MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance

20 Feb 2026 15:00h - 16:00h

MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The panel opened by asserting that artificial intelligence is already reshaping governance, markets and geopolitics and that the central challenge is not whether AI will influence policy but how governance will shape AI itself [1-3]. Speakers described a “governance paradox” in which overly slow regulation risks harm while heavy regulation risks stagnation, prompting a call for “intelligent governance” that is human-centered, transparent, risk-based and globally coordinated [6-13]. Because AI transcends borders, they argued for interoperable frameworks, shared safety standards and adaptive policies that evolve with the technology [14-18].


The Maharashtra government presented its “Maha AI” initiative as a living laboratory, highlighting AI-powered crime-fighting tools such as the Mahak Crime OS and an intelligent cloud-native infrastructure called Mahaiti that supports smart recruitment, urban dashboards and flood-management pilots [47-53]. Minister Ashish Shelar emphasized five pillars-compute, data, state AI governance, interoperability standards and capacity building-as the foundation for safe, secure and smart governance [58]. Praveen Pardeshi stressed the need for green energy to power AI, large-scale capacity-building through AI university courses, and warned that data monetisation without safeguards could undermine national interests, citing the development of a “Maha GPT” system for both officials and citizens [80-84][85-87][95-114].


Yashasvi Yadav outlined Maharashtra’s cyber-security project that leverages AI tools to monitor the dark web, freeze over ₹1,000 crore of fraud funds and protect more than 70 young women from sextortion, while also warning that quantum computing could soon break current encryption standards [119-136][137-150]. Suresh Sethi described how population-scale digital public infrastructures enable AI to move from static identity verification to dynamic eligibility and predictive welfare delivery, but insisted that AI decisions must be explainable, auditable and backed by human redress mechanisms [158-186][187-190]. Ranjit Goswami reinforced a holistic view that AI should serve welfare and happiness, urging integration of departmental data through a common Aadhaar-linked database to avoid siloed services [200-216]. Beena Sarkar highlighted ethical concerns, especially gender bias and the misuse of emerging devices such as smart glasses, calling for a dedicated safety institute to evaluate new technologies before market entry [221-258].


Amit Kapoor pointed out critical gaps in skill levels, broadband quality and infrastructure in Maharashtra, arguing that without rapid investment in education, connectivity and data centres AI’s benefits for nutrition, education and employment in tier-2 and tier-3 cities will remain unrealised, and he contested the optimism about post-2020 job creation expressed earlier [266-310][311-317]. Across the discussion, participants converged on the need for transparent, accountable and adaptable AI policies that combine technical standards with human-centric safeguards to ensure inclusive prosperity [12-13][20-24]. The session concluded that governing intelligence with wisdom, through coordinated global norms and domestic capacity building, is essential to harness AI’s potential while mitigating its risks [32][33].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Intelligent, adaptive AI governance is essential – AI is already reshaping governance, markets and geopolitics, creating a paradox where over-regulation stalls innovation and under-regulation risks harm; the solution is “intelligent governance” that is human-centered, transparent, risk-based, globally coordinated and continuously adaptive[1-13][14-18].


Maharashtra’s “Maha AI” vision and five-pillar framework – The state positions itself as a living laboratory, deploying AI-powered crime-prevention tools, a cloud-native “Mahaiti” infrastructure, and a governance stack built on compute, data, state AI governance, standards and capacity-building[46-58].


Operational pilots and data strategies – Initiatives highlighted include (a) large-scale green energy to power AI and staff up-skilling through an AI university[80-86]; (b) a state data authority that seeks to monetize India’s health and other public data rather than let it be exploited externally[96-102]; and (c) “Maha GPT”, a small-language-model interface that lets officials and citizens query complex government orders in real time[108-114].


AI in cyber-security and the looming quantum threat – The Maharashtra Cyber Security Project uses AI tools for dark-web monitoring, threat analysis and rapid response, reporting over ₹1,000 crore frozen and 70 lives saved in six months[119-136]; however, quantum computing could break current encryptions, prompting urgent preparation[145-150].


Ethical AI, bias mitigation and the need for infrastructure & skills – Women-for-Ethical-AI advocates stress evaluating new devices for gender-based risks and establishing safety institutes before deployment[221-257]; parallel concerns about uneven internet quality, low skill levels and under-employment in tier-2/3 cities underscore the requirement for education, broadband upgrades and affordable AI services to avoid widening inequality[266-306].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The panel convened to articulate a shared vision for responsible AI governance, showcase Maharashtra’s concrete AI-driven public-service initiatives, surface emerging risks (cyber-security, quantum computing, ethical bias), and agree on concrete steps-capacity-building, data stewardship, infrastructure investment, and global cooperation-to ensure AI delivers safe, inclusive, and human-centred outcomes for the state and beyond.


Overall tone and its evolution


– The opening remarks are optimistic and visionary, emphasizing opportunity and the moral imperative of wise governance.


– As the panel moves into individual presentations, the tone becomes pragmatic and demonstrative, detailing specific projects, technical solutions, and capacity-building efforts.


– When cyber-security and quantum computing are discussed, the tone shifts to cautious and urgent, highlighting threats and the need for rapid preparedness.


– The later contributions on ethics, bias, and digital divide adopt a critical yet constructive tone, calling for safeguards, inclusive policies, and infrastructure upgrades.


– The session closes on a collaborative and hopeful note, reaffirming commitment to “smart, safe, secure governance” and thanking participants.


Overall, the conversation moves from high-level aspiration to concrete implementation, then to risk awareness, and finally to a collective call for responsible action.


Speakers

Mr. Virendra Singh – –


Ms. Beena Sarkar – Customer Success Executive, ServiceNow; Volunteer with Women for Ethical AI South Asia (UNESCO) – Ethical AI, gender bias, AI governance [S2]


Dr. Amit Kapoor – Chair, Institute for Competitiveness – Economic policy, competitiveness, workforce development [S3]


Mr. Ashish Shelar – Honorable Minister of IT and Cultural Affairs, Government of Maharashtra – Technology-driven governance [S4]


Mr. Devroop Dhar – Co-Founder & CEO, Primus Partners; Moderator of the panel – Business strategy and consulting, session moderation [S6]


Mr. Ranjeet Goswami – Head, Corporate Affairs, Tata Consultancy Services – Technology solutions and governance [S9]


Mr. Yashasvi Yadav – Additional Director General of Police, Maharashtra Cyber Department, Government of Maharashtra – Cyber security, law enforcement, AI applications in cyber [S10]


Moderator – Moderator – Session moderation [S12]


Mr. Praveen Pardeshi – –


Mr. Suresh Sethi – Managing Director & CEO, Protean eGov Technologies – Digital public infrastructure, AI in governance [S16]


Additional speakers: None


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The session opened with Mr Virendra Singh warning that artificial intelligence is already reshaping governance, markets and geopolitics, and that the real dilemma is not whether AI will influence policy but whether governance will shape AI itself. He described a “governance paradox”: moving too slowly risks harm, while overly heavy regulation risks stagnation, and argued that the answer is not control versus innovation but intelligent governance – a human-centred, transparent, risk-based and globally coordinated framework that must evolve as AI evolves because static policies cannot manage dynamic intelligence[1-3][8-10][4-6].


In the keynote, Shri Ashish Shelar, Minister of IT & Cultural Affairs, highlighted that the AI Impact Summit 2026 is the first AI summit hosted in the global south, bringing together 20 heads of state, 60 ministers and hundreds of AI leaders[11-15]. He presented “Maha AI” as Maharashtra’s living laboratory and outlined five pillars for a safe, secure and smart governance stack: (i) compute and cloud at scale, (ii) high-quality public data sets, (iii) a dedicated state AI governance body, (iv) interoperability and standards, and (v) systematic capacity-building[16-22]. Flagship projects include the AI-powered Mahak Crime OS, showcased by Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, which accelerates crime prevention, detection and investigation, and the Mahaiti cloud-native, API-driven platform that underpins smart recruitment, AI-based property mapping, real-time urban dashboards for traffic, weather and civic issues, as well as pilots in flood-management and smart mobility[23-30]. The minister articulated three sector-wide imperatives – safeguard digital sovereignty, adopt AI responsibly, and treat AI governance as strategic infrastructure[35-38], and warned of digital-health, disinformation, deep-fakes and cyber-fraud, proposing a combined response of robust cyber-security, digital-literacy and critical-thinking, and a hybrid verification ecosystem[39-42].


The panel then moved to AI initiatives and capacity-building. Mr Praveen Pardeshi described Maharashtra’s green-energy target of more than 19 GW of solar capacity to power AI workloads, and announced an AI university and the IGOT (online learning) platform to up-skill civil servants[43-48]. He explained that the State Data Authority is creating a single source of truth for health and other public datasets, aiming to monetise these assets for national benefit rather than allowing foreign exploitation[49-55]. Pardeshi also unveiled “Maha GPT”, a small-language-model interface that lets officials and citizens query over 150 000 government orders (GRs) in real time, untangling complex regulations[56-61].


Mr Yashasvi Yadav outlined the Maharashtra Cyber Security Project, which integrates state-of-the-art AI tools, dark-web monitoring, threat analysis and a 24/7 helpline (1930) staffed by more than 150 cyber consultants[62-70]. Within six months the initiative froze and returned over ₹1 000 crore to victims and rescued more than 70 young women from sextortion and cyber-bullying, effectively saving 70 lives[71-78]. Yadav warned that quantum computing threatens to break current encryption standards-including RSA, blockchain and banking systems-unless India accelerates its quantum research, noting the country’s $1 billion spend versus rivals’ $15-20 billion[135-150].


Suresh Sethi highlighted Maharashtra’s population-scale Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI), which provides the data backbone for AI-enabled identity, payment and welfare systems. By moving from static identity verification to machine-readable, verifiable credentials, AI can automatically determine dynamic eligibility for subsidies, reduce inclusion and exclusion errors, and enable predictive governance that anticipates distress and triggers timely benefits[79-92]. He stressed that such AI layers must be explainable, auditable and coupled with a clear human-redress pathway to preserve accountability and public trust[93-100].


Major Ranjit Goswami (TCS) argued that AI should be viewed not merely as a technical efficiency tool but as a means to deliver welfare and happiness to the community. He called for a holistic, cross-departmental data architecture where every citizen is seen as a citizen of the state rather than of a siloed department, advocating integration with the Aadhaar database and common data standards across ministries[101-110].


Beena Sarkar, representing Women for Ethical AI, warned that emerging hardware such as smart glasses can jeopardise privacy and gender safety if released without rigorous assessment. She proposed establishing an India Safety Institute to vet new technologies for potential threats to women and the broader public before market entry[111-124].


Amit Kapoor drew attention to socio-economic challenges: only about 20 % of Maharashtra’s 9-crore-strong workforce possesses advanced skill levels, while the remaining 80 % are at basic levels, creating a bottleneck for AI adoption[125-129]. He highlighted inadequate broadband speeds-averaging 58 Mbps in Mumbai-and insufficient data-centre capacity as further constraints on scaling AI services to tier-2 and tier-3 cities[130-136]. Kapoor warned that without deliberate investment in education, connectivity and affordable AI, the technology could become a “dumping” element that harms mental health, fuels doom-scrolling and deepens inequality, especially among children[137-144]. He also identified opportunities for AI to monitor nutrition, water, sanitation and education at granular geographic levels, potentially addressing persistent development gaps[145-150].


Across the panel, participants converged on four core themes: (i) AI governance must be intelligent, human-centred and adaptable; (ii) robust, population-scale data infrastructure is essential for AI-enabled public services; (iii) capacity-building, explainability and human oversight are non-negotiable safeguards; and (iv) emerging risks-quantum computing, gender-biased hardware and the digital divide-require proactive, coordinated responses[150-165]. While optimism about AI’s transformative potential was widespread, disagreements emerged regarding the balance between dynamic, predictive AI services and the risk of societal “dumping”, as well as between monetising public data and protecting it from quantum-enabled threats[135-150]. The session closed with a collective call to “govern intelligence with wisdom”, urging coordinated global norms, domestic capacity-building and ethical safeguards to ensure that AI delivers safe, inclusive and sustainable prosperity for Maharashtra and beyond[150-165].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Mr. Virendra Singh

Artificial intelligence is real and it is influencing governance, markets, public services and even geopolitics. The question before us is not whether AI will shape governance. The question is whether governance is going to shape the artificial intelligence. It’s transforming governance in fundamental ways today. Through decision intelligence, public service delivery at scale and national security and strategic stability. Moreover, the governance challenge becomes uniquely complex as AI introduces speed, opacity to a level, concentration, global reach and dual use. This creates a governance paradox. Regulate too slowly and risk harm. Regulate too slowly and risk harm. Regulate too heavily and risk stagnation. The answer is not control versus innovation. The answer is intelligent governance. Therefore, the principle of AI governance should necessarily include human -centered design, transparency and accountability, risk -based regulations, global cooperation, and adaptive policies.

AI does not recognize borders. We need interoperable frameworks, shared safety standards, and cooperative oversight mechanisms. Governance frameworks must evolve as the artificial intelligence evolves. Static policies cannot manage dynamic intelligence. In this era, we move from individual, national -level policies to coordinated global norms, and that’s the necessity for today. History will not judge us by our sophisticated algorithms. It will judge us by the wisdom of our governance. The industrial revolution reshaped economies. The digital revolution reshaped communication. The AI revolution will reshape decision -making itself. With that power comes great responsibility. The digital revolution which we are undergoing today, surely we stand at crossroads. One path leads to inequity, instability and uncontrolled disruption. The other leads to augmented human capability, smart governance and inclusive prosperity.

The difference between these futures will not be determined by machines. It will be determined by us, the policy makers, the people who use it and each and every person who is involved in the process of AI governance. Therefore, we need to commit today to ourselves for building AI systems that are safe, secure, transparent, equitable and sustainable. and aligned with core human values. And that’s what we are going to discuss here today. Last but not the least, the message that this panel discussion and the fireside chat is going to give is let us govern intelligence with wisdom. Thank you so much.

Moderator

Thank you, sir. We are truly honored to have with us today a leader who has been forefront of technology -driven governance in Maharashtra. I now request Shri Ashish Shailar Sir, Honorable Minister of IT and Cultural Affairs, Government of Maharashtra, to grace us with a keynote address.

Mr. Ashish Shelar

Good morning to everybody. Respected guests, dignitaries, Excellencies and all the policy makers, members of the media, dear friends, young challengers, ladies and gentlemen. Namaskar, Vande Mataram and a very good morning to all. India today is not merely hosting an AI summit. India is helping to ride the operating system of AI age. We meet at Bharat Mandapam under the banner Maha AI, building safe, secure and smart governance. As a part of AI Impact Summit 2026, the first in its global series to be hosted in the global south. Over 20 heads of state, 60 ministers and hundreds of AI leaders from the industry and academia are here. Reflecting a shared vision. A shared conviction that AI must be inclusive, responsible and resilient.

I hereby say under the leadership of Chief Minister Devendra Fadanvisi, Maharashtra has positioned itself as a living laboratory for AI in governance. Our partnership with global technology leaders, for example, our AI -powered Mahak Crime OS, showcased by Microsoft’s Satya Nadellaji, has already transformed how we prevent, detect and investigate crime, faster response, shorter investigation cycles and more transparent processes. Simultaneously, our state digital agency, Mahaiti, is building what we call an intelligent government infrastructure, a cloud native, and a cloud -based infrastructure. modular, API -driven backbone that uses AI to integrate services, predict needs, and respond in real -time. This spans smart recruitment, AI -based property mapping for urban local bodies, real -time urban dashboard for traffic, weather, and civic issues, and pilots in flood management and smart mobility.

The philosophy is simple. Use AI not to distance the state from the citizens, but to make governance more human, faster, more responsive, and more inclusive. In other words, scale empathy through insight. Across the world, public sectors are resting with the same three imperatives. So better safeguard digital sovereignty. and adopt AI responsibly. Many countries have realized that interportal, public, date and robust AI governance are becoming strategic infrastructure at par with energy, transport or telecom. For Maharashtra, Maha AI is our response to this challenge. A safe, secure, smart governance stack must rest on five pillars. Computers, compute and cloud at scale number one, high quality public data sets number two, state AI governance number three, and interpolarity and standards number four, and capacity building is number five.

Smart governance is not only about deploying chatbots or dashboards. It is about building resilient, auditable, human -centered, AI systems. into the nerve systems of cities and states, transport, energy, public safety, urban planning, disaster response and welfare delivery, without trustworthy air governance, smart cities’ risk opacity, bias, security breaches and erosion of public trust. In Maharashtra, we see internet health as a core policy concern, just as physical health is essential for individuals, digital health is essential for societies. Disinformation, deepfakes, AI -generated fraud and cyberattacks can undermine democracies, markets and communities with unprecedented speed. Our response must be combined. That is robust cyber security, digital literacy and critical thinking, hybrid verification ecosystem. and that is our response as far as our state is concerned.

I am really happy to be the part of this summit and at the same time giving a response addressing the challenges and our ecosystem under the name of Mahayaya and therefore we are here to present our case as a building safe, secure, smart governance and appeal all the best of the technologies and platforms of the world to associate, coexist and work with us. Thank you so much. Thank you so much.

Moderator

Thank you, sir. Your vision for a digitally empowered Maharashtra truly sets the tone for everything we will discuss today. And now the highlight of today’s session. May I request all the panelists to join us on the stage please Sri Praveen Pardeshi Sir Yashasvi Adav Sir Dr. Anupam Chattopadhyay Dr. Amit Kapoor Mr. Suresh Sethi Major Ranjit Goswami Ms. Bina Sarkar Mr. Dev Rukhdar Davinder Sandhu Dr. Ganesh Ramakrishnan Vikash Chandra Rastogi Sir Rajesh Agarwal Sir Mr. Suresh Sethi Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Shri Yashastri Yadav, Additional Director General of Police, Maharashtra Cyber Department, Government of Maharashtra, Dr. Anupam Chattopadhyay, Associate Professor, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Dr. Amit Kapoor, Chair, Institute for Competitiveness, Mr.

Suresh Sethi, Managing Director and CEO, Protean EGov Technologies, Major Ranjit Goswami, Head, Corporate Affairs, Tata Consultancy Services, Ms. Beena Sarkar, Customer Success Executive Service Now, and moderating this conversation is Mr. Devaroop Dhar, Co -Founder and CEO, Primus Partners. I now hand over to Mr. Devaroop Dhar to moderate this session.

Mr. Devroop Dhar

Thank you, Aditi, and a warm welcome to all our panel members. I’ll start with Praveen Paradesi, sir. So, sir, at Mitra, you have been experimenting a lot with AI. There are multiple AI initiatives which have been taken. If you could share your thoughts, your vision as we start this.

Mr. Praveen Pardeshi

So first, the most important thing about AI is getting our energy, some of the hard things right. So one is energy because, you know, remember President Trump just mentioned that why should we be paying for Indians who are processing most of our answers. So I think we are pushing on green energy, more than 19 ,000 megawatts of that to come up at solar level. So that’s the fuel for AI in future. The second is that capacity building. So all our staff from Mitra and a lot of our other departments, we went to this AI university and gave them a course. And we also hope that there will be online courses available on IGOT where government staff can become empowered to use AI.

Then we look at what is the impact on the economy. So the impact on the economy, mostly people are concerned about the jobs. And that’s a real issue. One analysis from NITI. Shows that from 1950. to 2020, all highly educated people with postgraduate degrees, engineers, they are the ones who had a 95 % plus chance of getting jobs. But from 2020 till now, 0 .65 % is the rate at which physical jobs, that is, masons, bricklayers, home carers, their value and their employability is increasing vis -a -vis highly educated ones. So this is the impact of AI. So how should we do this better? One is, of course, as our Secretary IT mentioned, making it available in government, ensuring seamless access to services.

But other aspects which we don’t look at, which we are working through our state data authority, is how do we also encash the data at a large scale? Because otherwise we become… a sitting target for people to just use India’s data for monetizing their own values. So two big examples are pharmaceuticals. India has the largest population and the number of diseases, experiments, et cetera. Now, this is all health data, and this is very valuable for pharma companies. So the state data authority is working on issues wherein we can make it a single source of proof, make it available also, and if there is a commercial possibility, make those resources available to India, that is to our government, and not to be cashed for free.

So these are some of the applications. Government issues many, many orders. We have issued more than 150 ,000 orders, which are called government GRs. And it’s a maze through which it’s very difficult even for government officers, whose departments it is, to understand what is the latest position on a complicated situation. So we are working with Professor Ganesh here from IIT Mumbai. So Mitra and we are working together with them. And we are working with the government to make sure that we are getting the best results. And we are working with the government to make sure that we are getting the best results. disentangle all these orders through a small language model, not a large language model, and so that you can query at two levels.

One, for the government officers. The government officers should be able to ask in any complicated situation, what is the latest position on whether an additional FSIF or a building permit can be given in this situation or not, what are the Supreme Court orders. And on the other hand, citizens should also be able to ask under those rules. So this is called Maha GPT, and hopefully this will be the first application, which is both available to government officers and to citizens. I stop here.

Mr. Devroop Dhar

Thank you, sir, for sharing all these examples, wonderful examples. I’ll come to Yashishvi Yadav, sir. Cyber is another large user of AI. So if you could share your examples, your experience around how cyber is using AI.

Mr. Yashasvi Yadav

Okay, so law enforcement and cyber security. is one of the major concerns for law enforcement agencies all over the world. And I would like to draw your attention that under the visionary leadership of our Chief Minister, Mr. Devinder Fadnavis, who had the foresight to use AI in law enforcement work about five years ago. So we have launched and implemented this Maharashtra Cyber Security Project, which generously borrows AI tools, technologies, algorithms. And we are fighting real crime with these technologies. And the USP of this project is that the best and the most state -of -the -art tools, technologies, experienced consultants in the field of cyber security, and experienced and professional police officers have all coalesced, under one roof.

And there is a live police station as well. So this is how cyber security is being embellished through this project. And the beauty is that the dark web monitoring, threat analysis, social media monitoring, or any type of cyber crime, sextortion, ransomware, cyber bullying, and a lot of other types which cyber crime takes. They can all be undertaken, handled by just one, on the fingertips by just one helpline number, 1930. So this agency, if any kind of cyber issue is with any citizen, they can just dial this 1930 number and all the cyber solutions will be provided by more than 150 cyber consultants. So a lot of AI tools are being used. And this is the reason why we are using this and seamlessly.

And the best part of this whole exercise is that in less than six months, more than 1000 crore of rupees, which would have gone into the hand of the scamsters have been frozen and are being ultimately returned to the victims. What a big relief to the victims. And more than 70 young girls who were being subjected to intense cyberbullying, blackmailing and sextortion and were on the verge of committing suicide because of very efficient AI tracking. They were prevented from taking the extreme step. And 70 lives have been saved in less than six months of its operation. So that’s how AI is at the forefront. Thank you. Is at the forefront of being the bulwark against cyber security concerns.

I would like to draw your attention to only one report that we generated. which is called Echoes of Pahalgam. Now, in that case, while the Indian Army was fighting a conventional war with Pakistan because of the Pahalgam incident, more than one million cyber attacks were launched by nation -state actors, whom we called as APT, groups from Indonesia, Pakistan, and even Turkey, and so many other countries. And they were thwarted by such AI tools, which we call as threat intelligence tools, like Luminar, Cognite, or Pathfinder, which are big data analytical tools. So in the dark net, we still find the traces of these cyber attacks. So cyber crime is now slowly progressing into cyber terrorism and cyber warfare.

So that is what we have to be very, very careful. and before I end this preliminary address, I would like to also draw your attention what beyond AI? A big, big threat is lurking. It is called quantum computing. Now quantum computing can do processes in qubits, hundreds of millions of qubits. It’s at speed and it can solve complex issues in less than six seconds which the best of supercomputers would take more than 50 years to do it immediately. So quantum computing can break the best of encryptions including RSA encryptions of the banking industry, including blockchain technology. Now if these encryptions are broken in less than few minutes, the whole financial system can be lopsided and lots of money can flow into actors or threat actors which we are not aware at all.

Bitcoin can be broken Even credit card Encryptions can be broken Banking systems, encryptions can be broken So right now we have to prepare What quantum computing Can give us as in terms of Pros and what can be The shortcomings or dangers Lurking because of quantum Computing, the cons So we have to prepare because China And other countries have already invested 15 billion dollars Or even close to 20 billion dollars We have invested only 1 billion Dollar till now So that’s how we have to catch up with Quantum computing before it’s too late So this is how cyber security And law enforcement perspective On AI And I would like to pass on the baton To the next speaker, thank you

Mr. Devroop Dhar

Thank you sir, that was quite reassuring as well And since you spoke about quantum I want to bring in Dr. Anupam Chattopadhyay. Anupam, you’re working at the intersection of quantum and AI. So if you could share your thoughts, how are things moving in that direction? pooled into the product in order to help this. Thanks, Anupam, for giving a perspective, both from research as well as industry. So I’ll come to Suresh, you. So you’re working extensively in DPIs, and there’s a strong interaction between DPIs and AI. So from your experience, how are things moving in the DPI space, and how is AI influencing?

Mr. Suresh Sethi

Thanks, Devroop. I think from a DPI perspective, we are all very familiar. We today have population -scale digital rates. And, you know, that puts us in a very sweet spot because today a lot of times when we start using or embedding AI into any technology, are we ready to embed AI or not? And I think there was reference to data sets, how is data organized, how can you enable AI on top of it? So I think, first of all, the population -scale DPI that we have, that gives us a significant advantage. Whether we talk about identity, we talk about our UPI rails, which is the payment and the transactional layer which comes on top of it.

And similarly, when we look at data itself, DigiLocker today has millions of authenticated documents that come into play over there. So while we have the digital infrastructure in place, if we can embed an intelligence layer on top of it, and if the question is around targeting subsidy, getting the right beneficiary, putting the money in the hands of the right person, that becomes a very, very important and significant leverage. I will just take two or three examples where we see AI playing a significant role. One is that as we move from static identity to dynamic eligibility. Now, we’ve seen it all happen. Today, we have digitally verifiable credentials. So the moment you are using static identity, you are only able to prove who you are, what do you do.

and then you are applying for getting some sort of benefits or subsidy coming through to you. But if you have verifiable credentials, these are credentials which are machine readable. We talk about the concept of blue dot, which technically means all of us have certain attributes which are associated with us. If these are available in a machine readable format, then AI can actually determine who is eligible for what subsidy. The second part comes to the fact saying, are we being reactive or can we do predictive governance? And predictive governance can be strongly enabled by AI because the moment you are having credentials which are digitally verifiable, you are actually able to predict who needs some sort of subsidy.

Now today, if there’s a distress in income and that can be tracked, you can trigger some sort of benefit to that and coming at a government level. If you can put data. consented data being shared with the government, the same can come through. And last but not least is the important part related to inclusion error and exclusion error. So when we talk about inclusion error, we are talking about leakages. When we are talking about exclusion, naturally we are saying the right person is not getting what is due to them. So your ability to be able to predict precision using verification is going to be very critical. Again, an AI layer can be embedded over there.

But all this very clearly, and we’ve heard it before, all this is very clearly important to have the guardrails around it. So AI should be explainable. The moment we are saying explainable, today a decision taken not to give benefits to somebody should be very clearly explained. And similarly, if there are benefits going out, that should also be explainable. The second part is auditable. So whatever we are doing, there has to be an audit layer over there to explain what has happened. And more importantly, there should be a human redressal pathway because ultimately you can’t put everything to machines. You have to have that human person coming into play and having accountability settled over there. So I think these are critical aspects which can make governance more predictive, more precise, and more proactive going forward by embedding an intelligence layer into the DBI.

Mr. Devroop Dhar

Thanks, Suresh. I think very valid and meaningful points. I’ll come to Ranjit. Now, we’re talking about AI. There are a lot of happenings which are there. We have seen, we have heard about so many things at the summit. Now, a major tech company like TCS, which is doing a lot of work in this, how does large tech companies come in and collaborate with state governments? How can you enable that? What can be the steps in that?

Mr. Ranjeet Goswami

Thank you, Devroop. I think… we need to first take a holistic view of what are we trying to achieve with AI. The tagline for this summit, if we go by that, welfare for all, happiness for all is very holistically kind of captures it. As coming from Tata Group, I am reminded that 170 years back almost, our founding father, Jamshedji Tata spoke about giving us the guidance saying that society or community is not another stakeholder in the business. It is the purpose as to why the business exists in the first place. Similarly, if we were to apply the same analogy over here today, I think AI is not a technical tool which is fundamentally going to make the governance more efficient.

It is fundamentally meant for how to bring the benefit, welfare and happiness to the community at large. If we try and approach the question from that perspective, it definitely comes out. And like even Suresh alluded to, how do we make sure that it is inclusive, the people get the right benefits that they are entitled to, and do not go to somebody who is not entitled to. The colleague from the police forces also spoke about as to how the criminal tracking and other things. These are translating the intent into action at the ground level. Lastly, when it comes to organizations like DCS, we believe that each department in the government firstly should not be treated in isolation.

Each department in the government should have the ability to have a common database of people, be able to extract the information, and ensure that the citizen is seen as a citizen of the state or the country, and not as a citizen of the department. So that common databasing is something that we are trying to approach. We have the Aadhaar database. Not every department is still connected to it. Of course, we are trying to find a reason as to how that can become the major point of it. So small steps like that, and of course, bringing in the platform’s intelligence to its core. That’s fundamentally the steps that we have taken.

Mr. Devroop Dhar

Thanks, Ranjit. With that, I’ll go to Bina. Bina, I want to talk on the aspect of ethical AI biases, especially you work with women for ethical AI. How do you see biases or maybe biases around gender diversity creeping in and what needs to be done around this?

Ms. Beena Sarkar

Thank you, Debru. So, yes, I do work. I volunteer with the Women for Ethical AI South Asia chapter. It’s powered by UNESCO. So one of the key questions that we ask ourselves is what are we solving for? Every time and I’ve been looking at the various solutions that are. Debuting or being showcased as part of the. India AI mission. Many a times when we look at a particular hardware or a piece of any new device through which we are delivering what we now call as AI services, mostly on large language models, I should say that. What we sometimes seem to miss is the wood for the trees. I will just give a very hard example over here.

We do know smart glasses is not a new phenomenon. It was introduced by Google Glasses way back in 2015, I remember 2013, 2015, 2016, about that range. One of the reasons why it was recalled was you had safety concerns because people were taking images, videos without consent. we have seen the return of these glasses and those concerns have not gone away and yet you see them in the market you see it in India being sold in every in any optic store, in my neighborhood optic store I have my colleagues who flaunt it saying that I am so cool, I have taken the latest piece of technology so when we talk about how do you build ethics and governance Yashasvi sir said you are the best, you are the best framework.

So what this means is we are not giving guns to everybody. Right. India has been very, very smart about it. Of course, there are certain countries where owning a gun is is fine. It’s as for their rights. That doesn’t mean India has to adopt it. Right. We have our very able police force. We have the Indian army. Right. So what is exciting outside? One needs to contextualize it, humanize it, see if it is threatening 50 percent of your population. I’m a part of that population and then decide whether it even needs to exist. In that market. So when you’re building out solutions and when you’re building out devices, we have the India Safety Institute. It has been instituted in 2025.

I do know that. What I would urge policymakers is that it should not, while we do have it and I do know we are working with Research Institute, industry, industry, ideally, if any new device comes like this, the first line of defense, so to speak, should be this institute. That actually should determine whether it actually creates a problem for the police force, for cyber security, right? Does it threaten 50 % of the population? We are already seeing it playing out in the UK, US. There is no policy that protects us. Even now, we are not protected as women. Leave women, even children, right? So I think that is something one really needs to take into consideration. While we love technology, trust me, as a lady, I find it extremely liberating to be able to create applications with just language.

But if you use that technology against us by bringing out devices and hardware that endanger us, I feel that’s where it breaks down. So you definitely, as part of ethics, you need to evaluate it from that framework. I call it the Kali versus the Rakta Bija effect. I’m sure some of you know that. Why would you create a Rakta Bija? Create a Kali.

Mr. Devroop Dhar

So, Beena, I think a very valid point that you have made. With that, I’ll move to Dr. Amit Kapoor. We’re talking of AI and its impact and benefits. How do you see this benefit percolating? Next level of cities, tier 2, tier 3, other places.

Dr. Amit Kapoor

So, Devru, this is a very important question. And as I was hearing all the panelists here, I would like to rake a few points. We definitely agree that, yes, AI can be transformational. But we have to understand a couple of points here. One of them is that, S2, what is the quality of education that we are giving so that people are able to use it in the right earnest? In fact, the issue that Bina was talking about is about ethics, education, and so on and so forth. The larger point here is when you talk about the skill development levels in Maharashtra, out of the 100 % or 9 crore workforce that you have, only about 20 % of them are at skill level 3 and 4.

80 % of them are at skill level 1 and 2. So if you have to move beyond that, you need to do something far greater. That means you need to embed your education system and build it very strongly. And then the second point out here is that how do we use, and if you really want to talk about tier 1 and 2, sorry, tier 2 and tier 3 cities, we have to also understand that what is the level of penetration and quality of internet in these locations. We can tom -tom about internet and everything, but the numbers are not very supportive right now. And you talk about internet and broadband connectivity. There are severe issues with this within the state of Maharashtra itself, which is supposedly one of the finest states in terms of internet connectivity itself.

The average speed of internet traffic in Bombay or in Mumbai is about 58 Mbps on a broadband network. When you are talking about usage of AI, and if you want to take it to the masses, then you have to have far better, deeper internet connectivity and broadband. I think it has to be done on a war footing. Not that we are not getting there, but it will have to be done faster and quicker. The second thing is going to be about inadequacy of supporting infrastructure. So this is where I also see that there is a tremendous level of opportunity that exists in Maharashtra to create this. Because if you really look at it, like 16 % of India’s workforce, IT workforce, or what you call a technology workforce sits in one single city in Maharashtra.

That is Pune. So if you’re really talking about it, that means Maharashtra has the potential, the talent to really take it to the next level. And that is where you have to build infrastructure. You will have to build what you call, when you talk about the data centers, et cetera, the opportunity does exist and things. And last but not the least is about, it’s going to be about cost and affordability. You will have to bring cost and affordability to these services as you go along. But having said that, I think the larger potential, we have not touched here. And when you talk about Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, this technology has a huge possible impact that can be done at Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, and that is about nutrition.

Today, Maharashtra actually has a problem on nutrition. Fifty percent of the people in Maharashtra are malnourished even today. How do I use this technology to assess what is happening in my PIN code level or a smaller level of geography in various cities? And location. The second thing is about water and sanitation, access to basic knowledge. What about access to can AI solve my education problem in tier two and tier three cities? In fact, none of us is talking about the elephant in the room. And that elephant in the room is that we are all super excited about AI, but we are not understanding that AI is also going to be the biggest dumping down element for the society.

In fact, when you talk about AI itself, it is going to make bonobos out of us. People out here, when you actually use the doom scrolling, when you talk about Instagram, what is happening to our children? And that is exactly what AI is going to do. How do we set our education system right? That’s what you have to do in tier two and tier three cities. Last point, and that is about the higher education space itself. When you talk about your workforce, and close to about 50 % of it is underemployed. So I have to disagree with Praveen for one small point. He made a very powerful point in terms of saying that how after 2020, there has been a transformation.

In terms of how people are getting jobs, et cetera. I do agree with. But the larger point here is that we are also not preparing our workforce right, and that is happening in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. So we need to take it there. Potential exists. As of today, Maharashtra is the engine of growth in India. We cannot debate that. Even today, it is about close to 17 % to 18 % of India’s GDP, and it will define India’s growth story in the future, definitely. But if Maharashtra does it right, then the country can follow suit on this. And that is where things have to be.

Mr. Devroop Dhar

Thank you, Dr. Amit. And thanks to all the panelists. So with that, we’ll come to the end of the panel discussion.

Moderator

Thank you so much. Thank you to all our esteemed panelists and senior officers who are here. May I request all our panelists to just step forward for a photo? Very interesting, sir. May I request you to join our esteemed panelists? on this piece. Thank you. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (42)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (5)
Confirmedhigh

“Artificial intelligence is already reshaping governance, markets and geopolitics.”

The knowledge base states that AI is influencing governance, markets, public services and even geopolitics, confirming the claim.

Additional Contextmedium

“The answer is not control versus innovation but intelligent governance – a human‑centred, transparent, risk‑based and globally coordinated framework.”

S56 discusses the need to move deliberately and maintain things alongside acceleration, adding nuance to the concept of balanced, intelligent governance.

Confirmedhigh

“The AI Impact Summit 2026 is the first AI summit hosted in the global south.”

S116 notes that the AI Impact Summit 2026 will be the first global AI summit of this scale convened in the Global South, confirming the claim.

Additional Contextmedium

“The minister warned of digital‑health, disinformation, deep‑fakes and cyber‑fraud, proposing a combined response of robust cyber‑security, digital‑literacy and critical‑thinking, and a hybrid verification ecosystem.”

S123 highlights concerns around digital health technology and the need to address digital disparity, providing additional context to the minister’s warning about digital‑health risks.

Additional Contextmedium

“The State Data Authority is creating a single source of truth for health and other public datasets, aiming to monetise these assets for national benefit rather than allowing foreign exploitation.”

S124 discusses strategic sovereignty through data control and governance policies, adding nuance to the claim about a single source of truth and monetisation to protect national interests.

External Sources (128)
S1
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — Mr. Virendra Singh established the intellectual foundation by reframing the central question facing policymakers. Rather…
S2
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — – Mr. Praveen Pardeshi- Ms. Beena Sarkar – Ms. Beena Sarkar- Most other panelists
S3
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — -Dr. Amit Kapoor- Role/Title: Chair, Institute for Competitiveness, Area of expertise: Economic policy, competitiveness,…
S4
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — -Mr. Ashish Shelar- Role/Title: Honorable Minister of IT and Cultural Affairs, Government of Maharashtra, Area of expert…
S5
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — -Ashish Shailar- Honorable Minister (specific portfolio not mentioned)
S6
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — -Mr. Ashish Shelar- Role/Title: Honorable Minister of IT and Cultural Affairs, Government of Maharashtra, Area of expert…
S7
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/secure-talk-using-ai-to-protect-global-communications-privacy — A guest on the fireside chat is a seasoned global telecom leader who has not only defined the arc of the industry, but a…
S8
Keynote-Rishad Premji — -Mr. Dario Amote: Role/Title: Not specified; Area of expertise: Artificial intelligence (described as pioneer and though…
S9
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — -Major Ranjit Goswami- Role/Title: Head, Corporate Affairs, Tata Consultancy Services, Area of expertise: Technology sol…
S10
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — – Mr. Ashish Shelar- Mr. Praveen Pardeshi- Mr. Yashasvi Yadav
S11
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/mahaai-building-safe-secure-smart-governance — Thank you, sir, for sharing all these examples, wonderful examples. I’ll come to Yashishvi Yadav, sir. Cyber is another …
S12
Keynote-Olivier Blum — -Moderator: Role/Title: Conference Moderator; Area of Expertise: Not mentioned -Mr. Schneider: Role/Title: Not mentione…
S13
Keynote-Vinod Khosla — -Moderator: Role/Title: Moderator of the event; Area of Expertise: Not mentioned -Mr. Jeet Adani: Role/Title: Not menti…
S14
Day 0 Event #250 Building Trust and Combatting Fraud in the Internet Ecosystem — – **Frode Sørensen** – Role/Title: Online moderator, colleague of Johannes Vallesverd, Area of Expertise: Online session…
S15
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — – Mr. Ashish Shelar- Mr. Praveen Pardeshi- Mr. Yashasvi Yadav – Mr. Suresh Sethi- Mr. Praveen Pardeshi
S16
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — – Mr. Praveen Pardeshi- Mr. Ranjeet Goswami- Mr. Suresh Sethi – Mr. Virendra Singh- Mr. Suresh Sethi
S17
Building the Workforce_ AI for Viksit Bharat 2047 — Dr. Singh’s key assertion was that “artificial intelligence can substitute everything on this planet but it cannot subst…
S18
9821st meeting — For Mozambique, it is essential that the international community establishes norms and standards that promote trust and …
S19
Panel 3 – Legal and Regulatory Tools to Reduce Risks and Strengthen Resilience  — The level of disagreement was moderate and constructive. Speakers shared common goals of protecting submarine cable infr…
S20
Unveiling Trade Secrets: Exploring the Implications of trade agreements for AI Regulation in the Global South — In conclusion, Brazil’s ongoing efforts to establish a comprehensive legal framework for AI regulation are commendable. …
S21
AI reshapes cybercrime investigations in India — Maharashtra policeare expandingthe use of an AI-powered investigation platform developed with Microsoft to tackle the ra…
S22
AI-driven Cyber Defense: Empowering Developing Nations | IGF 2023 — Another concern is the challenges AI poses for law enforcement agencies. AI technology performs tasks at a pace that sur…
S23
AI Automation in Telecom_ Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust India AI Impact Summit 2026 — Sure. Thanks. Thanks for your question. I think this builds on actually the last couple of comments. I mean, what we’re …
S24
Building Population-Scale Digital Public Infrastructure for AI — And I’ll give you a small example as to how diffusion is happening. First of all, Shankar, really honored to have worked…
S25
AI for Democracy_ Reimagining Governance in the Age of Intelligence — I believe this had been the most important event. We are more or less actually reaching to the… culmination of this hi…
S26
Regulating Open Data_ Principles Challenges and Opportunities — In fact, the real question is the criticality of data in identifying relevant areas of policy intervention by the state …
S27
Ethical principles for the use of AI in cybersecurity | IGF 2023 WS #33 — Amal El Fallah Seghrouchini:Hello, everybody. I am very happy to talk about AI in cybersecurity. And I think that there …
S28
Cybercrime: Recognising and preventing malicious activities online — Given the potential harm caused by cybercrime and the challenges that law enforcement agencies face bringing offenders t…
S29
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained inparagraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 part 5 — Peru: Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Following the guiding questions for this section on CBMs and good practices, …
S30
From High-Performance Computing to High-Performance Problem Solving / Davos 2025 — Quantum computing poses a potential threat to current encryption methods
S31
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Several countries shared their approaches to balancing innovation with governance. InWS #283, Jayantha Fernando from Sri…
S32
WS #98 Towards a global, risk-adaptive AI governance framework — Mateos emphasizes the need to balance innovation and regulation in AI risk frameworks. She argues that while protecting …
S33
Panel Discussion Summary: AI Governance Implementation and Capacity Building in Government — In the document and then in our trainings, we have four pillars. They’re all linked. The first pillar is context-based a…
S34
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — So the goal of Genesis Project is to really, one, align public and private partnership, two, invest government resources…
S35
Digital Democracy Leveraging the Bhashini Stack in the Parliamen — Harleen Kaur outlined the policy framework built around four pillars: treating foundational datasets as public goods, in…
S36
Global South at the heart of India AI plan — India hasunveiledthe New Delhi Frontier AI Impact Commitments, a new initiative aimed at promoting inclusive and respons…
S37
Powering AI _ Global Leaders Session _ AI Impact Summit India Part 2 — And if you combine with the AI and you build your AI stack properly, you are looking for round the clock green power. So…
S38
Encryption — There are concerns that quantum computers, when widely available, could undermine current encryption techniques, renderi…
S39
Opening of the session/OEWG 2025 — AI can be used for automated phishing attacks and deepfake-based disinformation campaigns. Quantum computing has the pot…
S40
Pre 12: Resilience of IoT Ecosystems: Preparing for the Future — Cybersecurity | Human rights Emerging Technology Threats and Quantum Computing Impact IoT devices currently collect an…
S41
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance — Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S42
Open Forum #64 Local AI Policy Pathways for Sustainable Digital Economies — Achieving inclusive AI requires addressing inequalities across three fundamental areas: access to computing infrastructu…
S43
Gender rights online — AI systems can learnbiasesfrom training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes online, includinggender-based dispariti…
S44
High-Level Session 4: From Summit of the Future to WSIS+ 20 — Walton raises concerns about the ethical implications of AI and other emerging technologies. He emphasizes the need for …
S45
Cybersecurity, cybercrime, and online safety — Lucien Castex:Thank you. Thank you very much, Veronika. It’s indeed quite important to bring a gender perspective to cyb…
S46
Disrupt Harm: Accountability for a Safer Internet | IGF 2023 Open Forum #146 — APC and their members are looking to shift the narrative around gender issues online to focus on the positive aspects an…
S47
Framework to Develop Gender-responsive Cybersecurity Policy | IGF 2023 WS #477 — Additionally, there was a discussion on the gender perspective of cybercrime legislation and the strategies employed. Je…
S48
Comprehensive Report: China’s AI Plus Economy Initiative – A Strategic Discussion on Artificial Intelligence Development and Implementation — Zhang and Professor Gong Ke agreed on the fundamental importance of infrastructure development for AI advancement. Their…
S49
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services — And if we use AI, we can also use it for the security of our business. And how can we train the national data? That’s wh…
S50
Multistakeholder Partnerships for Thriving AI Ecosystems — -Infrastructure and capacity building as foundational requirements: Discussion covered the need for sensing infrastructu…
S51
Inclusive AI governance: Universal values in a pluralistic world — embedintercultural philosophical engagementinto policy-making processes prioritisehuman-centric governancethat protects…
S52
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — The roadmap is built upon core principles including “human and planetary welfare, accountability and transparency, inclu…
S53
AI for Social Empowerment_ Driving Change and Inclusion — He asks how governments and institutions can govern AI responsibly to minimise labour market disruption and ensure a smo…
S54
Open Forum #30 High Level Review of AI Governance Including the Discussion — ## Introduction and Context Lucia Russo: Thank you, Yoichi. Good morning and thank you my fellow panelists for this int…
S55
The perils of forcing encryption to say “AI, AI captain” | IGF 2023 Town Hall #28 — Increasingly, proposals across jurisdictions are pushing for content scanning or detection mechanisms in end-to-end encr…
S56
AI Meets Cybersecurity Trust Governance & Global Security — Alejandro Mayoral Banos,: is not only a technical matter. It is essentially a human rights issue. We will discuss today…
S57
Advancing Scientific AI with Safety Ethics and Responsibility — -Balancing Open Science with Security: Panelists explored the challenge of preserving open science benefits while preven…
S58
European Tech Sovereignty: Feasibility, Challenges, and Strategic Pathways Forward — Virkkunen explains that the EU’s AI regulation is not as comprehensive as critics suggest, focusing primarily on high-ri…
S59
Open Forum #58 Collaborating for Trustworthy AI an Oecd Toolkit and Spotlight on AI in Government — ### Initiative Background Jungwook Kim: Thank you. So Korea is ranked as one of the leading countries in OECD Digital G…
S60
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — man’s promise. It can enhance public service delivery, it can improve decision -making, it can optimize resource managem…
S61
Reinventing Digital Inclusion / DAVOS 2025 — Paula Ingabire discusses Rwanda’s focus on identifying AI use cases that can transform public sector delivery. This appr…
S62
Agentic AI and the new industrial diplomacy — Several trends are converging:UNandUNESCOframeworks emphasize that AI should augment human capabilities, not replace hum…
S63
Secure Finance Risk-Based AI Policy for the Banking Sector — It should be risk -based intensity. Fairness and non -discrimination. Third is explainability and transparency. And four…
S64
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — Algorithmic transparency is a critical topic discussed in various sessions, notably in the9821st meetingof the AI Securi…
S65
HIGH LEVEL LEADERS SESSION IV — The analysis highlights several key points regarding the importance of a human rights-based approach to new technologies…
S66
Day 0 Event #165 From Policy to Practice: Gender, Diversity and Cybersecurity — Canada requires all policy initiatives and programs to undergo a Gender-Based Analysis Assessment (GBA+). This assessmen…
S67
Digital Policy Perspectives — Their activities are directed towards enhancing gender equality in the digital space, aligning with the aims of Sustaina…
S68
Human Rights-Centered Global Governance of Quantum Technologies: Implications for AI, Digital Rights, and the Digital Divide — **Dual-Use Risks**: Quantum technologies present both opportunities and threats, particularly regarding encryption and s…
S69
Launch / Award Event #169 Report Launch: Quantum encryption: blessing or havoc? — Strong consensus exists on the urgency of quantum threats, need for multi-stakeholder coordination, IoT vulnerabilities,…
S70
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? — Responsible Deployment of AI and Quantum Computing in Critical InfrastructureThe deployment of emerging technologies lik…
S71
Quantum-IoT-Infrastructure: Security for Cyberspace | IGF 2023 WS #421 — It is argued that governments and the technology industry need to continuously and significantly invest in quantum techn…
S72
MahaAI Building Safe Secure & Smart Governance — Artificial intelligence is real and it is influencing governance, markets, public services and even geopolitics. The que…
S73
Panel Discussion Inclusion Innovation & the Future of AI — This comment fundamentally redefines AI governance from a defensive, compliance-focused activity to a proactive, value-c…
S74
Impact & the Role of AI How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Everything — That is why we must frame this not simply as technology policy, but as democratic governance. The choices made today abo…
S75
Main Session 2: The governance of artificial intelligence — The innovation vs. risk management debate represents a false dichotomy – both elements must be addressed simultaneously …
S76
Panel Discussion Summary: AI Governance Implementation and Capacity Building in Government — So two years ago, the French Prime Minister’s Digital Directorate elaborated a strategy based on five pillars. The first…
S77
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — So the goal of Genesis Project is to really, one, align public and private partnership, two, invest government resources…
S78
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — The Chief Minister positioned Maharashtra as offering a compelling agri-innovation ecosystem, actively inviting venture …
S79
AI and Data Driving India’s Energy Transformation for Climate Solutions — -Building Climate and Energy Data Infrastructure: The discussion focused on creating unified, standardized data architec…
S80
Powering AI _ Global Leaders Session _ AI Impact Summit India Part 2 — And if you combine with the AI and you build your AI stack properly, you are looking for round the clock green power. So…
S81
Need and Impact of Full Stack Sovereign AI by CoRover BharatGPT — Ankush points out that data is the raw material for AI and that India’s massive data generation enables a sovereign AI e…
S82
Encryption — There are concerns that quantum computers, when widely available, could undermine current encryption techniques, renderi…
S83
Opening of the session/OEWG 2025 — AI can be used for automated phishing attacks and deepfake-based disinformation campaigns. Quantum computing has the pot…
S84
Ethical principles for the use of AI in cybersecurity | IGF 2023 WS #33 — Amal El Fallah Seghrouchini:Hello, everybody. I am very happy to talk about AI in cybersecurity. And I think that there …
S85
Pre 12: Resilience of IoT Ecosystems: Preparing for the Future — Cybersecurity | Human rights Emerging Technology Threats and Quantum Computing Impact IoT devices currently collect an…
S86
Dynamic Coalition Collaborative Session — Cybersecurity | Infrastructure | Encryption Quantum computing as threat versus solution The speaker presents a more op…
S87
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance — Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S88
Gender rights online — AI systems can learnbiasesfrom training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes online, includinggender-based dispariti…
S89
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — Algorithmic transparency is a critical topic discussed in various sessions, notably in the9821st meetingof the AI Securi…
S90
High-Level Session 4: From Summit of the Future to WSIS+ 20 — Walton raises concerns about the ethical implications of AI and other emerging technologies. He emphasizes the need for …
S91
S92
Keynote by Uday Shankar Vice Chairman_JioStar India — The tone is consistently optimistic and visionary throughout, beginning with congratulatory remarks and maintaining an i…
S93
Welcome Address — The tone is consistently optimistic, visionary, and confident throughout the speech. Modi maintains an inspirational and…
S94
Opening address of the co-chairs of the AI Governance Dialogue — The tone is consistently formal, diplomatic, and optimistic throughout. It maintains a ceremonial quality appropriate fo…
S95
Opening — The overall tone was formal yet optimistic. Speakers acknowledged the serious challenges posed by rapid technological ch…
S96
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw — The tone is consistently visionary, authoritative, and optimistic throughout. The speaker maintains an inspirational and…
S97
AI, Data Governance, and Innovation for Development — The overall tone was optimistic and solution-oriented, with speakers focusing on practical ways to overcome obstacles th…
S98
How Small AI Solutions Are Creating Big Social Change — The discussion maintained a consistently optimistic and collaborative tone throughout. Panelists demonstrated mutual res…
S99
Capacity Building in Digital Health — The discussion maintained an optimistic and solution-oriented tone throughout, with panelists acknowledging significant …
S100
Building Population-Scale Digital Public Infrastructure for AI — The tone is optimistic and collaborative throughout, with speakers sharing concrete examples of successful implementatio…
S101
Workshop 3: Quantum Computing: Global Challenges and Security Opportunities — The discussion aimed to examine the current state and future implications of quantum computing, focusing on both the opp…
S102
Shaping an inclusive global action to anticipate quantum technologies — Audience 6:So for anyone who is dealing with quantum computing, will know that the quantum computing is actually picture…
S103
Pathways to De-escalation — The overall tone was serious and somewhat cautious, reflecting the gravity of cybersecurity challenges. While the speake…
S104
Strengthening Corporate Accountability on Inclusive, Trustworthy, and Rights-based Approach to Ethical Digital Transformation — The discussion maintained a professional, collaborative tone throughout, with speakers demonstrating expertise while ack…
S105
Open Forum #46 Developing a Secure Rights Respecting Digital Future — The discussion maintained a consistently collaborative and constructive tone throughout. It was professional yet accessi…
S106
Bridging the Digital Divide: Inclusive ICT Policies for Sustainable Development — ### Ethics and Environmental Challenges Hakikur Rahman: This is Dr. Haktikur Rahman from International Standard Univers…
S107
WS #257 Emerging Norms for Digital Public Infrastructure — The tone of the discussion was largely analytical and academic, with panelists offering nuanced views based on their exp…
S108
Multigenerational Collaboration: Rethinking Work, Learning and Inclusion in the Digital Age — The discussion maintained a professional yet urgent tone throughout, with speakers expressing both optimism about collab…
S109
Any other business /Adoption of the report/ Closure of the session — In conclusion, the session ended with a sense of accomplishment for the work done and a hopeful outlook for the future. …
S110
Closing Ceremony — The discussion maintains a consistently positive and collaborative tone throughout, characterized by gratitude, celebrat…
S111
[Parliamentary Session Closing] Closing remarks — The tone of the discussion was formal yet collaborative and appreciative. There was a sense of accomplishment for the wo…
S112
Closing Session  — The tone throughout the discussion was consistently formal, collaborative, and optimistic. It maintained a celebratory y…
S113
Information Society in Times of Risk — The discussion maintained a consistently academic and collaborative tone throughout. It was professional and research-fo…
S114
WS #162 Overregulation: Balance Policy and Innovation in Technology — James Nathan Adjartey Amattey, from the private sector in Africa, pointed out that the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated th…
S115
Press Briefing by HMIT Ashwani Vaishnav on AI Impact Summit 2026 l Day 5 — Congratulations on the declaration, sir. I just wanted to know, could you give us names of some of the countries that ha…
S116
Prominent United Nations leaders to attend AI Impact Summit 2026 — Senior United Nations leaders, including Antonio Guterres, will take part in theAI Impact Summit 2026, set to be held in…
S117
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — AI is a risk. AI is a risk. AI is a risk. is a dominant source of harm. That requires urgent attention and action. First…
S118
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/press-briefing-by-hmit-ashwani-vaishnav-on-ai-impact-summit-2026-l-day-5 — Sir, my question is in regards to the Global South. Since this was the first summit to be held in a Global South country…
S119
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges — The technical requirements for trustworthy AI emerged through multiple perspectives. Valerian Ghez from photonic quantum…
S120
Microsoft at 50 – A journey through code, cloud, and AI — Microsoft, the American tech giant, wasfounded50 years ago, on 4 April 1975, by Harvard dropout Bill Gates and his child…
S121
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-driven-enforcement_-better-governance-through-effective-compliance-services — The vision of a sovereign SLM for the tax domain stands out as a transformative initiative. The session on a Roadmap on …
S122
A Conversation with Satya Nadella and Klaus Schwab — Satya has been at Microsoft for 32 years, having experienced major paradigm shifts in industry. This virtual forum allo…
S123
Digital Health at the crossroads of human rights, AI governance, and e-trade (SouthCentre) — In conclusion, digital health technology holds immense potential for improving health systems globally. However, it is e…
S124
Agents of Change AI for Government Services & Climate Resilience — Governments can implement strategic sovereignty through data control and governance policies while pursuing longer-term …
S125
Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence | IGF 2023 — All the groups in the end navigated towards capacity building and included some recommendations or sentences on that.
S126
International multistakeholder cooperation for AI standards | IGF 2023 WS #465 — Audience:Holly, please. Hi. I’m Holly Hamblett with Consumers International. We’re a membership organization of consumer…
S127
Panel Discussion: 01 — Capacity development | Artificial intelligence
S128
Seismic Shift — GW target for wind power had been met. While the deployment of utility-scale solar is largely on track, the deployment o…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
M
Mr. Virendra Singh
2 arguments110 words per minute371 words201 seconds
Argument 1
Intelligent, human‑centered AI governance
EXPLANATION
He argues that AI governance must be built around human‑centered design, ensuring transparency and accountability. This approach places people at the core of AI policy rather than technology alone.
EVIDENCE
He states that the principle of AI governance should necessarily include human-centered design, transparency and accountability, risk-based regulations, global cooperation, and adaptive policies [13].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The five core principles of “intelligent governance”-human-centred design, transparency, accountability, risk-based regulation, global cooperation and adaptive policies-are detailed in the MahaAI report [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Human‑centered AI governance
AGREED WITH
Mr. Ashish Shelar, Mr. Suresh Sethi, Ms. Beena Sarkar
Argument 2
Risk‑based regulation, global cooperation, and adaptive policies
EXPLANATION
He highlights the need for regulation that balances speed and rigor, warning against both under‑regulation and over‑regulation. Risk‑based, globally coordinated, and adaptable policies are presented as the solution.
EVIDENCE
He notes that regulating too slowly risks harm while regulating too heavily risks stagnation, and emphasizes risk-based regulation, global cooperation and adaptive policies as part of AI governance [8-10][13].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S1 emphasizes risk‑based regulation, coordinated global cooperation and adaptive policy frameworks as essential components of AI governance.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Balanced AI regulation
AGREED WITH
Moderator, Mr. Devroop Dhar
M
Mr. Ashish Shelar
3 arguments99 words per minute586 words351 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑powered Mahak Crime OS improves crime detection, transparency, and response
EXPLANATION
He describes an AI‑driven crime‑fighting operating system that accelerates investigation and enhances transparency. The system is presented as a concrete example of AI improving public safety.
EVIDENCE
He cites the AI-powered Mahak Crime OS, showcased by Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, which has transformed crime prevention, detection and investigation by enabling faster response, shorter investigation cycles and more transparent processes [47].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AI-powered Mahak Crime OS is being rolled out to over 1,100 police stations in Maharashtra, accelerating investigations and enhancing transparency [S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for crime detection
Argument 2
Mahaiti cloud‑native infrastructure enables real‑time, AI‑driven public services
EXPLANATION
He outlines a cloud‑native, modular, API‑driven platform that uses AI to integrate services, predict needs and respond instantly. The infrastructure supports a range of smart‑city applications.
EVIDENCE
He describes Mahaiti, the state digital agency’s cloud-native, modular, API-driven infrastructure that uses AI to integrate services, predict needs and respond in real-time, supporting smart recruitment, property mapping, urban dashboards, flood management and smart mobility pilots [48-49].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The MahaAI document describes Mahaiti as a modular, API-driven, cloud-native backbone that integrates services and delivers real-time AI-driven public-service outcomes [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑enabled digital infrastructure
AGREED WITH
Mr. Praveen Pardeshi, Mr. Suresh Sethi, Mr. Ranjeet Goswami
Argument 3
“Scale empathy through insight” – AI to make governance more human
EXPLANATION
He emphasizes that AI should bring the state closer to citizens, making governance faster, more responsive and inclusive. The guiding principle is described as scaling empathy through insight.
EVIDENCE
He explains the philosophy of using AI to make governance more human, faster, more responsive and inclusive, summarised as ‘scale empathy through insight’ [51-53].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The guiding philosophy of “scale empathy through insight” for more human, faster and inclusive governance is articulated in the MahaAI report [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Human‑centric AI governance
AGREED WITH
Mr. Virendra Singh, Mr. Suresh Sethi, Ms. Beena Sarkar
M
Mr. Praveen Pardeshi
2 arguments171 words per minute601 words209 seconds
Argument 1
State data authority to monetize data responsibly and protect national interests
EXPLANATION
He argues that the state must treat large‑scale data as a strategic asset, monetising it while ensuring benefits remain with India. The health data of the population is given as a key example.
EVIDENCE
He explains that the state data authority is working to monetise large-scale data such as health data for pharmaceuticals, creating a single source of proof and ensuring commercial benefits stay with India rather than being given away for free [96-102].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S1 reports that the state data authority is developing mechanisms to monetise large‑scale health data while ensuring commercial benefits remain with India.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Responsible data monetisation
DISAGREED WITH
Mr. Yashasvi Yadav
Argument 2
Maha GPT for querying government orders and citizen services
EXPLANATION
He presents ‘Maha GPT’, a small language model designed to parse over 150,000 government orders, enabling both officials and citizens to query the latest regulatory positions. This tool aims to increase transparency and accessibility of governance information.
EVIDENCE
He outlines the development of ‘Maha GPT’, a small language model that can disentangle over 150,000 government orders, allowing government officers and citizens to query the latest positions on permits, Supreme Court orders and other rules [108-114].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The MahaAI paper outlines the creation of “Maha GPT”, a small language model that can parse over 150,000 government orders for officials and citizens [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven government information access
M
Mr. Yashasvi Yadav
3 arguments129 words per minute756 words350 seconds
Argument 1
AI tools in Maharashtra Cyber Security Project detect and prevent cybercrime, saving lives
EXPLANATION
He highlights the deployment of AI across multiple cyber‑security functions, which has led to substantial financial recoveries and the protection of vulnerable individuals. The project is portrayed as a life‑saving initiative.
EVIDENCE
He notes that the Maharashtra Cyber Security Project employs AI tools to fight real crime, leading to over 1,000 crore rupees frozen and returned to victims, and the rescue of more than 70 young girls from cyber-bullying, saving 70 lives within six months [122-124][130-136].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The Maharashtra Cyber Security Project leverages AI tools to combat real crime, freezing assets and rescuing victims, as described in the MahaAI report [S1] and reinforced by AI-driven cybercrime investigation case studies [S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for cyber‑security and victim protection
Argument 2
AI‑driven threat intelligence thwarted nation‑state cyber attacks
EXPLANATION
He cites a specific incident where AI‑based threat‑intelligence platforms blocked large‑scale attacks from multiple nation‑state actors. The success demonstrates AI’s strategic defensive capability.
EVIDENCE
He references the ‘Echoes of Pahalgam’ report where AI-driven threat-intelligence tools such as Luminar, Cognite and Pathfinder thwarted nation-state cyber attacks launched during a conventional war with Pakistan [139-141].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AI-based threat-intelligence platforms are highlighted as key to defending against sophisticated nation-state attacks in the IGF 2023 discussion on AI-driven cyber defence [S22].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑enabled threat intelligence
Argument 3
Quantum computing threatens encryption; urgent preparedness needed
EXPLANATION
He warns that quantum computers can break current encryption standards, jeopardising financial systems and blockchain technologies. Immediate investment and preparedness are urged to stay ahead of global competitors.
EVIDENCE
He warns that quantum computing, capable of processing hundreds of millions of qubits in seconds, can break RSA, blockchain and banking encryptions, posing a major risk to financial systems and urging urgent preparedness [145-150].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Both the MahaAI report and the Davos 2025 briefing note warn that quantum computers can break RSA, blockchain and banking encryptions, calling for immediate preparedness [S1][S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Quantum risk to cybersecurity
DISAGREED WITH
Mr. Praveen Pardeshi
M
Mr. Suresh Sethi
3 arguments162 words per minute643 words237 seconds
Argument 1
Population‑scale DPI provides data foundation for AI in identity, subsidies, and payments
EXPLANATION
He points out that India’s extensive digital public infrastructure, covering identity, payments and document storage, creates a massive data pool for AI applications. This foundation enables AI‑driven services at scale.
EVIDENCE
He notes that India’s population-scale digital public infrastructure, including identity systems, UPI payment rails and DigiLocker documents, provides a massive data foundation for AI applications [160-166].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Building population-scale digital public infrastructure as a data backbone for AI applications is discussed in the AI-for-development briefing [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
DPI as AI data backbone
Argument 2
Dynamic eligibility and predictive governance enabled by AI on verifiable credentials
EXPLANATION
He explains that machine‑readable, verifiable credentials allow AI to determine who is eligible for subsidies and to anticipate needs, shifting governance from reactive to predictive. This enhances precision and reduces errors.
EVIDENCE
He describes how verifiable, machine-readable credentials enable AI to determine dynamic eligibility for subsidies and support predictive governance by anticipating income distress and triggering benefits automatically [167-176].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑driven dynamic eligibility
AGREED WITH
Mr. Ashish Shelar, Dr. Amit Kapoor
DISAGREED WITH
Dr. Amit Kapoor
Argument 3
Necessity of explainability, auditability, and human redress in AI‑driven DPI
EXPLANATION
He stresses that AI decisions must be transparent, auditable and subject to human oversight to maintain accountability. Explainability and redress mechanisms are presented as essential guardrails.
EVIDENCE
He stresses that AI systems must be explainable, auditable and include human redress pathways to ensure accountability when decisions about benefits are made [184-190].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance safeguards for AI
AGREED WITH
Ms. Beena Sarkar
M
Mr. Ranjeet Goswami
2 arguments156 words per minute361 words138 seconds
Argument 1
Tata’s holistic AI approach focuses on welfare, common databases, and Aadhaar integration
EXPLANATION
He invokes Tata’s legacy to argue that AI should serve welfare and happiness, requiring shared databases across departments and integration with Aadhaar. This holistic view aims to treat citizens as members of the state rather than of isolated agencies.
EVIDENCE
He references Tata’s 170-year legacy, stating that AI should serve welfare and happiness for all, requiring common databases across departments and integration with Aadhaar to view citizens as state or country members rather than departmental entities [200-215].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for inclusive welfare
Argument 2
Collaboration between government and large tech firms to embed intelligence in core platforms
EXPLANATION
He highlights the need for partnership between public authorities and major technology companies to integrate AI capabilities into foundational platforms. Such collaboration is portrayed as essential for scaling intelligent governance.
EVIDENCE
He notes that embedding intelligence into core platforms requires collaboration between government and large technology companies, emphasizing the need to bring platform intelligence to the core of systems [216-217].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Public‑private AI collaboration
M
Ms. Beena Sarkar
2 arguments116 words per minute592 words306 seconds
Argument 1
Evaluation of emerging hardware (e.g., smart glasses) for privacy and gender safety
EXPLANATION
She raises concerns about new wearable devices that may infringe on privacy, especially for women, citing past issues with Google Glass. The argument calls for careful assessment before widespread adoption.
EVIDENCE
She highlights safety concerns of smart glasses, recalling the Google Glass recall due to non-consensual image capture, and stresses the need to assess privacy and gender-related risks of such devices [230-236].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Hardware privacy and gender impact
DISAGREED WITH
Mr. Ashish Shelar
Argument 2
Recommendation for India Safety Institute to vet technologies for societal impact
EXPLANATION
She proposes that the India Safety Institute, created in 2025, should act as the first line of defense to evaluate new technologies for potential threats to public safety, especially for women and children. This institutional mechanism aims to safeguard society.
EVIDENCE
She recommends that the India Safety Institute, established in 2025, should serve as the first line of defense to evaluate new technologies for potential threats to police, cybersecurity and societal safety, especially for women and children [244-250].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Institutional tech safety review
D
Dr. Amit Kapoor
3 arguments202 words per minute911 words269 seconds
Argument 1
AI can monitor nutrition, water, sanitation, and education at granular geographic levels
EXPLANATION
He suggests that AI can be deployed to assess essential services such as nutrition, water and sanitation down to the PIN‑code level, enabling targeted interventions. This granular monitoring is presented as a way to address malnutrition and basic service gaps.
EVIDENCE
He proposes using AI to assess nutrition, water, sanitation and education at the PIN-code level, enabling granular monitoring of malnutrition and basic services across Maharashtra [292-298].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for granular public health monitoring
Argument 2
Urgent need for upskilling, higher education, broadband connectivity, and affordable AI services
EXPLANATION
He points out the low skill levels of the majority of the workforce, inadequate broadband speeds, and the necessity for rapid investment in education, connectivity and affordable AI. These steps are deemed critical for inclusive AI adoption.
EVIDENCE
He cites that only about 20 % of Maharashtra’s workforce has high-skill levels, points to average broadband speeds of 58 Mbps in Mumbai, and calls for rapid investment in skill development, internet infrastructure and affordable AI services [270-283].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Capacity building and infrastructure for AI
Argument 3
Concern that AI may exacerbate mental‑health issues and “dumping” of society if not managed
EXPLANATION
He warns that unchecked AI could degrade societal well‑being, turning people into passive consumers and harming mental health, especially among children. The argument calls for safeguards in education and usage.
EVIDENCE
He warns that AI could become a ‘dumping’ element, turning people into ‘bonobos’, and that doom-scrolling on social media may harm children’s mental health, urging education system reforms [299-303].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI’s societal and mental‑health risks
DISAGREED WITH
Mr. Suresh Sethi
M
Moderator
1 argument47 words per minute272 words342 seconds
Argument 1
Call for intelligent, adaptive governance mechanisms
EXPLANATION
The moderator urges the panel to adopt intelligent and adaptable governance frameworks that can keep pace with AI’s rapid evolution. This call underscores the need for flexible policy design.
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Adaptive, intelligent policy design is one of the five pillars of the MahaAI governance framework [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Adaptive AI governance
AGREED WITH
Mr. Virendra Singh, Mr. Devroop Dhar
M
Mr. Devroop Dhar
1 argument46 words per minute393 words510 seconds
Argument 1
Need for intelligent, adaptive policies to balance innovation and risk
EXPLANATION
He stresses that policies must be both intelligent and adaptable, striking a balance between fostering innovation and mitigating potential harms of AI. This perspective highlights the policy dilemma of speed versus safety.
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
S1 stresses the need for policies that are both intelligent and adaptable to balance innovation with risk mitigation.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Balanced AI policy
AGREED WITH
Mr. Virendra Singh, Moderator
M
Mr. Anupam Chattopadhyay
1 argument0 words per minute0 words1 seconds
Argument 1
Quantum‑AI Intersection
EXPLANATION
He acknowledges that the convergence of quantum computing and AI represents a critical emerging frontier that requires focused research and policy attention.
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The convergence of quantum computing and AI as an emerging research frontier is highlighted in the Davos 2025 report on quantum threats and opportunities [S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Emerging quantum‑AI research
Agreements
Agreement Points
Human‑centered and inclusive AI governance
Speakers: Mr. Virendra Singh, Mr. Ashish Shelar, Mr. Suresh Sethi, Ms. Beena Sarkar
Intelligent, human‑centered AI governance “Scale empathy through insight” – AI to make governance more human Necessity of human redress in AI‑driven DPI Evaluation of emerging hardware for privacy and gender safety
All four speakers stress that AI systems and policies must be designed around people, ensuring transparency, accountability, empathy and safeguards for vulnerable groups [13][51-53][189-190][241-243].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This aligns with the inclusive AI governance framework that embeds universal values and human-centric principles in pluralistic settings [S51] and reflects the OECD’s multistakeholder AI governance work discussed at the AI Governance Open Forum [S54]; it also echoes the human-rights-based approach advocated for new technologies [S65].
Need for risk‑based, adaptive and balanced regulation
Speakers: Mr. Virendra Singh, Moderator, Mr. Devroop Dhar
Risk‑based regulation, global cooperation, and adaptive policies Call for intelligent, adaptive governance mechanisms Need for intelligent, adaptive policies to balance innovation and risk
Speakers agree that AI regulation must avoid both under-regulation and over-regulation by being risk-based, globally coordinated and adaptable to rapid technological change [8-10][13].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Risk-based, adaptive regulation is echoed in sector-specific AI policy for banking that prioritises risk intensity, explainability and accountability [S63], in the EU AI Act’s focus on high-risk use cases while keeping low-risk AI lightly regulated [S58], and in OECD guidance on responsible deployment of AI and quantum technologies [S70].
Robust data infrastructure as foundation for AI‑enabled public services
Speakers: Mr. Ashish Shelar, Mr. Praveen Pardeshi, Mr. Suresh Sethi, Mr. Ranjeet Goswami
Mahaiti cloud‑native infrastructure enables real‑time, AI‑driven public services State data authority to monetize data responsibly and Maha GPT for querying government orders Population‑scale DPI provides data foundation for AI in identity, subsidies and payments Collaboration on common databases and Aadhaar integration for inclusive welfare
All speakers highlight the creation of a unified, scalable digital public infrastructure (cloud-native platforms, DPI, common databases) that supplies high-quality data for AI applications in governance [48-49][96-114][160-166][210-215].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of data centres, compute resources and renewable energy for AI is highlighted in China’s AI-Plus Economy infrastructure roadmap [S48]; Poland’s public LLM initiative underscores AI as critical infrastructure for continuity of services [S49]; multistakeholder partnership discussions stress sensing infrastructure and data accessibility as prerequisites for thriving AI ecosystems [S50]; and the OECD Digital Government Index tracks data-infrastructure readiness in public sector AI adoption [S59].
AI as a catalyst for smarter, more responsive public service delivery
Speakers: Mr. Ashish Shelar, Mr. Suresh Sethi, Dr. Amit Kapoor
Mahaiti platform supports smart recruitment, property mapping, urban dashboards, flood‑management pilots Dynamic eligibility and predictive governance enabled by AI on verifiable credentials AI can monitor nutrition, water, sanitation and education at granular geographic levels
The panel concurs that AI can transform service delivery-from urban management to welfare eligibility and public-health monitoring-by providing real-time insights and predictive capabilities [48-49][167-176][292-298].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Panel discussions at the Global Vision for AI Impact session note AI’s potential to enhance decision-making, resource management and service delivery in the public sector [S60]; Rwanda’s AI pilots illustrate how governments can use AI to transform public services before formal regulation [S61]; and Poland’s deployment of a national LLM demonstrates AI-driven public service innovation [S49].
Capacity building and skill development are essential for AI adoption
Speakers: Mr. Praveen Pardeshi, Dr. Amit Kapoor
Capacity building through AI university courses and online training for government staff Urgent need for upskilling, higher‑education, broadband connectivity and affordable AI services
Both speakers stress that a skilled workforce and adequate digital infrastructure are prerequisites for effective AI deployment and inclusive growth [84-86][270-283].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Capacity building is identified as a foundational requirement for AI ecosystems in multistakeholder partnership reports [S50]; the AI Policy Research Roadmap lists capacity building alongside inclusivity and accountability as core principles [S52]; discussions on AI for social empowerment stress skill development to mitigate labour market disruption [S53]; and the OECD Digital Government Index highlights the need for skilled personnel in AI-enabled public services [S59].
Safeguards – explainability, auditability and human oversight for AI systems
Speakers: Mr. Suresh Sethi, Ms. Beena Sarkar
Necessity of explainability, auditability, and human redress in AI‑driven DPI Recommendation for India Safety Institute to vet emerging technologies for societal impact
Both emphasize that AI must be transparent, auditable and subject to human review, and that institutional mechanisms should evaluate new technologies before deployment [184-190][244-250].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Banking sector AI policy mandates explainability, transparency and auditability as pillars of risk-based governance [S63]; algorithmic transparency is a recurring theme in AI Security Council deliberations [S64]; human oversight is emphasized in human-rights-centered AI governance frameworks [S65]; and safety-ethics discussions advocate for tiered access and contextual safeguards to balance openness with security [S57].
Similar Viewpoints
Both advocate that AI governance should prioritize human values, empathy and transparency rather than treating AI as a purely technical tool [13][51-53].
Speakers: Mr. Virendra Singh, Mr. Ashish Shelar
Intelligent, human‑centered AI governance “Scale empathy through insight” – AI to make governance more human
All three stress the strategic importance of a unified, high‑quality data ecosystem (DPI, state data authority, Aadhaar) as the backbone for AI‑driven governance [96-114][160-166][210-215].
Speakers: Mr. Praveen Pardeshi, Mr. Suresh Sethi, Mr. Ranjeet Goswami
State data authority to monetize data responsibly Population‑scale DPI as AI data backbone Common databases and Aadhaar integration for welfare
Both highlight quantum computing as a looming security challenge that intersects with AI, calling for proactive research and policy attention [145-150][152-154].
Speakers: Mr. Yashasvi Yadav, Mr. Anupam Chattopadhyay
Quantum computing threatens encryption; urgent preparedness needed Quantum‑AI intersection as emerging frontier
Unexpected Consensus
Quantum computing as an imminent risk to cybersecurity and encryption
Speakers: Mr. Yashasvi Yadav, Mr. Anupam Chattopadhyay
Quantum computing threatens encryption; urgent preparedness needed Quantum‑AI Intersection
While Yashasvi frames quantum as a security threat to encryption and financial systems, Anupam brings a research-policy perspective, yet both converge on the urgency of addressing quantum-AI convergence-an area not originally emphasized by other panelists [145-150][152-154].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Analyses of quantum technologies highlight dual-use risks and the threat to current encryption schemes, calling for coordinated policy responses [S68]; a consensus on the urgency of quantum threats and the need for multi-stakeholder action is documented in recent quantum-encryption reports [S69]; security implications for IoT and critical infrastructure are explored in the Quantum-IoT-Infrastructure workshop [S71]; and responsible deployment guidance stresses assessing vulnerabilities before integrating quantum capabilities [S70].
Gender‑focused hardware safety assessment
Speakers: Ms. Beena Sarkar, Mr. Ashish Shelar
Evaluation of emerging hardware (e.g., smart glasses) for privacy and gender safety AI should make governance more human, faster, more inclusive
Beena’s call for gender-sensitive hardware vetting aligns unexpectedly with Ashish’s broader human-centric AI philosophy, linking device safety directly to inclusive, empathetic governance [230-236][51-53].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Gender perspectives in cybersecurity policy have been raised at UN and IGF sessions, emphasizing the need to address diversity and safety in hardware design [S45][S46][S47]; Canada’s requirement for Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) in all policy initiatives provides an institutional model for gender-focused safety assessments [S66]; and broader digital gender-equality initiatives align with Sustainable Development Goal 5 to embed gender considerations in technology policy [S67].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong convergence around four core themes: (1) human‑centered, inclusive AI governance; (2) adaptive, risk‑based regulatory frameworks; (3) building a unified, population‑scale data infrastructure as the foundation for AI‑enabled public services; and (4) investing in capacity building, explainability and safeguards (including quantum and hardware risks).

High consensus – the majority of speakers echo each other’s positions across multiple domains, indicating a shared vision for responsible, people‑first AI deployment in Maharashtra. This broad agreement suggests that policy initiatives emerging from the summit are likely to receive cross‑sectoral support and can be advanced with confidence.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
AI’s societal impact – optimistic predictive governance versus concerns of mental‑health degradation and societal “dumping”
Speakers: Mr. Suresh Sethi, Dr. Amit Kapoor
Dynamic eligibility and predictive governance enabled by AI on verifiable credentials Concern that AI may exacerbate mental‑health issues and “dumping” of society if not managed
Suresh Sethi argues that AI applied to verifiable credentials can create dynamic eligibility for subsidies and enable predictive governance, improving precision and reducing inclusion/exclusion errors [167-176][184-190]. Amit Kapoor counters that while AI is transformational, unchecked deployment could become a “dumping” element, turning people into passive consumers and harming mental health, especially among children, urging safeguards in education and usage [299-303].
Emerging hardware privacy and gender safety versus AI‑driven governance without explicit hardware safeguards
Speakers: Ms. Beena Sarkar, Mr. Ashish Shelar
Evaluation of emerging hardware (e.g., smart glasses) for privacy and gender safety “Scale empathy through insight” – AI to make governance more human, faster, more responsive and inclusive
Beena Sarkar raises concerns about new wearable devices such as smart glasses, citing past privacy violations and emphasizing the need to assess gender-specific safety risks, recommending the India Safety Institute as a first-line evaluator [230-236][244-250]. Ashish Shelar promotes AI as a tool to make governance more human and inclusive, focusing on cloud-native infrastructure and AI-driven services without addressing hardware privacy implications [51-53][48-49].
Monetising large‑scale state data versus protecting data against quantum‑enabled security threats
Speakers: Mr. Praveen Pardeshi, Mr. Yashasvi Yadav
State data authority to monetize data responsibly and protect national interests Quantum computing threatens encryption; urgent preparedness needed
Praveen Pardeshi argues that the state data authority should treat health and other large-scale data as strategic assets, monetising them while ensuring commercial benefits stay with India [96-102]. Yashasvi Yadav warns that quantum computing can break current encryption standards (RSA, blockchain, banking), posing severe risks to financial systems and urging immediate investment and preparedness [145-150]. The tension lies between exploiting data for economic gain and safeguarding it from emerging quantum threats.
Unexpected Differences
Hardware privacy and gender safety raised by a gender‑focused ethics advocate against a generally technology‑positive narrative
Speakers: Ms. Beena Sarkar, Other panelists (e.g., Mr. Ashish Shelar, Mr. Virendra Singh)
Evaluation of emerging hardware (e.g., smart glasses) for privacy and gender safety Intelligent, human‑centered AI governance
While the majority of the panel celebrated AI’s role in improving governance and public safety, Beena Sarkar introduced a distinct concern about emerging hardware (smart glasses) potentially infringing on women’s privacy and safety, recommending institutional vetting. This focus on gender-specific hardware risk was not anticipated in the otherwise AI-centric discussion [230-236][244-250].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The tension between gender-focused cybersecurity advocacy and prevailing technology-positive narratives is documented in IGF gender-cybersecurity workshops, where advocates call for explicit hardware safeguards while many participants emphasize broader tech optimism [S45][S46][S47].
Warning that AI could become a “dumping” element harming mental health, contrasting with the panel’s largely optimistic tone
Speakers: Dr. Amit Kapoor, Other panelists (e.g., Mr. Suresh Sethi, Mr. Ashish Shelar)
Concern that AI may exacerbate mental‑health issues and “dumping” of society if not managed Dynamic eligibility and predictive governance enabled by AI on verifiable credentials
Amit Kapoor’s stark warning about AI turning people into passive “bonobos” and causing mental-health problems was unexpected given the panel’s focus on AI as a catalyst for efficiency, inclusion, and welfare. This introduces a cautionary perspective not echoed by other speakers who emphasized AI’s positive governance outcomes [299-303][167-176].
Overall Assessment

The panel largely converged on the promise of AI for smarter, more inclusive governance, but key tensions emerged around the balance between AI‑driven efficiency and societal risks. Disagreements centered on (1) the optimistic view of AI enabling predictive, dynamic services versus concerns about mental‑health impacts; (2) the need to monetize state data for economic benefit versus safeguarding it against quantum‑enabled security threats; and (3) the omission of hardware privacy and gender‑specific safety considerations in a technology‑positive narrative.

Moderate to high. While there is broad consensus on AI’s strategic importance, the divergent views on risk management, ethical safeguards, and data security indicate substantial policy friction that could affect the design of governance frameworks, requiring careful integration of protective measures alongside innovation.

Partial Agreements
All speakers share the overarching goal of leveraging AI to enhance governance, public services, and welfare. However, they differ on the primary mechanisms: Virendra emphasizes human‑centered design, transparency and adaptive policies [13][8-10]; Ashish highlights AI‑driven crime‑fighting tools and a cloud‑native infrastructure [47][48-49]; Praveen focuses on a small language model (Maha GPT) to improve information access [108-114]; Suresh stresses AI on verifiable credentials for dynamic eligibility and predictive governance [167-176]; Ranjit calls for public‑private partnerships and common databases, especially Aadhaar integration, to embed AI across departments [200-215][216-217].
Speakers: Mr. Virendra Singh, Mr. Ashish Shelar, Mr. Praveen Pardeshi, Mr. Suresh Sethi, Mr. Ranjeet Goswami
Intelligent, human‑centered AI governance AI‑powered Mahak Crime OS improves crime detection, transparency, and response Maha GPT for querying government orders and citizen services Dynamic eligibility and predictive governance enabled by AI on verifiable credentials Collaboration between government and large tech firms to embed intelligence in core platforms
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI governance must be intelligent, human‑centered, risk‑based, adaptive and globally coordinated rather than static or overly restrictive. Maharashtra is positioning itself as a living laboratory for AI‑driven smart governance through initiatives such as Mahak Crime OS, the Mahaiti cloud‑native infrastructure, and Maha GPT. AI is already enhancing law‑enforcement and cybersecurity, with measurable outcomes (e.g., fraud recovery, lives saved) and is essential for countering nation‑state cyber threats. Quantum computing poses an imminent risk to current encryption standards; preparedness and investment are urgently needed. Population‑scale Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) provides a data foundation for AI in identity verification, dynamic eligibility, and predictive governance, but requires explainability, auditability and human redress mechanisms. Collaboration between government and large tech firms (e.g., TCS, Microsoft) is critical for embedding intelligence into core public platforms and creating common databases. Ethical AI considerations, especially gender‑related privacy and safety concerns, must be evaluated through dedicated bodies such as the India Safety Institute. Socio‑economic impact of AI hinges on upskilling the workforce, expanding broadband connectivity, and ensuring affordable AI services, particularly in Tier‑2/3 cities. AI can be leveraged for granular monitoring of nutrition, water, sanitation and education, but unchecked deployment may exacerbate mental‑health and societal “dumping” issues.
Resolutions and action items
Launch and operationalise Maha GPT to provide query access for government officers and citizens on orders, regulations and services. Strengthen the State Data Authority to create a single source of truth for health and other public data and to monetize data responsibly for national benefit. Continue scaling the Mahaiti cloud‑native, API‑driven infrastructure to support real‑time AI‑driven public services. Expand AI‑powered Mahak Crime OS across additional law‑enforcement domains and maintain the 1930 helpline for cyber‑crime assistance. Establish the India Safety Institute (or empower it) to vet emerging hardware and AI applications for privacy, gender safety and broader societal impact. Implement capacity‑building programmes (AI university, IGOT online courses) for government staff to increase AI literacy. Adopt explainability, auditability and human‑redress frameworks for AI decisions within DPI and welfare delivery systems. Prioritise investment in green energy, broadband expansion and affordable AI services to support Tier‑2/3 city adoption. Develop a coordinated quantum‑computing preparedness roadmap, including research funding and encryption‑resilience strategies.
Unresolved issues
Specific mechanisms for global interoperability and shared safety standards for AI governance remain undefined. Details on how the State Data Authority will commercialise data while protecting privacy and sovereignty are not fully articulated. Concrete standards and processes for AI explainability and auditability across diverse government departments are still pending. The timeline, funding model and governance structure for the quantum‑computing preparedness initiative were not clarified. How to systematically address AI‑induced mental‑health risks and societal “dumping” effects in Tier‑2/3 contexts needs further discussion. Procedures for integrating Aadhaar with all departmental databases and ensuring data security were mentioned but not resolved.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a balanced, risk‑based regulatory approach (“intelligent governance”) that avoids both over‑regulation (stagnation) and under‑regulation (harm). Combine AI automation with human oversight, ensuring explainable decisions and a clear human redress pathway. Leverage existing public infrastructure (DPI, Aadhaar) while protecting individual privacy through audit and transparency measures. Encourage private‑sector AI innovation while requiring adherence to ethical standards and safety vetting by the India Safety Institute.
Thought Provoking Comments
The question before us is not whether AI will shape governance. The question is whether governance is going to shape the artificial intelligence.
Frames the debate as a two‑way relationship, emphasizing that policy choices will determine AI’s trajectory rather than AI dictating policy.
Set the thematic foundation for the entire panel, prompting subsequent speakers to discuss governance frameworks, regulatory approaches, and the need for ‘intelligent governance’ rather than mere regulation.
Speaker: Mr. Virendra Singh
Use AI not to distance the state from the citizens, but to make governance more human, faster, more responsive, and more inclusive. In other words, scale empathy through insight.
Introduces the concept of ‘scale empathy’, linking technology deployment directly to citizen‑centric outcomes, and positions Maharashtra as a ‘living laboratory’.
Shifted the conversation from technical showcases to the purpose of AI in public service, influencing later speakers (e.g., Praveen Pardeshi and Suresh Sethi) to frame their initiatives around citizen impact and inclusivity.
Speaker: Mr. Ashish Shelar
We need to encash the data at a large scale… make health data a single source of proof and ensure commercial value stays with India, not foreign entities.
Highlights data as a strategic economic asset and raises the issue of data sovereignty and monetization, moving beyond operational AI uses.
Prompted a deeper discussion on data governance, leading Suresh Sethi to talk about auditable AI layers and Ranjit Goswami to mention common databases across departments.
Speaker: Mr. Praveen Pardeshi
In less than six months, more than 1,000 crore rupees have been frozen and returned to victims, and 70 lives saved, thanks to AI‑driven cyber tools.
Provides concrete, quantifiable outcomes of AI in law enforcement, demonstrating real‑world impact and building credibility for AI interventions.
Reinforced the narrative of AI as a protective tool, setting up the segue to his warning about quantum computing, which introduced a new risk dimension to the discussion.
Speaker: Mr. Yashasvi Yadav
Quantum computing can break RSA, blockchain, and banking encryptions within minutes; we are investing only $1 billion while rivals spend $15‑20 billion. We must prepare now.
Introduces a forward‑looking security threat that could undermine current AI and cyber safeguards, expanding the scope of the conversation to future‑proofing.
Shifted the tone from current successes to urgent strategic preparedness, prompting the moderator to bring in Dr. Anupam for a quantum‑AI perspective and adding urgency to the panel’s recommendations.
Speaker: Mr. Yashasvi Yadav
Dynamic eligibility and predictive governance: AI can move us from static identity verification to machine‑readable verifiable credentials that automatically determine subsidy eligibility.
Articulates a concrete evolution of public service delivery, linking AI to precision targeting of benefits and introducing concepts of inclusion/exclusion errors.
Deepened the technical discussion, leading other panelists to consider explainability, auditability, and human redress mechanisms, and reinforced the need for robust data standards.
Speaker: Mr. Suresh Sethi
AI should be built on a common citizen database, not siloed departmental records; Aadhaar must be integrated across all departments to see citizens as citizens of the state, not of a department.
Emphasizes systemic integration and the importance of unified data architecture for effective AI, moving the conversation from isolated pilots to holistic state‑wide strategy.
Encouraged consensus on data unification, influencing later remarks on data governance and prompting the audience to consider cross‑departmental collaboration.
Speaker: Mr. Ranjit Goswami
When new devices like smart glasses are released without safety oversight, they can threaten privacy and safety, especially for women; we need a dedicated safety institute to evaluate such technologies before market entry.
Brings gender‑focused ethical concerns to the fore, highlighting the gap between technological enthusiasm and societal safeguards.
Introduced an ethical dimension that shifted the discussion toward regulatory safeguards, influencing Amit Kapoor’s later critique of AI’s societal impact and reinforcing the need for ethical frameworks.
Speaker: Ms. Beena Sarkar
AI risks turning society into ‘bonobos’ through doom‑scrolling and content overload; without strong education, skill development, and affordable connectivity, AI will exacerbate inequality rather than alleviate it.
Offers a critical, socio‑economic perspective, warning of AI’s potential to deepen existing disparities and calling for systemic investment in education and infrastructure.
Served as a turning point that broadened the conversation from technical implementation to societal readiness, prompting acknowledgment of the ‘elephant in the room’ and reinforcing earlier calls for capacity building.
Speaker: Dr. Amit Kapoor
Overall Assessment

The discussion was driven forward by a series of pivotal remarks that moved the panel from high‑level optimism to a nuanced, multi‑layered debate. Early framing by Mr. Singh and Mr. Shelar set a citizen‑centric, governance‑focused agenda. Subsequent insights on data sovereignty (Pardeshi), tangible AI successes (Yadav), and emerging threats (quantum computing) introduced both opportunity and urgency. Technical depth was added by Sethi’s vision of dynamic eligibility and Ranjit’s call for unified citizen databases, while Beena’s gender‑bias concerns and Amit’s critique of societal readiness injected essential ethical and equity considerations. Collectively, these comments reshaped the conversation, prompting participants to address not only how AI can be deployed, but also how it must be governed, secured, and made inclusive, thereby steering the panel toward actionable, holistic recommendations.

Follow-up Questions
How can the state monetize and securely share large‑scale public data, such as health and pharmaceutical data, while ensuring it benefits the government rather than external entities?
Ensuring data sovereignty and capturing economic value from India’s massive health datasets is critical for national interest and to prevent exploitation by foreign actors.
Speaker: Praveen Pardeshi
What are the potential risks and benefits of quantum computing for encryption and national security, and how should India prepare for them?
Quantum computers could break current cryptographic standards, threatening financial systems, banking, and national security; proactive research and preparedness are essential.
Speaker: Yashasvi Yadav
What guardrails, explainability, auditability, and human redress mechanisms are needed for AI‑driven decision‑making in public service delivery?
Transparent and accountable AI systems are necessary to maintain public trust and ensure that automated decisions can be reviewed and corrected by humans.
Speaker: Suresh Sethi
How should ethical evaluation frameworks, such as the India Safety Institute, assess new AI‑enabled hardware (e.g., smart glasses) for gender bias and safety concerns?
Evaluating emerging devices for potential harm to women and vulnerable groups prevents misuse and aligns technology deployment with ethical standards.
Speaker: Beena Sarkar
What strategies can be employed to extend AI benefits to Tier‑2 and Tier‑3 cities, particularly for nutrition monitoring, water and sanitation, and education?
Targeted AI applications can address persistent development gaps in smaller cities, improving health, infrastructure, and learning outcomes.
Speaker: Amit Kapoor
How can AI be used to predict and prevent inclusion and exclusion errors in subsidy distribution?
Reducing leakages and ensuring rightful beneficiaries receive aid enhances the efficiency and fairness of welfare programs.
Speaker: Suresh Sethi
What steps are required to create a common, interoperable citizen database across government departments, linking to Aadhaar and other sources?
A unified data backbone enables seamless service delivery and avoids siloed information that hampers citizen‑centric governance.
Speaker: Ranjit Goswami
What capacity‑building programs and online courses are needed to empower government staff to effectively use AI tools?
Building AI literacy among civil servants is essential for successful implementation and avoids skill bottlenecks.
Speaker: Praveen Pardeshi
How can AI‑driven language models like Maha GPT be safely deployed for both officials and citizens, ensuring accuracy and privacy?
Deploying large‑scale conversational agents in governance requires safeguards to protect data, prevent misinformation, and maintain trust.
Speaker: Praveen Pardeshi
What research is needed on the societal impacts of AI, such as mental‑health effects from doom‑scrolling and content consumption among children?
Understanding negative social consequences helps shape policies that mitigate harm while leveraging AI’s benefits.
Speaker: Amit Kapoor
How can AI threat‑intelligence tools be enhanced to detect and mitigate nation‑state cyber‑attacks in real time?
Strengthening AI‑based cyber‑defence is vital to protect critical infrastructure against sophisticated state‑sponsored threats.
Speaker: Yashasvi Yadav
What policies and investments are required to close the gap in quantum computing research and development compared to other countries?
Closing the investment disparity ensures India remains competitive and can safeguard its digital ecosystem against future quantum threats.
Speaker: Yashasvi Yadav
How can AI governance frameworks be made adaptive and dynamic to keep pace with evolving AI technologies?
Static regulations quickly become obsolete; adaptive governance is needed to balance innovation with risk mitigation.
Speaker: Virendra Singh

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.