Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks

20 Feb 2026 18:00h - 19:00h

Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The inaugural session of the India AI Impact Summit 2026 focused on the convergence of artificial intelligence and telecommunications, highlighting AI as a transformative force across industries [6][7][14-16]. TRAI Chairman Anil Kumar Lahoti stressed that AI is no longer an add-on but a foundational layer that will become intrinsic to upcoming 6G networks, making the telecom infrastructure “AI-native” and a backbone of India’s AI ecosystem [28-34][31-33]. He cited concrete AI deployments that already improve network performance, predict faults, save energy and block hundreds of millions of spam calls daily, demonstrating tangible benefits of responsible AI use [38-43]. The chairman also warned that the scale of AI-driven decisions makes trust, transparency and accountability essential, outlining India’s risk-based regulatory framework, the 2023 AI recommendations, the 2024 sandbox for live testing, and the MANO-V vision for human-centric AI governance [46-53][54-56].


Ms Pallavi Mishra then introduced the first plenary on preparing telecom networks for the AI era, featuring panelists from Ericsson, Qualcomm, Nokia and Tejas Networks [74-81][82-84]. Ericsson’s Magnus Ewerbring noted that India already enjoys over 90 % population coverage with 5G and that AI has increased spectrum capacity by about 10 % and improved energy efficiency by roughly 33 %, with further gains expected as networks move toward level-5 autonomy in 6G [101-108][206-214]. Qualcomm’s Vinesh Sukumar explained that democratizing AI on edge devices requires hybrid edge-cloud architectures, keeping privacy-sensitive and latency-critical functions on the device while training and large-scale inference run in the cloud [119-128][219-229]. Nokia’s Pasi Toivanen stressed that capturing AI value demands a collaborative ecosystem, clear value-sharing models, and proactive security assessments embedded in the network itself [145-154][158-160].


Shantigram Jagannath from Tejas Networks argued that AI adoption must address both cost optimisation (CAPEX/OPEX) and new revenue streams, and that choosing between AI-first or bolt-on architectures depends on existing equipment and long-term investment cycles [169-184][185-190]. He also highlighted the need for trust and regulation to ensure equitable service, proposing network slicing and AI-driven management to prevent rural users from receiving lower bandwidth than urban users [188-196][255-266]. The moderator Ritu Ranjan Mittar queried how AI differs from traditional self-optimising networks, and Magnus confirmed that AI enables deeper data analysis, yielding measurable capacity and energy gains beyond existing SON capabilities [196-198][199-214]. Vinesh added that decisions involving user privacy and real-time responsiveness belong at the edge, while fleet management and model training remain cloud-centric, underscoring a hybrid approach [219-229].


Pasi suggested that most optimisation decisions should be pushed to the network itself, reducing reliance on regional data centres, whereas Shantigram emphasized that future AI agents will vastly outnumber human devices, requiring new business models and regulatory thinking [239-248][277-286]. The session concluded that AI will fundamentally reshape telecommunications, but its success will depend on coordinated industry innovation, robust governance, and inclusive deployment to ensure trusted, sustainable services for all users [62-64][55-56].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


AI is becoming the foundational, “AI-native” layer of telecom networks, especially with the upcoming 6 G era.


The Chairman emphasized that AI is no longer an add-on but the intelligence layer of telecom, and that future 6 G networks will be intrinsically AI-native rather than merely AI-enabled [28-34].


Current AI deployments are already delivering tangible benefits in Indian telecom.


AI is used for network performance optimisation, fault prediction, energy-efficiency gains, and fraud/spam mitigation – e.g., operators report significant energy savings and the blocking of ~400 million spam calls daily [38-44].


A risk-based regulatory framework is being put in place to ensure responsible AI use.


TRAI’s 2023 recommendations and the 2024 sandbox guidelines introduce a tiered approach (self-regulation for low-risk use cases, stricter obligations for high-risk ones) and align with the national AI-governance principles [46-48][49-53].


Technical challenges such as security, sustainability, and the edge-cloud split must be addressed.


The panel highlighted concerns about AI-driven attacks, the compute-intensive nature of AI and its energy impact, and the need to decide which functions stay on the edge versus the cloud [92-96][119-128].


Building an inclusive AI-telecom ecosystem and new business models is essential.


Speakers stressed the importance of collaborative ecosystems, trust-based “app-store” models for AI services, and ensuring affordable access for the bottom-of-the-pyramid while exploring revenue opportunities from AI-enabled services [145-152][163-170][184-190].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The session was convened to launch the “Responsible AI in Telecom” track of the India AI Impact Summit 2026, to share how AI is already transforming India’s telecom infrastructure, to outline regulatory and governance measures that will guide safe and trustworthy AI adoption, and to set the agenda for deeper technical and policy deliberations on preparing networks, protecting consumers, and fostering an inclusive AI-driven ecosystem.


Overall tone and its evolution


The conversation began with a formal, celebratory tone-acknowledging TRAI’s milestones and the promise of AI-driven networks. It then shifted to an analytical, evidence-based tone as speakers presented concrete benefits and regulatory steps. Mid-session, the tone became more cautionary and problem-solving, focusing on security, sustainability, and architectural decisions. By the closing remarks, the tone turned collaborative and forward-looking, emphasizing ecosystem partnership and inclusive growth. Throughout, the discourse remained professional and constructive.


Speakers

Ms. Pallavi Mishra


– Role/Title: Moderator, event host (India AI Impact Summit 2026)


– Area of Expertise: Telecommunications policy, AI in telecom (implied from hosting role)


Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti


– Role/Title: Honorable Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)


– Area of Expertise: Telecom regulation, AI governance, policy leadership [S7][S8]


Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar


– Role/Title: Member, TRAI; Session Moderator; Telecom policy expert with over three decades of experience


– Area of Expertise: Telecom networks, spectrum policy, regulatory frameworks, AI in telecom [S2]


Mr. Pasi Toivanen


– Role/Title: Representative, Nokia (speaker)


– Area of Expertise: Telecom network architecture, AI-enabled solutions, ecosystem collaboration [S1]


Mr. Shantigram Jagannath


– Role/Title: Technology Strategist, Tejas Networks (speaker)


– Area of Expertise: Telecom network design, AI-driven innovations, cost-revenue frameworks, ecosystem trust [S3]


Dr. Vinesh Sukumar


– Role/Title: Vice President, Product Management, Qualcomm


– Area of Expertise: Mobile AI, edge-cloud hybridization, AI inference on devices, privacy-aware AI deployment [S6]


Magnus Ewerbring


– Role/Title: Chief Technology Officer, Asia Pacific, Ericsson


– Area of Expertise: Telecom network automation, AI-native 5G/6G evolution, performance optimization, autonomous networks [S13]


Audience


– Role/Title: Attendee(s) from the session audience


– Area of Expertise: Not specified


Additional speakers:


Mr. Magnus Eberberg / Magnus Ewerbring – (same individual as Magnus Ewerbring listed above; appears under a variant spelling in the transcript).


No other speakers were identified outside the provided list.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The inaugural session of the India AI Impact Summit 2026 opened with Ms Pallavi Mishra welcoming a diverse audience of operators, OEMs, policymakers, academia and media, noting the event’s placement on the summit sidelines and the 29th anniversary of TRAI’s role in shaping India’s telecom landscape [5-9][11-13]. She framed the theme as the emergence of “self-healing” networks that can anticipate faults and deliver uninterrupted connectivity, stressing that this vision is already being realised through artificial intelligence [12-16].


TRAI Chairman Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti then delivered the inaugural address, describing AI as “the backbone for the intelligence era” and asserting that AI is no longer an optional add-on but an intrinsic, “AI-native” layer for forthcoming 6G systems [28-34][31-33]. He cited concrete deployments already in place: AI-driven predictive network management, fault detection, energy-efficiency optimisation, AI-and-blockchain-based filtering that blocks roughly 400 million spam calls and messages per day, the disconnection of about 2.1 million spam numbers, and a digital-consent acquisition framework piloted with banks to give consumers control over commercial communications [38-44]. To safeguard the massive impact of algorithmic decisions, he outlined TRI’s risk-based regulatory framework-recognising that “not all AI use cases are safe, but all AI use cases carry the same level of risk,” allowing low-risk cases to be self-regulated while imposing stricter obligations on high-risk ones-along with the 2024 sandbox for live AI testing and the human-centred MANOV vision that embeds safeguards by design [46-53][54-56]. He also announced that a second plenary will focus on building customer trust, covering governance, ethics, accountability and consumer protection [31-33].


After thanking the Chairman, Ms Mishra introduced the first plenary, “Preparing telecom networks for the AI era,” and announced a panel of senior technologists from Ericsson, Qualcomm, Nokia and Tejas Networks [74-81][82-84]. The session was moderated by Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar, who opened with four thematic questions-(a) evolution of the access network, (b) core-network changes, (c) AI on handsets and its impact on the network, (d) AI-enabled security threats, and (e) compute-intensity & sustainability-and noted the presence of Dr Tangirala and start-up representatives, underscoring the multi-stakeholder nature of the discussion [88-97].


Panel presentations


* Magnus Ewerbring, Chief Technology Officer, Asia-Pacific, Ericsson, highlighted India’s exceptional 5G footprint-over 90 % population coverage, with some estimates approaching 99 %-providing a robust platform for AI-enabled services [101-103]. He reported that AI-enhanced link-adaptation algorithms have already increased effective spectrum capacity by about 10 % and improved energy efficiency by roughly 33 % [206-214], and outlined Ericsson’s roadmap toward TM Forum Level 4 autonomy by 2028 and Level 5 “AI-native” autonomy for 6G [111-112][199-205].


* Dr Vinesh Sukumar, Vice-President, Qualcomm, argued for a hybrid AI model that moves inference to the edge of devices (phones, wearables, glasses) for privacy-sensitive and latency-critical functions, while retaining large-scale training, fleet management and drift handling in the cloud [119-128][219-224]. He called for further research to enable dynamic edge-cloud coexistence [225-232][233].


* Pasi Toivanen, Nokia, stressed that AI’s true value emerges from a 360° ecosystem linking OEMs, regulators, operators and startups, with clear value-sharing mechanisms and proactive security assessments embedded in the network [145-154][158-160]. He advocated pushing the majority of optimisation decisions into the network fabric to reduce reliance on regional data centres, thereby improving efficiency and resilience [239-248].


* Shantigram Jagannath, Tejas Networks, contrasted an “AI-first, AI-native” architecture with a bolt-on approach, noting the impact on CAPEX/OPEX and long-term sustainability [180-183]. He proposed a telecom-platform “app-store” where simple AI models can be uploaded and accessed under appropriate trust, regulation and safety frameworks [188-192][185-190]. Jagannath also noted that network slicing can be created with a single click, enabling rapid allocation of bandwidth to different slices and supporting equitable service for rural users [255-266].


The moderator’s follow-up questions elicited concise answers: Magnus clarified that AI offers deeper data analytics than traditional SON, delivering the cited capacity and energy gains [199-214]; Dr Sukumar reiterated that privacy-critical tasks belong at the edge while training and fleet management remain in the cloud [219-224]; Pasi emphasized pushing optimisation as far into the network as possible [239-248]; Jagannath highlighted the single-click slicing capability for equitable bandwidth distribution [262-266].


An audience member raised a practical concern about introducing AI across India’s 118 crore mobile connections without service disruption. Pasi responded that an end-to-end ecosystem approach-coordinating OEMs, regulators and startups-can avoid piecemeal patches and ensure smooth evolution [272-275]. Jagannath suggested that the simplest remedy is to procure additional equipment to handle the increased AI-driven traffic, illustrating a divergence between ecosystem-centric coordination and hardware-centric scaling [255-256][272-275].


Across the discussion, a strong consensus emerged that AI is a transformative driver for Indian telecom, delivering tangible efficiency gains, forming the backbone of the forthcoming AI-native 6G era, and requiring a risk-based, multi-stakeholder regulatory framework to preserve trust, accountability and inclusivity [28-34][38-44][46-53][54-56][145-154][199-214]. Moderate disagreements persisted regarding (i) optimal AI workload placement (edge vs. network vs. cloud) [219-224][239-248][206-214], (ii) AI-first versus bolt-on architectures [180-183][31-34], and (iii) scaling AI across the massive subscriber base (ecosystem coordination versus additional hardware) [272-275][255-256].


Key take-aways


1. AI will become an intrinsic layer of telecom, especially with 6G.


2. Current deployments already yield ~10 % capacity and ~33 % energy improvements and block hundreds of millions of spam communications daily.


3. TRI’s risk-based framework (low-risk self-regulation, high-risk obligations), sandbox and MANOV vision provide the governance backbone.


4. A hybrid edge-cloud model is needed, with privacy-sensitive tasks at the edge and large-scale analytics in the cloud.


5. Sustainability must be addressed through network-centric optimisation and careful compute management.


6. New business models such as AI-model marketplaces and AI-driven revenue streams are emerging.


7. Equity and inclusion require AI-enabled network slicing and trust mechanisms to protect rural and bottom-of-the-pyramid users.


Action items identified were the continuation of the sandbox programme, industry commitment to TM Forum Level 4 by 2028, exploration of AI-first versus bolt-on pathways, development of transparent value-sharing ecosystems, and formulation of concrete security and sustainability metrics. Unresolved issues include precise edge-cloud workload allocation criteria, detailed safeguards against AI-powered attacks, mechanisms to guarantee fair bandwidth allocation, and economic models for the projected explosion of AI agents (potentially 500 crore) that will generate new traffic patterns.


Ms Mishra closed the session, thanking the panelists and participants, expressing confidence that responsible AI-underpinned by evolving regulatory frameworks and collaborative industry effort-will drive a positive transformation of India’s telecom sector, and invited attendees to the forthcoming discussions on customer-trust and governance [294-295].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Ms. Pallavi Mishra

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. being organized on the sidelines of India AI Impact Summit 2026. Today, we are gathered to discuss the new elements of AI and telecommunication. This event is organized by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, TRI, in collaboration with India AI under Ministry of Electronics and IT. Today, interestingly, on 20th February, TRI marks 29 years of its journey in shaping India’s telecommunication landscape. Representatives from telecom operators, technology OEMs, policymakers, government, academia and media are present here. Aap sabhi ka hardik abhinandan hai. Kalpna kijiye ek aisa telecom network jo khud ko heal kar sakhe that can detect faults even before we know them and deliver seamless connectivity to billions without interruption.

This is not a science fiction. This is the power of AI in telecommunication. Today, AI is transforming industries. And as we look ahead, AI is all set to become even more transformative. From predictive network management to intelligent customer experiences, the possibilities are humongous. Now, it’s my proud privilege to invite Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti ji, Honorable Chairman TRAI, whose dynamic leadership continues to provide direction and strength to the telecom regulatory ecosystem of our country. Chairman sir needs no introduction. His vision has been instrumental in steering TRAI through a rapidly evolving digital landscape. I respectfully request Chairman sir to kindly deliver his inaugural address.

Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti

Distinguished leaders from the technology companies, from telecom service providers and industry associations, representatives from government, my colleague members from TRI and other colleagues from TRI, ladies and gentlemen. Good afternoon to all of you. It’s my privilege to welcome all of you to this session on Responsible AI in Telecom. This is a session by the side of India AI Impact Summit. During last few days, we have been listening to the world leaders from governments, technology companies, academia and civil society. AI is now and here. In this context, the very composition of this gathering reflects a shared responsibility of recognition. that artificial intelligence is no longer an emerging add -on to telecommunication. It’s a foundational capability shaping how networks are designed, operated and experienced by users.

Artificial intelligence and telecommunications complement each other to form the backbone for the intelligence era. Telecom networks are emerging as the primary carriers of AI, while AI itself is becoming the intelligence layer of telecom. In the upcoming 6G technology, AI will no longer be an application layer. It will be intrinsic. The telecom networks will be AI native. In this sense, telecom networks are no longer mere data carriers, but these are central pillar of India’s AI infrastructure. Our nationwide fiber backbones and mobile broadband networks constitute one of the most widely distributed digital infrastructures in the world, operating within mature operational and regulatory frameworks. India’s scale gives special significance to this convergence. With over 1 .3 billion telecom subscribers and over 1 billion data users, India operates telecom networks at a scale, where AI -driven automation is no longer optional.

It is indispensable. AI is already being deployed to optimize network performance, predict faults, improve energy efficiency, enhance customer experience, and combat fraud and spam communications. These deployments demonstrate how AI can improve service quality, resilience, and consumer safety when applied responsibly at the network level. India is already witnessing clear gains from the responsible use of AI in the telecom sector. Operators are stating significant energy saving with use of AI. Due to the effectiveness of AI and blockchain -based filtering operators are now flagging or blocking nearly 400 million suspected spam calls or messages each day. Enhanced enforcement and improved oversight of service providers has already led to the disconnection of about 2 .1 million spam numbers. The authority is also advancing the rollout of a digital consent acquisition framework following successful pilot runs with the banks to ensure consumers have digital control over consent for commercial communications.

At the same time, the scale at which AI systems operate is also increasing. The impact of AI in telecom also amplifies their impact. automated decisions taken by algorithms can affect millions of users simultaneously this makes trust the central pillar of AI adoption in telecommunication efficiency gains cannot come at the cost of transparency, accountability or consumer rights as telecom is an essential service public confidence must remain at the core of AI enabled transformation the government of India has been proactive in addressing this balance the India AI mission and the recently articulated AI governance guidelines emphasize a huge role in the development of AI and the recent articulated AI governance guidelines emphasize a huge role in the development of AI and the recent articulated AI governance guidelines emphasize a huge role in the development of AI emphasize a huge role in the development of AI and the recent articulated AI governance guidelines emphasize a huge role in the development of AI emphasize a huge role in the development of AI emphasize a huge role in the development of AI and the recent articulated AI governance guidelines one that encourages innovation while embedding safeguards by design.

These principles are particularly relevant for telecom, where AI systems interact continuously with the citizen, enterprises and public institutions. TRI has been aligned with this approach. In July 2023, TRI issued recommendations on leveraging artificial intelligence and big data in the telecommunications sector, proposing a risk -based regulatory framework for AI in telecom. This approach recognizes that not all AI use cases are safe, but that all AI use cases carry the same level of risk. While low -risk applications may be guided through self -regulation, high -risk use cases, especially those directly affecting consumers, require stronger obligations around transparency, explainability, and human oversight. In April 2024, TRI further facilitated this approach through its recommendations on the regulatory sandbox, enabling live network testing of AI -enabled solutions, including those relevant for 5G and future 6G networks within defined safeguards.

This reflects our regulatory philosophy of enabling innovation while ensuring that public interest remains protected. The MANOV vision announced yesterday by the Honorable PM of India emphasizes a human -centric framework for ethical, accountable, inclusive AI governance. The principles of the Mana vision are equally fundamental to AI governance in telecommunication. Coming back to the agenda of today’s program, the two plenary sessions, we have planned to capture this responsibility very well. The first session featuring technology developers will focus on preparing telecom networks for the AI era and examine how networks must evolve to become more intelligent, autonomous and resilient, while remaining secure and sustainable. The second session with representatives from telecom service providers and GSMA will address building customer trust through AI -driven operations, highlighting governance, ethics, accountability, and customer protection in an environment where AI -based decisions increasingly shape everyday connectivity.

As AI -driven telecom operations scale across borders, issues of interoperability, standards, and ethical alignment become global concerns. India’s experience of deploying AI in telecom at population scale offers valuable lessons, while international cooperation remains essential. To address shared challenges, let me conclude with this thought. AI will undoubtedly shape the future of telecommunications. But it is the way we design, govern and deploy AI that will determine whether this future is trusted, inclusive and resilient. TRI remains committed to working with all stakeholders, industry, policymakers and international partners to ensure that AI in telecom serves both innovation and public good. I wish this session fruitful deliberations and look forward to the insights that will emerge from today’s discussions. Thank you.

Ms. Pallavi Mishra

Thank you very much, Chairman, sir, for your inspiring address. You have illuminated how regulatory frameworks and policies are evolving AI -driven telecom. Sir, your words make us believe that this transformation is moving forward in a positive way. We are delighted to hear your perspective, sir. Heartful gratitude to all the esteemed speakers and guests. The inaugural session has set a vibrant context for our upcoming discussions. Now our first plenary session will begin. Our first session is on preparing telecom networks for AI era. In this session, our experts will discuss AI adoption in telecom, transparency, security, safety, sustainable AI networks, and embedding responsibility by design. To moderate this insightful discussion, we are honored to invite Sridhar Ranjan Mittal, member TRAI, an eminent telecom policy expert with over three decades of experience in telecom networks, global standards, and spectrum policy.

We are honored to have distinguished panel of industry leaders. I welcome on dies. Our first panelist, Mr. Magnus Eberberg, Chief Technology Officer for Asia Pacific at Ericsson, a global telecom innovator who had played a key role in developing region’s long -term technology vision from 5G deployment to 6G readiness. Joining us next is Dr. Vinesh Sukumar, Vice President, Product Management from Qualcomm, a seasoned product leader with over 20 years of experience in large -scale AI, deep learning, and mobile technologies across global telecom ecosystem. We also welcome Mr. Parsi Tovnen of Nokia, who leads strategic engagement with governments and industry on AI and connectivity initiatives, driving large -scale ecosystem collaboration in cloud. AI and AI RAN. Our next distinguished speaker is Mr.

Shanti Gram Jagannath from Tejas Networks, a technology strategist leading wireless products, network management system, and AI -driven innovations. I request all the panelists to join for a quick photograph session on the demand of the organizers. You all may stand for a moment. Thank you, sirs. We look forward to a thoughtful exchange on how AI -driven innovations are being used in the future. We are redefining telecom capabilities from our panelists. now I hand over the stage to our moderator Sri Rutheranjan Mithrasar to start the session

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

Thank you Madam Sri Lahoti Chairperson TRAI my colleague member Dr. Tangirala doyens of the industry OEMs your staff accompanying you my colleagues from TRAI industry associations young officers representatives of start -ups so it’s a very important session on how the telecom networks will actually evolve to AI we saw a lot of use cases in the last 2 -3 days related to farming education healthcare but today the focus is telecom and the first session, this session is on the network, the next session as you’ve been informed is the subscriber so as a telecom network we are introduced to term access network, so that is one thing we would like to understand how your access network is evolving with the AI, we all know that in the 6G, AI and communication is one of the important use cases one of the 6 cases similarly going to core what kind of changes do you envisage when you implement AI, especially with respect to core, chairperson spoke about the benefits that are already accruing for the network management when the network management is getting into the AI is getting into the network management management.

Another thing I would also request you to dwell on is that ultimately the AI is going to come on the handsets. So once AI is going to come in on the handsets, what kind of a challenge it will throw to the network? Another important aspect is also raised by chairperson is the security. Are are we going to be challenged by the AI being used for attacking the networks? And what kind of steps we intend to take? Another one thing with the AI is it is compute intensive. So the sustainability as also is listed is going to be important. So it will be important to know what kind of steps the OEMs are envisaging to take care of the sustainability part of it.

You will be all are kind of signatories to the or the countries signatories to the sustainable development goals of the UN so this aspect also is very important now without taking too much time I will, everybody wants to listen from the experts here, I will first like to invite Mr. Magnus Everbring from Ericsson to kindly share

Magnus Ewerbring

Thank you very much, it’s a great pleasure to be here now, bottom of my heart I’m very impressed by this event and the messages we’ve heard and I think we just heard at the onset of this very much central message to leverage AI fully for ordinary people, consumers, for industries, for enterprise and government functions. It needs to use compute resources and that we often attribute to the data centers and indeed they will be there. But also we need to connect them. And here I think India comes out being very much in the pole position having a well over 90 % population coverage I’ve heard numbers even up to 99 % population coverage for 5G today. And not only that, but truly well performing networks.

That is a fundamental platform to drive innovation on and to drive innovation on together with AI. And looking then for the next five years to come, that indeed is what we will see. And the nations that in a few years time end of this decade are at the leading edge with the best of what 5G can do connecting the data centers with the AI applications in devices will be at the cutting edge and will have an advantage. And they are the ones having the least step into 6G. And again I think India is just in a supreme pole position to be there. The networks already today use AI. They use that to a large degree but still I argue it’s only the beginning.

We use it as the systems are being configured becoming more and more autonomous. The goal in the industry is still a good challenge but reachable is to reach what we call level 4 in TM Forum. By 2028 many mobile operators aspire to be there. and that’s beautiful, that’s very good but it is a big undertaking AI is being part to reach that level taking the next step I argue is what we really do with 6G, that’s to reach level 5 and be fully autonomous to cut the rope, cut the ties a bit and let it run and that we have in mind now as we gradually set the standard for 6G 6G shall be AI native and that will then be a baseline for bringing on the knowledge we’ve gained in 5G and to take the next step with 6G lastly then, networks for AI AI on the application side and here I argue it’s important to go society wide.

India is building its digital stack in an impressive way. Leverage AI in that. Industries come in, develop applications on top of it. We’ll drive efficiency locally and also will be export possibilities. So leverage the 5G systems with AI and cloud and then drive the way into 6G. Thank you.

Dr. Vinesh Sukumar

Thank you. I got We at Qualcomm have been trying to really democratize AI and then try to see if we can translate AI to be resident on devices. These devices could be personal devices like phones, could be a laptop, could be your smart watches, your smart glasses, anything that you can think of. But doing that kind of AI inference on the edge is not easy, and especially when you want to go towards more personalized inference. I always joke with my colleagues that AI historically lacks common sense. How do you really translate that to something that’s meaningful to the user needs a lot of investment. In India, we’re seeing this significantly change. We’re seeing a lot of players putting a lot of focus, and how do we get it attached to the user and make a more important connection that drives a lot of these experiences.

At the same time, it’s also very critical of how do we look at coexistence between what runs on the cloud and what runs on the edge. It’s what we call a concept of hybridization. The concept of hybridization is the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built around the idea of a system that is built Hybrid AI, you know, working with our network operators is also not an easy concept.

It’s always been a challenge to understand, you know, which of these experiences would be transitioned towards the cloud, how do you make that decisions, and what runs on the edge. I think, you know, there’s a lot of research activity happening in this space, and India is definitely leading in this front. I totally expect in the next couple of, you know, months, we would see a strong transition where there’s a, you know, fundamental element of hybrid where you can have both edge and cloud coexist. And last but not

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

Thank you, Mr. Sukumar. I would like to invite Mr. Pasi from Nokia now.

Mr Pasi Toivanen

Namaste. My sincere thanks for the opportunity to be here. It’s exciting. It’s exciting for the sake of this AI Summit, but it’s also very personal for me. I have been coming to the beautiful country of India since 1999, and it has been fascinating to see this country evolving all these years, over these years, in different locations. We were talking earlier today already in how many places I have been experiencing this evolution and development. It’s fascinating. So thanks for the opportunity to be here. It’s very important. I don’t know what to add after such a wonderful keynote by the chairman of the other opening talks. I think it is obvious that AI will also impact telecommunication networks, the network evolution, the business models, the innovation, everything around it.

So instead of going deeper in the technology discussion, because they were very well covered by the previous panelists, industry leaders, I would focus this couple of minutes for how. Not what. But how. How to capture the best of AI era. And for me, it comes around who is able to build the most value -rich, most welcoming, most compelling ecosystems. Who is able to gather like -minded technology players, regulators, government agencies to think together the opportunity, the risks, the challenges, that whole 360 of AI. I don’t believe that any player, even though they would be the smartest people on the planet, are able to… fully capture the 360 by playing alone. Ecosystem it is. How you are able to proactively define the overall value of this AI evolution.

And then transparently and proactively… agree how that value is distributed, how that value is maximized within that ecosystem. It might sound ideological. It might sound a little bit naive, but I’m a firm believer that it is key for success. It’s a key to capture and deliver all the opportunities within this AI era. It is the only way to address the security risks, which are now going to be different than any time earlier. I mean, we are going to have different access network. We are going to have richer number of applications, applications which are transferring more data, which increased amount of data is contributing for the security risks. We have to address that topic together, end to end.

And let’s do it. India can show the direction forward. For whole world. There is a tradition for great. collaboration, great innovation, so let’s do it. Thank you.

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

Thank you so much, Mr. Pasi. I would now like to invite Mr. Shantaram from Tejas.

Mr. Shantigram Jagannath

Yes. Hi, good afternoon, everyone. Am I audible? Not audible? Now it’s okay. So my colleagues and my boss warned me that, you know, if you’re coming number four, then you may not have much to say, so think of something different. So there are a few things that I would like to say. A few things, you know, being from here, born, brought up, everything in India, making stuff for India, so I’ll try to, I’ll try to anchor my… few comments in terms of what we want to do here. I think the fundamental problem that, I don’t know if you happen to read this book by Sir C .K. Prahlad, where he talked about the economy at the bottom of the pyramid.

So we carry with us a responsibility of solving problems for the bottom of the pyramid, primarily. And Indian telecom especially has that additional responsibility of making sure that access is provided to, and at a very low cost, it is provided to pretty much everybody in the country. Now, in this context, if you want to accelerate the adoption of AI, I leave you with a framework of thought. This is what I use to basically figure out what it takes. So you can either be looking at cost, or you can be looking at revenue. Or both. So when telecom operators have to figure out what are they going to invest in, then these are the sort of the two guidelines or markers that they can use.

When it comes to cost, it is optimization of either the CAPEX or optimization of OPEX in a simplistic sense. OPEX would be operational efficiency. There’s a lot of literature which is available. And my friends from the global OEMs are far ahead in implementation of some of these. We in India are chasing it as well. In terms of the hardware, it leaves you with, again, two choices for architecture. Do you find a way to completely do an AI -first, AI -native architecture? Or should we find a path that has a bolt -on capability? Because, you know, you have equipment that’s already in the field, and there are a lot of investments that we are making, you know, very fresh.

unlike some of the more mature networks in the West where the capital cycle has already gone through you know 4g 5g and it’s it’s paid off over 5 10 years already but in India we have made fresh investments even as early as last year now that kind of equipment if it has to be leveraged for the next 10 years how do you deliver AI that is one challenge that we’ll have to solve so there will be a choice you know do you do AI first or do you do a bolt -on if you are looking at the revenue side of the equation again in simplistic sense there are two sort of big buckets there is a product enhancement where the telecom network itself is enhanced in terms of efficiency there’s a lot of work happening in 3gpp, bouth at 6G alliance, A lot of thought is going in in terms of how do you make, how do you bring in efficiency into the product, essentially optimizing the cost per bit, so to speak, and doing it in a way that is a lot smarter than what we did before.

And on the other side, you have a possibility of generating revenue by providing AI through the telecom network, which Pasi also kind of referred to. So that I see as a possibility of a two -way business model, which is an opportunity that’s available, where on one side you have all the users, you have communities, you have people in our villages, the farmers, etc., who are all on one side of it. And on the other side, you have startups, companies that are building models, companies that are building specific agentic applications. and in between you have the telecom player. And there’s a possibility if we do the frameworks right, and what do I mean by frameworks? The very top thing in terms of framework is trust.

There has to be trust, there has to be some amount of regulation, there has to be some amount of safety that comes with regulation. And allow people to dynamically upload, and it’s like an app store model. So the telecom network essentially becomes a platform where simple models, easy models can be actually uploaded and made accessible to all the users of the telecom network. It doesn’t have to be only the bottom of the pyramid, but of course the bottom and all the layers above. So I’ll leave you with this thought,

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

So thank you so much Mr. Shantaram for sharing your thoughts. Now for the next few minutes I will first have a round of questions with the panel here and then we will throw the session open for questions from the floor. So Mr. Magnus the first question is that we are talking of optimization with the AI but we always used to say that 4G, 5G networks are self -sorn. The concept of son was already there, self -optimization networks. So what does AI fundamentally change now?

Magnus Ewerbring

Okay, thank you. Well, it’s always a journey. We are… For every move we make, we learn, we get more insights and then we take that and move further on. So in that sense, although we’re done… more and more autonomous parts of the systems in the past. It doesn’t say we can do more in the future. And we should do more, of course. Now, with AI, we get a very powerful tool to analyze a lot of data and to apply that knowledge onto a set of, in the system, some algorithms. And we’ve had some fantastic observations there. One was just the, in a very part that’s been optimized for decades on how we do the link adaptation, how we control the communication between the system and the device, we’ve managed to optimize the capacity by 10%.

So imagine a water… a loading spectrum of 100 megahertz. Then you had the equivalent of 110 megahertz. by applying this optimized algorithm. And that’s the cutting edge of what we can do today. I’m sure we can do improvements tomorrow also on that. How much? I don’t dare to state. In energy efficiency, as has been discussed there also, we, in another part of the system, applied AI analysis and make that part of the ongoing processing. And energy efficiency was optimized by 33%. For that part. And that’s an enormous savings applying that on a pan -India network, of course. So, again, it is about to, wherever you are, how far you’ve been, continue to do research to understand the future potential, and then step -by -step apply that with the knowledge that you have derived.

And you will continue to take steps and climb the ladder. Thank you.

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

so next question to you Mr. Sukumar so in the telecom hardware and software space which decisions should be pushed to the edge and what decisions should be centralized

Dr. Vinesh Sukumar

it’s a great question by the way I think it’s really going to come down to elements of key performance indicators I would suppose if you’re looking at areas where you want to focus more on data privacy user privacy better responsiveness, better data management a predictable end to end performance to a large extent that’s going to be happening on the edge and this could look at experiences on data plane loops L1, L2 user kernel space operations anything to do with PII information or user privacy privacy, all that would be edge resident. And as you go more towards cloud, I would say the emphasis is going to be a lot more around fleet management, anything to do with AI, ML training as such.

There’s a concept which historically on the ML land was called MLOps from, you know, from training data all the way to inferencing and monitoring. We have a new model which looks at if there is areas there where things are breaking because of drift, how do we go fix that? That’s where I think cloud definitely helps. Now at the same time, it’s not very binary equation, which is one is edge, one is cloud. There’s also concepts of hybrid, where it’s going to be coexistence. As I was mentioning before in my talk, is that you have to find ways how edge can complement the cloud. And it could be elements of personalization, where you want to drive cloud.

What’s the edge? and you want to go towards more complex scenarios, then you position towards the cloud. A hybrid is in the very early stage. To a large extent, these days routers are very static in nature, meaning those workloads and experiences are predefined, saying X, Y, Z runs on the edge, you know, and A, B, C runs on the cloud. But the most difficult challenge has been is how do these routers can be intelligent enough when you happen to have a multi -turn conversation at some point of time positioned towards the cloud. I think that is something of a huge research topic, and I’m hoping in the next couple of months we’ll see some interesting results.

Thank you.

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

So the next question for you, Mr. Pasi. So I’m sure a lot of development is already taking with the telecom OEMs. Now, what are the decisions which are taken off -net? What kind of decisions do you expect will be taken off -net? Thank you. and what are the decisions during the operation of the network while using AI you think you would be taking?

Mr Pasi Toivanen

Wow. And we have only this four minutes? Okay, okay. But on a serious note, I think jury is still out for this one. So how we are able to… And again, going back to my earlier comment, how we holistically address the topic, how we go through the overall value and that ecosystem and related functionality. I believe more will be done by the network itself. When we design it correctly, it’s able to do many of the security vulnerability assessments by itself. It’s… alerting upstream? Is it going to the edge or further? Let’s see. But I think it needs to be very intense dialogue between the network and edge. More decisions are traveling further to the regional data centers, more we are contributing to inefficiency and hence also the complexity.

So I would, my planning assumption is that I would push as much of the optimization automation to the network itself and then the limited cases to edge and less and less to the actual regional data center, to put it short.

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

Thank you for that. Shantaram, let me come to the ethical part of it. So let’s say we’re a base station serves urban area and also part of it serves the rural area. So how can we make sure that with the AI at the background the customer in a rural area is not deprived of the bandwidth vis -a -vis with respect to the urban area. So what kind of steps do you, I’m sure you will be looking at those things that the bandwidth is not constrained to an area or to a set of subscribers but what do you what are your thoughts? How can we check these things in a network?

Mr. Shantigram Jagannath

Okay. So in just the easy answer is to buy more equipment. But But that’s a great question. It has always been, you know, this question has been live for many, you know, almost decades. I know we went through a case where, you know, we had net neutrality and those debates also happening. So it’s not different from those types of debates. I think while we look at access to AI, there is access to the central AI, right, which has to go through a backhaul capacity and so on. And obviously there one has to create different types of network slices for different types of use cases. And today’s technology, at least the way that we administer networks, it is quite possible to do that.

And it is possible to do that with single clicks. And with AI and us bringing in operational AI, it is, you know, it can even do it more efficiently. It can do it more efficiently without you having to think too much. you can just say that you know I need to create this kind of a bandwidth for this type of an application and the network management you know the assisted network management can actually go and do that for you. Now this coupled with having a lot of edge access for AI. So you know I’ll give I’ll share an example. In the US they recently launched an application where the telecom network can actually sense your voice metrics and identify you through that.

So imagine that kind of an application here in India where you know your identity etc. can actually be verified by the telecom operator not just by your number or by a digital information but by analog information that you are actually communicating and these types of applications can actually be launched. on the edge of the network so short answer step one try to have a lot of a GI and step to use lot more sophisticated network management capability to clearly separate out different types of

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

well thank you so much we can have a do the note that the times up but still we can have one or two quick questions yes mr.

Audience

good afternoon respected panelists it was a wonderful discussion but as I will try to keep myself short as I was hearing all that, we are having around 118 crores of mobile connections in India, built up over a huge network of say fiber and wireless and lead circuits and everything and once we are trying to introduce AI in that, as we know it’s not AI native, we have to build up in the form of external like apps and all and any single minute of disruption causes a huge resentment and the loss of the you know, all the time and resources, so how do we to actually progress from this 118 crores and we want to feed through the AI what is the vision in front of us that we can really carry forward from here, I will look for any of the panelists, thank you

Mr Pasi Toivanen

Perhaps I can start thanks for it, it’s a wonderful question and sorry if I sound like a broken record but without thinking the network evolution end -to -end, you are not able to address it. So it comes to this ecosystem of players that you are able to model what the change is introducing to the network and optimize the network end -to -end. I think it is the only way. Otherwise, you are going to put patch fixes here and there based on certain application behaviors and you are not able to evolve the whole network.

Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar

Do you like to also substitute?

Mr. Shantigram Jagannath

So I think essentially what you are saying is that it is a journey. And how do we sort of chart out that journey? There are two, three thoughts on this. I think one is that today we are telecom networks are mostly catering to human users. Of course there are enterprises etc. Three, four years, five years down the road I do expect AI users to be starting to dominate. So the business model and the regulation has to support that kind of an evolution. I think that is step one. We need to sort of think through what is, you know, how do we handle, so today we have 118 crores mobile phones. Five years from now we might actually have 500 crores of AI agents which are doing various things but they are still communicating either with each other or with central data repositories and so on.

And we need to basically figure out how do you charge for it? What is the, what is the economics of this? You know, how is it all going to work? Who is going to pay for all of that activity? So there is a lot of policy thought process that has to go in. On the physical side, we are building more and more and denser and denser fiber optics which are carrying 8 teras, 20 teras and so on and so forth. And in anticipation of something like this. So I don’t know if that answered your question but thank you so much.

Ms. Pallavi Mishra

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (20)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (3)
Confirmedhigh

“The inaugural session of the India AI Impact Summit 2026 was organized on the sidelines of the main summit.”

The knowledge base notes that the event was organized on the sidelines of the India AI Impact Summit 2026, confirming the report’s statement. [S90]

Confirmedhigh

“TRAI Chairman Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti delivered remarks at the summit, representing TRAI.”

The closing-ceremony transcript identifies Anil Kumar Lahoti as the Chairman of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and records his speech at the summit, confirming his participation and role. [S8]

Additional Contextmedium

“AI‑driven predictive network management, fault detection and energy‑efficiency optimisation are already being deployed in India’s telecom sector.”

Other summit materials describe telecom operators using AI for network planning, performance optimisation, predictive analysis and resource management, providing broader context for the specific deployments mentioned. [S91] and [S92]

External Sources (99)
S1
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — – Dr. Vinesh Sukumar- Mr Pasi Toivanen Dr. Sukumar advocates for edge processing for privacy and responsiveness concern…
S2
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — -Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar- Member TRAI, telecom policy expert with over three decades of experience in telecom networks, …
S3
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — – Mr. Shantigram Jagannath- Magnus Ewerbring
S4
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — – Magnus Ewerbring- Ms. Pallavi Mishra
S5
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/transforming-health-systems-with-ai-from-lab-to-last-mile — Last we saw was in G20. Hopefully, it brings back memories. Yes. Happy ones. I’d like to keep it that way. She has had e…
S6
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — – Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti- Dr. Vinesh Sukumar
S7
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — -Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti- Honorable Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), telecom regulatory expert wit…
S8
Closing Ceremony — ### Anil Kumar Lahoti – Chairman, India’s Telecom Regulatory Authority – **Anil Kumar Lahoti**: Chairman of the Telecom…
S9
Leaders TalkX: Towards a safer connected world: collaborative strategies to strengthen digital trust and cyber resilience — – **Anil Kumar Lahoti**: Role/Title: Not specified (India representative), Area of expertise: Cyber resilience and cross…
S10
WS #280 the DNS Trust Horizon Safeguarding Digital Identity — – **Audience** – Individual from Senegal named Yuv (role/title not specified)
S11
Building the Workforce_ AI for Viksit Bharat 2047 — -Audience- Role/Title: Professor Charu from Indian Institute of Public Administration (one identified audience member), …
S12
Nri Collaborative Session Navigating Global Cyber Threats Via Local Practices — – **Audience** – Dr. Nazar (specific role/title not clearly mentioned)
S13
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — -Magnus Ewerbring- Chief Technology Officer for Asia Pacific at Ericsson, global telecom innovator involved in developin…
S14
Telecommunications infrastructure — Network operators increasingly rely on AI for a wide range of tasks, fromnetwork planning(e.g. using algorithms to ident…
S15
Connecting the Unconnected in the field of Education Excellence, Cyber Security & Rural Solutions and Women Empowerment in ICT — Anil Kumar Bhardwaj: I’ll make sure I limit myself to three minutes. Mr. Seizo Onoe, Director TSB, Mr. Niraj Verma, Admi…
S16
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — I am part of the 6G use case group, work very closely with Shokji and I think many things are already in place. We draft…
S17
Artificial intelligence as a driver of digital transformation in industries (HSE University) — The analysis offers a comprehensive examination of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on various sectors. One s…
S18
WS #110 AI Innovation Responsible Development Ethical Imperatives — Dr Zhang Xiao: Thank you everyone. I’m glad to be involved in this interesting discussion and I have three points to sha…
S19
Ethics and AI | Part 6 — The EU Act categorizes AI systems into different risk levels—unacceptable, high-risk, and low-risk—each with correspondi…
S20
HIGH LEVEL LEADERS SESSION IV — There needs to be human oversight, transparency, and explainability This approach ensures that technology is used as a …
S21
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — Algorithmic transparency is a critical topic discussed in various sessions, notably in the9821st meetingof the AI Securi…
S22
AI Automation in Telecom_ Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust India AI Impact Summit 2026 — I mean, if a mobile operator arbitrarily starts turning off SIM cards because they think maybe that traffic looks a bit …
S23
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI — As India advances in digital public infrastructure and its AI ambitions, the key is how we ensure these systems remain t…
S24
India launches AI-driven consumer protection initiatives — The Indian government haslaunchedseveral initiatives to strengthen consumer protection, focusing on leveraging technolog…
S25
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — Participant: ≫ Distinguished guests, dear friends, it is a great honor to speak to you today on a topic that is reshapin…
S26
Multistakeholder Partnerships for Thriving AI Ecosystems — For instance, the National Skilling Mission, the skilling mission that is undertaken by NASCOM, which is the IT industry…
S27
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — Namaste. Honorable Minister Vaishnav, Your Excellency’s colleagues, let me begin by thanking our host, Prime Minister Mo…
S28
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Cristiano Amon — “So 6G is going to provide an evolution of connectivity, faster speed, lower latency, higher coverage.”[20]. “The bigges…
S29
WS #362 Incorporating Human Rights in AI Risk Management — – Some form of regulatory framework is needed to ensure widespread adoption of rights-respecting practices
S30
WS #187 Bridging Internet AI Governance From Theory to Practice — Vint Cerf: First, I have to unmute. So thank you so much, Alex. I always enjoy your line of reasoning. Let me suggest a …
S31
State of play of major global AI Governance processes — Juha Heikkila:Thank you very much, and thank you very much indeed for the invitation to be on this panel. So indeed the …
S32
Do we really need specialised AI regulation? — The Apex: AI useis where AI’s societal, legal, and ethical consequences come into sharp focus. Whether it’s deepfakes, b…
S33
AI is here. Are countries ready, or not? | IGF 2023 Open Forum #131 — In conclusion, AI presents a unique opportunity for human progress and the achievement of the SDGs. However, careful con…
S34
The State of Digital Fragmentation (Digital Policy Alert) — Digital fragmentation can have implications at the technical level, thereby exacerbating potential risks. Policy fragmen…
S35
Bridging the Digital Divide: Inclusive ICT Policies for Sustainable Development — Challenges and Risk Mitigation Environmental sustainability must be integrated into ICT development Human rights | Dev…
S36
WS #103 Aligning strategies, protecting critical infrastructure — Intersectionality of technological landscape complicates policy approaches
S37
Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech — In conclusion, the meeting underscored the importance of AI in societal development and how it can address various chall…
S38
Omnipresent Smart Wireless: Deploying Future Networks at Scale — Bocar A. BA.:I think it’s a great opportunity, and everybody in the room worldwide can attest that we have lived the pan…
S39
Smaller Footprint Bigger Impact Building Sustainable AI for the Future — Africa is one of the most energy -constrained regions. It’s also a continent where adoption is becoming very frequent. W…
S40
Navigating the Double-Edged Sword: ICT’s and AI’s Impact on Energy Consumption, GHG Emissions, and Environmental Sustainability — In summary, Colombia’s comprehensive approach to energy transition is manifested through shifts in hydrocarbon explorati…
S41
Green AI and the battle between progress and sustainability — AI is increasingly recognised for its transformative potential and growing environmental footprint across industries. Th…
S42
Planetary Limits of AI: Governance for Just Digitalisation? | IGF 2023 Open Forum #37 — One argument raised is the need to rethink the ideology and narrative of growth and development. There is a call to move…
S43
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — Risk-based regulatory approaches are needed but implementation remains challenging
S44
Can (generative) AI be compatible with Data Protection? | IGF 2023 #24 — The analysis examines the importance of principles and regulation in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). It highl…
S45
Secure Finance Risk-Based AI Policy for the Banking Sector — The conversation framed AI governance not as a constraint on innovation but as an enabler of sustainable, trustworthy AI…
S46
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — The panel discussion featured distinguished experts from major telecommunications equipment manufacturers, each offering…
S47
Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress — The second figure more or less reflects the reference scenario of the Stern review. Even if it projected large negative …
S48
Efforts to improve energy efficiency in high-performance computing for a Sustainable Future — The demand for high-performance computing (HPC) has surged due to technological advancements like machine learning, geno…
S49
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — Rodrigues emphasizes that while early AI discussions were dominated by fear about job displacement and technological thr…
S50
Data first in the AI era — The path forward requires sustained collaboration across sectors, attention to power imbalances and capacity building ne…
S51
Open Forum #64 Local AI Policy Pathways for Sustainable Digital Economies — Wai Sit Si Thou from UN Trade and Development presented a framework focusing on infrastructure, data, and skills as key …
S52
Comprehensive Report: China’s AI Plus Economy Initiative – A Strategic Discussion on Artificial Intelligence Development and Implementation — One of the most striking revelations came from Yutong Zhang’s discussion of Moonshot AI’s resource efficiency in develop…
S53
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — Artificial intelligence | Data governance He explains that remote, low‑connectivity scenarios benefit from edge deploym…
S54
Research Publication No. 2014-6 March 17, 2014 — – (1) Policy objectives : Our cases studies illustrate that the public sector can develop and implement cloud-relevant …
S55
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — Power consumption concerns are driving data centers toward edge deployment Simple inferencing workloads will be handled…
S56
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI — “Today’s mobile networks are becoming intelligent, programmable and trusted layers of the national infrastructure.”[1]. …
S57
Telecommunications infrastructure — Network operators increasingly rely on AI for a wide range of tasks, fromnetwork planning(e.g. using algorithms to ident…
S58
Beyond development: connectivity as human rights enabler | IGF 2023 Town Hall #61 — On the other hand, various barriers to connectivity are observed. Infrastructure limitations, such as the backhaul and m…
S59
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — These key comments collectively transformed what could have been a typical technology-focused discussion into a more nua…
S60
High-level AI Standards panel — The standards ecosystem should be expanded to include connections with broader AI governance discussions and internation…
S61
Building Scalable AI Through Global South Partnerships — These key comments fundamentally shaped the discussion by moving it beyond superficial celebrations of AI achievements t…
S62
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Cristiano Amon — Amon highlights India’s unique positioning to benefit from this AI transformation, noting the country’s successful mobil…
S63
India’s AI market set to surge to over $130 billion by 2032 — The AI market in India hasexpandedfrom roughly $2.97 billion in 2020 to $7.63 billion in 2024, and is projected to reach…
S64
Big Tech boosts India’s AI ambitions amid concerns over talent flight and limited infrastructure — Majorannouncementsfrom Microsoft ($17.5bn) and Amazon (over $35bn by 2030) have placed India at the centre of global AI …
S65
GPAI: A Multistakeholder Initiative on Trustworthy AI | IGF 2023 Open Forum #111 — Abhishek Singh:Thank you, thank you Inma. I must straightaway mention that one key value that we get as being part of th…
S66
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Cristiano Amon — The equipment was different. The use case is different. We’re heading to the next big transformation of the telecom sect…
S67
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — Ashok Kumar from the Department of Telecom established the foundational premise that 6G represents a fundamental departu…
S68
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — And let’s do it. India can show the direction forward. For whole world. There is a tradition for great. collaboration, g…
S69
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI — Thank you, Julian. Thanks for the opening remarks. Am I audible? Looks like yes. So let’s begin. We have a fantastic pan…
S70
AI Automation in Telecom_ Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust India AI Impact Summit 2026 — And the reason for it is in the scam economy, regulation cannot move as fast as scammers. Scammers are not bound by geog…
S71
From KW to GW Scaling the Infrastructure of the Global AI Economy — The success of this transformation will depend on continued collaboration between global technology providers and local …
S72
Global telecommunication and AI standards development for all — The country has actively contributed to defining telecommunications standards, as evidenced by its development of the 5G…
S73
WS #145 Revitalizing Trust: Harnessing AI for Responsible Governance — Lucia Russo: Maybe I’ll go first. Yes, you’re totally right. We are seeing many policies and regulations emerging. A…
S74
WS #362 Incorporating Human Rights in AI Risk Management — – Some form of regulatory framework is needed to ensure widespread adoption of rights-respecting practices
S75
WS #187 Bridging Internet AI Governance From Theory to Practice — Vint Cerf: First, I have to unmute. So thank you so much, Alex. I always enjoy your line of reasoning. Let me suggest a …
S76
AI and ethics in modern society — Humanity’s rapid advancements in robotics and AI have shifted many ethical and philosophical dilemmas from the realm of …
S77
AI is here. Are countries ready, or not? | IGF 2023 Open Forum #131 — In conclusion, AI presents a unique opportunity for human progress and the achievement of the SDGs. However, careful con…
S78
Broadband from Space! Can it close the Digital Divide? | IGF 2023 WS #468 — Cooperation and interoperability among space-based providers are key factors for success. Despite concerns about the env…
S79
UNSC meeting: Scientific developments, peace and security — Algeria:I thank Switzerland for the excellent choice of the theme of our briefing today. And we listen carefully to the …
S80
Scramble for Internet: you snooze, you lose | IGF 2023 WS #496 — In conclusion, the internet’s original purpose was to connect the scientific and academic community, but it quickly evol…
S81
Main Session on GDC: A multistakeholder perspective | IGF 2023 — The internet’s growth is expected to continue, but challenges with capacity, infrastructure, integrity, and security mus…
S82
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — Dai Wei: Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, good day to you all. I’m delighted to join you in this United Natio…
S83
Building Inclusive Societies with AI — Ecosystem collaboration is essential to solve informal sector problems Industry partnerships essential for curriculum d…
S84
Open Internet Inclusive AI Unlocking Innovation for All — But even with today’s SOTA model, you can get to about maybe a rupee. Right now, the question is, even at a rupee, now y…
S85
Open Forum #82 Catalyzing Equitable AI Impact the Role of International Cooperation — Cina Lawson: Thank you very much, so the first comment I make is that AI has to work for us. It means that we have to ma…
S86
Keynote Adresses at India AI Impact Summit 2026 — -Ashwini Vaishnav- Minister (India) -Participant- Event moderator/host And so we are here to listen to our distinguish…
S87
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — Honourable Prime Minister Modi, Excellencies, dear colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. It is a great honour for me to be i…
S88
Powering AI Global Leaders Session AI Impact Summit India — -Sam Altman: CEO and co-founder of OpenAI (mentioned but did not speak in this transcript) -Speaker: Role/title not spe…
S89
Panel 5 – Ensuring Digital Resilience: Linking Submarine Cables to Broader Resilience Goals — Audience: Thank you. Very insightful session. Thank you very much, Ms. Moser, for that very insightful aspect of use…
S90
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/trusted-connections_-ethical-ai-in-telecom-6g-networks — Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. being orga…
S91
Workshop 6: Perception of AI Tools in Business Operations: Building Trustworthy and Rights-Respecting Technologies — Coriz provided concrete examples of how the telecommunications sector is already implementing AI solutions. These applic…
S92
WSIS Action Line C2 Information and communication infrastructure — AI technologies can help lower the costs of operating networks while improving their efficiency in both urban and rural …
S93
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — What is it about AI that we need to regulate?The discussions across the Internet Governance Forum 2025 sessions revealed…
S94
Shaping AI to ensure Respect for Human Rights and Democracy | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #51 — Francesca Rossi:Thank you very much for this invitation and for the opportunity to participate in this panel. So many of…
S95
Digital Trust 2025 — The second session will examine how different sectors build trust over time, based on their practices and government pol…
S96
Building Trust through Transparency — Another perspective shifts the focus from trust to trustworthiness. The speaker contends that trustworthiness should be …
S97
AI-driven Cyber Defense: Empowering Developing Nations | IGF 2023 — He introduces a panel of experts from different fields
S98
Panel Discussion AI & Cybersecurity _ India AI Impact Summit — The moderator opens, transitions, and closes the session, guaranteeing that speakers are introduced, the discussion proc…
S99
Using AI to tackle our planet’s most urgent problems — Amazon’s Chief Technology Officer Werner Vogels delivered a presentation on leveraging artificial intelligence to addres…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
S
Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti
11 arguments93 words per minute1023 words654 seconds
Argument 1
AI enables predictive network management, fault detection, energy savings, and spam filtering (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti)
EXPLANATION
The chairman highlighted that AI is already being used to anticipate network faults, optimise performance, reduce energy consumption and filter spam, demonstrating concrete operational benefits for telecom operators. These applications show how AI can improve service quality, resilience and consumer safety when deployed responsibly.
EVIDENCE
He noted that AI is deployed to optimise network performance, predict faults, improve energy efficiency, enhance customer experience and combat fraud and spam communications, with operators reporting significant energy savings and the ability to flag or block nearly 400 million suspected spam calls or messages each day, and the disconnection of about 2.1 million spam numbers [38-44].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Network operators increasingly rely on AI for planning, performance optimisation, fault detection and energy efficiency improvements, confirming the operational benefits described [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Predictive management & efficiency
AGREED WITH
Magnus Ewerbring, Mr Pasi Toivanen
Argument 2
AI will become intrinsic to 6G, making networks AI‑native (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti)
EXPLANATION
The chairman explained that in the upcoming 6G era AI will no longer be an add‑on application layer but will be embedded within the network architecture itself, resulting in AI‑native telecom networks. This shift will transform networks into the primary carriers of AI intelligence.
EVIDENCE
He stated that in 6G AI will no longer be an application layer, it will be intrinsic, and telecom networks will be AI native, turning them into a central pillar of India’s AI infrastructure [31-34].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AI-core and edge integration for 6G is highlighted in TRAI’s white-paper work and industry studies, emphasizing AI-native network architectures [S16][S17][S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑native 6G networks
AGREED WITH
Magnus Ewerbring, Mr Shantigram Jagannath
DISAGREED WITH
Mr Shantigram Jagannath, Mr Magnus Ewerbring
Argument 3
TRI’s risk‑based regulatory framework and sandbox for AI trials (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti)
EXPLANATION
TRAI introduced a risk‑based approach that differentiates low‑risk AI use cases, which can be self‑regulated, from high‑risk applications that require stronger obligations such as transparency and human oversight. A regulatory sandbox was also created to allow live testing of AI solutions under defined safeguards.
EVIDENCE
He referenced the July 2023 recommendations that proposed a risk-based regulatory framework for AI in telecom and the April 2024 recommendations that facilitated a regulatory sandbox for live network testing of AI-enabled solutions, including those for 5G and future 6G networks [49-53].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The EU AI Act’s risk-based classification provides a comparable regulatory model, supporting TRAI’s risk-based approach and sandbox concept for live AI testing [S19][S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Regulatory sandbox & risk‑based framework
AGREED WITH
Mr Pasi Toivanen, Ms. Pallavi Mishra
Argument 4
Human‑centric “MANOV” vision emphasizing ethics, accountability, and safeguards (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti)
EXPLANATION
The MANOV vision, announced by the Prime Minister, calls for a human‑centric AI governance framework that embeds ethical safeguards, accountability and inclusivity by design, guiding AI deployment across sectors including telecom.
EVIDENCE
He mentioned that the MANOV vision emphasizes a human-centric framework for ethical, accountable, inclusive AI governance and that its principles are fundamental to AI governance in telecommunications [54-56].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
TRAI’s ethical AI discussions and global responsible-AI imperatives stress human-centric governance, ethics and accountability, aligning with the MANOV vision [S1][S18][S20].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Human‑centric AI governance
Argument 5
Transparency, explainability, and human oversight required for high‑risk AI (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti)
EXPLANATION
For AI applications that directly affect consumers, the chairman stressed the need for higher regulatory obligations, including clear transparency, explainability of decisions and human oversight, to protect consumer rights and maintain trust.
EVIDENCE
He explained that high-risk use cases require stronger obligations around transparency, explainability, and human oversight, whereas low-risk applications may be guided through self-regulation [50-52].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
International guidelines for high-risk AI call for transparency, explainability and human oversight, mirroring the obligations outlined by TRAI [S20][S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
High‑risk AI governance
Argument 6
Trust and consumer protection are central to AI adoption in essential telecom services (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti)
EXPLANATION
The chairman underscored that because telecom is an essential public service, AI‑driven efficiency gains must not compromise transparency, accountability or consumer rights; trust must remain the cornerstone of AI transformation.
EVIDENCE
He highlighted that trust is the central pillar of AI adoption in telecom, emphasizing that efficiency gains cannot come at the cost of transparency, accountability or consumer rights, and that public confidence must remain at the core of AI-enabled transformation [46-48].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AI Automation sessions stress accountability and public trust, while India’s AI-driven consumer-protection initiatives demonstrate the focus on safeguarding users [S22][S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Trust & consumer protection
Argument 7
India’s extensive fiber backbone and mobile broadband networks provide a strong foundation for AI deployment in telecom.
EXPLANATION
The chairman highlighted that the country’s nationwide fiber and mobile infrastructure is among the most widely distributed digital assets globally, creating an enabling environment for AI‑driven services.
EVIDENCE
He noted that “Our nationwide fiber backbones and mobile broadband networks constitute one of the most widely distributed digital infrastructures in the world, operating within mature operational and regulatory frameworks” [35-36].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Infrastructure readiness for AI
Argument 8
A digital consent acquisition framework is being rolled out to give consumers control over commercial communications.
EXPLANATION
TRAI is advancing a mechanism that allows users to grant or withdraw consent digitally, ensuring that AI‑enabled marketing respects privacy and user choice.
EVIDENCE
He mentioned “The authority is also advancing the rollout of a digital consent acquisition framework following successful pilot runs with the banks to ensure consumers have digital control over consent for commercial communications” [44].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Consumer consent and privacy
Argument 9
AI‑driven telecom operations across borders raise interoperability and standards challenges that require international cooperation.
EXPLANATION
As AI scales globally, the need for common standards, interoperable protocols, and ethical alignment becomes critical, prompting collaboration beyond national boundaries.
EVIDENCE
He stated “As AI-driven telecom operations scale across borders, issues of interoperability, standards, and ethical alignment become global concerns” [59-60].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Calls for trusted, interoperable AI systems and global cooperation to avoid fragmentation are documented in discussions on international AI ecosystems [S23][S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Cross‑border AI interoperability
Argument 10
TRI is committed to multi‑stakeholder collaboration to ensure AI serves both innovation and the public good.
EXPLANATION
The regulator emphasizes working with industry, policymakers, and international partners to balance innovation with public interest safeguards.
EVIDENCE
He concluded “TRI remains committed to working with all stakeholders, industry, policymakers and international partners to ensure that AI in telecom serves both innovation and public good” [64-65].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multistakeholder partnerships and collaborative strategies are highlighted as essential for thriving AI ecosystems and balancing innovation with public interest [S26][S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Collaborative governance
Argument 11
AI‑driven automation is indispensable for managing India’s massive subscriber base and network scale
EXPLANATION
The chairman stresses that with over 1.3 billion telecom subscribers, AI is no longer optional but essential to handle the scale of operations, optimise performance and maintain service quality.
EVIDENCE
He notes that with over 1.3 billion telecom subscribers and over 1 billion data users, AI-driven automation is no longer optional and is indispensable for network management [37-38].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Necessity of AI at scale
M
Magnus Ewerbring
6 arguments125 words per minute764 words365 seconds
Argument 1
AI improves link‑adaptation capacity by 10% and energy efficiency by 33% (Magnus Ewerbring)
EXPLANATION
Magnus reported that AI‑driven optimisation of link‑adaptation algorithms increased effective spectrum capacity by 10%, while AI analysis of processing components delivered a 33% improvement in energy efficiency, showcasing tangible performance benefits.
EVIDENCE
He gave specific figures: optimisation of link adaptation raised capacity from 100 MHz to an equivalent of 110 MHz (a 10% gain) and AI-based analysis of a system component improved energy efficiency by 33% [206-214].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Performance and energy gains
AGREED WITH
Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Mr Pasi Toivanen
Argument 2
AI‑driven optimization yields 10% capacity gain and 33% energy savings (Magnus Ewerbring)
EXPLANATION
Reiterating earlier points, Magnus emphasized that AI can deliver a 10% increase in network capacity and a 33% reduction in energy consumption, reinforcing the business case for AI‑enabled network optimisation.
EVIDENCE
He restated the same quantitative improvements: 10% capacity increase through link-adaptation optimisation and 33% energy efficiency gain from AI analysis [206-214].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Optimization benefits
Argument 3
India’s 90‑99% 5G population coverage positions the country to leverage AI for large‑scale innovation.
EXPLANATION
The speaker pointed out that near‑universal 5G coverage creates a strategic advantage for deploying AI‑enabled services and applications at scale.
EVIDENCE
He said “India comes out being very much in the pole position having a well over 90 % population coverage… up to 99 % population coverage for 5G today” [101-103].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Strategic advantage of extensive 5G coverage
Argument 4
The industry aims to reach TM Forum Level 4 by 2028 and Level 5 for AI‑native 6G networks.
EXPLANATION
Magnus outlined a roadmap where operators target TM Forum maturity Level 4 by 2028, then move to Level 5 with fully autonomous, AI‑native 6G networks.
EVIDENCE
He explained “The goal … is to reach what we call level 4 in TM Forum. By 2028 many mobile operators aspire to be there… the next step … level 5 and be fully autonomous… 6G shall be AI native” [111-112].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Roadmap to AI‑native network maturity
Argument 5
Current AI use in networks is only the beginning, with further performance gains expected.
EXPLANATION
He emphasized that while AI already powers many network functions, substantial future improvements are anticipated as AI integration deepens.
EVIDENCE
He remarked “The networks already today use AI… I argue it’s only the beginning” [109-110].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Future potential of AI in telecom
Argument 6
Leveraging AI on India’s digital stack can boost local efficiency and create export opportunities
EXPLANATION
Eberbring argues that integrating AI into India’s existing digital infrastructure will not only improve operational efficiency domestically but also position Indian firms to export AI‑enabled services globally.
EVIDENCE
He mentions that India is building its digital stack impressively, leveraging AI to drive local efficiency and also creating export possibilities for AI-enabled services [113-117].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Economic benefits of AI integration
D
Dr. Vinesh Sukumar
5 arguments202 words per minute882 words261 seconds
Argument 1
Democratizing AI on devices through hybrid edge‑cloud models (Dr. Vinesh Sukumar)
EXPLANATION
Dr. Sukumar described Qualcomm’s effort to bring AI inference to a wide range of edge devices—phones, laptops, wearables—while coordinating with cloud resources through a hybrid model, aiming to make AI accessible and personalized at the device level.
EVIDENCE
She explained that Qualcomm is working to democratise AI by enabling inference on personal devices such as phones, laptops, smart watches and glasses, noting the challenges of edge inference and the importance of hybridisation between cloud and edge for personalized services [119-128].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Edge‑cloud hybridisation
Argument 2
Edge AI for privacy, low latency; cloud for fleet management and model training (Dr. Vinesh Sukumar)
EXPLANATION
She argued that privacy‑sensitive and latency‑critical tasks should run on the edge, whereas cloud platforms are better suited for fleet management, AI/ML model training and broader analytics, highlighting a complementary division of labour.
EVIDENCE
She stated that edge AI handles privacy, low-latency needs and user-centric data, while cloud handles fleet management, AI/ML training, and MLOps, emphasizing a hybrid approach rather than a binary split [219-224].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Edge vs. cloud responsibilities
AGREED WITH
Mr Pasi Toivanen, Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar
DISAGREED WITH
Mr Pasi Toivanen, Mr Magnus Ewerbring
Argument 3
Edge AI currently lacks common‑sense, requiring significant investment to become user‑centric.
EXPLANATION
She noted that AI models on devices often miss contextual understanding, and bridging this gap demands considerable research and financial resources.
EVIDENCE
She said “AI historically lacks common sense… needs a lot of investment” [122-124].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Limitations of current edge AI
Argument 4
Determining which workloads belong on the edge versus the cloud is a complex research challenge that demands hybrid strategies.
EXPLANATION
The speaker highlighted the difficulty of deciding workload placement and called for ongoing research into hybrid architectures that balance latency, privacy, and scalability.
EVIDENCE
She described “Hybridization… challenge to understand, which of these experiences would be transitioned towards the cloud… research activity… expect a strong transition where there’s a fundamental element of hybrid” [128-132].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Hybrid edge‑cloud workload allocation
Argument 5
Qualcomm aims to democratise AI across a broad spectrum of consumer devices, requiring extensive cross‑device integration
EXPLANATION
Sukumar describes Qualcomm’s effort to bring AI inference to phones, laptops, wearables and glasses, highlighting the challenge of making AI work seamlessly across diverse hardware platforms.
EVIDENCE
She explains that Qualcomm is trying to democratise AI by enabling inference on personal devices such as phones, laptops, smart watches and smart glasses, noting the difficulty of achieving this across many device types [119-124].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Cross‑device AI deployment
M
Mr Pasi Toivanen
7 arguments118 words per minute687 words348 seconds
Argument 1
Ecosystem‑wide safeguards and collaborative governance are essential (Mr Pasi Toivanen)
EXPLANATION
Pasi stressed that capturing AI value requires a 360° ecosystem involving OEMs, regulators, startups and other stakeholders, and that collaborative governance is needed to address security risks and ensure responsible AI deployment.
EVIDENCE
He spoke about the importance of a 360° ecosystem of technology players, regulators and government agencies to capture AI value, highlighted security risks, and called for proactive, transparent agreement on value distribution and safeguards [135-158].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multistakeholder partnerships and collaborative governance frameworks are emphasized as key to capturing AI value while managing security risks [S26][S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Collaborative ecosystem governance
AGREED WITH
Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Ms. Pallavi Mishra
Argument 2
Push most optimization decisions to the network itself, reducing reliance on regional data centers (Mr Pasi Toivanen)
EXPLANATION
Pasi suggested that the majority of AI‑driven optimisation should be performed directly within the telecom network, limiting the need to send decisions to edge devices or regional data centres, thereby simplifying architecture and improving efficiency.
EVIDENCE
He indicated that most optimisation and automation decisions should be pushed to the network itself, with limited cases to the edge and even fewer to regional data centres, emphasizing intense dialogue between network and edge [239-248].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Network‑centric optimisation
Argument 3
Capturing AI value requires a 360° ecosystem of OEMs, regulators, and startups (Mr Pasi Toivanen)
EXPLANATION
Reiterating his earlier point, Pasi emphasized that no single entity can fully capture AI benefits; a coordinated ecosystem of OEMs, regulators and startups is essential for responsible AI deployment.
EVIDENCE
He again highlighted that capturing AI value needs a 360° ecosystem of OEMs, regulators, government agencies and startups, stressing collaborative governance and security risk mitigation [135-158].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
360° ecosystem necessity
Argument 4
Incremental journey and ecosystem coordination are key to safely evolve legacy networks (Mr Pasi Toivanen)
EXPLANATION
Pasi argued that evolving legacy networks safely requires an end‑to‑end ecosystem approach rather than piecemeal patch fixes, advocating for holistic coordination among all stakeholders.
EVIDENCE
He responded to the audience question by stating that without an end-to-end ecosystem approach, only patch fixes would be possible, and that a holistic ecosystem is the only way to evolve the whole network [272-275].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Incremental ecosystem evolution
Argument 5
AI can autonomously perform security vulnerability assessments within the network.
EXPLANATION
When designed appropriately, AI‑enabled network elements can detect and flag security weaknesses without human intervention.
EVIDENCE
He stated “When we design it correctly, it’s able to do many of the security vulnerability assessments by itself” [244-245].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven security assessment
Argument 6
Effective AI deployment requires an intense dialogue between the network core and edge components.
EXPLANATION
Coordinated communication between centralized network functions and edge devices is essential to ensure AI decisions are correctly propagated and acted upon.
EVIDENCE
He noted “… it needs to be very intense dialogue between the network and edge” [246-247].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Network‑edge coordination
Argument 7
Pushing AI‑driven optimisation to the network core reduces reliance on regional data centres and improves overall efficiency
EXPLANATION
Toivanen suggests that most optimisation decisions should be handled directly within the telecom network, limiting the need to route decisions to edge devices or regional data centres, thereby streamlining operations.
EVIDENCE
He states that the majority of optimisation and automation decisions should be pushed to the network itself, with limited cases to the edge and even fewer to regional data centres, emphasizing an intense dialogue between network and edge [239-248].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Network‑centric AI optimisation
M
Mr Shantigram Jagannath
10 arguments0 words per minute0 words1 seconds
Argument 1
Decision on AI‑first vs. bolt‑on architecture impacts CAPEX/OPEX and long‑term sustainability (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
EXPLANATION
Jagannath outlined the strategic choice between building an AI‑first, AI‑native architecture versus adding AI as a bolt‑on to existing equipment, noting that this decision influences capital and operational expenditures as well as future sustainability.
EVIDENCE
He described the two architectural choices: a completely AI-first, AI-native architecture or a bolt-on capability that leverages existing field equipment, emphasizing the impact on CAPEX and OPEX [180-183].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑first vs bolt‑on architecture
AGREED WITH
Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Magnus Ewerbring
DISAGREED WITH
Mr Magnus Ewerbring, Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti
Argument 2
AI can generate new revenue streams via a telecom‑platform “app‑store” for AI models (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
EXPLANATION
Jagannath proposed that telecom networks could become platforms where AI models are uploaded and accessed like an app store, creating new monetisation opportunities for operators and ecosystem partners.
EVIDENCE
He explained that the telecom network could act as a platform where simple AI models are uploaded and made accessible to all users, akin to an app-store model, generating revenue while ensuring trust and safety [188-192].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI app‑store revenue model
Argument 3
Balancing cost optimization with revenue opportunities; choosing AI‑first or bolt‑on paths (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
EXPLANATION
He discussed the need to weigh cost‑saving measures (CAPEX/OPEX optimisation) against potential new revenue from AI services, suggesting that the choice of architecture (AI‑first vs bolt‑on) should reflect both efficiency and business opportunities.
EVIDENCE
He noted that operators consider cost optimisation (CAPEX/OPEX) and revenue generation, referencing both the cost-optimization discussion and the AI-first versus bolt-on architectural choices [173-176][180-183].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Cost vs revenue trade‑off
Argument 4
Ensure rural users receive fair bandwidth through AI‑enabled network slicing (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
EXPLANATION
Jagannath argued that AI can dynamically create network slices to allocate bandwidth equitably, preventing rural users from being disadvantaged compared to urban subscribers.
EVIDENCE
He described using AI-driven network slicing to allocate bandwidth for different applications, noting that such slicing can be performed with a single click and more efficiently with operational AI, thereby ensuring fair access for rural areas [260-266].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Equitable bandwidth allocation
Argument 5
AI must serve the bottom‑of‑pyramid with low‑cost access and inclusive services (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
EXPLANATION
He emphasized the responsibility of Indian telecom to provide affordable, inclusive AI‑enabled services to the poorest segments of society, aligning with the bottom‑of‑the‑pyramid concept.
EVIDENCE
He referenced the need to solve problems for the bottom of the pyramid, ensuring low-cost access for everyone in India, and highlighted telecom’s additional responsibility to provide affordable services to all [168-171].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion for underserved populations
AGREED WITH
Ms. Pallavi Mishra, Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar
Argument 6
Future AI agents will vastly increase traffic; policies must evolve to handle new economics and usage patterns (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
EXPLANATION
Jagannath projected that AI agents could outnumber human devices, creating massive traffic and new business models, and called for policy and regulatory frameworks to address the economics, charging mechanisms and sustainability of such usage.
EVIDENCE
He projected that while today there are 118 crore mobile phones, in five years there could be 500 crore AI agents, raising questions about charging, economics, and who will pay for the activity, and noted the need for policy thought and dense fiber infrastructure to support this future [281-291].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Future AI traffic & policy
Argument 7
AI enables automated network slicing with single‑click operations to ensure equitable bandwidth allocation.
EXPLANATION
He explained that AI‑driven orchestration can create and adjust network slices instantly, allowing operators to balance capacity between urban and rural users without manual intervention.
EVIDENCE
He said “it is quite possible to do that with single clicks… AI can do it more efficiently… you can create this kind of bandwidth for this type of application and the network management… can actually go and do that for you” [262-265].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Automated network slicing for fairness
Argument 8
AI‑driven voice‑based identity verification can enhance security and user authentication in telecom networks.
EXPLANATION
He cited a US example where voice metrics are used for identity verification and suggested similar AI‑enabled biometric solutions could be deployed in India.
EVIDENCE
He noted “In the US they recently launched an application where the telecom network can actually sense your voice metrics and identify you… could be launched here in India” [268-269].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for biometric authentication
Argument 9
An AI‑powered “app‑store” model can be used to monitor and enforce regulatory compliance across network services.
EXPLANATION
By allowing simple AI models to be uploaded and distributed via the telecom platform, operators can ensure that applications adhere to safety, trust, and regulatory standards.
EVIDENCE
He described “the telecom network essentially becomes a platform where simple models… can be uploaded and made accessible… with trust, regulation, safety” [188-192].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Regulatory compliance via AI marketplace
Argument 10
Expanding dense fibre infrastructure is essential to accommodate the future surge in AI‑generated traffic
EXPLANATION
Jagannath points out that as AI agents proliferate, the resulting traffic will require robust fibre networks, and therefore continued investment in high‑capacity fibre optics is critical.
EVIDENCE
He notes that India is building more and denser fibre optics capable of carrying 8 terabits to 20 terabits, anticipating the massive traffic that future AI agents will generate [291-293].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Infrastructure readiness for AI traffic
S
Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar
4 arguments119 words per minute743 words374 seconds
Argument 1
Moderator highlights need to address AI impact on access networks, security threats, and sustainability (Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar)
EXPLANATION
As moderator, Mittar raised key operational concerns: how AI will affect access networks, handset integration, potential security attacks, the compute‑intensive nature of AI, and the importance of sustainability in AI deployments.
EVIDENCE
He asked about AI’s evolution in access networks, challenges from AI on handsets, security threats from AI-based attacks, the compute-intensive nature of AI and its sustainability implications, urging experts to address these points [88-97].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Operational challenges & sustainability
AGREED WITH
Dr. Vinesh Sukumar, Mr Pasi Toivanen
Argument 2
The compute‑intensive nature of AI raises sustainability concerns for telecom operators.
EXPLANATION
He warned that AI’s high processing demands could increase energy consumption, making sustainability a key consideration in AI‑enabled network designs.
EVIDENCE
He observed “Another one thing with the AI is it is compute-intensive. So the sustainability as also is listed is going to be important” [94-96].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainability of AI workloads
Argument 3
AI could be weaponised to launch attacks on telecom networks, necessitating proactive security safeguards.
EXPLANATION
The moderator raised the risk that malicious actors might exploit AI to compromise network integrity, calling for pre‑emptive defensive measures.
EVIDENCE
He asked “Are we going to be challenged by the AI being used for attacking the networks? And what kind of steps we intend to take?” [92-93].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven cyber threats
Argument 4
AI embedded in handsets could introduce new security threats to telecom networks
EXPLANATION
Mittar raises the concern that as AI capabilities move onto user devices, they may become vectors for attacks on the network, requiring proactive defensive measures.
EVIDENCE
He asks whether AI on handsets will pose challenges to the network and whether AI could be used for attacking networks, prompting a discussion on required safeguards [89-93].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven cyber threats from devices
A
Audience
1 argument134 words per minute149 words66 seconds
Argument 1
Scaling AI across 118 crore connections requires an end‑to‑end ecosystem approach to avoid disruption (Audience)
EXPLANATION
An audience member questioned how AI can be rolled out across India’s massive telecom base without causing service interruptions, emphasizing the need for a coordinated, end‑to‑end ecosystem strategy.
EVIDENCE
The audience asked how to progress AI deployment across 118 crore connections without disruption, stressing the need for an end-to-end ecosystem approach [271].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
End-to-end ecosystem coordination is recommended for large-scale AI deployment in telecom, ensuring stability and inclusive value capture [S26][S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Large‑scale AI deployment challenge
DISAGREED WITH
Mr Pasi Toivanen, Mr Shantigram Jagannath
M
Ms. Pallavi Mishra
4 arguments56 words per minute601 words638 seconds
Argument 1
Opening remarks affirm confidence that responsible AI will drive positive transformation in telecom (Ms. Pallavi Mishra)
EXPLANATION
Mishra thanked the chairman and expressed confidence that the evolving regulatory frameworks and responsible AI initiatives will positively transform India’s telecom sector.
EVIDENCE
She thanked the chairman, noted that regulatory frameworks and policies are evolving for AI-driven telecom, and expressed belief that the transformation is moving forward positively [67-73].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Responsible AI initiatives and ethical frameworks are presented as drivers of positive change in the telecom sector, supporting the optimistic outlook [S26][S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Positive outlook on responsible AI
AGREED WITH
Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Mr Pasi Toivanen
Argument 2
The inaugural plenary must focus on transparency, security, safety, sustainability and responsibility‑by‑design for AI‑driven telecom networks
EXPLANATION
Mishra outlines that the first session will discuss AI adoption together with key pillars such as transparency, security, safety, sustainable networks and embedding responsibility by design, signalling the need for holistic governance of AI in telecom.
EVIDENCE
She states that the session will cover AI adoption, transparency, security, safety, sustainable AI networks and embedding responsibility by design as the agenda for the first plenary session [74-76].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Guidelines for AI in telecom stress transparency, security, safety, sustainability and responsibility-by-design, aligning with the plenary agenda [S20][S21][S22][S23].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance and responsible AI design
Argument 3
AI can enable self‑healing telecom networks that detect and fix faults before they affect users
EXPLANATION
Mishra envisions a telecom network that can automatically identify and remediate problems, effectively ‘healing’ itself without human intervention, thereby improving reliability and service continuity.
EVIDENCE
She asks the audience to imagine “a telecom network that can heal itself… that can detect faults even before we know them,” framing this as a realistic capability of AI in telecom [11-13].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Self‑healing network capability through AI
Argument 4
AI is a transformative force that expands possibilities for telecom, from predictive management to intelligent customer experiences
EXPLANATION
Mishra emphasizes that AI is already reshaping industries and will further revolutionize telecom by enabling predictive network management and personalized customer interactions, creating vast new opportunities.
EVIDENCE
She states, “Today, AI is transforming industries… From predictive network management to intelligent customer experiences, the possibilities are humongous,” underscoring AI’s broad impact on telecom services [14-16].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Broad transformative potential of AI in telecom
M
Mr. Shantigram Jagannath
3 arguments138 words per minute1391 words602 seconds
Argument 1
Scaling AI‑driven services requires additional network equipment and capital investment
EXPLANATION
Jagannath notes that the simplest way to accommodate the growing demand of AI‑enabled telecom services is to procure more hardware, implying that significant CAPEX will be needed to sustain AI rollout.
EVIDENCE
He states, “Okay. So in just the easy answer is to buy more equipment,” indicating that expanding AI capabilities will hinge on acquiring new network assets [255-256].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Infrastructure investment for AI rollout
Argument 2
AI deployment must respect net‑neutrality principles to ensure equitable treatment of traffic across regions
EXPLANATION
Jagannath draws a parallel between current AI access debates and past net‑neutrality discussions, suggesting that AI‑driven services should be governed by the same fairness rules to avoid discrimination between urban and rural users.
EVIDENCE
He remarks, “I know we went through a case where… we had net neutrality and those debates also happening. So it’s not different from those types of debates,” linking AI access fairness to net-neutrality concerns [257-259].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Fairness and non‑discrimination in AI‑enabled telecom
Argument 3
AI access depends on sufficient backhaul capacity, requiring upgrades to core and transport infrastructure
EXPLANATION
Jagannath points out that AI services must traverse central AI nodes and backhaul links, so expanding AI usage necessitates strengthening the core network and transport layers.
EVIDENCE
He explains, “while we look at access to AI, there is access to the central AI, right, which has to go through a backhaul capacity,” highlighting the need for backhaul enhancements to support AI traffic [260-261].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Backhaul and core network readiness for AI
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI delivers concrete operational efficiency gains such as improved capacity, energy savings and predictive network management
Speakers: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Magnus Ewerbring, Mr Pasi Toivanen
AI enables predictive network management, fault detection, energy savings, and spam filtering (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti) AI improves link‑adaptation capacity by 10% and energy efficiency by 33% (Magnus Ewerbring) Push most optimization decisions to the network itself, reducing reliance on regional data centres (Mr Pasi Toivanen)
All three speakers agree that AI is already being used to optimise network performance – increasing effective spectrum capacity, cutting energy consumption and enabling predictive fault detection – and that such optimisation should be embedded directly in the telecom network rather than handled by external data-centres. [38-44][206-214][239-248]
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Telecom operators are already leveraging AI for network planning, capacity optimization and energy reduction, as documented in industry analyses of AI-driven performance improvements [S57] and broader discussions of AI’s energy savings potential [S41].
Future 6G networks will be AI‑native, with AI embedded as an intrinsic layer rather than an add‑on
Speakers: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Magnus Ewerbring, Mr Shantigram Jagannath
AI will become intrinsic to 6G, making networks AI‑native (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti) The industry aims to reach TM Forum Level 4 by 2028 and Level 5 for AI‑native 6G networks (Magnus Ewerbring) Decision on AI‑first vs. bolt‑on architecture impacts CAPEX/OPEX and long‑term sustainability (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
The regulator, an industry CTO and a telecom strategist all stress that the next generation (6G) will embed AI at the core of the architecture, requiring AI-first design choices and new maturity levels. [31-34][111-112][180-183]
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The vision of AI-native 6G aligns with discussions at the IGF and industry panels emphasizing AI as an intrinsic layer of future networks rather than a bolt-on, highlighted in the Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks session [S46] and edge-centric 6G design studies [S55].
AI deployment must be governed by a risk‑based regulatory framework and coordinated through a multi‑stakeholder ecosystem
Speakers: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Mr Pasi Toivanen, Ms. Pallavi Mishra
TRI’s risk‑based regulatory framework and sandbox for AI trials (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti) Ecosystem‑wide safeguards and collaborative governance are essential (Mr Pasi Toivanen) Opening remarks affirm confidence that responsible AI will drive positive transformation in telecom (Ms. Pallavi Mishra)
Both the regulator and industry leaders call for a risk-based approach, sandbox testing and broad ecosystem collaboration, while the moderator highlights the overall confidence that responsible AI, under such governance, will transform the sector. [49-53][135-158][67-73]
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Risk-based AI governance and multi-stakeholder coordination are advocated in international AI policy forums, notably the call for risk-based regulatory approaches in building an AI cooperation ecosystem [S43] and the principle-based ecosystem framework [S44].
AI‑enabled networks must ensure equitable, inclusive service for all users, especially rural and bottom‑of‑pyramid populations
Speakers: Ms. Pallavi Mishra, Mr Shantigram Jagannath, Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar
AI can enable self‑healing telecom networks that detect and fix faults before they affect users (Ms. Pallavi Mishra) AI must serve the bottom‑of‑pyramid with low‑cost access and inclusive services (Mr Shantigram Jagannath) How can we make sure that a rural area is not deprived of bandwidth… (Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar)
The opening speaker envisions self-healing, universal networks; the Tejas Networks strategist stresses low-cost, inclusive AI services for the poorest; and the moderator explicitly asks how AI can avoid disadvantaging rural subscribers. All converge on the need for universal, fair AI-driven connectivity. [11-13][168-171][252-254]
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ensuring inclusive connectivity is a recurring theme in global policy, with IGF deliberations framing connectivity as a human right and stressing rural inclusion [S58], and UN-led frameworks promoting locally-driven, inclusive AI adoption [S51].
Workload placement between edge, network core and cloud should follow a hybrid, context‑driven approach
Speakers: Dr. Vinesh Sukumar, Mr Pasi Toivanen, Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar
Edge AI for privacy, low latency; cloud for fleet management and model training (Dr. Vinesh Sukumar) Push most optimization decisions to the network itself, reducing reliance on regional data centres (Mr Pasi Toivanen) Moderator highlights need to address AI impact on access networks, security threats, and sustainability (Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar)
Qualcomm’s VP outlines a clear split of responsibilities (edge for privacy-sensitive tasks, cloud for training); Nokia’s representative advocates moving optimisation into the network; and the moderator raises the broader operational challenges, indicating shared recognition of a nuanced, hybrid deployment model. [219-224][239-248][88-97]
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Hybrid workload placement strategies are recommended in technical guidance that differentiates edge for low-latency inference and cloud for heavy training, as outlined in edge-vs-cloud deployment analyses [S55] and case studies on remote, low-connectivity scenarios favoring edge processing [S53].
Similar Viewpoints
Both the regulator and the industry CTO stress that AI delivers measurable performance and energy benefits for telecom operators, underpinning the case for wider AI adoption. [38-44][206-214]
Speakers: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Magnus Ewerbring
AI enables predictive network management, fault detection, energy savings, and spam filtering (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti) AI improves link‑adaptation capacity by 10% and energy efficiency by 33% (Magnus Ewerbring)
Both highlight that AI‑driven optimisation should be performed as close to the data source as possible – either within the network core or at the edge – while reserving cloud resources for broader management tasks. [219-224][239-248]
Speakers: Mr Pasi Toivanen, Dr. Vinesh Sukumar
Push most optimization decisions to the network itself, reducing reliance on regional data centres (Mr Pasi Toivanen) Edge AI for privacy, low latency; cloud for fleet management and model training (Dr. Vinesh Sukumar)
Both stress that a coordinated ecosystem (OEMs, regulators, startups) is needed not only for safety but also to unlock new business models such as AI‑model marketplaces. [135-158][188-192]
Speakers: Mr Pasi Toivanen, Mr Shantigram Jagannath
Ecosystem‑wide safeguards and collaborative governance are essential (Mr Pasi Toivanen) AI can generate new revenue streams via a telecom‑platform “app‑store” for AI models (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
Unexpected Consensus
Quantitative performance gains (10% capacity increase and 33% energy reduction) are accepted as realistic outcomes by both regulator and industry
Speakers: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Magnus Ewerbring
AI enables predictive network management, fault detection, energy savings, and spam filtering (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti) AI improves link‑adaptation capacity by 10% and energy efficiency by 33% (Magnus Ewerbring)
While the regulator’s remarks are largely qualitative, the fact that the regulator’s narrative aligns with the industry’s specific quantitative figures (10% capacity, 33% energy) shows an unexpected level of concrete agreement on measurable benefits. [38-44][206-214]
Both a telecom‑centric AI‑first architecture and a network‑centric optimisation approach are advocated as the preferred path forward
Speakers: Mr Shantigram Jagannath, Mr Pasi Toivanen
Decision on AI‑first vs. bolt‑on architecture impacts CAPEX/OPEX and long‑term sustainability (Mr Shantigram Jagannath) Push most optimization decisions to the network itself, reducing reliance on regional data centres (Mr Pasi Toivanen)
Jagannath argues for an AI-first, AI-native design, while Pasi pushes optimisation into the network core; the convergence on keeping the bulk of AI logic inside the network rather than at the edge or cloud was not explicitly anticipated. [180-183][239-248]
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Both telecom-centric AI-first and network-centric optimisation approaches are reflected in industry perspectives that describe telecom operators as programmable infrastructure layers [S46] and in network-level AI optimisation use cases for planning and performance [S57].
Overall Assessment

There is a strong, cross‑cutting consensus that AI is already delivering tangible efficiency gains, will become intrinsic to future 6G networks, and must be deployed under a risk‑based, multi‑stakeholder governance framework that safeguards inclusion, security and sustainability.

High consensus – the regulator, industry leaders, and the moderator repeatedly echo the same themes, indicating a unified direction for responsible AI integration in India’s telecom sector. This alignment suggests that policy, standards and commercial initiatives are likely to progress in a coordinated manner, accelerating AI‑driven transformation while maintaining trust and equity.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Placement of AI decision‑making (edge vs. network core vs. cloud)
Speakers: Dr. Vinesh Sukumar, Mr Pasi Toivanen, Mr Magnus Ewerbring
Edge AI for privacy, low latency; cloud for fleet management and model training (Dr. Vinesh Sukumar) Push most optimisation decisions to the network itself, limiting edge and regional data‑centre involvement (Mr Pasi Toivanen) AI is already used in the network to optimise link‑adaptation and energy efficiency (Mr Magnus Ewerbring)
Dr. Sukumar argues that privacy-sensitive and latency-critical functions should run on the edge while broader fleet-management and AI/ML training belong in the cloud [219-224]. Pasi contends that the majority of AI-driven optimisation should be performed directly within the telecom network, reducing reliance on edge devices and regional data centres [239-248]. Magnus focuses on network-level AI applications that improve capacity and energy use but does not address edge versus cloud placement, emphasizing network-centric gains [206-214]. These differing views illustrate a lack of consensus on where AI workloads should reside.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The debate over where AI decisions should reside mirrors documented considerations of edge, core and cloud placement, with recommendations for context-aware distribution in edge-centric deployment studies [S55] and remote scenario analyses [S53].
AI‑first (AI‑native) versus bolt‑on architecture for integrating AI into telecom networks
Speakers: Mr Shantigram Jagannath, Mr Magnus Ewerbring, Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti
Decision on AI‑first vs. bolt‑on architecture impacts CAPEX/OPEX and long‑term sustainability (Mr Shantigram Jagannath) In 6G AI will be intrinsic and networks will be AI‑native, setting a baseline for future deployments (Mr Magnus Ewerbring) AI will become intrinsic to 6G, making networks AI‑native (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti)
Jagannath highlights a strategic choice between building a completely AI-first, AI-native architecture or adding AI as a bolt-on to existing equipment, stressing cost and sustainability implications [180-183]. Magnus and Lahoti both project that future 6G networks will be AI-native, implying an AI-first approach [31-34][31-34]. The tension lies between a forward-looking AI-native vision and the practical consideration of retrofitting existing infrastructure.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The AI-first versus bolt-on architecture discussion is echoed in panel discussions on ethical AI integration in telecom, which contrast native AI layers with add-on solutions [S46] and outline edge-centric design principles for AI-native 6G [S55].
How to scale AI across India’s 118 crore mobile connections without service disruption
Speakers: Audience, Mr Pasi Toivanen, Mr Shantigram Jagannath
Scaling AI across 118 crore connections requires an end‑to‑end ecosystem approach to avoid disruption (Audience) A holistic ecosystem of OEMs, regulators and startups is essential; piecemeal patch fixes are insufficient (Mr Pasi Toivanen) The simplest answer is to buy more equipment to handle AI‑driven traffic (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
An audience member stresses the need for an end-to-end ecosystem to roll out AI at scale without interruptions [271]. Pasi echoes this, arguing that only a coordinated ecosystem can safely evolve legacy networks [272-275]. Jagannath counters with a more hardware-centric view, suggesting that procuring additional equipment is the straightforward solution [255-256]. These positions diverge on whether coordination or capital investment is the primary path forward.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Scaling AI to serve over 118 crore mobile users is addressed in national digital strategy briefings that highlight India’s mobile-first ecosystem and the need for resilient AI infrastructure [S62], as well as investment announcements underscoring capacity expansion plans [S64].
Addressing the compute‑intensive nature of AI and its sustainability impact
Speakers: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator), Mr Magnus Ewerbring, Mr Shantigram Jagannath, Mr Pasi Toivanen
AI is compute‑intensive; sustainability will be important (Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar) AI‑driven analysis achieved a 33 % improvement in energy efficiency (Mr Magnus Ewerbring) Buy more equipment to support AI, implying increased resource use (Mr Shantigram Jagannath) Push optimisation to the network itself to improve efficiency and reduce reliance on data centres (Mr Pasi Toivanen)
The moderator flags AI’s high compute demands and the need for sustainable deployment [94-96]. Magnus reports significant energy-efficiency gains from AI-enabled optimisation [212-214], while Jagannath suggests expanding hardware capacity, which could raise energy consumption [255-256]. Pasi proposes network-centric optimisation to enhance efficiency and limit extra compute load [239-248]. The disagreement centers on whether AI’s sustainability challenge is best met through efficiency gains, hardware expansion, or architectural optimisation.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The compute-intensive nature of AI and its sustainability implications are highlighted in analyses of Green AI and high-performance computing energy use, which discuss large model resource demands and environmental impact [S41][S48].
Unexpected Differences
Hardware‑centric expansion versus ecosystem‑centric coordination for AI rollout
Speakers: Mr Pasi Toivanen, Mr Shantigram Jagannath
A holistic ecosystem of OEMs, regulators and startups is essential; piecemeal patch fixes are insufficient (Mr Pasi Toivanen) The simplest answer is to buy more equipment (Mr Shantigram Jagannath)
While both speakers aim to scale AI across the massive Indian subscriber base, Pasi’s emphasis on coordinated ecosystem development contrasts sharply with Jagannath’s straightforward call for additional hardware procurement. The divergence is unexpected given their shared industry background, revealing differing strategic priorities.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The tension between hardware-centric rollout and ecosystem-centric coordination reflects policy discussions advocating risk-based, multi-stakeholder AI ecosystems [S43] and principle-based governance at the ecosystem level [S44].
Energy‑efficiency gains versus compute‑intensity concerns
Speakers: Mr Magnus Ewerbring, Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator)
AI‑driven analysis achieved a 33 % improvement in energy efficiency (Mr Magnus Ewerbring) AI is compute‑intensive; sustainability will be important (Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar)
Magnus highlights concrete energy‑saving outcomes from AI, whereas the moderator stresses the broader compute‑intensive nature of AI that could offset such gains. The tension between reported efficiency improvements and overarching sustainability worries was not anticipated.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Balancing energy-efficiency gains with the high compute demands of AI models is a recurring theme in sustainability literature, noting both potential reductions in energy use through AI optimisation and the substantial electricity consumption of large-scale AI workloads [S41][S48].
Overall Assessment

The discussion shows strong consensus on AI’s strategic importance for India’s telecom sector, but notable disagreements on technical implementation—specifically where AI workloads should reside (edge vs. network vs. cloud), whether to adopt AI‑first or bolt‑on architectures, the best method to scale AI across 118 crore connections (ecosystem coordination vs. hardware expansion), and how to reconcile AI’s compute‑intensity with sustainability goals.

Moderate disagreement: while all participants share the same overarching goal of leveraging AI, the divergent views on architecture, deployment strategy and sustainability indicate that policy and industry coordination will be required to align technical choices and investment priorities. These disagreements could affect the speed and effectiveness of AI integration in India’s telecom infrastructure.

Partial Agreements
All speakers concur that AI is a transformative and essential technology for India’s telecom sector, promising performance gains, new services and economic opportunities. However, they diverge on the pathways to realise these benefits—whether through network‑level optimisation, edge‑cloud hybridisation, new revenue models, or ecosystem governance.
Speakers: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti, Mr Magnus Ewerbring, Dr. Vinesh Sukumar, Mr Shantigram Jagannath, Mr Pasi Toivanen
AI enables predictive network management, fault detection, energy savings and spam filtering (Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti) AI improves link‑adaptation capacity by 10 % and energy efficiency by 33 % (Mr Magnus Ewerbring) Democratising AI on devices through hybrid edge‑cloud models (Dr. Vinesh Sukumar) AI can generate new revenue streams via a telecom‑platform “app‑store” for AI models (Mr Shantigram Jagannath) Ecosystem‑wide safeguards and collaborative governance are essential (Mr Pasi Toivanen)
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI is becoming a core, transformative capability for telecom, moving from an add‑on to an intrinsic, AI‑native layer especially with the upcoming 6G era. AI already delivers tangible benefits in India: predictive network management, fault detection, energy savings (up to 33% reported), and large‑scale spam filtering (≈400 million spam calls/messages blocked daily). Regulatory bodies (TRI) are adopting a risk‑based framework, sandbox environment and the human‑centric MANOV vision to ensure transparency, explainability, accountability and consumer protection for high‑risk AI use cases. Technical implementation requires a hybrid edge‑cloud approach: edge for privacy‑sensitive, low‑latency decisions; cloud for fleet management, model training and large‑scale analytics; and a gradual shift toward AI‑first or bolt‑on architectures depending on CAPEX/OPEX considerations. Sustainability is a key driver; AI‑driven optimization can increase spectral capacity by ~10% and reduce energy consumption significantly, but compute intensity must be managed. New business models are emerging, such as telecom‑platform “app‑store” for AI models, revenue sharing with startups, and ecosystem‑wide value creation through collaboration among OEMs, regulators, operators and innovators. Equity and inclusion are essential: AI‑enabled network slicing and trust mechanisms must ensure rural and bottom‑of‑the‑pyramid users receive fair bandwidth and affordable services. Future challenges include scaling AI across >118 crore connections, handling security threats from AI‑powered attacks, and preparing for a massive increase in AI agents (potentially 500 crore) that will generate new traffic and economic models.
Resolutions and action items
TRI will continue to apply its risk‑based regulatory framework and expand the AI sandbox for live network testing of AI‑enabled 5G/6G solutions. Stakeholders (OEMs, operators, regulators, startups) are urged to collaborate on an end‑to‑end ecosystem approach to AI integration, avoiding piecemeal patch fixes. Industry participants committed to advancing AI‑native network designs (level‑4 TM Forum by 2028, progressing toward level‑5 for 6G). Operators and OEMs to explore AI‑first versus bolt‑on architectural paths, balancing CAPEX/OPEX and long‑term sustainability. Development of trust frameworks, transparency standards and “app‑store” style platforms for AI model distribution was highlighted as a priority.
Unresolved issues
Precise criteria for deciding which functions should reside at the edge versus the cloud remain open. Concrete mechanisms to guarantee that rural users are not disadvantaged in bandwidth allocation by AI‑driven network slicing need further definition. Specific security safeguards against AI‑generated attacks on the network were discussed but not detailed. How to manage the massive increase in AI agents and the associated economic model (pricing, billing, cost recovery) is still under debate. The optimal balance between AI‑first native architecture and bolt‑on upgrades for existing equipment lacks a clear roadmap. Implementation details for sustainability metrics and compute‑intensity mitigation were not finalized.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a hybrid edge‑cloud model rather than a binary edge‑only or cloud‑only approach, allowing dynamic workload placement. Use AI‑driven network slicing with configurable policies to ensure equitable bandwidth distribution across urban and rural areas. Pursue both AI‑first native designs for new deployments and bolt‑on upgrades for legacy equipment, selecting the approach based on cost‑benefit analysis. Combine regulatory oversight (transparency, explainability) with industry‑led self‑regulation for low‑risk AI use cases, reserving stricter obligations for high‑risk scenarios. Encourage ecosystem collaboration (OEMs, regulators, startups) to share value and risks, rather than each player attempting to capture the entire AI value chain alone.
Thought Provoking Comments
AI and telecommunications complement each other to form the backbone for the intelligence era. Telecom networks are emerging as the primary carriers of AI, while AI itself is becoming the intelligence layer of telecom. In the upcoming 6G technology, AI will no longer be an application layer – it will be intrinsic. The telecom networks will be AI‑native.
This statement reframes AI from being a peripheral add‑on to being a foundational characteristic of future networks, setting a strategic vision for 6G and beyond.
It established the overarching theme of the session, prompting panelists to discuss concrete steps toward AI‑native infrastructure and influencing subsequent remarks about network autonomy, standards (e.g., TM Forum levels) and the need for regulatory foresight.
Speaker: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti (Chairman, TRAI)
Trust is the central pillar of AI adoption in telecommunications. Automated decisions taken by algorithms can affect millions of users simultaneously; efficiency gains cannot come at the cost of transparency, accountability or consumer rights.
Highlights the ethical dimension of large‑scale AI deployment, reminding stakeholders that technical progress must be balanced with governance.
Shifted the conversation from purely performance‑oriented benefits to governance concerns, leading to questions about explainability, human oversight, and later prompting the panel to address fairness (e.g., rural vs urban bandwidth) and ecosystem‑wide trust.
Speaker: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti (Chairman, TRAI)
Our goal is to reach Level 4 in the TM Forum maturity model by 2028 and then, with 6G, move to Level 5 – a fully autonomous, AI‑native network. This is the next big step after the current self‑optimising networks.
Provides a concrete, industry‑wide roadmap that quantifies the ambition for AI‑driven autonomy, linking technical milestones to business timelines.
Prompted the moderator’s follow‑up question about what AI changes compared to existing self‑optimising networks, and led Magnus to cite measurable gains (10% capacity, 33% energy efficiency), deepening the technical discussion.
Speaker: Magnus Eberberg (CTO, Ericsson)
AI historically lacks common sense. Translating AI to the edge for personalized inference is hard, and we need a hybrid approach where some functions run on the edge and others in the cloud. Deciding which belongs where is a major research challenge.
Identifies a fundamental limitation of current AI systems and frames the edge‑cloud split as a nuanced, research‑intensive problem rather than a simple binary choice.
Steered the dialogue toward the practicalities of deployment, leading to further questions about edge vs. cloud decisions and eliciting detailed responses from both Dr. Sukumar and later panelists about MLOps, privacy, and hybrid architectures.
Speaker: Dr. Vinesh Sukumar (Vice President, Qualcomm)
The real value will be captured by ecosystems that bring together technology players, regulators, and governments. We must proactively define, distribute, and maximise value across the ecosystem; this collaborative model is essential to address security risks and to realise the AI era.
Shifts focus from isolated technological solutions to a holistic, multi‑stakeholder ecosystem approach, emphasizing governance, shared risk, and value‑sharing.
Influenced subsequent remarks about end‑to‑end network evolution, prompted the audience question about scaling AI across 118 crore connections, and reinforced the moderator’s emphasis on collaborative frameworks.
Speaker: Mr. Pasi Toivanen (Nokia)
We have a responsibility to serve the bottom of the pyramid. AI adoption must be evaluated through cost‑optimization or revenue‑generation lenses, and we need to decide between AI‑first native architecture versus bolt‑on solutions to protect low‑cost universal access.
Brings socio‑economic considerations into the technical debate, linking AI strategy to affordability and inclusive access for the vast Indian population.
Introduced the theme of inclusive design, leading to later discussion on network slicing for rural vs. urban users and the ethical question of bandwidth fairness raised by the moderator.
Speaker: Mr. Shanti Gram Jagannath (Tejas Networks)
When we design the network correctly, it can perform security vulnerability assessments autonomously and push optimization decisions to the network itself, reducing reliance on regional data centres.
Proposes a concrete architectural shift toward decentralized, self‑protecting networks, addressing both security and efficiency concerns.
Prompted the moderator to ask about decisions taken off‑net and reinforced the narrative that AI should be embedded within the network fabric rather than as an external overlay.
Speaker: Mr. Pasi Toivanen (Nokia)
We need to think about a future where AI agents, not just human users, dominate traffic – potentially 500 crore AI agents. This raises new business‑model and regulatory questions about charging, economics, and network capacity.
Projects a forward‑looking scenario that expands the scope of AI impact beyond current human‑centric usage, highlighting upcoming policy challenges.
Extended the conversation from immediate technical implementations to long‑term strategic planning, influencing the audience’s question about scaling AI across the massive subscriber base.
Speaker: Mr. Shanti Gram Jagannath (Tejas Networks)
Overall Assessment

The discussion was shaped by a series of pivotal remarks that moved the dialogue from a high‑level celebration of AI’s potential to a nuanced exploration of implementation, governance, and inclusivity. Chairman Lahoti’s framing of AI‑native networks and the centrality of trust set the strategic backdrop. Technical leaders (Magnus, Dr. Sukumar) then grounded the vision with concrete roadmaps and highlighted the edge‑cloud dilemma, while Pasi Toivanen and Shanti Gram Jagannath introduced ecosystem‑centric and bottom‑of‑the‑pyramid perspectives that broadened the conversation to include economic, regulatory, and societal dimensions. These comments triggered targeted questions from the moderator and audience, steering the session toward actionable challenges—such as network autonomy, security, fairness, and future AI‑agent traffic—thereby deepening the analysis and ensuring the debate remained both forward‑looking and grounded in India’s unique scale and diversity.

Follow-up Questions
How is the access network evolving with AI?
Understanding AI integration in the access layer is crucial for improving network performance, scalability, and preparing for 6G deployments.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator)
What changes are expected in the core network when AI is implemented?
Core network transformation impacts latency, resource management, and the overall efficiency of telecom services.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator)
What challenges will AI on handsets pose to the network?
AI-enabled devices may generate new traffic patterns and processing demands, requiring network adaptations to maintain QoS and reliability.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator)
Will AI be used to attack telecom networks, and what defensive steps are planned?
AI can be weaponized for cyber‑attacks; identifying mitigation strategies is essential for safeguarding critical communications infrastructure.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator)
How will OEMs address sustainability given AI’s compute‑intensive nature?
AI workloads increase energy consumption; sustainable design and energy‑efficient hardware are needed to meet UN SDG commitments.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator)
What does AI fundamentally change compared to existing self‑optimizing (SON) networks?
Clarifies the added value of AI over traditional SON, informing operators about expected performance gains and investment justification.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator) to Magnus Eberberg
Which decisions should be pushed to the edge and which should remain centralized in telecom hardware/software?
Determining the edge‑vs‑cloud split affects latency, privacy, data management, and overall network efficiency.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator) to Dr. Vinesh Sukumar
What decisions are taken off‑network and what decisions will be taken off‑network during AI‑enabled operation?
Understanding off‑network automation informs architecture design and the distribution of intelligence across the network hierarchy.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator) to Mr. Pasi Toivanen
How can we ensure rural users are not deprived of bandwidth compared to urban users when AI manages resources?
Addresses equity, net‑neutrality, and service‑level fairness concerns in AI‑driven network slicing and resource allocation.
Speaker: Shri Ritu Ranjan Mittar (moderator) to Mr. Shantigram Jagannath
How can AI be introduced across 118 crore mobile connections without causing disruption, and what is the vision for scaling AI in such a massive network?
Large‑scale rollout poses operational risk; a clear roadmap is needed to maintain service continuity while leveraging AI benefits.
Speaker: Audience member (unidentified)
Research on hybrid AI models that dynamically balance edge and cloud inference, including decision‑making criteria for workload placement.
Hybrid architectures can optimise performance, privacy, and resource utilisation, but require systematic study to define optimal split strategies.
Speaker: Dr. Vinesh Sukumar
Developing intelligent routers capable of multi‑turn conversations and adaptive decision‑making between edge and cloud environments.
Such routers are essential for seamless AI services; current static routing limits flexibility, necessitating advanced research.
Speaker: Dr. Vinesh Sukumar
Designing AI‑first versus bolt‑on architectures for existing telecom equipment, assessing lifecycle, upgrade paths, and cost implications.
Operators need guidance on whether to retrofit legacy gear or invest in AI‑native hardware to maximize ROI and future‑proof networks.
Speaker: Mr. Shantigram Jagannath
Creating ecosystem frameworks for value distribution, trust, and regulation among OEMs, operators, regulators, and startups.
Collaborative value‑sharing models are vital to capture the full potential of AI while managing risks and ensuring fair returns for all stakeholders.
Speaker: Mr. Pasi Toivanen
Implementing regulatory sandbox approaches for live network testing of AI solutions, including safety and compliance metrics.
Sandboxes enable controlled innovation, allowing stakeholders to validate AI applications while protecting public interest.
Speaker: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti
Developing AI governance guidelines focused on transparency, explainability, and human oversight specific to telecom applications.
Trustworthy AI requires clear accountability mechanisms to protect consumer rights and maintain confidence in essential services.
Speaker: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti
Establishing interoperability standards and ethical alignment for AI‑driven telecom across borders.
Global coordination is needed to ensure seamless operation, avoid fragmentation, and uphold shared ethical principles.
Speaker: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti
Defining sustainability metrics for AI‑enabled telecom networks aligned with UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Measuring and reducing the environmental impact of AI deployments supports national and international climate commitments.
Speaker: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti
Formulating economic models for AI traffic, including pricing and charging mechanisms for AI agents versus human users.
Future revenue streams depend on clear policies for monetising AI‑generated data traffic and services.
Speaker: Mr. Shantigram Jagannath
Assessing security risks of AI‑generated attacks on telecom infrastructure and developing mitigation frameworks.
Proactive security research is essential to protect networks from sophisticated AI‑driven threats.
Speaker: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti (and panelists)
Investigating AI‑driven network slicing and dynamic bandwidth allocation techniques to ensure fairness between different regions and user groups.
Technical solutions are needed to prevent bias and maintain equitable service quality across diverse geographies.
Speaker: Mr. Shantigram Jagannath
Quantifying the ROI of AI‑driven fault prediction and proactive maintenance at massive scale.
Demonstrating tangible cost savings and performance gains will drive wider adoption of AI in telecom operations.
Speaker: Shri Anil Kumar Lahoti

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.