Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit

20 Feb 2026 16:00h - 17:00h

Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

Speaker 1 opened the session by framing the talk around AI sovereignty, stressing its strategic importance for countries such as India that aim to lead in artificial intelligence [1-3]. He defined sovereignty as the capacity to own, control, and flexibly manage data and AI models while maintaining security, without excessive dependence on third-party providers [4-10]. Fujitsu leveraged its 90-year heritage and recent milestones-including the world’s first two-nanometre ARM-based servers and a quantum roadmap-to position itself as a provider of sovereign AI solutions [14-22][20-21]. The speaker identified three essential pillars for any AI platform-software, compute, and networking-and argued that true sovereignty requires independence across all three areas [26-29]. Fujitsu highlighted its Japanese-made hardware, notably the Monaca two-nanometre chip powering a planned 20-exaflop AI supercomputer and an upcoming 1.4-nanometre processor with integrated NPU for inferencing, both featuring hardware-level confidential computing [35-41][42-48][55-58]. He emphasized that the accompanying software stack is fully open source, preventing vendor lock-in and allowing customers to fine-tune models for specific domains [44-52][84-86]. In the quantum domain, Fujitsu claimed a top-three global position, targeting a 250-logical-qubit system by 2030 and a 10,000-qubit machine within three years, to be combined with high-performance computing for mission-critical AI workloads [62-71][69-73]. Its networking strategy includes a 1.6-terabyte photonic switch with low-latency, long-reach capabilities and an open-RAN orchestration layer to move AI workloads efficiently across data centres and edge sites [75-76]. The Takane large-language-model platform and Kozuchi AI-agent framework were presented as tools for building domain-specific, secure, and customizable AI applications in sectors such as defense, healthcare, and finance [77-84]. These technologies are intended to converge on edge devices-including robots, drones, and medical equipment-enabling autonomous operation while preserving data sovereignty [87-90][91-93]. Fujitsu’s go-to-market approach relies on integrated solutions and partnerships with companies like AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro rather than selling isolated components [95-99]. The session concluded with Speaker 2 announcing the next fireside chat featuring executives from CDAT and Intel and requesting speakers and the audience to clear the stage [100-104]. Overall, the discussion underscored Fujitsu’s strategy to combine proprietary Japanese hardware, open software, quantum advances, and network innovations to deliver sovereign AI capabilities for nations seeking secure, flexible, and independent AI infrastructures.


Keypoints


Major discussion points


AI sovereignty as a strategic priority – The speaker frames sovereignty as “being flexible and secure,” stressing the need for countries (e.g., India) to own and control their data and AI models without over-reliance on third parties [1-9][10-11].


Fujitsu’s sovereign-focused hardware portfolio – Highlights the upcoming two-nanometer ARM-based “Monaco” servers, a future 1.4 nm chip with 256-core + 128-core CPUs and an NPU for inferencing, and a planned 20-exaflop AI supercomputer built on the Fujitsu Monaca chip with confidential-computing features [20-23][36-43][44-48][55-58][60-62].


Open software stack and AI platform – Emphasizes that the software stack is completely open with no lock-in, incorporating the Takane large-language-model platform and the Kozuchi AI-agent technology to let customers fine-tune domain-specific, secure models for sectors such as defense, healthcare, and finance [44-49][78-84][85-86].


Quantum-HPC integration for mission-critical AI – Announces a roadmap to 250 logical qubits by 2030, a 1,000-qubit machine going live next month, and a 10,000-qubit system in three years, positioning quantum together with high-performance computing as a driver for advanced AI workloads [62-70][71-73].


Advanced networking and photonics – Describes a 1.6 TB (future 3.2 TB) low-power optical switch for long-distance, low-latency transmission, and the use of open-RAN orchestration to move AI workloads efficiently across data-center and edge environments [76].


Overall purpose / goal


The discussion is a promotional briefing by Fujitsu aimed at positioning the company as a one-stop provider of “sovereign AI” solutions. By outlining its end-to-end capabilities-secure, open-source software, cutting-edge compute (including AI-optimized CPUs/NPUs and exascale supercomputers), quantum accelerators, and high-performance networking-the speaker seeks to convince governments and enterprises (particularly in India and Europe) that Fujitsu can deliver independent, privacy-preserving AI infrastructures without reliance on foreign cloud vendors.


Overall tone


The tone is confident, forward-looking, and technically detailed, consistently emphasizing innovation, security, and independence. It remains upbeat throughout the technical sections, shifting only at the very end when Speaker 2 takes over to announce the next session, where the tone becomes procedural and courteous. No major emotional or argumentative shift occurs within the main presentation.


Speakers

Speaker 1


– Area of expertise: Artificial intelligence, quantum computing, high-performance computing, networking, sovereign AI solutions


– Role: Presenter / speaker representing Fujitsu


– Title:


Speaker 2


– Area of expertise: Moderation / event facilitation


– Role: Moderator for the fireside-chat session [S1][S2][S3]


– Title:


Additional speakers:


– None


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The presentation opened by defining AI sovereignty as the ability to be both flexible and secure-to own and control data, to fine-tune AI models, and to do so without excessive reliance on third-party providers [1-9][10-11]. This framing linked sovereignty directly to national security and economic independence.


Fujitsu background – The speaker highlighted Fujitsu’s 90-year legacy, from early mainframes through pioneering DRAM to the world’s first two-nanometre ARM-based servers, and noted the recent launch of a U.S. brand that aggregates all Fujitsu solutions for customers [14-23][20-22][15-19].


Three-pillar framework – Sovereign AI was positioned as requiring three independent layers: software, compute, and networking [26-29]. Fujitsu, as a Japanese-made technology provider, was presented as an alternative to dominant American vendors, giving governments and enterprises a genuine choice for sensitive sectors such as defence, healthcare and finance [30-33].


Compute pillar

Fujitsu announced the imminent shipment of “Monaco” servers powered by its proprietary Monaca two-nanometre ARM chip, which embeds hardware-level confidential computing to protect data [35-41][60-62]. Building on this, the company disclosed a plan to deliver a 20-exaflop AI supercomputer within two years, also based on the Monaca chip [36-38]. The next-generation processor, a 1.4-nanometre device featuring a 256-core CPU, a 128-core CPU and an integrated NPU for AI inferencing, was described as the world’s first of its kind [42-43][55-58]. These chips are optimized for data-centre efficiency and include confidential-computing capabilities, reinforcing the security aspect of sovereignty [40-41].


For inference, the speaker distinguished between workloads: smaller- and medium-sized models can run on-premise using the NPU, whereas very large models may still require GPU-based or hybrid architectures [??].


Quantum pillar

Fujitsu outlined an ambitious quantum roadmap that the speaker described as a leading effort: a 250-logical-qubit system by 2030, a 1 000-qubit machine scheduled to go live next month in Kawasaki, and a 10 000-qubit machine expected within three years [62-71][65-68][70-71]. He also noted that Fujitsu designs its own quantum control electronics and is investing in advanced cryogenic cooling technology to support these systems [??]. The convergence of quantum computing with HPC was presented as a way to enable mission-critical AI workloads, shifting quantum from a standalone technology to an integral component of a hybrid compute ecosystem [69-73][S25][S39].


Networking pillar

Fujitsu unveiled a 1.6-terabit photonic switch (with a future 3.2-terabit version) that delivers low-power, long-reach (up to a thousand kilometres) optical transmission with low latency [75-76]. The switch is coupled with an open-RAN orchestration layer that can dynamically move AI workloads across data-centre and edge sites [75-76]. Fujitsu is one of only a few companies that offers both high-performance photonic switching and wireless solutions, enabling end-to-end AI-ready connectivity [??].


Software pillar

The software stack was portrayed as completely open source, eliminating vendor lock-in and allowing customers to fine-tune models to their specific needs [44-52]. It is optimised for AI, data-centre workloads and high-performance computing [44-48][49-51]. Domain-specific platforms sit atop Fujitsu’s proprietary security layer: Takane, a large-language-model platform, and Kozuchi, an AI-agent framework [77-84][85-86].


Edge and physical AI vision

Fujitsu described the “Kozuchi physical OS” as an operating system that embeds intelligence directly into robots, drones, medical devices and other edge equipment, allowing them to retain memory and operate autonomously [86-93][87-90][91-93]. This edge-centric approach unifies compute, networking and AI software into a single consumable platform, extending sovereign AI capabilities to the network periphery.


Services and ecosystem

The speaker emphasized that Fujitsu’s large services organization integrates hardware, software, networking and consulting to deliver a turnkey sovereign AI platform for customers [??]. Partnerships with AMD, Lockheed Martin, Supermicro and various robotics manufacturers were cited as ways to broaden the ecosystem, ensure interoperability and accelerate delivery of “physical AI” solutions across multiple industries [95-99][97-99].


Transition

The session concluded with the speaker handing the stage to Speaker 2, who announced an upcoming fireside chat featuring executives from CDAT and Intel and asked the audience to clear the stage [100-104].


Overall, the talk positioned Fujitsu as a one-stop provider of sovereign AI infrastructure, combining Japanese-made, security-focused hardware, an open software stack, a quantum roadmap, high-capacity photonic networking and a robust services ecosystem to deliver flexible, independent AI solutions for critical national and industrial applications.


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Speaker 1

AI commerce. What I’m going to talk about is something that was discussed in the plenary session yesterday as well about sovereignty. And I believe something like sovereignty is very, very important for countries like India, which are trying to eke out a path in leading AI and being dominant in AI. Now, what is sovereignty, first of all? For us, it is being flexible. And being secure, right? So you want ownership of your data. You want to control that data. But you also want to have flexibility to manage that data, create models that meet your needs, that doesn’t have to be reliant on third party overwhelmingly. And you can modify and tune that data, right? Modify and tune those models.

So Fujitsu is on a path to – we’ve always been an innovative company, and we have a long history, and I’ll talk briefly. But how do we make that sovereign? And that’s what I’m going to talk about today. So Fujitsu, some of you might not know it. I mean, we have a 90 -year -old history, right? So we are a pretty old company. We have our roots all the way in technology. And if you look at some of the things that are demonstrated here, one megabit DRAM, for example, right? Of course, we were one of the pioneers of mainframe business along with IBM. In recent past, we’ve announced, which we will be shipping very shortly, the world’s first two nanometer servers, ARM -based servers.

We announced for quantum, if you are not aware, which I will be talking about shortly as well, we have the world’s leading quantum roadmap here that we are going to deliver. Same on networks. And our U .S. brand that we created in 2021, that effectively brings all of Fujitsu’s solutions. to be consumed by our customers. Now, how does this work in the context of AI? And why is this relevant in the context of AI? And that’s what I’m going to talk about. So, to effectively drive artificial intelligence, you need three key components, right? You obviously need software, you need compute, and you need three networks, right? If you don’t have those three, you can’t really build an AI platform that will suit your enterprise needs.

And our focus on sovereignty here is really being independent in all of these three areas and give customers a choice. We are a Japanese company. Our technology is made in Japan and that’s where we find ourselves at a very interesting point because we are a choice to a lot of American companies as an alternative. So if you’re looking for leading edge computing technology, leading edge quantum technology, leading edge network technology, leading edge AI software technology, agentic technology, and there’s an end user application on which you can build an AI platform in the area such as defense, government, healthcare, manufacturing, finance, where you do care about privacy, this becomes very, very important. Now how do we actually drive that?

Some of the speakers talked about commerce, which are big, but at the end of the day, if you don’t have a platform that helps you deliver that, you’re never going to be sovereign, you’re never going to control the AI business. Fujitsu has a couple of areas that we are focused on, as I mentioned, computing. If you think about CPUs, you think about AMD, you think about Intel, we were, until two years ago, we had the fastest supercomputer in the world for five years running. And we announced that we will be building a 20 AI exascale AI supercomputer in about two years from now, which will be driving pretty much AI application, AI workloads. This will be powered by our Fujitsu Monaca chip, which is a two nanometer chip.

It’s built in Japan, and it is completely ARM -based, highly power efficient, focused on data centers to reduce power efficiency. Okay, and it has confidential computing built at the hardware level to drive security. Now, this comes out, the servers come out in about two months from now, the test servers. It’s ARM -based. The follow -up of this is a 1 .4 nanometer, and that will also be the world’s first 1 .4 nanometer, which has two versions, 256 -core CPU plus 128 -core CPU plus an NPU to drive exactly what India needs, sovereign AI models focused on inferencing. And this is something that I believe we will drive a lot of value in countries like India as well as Europe. I’m not going to go into this in detail, but this stack is a completely open software stack.

I just want you to remember, it’s a completely open software stack. There’s nothing locked in. There’s nothing. You don’t get locked into a Fujitsu stack. All the software that you see here, it’s completely open. It’s focused on AI. It’s focused on data centers, and it’s focused on HPC. This is what you need for AI, right? All the key areas are a lot of open source software that we have fine -tuned to work on this process. This can help you drive your AI workloads today on the Monaco servers. As I mentioned, what’s coming? There are two versions, the 256 -core CPU plus 128 -core CPU with the NPU on it. The NPU is focused on AI inferencing. You will see a lot of work going into inferencing moving forward.

And especially when you talk about sovereign, this will become extremely important, especially with small language models and medium language models. So you can contain that in a private or a semi -private environment that you can choose. Obviously, if you want large language models, you can choose what is going on on GPUs. And you can obviously choose the Monaco GPU hybrid architecture as well. Now, for those of you who might not be aware, we are extremely highly invested in quantum. We need quantum in Japan. I would say we are probably one of the top three players in quantum worldwide. We have announced a 250 logical qubit roadmap by the end of 2030, which is ahead of any other company in the world that I know of.

We make our own control systems. We are going to focus on driving the cooling systems as well. And this is going to become extremely important as you go ahead. Quantum plus HPC together driving mission -critical AI workloads. The 10 ,000 -qubit machine will go live in about three years from now. Next month, the 1 ,000 -qubit machine goes live in Kawasaki, Japan. As I mentioned, you would have HPC and Quantum working together to drive AI workloads. This is how computing will be consumed moving forward. And the software stack that we are working on, it will make transparent to you and users to use to consume compute and the workload can be optimized to whichever computer you want. Now, I’ll briefly talk about the networks because that’s the other part of the puzzle.

And finally, I’ll talk about the software for AI. photonics and wireless we’re one of the probably want two companies that does both no cares another one right and we are doing a 1 .6 terabyte switch that travels that is highly power efficient that drives about a thousand kilometer this distance distance on this long range transmission low latency low power consumption that’s the beauty of the switch right and and we are we will go on to 3 .2 tera this is very strong implicate implications and data centers that are being built in India as that would be highly highly power hungry and you would need to connect that through optical fibers and same with the wireless mobile systems okay now what we do is we also connect with open RAN and the network orchestration stack to bring the AI workloads move them in a highly efficient manner and we’re going to do that by using the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the RAN and the This is the third part that really brings everything together, the AI software stack.

Fujitsu, as I mentioned at the very beginning, we are focused on sovereign. When we talk about sovereign, it’s got to be domain specific, something for defense. If you’re making nuclear plants or submarines or healthcare, this is not the data you want to put on public cloud. You want to define and build these domain specific models. Second, you need to have flexibility. You, as a company, should be able to fine tune these models to your own benefit, to your own needs. They need to be highly secure. These are the three key areas that we are focused on using what we call our Takane, the large language model platform, as well as our AI agent tech model from Kozuchi, powered by the security platform that we have built within our own research teams.

It’s a complete platform that you can use to build your own applications. Thank you. Again, I won’t go into details on this. but this is a platform that also uses third -party tools and you see on the extreme right where we have issue with their government manufacturing health care finance applications so Fujitsu has a fairly large business and services which brings all of this together so we are not just selling you pieces of technology we are selling your total solution or we are asking you to use a total solution here from compute all the way to networks and the application stack together and this is our vision that we want to continue to build on this continue to bring this to other to the end customers as well as users now where are we headed right we see all this converge in the physical AI platform space and what we are building is Kozuchi physical OS which will have the intelligence based on the brain intelligence for the robot and what that means is robots tend to forget And what we are working on, some intelligence work and research so that robots can continue to remember.

But then this technology, the compute networks, as well as the AI platform stack, comes together in edge devices. Robots are one example, but even drones or medical devices or your healthcare on your iPhones. That’s where it will all come together. And that’s the world we are aiming for. That will bring together the AI agentic platform together. That will bring the security platform together in the complete platform that could be consumed for our end users, our companies. And you can choose to play in a part that is comfortable for you. And we are obviously going to partner with a lot of different companies on this. So, as I mentioned, the software, compute, network, the three pillars.

And we are going to be able to do that. We announced in October last year, our CEO Tokita and Jensen were on stage together announcing a huge partnership on physical AI, where we’re partnering with different robotics manufacturers. So it’s working with AMD, working in defense with Lockheed Martin, Supermicro. So this is something

Speaker 2

Thank you. Thank you so much. For the next session, we have a fireside chat between Mr. Vivek Kaneja, Executive Director, CDAT, Mr. Nitin Bajaj, Director, Sales and Marketing, Intel, and the session will be moderated by Mr. Aman Khanna, Vice President of the Asia Group. May I request all the speakers to join us on the stage, please? I also request everybody to please clear the pathway. May I request the audience to please clear the pathway?

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (15)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (5)
Confirmedhigh

“AI sovereignty is defined as the ability to be flexible and secure—own and control data, fine‑tune AI models, and reduce reliance on third‑party providers.”

The knowledge base explicitly describes AI sovereignty in terms of flexibility, security and reduced third-party dependence, matching the report’s definition [S8] and also notes the focus on control over data, models and security measures [S45].

Confirmedhigh

“Sovereign AI requires three independent layers – software, compute, and networking – and Fujitsu, as a Japanese‑made provider, offers a genuine alternative to dominant American vendors.”

A Fujitsu representative states that sovereignty means independence in three areas and highlights the company’s Japanese origin as a choice against American suppliers [S26].

Additional Contextmedium

“Linking AI sovereignty to national security and economic independence.”

The broader discussion connects technological sovereignty with economic independence and strategic security, emphasizing the risk of “renting intelligence” from foreign providers [S46].

Additional Contextmedium

“Emphasis on reducing third‑party dependence as a core aspect of AI sovereignty.”

The knowledge base highlights a nuanced framework that balances selective control with collaboration, underscoring the importance of limiting reliance on external vendors [S21].

Additional Contextlow

“Incorporation of hardware‑level confidential computing to protect data in Fujitsu’s compute solutions.”

Fujitsu’s security-by-design approach, integrating security into software and hardware development, provides additional context for the confidential-computing claim [S17].

External Sources (53)
S1
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — -Speaker 1- Role/title not specified (appears to be a moderator/participant) -Speaker 2- Role/title not specified (appe…
S2
Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence | IGF 2023 — Moderator 2, Affiliation 2 Speaker 1, Affiliation 1 Speaker 2, Affiliation 2
S3
S4
Keynote-Martin Schroeter — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not specified, Area of expertise: Not specified (appears to be an event moderator or host introd…
S5
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning — -Speaker 1: Role/title not specified – appears to be a student or child participant in educational videos/demonstrations…
S6
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vijay Shekar Sharma Paytm — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not mentioned, Area of expertise: Not mentioned (appears to be an event host or moderator introd…
S7
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained inparagraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 part 4 — Mozambique: Thank you, Mr. Chair, for giving me the floor. Mr. Chair, Mozambique aligned itself with statement delive…
S8
Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit — This comment reframes AI sovereignty from a purely nationalistic concept to a practical business and security imperative…
S9
Global Internet Governance Academic Network Annual Symposium | Part 3 | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #112 — Adio Adet Dinika:All right. Wonderful. Thanks for that. So, quickly moving on to the Crimean postcolonial critique, basi…
S10
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups &amp; Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Takahito Tokita Fujitsu — <strong>Announcer:</strong> Please welcome Mr. Takahito Tokita, the President and CEO of Fujitsu. <strong>Takahito Toki…
S11
What policy levers can bridge the AI divide? — Ebtesam Almazrouei: Good afternoon, everyone. It’s our pleasure to have you here today with us again and discussing a ve…
S12
UNSC meeting: Scientific developments, peace and security — In this address to the Security Council, Guyana’s representative emphasised the critical need to adapt to rapidly advanc…
S13
Steering the future of AI — Nicholas Thompson: All right, Jann, you ready to be information-dense? That was a good introduction. How are you? I’m pr…
S14
9821st meeting — Secretary-General – Antonio Guterres:Mr. President, Excellencies, I thank the United States for convening the Meeting on…
S15
Open Forum: A Primer on AI — Artificial Intelligence is advancing at a rapid pace
S16
[Parliamentary Session 3] Researching at the frontier: Insights from the private sector in developing large-scale AI systems — Basma Ammari: That’s a very good question. I think it’s a natural continuation of what my friend Ivana was just speak…
S17
Open/secure 5G and supplier diversification — From a vendor’s perspective, Fujitsu is concentrating on integrating security into their software development process. T…
S18
Fireside Conversation: 02 — -Moderator: Role – Event moderator/host (introducing speakers and facilitating the event) Absolutely. So the relationsh…
S19
Fireside chat with Dr Matthew Meselson — Ljupčo Gjorgjinski: Ah, all right, well, good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are in the world. …
S20
Partnering on American AI Exports Powering the Future India AI Impact Summit 2026 — This comment demonstrates sophisticated understanding that ‘AI sovereignty’ isn’t a monolithic concept but represents di…
S21
Panel Discussion Data Sovereignty India AI Impact Summit — This comment reframes the entire sovereignty debate by distinguishing between isolation and strategic control. It moves …
S22
Global AI Policy Framework: International Cooperation and Historical Perspectives — Mirlesse outlines practical steps for implementing open sovereignty, emphasizing domestic AI deployment in key sectors w…
S23
Secure Finance Risk-Based AI Policy for the Banking Sector — “Three dominate cloud capacity and a handful command foundation models threatening financial stability and economic sove…
S24
Global Perspectives on Openness and Trust in AI — And then exclusive partnerships and the systems being opaque. So those were the things identified in the market study. A…
S25
From High-Performance Computing to High-Performance Problem Solving / Davos 2025 — Georges Olivier Reymond It shifted the discussion from viewing quantum computing as a standalone technology to seeing i…
S26
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/keynote-by-vivek-mahajan-cto-fujitsu-india-ai-impact-summit — We have announced a 250 logical qubit roadmap by the end of 2030, which is ahead of any other company in the world that …
S27
The Virtual Worlds we want: Governance of the future web | IGF 2023 Open Forum #45 — Masahisa Kawashima:And also I want to just make one comment quickly. So to achieve high bandwidth, low latency radio com…
S28
Future Network System as Open Platform in Beyond 5G/6G Era | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #201 — Tony Quek:Okay, I’m Tony. So I’m a faculty at a university, but I’m also serving as a director of the Future Communities…
S29
Partnering on American AI Exports Powering the Future India AI Impact Summit 2026 — This comment demonstrates sophisticated understanding that ‘AI sovereignty’ isn’t a monolithic concept but represents di…
S30
Keynote by Vivek Mahajan CTO Fujitsu India AI Impact Summit — This comment reframes AI sovereignty from a purely nationalistic concept to a practical business and security imperative…
S31
Keynote ‘I’ to the Power of AI An 8-Year-Old on Aspiring India Impacting the World — This discussion features an 8-year-old prodigy presenting their perspective on global AI development and India’s strateg…
S32
Panel Discussion Data Sovereignty India AI Impact Summit — Both speakers agree that sovereignty should involve strategic partnerships and collaboration rather than complete self-r…
S33
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups &amp; Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw — This comment provides a philosophical and ethical framework for the entire biotech sovereignty agenda, showing how India…
S34
Open/secure 5G and supplier diversification — Anil Umesh:Thank you. So also from energy efficiency, we see a big part from two aspects. One is from the hardware persp…
S35
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups &amp; Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Takahito Tokita Fujitsu — This discussion features Takahito Tokita, President and CEO of Fujitsu, presenting the company’s vision for artificial i…
S36
WS #208 Democratising Access to AI with Open Source LLMs — Daniele Turra: Thank you so much, Ahitha, for presenting me today. I’m so glad to be here to discuss this very importa…
S37
Global Perspectives on Openness and Trust in AI — And then exclusive partnerships and the systems being opaque. So those were the things identified in the market study. A…
S38
Democratizing AI: Open foundations and shared resources for global impact — The Swiss-made LLM represents the largest truly open language model designed to serve society, with complete transparenc…
S39
From High-Performance Computing to High-Performance Problem Solving / Davos 2025 — Georges Olivier Reymond It shifted the discussion from viewing quantum computing as a standalone technology to seeing i…
S40
Fujitsu and RIKEN expand quantum computing with 256 qubits — Fujitsu and RIKEN, a prominent Japanese research institute,have unveileda new 256-qubit superconducting quantum computer…
S41
Quantum and supercomputing converge in IBM-AMD initiative — IBM has announced plans todevelop next-generation computing architecturesby integrating quantum computers with high-perf…
S42
The Virtual Worlds we want: Governance of the future web | IGF 2023 Open Forum #45 — Masahisa Kawashima:And also I want to just make one comment quickly. So to achieve high bandwidth, low latency radio com…
S43
Researchers develop high-frequency, low-power switch to revolutionise 6G communications — Researchers atUAB, theUniversity of Texas at Austinand theUniversity of Lilledeveloped atelecommunications switchthat op…
S44
Panel #3: « Gouverner les données : entre souveraineté, éthique et sécurité à l’ère de l’interconnexion » — Drudeisha Madhub Merci beaucoup de m’avoir invitée à l’OIF. C’est vraiment un joli atelier depuis hier, c’est une belle …
S45
Building Sovereign and Responsible AI Beyond Proof of Concepts — Sovereignty dimension focuses on control over data, models, and security measures
S46
Keynote-Mukesh Dhirubhai Ambani — This is a profound strategic insight that connects technological sovereignty with economic independence. The metaphor of…
S47
Discussion Report: Sovereign AI in Defence and National Security — This comment addresses a key concern about AI sovereignty leading to fragmentation, instead positioning it as a foundati…
S49
MahaAI Building Safe Secure &amp; Smart Governance — Unexpected framing of data monetization not just as economic opportunity but as preventing exploitation by foreign entit…
S50
Regional Leaders Discuss AI-Ready Digital Infrastructure — “So these three S were introduced yesterday by ITU’s head, the three S of solutions, standards, and skills”[19]. “So whe…
S51
Building the AI-Ready Future From Infrastructure to Skills — And we delivered that first exascale system, Valfrontier at Utrich, for less than 20 megawatts. Everybody thought it was…
S52
Exploring AI developments: From brain implants to ChatGPT Enterprise — Next Monday is going to be an exciting day! Tesla is making a supercomputer that is going to be one of the most powerful…
S53
Quantum leap: The future of computing — If AI was the buzzword for 2023 and 2024,quantum computinglooks set to claim the spotlight in the years ahead. Despite g…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
S
Speaker 1
7 arguments157 words per minute1953 words741 seconds
Argument 1
Definition of sovereignty as flexibility, security, and data ownership (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 defines AI sovereignty as the ability of a nation to retain control over its data and AI models while maintaining flexibility to adapt them. It combines data ownership, security, and the capacity to modify and tune AI systems without dependence on external providers.
EVIDENCE
Speaker 1 states that sovereignty means being flexible and secure, requiring ownership and control of data, and the ability to modify and tune models without heavy reliance on third parties [4-8][9-11].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Vivek Mahajan’s keynote explicitly defines AI sovereignty in terms of flexibility, security, and reduced third-party dependence, aligning with the speaker’s definition [S8].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Definition of AI sovereignty
Argument 2
Fujitsu’s 2 nm ARM‑based Monaca chip and upcoming 1.4 nm CPUs with NPU for AI inferencing, using an open software stack (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 highlights Fujitsu’s development of a 2‑nm ARM‑based Monaca processor and forthcoming 1.4‑nm CPUs equipped with NPUs for AI inference, emphasizing that these are delivered with an open software stack. This infrastructure aims to give customers sovereign control over compute resources.
EVIDENCE
He mentions the Monaca chip as a two-nanometer ARM-based processor built in Japan with confidential computing at the hardware level [38-40], and describes upcoming 1.4-nm CPUs featuring 256-core and 128-core configurations plus an NPU for AI inference [42]. He also stresses that the software stack is completely open with no lock-in [45-48].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open hardware and software for sovereign AI compute
Argument 3
Plan to build a 20 exaflop AI supercomputer powered by the Monaca chip (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 announces Fujitsu’s intention to construct a 20‑exaflop AI supercomputer powered by the Monaca chip, positioning it as a national‑scale resource for AI workloads. The project builds on Fujitsu’s history of operating world‑leading supercomputers.
EVIDENCE
Speaker 1 notes that Fujitsu previously operated the world’s fastest supercomputer for five years and now plans to build a 20-exaflop AI supercomputer within two years, powered by the Monaca chip [36-38].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Planned exascale AI supercomputer
Argument 4
Fujitsu’s roadmap to 250 logical qubits by 2030, launch of a 1 000‑qubit machine, and coupling quantum with HPC for mission‑critical AI workloads (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 outlines Fujitsu’s quantum ambitions, targeting 250 logical qubits by 2030 and the imminent deployment of a 1,000‑qubit machine, while emphasizing the integration of quantum processors with high‑performance computing to support mission‑critical AI. This strategy positions quantum as a complementary pillar to classical AI infrastructure.
EVIDENCE
He outlines Fujitsu’s quantum roadmap, including a target of 250 logical qubits by 2030 [65], the launch of a 1,000-qubit machine next month in Kawasaki [71], and a 10,000-qubit system expected in three years, emphasizing the coupling of quantum with HPC for AI workloads [62-70].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Quantum roadmap for AI
Argument 5
Development of a 1.6 Tbps photonic switch (future 3.2 Tbps), low‑latency optical links, and open RAN orchestration to move AI workloads efficiently (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 describes the creation of a 1.6‑Tbps photonic switch (with a planned 3.2‑Tbps version) that provides low‑latency, power‑efficient optical links, and mentions the use of open RAN orchestration to efficiently transport AI workloads across networks. These networking advances are presented as essential for sovereign AI deployments.
EVIDENCE
Speaker 1 describes a 1.6-Tbps photonic switch that is highly power-efficient and supports low-latency, long-distance optical transmission, with plans to upgrade to 3.2 Tbps, and mentions the use of open RAN and network orchestration to move AI workloads efficiently [76].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
High‑capacity photonic networking
Argument 6
Takane large‑language‑model platform and Kozuchi AI‑agent built on Fujitsu’s proprietary security layer, enabling domain‑specific, fine‑tuned, secure AI models (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 presents Fujitsu’s Takane large‑language‑model platform and Kozuchi AI‑agent, both built on a proprietary security layer, enabling the development of domain‑specific, fine‑tuned, and secure AI models for sectors such as defense, nuclear, and healthcare. The emphasis is on sovereignty through security and customization.
EVIDENCE
He explains that sovereign AI requires domain-specific models for sectors like defense, nuclear, healthcare, and that Fujitsu’s Takane LLM platform and Kozuchi AI-agent, built on a proprietary security layer, enable fine-tuning and secure deployment of such models [78-84].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Secure domain‑specific AI platforms
Argument 7
Fujitsu offers a total solution from compute to applications, partnering with AMD, Lockheed Martin, Supermicro and others for physical AI, robotics, and industry use cases (Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 emphasizes that Fujitsu delivers a complete, end‑to‑end AI solution covering compute, networking, and applications, and cites partnerships with AMD, Lockheed Martin, Supermicro and others to advance physical AI, robotics, and industry use cases. The message is that customers can obtain a sovereign AI stack without piecemeal integration.
EVIDENCE
Speaker 1 states that Fujitsu provides a total solution from compute to applications, leveraging its own technologies and partnerships with AMD, Lockheed Martin, Supermicro and others for physical AI, robotics and industry use cases [86-99].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
End‑to‑end AI solution and partnerships
S
Speaker 2
1 argument102 words per minute78 words45 seconds
Argument 1
Announcement of the upcoming fireside chat and request for speakers and audience to clear the pathway (Speaker 2)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 2 introduces the next session, announcing a fireside chat with senior executives from CDAT and Intel, and asks both speakers and the audience to clear the stage. The remarks serve to transition the program and manage logistics.
EVIDENCE
Speaker 2 thanks the audience, announces a fireside chat with Mr. Vivek Kaneja and Mr. Nitin Bajaj, and requests the speakers and the audience to clear the pathway [100-104].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The program schedule mentions a fireside chat with senior executives from CDAT and Intel, confirming the announced session and its participants [S8]; additional references describe the fireside conversation format [S18].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Session handover and logistics
Agreements
Agreement Points
Similar Viewpoints
Unexpected Consensus
Overall Assessment

The transcript contains a single substantive contribution (Speaker 1) that outlines Fujitsu’s vision for AI sovereignty, emphasizing data ownership, open hardware/software, quantum‑HPC integration, high‑capacity photonic networking, and end‑to‑end AI solutions. Speaker 2 only provides a procedural hand‑over to the next session and does not present any substantive policy or technical arguments. Consequently, there is no demonstrable overlap or shared stance between the two speakers on any of the listed arguments.

Very low – the only points of convergence are procedural (both participants are part of the same event). The lack of substantive agreement limits any immediate implications for policy or technical coordination on AI sovereignty.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Unexpected Differences
Overall Assessment

The transcript contains a detailed presentation by Speaker 1 on Fujitsu’s sovereign AI strategy and a brief logistical hand‑over by Speaker 2. No substantive policy or technical positions are offered by Speaker 2 that could be compared with Speaker 1, resulting in an absence of identifiable disagreement or partial agreement between the speakers.

Very low – the two speakers do not present conflicting viewpoints, so the discussion proceeds without contention, implying smooth transition but offering no debate on the AI sovereignty topics.

Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI sovereignty is defined as the combination of flexibility, security, and ownership/control of data. Fujitsu is developing sovereign AI infrastructure across compute, network, and software layers. Compute: 2 nm ARM‑based Monaca chip, upcoming 1.4 nm CPUs with integrated NPU for AI inferencing, and a planned 20 exaflop AI supercomputer. All compute solutions use a completely open software stack, avoiding vendor lock‑in. Quantum: roadmap to 250 logical qubits by 2030, launch of a 1 000‑qubit machine, and integration of quantum with HPC for mission‑critical AI workloads. Network: 1.6 Tbps (future 3.2 Tbps) photonic switch, low‑latency long‑range optical links, and open RAN orchestration to move AI workloads efficiently. AI software: Takane large‑language‑model platform and Kozuchi AI‑agent built on Fujitsu’s proprietary security layer, enabling domain‑specific, fine‑tuned, secure models. Fujitsu offers an end‑to‑end, total solution—from compute and networking to applications—and is partnering with companies such as AMD, Lockheed Martin, and Supermicro for physical AI and robotics use cases. The session concluded with a transition announcement for a fireside chat featuring Intel and CDAT executives.
Resolutions and action items
None identified
Unresolved issues
None identified
Suggested compromises
None identified
Thought Provoking Comments
For us, sovereignty is being flexible and being secure – you want ownership of your data, control over it, and the ability to manage and tune models without overwhelming reliance on third‑party providers.
Sets a clear, nuanced definition of AI sovereignty that goes beyond simple data ownership, framing it as a balance of flexibility and security.
Establishes the conceptual foundation for the rest of the talk, prompting the speaker to structure the presentation around three independent pillars (software, compute, networks) and influencing listeners to view sovereignty as a multi‑dimensional requirement.
Speaker: Speaker 1
To effectively drive artificial intelligence, you need three key components: software, compute, and networks. Our focus on sovereignty is being independent in all three areas and giving customers a choice.
Introduces a concrete three‑pillar framework that organizes the technical discussion and highlights independence as the core of sovereignty.
Creates a turning point that shifts the narrative from abstract definition to concrete technology domains, leading to separate deep‑dives into compute, quantum, and networking later in the talk.
Speaker: Speaker 1
We will be building a 20 AI‑exascale supercomputer in about two years, powered by our Fujitsu Monaca 2‑nm ARM‑based chip with confidential computing built at the hardware level.
Announces a tangible, cutting‑edge hardware roadmap that directly addresses the compute pillar and ties hardware design to security (confidential computing).
Introduces a new topic—high‑performance, secure compute—prompting the audience to consider how such hardware can underpin sovereign AI workloads and setting up later references to NPUs and inference‑focused designs.
Speaker: Speaker 1
The software stack we are delivering is completely open – there is nothing locked in, no vendor lock‑in.
Challenges the common perception that enterprise AI platforms are proprietary, positioning Fujitsu’s offering as uniquely flexible and interoperable.
Deepens the conversation about sovereignty by linking it to software openness, reinforcing the earlier flexibility theme and preparing listeners for the later discussion of domain‑specific models.
Speaker: Speaker 1
We have announced a 250‑logical‑qubit roadmap by the end of 2030, with a 1,000‑qubit machine going live next month and a 10,000‑qubit machine in three years – quantum plus HPC together will drive mission‑critical AI workloads.
Introduces quantum computing as a strategic pillar, positioning Fujitsu as a top‑three global player and tying quantum progress to AI workload acceleration.
Creates a major shift in the discussion, expanding the scope from classical compute to quantum, and adds complexity by suggesting a future where quantum‑HPC hybrid systems become part of sovereign AI infrastructure.
Speaker: Speaker 1
We are developing a 1.6 TB (soon 3.2 TB) photonic switch that delivers low‑latency, low‑power transmission over a thousand‑kilometre distances, and we integrate it with open‑RAN for AI‑driven network orchestration.
Presents a novel networking solution that directly addresses the third pillar, emphasizing ultra‑high bandwidth and energy efficiency for data‑center scale deployments.
Shifts the conversation to the networking layer, showing how Fujitsu’s hardware complements the compute and software stacks, and reinforces the end‑to‑end sovereignty narrative.
Speaker: Speaker 1
Sovereign AI must be domain‑specific – for defense, nuclear, healthcare, finance you cannot use public clouds; you need to build and fine‑tune models that are secure and tailored to each sector.
Deepens the sovereignty concept by linking it to regulatory and risk considerations across critical sectors, moving beyond technology to real‑world application constraints.
Guides the audience to think about use‑case driven deployments, setting the stage for the later mention of the Takane LLM platform and AI agent tech as tools for building such domain‑specific solutions.
Speaker: Speaker 1
Our vision is the Kozuchi physical OS – a physical AI platform that gives robots (and other edge devices like drones or medical equipment) a persistent memory and intelligence, merging compute, network, and AI software into edge‑ready solutions.
Introduces a forward‑looking, integrated edge‑AI concept that unifies all three pillars into a single physical operating system, highlighting a future direction beyond data‑center centric AI.
Acts as a concluding turning point, tying together compute, networking, and software into a cohesive product vision, and signals upcoming partnerships and ecosystem development.
Speaker: Speaker 1
Overall Assessment

The discussion was driven by a series of strategically placed, thought‑provoking statements that each expanded the notion of AI sovereignty from a high‑level definition to concrete, technology‑specific commitments. By first framing sovereignty as flexibility plus security, the speaker set a lens through which every subsequent claim—whether about open software, exascale compute, quantum roadmaps, ultra‑high‑bandwidth networking, domain‑specific model requirements, or an integrated edge OS—was interpreted as a step toward independent, secure AI capability. Each turning point introduced a new pillar or application layer, progressively deepening the conversation and reinforcing Fujitsu’s narrative of offering a complete, sovereign AI stack. This layered approach kept the audience engaged, shifted focus smoothly across topics, and culminated in a holistic vision that ties all components together, thereby shaping the overall discourse around a unified, sovereign AI ecosystem.

Follow-up Questions
Can you provide detailed specifications and roadmap for the open software stack that Fujitsu claims is completely open and fine‑tuned for AI, compute, and HPC?
Understanding the components, licensing, and integration points of the open stack is crucial for customers to assess compatibility and avoid vendor lock‑in.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What are the exact performance characteristics, availability timeline, and deployment plans for the 1.4 nm chip featuring 256‑core CPU, 128‑core CPU, and an NPU for AI inferencing?
Clarifying these details will help stakeholders evaluate the chip’s suitability for sovereign AI workloads, especially in markets like India and Europe.
Speaker: Speaker 1
How is confidential computing implemented at the hardware level in the Fujitsu Monaca chip, and what security guarantees does it provide?
Security is a core element of sovereignty; explicit information on hardware‑based confidentiality is needed to build trust.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What is the detailed quantum roadmap, including milestones for the 250 logical qubits by 2030, the 1,000‑qubit machine launching next month, and the 10,000‑qubit system expected in three years?
Stakeholders need a clear timeline and technical roadmap to plan integration of quantum resources with AI workloads.
Speaker: Speaker 1
In what ways will quantum computing and high‑performance computing (HPC) be integrated to drive mission‑critical AI workloads, and what software abstractions will support this integration?
Understanding the coupling of quantum and HPC is essential for designing hybrid workloads and assessing performance benefits.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What are the performance metrics, power efficiency figures, and scalability plans for the 1.6 TB photonic switch and its future 3.2 TB version?
Network bandwidth and latency are critical for data‑center and edge AI; detailed specs are needed for capacity planning.
Speaker: Speaker 1
How will the open RAN and network orchestration stack be leveraged to move AI workloads efficiently across the infrastructure?
Clarifying orchestration mechanisms will help operators optimize AI workload placement and ensure low‑latency delivery.
Speaker: Speaker 1
Can you elaborate on the Takane large language model platform and the Kozuchi AI agent technology, particularly regarding their security architecture and customization capabilities?
Domain‑specific, secure, and fine‑tunable models are central to sovereign AI; detailed information is required for adoption.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What processes and governance frameworks are envisioned for building domain‑specific sovereign AI models for sectors such as defense, nuclear, healthcare, and finance?
These sectors have strict data‑privacy and regulatory requirements; guidance on model development and control is necessary.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What are the specifics of Fujitsu’s partnerships with AMD, Lockheed Martin, Supermicro, and robotics manufacturers for physical AI, and how will these collaborations materialize in products?
Partnership details will indicate ecosystem support, interoperability, and market reach of the physical AI solutions.
Speaker: Speaker 1
How will the compute, network, and AI software stack be integrated into edge devices such as robots, drones, and medical equipment, and what are the expected use‑cases?
Edge deployment is a key frontier; understanding integration pathways and applications will guide developers and OEMs.
Speaker: Speaker 1
What concrete deployment strategies and value propositions does Fujitsu propose for sovereign AI in India and Europe, considering local regulatory and infrastructure contexts?
Tailored approaches are needed to address regional sovereignty concerns, market needs, and policy environments.
Speaker: Speaker 1

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.