Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure

20 Feb 2026 17:00h - 18:00h

Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The session opened with Dr. Saurabh Garg outlining four pillars required to make data AI-ready-discoverability through clear metadata, trustworthiness via quality assessment, interoperability using unique identifiers, and usability grounded in common standards-while stressing that datasets are central to AI infrastructure and must be disseminated responsibly [3-7][8][9]. He also raised concern about the heavy compute and power demands of current models, noting that a single query can consume gigawatts compared with a human’s 100-watt caloric intake, and suggested a need to rethink infrastructure efficiency [11-15].


Arndt Husar framed the panel around the “three S” of solutions, standards and skills and asked each panelist to identify the most critical gap or opportunity for the Global South [22-26][30-33]. Johanna Hill of the WTO pointed to a projected 40 % increase in world trade by 2040 if AI is leveraged, but stressed that this depends on digital infrastructure, skilled labour and policy readiness [40-42][43-44]. She added that SMEs in developing economies are already using AI for market intelligence, highlighting AI’s potential as a game-changer for small firms [45-48].


The Uzbek representative identified unequal access to compute and AI skills as a “triple deficit” and noted a national AI strategy for 2030 that earmarks $300 million for projects, data-center construction and a $1 billion infrastructure fund, with partnerships such as Huawei and venture-fund incentives [56-58][124-131][221-226]. He also described a $50 million allocation for AI startups and a data-lake that will be openly available to innovators [225].


Indonesia’s Hamam Riza described a similar triple deficit, a shortage of localized data centres and talent, and a national roadmap that targets 12 million AI-skilled workers by 2030 through a “penta-helix” ecosystem and a digital academy [95-98][200-207]. He noted that global hyperscalers have established cloud regions in Indonesia but must be integrated into a sovereign AI strategy, including special economic zones for edge computing [129-136].


ADB’s Mio Oka emphasized that reliable power, devices and broadband are foundational, but the bank is prioritising sectoral AI services-such as agriculture and water management-and mobilising private capital through joint planning, capacity building and knowledge sharing [105-114][177-186]. The WTO highlighted that AI can lower trade costs, create new AI-enabled products and services, but fragmented regulations and high compliance costs hinder competitiveness, prompting the Secretariat’s AI Trade Policy Openness Index to guide countries [151-166].


Regional cooperation was presented as a way to achieve economies of scale, with ADB supporting both large economies like India and smaller states through shared infrastructure and skill programmes, while cautioning that AI solutions must align with local employment concerns [255-272][252-254].


The discussion concluded that AI is not a universal remedy; its impact will depend on coordinated investments in skills, infrastructure and appropriate regulation, a point underscored in the closing remarks [274-277].


Keypoints


AI-ready data must be discoverable, trustworthy, interoperable and usable – Dr. Garg outlined four pillars: metadata-driven discoverability, a quality-assessment framework for trust, unique identifiers to enable interoperability, and common standards/classifications for usability across systems [3-7].


Current AI models are extremely compute- and power-intensive, prompting a search for more efficient infrastructure – He noted that every query forces “billions of bytes” through massive compute, consuming gigawatts of power, and contrasted this with a human’s 100 W metabolic rate, questioning whether the sector is “missing something” [10-16].


The Global South faces a “three-S” gap (solutions, standards, skills) that limits AI-driven trade and SME adoption – Arndt introduced the three S framework [24-26]; Johanna Hill highlighted AI’s potential to boost trade by up to 40 % by 2040 but warned that digital infrastructure, skills and policy readiness are essential, and she cited regulatory fragmentation and high compliance costs as barriers [39-45][151-166].


Uzbekistan is pursuing a multi-pronged, state-led AI strategy that balances infrastructure, talent and private capital – The government has earmarked $200 M for a sovereign data centre, $300 M for AI projects, and is partnering with Huawei on 5G/6G and data-lake initiatives; it also creates venture-fund-of-funds and tax incentives to attract domestic and foreign investors [78-82][124-131][221-226].


Indonesia is tackling a “triple deficit” of data, compute and talent through a national AI roadmap and ecosystem platforms – The roadmap calls for massive infrastructure upgrades, a “penta-helix” of government, industry, academia, civil society and media, and a digital academy (Korika) targeting 12 million AI-skilled workers by 2030; it also links AI to climate-health use cases such as disease prediction [95-100][129-138][200-209].


Overall purpose/goal


The panel discussion aimed to diagnose the foundational challenges (data quality, compute infrastructure, skills, standards) that hinder AI adoption in the Global South, share country-level strategies, and explore collaborative pathways-through trade policy, regional cooperation, and financing-to unlock AI’s development and economic impact.


Overall tone


The conversation began with a technical, problem-identifying tone (focus on data and compute constraints). It then shifted to a more optimistic, solution-oriented tone as participants described national roadmaps, public-private partnerships, and regional initiatives. Throughout, the tone remained collegial and forward-looking, ending on a reflective note that acknowledges AI’s limits while emphasizing the need for coordinated skill-building, infrastructure investment, and regulation.


Speakers

Dr. Saurabh Garg


– Expertise: AI-ready data, data discoverability, trustworthiness, interoperability, usability, AI infrastructure efficiency


– Role/Title: Secretary, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India


– Affiliation: Government of India [S10]


Arndt Husar


– Expertise: Digital infrastructure, solutions-standards-skills framework, panel moderation


– Role/Title: Moderator / Panel Chair (fireside chat)


– Affiliation: (not specified)


Johanna Hill


– Expertise: Trade policy, AI’s impact on trade, digital trade, AI trade policy openness


– Role/Title: Representative, World Trade Organization (WTO)


– Affiliation: World Trade Organization [S3]


Zuhriddin Shadmanov


– Expertise: AI ecosystem development, infrastructure investment, skills up-skilling, public-private partnership in Uzbekistan


– Role/Title: Representative, Ministry of Digital Technology (Uzbekistan)


– Affiliation: Government of Uzbekistan


Mio Oka


– Expertise: AI applications in agriculture, water, irrigation; regional development financing; private-capital mobilization


– Role/Title: Country Director for India, Asian Development Bank (ADB)


– Affiliation: Asian Development Bank [S5]


Hamam Riza


– Expertise: National AI roadmap, AI talent development, AI-driven public services, climate-health nexus, AI ecosystem coordination


– Role/Title: Professor; Co-Chair, National AI Roadmap Indonesia 2030; President, Collaborative Research and Industrial Innovation in Artificial Intelligence


– Affiliation: Indonesia (government/academic sector) [S6][S7]


Additional speakers:


– None identified beyond the listed speakers.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Opening – AI-ready data (Dr Saurabh Garg)


Dr Saurabh Garg opened the session by stating that making data AI-ready rests on four inter-linked pillars: discoverability through a well-defined metadata structure [3-4]; trustworthiness via a quality-assessment framework that validates credibility [5-6]; interoperability enabled by unique identifiers that allow reliable linking of disparate datasets [6-7]; and usability ensured by common standards and classifications [7-8]. He emphasized that these elements must be deployed in ways that preserve individual privacy while retaining business value [8-9]. Garg then turned to the compute side, noting that current AI models are “infrastructure-heavy”, requiring billions of bytes per query and consuming gigawatts of power [10-12]; by contrast, the human body operates at roughly 100 W, prompting him to ask whether the sector is overlooking more efficient approaches [13-15].


Framing the panel (Arndt Husar)


Arndt Husar introduced the “three S” framework – solutions, standards and skills – a taxonomy proposed by the ITU head to broaden the focus beyond data-centres and raw compute [23-26]. He asked each panelist to state their name and institution and to identify the most critical gap or the most exciting opportunity for the Global South to generate positive impact through AI [30-33].


WTO perspective (Johanna Hill)


Johanna Hill (World Trade Organisation) projected a “40 by 40” effect: AI-enabled trade could lift global trade volumes by almost 40 % by 2040 [40-42]. She said this growth hinges on three pre-conditions – robust digital infrastructure, a skilled workforce and policy readiness [43-44]. Citing a WTO-ICC survey, Hill noted that many SMEs in developing economies already use AI for market intelligence, but they face regulatory fragmentation and high compliance costs [45-48]. She also mentioned the WTO’s AI Trade Policy Openness Index, warning that overly lax regulation can undermine competitiveness [158-160].


Uzbekistan – gaps & strategy (Zuhriddin Shadmanov)


Zuhriddin Shadmanov described a “triple deficit” of unequal compute access, limited advanced AI skills, and insufficient sovereign data-infrastructure [56-58]. Uzbekistan’s 2030 human-centred AI strategy prioritises human-skill development, the construction of a sovereign data-centre (US$200 million) and a $5 billion renewable-energy data-centre partnership with Saudi-Arabian firm DataVault [78-82][90-92]. The government has earmarked US$300 million for AI projects across health, education, transport and cybersecurity, allocated US$50 million to AI-focused startups, and introduced tax incentives and a venture-fund-of-funds model to attract US$1 billion of private capital [124-132][221-226].


Balancing priorities (Arndt → Uzbekistan)


Arndt asked Shadmanov how Uzbekistan plans to balance these priorities and finance the strategy. Shadmanov explained the public-private mix, the role of tax incentives, and the partnership with Huawei on 5.5G/6G networks and AI infrastructure [124-132][221-226].


Indonesia – infrastructure & talent (Prof Hamam Riza)


Prof Hamam Riza highlighted a similar “triple deficit” but placed greater emphasis on talent and sovereign AI development [56-58]. Indonesia’s national AI roadmap targets 12 million AI-skilled workers by 2030, addressing a current shortfall of 3-5 million [202-203]. The roadmap is built around a “penta-helix” platform that unites government, industry, academia, civil society and media, and has launched the Korika digital academy together with a Kodika chatbot to up-skill civil servants and the broader workforce [200-208]. Indonesia is preparing a presidential regulation to promote sovereign AI models that reflect local culture, and is designating special economic zones for hyperscalers and edge-computing facilities [132-136]. Climate-health initiatives, such as AI-driven malaria and dengue prediction in partnership with NASA and universities, illustrate the country’s ambition to link AI with societal challenges [208-212].


ADB perspective (Mio Oka)


Mio Oka (Asian Development Bank) stressed that the most fundamental prerequisites for AI deployment are a stable power supply, affordable devices and reliable broadband connectivity [105-107]. He added that ADB’s newly created digital-sector office is already receiving strong demand for data-centre projects [190-192]. While acknowledging the need for foundational infrastructure, ADB prioritises sector-specific AI services-particularly in agriculture, water supply and irrigation-as the immediate entry points for impact [111-114]. Citing the Telangana example, he illustrated the importance of “right-sizing” compute to the problem rather than defaulting to massive data-centre deployments [165-170]. ADB is mobilising private capital through joint master-planning, capacity-building programmes and knowledge-sharing, exemplified by collaborations on water-road projects and AI pilots in agriculture [177-186]. The bank also supports the “democratisation of AI compute” working group, which seeks cross-border sharing of compute resources to avoid duplication and reduce the energy footprint of AI [165-170]. Mio recounted an anecdote about an AI-based fish-feeding system that was rejected by a small-country government, highlighting the socio-economic trade-offs of automation [268-272].


Regional cooperation


The panel repeatedly underscored the need for holistic digital-infrastructure ecosystems that integrate solutions, standards and skills (the three S). Many speakers highlighted that AI can be a catalyst for trade growth when data are discoverable, trustworthy and interoperable [3-8][40-44]. They also converged on blended financing models that combine public funding, tax incentives and private-sector venture capital [124-132][105-107]. Regional cooperation was cited as a way to achieve economies of scale, harmonise standards and share infrastructure: the WTO’s AI Trade Policy Openness Index and ADB’s support for joint projects were presented as concrete tools [158-160][177-186].


Points of divergence


Hardware strategy: Uzbekistan leans heavily on foreign partners such as Huawei and NVIDIA, whereas Indonesia stresses sovereign AI models and aims to limit dependence on external hyperscalers [221-226][132-136].


Financing approach: Uzbekistan foregrounds substantial state allocations and tax incentives; ADB positions itself as a catalyst that mobilises private capital after basic services are in place [124-132][105-107].


SME adoption perception: Arndt noted a large adoption lag for small firms [49-51], while the WTO survey indicated many SMEs are already leveraging AI for market intelligence [45-48].


Feasibility of climate-health projects: Arndt’s skeptical interjection (“I’m not buying any of them”) contrasted with Hamam’s confident description of AI-driven malaria and dengue prediction, revealing differing views on ambitious use-cases [208-212][213-214].


Key take-aways (four pillars)


1. A holistic digital-infrastructure ecosystem that integrates solutions, standards and skills.


2. Large-scale talent development programmes and multi-stakeholder governance (penta-helix, digital academies).


3. Blended financing mechanisms that marry public investment, tax incentives and private-sector capital.


4. Regional cooperation to harmonise standards, share compute resources and reduce regulatory fragmentation.


Open questions / next steps


– How will countries prioritise and balance these pillars within limited budgets?


– What mechanisms can enable cross-border data sharing that respects sovereignty while fostering collaboration?


– Which strategies will effectively curb the energy intensity of large AI models?


– How can the SME adoption gap be closed, for example through right-sized compute and targeted capacity-building?


Conclusion – As Arndt Husar reminded in his closing remarks, AI is not a universal panacea; its benefits will be maximised only through coordinated investments in infrastructure, talent, regulation and regional collaboration [274-277][S69][S70].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Dr. Saurabh Garg

models or talent, how we can ensure that it works in a federated manner. I think I’ll just, I was discussing and maybe I’ll just focus on one piece, which is on AI -ready data, if I can focus on that and leave it for the esteemed panelists on the large number of issues. Some of the elements that we are focusing on include, one is on how to make it more discoverable. That would be a very basic point to ensure that it’s discoverable. Second is how to ensure that the data sets are trustworthy, and that would be the second element. The third would be on the interoperability, and the fourth would be on the usability across systems.

So on discoverability. On discoverability, the metadata of that structure is extremely important, so that would help to, that’s a first. element of having a metadata structure which is understandable and well defined and can be used across the second on the trustworthy part would be the quality assessment so we’ve developed as kind of a quality assessment framework which focuses on the quality of the data so that to ensure credibility on the data interoperability a lock would depend on whether data can talk to each other what is the unique identifiers that we have which will ensure that the different data sets whether are they talking about the same thing or different we are able to identify that and the fourth would be on the usability across systems would be based on the standards and classifications that we have whether it’s a common definitions and common standards so that two sets of data don’t refer to the same thing and I suppose this really forms the bedrock of making a data AI ready and that That’s something that we’re working with ministries and governments and state governments across the country.

And given the importance of data sets in the AI infrastructure, it has an important part to play. The other aspect on data is also on its dissemination and access, on how we are able to ensure that data sets in themselves have value beyond AI and what kind of dissemination and mechanisms can be there which will make it usable for people to leverage them for business while preserving the privacy aspects of individual data. One other thing, since we are talking about and the panel will be having discussions on AI infrastructure, I just wanted to focus on one thing that I think discussed, over the past couple of days. has also come up that the existing models seem to be extremely data infrastructure, infrastructure heavy, whether compute infrastructure, data infrastructure.

And every time a new query is put out to the model, is it necessary for the billions of bytes to be again run through again and the gigawatts of power that we need? And are there alternative mechanisms available? And I just want to highlight yesterday one comment which stays with me, is what Vishal Sikka had made, that when we talk in terms of AI infrastructure, we talk in terms of gigawatts of power. Compared to that, a human being requires 2 ,000 calories, which is only 100 watts. So are we missing something out there in the infrastructure? And perhaps a greater focus on the models going forward is there. So I’ll stop here. Thank you for inviting me. Thank you.

Arndt Husar

Thank you so much, Secretary. And I’m now going to join the fireside chat here. The discussion that we have planned will cover various different aspects of digital infrastructure. So when you hear digital infrastructure, you might be first thinking of the data centers and the compute. But we actually want to have a conversation that also encompasses the solution side, the skill side, so that we really look at the whole spectrum of infrastructure, even standards. So these three S were introduced yesterday by ITU’s head, the three S of solutions, standards, and skills. Kind of a nice way to open up to the panel. We have different perspectives here today. And we’re going to try to stick to time.

But let me introduce you to this panel by asking the first question. And I would request that each of the panelists then quickly states their name and their institution to shorten the time. What we would like to hear from each of you is that from your vantage point, what do you see as the most critical gap, the most exciting opportunity for the global south in generating positive impact through AI? So we’ve asked each of them to think about a concern or opportunity and then also to maybe link it to strategy or vision. So maybe I’ll first go to the lady on my right from the WTO. May I request you for your perspective on the big challenge or opportunity?

Johanna Hill

Thank you so much to the Asian Development Bank for the invitation and the organization to this interesting conversation. My name is Johanna Hill. And I… I am with the World Trade Organization. And let me start out with the opportunity side of the equation. We really are seeing that AI and trade, when they work together, can offer important opportunities for developing countries and low -income economies. Our projections at the Secretariat have led us to believe that by the year 2040, trade could grow by almost 40%. So that would be the 40 by 40 effect. But then here come the caveats, right? For that to happen, for those opportunities to really be realized, one element that is really important is the digital infrastructure, the skills that you mentioned, and policy readiness.

You know, we’ve heard throughout this conference and before the important opportunities and applications in different sectors, in agriculture, health care, new services being developed as we speak, new services and goods that are becoming more AI -related, more tradable, and we are also seeing that that can have important opportunities. for the smaller firms in developing economies and in the big economies also. We did a survey with the ICC that we published last year on the opportunities for businesses and for small and medium enterprises. And of those respondents, many of them were saying that they’re already using AI, of course, from bigger companies, more developed economies. But even the smaller firms are also seeing opportunities in areas like market intelligence.

So we do see that it can be a game changer.

Arndt Husar

Fantastic. And one of the things that I’ve been hearing a lot at this summit is that specifically the SMEs, the technology has moved so fast that there’s a huge adoption gap and understanding of how they can actually integrate the AI into their business models, into their little shop that takes a picture of a product and uploads it quickly. AI can be super helpful in this but hasn’t yet reached that audience. Maybe I’ll turn it over to you. Maybe I’ll turn to the other side and request our colleague from Uzbekistan to share his perspective.

Zuhriddin Shadmanov

Thanks for the question. Thanks for having me here. Let me talk about the gaps which exist in our country. I think the first one is unequal access to compute capacities and I think advanced AI digital skills. So in that sense, these foundations play a crucial role because if you don’t bridge those gaps, many countries, nations will be just the consumers of AI rather than creators of AI value. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. First one is developing human skills. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. First one is developing human skills. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas.

So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. So in that sense, Uzbekistan is advancing strategic ideas. all stratus of our nation, starting from students, professionals, and public servants. So we are not concentrating on the tech sector, but also we try to cover all the spheres of our nation.

And secondly, we are developing our infrastructure. For that reason, our government is allocating around 200 million USD. So to create our own government data center with supercomputers, GPUs, acquiring from NVIDIA. And also we are working with DataVault, a Saudi Arabian company, to create an energy -efficient data center, which is based on renewable energy. It is a very big project. It’s around 5 billion USD. And the data center will be… put into operation within two, three years. hopefully and also we are trying to develop our government strategy we adopted a strategy 2030 last year and this by by the year to 2030 we’re trying to get there early reach the export of AI related products by five 1 .5 billion USD so

Arndt Husar

fantastic so either by coincidence or planning you touched on the 3s the solutions the skills and the standards the policies fantastic thank you so a very comprehensive view with multi -pronged strategy that you didn’t introduce yourself so I just say you with the Ministry of Digital Technology and an institution quite focus the center of the development of AI and the digital economy Fantastic. Okay, let me turn back to this side. So from Indonesia, we have someone who’s actually in this skills domain. Would you like to share with us what you, from your vantage point, perceive as the key opportunity or challenge?

Hamam Riza

All right, thank you. Hi, everyone. I am Professor Hamam Riza. I am the co -chair of the National AI Roadmap Indonesia 2030. And also I am the president of the Collaborative Research and Industrial Innovation in Artificial Intelligence, the organization that was founded in 2020 when we launched our first national AI strategy towards Indonesia 2045. That is the vision. And I think AI will take us there, really. So from my vantage point, I think… We are… we have no we need to move beyond numbers even though we understood that AI economy will create millions of jobs and also potential economy of up to 1 trillion so from my vantage point from the Indonesian perspective global south they are basically triple deficit in terms of what we are going to it is the most challenging one the first one is that certainly about the data and infrastructures, the compute infrastructures we are still lacking the connectivity the networks but as I have marked down here in order for us to smooth up all the AI use cases for public services for health services, for agriculture, and many other things, you need to basically solve this triple deficit.

And that is also regarding how you need to develop the AI talents. There is a significant lack and scarcity of high -quality localized data centers tailored to Indonesia, as well as shortage of AI skilled talents that limits the capacity of long -term innovations capabilities. So our government is addressing these gaps through the national roadmap that I co -chaired. And our primary concern is how the digital divide and how the AI divide, which is the digital divide. Which is created by this. generatively I didn’t think I towards many of the public sectors in Indonesia in an in general in the global self that we can tackle so that while there is nine to two percent of our skill knowledge worker but we are still using you know a very basic AI tools and needs to be aware of all the and all the risks you know applied to the output of this AI tools so those those things are that I think will be my point of view towards closing the gaps for the global south and especially for Indonesia

Arndt Husar

thank you so much and it’s of course one of the most populous countries in Southeast Asia It’s a very young workforce. 270 million. Yes, and startup buzz in Indonesia is also palpable, so lots of potential in Indonesia. Last but not least, I want to go to our Asian Development Bank Country Director for India. Mio, can I request you to share your views?

Mio Oka

Thank you. From ADB’s perspective, of course, foundation is important. We need to have a power supply, stable power supply, and the devices that people have access to, and reliable broadband, even in our office. So that’s a foundation. But we are in India. Do we expect India to put so much money on foundation to have a ground -level impact? But India has a scale. So what we need to focus is, as others already said, is a service. So we work on agriculture sector, water supply, and even irrigation sector where AI is widely applied. Because of the scale of the people that we have in the global south, while we work on the foundational infrastructure, at the same time we really have to work on how AI can be applied at the service level.

And this is where ADB would like to support. Thanks.

Arndt Husar

Thank you, Mio. So we have, as you can see, different perspectives at the same space of how do we get at grappling with this massive development opportunity that AI represents. For this first round of questions after the opening, let’s go into the foundations a little bit. I want to go to Uzbekistan again. And you already mentioned you have… ambitions on infrastructure, policy and skills. Now, how do you actually balance this in terms of priority setting? Can you go for all of them all at once? How do you finance it? Does this keep you up at night, how you balance these three different strategic objectives?

Zuhriddin Shadmanov

It’s a tough question because we are a developing nation and money is always a scarce element for us. So anyway, our government is trying to allocate enough resources so we can cover all the aspects of AI development to create the AI ecosystem. First one, as I already mentioned, it’s a strategy. 2030, which sets our priorities, which is human -centered AI. And secondly, with the government trying to allocate enough resources overall now the government announced about 300 million USD for development of AI and the money goes to first of all implementing projects in the government sector in the social sphere healthcare, education, transportation cyber security and etc and also government is trying to provide necessary infrastructure building data centers acquiring GPUs and also we are now creating a data lake which will be collecting the data of the government sector so SMEs, startups and other who wants the data they can use those data for free or for some money usually free and anyway we’re trying to work with other countries as I already said that we are we have a good project five million AI leaders so United Arab Emirates they helping us to helped us to build this program and it was launched now over 1 million people already registered and go to training certifications there so also we are trying to attract foreign foreign investments and now government announced very good in tax incentives and other incentives to for example if you are want to invest in a you know in Uzbekistan and try want to build a data center which costs over 100 million USD you will get very cheap and take the intensive and customs exams and etc so going trying to balance with cautiously but still providing necessary conditions for the to build a ecosystem

Arndt Husar

very impressive and since I had the opportunity to chat with somebody else from Uzbekistan this week I also know that in your KPI as a public servant AI roll it out has entered that KPI space so that’s always going to make a difference let’s go back to Indonesia now I’m gonna you know of course skills is your comfort zone but can I ask you about the infrastructure side I know that the hyperscalers the big cloud companies international companies have invested significantly in Indonesia now how do you see that now moving into the AI age and is that a big step forward for you? is there a lot of activity on additional infrastructure build out what do you see happening in that

Hamam Riza

yes so I see these questions and I’m really eager to answer this because suddenly our infrastructure is undergoing a transformation really to meet the demands of the AI demand and certainly with the ability of many of these new infrastructures coming out of the government and also from the business I think benchmarking with many other countries including you know in the regional ASEAN take for example the presence of the global hyperscaler in the country have established actually multiple cloud regions in Indonesia. But certainly this needs to be amplified because as you know 10 years in many other technologies, one year in AI, right? That’s what they are saying. So how do you can fulfill this demand of AI compute massive data for training because you need to build up our own for example large language model that can align with our cultures.

So those hyperscalers needs to move beyond just being a single a host for this you know many of the AI models from outside of the country right so and the infrastructure readiness is also being federated by our chief toward the sovereign AI we are now preparing the presidential regulation actually to push forward the innovations the investment and we need to collaborate with many of the hyperscalers and we are ensuring that the physical infrastructures like the GPU data center and localized edge computing yeah is going to be present in the country. And one thing that the Vice Minister of Communication and Digital Affairs mentioned to me yesterday that we are struggling building up the ecosystem. That means there will be special economic zone for these hyperscalers and new data centers being brought forward in order to align and be part of our national AI roadmap, AI journey in Indonesia.

And we are going to prepare ourselves in this AI transformation so that our data… digital consumer… is going to be part of our transformation. The technology is accessible for all. Even, you know, what we are right now, you know, participating in the India AI Summit says about democratizing AI for all. So I think that is a very significant theme that is also part of our national AI roadmap. Thank you.

Arndt Husar

Fascinating. And, again, I think you as a large economy, you have that opportunity similar to how India is also portraying it this week of really wanting to develop your own, you know, language models and really playing in that league. However, there are many countries. also countries we work with who don’t have that kind of scale and who need to look at it quite differently. So the different nuanced strategy that you mentioned of investing into the big AI, the small AI, the edge AI, all these different pieces, very interesting. With this dynamic, can I turn to WTO? How do you see trade competitiveness evolve? That’s really your space where you are at. What are those interesting approaches that are emerging which could help support maybe the cross -border collaboration while you also, of course, respect data sovereignty?

Countries will need to collaborate, right? There’s not enough money to go around for everybody to play in that top league. So trade competitiveness, what do you see there?

Johanna Hill

So I was talking about the opportunities of trade growing by the use of AI. Okay. And if you think about… That growth comes from the lowering of trade costs. It comes from powering AI -enabled goods and services crossing borders. And it’s… Also, new products and services that are going to be invented are being invented by AI. And when you talk to business, when we asked through the survey, some of the constraints that they are having and doubts in the use of AI have to do with competing regulations and having a high cost in trying to comply. And fragmentation is actually an area of data, for example, that can become a problem. And so we developed and published last year in the World Trade Report what the Secretariat calls the AI Trade Policy Openness Index to help regions measure how they’re doing in that space.

And in there, you can see, for example, that some of the lower income economies can seem quite open in that space. But it might be because of the lack of regulation. And when you talk about AI, I think what a lot of countries and customers are saying is that AI is not a good thing. What customers are looking for is, you know, it’s AI. that is responsible, you know, trading AI with trust. So just not having regulation can also be a disadvantage to your competitiveness. So starting to look at those things that way. And then in the part of the solution side, definitely the regional approaches are important, those collaborations, and sharing infrastructure, for example.

When you don’t have those economies of scale, those huge investments come in your way. And then not every single company or every single country is looking to be on the edge of things necessarily, but we do want to adopt AI to boost our economy and our competitiveness.

Arndt Husar

Well, thank you so much. And I don’t know whether people heard about this new initiative that the working group on the democratization of AI, of compute, has come up with. ADB is actually supporting that. Really, this is… This has not yet evolved, right? This collaboration on the infrastructure. How do you share that properly across borders? It’s still new territory and very interesting to see. Can I turn to my colleague, Mio, and request her to talk a little bit about the engagement that we’ve had with member countries. What does demand to ADB actually look like in this space?

Mio Oka

try to invest in the township planning and the implementation. Also, we can have a water supply road project that can be connected to the industrial parks so that private sector can invest in the digital -related facilities. So mobilization of private capital is one. And the second is it’s an application across sectors. We just don’t look at the single sector project. As I said, we can work on road and water at the same time. And while we work on the Agri -AI project, we work with the building capacity of that institution as well so that they can handle the AI. And the third is the knowledge. As I said, we support quite a bit of this master planning or the strategy development at the municipality or the state or even at the regional level.

We see India. And you’ve been coding on science. India. And of course we always bring in the international experts so that India can learn and also this is a good opportunity for India to expand their capacity to outside countries. Thank you.

Arndt Husar

Thanks, Miyu. I actually had a follow -up question for you that would have touched on this de -risking and catalyzing investment topic. Maybe I’ll let you ask you to repeat that now, but let me just add our digital sector office being fairly new. They are getting a lot of demand for guess what? Data centers. And, you know, we welcome that. We have conversations with government but I’m truly impressed with the conversations at the summit here. Earlier this morning I attended one where the state of Telangana was sharing what they’re thinking about and they’re really quite cognizant of the kids to school not many kids fit into a Ferrari milk doesn’t make sense so we need to look at what type of compute is needed for what and I think we in ADB are also learning more and more how to engage in these conversations properly we’re learning alongside everybody else in this room probably and that’s an important distinction to make because it will influence the financing bit how much do we need, what do we actually need and when and how do we make that investment sustainable just wanted to add that it’s an insight from this morning that I couldn’t not retail.

Let me go back to Indonesia and ask you about cutting -edge skills because you’re in that space. I found it very interesting that you’re actually, you said co -president or co -chairing this platform where you bring together private sector, education sector, government. And as you are looking at that, how is your organization doing it in practice? How do you bring these people together and get them into action mode? How do you do that?

Hamam Riza

Okay, thank you. Very important question here, I think. So I would like to say in three pillars that what we are doing, especially that we chair the AI ecosystem in Indonesia where the government, the industry are involved in the AI ecosystem. Within an academia as well as the… civil society as well as media we call this pentahelix platform we discuss about I think three pillars first one is the talent certainly second one is infrastructures and the third one is how basically we can articulate use cases towards all the services public services and businesses as well so Indonesia for talent we have set our target quite ambitious that we want to have at least 12 million talent by 2030 and for us this is something that are uh fairly challenging, considering that we are still lacking around 3 to 5 million talent as of now, right?

So what we are trying to achieve together with the whole ecosystem is to establish an academy, the Korika Academy, where we promote to not only upskilling and reskilling some of the civil servants and other workers, but we are also looking at how we can train the trainers. We work with several of our friends. I will note here that Elevate Indonesia, for example, part of the… Microsoft and many others big tech that are there works together with our ministry to establish this program for Thailand

Arndt Husar

and it’s a digital academy or is it a physical?

Hamam Riza

it’s a digital academy with the LMS learning management system and many other things we also established the Kodika chat actually it’s a chatbot for this training and upskilling program that we do with the government beyond Thailand basically we are aggressively looking at how we can nurture this talent to work in data centers, in many others startups and incubators as well as to establish some of the most diverse demanding use cases So the third one is we try to work on climate health nexus in establishing how we counter and predict the climate sensitive infectious disease such as malaria and dengue. And we have established for the past three years the Climate Smart Indonesia which have attracted many of the universities as well as NASA pollution and air quality programs to look into these use cases.

So we can basically reach out to many of the areas where the… …the health, the disaster prone area because Indonesia is a supermarket for disaster. You can have the hydromelectorological disaster, you can have ecological, you can have many things. So you need to…

Arndt Husar

I’m not buying any of them.

Hamam Riza

Of course, we don’t want to be shopping.

Arndt Husar

So really amazing this focus also on the use cases, right? And prioritizing those that match with your country needs. Yes, thank you. Give the highest impact, right? Super. I’ll turn back to Uzbekistan and just wanted to ask you to elaborate a little bit in terms of private sector capital mobilization. You have all these ambitions you shared across the board really in terms of infra, in terms of skills and so on and so forth. Uzbekistan as an economy has still… a good chunk of traditional economy but also has a very active startup sector that I’m learning more and more about how dynamic people are around the region, Central West Asia going and finding scalable solutions but these are the still growing companies for mobilizing capital for your infra you’re going to need the big ones or you’re not going to need the international partners or what are you thinking about this private capital mobilization, what’s your strategy there?

Zuhriddin Shadmanov

First of all I should mention that according to the documents adopted by year 2030 we are planning to attract around 1 billion USD for investments for creating AI related digital infrastructure and part of this goes to creating data centers and we’re going to need to And also we’re working with our Chinese partners also. It’s the biggest IT company, Huawei. So they’re also involved in creating AI ecosystem in Uzbekistan. Mainly, first one is upskilling public servants to help them to adopt AI adoption and also creating the necessary training programs for the specialists and also creating the AI infrastructure like data centers, data lakes. And also we need to get, we are transferring to 5 .5G and also working on 6G also with Huawei.

So, yes. And also, as you mentioned already about startups, we are developing our own. startup ecosystem and we established many venture funds funds of funds and also there are many emerging private funds so they are now trying to invest in startups attracting private funds, private investments so currently we have allocated around 50 million USD for AI startups so they are already providing services both for public and for businesses so trying to balance and attract all the stakeholders of the ecosystem

Arndt Husar

Fantastic, so you’re mixing also your public funds that you invest for example in the fund of funds and then bringing in more investment domestically from your investors but also from abroad That’s amazing. And then having large industry partners that are interested in the market, bringing them in like Indonesia did with some of the hyperscalers. You are bringing in Huawei and Chinese partners. So basically it’s a mix of different strategies you mentioned. Also, that’s fascinating. Again, Uzbekistan being one of the larger countries in Central West Asia and Indonesia, both fairly large in their region. And then, of course, again, I want to come back to this point about diversity of country context. That’s both a challenge but also an opportunity.

I mean, for us at ADB, it adds, of course, complexity because we need to respond to these different needs. But from the perspective of WTO, is there like a specific area such as maybe interoperability standards or AI talent mobility? Or the shared data set? joint research, where do you see regional cooperation making the biggest difference? I

Johanna Hill

think that it’s a bit of a matter of context, right? At the regional level and at the national level. We’ve talked about the divide in the digital divide and how do we overcome that and the role of infrastructure and skills and the rest. And at the WTO Secretariat, we’ve been very concerned on this issue. And so we partnered with the World Bank and we did a study called Digital Trade in Africa, a general one, and then we did some country pilot studies to look at the situation. And we did see that some of the regional work, like the ACFDA and the digital protocol, really made a difference in how it helped bring them along and to set a certain standard in many of the countries that we studied.

Then we did a similar study with the World Bank in Latin America and the U .S. The Caribbean and the Inter -American Development Bank partnered with us. And we saw there that the situation was a bit different, more diversity in terms of regulation and trade policy, infrastructure needs. So there’s basically not one size fits all. But we have seen regional banks playing a very important role in helping countries that want to go in the regional way. I know ASEAN has done important work in AI policy, for example, and other regions are also working in that sense. And I do think that that brings economies of scale to a certain extent. It helps you resolve questions on electricity sometimes.

And so I think there’s a lot of opportunity and further work to be done at the regional level.

Arndt Husar

Thank you. And I think with the regional cooperation integration agenda being also top of mind for ADB, I just ask my colleague also to… tell me a little bit about her perspective. Of course, she represents ADB in a very large economy in South Asia, but we do have regional cooperation happening around the region. Mio, what do you see as opportunities with regards to regional cooperation integration on this digital infrastructure space?

Mio Oka

Right, thank you. So again, ADB, we support India. I’m in India. Our office covers India. So we are here to support Vixie Bharat so that India can grow at the pace to become a developed country by 2047, and the AI is a necessary means to do that. But again, as everybody knows, we are the regional bank. Nobody around us should be left alone or left behind. So ADB, through this kind of forum, has to be a catalyst. A catalyst for the global south. So we are here. Of course, there are many countries who cannot invest in scale. What are the solutions? So we are here to support the solutions, and also we support big tigers like India to support those countries too.

That’s number one. And number two is the balance approach. When we talk about regional cooperation or the work in a small country, I was quite shocked about five years ago. I went to the small neighbor country here, and I was working in the agriculture sector, and I was proudly introducing, I want to introduce aquaculture using the AI -based fish feeding system. And my negotiation ended in three seconds because the government said, no, we are interested in employment. What are you talking about? What AI -based feeders will just reduce the people who are going to work there? So that is a big lesson learned for me. We need an ecosystem, but even we talk about AI, the solution may be elsewhere.

so as you introduced the skill is super important and since that understanding again going back to India we’ve invested more than like 5 billion in the skill including the PM set and working over 10 states and now AI based skill is the big part of it so we are always mindful that the regional cooperation and we should not forget should not leave any country to be left behind but solution again may not be as direct as we expect thank you

Arndt Husar

thank you Mio and we have one minute left on the clock that throws a spanner into my closing with the thought that AI may not be the solution for everything but I think it’s a fair ending looking for a name We need to understand the problems and see how AI, if it can be deployed, if it can make a difference, how it should be supported through skills development, infrastructure investments, regulation. So I want to thank my panel for a very interesting tour de force of this topic. Also thought I’d take the opportunity to thank the audience and India for hosting this amazing summit. As ADB, we’ve been proud to be a partner of it, and it’s been truly fascinating, and we’re quite proud to have been part of this journey.

Thank you all for attending, and thanks to the panel. Let’s give them a round of applause for sharing their views. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (15)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (7)
Confirmedhigh

“Making data AI‑ready rests on four inter‑linked pillars: discoverability through a well‑defined metadata structure; trustworthiness via a quality‑assessment framework; interoperability enabled by unique identifiers; and usability ensured by common standards and classifications.”

The knowledge base highlights the importance of a well-defined metadata structure for discoverability and a quality-assessment framework for trustworthiness, confirming these two pillars [S2]. It also discusses systematic approaches to data readiness that align with the described pillars [S25].

Additional Contextmedium

“These elements must be deployed in ways that preserve individual privacy while retaining business value.”

Discussion in the knowledge base emphasizes balancing privacy with security and business needs, noting that privacy should not be treated as opposed to other objectives [S80] and that responsible innovation must protect individual rights [S79].

Additional Contexthigh

“Current AI models are “infrastructure‑heavy”, requiring billions of bytes per query and consuming gigawatts of power; the human body operates at roughly 100 W.”

Sources project AI-related power consumption reaching tens of gigawatts and stress the challenge of scaling infrastructure, providing context for the claim about high energy use [S69] and the need for more efficient compute approaches [S29] and infrastructure scaling limits [S50].

Confirmedhigh

“Arndt Husar introduced the “three S” framework – solutions, standards and skills – a taxonomy proposed by the ITU head.”

The three-S framework (solutions, standards, skills) introduced by the ITU head is explicitly mentioned in the knowledge base [S4].

Additional Contextmedium

“Growth of AI‑enabled trade hinges on three pre‑conditions – robust digital infrastructure, a skilled workforce and policy readiness.”

The knowledge base stresses that closing the digital divide requires targeted investment in infrastructure, locally relevant applications, and skills development, aligning with the three pre-conditions cited [S36].

Confirmedhigh

“Many SMEs in developing economies already use AI for market intelligence, but they face regulatory fragmentation and high compliance costs.”

Regulatory fragmentation leading to higher compliance costs for enterprises, especially SMEs in developing regions, is documented in the knowledge base [S52] and further illustrated by the challenges faced by Latin American firms [S91].

Additional Contextlow

“Overly lax regulation can undermine competitiveness (WTO’s AI Trade Policy Openness Index warning).”

While the specific WTO index is not cited, the knowledge base notes concerns that insufficient regulation can affect competitiveness and that balanced policy is needed for responsible AI deployment [S52].

External Sources (92)
S1
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/building-trusted-ai-at-scale-cities-startups-digital-sovereignty-fireside-chat-moderator-mariano-florentino-cuellar — Now we move to a conversation about how artificial intelligence needs to be positioned in the global context. And we hav…
S2
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/regional-leaders-discuss-ai-ready-digital-infrastructure — And in there, you can see, for example, that some of the lower income economies can seem quite open in that space. But i…
S3
United Nations High-Level Leaders’ Dialogue — – **Johanna Hill** – World Trade Organization (WTO) Johanna Hill: harness? Thank you for the invitation. We are facing …
S4
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — – Zuhriddin Shadmanov- Hamam Riza Shadmanov emphasizes a broad societal approach covering all sectors beyond technology…
S5
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — -Mio Oka- Asian Development Bank (ADB) Country Director for India
S6
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/regional-leaders-discuss-ai-ready-digital-infrastructure — All right, thank you. Hi, everyone. I am Professor Hamam Riza. I am the co -chair of the National AI Roadmap Indonesia 2…
S7
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — All right, thank you. Hi, everyone. I am Professor Hamam Riza. I am the co -chair of the National AI Roadmap Indonesia 2…
S8
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — – Dr. Saurabh Garg- Zuhriddin Shadmanov- Hamam Riza- Arndt Husar – Johanna Hill- Mio Oka- Arndt Husar – Zuhriddin Shad…
S9
Legal Notice: — Chief of International Law Studies. He has previously served as Dean of the George C. Marshall Center in Germany and Gen…
S10
The Foundation of AI Democratizing Compute Data Infrastructure — -Saurabh Garg: Secretary in the Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation in the Government of India
S11
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/the-foundation-of-ai-democratizing-compute-data-infrastructure — And they could be partly technological and partly policy -based or protocol -based. And a combination of this will ensur…
S12
Democratizing AI Building Trustworthy Systems for Everyone — – Dr. Saurabh Garg- Natasha Crampton – Dr. Saurabh Garg- Natasha Crampton- Justin Carsten
S13
Digital infrastructure and standards in Africa: Continental and regional policies and their international elements — Across regional economic communities (RECs), there are multiple policy initiatives and projects that cover matters relat…
S14
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Fireside Chat Moderator- Mariano-Florentino Cuellar — Now we move to a conversation about how artificial intelligence needs to be positioned in the global context. And we hav…
S15
A digital public infrastructure strategy for sustainable development – Exploring effective possibilities for regional cooperation (University of Western Australia) — Open standards allow other systems to be plugged into them The importance of open standards and interoperability is emp…
S16
AI-driven Cyber Defense: Empowering Developing Nations | IGF 2023 — AI technologies offer immense potential for enhancing cybersecurity; however, they can also introduce risks that may con…
S17
WS #466 AI at a Crossroads Between Sovereignty and Sustainability — Yu Ping Chan: Thank you so much to the organizers for having me here today. So I represent the United Nations Developmen…
S18
AI and the future of digital global supply chains (UNCTAD) — There is a skills gap in these countries
S19
Strategy for the development of artificial intelligence in the Republic of Tajikistan for the period up to 2040 — 125. The implementation of the priorities and activities of the Strategy will be ensured by all types of sources of fina…
S20
REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, INFORMATION TECHNOLY AND COMMUNICATIONS — In connection with the goal of creating knowledge and skills for the development and use of AI, enshrined in the concept…
S21
Uzbekinstan’s strategy for the development of artificial intelligence technologies until 2030 — Additionally, the Strategy outlines medium- and long-term tasks, including those in scientific and technological develop…
S22
Signature Panel: Building Cyber Resilience for Sustainable Development by Bridging the Global Capacity Gap — Indonesia:Thank you. Moderator, Mr. Robin, good afternoon to all delegations here, allow me this morning to convey three…
S23
© 2019, United Nations — Latin America and Asia present more dynamic entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystems than those found in …
S24
Solomon Islands Rapid eTrade Readiness Assessment — The skills development focus is centered the government’s efforts to develop ICT skills proficiency starting at the p…
S25
Collaborative AI Network – Strengthening Skills Research and Innovation — This comment provides a systematic framework for thinking about data preparation for AI, moving beyond generic discussio…
S26
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges — The technical requirements for trustworthy AI emerged through multiple perspectives. Valerian Ghez from photonic quantum…
S27
Safe and Responsible AI at Scale Practical Pathways — Data must be interoperable, contextual, and verifiable/governable to solve key problems
S28
Is AI the key to nuclear renaissance? — There is a direct correlation between the exponential increase in model parameters and the increase in the computational…
S29
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — Dr. Saurabh Garg (referencing Vishal Sikka) This comment introduced a completely different perspective on the compute s…
S30
Projecting Digital economy rules on Global South’s AI regulations: what is needed to safeguard human rights? ( Data Privacy Brasil Research Association) — In addition to supporting member states, UNCTAD also aims to bridge gaps in international cooperation. Many challenges f…
S31
WS #82 A Global South perspective on AI governance — Lack of infrastructure and skills in developing countries
S32
WS #100 Integrating the Global South in Global AI Governance — – Lack of computing power and infrastructure in developing countries A fundamental issue underlying many challenges is …
S33
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — So the goal of Genesis Project is to really, one, align public and private partnership, two, invest government resources…
S34
Beijing seeks to curb excess AI investment while sustaining growth — China has pledged to rein inexcessive competition in AI, signalling Beijing’s desire to avoid wasteful investment while …
S35
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw — Detailed implementation strategies for building the proposed triple helix collaboration between government, academia, an…
S36
Business Engagement Session — Addressing Global Challenges and Inclusivity Addressing inclusivity and accessibility in technological solutions Garza…
S37
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — Skills development must be comprehensive, covering all sectors and skill levels rather than focusing only on technical s…
S38
Comprehensive Discussion Report: Governance Frameworks for Reducing Digital Divides in African and Francophone Contexts — Development | Legal and regulatory | Economic Implementation and Practical Approaches N’diaye emphasizes that public p…
S39
Facilitating an integrated approach to digital issues — Speed: In a world where communications have become instant, implementation of solutions must be made in phases, so that …
S40
Overcoming the fragmentation of the digital governance: what role for the Global Digital Compact and e-trade rules? (South Centre) — Fragmentation at a local level is seen as beneficial as it allows countries to have their own policy space and introduce…
S41
High-Level sessions: Setting the Scene – Global Supply Chain Challenges and Solutions — Collaboration emerged as a persistent theme with a unanimous agreement on the necessity of cross-sector and regional par…
S42
AI for Democracy_ Reimagining Governance in the Age of Intelligence — “Because what we essentially need is four types of governance.”[22]. “We need a technological governance because whose v…
S43
Comprehensive Discussion Report: AI’s Transformative Potential for Global Economic Growth — Let’s move this beyond the developed economies. Helping understand how AI is it a broadened the world and help the world…
S44
AI Development Beyond Scaling: Panel Discussion Report — Choi advocates for AI democratization where AI reflects human knowledge and values, serves all humans rather than just t…
S45
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — Dr. Saurabh Garg outlined India’s approach through the proposed “Maitri” platform, a collaborative framework designed to…
S46
International multistakeholder cooperation for AI standards | IGF 2023 WS #465 — Florian Ostmann:Thank you, Matilda. So with that set out in terms of what kinds of standards we are focused on and why w…
S47
The impact of AI on jobs and workforce — The ILO’s webinar was triggered by the recent impact of ChatGPT on our society and jobs. OpenAI’s ChatGPT, in particular…
S48
TechUK urges UK government to prioritise digital adoption among SMEs to boost economy — TechUKcallson the government to address the critical issue of digital adoption among SMEs, which has been identified as …
S49
AI adoption reshapes UK scale-up hiring policy framework — AI adoption is prompting UK scale-ups torecalibrateworkforce policies. Survey data indicates that 33% of founders antici…
S50
From KW to GW Scaling the Infrastructure of the Global AI Economy — NVIDIA’s contribution to India’s AI ecosystem includes sharing reference designs for AI factories, open-sourcing control…
S51
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges — Unexpectedly, these speakers represent different philosophies toward AI development. Sheth emphasizes building indigenou…
S52
WS #145 Revitalizing Trust: Harnessing AI for Responsible Governance — The level of consensus among the speakers was relatively high, particularly on the benefits and potential applications o…
S53
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Ebba Busch Deputy Prime Minister Sweden — 2.Infrastructure capacity- having sovereign compute for advanced models If AI is to become electable in our democracies…
S54
Huawei’s dominance in AI sparks national security debate in Indonesia — Indonesia is urgently working tosecure strategic autonomy in AIas Huawei rapidly expands its presence in the country’s c…
S55
UN warns AI poses risks without proper climate oversight — AI can help tackle the climate crisis, butgovernments must regulate itto ensure positive outcomes, says UN climate chief…
S56
New AI strategy aims to attract global capital to Indonesia — Indonesia is moving tocement its position in the global AI and semiconductor landscapeby releasing its first comprehensi…
S57
Climate change and Technology implementation | IGF 2023 WS #570 — Artificial intelligence and improved sensors can provide real-time environmental data, shaping climate research and poli…
S58
AI climate benefits overstated says new civil society report — Environmental groups, including Beyond Fossil Fuels and Stand.earth,have publisheda report challenging claims that AI wi…
S59
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — ## Introduction and Context Setting ## Sectoral Applications: Healthcare Insights Alex Moltzau: I think I just also wa…
S60
Democratizing AI Building Trustworthy Systems for Everyone — Private sector investment is necessary due to the scale of infrastructure needs that cannot be met by governments alone
S61
WS #214 AI Readiness in Africa in a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape — Economic | Infrastructure | Development Need for blended financing approaches combining government, private sector, and…
S62
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — But you must be aware that, you know, this game is actually, I mean, if you see my context, I mean, I have four diamonds…
S63
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — Dr. Saurabh Garg opened the discussion by outlining four essential elements for AI-ready data infrastructure. First, dis…
S64
Collaborative AI Network – Strengthening Skills Research and Innovation — This comment provides a systematic framework for thinking about data preparation for AI, moving beyond generic discussio…
S65
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges — The technical requirements for trustworthy AI emerged through multiple perspectives. Valerian Ghez from photonic quantum…
S66
Safe and Responsible AI at Scale Practical Pathways — Data must be interoperable, contextual, and verifiable/governable to solve key problems
S67
Is AI the key to nuclear renaissance? — Training large AI models, particularly deep learning, requires vast amounts of computational power. These powerful model…
S68
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — Dr. Saurabh Garg (referencing Vishal Sikka) This comment introduced a completely different perspective on the compute s…
S69
HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTE FOR DEMOCRATIZING ACCESS TO AI — Power consumption will reach 63 gigawatts in coming years, presenting major infrastructure challenges
S70
WS #82 A Global South perspective on AI governance — Lack of infrastructure and skills in developing countries
S71
Ensuring Safe AI_ Monitoring Agents to Bridge the Global Assurance Gap — Global South Challenges: multilingualism, infrastructure, and capacity
S72
Open Forum #17 AI Regulation Insights From Parliaments — Countries in the Global South face multiple challenges including lack of computational power, data access gaps, and insu…
S73
Uzbekistan positions itself as Central Asia’s new AI and technology hub — Using its largest-ever ICT Week, Uzbekistanis showcasingambitions to become a regional centre for AI and digital transfo…
S74
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — So the goal of Genesis Project is to really, one, align public and private partnership, two, invest government resources…
S75
New digital strategy positions Uzbekistan as emerging AI hub — Uzbekistanhas outlinedan extensive plan to accelerate digital development by introducing new measures at major AI forums…
S76
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw — Transformation requires a triple helix of government, academia, and industry working together with specific roles for ea…
S77
AI-Powered Chips and Skills Shaping Indias Next-Gen Workforce — The discussion reveals strong consensus on key strategic directions: comprehensive ecosystem development beyond chip man…
S78
Leading in the Digital Era: How can the Public Sector prepare for the AI age? — Shri Sushil Pal:Thank you, Professor Jalasi, and thank you, UNESCO, for inviting me here. I must commend UNESCO on the r…
S79
Keynotes — O’Flaherty emphasizes that technology development carries real risks and threats to democratic institutions and individu…
S80
WS #125 Balancing Acts: Encryption, Privacy, and Public Safety — Boris Radanovic argues for rejecting the framework of conversation that pits privacy against security. He emphasizes the…
S81
Enhancing Digital Resilience: Cybersecurity, Data Protection, and Online Safety — The discussion delved into the crucial role of the private sector in data protection. Ayodeji Rex Abitogun, an IT consul…
S82
Expert workshop on the right to privacy in the digital age — Mr Alessandro Mantelero, associate professor of Law,Polytechnic University of Turin, Italy,told the audience not to forg…
S83
Smaller Footprint Bigger Impact Building Sustainable AI for the Future — Second, resource -efficient AI is not a trade -off. It is a path to inclusion and access. Thirdly, delivering impact at …
S84
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/leaders-plenary-global-vision-for-ai-impact-and-governance-morning-session-part-2 — Thank you. Thank you so much. Excellency, ladies and gentlemen, I guess I should say good evening. We all recognize arti…
S85
Internet standards and human rights | IGF 2023 WS #460 — On a positive note, advocating for a multi-stakeholder approach has the potential to improve dialogue between standard-s…
S86
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Ensuring Better Representation of Developing and Least-Developed Countries in Global Digital GovernanceThe question of h…
S87
High-level ministerial roundtable on digital trade: Do regional trade agreements indicate the way forward for the multilateral trading system? — It is crucial for nations to find common ground and establish partnerships that promote collaborative efforts and mitiga…
S88
Bridging the Digital Divide: Advancing Inclusion in Africa with Affordable Devices (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) — The analysis concludes on an optimistic note, highlighting the panel’s discussions and their shared belief in the future…
S89
Leaders TalkX: ICT Applications Unlocking the Full Potential of Digital – Part II — Professor Sandra Maximiano from Portugal discussed the role of telecommunications in promoting e-employment and remote w…
S90
Accelerating Structural Transformation and Industrialization in Developing Countries: Navigating the Future with Advanced ICTs and Industry 4.0 — However, Mbang stressed a crucial prerequisite: “The most crucial prerequisite is the capacity to truly master the techn…
S91
Better understanding e-commerce marketplaces: the Africa, Asia and Latin America Marketplace Explorers (ITC) — Furthermore, Latin American firms selling on marketplaces face complexities and high compliance costs. Compared to compa…
S92
AI is here. Are countries ready, or not? | IGF 2023 Open Forum #131 — It champions working with indigenous communities, who represent different worldviews, to ensure that every individual ha…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
D
Dr. Saurabh Garg
1 argument143 words per minute569 words238 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑Ready Data Foundations
EXPLANATION
Dr. Garg outlines four pillars needed to make data AI‑ready: discoverability, trustworthiness, interoperability and usability. He stresses that each pillar relies on concrete technical measures such as metadata standards, quality assessment frameworks, unique identifiers and common classifications.
EVIDENCE
He explains that discoverability requires a well-defined metadata structure; trustworthiness is ensured through a quality-assessment framework he helped develop; interoperability depends on unique identifiers that allow datasets to recognise each other; and usability across systems is achieved by adopting common definitions and standards, all of which are being piloted with ministries and state governments across the country [7].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S10 and S12 document Dr. Garg’s work on democratizing compute and building trustworthy AI systems, which underpins the four pillars of discoverability, trustworthiness, interoperability and usability. Open‑standard discussions in S15 also reinforce the interoperability pillar.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data discoverability, quality, standards and interoperability
AGREED WITH
Johanna Hill
A
Arndt Husar
1 argument130 words per minute1910 words875 seconds
Argument 1
Digital Infrastructure Spectrum (Solutions, Standards, Skills)
EXPLANATION
Arndt frames digital infrastructure as a broader concept that goes beyond data centres and compute hardware. He includes the three “S” – solutions, standards and skills – as essential components of a holistic infrastructure ecosystem.
EVIDENCE
He states that when people think of digital infrastructure they first imagine data centres and compute, but the discussion should also cover the solution side, the skill side and standards, referring to the three S introduced by the ITU head [23-26].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Both S4 and S2 explicitly cite the ITU’s three S framework (solutions, standards, skills) and stress that digital infrastructure extends beyond data centres and compute hardware.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Broad definition of digital infrastructure
AGREED WITH
Johanna Hill, Mio Oka
J
Johanna Hill
2 arguments161 words per minute861 words319 seconds
Argument 1
AI as a Trade Growth Driver and Need for Responsible Policy
EXPLANATION
Johanna argues that AI can boost global trade by up to 40 % by 2040, but realising this potential hinges on solid digital infrastructure, skilled workforces and trustworthy policy frameworks. She also highlights that responsible, trustworthy AI is essential for competitiveness.
EVIDENCE
She cites WTO projections that AI-enabled trade could grow by almost 40 % by 2040 (the “40-by-40” effect) and notes that this growth depends on digital infrastructure, skills and policy readiness; she references a survey with the ICC showing many SMEs already using AI and seeing opportunities in market intelligence, while also pointing out concerns about fragmented regulations and high compliance costs [39-44][45-48].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S3 records Johanna Hill’s WTO remarks on AI‑enabled trade growth of up to 40 % by 2040 and the necessity of trustworthy policy frameworks to realise that potential.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven trade expansion and regulatory trust
AGREED WITH
Dr. Saurabh Garg
Argument 2
Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness
EXPLANATION
Johanna stresses the importance of regional bodies and shared standards to reduce fragmentation and enable cross‑border AI trade. She points to the WTO’s AI Trade Policy Openness Index as a tool for measuring openness and notes successful regional initiatives in Africa, Latin America and ASEAN.
EVIDENCE
She describes the AI Trade Policy Openness Index published in the World Trade Report, which helps regions gauge their policy openness, and cites examples of regional work such as the ACFDA digital protocol that has helped set standards in African countries, as well as ASEAN’s AI policy work, illustrating how regional cooperation can create economies of scale and address regulatory diversity [158-166].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S13 and S15 discuss regional digital‑infrastructure policies and the role of open standards in enabling cross‑border AI trade, echoing Hill’s call for regional standards and the AI Trade Policy Openness Index.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Regional standards and policy measurement for AI trade
AGREED WITH
Mio Oka, Arndt Husar
Z
Zuhriddin Shadmanov
3 arguments118 words per minute902 words457 seconds
Argument 1
Compute and Skills Gaps in Developing Nations (Uzbekistan)
EXPLANATION
Zuhriddin highlights that Uzbekistan faces unequal access to compute resources and a shortage of advanced AI skills, which risks turning the country into a mere consumer of AI rather than a creator. He calls for a human‑centred AI strategy to address these gaps.
EVIDENCE
He states that the first major gap is unequal access to compute capacities and advanced AI digital skills, and argues that without bridging these gaps Uzbekistan would remain a consumer of AI value rather than a creator [56-58].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S21 outlines Uzbekistan’s AI strategy, highlighting unequal access to compute resources and a shortage of advanced AI skills, directly matching Shadmanov’s concerns. S18 also notes a broader skills gap in developing countries.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Unequal compute access and talent shortage
AGREED WITH
Arndt Husar, Johanna Hill, Hamam Riza, Mio Oka
DISAGREED WITH
Hamam Riza
Argument 2
Financing Priorities and Balancing Public Resources (Uzbekistan)
EXPLANATION
Zuhriddin explains how the Uzbek government is allocating substantial public funds to AI projects, prioritising human‑centred AI, data‑center infrastructure and training programmes, while also offering tax incentives to attract foreign investment.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the government has earmarked about US$300 million for AI projects across sectors such as health, education and cybersecurity, is building data centres and GPUs, creating a data lake for public use, and has introduced tax incentives for investors in large-scale data-centre projects, all aimed at balancing resources across priorities [124-132].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S21 details Uzbekistan’s allocation of roughly US$300 million to AI projects, data‑centre construction and tax incentives, confirming the financing priorities described. S19 adds context on mixed public‑private financing sources for AI strategies.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Public funding allocation and incentives
AGREED WITH
Mio Oka, Arndt Husar
DISAGREED WITH
Mio Oka
Argument 3
Private Capital Mobilization for AI Ecosystem (Uzbekistan)
EXPLANATION
Zuhriddin outlines Uzbekistan’s strategy to attract private capital, targeting US$1 billion in investments, partnering with Huawei for infrastructure, and establishing venture‑fund‑of‑funds and a US$50 million pool for AI startups.
EVIDENCE
He reports a plan to attract around US$1 billion for AI-related digital infrastructure, collaboration with Huawei on data-centres and 5.5G/6G networks, and the creation of a venture-fund-of-funds that has already allocated US$50 million to AI startups, demonstrating a mix of public and private financing [221-226].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S21 reports Uzbekistan’s target of attracting US$1 billion of private AI investment, partnership with Huawei, and the creation of a venture‑fund‑of‑funds with US$50 million for startups, aligning with the argument.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Attracting private investment and partnerships
AGREED WITH
Mio Oka, Arndt Husar
H
Hamam Riza
2 arguments92 words per minute1186 words771 seconds
Argument 1
Indonesia’s AI Roadmap: Tackling the “Triple Deficit”
EXPLANATION
Hamam describes Indonesia’s “triple deficit” of data, compute and talent, and presents the national AI roadmap that aims to close these gaps through massive talent targets, sovereign AI model development and a digital academy for up‑skilling.
EVIDENCE
He identifies the triple deficit-shortages in data, compute infrastructure and AI talent-as the main barrier, notes a target of 12 million AI-skilled workers by 2030 (currently 3-5 million short), and explains the creation of a digital academy (Korika Academy) with LMS and chatbot support, as well as efforts to develop sovereign AI models aligned with local culture [95-98][99-100].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S22 identifies Indonesia’s triple deficit of data, compute and talent and describes the national AI roadmap, digital academy and sovereign model initiatives that Riza references.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Addressing data, compute and talent shortages
DISAGREED WITH
Zuhriddin Shadmanov
Argument 2
Skills and Ecosystem Development (Indonesia)
EXPLANATION
He details a “penta‑helix” ecosystem that brings together government, industry, academia, civil society and media, focusing on talent development, infrastructure and use‑case articulation, including climate‑health nexus projects.
EVIDENCE
He explains the penta-helix platform, the ambition to train 12 million talent, the establishment of the Korika digital academy with LMS and a chatbot, and the Climate Smart Indonesia initiative that partners with universities and NASA to address climate-sensitive diseases [200-210].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S22 further outlines Indonesia’s penta‑helix ecosystem, the Korika digital academy and climate‑smart AI projects, providing concrete context for Riza’s ecosystem description.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Multi‑stakeholder AI ecosystem and talent pipeline
AGREED WITH
Arndt Husar, Johanna Hill, Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Mio Oka
M
Mio Oka
2 arguments143 words per minute664 words278 seconds
Argument 1
ADB’s Focus on Foundational Services and Sectoral AI Applications
EXPLANATION
Mio outlines ADB’s view that stable power, reliable broadband and device access are foundational, but the immediate priority is applying AI to sectoral services such as agriculture, water supply and irrigation to generate impact at scale.
EVIDENCE
She states that a stable power supply, devices and reliable broadband are basic foundations, then emphasizes that ADB focuses on AI applications in agriculture, water and irrigation, supporting these sectors while also building foundational infrastructure [105-114].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S4 includes ADB’s emphasis on stable power, reliable broadband and device access as foundational, and notes its focus on sectoral AI applications in agriculture, water and irrigation.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Foundational infrastructure and sector‑specific AI deployment
AGREED WITH
Arndt Husar, Johanna Hill, Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Hamam Riza
DISAGREED WITH
Zuhriddin Shadmanov
Argument 2
Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness (ADB perspective)
EXPLANATION
Mio describes ADB’s role as a catalyst for regional integration, helping both large economies like India and smaller countries by facilitating capacity building, private‑capital mobilisation and ensuring no country is left behind.
EVIDENCE
She notes that ADB supports India’s AI skill programme (over US$5 billion), stresses the need to avoid leaving any country behind, and shares experiences of trying to introduce AI-based solutions in a small neighbouring country where concerns about job loss highlighted the importance of ecosystem-wide approaches [255-267].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S13 and S15 discuss the importance of open standards and regional policy coordination for AI, while S4 references ADB’s role in catalysing inclusive regional AI cooperation.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
ADB as catalyst for inclusive regional AI cooperation
AGREED WITH
Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Arndt Husar
DISAGREED WITH
Zuhriddin Shadmanov
Agreements
Agreement Points
Digital infrastructure must go beyond hardware and include solutions, standards and skills
Speakers: Arndt Husar, Dr. Saurabh Garg, Johanna Hill, Mio Oka
Digital Infrastructure Spectrum (Solutions, Standards, Skills) AI‑Ready Data Foundations Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness
All speakers stress that digital infrastructure is not limited to data centres and compute; it requires well-defined standards, solution-oriented approaches and skilled human capacity, and regional coordination to make it effective [23-26][7][158-166][255-267].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy discussions emphasize that digital infrastructure should integrate standards, solutions and capacity building, not just physical assets, as highlighted in the Business Engagement Session on inclusivity and the need to close the digital divide [S36] and the call for comprehensive skills development across sectors [S37].
Developing AI talent and upskilling is essential for AI adoption
Speakers: Arndt Husar, Johanna Hill, Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Hamam Riza, Mio Oka
Digital Infrastructure Spectrum (Solutions, Standards, Skills) AI as a Trade Growth Driver and Need for Responsible Policy Compute and Skills Gaps in Developing Nations (Uzbekistan) Skills and Ecosystem Development (Indonesia) ADB’s Focus on Foundational Services and Sectoral AI Applications
Each speaker highlights the need to build digital skills, from basic AI literacy to advanced talent pipelines, as a prerequisite for leveraging AI in trade, public services and economic growth [23-26][39-44][56-58][95-98][255-267].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple forums stress the importance of AI talent pipelines and continuous upskilling to enable adoption, noting that workforce development must span technical and non-technical roles [S37] and that AI’s impact on jobs requires proactive reskilling strategies [S47].
Financing AI infrastructure requires a mix of public funds, private investment and incentives
Speakers: Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Mio Oka, Arndt Husar
Financing Priorities and Balancing Public Resources (Uzbekistan) Private Capital Mobilization for AI Ecosystem (Uzbekistan) Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness (ADB perspective)
Speakers agree that building AI ecosystems needs substantial public allocation, tax incentives and venture-fund-of-funds, complemented by private capital and international partners to achieve scale [124-132][221-226][189-194].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Evidence from high-level sessions shows consensus on blended financing models that combine government seed funding, private capital and international support to build AI ecosystems [S41], while India’s “Maitri” platform exemplifies a public-private collaborative financing approach for compute and data as digital public goods [S45]; similar blended-financing recommendations appear in regional AI policy roadmaps [S61].
AI can drive trade and economic growth but only if supported by trustworthy data and responsible policy frameworks
Speakers: Johanna Hill, Dr. Saurabh Garg
AI as a Trade Growth Driver and Need for Responsible Policy AI‑Ready Data Foundations
Both speakers link AI’s potential to boost trade (up to 40 % by 2040) with the necessity of data discoverability, quality assessment and interoperable standards to ensure trust and regulatory confidence [39-44][5-6][7].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for trustworthy data and responsible AI governance is reflected in multi-stakeholder governance frameworks that define technological, institutional and civic layers of oversight [S42] and in UN statements warning that AI benefits for climate and trade depend on robust regulatory safeguards [S55]; broader analyses also link AI’s growth potential to inclusive, evidence-based policy design [S59].
Regional cooperation and shared standards are key to overcoming fragmentation and achieving economies of scale
Speakers: Johanna Hill, Mio Oka, Arndt Husar
Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness Digital Infrastructure Spectrum (Solutions, Standards, Skills)
All three emphasize that regional bodies, joint standards and cross-border collaboration can reduce regulatory fragmentation and enable smaller economies to benefit from AI investments [158-166][255-267][145-150].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Fragmentation concerns are addressed in discussions on the Global Digital Compact and e-trade rules, which call for coordinated regional standards to unlock scale economies [S40]; multistakeholder initiatives on AI standards further underline the importance of shared normative frameworks [S46], while cross-sector partnerships are repeatedly cited as essential for overcoming digital silos [S41].
Similar Viewpoints
Both identify a three‑fold gap—lack of compute resources, quality data and skilled talent—as the main barrier to AI development in their countries and propose national roadmaps to address them [56-58][95-98].
Speakers: Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Hamam Riza
Compute and Skills Gaps in Developing Nations (Uzbekistan) Indonesia’s AI Roadmap: Tackling the “Triple Deficit”
Both stress the importance of open, trustworthy, and interoperable data as a foundation for AI, and link this to broader ecosystem and talent development efforts [7][200-204].
Speakers: Dr. Saurabh Garg, Hamam Riza
AI‑Ready Data Foundations Skills and Ecosystem Development (Indonesia)
Unexpected Consensus
Democratization of AI beyond large economies
Speakers: Dr. Saurabh Garg, Hamam Riza
AI‑Ready Data Foundations Skills and Ecosystem Development (Indonesia)
While Dr. Garg raises concerns about the heavy compute and power demands of current models and the need for federated, low-power approaches [12-15], Hamam explicitly mentions the goal of “democratizing AI for all” and building inclusive ecosystems [138-139]; both converge on the idea that AI must be made accessible to a broader set of actors, a point not explicitly raised by other participants.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Calls for AI democratization stress open-source models and shared resources to ensure AI benefits reach all countries, not just major economies, as argued in panel discussions on AI beyond scaling [S44] and reports on AI’s transformative potential for global growth beyond developed nations [S43]; initiatives like India’s public-good compute platform further illustrate democratizing approaches [S45].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong convergence on four core themes: (1) digital infrastructure must be holistic, integrating standards, solutions and skills; (2) capacity development and talent pipelines are critical; (3) financing models need blended public‑private approaches with incentives; (4) AI’s economic potential hinges on trustworthy data, responsible policy and regional cooperation to reduce fragmentation.

High consensus across speakers and regions, indicating a shared understanding that AI deployment in the Global South requires coordinated infrastructure, skill building, financing and governance frameworks. This consensus suggests that future policy initiatives can build on these common pillars to design inclusive, scalable AI strategies.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Approach to AI infrastructure development – reliance on foreign hyperscalers versus building sovereign, locally‑controlled AI models and ecosystems
Speakers: Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Hamam Riza
Compute and Skills Gaps in Developing Nations (Uzbekistan) Indonesia’s AI Roadmap: Tackling the “Triple Deficit”
Uzbekistan plans to partner with Huawei and attract foreign investment to build data-centres, 5.5G/6G networks and a venture-fund-of-funds for AI startups, emphasizing external hardware and capital ([221-226]). Indonesia, by contrast, stresses the need to develop sovereign AI models that reflect local culture and to reduce dependence on external hyperscalers, focusing on a home-grown talent pipeline and domestic AI ecosystems ([132-134]).
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Debates on sovereignty versus dependence on foreign hyperscalers are evident in case studies of NVIDIA’s partnership model for local inferencing [S50], contrasting philosophies between indigenous model development and open-source collaboration in France-India dialogues [S51], and concerns over strategic autonomy highlighted by Indonesia’s response to Huawei’s expanding role [S54]; broader geopolitical analyses also flag the strategic implications of foreign AI infrastructure reliance [S62].
Public‑funded versus private‑capital‑driven financing of AI ecosystems
Speakers: Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Mio Oka
Financing Priorities and Balancing Public Resources (Uzbekistan) ADB’s Focus on Foundational Services and Sectoral AI Applications Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness (ADB perspective)
Uzbekistan allocates roughly US$300 million of public money to AI projects, creates tax incentives and a fund-of-funds to attract private investors, and stresses a balanced public-private mix ([124-132]). ADB stresses that the basic foundations are stable power, devices and broadband, and that the bank’s role is to catalyse private-capital mobilisation for sector-specific AI deployments, while warning against leaving any country behind ([105-114][255-267]). The two positions differ on the relative weight of state spending versus market-driven investment.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy literature presents divergent views on financing models: India’s “Maitri” platform showcases a public-driven collaborative funding structure for compute and data [S45], while other analyses argue that the scale of AI infrastructure necessitates substantial private sector investment to complement public seed funding [S60]; blended-financing recommendations further bridge the two approaches [S61].
Perceived level of AI adoption among SMEs
Speakers: Arndt Husar, Johanna Hill
SME adoption gap (implied in Arndt’s remarks) AI as a Trade Growth Driver and Need for Responsible Policy (WTO)
Arndt notes a huge adoption gap for SMEs, saying the technology has moved so fast that many small firms cannot yet integrate AI into their business models ([49-51]). Johanna, however, cites a WTO-commissioned survey showing that many SMEs are already using AI for market intelligence and view it as a game-changer ([45-48]). The speakers therefore disagree on how far AI penetration has progressed in the SME sector.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Surveys from the UK indicate that a significant share of SMEs still lack basic digital tools, highlighting a gap between perceived and actual AI adoption [S48]; related research on scale-up hiring shows cautious AI integration among smaller firms, underscoring the perception challenge [S49].
Credibility of reported climate‑health AI initiatives
Speakers: Arndt Husar, Hamam Riza
Skills and Ecosystem Development (Indonesia) – climate‑health nexus Arndt’s skeptical interjection
Hamam describes Indonesia’s Climate Smart initiatives, linking AI to malaria and dengue prediction and collaborating with NASA and universities ([208-212]). Arndt responds with a skeptical remark, “I’m not buying any of them,” indicating doubt about the feasibility or impact of those claims ([213-214]).
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
UN climate officials warn that AI applications without proper oversight risk overstated benefits, raising questions about the credibility of climate-health AI claims [S55]; civil-society reports further argue that AI’s touted climate impact is often exaggerated and lacks rigorous validation [S58]; broader discussions on climate-tech implementation note the need for robust verification mechanisms [S57].
Unexpected Differences
Skepticism about Indonesia’s climate‑health AI projects
Speakers: Arndt Husar, Hamam Riza
Skills and Ecosystem Development (Indonesia) – climate‑health nexus Arndt’s skeptical interjection
Arndt’s blunt comment “I’m not buying any of them” ([213-214]) was not anticipated given the generally collaborative tone of the panel, and directly challenges the credibility of Hamam’s described climate-health AI initiatives ([208-212]).
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Indonesia’s rapid AI expansion, especially involving foreign vendors like Huawei, has sparked national-security debates and skepticism regarding the authenticity and effectiveness of its climate-health AI initiatives [S54]; the country’s new AI strategy aims to attract global capital while confronting credibility concerns about project outcomes [S56]; similar credibility issues are highlighted in broader climate-tech assessments [S57].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows broad consensus that AI can drive development, but key disagreements surface around (i) whether AI infrastructure should be built through foreign partnerships or sovereign, locally‑controlled models; (ii) the balance between state‑led public financing and market‑driven private capital; (iii) the actual level of AI uptake among SMEs; and (iv) the plausibility of ambitious climate‑health AI programmes. These divergences reflect differing national contexts and strategic priorities.

Moderate – while there is shared recognition of AI’s importance, the varied viewpoints on financing, priority setting, and implementation pathways could lead to fragmented policies unless coordinated mechanisms are established. The disagreements highlight the need for flexible, context‑sensitive frameworks that align infrastructure, talent development, and regulatory standards across the Global South.

Partial Agreements
All three agree that a robust AI ecosystem is essential for development, but they differ on what should be prioritised first: Uzbekistan stresses immediate compute capacity and foreign‑partnered data‑centres ([56-58]), Indonesia stresses closing the talent and data deficits and building sovereign models ([95-98]), while ADB stresses stable power, broadband and sector‑specific AI services as the foundation before scaling up ([105-114]).
Speakers: Zuhriddin Shadmanov, Hamam Riza, Mio Oka
Compute and Skills Gaps in Developing Nations (Uzbekistan) Indonesia’s AI Roadmap: Tackling the “Triple Deficit” ADB’s Focus on Foundational Services and Sectoral AI Applications
All concur that regional cooperation is vital for AI‑driven growth, yet they propose different levers: WTO highlights standards, policy openness indices and regulatory harmonisation ([158-166]), ADB stresses a catalytic role that mobilises private capital and capacity‑building while avoiding exclusion ([255-267]), and Arndt frames the discussion around the three‑S framework (solutions, standards, skills) as a holistic infrastructure approach ([23-26]).
Speakers: Johanna Hill, Mio Oka, Arndt Husar
Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness (WTO) Regional Cooperation, Standards, and Trade Policy Openness (ADB perspective) Digital Infrastructure Spectrum (Solutions, Standards, Skills)
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI‑ready data requires four pillars: discoverability (metadata), trustworthiness (quality assessment), interoperability (unique identifiers), and usability (common standards). Digital infrastructure is broader than compute; it includes solutions, standards, and skills (the “three S” framework). AI is projected to boost global trade by up to 40% by 2040, but this depends on reliable digital infrastructure, skilled workforce, and responsible trade policies. Developing nations face a triple deficit: insufficient data, compute capacity, and AI talent, exemplified by Uzbekistan and Indonesia. Uzbekistan is pursuing a human‑centred AI strategy with $300 M public funding for AI projects, $200 M for data‑center infrastructure, tax incentives, and a goal to attract $1 B private investment. Indonesia’s AI Roadmap targets 12 million AI‑skilled workers by 2030, addresses data/compute/talent gaps, promotes sovereign AI models, and establishes a digital academy (Korika) with AI‑enabled training tools. ADB emphasizes foundational services (stable power, broadband, devices) and sector‑specific AI applications (agriculture, water, irrigation) while supporting infrastructure financing and capacity building. Regional cooperation, shared standards, and policy tools such as the WTO’s AI Trade Policy Openness Index are seen as essential to reduce fragmentation and enable cross‑border AI collaboration. Public‑private partnership models (tax incentives, venture‑fund‑of‑funds, special economic zones) are highlighted as mechanisms to mobilize capital for AI ecosystems.
Resolutions and action items
Uzbekistan will allocate US$300 M for AI projects and US$200 M for data‑center/GPU infrastructure, and pursue US$1 B of private investment through incentives and venture‑fund‑of‑funds. Uzbekistan will continue building a national AI data lake and provide open or low‑cost access to SMEs and startups. Indonesia will launch the Korika digital academy, deploy the Kodika chatbot for up‑skilling, and create special economic zones for hyperscalers and edge‑computing facilities. Indonesia will prepare a presidential regulation to promote sovereign AI model development and attract investment in localized GPU/edge infrastructure. ADB will support democratization of AI compute, fund sectoral AI pilots (agriculture, water, irrigation), and assist member countries with master‑planning and capacity‑building initiatives. WTO will continue publishing and updating the AI Trade Policy Openness Index to guide countries on responsible AI trade policies. All participants agreed to pursue multi‑pronged public‑private financing strategies and to engage regional bodies (ASEAN, ACFDA, etc.) for standards harmonization.
Unresolved issues
How to efficiently balance and prioritize the three pillars (skills, infrastructure, policy) within limited budgets in each country. Specific mechanisms for cross‑border data sharing that respect data sovereignty while enabling AI collaboration. Ways to reduce the high energy consumption of large AI models and explore alternative, lower‑power inference architectures. How to close the adoption gap for SMEs that lack clear pathways to integrate AI into their business models. Details on how regional standards and protocols will be operationalized and enforced across diverse regulatory environments. Long‑term sustainability of private‑capital‑driven AI ecosystems without creating dependence on a few large technology providers.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a mixed financing approach: combine public funding, tax incentives, and private‑sector venture capital to spread risk and leverage expertise. Use regional cooperation to share infrastructure (e.g., joint data‑centers, cloud zones) while allowing each country to retain control over critical data through standardized interoperability frameworks. Balance AI ambition with realistic expectations: recognize AI is not a solution for every problem and prioritize use cases with high societal impact before scaling. Implement incremental standards (common metadata, unique identifiers) that can be adopted gradually, reducing fragmentation without imposing a one‑size‑fits‑all regime.
Thought Provoking Comments
When we talk in terms of AI infrastructure, we talk in terms of gigawatts of power. Compared to that, a human being requires 2,000 calories, which is only 100 watts. So are we missing something out there in the infrastructure?
This observation reframes the AI‑infrastructure debate from a purely technical issue to a sustainability and efficiency challenge, highlighting the massive energy gap between biological cognition and current AI models.
It shifted the conversation from describing data‑readiness and metadata to questioning the fundamental design of AI systems. Several panelists later referenced infrastructure efficiency (e.g., Arndt’s focus on the ‘three S’s’ and Mio’s discussion of balancing foundation vs service‑level AI), prompting a deeper look at power‑aware model design and the need for greener AI.
Speaker: Dr. Saurabh Garg
The three S’s of digital infrastructure – Solutions, Standards, and Skills – should frame our discussion.
By explicitly naming the three pillars, Arndt provided a clear analytical framework that guided the rest of the panel, ensuring that each contribution touched on a distinct but interrelated dimension.
All subsequent speakers organized their remarks around these themes (e.g., Johanna on standards and policy openness, Zuhriddin on skills and infrastructure, Hamam on a penta‑helix platform). This framing turned a potentially scattered dialogue into a structured, multi‑angle exploration.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
Our projections at the WTO Secretariat suggest that by 2040 AI‑enabled trade could grow by almost 40% – the ‘40 by 40’ effect.
The quantitative forecast gave a concrete, ambitious target that anchored the abstract benefits of AI in trade to a measurable outcome, making the stakes of the discussion tangible.
It prompted other panelists to link their national strategies to trade outcomes (e.g., Hamam’s emphasis on sovereign LLMs for local markets, Mio’s focus on service‑level AI for agriculture). The figure also sparked a brief debate about the conditions needed to achieve such growth, deepening the analysis of policy and infrastructure gaps.
Speaker: Johanna Hill
We have created a ‘penta‑helix’ platform that brings together government, industry, academia, civil society and media to build AI talent, infrastructure and use‑cases, including a digital academy (Kodika) and a climate‑health nexus.
This description introduced an innovative, multi‑stakeholder governance model that goes beyond the usual government‑industry partnership, showing how coordinated ecosystems can accelerate AI adoption while addressing societal challenges.
The comment expanded the conversation from isolated national policies to collaborative ecosystem design. It led Arndt to probe how Indonesia operationalises the platform, and inspired comparisons with Uzbekistan’s fund‑of‑funds approach and the WTO’s regional standards work.
Speaker: Prof. Hamam Riza
We need to look beyond building massive data‑centres and instead match compute to the specific problem – not every AI use‑case requires gigawatts of power.
Mio’s practical reminder about right‑sizing compute resources introduced a nuanced perspective on infrastructure investment, emphasizing efficiency and relevance over sheer scale.
This comment resonated with Dr. Garg’s earlier power‑consumption point and steered the dialogue toward smarter, demand‑driven infrastructure planning. It also reinforced the panel’s recurring theme of balancing foundational investments with service‑level applications.
Speaker: Mio Oka
When I tried to introduce an AI‑based fish‑feeding system in a small neighboring country, the government rejected it in seconds because it would reduce employment.
The anecdote highlighted the socio‑economic trade‑offs of AI deployment, reminding the group that technology adoption must be aligned with local labor concerns and political realities.
It caused a brief shift in tone, from optimistic infrastructure talk to a more grounded discussion of AI’s societal impact. Arndt used it to underscore the importance of skills development and inclusive policy, and it prompted other speakers to acknowledge the need for responsible AI that safeguards jobs.
Speaker: Mio Oka
We have launched an AI Trade Policy Openness Index to measure how open economies are to AI‑driven trade, revealing that low regulation can be both an opportunity and a competitiveness risk.
Introducing a concrete measurement tool added analytical depth, allowing participants to discuss not just qualitative gaps but also quantitative benchmarks for policy progress.
The Index became a reference point for later discussions on regional standards and interoperability. It encouraged other panelists to consider how their national strategies could be evaluated against such metrics, enriching the conversation with a data‑driven perspective.
Speaker: Johanna Hill
Overall Assessment

The discussion was shaped by a handful of pivotal remarks that moved the dialogue from abstract descriptions of AI infrastructure to concrete challenges, frameworks, and solutions. Dr. Garg’s power‑consumption analogy and Arndt’s three‑S framework set the thematic boundaries, while Johanna’s 40% trade growth forecast and the WTO’s Openness Index supplied measurable goals. Indonesia’s penta‑helix model and Uzbekistan’s mixed public‑private financing illustrated innovative governance approaches, and Mio’s anecdotes about energy‑efficient compute and employment concerns injected practical realism. Collectively, these comments redirected the conversation toward a balanced view that intertwines technical capacity, sustainability, policy openness, and socio‑economic impact, leading the panel to explore nuanced, actionable pathways for AI development in the Global South.

Follow-up Questions
Are there alternative mechanisms to reduce the massive compute and power requirements of AI models?
Seeks sustainable, energy‑efficient AI infrastructure solutions beyond current gigawatt‑scale consumption.
Speaker: Dr. Saurabh Garg
How can AI‑ready data be made discoverable, trustworthy, interoperable, and usable across systems while preserving privacy?
Identifies core challenges for data infrastructure that underpin effective AI deployment.
Speaker: Dr. Saurabh Garg
What mechanisms can ensure data sets have value beyond AI and can be leveraged for business while preserving individual privacy?
Calls for policies or technical approaches that balance data utility with privacy protection.
Speaker: Dr. Saurabh Garg
How should countries balance priority setting among AI infrastructure, skills, and policy, and how can they finance these simultaneously?
Addresses strategic allocation of scarce resources in developing economies.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
What is the role of hyperscalers in supporting sovereign AI development and localized large language models?
Explores dependence on global cloud providers versus building national AI compute capacity.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
How can trade competitiveness be enhanced through AI while respecting data sovereignty and addressing regulatory fragmentation?
Seeks policy and regulatory frameworks that enable cross‑border AI‑driven trade without compromising sovereignty.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
What does demand for AI infrastructure look like from ADB member countries, and how can it be met?
Aims to map member‑country needs to shape financing and technical assistance.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
How can private‑sector capital be mobilized effectively for AI infrastructure and startups in Uzbekistan?
Looks for financing models that combine public funds, foreign partners, and domestic venture capital.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
What specific regional cooperation areas (e.g., interoperability standards, talent mobility, shared datasets, joint research) can most improve AI development in the Global South?
Identifies leverage points for regional collaboration to overcome scale and resource constraints.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
What are the opportunities and challenges of regional cooperation integration on digital infrastructure in South Asia?
Seeks to understand how South Asian countries can jointly develop digital and AI infrastructure.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
How effective is the AI Trade Policy Openness Index in measuring openness and influencing AI‑driven trade growth in low‑income economies?
Calls for empirical research to validate the index and its policy implications.
Speaker: Johanna Hill
What is the impact of AI‑driven climate‑health nexus projects (e.g., malaria and dengue prediction) in Indonesia?
Requests evaluation of AI applications for public health and climate resilience.
Speaker: Hamam Riza
What are the socio‑economic effects of AI automation on employment in sectors such as agriculture, and how can potential job losses be mitigated?
Highlights the need to study AI’s impact on labor markets and develop inclusive policies.
Speaker: Mio Oka
What frameworks can be developed to de‑risk AI investments and catalyze private‑sector participation?
Seeks mechanisms to lower investment barriers and attract private capital to AI projects.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
How can AI compute resources be democratized across borders, as envisioned by the ADB working group on compute democratization?
Explores models for shared, cross‑national compute infrastructure to reduce duplication and cost.
Speaker: Arndt Husar
How scalable and effective are digital academies like the Korika Academy in building AI talent pipelines?
Calls for assessment of training programs, their reach, and outcomes for workforce development.
Speaker: Hamam Riza

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.