DW Weekly #174 – 23 August 2024
This week, we’ve seen significant developments in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). Researchers at the University of California Davis Health have developed a highly accurate BCI that can translate brain signals into speech with 97% accuracy. The system, which involves implanting four microelectrode arrays in the brain, decodes neural patterns into text and speech. This technology offers new hope for individuals with severe speech impairments.
Musk’s Neuralink has also reported progress with their second patient, codenamed Alex. The device allowed Alex, who has quadriplegia, to control digital devices with his mind, such as playing video games and using computer-aided design (CAD) software. The trial aims to demonstrate that the link is safe and valuable in daily life, to restore autonomy for people with disabilities. Neuralink is working on expanding the device’s capabilities, including allowing users to feed themselves and move more independently by controlling a robotic arm or their wheelchair. Musk predicts that ‘hundreds of millions’ will have Neuralinks within ‘the next couple of decades’. Neuralink could enhance human brain output rates to keep pace with AI, enabling more efficient communication with computers, and potentially even surpassing normal human capabilities. ‘While we’re in there, why not? Let’s give people superpowers,’ Musk stated.
Advancements in brain-computer interface (BCI) technology signal a transformative era in how humans interact with machines and, potentially, each other. The immediate benefits, such as restoring speech and mobility to individuals with severe disabilities, are groundbreaking and offer immense hope. However, as the technology progresses, particularly with the more advanced ambitions envisioned by Musk, there are critical ethical and societal implications to consider.
The prospect of enhancing human capabilities beyond natural limits raises questions about equity, accessibility, and the definition of what it means to be human. If Neuralink or similar technologies become widely available, there could be a significant divide between those who can afford such enhancements and those who cannot, leading to a new form of inequality. The long-term effects of integrating such devices into the human brain are unknown, and the potential for misuse – whether by individuals, corporations, or governments – cannot be overlooked.
Andrijana and the Digital Watch team
Highlights from the week of 16-23 August 2024
Despite the advantages of AI model training, some organisations, like the New York Times, have sued OpenAI over copyright issues.
The report calls for a shift to a circular digital economy, emphasising durable products, responsible consumption, reuse, recycling, and sustainable business models.
The decision to lift the ban comes amid public protests over lost income and free speech.
The ruling is part of a global movement for enhanced data protection and could impact not only WhatsApp but also other tech companies in Brazil and potentially set a precedent for similar actions worldwide.
Rival bargain retailers Shein and Temu are locked in a fierce copyright dispute.
The case has been sent back for further review. Google disagrees with the ruling but remains confident in its position.
EU initiatives like the MEDUSA project are key to advancing digital connectivity in the Middle East and North Africa.
The Malaysian government has unveiled a fresh collaboration with Worldcoin, focusing on incorporating cutting-edge technology into its countrywide identification framework.
The energy sector faces increasing cyber threats, with past incidents like the 2021 Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack underscoring the severe impact such breaches can have.
Additionally, the ACT calls for a regulatory framework to bring OTT providers under the same licensing regime as traditional network operators.
The ongoing scrutiny of platforms like 𝕏 under Elon Musk’s ownership highlights the complex role social media plays in public discourse and the spread of extremist content.
