Justice Department pushes to curb Google monopoly

Google has pushed back against a US government proposal to break up its business, arguing that such a move would hurt consumers and reduce competition rather than enhance it.

In a court filing ahead of a remedy trial due to begin on 21 April, Google claimed the Justice Department’s plan to divest services like Chrome and Android would force users to adopt less effective alternatives.

The company stressed that consumers overwhelmingly prefer Google’s search engine and that its agreements with browser and device manufacturers do not prevent rivals from competing.

The Justice Department is asking the court to consider structural remedies, including breaking up parts of Google’s business or limiting its default search agreements, to curb what it deems monopolistic behaviour.

The agency originally proposed more aggressive action, such as divesting Google’s AI investments, but later backed down, citing concerns over unintended consequences in the fast-evolving AI sector.

Google has offered alternative remedies, including more flexibility for Android manufacturers to preload or set other search engines as default, without fully removing its own search partnerships.

A 15-day hearing will begin later this month, with both sides set to present evidence and call high-profile witnesses. Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple’s senior VP of services are among the 20 witnesses listed by the tech giant.

The Justice Department plans to call 19 witnesses, including executives from OpenAI, DuckDuckGo and Microsoft, as it argues for stronger measures to level the playing field in internet search.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.