Starlink complies with Brazilian court order amid country’s crackdown on Elon Musk

The order, issued by Judge Alexandre de Moraes, also involves freezing Starlink’s accounts to ensure payment of fines owed by X, which Musk also owns.

 Blazer, Clothing, Coat, Jacket, Face, Head, Person, Photography, Portrait, Formal Wear, Suit, Adult, Male, Man, Accessories, Tie, People, Crowd, Shirt, Electrical Device, Microphone, Overcoat, Elon Musk

Elon Musk’s Starlink has become entangled in a legal dispute with Brazil, as the company reluctantly complies with a court order to block access to the country’s social media platform X. The compliance comes just a day after Starlink initially informed Brazil’s telecom regulator, Anatel, that it would defy the order, setting up a clash with the Brazilian judiciary. The legal battle is centred around actions by Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes, who ordered the freezing of Starlink’s accounts as a precaution against unpaid fines owed by X and, thus, by Musk.

The conflict escalated after Moraes directed all internet providers in Brazil to block access to X, citing the platform’s failure to maintain a legal representative, which was one of the conditions imposed by the court. The decision, which was upheld by a panel of Supreme Court justices, has led to the platform’s shutdown in Brazil. Despite initial resistance, Starlink reversed its stance and began implementing the block, with Anatel confirming that access to X has already started being cut off.

Starlink, which serves over 200,000 customers in Brazil, expressed its discontent with the situation in a post on X, labelling the freezing of its assets as illegal. The company has initiated legal proceedings in the Brazilian Supreme Court, arguing that Moraes’ orders violate the Brazilian constitution. However, Starlink missed a deadline to file a new appeal against the asset freeze, leaving its next legal steps uncertain.

The roots of this dispute trace back to an earlier order by Moraes, which required X to block accounts under investigation for spreading disinformation and hate speech. Musk condemned this order as censorship and closed X’s office in Brazil in August. Despite the office closure, X remained accessible until Moraes’ recent crackdown. Some users in Brazil are reportedly bypassing the block by using VPNs.

The standoff highlights broader tensions between Musk and the Brazilian judiciary, raising concerns about the balance between state power and the protection of free speech. Musk’s pushback against what he views as government overreach has now turned into an ardent legal battle, with potential implications for internet freedom and the role of tech companies in upholding or challenging state authorities.