Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity

20 Feb 2026 16:00h - 17:00h

Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The panel, chaired by UK Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, examined how AI can be harnessed for development in Africa and Asia through language-focused initiatives and new computing infrastructure [1-3][6-8][9-11]. Lammy outlined the AI for Development programme, which includes expanding AI into more than 40 African languages, establishing Africa’s first public-sector AI compute cluster at the University of Cape Town, and launching an Asia AI for Development Observatory in partnership with Canada, Germany, Japan, Sweden and the GSMA Foundation [1-3][6-8][9-11].


Kenyan envoy Philip Thigo emphasized that the Global South possesses intelligence but has historically lacked the power to record and transmit it, making representation of oral cultures in AI models a matter of civilizational survival [23-33][37-44]. He argued that building research capacity, talent, and context-specific language models is essential for sovereignty and for delivering concrete use cases across the continent’s 2,000 languages [39-42][43-45]. The Masakane African Language Hub, described by its chair, aims to impact one billion Africans by developing high-quality data, inclusive benchmarks, gender-responsive projects such as Project Echo, and sustainable community-led AI ecosystems [52-60][61-70][71-77].


Indian CEO Shekhar Sivasubramanian explained that Wadwani AI designs applications in 14-16 languages from the outset, ensuring rural-urban inclusivity and tangible utility in health, education and agriculture [84-92][94-102]. He gave examples of a multilingual disease-surveillance system that alerts governments every four hours and an oral-reading tool that provides real-time feedback to children and teachers, illustrating how language and purpose are inseparable for adoption [95-102][108-113].


German parliamentary state secretary Babel Kofler highlighted that AI can only overcome inequality if it is inclusive, noting that bias in data and neglect of dialects must be addressed and that Germany has contributed through the Fair Forward initiative and partnerships with India to collect multilingual datasets [135-143][145-151]. The UK, Canadian, Japanese governments, Microsoft and the Gates Foundation are jointly funding public-good projects such as the African Compute Initiative-a high-performance GPU cluster at UCT-and the Lingua Africa open-core platform to turn language data into deployable services [258-270][272-279][224-233]. Microsoft’s Natasha Crampton stressed that compute is the enabler for making AI linguistically and culturally aware, required both for model training and for testing with local speakers, and that trustworthy AI depends on adequate infrastructure [224-233][236-244][245-248].


Across the discussion, participants agreed that without affordable compute and representative language resources, African and Indian researchers cannot contribute to or shape global AI systems [39-42][224-233][258-270]. They also concurred that public-sector investment and multi-stakeholder collaborations are necessary to fill market gaps, sustain talent and ensure that AI benefits are equitably distributed [212-214][258-270][71-77]. The session concluded that coordinated, inclusive AI development-grounded in local languages, robust compute and shared governance-offers a pathway to an equitable AI future for the Global South [13-14][126-127].


Keypoints

Major discussion points


Launching and scaling AI initiatives that prioritize African (and Asian) languages and compute capacity.


David Lammy outlined the AI for Development programme, the Masakane African Languages Hub, a public-sector AI compute cluster at the University of Cape Town, and the Lingua Africa open-core partnership - all aimed at bringing AI to over 40 African languages and providing the hardware needed for local model training [1-8][9-13][160-176][224-233][260-270].


Ensuring cultural representation and linguistic sovereignty.


Philip Thigo emphasized that the Global South’s oral heritage is at risk if AI models ignore local languages, and that building data, talent and research capacity is essential for “sovereignty” [22-33][38-45]. The Masakane Chair added that the hub’s four-pillar approach (data, research, innovation, sustainability) seeks to capture the nuance of each language and to preserve cultural memory [51-60][61-70][71-76].


Concrete, impact-driven use cases across sectors.


Wadwani AI described multilingual health-surveillance, disease-outbreak alerts, and an oral-reading-fluency tool for children, illustrating how language-aware AI can deliver tangible benefits in health, education and agriculture [84-102]. Masakane’s Project Echo was highlighted as a gender-responsive initiative that uses African-language AI to empower women’s economic participation and health [71-74].


Multi-stakeholder partnerships and public-goods funding to fill market gaps.


Representatives from the UK, Canada, Germany, the Gates Foundation, Microsoft and IDRC stressed that commercial markets overlook low-resource languages, so coordinated public-sector and philanthropic investment is required to create open data, benchmarks and compute resources [8-10][126-134][145-151][183-214][224-236][257-279].


Compute infrastructure as the critical enabler and a barrier to entry.


Both the African Compute Initiative and Microsoft’s commentary highlighted the exponential cost disparity for high-performance GPUs in Africa, arguing that dedicated clusters are indispensable for training, testing and deploying culturally-aware models [3][5][224-233][260-270][274-279].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The panel was convened to announce and explain a coordinated, multi-nation effort to make AI inclusive of Africa’s (and Asia’s) linguistic diversity, to build the necessary data and compute foundations, and to demonstrate how such infrastructure can be turned into real-world applications that advance health, education, gender equity and economic development.


Overall tone and its evolution


The conversation began with an optimistic, visionary tone-celebrating “brilliant, genuinely African-led initiatives” and the promise of an equitable AI future [2][13]. As speakers detailed the challenges of language extinction, talent scarcity, and compute cost, the tone shifted to a more urgent, problem-focused stance, emphasizing the existential risk of exclusion [30-33][224-233]. Throughout, the dialogue remained collaborative and constructive, ending on a hopeful, call-to-action note that highlighted partnership, public-goods investment and the potential for lasting impact [214-219][254-259].


Speakers

Co-Moderator – Panel moderator (role: co-moderating the discussion).


David Lammy – Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; MP; leads the UK’s AI for Development programme. [S4]


Natasha Crampton – Chief Responsible AI Officer, Microsoft; expertise in AI ethics, trustworthy and multilingual AI. [S6]


Ankur Vora – Chief Strategy Officer and President, Africa and India Office, Gates Foundation; focuses on philanthropic strategy for AI-driven development. [S9]


Chenai Chair – Director, Masakane African Language Hub; specialist in African language NLP, data collection, and AI model benchmarking for low-resource languages. [S11]


Shekar Sivasubramanian – CEO, Wadwani AI; Chennai Chair and Director of the Mazakani African Languages Hub; works on applied AI solutions for health, education, agriculture and multilingual technology in India.


Julie Delahanty – President, International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Canada; expertise in research funding for AI in low- and middle-income countries. [S14]


Philip Thigo – His Excellency Ambassador Philip Thigo, Special Technology Envoy of the Government of Kenya; focuses on AI policy, technology strategy and representation of African languages in AI. [S18]


Barbel Kofler – Parliamentary State Secretary to the Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany; works on international development policy and AI governance. [S20]


Additional speakers:


Debra Kofler – Mentioned during the panel change-over; no further role or expertise detailed in the transcript.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Opening Remarks – David Lammy


UK Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy opened the session by outlining the AI for Development programme. The programme has three pillars: (i) extending AI services to more than 40 African languages, (ii) creating Africa’s first public-sector AI compute cluster at the University of Cape Town, and (iii) launching an Asia AI for Development Observatory [1-8][9-13]. He noted the partnership network – the UK, Canada’s IDRC, the Gates Foundation, Germany, Japan, Sweden and the GSMA Foundation [1-8][9-13]. Lammy announced funding for four start-ups, including Torn AI in Morocco, which is building a voice-interface for low-literacy rural users to access digital and financial services [280-281]. He framed the work as a moral crossroads: AI can either concentrate power and widen inequality, or act as a force for good that uplifts humanity [13-14].


Panel Introduction – Co-Moderator


The co-moderator introduced the panel: Philip Digo, Kenya’s Special Technology Envoy; Babel Kofler, Germany’s Parliamentary State Secretary; Shekhar Sivasubramanian, CEO of Wadwani AI and Chair of the Masakane African Languages Hub; and Julie Delahanty, President of IDRC [15-21].


Philip Digo’s Response


When asked how AI in local languages could shape Kenya’s digital development (the continent has roughly 2 000 languages) [20-21], Digo described an “age of intelligence” in which AI reshapes how people live, learn and work [22-27]. He argued that the Global South has never lacked intelligence, but has lacked the power to record, transmit and recognise it, especially because many cultures are oral [28-33]. He warned that the absence of African languages in current models threatens an existential loss of civilisation [32-33]. Digo highlighted the need for research capacity, talent pipelines and a full AI stack-from data collection to model training-to achieve linguistic sovereignty and deliver context-specific use cases [38-45]. He cited youth in Kenya using “Chagipiti” (a local reference to ChatGPT) to create culturally relevant content [284].


Masakane African Languages Hub – Chair


The Chair explained that the Masakane African Languages Hub emerged in 2019 from a community-driven effort to digitise local languages when no external funding was available [51-55]. Its ambition is to reach 1 billion Africans through 50 of the most spoken languages, delivering economic, health and social benefits while preserving linguistic evolution [54-55][56-60]. The hub operates on four pillars:


1. Data – expanding high-quality, diverse datasets (building on the JW300 Bible corpus) [61-64];


2. Research & Benchmarking – creating an African speech-and-text benchmark to capture local nuances [65-67];


3. Innovation – allocating 40 % of the budget to concrete use-cases, notably Project Echo, a gender-responsive intervention that improves women’s economic empowerment and health in African languages [71-74];


4. Sustainability – focusing on institutional capacity-building so that open-source models can spawn local businesses and ensure long-term African-led AI [75-77].


Wadwani AI – Shekhar Sivasubramanian


Sivasubramanian described Wadwani AI’s inclusive design principle: every solution is built for at least 14-16 languages and must bridge the rural-urban divide [84-92]. He showcased two flagship projects: a multilingual disease-surveillance system that scans Indian news every four hours in 16 languages and alerts the government to outbreaks [94-99]; and an oral-reading-fluency tool that records children’s spoken reading, provides instant feedback and helps teachers tailor instruction [100-102]. He stressed that language and utility are inseparable-a model must deliver tangible value to achieve adoption [108-113].


Babel Kofler – Germany


Kofler reinforced the ethical dimension, stating that AI can only be a game-changer for the Sustainable Development Goals if it is inclusive and built on bias-free data [135-143]. She highlighted the importance of dialectal variation, noting that ignoring it reproduces cultural marginalisation. Kofler cited Germany’s Fair Forward initiative (launched in 2019) that collaborates with India to collect multilingual datasets for citizen-facing services [282-283][145-151].


Lingua Africa Announcement – Masakane Chair


The Chair announced Lingua Africa, an open-core, community-governed language-infrastructure platform funded by a multi-million-pound partnership among the UK, the Gates Foundation, Microsoft AI for Good and Masakane [160-176][170-178]. The platform will coordinate community-governed language infrastructure, domain-specific data collection, model development and deployment pathways.


Ankur Vora – Gates Foundation


Vora framed language as a public good that markets have abandoned because commercial incentives focus on English and Mandarin [183-190][191-215]. He argued that when markets are broken, coordinated public-good funding from governments, foundations and tech firms is required to develop low-resource language AI, and he reaffirmed support for Lingua Africa[188-192][205-212][160-176].


Natasha Crampton – Microsoft


Crampton highlighted that compute is the enabler for language-aware, culturally-sensitive AI. High-performance GPUs are needed not only to fine-tune models with locally collected data but also to test them with native speakers and to run day-to-day services [224-233][232-247]. She warned that AI diffusion is currently twice as fast in the Global North, underscoring the urgency of closing the compute gap [225-227].


Julie Delahanty – IDRC


Delahanty detailed the African Compute Initiative, the first dedicated high-performance GPU cluster for public institutions in Africa, to be hosted at the University of Cape Town [258-271]. The cluster will provide modern GPUs, fast storage and networking, enabling African researchers to train large models, test innovations quickly and support projects such as the Masakane Hub [274-279][272-273]. She also noted community-driven localisation work, citing subtitles created by the Amara.org community [285].


Consolidated Consensus

All speakers agreed that:


* Compute infrastructure is foundational for building and deploying multilingual AI models [3-4][224-233][258-271][39-40][188-192];


* Linguistic inclusion is essential to prevent cultural extinction and to deliver equitable AI benefits [13][28-33][54-66][86-92];


* Public-good, multi-donor partnerships are needed to fill market failures for low-resource languages [8-10][126-134][145-151][183-215];


* Domain-specific use cases in health, education and agriculture demonstrate real-world impact [10-11][71-74][94-102]; and


* Capacity-building in talent, research and institutions underpins AI sovereignty [40-41][64-66][86-92][267-271][212-215].


Points of Divergence

1. Funding Model – Vora stressed that markets are broken and only public-good investment can address language gaps [188-192][205-212]; Lammy called for strong state intervention to avoid leaving AI to the marketplace [218-219]; Sivasubramanian highlighted the role of private-sector risk-taking and innovation [84-86].


2. Priority: Compute vs. Data – Crampton and Delahanty positioned compute as the immediate bottleneck [224-233][267-271]; Kofler and the Masakane Chair emphasised high-quality, bias-free data and benchmarks as the prerequisite [136-143][60-66][70-76].


3. Framing of Language Preservation – Digo framed it as an existential civilisational threat [28-33]; Vora described it as a market failure requiring public-good investment [188-192][205-212].


Key Take-aways

* Linguistic inclusion safeguards cultural heritage and ensures AI benefits all communities [13][28-33][54-66][86-92].


* The Masakane Hub targets 50 major African languages, aiming to impact 1 billion people through data expansion, benchmarking, gender-responsive projects and sustainability [54-55][61-70][71-77].


* Effective AI solutions must be multilingual and directly useful, as shown by disease-surveillance, oral-reading tools, and voice-interface start-ups [10-11][94-102][280-281].


* Bias-free, representative data and local testing are prerequisites for trustworthy AI [135-143][232-247].


* Market forces ignore low-resource languages; coordinated public-good funding is required [188-192][205-215].


* Compute capacity is a major bottleneck; the African Compute Initiative will provide the first public-sector high-performance GPU cluster in Africa [258-271][274-279].


* Multi-stakeholder partnerships (UK, Gates, Microsoft, IDRC, Germany, Canada, GSMA) are mobilised to fund language infrastructure, compute and applied projects [8-10][126-134][145-151][183-215][224-233][258-271].


* Governance, ethics, gender-responsive design and long-term sustainability are central to ensuring AI remains safe, inclusive and equitable [71-77][135-143][224-233].


Resolutions & Action Items

* Launch of Lingua Africa, an open-core, community-governed language-infrastructure platform funded by a UK-Gates-Microsoft partnership [160-176][170-178].


* Allocation of substantial funding to Masakane for data collection, benchmark creation, use-case development and sustainability activities [9-10][71-77].


* Support for four additional start-ups (including Torn AI) via the GSMA Foundation to deliver responsible AI for underserved populations [9-10][280-281].


* Establishment of the African Compute Initiative – a dedicated high-performance GPU cluster at UCT for public-sector researchers [258-271][272-273].


* Commitment of 40 % of Masakane’s budget to concrete use cases, notably Project Echo for women’s economic empowerment and health [71-74].


* Development of an African speech-and-text benchmark to evaluate models in local contexts [66-67].


* Ongoing capacity-building programmes to train African researchers, data scientists and AI engineers [40-41][64-66][86-92][212-215].


Open Questions & Unresolved Issues

* Scaling beyond 50 languages – a roadmap is needed to extend support to the full 2 000 + African language ecosystem [42-45].


* Long-term financing – mechanisms to sustain the Masakane hub and the compute cluster after the initial grant period remain to be defined.


* Governance of Lingua Africa – the precise community-governed decision-making structure and benefit-sharing model require clarification.


* Data ownership and privacy – strategies for collecting high-quality data for extremely low-resource dialects while protecting community rights are still under discussion.


* Deployment at scale – methods to roll out voice-interface solutions like Torn AI to low-literacy, rural users across diverse contexts need further elaboration.


* Impact measurement – robust metrics for evaluating gender-responsive interventions (e.g., Project Echo) and health outcomes from AI tools are required [71-74].


* Balancing public-good and private-sector roles – ensuring that private innovators benefit from public infrastructure without compromising local sovereignty [218-219][84-86].


* Benchmarking and scenario-aware evaluation – defining standards for accuracy, cultural relevance and context-specific performance of African language models [66-67][232-247].


Alignment with Policy Context

The discussion mirrors recent AI-readiness reports that call for “the most useful” AI in Africa rather than the most powerful [S38], and stress that digital sovereignty must incorporate linguistic dimensions [S41][S86]. The emphasis on public-sector compute as critical national infrastructure aligns with recommendations to treat AI infrastructure as a public good [S55][S103]. By combining government funding, multilateral development partners and private-sector expertise, the panel’s agenda directly addresses identified gaps in capacity, infrastructure and inclusive governance [S39][S40][S52].


Overall, the panel presented a coordinated, multi-nation effort to build the data, talent and compute foundations required for multilingual, culturally-aware AI, while recognising the ethical imperative to preserve linguistic heritage and to deliver equitable development outcomes across Africa and Asia.


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
David Lammy

to make AI work in more than 40 African languages. This is a brilliant, genuinely African -led initiative which helps people to access AI in the languages that they actually use in their everyday lives. Second, we’re investing in Africa’s first dedicated public sector AI computer cluster at the University of Cape Town. Too many African researchers are held back by costs and a lack of access. And the hope is that this new hub will give them the computing power to build and train models locally. And third, we’re launching the Asia AI for Development Observatory. This is a new network to support research, responsible AI governance, to protect rights and to ensure AI reflects the realities of people’s lives across the region.

All of these initiatives are effectively part of our AI for Development programme, launched when we hosted the first of these AI summits back at Bletchley Park three years ago and made in partnership with Canada’s International Development Research Centre and as part of a wider collaboration to coordinate investments with the Gates Foundation, the governments of Germany, Japan and Sweden, as well as Community Jamil. And as part of our partnership with the GSMA Foundation, we’re proud to announce the support to four additional start -ups and these innovative businesses will harness responsible AI and will be able to support the development of AI for the future. to support the needs of underserved people. across Asia and Africa. They include Torn AI in Morocco, which creates voice interfaces to local dialects to help low -literacy rural users access digital and financial services through simple spoken interactions.

And all of these initiatives will make a real difference to people across the continent of Africa and Asia. But I hope they’ll do a bit more than that. Yesterday, I spoke about the choice the world faces, the two paths before us, one which sees AI take power and opportunity away from people and sadly divides us, and one that sees AI used as a force for good to solve problems and uplift all of humanity. and the projects I’ve mentioned, the ones we’re going to hear about today and the many new institutions and coalitions that are now emerging can help make sure we go down the right path and that is a path of a safe AI, an inclusive AI and importantly an equitable AI for everyone.

So let’s turn now to our panel, an exceptional group of leaders from across India and Africa and I’m going to get an introduction to our panel members and then I’ll start with the first question.

Co-Moderator

Thank you. It’s my pleasure to introduce, joining our Deputy Prime Minister on the stage, we have His Excellency Ambassador Philip Digo, Special Technology Envoy of the Government of Kenya. We have Dr. Babel Kofler. parliamentary state secretary to the federal minister for economic cooperation and development of Germany. We have Shekhar Sivasubramanian, CEO of Wadwani AI and Chennai Chair, Director of the Mazakani African Languages Hub. And so to the first question to Philip. So we’re beginning to see an attempt well we all experience how large language models are affecting our lives on a daily basis. I certainly use a, I don’t use chat GPT but I use a secure network which isn’t taking my stuff because obviously for obvious reasons as Deputy Prime Minister of the UK I have to be a bit careful but I’m using it to research and you know usually really get quickly to a that I don’t fully understand.

So as we move this on to local languages, dialects, and across Africa we’ve got an estimated 2 ,000 languages, how do you see AI in local languages shaping the next phase of your country’s digital development having been to Kenya many times and knowing the many groups that are there, how does this really work on the ground?

Philip Thigo

Thank you so much, Right Honourable Prime Minister. I think this moment is so profound that I don’t think you guys are realising what is happening here. I think the first thing is to understand that we’re actually in the age of intelligence, right? So it’s not about ICTs or technology, it’s about our AI shape. I think how we live, learn, work, collaborate. and engage. From our point of view, it’s a civilizational discussion. The Global South has never lacked intelligence, as we know, right? So what it has lacked is the power to define how that intelligence is recognized, recorded, or transmitted. Because our entire culture’s values have been coined in language. The Global South is largely an oral civilization.

And so the current models lacking our language means our civilization are at risk, almost existential, to be extinct. And I think this initiative, in our view, begins to ensure that we are represented in the current age of intelligence, but also our intelligence is part of our global collective history and memory. And so I think which means then how we engage in this is that now with the capabilities like Masakani, it means that when I get into Chagipiti that you refused to mention, is that… Young people in Kenya, who are the number one users of Chagipiti? by the way, are not only seeking emotional advice or guidance from these models, but then when they engage with these models, it actually also represents their cultures and civilization.

I think for me that’s how it works practically on the ground. First of all, it’s representation and existence. The second part, of course, is it also works when we have the entire stack. And you mentioned a couple of things around finding the models, but I think it would be interesting to see how we find the compute, the talent that then influences, develops the data, develops the language. The research and development capability, which I was in the first instance, and that was an amazing initiative because then we need to build research capacity and capability because talent development is the first instance of sovereignty. Then the final point, of course, is the specific use cases and languages, especially in the African context.

Again, you say 2000. So each of the 2000 are very context -specific. Kiswahili and Yoruba are not the same, and neither are their applications in the context of the African context. sense in even our history and cultures in Africa. So I think that capability, as diverse as it could be, also ensures that our diversity in the African continent is represented in the future models.

David Lammy

And that’s wonderful. And the first point you made is really about sort of seeing yourself in this story that the global community is going to be telling in relation to intelligence. And we know that in the past, Africa has been written out of that story. So it’s hugely important that African languages intellect history over thousands of years is in this storybook. So should I tell us then how the Masa Kani African languages is addressed? And how are we addressing these issues and really working as a tangible, real thing?

Chenai Chair

Thank you so much. Minister. So I think I want to say that I am proud to be representing the Masakane community that started in 2019, wanting to see their own languages represented in the global domain, and they did it by the bootstraps. No one wanted to fund them, and they came together and said, hey, how do I ensure that the language that I speak is captured digitally? So the Masakane African Language Hub emerges from that community -driven initiative, where our main goal is to impact 1 billion Africans through 50 of the most spoken languages with relevant AI tools that will allow for economic growth, health, and social benefit, and also working towards the preservation and also capturing the evolution of African languages.

The 2 ,000 -plus are growing, and so then even as Honorable Philip Degas mentioned, the diversity of the language is growing. So I think it’s a very important thing to do. Thank you. Thank you. Like I speak Shona, but the Shona I speak in Harare is not the same as the Shona spoken in Mutai. So it’s really capturing that diversity and nuance of that work. So what we do with support from the funding collaborative and the partners that we have is actually think about enabling the ecosystem through partnerships and grant making. So we specifically focus on four pillars of work, which is around data. So expanding and diversifying high quality data. In 2019, there wasn’t as much data, but the Masakana community actually started building up that data based from the JW300 Bible data set that had been created.

Secondly, we’re also looking at research. So it’s important for us to take it on as an ecosystem invention, where we are looking at developing and refining inclusive AI machine learning models, but also thinking about the tooling that’s resourcing these. So what we are working on specifically, that is having a benchmark project where we’re actually… going to create a relevant African benchmark looking at speech and text because the current benchmark models out there do not nuance the realities on the African context. And then also looking at innovation. So again, a lot of the questions that we’ve seen is when you create the data, where does it go? Is it taken up in the market? What’s the impact?

And so for us, we’re actually working 40 % of the funding that we have will go to creating use cases and impacting use cases. And one special mention I want to put forward is actually that we are working on a project called Project Echo, which means enhancing communications for her opportunities. This is a gender responsive intervention that exists in the context of high gendered inequality on the continent. And what that does is it will provide relevant use cases in African languages that lead to impact on women’s economic empowerment and health. And that’s a significant part of us recognizing the context we exist in. And then lastly, we really are thinking about sustainability. and right now we’re in a moment where there is resourcing, where there is funding and we also come from a moment where people were doing it without funding.

So we’re thinking about institutional capacity building for the African NLP community which will actually then see businesses coming up from these open source models, people innovating off the data that’s created and sustainability beyond the Masakana community which has been happening right now but then this funding allows us to actually have African -led AI which is built for impact. Thank you very much.

David Lammy

Thank you very much. Centres Africa but also importantly the fundamental inequality and gender issues that sit at the heart not just of Africa but making sure that women are, a big part of this story. Shekhar, bringing India into this and thinking of Wadwani AI and we’re sitting here in the most populous country on the planet. There are also lots of languages and tremendous diversity but also innovation and range across this country. So tell us how Wadwani AI is working at the heart of that innovation here in India. Thank you. First, the

Shekar Sivasubramanian

work we do is applied AI, which means we solve for problems in health, education and agriculture. And we’ve been doing it for the last seven years. The moment you work in India, the very first design principle that you start with is the ability to be… inclusive and embrace the entire population. So the dimensions of population we are looking at are language. So you start with at least 14 to 16 languages. You don’t even think of an application otherwise. Second, you also think of complete inclusivity, which means you need to think through the divide between rural and urban, the kinds of applications that will be delivered to people which will be of use to them. Third, are applications fundamentally must be useful to people.

Then they open out their ability to learn languages, changes that better interface with technology that can actually be of use to them. So that utility value sits at the heart of everything that we do, which drives a lot of behavior both by us as well as the ecosystem. Just as an example, we do media disease surveillance. We’ve been doing it for a while, which picks up every article published in India, it runs four hours, and it picks. Events of interest in health. 16 languages and it’s been running for the last two and a half to three years. It uses AI and it tells you in this region this many people got this disease at this time.

It runs every four hours and it tells the central government if it’s a disease outbreak what should you do. Another completely different example. We collect data from children in a couple of states and that will expand to 14 to 16 states where we have the largest data set of spoken local language. And which again in of itself of no use but when you provide something called oral reading fluency which assists the poorest child to read a paragraph and the AI tells you what you read well, what you did not read well and assists the teacher to cohortize the students and provide them information. Suddenly the language and the application you cannot distinguish between them. It is very important in human contexts to provide some value to the person in any interchange.

If you can work the value then the adoption is possible. option is easy. If you divorce the two, people don’t understand why I’m doing what I’m doing. It looks like an encumbrance. So for us, at the heart of our innovation is what does it mean for the person. Independent of which, we do analysis on various languages. We’ve done one on Tibetan, where we’ve preserved their entire culture by taking, we worked in Dharmashala, as well as in Karnataka. We digitized their entire library system and allowed the communities there to gain employment using it. Likewise, we plan to work on multiple less -used languages, Pan -India. We believe, it’s our position that, and we’ve got Agrivani, Healthvani, everything that we do is multilingual.

Everything that we do collects data. We have the largest data sets now, incidentally, of the work we do. It’s not what we do. It comes as a by -product of the work that we do. Over a period of time, it is my heart. Considered an humble opinion that these models using AI will take time. We should be ready to write this for a period of time. We should be ready to invest in deep research and or very utilitarian based approaches so that you can take the community along with you. That is super important. The theory is interesting, the practice is different. There is a theory as to how to design roads in India. I will keep quiet after a bit.

Very

David Lammy

very good example. Obviously I talked about the UK as a donor country doing this in partnership with others, Canada, Sweden, but also the German government and we’re joined by Babel Koffler just to bring the donor a perspective really to this and why this is so important. Thank

Barbel Kofler

you very much, Deputy Prime Minister. Thank you. Oh, there’s no one? What did I do? Oh, thank you. Thank you very much. I should put it on first, that’s true, yeah. Thank you very much, Deputy Prime Minister. I wouldn’t talk if it’s coming to AI in a manner of donor and recipient, because at the end of the day I think it’s a new technology where we all have to bridge if we really want to make it useful for everybody. And that’s also our interest, of course, from the German side. We see that AI can only be really the game changer to overpower… …to overcome inequality, to fulfill the promises of the SDG. And that’s for every country important, not only for global laws.

global South that’s important for everybody, can only be that game changer if it is inclusive. That starts with data at the end of the day and how biased data is. And if you talk about bias in data, language is quite close to it. You were pointing out how important it is and how you differently speak in various variations of your language. I really understand that I don’t speak standard German normally, so I also use a dialect, and that’s quite different from Hamburg. So we all have something to include also, which is connected with a cultural momentum, and we see so many languages neglected, totally neglected, dialects, cultures, because it’s not only the language, it’s what the language is transporting also, which is neglected.

And that’s why we really try to be part. And we are very proud to be part of your initiative. also. We were starting in 2019 with discussing those topics, working on an initiative called Fair Forward. That’s part of the initiative. And working also with partner countries like India on collecting data sets, so really to collect the necessary data on those local languages, which at the end of the day is offering then or should offer service to citizens in their mother tongue in multilingual countries or contexts, for example. So for us, it’s of utmost importance. Happy to be part of the initiative. We want to stay a reliable partner on that, and we will be part of that initiative.

And I hope the idea is spreading and growing. Thank you. Thank

Co-Moderator

you. We’ll now have a small… Changeover in our panellists. If I could ask, if we could have another big round of applause, please, for His Excellency Philip Higo, Debra Kofler and Shekhar Sivasubramanian. And now joining us on stage, we will have Ankara Vora, Chief Strategy Officer and President of the Africa and India Office at the Gates Foundation. Julie Delahunty, President of Canada’s International Development Research Centre. And Natasha Crampton, Chief Responsible AI Officer at Microsoft. Thank you very much.

David Lammy

Back to Chennai, my understanding is that Masakami are announcing a new multi -million pound partner for an open call today for Lingua Africa. So can you tell us a little bit more about this initiative and the gap that it’s designed to close effectively? And then why this moment is so important for African languages as a whole and AI?

Chenai Chair

Thank you so much Deputy Prime Minister. So yes, I do have the honour with my esteemed panellists to actually announce Lingua Africa. So with Masakami, which I’ve said means to build together, we’ve been working with researchers and communities across the continent to close the gap in how African languages are being used. And how African languages are represented in the AI systems. What we’ve constantly seen is that… I think I did mention this, is that it’s not just about data. It’s about whether the language resources actually translate into tools people can use, particularly in healthcare, education, agriculture, and public services, because those are the developmental domains that we’re likely to have significant impact with. So together with Microsoft AI for Good and the Gates Foundation, as well as our AI for D partners, LINGUA Africa will be a multi -partner open core focused on open community -governed language infrastructure, which will directly enable real -world AI applications.

I think a lot of the times as we’re developing AI solutions, the question becomes, if we’re building them in a lab, will they work in the real world? And that’s also consistently part of what we’re doing with the benchmarking work. So how we’ll do this is actually then it’ll be a use case or impact -focused specific approach. Where we will do model development, we will collect targeted data in those… specific domains and then also support strong pathways for deployment and adoption. So this is us working with multiple entities, the academic community, our partners here on stage with us, but also the tech entrepreneurs who are actually building up these solutions. And then for us, it’s quite simple.

The goal is to make sure that language is not a barrier anymore into including people into these solutions, particularly if you think about digital public infrastructure interventions. They need to be in languages that people communicate with because you will leave behind a majority of people if they are in languages that they do not understand. So that is our most significant contribution right now. Thank you.

David Lammy

Thank you. And obviously, we’re very pleased in the UK to be partnering with the Gates Foundation on new support for linguistic diversity across AI. But just explain, Ankur, the role. that the hub has effectively in that wider impact on the global south.

Ankur Vora

This is on? It’s on, all right. Languages matter. Can you first join me in giving a big round of applause to Chennai for this amazing movement. It is kind of brilliant where we are in this moment in time. Let me talk about three whys. One is why care about language? The second is why care about investing in language? And the third one is why care about investing in initiatives like Masakane? The first one, I think so everybody knows, but it’s useful to repeat it. And many people have talked about this before. Because we want to make… We want to make sure that the power of AI… actually changes lives. History is not going to remember us for the models we developed or the speeches we give here.

History is going to remember the impact we all had. We’re talking about mothers and babies not dying. We’re talking about the next generation growing up in a world without infectious diseases. We’re talking about hundreds of millions of people escaping the clutches of poverty. Those kind of things matter. And the solutions are there. They can get better. But we need to find a way of these solutions getting translated for these use cases. So that’s why we need to care about this thing. Why invest in language? Because the markets are broken. The markets are broken. Private sector companies are investing in models developed in English and Mandarin. And it makes sense for the markets to do that.

Because that’s where the economics work. But just because… the economics don’t work for the small resource languages doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be investing in this. And that’s the point why all of us need to get together and say we need to do something about it. When markets are broken, funders can get together and invest in public goods. And that’s what we all are doing right now. UK government, Canadian government, the Japanese, Microsoft, IDRC, everybody is getting together and making the point that we need to invest in public goods because these markets are broken and this is an important thing. And so I’m quite excited about the fact that we’re all sitting at this panel, people in this audience, and saying we’re going to make sure that as we think about tomorrow, the important thing of developing solutions in the right languages that can solve the problem.

Thank you. be a problem that we will tackle. Thank you.

David Lammy

Thank you. I’ve got to say as a politician I like the idea that the state intervenes and doesn’t just leave it to the marketplace to determine where to put the funds, I’ve got to say. But obviously we are, and you have to in terms of the innovation, work at the cutting edge and that cutting edge is most often in the private sector as well, taking those risks to develop and innovate and here Microsoft and cloud computing is hugely important, Natasha, and it’s important to understand that interaction between the cloud. I think that the Masakani hub as it has been described so well, by Shaniai and how important it is that computation and cloud technology helps the innovation of these local languages.

Could you say a little bit more about that? But there is another subset to this, which is getting the balance right so that the languages and often the communities that we’re supporting that are at the front line have equity in this and don’t lose their own sovereign capabilities, which has been a theme of this conference. So I wonder if you could just reflect on that as well.

Natasha Crampton

is an urgent priority. Our own analysis shows that we have AI diffusing in the global north at roughly double the rate that we have it diffusing in the global south at the current time, and that is exactly why we need partnerships like these in order to start to put the right infrastructure in place to close that gap. Now, language is particularly important in terms of overcoming that AI divide. As we’ve heard many speakers say today, nobody is going to use AI if it does not speak the language that you speak, and importantly, that it does not work in the context, in the specific scenario in which you need to use it. So language -aware and scenario -aware, AI.

AI is incredibly important to empowering people to put… the technology to work in the use cases that mean the most to them. And that’s why we’re so thrilled to be partnering with Masakane, as well as the Gates Foundation, and the UK government on this Lingua Africa initiative. So how does compute come into all of this? I think, quite simply, compute is the enabler of making language and culturally aware AI. It’s a critical component of it. So when we take a base model that may have just been trained, like most models, on data sets that are predominantly English, we need to make sure that we can do this responsibly, locally -led data collection that Shania was talking about earlier.

And then we need to do some further work on the models to essentially ingest that data and make it well -registered. And that’s what we’re trying to do. And that’s what we’re trying to do. And that’s what we’re trying to do. And that’s what we’re trying to do. And that’s what we’re trying to do. And that’s what we’re trying to do. And that’s what we’re trying to do. And that’s what we’re trying to do. And that’s what we’re trying to do. takes compute. Then it’s very important once we’ve actually made the model language, linguistically and culturally aware, we need to make sure that we’re testing it with local language speakers and in the right scenarios.

That also, that testing, that also takes compute. And then finally, the day -to -day use of this technology, it also requires computing power. So we’re really here today as an enabler of an Africa -led effort by Africans for Africans to create this linguistically aware and multi -culturally aware technology, and compute fundamentally is just the enabler of it. I think my last thought to offer here today is I think these types of initiatives just really reinforce that trustworthy AI is not going to be the best tool for computing. I think it’s going to be the best tool for computing. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. because of the choices that we make, the ways in which we choose to build and test and deploy these AI systems and for us at Microsoft it’s really important that we do take all of those steps to represent the world as it is multicultural, multilingual and deeply interconnected so we’re thrilled to be part of this initiative.

Thank you very much.

David Lammy

And Julie, so we very much described this journey that we’ve been on since Bletchley Park and talked about languages, talked about computing. In a sense, AI, that’s the foundation stone for communities but just to round off this event, how do we see the opportunities going forward? particularly, where do we need to get to?

Julie Delahanty

Thank you. Thanks, everybody, for being here and for the Deputy Prime Minister for welcoming us. We’re incredibly proud at IDRC to be part of the AI4D initiative with the UK government and to be partnering with the Masa Kani African Language Hub as well as the African Compute Initiative. And I think going back a little bit to the Microsoft views on it, I think it’s very similar for us. Researchers in lower and middle -income countries really have to have strong computing power to be able to do the kind of cutting -edge AI work that Shana and others are doing. But right now, of course, they do face a lot of barriers. We did a study that showed the incredible increased cost of getting compute capacity, the difference between getting it in Germany and getting it in the UK.

But in an African country, the costs are exponentially larger. So that computing cost and how much it is, the local infrastructure that might be limited, the GPUs that are the… hardware that’s really driving the powers modern AI is also very difficult and hard to access for African countries. So it really makes it difficult for them to fully participate in global AI innovations. The African Compute Initiative is going to change all that, we hope. It is going to be the first dedicated high -performance computing cluster for public institutions in Africa. It will be based in South Africa at the University of Cape Town. And that initiative is going to include modern GPUs. It’s going to have faster and better storage capacity and much faster networking.

And it’s that kind of computing power that is essential. It’s essential for training large AI models. It’s essential for testing new ideas more quickly, as you mentioned. Subtitles by the Amara .org community And it’s been essential and will be essential for things like the Masakani African Language Hub. Both the initiatives that I’m talking about are really responding to the foundational gaps. So whether that’s compute capacity or the kinds of representative and robust data sets, both of those things are absolutely necessary. And if you don’t have those foundations, then you can’t contribute to AI systems. And if you can’t contribute to AI systems, then you can’t shape the AI systems. So it’s absolutely critical for Africa’s AI innovations to have those foundational elements that exist.

And I think the lessons that we’re going to learn through a lot of this programming is going to help other regions and other lower resource contexts to do that kind of work. And in terms of the next steps or the things that we can do with that, I mean, you can imagine some of the obvious things. I mean, some people have already mentioned it, but things like having…

Co-Moderator

Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (23)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (5)
Confirmedmedium

“UK Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy opened the session.”

The knowledge base lists David Lammy as the Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, confirming his role in opening the session [S1].

Confirmedhigh

“The continent has roughly 2 000 languages.”

The knowledge base notes that there are over 2,000 documented African languages, corroborating the figure cited in the report [S106].

Confirmedmedium

“Babel Kofler is Germany’s Parliamentary State Secretary.”

Source [S21] identifies Bärbel Kofler as the Parliamentary State Secretary to the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, confirming her title.

!
Correctionhigh

“Philip Digo is Kenya’s Special Technology Envoy.”

The knowledge base records the envoy’s name as Philip Thigo, not Philip Digo, indicating a naming error in the report [S17].

Additional Contextlow

“The partnership network includes the Gates Foundation among other donors.”

Source [S109] mentions collaboration with partners such as the Gates Foundation in AI-related initiatives, providing additional context to the reported partnership list.

External Sources (118)
S1
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — -Co-Moderator- Role/title not specified
S2
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-the-workforce_-ai-for-viksit-bharat-2047 — Minister in the National Council on Scale Development We welcome you sir On the panel, we are joined by Guilherme Albusc…
S3
WSIS+20 Open Consultation session with Co-Facilitators — – **Bojana** – Global Forum for Media Development representative – **Jennifer Chung** – (Role/affiliation not clearly s…
S4
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — -Co-Moderator- Role/title not specified -David Lammy- Deputy Prime Minister of the UK
S5
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — -Chris Baryomunsi- Role/title not specified (represents Uganda) -David Lamy MP- Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor …
S6
Multi-stakeholder Discussion on issues about Generative AI — Natasha Crampton:So, I’m Natasha Crankjian from Microsoft. I’m incredibly optimistic about AI’s potential to help us hav…
S7
Towards a Safer South Launching the Global South AI Safety Research Network — – Mr. Abhishek Singh- Ms. Natasha Crampton- Ms. Chenai Chair – Ms. Natasha Crampton- Dr. Rachel Sibande
S8
Democratizing AI Building Trustworthy Systems for Everyone — – Dr. Saurabh Garg- Natasha Crampton – Dr. Saurabh Garg- Natasha Crampton- Justin Carsten – Natasha Crampton- Particip…
S9
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — -Ankur Vora- Chief Strategy Officer and President of the Africa and India Office at the Gates Foundation -Co-Moderator-…
S10
Keynote-Ankur Vora — “AI is not a leap into the unknown for India. It is the next chapter in a journey of building solutions that serve every…
S11
Towards a Safer South Launching the Global South AI Safety Research Network — -Ms. Chenai Chair- Director of the Masakane African Language Hub
S12
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — – Philip Thigo- Chenai Chair – Shekar Sivasubramanian- Chenai Chair
S13
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — – Shekar Sivasubramanian- Chenai Chair
S14
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — -Co-Moderator- Role/title not specified -Julie Delahanty- President of Canada’s International Development Research Cent…
S15
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/responsible-ai-for-shared-prosperity — And I hope the idea is spreading and growing. Thank you. Thank Co-Moderator: you. We’ll now have a small… Changeover…
S16
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-for-social-empowerment_-driving-change-and-inclusion — So with that, I hope, provocative context setting, I am really grateful. On behalf of the Just Jobs Network, again, with…
S17
Philip Thigo named Kenya’s special envoy for technology — Philip Thigo, the Executive Director for Africa at Thunderbird School of Global Management, has been appointed as the Sp…
S18
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — -Philip Thigo- His Excellency Ambassador, Special Technology Envoy of the Government of Kenya
S19
Sustainable Capacity Building: Internet Governance in Africa — Mr Philip Thigo, Senior Adviser, Regional Bureau for Africa, UN Development Programme (UNDP)
S20
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — -Barbel Kofler- Parliamentary State Secretary to the Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development of German…
S21
GermanAsian AI Partnerships Driving Talent Innovation the Future — -Dr. Bärbel Kofler- Title: Parliamentary State Secretary to the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development…
S22
Multistakeholder Partnerships for Thriving AI Ecosystems — -Bärbel Kofler- Parliamentary State Secretary at Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, me…
S23
Digital Inclusion Through a Multilingual Internet | IGF 2023 WS #297 — Edmon Chung:Yeah, I think it’s a great idea. In fact, I don’t know whether you intended it as an idea, but bringing up t…
S24
WS #119 AI for Multilingual Inclusion — – Supporting local chapters working in their languages 1. How to encourage local communities to produce better quality …
S25
Day 0 Event #261 Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Generated Content — Ernst Noorman: Thank you very much, Lei, and it’s always a pleasure to be together with the RNW media in an event, and I…
S26
Artificial intelligence (AI) and cyber diplomacy — Jovan Kurbalija:Vlada, just a quick journey through this pyramid. On computational power, many countries, and I would sa…
S27
Open Forum #26 High-level review of AI governance from Inter-governmental P — Speaker 1: Thank you. So just a couple of things I want to touch on. I think companies have significant responsibilit…
S28
AI, Data Governance, and Innovation for Development — Sade Dada: So, you know, getting to these areas is really, really complicated, very, very challenging, and it’s because …
S29
Impact & the Role of AI How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Everything — Second, entrepreneurship enabled by AI’s accessibility features. Voice activation and local language models can overcome…
S30
A Global Human Rights Approach to Responsible AI Governance | IGF 2023 WS #288 — These efforts are crucial to prevent the exacerbation of inequality and the marginalization of vulnerable groups. Stakeh…
S31
Open Forum #75 Shaping Global AI Governance Through Multistakeholder Action — **Ernst Noorman**, Cyber Ambassador for the Netherlands and co-chair of the FOC Task Force on AI and Human Rights, share…
S32
Ensuring Safe AI_ Monitoring Agents to Bridge the Global Assurance Gap — – Natasha Crampton- Vukosi Marivate Crampton advocates for integrating assurance from the beginning of system developme…
S33
AI-driven Cyber Defense: Empowering Developing Nations | IGF 2023 — Tatiana Tropina:I must admit here that I cannot say that I cannot speak for global south, which is global majority, righ…
S34
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications — I think we should, let’s not talk about Saudi Arabia or India for a moment, but let’s just talk about the global north a…
S35
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services — Inclusive participation of all stakeholders (government, civil society, technical community, private sector) breeds legi…
S36
WS #219 Generative AI Llms in Content Moderation Rights Risks — ### The Low-Resource Language Crisis Dhanaraj Thakur provided extensive analysis of how language inequities create syst…
S37
Welfare for All Ensuring Equitable AI in the Worlds Democracies — “if a model or system is primarily prepared to perform well in high resource languages, but not in low resource language…
S38
WS #214 AI Readiness in Africa in a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape — ### Current Policy Landscape ### Infrastructure and Capacity Constraints **Additional speakers:** Ashana Kalemera: Mu…
S39
Smart Regulation Rightsizing Governance for the AI Revolution — The panelists identified several promising areas for cooperation, including technical standards through frameworks like …
S40
Panel Discussion Summary: AI Governance Implementation and Capacity Building in Government — European contexts focus heavily on regulatory compliance and managing cultural resistance within established bureaucraci…
S41
Workshop 2: The Interplay Between Digital Sovereignty and Development — ## Cultural and Linguistic Dimensions **Anton Barberi** from the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie expande…
S42
Ministerial Roundtable — ### Cultural and Linguistic Considerations
S43
How to ensure cultural and linguistic diversity in the digital and AI worlds? — Hannah Taieb:Real diversity is very important indeed, and it all depends on the models and business models. Algorithms a…
S44
Non-regulatory approaches to the digital public debate | IGF 2023 Open Forum #139 — Addressing harmful content online requires a multidimensional approach that takes into account linguistic nuances, cultu…
S45
How Submarine Cables Enhance Digital Collaboration | IGF 2023 Town Hall #80 — In conclusion, the analysis showcases the immense potential of submarine cables across the Arctic. These cables offer a …
S46
Panel Discussion: 01 — Concrete impact stories / use cases
S47
Accelerating Structural Transformation and Industrialization in Developing Countries: Navigating the Future with Advanced ICTs and Industry 4.0 — Sama Mbang: Thank you very much, but you can hear me, right? It’s okay. It’s okay. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Thank you very much…
S48
Scaling Multistakeholder Partnerships: Connectivity and Education — However, a glimmer of hope is evident in the formation of public policies directed towards bridging these gaps. The alli…
S49
Leaders TalkX: When policy meets progress: paving the way for a fit for future digital world — Necessity of multi-stakeholder collaboration and partnerships
S50
About the Commission — Typically (and necessarily in jurisdictions where State aid rules govern this form of intervention), the pub…
S51
Switzerland: — All these gaps demand a strategic approach and indicate the need for cooperation among various stakeholders in…
S52
Bridging the Digital Divide: Inclusive ICT Policies for Sustainable Development — Development | Economic | Future of work Survey data showing barriers: lack of advanced skills (46%), poor internet infr…
S53
TABLE OF CONTENTS — The Policy therefore aims to address ICT infrastructure and other ecosystem gaps through the use of several policy instr…
S54
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — This shifted the discussion from viewing regulation as a barrier to seeing it as an enabler of competitive advantage. It…
S55
Panel Discussion Inclusion Innovation & the Future of AI — Treat compute infrastructure as critical national infrastructure requiring government investment and protection
S58
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — “The research and development capability, which I was in the first instance, and that was an amazing initiative because …
S59
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact — I mean, the potential is so immense. We have not even scratched the surface, not even the tip of the iceberg we have tou…
S60
Ateliers : rapports restitution et séance de clôture — Joseph Nkalwo Ngoula Merci. C’est toujours difficile de restituer la parole d’experts de haut vol. sans courir le risque…
S61
Inclusive AI_ Why Linguistic Diversity Matters — Inclusivity, Language Coverage, and Cultural Preservation
S62
WS #119 AI for Multilingual Inclusion — AI technology can be used to preserve and protect endangered languages. This helps maintain cultural heritage and ensure…
S63
WS #254 The Human Rights Impact of Underrepresented Languages in AI — Market forces play a significant role in driving AI development, often favoring dominant languages like English. However…
S64
WS #219 Generative AI Llms in Content Moderation Rights Risks — ### The Low-Resource Language Crisis Dhanaraj Thakur provided extensive analysis of how language inequities create syst…
S65
Advancing Scientific AI with Safety Ethics and Responsibility — -Balancing Open Science with Security: Panelists explored the challenge of preserving open science benefits while preven…
S66
OpenAI explains approach to privacy, freedom, and teen safety — OpenAI has outlined how itbalances privacy, freedom, and teen safetyin its AI tools. The company said AI conversations o…
S67
DC-CIV & DC-NN: From Internet Openness to AI Openness — Vint Cerf suggests that AI governance should concentrate on regulating specific applications and their associated risks,…
S68
WS #31 Cybersecurity in AI: balancing innovation and risks — Melodena Stephens: So thank you for the question. I think it’s a complex one. So let me start from the top. If you loo…
S69
WS #214 AI Readiness in Africa in a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape — ### Infrastructure and Capacity Constraints ### Infrastructure and Financing Audience: Good evening, everyone. Is it? …
S70
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm — Development | Infrastructure | Data governance She states ‘We’re building the data backbone for the global south. Not j…
S71
African AI: Digital Public Goods for Inclusive Development | IGF 2023 WS #317 — It is noted that the lack of proper data infrastructure can hinder the development and use of AI, especially in contexts…
S72
Global cyber capacity building efforts — Moctar Yedaly:Thank you, Martin. And thank you for the previous speakers. As I see in America, it’s very hard to follow,…
S73
Leaders TalkX: Local to global: preserving culture and language in a digital era — Cultural diversity | Development | Legal and regulatory Policy Requirements for Cultural Preservation Summary of sessi…
S74
DIPLOFOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF MALTA — An important sociocultural issue is the shaping of content policy. On a cultural level, the advantages for preservation …
S75
Digital Inclusion Through a Multilingual Internet | IGF 2023 WS #297 — In addition to the role of the internet, government and community support are crucial for the promotion and preservation…
S76
WSIS Action Line C8: Multilingualism in the Digital Age: Inclusive Strategies for a People-Centered Information Society — Low to moderate disagreement level with high strategic significance. While speakers agreed on fundamental goals of lingu…
S77
The mismatch between public fear of AI and its measured impact — Looking at real-world use cases helps clarify the mismatch.
S78
Skilling and Education in AI — The conversation began with a Professor’s detailed analysis of four critical sectors where AI can drive substantial impa…
S79
Global AI Governance: Reimagining IGF’s Role & Impact — Paloma Lara-Castro: Thank you, Liz. Hi, everyone. Thank you for the space. I’m representing Derechos Digitales. We are a…
S80
Partnering on American AI Exports Powering the Future India AI Impact Summit 2026 — Specific use case priorities and resource allocation across different sectors (healthcare, education, agriculture, manuf…
S81
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — This discussion brought together international government officials, technology leaders, and development organisations t…
S82
WS #214 AI Readiness in Africa in a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape — Lacina Kone’s observation that “Africa is not looking for the most powerful AI, it’s looking for the most useful one” re…
S83
How Small AI Solutions Are Creating Big Social Change — African languages. And we just released a data set of 21 now, 27 voice languages, given that Africa has 2 ,000 or so lan…
S84
Smart Regulation Rightsizing Governance for the AI Revolution — The panelists identified several promising areas for cooperation, including technical standards through frameworks like …
S85
Toward Collective Action_ Roundtable on Safe & Trusted AI — Continued scholarship programs prioritizing African women through the Women in Focus series Launch of the African Compu…
S86
Workshop 2: The Interplay Between Digital Sovereignty and Development — ## Cultural and Linguistic Dimensions **Anton Barberi** from the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie expande…
S87
Leaders TalkX: Local Voices, Global Echoes: Preserving Human Legacy, Linguistic Identity and Local Content in a Digital World — Fostering cultural and linguistic diversity helps in preserving human legacy Local content creation emerges as a pivota…
S88
La découvrabilité des contenus numérique: un facteur de diversité culturelle et de développement (Délégation Wallonie-Bruxelles, Belgian Mission to the UN in Geneva) — Furthermore, language accessibility is impacted when content in certain languages is less discoverable. This raises conc…
S89
How Multilingual AI Bridges the Gap to Inclusive Access — Cultural preservation, sovereignty, and ethical considerations
S90
Panel Discussion: 01 — Concrete impact stories / use cases
S91
How nonprofits are using AI-based innovations to scale their impact — And then the fourth motor we switch on, we call impact evaluation, and that’s when you have tens of thousands, hundreds …
S92
The future of Digital Public Infrastructure for environmental sustainability — Yolanda Martinez:Yes, definitely. First of all, congratulations. I thoroughly agree that it’s not easy to put together t…
S93
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/how-the-global-south-is-accelerating-ai-adoption_-finance-sector-insights — We joke that we shouldn’t worry about AI until we figure out AV. So I guess this is a perfect example of that. Thanks fo…
S94
WSIS Action Line C7 E-environment: Milestones, challenges and future directions — David Jensen:Sure, thank you very much, happy to be here. You’ll notice I’m not Sally Radwan. Sally Radwan is UNEP’s Chi…
S95
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications — Development banks and assistance programs filling market gaps where private investment is insufficient
S96
DPI+H – health for all through digital public infrastructure — Philippe Veltsos:Thank you very much, Lori. Good morning, everybody. Happy Friday, even though for some of you it’s rain…
S97
About the Commission — Typically (and necessarily in jurisdictions where State aid rules govern this form of intervention), the pub…
S98
Scaling Multistakeholder Partnerships: Connectivity and Education — However, a glimmer of hope is evident in the formation of public policies directed towards bridging these gaps. The alli…
S99
WS #225 Bridging the Connectivity Gap for Excluded Communities — Market failures require public investment and public-private alliances with greater community participation
S100
Press Conference: Closing the AI Access Gap — The governance, alongside the talent, the compute, the infrastructure, is an enabler of responsible innovation
S101
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — Okay, two big questions. Thank you. So, as you mentioned, we launched Current AI last year. We’ll be launching just this…
S102
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact — India possesses many essential ingredients for AI success: a robust software services industry, thriving startup ecosyst…
S103
Panel Discussion Inclusion Innovation & the Future of AI — Treat compute infrastructure as critical national infrastructure requiring government investment and protection
S104
UK and India forge new tech security partnership — Britain hasinitiateda new technology security partnership with India, aiming to boost economic growth and collaboration …
S105
Global Digital Compact: AI solutions for a digital economy inclusive and beneficial for all — Ciyong Zou: Thank you. Thank you very much, moderator. Distinguished representatives, ladies and gentlemen, good afterno…
S106
The Foundation of AI Democratizing Compute Data Infrastructure — Language diversity creates enormous scope of work with over 2,000 documented African languages
S107
Reviewing Global Governance Capacity Development and Identifying Opportunities for Collaboration — Companies are also investing in joint ventures, research hubs and start-up incubators in partnership with universities a…
S108
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-automation-in-telecom_-ensuring-accountability-and-public-trust-india-ai-impact-summit-2026 — Sure. Thanks. Thanks for your question. I think this builds on actually the last couple of comments. I mean, what we’re …
S109
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/how-small-ai-solutions-are-creating-big-social-change — Once it fails, the community is not going to believe it. So it’s very important that whatever we put in place work with …
S110
Tightening the interconnectedness of ICT, Digitalization and Industry 4.0 to accelerate Economic growth and industrialization in developing countries — Adel BEN YOUSSEF:Thank you very much, Sama. I’m going to provide some insights from the field and focusing on Africa bec…
S111
Signature Panel: Building Cyber Resilience for Sustainable Development by Bridging the Global Capacity Gap — Morocco:Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to speak to deliver the f…
S112
Morocco announces upcoming Digital Strategy 2030 at Gitex Africa 2024 — At Gitex Africa 2024 in Marrakech, Head of Government Aziz AkhannouchrevealedMorocco’s Digital Strategy 2030, a result o…
S113
Enhancing rather than replacing humanity with AI — Right now, amid valid concerns about displacement, manipulation, and loss of human agency, there are also real examples …
S114
AI and the moral compass: What we can do vs what we should do — If technology reshapes what we can do, moral education must reshape how we decide. Ethics cannot be outsourced to compli…
S115
Optimism for AI – Leading with empathy — Nicholas Thompson frames the present as a pivotal moment where AI development could take fundamentally different paths b…
S116
Open Forum #43 African Union Open Forum Advancing Digital Governance and Transformation — Maktar Sek: Thank you, Adil. And good morning to everyone. Good morning, P.S. Honorable Minister, distinguished delegate…
S117
Inclusive AI For A Better World, Through Cross-Cultural And Multi-Generational Dialogue — Diana Nyakundi:Yeah, thanks Fadi. So with regards to opportunities, there are a lot of AI pilot projects that are coming…
S118
Global AI Policy Framework: International Cooperation and Historical Perspectives — If we are talking about oral culture, it wouldn’t be a data problem because it has primarily historically been an oral c…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
C
Co-Moderator
1 argument41 words per minute328 words477 seconds
Argument 1
Framing question: AI’s daily impact highlights need for local language support
EXPLANATION
The co‑moderator points out that large language models are already affecting everyday life and asks how AI in local languages can shape digital development, especially given Africa’s linguistic diversity. This frames the discussion around the necessity of language‑specific AI solutions.
EVIDENCE
The co-moderator asks, “how do you see AI in local languages shaping the next phase of your country’s digital development… how does this really work on the ground?” highlighting the estimated 2,000 African languages and the relevance of daily AI use [19-21].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Local language support is emphasized as key for digital inclusion, echoed in discussions on community networks and multilingual internet initiatives [S23] and efforts to support local language chapters [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Linguistic Inclusion and Representation in AI
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Barbel Kofler, Ankur Vora, Co‑Moderator
D
David Lammy
5 arguments110 words per minute1032 words557 seconds
Argument 1
AI should be safe, inclusive, and equitable for all linguistic communities
EXPLANATION
Lammy stresses that AI must follow a path that benefits humanity, emphasizing safety, inclusivity, and equity for every linguistic group. He contrasts this with a scenario where AI widens inequality.
EVIDENCE
He describes two possible futures for AI-one that “takes power and opportunity away from people” and another that “uses AI as a force for good… a safe AI, an inclusive AI and importantly an equitable AI for everyone” [13].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Lammy’s call for safe, inclusive, equitable AI aligns with his statements in the Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity briefing and with broader responsible AI governance frameworks [S1][S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Linguistic Inclusion and Representation in AI
AGREED WITH
Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Barbel Kofler, Ankur Vora, Co‑Moderator
Argument 2
UK is funding Africa’s first public‑sector AI compute cluster at the University of Cape Town
EXPLANATION
Lammy announces a UK investment to create the continent’s first dedicated public‑sector AI compute facility, aiming to give African researchers the hardware needed for AI development. The cluster will be hosted at the University of Cape Town.
EVIDENCE
He states, “we’re investing in Africa’s first dedicated public sector AI computer cluster at the University of Cape Town” and notes that “Too many African researchers are held back by costs and a lack of access” [3-4].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The UK investment in a public-sector AI compute cluster at UCT was announced in the same briefing and reflects broader calls for African compute infrastructure [S1][S26].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Compute Infrastructure and Capacity Building
AGREED WITH
Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty, Philip Thigo, Ankur Vora
Argument 3
AI for Development programme coordinated with Gates Foundation, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and GSMA
EXPLANATION
Lammy outlines the AI for Development programme as a collaborative effort involving multiple governments and foundations, designed to align investments and accelerate AI initiatives across Africa and Asia. The partnership includes the Gates Foundation, IDRC, and several national governments.
EVIDENCE
He describes the programme as “launched… in partnership with Canada’s International Development Research Centre… coordinated with the Gates Foundation, the governments of Germany, Japan and Sweden, as well as Community Jamil” and notes a partnership with the GSMA Foundation supporting start-ups [8-9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Funding, Partnerships, and Public‑Good Investment
AGREED WITH
Ankur Vora, Barbel Kofler, Julie Delahanty, Chenai Chair, Natasha Crampton
Argument 4
Torn AI creates voice interfaces for low‑literacy rural users to access digital and financial services
EXPLANATION
Lammy highlights Torn AI, a Moroccan start‑up that builds voice‑based interfaces in local dialects, enabling low‑literacy rural populations to interact with digital and financial platforms through spoken commands. This exemplifies AI tailored to linguistic needs.
EVIDENCE
He mentions “Torn AI in Morocco, which creates voice interfaces to local dialects to help low-literacy rural users access digital and financial services through simple spoken interactions” [10-11].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Voice-based AI for low-literacy users is highlighted as a way to unlock rural entrepreneurship and financial access in recent analyses of multilingual AI applications [S29].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Practical Applications and Use Cases for Development
AGREED WITH
Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Ankur Vora, Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty
Argument 5
Responsible AI governance is needed to protect rights and ensure inclusive outcomes
EXPLANATION
Lammy argues that AI must be governed responsibly to safeguard human rights and ensure that AI systems reflect the lived realities of diverse populations. Governance mechanisms are essential for inclusive and equitable AI deployment.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the AI for Development programme includes “responsible AI governance, to protect rights and to ensure AI reflects the realities of people’s lives across the region” [7-8] and reiterates the need for a “safe AI, an inclusive AI and importantly an equitable AI” [13].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Calls for responsible AI governance to protect rights are reinforced by global human-rights-focused AI governance guidelines and inclusive participation principles [S30][S35].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance, Ethics, and Sustainable Impact
N
Natasha Crampton
3 arguments153 words per minute544 words212 seconds
Argument 1
Compute enables language‑aware AI and requires testing with local speakers
EXPLANATION
Crampton explains that high‑performance compute is the key enabler for adapting AI models to local languages and cultural contexts, and that both model training and user testing demand substantial compute resources. Without it, language‑aware AI cannot be reliably deployed.
EVIDENCE
She states, “compute is the enabler of making language and culturally aware AI… testing it with local language speakers… also takes compute… day-to-day use of this technology also requires computing power” [232-247].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Crampton stresses that compute underpins language-aware AI and that testing with local speakers is essential, as reflected in her remarks on safe AI and assurance practices [S6][S32].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Linguistic Inclusion and Representation in AI
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Julie Delahanty, Philip Thigo, Ankur Vora
Argument 2
AI diffusion is twice as fast in the Global North; compute gaps must be closed
EXPLANATION
Crampton presents analysis showing that AI adoption is occurring at roughly double the speed in the Global North compared with the Global South, underscoring the urgency of closing compute gaps through partnerships and infrastructure investment.
EVIDENCE
She notes, “Our own analysis shows that we have AI diffusing in the global north at roughly double the rate that we have it diffusing in the global south… we need partnerships like these in order to start to put the right infrastructure in place to close that gap” [225-227].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Studies show AI adoption is roughly twice as fast in the Global North, underscoring the compute gap that must be addressed [S34][S22].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Compute Infrastructure and Capacity Building
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Ankur Vora, Barbel Kofler, Julie Delahanty, Chenai Chair
Argument 3
Trustworthy AI requires rigorous building, testing, and deployment with local stakeholder involvement
EXPLANATION
Crampton stresses that trustworthy AI depends on careful development, extensive testing with local users, and responsible deployment, ensuring that AI reflects the multicultural and multilingual reality of its users. This approach aligns with Microsoft’s commitment to ethical AI.
EVIDENCE
She remarks that “trustworthy AI requires rigorous building, testing, and deployment with local stakeholder involvement… we do take all of those steps to represent the world as it is multicultural, multilingual and deeply interconnected” and repeats the need for testing and compute throughout [249-254].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Her emphasis on rigorous building, testing and stakeholder involvement matches discussions on assurance from development through deployment [S6][S32].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance, Ethics, and Sustainable Impact
A
Ankur Vora
3 arguments150 words per minute415 words165 seconds
Argument 1
Language is a public good; market forces ignore low‑resource languages
EXPLANATION
Vora argues that language resources are a public good that the market fails to provide because private investment focuses on high‑return languages like English and Mandarin. He calls for collective public‑good investment to fill this gap.
EVIDENCE
He explains that “markets are broken… private sector companies are investing in models developed in English and Mandarin… the economics don’t work for the small resource languages… funders can get together and invest in public goods” [205-212].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Vora’s framing of language as a public good and market failure for low-resource languages is echoed in analyses of low-resource language crises and market dynamics [S10][S28][S36].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Linguistic Inclusion and Representation in AI
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Barbel Kofler, Co‑Moderator
Argument 2
Public‑good investment is needed because markets fail to provide compute for low‑resource languages
EXPLANATION
Vora emphasizes that when market mechanisms do not supply compute resources for under‑served languages, public‑good funding from governments and foundations must step in to ensure equitable AI development.
EVIDENCE
He states, “When markets are broken, funders can get together and invest in public goods… that’s what we are doing right now… UK government, Canadian government, the Japanese, Microsoft, IDRC… we need to invest in public goods because these markets are broken” [212-215].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for public-good funding to supply compute for low-resource languages is reinforced by market-failure assessments and low-resource language challenges [S10][S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Compute Infrastructure and Capacity Building
Argument 3
Collaborative public‑good funding addresses market failure in low‑resource language AI
EXPLANATION
Vora points out that coordinated funding from multiple donors and partners creates a public‑good model that compensates for market failures, enabling the development of AI for low‑resource languages.
EVIDENCE
He notes that “we are all sitting at this panel… we are making the point that we need to invest in public goods because these markets are broken… UK government, Canadian government, the Japanese, Microsoft, IDRC… all getting together” [212-215].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Collaborative donor funding to address market gaps aligns with Vora’s description of multi-partner public-good investments [S10][S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Funding, Partnerships, and Public‑Good Investment
C
Chenai Chair
5 arguments166 words per minute954 words343 seconds
Argument 1
Masakane hub targets 50 major African languages, building community‑governed data and tools
EXPLANATION
The chair describes the Masakane African Language Hub’s ambition to impact one billion Africans by focusing on the 50 most spoken languages, creating high‑quality data, tools, and benchmarks that reflect linguistic diversity. The effort is community‑driven and aims at economic, health, and social benefits.
EVIDENCE
She states the hub’s goal “to impact 1 billion Africans through 50 of the most spoken languages with relevant AI tools… preserving and capturing the evolution of African languages” and explains the four pillars of work, especially data expansion and high-quality datasets built from the JW300 Bible set [54-55][60-66].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Linguistic Inclusion and Representation in AI
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Philip Thigo, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Barbel Kofler, Ankur Vora, Co‑Moderator
Argument 2
Lingua Africa is a multi‑partner open‑core initiative with Microsoft, Gates, and the UK to create community‑governed language infrastructure
EXPLANATION
She announces Lingua Africa as an open‑core, multi‑partner project that will develop community‑governed language infrastructure, focusing on targeted data collection, model development, and pathways for deployment in key sectors such as health, education, and agriculture.
EVIDENCE
She explains that “Lingua Africa will be a multi-partner open core… with Microsoft AI for Good and the Gates Foundation… will directly enable real-world AI applications… model development, targeted data collection, and support strong pathways for deployment and adoption” [170-176].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Lingua Africa is described as a multi-partner open-core effort involving Microsoft, the Gates Foundation and the UK government to build community-governed language infrastructure [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Funding, Partnerships, and Public‑Good Investment
Argument 3
Grants and ecosystem partnerships sustain the Masakane community and its projects
EXPLANATION
The chair outlines how funding is allocated across four pillars—data, research, innovation, and sustainability—to build the ecosystem, create use cases, and ensure long‑term institutional capacity for African‑led AI. A portion of the budget is earmarked for concrete applications.
EVIDENCE
She notes “we specifically focus on four pillars… expanding and diversifying high quality data… research… innovation… 40 % of the funding will go to creating use cases… institutional capacity building for the African NLP community… sustainability beyond the Masakane community” [60-66][70-76].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Funding, Partnerships, and Public‑Good Investment
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Ankur Vora, Barbel Kofler, Julie Delahanty, Natasha Crampton
Argument 4
Project Echo delivers gender‑responsive AI tools in African languages to boost women’s economic empowerment and health
EXPLANATION
Project Echo is presented as a gender‑responsive intervention that creates AI‑driven services in African languages, aiming to improve women’s economic opportunities and health outcomes, thereby addressing gender inequality in the continent.
EVIDENCE
She describes “Project Echo… a gender responsive intervention… will provide relevant use cases in African languages that lead to impact on women’s economic empowerment and health” [71-74].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Practical Applications and Use Cases for Development
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Ankur Vora, Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty
Argument 5
Gender‑responsive interventions and long‑term sustainability are central to community‑led AI
EXPLANATION
The chair emphasizes that AI projects must be gender‑responsive and built with sustainability in mind, ensuring that benefits persist beyond initial funding and that communities retain ownership of the technology.
EVIDENCE
She highlights the gender-responsive nature of Project Echo and discusses “thinking about sustainability… institutional capacity building… businesses coming up from open source models… African-led AI built for impact” [71-76].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance, Ethics, and Sustainable Impact
S
Shekar Sivasubramanian
4 arguments166 words per minute637 words229 seconds
Argument 1
AI applications must be multilingual and directly useful to users, integrating language into design
EXPLANATION
Sivasubramanian explains that inclusive AI design starts with supporting multiple languages (14‑16 in India) and ensuring applications address real needs across rural‑urban divides. Utility and cultural relevance are central to adoption.
EVIDENCE
He says “the very first design principle… is the ability to be inclusive… dimensions of population we are looking at are language… you start with at least 14 to 16 languages… applications must be useful… utility value sits at the heart of everything we do” [86-92].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The principle of designing AI first for multiple languages and utility mirrors recommendations for local-language chapters and multilingual inclusion initiatives [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Linguistic Inclusion and Representation in AI
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Barbel Kofler, Ankur Vora, Co‑Moderator
Argument 2
Multilingual disease‑surveillance system monitors health events across 16 Indian languages
EXPLANATION
He describes a health‑monitoring system that ingests news articles in 16 languages, runs every four hours, and alerts authorities to disease outbreaks, demonstrating the practical impact of multilingual AI.
EVIDENCE
He details “media disease surveillance… picks up every article published in India… runs every four hours… 16 languages… tells the central government if it’s a disease outbreak what should you do” [94-99].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Practical Applications and Use Cases for Development
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Chenai Chair, Ankur Vora, Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty
Argument 3
Oral reading fluency tool uses AI to assess and improve children’s reading in local languages
EXPLANATION
Sivasubramanian outlines a tool that records children reading aloud, uses AI to evaluate pronunciation and fluency, and provides teachers with data to group students and tailor instruction, thereby enhancing literacy in native languages.
EVIDENCE
He explains “we collect data from children… oral reading fluency… AI tells you what you read well, what you did not read well and assists the teacher to cohortize the students” [100-102].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Practical Applications and Use Cases for Development
Argument 4
AI solutions in health, education, and agriculture must be language‑appropriate to achieve impact
EXPLANATION
He reiterates that for AI to be effective in sectors such as health, education, and agriculture, solutions must be tailored to the linguistic realities of users, ensuring relevance and adoption.
EVIDENCE
He notes “the dimensions of population we are looking at are language… applications must be useful… utility value sits at the heart of everything we do” and gives examples across health, education, and agriculture [86-92].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Practical Applications and Use Cases for Development
B
Barbel Kofler
3 arguments144 words per minute391 words162 seconds
Argument 1
Inclusive, bias‑free data is essential for equitable AI outcomes
EXPLANATION
Kofler argues that AI can only be a game‑changer if the underlying data is inclusive and free from bias, noting that language bias reflects broader cultural neglect. She stresses the need for diverse, representative datasets.
EVIDENCE
She says “AI can only be really the game changer… if it is inclusive… starts with data and how biased data is… language is quite close to it… many languages neglected, dialects, cultures… we try to be part of that” [136-143].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of bias-free, inclusive data is highlighted in discussions of bias in automated welfare systems and the low-resource language crisis [S31][S36].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Linguistic Inclusion and Representation in AI
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Ankur Vora, Co‑Moderator
Argument 2
German partnership via Fair Forward supports data collection for multilingual services
EXPLANATION
Kofler describes Germany’s Fair Forward initiative, which collaborates with partner countries to gather multilingual datasets, enabling services to be delivered in citizens’ mother tongues and supporting inclusive digital public services.
EVIDENCE
She notes “We were starting in 2019… initiative called Fair Forward… working with partner countries like India on collecting data sets… offering service to citizens in their mother tongue in multilingual countries” [145-148].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Funding, Partnerships, and Public‑Good Investment
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Ankur Vora, Julie Delahanty, Chenai Chair, Natasha Crampton
Argument 3
Addressing bias in language data is crucial for fair AI systems
EXPLANATION
Kofler emphasizes that bias in language data leads to exclusion of many dialects and cultures, and that confronting this bias is essential for building fair and equitable AI systems that respect cultural diversity.
EVIDENCE
She explains “if you talk about bias in data, language is quite close to it… we see many languages neglected… we really try to be part of it” [138-143].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Addressing language-data bias is identified as essential for fair AI in analyses of bias in automated decision-making [S31].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance, Ethics, and Sustainable Impact
P
Philip Thigo
3 arguments173 words per minute444 words153 seconds
Argument 1
Global South languages must be represented to prevent cultural extinction
EXPLANATION
Thigo warns that the absence of Global South languages in AI models threatens the survival of oral cultures, arguing that representation is essential to preserve cultural memory and avoid existential loss.
EVIDENCE
He states “The Global South has never lacked intelligence… what it has lacked is the power to define how that intelligence is recognized… because our entire culture’s values have been coined in language… the Global South is largely an oral civilization… current models lacking our language means our civilization are at risk, almost existential, to be extinct” [28-33].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The risk of cultural extinction due to missing Global South languages is underscored by the low-resource language crisis literature [S36][S37].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Linguistic Inclusion and Representation in AI
AGREED WITH
David Lammy, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Barbel Kofler, Ankur Vora, Co‑Moderator
Argument 2
Development of language models requires compute, talent, and research capacity
EXPLANATION
Thigo outlines that building effective language models for the Global South needs not only compute resources but also skilled talent and robust research infrastructure, which together constitute AI sovereignty.
EVIDENCE
He mentions “the second part… find the compute, the talent that then influences, develops the data… research and development capability… talent development is the first instance of sovereignty” [39-41].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Building language models requires compute resources and skilled talent, as noted in discussions of African compute initiatives and talent development needs [S26][S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Compute Infrastructure and Capacity Building
AGREED WITH
Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty, Ankur Vora
Argument 3
Building local talent and research capacity safeguards sovereignty over AI development
EXPLANATION
Thigo stresses that developing local research expertise and talent is the foundation of AI sovereignty for the Global South, ensuring that AI development remains under local control and reflects indigenous knowledge.
EVIDENCE
He notes “talent development is the first instance of sovereignty… we need to build research capacity and capability because talent development is the first instance of sovereignty” [40-41].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Developing local research talent is presented as a cornerstone of AI sovereignty in market-failure and capacity-building analyses [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance, Ethics, and Sustainable Impact
J
Julie Delahanty
1 argument154 words per minute471 words183 seconds
Argument 1
African Compute Initiative will provide high‑performance GPUs, storage, and networking for African researchers
EXPLANATION
Delahanty describes the African Compute Initiative as a dedicated high‑performance computing cluster at the University of Cape Town, equipped with modern GPUs, fast storage, and networking, aimed at giving African public institutions the resources needed for cutting‑edge AI research.
EVIDENCE
She says “African Compute Initiative will be the first dedicated high-performance computing cluster for public institutions in Africa… based in South Africa at the University of Cape Town… will include modern GPUs, faster and better storage capacity and much faster networking” [267-271].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The African Compute Initiative’s provision of GPUs, storage and networking aligns with calls for dedicated African compute infrastructure [S26][S22].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Compute Infrastructure and Capacity Building
AGREED WITH
Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Natasha Crampton, Ankur Vora
Agreements
Agreement Points
Compute infrastructure is essential for building and deploying AI models in African and Global South languages
Speakers: David Lammy, Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty, Philip Thigo, Ankur Vora
UK is funding Africa’s first public‑sector AI compute cluster at the University of Cape Town Compute enables language‑aware AI and requires testing with local speakers African Compute Initiative will provide high‑performance GPUs, storage, and networking for African researchers Development of language models requires compute, talent, and research capacity Public‑good investment is needed because markets fail to provide compute for low‑resource language AI
All speakers stress that without dedicated high-performance compute resources African researchers cannot train, test, or deploy language-specific AI models, making compute a foundational enabler for the initiative [3-4][232-247][267-271][39-40][212-215].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This view aligns with the AI readiness assessments for Africa that highlight severe infrastructure and financing gaps and call for expanded compute access as a prerequisite for multilingual model development [S69][S70][S71].
Linguistic inclusion and representation of local languages are critical to prevent cultural loss and ensure equitable AI benefits
Speakers: David Lammy, Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Barbel Kofler, Ankur Vora, Co‑Moderator
AI should be safe, inclusive, and equitable for all linguistic communities Global South languages must be represented to prevent cultural extinction Masakane hub targets 50 major African languages, building community‑governed data and tools AI applications must be multilingual and directly useful to users, integrating language into design Inclusive, bias‑free data is essential for equitable AI outcomes Language is a public good; market forces ignore low‑resource languages Framing question: AI’s daily impact highlights need for local language support
Speakers converge on the necessity of supporting African and other low-resource languages in AI to preserve cultural heritage, avoid bias, and deliver inclusive services, emphasizing that language diversity must be embedded in data, models, and governance [13][28-33][54-66][86-92][136-143][187-190][19-21].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of linguistic diversity and cultural preservation is documented in inclusive AI frameworks and IGF sessions on multilingual inclusion, which stress that under-represented languages must be covered to avoid cultural erosion and to deliver equitable services [S61][S62][S63][S64][S75].
Collaborative, multi‑donor public‑good funding and partnerships are required to address market failures and build sustainable AI ecosystems
Speakers: David Lammy, Ankur Vora, Barbel Kofler, Julie Delahanty, Chenai Chair, Natasha Crampton
AI for Development programme coordinated with Gates Foundation, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and GSMA Public‑good investment is needed because markets fail to provide compute for low‑resource language AI German partnership via Fair Forward supports data collection for multilingual services African Compute Initiative will provide high‑performance GPUs, storage, and networking for African researchers Grants and ecosystem partnerships sustain the Masakane community and its projects AI diffusion is twice as fast in the Global North; compute gaps must be closed
All agree that no single actor can fill the gaps; coordinated funding from governments, foundations, and private sector is essential to create data, compute, and capacity as public goods, countering market neglect of low-resource languages [8-9][205-215][145-148][214-215][60-76][225-227].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple policy briefs on digital public infrastructure and sovereign AI call for multi-donor cooperation, capacity-building funds, and public-good financing to correct market failures in low-resource language AI [S56][S57][S58][S59][S69].
Developing concrete, domain‑specific use cases (health, education, agriculture, gender empowerment) is vital to demonstrate AI’s real‑world impact
Speakers: David Lammy, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Ankur Vora, Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty
Torn AI creates voice interfaces for low‑literacy rural users to access digital and financial services Project Echo delivers gender‑responsive AI tools in African languages to boost women’s economic empowerment and health Multilingual disease‑surveillance system monitors health events across 16 Indian languages Language is a public good; market forces ignore low‑resource languages (implies need for impactful applications) Compute enables language‑aware AI and testing with local speakers (supports deployment of use cases) African Compute Initiative will provide resources essential for cutting‑edge AI work and applications
Speakers highlight that AI must move beyond research to tangible solutions in health, education, agriculture, and gender equity, showing that language-aware tools can directly improve livelihoods [10-11][71-74][94-102][194-199][245-247][267-271].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Sector-focused AI impact studies and summit agendas repeatedly prioritize health, education, agriculture and gender-related applications as proof points for AI value in emerging economies [S78][S80][S69].
Building local capacity—talent, research expertise, and institutional strength—is fundamental for AI sovereignty and sustainable development
Speakers: Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty, Ankur Vora
Development of language models requires compute, talent, and research capacity Masakane hub targets 50 major African languages, building community‑governed data and tools (includes research pillar) AI applications must be multilingual and directly useful to users, integrating language into design (implies capacity) AI diffusion is twice as fast in the Global North; compute gaps must be closed (implies capacity building) African Compute Initiative will provide high‑performance GPUs, storage, and networking for African researchers Public‑good investment is needed because markets fail to provide compute for low‑resource language AI
All speakers stress that developing skilled researchers, data scientists, and institutional frameworks is essential to achieve AI sovereignty and ensure that AI solutions are locally owned and maintained [40-41][64-66][86-92][225-227][267-271][212-215].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Capacity-building is a cornerstone of several strategic documents on AI sovereignty and digital development, emphasizing talent pipelines, research institutions and local expertise as essential for self-reliant AI ecosystems [S56][S57][S58][S59].
Similar Viewpoints
Both emphasize that AI must be governed responsibly with inclusive, bias‑free data to protect rights and ensure equitable outcomes for all language groups [13][136-143].
Speakers: David Lammy, Barbel Kofler
AI should be safe, inclusive, and equitable for all linguistic communities Inclusive, bias‑free data is essential for equitable AI outcomes
Both argue that languages are a cultural public good whose preservation requires collective action beyond market mechanisms [28-33][187-190].
Speakers: Philip Thigo, Ankur Vora
Global South languages must be represented to prevent cultural extinction Language is a public good; market forces ignore low‑resource languages
Both stress that multilingual AI design, backed by community‑driven data, is essential for creating useful applications that serve diverse language speakers [86-92][54-66].
Speakers: Shekar Sivasubramanian, Chenai Chair
AI applications must be multilingual and directly useful to users, integrating language into design Masakane hub targets 50 major African languages, building community‑governed data and tools
Both highlight that high‑performance compute resources are the backbone for training, testing, and deploying language‑aware AI models in Africa [232-247][267-271].
Speakers: Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty
Compute enables language‑aware AI and requires testing with local speakers African Compute Initiative will provide high‑performance GPUs, storage, and networking for African researchers
Unexpected Consensus
Both European (German) and Indian representatives stress multilingual AI for health and education despite different regional focuses
Speakers: Barbel Kofler, Shekar Sivasubramanian
Inclusive, bias‑free data is essential for equitable AI outcomes Multilingual disease‑surveillance system monitors health events across 16 Indian languages
While Kofler discusses bias-free data from a European perspective, Sivasubramanian presents a concrete multilingual health surveillance system in India, showing a shared belief that multilingual AI is pivotal for health sector impact across continents [136-143][94-102].
Overall Assessment

The panel demonstrates strong convergence on four pillars: (1) the necessity of compute infrastructure; (2) the centrality of linguistic inclusion; (3) the need for collaborative public‑good funding; (4) the importance of real‑world, domain‑specific applications; and (5) capacity building for sustainable AI sovereignty.

High consensus – most speakers echo each other’s points, indicating broad political and technical agreement that coordinated investment in compute, data, talent, and multilingual use cases is essential to achieve inclusive, equitable AI for the Global South.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Role of market versus public‑good funding for low‑resource language AI
Speakers: Ankur Vora, David Lammy, Shekar Sivasubramanian
Language is a public good; market forces ignore low-resource languages (Ankur Vora) [188-192][205-212] State intervention is needed; the UK should not leave AI development solely to the marketplace (David Lammy) [218-219] Private-sector innovation and risk-taking are essential to develop AI solutions (Shekar Sivasubramanian) [84-86][218-219]
Vora argues that markets are broken and only coordinated public-good investment can fill the gap for minority languages, while Lammy stresses the importance of state-led funding and intervention, and Shekar highlights the role of private-sector innovation and risk-taking, showing a tension between public-funded versus private-sector driven approaches to language AI development [188-192][205-212][218-219][84-86].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Analyses of low-resource language AI highlight a tension between market-driven development that favors dominant languages and public-service-oriented funding needed to address market failure [S63][S64][S69].
Primary lever for advancing African language AI – compute infrastructure versus data quality and bias mitigation
Speakers: Natasha Crampton, Julie Delahanty, Barbel Kofler, Chenai Chair
Compute is the enabler of language-aware AI and testing with local speakers (Natasha Crampton) [232-247] African Compute Initiative will provide high-performance GPUs, storage and networking (Julie Delahanty) [267-271] Inclusive, bias-free data is essential for equitable AI outcomes (Barbel Kofler) [136-143] Four pillars focus on expanding high-quality data, research and sustainability (Chenai Chair) [60-66][70-76]
Crampton and Delahanty prioritize building compute capacity as the critical bottleneck for multilingual AI, whereas Kofler and the Masakane Chair stress that high-quality, bias-free data and ecosystem support are the foundational needs, revealing a split on whether hardware or data should be addressed first [232-247][267-271][136-143][60-66][70-76].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Debates in African AI forums contrast the need for compute resources with concerns over data scarcity, quality and bias, indicating that both infrastructure and data governance are contested levers for progress [S69][S70][S61][S64].
Framing of language preservation – cultural survival versus public‑good market failure
Speakers: Philip Thigo, Ankur Vora
Absence of Global South languages in AI models threatens cultural extinction (Philip Thigo) [28-33] Language is a public good ignored by markets; collective investment is required (Ankur Vora) [188-192][205-212]
Thigo emphasizes the existential risk to oral cultures if languages are omitted from AI, framing the issue as cultural survival, while Vora frames the same challenge as a market failure that necessitates public-good investment, showing differing narratives for the same problem [28-33][188-192][205-212].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy discussions frame language preservation both as a cultural-rights imperative and as a market-failure issue that requires public-good interventions, as reflected in inclusive AI literature and human-rights impact studies [S61][S62][S63][S73].
Unexpected Differences
Security‑focused personal AI use versus open promotion of AI tools
Speakers: Co‑Moderator, David Lammy, Shekar Sivasubramanian
Co-Moderator states personal caution, using a secure network and avoiding ChatGPT for security reasons (Co-Moderator) [20] Lammy and other panelists discuss broad AI adoption and public-sector initiatives without highlighting security concerns (David Lammy) [13][218-219] Shekar presents AI solutions for health, education and agriculture, assuming open deployment (Shekar Sivasubramanian) [84-86]
The Co-Moderator’s explicit concern about secure AI usage contrasts with the rest of the panel’s emphasis on scaling AI solutions, revealing an unexpected tension between personal data security considerations and the push for widespread AI deployment [20][13][84-86].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The balance between open AI innovation and security/privacy safeguards is a recurring theme in responsible AI and cybersecurity policy debates, which advocate tiered access and application-specific governance rather than blanket openness [S65][S66][S67][S68].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong consensus on the importance of multilingual, inclusive AI for Africa and Asia, but diverges on how to fund, prioritize, and implement it—whether through public‑good investment versus private‑sector innovation, whether to focus first on compute infrastructure or on data quality, and how to frame the urgency of language preservation. These disagreements are moderate rather than fundamental, reflecting different strategic emphases rather than outright conflict.

Moderate disagreement: strategic and priority differences that could affect coordination and resource allocation, but not undermining the shared goal of equitable AI development.

Partial Agreements
All speakers concur that multilingual, inclusive AI is vital for development and cultural preservation, but they differ on the primary mechanisms—representation, data collection, application design, or compute infrastructure—to achieve that goal [13][28-33][54-55][60-66][86-92][232-247].
Speakers: David Lammy, Philip Thigo, Chenai Chair, Shekar Sivasubramanian, Natasha Crampton
AI must be safe, inclusive and equitable for all linguistic communities (David Lammy) [13] Representation and existence of local languages in AI are essential (Philip Thigo) [28-33] Masakane hub aims to impact 1 billion Africans through 50 major languages (Chenai Chair) [54-55][60-66] AI applications must be multilingual and directly useful to users (Shekar Sivasubramanian) [86-92] Compute enables language-aware AI and is required for testing and deployment (Natasha Crampton) [232-247]
Takeaways
Key takeaways
Linguistic inclusion is essential to prevent cultural extinction and to ensure AI benefits all communities, especially in the Global South. The Masakane African Languages Hub aims to support 50 major African languages through community‑governed data, research, innovation, and sustainability pillars, with a goal of reaching 1 billion Africans. AI solutions must be multilingual and directly useful to end‑users, integrating language into design (e.g., voice interfaces for low‑literacy users, disease‑surveillance, oral‑reading tools). Bias‑free, representative data and local testing are critical for trustworthy, equitable AI. Market forces do not provide AI resources for low‑resource languages; public‑good investment and multi‑partner funding are required. Compute capacity is a major bottleneck; the African Compute Initiative will create the first public‑sector high‑performance AI cluster in Africa (University of Cape Town). Partnerships across governments, foundations, and industry (UK, Gates Foundation, Canada, Germany, Sweden, GSMA, Microsoft, IDRC) are being mobilised to fund language infrastructure, compute, and applied projects. Specific projects such as Torn AI, Project Echo, multilingual disease‑surveillance, and oral‑reading fluency illustrate how language‑aware AI can drive health, education, agriculture, and economic empowerment. Governance, ethics, gender‑responsive design, and long‑term sustainability are central to ensuring AI remains safe, inclusive, and equitable.
Resolutions and action items
Launch of Lingua Africa – a multi‑partner, open‑core, community‑governed language infrastructure initiative (UK, Gates, Microsoft, Masakane, etc.). Commitment of multi‑million‑pound funding to Masakane for data collection, benchmark development, use‑case creation, and sustainability activities. Support for four additional start‑ups (including Torn AI) through the GSMA Foundation partnership to develop responsible AI solutions for underserved populations. Establishment of the African Compute Initiative – a dedicated high‑performance GPU cluster at the University of Cape Town for African public‑sector researchers. Allocation of 40 % of Masakane funding to develop concrete use‑cases; initiation of Project Echo targeting gender‑responsive economic empowerment and health outcomes. Development of an African speech‑and‑text benchmark to evaluate models in local contexts. Commitments from partners (UK, Gates, Microsoft, IDRC, German Fair Forward) to provide ongoing financial, technical, and capacity‑building support. Agreement to build research capacity and talent pipelines in Africa as a sovereign capability (as highlighted by Philip Thigo).
Unresolved issues
Scalable roadmap for extending support from the initial 50 languages to the full spectrum of 2,000+ African languages and dialects. Long‑term financing model beyond the initial grant period to ensure sustainability of the Masakane hub and the compute cluster. Detailed governance structure for the community‑governed Lingua Africa infrastructure and how decision‑making will be shared among stakeholders. Specific mechanisms to guarantee equitable benefit‑sharing and sovereignty for local communities over the AI models and data they help create. Technical strategies for collecting high‑quality data for extremely low‑resource dialects and for maintaining data privacy and ownership. Concrete deployment and adoption plans for rural, low‑literacy users, including training, support, and monitoring of impact. Metrics and monitoring frameworks to assess the social and economic impact of the announced projects.
Suggested compromises
Public‑good funding (government, foundations) is used to fill the market gap for low‑resource language AI, balancing private‑sector profit motives with societal needs. A multi‑partner collaboration model that pools resources from the UK, Gates Foundation, Microsoft, Germany, Canada, and others, sharing risk and expertise. Provision of a publicly accessible compute cluster alongside support for private‑sector start‑ups, ensuring open infrastructure while encouraging commercial innovation.
Thought Provoking Comments
We are actually in the age of intelligence… the Global South has never lacked intelligence, what it has lacked is the power to define how that intelligence is recognized, recorded, or transmitted. Because our entire culture’s values have been coined in language, the current models lacking our language means our civilization is at risk, almost existential, to be extinct.
Frames AI development as a civilizational issue rather than a purely technical one, highlighting the existential threat to oral cultures if their languages are excluded from AI models.
Set the tone for the panel, moving the conversation from a generic AI‑for‑development narrative to a deeper discussion about cultural survival, representation, and the urgency of building language‑specific models. It prompted other speakers to address concrete steps—compute, talent, and use‑cases—to prevent that extinction.
Speaker: Ambassador Philip Thigo
The Masakane African Language Hub aims to impact 1 billion Africans through 50 of the most spoken languages, focusing on four pillars: data expansion, research & tooling, innovation (including Project Echo for gender‑responsive economic empowerment), and sustainability through institutional capacity‑building.
Provides a clear, structured roadmap that links language data work to gender equity, economic impact, and long‑term sustainability, moving beyond rhetoric to actionable strategy.
Introduced the gender‑lens and sustainability dimension, prompting follow‑up questions about concrete use‑cases and influencing later remarks on public‑good funding and compute infrastructure.
Speaker: Chenai Chair (Masakane Hub representative)
Our first design principle at Wadwani AI is inclusivity – we start with at least 14‑16 languages, ensuring rural‑urban divide is addressed, and we build applications that deliver real value, such as a multilingual disease‑surveillance system and an oral‑reading fluency tool for the poorest children.
Illustrates how multilingual AI can be embedded in essential public services, showing that language inclusion is not an abstract goal but a driver of tangible health and education outcomes.
Shifted the discussion from high‑level policy to concrete, scalable applications, reinforcing the need for localized data and prompting other panelists to discuss how compute resources and partnerships can support such deployments.
Speaker: Shekhar Sivasubramanian
Markets are broken – private sector invests in English and Mandarin models because that’s where the economics work. That doesn’t mean we should abandon low‑resource languages; funders must step in to create public‑goods for these languages.
Diagnoses the structural market failure that leaves many languages unsupported and frames public‑good investment as the solution, providing a rationale for the multi‑partner funding model.
Reoriented the conversation toward the economics of language AI, justifying the coalition of governments, NGOs, and tech firms, and leading to deeper discussion on how the Lingua Africa initiative operationalises this public‑good approach.
Speaker: Ankur Vora, Gates Foundation
Compute is the enabler of language‑aware AI. From data collection, model fine‑tuning, testing with local speakers, to day‑to‑day deployment, every step needs high‑performance compute. Trustworthy AI will be the best tool for computing, not the other way around.
Connects the abstract need for language diversity with the concrete technical requirement of compute infrastructure, emphasizing that without it, inclusive AI cannot be realised.
Bridged the earlier cultural and policy discussions with the technical reality of GPU clusters, reinforcing the importance of the African Compute Initiative and prompting agreement from other speakers about the necessity of shared infrastructure.
Speaker: Natasha Crampton, Microsoft
Two paths before us: AI can take power and opportunity away from people and divide us, or it can be a force for good to solve problems and uplift all of humanity.
Frames the entire dialogue as a moral choice, setting up the stakes for the subsequent discussion on language, compute, and equitable AI.
Provided a narrative anchor that kept the panel focused on the ethical implications of their work, influencing how each speaker positioned their contributions as part of the ‘force for good’ pathway.
Speaker: David Lammy
Overall Assessment

The discussion was shaped by a series of pivotal remarks that moved it from a generic announcement of funding to a nuanced debate about cultural survival, market failure, gender equity, and technical infrastructure. Ambassador Thigo’s existential framing forced the panel to treat language inclusion as a civilizational imperative. The Masakane Hub’s four‑pillar strategy and Wadwani AI’s concrete multilingual applications grounded that imperative in actionable projects. Vora’s market‑failure analysis justified the coalition of public‑good funders, while Crampton’s emphasis on compute linked policy and cultural goals to the necessary technical backbone. Together, these comments created a coherent narrative: inclusive AI requires data, talent, compute, and sustained public investment, and without them, entire cultures risk erasure. The dialogue therefore progressed from high‑level ideals to concrete, interdisciplinary solutions, highlighting the interdependence of language, infrastructure, and equitable policy.

Follow-up Questions
How can sustainable compute resources be provided to African researchers and institutions to support AI development?
Both highlighted the critical need for compute power—Philip discussed finding compute and talent, while Natasha emphasized compute as the enabler for language‑aware AI and the current diffusion gap between Global North and South.
Speaker: Philip Thigo, Natasha Crampton
What specific metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks should be used to assess African language models for accuracy, cultural relevance, and scenario awareness?
Chenai mentioned creating an African benchmark for speech and text, and Natasha stressed testing models with local speakers and scenario‑aware evaluation, indicating a need for concrete measurement standards.
Speaker: Chenai Chair, Natasha Crampton
How will the impact of gender‑responsive interventions like Project Echo be measured and validated in terms of women’s economic empowerment and health outcomes?
Project Echo was presented as a key gender‑focused use case, but the transcript did not detail impact metrics, prompting a need for systematic evaluation.
Speaker: Chenai Chair
What methods can be employed to identify and mitigate bias in language data, especially across diverse dialects and non‑standard language varieties?
Babel highlighted that biased data and dialect variation threaten inclusivity, suggesting research into bias detection and mitigation strategies is required.
Speaker: Babel Kofler
What are the cost differentials for accessing high‑performance compute in African contexts, and how can these costs be reduced or subsidized?
Julie referenced a study showing exponentially higher compute costs in Africa, indicating a need for detailed cost analysis and financing models.
Speaker: Julie Delahanty
How can public‑private partnerships ensure sovereignty and equitable benefit for local communities while leveraging private sector innovation?
Both raised concerns about balancing state intervention with private sector risk‑taking, emphasizing the importance of preserving community ownership and equitable outcomes.
Speaker: Natasha Crampton, David Lammy
What strategies are needed to scale AI solutions for low‑literacy, rural users (e.g., voice interfaces like Torn AI) across diverse African contexts?
David referenced Torn AI as an example but did not explore scaling mechanisms, indicating a gap in deployment strategy research.
Speaker: David Lammy
What approaches are required to build research capacity and talent pipelines in Africa to develop, curate, and maintain language data and models?
Philip noted talent development as the first instance of sovereignty, pointing to the need for systematic capacity‑building programs.
Speaker: Philip Thigo
How can AI models be made culturally and scenario‑aware to ensure relevance and usability in specific African contexts?
Natasha emphasized that language‑aware AI must also be scenario‑aware, suggesting research into contextual adaptation techniques.
Speaker: Natasha Crampton
What sustainable business models can support African‑led AI initiatives beyond grant funding to ensure long‑term viability?
Chenai discussed sustainability and institutional capacity building, indicating a need to explore revenue‑generating or self‑sustaining models.
Speaker: Chenai Chair
What is the optimal balance between long‑term deep research investment and short‑term utilitarian approaches to foster community‑led AI development?
Shekar warned that theory differs from practice and advocated for sustained research investment, highlighting a strategic research planning gap.
Speaker: Shekar Sivasubramanian
How can partnerships with countries like India enhance data collection and model development for low‑resource languages in the Global South?
Babel mentioned collaborations with India for data sets, suggesting a need to study cross‑regional partnership models and data sharing frameworks.
Speaker: Babel Kofler
What evaluation frameworks are needed to assess the deployment and adoption of language models in real‑world public service domains (health, education, agriculture)?
Both speakers stressed the importance of moving from lab prototypes to real‑world impact, indicating a research need for deployment assessment methodologies.
Speaker: Natasha Crampton, Chenai Chair
How will the African Compute Initiative’s effectiveness be measured in terms of research output, model training capacity, and broader AI ecosystem growth?
Julie described the initiative’s goals but did not specify impact metrics, pointing to a need for systematic evaluation of the compute cluster’s outcomes.
Speaker: Julie Delahanty

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.