Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit

20 Feb 2026 16:00h - 17:00h

Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The session centered on AI sovereignty and Fujitsu’s strategy to deliver sovereign AI capabilities for nations such as India [1][2][4-8]. Sovereignty is defined as owning, controlling, and flexibly managing data and models without excessive third-party dependence [4-10]. Fujitsu highlighted its 90-year history and breakthroughs, including upcoming 2 nm ARM servers and a 20-exaflop AI supercomputer powered by Monaca [15-22][36-41]. Monaca, a Japan-made 2 nm chip, will be succeeded by a 1.4 nm version with 256-core and 128-core CPUs and an NPU for inference [42-48][55-58]. Fujitsu’s software stack is fully open source, avoiding lock-in and tuned for AI, HPC, and data-center workloads [44-53]. Its quantum roadmap aims for 250 logical qubits by 2030 and a 10 000-qubit machine within three years, placing it among the top three players [62-71]. Network offerings include a 1.6-terabit low-power switch for long-range transmission and open-RAN integration to efficiently orchestrate AI workloads [76]. The Takane LLM platform and Kozuchi AI agent, built on a proprietary security layer, enable domain-specific, tunable, secure models for defense, healthcare, and finance [77-84]. Fujitsu markets an end-to-end solution that combines compute, network, and software, allowing selective adoption and leveraging partners such as AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro [85-99]. These components aim to create a physical AI platform that runs on edge devices such as robots, drones, and medical equipment [86-95]. The session concluded with an announcement of a fireside chat featuring CDAT and Intel executives, moderated by Aman Khanna [100-104]. Overall, Fujitsu positions itself as a Japanese alternative to U.S. vendors, offering open, secure AI infrastructure across compute, quantum, networking, and software [31-33].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Definition and importance of AI sovereignty – The speaker frames sovereignty as the ability to own, control, and flexibly manage data and AI models without heavy reliance on third-party providers, stressing its relevance for nations such as India that seek leadership in AI [1-9][10-11].


Fujitsu’s sovereign-by-design hardware portfolio – Fujitsu highlights its home-grown, cutting-edge compute assets-including 2 nm ARM-based “Monaca” servers, a planned 20 exaflop AI supercomputer, NPUs for inference, and an open-source software stack – all built in Japan to ensure security and avoid vendor lock-in [20-23][36-43][44-48][55-58].


Quantum and HPC integration as a strategic advantage – The company positions its quantum roadmap (250 logical qubits by 2030, 1 000-qubit machine launching soon) alongside high-performance computing to deliver mission-critical AI workloads, underscoring a unique combined capability [62-71][69-73].


Network and photonics solutions for low-latency, power-efficient AI delivery – Fujitsu describes a 1.6 Tbps (future 3.2 Tbps) optical switch, long-reach low-power transmission, and open-RAN orchestration that together enable secure, high-speed movement of AI workloads across data-center and edge environments [76].


End-to-end AI software platform and ecosystem partnerships – The “Takane” large-language-model platform and “Kozuchi” AI-agent stack provide domain-specific, fine-tunable, and secure models, while Fujitsu stresses a total-solution approach-partnering with firms such as AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro-to deliver compute, network, and application layers as a unified offering [78-86][92-99].


Overall purpose / goal


The discussion is a strategic presentation aimed at positioning Fujitsu as a provider of a complete, sovereign AI ecosystem-encompassing hardware, quantum/HPC, networking, and software-that enables governments and enterprises (especially in markets like India and Europe) to retain full control over their data and AI workloads while avoiding dependence on foreign cloud or AI vendors.


Tone of the discussion


The tone is consistently promotional and confident, using technical detail to convey credibility and optimism about Fujitsu’s capabilities. It remains upbeat throughout, with no noticeable shift to a more neutral or critical stance.


Speakers

Speaker 1


Role/Title: Presenter (Fujitsu executive delivering a keynote on AI sovereignty)


Area of Expertise: Artificial intelligence, sovereign AI platforms, high-performance computing, quantum computing, networking, Fujitsu hardware and software solutions


Speaker 2


Role/Title: Moderator / Session host (introducing the upcoming fireside chat)


Area of Expertise: Event moderation / facilitation[S1][S2][S3]


Additional speakers:


– None identified beyond the two speakers listed above.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Speaker 1 opened the session by linking the theme of AI sovereignty – also raised in the previous plenary – to the strategic ambitions of nations such as India that wish to become leaders in artificial intelligence. He framed sovereignty not as a political slogan but as a technical requirement: organisations must own and control their data while retaining the flexibility to manage, tune and deploy AI models without excessive reliance on external providers [1-10][11].


He then highlighted Fujitsu’s 90-year heritage, from early DRAM and mainframe work alongside IBM to recent breakthroughs such as the world’s first two-nanometre ARM-based servers and a leading quantum-technology roadmap [14-23][20-22][21]. In 2021 Fujitsu launched a U.S. brand that aggregates all of its solutions for customers, reinforcing the company’s global reach [34-35].


The vision for a sovereign AI platform rests on three pillars – software, compute and networking [26-28].


Compute & Quantum – Fujitsu noted that it operated the fastest supercomputer in the world for five consecutive years, a record that stood until two years ago [36-38]. The upcoming hardware centrepiece is the Monaca two-nanometre ARM-based chip, which has confidential computing built at the hardware level to drive security [38-41]. Within two years the company plans to assemble a 20-exaflop AI supercomputer around Monaca, followed by a 1.4-nanometre processor family that will include a 256-core CPU, a 128-core CPU and an integrated NPU specialised for AI inference [42-48]. The stack is described as completely open with “nothing locked in,” allowing customers to fine-tune models without vendor lock-in [44-48][44-46].


On the quantum side, Fujitsu positions itself among the world’s top three quantum players. Its roadmap targets 250 logical qubits by 2030, with a 1 000-qubit machine scheduled to go live in Kawasaki next month and a 10 000-qubit system expected within three years. Integration of quantum processors with high-performance computing is intended to support mission-critical AI workloads that demand both speed and precision [62-66][67-71][62-71].


Networking – The company is developing a 1.6 TB photonic switch (expandable to 3.2 TB) that provides long-range, low-latency, power-efficient transmission for data-centre interconnects [70-71]. This hardware is paired with an open-RAN orchestration framework that can move AI workloads efficiently across optical and wireless links, extending sovereign AI capabilities to edge environments [72-73].


AI Software Stack – Fujitsu’s domain-specific platforms comprise the Takane large-language-model (LLM) platform and the Kozuchi AI-agent stack, both built on Fujitsu’s own security layer. They target verticals such as defence, nuclear energy, healthcare, finance, government and manufacturing [84-86]. Because the underlying software stack is fully open, customers can fine-tune models and use third-party tools without becoming dependent on Fujitsu-only solutions [44-48][44-46].


Fujitsu emphasises that it does not sell isolated components but an end-to-end solution that bundles compute, networking and application layers. It has already forged partnerships with major OEMs and system integrators-including AMD, Lockheed Martin, Supermicro and various robotics manufacturers-to deliver a cohesive physical-AI platform across a range of use-cases [85-99][96-98].


Looking ahead, Fujitsu envisions a “Kozuchi” physical operating system that embeds brain-inspired intelligence into robots and other edge devices. Research on memory-retention aims to let devices such as drones, medical equipment and smartphones retain state and operate autonomously, uniting compute, network and AI software stacks at the edge [86-89][90-94].


Speaker 2 concluded the segment by announcing the next agenda item – a fireside chat featuring Mr Vivek Kaneja (Executive Director, CDAT), Mr Nitin Bajaj (Director, Sales and Marketing, Intel) and moderated by Mr Aman Khanna (Vice President, Asia Group) – and asked both speakers and the audience to clear the stage [100-104].


Overall, the presentation positioned Fujitsu as a Japanese alternative to U.S. AI vendors, offering a fully sovereign, open and integrated AI infrastructure that spans cutting-edge compute, quantum acceleration, high-capacity networking and domain-specific software, all designed to meet policy-driven demand for data ownership, security and flexibility [S7][S9][S21].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Speaker 1

AI commerce. What I’m going to talk about is something that was discussed in the plenary session yesterday as well about sovereignty. And I believe something like sovereignty is very, very important for countries like India, which are trying to eke out a path in leading AI and being dominant in AI. Now, what is sovereignty, first of all? For us, it is being flexible. And being secure, right? So you want ownership of your data. You want to control that data. But you also want to have flexibility to manage that data, create models that meet your needs, that doesn’t have to be reliant on third party overwhelmingly. And you can modify and tune that data, right? Modify and tune those models.

So Fujitsu is on a path to – we’ve always been an innovative company, and we have a long history, and I’ll talk briefly. But how do we make that sovereign? And that’s what I’m going to talk about today. So Fujitsu, some of you might not know it. I mean, we have a 90 -year -old history, right? So we are a pretty old company. We have our roots all the way in technology. And if you look at some of the things that are demonstrated here, one megabit DRAM, for example, right? Of course, we were one of the pioneers of mainframe business along with IBM. In recent past, we’ve announced, which we will be shipping very shortly, the world’s first two nanometer servers, ARM -based servers.

We announced for quantum, if you are not aware, which I will be talking about shortly as well, we have the world’s leading quantum roadmap here that we are going to deliver. Same on networks. And our U .S. brand that we created in 2021, that effectively brings all of Fujitsu’s solutions. to be consumed by our customers. Now, how does this work in the context of AI? And why is this relevant in the context of AI? And that’s what I’m going to talk about. So, to effectively drive artificial intelligence, you need three key components, right? You obviously need software, you need compute, and you need three networks, right? If you don’t have those three, you can’t really build an AI platform that will suit your enterprise needs.

And our focus on sovereignty here is really being independent in all of these three areas and give customers a choice. We are a Japanese company. Our technology is made in Japan and that’s where we find ourselves at a very interesting point because we are a choice to a lot of American companies as an alternative. So if you’re looking for leading edge computing technology, leading edge quantum technology, leading edge network technology, leading edge AI software technology, agentic technology, and there’s an end user application on which you can build an AI platform in the area such as defense, government, healthcare, manufacturing, finance, where you do care about privacy, this becomes very, very important. Now how do we actually drive that?

Some of the speakers talked about commerce, which are big, but at the end of the day, if you don’t have a platform that helps you deliver that, you’re never going to be sovereign, you’re never going to control the AI business. Fujitsu has a couple of areas that we are focused on, as I mentioned, computing. If you think about CPUs, you think about AMD, you think about Intel, we were, until two years ago, we had the fastest supercomputer in the world for five years running. And we announced that we will be building a 20 AI exascale AI supercomputer in about two years from now, which will be driving pretty much AI application, AI workloads. This will be powered by our Fujitsu Monaca chip, which is a two nanometer chip.

It’s built in Japan, and it is completely ARM -based, highly power efficient, focused on data centers to reduce power efficiency. Okay, and it has confidential computing built at the hardware level to drive security. Now, this comes out, the servers come out in about two months from now, the test servers. It’s ARM -based. The follow -up of this is a 1 .4 nanometer, and that will also be the world’s first 1 .4 nanometer, which has two versions, 256 -core CPU plus 128 -core CPU plus an NPU to drive exactly what India needs, sovereign AI models focused on inferencing. And this is something that I believe we will drive a lot of value in countries like India as well as Europe. I’m not going to go into this in detail, but this stack is a completely open software stack.

I just want you to remember, it’s a completely open software stack. There’s nothing locked in. There’s nothing. You don’t get locked into a Fujitsu stack. All the software that you see here, it’s completely open. It’s focused on AI. It’s focused on data centers, and it’s focused on HPC. This is what you need for AI, right? All the key areas are a lot of open source software that we have fine -tuned to work on this process. This can help you drive your AI workloads today on the Monaco servers. As I mentioned, what’s coming? There are two versions, the 256 -core CPU plus 128 -core CPU with the NPU on it. The NPU is focused on AI inferencing. You will see a lot of work going into inferencing moving forward.

And especially when you talk about sovereign, this will become extremely important, especially with small language models and medium language models. So you can contain that in a private or a semi -private environment that you can choose. Obviously, if you want large language models, you can choose what is going on on GPUs. And you can obviously choose the Monaco GPU hybrid architecture as well. Now, for those of you who might not be aware, we are extremely highly invested in quantum. We need quantum in Japan. I would say we are probably one of the top three players in quantum worldwide. We have announced a 250 logical qubit roadmap by the end of 2030, which is ahead of any other company in the world that I know of.

We make our own control systems. We are going to focus on driving the cooling systems as well. And this is going to become extremely important as you go ahead. Quantum plus HPC together driving mission -critical AI workloads. The 10 ,000 -qubit machine will go live in about three years from now. Next month, the 1 ,000 -qubit machine goes live in Kawasaki, Japan. As I mentioned, you would have HPC and Quantum working together to drive AI workloads. This is how computing will be consumed moving forward. And the software stack that we are working on, it will make transparent to you and users to use to consume compute and the workload can be optimized to whichever computer you want. Now, I’ll briefly talk about the networks because that’s the other part of the puzzle.

And finally, I’ll talk about the software for AI. photonics and wireless we’re one of the probably want two companies that does both no cares another one right and we are doing a 1 .6 terabyte switch that travels that is highly power efficient that drives about a thousand kilometer this distance distance on this long range transmission low latency low power consumption that’s the beauty of the switch right and and we are we will go on to 3 .2 tera this is very strong implicate implications and data centers that are being built in India as that would be highly highly power hungry and you would need to connect that through optical fibers and same with the wireless mobile systems okay now what we do is we also connect with open RAN and the network orchestration stack to bring the AI workloads move them in a highly efficient manner and we’re going to do that by using the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the This is the third part that really brings everything together, the AI software stack.

Fujitsu, as I mentioned at the very beginning, we are focused on sovereign. When we talk about sovereign, it’s got to be domain specific, something for defense. If you’re making nuclear plants or submarines or healthcare, this is not the data you want to put on public cloud. You want to define and build these domain specific models. Second, you need to have flexibility. You, as a company, should be able to fine tune these models to your own benefit, to your own needs. They need to be highly secure. These are the three key areas that we are focused on using what we call our Takane, the large language model platform, as well as our AI agent tech model from Kozuchi, powered by the security platform that we have built within our own research teams.

It’s a complete platform that you can use to build your own applications. Thank you. Again, I won’t go into details on this. but this is a platform that also uses third -party tools and you see on the extreme right where we have issue with their government manufacturing health care finance applications so Fujitsu has a fairly large business and services which brings all of this together so we are not just selling you pieces of technology we are selling your total solution or we are asking you to use a total solution here from compute all the way to networks and the application stack together and this is our vision that we want to continue to build on this continue to bring this to other to the end customers as well as users now where are we headed right we see all this converge in the physical AI platform space and what we are building is Kozuchi physical OS which will have the intelligence based on the brain intelligence for the robot and what that means is robots tend to forget And what we are working on, some intelligence work and research so that robots can continue to remember.

But then this technology, the compute networks, as well as the AI platform stack, comes together in edge devices. Robots are one example, but even drones or medical devices or your healthcare on your iPhones. That’s where it will all come together. And that’s the world we are aiming for. That will bring together the AI agentic platform together. That will bring the security platform together in the complete platform that could be consumed for our end users, our companies. And you can choose to play in a part that is comfortable for you. And we are obviously going to partner with a lot of different companies on this. So, as I mentioned, the software, compute, network, the three pillars.

And we are going to be able to do that. We announced in October last year, our CEO Tokita and Jensen were on stage together announcing a huge partnership on physical AI, where we’re partnering with different robotics manufacturers. So it’s working with AMD, working in defense with Lockheed Martin, Supermicro. So this is something

Speaker 2

Thank you. Thank you so much. For the next session, we have a fireside chat between Mr. Vivek Kaneja, Executive Director, CDAT, Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Director, Sales and Marketing, Intel, and the session will be moderated by Mr. Aman Khanna, Vice President of the Asia Group. May I request all the speakers to join us on the stage, please? I also request everybody to please clear the pathway. May I request the audience to please clear the pathway?

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (6)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (4)
Confirmedhigh

“Speaker 1 linked AI sovereignty to the strategic ambitions of nations such as India that wish to become leaders in artificial intelligence.”

Vivek Mahajan, CTO of Fujitsu India, explicitly highlighted the importance of AI sovereignty for India during the summit, confirming the report’s statement [S7].

Confirmedhigh

“Fujitsu’s 90‑year heritage and recent breakthroughs such as the world’s first two‑nanometre ARM‑based servers and a leading quantum‑technology roadmap.”

The keynote notes that Fujitsu positions itself as a Japanese alternative with 90 years of innovation, including world-first 2-nm ARM-based processors and leading quantum computing capabilities, supporting the claim [S9].

!
Correctionmedium

“Fujitsu operated the fastest supercomputer in the world for five consecutive years, a record that stood until two years ago.”

The TOP500 history shows that Japan’s Fugaku was the world’s fastest for the two years prior to Frontier’s takeover, but it does not confirm a five-year streak; the record lasted until two years ago, not necessarily five years [S36].

Additional Contextmedium

“Sovereign AI requires organisations to own and control their data while retaining flexibility to manage, tune and deploy AI models without excessive reliance on external providers.”

Discussion sources describe AI sovereignty as encompassing data control, legal frameworks, encryption-key ownership and governance, providing broader context to the report’s definition [S28] and [S29] and [S30].

External Sources (36)
S1
Keynote_ 2030 – The Rise of an AI Storytelling Civilization _ India AI Impact Summit — -Speaker 2: Role appears to be event moderator or host. Area of expertise and specific title not mentioned.
S2
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — -Speaker 1- Role/title not specified (appears to be a moderator/participant) -Speaker 2- Role/title not specified (appe…
S3
Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence | IGF 2023 — Moderator 2, Affiliation 2 Speaker 1, Affiliation 1 Speaker 2, Affiliation 2
S4
Keynote-Martin Schroeter — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not specified, Area of expertise: Not specified (appears to be an event moderator or host introd…
S5
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning — -Speaker 1: Role/title not specified – appears to be a student or child participant in educational videos/demonstrations…
S6
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vijay Shekar Sharma Paytm — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not mentioned, Area of expertise: Not mentioned (appears to be an event host or moderator introd…
S7
Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit — Vivek Mahajan defines AI sovereignty as having ownership and control over data while maintaining flexibility to manage, …
S8
Panel #3: « Gouverner les données : entre souveraineté, éthique et sécurité à l’ère de l’interconnexion » — Drudeisha Madhub Merci beaucoup de m’avoir invitée à l’OIF. C’est vraiment un joli atelier depuis hier, c’est une belle …
S9
Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit — This comment reframes AI sovereignty from a purely nationalistic concept to a practical business and security imperative…
S10
India’s AI Future Sovereign Infrastructure and Innovation at Scale — Professor Ganesh argues that India has barely scratched the surface of AI potential and can achieve significant breakthr…
S11
Keynote ‘I’ to the Power of AI An 8-Year-Old on Aspiring India Impacting the World — India’s approach, according to the speaker, centers on three pillars of sovereignty: data sovereignty, infrastructure so…
S12
Keynote ‘I’ to the Power of AI An 8-Year-Old on Aspiring India Impacting the World — 8 year old prodigy: Sharing is learning with the rest of the world. One, an AI that is independent. From large global A…
S13
Multistakeholder Partnerships for Thriving AI Ecosystems — to contextualize it’s not just true for help it’s true for any domain you look at and and yes data is fragmented siloed …
S14
What policy levers can bridge the AI divide? — Ebtesam Almazrouei: Good afternoon, everyone. It’s our pleasure to have you here today with us again and discussing a ve…
S15
Nvidia builds ‘Israel-1’ AI supercomputer, claims to have ended digital divide — The world is at a ‘tipping point of a new computing era’, Nvidia Group has noted at a recent conference at the Computex …
S16
Researchers develop high-frequency, low-power switch to revolutionise 6G communications — Researchers atUAB, theUniversity of Texas at Austinand theUniversity of Lilledeveloped atelecommunications switchthat op…
S17
WS #155 Digital Leap- Enhancing Connectivity in the Offline World — 2. Open RAN technology for interoperability and cost reduction Maria Beebe provided a detailed list of critical skill g…
S18
DC-CIV & DC-NN: From Internet Openness to AI Openness — Anita Gurumurthy: You can hear me, I hope. Yeah. All right. So, thank you very much. I just heard that from Renata, an…
S19
Open Forum #27 Make Your AI Greener a Workshop on Sustainable AI Solutions — Marco Zennaro: Sure, sure. Definitely. Thank you very much. So let me introduce TinyML first. So TinyML is about running…
S20
Partnering on American AI Exports Powering the Future India AI Impact Summit 2026 — This comment demonstrates sophisticated understanding that ‘AI sovereignty’ isn’t a monolithic concept but represents di…
S21
Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit — Vivek Mahajan defines AI sovereignty as having ownership and control over data while maintaining flexibility to manage, …
S22
Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit — This comment reframes AI sovereignty from a purely nationalistic concept to a practical business and security imperative…
S23
Panel Discussion Data Sovereignty India AI Impact Summit — This comment reframes the entire sovereignty debate by distinguishing between isolation and strategic control. It moves …
S24
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Takahito Tokita Fujitsu — Fujitsu’s advanced computing capabilities and quantum technology development K-Computer and Fugaku supercomputers, 1,00…
S25
From High-Performance Computing to High-Performance Problem Solving / Davos 2025 — Georges Olivier Reymond emphasizes that quantum computing will not replace AI or CPUs, but rather complement them. He de…
S26
Multistakeholder Partnerships for Thriving AI Ecosystems — Academic institutions provide evaluation capabilities and technical expertise that build trust in AI systems. Internatio…
S27
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 — Agar kisi machine ko sir paper clip banane ka alak de diya jaye to wo uska ek kaam ke liye duniya ke saare resources ko …
S28
Agents of Change AI for Government Services & Climate Resilience — Governments can implement strategic sovereignty through data control and governance policies while pursuing longer-term …
S29
Discussion Report: Sovereign AI in Defence and National Security — Faisal outlines six critical dimensions of AI sovereignty that countries must consider: control over data (the fuel of A…
S30
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services — The discussion revealed that data sovereignty encompasses more than simple data localization. As Pramod noted, true sove…
S31
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Takahito Tokita Fujitsu — This discussion features Takahito Tokita, President and CEO of Fujitsu, presenting the company’s vision for artificial i…
S32
Fujitsu launches AI scanner to assess tuna fat — Fujitsu hasdevelopeda new AI-powered inspection device that determines the fat content of frozen albacore tuna with unpr…
S33
Managing Change in Media Space: Social Media, Information Disorder, and Voting Dynamics  — Afia Asantewaa Asare-Kyei:You have three questions, so I’m going to take them all at once. So we have, for the gentleman…
S34
https://app.faicon.ai/ai-impact-summit-2026/how-the-eus-gpai-code-shapes-safe-and-trustworthy-ai-governance-india-ai-impact-summit-2026 — sure and first of all I I’m going to try not to repeat Aparna’s view because I basically agree with everything you just …
S35
https://app.faicon.ai/ai-impact-summit-2026/aligning-ai-governance-across-the-tech-stack-iti-c-suite-panel — We do. And we have to go all of the way to give them the possibility to figure this out for themselves, for their applic…
S36
US supercomputer ranks fastest in the world — The US Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)announcedthat its Frontier supercomputer ranked as the…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
S
Speaker 1
11 arguments157 words per minute1953 words741 seconds
Argument 1
Sovereignty requires flexibility and security, i.e., ownership and control of data (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
The speaker defines AI sovereignty as the ability to flexibly manage data while keeping it secure. This means that organisations must own their data, control how it is used, and be able to modify models without dependence on external providers.
EVIDENCE
The speaker states that sovereignty means being flexible [4] and secure [5], emphasizing ownership of data [6] and control over that data [7]. He further explains the need for flexibility to manage data, create independent models, and modify or tune both data and models as required [8-10].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Mahajan’s keynote defines AI sovereignty as ownership and control of data combined with flexibility and security, matching the argument [S7][S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Definition of AI sovereignty
Argument 2
Sovereignty is crucial for countries like India to lead and dominate in AI (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
The speaker argues that AI sovereignty is especially important for emerging economies such as India, which seek to become leaders in AI development. Without sovereign capabilities, these nations risk dependence on foreign technology.
EVIDENCE
He explicitly says that sovereignty is “very, very important for countries like India, which are trying to eke out a path in leading AI and being dominant in AI” [2].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of AI sovereignty for India is highlighted in Mahajan’s remarks and further discussed in analyses of India’s AI strategy [S7][S9][S10][S11].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Strategic importance for India
Argument 3
Development of 2 nm ARM‑based servers with the Monaca chip, featuring hardware‑level confidential computing (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu is introducing two‑nanometre ARM‑based servers powered by its in‑house Monaca chip. The hardware incorporates confidential computing capabilities to ensure data security at the silicon level.
EVIDENCE
The company announced the world’s first two-nanometre ARM-based servers [20] and later described that the upcoming servers will be powered by the Fujitsu Monaca chip, a two-nanometre processor built in Japan, which includes hardware-level confidential computing for security [38-40].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Mahajan announced Fujitsu’s 2-nm ARM-based servers using the Monaca chip with hardware-level confidential computing [S7][S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Secure next‑gen server hardware
Argument 4
Plan to build a 20 exaflop AI supercomputer and future 1.4 nm CPUs with integrated NPU for AI inferencing (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu intends to construct a 20‑exaflop AI supercomputer within two years and later release a 1.4‑nanometre processor family that combines high‑core CPUs with a dedicated NPU for inference workloads. These systems are positioned as sovereign AI platforms for markets such as India and Europe.
EVIDENCE
The speaker notes that Fujitsu will build a 20-exaflop AI supercomputer in about two years [37] and that a follow-up 1.4-nm processor will feature 256-core and 128-core CPU variants plus an NPU designed for AI inferencing, targeting sovereign AI models for India [42-58].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The roadmap includes a 20-exaflop AI supercomputer and a future 1.4-nm processor family with integrated NPU for inference [S7][S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Roadmap for sovereign AI compute
Argument 5
Fujitsu’s quantum roadmap (250 logical qubits by 2030, 10 k‑qubit machine in three years) to complement mission‑critical AI workloads (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu positions itself as a leading quantum player, outlining a roadmap to deliver 250 logical qubits by 2030 and a 10,000‑qubit machine within three years. The quantum systems are intended to work alongside high‑performance computing for critical AI tasks.
EVIDENCE
The speaker claims Fujitsu is among the top three global quantum vendors [64] and has announced a 250-logical-qubit roadmap by 2030 [65]. He also mentions a 10,000-qubit machine slated for live operation in three years [70] and a 1,000-qubit machine launching next month in Kawasaki [71], emphasizing the integration of quantum with HPC for mission-critical AI workloads [69].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Fujitsu’s quantum roadmap targeting 250 logical qubits by 2030 and a 10 k-qubit system is described in the keynote [S7][S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Quantum‑HPC integration for AI
Argument 6
Creation of high‑capacity photonic switches (1.6 Tbps, scaling to 3.2 Tbps) for low‑latency, power‑efficient data‑center connectivity (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu is developing a photonic switch capable of 1.6 Tbps throughput, with plans to double capacity to 3.2 Tbps. The switch is designed for long‑range, low‑latency, low‑power transmission, targeting power‑hungry data‑center deployments such as those in India.
EVIDENCE
In a detailed description, the speaker explains that Fujitsu is building a 1.6-terabit switch that is highly power-efficient, supports long-range (about a thousand-kilometre) transmission with low latency and low power consumption, and that a 3.2-terabit version will follow, noting its relevance for Indian data-centres [76].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Advanced photonic networking hardware
Argument 7
Use of open RAN and network orchestration to move AI workloads efficiently across optical and wireless links (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu leverages open RAN technology together with a network orchestration stack to transport AI workloads across both optical fiber and wireless networks in an efficient manner. This approach aims to reduce latency and improve flexibility for AI services.
EVIDENCE
The speaker states that Fujitsu connects with open RAN and a network orchestration stack to move AI workloads in a highly efficient manner across optical and wireless links [76].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Open RAN technology for interoperable, cost-effective AI workload transport is discussed in the Open RAN overview [S17].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open RAN for AI workload transport
Argument 8
Fully open, lock‑in‑free software stack fine‑tuned for AI, HPC, and data‑center use (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu offers a completely open software stack with no vendor lock‑in, optimized for AI, high‑performance computing, and data‑center environments. The stack incorporates a large amount of open‑source software that has been specifically tuned for Fujitsu’s hardware.
EVIDENCE
The speaker emphasizes that the stack is “completely open” with nothing locked in [44-46], reiterates the openness [48], and notes that many open-source components have been fine-tuned for the platform [52].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Mahajan stresses that Fujitsu’s software stack is fully open with no vendor lock-in, tuned for AI and data-center workloads [S7][S9].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open, vendor‑neutral software ecosystem
Argument 9
Takane large‑language‑model platform and Kozuchi AI‑agent model provide secure, customizable, domain‑specific AI solutions (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu’s Takane LLM platform and Kozuchi AI‑agent model are presented as tools for building domain‑specific AI applications (e.g., defense, healthcare) that can be fine‑tuned and kept secure within a sovereign environment. These solutions are powered by Fujitsu’s own security platform.
EVIDENCE
The speaker outlines three key requirements-domain specificity, flexibility, and security [78-84] and describes the Takane LLM platform together with the Kozuchi AI-agent model, both built on Fujitsu’s internal security platform [84].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for secure, domain-specific AI models built on Fujitsu’s internal security platform is outlined in the keynote and reinforced by discussions on sector-specific AI security [S7][S19].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Domain‑specific, secure AI platforms
Argument 10
Fujitsu offers a total solution covering compute, networking, and applications, partnering with OEMs such as AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu positions itself as a one‑stop provider that integrates compute hardware, networking equipment, and AI software, and it collaborates with major OEMs like AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro to deliver end‑to‑end solutions. The company stresses that it sells complete solutions rather than isolated components.
EVIDENCE
The speaker references a partnership announced in October with robotics manufacturers and mentions collaborations with AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro for physical AI initiatives [86-99].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
End‑to‑end ecosystem and strategic partnerships
Argument 11
Vision of a “Kozuchi” physical OS that unites compute, network, and AI stack for edge devices like robots, drones, and medical equipment (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Fujitsu envisions a physical operating system called Kozuchi that integrates compute, networking, and AI capabilities to run on edge devices such as robots, drones, and medical hardware. This platform aims to provide persistent intelligence (e.g., memory for robots) across diverse edge applications.
EVIDENCE
The speaker describes Kozuchi as a physical OS with brain-like intelligence for robots, noting that robots tend to forget and that Fujitsu is researching ways to retain memory [86]. He then extends the vision to edge devices including drones, medical devices, and smartphones [87-90].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Edge‑focused physical AI operating system
S
Speaker 2
1 argument102 words per minute78 words45 seconds
Argument 1
Announcement of the upcoming fireside chat and request for speakers and audience to clear the pathway (Speaker 2)
EXPLANATION
The moderator introduces the next session, a fireside chat featuring executives from CDAT and Intel, and asks both speakers and the audience to clear the stage area. This serves as a logistical transition between program segments.
EVIDENCE
The speaker thanks the audience, announces the fireside chat with Mr. Vivek Kaneja, Mr. Nitin Bajaj, and moderator Mr. Aman Khanna, and requests that speakers and the audience clear the pathway [100-104].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Session transition logistics
Agreements
Agreement Points
Similar Viewpoints
Unexpected Consensus
Overall Assessment

The transcript contains a substantive presentation by Speaker 1 on AI sovereignty, hardware, software, quantum and networking solutions, while Speaker 2 only performs a procedural hand‑over to the next session. There is no overlap in substantive arguments or viewpoints between the two speakers.

Very low substantive consensus; the only common ground is the procedural nature of the session transition, which has limited relevance to the thematic topics.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Unexpected Differences
Overall Assessment

The two speakers addressed completely different aspects of the event. Speaker 1 delivered an extensive technical and strategic presentation on AI sovereignty, hardware, software, quantum and networking solutions ([1-99]), while Speaker 2 performed a brief logistical hand-over, announcing the next fireside chat and asking participants to clear the stage ([100-104]). No overlapping substantive claims were made, resulting in no observable disagreement or partial agreement between them.

Minimal – the speakers operated in separate domains (technical presentation vs. session moderation), so there is no conflict affecting the discussion of AI sovereignty or related topics.

Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI sovereignty—defined as flexibility and security (ownership and control of data)—is essential for nations like India seeking leadership in AI. Fujitsu is positioning itself as a sovereign AI provider through independent compute, networking, and software capabilities. Hardware initiatives include 2 nm ARM‑based Monaca servers with built‑in confidential computing, a planned 20 exaflop AI supercomputer, and future 1.4 nm CPUs with integrated NPUs for AI inferencing. Fujitsu’s quantum roadmap (250 logical qubits by 2030, 1,000‑qubit machine launching soon, 10 k‑qubit system in three years) is intended to complement HPC for mission‑critical AI workloads. Networking solutions feature high‑capacity photonic switches (1.6 Tbps scaling to 3.2 Tbps) and open‑RAN orchestration to move AI workloads efficiently across optical and wireless links. The software stack is fully open and lock‑in‑free, with domain‑specific AI platforms such as the Takane LLM platform and the Kozuchi AI‑agent model, emphasizing security and customizability. Fujitsu offers an end‑to‑end solution—compute, network, and applications—and is partnering with OEMs like AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro to deliver integrated physical AI platforms. Future vision includes a “Kozuchi” physical OS that unites compute, networking, and AI stacks for edge devices (robots, drones, medical equipment). The session concluded with a logistical announcement for an upcoming fireside chat featuring Intel and CDAT executives.
Resolutions and action items
None identified
Unresolved issues
Detailed roadmap for how customers can adopt and migrate to Fujitsu’s sovereign AI stack (e.g., migration steps, timelines, support models). Specifics on partnership models, revenue sharing, and integration responsibilities with OEMs and ecosystem partners. Clarification on the governance and certification processes for domain‑specific, high‑security AI models (defense, healthcare, nuclear, etc.). Performance benchmarks and cost comparisons of Fujitsu’s 2 nm and upcoming 1.4 nm hardware versus competing solutions. Implementation details for the open‑RAN orchestration layer and how it will interoperate with existing carrier networks.
Suggested compromises
None identified
Thought Provoking Comments
For us, sovereignty is being flexible and being secure – you want ownership of your data, you want to control that data, but you also want the flexibility to manage that data, create models that meet your needs without being overly reliant on third‑party providers.
This reframes ‘sovereignty’ from a political buzz‑word to a concrete technical requirement (flexibility + security), setting the agenda for the whole talk and linking it directly to AI deployment challenges faced by nations like India.
It establishes the central theme of the discussion, prompting the rest of the presentation to be organized around how Fujitsu’s hardware, software and network offerings can deliver that flexibility and security. It also signals to the audience that the talk will move beyond marketing into concrete capabilities.
Speaker: Speaker 1
We announced that we will be building a 20 AI‑exascale supercomputer in about two years, powered by our Fujitsu Monaca chip – a two‑nanometer, ARM‑based processor with confidential computing built at the hardware level.
Introducing a concrete, cutting‑edge hardware roadmap (2 nm ARM chip with built‑in confidential computing) provides a tangible illustration of how Fujitsu intends to deliver sovereign AI infrastructure, differentiating itself from traditional x86 vendors.
This shifts the conversation from abstract notions of sovereignty to a specific, high‑impact technology claim, leading the audience to consider the feasibility of national‑scale AI compute that remains under domestic control.
Speaker: Speaker 1
We have announced a 250 logical‑qubit quantum roadmap by the end of 2030, with a 1 000‑qubit machine going live next month in Kawasaki and a 10 000‑qubit machine in three years – positioning quantum together with HPC to drive mission‑critical AI workloads.
Bringing quantum computing into the sovereignty narrative adds a layer of future‑proofing and strategic depth, suggesting that true AI independence will eventually rely on quantum‑enhanced processing.
This introduces a new dimension (quantum) to the discussion, prompting listeners to think about long‑term technology trajectories and how Fujitsu’s integrated roadmap (quantum + HPC) could become a unique selling point for sovereign AI strategies.
Speaker: Speaker 1
Our network solution is a 1.6 TB/s switch that is highly power‑efficient, supports long‑range low‑latency transmission, and integrates with open‑RAN to move AI workloads efficiently across data‑center and edge environments.
Highlighting a next‑generation, high‑capacity, low‑latency network underscores that sovereignty is not just about compute but also about the data‑movement fabric, especially for latency‑sensitive applications like defense and healthcare.
This expands the scope of the discussion to include networking, reinforcing the three‑pillar (compute, software, network) framework and showing how Fujitsu’s end‑to‑end stack can be deployed in sectors that demand strict privacy and performance.
Speaker: Speaker 1
We are delivering a completely open software stack – nothing is locked in – and we provide domain‑specific AI platforms (e.g., Takane LLM platform, Kozuchi AI agent tech) that can be fine‑tuned for defense, nuclear, healthcare, finance, etc., while remaining secure.
Emphasizing openness and domain‑specificity directly addresses concerns about vendor lock‑in and data leakage, positioning Fujitsu’s software as both flexible and secure, which is central to the sovereignty argument.
This comment transitions the talk from hardware to software, reinforcing the earlier claim of flexibility. It also invites the audience to envision concrete use‑cases where sovereign AI can be applied, deepening the practical relevance of the presentation.
Speaker: Speaker 1
We are building Kozuchi, a physical OS that embeds brain‑inspired intelligence into robots, enabling them to remember and operate autonomously at the edge – a convergence of compute, network, and AI software for devices like drones, medical equipment, and smartphones.
This forward‑looking vision ties together all three pillars into a tangible edge‑device scenario, illustrating how sovereign AI can extend beyond data‑centers into everyday devices while maintaining security and control.
It serves as a culminating turning point, moving the discussion from enterprise‑scale infrastructure to consumer‑level applications, thereby broadening the audience’s perception of the potential impact of sovereign AI.
Speaker: Speaker 1
Overall Assessment

The discussion was driven by a series of strategically placed, high‑impact statements from Speaker 1 that progressively broadened the concept of AI sovereignty. Starting with a clear definition of sovereignty (flexibility + security), the speaker introduced concrete hardware (2 nm ARM chips, exascale supercomputer), ambitious quantum roadmaps, advanced networking, and an open, domain‑specific software stack. Each comment acted as a turning point, shifting focus from abstract policy to tangible technology, then expanding the scope from compute to quantum, network, and finally edge devices. This layered approach not only reinforced Fujitsu’s positioning as a comprehensive, non‑US alternative for sovereign AI but also deepened the conversation by linking each technological pillar to real‑world use‑cases (defense, healthcare, finance, robotics). The cumulative effect was to transform a single‑speaker monologue into a compelling narrative that framed sovereignty as an achievable, end‑to‑end technical solution rather than a purely political aspiration.

Follow-up Questions
How can sovereign AI models be developed and deployed for domain‑specific use cases such as defense, nuclear plants, healthcare, and finance?
Speaker 1 emphasized the need for domain‑specific, secure, and fine‑tuned models, indicating further investigation into methodologies, tooling, and compliance requirements.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What mechanisms are needed to ensure flexibility for customers to fine‑tune AI models while maintaining security and data ownership?
Speaker 1 stressed flexibility as a pillar of sovereignty, suggesting research into model‑tuning workflows, access controls, and confidential computing techniques.
Speaker: Speaker 1
How can the open software stack be kept truly open and interoperable across different hardware platforms (Monaco CPUs, GPUs, NPUs, quantum systems)?
Speaker 1 mentioned a completely open software stack but did not detail standards or governance, implying a need for further study of open‑source licensing, compatibility layers, and integration frameworks.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What are the performance, power‑efficiency, and security implications of the upcoming 1.6 TB and 3.2 TB photonic switches for long‑range, low‑latency data‑center interconnects?
Speaker 1 introduced high‑capacity photonic switches but provided limited technical data, indicating a research gap on metrics, deployment scenarios, and cost‑benefit analysis.
Speaker: Speaker 1
How will open‑RAN orchestration be integrated with AI workloads to achieve efficient, secure, and low‑latency data movement?
Speaker 1 referenced extensive use of open‑RAN for AI workload transport without describing the orchestration architecture, pointing to a need for deeper investigation.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What are the practical pathways for combining quantum computing (e.g., 1 000‑qubit, 10 000‑qubit machines) with HPC to accelerate mission‑critical AI workloads?
Speaker 1 outlined a quantum roadmap but did not explain integration strategies, workload partitioning, or software toolchains, suggesting further research.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What are the requirements and challenges for deploying the sovereign AI platform on edge devices such as robots, drones, and medical equipment?
Speaker 1 described a vision of edge deployment but omitted details on latency, power, security, and model size constraints, indicating an area for additional study.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What partnership models and technical integration plans exist with companies like AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro for physical AI solutions?
Speaker 1 announced collaborations but did not elaborate on joint‑development roadmaps, standards alignment, or co‑marketing strategies, warranting further clarification.
Speaker: Speaker 1
How will confidential computing be implemented at the hardware level in the Monaca 2‑nm ARM‑based chips, and what verification methods will be used?
Speaker 1 claimed hardware‑level confidential computing but gave no specifics on architecture, attestation, or certification, highlighting a need for detailed research.
Speaker: Speaker 1

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.