenges, including the importance of voice-first, multilingual solutions for diverse populations.


Future Healthcare Transformation: Discussion of India’s demographic dividend turning into a challenge as the population ages, requiring predictive healthcare, home care solutions, and AI-enabled infrastructure to address the shortage of doctors and healthcare facilities in the coming 15 years.


Overall Purpose:

The discussion aimed to explore the current state and future potential of AI adoption in India’s healthcare sector, examining both the technological possibilities and practical challenges of implementing AI solutions across diverse healthcare settings, from premium private hospitals to rural public health centers.


Overall Tone:

The discussion maintained a cautiously optimistic tone throughout. Speakers were enthusiastic about AI’s potential while consistently emphasizing the need for careful, ethical implementation in healthcare. The tone was collaborative and knowledge-sharing, with industry leaders, policymakers, and technologists sharing both successes and failures. There was a notable shift from theoretical possibilities to practical implementation challenges, with speakers becoming more candid about current limitations and the work still needed to achieve widespread, effective AI adoption in Indian healthcare.


Speakers

Speakers from the provided list:


Abhay Soi – Max Healthcare, discussing AI adoption in hospital systems, digital transformation, and patient care technology


Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta – Advisor to Health Minister, instrumental in defining ABDM white paper, involved in National Health Policy development and Mayo Clinic strategy in India


Tanvi Lall – PeoplePlus (initiative of Aikstep), focuses on adoption trends analysis for high need populations in healthcare, education, and agriculture


Jigar Halani – Director, Enterprise Solutions Architecture and Engineering at NVIDIA South Asia, 20-year technology veteran specializing in supercomputing, big data, and AI infrastructure


Announcer – Event moderator/host


Deepak Tuli – Panel discussion moderator


Padmini Vishwanath – Researcher at WHO SEARO (Southeast Asian Regional Office), specializes in health equity, digital health policy, and evidence-based transformation in low and middle income countries


Vikalp Sahni – Session moderator, co-founder mentioned in travel startup background, now involved in health sector


Audience member 1 – Conference attendee asking questions about voice language solutions and hosting


Audience member 2 – Conference attendee, dentist pursuing MBA in analytics, asking about AI tools and Indian data sets


Nikhil Dhongari – Director IT at National Health Authority, leads technical architecture and implementation of Ayushman Bharat Digital Machine and Ayushman Bharat PMG, previously worked in Railways


Additional speakers:


None identified beyond the provided speakers names list.


Full session report

This discussion on artificial intelligence implementation in India’s healthcare sector featured two distinct sessions: an interview with Abhay Soi from Max Healthcare, followed by a panel discussion with industry leaders and policymakers examining AI adoption challenges and opportunities.


Max Healthcare’s AI Journey: Lessons from Early Implementation

Abhay Soi from Max Healthcare shared his organization’s five-year journey in healthcare digitalization, which began well before AI became mainstream. Max Healthcare, with 43,000 healthcare workers, built a comprehensive data lake containing 15 years of patient records as the foundation for AI applications. Soi emphasized a key principle: the best technology remains invisible to users while dramatically improving their experiences and outcomes.


Max Healthcare’s AI initiatives focused on practical applications including predictive bed analysis, safety measures, and clinical support systems. However, Soi candidly acknowledged numerous failures, particularly with longitudinal patient data management and ICD-11 compliance tagging. He viewed these setbacks as valuable learning experiences, challenging conventional risk-averse approaches in healthcare.


Soi presented a compelling argument that AI adoption is not optional but necessary for India’s healthcare future. With India’s current demographic dividend (average age 28-29), the population will require significant medical intervention within 15 years. Current healthcare capacity is already insufficient, and traditional infrastructure expansion would require resources and time India doesn’t possess, making AI-enabled transformation an existential necessity.


India’s Digital Health Infrastructure: ABDM’s Foundation

The panel discussion, moderated by Deepak Tuli, featured Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta (instrumental in conceptualizing ABDM), Padmini Vishwanath from WHO SEARO, Jigar Halani from NVIDIA, and Nikhil Dhongari from the National Health Authority.


Dr. Gupta provided context on the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM), which originated from the BJP’s 2014 manifesto and evolved through the National Health Policy of 2016. The program has created 860 million ABHA (Ayushman Bharat Health Account) IDs, establishing a federated architecture for healthcare data interoperability across India.


However, significant gaps remain between infrastructure creation and practical implementation. Despite massive digital ID creation, the actual number of longitudinal health records remains disappointingly low, highlighting that while technical infrastructure exists, healthcare providers haven’t adopted digital documentation practices at the same pace.


Nikhil Dhongari emphasized that ABDM’s federated architecture creates opportunities for developing specialized AI applications tailored to Indian healthcare contexts, including conversational AI interfaces accommodating India’s linguistic diversity and varying literacy levels.


Trust, Safety, and Implementation Challenges

Throughout the discussion, speakers consistently emphasized that healthcare AI requires exceptional caution due to patient safety concerns. Unlike other sectors where error margins might be acceptable, healthcare demands near-perfect reliability.


Soi illustrated this with ECG interpretation in emergency departments, describing scenarios where AI systems could serve as assistive tools, flagging potential risks when human interpretation might miss critical conditions. This approach prioritizes patient safety by erring on the side of caution.


Jigar Halani articulated the complexity of trust requirements across different user groups: while IT professionals might accept 5-10% error rates for efficiency gains, patients require absolute reliability. This insight challenges applying universal metrics to deeply personal healthcare decisions.


The discussion revealed that technical capabilities often exceed institutional readiness for AI adoption. Behavioral change among healthcare professionals emerged as a critical barrier. Nikhil Dhongari shared examples where doctors prefer traditional paper-based methods despite free digital solutions being available, contrasting this with Indian Railways’ successful mandate for digital prescriptions.


Data Sovereignty and Indian Context

A significant focus was the need for AI models trained on Indian population data rather than global datasets. This stems from India’s unique demographic, environmental, and healthcare characteristics that may not be represented in international training data.


Dr. Gupta raised concerns about current AI healthcare tools lacking proper training on Indian data and context-specific requirements. The speakers emphasized understanding local environmental factors, genetic variations, disease patterns, and cultural practices that influence health outcomes.


Voice technology and multilingual capabilities were highlighted as crucial horizontal solutions for healthcare AI in India. Given the country’s linguistic diversity and varying literacy levels, voice-first interfaces could significantly improve accessibility, though implementing such solutions requires substantial investment in language processing capabilities.


Regulatory and Systemic Challenges

The conversation addressed inadequate regulatory frameworks for healthcare AI implementation. Dr. Gupta emphasized that successful AI adoption requires addressing systemic issues in medical practice, including unethical prescription practices and lack of transparency in medical decision-making.


Speakers discussed the need for unified policy approaches treating private and public healthcare sectors as components of a single system rather than separate entities, essential for optimal resource utilization and equitable care delivery.


Tanvi Lall from the development sector noted that while AI demonstrations often perform well initially, many solutions become unused after a few months because they fail to integrate into existing workflows. This emphasized the need for comprehensive transformation journeys rather than standalone technical solutions.


Audience Questions and Future Directions

During the Q&A session, audience members raised questions about voice and language models for Indian contexts, and the importance of using Indian versus global datasets for AI development. The panel reinforced that Indian-specific data and multilingual capabilities are essential for successful healthcare AI implementation.


The discussion concluded with recognition that India’s AI healthcare future depends more on addressing human factors, regulatory frameworks, and systemic changes than on technical sophistication alone. Success requires coordinated efforts across technology development, policy reform, behavioral change, and infrastructure development.


The speakers positioned AI not as a choice but as essential infrastructure for India’s healthcare future, requiring immediate action to address demographic challenges while maintaining trust and quality in healthcare delivery. The transformation’s success will depend on coordinated public and private sector efforts, supported by appropriate regulatory frameworks and sustained commitment to equitable, patient-centered care.


Session transcript

Abhay Soi

Thank you very much for having me here. at this very, very prestigious event. I just came in from Mumbai in the morning, and what I see over here is, I mean, I think it seems to be the microcosm of the globe, in fact. So thank you very much. Yes, I think, you know, I take all these compliments on behalf of Max, and I think it starts and ends with the trust which is sort of reposed by patients at our hospital system. Today, our occupancy is at least 10 % to 15 % better than the next best player in the hospital system. And, you know, one of the things that I want to point out is, you know, AI seems to be sort of the buzzword, of course, today.

But five or six years ago, when we started our journey, we started bringing digital technology at that point in time to the core. And what you see today, what you experience, and, you know, you mentioned better outcomes, and perhaps… patient services. But that is what you experience. What you don’t see is the technology behind it. And I think that is the true test of technology, and that will be the true test of AI as well. When you don’t interface with technology, but the experiences are improved. Having said that, I think, you know, like I said, we started this journey a few years ago. We started by creating a common -size data lake for all the patients which have been through our doors over the last 15 years, and which are doing so on a real -time basis today.

Having said that, you know, these were our attempts. We tried to sort of create a closed -loop system, like Google, so to say, for our doctors and our patients. But, you know, we, like many people, faced very early, very big setbacks because we didn’t have the technology. Because when we used to do search results, we used to get zero results. in the search engine because it wasn’t sort of native to the language, and that’s stuff that we’ve been playing with. But having said that, I think the early days of AI are going to impact tasks rather than, although one is moving towards institutional, adopting it from an ecosystem standpoint, from inculcating it within the institution, so it becomes an intrinsic part of the institution.

But I think today it’s affecting our tasks. It’s affecting tasks of efficiency. You know, we’ve already started doing predictive analysis of beds which are vacant and available and so on. It’s working on safety measures. I think though the early sort of wins that we have, especially with respect to patient satisfaction of the risks and so on, I think clinical support, you know, it’s data collection, a lot of… time by clinicians was being spent in the past to collect data. now a lot of that data is being collected through forms which are in our apps today. And you can speak to them. It kind of collates in a particular manner. So the clinician actually spends less time in perhaps gathering history than in providing a little more value of the value chain.

Vikalp Sahni

Great. And I think, Max, I mean, as you mentioned, there is this data lake that you have created is quite ahead in terms of digital adoption. And I’m sure when you would be starting, and this is a term that we use and see quite a lot, that adoption of digital in a hospital. So is that what is also happening on top of this large data lake and the EMR solutions that you have created on, for Max, is there like a AI adoption wave that is happening? And do you think, like, when the digital adoption happened, things such as NABH, ABDM, many of these things started coming up, talking about policy, talking about regulation. In AI adoption, are there any challenges, any things that you see that can help in this adoption to be much more faster?

Or you see that people are just going all crazy on getting AI adopted in the hospital settings?

Abhay Soi

I think, you know, there is a desire all across, you know. But having said that, desire does meet reality. I would say more than occasionally. And that comes in the form of failures, which are welcome, sort of. I mean, we quite welcome it, actually, because the more you try, the more you will fail, and the more you will sort of have better outcomes coming into the future as well. So we’ve had a lot of failures, I can tell you. You know, whether it is the longitudinal data of. Patient or. looking at, you know, ICD -11 norms, you know, tagging our data with respect to the WHO. I mean, we’ve been failing left, right, and center.

We’ve been reasonably successful as far as ICD -10 is concerned, but I think 11, you know, most sort of layers that are available in the market don’t work. The ones which work are very, very expensive. You know, so we’ve started, you know, we’ve been in -housing a lot of this. So we’re toying around with it. I have no doubt that the speed at which we are failing and the amount of failures that we have, shortly we will run out of all excuses and failures, and it will be like Edison, right? You would have found out every way to fail, and I think perhaps the only way to succeed will be in front of us. So, yes, there is a lot of enthusiasm, you know, towards adopting it.

We see this as a future. I think everybody does. There is, we, of course, have to be very, very careful. Because unlike, you know, let’s say something like education, where if you’re imparting. perhaps incorrect information, you know, it can be resolved. But this is healthcare. I think patient safety, data privacy, these things are right up there. We have very, very little, you know, standard deviation possible in what we do. And so it requires a large extent of supervision, I would say. And perhaps it will continue to for years to come. Although it makes life easy for most, but, you know, at least from a clinical prescription outcome, it will require a lot more supervision to come as well.

Vikalp Sahni

Sorry. So is it now the priority for hospitals? For example, when the digitization adoption happened, it used to be a priority for CEOs that, okay, you have to make sure that all the billings are online. You have to have all the JCIA. You have to have all the discussions and UHS. ID created and so on and so forth. Is this a priority today, adopting AI at hospitals and as a KRAs for your CEOs or operators? Is that what, has AI reached that level today at hospitals?

Abhay Soi

No, I think clearly, clearly it has. And it’s really out of, I think, two sort of drivers that I find at least, and you know, this is at a very, very, at the outset level. I think one is the way the world, the consumer behavior itself is changing. I mean, a lot of the searches used to happen on Google, a lot of the searches now are happening through different platforms altogether. And the way they sort of seek, whether it’s their thought about your website or, you know, when they’re looking at, if you simply ask which is the best cardiologist in Delhi, you know, there’s a different way of people reading into that early and there’s a different way of people.

So you have to, whether it’s your collateral, whether it’s your digital. assets and so on and so forth. You have to make those changes. Information, I mean, if I look at ESG, if I look at investor ESG, how do I improve my ESG score? I mean, it’s like an encyclopedia out there, right? You just ask it any question, it tells you to do so. How should I present my annual report? How should I present myself? I think, you know, pretty much, you know, it is intrinsic to now everything that we do from that standpoint. Second is how can I use it as a tool to improve efficiency? And these are low -hanging fruits. I’m talking about the low -hanging fruits before we even, I mean, kind of, you know, absorb the entire ecosystem or create that ecosystem or participate in that ecosystem.

Make it a part of institutional habits, right? I think even prior to that, when we’re looking at it as a task stage, you know, how is it that I can improve? Now, you know, if I have a particular waiting for my patients, okay, how can I do predictive analysis of room availability? When I’m looking at discharge, how can I sort of this thing? When it comes to patient summary, how do I get, how do I unlock the time that my doctor spent on patient sort of history and so on and so forth. That all improves efficiency all improves outcomes see eventually the lens we are looking at it from is efficiency is accessibility is safety, is clinical support and finally to the experience I mean it’s quite a bit of breadth that you’re looking at AI

Vikalp Sahni

but a little bit more on generic terms everybody says that technology is moving very fast or things are changing so fast AI is also changing so fast and we also keep doing that like we want our businesses our operations, our sales also run very fast is more your internal feeling how are you feeling? how are you feeling? how are you feeling? health institutions moving as fast as the technology is moving even people in the organization be it doctors be it nurse staff all of them are looking at it and a lot of this is about India AI Summit as well because government is looking for educating people on how fast things are changing and we should all be ready for it so what are your views on your institutional readiness people in your institute and in general on this whole AI moving fast

Abhay Soi

so I think first and foremost also depends on you know the institutional culture we are very clear about one thing that we have to be more sort of circumspect about it than anything else we must go up the learning curve as far as AI is concerned things are changing very very fast we have close to 43 3000 healthcare workers which provide healthcare. You know, that means there are thousands, if not hundreds and thousands of work processes. For us to adopt AI in any task means, you know, you have to change huge amount of attendant work processes, even if this layer sits on top. And having said that, okay, is there something else which is better out there?

Is there something which will disrupt this further and so on? Should we wait for something to be adopted by and large to see, sorry, to see what the efficacy of that is and see what the, you know, see once it’s sort of established before adopting it. To me, look, having the first mover advantage in this is not going to do anything. But getting it right is. I think because we can’t afford to get it wrong. These are human lives, these are people. So I think there’s a huge amount of learning within the organization which is happening and I meet you know phenomenal people people across the board, okay, for various aspects. I think since the morning of today, if I look at my sort of schedule, 30 % of my meetings would be people, you know, from a technology background, pitching various sort of applications where our lives can be improved and outcomes can be improved and efficiency can be improved and so on and so forth.

But, you know, at the very least, you have to be very, very circumspect about what you’re going to adopt and what you’re going to roll out.

Vikalp Sahni

No, and I think you touched a very important point that we learned at Eka. We were earlier did a travel startup, me and Deepak. What we realized that in health, there is obviously innovation that people are looking for, but trust is the most important thing. I can bring a cool idea or there could be a cool way of doing a diagnosis at a clinic, but I as a person would trust only the doctor that I have spoken to or I have spoken to. been talked about. So there is this and that’s the reality that we learned when we started doing health that yes, innovation is definitely important, but trust is key. And I think Max has been trusted over the years.

And to be very honest, we also don’t know how to balance that out. The trust that has been created for institutions, for doctors, and now these technologies that are coming in, where it asks questions to the patients and gives relevant next suggestions. This trust factor is kind of getting a little sort of changed. Any views that you have, especially when it comes to patients, people trusting doctors to AI to institutes, any change that you see, and even doctors looking for AI solution and whether they feel that this is right now not as good?

Abhay Soi

So, you know, I’ll give you one example. At most hospitals, at least once every couple of months, you will have a patient who will come in, okay, with a pain in the chest. You do the ECG, and the ECG to the doctor seems sort of normal. He speaks to the cardiologist, okay, and the cardiologist says, okay, I don’t see anything wrong with it. And the patient is sent home, and he has a heart attack, right? Because ECGs, although they’re extremely, extremely common, okay, can be very, very nuanced. So, an expert cardiologist, okay, may be able to catch a particular movement there, okay, while somebody else may not. But even the expert cardiologist on a good day may be able to catch a particular movement.

able to catch it on a bad day not right now I’m not saying AI in its sort of this thing is complete but when a patient comes to ER okay I think it’s absolutely necessary to use that tool okay because that tool says requires admission okay whether the patient doctor sees it on admit him okay look by the end of the day you may admit 150 instead of 100 actual patients but don’t let that one go I think that’s the important thing you’re able to if you’re able to use this as assistive tool to augment your capabilities okay and I think that is what is emerging today you know I think it’s little too far out to say whether it will replace the clinician or not okay but I think right now clearly that is a very very essential tool that you can use and let’s start with safety before we go to efficiency or anything else you know so I think a very simple example like this okay and it depends it starts with leadership moves to institutional sort of habits okay to be able to adopt something like that change your work processes because the umpteen amount of work processes which have to change okay doctor when a patient comes where do you move when this sort of ecg report you move him to the cath lab okay and which is a 13 minute sort of this thing but that’s also preparatory time right you’re doing it within the golden hours you sort of move him into uh you know the icu how do you sort of interact with the doctor you have to call the doctor let’s say it happens at three o ‘clock at night okay the doctor the cardiologist has to come from his home and so on and so forth so the entire dance starts right okay but you have to make sure that you know you you can use this tool to err on the side of caution but i think at the very least that’s what you need to

Vikalp Sahni

and i think you touched upon um like these this complex healthcare process and uh when we look at it from a technology perspective this is what ai can solve for these extremely complex process that today there’s a multiple human touch point very simple such as doing an emergency call to a specific doctor with giving all the respective which today can be optimized, which can save lives. So that’s the sort of things that we keep discussing about during our board meetings and discussions. But a lot of these, and maybe health and non -health as well, what’s your view how the next five years, next six years, yesterday there was this conversation with Sam where AGI will be there by 2028.

What is your view on how next three years to five years? Now we can’t even say a decade, right? It seems like we don’t know what all will happen in a decade. But how do you see next three to five years changing in your hospitals or in general health care?

Abhay Soi

I think dramatically. Adoption of, and it’s not because hospitals or health care providers desire it, I think it’s becoming… absolute necessity for the country. One of the things, and perhaps one of the major things that propels our country forward is the demographic dividend. You know, the average age is 29, 28, 29, whatever. But make no mistake, 15 years down the line, it will be very, very close to the European age. And that’s the time people will require medical intervention. There just isn’t enough infrastructure and doctors available in the country. Okay, barely, barely sort of, it’s actually not even enough for the population today. I can certainly tell you 15 years down the line, there isn’t enough infrastructure which can possibly be built.

There isn’t enough money over here. Or, I mean, we’re just behind the curve a little too much, right? And if we have to solve this equation as far as healthcare is concerned, you know, you have no choice. But you have to, it has to be about predictive health. It has to be about, you know, sort of, before even patient comes to the hospital, falls sick, to be able to predict that he’s going to fall sick. and make amends there. Reaching out to people, unclog the hospital infrastructure, home care and so on and so forth. Okay, be able to replicate capabilities, skill sets of doctors to be able to take them to patients and so on.

I think all of that is a necessity. Without that, we will fail the future generation. So there’s no question of us. I think, you know, this is here. I mean, the future is here today.

Vikalp Sahni

And especially the whole vision of making India a developed country, we have to leapfrog. And many of these technologies can help us in leapfrogging the way you were explaining. But thank you so very much, Abhay, for your deep insights. I think we all love Max and the kind of work that you are doing. And we see more and more AI coming together at Max to solve for doctors, patients, and all of us. Thank you very much.

Abhay Soi

That is entirely mine. Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you.

Announcer

as Director IT at the National Health Authority where he leads the technical architecture and implementation of flagship national initiatives including the Ayushman Bharat Digital Machine and Ayushman Bharat PMG. We welcome you sir. We have with us Ms. Padmini Vishwanath, Researcher at the WHO SEARO, Southeast Asian Regional Office, bringing a regional lens to health equity, digital health policy and evidence -based transformation in low and middle income countries. We welcome you Ms. Padmini. And last but not the least, we have Mr. Jigarth Halani, Director, Enterprise Solutions Architecture and Engineering at NVIDIA South Asia, a 20 -year technology veteran driving innovation in supercomputing, big data and AI infrastructure and a trusted advisor to government and industry on AI strategy.

I now hand over to Duy. Deepak to lead the panel discussion. I think we are short of space, so I’ll manage to standing high.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much. It was a great session, Vikalp and Abhay just left. We have a short of time, so I will try to leave maybe 5 -10 minutes at the end for everyone to have questions. I would like to start this session with Dr. Gupta. Dr. Gupta, we were talking last night. You were instrumental in defining the whole first white paper around ABDM, how did it all started. There is obviously a lot of progress from when you conceptualized way back in 2019 -2020 to today. What do you really think has really worked towards seeing the reality and what are the challenges? How do you see going forward? How do this whole documentation moving from?

Between patient and interoperability will start impacting the clinical decision making for the physician. going forward.

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

Thank you Deepak and thank you Vikal for this wonderful session and giving me the opportunity. So it started actually in 2014. It was in BJP’s manifesto where I wrote and then in National Health Policy in 2016 and eventually when I was advisor to Health Minister. So you know, firstly we should compliment the ABDM team. There is no precedent. There is no precedent to create records for a billion population. How do you go about doing it? But I think people like Vikal and you every time you know you take a bold step, there are nurses who will say Bijli nahi aati, aap kese karoge. Today we have 860 million ABHA IDs. So I think if I look at the reality today and I know I am sitting on the right of the Director IT.

We have created the digital infrastructure. Now we have to leverage that to empower the people who are going to use it. I see a future where we will not have people using multiple schemes. That was our biggest problem internally. I can tell you why this got you know created and there are more reasons to but eventually technology will allow us to optimally use resources to clinically be precise in treating people remove redundancies and also my boss who is still the unit health minister we agreed fundamentally it will be tough to send doctors to relay they study for 12 years to make their life better not to go of course we want them it will take time to have that infrastructure where they can stay in rural areas but we believe that digital health digital solutions will be able to leverage this backbone that we have created to serve people in the areas where they need them the most I think that golden hour to platinum minutes to I think finally what I believe will be the digital health standards that in a minute you could get to what you need at least for primary care so I am very optimistic and we call was right the decade is not we used to talk decade at 2013 -14 now we talk three years max few months is better to talk So I think it’s a time where we should be really optimistic of the vision that we were able to build thanks to people like who had implemented.

You know, we had COVID at our hand, you know, when we looked at 2 .2 billion people, you know, getting vaccinated, not calling up people, just going to the app and getting it done. So I think the creators are in the room. The implementers are in the room. So ideators don’t need to worry much. Thank you.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much. That’s very nice. So moving to your left, Nikhil. Nikhil, you guys have done a phenomenal job in, you know, deploying adoption of ABDM in public sector today. But we see a lack in the private sector, definitely. What have you been learning? How do you think this whole learning from ABDM deploying at a large scale PSU where obviously there is obviously massive, massive load of patients walking in and very limited physician and staff to support. Digitizing appointment has done a great way. do you see it going forward moving into private sector how do you see it going forward getting into the workflows even deeper which will really help better outcomes

Nikhil Dhongari

which can be developed by IKAK and other health startups. Where ABDM created the federated architecture, where the model can go there and they can be tried. Because the simple making algorithm doesn’t make a solution in the health sector. Just now as the max safety is very much important. So what is missing in the foreign models, which is not tried in the Indian data, especially we can’t neglect the population, the rural population, small hospitals where most of the people go there. Where ABDM created HMI solutions, where we have access to the longitude records of the patients, where our Indian models can be tried, and where we can get the success actually. The ground is fertile enough right now to pitch in for the Indian startups to come in and try.

in your models especially because of federal drugs you don’t need LLMs you just need SLMs and some random models to come and do it so that the model cannot be biased because the biasness I can’t see only from the technical angle here you have to keep both clinicians and technologies so that the context data is available from across the India and across the population where the subject is the billion clinical realities and where and the AI model should be not only transactional they should be conversational where the literacy rate is very low so now is a fertile ground for the Indian startups to come in and show the brand value of the Indian startups so where I can see it.

Thank you.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much Nikhil insightful you touched upon cloud infrastructure and we have Jigar here. So Jigar cloud infrastructure has made AI scale. We all are using, everyone is using chat GPT today. Infrastructure, sovereignty and trust are hot things. We’ve been hearing about these words for last five days like I don’t know n number of times. It becomes super, super relevant for health as we heard in the last session, the trust. How do you think the models or the companies building in India bring that trust factor so that physicians and the operator like Abhay would trust the solutions and then start implementing which will really help, you know, people like Nikhil in building those models for the country.

Jigar Halani

So I think it’s a deep question. Trust has many aspects if you ask me honestly, right. Trust in my language could be the most accurate results and I’m happy because I’m a fast moving guy, IT professional, right. So we are known for it. The event gets over today and Monday we are going to do it. We are back to work and we know we are going to hog again for next five days to make sure that we are something better and bigger right trust for my mom could be a very different storyline right because for her everything on priority line is health nothing else essentially right for me plus or minus 1 % 3 % 5 % 10 % is also okay for her nothing is right and trust for a mother who has just a newborn in her hand it’s gonna be completely different right so it I personally feel it has many years but a fundamental layer if you ask me honestly model builders what they’re trying to do is trying to still accumulate the knowledge which is still available on the web right what we haven’t gone back and that’s where I would borrow if India is achieving these numbers which I was not aware I knew about pretty well I have it from myself as well although I have not used it yet but a but I am a registered user I won’t myself get enrolled into everything but I am a registered user I won’t myself get enrolled into everything scheme that government is coming of it just to make sure that to understand where all connectivities possible essentially right but I’m not even a willing one yeah but but but I’m saying that once we have this data how do we make use of this data better so that I bring not just the context of India which is so important and what a couple is trying to do just on the language side of the story which we all understand that language is so important to us but imagine the you know the the the the environmental changes that I have from you know place to place and basis which the changes that I have in my body structure and basis which what medicine helps me better and so on and so forth right it has its own subsequent you know chain of things that that is it how do I bring that data more into the ecosystem thereby I make those model more and more efficient better and in the lingo of what India understand not just in language but also in the lingo of health which is important acting that particular like for example I come from Gujarat but I stay in back Bangalore, I know for sure that environment is not suitable to me, right?

And I keep sneezing for the poll reason, of course, many of the moment I go back to Gujarat, I’m absolutely normal, right? Whether it is extreme cold, whether it is extreme hot, it’s raining, doesn’t matter at all. I never sneeze. I think things work in Gujarat. I go, I come daily, I don’t get sneezing at all. I’m just another example, right? So how do I bring that data more into the ecosystem, number one? And then number two, how do I train those models more efficiently and serve them back to the users? So that’s one aspect of it, right? The second aspect of it is I think unlike language, in the healthcare, we need a very large momentum of citizens to participate and help us to have a lot of feedback ecosystem in what they are pursuing from these models which they are inferring it.

Right? Thank you. like, for example, in your solution, which I’ve seen the demo because now it’s been a number of times in the demo booth I’ve seen this. If a patient is talking, right, and, you know, going through your recordings, let’s say, which he or she has just done, for him or her, it’s the most important thing. For the doctor, it’s like the next patient, right? How do I go to the next? But the patient will definitely go back and check the recording. Patient will definitely go back, as we all do, and for the rightful reasons. We check the second opinion with the doctor, right? But that information is only with me. What did the second doctor told me, right?

I check with you as a doctor, and then I say, all right, it’s a big operation. I should take a second opinion. And I go to her. I take another opinion, and then both they say the same thing. And I then still Google, right, and I take the opinion there. And I say, you know what? Looks to be that I need to get operated. But we’ll wait. And then five days. It’s free consulting. Four days later. will come to the doctor. There are four questions. So I think the user also need to put the feedback back in the ecosystem by using these models and then getting democratized. I think that’s how the trust layer is growing.

This is at a very high level. Policy level, things are going to be very, very different and I’m sure it’s a topic by itself. Some other day we’ll work on it and I’m

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much. This Google doctor has been very, very popular in clinics. When we meet a doctor, they hate it. I have seen a board many, many times outside the physician’s cabin. No Google doctor, please. Okay. So we discussed, so next question to tell me, we’ve been talking about private hospital infrastructure. There’s a mass of high quality infrastructure available in the country with really great physicians. On the other side, we have PSC, massive pressure, less number of physicians. How do you think, you know, builders, when they think of building solutions for both of these perspectives? Should they think of a single solution? So I think the answer is yes. So I think the answer is yes.

So I think the answer is yes. What do you think of two different solutions? What do you think how it’s going forward?

Tanvi Lall

Yeah, so at PeoplePlus, which is an initiative of Aikstep, we do a lot of analysis on what are the adoption trends and for high need populations. So basically for people who are building in healthcare, education, agriculture, right? What’s the uptake? Who’s building what? Who’s not taking third -party solutions and trying to build internally? And there are a couple of points that have emerged in that thesis. I think the first is because AI is meant to be personalized and context -specific. It can deal with multilinguality and voice. There’s firstly a lot of opportunity to bridge some of these inequity gaps that exist. So the first thing is that today you can imagine as a builder solutions that are in some very, very regional, low -resource languages for the different beneficiaries.

And you can design them to be voice first, which in a way is inducing trust because now they are speaking to someone and they’re just not reading or… an answer and they don’t know who’s behind that solution. So the first aspect is that AI is meant to be personalized. So when you’re building solutions or, you know, I’m going to go a step further. I’m going to say it’s beyond a solution. It’s a transformation. You can create very customized transformations. That’s number one. I think the second thing over here is that when, you know, because it’s a very fragmented value chain, right? In the case of healthcare, like someone is paying, someone is using the technology, someone’s ultimately benefiting from it.

What we’ve realized is when you’re designing these transformations, a big part of a builder’s journey is not just making the tech stack, but spending time with people who will be adopting it, educating them at different levels to explain how this tech could get consumed or improve their life, right? So many times, and I mean, there are 700 plus healthcare startups in India who are doing all kinds of pilots and demos right now. And what we’ve realized… is that the demo phase goes really well. Like three months, six months. Because there is adopters who could be hospitals or other institutions sometimes play from a place of either fear or hype. Like I want to be aware of what’s going on and I’ll do the demo.

But after three months, this is just going to be a side window on my browser which I never go back to because it was never thought of as a solution that I would embed into my workflow. So you have to think from the start of this as a journey and not just a one -time switch. That I get that one -time contract or that one -time demo and imagine that that will convert into some kind of impact. Now to build that trust, it’s very different in a private hospital which is maybe much more urban, much more aware of what’s going on versus a PHC, right? And the people in the PHC. So I think a tech stack and the solution is one piece of it.

But when you’re designing the transformation which comes with education, awareness, trust -building activities, creating safety and maybe feedback and evals that may be a little bit more make sense for a PHC versus a hospital which might be very different. So when you’re thinking of the… Transformation stack, it has to be very different. And transformation is about much more than tech. And I think that’s where people should be spending a lot more time as builders. It’s just not about cracking that first pilot or that first deployment, but saying what will it take to go from pilot to population scale, right? What will that take? Because that is a very different journey. That’s a systems journey. That’s not a tech journey always.

Deepak Tuli

No, that’s super helpful. Continuing the same discussion, Dr. Gupta, when you look at policymaking, do you look at these two segments very differently or you think when you look at policy like private sector, PSC, you think health is one single sector or do you start defining, saying, okay, how will it work in public, how will it work in private sectors?

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

So if you look at the national health policy, this is the first time where I actually wrote the line both for private and public sector. In 2002, it was mostly written and even implied that it was only meant for public sector. I think if you really want to deliver care, you have to break that. barrier between private and public that’s how you will deliver care when patients has a problem it doesn’t see whether is the private or public should I get it the first hospital they get it so I think that was the thinking behind it and that’s what the policy is like

Deepak Tuli

oh that’s great learn something I move on to Padmini from your regional vantage point how should AI system be designed differently to reflect the diversity of context capabilities and care relative across countries

Padmini Vishwanath

yeah thank you first of all thank you so much for having us today WH was very glad to be representing the work that we do and you know listening to my co -panelists it’s interesting to hear about you know the the importance of tailoring because interesting and a little how do I say anxiety in using for me because the you know the work that we do is on the other end of the spectrum which is how do we create norms right how do we create norms and normative guidance to ensure that AI is equitable and moving in the right direction. And so I’ll talk from the regional perspective. And, you know, of course, we work with eight countries across CRO, and all of these countries and systems are at very, very varying levels of digital maturity, right?

But what we often find is the AI tools are developed for the most advanced, most connected tertiary institutions. And then adapted later for the most more remote settings, right? But we are finding that some of the countries, you know, pilots are looking at reversing this logic, which means that we start developing readiness frameworks for the most remote settings, understanding the frontline capabilities, device availabilities, all the factors that matter in AI readiness. You know, developing a framework, a framework for that level of remoteness. and then scaling it. And we do see that in contexts where we do that, there is higher provider trust, there is more equity. So I think that is, from our experience, we feel that maybe we need to slow down a little bit and look at how we can modernize existing legacy systems rather than kind of building on and adding new systems.

Yeah, I’ll stop there for now.

Deepak Tuli

Please, Annie. So maybe starting from here.

Jigar Halani

I’ll go first. I think voice. It’s a common factor. I think it is horizontal, not vertical, but it’s very, very important for the country, right? If I understand what Tamil doctor is speaking with the patient and convert it into Hindi and have that deployed in Delhi and Gujarat, I think I’m home essentially, right? I’m solving many problems for years together that has been prolonging in the country essentially. I think it’s by itself is a reward to the country and we should be fully liberating it. One thing that I’m very happy about is the mindset change. You know, that’s going to be the biggest thing. It’s not a technology problem. It’s a mindset problem. And that’s what I’ve seen every single person, you know, talking to, they started more believing in the fact that, you know, the time has arrived.

Nikhil Dhongari

I will tell two things. One thing is product. So I am very happy that a lot of discussion is going on about AI. So for any technology, anything to encourage the public, the thought process is very much important. That impact submitted created that impact to discuss things on AI basically. Now everyone will discuss on AI, like you beat a very rickshaw puller to the CEO, that discussion is happening. That is very much important to build systems, that thought process. Second thing, I visited few of the special start -ups. So very happy to see some start -ups are doing really great, like Eka scribe. So where the TVDM can use basically small clinics to reduce the burden of the clinicians from the non -clinical worker work.

So and there is one company and they are doing very great work on data anonymization. Because for many people, they have models to train after the advent of the technology. DPDP act so the data privacy and patient consent is very much important so they are working very really good in India so I’m very happy to such companies are there and they’re doing really wonderful so I’m very fed

Tanvi Lall

I think for me it would be the emphasis on AI ready data systems because this is across sectors everyone is realizing that AI is only as good as the data for the model and application layer that it has access to and I really want to give you guys credit for that because you are pioneers in terms of putting out data and making it available to that MCP server that came out in fact we cite that as an example we are working very closely with Mosby right now and they want to make their statistical data sets available to the world they have put out their first MCP about a week ago but just the fact that you are you know institutions are just not extractive when it comes to data but they want to give it back so that others can build on top of it is very important so in health it’s crucial that happens because otherwise there is no personalization happening.

Padmini Vishwanath

So I would say I think so far we have looked at a lot of quantitative measures of adopting AI in health, diagnosis, accuracy, number of patient visits, et cetera. But I think this time around we are seeing more discussions around the qualitative dimensions, right, empathy, dignity, care. And, you know, it’s interesting because in one of the pilots we are conducting on palliative care, we, you know, we didn’t even think about it, but a caregiver and a patient, palliative care patient visiting a nurse, you know, that’s their only source of human connection during that week. And so how does AI kind of change that dynamic of caregiving, right, in those little moments they spend together in the clinic?

So I think. The increased conversation around this. and just acknowledgement of not just the quantitative but also the qualitative dimensions is something that I’m personally really looking forward to.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you. The objective of this question was not to get the promotion for Eka, just a disclaimer. I will… No, but thank you. This was super insightful. Audience, any question?

Audience member 1:

Sir, I just had a question. You said a voice language is not as new. So that mostly 90 % of them are on the cloud. So that needs to be on the edge only or on the cloud or hybrid?

Jigar Halani

No, no, of course. I think… Do you use ChatGPT? Yes. One of the servers I hosted over in India. No, I’m just saying there’s cost factor is also there and they have data privacy also there, so… The moment you add cost, as long as it is in India, I think we are home. I don’t think so we could be… Ever cheaper.

Audience member 1:

So I was just… I’m asking a suggestion from you, so like what model should, like someone who’s creating such solution for voice and translation, multilingual, let’s just target 22 languages. So where should the MCV or the influencer or the activity server should be hosted? On the edge, on a gadget, like a mobile phone or something, audio recorder, or, you know, hybrid?

Jigar Halani

I would say, I would say it depends on the use case. If you have a very particular use case, very tiny one in a remote place, edge would be the solution. You don’t have a choice. You will lack behind the connectivity and few other aspects as well.

Audience member 1:

It will synchronize once a month or once a week or once a day?

Jigar Halani

No, voice is something you need to have connectivity in play.

Audience member 1:

Okay. Jigar Halani

You can’t be having offline things. That’s my view at least. People are trying. I think Saboom had something on, on the device. 90 % we should go for.

Audience member 1:

Connecting with the cloud or the server?

Jigar Halani

Yes.

Audience member 1:

Even if it’s a local India hosted server?

Jigar Halani

That’s correct.

Audience member 2:

Hello everyone, we have seen a lot of stalls in the expo showing AI powered documentation and diagnosis. I am a dentist and I am currently pursuing MBA in analytics. So I am curious how far this AI, Indian based AI tools are relying on Indian data rather than global data sets.

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

Depends on what they are claiming that’s first. And the other side I also represent the Mayo Clinic strategy in India. So as Mayo Clinic platform we are opening in partnership with some of our data sets to look at but also collaborating with hospitals inside to leverage each other’s anonymized data sets. So I think important. Thank you. point to note is the culture of data is missing. I mean, we still have to get the culture of data to get to have those AI systems that are based on Indian population. I think this is still far away. I think with ABDM sitting next to we have 860 million of IDs, but if the number of records on ABDM, if you check, they are not what we want to be.

So I think we’re still not there in terms of if someone makes a claim, be careful. Thank you.

Deepak Tuli

That’s great. We talked about what we really like, what we’ve seen the change fundamentally. But do you guys also think there are still few items we’re lacking behind as a country, as a health, where we should have been already seen? Or you think we are on the right path? And if we are on the right path, then what do you think would be the great outcomes in next year?

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

My answer is very frankly, even at the cost of obesity. See, the issue is not about the usefulness of technology or the use case. It’s about ethics and doing the right things. Most of the people are not using, not because the UX, UI, technology, outcomes, everyone knows that. How many doctors would actually want to tell what they charge for a prescription, how many prescriptions they may, and why they write three antibiotics for one case. So I think it is about regulating that unethical part, the way they were able to crack it, you’ll be seeing the mass adoption. The challenge lies in the medical practices and medical ethics, not on the solutions per se. Otherwise, we would be the most adopted nation in terms of digital technologies.

Deepak Tuli

The great, last night, we were having this conversation where in China, I was surprised to hear this, that in the real time, when a physician, is writing a prescription there’s a data going back and if there are errors it’s coming back and the doctors are getting flagged if they continuously do this thing and then that’s the way one way of controlling what you really said and you know think of us we are still in metros literate but think of people in tier two tier three having three antibiotics at the same time i have seen in bombay a chemist saying as you throw my religion yeah we pop up so i think it’s an issue about practice medical practices good good pharmacy practices good prescription practices to follow i mean you could have given a cold and a cup syrup that would have made him money too

Nikhil Dhongari

i want to give as if you had a point just want to add and she asked one question how many models are training on indian data so you said now that where we are lagging behind so we want to say like the behavioral change is very much important so we have solutions even And we gave very, with CDAC, we gave one e -shift flight, which is almost free to small hospitals. And all the government hospitals, including Ames, having the HMI solution where they can create the language records. But some of the docs are not ready to do, because they said that we are very much accustomed to writing on the paper only. So still they are doing, and we are accepting.

So where we are losing the context data from the major public hospitals. So where we need some tough stance, because I am now working in National Tadati, but before I was in Railways. Now Railways totally stopped physical prescription. Because they took a decision that no more physical prescription. They are doing only now online prescription, everything, even lab record, everything integrated. So they took one decision. They retested. So we need some tough decisions, and also we need some behavioral change, where we have to go for creating language records. then only we can give some context data to the Indian startups where our models can be deployed and trained then we can get rid of it.

Deepak Tuli

Thank you very much you have been a great panel thank you very much for all your insight and I am sorry in the interest of time we will have to wrap up but before we close this session a sincere gratitude and thank you to all our panelists I request Deepak to just present a moment to from our behalf thank you Thank you. Thank you.

A

Abhay Soi

Speech speed

149 words per minute

Speech length

2428 words

Speech time

975 seconds

Unified data lake and real‑time analytics improve patient experience

Explanation

Abhay explains that Max created a common, large‑scale data lake covering 15 years of patient records and now runs real‑time analytics on it. This hidden technology layer boosts efficiency, safety and patient satisfaction without patients noticing any tech.


Evidence

“We started by creating a common -size data lake for all the patients which have been through our doors over the last 15 years, and which are doing so on a real -time basis today.” [1]. “When you don’t interface with technology, but the experiences are improved.” [4].


Major discussion point

Digital transformation and AI integration in healthcare


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Data governance | Social and economic development


AI as an assistive safety tool, not a replacement

Explanation

Abhay stresses that AI should be used to augment clinicians – for example, predicting admissions or flagging high‑risk patients – with safety as the primary goal, rather than trying to replace doctors.


Evidence

“I think it’s absolutely necessary to use that tool… it’s an assistive tool to augment your capabilities… I think at the very least, that’s what you need to… use this tool to err on the side of caution…” [11]. “You know, we’ve already started doing predictive analysis of beds which are vacant and available and so on.” [16].


Major discussion point

Trust, safety and patient‑clinician acceptance


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Capacity development


Institutional learning curve and circumspection

Explanation

Abhay notes that large hospitals must re‑engineer thousands of work processes and adopt a cautious, learning‑oriented culture rather than chasing first‑mover advantage.


Evidence

“we are very clear about one thing that we have to be more sort of circumspect about it than anything else we must go up the learning curve as far as AI is concerned…” [31]. “You know, that means there are thousands, if not hundreds and thousands of work processes.” [125]. “You have to make those changes.” [126]. “But, you know, at the very least, you have to be very, very circumspect about what you’re going to adopt and what you’re going to roll out.” [128].


Major discussion point

Institutional readiness and cultural change


Topics

Capacity development | The enabling environment for digital development | Artificial intelligence


Future necessity of AI for predictive health

Explanation

Abhay predicts that demographic pressures will create a doctor shortage, making AI‑driven predictive health and resource optimisation an absolute necessity for the country.


Evidence

“But you have to, it has to be about predictive health.” [33]. “Adoption of, and it’s not because hospitals or health care providers desire it, I think it’s becoming… absolute necessity for the country.” [152].


Major discussion point

Future outlook and necessity of AI


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development | The enabling environment for digital development


V

Vikalp Sahni

Speech speed

138 words per minute

Speech length

877 words

Speech time

378 seconds

Regulatory frameworks and trust are evolving

Explanation

Vikalp asks whether recent policy instruments such as NABH and ABDM are shaping AI adoption, and stresses that trust remains the most critical factor for patients and providers.


Evidence

“And do you think, like, when the digital adoption happened, things such as NABH, ABDM, many of these things started coming up, talking about policy, talking about regulation.” [84]. “What we realized that in health, there is obviously innovation that people are looking for, but trust is the most important thing.” [90].


Major discussion point

Challenges, failures and regulatory considerations


Topics

The enabling environment for digital development | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Artificial intelligence


AI as a strategic KRA for CEOs

Explanation

Vikalp probes whether AI adoption has become a key result area for hospital CEOs, mirroring earlier digitisation priorities.


Evidence

“Is this a priority today, adopting AI at hospitals and as a KRAs for your CEOs or operators?” [15]. “And you see more and more AI coming together at Max to solve for doctors, patients, and all of us.” [23].


Major discussion point

Policy frameworks and public vs private sector dynamics


Topics

The enabling environment for digital development | Artificial intelligence


A

Announcer

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

146 words

Speech time

65 seconds

Leadership in national digital health architecture

Explanation

The Announcer introduces the Director IT of the National Health Authority, highlighting his role in steering flagship initiatives such as the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission.


Evidence

“as Director IT at the National Health Authority where he leads the technical architecture and implementation of flagship national initiatives including the Ayushman Bharat Digital Machine and Ayushman Bharat PMG.” [30].


Major discussion point

Policy frameworks and public vs private sector dynamics


Topics

The enabling environment for digital development | Data governance | Artificial intelligence


D

Deepak Tuli

Speech speed

141 words per minute

Speech length

947 words

Speech time

402 seconds

Infrastructure and cloud enable AI scaling

Explanation

Deepak notes that cloud infrastructure, particularly the partnership with Jigar, has been pivotal in scaling AI solutions, while also flagging sovereignty and trust as hot issues.


Evidence

“Jigar cloud infrastructure has made AI scale.” [34]. “Infrastructure, sovereignty and trust are hot things.” [100].


Major discussion point

Infrastructure, data sovereignty and model development


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Data governance | The enabling environment for digital development


High‑quality national infrastructure supports health AI

Explanation

Deepak points out that India possesses a massive, high‑quality infrastructure base that can be leveraged for AI‑driven health services.


Evidence

“There’s a mass of high quality infrastructure available in the country with really great physicians.” [62].


Major discussion point

Infrastructure, data sovereignty and model development


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Capacity development


D

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

Speech speed

192 words per minute

Speech length

849 words

Speech time

264 seconds

ABHA IDs and digital infrastructure underpin AI readiness

Explanation

Dr. Gupta highlights the creation of 860 million ABHA IDs and the supporting digital infrastructure as the foundation for AI‑ready health ecosystems.


Evidence

“Today we have 860 million ABHA IDs.” [28]. “We have created the digital infrastructure.” [29].


Major discussion point

Digital transformation and AI integration in healthcare


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Data governance | Social and economic development


Policy bridges public and private health sectors

Explanation

He explains that the National Health Policy explicitly mentions both public and private sectors, breaking historic silos and enabling unified AI deployment.


Evidence

“I think if you look at the national health policy, this is the first time where I actually wrote the line both for private and public sector.” [166]. “Barrier between private and public…” [168].


Major discussion point

Policy frameworks and public vs private sector dynamics


Topics

The enabling environment for digital development | Policy frameworks and public vs private sector dynamics


Medical ethics and prescription monitoring as barriers

Explanation

Dr. Gupta stresses that ethical prescribing practices and real‑time prescription monitoring are critical hurdles that must be addressed before AI can be widely adopted.


Evidence

“The challenge lies in the medical practices and medical ethics, not on the solutions per se.” [70]. “…when a physician, is writing a prescription there’s a data going back and if there are errors it’s coming back and the doctors are getting flagged…” [85]. “It’s about ethics and doing the right things.” [88].


Major discussion point

Challenges, failures and regulatory considerations


Topics

Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Artificial intelligence


N

Nikhil Dhongari

Speech speed

151 words per minute

Speech length

707 words

Speech time

279 seconds

Federated ABDM architecture enables Indian‑centric AI models

Explanation

Nikhil describes how the ABDM’s federated architecture allows Indian models to be tried on local longitudinal patient records, reducing bias and ensuring relevance to the Indian population.


Evidence

“Where ABDM created the federated architecture, where the model can go there and they can be tried.” [38]. “Where ABDM created HMI solutions, where we have access to the longitude records of the patients, where our Indian models can be tried…” [39].


Major discussion point

Digital transformation and AI integration in healthcare


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Data governance


Bias mitigation requires Indian data and contextual validation

Explanation

He argues that bias can be avoided only by training models on diverse Indian clinical data and involving clinicians in the loop.


Evidence

“…the model cannot be biased because the biasness I can’t see only from the technical angle here you have to keep both clinicians and technologies so that the context data is available from across the India…” [42].


Major discussion point

Challenges, failures and regulatory considerations


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society


J

Jigar Halani

Speech speed

190 words per minute

Speech length

1209 words

Speech time

380 seconds

AI challenges are cultural, not just technical

Explanation

Jigar asserts that AI adoption is fundamentally a mindset and cultural issue rather than a pure technology problem.


Evidence

“It’s not a technology problem.” [10]. “It’s a mindset problem.” [99].


Major discussion point

Institutional readiness and cultural change


Topics

Capacity development | The enabling environment for digital development


Edge vs cloud deployment depends on use case

Explanation

He explains that remote, low‑connectivity scenarios benefit from edge deployment, while most workloads run on the cloud.


Evidence

“If you have a very particular use case, very tiny one in a remote place, edge would be the solution.” [186]. “So that mostly 90 % of them are on the cloud.” [190].


Major discussion point

Infrastructure, data sovereignty and model development


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Data governance


Trust has many aspects and must be transparent

Explanation

Jigar highlights that trust encompasses accuracy, data privacy, and transparent model governance.


Evidence

“Trust has many aspects if you ask me honestly, right.” [101]. “No, I’m just saying there’s cost factor is also there and they have data privacy also there, so…” [73].


Major discussion point

Trust, safety and patient‑clinician acceptance


Topics

Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Artificial intelligence


T

Tanvi Lall

Speech speed

190 words per minute

Speech length

810 words

Speech time

254 seconds

Voice‑first multilingual AI bridges equity gaps

Explanation

Tanvi argues that voice‑driven, multilingual interfaces can reach low‑resource users and personalize care, helping to close equity gaps.


Evidence

“It can deal with multilinguality and voice.” [51]. “There’s firstly a lot of opportunity to bridge some of these inequity gaps that exist.” [52].


Major discussion point

Digital transformation and AI integration in healthcare


Topics

Closing all digital divides | Artificial intelligence


AI‑ready data systems and open sharing accelerate personalization

Explanation

She emphasizes that making large, high‑quality health datasets openly available enables model personalization and faster AI development.


Evidence

“I think for me it would be the emphasis on AI ready data systems because this is across sectors everyone is realizing that AI is only as good as the data for the model and application layer that it has access to… you are pioneers in terms of putting out data and making it available… it is crucial that happens because otherwise there is no personalization happening.” [20].


Major discussion point

Infrastructure, data sovereignty and model development


Topics

Data governance | Artificial intelligence


Continuous education and stakeholder engagement are essential

Explanation

Tanvi notes that successful transformation requires spending time with end‑users, educating them, and designing solutions that fit their context.


Evidence

“a big part of a builder’s journey is not just making the tech stack, but spending time with people who will be adopting it, educating them at different levels to explain how this tech could get consumed or improve their life, right?” [139].


Major discussion point

Institutional readiness and cultural change


Topics

Capacity development | The enabling environment for digital development


P

Padmini Vishwanath

Speech speed

143 words per minute

Speech length

451 words

Speech time

188 seconds

Shift from quantitative to qualitative impact (empathy, dignity, care)

Explanation

Padmini points out that the focus is moving beyond metrics like accuracy to include qualitative dimensions such as empathy and dignity, which affect provider trust and equity.


Evidence

“So I would say I think so far we have looked at a lot of quantitative measures of adopting AI in health, diagnosis, accuracy, number of patient visits, et cetera.” [18]. “But I think this time around we are seeing more discussions around the qualitative dimensions, right, empathy, dignity, care.” [56]. “And we do see that in contexts where we do that, there is higher provider trust, there is more equity.” [58].


Major discussion point

Future outlook and necessity of AI


Topics

Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Artificial intelligence


A

Audience member 1

Speech speed

186 words per minute

Speech length

135 words

Speech time

43 seconds

Edge vs cloud deployment considerations for low‑resource use cases

Explanation

The audience member asks whether voice‑driven solutions should run on edge devices or the cloud, highlighting the need to match architecture to connectivity constraints.


Evidence

“I’m asking a suggestion from you, so like what model should, like someone who’s creating such solution for voice and translation, multilingual, let’s just target 22 languages.” [53]. “So that needs to be on the edge only or on the cloud or hybrid?” [61]. “Connecting with the cloud or the server?” [63].


Major discussion point

Infrastructure, data sovereignty and model development


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Data governance | Closing all digital divides


A

Audience member 2

Speech speed

121 words per minute

Speech length

52 words

Speech time

25 seconds

Need for Indian‑centric data rather than reliance on global datasets

Explanation

The audience member questions how much Indian AI tools depend on Indian data, prompting a discussion on building local data repositories.


Evidence

“I am curious how far this AI, Indian based AI tools are relying on Indian data rather than global data sets.” [40]. “I think with ABDM sitting next to we have 860 million of IDs, but if the number of records on ABDM, if you check, they are not what we want to be.” [45].


Major discussion point

Infrastructure, data sovereignty and model development


Topics

Data governance | Artificial intelligence | Capacity development


Agreements

Agreement points

AI adoption requires extensive supervision and careful implementation due to patient safety concerns

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
– Padmini Vishwanath

Arguments

AI adoption requires extensive supervision and careful implementation due to patient safety concerns


Medical ethics and prescription practices need regulation before mass AI adoption can succeed


Qualitative dimensions like empathy, dignity, and care are increasingly important alongside quantitative measures


Summary

All speakers emphasize that healthcare AI implementation must prioritize patient safety and ethical considerations over speed of adoption, requiring careful supervision and attention to both quantitative and qualitative aspects of care


Topics

Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Artificial intelligence | Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs


Data infrastructure and longitudinal patient records are essential for effective AI implementation

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
– Nikhil Dhongari
– Tanvi Lall

Arguments

Created common data lake for 15 years of patient data as foundation for AI implementation


Culture of data sharing and longitudinal patient records is still missing despite infrastructure availability


Federal architecture of ABDM provides fertile ground for Indian startups to develop and test AI models


AI-ready data systems are crucial as AI is only as good as the data it has access to


Summary

All speakers agree that robust data infrastructure with comprehensive patient records is fundamental for AI success, though they acknowledge current gaps in data culture and sharing


Topics

Data governance | Artificial intelligence | Information and communication technologies for development


AI should augment rather than replace healthcare professionals

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Jigar Halani
– Padmini Vishwanath

Arguments

AI should be used as assistive tool to augment physician capabilities, especially for safety-critical decisions like ECG interpretation


Trust has multiple dimensions depending on user perspective – accuracy for professionals, safety for patients


AI systems need to be designed starting from the most remote settings and scaled up, rather than adapting advanced systems downward


Summary

Speakers consistently view AI as a tool to enhance healthcare professionals’ capabilities rather than replace them, emphasizing the importance of maintaining human oversight and adapting to different user needs


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Social and economic development


Behavioral change and institutional adoption are major challenges for AI implementation

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
– Nikhil Dhongari
– Tanvi Lall

Arguments

Multiple failures in AI implementation are welcome as they lead to better future outcomes


Medical ethics and prescription practices need regulation before mass AI adoption can succeed


Behavioral change in healthcare professionals is essential for successful AI adoption


Healthcare AI transformation requires education, awareness, and trust-building activities beyond just technology deployment


Summary

All speakers recognize that successful AI adoption requires significant behavioral and cultural changes within healthcare institutions, not just technological implementation


Topics

Capacity development | Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development


Similar viewpoints

Both speakers emphasize that trust is the fundamental foundation of healthcare success, more important than technological innovation, and directly impacts business outcomes

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Vikalp Sahni

Arguments

Patient trust is the foundation of healthcare success, with occupancy rates 10-15% better due to trust


Trust is the most important factor in healthcare, more critical than innovation


Topics

Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Social and economic development


Both speakers advocate for unified policy approaches that break down barriers between sectors and require decisive regulatory action to drive adoption

Speakers

– Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
– Nikhil Dhongari

Arguments

Healthcare policy should treat private and public sectors as unified system for optimal care delivery


Tough decisions like mandatory digital prescriptions are needed to generate contextual data for Indian AI models


Topics

The enabling environment for digital development | Social and economic development


Both speakers emphasize the critical importance of developing AI solutions that are specifically tailored to Indian contexts, populations, and linguistic diversity rather than adapting foreign solutions

Speakers

– Jigar Halani
– Tanvi Lall

Arguments

Indian models need to incorporate environmental and population-specific factors rather than relying on foreign datasets


AI solutions must be personalized and context-specific, capable of handling multilinguality and voice interfaces


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Closing all digital divides | Social and economic development


Both speakers see AI as essential for India’s future development, particularly in addressing the healthcare infrastructure gap that will emerge as the population ages

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Vikalp Sahni

Arguments

India’s demographic dividend will create massive healthcare demand in 15 years without sufficient infrastructure or doctors


India needs to leapfrog using AI technologies to become a developed country


Topics

Social and economic development | Artificial intelligence | Information and communication technologies for development


Unexpected consensus

Embracing failure as part of AI development process

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Tanvi Lall

Arguments

Multiple failures in AI implementation are welcome as they lead to better future outcomes


Healthcare AI transformation requires education, awareness, and trust-building activities beyond just technology deployment


Explanation

It’s unexpected that healthcare leaders would openly embrace failure in a sector where patient safety is paramount, but both speakers see iterative failure as essential for learning and eventual success


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Capacity development


Need for tough regulatory decisions to force behavioral change

Speakers

– Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
– Nikhil Dhongari

Arguments

Medical ethics and prescription practices need regulation before mass AI adoption can succeed


Tough decisions like mandatory digital prescriptions are needed to generate contextual data for Indian AI models


Explanation

Both policy-oriented speakers surprisingly advocate for strong regulatory intervention rather than market-driven adoption, recognizing that voluntary adoption has failed to generate necessary data and behavioral changes


Topics

The enabling environment for digital development | Artificial intelligence


Voice technology as horizontal solution across healthcare

Speakers

– Jigar Halani
– Tanvi Lall

Arguments

Voice technology and multilingual capabilities are crucial horizontal solutions for healthcare AI in India


AI solutions must be personalized and context-specific, capable of handling multilinguality and voice interfaces


Explanation

The consensus on voice technology as a key enabler is unexpected given the technical complexity and the fact that it’s not typically prioritized in healthcare AI discussions, yet both speakers see it as fundamental


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Closing all digital divides


Overall assessment

Summary

The speakers demonstrate strong consensus on fundamental principles: patient safety and trust must be prioritized over speed of AI adoption, robust data infrastructure is essential, AI should augment rather than replace healthcare professionals, and successful implementation requires significant behavioral and institutional changes. There’s also agreement on the need for India-specific AI solutions and the critical role of voice/multilingual capabilities.


Consensus level

High level of consensus on core principles with implications for measured, safety-first approach to healthcare AI adoption in India. The agreement suggests a mature understanding of AI implementation challenges and the need for comprehensive transformation strategies rather than purely technological solutions. This consensus could facilitate coordinated policy and implementation approaches across public and private healthcare sectors.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Speed vs. Caution in AI Implementation

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Vikalp Sahni

Arguments

Multiple failures in AI implementation are welcome as they lead to better future outcomes


Technology and AI are moving very fast, requiring businesses and organizations to adapt quickly


Summary

Abhay Soi advocates for a cautious, failure-tolerant approach emphasizing that ‘getting it right is more important than first mover advantage’ due to patient safety concerns, while Vikalp Sahni emphasizes the need to move fast to keep pace with rapidly changing technology


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society


Approach to AI System Design for Different Healthcare Settings

Speakers

– Tanvi Lall
– Padmini Vishwanath

Arguments

Transformation stack must be different for private hospitals versus primary health centers


AI systems need to be designed starting from the most remote settings and scaled up, rather than adapting advanced systems downward


Summary

Tanvi Lall argues for different transformation approaches for different settings (private vs. public), while Padmini Vishwanath advocates for a reverse approach starting with the most remote settings first


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Closing all digital divides | Social and economic development


Mandatory vs. Voluntary Digital Adoption

Speakers

– Nikhil Dhongari
– Abhay Soi

Arguments

Tough decisions like mandatory digital prescriptions are needed to generate contextual data for Indian AI models


AI adoption requires extensive supervision and careful implementation due to patient safety concerns


Summary

Nikhil advocates for tough mandatory decisions like Railways’ digital-only prescription policy, while Abhay emphasizes the need for careful, supervised implementation prioritizing patient safety over speed


Topics

The enabling environment for digital development | Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society


Unexpected differences

Role of Failures in AI Development

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Padmini Vishwanath

Arguments

Multiple failures in AI implementation are welcome as they lead to better future outcomes


Qualitative dimensions like empathy, dignity, and care are increasingly important alongside quantitative measures


Explanation

Unexpectedly, while Abhay embraces failures as learning opportunities, Padmini’s focus on qualitative care dimensions suggests a more cautious approach to preserve human elements in healthcare


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Social and economic development


Priority of Innovation vs. Trust

Speakers

– Vikalp Sahni
– Abhay Soi

Arguments

Trust is the most important factor in healthcare, more critical than innovation


Technology should be invisible to users while improving experiences and outcomes


Explanation

Despite both being from the same organization (Eka), they show different emphases – Vikalp prioritizes trust over innovation while Abhay focuses on seamless technology integration


Topics

Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Artificial intelligence


Overall assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement center around implementation speed versus caution, mandatory versus voluntary adoption approaches, and different strategies for designing AI systems for diverse healthcare settings


Disagreement level

Moderate disagreement level with significant implications for AI implementation strategy in healthcare. The disagreements reflect fundamental tensions between innovation speed and patient safety, between top-down policy enforcement and organic adoption, and between standardized versus customized approaches to AI deployment across different healthcare contexts


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Both agree that behavioral and cultural changes are needed for successful AI adoption, but Dr. Gupta focuses on medical ethics and prescription practices while Nikhil emphasizes mandatory policy decisions to force behavioral change

Speakers

– Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
– Nikhil Dhongari

Arguments

Culture of data sharing and longitudinal patient records is still missing despite infrastructure availability


Behavioral change in healthcare professionals is essential for successful AI adoption


Topics

Data governance | Capacity development | The enabling environment for digital development


Both agree that AI should augment rather than replace healthcare professionals and that trust is crucial, but they differ on acceptable error rates and implementation approaches

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Jigar Halani

Arguments

AI should be used as assistive tool to augment physician capabilities, especially for safety-critical decisions like ECG interpretation


Trust has multiple dimensions depending on user perspective – accuracy for professionals, safety for patients


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society


Both agree on the critical importance of proper data infrastructure for AI, but Tanvi focuses on making data available for building while Dr. Gupta emphasizes the lack of Indian-specific training data

Speakers

– Tanvi Lall
– Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta

Arguments

AI-ready data systems are crucial as AI is only as good as the data it has access to


Current AI tools often lack training on Indian data and context-specific requirements


Topics

Data governance | Artificial intelligence


Similar viewpoints

Both speakers emphasize that trust is the fundamental foundation of healthcare success, more important than technological innovation, and directly impacts business outcomes

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Vikalp Sahni

Arguments

Patient trust is the foundation of healthcare success, with occupancy rates 10-15% better due to trust


Trust is the most important factor in healthcare, more critical than innovation


Topics

Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Social and economic development


Both speakers advocate for unified policy approaches that break down barriers between sectors and require decisive regulatory action to drive adoption

Speakers

– Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta
– Nikhil Dhongari

Arguments

Healthcare policy should treat private and public sectors as unified system for optimal care delivery


Tough decisions like mandatory digital prescriptions are needed to generate contextual data for Indian AI models


Topics

The enabling environment for digital development | Social and economic development


Both speakers emphasize the critical importance of developing AI solutions that are specifically tailored to Indian contexts, populations, and linguistic diversity rather than adapting foreign solutions

Speakers

– Jigar Halani
– Tanvi Lall

Arguments

Indian models need to incorporate environmental and population-specific factors rather than relying on foreign datasets


AI solutions must be personalized and context-specific, capable of handling multilinguality and voice interfaces


Topics

Artificial intelligence | Closing all digital divides | Social and economic development


Both speakers see AI as essential for India’s future development, particularly in addressing the healthcare infrastructure gap that will emerge as the population ages

Speakers

– Abhay Soi
– Vikalp Sahni

Arguments

India’s demographic dividend will create massive healthcare demand in 15 years without sufficient infrastructure or doctors


India needs to leapfrog using AI technologies to become a developed country


Topics

Social and economic development | Artificial intelligence | Information and communication technologies for development


Takeaways

Key takeaways

AI implementation in healthcare must prioritize patient safety and trust over speed of adoption, with technology remaining invisible to users while improving experiences


India has successfully created unprecedented digital health infrastructure with 860 million ABHA IDs under ABDM, providing a foundation for AI development


AI adoption in healthcare is becoming an absolute necessity for India due to demographic changes that will create massive healthcare demand without sufficient infrastructure in 15 years


Voice technology and multilingual capabilities are crucial horizontal solutions for healthcare AI in India to bridge language and literacy barriers


AI should serve as an assistive tool to augment physician capabilities rather than replace them, particularly for safety-critical decisions


The culture of data sharing and ethical medical practices must be established before mass AI adoption can succeed


AI systems should be designed starting from the most remote healthcare settings and scaled up, rather than adapting advanced systems downward


Trust in healthcare AI has multiple dimensions depending on user perspective – accuracy for professionals, comprehensive safety for patients


Behavioral change among healthcare professionals is essential for successful AI adoption and data generation


Resolutions and action items

Healthcare institutions need to implement mandatory digital prescriptions to generate contextual data for Indian AI models, following the Railways example


Builders should focus on creating transformation stacks that include education, awareness, and trust-building activities beyond just technology deployment


AI development should prioritize Indian population-specific data and environmental factors rather than relying on foreign datasets


Healthcare policy should treat private and public sectors as a unified system for optimal care delivery


Regulatory frameworks need to address unethical medical practices and prescription behaviors to enable mass AI adoption


Unresolved issues

How to effectively bridge the gap between AI adoption in private hospitals versus public health centers with different resource levels


The challenge of generating sufficient longitudinal patient records despite having ABDM infrastructure in place


Balancing the speed of AI technological advancement with the cautious approach required for healthcare safety


How to maintain human connection and empathy in healthcare while implementing AI solutions, particularly in palliative care


The cost and infrastructure requirements for deploying voice-based multilingual AI solutions at scale


How to ensure AI models trained on Indian data are representative of the diverse population and environmental factors across the country


Suggested compromises

Use AI as an assistive tool that errs on the side of caution (e.g., admitting more patients when ECG analysis suggests risk) rather than replacing clinical judgment


Implement hybrid cloud-edge solutions for voice AI depending on specific use cases and connectivity availability


Start AI implementation with low-hanging fruits like efficiency improvements and predictive analytics before moving to more complex clinical applications


Focus on creating AI-ready data systems while simultaneously working on behavioral change among healthcare professionals


Develop separate but coordinated approaches for private and public healthcare sectors while maintaining unified policy framework


Thought provoking comments

When you don’t interface with technology, but the experiences are improved. Having said that, I think, you know, like I said, we started this journey a few years ago. We started by creating a common -size data lake for all the patients which have been through our doors over the last 15 years, and which are doing so on a real -time basis today.

Speaker

Abhay Soi


Reason

This comment introduces a profound philosophical shift in how we should think about technology implementation – that the best technology is invisible to the user while dramatically improving outcomes. It challenges the common approach of showcasing technology features rather than focusing on seamless user experience.


Impact

This comment set the tone for the entire discussion by establishing that successful AI implementation in healthcare should be measured by improved patient experiences rather than technological sophistication. It influenced subsequent speakers to focus on practical outcomes and user adoption challenges.


There just isn’t enough infrastructure and doctors available in the country… 15 years down the line, there isn’t enough infrastructure which can possibly be built. There isn’t enough money over here… Without that, we will fail the future generation.

Speaker

Abhay Soi


Reason

This comment reframes AI adoption from a choice to an absolute necessity by highlighting India’s looming demographic crisis. It presents a compelling argument that AI isn’t just about efficiency but about preventing healthcare system collapse.


Impact

This shifted the discussion from ‘how to implement AI’ to ‘AI as essential infrastructure.’ It influenced later panelists to discuss AI as a leapfrogging technology and prompted discussions about predictive healthcare and home care solutions.


The challenge lies in the medical practices and medical ethics, not on the solutions per se. Otherwise, we would be the most adopted nation in terms of digital technologies… How many doctors would actually want to tell what they charge for a prescription, how many prescriptions they may, and why they write three antibiotics for one case.

Speaker

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta


Reason

This comment cuts through technical discussions to identify the real barrier to AI adoption – resistance from practitioners due to transparency concerns and potential exposure of unethical practices. It’s a brutally honest assessment that challenges the assumption that technology adoption failures are due to technical limitations.


Impact

This comment fundamentally shifted the conversation from technical challenges to systemic and ethical issues. It prompted discussions about regulatory frameworks and the need for ‘tough decisions’ to enforce digital adoption, as mentioned by Nikhil Dhongari’s example of Railways mandating digital prescriptions.


Trust for my mom could be a very different storyline right because for her everything on priority line is health nothing else essentially right for me plus or minus 1% 3% 5% 10% is also okay for her nothing is right and trust for a mother who has just a newborn in her hand it’s gonna be completely different right

Speaker

Jigar Halani


Reason

This comment brilliantly illustrates that trust in AI isn’t a monolithic concept but varies dramatically based on personal stakes and context. It challenges the tech industry’s tendency to apply universal metrics to deeply personal healthcare decisions.


Impact

This comment deepened the discussion about trust by making it personal and contextual. It influenced the conversation toward understanding that AI solutions must be designed with different trust thresholds for different user groups, leading to discussions about personalization and the need for different approaches for different healthcare settings.


AI tools are developed for the most advanced, most connected tertiary institutions. And then adapted later for the most more remote settings… But we are finding that some of the countries, you know, pilots are looking at reversing this logic, which means that we start developing readiness frameworks for the most remote settings

Speaker

Padmini Vishwanath


Reason

This comment challenges the conventional top-down approach to technology deployment and suggests a revolutionary bottom-up methodology. It’s insightful because it addresses equity concerns and suggests that designing for constraints first might lead to more robust and inclusive solutions.


Impact

This comment introduced a new paradigm for AI development strategy, shifting the discussion from scaling down advanced solutions to building up from basic needs. It influenced the conversation toward equity considerations and the importance of designing for the most challenging environments first.


The demo phase goes really well… But after three months, this is just going to be a side window on my browser which I never go back to because it was never thought of as a solution that I would embed into my workflow… you have to think from the start of this as a journey and not just a one-time switch.

Speaker

Tanvi Lall


Reason

This comment identifies a critical gap between proof-of-concept success and real-world adoption. It’s insightful because it explains why many promising AI solutions fail to achieve sustained impact and introduces the concept of ‘transformation’ rather than just ‘solution.’


Impact

This comment shifted the focus from building AI solutions to designing transformation journeys. It influenced the discussion toward understanding that successful AI implementation requires comprehensive change management, education, and workflow integration rather than just technical deployment.


Overall assessment

These key comments fundamentally shaped the discussion by moving it beyond technical considerations to address the human, ethical, and systemic challenges of AI adoption in healthcare. The conversation evolved from showcasing AI capabilities to examining the deeper barriers to adoption – from trust and ethics to workflow integration and equity. The most impactful insight was the recognition that successful AI implementation requires addressing human factors, regulatory frameworks, and systemic changes rather than just technological advancement. The discussion ultimately concluded that India’s AI healthcare future depends more on policy decisions, ethical practices, and inclusive design approaches than on technical sophistication alone.


Follow-up questions

How can AI systems be designed to balance innovation with the trust factor that patients have traditionally placed in doctors and institutions?

Speaker

Vikalp Sahni


Explanation

This addresses the fundamental challenge of maintaining patient trust while introducing AI technologies into healthcare workflows, which is crucial for successful adoption.


What specific regulatory frameworks and policies are needed to accelerate AI adoption in hospitals while ensuring patient safety?

Speaker

Vikalp Sahni


Explanation

Understanding the regulatory landscape is essential for healthcare institutions to implement AI solutions safely and effectively.


How can the culture of data sharing be improved in Indian healthcare to enable better AI model training on Indian population data?

Speaker

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta


Explanation

The lack of data culture is identified as a major barrier to developing AI systems based on Indian population characteristics rather than global datasets.


What are the specific challenges in moving from AI pilot projects to population-scale deployment in healthcare?

Speaker

Tanvi Lall


Explanation

Understanding the gap between successful demos and actual implementation at scale is critical for healthcare AI adoption.


How can AI solutions be designed differently for private hospitals versus public sector healthcare facilities?

Speaker

Deepak Tuli


Explanation

The different resource constraints, patient loads, and operational models between private and public healthcare require tailored AI approaches.


What role should voice and multilingual capabilities play in making AI healthcare solutions more accessible across India’s diverse population?

Speaker

Jigar Halani


Explanation

Language barriers are a significant challenge in healthcare delivery, and voice-based AI could bridge these gaps.


How can medical ethics and prescription practices be regulated to enable better AI adoption in healthcare?

Speaker

Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta


Explanation

Unethical medical practices are identified as a barrier to AI adoption, requiring regulatory solutions.


What behavioral changes are needed among healthcare professionals to enable better data collection for AI model training?

Speaker

Nikhil Dhongari


Explanation

Resistance to digital documentation by healthcare professionals is limiting the availability of contextual Indian healthcare data.


How should AI readiness frameworks be developed starting from the most remote healthcare settings rather than advanced tertiary institutions?

Speaker

Padmini Vishwanath


Explanation

This reverse approach could lead to more equitable and trusted AI implementations across diverse healthcare settings.


What are the qualitative dimensions of AI in healthcare beyond quantitative measures like diagnosis accuracy?

Speaker

Padmini Vishwanath


Explanation

Understanding how AI affects empathy, dignity, and human connection in healthcare is important for comprehensive evaluation.


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.