Panel Discussion: 01

19 Feb 2026 10:00h - 10:30h

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The ministerial conversation at the AI Impact Summit focused on how artificial intelligence can be harnessed to benefit the Global South and ensure that “AI for all” reaches every citizen [1][13-14]. Ministers from Togo, Indonesia and Egypt-Her Excellency Sina Lawson, His Excellency Nizar Patria and His Excellency Rafat Hindi-were introduced to discuss their countries’ digital-transformation journeys [3-5][9-11]. Patria rated the world’s AI infrastructure a 6 out of 10, noting a persistent digital gap especially for archipelagic Indonesia, which must connect 17 000 islands and currently enjoys about 80 % internet penetration [44-48][54-55]. He emphasized that “meaningful connectivity” means using telecom networks together with AI to deliver tangible benefits, and that governments must act as accelerators of this connectivity [56-59]. Lawson agreed, pointing out that Africa holds less than 1 % of global AI talent and faces infrastructure deficits, yet she rates the impact of AI projects in her country at 9 out of 10, focusing on health, education and agriculture as priority sectors [69-73][76-78]. Hindi highlighted Egypt’s AI-driven expansion of essential services, citing early-detection tools for breast cancer and diabetes and a new AI education platform that now reaches underserved schools and hospitals [87-92]. Patria shared an Indonesian example where an AI startup, supported by a government innovation hub, combines X-ray data and machine-learning to help remote doctors diagnose tuberculosis, illustrating cross-sector replication of AI solutions [97-106]. Lawson described Togo’s pandemic-era cash-transfer program that used satellite imagery and telecom metadata to prioritize beneficiaries, and how the ministry has since created a 25-person data-science team to support other government branches [111-129]. Across the three speakers, the main obstacles identified were inadequate infrastructure, limited institutional capacity and awareness, language diversity (Togo’s 42 local languages), and the need for trustworthy, transparent AI systems [144-151][155-160][169-176][222-229]. When asked how AI success should be measured over the next five years, participants argued that the key metric is the proportion of people who gain access to high-quality AI-enabled services, not the size of models or compute power [198-204][217-219]. They also stressed that success requires AI to be inclusive, trusted, and aligned with development goals such as health, education and agriculture, supported by standards for data exchange and robust R&D [231-242][245-251]. The discussion concluded that despite differing national contexts, the ministers share a common vision: collaborative policy, capacity building and responsible AI deployment are essential to ensure that AI delivers real-world impact for the Global South [185-190][245-251]. This consensus underscores the summit’s significance as a platform for collective action to make AI an inclusive driver of development worldwide [245-251].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Building “meaningful connectivity” as the foundation for AI impact – Indonesia’s Vice-Minister highlighted that 80 % internet penetration is only useful when it translates into “meaningful connectivity” that lets emerging AI services reach remote islands [44-58]. Togo’s Minister echoed this, stressing that infrastructure is the starting point but many officials still do not know AI tools exist, creating an institutional-capacity gap [144-151].


Sector-focused AI pilots that demonstrate concrete impact


* Togo used two AI algorithms (satellite-derived poverty maps and telecom-metadata clustering) to prioritize cash-transfer beneficiaries during the pandemic [111-124].


* Egypt cited AI-driven early detection of breast cancer and a new AI-powered education support tool that extends high-quality services to underserved communities [87-94].


* Indonesia described an AI-enabled TB-diagnosis app that combines X-ray data with a simple algorithm to help remote doctors, and noted similar pilots in education and agriculture [97-106].


Key barriers to scaling AI in the Global South: institutional capacity, trust, regulation and R&D – Lawson pointed out that many public-sector staff are unaware of AI possibilities and that multilingual models (Togo has 42 languages) are needed for mass adoption [144-160]. Patria added that geopolitical asymmetries, platform dominance, the need for balanced regulation, and limited R&D and talent pipelines hinder progress [169-184]. Hindi later emphasized that trust-through transparency and accountability-is essential for societal acceptance [222-229].


Redefining how AI success should be measured – Rather than counting models or compute, speakers argued that success metrics must be people-centric: percentage of population with AI-enabled services, quality of health/education outcomes, and overall accessibility by 2030 [198-206]; Patria stressed accessibility, problem-solving relevance, and trust as three pillars [222-229]; Lawson visualised a future where every Togolese can access any public service with a single phone call [231-236].


Call for collective action and shared knowledge (AI Commons) – The moderator highlighted the creation of an “AI Commons” to pool best practices and accelerate impact across nations [78-82], reinforcing the earlier statement that global cooperation is needed so “nobody is left out of the touch of artificial intelligence” [13-15].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The ministerial conversation was convened to showcase how AI can be leveraged in Global South countries, to surface common challenges (infrastructure, capacity, trust, regulation), and to agree on collaborative mechanisms-such as shared best-practice repositories and joint policy frameworks-that will ensure AI delivers inclusive, people-focused impact rather than merely technical milestones.


Overall tone and its evolution


The tone begins formally and celebratory, with ceremonial introductions and praise for the panel’s expertise. As the dialogue progresses, it becomes constructive and solution-oriented, with each minister sharing concrete pilots and candidly diagnosing systemic gaps. Toward the end, the tone shifts to a forward-looking, hopeful consensus, emphasizing shared values (inclusivity, trust) and a collective vision for measuring AI success. Throughout, the discussion remains collaborative and optimistic, despite acknowledging significant hurdles.


Speakers

Debjani Ghosh


Area of expertise: AI policy, governance, and ethical AI


Role/Title: Distinguished Fellow, NITI Aayog; Moderator of the ministerial conversation (also referred to as Ms. Devjani Khosh)


Affiliation: NITI Aayog, Government of India


Citations: [S1][S2]


Rafat Hindi


Area of expertise: Digital transformation, AI applications in public services (healthcare, education)


Role/Title: Minister of Information and Communication Technology (Minister of Communications), Arab Republic of Egypt


Affiliation: Government of Egypt


Citations: [S3][S5]


Nizar Patria


Area of expertise: Telecommunications policy, AI adoption in a large archipelagic nation


Role/Title: Vice Minister of Communications, Indonesia


Affiliation: Ministry of Communications, Indonesia


Citations: [S6][S7]


Sina Lawson


Area of expertise: Digital transformation, mobile-first government services, AI for development in the Global South


Role/Title: Her Excellency, Minister of Digital Transformation, Togo


Affiliation: Government of Togo


Citations: [S8][S9]


Speaker 1


Area of expertise: Event hosting / moderation (introductory remarks)


Role/Title: Host/Moderator of the AI Impact Summit opening session (specific title not provided)


Affiliation: Not specified


Citations: [S10][S12]


Additional speakers:


Ms. Jenny – Mentioned briefly in the transcript; no further information on role, title, or expertise is provided.


Mr. Petra – Referred to once; appears to be a mis-pronunciation of “Mr. Patria” (Nizar Patria) and does not represent a distinct participant.


Ms. Devjani Khosh – Same individual as Debjani Ghosh; already listed above.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The ministerial conversation opened with Speaker 1’s formal acknowledgement of artificial intelligence’s “transformative and disruptive” potential and a call for an “AI for all” agenda that reaches every citizen, especially in the Global South [1-8][13-15][17-18]. The panel was introduced as a “fireside conversation” featuring Her Excellency Sina Lawson, Minister of Digital Transformation for Togo; His Excellency Nizar Patria, Vice-Minister of Communications for Indonesia; and His Excellency Rafat Hindi, Minister of Communications for Egypt, with Ms Debjani Ghosh of Niti Aayog moderating [3-5][9-12][13][34-38].


Patria responded to the moderator’s question on the world’s overall AI readiness, giving it a score of six out of ten and attributing the shortfall to a persistent digital gap, especially for archipelagic nations like Indonesia [44-45]. He highlighted Indonesia’s geography of 17 000 islands and five major islands, noting that while internet penetration has reached roughly 80 % of its 250 million-strong population, the challenge now lies in converting that coverage into “meaningful connectivity” that couples telecom infrastructure with AI-driven services for real-world benefit [46-55][56-59].


Lawson concurred that infrastructure is a prerequisite but argued that the true measure of AI’s value in Africa is its application, not its existence. She pointed out that the African continent accounts for less than 1 % of global AI talent and still struggles with basic connectivity for schools and hospitals [71-74]. Nevertheless, she rated the impact of AI projects in her country at nine out of ten, citing successful pilots in health, education and agriculture that are reshaping public service delivery [67-70][76].


Hindi presented Egypt’s experience as a “government-first” model that has already expanded essential services through AI. He described AI tools for early detection of breast cancer and diabetes, and a new AI-powered education platform that now reaches high-school students and teachers nationwide, bringing advanced medical screening and learning support to previously underserved communities [87-95].


Concrete impact stories followed. Patria recounted an Indonesian AI startup, nurtured within a government-run innovation hub, that aggregates health-centre data and, together with X-ray imaging, enables remote doctors to diagnose tuberculosis more accurately [97-106]. He noted that similar AI-driven solutions are now being replicated in education and agriculture, reflecting a growing entrepreneurial enthusiasm [106-108]. Lawson then detailed Togo’s pandemic-era cash-transfer programme, which combined satellite-derived poverty maps with machine-learning analysis of telecom metadata to prioritise beneficiaries [111-124]. Debjani Ghosh then asked Minister Lawson to share the case study for inclusion in the AI Commons repository [130-132]. After the crisis, the Ministry of Public Sector Efficiency institutionalised a 25-person data-science unit to support AI adoption across other ministries [128-129].


The panel identified several barriers to scaling AI impact. Lawson stressed a lack of institutional capacity: many officials are unaware that AI tools exist, and Togo’s 42 languages and dialects necessitate multilingual AI models to foster trust and adoption [144-151][157-166]. She also highlighted the need for standards and a common data-exchange platform to enable effective collaboration with the Global North [240-242]. Lawson noted that half of Africa’s population is under 18 years old and 75 % is under 35 years old, underscoring the importance of building trusted AI for a youthful continent [250-252]. Patria added macro-level constraints such as geopolitical asymmetries and platform dominance, alongside the need to raise infrastructure standards, balance regulation and innovation, and boost R&D and talent pipelines; he emphasized that AI must be accessible, must solve real problems, and must be trustworthy [169-184][222-229]. Hindi reinforced the importance of trust, calling for transparency, accountability and safeguards against deep-fakes to ensure societal acceptance [222-229].


Finally, the moderator asked each minister to outline how AI success should be measured over the next five years. The speakers agreed that people-centred metrics must replace technical tallies. Ghosh urged a shift from counting models or compute power to assessing how many lives are changed [193-197]. Hindi proposed the percentage of the population with access to high-quality AI-enabled services as the primary KPI, arguing that this focus moves attention from technology to tangible benefits in health, education and agriculture [198-204]. Patria echoed this, adding that AI must be accessible, must solve real problems and must be trustworthy [222-229]. Lawson visualised a future where every Togolese citizen can obtain any public service with a single phone call, linking the abstract KPI to a concrete, inclusive service model [231-236].


The moderator highlighted the creation of an “AI Commons” – a shared repository of best practices and know-how – as a mechanism to accelerate impact across nations [78-82]. Throughout the dialogue, the speakers repeatedly affirmed the mantra “AI for all” and stressed that inclusive, low-cost solutions are essential for the Global South [14-18][20-21][24-28].


All speakers agreed that the AI Impact Summit can serve as a platform for sharing best practices and fostering collective action [260-263]. The discussion underscored a consensus: inclusive, trustworthy AI embedded in priority sectors (health, education, agriculture) and measured by people-centric outcomes will drive development, provided there is coordinated policy, capacity-building, multilingual model development, balanced regulation, and robust public-private partnerships, all underpinned by collective initiatives such as the AI Commons [245-251].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Speaker 1

for your inspiring reflections and also for highlighting the transformative role of artificial intelligence, as well as the disruptive role of artificial intelligence, drawing our attention to it and shaping our future. Ladies and gentlemen, I would now like to introduce the speakers for a ministerial conversation. The speakers in this fireside conversation is Her Excellency Sina Lawson, Minister of Digital Transformation, Togo. His Excellency Nizar Patria, Vice Minister of Communications, Indonesia. His Excellency Rafat Hindi, Minister of Communications, Egypt. Minister Lawson has made Togo one of Africa’s most watched digital transformation stories, building mobile first government services that reach citizens who were previously entirely excluded from the formal economy. Her work is a reminder that AI’s greatest opportunities may lie in the global south.

Her work is a reminder that AI’s greatest opportunities may lie in the global south. minister patria representing the world’s fourth most populous nation and one of southeast asia’s fastest growing digital economies his excellency is navigating the complex challenge of building ai policy for a country of 270 million people spread across 17 000 islands egypt is positioning itself as an ai hub for the arab world and africa and minister hindi is leading that change with a young population and growing digital infrastructure egypt’s ambitions are both compelling and instructive for developing nations navigating the ai transition ladies and gentlemen i would like to invite our speakers please with a big round of applause i would like to request you to please welcome the minister from togo from indonesia and also from egypt i request our honorable dignitaries to kindly take your place on this stage and this conversation is being moderated by Ms.

Debjani Ghosh distinguished fellow Niti Aayog, I request Ms. Debjani Ghosh to kindly join us AI Summit is a place where everybody looks forward to such ministerial conversations and this is one such conversation that everybody is looking forward to because when we say that this is the first ever AI Summit which is being organized in a country of global south, it makes a difference and here we have very elite panel with us. Her Excellency Sina Lawson, Minister of Digital Transformation, Togo is going to join us. His Excellency Nizar Patria, Vice Minister of Communications, Indonesia. His Excellency Rafat Hindi, Minister of Communications, Egypt. We are expecting our other guests to join us very soon as Ms. Devjani Khosh, Distinguished Fellow Niti Ayog is going to moderate this conversation.

And this will also give us an insight into the countries of Global South, how they are adopting artificial intelligence, what are the challenges before them, and how the world has to come together. This global cooperation is needed so that nobody is left out of the touch of artificial intelligence, the benefits of artificial intelligence. And that’s when Honorable Prime Minister says it’s AI for all. This is what we mean, that it should reach each and every person. Of the continent, of the world, and AI should bring a change into the people of global. South too. Only then we can say that we are going, moving ahead in the right direction. So keeping that in mind, ladies and gentlemen, this ministerial conversation is going to be of utmost importance when we talk of AI Impact Summit, because this conversation will also bring to the fore those points on the basis of which we can say that AI is making an impact into the lives of people, especially the people of Global South.

And when we talk of the challenges, the difficulties which face Indians, our countrymen, that is the time when we can say that if you are able to find low -cost AI solutions to our problems, they will also be the solutions which can be adopted very, very easily by the other countries of the Global South. So here we are bringing to you this ministerial conversation. Our guests are here. And this elite panel from these countries, from Congo, Egypt, and Indonesia, will bring before us those issues that are of utmost importance to the lives of people, especially the people those aspects on which they’ve already been. working, the challenges which they think they need cooperation from other countries as well, if they want to counter these challenges.

Because when you talk of Global South, ladies and gentlemen, unless Global South develops, unless Global South adopts artificial intelligence, it cannot bring a change in the world. And that is what this summit aims at, that we must impact the lives of common men. Nobody should be left behind. And when we say this, we say, which means it’s AI for all. Everybody should be benefited. So, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome our elite panelists here. We have Her Excellency, Sina Lawson, Minister of Digital Transformation, Togo. Please welcome her. His Excellency, Nisar Patria, Vice Minister of Communications, Communications Indonesia, and His Excellency, Raphat Hindi, Minister of Communications, Egypt. It’s over to you, Ms. Devjani Khosh. Thank you.

Debjani Ghosh

Thank you very much. much and good afternoon, everyone. And thank you to all of those who are here. So we are all finally here. And as you can see, this is truly a very power -packed panel. So since this is about the Impact Summit, the AI Impact Summit, and since we are gathered from all over the world to talk about the creation of Impact by AI, I want to first start with you, Mr. Petra. You know, when you think about the journey that we’ve had till now, the global community has had till now with AI, a lot of the focus has been on building the infrastructure. So how do you think we have really done on putting that infrastructure to work to create impact?

If you had to rate it on a scale of one to ten, what would you give the world? What score would you give the world? Thank

Nizar Patria

you, Ms. Jenny. This is really a challenging question, actually. if I had to give a number I would give 6 out of 10 yeah why 6? because well if we talk about the emerging technologies like artificial intelligence is it is the words like a buzz like a mantra right now everyone talking about AI and AI right now is here is with us and many people they don’t scrutinize anymore about the useful of AI they just use but the problem is the level of adoption of this technology, this emerging technology, especially for the global short countries like Indonesia and maybe some of African countries, Asian countries. We still have a digital gap. Yes. Especially for Indonesia, we are an archipelago country.

We are archipelagic. So we have 17 ,000 islands. We have five big islands in Indonesia. And each island has a very unique characteristic, very unique people, culture, and so on. And the telecommunication infrastructure is very, very important for our country. That unites our country with this telecommunication infrastructure. We try to improve. We try to cover all of the archipelago by our telecommunication network. And now the internet penetration into the population is already about 80%. Our population right now is 250 million people. And now what we do with these infrastructures, digital infrastructure or telecommunication infrastructure, we want meaningful connectivity. Yeah, that’s it. Meaningful connectivity. That means how we use this connectivity with the emerging technologies like artificial intelligence on top of these infrastructures to give benefit to the people.

So government try to be the accelerator to build this meaningful connectivity

Debjani Ghosh

Now, that’s very well said. So six out of 10. And the main gap or the main reason is we still have miles to go before everyone has access. And access has to be meaningful. Right? I think that’s very well said. Ms. Lawson, would you agree with that? Or would you have a different take on that?

Sina Lawson

Hello, everyone. Good afternoon. Yes, I do agree. Absolutely. I think that when we talk about AI, for us, at least Africans, it’s not about the technology. It’s about what we can do with it. And so a few comments. Number one is that in terms of AI talent, the African continent represents less than 1 % worldwide. In terms of infrastructure, we also have a lot of AI talent. We also have challenges. You know, a lot of countries don’t have connected schools or hospitals. So we’re still building our connectivity. and I would say that but if you look at few examples few achievements that we had using AI in terms of impact we can see that even today it’s equal to 9 out of 10 so every time we implement it in our way solving our problems then the number comes closer to 10 than anything I would also say that the African Union position was to use artificial intelligence in real life use cases so the impact for us and the sectors, the priority sectors are government infrastructure and the way we function it’s health, education, agriculture so I think that if we succeed to implement AI in those sectors then our continent will change forever

Debjani Ghosh

I really like that, the fact that you brought out three very important mission -critical sectors, rather than saying we need to go and do everything. But I think that priority is so important. And by the way, part of the seven working groups that was there under the AI Summit, one of the working groups, which I had the privilege of co -chairing, along with Indonesia and Netherlands, was economic impact and social development. And one of the things we decided that’s needed right now to accelerate impact is the creation of AI Commons that brings together best practices, know -how. So that was one of the key outcomes of part of the working groups that we launched. Mr.

Hendy, if I may come to you. When we talk about impact, one thing we realize is it means so many different things to so many different people. Can you give us an example of something? Something that you believe is truly… a North Star with respect to how impact has been created. A great example of how impact has been created.

Rafat Hindi

Yes, thank you. In Egypt, the most meaningful impact AI has been in expanding the access to the essential public services, such as healthcare and education, in a larger scale and at nation -wide. We are using AI tools for early detection for breast cancer and some diabetes -related conditions. And we are now launching a new AI powerful tool for education support to be used in high school with high school students and teachers across the country. For the first time, advanced medical screening and learning support become available for underserved community. We usually have able to do it in big city and in elite institution, but now we are able to do it with underserved community. Three things made this possible in Egypt.

A government -first approach that puts public interest first and sovereignty AI capability that reflects our language and our local needs. Also, the strong partnership between across the government and national AI ecosystem and the global partners. Thank you.

Debjani Ghosh

Mr. Patria, any good example that you would like to share of impact creation in Indonesia or any other country that you think has done a really good job of it?

Nizar Patria

Well, I will share one example from Indonesia, how this artificial intelligence can help. Because we are a very diverse nation and also archipelago country, so sometimes we in the public services, for instance, healthcare, we need effective and efficient technology adoptions to help these healthcare sectors. So now we try to to encourage our young generation that build a startup. And we try to facilitate them in what he calls is an AI innovation hub. And one of the product is try to help doctors in the remote area to diagnostic the tuberculosis. The tuberculosis or TBC is coming on the stage. And it becomes very difficult for the doctors in the remote area to detect because they have a very limited access on the modern equipment or sophisticated technology to detect this tuberculosis diseases.

But with the artificial intelligence, so this startup tried to gather all of the big data from the health center in the remote areas and then make a simple program and give it to the doctors. And combined with the x -ray machine, it can help doctors to identify whether this is TBC or this is just ordinary lung problems. So I see these initiatives in certain sectors already copied to other sectors for the education, for the agriculture. Many startups try to adopt this AI technology right now. And I can see and we can feel that the enthusiasm is really, really high. But the problem we need as a government, as a policymaker, we need to give the safeguard and to accelerate.

in building this healthy and fair ecosystem to boost the innovation on artificial intelligence.

Debjani Ghosh

Fantastic. Ms. Lawson, any favorite impact story that you want to share?

Sina Lawson

Yes, I have a great impact story. During the pandemic, we were able to use AI to prioritize the beneficiaries for our financial aid program. So at the height of the pandemic, we built a program to distribute cash using mobile phones, right? So the question then was, how do you prioritize beneficiaries? We started in 2020. And in 2020, we didn’t know if the pandemic was going to last for a long time. So we had one certainty, which was that we needed to be super efficient in programming. Prioritizing who needed the money the most. And so we used two AI algorithms. One… applied to satellite imagery. We drew the poverty map of Togo. And then another based on machine learning with telecom metadata, we were able to isolate the phone numbers of people who were, yeah.

So that was really our first major experience using AI. And then after the pandemic, the question for us was, we want this to be sustainable. Right? How do you, because it was during the pandemic, we had a partnership with Berkeley. So we were working, really figuring out things as they were coming. But afterwards, we wanted to build capabilities in -house. So we now have within the Ministry of Public Sector Efficiency, a team of 25 people, data scientists, and we support other branches of government. Because when we talk, you know, here we talk about AI and everybody really, knows what AI is and the type of applications that, you know, things we can do with AI. But a lot of people, they don’t know what AI is.

don’t know. So it’s very important to have a team of people who work, say, with the Ministry of Agriculture or the Ministry of Environment and producing images and really data that can help these ministries improve policies. So I think this is a great learning experience for us. It’s applying AI to improve policies.

Debjani Ghosh

It’s such a brilliant example because one, it impacts the grassroots, right? The people who need it the most. And second, it’s, you know, government has a lot of, I mean, especially in the Global South, a lot of government usages, augmentation of services. I think what you’re doing is really enabling better development of policies. And that’s that. I would, in fact, request you to please share this case study so we can put it in the AI Commons that we have built. So I would really request you to do that. The next question is also to you, Ms. Lawson, which is… As government, what do you think is the biggest roadblock to scaling impact creation where it can reach population?

Is it data? Is it infrastructure? Is it regulation? Or is it even geopolitical dynamics?

Sina Lawson

So I think it’s a combination of various things. We’re tackling all of these things. But first, it’s infrastructure, because that’s the starting point. But you also have something, when I was referring to the data lab, a lot of people don’t know this universe exists, right? That you can apply, you know, you can use AI to gather information as to when you want to design a new infrastructure, like an itinerary. For example, when we build our fiber optics network, we use satellite imagery and so on. But a lot of people just don’t know it exists. Right. So they can’t ask. They don’t know which question to ask. Right. And so. So even if we’re there, so we do a lot of outreach within government going and saying, look, this is what we were able to do using AI and so on.

So I think that what I would call institutional capacity is a roadblock because people just don’t know. So it’s a lot of training required. The other thing is, and I think it’s also one thing that we’ve been working on is right now AI is in French or English, right? It’s not in, it’s not, we have in Togo, we have 42 languages and dialects. And for AI to, if we want massive AI adoption, we need to be able to provide these models in local languages. So that’s one very important aspect of what we’ve been up to. 42 languages. Yeah. Wow. And dialects, you know, I’m sure that, yeah. Yeah. So that’s the challenge. But that’s also the opportunity because when you think about creating.

impact for AI. Think of education. Imagine, and that’s what I imagine, imagine a world where every school children has an AI tutor being able to explain to them, you know, math and science in local languages, in their own dialects. That’s for me, the power of AI, really.

Debjani Ghosh

So institutional capacity is one of the biggest roadblocks that you see. Mr. Pedra, is there anything you want to add to that in terms of the biggest roadblocks to mass scale impact creation?

Nizar Patria

Yeah, I agree with the colleagues from Togo. I think it’s the problem today for the global sub -countries like Indonesia, and I think some of African countries and other ASEAN countries. is now we are facing the geopolitical condition that you mentioned is really challenging times today because we are facing asymmetric conditions amongst global sorts and global norms. And that’s one problem because the platformization, the dominance of the platform is so important to define or to determine the progress of the fair ecosystem in one country. That’s the first thing. And the second one, I think the infrastructure is one of the critical things that we need to pay attention. We need to improve. We need to heighten the standard of services on this infrastructure.

And then regulations. I think regulation is also very important. in this sense because… Do we over -regulate? No, no, no. We don’t intend to heavily regulate these AI sectors because we try to balance protections and also innovations. That’s most important, I think. If you heavily regulate, so no innovations at all. I cannot agree more. Yeah, so we try to balance. And the most important, the last thing that is most important, I think, we need to improve our research and development and then attract the investment to support these innovations and to nurture our digital talent. That’s the most important that we have to do in the short term.

Debjani Ghosh

Extremely well said. And I think between the two of you really captured it. While infrastructure is always important and you always want to, you want more compute, you want to build it out. But if you don’t have institutional capacity, then investment in that infrastructure will not give you the returns. And regulation needs to help innovation, needs to help scale. And R &D is absolutely critical. So I think these are brilliant points. I know our time is up. So my last question, and I would request all three of you to answer. If we look at the next five years, the future, how should AI success be measured? Today, we are primarily looking at how many models we are building, how big are the models.

How should we be looking at AI success? What’s the North Star? I’ll start with you, Mr. Hendy.

Rafat Hindi

If I have to choose now, it would be this. The business. The percentage of people that have access. Wonderful. To high. Quality AI enabled services. Wonderful. Not the number of models, not the compute. The people’s benefits are the most important. They have to benefit from healthcare, from education, from agriculture and government. And the KPI matters for three reasons, actually. First, it shifts the focus from technology to people. And AI is advancing very fast. But access to it is not that fast. We need to make sure this happens. And this is what I can see for 2030, maybe for AI. Second, it exposes the global gaps, not hiding them. So gaps in the compute, gaps in infrastructure, in local language models.

So this is very important. The third one is it’s framing AI as a development tool. Not a dominant tool. where compute power is shared and public service is prioritized. I think this is what I look forward to.

Debjani Ghosh

So success is not the size of models or the size of your compute infrastructure, but how many lives we are able to change. And are we able to do that in a way that no one is left behind, right? It’s inclusive. Brilliant. Anything you all want to add? Any different thoughts, Mr. Petra and then Ms. Lawson?

Nizar Patria

Yeah, just a very short on this. I just want to add three more. But the first one I think is similar like colleagues from Egypt. In the next five years, AI should be accessible. That’s the first one. And the second one, for the global south countries, AI must solve the problem. That’s the most important. And the third one, I think AI, need to be trusted. trusted yeah need to be trusted so it need to comply with the transparency and accountability standard so no more AI deep fake can cheat people yeah so because people have good awareness on this AI product especially generative AI like AI deep fake or synthetic reality that produced by this AI machines so I think that three points we can give mark whether this AI workable in the society or it’s become a disaster to the

Debjani Ghosh

I cannot agree more with you on all three but I think the one that is most important is trust because if it’s not trustworthy it’ll never be adopted it’ll never be used so I think that is brilliant brilliant point Ms. Lawson the last words to you

Sina Lawson

I would echo what has been said and for me success would be I think If five years from now, every Togolese is one phone call away to access any public services, right? And so that’s how I’m going. Personally, I’m going to measure success with regards to AI in Togo because then it talks to the people, right? Because so far we’ve been talking about digital transformation, which was really going from paper to screen. But what is going to be a real game changer is if I can talk to the machine and the machine can reply and so on. So that’s one thing. And obviously, the comment about trust is a very important one. We are a very young continent.

Half of the African population is less than 18 years old and 75 % is less than 35. And so it’s very important for us to have a trusted AI. AI infrastructure and so on. And so there’s a lot of work that we need to do. We didn’t mention to have also standards and platform for data exchange, which is going to be extremely crucial in our relationship with the global north. So these are really important issues that we need to tackle if we want to be successful five years from now.

Debjani Ghosh

I think that’s very, very well put. And, you know, this was, ladies and gentlemen, such a powerful discussion because what’s coming out of it is how despite all the differences between countries, I think governments today are thinking very similarly about artificial intelligence. Its success, again, is not about the size of your infrastructure, but about how many lives changed. And in order to scale transformation of lives, you need to ensure your technology. It’s trustworthy. You need to ensure it’s inclusive by design. You need to invest in capacity development, innovation. And it’s fantastic to see everyone thinking along the same lines because it really. brings to forward the importance of collective action and collaboration and I think that’s what has come out of this summit.

So with that, thank you to all three of you and please give them a huge round of applause. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (20)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (4)
Confirmedhigh

“Speaker 1 called for an “AI for all” agenda that reaches every citizen, especially in the Global South.”

The panel discussion transcript includes the phrase “AI for all. Everybody should be benefited,” confirming the agenda was explicitly mentioned [S2].

!
Correctionhigh

“The panel was introduced as a “fireside conversation” featuring Her Excellency Sina Lawson, Minister of Digital Transformation for Togo; His Excellency Nizar Patria, Vice‑Minister of Communications for Indonesia; and His Excellency Rafat Hindi, Minister of Communications for Egypt, with Ms Debjani Ghosh of Niti Aayog moderating.”

The knowledge base lists Her Excellency **Cina** Lawson (spelled with a “C”) as the Togo minister and confirms Nizar Patria’s participation, but does not mention Rafat Hindi or Debjani Ghosh, indicating a discrepancy in the reported panel composition and a misspelling of Lawson’s name [S2].

Confirmedhigh

“Indonesia’s geography comprises 17 000 islands and five major islands, with internet penetration roughly 80 % of its 250 million‑strong population.”

Sources note that Indonesia is a nation of over 17 000 islands and that internet penetration exceeds 80 %, supporting the reported figures; the population figure is not addressed in the knowledge base [S90] and [S91].

Additional Contextmedium

“The African continent accounts for less than 1 % of global AI talent.”

The knowledge base cites that Africa holds less than 1 % of global computing (data-centre) capacity, not specifically AI talent, providing related but not identical context to the claim [S19] and [S95].

External Sources (102)
S1
Ethical AI_ Keeping Humanity in the Loop While Innovating — -Debjani Ghosh- Distinguished Fellow at NITI Aayog, former role with NASCOM
S2
Panel Discussion: 01 — -Debjani Ghosh- Distinguished Fellow, Niti Aayog (role: moderating the ministerial conversation)
S3
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — -Chris Baryomunsi- Role/title not specified (represents Uganda) -Josephine Teo- Role/title not specified (represents Si…
S4
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/panel-discussion-01 — I request our honorable dignitaries to kindly take your place on this stage and this conversation is being moderated by …
S5
Panel Discussion: 01 — -Raafat Hindi- Minister of Communications, Egypt
S6
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/panel-discussion-01 — And when we say this, we say, which means it’s AI for all. Everybody should be benefited. So, ladies and gentlemen, plea…
S7
Panel Discussion: 01 — – Cina Lawson- Nizar Patria – Nizar Patria- Cina Lawson- Raafat Hindi
S9
Governments, Rewired / Davos 2025 — – Cina Lawson- Maryam Al Hammadi
S10
Keynote-Martin Schroeter — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not specified, Area of expertise: Not specified (appears to be an event moderator or host introd…
S11
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning — -Speaker 1: Role/title not specified – appears to be a student or child participant in educational videos/demonstrations…
S12
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vijay Shekar Sharma Paytm — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not mentioned, Area of expertise: Not mentioned (appears to be an event host or moderator introd…
S13
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — – Speaker 1- Anurag Hoon- Radha Basu
S14
Global Digital Compact: AI solutions for a digital economy inclusive and beneficial for all — ## Challenges and Unresolved Issues ## Corporate Responsibility and Partnership Models ## Key Agreements and Consensus…
S15
A Digital Future for All (morning sessions) — Karan Bhatia: Thank you very much. Good morning, everybody. A clear vision for 2030, 17 sustainable development goals…
S16
Conversational AI in low income & resource settings | IGF 2023 — Sameer Pujari:Thank you, Rajendra. And thanks for sitting on this forum. I think it’s a very interesting discussion, esp…
S17
Internet of Things (IoT) Framework In the Arab Republic of Egypt — –  Consumer IoT Apps: Wearable devices and smart home systems through which users are enabled to monitor and manage the…
S18
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — The speakers demonstrate strong consensus on key strategic approaches: the critical importance of public-private partner…
S19
Panel Discussion Data Sovereignty India AI Impact Summit — My closing remarks. One, of course, I did speak about before in terms of how you treat this asset. You’ve got to treat i…
S20
UK AI plan calls for AI sovereignty and bottom-up developments — The UK government has launched an ambitiousAI Opportunities Action Planto accelerate the adoption of AI to drive economi…
S21
WS #214 AI Readiness in Africa in a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape — ## Education and Capacity Building ### Implementation Gap ### Infrastructure and Capacity Constraints Audience: talk …
S22
Opening — Balance needed between innovation and regulation
S23
Operationalizing data free flow with trust | IGF 2023 WS #197 — In conclusion, the success of the Internet is attributed to factors such as effective governance, open standards, and co…
S24
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Risks of Over-Emphasising Quantitative Metrics in Digital Inclusion MeasurementThe discussions across multiple IGF 2025 …
S25
Opening Ceremony — **Nandini Chami**, representing the Global Digital Justice Forum, provided a critical perspective on digital progress: “…
S26
WS #225 Gender inequality in meaningful access in the Global South — Fabio Senne from Cetic Brazil introduced a crucial distinction between basic access and meaningful connectivity. He stat…
S27
Policy Network on Meaningful Access: Meaningful access to include and connect | IGF 2023 — Data and statistics are crucial for meaningful access to the internet and the development of policies in this area. The …
S28
Digital Cooperation for Inclusive Development: Brazil–South Africa Synergies in the G20 and the WSIS Framework — This observation shifted the discussion from celebrating connectivity achievements to recognizing the inadequacy of curr…
S29
Skilling and Education in AI — The conversation began with a Professor’s detailed analysis of four critical sectors where AI can drive substantial impa…
S30
AI for food systems — Development | Infrastructure Partnership and Collaboration Approach Seizo Onoe argues that by providing shared digital…
S31
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — ## Industry Perspectives: Systems Integration Challenges ## Introduction and Context Setting ## Sectoral Applications:…
S32
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — Evidence from around the world is consistent with this. Farmers respond to these AI weather forecasts. So I think that’s…
S33
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — Key barriers to scaling include the need for high-quality data foundations, reimagined business processes, and comprehen…
S34
Global AI Policy Framework: International Cooperation and Historical Perspectives — Werner identifies three critical barriers that prevent AI for good use cases from scaling globally. He emphasizes that d…
S35
Ensuring Safe AI_ Monitoring Agents to Bridge the Global Assurance Gap — Global South Challenges: multilingualism, infrastructure, and capacity
S36
WS #462 Bridging the Compute Divide a Global Alliance for AI — Ivy Lau-Schindewolf: At the risk of just repeating myself and other people, I will actually still say there’s something …
S37
Main Session | Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence — Benifei argues for the importance of developing common standards and definitions for AI at a global level. He suggests t…
S38
From India to the Global South_ Advancing Social Impact with AI — Low level of disagreement with high convergence on AI’s transformative potential. Differences are primarily tactical rat…
S39
Comprehensive Report: Preventing Jobless Growth in the Age of AI — High level of consensus with significant implications for policy and business strategy. The agreement across diverse sta…
S40
Agents of Change AI for Government Services & Climate Resilience — These key comments shaped the discussion by progressively grounding abstract AI concepts in practical governance realiti…
S41
AI for Social Empowerment_ Driving Change and Inclusion — High level of consensus with significant implications for policy development. The convergence of perspectives across dif…
S42
Approaches Towards Meaningful Connectivity in the Global South — Effective connectivity policies must be contextually grounded and take into account intercultural factors specific to di…
S43
Internet Technology and Policy: Challenges and Solutions online course — Telecommunications infrastructure:Understanding the basis for core infrastructures fosters better policy shaping, leadin…
S44
WS #225 Bridging the Connectivity Gap for Excluded Communities — Strong consensus emerged around treating connectivity as a fundamental right that requires government intervention and p…
S45
The Declaration for the Future of the Internet: Principles to Action — In accordance with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), particularly SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, an…
S46
Networking Session #60 Risk & impact assessment of AI on human rights & democracy — The Huderia methodology is a unique anticipatory approach to AI governance. It focuses on four fundamental elements: con…
S47
WS #45 Fostering EthicsByDesign w DataGovernance & Multistakeholder — 3. UNESCO’s readiness assessment methodology and ethical impact assessment framework Rosanna Fanni emphasized UNESCO’s …
S48
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications — This categorization became the organizing principle for much of the subsequent discussion. Other panelists repeatedly re…
S49
Panel Discussion: 01 — Minister Patria highlighted additional systemic barriers, particularly geopolitical dynamics creating asymmetric conditi…
S50
Multistakeholder platform regulation and the Global South | IGF 2023 Town Hall #170 — The analysis draws attention to several challenges related to global platform governance and stakeholder participation, …
S51
Building Scalable AI Through Global South Partnerships — The pathway concept recognizes that successful AI implementation involves much more than technical development. It requi…
S52
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — New institutional frameworks are needed that connect technical sophistication with policy impact and government support
S53
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development — It requires risk tolerance. It requires capital that understands that building sovereign AI capacity involves experiment…
S54
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — The discussion revealed sophisticated understanding of AI development challenges and opportunities, with remarkable cons…
S55
Open Forum #70 the Future of DPI Unpacking the Open Source AI Model — Legal and regulatory | Development | Economic Private technology companies can play a crucial role in AI for social goo…
S56
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — – Qi Xiaoxia- Dai Wei- Ricardo Pelayo Development | Economic | Capacity development Innovation Ecosystems and Practica…
S57
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — Thank you. Thank you so much. Excellency, ladies and gentlemen, I guess I should say good evening. We all recognize arti…
S58
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — So adoption is ultimately where success is measured. And actually, you need to design that in from the get-go. And that …
S59
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity — Success will be measured by real-world impact: reducing maternal mortality, supporting education, enabling economic empo…
S60
The Intelligent Coworker: AI’s Evolution in the Workplace — Success should be measured through adoption rates, employee satisfaction, and daily usage patterns rather than tradition…
S61
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — Chairman Lahoti emphasised that trust must remain the central pillar of AI adoption in telecommunications, given that au…
S62
Global AI Governance: Reimagining IGF’s Role & Impact — The discussion emphasized that AI governance requires learning from past internet governance experiences, where market-d…
S63
Responsible AI in India Leadership Ethics & Global Impact part1_2 — And last, enterprises. Like many of yours in this room, that are willing and excited to go first that really look at tra…
S64
Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech — Jennifer Chung:Thank you, Nazar. I actually do see two more questions from the Bangladesh Remote Hub. This is good. This…
S65
Panel Discussion: 01 — Minister Patria introduced the crucial concept of “meaningful connectivity,” which transcends basic internet access to e…
S66
UN General Assembly 66th Plenary Meeting – WSIS Plus 20 High-Level Review — Far too many people still lack meaningful connectivity. And while the differences are stark between countries and region…
S67
Bridging the Digital Divide: Achieving Universal and Meaningful Connectivity (ITU) — Both regulator and Minister of Communication in Brazil embrace the idea of meaningful connectivity. Brazil has been uti…
S68
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Risks of Over-Emphasising Quantitative Metrics in Digital Inclusion MeasurementThe discussions across multiple IGF 2025 …
S70
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications — The discussion highlighted significant challenges in quantifying AI’s economic benefits. Georgieva acknowledged that mea…
S72
Strategy — – AI4G: identify and prototype different use cases for AI in government, with a focus on new applications…
S73
AI for food systems — Development | Infrastructure Partnership and Collaboration Approach Seizo Onoe argues that by providing shared digital…
S74
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — Key barriers to scaling include the need for high-quality data foundations, reimagined business processes, and comprehen…
S75
How the Global South Is Accelerating AI Adoption_ Finance Sector Insights — Compute infrastructure and research talent shortages present bigger obstacles than regulatory constraints Sharma identi…
S76
Ensuring Safe AI_ Monitoring Agents to Bridge the Global Assurance Gap — Global South Challenges: multilingualism, infrastructure, and capacity
S77
Planetary Limits of AI: Governance for Just Digitalisation? | IGF 2023 Open Forum #37 — Key barriers include access to funding and finance, proximity to crucial markets, local policies, affordable Internet co…
S78
The Intelligent Coworker: AI’s Evolution in the Workplace — Christoph Schweizer advocated for new measurement approaches, emphasising “adoption and usage,” “employee satisfaction s…
S79
Catalyzing Global Investment in AI for Health_ WHO Strategic Roundtable — Both speakers emphasized that success should be measured by actual health outcomes and real-world impact rather than tec…
S80
WS #462 Bridging the Compute Divide a Global Alliance for AI — Alisson O’Beirne: Perfect, thanks. I think, really following on from Ivy’s point, I think that… There is something ver…
S81
AI Automation in Telecom_ Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust India AI Impact Summit 2026 — This comment provided a strong conclusion to the session by tying together themes of collaboration, data sharing, and gl…
S82
Main Session | Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence — Benifei argues for the importance of developing common standards and definitions for AI at a global level. He suggests t…
S83
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — **Sajid Rahman**, ICANN board member, emphasized that AI’s growth is “unprecedented compared to previous technological w…
S84
9821st meeting — Ecuador:Mr. President, I thank the United States for convening this important meeting. I also thank the Secretary Genera…
S85
(Interactive Dialogue 3) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session — Alar Karis: Thank you, Chair. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, distinguished participants, the theme of this dia…
S86
Open Forum #54 Advancing Lesothos Digital Transformation Policies — – **Dr Tahleho T’seole** – Mentioned as participating online (referenced but no direct quotes in transcript) – **Lekhot…
S87
High-Level Session 2: Transforming Health: Integrating Innovation and Digital Solutions for Global Well-being — – Emma Theofelus: Minister of Information Communications and Technology, Namibia Emma Theofelus, Minister of Informatio…
S88
AI for Good – food and agriculture — Dongyu Qu: Excellencies, ladies, gentlemen, good morning. A year ago, we all gathered for the Previous AI for Good Summi…
S89
Digital on Day 6 of UNGA79: Digital transformation and equitable AI access — Burundistressed the urgent need for universal, affordable access to the internet, including AI, particularly in developi…
S90
Comprehensive Report: UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting on the 20-Year Review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Outcomes — Japan’s Vice Minister Takuo Imagawa focused on maintaining an open, free, and secure internet while promoting innovation…
S91
Leveraging the postal network for a sustainable and inclusive deployment of digital infrastructure and services (UPU) — During a panel discussion, the importance of connectivity for 4G was emphasised, highlighting the impressive coverage of…
S92
Open Forum #67 Open-source AI as a Catalyst for Africa’s Digital Economy — Moderator: Maybe I’m not understanding the question properly, but that’s how I see it. So I think part of the question w…
S93
The Foundation of AI Democratizing Compute Data Infrastructure — Faith Waidaka, despite her role building physical data center infrastructure across Africa, acknowledged that democratis…
S94
AI: The Great Equaliser? — She mentions the lack of certain capacities on the African continent
S95
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm — **The Compute Infrastructure Divide**: 90% of global data centre capacity is held by the United States and China despite…
S96
Multistakeholder Partnerships for Thriving AI Ecosystems — Robert Opp opened the discussion by highlighting UNDP’s concern that without responsible deployment, AI could exacerbate…
S97
Software.gov — Bogdan-Martin also emphasizes the potential of combining artificial intelligence (AI) with GovTech or GovStack. She ment…
S98
From Innovation to Impact_ Bringing AI to the Public — I tried asking this, it is suggesting this, and this is a brief if you want to read the PDF, but net output is, instead …
S99
Building Trusted AI at Scale – Keynote Anne Bouverot — I believe this is a very key geopolitical moment. In Paris, we spoke about action. This year in Delhi, we speak about im…
S100
Launch / Award Event #52 Intelligent Society Development & Governance Research — ### International Perspective: Egyptian Experience Ahmed Elsabbagh: Thank you for inviting me to be part of your succes…
S101
Open Forum #17 AI Regulation Insights From Parliaments — Amira Saber: Yeah, thank you so much. And it’s a pleasure to be talking on this panel amid esteemed colleagues. Actually…
S102
Cairo Forum examines MENA’s path in the AI era — The Second Cairo Forum brought together experts to assess how AI, global shifts, and economic pressures areshaping MENA….
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
S
Speaker 1
1 argument137 words per minute836 words363 seconds
Argument 1
AI for all – need for inclusive, low‑cost solutions
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 stresses that artificial intelligence must be accessible to everyone, especially people in the Global South, and that the technology should not leave anyone behind. He also calls for affordable AI solutions that can be easily replicated across developing nations.
EVIDENCE
He emphasised that global cooperation is required so that nobody is excluded from the benefits of AI and that AI should be “for all”, reaching every person in the continent and the world, particularly the Global South [14-18]. He added that finding low-cost AI solutions for local problems would enable rapid adoption by other Global South countries [20-21].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for inclusive AI that starts with people rather than just algorithms is emphasized in [S13]; the Global Digital Compact calls for AI solutions that are affordable and benefit all, especially the Global South, in [S14]; the panel discussion repeatedly frames AI as “for all” in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive, affordable AI for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
D
Debjani Ghosh
1 argument166 words per minute1013 words365 seconds
Argument 1
Shift KPI from model size to societal impact
EXPLANATION
Ghosh argues that current AI performance metrics focus on technical aspects such as model size and compute power, but the true measure of success should be the tangible impact on people’s lives. She calls for a re‑orientation of key performance indicators toward societal outcomes.
EVIDENCE
She noted that today the focus is on how many models are built and how large they are, and urged a shift toward measuring AI success by the number of lives changed and societal impact [193-197].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ethical AI discussions highlight a shift toward human-centric, impact-based metrics rather than model size in [S1]; the same call to move from purely technical KPIs to real-world impact is voiced in the panel discussion [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Re‑defining AI success metrics
AGREED WITH
Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
DISAGREED WITH
Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
R
Rafat Hindi
3 arguments104 words per minute328 words187 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑enabled health and education services in Egypt
EXPLANATION
Hindi describes how Egypt is using AI to broaden access to essential public services, particularly in health and education, reaching underserved communities at a national scale. He cites specific AI tools for disease detection and for supporting high‑school learning.
EVIDENCE
He explained that AI is used for early detection of breast cancer and diabetes, and that a new AI-powered education support tool is being rolled out to high-school students and teachers across the country, making advanced medical screening and learning support available to underserved communities for the first time [87-95].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI improving health and education in Egypt
Argument 2
Need for sovereign AI capability and strong public‑private partnership
EXPLANATION
Hindi stresses that Egypt’s AI progress depends on a government‑first approach that builds sovereign AI capabilities tailored to local languages and needs, complemented by robust partnerships between the public sector, the national AI ecosystem, and international collaborators.
EVIDENCE
He highlighted three enabling factors: a government-first approach prioritising public interest, sovereign AI capability that reflects local language and needs, and a strong partnership across government, the national AI ecosystem and global partners [92-95].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sovereign AI and partnerships
AGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
Argument 3
Success measured by people’s access to high‑quality AI services
EXPLANATION
Hindi proposes that AI success should be judged by the proportion of the population that can access high‑quality AI‑enabled services in sectors such as health, education, agriculture and government, rather than by technical metrics like model count or compute power.
EVIDENCE
He argued that the key performance indicator should be the percentage of people with access to quality AI-enabled services, shifting focus from technology to people and emphasizing benefits in health, education, agriculture and government [198-205].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The argument that the key performance indicator should be the percentage of people with access to quality AI-enabled services is directly stated in [S4]; the panel reiterates this people-centric KPI in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
People‑centric AI success metric
AGREED WITH
Debjani Ghosh, Nizar Patria
DISAGREED WITH
Debjani Ghosh, Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
N
Nizar Patria
4 arguments97 words per minute929 words571 seconds
Argument 1
Rating AI readiness 6/10 – digital gap & archipelagic challenges
EXPLANATION
Patria rates global AI readiness at 6 out of 10, pointing to a digital gap especially in archipelagic nations like Indonesia. He notes the country’s unique geography of 17,000 islands and the need to bridge connectivity gaps despite relatively high internet penetration.
EVIDENCE
He gave AI a score of 6/10, explaining that the digital gap and Indonesia’s archipelagic nature (17,000 islands) hinder adoption, and mentioned that internet penetration is about 80% while meaningful connectivity is still lacking [44-55].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The panel discussion notes the archipelagic nature of Indonesia and the persistent digital gap that hampers AI adoption, aligning with the 6/10 readiness rating, in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI readiness and geographic challenges
DISAGREED WITH
Sina Lawson
Argument 2
TB diagnostic AI startup supporting remote doctors in Indonesia
EXPLANATION
Patria shares an Indonesian startup that uses AI to help remote doctors diagnose tuberculosis by aggregating health‑center data and integrating it with X‑ray imaging. This illustrates a concrete AI application addressing a critical health need in underserved areas.
EVIDENCE
He described a startup that gathers data from remote health centres, combines it with X-ray machines, and uses AI to help doctors identify tuberculosis versus ordinary lung problems, and noted that similar AI initiatives are spreading to education and agriculture [97-106].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for remote health diagnostics
Argument 3
Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
EXPLANATION
Patria outlines several systemic challenges: geopolitical tensions, platform dominance, infrastructure quality, regulatory balance, and the need for R&D and talent development. He stresses that over‑regulation can stifle innovation, while trust and transparency are essential.
EVIDENCE
He mentioned geopolitical conditions, platform dominance, the need to improve infrastructure standards, the importance of balanced regulation to protect without hindering innovation, and the urgency to boost R&D, attract investment and nurture digital talent [169-184].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Balancing protective regulation with innovation is discussed in [S4] and reinforced as a needed balance in [S22]; concerns about over-regulation and the importance of trust and accountability are highlighted in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Policy and ecosystem balance for AI
AGREED WITH
Rafat Hindi
DISAGREED WITH
Sina Lawson
Argument 4
Success defined by accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust
EXPLANATION
Patria envisions that in the next five years AI must be widely accessible, solve real problems for Global South countries, and be trustworthy through transparency and accountability, preventing misuse such as deepfakes.
EVIDENCE
He stated that AI should be accessible, solve problems for Global South nations, and be trusted by complying with transparency and accountability standards, warning against deepfakes and synthetic reality [222-229].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Success criteria focusing on accessibility and trustworthy AI are outlined in [S4]; the panel emphasizes that AI must be accessible to the Global South in [S2]; trust and transparency requirements are further detailed in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Future AI criteria: access, impact, trust
AGREED WITH
Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
DISAGREED WITH
Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Sina Lawson
S
Sina Lawson
4 arguments139 words per minute1074 words460 seconds
Argument 1
80 % internet penetration but need meaningful connectivity
EXPLANATION
Lawson points out that while internet penetration in her country is high, the connectivity must be meaningful to deliver real benefits. She stresses that infrastructure alone is insufficient without effective use.
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The distinction between basic internet access and meaningful connectivity is explored in [S26]; broader concerns about digital exclusion despite high penetration are raised in [S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Need for meaningful connectivity
AGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
Argument 2
Pandemic cash‑distribution AI system in Togo
EXPLANATION
Lawson explains how Togo used AI during the COVID‑19 pandemic to prioritize beneficiaries for cash assistance, employing satellite imagery and telecom metadata. She also describes the creation of an in‑house data‑science team to sustain AI applications across ministries.
EVIDENCE
She detailed that two AI algorithms-one using satellite imagery to create a poverty map and another using telecom metadata to identify phone numbers of those in need-were used to prioritize cash distribution, followed by the establishment of a 25-person data-science team within the Ministry of Public Sector Efficiency to support other government branches [111-133].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven social assistance during pandemic
DISAGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
Argument 3
Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers
EXPLANATION
Lawson identifies several roadblocks to scaling AI impact: limited institutional capacity, lack of awareness among officials, and the challenge of providing AI services in 42 local languages and dialects. She stresses outreach and training to close these gaps.
EVIDENCE
She noted that infrastructure is the starting point but many people are unaware of AI capabilities, creating an institutional capacity gap; she highlighted language diversity with Togo having 42 languages and dialects, requiring AI models in local languages, and described outreach efforts to demonstrate AI applications within government [144-166].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Capacity building challenges and institutional gaps are highlighted in [S21]; the panel discussion underscores the institutional capacity gap as a barrier to AI scaling in [S4].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Capacity, language, and awareness challenges
AGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
DISAGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
Argument 4
Success as every citizen being a phone call away from public services
EXPLANATION
Lawson envisions that within five years all Togolese citizens should be able to access any public service with a single phone call, reflecting AI‑enabled, instant service delivery as the benchmark for success.
EVIDENCE
She stated that her goal is for every Togolese to be one phone call away from any public service, indicating that AI-mediated, immediate access will define success [231-236].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven universal service access
DISAGREED WITH
Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI must be inclusive and affordable for the Global South, ensuring no one is left behind.
Speakers: Speaker 1, Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
AI for all – need for inclusive, low‑cost solutions Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Success defined by accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust
All three speakers stress that artificial intelligence should reach every person in the Global South, be low-cost and replicated across developing nations, and that inclusive policies are required so that no one is excluded [14-18][20-21][24-28][68-71][144-156][157-166][169-176][222-229].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This consensus aligns with the inclusive AI agenda outlined in the “From India to the Global South” report and the AI Impact Summit 2026, which call for affordable, equitable AI solutions and cross-sector collaboration for the Global South [S38][S57].
The primary metric of AI success should shift from technical size to societal impact and people’s access to quality services.
Speakers: Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
Shift KPI from model size to societal impact Success measured by people’s access to high‑quality AI services Success defined by accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust
Debjani calls for KPI re-orientation toward impact; Hindi proposes measuring success by the percentage of population with access to high-quality AI-enabled services; Nizar adds that AI must be accessible, solve real problems and be trustworthy – all emphasizing people-centric outcomes over model count or compute power [193-197][198-205][222-229].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The shift mirrors recommendations in the AI for Social Empowerment report and multiple panel discussions that prioritize real-world impact, adoption rates, and access to services over model size or compute metrics [S41][S58][S59].
Building institutional and technical capacity is essential for scaling AI impact.
Speakers: Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
Lawson highlights gaps in institutional knowledge, language diversity and the need for outreach; Patria stresses the need for balanced regulation, R&D investment and talent nurturing to create a healthy AI ecosystem – both pointing to capacity development as a prerequisite for impact [144-166][169-184].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Capacity-building is highlighted as a core pillar in “Building Scalable AI Through Global South Partnerships” and in the “Approaches Towards Meaningful Connectivity” framework, which stress institutional and technical readiness for scalable impact [S51][S42].
Robust public‑private partnerships and a government‑first approach accelerate AI deployment.
Speakers: Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
Need for sovereign AI capability and strong public‑private partnership Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
Hindi describes Egypt’s government-first strategy combined with strong partnerships across the national AI ecosystem and global actors; Patria adds that investment, R&D and talent development-often delivered through public-private collaboration-are critical for scaling AI [92-95][184-184].
Trust, transparency and accountability are non‑negotiable for AI adoption.
Speakers: Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
Success defined by accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers (including trust in local language models) Success is not the size of models but how many lives we change, implying trustworthy AI
Patria stresses that AI must be trustworthy, with transparency and accountability to avoid deep-fakes; Lawson notes that multilingual models and outreach are needed for trust; Ghosh reiterates that AI success hinges on inclusive, trustworthy deployment [222-229][157-166][217-219].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
UNESCO’s ethical AI framework and the Huderi­a risk-impact methodology both place trust, transparency, and accountability at the centre of AI governance, reinforcing their non-negotiable status [S46][S47][S61][S62][S63].
Infrastructure is a prerequisite, but must be transformed into meaningful connectivity.
Speakers: Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
80 % internet penetration but need meaningful connectivity Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust (including infrastructure quality)
Lawson points out that high internet penetration is insufficient without meaningful connectivity; Patria underscores that improving infrastructure standards is essential before AI can deliver impact [146-58][173-176].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy literature on meaningful connectivity and the UN-aligned Declaration for the Future of the Internet stress that infrastructure must be leveraged to deliver affordable, inclusive digital services, echoing this point [S42][S43][S44][S45][S40].
Similar Viewpoints
All three argue that AI success should be judged by concrete benefits to people—access to quality services, problem‑solving capacity and trust—rather than by technical metrics such as model count or compute power [193-197][198-205][222-229].
Speakers: Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
Shift KPI from model size to societal impact Success measured by people’s access to high‑quality AI services Success defined by accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust
Both emphasize that without strong institutional capacity—training, awareness, regulatory balance, and talent pipelines—AI initiatives cannot scale effectively [144-166][169-184].
Speakers: Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
All three stress inclusive AI for the Global South, highlighting affordability, language diversity and the necessity that AI be accessible to every citizen [14-18][20-21][24-28][68-71][144-166][222-229].
Speakers: Speaker 1, Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
AI for all – need for inclusive, low‑cost solutions Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Success defined by accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust
Unexpected Consensus
Trust and transparency as the decisive factor for AI adoption across very different national contexts.
Speakers: Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
Success defined by accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers (including trust in local language models) Success is not the size of models but how many lives we change, implying trustworthy AI
Despite representing Africa, Southeast Asia and a neutral moderator, they converge on trust being the single most critical prerequisite for scaling AI-something not explicitly foregrounded in the opening remarks of Speaker 1 or the technical discussion of infrastructure. This cross-regional alignment on ethical trust is therefore unexpected [222-229][157-166][217-219].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Telecom-focused ethical AI discussions and global AI governance recommendations underline trust and transparency as decisive factors across diverse jurisdictions [S61][S62][S46].
Agreement that AI impact should be measured by a single‑phone‑call access to public services.
Speakers: Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
Success as every citizen being a phone call away from public services Success is not the size of models but how many lives we change
Lawson’s concrete vision of “one phone call away” aligns with Ghosh’s broader call for people-centric KPIs, linking a specific service metric to the abstract impact measurement-a linkage not anticipated from the earlier policy-focused statements [231-236][217-219].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Scaling-AI panels advocate user-centric success metrics such as single-phone-call access to services, linking adoption design to measurable public-service reach [S58][S59].
Overall Assessment

The panel demonstrates a strong convergence around people‑centric AI: inclusive, affordable deployment; measurement of success by societal impact; the necessity of institutional capacity and trustworthy, multilingual models; and the role of public‑private partnerships. While each speaker brings regional specifics (archipelagic connectivity, sovereign AI, language diversity), the core principles are shared.

High consensus – the speakers largely agree on the same strategic priorities, indicating that future AI policy for the Global South can be coordinated around inclusive access, capacity building, trust, and impact‑oriented metrics. This shared vision facilitates collective action and could shape the agenda of the AI Impact Summit and related multilateral initiatives.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Assessment of AI readiness and impact level
Speakers: Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
Rating AI readiness 6/10 – digital gap & archipelagic challenges Pandemic cash‑distribution AI system in Togo
Patria rates global AI readiness at 6/10, citing digital gaps and Indonesia’s archipelagic challenges [44-55]. Lawson counters by saying AI impact in Africa is close to 9/10 based on successful implementations like the pandemic cash-distribution system [67-76].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for structured readiness assessments is addressed by UNESCO’s readiness methodology and the Huderi­a risk-impact framework, which provide authoritative tools for evaluating AI governance capacity [S47][S46].
Primary roadblocks to scaling AI impact
Speakers: Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers
Patria highlights geopolitical tensions, platform dominance, infrastructure quality, balanced regulation, and the need for R&D and talent as key obstacles [169-184]. Lawson emphasizes limited institutional capacity, lack of awareness of AI tools, and the challenge of providing AI in 42 local languages, calling for outreach and training [144-166].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ministerial remarks and analyses identify platformisation, geopolitical asymmetry, and capacity gaps as key barriers for the Global South, highlighting systemic challenges to scaling AI impact [S48][S49][S50].
How AI success should be measured
Speakers: Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
Shift KPI from model size to societal impact Success measured by people’s access to high‑quality AI services Success defined by accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust Success as every citizen being a phone call away from public services
Ghosh calls for moving KPIs away from model count toward lives changed [193-197]. Hindi proposes the percentage of population with quality AI-enabled services as the KPI [198-205]. Patria adds that AI must be accessible, solve real problems, and be trustworthy [222-229]. Lawson envisions a phone-call-away model for all public services as the success benchmark [231-236].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The literature reflects a debate between adoption-based metrics (e.g., daily usage, service access) and traditional technical benchmarks, as discussed in scaling-AI and responsible AI reports [S58][S59][S60].
Unexpected Differences
Platformisation and geopolitical asymmetry as major barriers
Speakers: Nizar Patria
Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
Patria raises platform dominance and geopolitical asymmetry as critical challenges for AI adoption in the Global South [169-173]. None of the other speakers mention platformisation or geopolitics, making this a surprising point of divergence.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Analyses of global power dynamics and platform governance for the Global South emphasize platformisation and geopolitical asymmetry as structural obstacles to equitable AI development [S48][S49][S50].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong consensus on the need for inclusive, people‑centric AI for the Global South, but there are notable disagreements on how to assess current AI readiness, which obstacles are most critical, and the exact metrics to gauge success. These differences reflect varied national contexts—Indonesia’s archipelagic geography, Togo’s language diversity, Egypt’s sovereign AI push, and broader policy concerns—yet they do not undermine the shared commitment to AI‑driven development.

Moderate disagreement: while all speakers align on overarching goals, they diverge on priority challenges and measurement frameworks, suggesting that coordinated policy and capacity‑building efforts will need to accommodate diverse national realities to achieve inclusive AI impact.

Partial Agreements
All participants agree that AI must be inclusive and benefit the Global South, but they diverge on the pathways: Speaker 1 stresses low‑cost, replicable solutions [14-18][20-21]; Patria focuses on balanced regulation, trust and R&D investment [169-184]; Lawson points to building institutional capacity, multilingual models and outreach [144-166]; Ghosh urges redefining success metrics toward societal impact rather than technical size [193-197].
Speakers: Speaker 1, Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
AI for all – need for inclusive, low‑cost solutions Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Shift KPI from model size to societal impact
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI must be inclusive and low‑cost to benefit the Global South; the mantra is “AI for all”. Overall AI readiness in the Global South is moderate (around 6/10); significant digital gaps remain, especially in archipelagic and remote regions. High internet penetration (e.g., 80% in Indonesia) is insufficient without “meaningful connectivity” that enables AI‑driven services. Impactful AI use cases highlighted: AI‑enabled health and education services in Egypt; TB‑diagnostic AI tool for remote doctors in Indonesia; AI‑driven cash‑distribution and poverty‑mapping during the pandemic in Togo. Major barriers to scaling AI impact include: insufficient institutional capacity and awareness, language diversity (many local languages/dialects), infrastructure deficits, regulatory uncertainty, need for sovereign AI capabilities, and trust concerns (e.g., deep‑fakes). Future success should be measured by people’s access to high‑quality AI services, problem‑solving relevance, and trustworthiness rather than model size or compute power. Collaboration mechanisms such as an AI Commons for sharing best practices, standards, and data‑exchange platforms were emphasized.
Resolutions and action items
Create and populate an AI Commons with case studies (e.g., Togo’s pandemic cash‑distribution model) to disseminate best practices across the Global South. Strengthen institutional capacity through outreach, training, and the establishment of dedicated AI teams within ministries (e.g., Togo’s 25‑person data‑science unit). Develop AI models in local languages and dialects to improve accessibility (highlighted by Togo’s 42‑language challenge). Promote public‑private partnerships and AI innovation hubs to accelerate startup‑driven solutions (e.g., Indonesia’s TB diagnostic startup). Adopt balanced regulatory frameworks that protect citizens while fostering innovation, avoiding over‑regulation. Invest in R&D, talent development, and standards for data exchange to support sovereign AI capabilities.
Unresolved issues
Concrete financing mechanisms and timelines for expanding infrastructure and building local‑language AI models were not defined. Specific governance structures for the AI Commons and how contributions will be coordinated among Global South nations remain unclear. Details on how to ensure AI trustworthiness (e.g., standards for deep‑fake detection, transparency, accountability) were discussed but not finalized. Mechanisms for aligning global North‑South collaboration and equitable technology transfer were mentioned but not concretely addressed. Metrics and reporting frameworks for the proposed people‑centric AI success indicators have not been established.
Suggested compromises
Balance regulation by avoiding heavy restrictions that could stifle innovation while still ensuring protection and accountability. Combine infrastructure investment with capacity‑building outreach to ensure that new connectivity translates into effective AI use. Leverage platformization benefits (e.g., existing global AI platforms) while developing sovereign, locally‑relevant AI capabilities.
Thought Provoking Comments
We try to improve. We try to cover all of the archipelago by our telecommunication network… and now what we do with these infrastructures, digital infrastructure or telecommunication infrastructure, we want meaningful connectivity.
Introduces the concept of “meaningful connectivity”—that infrastructure must translate into real, usable services for people, not just raw coverage.
Shifted the conversation from measuring infrastructure reach to evaluating its utility, prompting other speakers to discuss how connectivity can be leveraged for impact (e.g., Lawson’s focus on AI applications).
Speaker: Nizar Patria
When we talk about AI, for us, at least Africans, it’s not about the technology. It’s about what we can do with it… our priority sectors are government, health, education, agriculture.
Reframes AI discussion from a technology‑centric view to a problem‑solving, sector‑focused approach, emphasizing concrete impact over hype.
Guided the panel toward concrete use‑case discussions, leading Rafat to share Egypt’s health‑and‑education AI projects and prompting the moderator to ask for specific impact examples.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
Three things made this possible in Egypt: a government‑first approach that puts public interest first, sovereign AI capability that reflects our language and local needs, and a strong partnership across government, the national AI ecosystem, and global partners.
Identifies a replicable three‑pillar framework (policy, localization, partnership) that underpins successful AI deployment in a developing‑country context.
Provided a concrete model that other ministers referenced when discussing their own challenges, and reinforced the importance of local language models and governance that Lawson later expanded on.
Speaker: Rafat Hindi
During the pandemic we built a program to distribute cash using mobile phones. We used satellite imagery to draw a poverty map and machine‑learning on telecom metadata to isolate phone numbers of people who needed aid.
Offers a vivid, data‑driven case study of AI delivering immediate, life‑saving services, illustrating how AI can be operationalized quickly in crisis settings.
Prompted the moderator to request the case study for the AI Commons, and sparked a deeper discussion on institutional capacity and the need for in‑house data‑science teams.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
A lot of people just don’t know this universe exists… we need AI models in 42 local languages and dialects. Institutional capacity and language localisation are major roadblocks.
Highlights two often‑overlooked barriers—lack of awareness within institutions and multilingual model availability—linking technical challenges to societal inclusion.
Led Nizar to add geopolitical and platform‑dominance concerns, and reinforced Rafat’s emphasis on trust and accessibility, broadening the scope of the discussion to include language and capacity building.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
Success should be measured by the percentage of people that have access to high‑quality AI‑enabled services, not by the number of models or compute power.
Proposes a people‑centric KPI that reframes AI evaluation from technical metrics to societal outcomes, aligning with the panel’s theme of impact.
Redirected the final segment of the conversation toward defining future success metrics, influencing Nizar and Sina to echo themes of accessibility, problem‑solving, and trust.
Speaker: Rafat Hindi
We are facing asymmetric geopolitical conditions; platform dominance defines progress of a fair ecosystem. We must balance regulation—avoid over‑regulation that stifles innovation—while boosting R&D and talent.
Introduces the macro‑level challenge of global platform power and the delicate balance between regulation and innovation, adding geopolitical complexity to the discussion.
Expanded the dialogue beyond national projects to global structural issues, prompting the moderator to synthesize how trust, regulation, and infrastructure interrelate.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
AI must be trusted—transparent, accountable, and free from deep‑fakes—otherwise it will never be adopted.
Elevates trust as the foundational prerequisite for AI adoption, linking technical integrity to societal acceptance.
Served as a concluding pivot that unified earlier points about capacity, language, and governance, leading Sina to echo trust as a key success factor and reinforcing the panel’s consensus on trustworthy AI.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
Overall Assessment

The discussion was shaped by a series of pivotal insights that moved the conversation from abstract enthusiasm about AI to concrete, people‑centered implementation challenges. Early remarks about “meaningful connectivity” and the shift from technology to problem‑solving set the tone for practical examples from Egypt, Indonesia, and Togo. Lawson’s pandemic cash‑distribution story and her emphasis on institutional capacity and multilingual models highlighted operational hurdles, while Rafat’s redefinition of success anchored the dialogue in measurable societal outcomes. Patria’s geopolitical and trust‑focused comments added a macro‑level perspective, compelling the panel to consider regulatory balance and global platform dynamics. Collectively, these comments redirected the panel toward a shared vision: AI success will be judged by inclusive, trusted services that reach every citizen, especially in the Global South.

Follow-up Questions
Please share the Togo AI cash distribution case study so it can be added to the AI Commons repository.
Including this real‑world example in a shared AI Commons will help other countries replicate successful AI‑driven public service interventions.
Speaker: Debjani Ghosh
What are the biggest roadblocks to scaling AI impact creation for governments – data, infrastructure, regulation, or geopolitical dynamics?
Identifying and prioritising these barriers is essential for designing policies and investments that enable widespread AI adoption in the Global South.
Speaker: Debjani Ghosh (question to Sina Lawson) and Nizar Patria (additional input)
How should AI success be measured over the next five years beyond counting models and compute power?
Developing people‑centred metrics will shift focus to tangible societal benefits, ensuring AI development aligns with development goals and inclusivity.
Speaker: Debjani Ghosh (question to all three ministers)
What research is needed to develop AI models in the 42 local languages and dialects spoken in Togo?
Local‑language models are critical for equitable AI access, enabling services like education tutors and public‑service chatbots in native tongues.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
What strategies can strengthen institutional capacity and awareness within governments to recognise and request AI solutions?
Many officials are unaware of AI possibilities; building capacity will unlock demand for AI tools and improve policy integration.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
What standards and platforms are required for secure data exchange between Global South nations and the Global North?
Effective data sharing underpins cross‑border AI collaboration, research, and innovation while safeguarding sovereignty and privacy.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
How can trust, transparency, and accountability be embedded in AI systems to prevent misuse such as deepfakes?
Trust is a prerequisite for public adoption; establishing clear standards will mitigate risks and foster confidence in AI applications.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
What policies can balance regulation with innovation to avoid over‑regulation that stifles AI development?
Finding the right regulatory equilibrium is vital to protect citizens while encouraging entrepreneurial AI solutions.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
What investments and programs are needed to boost R&D and nurture digital talent in the Global South?
Sustained research capacity and skilled workforce are essential for homegrown AI ecosystems and long‑term competitiveness.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
How can AI innovation hubs and startup ecosystems be structured to effectively address sectoral challenges such as tuberculosis diagnosis in remote areas?
Understanding successful hub models will guide replication across health, education, and agriculture, accelerating impact at scale.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
What metrics (KPIs) should be used to track AI‑enabled access to essential services like healthcare, education, and agriculture?
Defining clear KPIs will allow governments to monitor progress, identify gaps, and demonstrate AI’s contribution to development goals.
Speaker: Rafat Hindi
How do geopolitical conditions and platform dominance affect AI ecosystem development in the Global South?
Geopolitical asymmetries can limit access to technology and markets; studying these dynamics is crucial for equitable AI growth.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
What low‑cost AI solutions can be designed for the Global South and how can they be scaled across similar economies?
Identifying affordable AI tools will enable broader adoption in resource‑constrained settings, amplifying impact.
Speaker: Debjani Ghosh (introductory remark)

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.