
Dear readers,
Last week, the UN Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on the security of the use of information and communications technologies in 2021–2025 held its tenth substantive session, the penultimate session of the group before its mandate concludes in July of this year.
Tensions ran high since the first day, with attributions of cyberattacks and rights of reply denouncing those attributions taking centre stage. The states held tightly to their positions, largely unchanged since the last session in December 2024. The Chair pointed out that direct dialogue was lacking, with participants instead opting for a virtual town hall approach—circulating their positions and posting them on the portal, and reminded delegates that whatever decisions to be made would be made by consensus, urging them to demonstrate flexibility.
Ransomware, AI, and threats to critical infrastructure remain the biggest concerns of countries regarding the threat landscape. Even as countries don’t agree on an exhaustive list of threats or their sources, there is a strong emphasis on collective and cooperative responses such as capacity development and knowledge sharing to reduce the risk of these threats, as well as mitigate and manage them.
The long-standing debate between implementing existing norms and developing new ones continued. However, this session saw ASEAN countries take a more pragmatic approach, emphasising concrete steps toward implementing agreed norms while maintaining openness to discussing new ones in parallel. At the same time, the call from developing countries for greater capacity development gained momentum, underscoring the challenge of implementing norms without sufficient resources and support.
The discussions on international law have shown little progress in drawing closer between the positions states hold — there is still no consensus on the necessity of new legally binding regulations for cyberspace. There is also discord on how to proceed with discussing international law in the future permanent UN mechanism on cybersecurity.
Discussions on confidence-building measures (CBMs) were largely subdued, as few new CBMs were introduced, and states didn’t overly detail their POC Directory experience. Many states shared their CBM implementation, which is often linked to regional initiatives and best practices, showing eagerness to operationalise CBMs. It seems states now anticipate the future permanent mechanism to serve as the forum for detailed CBM discussions.
The Voluntary Fund and the Capacity-Building Portal have increasingly been regarded as key deliverables of the OEWG process. However, states remain cautious about the risk of duplicating existing global and regional initiatives, and a clear consensus has yet to emerge regarding the objectives of these deliverables.
States are still grappling with thematic groups and non-state stakeholder engagement questions in the future permanent mechanism. The Chair’s upcoming reflections and town halls will likely get the ball rolling on finding elements for the future permanent mechanism acceptable to all delegations.
Delegations have much to agree upon and exceedingly little time to do so. While this has been the mantra for the last two years, negotiations are now truly entering the eleventh hour, and consensus remains elusive. This spells trouble not just for the group’s final report, but also uncertainty for the future of UN cybersecurity discussions that the report will chart.
For more information on cybersecurity, digital policies, AI governance and other related topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
The event:
The Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on the security of and in the use of information and communications technologies in 2021–2025 will hold its seventh substantive session on 17-21 February 2025 in New York, the USA.
In other news:
Trump’s team considers tighter semiconductor trade restrictions on China with international cooperation
Donald Trump’s team is considering stronger semiconductor restrictions on China, expanding on measures introduced during Joe Biden’s presidency.
EU Commission proposes enhanced cyber crisis management framework
The EU Commission introduced a proposal aimed at strengthening the EU’s response to large-scale cyber attacks.
Marko, Andrijana and the Digital Watch team
Highlights from the week of 21-28 February 2025
The EU Commission’s proposal seeks to boost cybersecurity cooperation among Member States through collaborative clusters, a common crisis management taxonomy, ongoing exercises, improved DNS strategies, and enhanced information sharing.
Jim Jordan and Scott Fitzgerald question EU rules on Big Tech.
Some users exploited ChatGPT to generate misleading news and fake job applications, raising security concerns.
A new wave of competition is emerging against Elon Musk’s Starlink, with rivals like China’s SpaceSail and Jeff Bezos’s Project Kuiper entering the satellite internet market.
A legal battle unfolds as Rumble and Trump Media challenge Brazil’s restrictions in a US court.
Chegg claims Google’s AI search features are eroding demand for original content and harming digital publishers.
Although a quantum attack threat is distant, experts advocate for immediate preparations.
Eastern Europe’s defence tech sector grows amid tensions.
Despite being one of the world’s most influential platforms, YouTube remains shrouded in mystery. A team of researchers has devised an unconventional way to uncover hidden statistics, challenging the carefully…
Known for its cost-effective and innovative strategies, DeepSeek is challenging more expensive Western AI models by using efficient Nvidia hardware and advanced techniques like Mixture-of-Experts (MoE).
Taiwan firmly denies these claims, emphasising its semiconductor autonomy amid geopolitical tensions.
Reading corner
The OEWG’s tenth session in February 2025 saw states emphasise collective action against cyber threats, address divisions on norms implementation and binding regulations, highlight the Voluntary Fund and Capacity-Building Portal,…
These approaches illustrate a global shift towards embracing AI’s transformative potential while considering the ethical and societal implications, fostering international cooperation to future-proof technological advancements.
Augmented reality features like ‘Tabletop’ allow NBA fans to view matches from multiple angles, analyse performances in real time, and simulate alternative outcomes.
UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence sets a global standard for AI governance. It provides a framework for policymakers to ensure AI development aligns with ethical and inclusive principles.
The closure of USAID marks an important shift in U.S. foreign policy, potentially weakening American soft power and leaving a vacuum that rivals like China may exploit. As global diplomacy evolves, questions arise about the future of influence, public diplomacy, and the role of digital networks in shaping international relations.
How ready are countries for the metaverse? Nations are taking different approaches – state-led, industry-driven, or hybrid models. Where does your country stand? Dr Anita Lamprecht explores.
Once, diplomacy was a game of kings, queens, and marriages. Now, it’s a world of sub-federal actors, corporations, NGOs, and diasporas. The ambassador is no longer the sole conduit of statecraft – just one node in a growing network. Aldo Matteucci writes.
Upcoming
The primary goal of this webinar is to provide a platform for dialogue, knowledge sharing, and collaboration among policymakers, tourism stakeholders, and digital technology experts.
Digital Diplomacy and Tourism in Africa: Unlocking Opportunities for Growth and Collaboration ⏰ 16:00–17:30 (EAT) / 14:00–15:30 (CET)