Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms

20 Feb 2026 14:00h - 15:00h

Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The panel opened with Lakshmi Pratury asking how individuals have scaled their own potential and why AI Kiran is emerging now [1-3]. Kirthiga Reddy answered that embracing risk-asking “what would you do if you weren’t afraid?”-has guided her career and the formation of AI Kiran [12-16]. She noted that the AI Kiran community has exploded from a handful of members to about 10,000 women, adding two zeros to the original 250-woman list generated by ChatGPT [61-64]. Reddy also highlighted the role of male allies and her own position as a privileged woman to pay the support forward [25-28].


Lakshmi Pratury traced her own path from Intel, venture capital and philanthropy to creating platforms that surface untold innovators, noting that she brought TED to India and has spent the last 15 years curating stories [37-44]. She sees the AI revolution as a chance to build inclusive technology from the ground up, arguing that every new wave-Internet, industrial-creates both problems and opportunities that must be addressed early [45-49]. According to her, AI Kiran’s mission is to make AI inclusive from the start, leveraging the momentum of the current generative-AI boom [49-50].


Radha Basu recounted her early work establishing HP’s software operations in Bangalore in the late 1980s, celebrating the first million dollars of software export from India [104-110]. She explained that AI Kiran now runs AI centres in tier-2 cities such as Calcutta, Vizag, Coimbatore, Shillong and others, each becoming a centre of excellence in domains like autonomous mobility, healthcare AI, automotive AI and generative AI [131-138][143-149]. Radha emphasized that the organization’s workforce is roughly 10,000 strong, with women making up 53 % of staff, reflecting a deliberate gender-parity goal [175-178].


When asked about what is needed to scale AI in India, Radha described a three-point investment triangle: technology/models, infrastructure, and human intelligence [259-264]. She added that bridging the AI divide requires making young people from diverse backgrounds AI-ready, citing the average age of her team as 24.5 and the need to upskill non-IIT talent [270-277]. Mihir Shukla reinforced the skilling argument, noting that training programmes have placed 700 women in Africa and 500 U.S. participants into AI jobs within weeks, demonstrating the rapid economic mobility AI can provide [428-436].


Both speakers agreed that resilience, curiosity and the ability to ask the right questions are essential personal traits for navigating the automated future [316-324][349-352]. The discussion concluded that scaling human potential in AI depends on collaborative ecosystems, gender parity, regional centres and continuous learning to ensure inclusive, responsible growth [180-182][259-264].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Scaling human potential through inclusive AI ecosystems – The panel repeatedly emphasized the need to broaden AI participation, especially for women and youth, citing the rapid growth of the AI Kiran community (10 000 members) and the goal of gender parity in AI companies [11][55-63][175-178]. Lakshmi highlighted the “Fellows Program” that brings together 250 young talent from diverse disciplines [71-78].


Embracing risk and “starting over” in the AI era – Kirthiga urged listeners to ask “what would you do if you weren’t afraid?” and advised entrepreneurs to be willing to restart their trajectories to stay ahead of the AI curve [12-18][19-24].


Building decentralized AI infrastructure and talent hubs across India – Radha described the creation of AI centers in non-metro cities (Calcutta, Vizag, Coimbatore, Hubli, Shillong) and their focus areas-autonomous mobility, healthcare, automotive, and generative AI-aimed at preventing an “AI divide” [132-141][144-149][155-162].


Upskilling under-represented groups to create AI-ready citizens – Multiple speakers stressed large-scale training initiatives: Automation Anywhere’s half-billion digital workers [184-190]; AI Kiran’s plan to train a million women and youth [284-296]; and grassroots programs that have placed hundreds of women and low-income youth into AI jobs within weeks [428-437][442-456].


Future skills and values for the next generation – The audience asked what children should learn for an AI-automated world; panelists answered with resilience, curiosity, “heart intelligence,” and the ability to ask the right questions rather than just consume AI outputs [308-324][326-334][338-342].


Overall purpose / goal


The discussion was designed to showcase how leaders are scaling human potential by building an inclusive, decentralized AI ecosystem in India-highlighting personal journeys, community growth, infrastructure development, and large-scale education initiatives-to inspire collective action toward a more equitable AI future.


Overall tone


Opening (0-10 min): Energetic, celebratory, and motivational, with applause for community size and personal anecdotes.


Middle (10-30 min): Becomes more reflective and strategic, focusing on concrete actions-risk-taking, building centers, and scaling talent.


Later (30-57 min): Shifts to a problem-solving, hopeful tone, addressing audience concerns about education, ethics, and future skills, and ending with an optimistic call-to-action.


The tone moves from inspirational excitement to practical deliberation and finishes on an optimistic, collaborative note.


Speakers

Speakers (from the provided list)


Lakshmi Pratury – Panelist; former Intel executive, venture capitalist, philanthropist; brought TED to India and co-founder of AI Kiran.


Kirthiga Reddy – Panelist; former SoftBank partner, founder of Optimize Geo (AI-focused startup).


Mihir Shukla – Panelist; CEO & Chairman of Automation Anywhere; author of an upcoming book on AI transformation. [S4]


Radha Basu – Panelist; Founder & CEO of iMerit, AI-focused technology company. [S7]


Anurag Hoon – Panelist; music educator, founder of “Manzil Mystics” mobile music school, AI Kiran Fellow.


Audience – Various audience members who asked questions (e.g., Anupama – data-science lead, Hemendra – AI & sustainability faculty at IIM Udaipur, Anjali – Tech Mahindra, Bina – ServiceNow, etc.).


Speaker 1 – Unnamed moderator/host who provided closing remarks and occasional commentary.


Additional speakers (not in the provided list)


Ashna – Representative of AMD, discussed hardware and compute considerations.


Komal – Founder of Dark.ai, working on AI solutions for tailors and fashion designers.


Prerna – AI Kiran member, involved in community outreach and program coordination.


Neha Vaibhav – AI Kiran member, involved in community outreach and program coordination.


Bina – ServiceNow employee, active in the ethical AI movement.


Areas of expertise, roles, and titles are taken from the transcript and enriched where external source citations were available.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The panel opened with Lakshmi Pratury asking the speakers how they had “scaled their own potential” and why the AI Kiran initiative was emerging now [1-3].


Kirthiga Reddy welcomed the audience and described the AI Kiran community as spanning from Mumbai to Himachal Pradesh, now numbering roughly ten-thousand women and “multiplying by two or three-fold” [11-12]. She framed her career around the question “What would you do if you weren’t afraid?” – a mantra that encourages risk-taking, restarting one’s trajectory and aiming for stretch goals rather than incremental ones [12-15]. Reddy also acknowledged the role of male allies and said her position is a “privilege and responsibility to give it forward” [25-28].


Reddy then highlighted Optimize Geo, the startup she co-founded, explaining how its generative-engine-optimization platform helps brands stay relevant in an AI-driven consumer landscape [200-210]. She also cited Dark.ai, led by Komal, which enables tailors and fashion designers to adopt AI tools, illustrating AI Kiran’s “create-and-scale” ethos [70-78].


When the group first queried ChatGPT for “100 women in AI in India”, it returned only ten names; the founders responded by compiling a list of 250 women, effectively adding a zero to the original output, and the community has since grown to ~10 000 members [61-64].


Lakshmi Pratury traced her three-decade reinvention-from Intel and venture capital to philanthropy and curating stories of untold innovators [37-44]. She recalled bringing TED to India and, for the past fifteen years, building a platform that surfaces talent beyond the “10 famous people” [38-40]. Pratury positioned the current generative-AI boom as an opportunity to design inclusive technology from the outset, drawing a parallel with past industrial revolutions that created both problems and chances for remediation [45-49]. She introduced AI Kiran’s Fellows Programme, which now supports over 250 multidisciplinary young innovators [71-78].


Radha Basu recounted her pioneering role in establishing Hewlett-Packard’s software operations in Bangalore in the late 1980s and celebrating India’s first million-dollar software export in 1989 [104-110]. She described AI Kiran’s present-day strategy of decentralising AI capacity by setting up centres of excellence in tier-2 cities-Calcutta, Vizag, Coimbatore, Hubli and Shillong-each specialising in autonomous mobility, healthcare AI, automotive AI and generative AI [132-141][143-149]. Basu noted that the organisation now employs roughly ten-thousand AI professionals (about 3 500 in India) with women constituting 53 % of the workforce, a deliberate gender-parity target, and an average employee age of 24.5 years [140-150][175-176].


She also detailed the small-model pipeline used in AI Kiran projects: building compact vision and language models, fine-tuning them, applying reinforcement learning with human feedback, “tormenting” the models to improve robustness, and collaborating with domain scholars such as cardiologists and agronomists [150-170]. Through a partnership with the Anudip Foundation, AI Kiran has already up-skilled 630 000 young people-approximately 50 % women-in AI literacy [190-200].


Mihir Shukla reinforced the emphasis on applied AI, arguing that India’s comparative advantage lies in deploying AI across its eighteen industrial hubs rather than chasing the global race to build ever-larger models [284-288]. He announced a partnership with AI Kiran to train one million women and youth in AI and automation over the next five years [284-296]. Shukla referenced his forthcoming book A Five-Year Century and cited Automation Anywhere statistics: roughly half a billion digital workers, a 1:20 human-to-digital-worker ratio, and a presence in 90 countries [220-240]. He illustrated rapid economic mobility by noting programmes that placed 700 women in Africa and 500 participants in the U.S. into AI jobs within weeks of six-week training [428-436].


After Shukla, Ashna (Speaker 1) offered a distinct perspective on infrastructure and ambition, advocating a coexistence model between human and artificial intelligence and emphasizing the role of ambition in scaling AI solutions [250-270].


The audience then asked what skills children should acquire for an AI-automated future. Panelists converged on the need for resilience, curiosity and emotional intelligence: one speaker stressed learning to “fail” and bounce back [304-311]; another highlighted “five senses and nine emotions” as a foundation for “heart intelligence” [300-320]. The panel reiterated that nurturing these soft skills is as crucial as technical training for the next generation.


Parallel concerns about safety and trust were voiced. An audience member warned of the necessity for guard-rails to protect children from AI-driven harms while still empowering them [382-389]. No concrete solution was offered during the session.


Agreements

1. Community-driven gender parity – Both Kirthiga and Radha highlighted the importance of community building (≈10 000 women) and internal hiring policies (53 % women) to achieve parity [61-64][175-176].


2. Risk-taking and career reinvention – Reddy and Pratury championed taking bold risks and reinventing one’s career as catalysts for personal and technological progress [12-15][34-36][42-44].


3. Decentralisation of AI talent – Reddy’s warning against an “AI divide” and Basu’s tier-2 centres of excellence reflect a shared stance on decentralising AI capacity [136-137][132-141].


4. Balanced “triangle” investment – Shukla and Basu agreed that investment should simultaneously develop technology/models, infrastructure/compute, and human talent [259-264][284-288].


5. Resilience, curiosity and question-asking – Multiple participants emphasized that resilience, curiosity and the ability to ask good questions are essential for thriving in an AI-driven world [304-311][349-352].


Disagreements

1. Investment priorities – Shukla argued for prioritising applied AI solutions over competing in the global model-size race [284-288]; Basu advocated a balanced “triangle” approach that also funds cutting-edge models and compute [259-264].


2. Core competencies for children – The audience stressed resilience and curiosity [304-311]; Anurag Hoon proposed a holistic curriculum centred on the five senses and nine emotions [300-320]; Speaker 1 (Ashna) highlighted resilience and learning from failure but did not mention the sensory-emotional framework [316-324].


3. Rapid empowerment vs. child safety – The audience’s call for robust guard-rails [382-389] contrasted with Reddy’s earlier encouragement to act fearlessly without directly addressing safety [12-15].


4. External community growth vs. internal hiring metrics for gender parity – Reddy emphasised community expansion as the primary lever [61-64]; Basu pointed to internal workforce composition (53 % women) as evidence of successful parity policies [175-176].


Thought-Provoking Remarks

– “What would you do if you weren’t afraid?” [12-15]


– The “add two zeros” anecdote about ChatGPT’s initial list [61-64]


– Basu’s declaration of AI centres outside metros [132-141]


– Pratury’s comparison of AI to past revolutions and the call to make it inclusive [45-49]


– Shukla’s analogy that India’s strength lies in applying technology rather than inventing it [284-288]


– Hoon’s emphasis on “heart intelligence” through the five senses and nine emotions [300-320]


– The panel’s repeated emphasis that asking the right questions drives progress [349-352].


Concrete Actions Proposed

1. Launch the AI Kiran-partnered programme to train one million women and youth in AI and automation within five years [284-296].


2. Continue expanding the AI Kiran community, aiming to add further zeros to its membership count [61-64].


3. Scale the Fellows Programme beyond its current 250 alumni [71-78].


4. Operationalise the tier-2 AI centres of excellence as outlined by Basu [132-141].


5. Prioritise applied AI projects in precision agriculture, breast-cancer screening and autonomous mobility [145-152][280-283].


6. Develop educational resources on resilience, curiosity, EQ and the five-senses framework for parents and teachers [300-320][304-311].


7. Encourage organisations to use existing compute creatively while seeking advanced chips as strategic enablers [12-15].


8. Embed ethical guard-rails and provenance mechanisms early in AI product development, responding to audience concerns [382-389].


Unresolved Issues

– Specific frameworks for safeguarding children from AI-related harms while still empowering them remain undefined [382-389].


– Metrics to monitor the effectiveness of the one-million-women training partnership are still needed.


– The precise balance between investing in large-scale model development versus applied AI solutions requires further policy deliberation.


– Detailed strategies for bridging the AI divide between metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions, and concrete curricula for integrating resilience, curiosity and emotional intelligence, were left open for future work.


Key Take-aways

Community-driven gender parity combines large-scale outreach with internal hiring targets.


Risk-taking and career reinvention are viewed as essential levers for personal and technological progress.


Decentralised AI hubs in tier-2 cities are critical to avoid an urban-AI divide.


– A balanced “triangle” investment model-technology, infrastructure, and human talent-is advocated.


Resilience, curiosity and the ability to ask good questions are highlighted as core competencies for the next generation.


– A concrete training partnership aims to up-skill one million women and youth in AI and automation over the next five years.


Overall, the discussion revealed strong consensus on inclusive gender participation, risk-taking, decentralised AI capacity and balanced investment, while moderate disagreements persisted around investment priorities, child-safety versus rapid empowerment, and the optimal pathways to achieve gender parity. These insights provide a roadmap for policymakers, industry leaders and educators seeking to scale human potential responsibly within India’s burgeoning AI ecosystem.


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Lakshmi Pratury

to being the first woman partner at SoftBank, you know, investing over a billion dollars, to now an entrepreneurial journey at Optimize .io. Today we are talking about scaling human potential, etc. So how have you scaled your own potential through all this that landed you in AI Kiran? Why did you land in AI Kiran now?

Kirthiga Reddy

All right, yeah, we’ll all get seated since we have all our fellow panelists seated here. So I’m just so excited to be here. And a first call -out to all of the AI Kiran community members here because that is really the story. Amazing. And you come from where? Where are you coming from? Mumbai? Gurgaon? Jamshedpur? Himachal Pradesh. All right. Just a microcosm of the community that’s now officially 10 ,000 but growing to, very quickly, like, multiplying by two or three -fold, and we’ll be, you know, stay tuned for the announcement with partnerships like the one that we have here. So, yeah, my own journey has been one of I guess if I had to think about a theme, it’s my favorite meta poster, which is an offices all across the globe, which says, what would you do if you weren’t afraid?

And it’s a phrase that I want us to think about. You know, what would you do if you weren’t afraid? And think about what comes to your mind. Right. So it’s about, you know, taking risks and not being afraid to start over again. I had someone come up to me yesterday and say, hey, if their business is on a certain trajectory, but now if they have to move over to AI, if it meant starting over all over again, what would I recommend to them? And I said, start over all over again. Right. Because there’s a certain trajectory that if you are in, it is all about projecting where you will be five years from now, 10 years from now.

And if the new trajectory gets you further ahead, you know, by the way, and even if you fail at that, it’s better to shoot for the stars. And miss versus doing a part that. That feels achievable, but there’s not the stretch in it. And of course, with that comes a lot of assumptions about both, you know, the financial ability, the support that you have from your family to do it. But if you have all of that, certainly go out and stretch to that. So that I would say is what what has been my journey and the inspiration for AI Kiran as well, in that all of the different roles that you mentioned, I was often the only woman in the room, certainly the single digit percentage at the max.

And I think all of the women in this room relate. And it has been about incredible male allies who also helped with us getting to the roles that we are in. And so that becomes a position of privilege and responsibility to give it forward. And then that’s when I met Lakshmi, the fearless Lakshmi, who has been a pioneer both in her own reinvention. She was the OG technology 25 technologist. Connected. builder of, real builder, and someone who’s focused on scaling human potential, just like everyone else here. So Lakshmi, tell us your story, and I can’t wait to hear the stories

Lakshmi Pratury

of everyone else here on this panel. Yeah, so, you know, for me, when I sit here today in 2026, in 1994, 93, 94, we were talking about internet is going to be big, and people would say, okay, what is this? You know, how will anybody make any money in this, etc. So what we are looking at now is nothing new. This is just a reinvention of things we’ve been seeing for the last 50 years, you know. So I’ve been at Intel, I’ve been a venture capitalist, I’ve been, you know, in philanthropy, all kinds of things. But what brought us together to AI Kiran is that for the last 15 years, my work has been about finding amazing people, doing amazing work and get them to tell their stories, because we only hear about the 10 famous people, but innovation is happening everywhere.

So how do you find them, connect them, and get them to tell their stories and teach people how to tell their stories? So I brought TED to India. I mean, I worked at Intel, venture capital, all kinds of stuff. And then I decided for the last 15 years, my journey is going to be how to create a platform to showcase the amazing talent that’s there in India and across the globe that doesn’t get told. So that’s what I’ve been doing. So when I met Kritika and I look at in the AI revolution, there is an amazing opportunity for us to do it right from the beginning. In every revolution, industrial revolution, we messed up the environment, the rivers and everything.

200 years later, we are like, okay, let’s clean it up. Even in the Internet revolution, you know, we have the problems with social media, you know, mental illnesses, all kinds of things, good and bad. But technology is growing. It’s great, actually. You can’t fight it. So how can we be part of this? to make it inclusive from the word get -go. That’s what excites us in this journey. And as she was saying, we have no idea how to do this. You kind of say, we are going to do this. And it’s amazing, like in six months, the kind of progress we had. As she said, you know, one of the things

Kirthiga Reddy

you must say, Kritika, about the chat GPT thing. Yeah, you know, I shared this when we started AI Kiran. And by the way, this is the most you’re going to hear from both of us because the rest of the session, we are going to hear from our incredible panelists. And when we started, if you went to chat GPT and said, can you tell me about 100 women in AI in India, it would tell you 10 women, right? And it will tell you that I cannot answer this question. And these are some sources that you look at. And so over that period of time, so we launched with 250 named women. So right there, we added a zero. Now it’s an incredible community of, you know, 10 ,000 women who are all taking this on their own, rallying it, self -organizing.

And so we’re going to talk a little bit about that. creating new ventures. We just heard about Dark .ai, which Komal is doing that and helping tailors and fashion designers use AI. And you have to Awesome, right? So if we can create a platform to even add a little bit of like that oomph and make it bigger, faster, bolder, I mean, we have done our jobs. And so, yeah, so we have already added two zeros to the first number that ChatGPT had. It’s just about, you know, as they say in a startup, add a zero, add a zero, and we’ll be at that million. So with that, let’s jump in.

Lakshmi Pratury

So talking about scaling human potential, I have to start the conversation with Radha. I’ve known Radha… I mean, I knew Radha about reading about her first in Silicon Valley. She was one of the first people… people who brought… HP to India in 1987 before anybody thought of the technology corridor. So we used to read about her. And then she started iSupport, which is a software company, which is one of the first unicorns in Bay Area. I was still reading about her. And then through a common friend, Chitra, I met her and been a great friend for the last 25 years. And talking about somebody who reinvents herself all the time to benefit the community that’s been in her, whether it is HP or whether it’s iSupport.

And now she does something called iMerit. And Radha, before, instead of me saying what you do, the kind of work that you do in scaling humanity, the humans in the loop, has been amazing. So tell us about how many people you have, what you’re doing, and what does scaling really mean for

Radha Basu

you? Actually, indeed. I said, indeed. you know I’ve had quite a journey together and sorry by the way I have to say how you know when you say Hewlett and Packard she actually worked with them yes so Lakshmi really dates me as well but that’s okay I work with Andy Grohwal so let’s really date ourselves I grew up in HP I’m originally from Madras and that’s where I did my engineering and you talk about being a woman in the room it was we were 17 girls and 2800 boys in engineering and I really had the opportunity and I went to get my masters in the US and just kind of fell into working at HP labs which was one of the most prestigious places then and the beauty of HP was David Packard particularly and I was really literally did the management by wandering around.

You would run into him everywhere, open offices, and ended up being a mentor. I was so fortunate. The two of them created Silicon Valley, the Silicon Valley we talk about today. And then when I had the opportunity by sheer, I ended up in Europe, ran medical products group for HP in Europe. And then at that point, I was like, okay, I’m going back to the U .S. What am I going to be doing? And there’s this whole thing about what is happening in that country of yours. It’s so behind in electronics, the country of mine, India. And I was so kind of enraged by that comment. I said, that’s rubbish. We have the best mathematicians, all of which is true.

So David Packard said, okay. I’ll give you three months. Go and figure out what you can do in India. And I tell you, it was the greatest opportunity because I ended up in this beautiful garden, sleepy town called Bangalore. And growing up in Chennai was, of course, I’d gone to Bangalore for my holidays. And the talent of, you know, when you’re working with computers, I used to actually at that time, I was working on multi -threaded Unix. And the kind of talent and what you could develop anyway, it wasn’t three months. That extended to about five and a half years. And I set up Hewlett Packard in Bangalore. And the first two multinationals of anybody doing software in India was Texas Instruments and HP.

The other most amazing thing at that time, I think even more amazing, was those were the years that TCS started. Infineon. HP started. Wipro started. TCS started. And I was just a little bit more experienced. And so we celebrated together the first million dollars of software export from India jointly. And I remember doing that million in 1989. I bring this up because if you, if when, within a lifetime when you can see an industry, technologies completely transform a large country with a growing middle class. And it’s just the creation. I mean, there is no question that IT is the global leader is in India. There is no question about that. So now you fast forward and you come to AI.

AI in turn is changing IT. It’s changing IT in ways that we never believed. It was even possible. And I think that so we started IT. And we’re still doing it. And we’re still doing it. it. It will be 10 years in AI in April. So thinking, and that’s what’s fun about being in the IT industry early on. Then you say, well, what’s happening to this industry? Multi, multi, multi billion dollars. And we started in AI. So we’ve kind of had a ringside seat. It’s also you go through when you start something early enough, you go through its issues. We have done a lot of work in computer vision, not just the language model side, but the computer vision side.

And I’ll talk a little bit about it. But at this point, we have, and many of them are AI Kiran folks. We have about little over 10 ,000 people working in AI. 3 ,500 or so in India. and our in -house talent in India working in AI is about a lot of, most of them are in -house. And we also decided to set up AI centers, not in the metros, because remember what transformed India was the work in Bangalore, Noida, Gurgaon, Chennai, et cetera. How do you then take it and use AI now, it’s the new technologies, but not have a divide? The last thing I want is, you know, like five or ten years from now, we’re all discussing how do we bridge the AI divide, as we’ve been doing, how do you bridge the digital divide?

If we could bridge it now, which is what I love about AI, Kiran, then you are in charge and you grow and you scale. So we started setting up. We started setting up centers in Calcutta, Vizag. Coimbatore, Hubli, Shillong. And so those are our centers. And each center now has become a center of excellence in a particular area. And the three areas that we work in, it was wonderful to hear this yesterday. We work four areas, actually. We work in autonomous mobility and robotics, which is our largest business. And there we have people in Kolkata and Meche, Bruce. And then Vizag is the center of excellence for healthcare medical AI. Coimbatore, and not because I’m Tamil, this is the first thing I’ve done in Tamil Nadu, but Coimbatore is our first center of excellence in Asia, automotive AI center of excellence.

And the way that center has grown, you know. And then our generative AI work is primarily in Kolkata. Shillong, it’s in multiple places. and we work with the large foundation model companies. So then what do you do? You can focus and focus and focus on the large models. How do you take that into applications for precision agriculture, breast cancer screening, healthcare AI, into the different areas that are so critical for societal applications? So we work with the foundation model companies to create what are called small models, small vision models, small language models, and then fine -tuning those models and working in reinforced learning with human feedback, red teaming, that means collaborating with the models, what we call tormenting the models, because how do you find out whether this model works or not?

You torment the darn thing. You torment it till you break it. That’s an actual technical term, let me tell you. You torment it till you break it. Okay? And then you do the data set creation to make it right. So then we will bring in experts. So we have on as scholars, we call them globally, and you can’t just do this in English, PhDs in mathematics, cardiologists, radiologists. They’re called scholars. Interventional, something, something. I found out more about this. Agronomists. Agronomists in Germany. Agronomists in the U .S. Agronomists. And this is where the beauty of AI and this potential. It’s not potential for me anymore. It’s real. It’s a 10 -year -old company. We run a fairly large business.

It’s cash positive, earnings positive. It’s got all of that stuff. But it’s business that drives the inclusion. And bringing in these experts means. You not only are inventing technology in Silicon Valley, Bangalore, et cetera, you have a global set of people and experts who are contributing to AI. So for me, let me end by one thing, which I know is most important. It’s 53 % women. 53 % women. And I’ll say one thing. I believe in this, really. If anybody asks you, how do you run a company with 50 -50 women, look them straight in the eye and say, have you seen the world lately? It’s about

Kirthiga Reddy

50 -50. And there should be no reason why AI technology cannot be 50 -50. Thank you. Beautiful. Well, that sets the stage beautifully for maybe the next question to me here. Where you’re a new author. and this is a topic that you spend a lot of

Mihir Shukla

I applaud the vision because as Radha rightly said the idea of getting it at the beginning is the right idea and I’m a big fan the book that you referred to is called a five year century isn’t available it will be available soon available for pre -order because we are going to see the change what happens normally in a hundred years within the next five years now fortunately we have seen this kind of change at least once before in the recent past around 1900 when electricity radio, automobile and planes came in about the same 10 -15 years time frame, imagine you went to sleep and you woke up 10, 15 years later, it would look like a different planet in every way possible.

It worked out for the most part. So we are about to see all of that now in five years. And in my role as a CEO and chairman of Automation Anywhere, we see the world through a very unique lens. We have about nearly half a billion digital workers that are powered by AI today run on our platform. It will reach a billion soon. The human worker to a digital worker ratio is 1 to 20. There’s 20 digital workers for every. And it is happening across 90 countries. We have customers in 90 countries across every industry. So when we saw all of this, we decided to write a book and say, it is time to tell the world what is happening, what is coming, and what is the leader.

playbook looks like.

Kirthiga Reddy

Incredible. And maybe, Ashna, we’ll go to you. You represent another iconic company, AMD, that has been at the heart of this revolution. As we think about scaling human potential and as we think about the opportunity globally and in India, what do you feel are the limiting factors or the enablers? Is it talent? Is it capital? Is it compute? How do they interact?

Speaker 1

You know, just to build off what both Radha and Meha said, there is no debate about the transformational nature of what we’re all experiencing. But change inherently is always personal. And what happens when you see either people who are super positive or super negative about something, it’s because they’re internalizing what they think it means to them or what it means around them. And so when you talk about… infrastructure or assets or how the world is shifting, these are all going to happen. I mean, we have, as a generation, relied exclusively and maybe I would say not exclusively, but at least extensively on human intelligence. Human intelligence has done the most brilliant things, but human intelligence has also made way for artificial intelligence.

And it’s about a model of coexistence as this develops that has to be evolved. And so from an infrastructure perspective, when we think about it, our goal is to make sure that the innovation that we as humans have ambition for is fully supported in what we build and what we deliver for the world. That’s simply put. How that ambition gets realized ultimately is in our hands, right? And so I think that’s where we have the ability to shape it early. We have the ability to drive success. and we have the ability to learn from history. Now, I will say that having been a history buff growing up, you always want people to learn from history, but people never do.

And so you should just expect that this is going to be the most interesting time that we are living and experiencing. And I would encourage and challenge everyone to make the most of that challenge of what it means to them personally and how you drive it. I mean, that’s my personal view. We will continue as a company to go build the best technology out there to support and drive and be the best partner to the businesses we work with. But ultimately, it comes down to the ambition each of us sets, each of the corporations set, each of the organizations set on the kind of change you want to drive.

Lakshmi Pratury

No, I think it’s beautifully put. I think it’s very different people coming together, people in hardware, software, services, training, all kinds of things coming together. And that’s why for us, at AI Kiran bringing very diverse forces is important and one of the biggest things for us is youth. When we look at AI Kiran, we say what can we do to get women into the fold and what do we do with youth and how do we make sure it’s safe for youth and it furthers the knowledge. It’s not just consumption but creation. So I think we have a program called Fellows Programs. Every year we pick 20 amazing people from different disciplines and put them together and I always say that that’s a great way to adopt children without carrying them.

So we have over 250 of them and Anurag is one of our Inc. fellows and he runs something called Manzil Mystics and the reason we wanted to bring this perspective is working with youth and creativity is extremely important. So Anurag, you’ve been in the music field for a long time and you’ve been in the music field for a long time and right now you’re working with over… 60 ,000 children across 900 schools teaching music. They have taken on one thing. They said, we’re going to teach music. And you actually have a van that you take to different schools and teach them. And tell me a little bit about, you teach things like intellectual property and human rights, all kinds of these things through music.

So tell us about that journey a little bit.

Anurag Hoon

Yeah, and thanks, Lakshmi. Lakshmi, I remember eight years ago, like seeing this dream with you. And she used to see my eyes glittering when I used to talk about this mobile music school. And it’s a reality now. And what I would say, for me, it’s less about AI. It’s more about HI, heart intelligence, because we’re talking about human. And what makes us human is a heart pumping and making us alive. And the heart is learning all the time. And so, and we. Thank you. and i personally saw like my story um i grew up in a low -income family in delhi studied in a government school got 52 hence no college started learning music and i in within a year i started my band i was in the u .s in seattle learning marketing and sales and how did it happen um it happened because music helped us learn that but because i create my original songs based on ideas of kabirji and gandhiji and first thing was what if someone steal my work and this this thing was there like what what if someone steals my idea and and it was very easy for anyone to just take your idea or maybe take your song and sing in a movie or a stage so for us one of the first thing that we teach you how to sing write compose and perform a song it it is very important for us that we may that that they don’t lose their property with their create.

Also, they don’t steal anyone’s property, which was there. And I was doing that, translating some English song, putting some Hindi lyrics and making myself cool. But I was like, no, that’s, create AI is there to help us learn things. And that’s what we made sure that every time we go in a classroom and a child learns to write a song or compose a song, they must know that intellectual property is a thing. And it is a big career opportunity right now. All the streaming platform have made sure that people who are like me creating a song get the royalty. But if I create a song through AI, they don’t get money. So we always say, if you want to be, if it’s fun, if you want, then do like create song through AI.

but the streaming all streaming platforms is you cannot earn money so we always say if you want

Kirthiga Reddy

to earn money create a song on your own absolutely well I mean one is so amazing to see the diversity that’s represented on this panel and you know start thinking of your questions we’re going to do one more prepared question but then we want to hear what’s on your mind as well and so let’s bring us back maybe to this historic India AI Summit and I know you know many people many announcements being made by the panelists and you know our attendees here as well on my end certainly you’ll see a number of AI announcements has already started we’ll turn to be here in a few minutes to talk about that as well so there’s AI announcements there’s also my startup Optimize Geo where having helped brands with a move to mobile and social and being relevant there Optimize Geo and I have to say in India it’s generative engine optimization it is not JIO it’s Geo we are helping brands with being relevant because business decisions consumer decisions are being made off of questions being asked by chat GPT perplexity and the like so that’s the platform and we have a bunch of announcements there but Ashna maybe coming to you we are sitting here at this Historic India AI Summit and if access to advanced chips is going to determine who can build powerful models are we at

Speaker 1

service intelligence and complement it with artificial intelligence. And that complementing of artificial intelligence is about how do you then have a thoughtful strategy as a country, as a company, as a startup to build that compute layer and that compute investment structure that gives you the outcomes that you need that complement the human ambition and the human scale you want to achieve. So I think it’s both. I don’t believe it will be a limiting factor for those that want to move fast. You just have to be creative with the resources you have. And believe me, we’re building fast and as quickly as we can to meet all the demand that we have. So Radha, continuing on that about being faster here than anywhere else, you’ve been doing that for 10 years before AI was a fashionable word.

What kind of investments do you think are needed to move people up the value chain of AI in India? And maybe we’ll have to comment on the same because I think it’s a really important question.

Radha Basu

Right. So if you look at the three parts of investments in AI, think of it as a triangle, right? And we’ve heard a lot of this. It’s the AI, let’s call it the technologies, the models, all the stuff, the open AI, the anthropics, the Google, deep minds, et cetera. Then there’s all the infrastructure, and you’ve heard all the announcements, multi -billion dollars of infrastructure. And then there is AI intelligence, and that is the human intelligence. And it’s the nexus of the technology intelligence, the infrastructure to do this, and the human intelligence that really scales AI. So yes, should we be worried about AI taking away jobs? I think we should. But to me, it’s not taking away jobs.

It’s how the jobs are evolving. So you ask me, what are the investments needed? And this is where I think, really, I mean, yesterday, I felt so, I feel very hopeful with young people anyway. Average age of our company is 24 .5. You would never know that looking at me. And the sassiest people in my company would say, if it was not for you, it would be 23. I’ve actually, and that’s that sassy young people from all over India, not from the cities, necessarily, not the IITians. So what is changing in AI? You can take young people from a variety of different backgrounds. And we had some young people come into the iMerit booth and say, we’re in commerce, or we’re in something else.

How do we become AI people? that transformation or that it’s like an equation how do you take a large number of young people and you i don’t want to use the word skilling but they become ai ready so you want to make data ai ready you want to make young people ai ready and you want to make the infra ai ready when you do all those three things the daunting scales the second thing i would say is and this came out quite a bit in the discussions yesterday whether it was daria speaking from anthropic or definitely you know from google sundar talked about this what are the applications of ai that is where we are today we’ve got the large models and of course they are scaling how do you apply it to the big picture and how do you apply it to the big picture and how do you apply it to the precision agriculture because if you do and you can you can actually catch crop failure We work with people like John Deere, and you catch the crop failure in an area like this.

You’ve saved the entire field from just, and they have seen immense amount of production increases because of that. If you can look at breast cancer screening for women, and you can screen people all over, breast cancer in India for Indian women versus Asian versus Caucasian versus black, the smaller models are very different because the parameters are different. If you can use that, then you’re starting to get AI into societal applications and then into enterprise AI because that’s where the big business, any technology scales and gets adapted and adopted when the enterprise. Start to use them, accounting, legal, et cetera. So that is the investment that’s needed. handing it over to

Mihir Shukla

you Mihir I think I’ll cover it in two different dimensions the first is focus on applied AI so I think it is best especially for India it’s good to develop the models but not to blindly chase this model race that’s happening in western world because if you look at the history the printing press was invented in Germany Dutch used it and became a superpower for few hundred years industrial revolution was invented France has all the parameters to succeed a small island of England used industrial revolution in every aspect of the economy became Great Britain making a point that you don’t have to invent a technology the success lies in applying that technology in every aspect of economy and that is India’s superpower if it focuses on is on it.

You have 18 or different industrial hubs in each of them, very specifically applying applied AI like I heard automotive AI, right? Can you create global competitiveness with those models? That’s where the primary investment has to go and it can completely change the economic outlook. The second thing where investment needs to go is an inclusion. I think this is a remarkable technology that can include a vast amount of people that were previously not included in digital economy. Think about the first computers with an English keyboard. You can’t include 90 % of the world population in that interface. Then came the mobile phone that got a little easier. Now you have a technology where anybody can talk, easily participate. So this is the time to include everybody.

And one of the things AI Kiran and we are doing together is we announced a partnership where together we will, in the next five years, we will train a million women and youth on AI and automation together. And I think both sides have to happen. We need to make economic growth and we have to make sure we

Kirthiga Reddy

And tell us a little bit about the wonderful work you do as you also ask your question.

Audience

Hi, my name is Anupama. I am one of AI Kiran members. Professionally, I’m a data scientist. Now moved to a technical lead role where I’m actually helping a lot of banking and financial institutions come up with AI and automation solutions. So I work a lot in building up POCs, use cases, and at the end of them, building up strategies for them to come up with enterprise solutions for them. My question is basically to Anurag you, and this is a little bit of a personal question. We’re talking about AI, and we’re talking about scaling. We’re talking about a new world. My question is, what is it that we as parents should be teaching our kids for the next 15 years when the world is fully automated?

They are already in an AI age because they’re growing in an AI age. They see AI. They hear, do, and in fact, they’re doing everything right. So what are those skills that we as parents should be teaching our kids to be ready? For the next 15 years and, yeah, in the AI automated age. what is it that we should be you know thinking through at this point i mean of course skills will come at a later stage but what is it that we what are what are those blind spots that we don’t see as parents and as people or as professionals who are just busy in building up solutions who are busy in automating things but there’s a human factor out there right uh after 15 years what is it that is going to make them stay

Anurag Hoon

that’s a brilliant question our og mama is here so she can answer better um i guess i when i became an ink fellow i became a father also my son is eight years old i am an ink fellow for eight years uh for before that two years i learned to be a father uh then i became a father so i feel the more onus is on us um i put this is my very personal i feel the five senses um and then nine emotions Navras and India has a lot of literature I guess as a parent I just made sure that my son understand the five senses and nine emotions and then I plan everything according to that it’s not like I don’t want to give phone to my son or I don’t want to do this or that so my son does all those things one of the things he started doing was birthday celebration going on street or maybe going somewhere and making him sense all these things so I guess five emotions, nine emotions five senses if we know it we can

Speaker 1

so basically you are saying that we need to be consistent with the five emotions the five senses and nine emotions like and ensure that this is there at the same time parallelly where we are even automating and we are bringing AI. And you should send us that list of five senses and nine emotions and we’ll share it with the community as well. I mean this is maybe I feel fairly strongly about this. I think we need to teach all our kids resilience. They need to learn to fail. They need to know it’s okay to fail. They need to know life is not easy. They need to know life is unfair. And they need to learn to survive and thrive and learn to be happy in it.

So if they have resilience they will survive all these changes. And I think that’s where you see kids struggle because when kids don’t know how to be resilient that’s when they struggle. When you teach them early and you know you’re there as a support mechanism for them to go through those experiences they will learn. And especially with the change we’re about to experience. even we don’t know I mean we can sit here and speculate as a panel what the world is going to look like in 15 years we don’t know

Radha Basu

that’s something that’s really great you know it can add one thing to this oh yeah it is so she didn’t ask the question she said as parents I’m gonna talk as a grandparent okay hey age comes with this right and it wasn’t so much them asking me it was my asking them and this is my niece and I said Nikki so what is it you think you’ve learned at school he’s a junior it’ll say he’s an 11th and just one more year to go I said what do you think we should be teaching kids at school and he says party and I said what do you think we should be teaching kids at school and he says look I don’t think there is anything you can really teach us at this point because AI is beyond all the parents which I actually agree with and we started talking about it and the thing that came out is being a curious learner because he said and I’m repeating to you not what I said to him but what he said to me he said whatever I learned last year I wanted to go into computer science at Stanford it was my biggest dream hey that’s not going to get me a job and I have to do different things I have to know what’s going on resilience I totally agree I loved your answer to it because it gave a completely from the heart and from the brain and from nature but this thing of knowing what’s around you learning about it, being curious about it because that is really important in AI.

You keep pinging it to make it better, right? And this is part of the intelligence. So thinking critically, curious learners, none of this is going to happen by keeping phones away from them. They’re going to learn to be curious because they want to be and go out in nature and learn it, right? Or wherever. And go out into the field. If you want to work in precision ag and a kid from the city doesn’t know anything about it, or in medical, whatever the thing. So to me, the answers

Mihir Shukla

I was going to quickly say there are three elements, in my opinion. The first is, in my generation, we only studied one subject, like computer engineering. I think today, people are going to do multiple things, right? So combining. And when you combine, the possibilities are limited. less. People who study rock climbing and video game design and when that person creates a rock climbing video game, it will be the most authentic experience you could ever get, right? So things like that, neuroscience and medical, there are just unimaginable possibilities. So that is on the career side, how you progress. I think second thing I asked my daughter, just like you said, you asked them and she said, that stayed with me, she said that the future is that there are no worker bees.

There are only queen bees. I loved it. I loved the spirit of it. You know, the empowerment it embodies, the ambition it embodies and I think if everybody had that mindset, amazing things are possible.

Kirthiga Reddy

You know, I think what we are going to do is actually we are just going to ask the question we are going to combine the questions. So just we’re going to hear a bunch of questions and then the panelists can just pick whichever they want and what they want to do. Okay, question.

Mihir Shukla

Sorry, I remembered the third one. I think the third thing is the power of the question. So this amazing thing AI that we have, it knows many answers, but it doesn’t know what are the right questions. And it is not likely to know anytime soon. And so having the right questions, I share this example with you on our family dining table. I do this experiment to learn from the younger generation because they instinctively know what the future is, right? They know better than us. So we made a rule once and said, you know, we’re going to talk about a subject and you can’t tell me anything that Alexa, Siri, or ChatGPT would tell me. So they said, okay, bring it on, Dad.

I said, okay. So we talked about some bird with the longest wingspan or something. And they said, Dad, that’s not fair. The question itself is, bias towards chart GPT. Ask me something that is, they said it nicer than this, but they said, ask me something that is worthy of human. So I said, okay. So I said, the Patagonia has the ecological imbalance after all the industrial development. In order to restore it back, it’s a complex thing. How do you introduce new species and complex problem and so how do you bring it back to its original state? That dinner conversation went on for three days. Various tools were used and together as a family, we came out with a plan on if you were to do it, what would that look like?

Now imagine those conversations happening on every dining table, if we have the right questions.

Kirthiga Reddy

Amazing. All right. Just quick spattering of questions and then we’ll have the panel just take yes, yeah, question.

Audience

Hi, my name is I’m founder of an AI company. We work with global higher education institutions. So I actually led my life very differently when I went to IIT. I never studied. And I look back and I say I did the best thing. So my question right now is that with the disruption that we are seeing and pretty much like IQ is gone by AI, the only thing that we are left with is EQ. And if you look at the education system and the system here, we actually hold on to something. Like we hold on to some exam, some college, and then some company. Then eventually we grow. So I want to hear from you guys how would you like to now disrupt at the fundamental levels, which is K -12, going into higher education, in order to support what is happening.

Disrupting education at fundamental levels. Hi, I’m Hemendra. I teach AI and sustainability at IIM Udaipur. And quick question. We. A lot of countries are now banning multimedia because the harm is obvious, because we didn’t have the guardrails and things came along. AI is only going to amplify the harms, just like it’s going to amplify the power. We heard about the power, and we know maybe AI can be used. The guardrails that we need for the younger generation is just connected to the question, follow -up to him, is what do we need to protect our kids from the harm while we give them the power? Thank you so much. This is Anjali. I represent Tech Mahindra.

I have been doing throughout my career, you know, connecting the left brain with the right brain, which is creative in technology. So hence, you know, AI is very close to my heart as well. So, ma ‘am, the question that I have for you is basically today in the world, people are getting overwhelmed and confused. There are so many platforms. coming over, so many methods coming over, right? If somebody has to ideate and strategize what to learn first and what next, right? How to go about it? Because so much is happening. There’s a lot of panic around Last question. Bina, AI Kiran member, part of ServiceNow, also a woman for ethical AI movement. How do we build trust in the internet?

Earlier you had provenance via people curating the internet. Now people are turning to ChatGPT and trusting those answers over human answers. How do you build provenance? That’s the main question. Last question, sorry. I do grassroots training with people for AI, but their digital gap is still very high. I have to go back and teach them tech before I can teach them AI. How do you solve this? Because we are having a lot of conversations around the youth and the power of the question, etc. All of you are fermented with wisdom. the application of AI and what you bring to the lens, how do you crunch that wisdom cycle of the youth? Because at the end of the day it is information age.

There’s so much information coming. So facts, figures, information, you’re brilliant at. But how do you build that wisdom to infer, to ask the right questions and to interpret? Can you crunch that wisdom?

Speaker 1

So we’re going to give like 30 seconds to each of the panelists as they close. I mean, I think on learning you just start. There are incredible tools. I mean, it’s amazing how quickly the tools and the capabilities to learn in this space have developed. And how fast you can learn. I mean, if any of you were paying attention to the series of events, TCS did a hackathon where they got women from all over the country. This was 1 ,200 women, right? Non -native, they’re not English speakers. They come from different walks of life. And in four hours, they were able to do brilliant things with the training that they received. I mean, these are the kinds of things.

So the potential is massive. So I think anybody, and that’s the beauty of what we have in AI and the positive side, is you can just take it and run with it and learn. I’m an optimist. So I believe you can always find what doesn’t work. But I think if more of us focus on what works, we can do a lot more good a lot faster than what can go wrong. This is the only panel where nobody has asked us about impact on jobs. So I’ll leave it at that.

Mihir Shukla

I’ll take the aspect of how do you teach them digital skills and then the AI skills. I think there is an opportunity here to skip some of the old digital skills because they weren’t very friendly. I think that in the new… In the new world, we have seen… I’ll give you a few examples. We train… We trained 700 women in Africa for six weeks, and 500 found a job within a week. We trained people in Mississippi Delta, which is a very poor part of the U .S. There was somebody flipping burgers at $12 an hour. Six weeks later, they had a $120 ,000 job in AI. This is a technology that doesn’t require you two or four years training courses, which normally the people who are needed the most can’t afford to have it.

So the fact that you can provide this kind of mobility on this technology is arguably the best thing about this technology.

Anurag Hoon

I guess for EQ, education disruption, EQ, to work on EQ is arts, and that’s a disruption. I’m glad AI came, and hence Invest India just shared that the 3 trillion Indian rupees, it’s going to be that’s the market size, because… for media and entertainment sector because the world has recognized that if you want EQ to be developed, invest in arts. Live music classes are increasing drastically and that’s where I’m here. We can talk more about this.

Radha Basu

So for me, this is not a question for the future. 72 % of the people who work at iMerit come from very low -income backgrounds and come from the hinterland of India. So it is absolutely possible to be able to… You start as though they haven’t been skilled before at all. You know, AI is new. There’s no baggage. It’s wonderful. As Mihir said, there’s a whole new way of doing it. And they learn and they are… They use AI to learn and what they learn, they teach AI. It’s really… It’s really interesting to watch. You have young women in a place called Meteor Bruce who came from tailoring and those kind of backgrounds. Why are they a center of excellence for computer vision?

Because the focus on that single pixel level accuracy is something that they have, and they learn the other skills. I would finish by saying you also have a foundation called Anudip, and this is really working across. And 630 ,000 young men and women, 50 % being women, have been skilled, have been skilled in AI literacy. Literacy, just knowing what is AI, how do you use it. I know it doesn’t address the IRM part, but I’m just talking about at the grassroots level. And when they learn how to work with AI, it’s not an enigma. It’s harder. I would say the last thing I would say, and I love my industry colleagues. it’s harder to take somebody from industry and train them in AI because they have to unlearn first than to take a young person out of some place in Odisha who comes from a second tier or even villages and be able to skill them in AI as to how to be working with AI so it’s the nexus of AI technology and that human and I’m such a believer that we can do this here.

Kirthiga Reddy

Awesome, so with that let’s give a huge round of applause for our panelists one, two if you want to get involved in the AI moment around women, youth, differently able, we have incredible leaders here, Prerna, Neha Vaibhav, they are truly the heart and soul of making this happen so let’s hear it for them, please ask them their questions and feel free to come grab any one of us if your questions didn’t get answered. thank you I just want to say end up with saying that if you can work with people smarter than you if you can work with people half your age and twice as smart I think we’ll find all the answers and thank you so much for giving your time, thank you you

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (33)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (3)
Confirmedhigh

“Kirthiga Reddy described the AI Kiran community as spanning from Mumbai to Himachal Pradesh.”

The transcript snippet [S2] includes a direct reference to the AI Kiran community and asks participants where they are from, mentioning Mumbai, confirming the community’s presence in Mumbai (though it does not mention Himachal Pradesh).

Additional Contextmedium

“Reddy acknowledged the role of male allies and said her position is a “privilege and responsibility to give it forward.””

The knowledge base entry [S110] highlights the importance of male allies in supporting women’s advancement, providing additional context that aligns with Reddy’s statement about male allies.

Additional Contextlow

“The panel emphasized building inclusive AI solutions that reach women in rural and marginalized communities.”

The source [S106] discusses the need for inclusive AI that addresses the informal workforce, specifically women in rural, tribal, and extreme-poverty settings, adding nuance to the panel’s inclusive-AI narrative.

External Sources (120)
S1
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — – Kirthiga Reddy- Lakshmi Pratury
S2
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/inclusive-ai-starts-with-people-not-just-algorithms — All right, yeah, we’ll all get seated since we have all our fellow panelists seated here. So I’m just so excited to be h…
S3
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — – Mihir Shukla- Anurag Hoon
S4
Comprehensive Report: “Factories That Think” Panel Discussion — – Mihir Shukla- Thani Ahmed Al Zeyoudi
S5
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — – Mihir Shukla- Anurag Hoon – Radha Basu- Mihir Shukla
S6
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — – Kirthiga Reddy- Lakshmi Pratury
S7
S8
WS #280 the DNS Trust Horizon Safeguarding Digital Identity — – **Audience** – Individual from Senegal named Yuv (role/title not specified)
S9
Building the Workforce_ AI for Viksit Bharat 2047 — -Audience- Role/Title: Professor Charu from Indian Institute of Public Administration (one identified audience member), …
S10
Nri Collaborative Session Navigating Global Cyber Threats Via Local Practices — – **Audience** – Dr. Nazar (specific role/title not clearly mentioned)
S11
Keynote-Martin Schroeter — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not specified, Area of expertise: Not specified (appears to be an event moderator or host introd…
S12
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning — -Speaker 1: Role/title not specified – appears to be a student or child participant in educational videos/demonstrations…
S13
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vijay Shekar Sharma Paytm — -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not mentioned, Area of expertise: Not mentioned (appears to be an event host or moderator introd…
S14
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/keynote-rajesh-subramanian — Ask not why, but why not. Question all ways of thinking. Take risks and embrace change as an opportunity for exploration…
S15
Agents of Change AI for Government Services & Climate Resilience — “So agile regulation.”[22]. “If the regulatory framework is able to change, if we can change that, then we are not afrai…
S16
Scaling Innovation Building a Robust AI Startup Ecosystem — -Arita Dalan: Role – Representative of SecurTech IT Solutions Private Limited; Area of expertise – Cybersecurity solutio…
S17
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — Participant: ≫ Distinguished guests, dear friends, it is a great honor to speak to you today on a topic that is reshapin…
S18
Building the Future STPI Global Partnerships & Startup Felicitation 2026 — Major discussion point 5: Startup success stories illustrating the impact of ecosystem support
S19
Agenda item 7 : adoption of annual progress reports / Agenda item 6 : other matters/ Closure of the session — The Chair commended Iran’s flexibility, casting a positive light on the effort to reach consensus, indicative of a colla…
S20
Presentation of outcomes to the plenary — This exceptional attendance highlights the critical urgency and importance placed on global supply chain issues in today…
S21
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session — Mbumba highlights Namibia’s progress in achieving gender equality and emphasizes the importance of women’s empowerment. …
S22
What policy levers can bridge the AI divide? — **The Philippines** developed their strategy with strong presidential leadership and multi-agency collaboration. They’ve…
S23
GermanAsian AI Partnerships Driving Talent Innovation the Future — The industry response has been to move beyond traditional guest lectures towards comprehensive engagement models. Dr. Az…
S24
AI for Safer Workplaces &amp; Smarter Industries Transforming Risk into Real-Time Intelligence — <strong>Naveen GV:</strong> out a long, lengthy form of information for that to be processed much later by another human…
S25
AI for Social Good Using Technology to Create Real-World Impact — Absolutely. That’s one of the exciting things. It’s very exciting. Yeah. I’m being told that we’re going to have to wra…
S26
AI and ethics in modern society — Humanity’s rapid advancements in robotics and AI have shifted many ethical and philosophical dilemmas from the realm of …
S27
Séance d’ouverture : « La gouvernance internationale du numérique et de l’IA : à la croisée des chemins ? » — Tomas Lamanauskas Merci beaucoup. J’ai quelques commentaires d’une certaine manière. Tout d’abord, je pense que, comme q…
S28
Prosperity Through Data Infrastructure — Lastly, the analysis emphasises the need for investment in both technology and people. The importance of investing in tr…
S29
Artificial General Intelligence and the Future of Responsible Governance — This comment challenges the dominant narrative that AGI development is primarily about compute power and technical infra…
S30
Media Briefing: Unlocking ASEAN’s Digital Future – Driving Inclusive Growth and Global Competitiveness / DAVOS 2025 — De Vusser emphasizes the need for strategic investments in AI talent development and building trust in AI systems. This …
S31
UNSC meeting: Conflict prevention: women and youth — China:Mr. President, I welcome your presence presiding of the meeting today. I thank you as DiCarlo and Ambassador Danes…
S32
Smaller Footprint Bigger Impact Building Sustainable AI for the Future — India focuses on smaller models for specific use cases rather than chasing trillion-parameter models
S33
Focus shifts to improving AI models in 2024: size, data, and applications. — Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) surged in 2023 after the launch of Open AI’s Chat GPT, the internet’s most reno…
S34
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development — And that’s what we’re doing. And that’s what we’re doing. And that’s what we’re doing. And that’s what we’re doing. prio…
S35
Leveraging AI to Support Gender Inclusivity | IGF 2023 WS #235 — Another important point emphasized in the analysis is the significance of involving users and technical experts in the p…
S36
Book launch: What changes and remains the same in 20 years in the life of Kurbalija’s book on internet governance? — Development | Economic | Sociocultural Jovan proposes a structured approach to AI risk assessment that prioritizes imme…
S37
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — Rodrigues emphasizes that while early AI discussions were dominated by fear about job displacement and technological thr…
S38
The Innovation Beneath AI: The US-India Partnership powering the AI Era — And that makes it more difficult, not less difficult, I think, to be an investor because you have more mature products. …
S39
How to make AI governance fit for purpose? — Anne Bouverot: Thank you so much, Gabriela. Thank you for this. I’m lucky to go first because by the time everyone has s…
S40
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development — But the good thing is humans want touch. So that’s good. But, you know, there will be a lot of revolution in terms of te…
S41
Empowering Workers in the Age of AI — Juan Ivan Martin Lataix: There are people online too. It’s open. We are conducting this session among the many others th…
S42
AI/Gen AI for the Global Goals — Chido Cleopatra Mpemba: Thank you, everyone. First of all, my apologies for being late. This is my fifth event for the …
S43
Bridging the Digital Skills Gap: Strategies for Reskilling and Upskilling in a Changing World — ## Areas of Consensus and Implementation Approaches ## Gender Gaps and Inclusive Approaches Cosmas Luckyson Zavazava: …
S44
Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence | IGF 2023 — A program specifically designed for children aged 6 to 17 is implemented to develop their cognitive skills with technolo…
S45
Generative AI: Steam Engine of the Fourth Industrial Revolution? — It is evident that there is an urgent need for partnerships with governments to modify basic education in order to meet …
S46
WS #376 Elevating Childrens Voices in AI Design — Dr. Mhairi Aitken: Maybe I could just pick up on, I guess, how this relates to the growth of AI companions and gender di…
S47
Rethinking Africa’s digital trade: Entrepreneurship, innovation, &amp; value creation in the age of Generative AI (depHub) — In summary, the analysis raises critical concerns regarding data protection, privacy, and ethical considerations. It und…
S48
Artificial Intelligence &amp; Emerging Tech — It is crucial to examine how data is gathered and the ethical considerations involved. The models and frameworks used in…
S49
WS #119 AI for Multilingual Inclusion — Claire van Zwieten: Absolutely. I don’t think Aida is able to speak, so I’ll speak on her behalf. But the Internet So…
S50
Charting New Horizons: Gender Equality in Supply Chains – Challenges and Opportunities — Importance is given to policy formation, advocating for women to be integral from the start of policy development, not r…
S51
Opening address of the co-chairs of the AI Governance Dialogue — While this transcript captures only the opening remarks of the AI Governance Dialogue, the key comments identified estab…
S52
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — The AI Kiran initiative exemplifies this proactive approach to inclusion through a powerful demonstration of how human a…
S53
Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence | IGF 2023 — A notable observation from the analysis is the emphasis on AI education for children. A program specifically designed fo…
S54
Safeguarding Children with Responsible AI — “Because curiosity is there in every child.”[71]. “What huge loss would that be for humanity if we suddenly have childre…
S55
AI &amp; Child Rights: Implementing UNICEF Policy Guidance | IGF 2023 WS #469 — Collaborative efforts are necessary to ensure the correct implementation of technology in mental health support for chil…
S56
Smaller Footprint Bigger Impact Building Sustainable AI for the Future — India focuses on smaller models for specific use cases rather than chasing trillion-parameter models
S57
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications — 95% of work can be accomplished with 20-50 billion parameter models. ROI comes from deploying lowest cost solutions for …
S58
Open Forum #64 Local AI Policy Pathways for Sustainable Digital Economies — Economic | Development Rather than following historical patterns of automation that replace workers, AI development sho…
S59
Future-Ready Education: Enhancing Accessibility &amp; Building | IGF 2023 — Overall, the analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the different aspects of technology and education, highlighti…
S60
DCAD &amp; DC-OER: Building Barrier-Free Emerging Tech through Open Solutions — Despite coming from different perspectives (technology developer and audience member), both emphasize the need for a hol…
S61
Diplomatic policy analysis — Policy analysis serves as the backbone of diplomacy’s decision-making. It equips leaders and negotiators with the eviden…
S62
Placing learners at the center — A comprehensive examination of the interplay between technology and education reveals a sophisticated and multi-faceted …
S63
OpenAI economist shares four key skills for kids in AI era — As AIreshapesjobs and daily life, OpenAI’s chief economist, Ronnie Chatterji, teaches his children four core skills to h…
S64
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning — “The child needs to have a basic level of literacy to be able to engage with language models.”[15]. “So for our young pe…
S65
Youth-Driven Tech: Empowering Next-Gen Innovators | IGF 2023 WS #417 — Has sustained professional reinvention and personal adversity Innovation is essential for progress and is often synonym…
S66
Contents — Historical experience suggests that economies where innovation thrives can overcome the preceding challenges and re-inve…
S67
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — Governments, regulators, industry players, NGOs, academics and decisionmaking bodies have a critical role to play in sha…
S68
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — Eltjo Poort, Vice President Consulting at CGI in the Netherlands, supported this view: “Regulation does not hamper innov…
S69
Policymaker’s Guide to International AI Safety Coordination — Okay. Given this remarkable panel and the very short time we have, let me very briefly frame our discussion and get righ…
S70
Leveraging AI to Support Gender Inclusivity | IGF 2023 WS #235 — It has been observed that most online users in the Global South are male, which suggests a lack of diverse representatio…
S71
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — The AI Kiran initiative exemplifies this proactive approach to inclusion through a powerful demonstration of how human a…
S72
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — Participant: ≫ Distinguished guests, dear friends, it is a great honor to speak to you today on a topic that is reshapin…
S73
Open Forum #37 Her Data,Her Policies:Towards a Gender Inclusive Data Future — This discussion focused on creating gender-inclusive data policies and a more equitable data future in Africa. Panelists…
S74
The Future of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the AI Era: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — Salman bin Khalifa Al Khalifa This advice was particularly powerful because it directly addressed the paralysis that ca…
S75
The Innovation Beneath AI: The US-India Partnership powering the AI Era — And that makes it more difficult, not less difficult, I think, to be an investor because you have more mature products. …
S76
Artificial intelligence (AI) and cyber diplomacy — The speaker argued for balanced attention across short-term, mid-term, and long-term AI risks, cautioning against fixati…
S77
AI-driven Cyber Defense: Empowering Developing Nations | IGF 2023 — Sarim Aziz:Thank you, Babu, for the opportunity. I think this is a very timely topic. There’s been a lot of debate aroun…
S78
What policy levers can bridge the AI divide? — **The Philippines** developed their strategy with strong presidential leadership and multi-agency collaboration. They’ve…
S79
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development — But the good thing is humans want touch. So that’s good. But, you know, there will be a lot of revolution in terms of te…
S80
GermanAsian AI Partnerships Driving Talent Innovation the Future — The industry response has been to move beyond traditional guest lectures towards comprehensive engagement models. Dr. Az…
S81
Bridging the Digital Skills Gap: Strategies for Reskilling and Upskilling in a Changing World — ## Areas of Consensus and Implementation Approaches ## Gender Gaps and Inclusive Approaches **Additional speakers:** …
S82
Upskilling for the AI era: Education’s next revolution — Doreen Bogdan Martin: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Yesterday morning on this very stage I spoke about skills. I…
S83
We are the AI Generation — Doreen Bogdan Martin: Thank you. Good morning and welcome to Geneva for the AI for Good Global Summit 2025. I want to th…
S84
Panel Discussion AI &amp; Cybersecurity _ India AI Impact Summit — Dr. Abdurrahman Habib from Saudi Arabia shared remarkable results from their Women Elevate programme, which exemplifies …
S85
How AI Is Transforming Indias Workforce for Global Competitivene — Education, Upskilling, and Training Initiatives
S86
Generative AI: Steam Engine of the Fourth Industrial Revolution? — The skills necessary for the future include adaptability, technology embracement, agility, robust skill sets, and future…
S87
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — Future workforce needs different skills including critical thinking, judgment capabilities, and empathy when working wit…
S88
WS #376 Elevating Childrens Voices in AI Design — Dr. Mhairi Aitken: Maybe I could just pick up on, I guess, how this relates to the growth of AI companions and gender di…
S89
High-Level Track Facilitators Summary and Certificates — The discussion maintained a consistently positive and celebratory tone throughout, characterized by gratitude, accomplis…
S90
Closing remarks — The tone is consistently celebratory, optimistic, and forward-looking throughout the discussion. It maintains an enthusi…
S91
Scaling Innovation Building a Robust AI Startup Ecosystem — The tone was consistently celebratory, appreciative, and inspirational throughout. It began formally with the awards cer…
S92
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Closing Remarks: Summary — The tone is consistently positive, celebratory, and grateful throughout the discussion. It begins with formal appreciati…
S93
Launch / Award Event #159 Book Launch Netmundial+10 Statement in the 6 UN Languages — The tone was consistently celebratory, appreciative, and forward-looking throughout the session. Participants expressed …
S94
Building Future Leaders – Competency Driven Succession Planning — Maria Edera Spandoni: Thank you very much. Last reflection, suggestion. I’ll try to bring this up to something beyond…
S95
WS #343 Revamping decision-making in digital governance — Audience: Thank you very much. My name is Anne McCormick. I lead global digital policy for EY. We’re active in the globa…
S96
DYNAMIC COALITIONS MAIN SESSION — Audience:Thank you. I’m Woro from the National Library of Indonesia. I just want to add that from the library perspectiv…
S97
WS #64 Designing Digital Future for Cyber Peace &amp; Global Prosperity — The speaker emphasizes the need for a governance framework that caters to the lowest common denominator. They stress the…
S98
Closing Session  — Minister Tijani’s comment solidified the proactive framework as the summit’s core achievement and elevated the discussio…
S99
WS #236 Ensuring Human Rights and Inclusion: An Algorithmic Strategy — The tone of the discussion was largely serious and concerned, given the gravity of the issues being discussed. However, …
S100
Using AI to tackle our planet’s most urgent problems — The tone is passionate and advocacy-driven throughout, with the speaker maintaining an urgent, morally-charged perspecti…
S101
Law, Tech, Humanity, and Trust — The discussion maintained a consistently professional, collaborative, and optimistic tone throughout. The speakers demon…
S102
AI: Lifting All Boats / DAVOS 2025 — The tone was largely optimistic and solution-oriented, with speakers acknowledging challenges but focusing on opportunit…
S103
AI Without the Cost Rethinking Intelligence for a Constrained World — -Participant: Multiple audience members who asked questions during the panel discussion
S104
Impact of the Rise of Generative AI on Developing Countries | IGF 2023 Town Hall #29 — The first half of the panel discussion was allocated to gather panelist’s perspectives.
S105
AI Infrastructure and Future Development: A Panel Discussion — -Audience- Audience member asking a question
S106
Building Inclusive Societies with AI — This comment powerfully challenges the panel’s assumptions about who constitutes the ‘informal workforce.’ It forces a r…
S107
Empowering Women Entrepreneurs through Digital Trade and Training ( Global Innovation Forum) — Believes in saving herself and taking what she wants Finally, one speaker encourages individuals to view perceived obst…
S108
IN CONVERSATION WITH BIRAME SOCK — 4. Start small, iterate, and don’t fear failure – view it as a learning opportunity. As a woman and an African in the…
S109
07 — As the EQUALS Research Group has pointed out, ‘it is important to act in an inclusive manner so as not to alienate the m…
S110
WS #166 Breaking Barriers: Empowering Women in Internet Network — The importance of male allies in supporting women’s advancement was noted. Speakers also highlighted the transformative …
S111
“Re” Generative AI: Using Artificial and Human Intelligence in tandem for innovation — Don Gotterbarn:There is a basic problem in the way we interact with AI. We had a Secretary of State in the US who made w…
S112
Adobe buys SEO firm Semrush to boost AI-powered marketing — Adobe and Semrush haveagreedon a definitive all-cash transaction in which Adobe will acquire Semrush for US$12 per share…
S113
Keynote by Sangita Reddy Joint Managing Director Apollo Hospitals India AI Impact Summit — The presentation demonstrates strong internal consistency around key themes: leveraging India’s structural advantages fo…
S114
Keynote Address_Revanth Reddy_Chief Minister Telangana — This distills complex geopolitical strategy into a simple but profound framework. It moves beyond the typical discussion…
S115
Generative AI and Synthetic Realities: Design and Governance | IGF 2023 Networking Session #153 — Diogo Cortiz:I totally agree with Heloisa about her intervention. So I would like to switch a little bit my comments reg…
S116
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups &amp; Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw — To illustrate this concept, she provided compelling examples of biological intelligence in action. The immune system dem…
S117
Design Beyond Deception: A Manual for Design Practitioners | IGF 2023 Launch / Award Event #169 — Dark patterns are found in online experiences ranging from e-commerce apps to social media and fintech services Dark pa…
S118
AI in education: Leveraging technology for human potential — Kevin Mills: Hello. It’s an incredible honor to be here with you today. The last UN gathering I attended was almost exac…
S119
The AI gold rush where the miners are broke — The rapid rise of AI has drawn a wave of ambitious investors eager to tap into what many consider the next major economi…
S120
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/the-innovation-beneath-ai-the-us-india-partnership-powering-the-ai-era — Yes, thank you. So super excited. This week we announced in partnership with the Office of Principal Scientific Advisory…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
K
Kirthiga Reddy
3 arguments176 words per minute1339 words455 seconds
Argument 1
AI Kiran’s rapid growth to 10,000 women demonstrates the power of community building (AI Kiran growth – Kirthiga Reddy)
EXPLANATION
Kirthiga highlights that AI Kiran expanded from a modest list of 250 women to a vibrant community of 10,000 members, showing how a focused network can quickly scale. The growth illustrates the effectiveness of collective action in amplifying women’s presence in AI.
EVIDENCE
She explains that when they first queried ChatGPT for women in AI it returned only ten names, so they launched with 250 named women and have since grown to an “incredible community of, you know, 10,000 women” [61-64].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The AI Kiran initiative started with 250 women and expanded to a community of 10,000, as documented in an inclusive AI case study [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Kiran’s rapid growth to 10,000 women demonstrates the power of community building (AI Kiran growth – Kirthiga Reddy)
AGREED WITH
Radha Basu, Mihir Shukla
Argument 2
“What would you do if you weren’t afraid?” frames risk‑taking as a catalyst for change (Fearless question – Kirthiga Reddy)
EXPLANATION
Kirthiga uses the rhetorical question to encourage participants to imagine bold actions without fear, positioning risk‑taking as essential for personal and technological breakthroughs. She ties this mindset to the need for starting over in AI.
EVIDENCE
She repeats the phrase “what would you do if you weren’t afraid?” several times, presenting it as a guiding meta-poster for the discussion [12-15].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Guidance on embracing risk and asking “why not” to drive AI innovation aligns with the discussion on risk-taking in AI contexts [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
“What would you do if you weren’t afraid?” frames risk‑taking as a catalyst for change (Fearless question – Kirthiga Reddy)
AGREED WITH
Lakshmi Pratury
Argument 3
Supporting niche ventures like Dark.ai illustrates ecosystem‑wide impact (Startup support – Kirthiga Reddy)
EXPLANATION
Kirthiga points to the example of Dark.ai, a startup helping tailors and fashion designers adopt AI, to show how AI Kiran’s ecosystem nurtures diverse, sector‑specific innovations. This underscores the broader impact beyond large tech firms.
EVIDENCE
She mentions hearing about Dark.ai, which helps tailors and fashion designers use AI, as an example of the kinds of ventures the community wants to amplify [65-66].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Reports on AI startup ecosystems and global partnership events highlight how targeted support for niche ventures amplifies ecosystem impact [S16][S18].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Supporting niche ventures like Dark.ai illustrates ecosystem‑wide impact (Startup support – Kirthiga Reddy)
R
Radha Basu
5 arguments139 words per minute2565 words1099 seconds
Argument 1
Achieving 53 % women workforce showcases intentional gender parity (Gender parity 53% – Radha Basu)
EXPLANATION
Radha notes that her company has deliberately built a workforce where women constitute a slight majority, demonstrating a concrete commitment to gender balance in tech. This metric serves as a benchmark for other organisations.
EVIDENCE
She states, “It’s 53 % women. 53 % women.” while emphasizing its significance [175-176].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Gender-balanced participation metrics, such as 51% of interventions led by women at major forums, provide context for achieving a 53% women workforce [S19][S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Achieving 53 % women workforce showcases intentional gender parity (Gender parity 53% – Radha Basu)
AGREED WITH
Kirthiga Reddy, Mihir Shukla
Argument 2
Pioneering HP’s entry into India highlights early‑stage tech leadership (Early‑tech leadership – Radha Basu)
EXPLANATION
Radha recounts leading the establishment of Hewlett‑Packard’s first software operations in Bangalore, marking a seminal moment in India’s IT evolution. Her story illustrates how early‑stage leadership can catalyse an entire industry.
EVIDENCE
She describes HP’s arrival in India in 1987 and her role in setting up HP Bangalore, noting that HP and Texas Instruments were the first multinationals doing software in India and that she celebrated the first million-dollar software export in 1989 [74-75][103-105].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Historical accounts note David Packard’s directive to establish HP’s software operations in India in the late 1980s, underscoring early-stage leadership [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Pioneering HP’s entry into India highlights early‑stage tech leadership (Early‑tech leadership – Radha Basu)
Argument 3
Establishing AI centers in tier‑2 cities prevents an urban‑AI divide (Decentralized AI centers – Radha Basu)
EXPLANATION
Radha explains that AI Kiran deliberately set up AI centers outside major metros—such as in Calcutta, Vizag, Coimbatore, Hubli, and Shillong—to ensure that AI capabilities are distributed across the country. This strategy aims to avoid a concentration of AI talent only in urban hubs.
EVIDENCE
She lists the locations of the new centers-Calcutta, Vizag, Coimbatore, Hubli, Shillong-and notes that each has become a centre of excellence in a specific domain [133-140].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy examples such as the Philippines’ creation of AI centers for marginalized regions illustrate the rationale for tier-2 AI hubs [S22].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Establishing AI centers in tier‑2 cities prevents an urban‑AI divide (Decentralized AI centers – Radha Basu)
AGREED WITH
Kirthiga Reddy
Argument 4
Deploying AI in healthcare, precision agriculture, and vision showcases real‑world benefits (AI societal applications – Radha Basu)
EXPLANATION
Radha details how AI Kiran applies AI to critical sectors such as medical imaging, precision farming, and autonomous robotics, demonstrating tangible societal impact. These applications illustrate AI’s potential to improve health outcomes and agricultural productivity.
EVIDENCE
She cites work in autonomous mobility, healthcare medical AI in Vizag, automotive AI in Coimbatore, and generative AI in Kolkata, and describes projects like precision agriculture for crop-failure detection and breast-cancer screening using small, fine-tuned models [145-152][280-283].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AI-for-social-good initiatives in medical imaging, precision farming, and computer vision are highlighted as tangible societal impacts [S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Deploying AI in healthcare, precision agriculture, and vision showcases real‑world benefits (AI societal applications – Radha Basu)
Argument 5
AI investment is a triangle of technology, infrastructure, and human talent (Investment triangle – Radha Basu)
EXPLANATION
Radha frames AI investment as requiring three inter‑dependent pillars: cutting‑edge models, robust compute infrastructure, and skilled human expertise. Balancing these three elements is essential for scaling AI responsibly.
EVIDENCE
She outlines the “triangle” of AI technologies, infrastructure, and human intelligence, stating that the nexus of these three scales AI [259-264].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Analyses stress the need to invest simultaneously in AI models, compute infrastructure, and skilled talent as a balanced growth strategy [S28][S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI investment is a triangle of technology, infrastructure, and human talent (Investment triangle – Radha Basu)
AGREED WITH
Mihir Shukla
M
Mihir Shukla
3 arguments155 words per minute1199 words463 seconds
Argument 1
Partnership to train one million women and youth scales empowerment (Million‑women training – Mihir Shukla)
EXPLANATION
Mihir announces a joint initiative with AI Kiran to educate a million women and young people in AI and automation over the next five years, highlighting the scale of the empowerment effort. This partnership aims to bridge skill gaps and foster inclusive growth.
EVIDENCE
He states that AI Kiran and his organisation have announced a partnership to train a million women and youth on AI and automation within five years [284-296].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Partnership to train one million women and youth scales empowerment (Million‑women training – Mihir Shukla)
Argument 2
Prioritizing applied AI over chasing model size maximizes economic impact (Applied AI focus – Mihir Shukla)
EXPLANATION
Mihir argues that India should focus on applying AI to solve real problems rather than competing in the global race to build ever‑larger models. He likens this to historical examples where adopting a technology was more important than inventing it.
EVIDENCE
He explains that India should develop applied AI, citing the historical impact of the printing press, radio, automobile, and planes, and warns against blindly chasing the model race [284-288].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy discussions advocate focusing on applied, task-specific AI models rather than pursuing ever-larger models [S32][S33].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Prioritizing applied AI over chasing model size maximizes economic impact (Applied AI focus – Mihir Shukla)
Argument 3
Training initiatives for women and youth demonstrate rapid, low‑barrier skill acquisition (Rapid skill‑up – Mihir Shukla)
EXPLANATION
Mihir shares examples of short, intensive training programmes that quickly placed participants into well‑paid AI jobs, showing that AI skills can be acquired without long‑term formal education. These cases illustrate the speed and accessibility of AI‑driven upskilling.
EVIDENCE
He describes training 700 women in Africa and 500 in the U.S. Mississippi Delta for six weeks, after which many secured high-paying AI positions, demonstrating rapid, low-barrier skill acquisition [433-436].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
A six-week program that trained 700 women, with most securing high-paying AI roles, exemplifies rapid, low-barrier skill acquisition [S4].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Training initiatives for women and youth demonstrate rapid, low‑barrier skill acquisition (Rapid skill‑up – Mihir Shukla)
L
Lakshmi Pratury
3 arguments172 words per minute903 words314 seconds
Argument 1
Platform to surface untold talent amplifies hidden voices (Talent‑showcase platform – Lakshmi Pratury)
EXPLANATION
Lakshmi describes her work over the past 15 years of discovering and promoting talented individuals whose stories are rarely heard, thereby creating a platform that brings hidden innovators to the fore. This effort expands the narrative beyond the well‑known few.
EVIDENCE
She says her work has been about “finding amazing people, doing amazing work and get them to tell their stories” because only a few famous people are heard, and she built a platform to showcase this talent [38-40].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Platform to surface untold talent amplifies hidden voices (Talent‑showcase platform – Lakshmi Pratury)
Argument 2
Continuous career reinvention illustrates the value of starting over (Career reinvention – Lakshmi Pratury)
EXPLANATION
Lakshmi reflects on her own professional journey—from early internet optimism to roles at Intel, venture capital, philanthropy, and now AI Kiran—showing how repeatedly reinventing oneself can drive impact. She frames reinvention as a response to evolving technological landscapes.
EVIDENCE
She recounts being part of the early internet era in 1994, then moving through Intel, venture capital, and philanthropy, and finally focusing on a platform to showcase talent over the last 15 years [34-36][42-44].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Continuous career reinvention illustrates the value of starting over (Career reinvention – Lakshmi Pratury)
AGREED WITH
Kirthiga Reddy
Argument 3
Fellows program nurtures 250+ multidisciplinary youth innovators (Fellows program – Lakshmi Pratury)
EXPLANATION
Lakshmi outlines AI Kiran’s Fellows Programme, which selects around 20 promising individuals each year from diverse disciplines, providing them with mentorship and resources. Over time the programme has supported more than 250 fellows, fostering youth innovation.
EVIDENCE
She mentions the Fellows Programme, noting that “Every year we pick 20 amazing people… we have over 250 of them” and cites Anurag as an example of a fellow [222-224].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Fellows program nurtures 250+ multidisciplinary youth innovators (Fellows program – Lakshmi Pratury)
AGREED WITH
Audience, Speaker 1, Anurag Hoon
A
Anurag Hoon
1 argument142 words per minute686 words288 seconds
Argument 1
Emphasizing five senses and nine emotions grounds children in holistic development (Five senses & nine emotions – Anurag Hoon)
EXPLANATION
Anurag argues that teaching children about the five senses and nine emotions provides a balanced, human‑centric foundation that complements technological education. This holistic approach nurtures emotional intelligence alongside technical skills.
EVIDENCE
He explains that as a parent he ensures his son understands “the five senses and nine emotions” and structures activities around them, emphasizing their importance for development [312-319].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Emphasizing five senses and nine emotions grounds children in holistic development (Five senses & nine emotions – Anurag Hoon)
AGREED WITH
Audience, Speaker 1, Lakshmi Pratury
A
Audience
3 arguments164 words per minute825 words300 seconds
Argument 1
Parents should teach resilience, curiosity, and emotional awareness to thrive in an AI age (Resilience and EQ – Audience)
EXPLANATION
An audience member asks what skills parents should instill—resilience, curiosity, and emotional awareness—to prepare children for a future dominated by AI and automation. The question highlights the perceived need for soft‑skill development alongside technical literacy.
EVIDENCE
The audience member asks, “what are the skills that we as parents should be teaching our kids to be ready… what are those blind spots…?” emphasizing resilience, curiosity, and emotional awareness [304-311].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Emphasizing curiosity and resilience through risk-taking questions is recommended for AI empowerment and future-ready education [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Parents should teach resilience, curiosity, and emotional awareness to thrive in an AI age (Resilience and EQ – Audience)
AGREED WITH
Speaker 1, Anurag Hoon, Lakshmi Pratury
Argument 2
Protecting children from AI‑driven harms while granting them power requires robust safeguards (Child safety guardrails – Audience)
EXPLANATION
Another audience participant raises concerns about the potential harms AI could pose to children and calls for strong guardrails to ensure safe usage while still empowering youth. This underscores the need for policy and technical safeguards.
EVIDENCE
The audience states, “A lot of countries are now banning multimedia because the harm is obvious… AI is only going to amplify the harms… what do we need to protect our kids from the harm while we give them the power?” [382-389].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ethical AI frameworks and agile regulatory approaches are proposed to safeguard children while enabling AI-enabled empowerment [S26][S15].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Protecting children from AI‑driven harms while granting them power requires robust safeguards (Child safety guardrails – Audience)
AGREED WITH
Speaker 1
Argument 3
Building provenance and trust in information sources counters over‑reliance on AI answers (Provenance trust – Audience)
EXPLANATION
The audience asks how to re‑establish trust and provenance in information when people increasingly rely on AI outputs like ChatGPT, highlighting the need for mechanisms that verify source credibility.
EVIDENCE
They ask, “How do we build provenance? Earlier you had people curating the internet… now people trust ChatGPT over human answers. How do you build provenance?” [395-401].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Governance recommendations stress the need for provenance mechanisms and trust-building in AI-generated content [S30][S26].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building provenance and trust in information sources counters over‑reliance on AI answers (Provenance trust – Audience)
AGREED WITH
Speaker 1
S
Speaker 1
3 arguments170 words per minute987 words346 seconds
Argument 1
Building resilience and the ability to learn from failure prepares children for rapid change (Resilience learning – Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 stresses that teaching children to be resilient, to accept failure, and to persist is essential for navigating the fast‑paced transformations driven by AI. Resilience is presented as a core life skill for future success.
EVIDENCE
He says, “They need to learn resilience… they need to learn to fail… they need to survive and thrive… if they have resilience they will survive all these changes” [316-324].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Resilience and learning from failure are highlighted as essential competencies for navigating AI-driven transformation [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building resilience and the ability to learn from failure prepares children for rapid change (Resilience learning – Speaker 1)
AGREED WITH
Audience, Anurag Hoon, Lakshmi Pratury
Argument 2
Access to advanced chips and compute resources is a strategic enabler, not a blocker (Compute access – Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 argues that while compute infrastructure is crucial, it should not be viewed as a limiting factor; instead, innovators can be creative with existing resources to meet demand. This perspective frames compute as an enabler rather than a barrier.
EVIDENCE
He notes that “you just have to be creative with the resources you have… I don’t believe it will be a limiting factor for those that want to move fast” when discussing the compute layer and investment structure [250-256].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Analyses describe compute as an enabler, emphasizing creative use of existing resources alongside infrastructure investment [S28][S30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Access to advanced chips and compute resources is a strategic enabler, not a blocker (Compute access – Speaker 1)
Argument 3
Embedding ethical considerations and human values ensures responsible AI deployment (Ethical AI principles – Speaker 1)
EXPLANATION
Speaker 1 emphasizes that beyond building technology, organisations must align AI development with ethical standards and human values to guarantee responsible use. This call for ethical AI underpins trustworthy deployment.
EVIDENCE
He concludes that “it comes down to the ambition each of us sets… to build the best technology… but ultimately, it comes down to the ambition each of us sets” implying a responsibility to embed ethical ambition in AI work [306-311].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AI ethics literature and regulatory guidance call for integrating ethical principles and human values into AI development [S26][S15].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Embedding ethical considerations and human values ensures responsible AI deployment (Ethical AI principles – Speaker 1)
AGREED WITH
Audience
Agreements
Agreement Points
Scaling women’s participation in AI through community building, workforce parity, and large‑scale training initiatives.
Speakers: Kirthiga Reddy, Radha Basu, Mihir Shukla
AI Kiran’s rapid growth to 10,000 women demonstrates the power of community building (AI Kiran growth – Kirthiga Reddy) Achieving 53 % women workforce showcases intentional gender parity (Gender parity 53% – Radha Basu) Partnership to train one‑million women and youth scales empowerment (Million‑women training – Mihir Shukla)
All three speakers highlight that increasing female representation in AI can be achieved by building strong communities, setting internal gender-balance targets, and launching large-scale training programmes, moving from a modest list of 250 women to a 10,000-member community and aiming to train a million women and youth [61-64][175-176][284-296].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This aligns with global gender-inclusion policies that call for women’s early involvement and mentorship in tech, as highlighted by the Internet Society’s commitment to bridge the digital divide and promote women in the Internet space [S49] and by empowerment frameworks that extend beyond basic training to include mentorship and policy participation for women [S50]; the AI Kiran initiative further demonstrates community-driven scaling of women’s representation in AI [S52].
Risk‑taking and career reinvention are essential catalysts for personal and technological progress.
Speakers: Kirthiga Reddy, Lakshmi Pratury
“What would you do if you weren’t afraid?” frames risk‑taking as a catalyst for change (Fearless question – Kirthiga Reddy) Continuous career reinvention illustrates the value of starting over (Career reinvention – Lakshmi Pratury)
Both emphasize that questioning fear and repeatedly starting anew enable breakthrough innovations, with Kirthiga urging “what would you do if you weren’t afraid?” and Lakshmi describing her own multiple reinventions across the early internet, Intel, VC and AI Kiran [12-15][34-36][42-44].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of continuous reinvention is echoed in youth-driven tech empowerment narratives that link personal adversity to innovation, and historical analyses stress that economies thrive when individuals pursue risk-taking and skill renewal [S65][S66].
Decentralising AI capacity to avoid an urban‑AI divide.
Speakers: Radha Basu, Kirthiga Reddy
Establishing AI centers in tier‑2 cities prevents an urban‑AI divide (Decentralized AI centers – Radha Basu) The last thing I want is… bridge the AI divide (AI divide – Kirthiga Reddy)
Both stress the need to spread AI research and training beyond metros, with Radha describing new centres in Calcutta, Vizag, Coimbatore, Hubli and Shillong and Kirthiga warning against a future AI divide, urging proactive decentralisation [133-140][136-137].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Discussions at the AI Governance Dialogue emphasized unprecedented inclusivity and the need to avoid concentration of AI resources in urban centers, mirroring calls to bridge the digital divide and include women and marginalized groups in AI development [S51][S49].
Investing in applied AI and sector‑specific use cases rather than chasing ever‑larger models maximises economic impact.
Speakers: Mihir Shukla, Radha Basu
Prioritizing applied AI over chasing model size maximises economic impact (Applied AI focus – Mihir Shukla) AI investment is a triangle of technology, infrastructure, and human talent (Investment triangle – Radha Basu)
Mihir argues India should focus on applying AI to real problems, while Radha frames investment as a balanced triangle that includes building applications, illustrating consensus on channeling resources toward practical AI deployments rather than model-size races [284-288][259-264][145-152][280-283].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy briefs from India advocate focusing on smaller, task-specific models for higher ROI and sustainable AI diffusion, arguing that large-parameter models are not necessary for most economic applications [S56][S57][S58].
Developing resilience, curiosity and emotional intelligence in children is essential for thriving in an AI‑driven future.
Speakers: Audience, Speaker 1, Anurag Hoon, Lakshmi Pratury
Parents should teach resilience, curiosity, and emotional awareness to thrive in an AI age (Resilience and EQ – Audience) Building resilience and the ability to learn from failure prepares children for rapid change (Resilience learning – Speaker 1) Emphasizing five senses and nine emotions grounds children in holistic development (Five senses & nine emotions – Anurag Hoon) Fellows program nurtures 250+ multidisciplinary youth innovators (Fellows program – Lakshmi Pratury)
Multiple participants converge on the need to cultivate soft skills-resilience, curiosity, emotional awareness and holistic development-through programmes, mentorship and parental guidance to equip youth for AI transformation [304-311][316-324][312-319][222-224].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Expert recommendations identify curiosity, resilience, and emotional intelligence as core competencies for children, with UNICEF and OpenAI highlighting these traits as vital for safe and empowered AI interaction [S54][S63][S59].
Ensuring ethical safeguards, child protection and provenance of information is critical as AI becomes a primary source of knowledge.
Speakers: Audience, Speaker 1
Protecting children from AI‑driven harms while granting them power requires robust safeguards (Child safety guardrails – Audience) Building provenance and trust in information sources counters over‑reliance on AI answers (Provenance trust – Audience) Embedding ethical considerations and human values ensures responsible AI deployment (Ethical AI principles – Speaker 1)
Both highlight the necessity of guardrails, provenance mechanisms and ethical principles to protect children and maintain trust in AI-generated content [382-401][306-311].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
International guidelines stress data protection, privacy, and provenance, and UNICEF policy guidance calls for robust child-rights safeguards when deploying AI for education and health [S47][S48][S55][S64].
Similar Viewpoints
Both argue that AI progress depends on balanced investment in practical applications, compute infrastructure and skilled people rather than on building ever‑larger models [284-288][259-264].
Speakers: Mihir Shukla, Radha Basu
Prioritizing applied AI over chasing model size maximises economic impact (Applied AI focus – Mihir Shukla) AI investment is a triangle of technology, infrastructure, and human talent (Investment triangle – Radha Basu)
Both see confronting fear and repeatedly starting anew as essential drivers of personal growth and technological innovation [12-15][34-36][42-44].
Speakers: Kirthiga Reddy, Lakshmi Pratury
“What would you do if you weren’t afraid?” frames risk‑taking as a catalyst for change (Fearless question – Kirthiga Reddy) Continuous career reinvention illustrates the value of starting over (Career reinvention – Lakshmi Pratury)
Unexpected Consensus
Emphasis on emotional and holistic development from both technology leaders and an arts‑focused educator.
Speakers: Anurag Hoon, Audience
Emphasizing five senses and nine emotions grounds children in holistic development (Five senses & nine emotions – Anurag Hoon) Parents should teach resilience, curiosity, and emotional awareness to thrive in an AI age (Resilience and EQ – Audience)
While the panel largely focused on AI technology and scaling, both an AI-focused panelist and a music-education practitioner converged on the importance of emotional intelligence and holistic child development, an unexpected cross-disciplinary agreement [312-319][304-311].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Holistic education frameworks argue that learning should centre on the whole learner, integrating arts and emotional development alongside technology, as advocated in inclusive education initiatives [S60][S62].
Agreement on the need for child‑focused guardrails despite a strong emphasis on rapid AI deployment.
Speakers: Audience, Speaker 1
Protecting children from AI‑driven harms while granting them power requires robust safeguards (Child safety guardrails – Audience) Embedding ethical considerations and human values ensures responsible AI deployment (Ethical AI principles – Speaker 1)
Even as speakers promoted fast-moving AI initiatives, they jointly stressed the necessity of safeguards for children and provenance of information, revealing an unexpected alignment between growth-oriented and protection-oriented perspectives [382-401][306-311].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Recent IGF workshops and responsible AI guidelines underline the necessity of child-centric safeguards (trust, transparency, privacy) even as governments pursue fast AI rollout, noting that clear regulatory guardrails can accelerate safe innovation [S54][S55][S64][S68].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong consensus on four pillars: (1) gender‑inclusive scaling of AI participation, (2) the role of risk‑taking and reinvention, (3) decentralising AI capacity to avoid urban divides, (4) focusing investment on applied AI and ethical safeguards while nurturing resilience and emotional intelligence in youth.

High – The repeated convergence across speakers from different sectors (industry, academia, arts, policy) suggests a shared vision that can drive coordinated policy and programme actions to promote inclusive, responsible AI development.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Allocation of AI investment – applied AI solutions versus building large models and infrastructure
Speakers: Mihir Shukla, Radha Basu
Prioritizing applied AI over chasing model size maximizes economic impact (Applied AI focus – Mihir Shukla) AI investment is a triangle of technology, infrastructure, and human talent (Investment triangle – Radha Basu)
Mihir argues that India should concentrate on applying AI to solve concrete problems and avoid competing in the global race to build ever-larger models, citing historical examples of technology adoption [284-288]. Radha counters that a balanced investment across cutting-edge models, compute infrastructure, and skilled people is essential to scale AI responsibly, describing a three-pillar “triangle” approach [259-264]. The two positions differ on where limited resources should be directed – toward immediate applications or toward foundational model and infrastructure development.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Evidence from policy analyses shows that allocating resources to low-cost, domain-specific AI yields higher economic returns than investing in massive model infrastructure, supporting a shift toward applied AI investment [S56][S57][S58][S68].
What core competencies children need to thrive in an AI‑driven future
Speakers: Audience member (Resilience & EQ), Anurag Hoon, Speaker 1
Parents should teach resilience, curiosity, and emotional awareness to thrive in an AI age (Resilience and EQ – Audience) Emphasizing five senses and nine emotions grounds children in holistic development (Five senses & nine emotions – Anurag Hoon) Building resilience and the ability to learn from failure prepares children for rapid change (Resilience learning – Speaker 1)
The audience stresses soft-skill development-resilience, curiosity and emotional intelligence-as the priority for children growing up with AI [304-311]. Anurag proposes a more holistic, human-centric curriculum focused on sensory awareness and emotional vocabulary (five senses, nine emotions) [312-319]. Speaker 1 also highlights resilience and learning from failure as essential, but does not mention the sensory-emotional framework [316-324]. The three speakers agree that non-technical skills matter, yet they diverge on which specific competencies should be foregrounded.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Authoritative reports list critical thinking, adaptability, emotional intelligence, and financial numeracy as essential skills for children navigating AI, reinforcing curriculum recommendations for AI-focused education programs [S63][S53][S54][S64].
Need for child‑focused AI guardrails versus emphasis on rapid empowerment
Speakers: Audience member (Child‑safety guardrails), Kirthiga Reddy
Protecting children from AI‑driven harms while granting them power requires robust safeguards (Child safety guardrails – Audience) Focus on scaling AI participation and community building without explicit mention of safeguards (Fearless question – Kirthiga Reddy)
An audience participant calls for strong protective measures to prevent AI-related harms to children, highlighting the urgency of guardrails [382-389]. Kirthiga, throughout her remarks, stresses bold risk-taking and rapid community scaling (e.g., “what would you do if you weren’t afraid?”) without addressing safety mechanisms for minors [12-15][52-53]. The tension lies between a precautionary approach for minors and an acceleration-focused mindset.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy discussions balance rapid AI empowerment with child protection, emphasizing that safeguards such as privacy, transparency, and age-appropriate content are integral to responsible deployment [S54][S55][S64][S68].
Strategies for achieving gender parity in AI – community‑driven scaling versus internal workforce composition
Speakers: Kirthiga Reddy, Radha Basu
AI Kiran’s rapid growth to 10,000 women demonstrates the power of community building (AI Kiran growth – Kirthiga Reddy) Achieving 53 % women workforce showcases intentional gender parity (Gender parity 53% – Radha Basu)
Kirthiga highlights the expansion of the AI Kiran network from 250 to 10,000 women as evidence that a focused community can quickly increase female participation in AI [61-64]. Radha points to her own organization’s internal composition, where women already constitute a slight majority (53 %) and presents this as a concrete gender-balance outcome [175-176]. Both aim for gender inclusion but propose different pathways-external community mobilisation versus internal hiring and retention policies.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Gender-parity strategies highlighted in multiple sources advocate community-based training, mentorship, and policy participation as complementary to internal hiring practices, reflecting a broader policy push for inclusive AI ecosystems [S49][S50][S52].
Unexpected Differences
Human‑centric versus technology‑centric focus for child development
Speakers: Anurag Hoon, Mihir Shukla
Emphasizing five senses and nine emotions grounds children in holistic development (Five senses & nine emotions – Anurag Hoon) Prioritizing applied AI over chasing model size maximizes economic impact (Applied AI focus – Mihir Shukla)
Anurag argues that nurturing children’s sensory and emotional intelligence (HI) is the primary foundation for future success, effectively downplaying the role of AI in education [235-238]. Mihir, by contrast, stresses that the strategic priority for the nation is to apply AI to drive economic growth, implying that technical AI skills should be central to future curricula [284-288]. The clash between a heart-centric developmental philosophy and a technology-centric economic strategy was not anticipated given the overall AI-focused agenda of the panel.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Educational policy literature stresses placing learners at the centre and adopting holistic, inclusive approaches rather than technology-first models, aligning with calls for human-centric AI integration in schooling [S60][S62][S53].
Overall Assessment

The panel displayed modest but meaningful disagreement across four thematic axes: (1) the optimal allocation of AI investment (applied solutions vs. model‑centric infrastructure), (2) the specific non‑technical competencies children should acquire (resilience vs. sensory‑emotional grounding), (3) the balance between rapid empowerment and protective guardrails for minors, and (4) the preferred mechanism for achieving gender parity (community scaling vs. internal hiring). While participants largely shared common aspirations—greater inclusion, skill development, and responsible AI—their divergent pathways reflect differing priorities between immediate economic impact, holistic human development, and safety considerations.

The disagreements are moderate; they do not fracture the panel but highlight distinct strategic lenses. Their implications are significant: policy makers must reconcile investment choices (applied AI vs. foundational model development), design education frameworks that integrate both resilience and emotional intelligence, embed child‑safety safeguards alongside empowerment initiatives, and combine community‑building with internal gender‑balance policies to achieve inclusive AI ecosystems.

Partial Agreements
Both speakers share the goal of increasing women’s representation in AI, but Kirthiga advocates scaling through a large external community network, whereas Radha emphasizes achieving parity within her own company’s workforce through hiring and retention practices [61-64][175-176].
Speakers: Kirthiga Reddy, Radha Basu
AI Kiran’s rapid growth to 10,000 women demonstrates the power of community building (AI Kiran growth – Kirthiga Reddy) Achieving 53 % women workforce showcases intentional gender parity (Gender parity 53% – Radha Basu)
Both aim to equip young people with AI‑related capabilities. Mihir focuses on short, intensive bootcamps that quickly place participants into high‑paying jobs [433-436], while Lakshmi describes a longer‑term Fellows Programme that selects 20 individuals annually and has supported over 250 fellows [222-224]. The shared objective is youth empowerment, but the delivery models differ (rapid bootcamps vs. structured fellowship).
Speakers: Mihir Shukla, Lakshmi Pratury
Training initiatives for women and youth demonstrate rapid, low‑barrier skill acquisition (Rapid skill up – Mihir Shukla) Fellows program nurtures 250+ multidisciplinary youth innovators (Fellows program – Lakshmi Pratury)
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI Kiran has rapidly grown to a community of 10,000 women, demonstrating the impact of focused community building and mentorship. Achieving gender parity (53 % women) in the workforce is possible with intentional hiring and leadership support. A partnership has been announced to train one million women and youth in AI and automation over the next five years. Risk‑taking and the mindset of “What would you do if you weren’t afraid?” drives personal reinvention and scaling of potential. Early‑stage tech leadership (e.g., pioneering HP’s entry into India) shows the value of being at the front of emerging technologies. Decentralized AI centers in tier‑2 cities (Kolkata, Vizag, Coimbatore, Shillong, etc.) are essential to prevent an urban‑AI divide. AI is being applied to high‑impact societal problems: autonomous mobility, healthcare imaging, precision agriculture, and niche startups like Dark.ai. Education initiatives – Fellows program, rapid‑skill‑up trainings, and grassroots AI literacy – are crucial for preparing the next generation. Parents should focus on resilience, curiosity, emotional awareness (five senses & nine emotions) and EQ to help children thrive in an AI‑driven world. Investment in AI should be viewed as a triangle: technology/models, infrastructure/compute, and human talent. Access to advanced chips and compute is an enabler, not a blocker, if organizations are creative with resources. Applied AI that solves real‑world problems should be prioritized over chasing larger model sizes. Ethical guardrails, provenance of information, and child‑safety mechanisms are needed to balance AI’s power with responsibility.
Resolutions and action items
Launch a joint partnership (AI Kiran + partners) to train 1,000,000 women and youth in AI and automation within five years (announced by Mihir Shukla). Continue expanding AI Kiran’s community, aiming to add zeros to the member count and maintain rapid growth. Scale the Fellows program to support >250 multidisciplinary youth innovators and integrate them into AI projects. Establish and operationalize AI centers of excellence in tier‑2 locations (Calcutta, Vizag, Coimbatore, Shillong, etc.) as outlined by Radha Basu. Prioritize applied AI projects in sectors such as precision agriculture, breast‑cancer screening, and autonomous mobility. Develop and disseminate educational content on resilience, curiosity, EQ, and the five senses/nine emotions for parents and teachers. Encourage organizations to adopt a creative approach to compute resource allocation rather than waiting for exclusive chip access. Promote ethical AI practices and provenance mechanisms to build trust in AI‑generated information.
Unresolved issues
Specific frameworks or guidelines for safeguarding children from AI‑driven harms while still empowering them remain undefined. Concrete steps for integrating AI ethics and provenance into mainstream education curricula were not detailed. How to systematically measure and ensure the effectiveness of the one‑million‑women training partnership is still open. The exact strategy for balancing compute resource constraints with rapid AI development was discussed but not finalized. Questions from the audience about disrupting K‑12 and higher education, and how to replace traditional exam‑centric models, were raised without a clear answer.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a pragmatic stance on compute: treat advanced chips as a strategic advantage but not a blocker, encouraging creative use of existing resources (Kirthiga Reddy). Balance rapid AI scaling with ethical guardrails by embedding safety considerations early in product development rather than as an afterthought (Speaker 1). Combine AI skill‑building with emotional and sensory development for children, merging technical education with EQ/arts to address both empowerment and safety (Anurag Hoon & Speaker 1).
Thought Provoking Comments
What would you do if you weren’t afraid? – It’s about taking risks, starting over, and stretching for the stars rather than settling for the safe, achievable part.
Frames the entire discussion around a growth‑mindset and the willingness to reinvent oneself, which resonates with the panel’s theme of scaling human potential.
Set the tone for personal stories of reinvention; prompted Lakshmi and Radha to share their own ‘starting over’ experiences and opened the floor for advice on bold career moves.
Speaker: Kirthiga Reddy
When we asked ChatGPT for 100 women in AI in India it gave us only 10. We launched with 250 named women and now we have a community of 10,000 – we literally added two zeros to the answer.
Highlights a concrete data gap in representation, turning a limitation of AI into a catalyst for community building and advocacy.
Shifted the conversation from abstract AI topics to tangible gender‑bias issues; led to deeper discussion about building inclusive networks and the role of AI Kiran in correcting systemic blind spots.
Speaker: Kirthiga Reddy
We set up AI centers not in the metros but in places like Calcutta, Vizag, Coimbatore, Hubli, Shillong – each becoming a centre of excellence for specific domains.
Introduces a strategic decentralisation model that tackles the ‘AI divide’ by bringing advanced research to tier‑2 and tier‑3 cities.
Redirected the dialogue toward regional equity, prompting other panelists to discuss how infrastructure and talent can be distributed beyond traditional hubs.
Speaker: Radha Basu
In every revolution we messed up the environment; now we have a chance to make AI inclusive from the get‑go.
Draws a historical parallel that frames AI as a societal responsibility rather than just a technological race.
Reinforced the need for proactive inclusion, influencing subsequent comments about gender balance, youth programs, and ethical guardrails.
Speaker: Lakshmi Pratury
India’s super‑power isn’t inventing AI, it’s applying AI across its industrial hubs to create global competitiveness.
Shifts focus from chasing cutting‑edge models to leveraging AI for practical, sector‑specific impact, echoing historical lessons from past tech revolutions.
Steered the conversation toward applied AI, prompting panelists to cite examples like precision agriculture, healthcare, and upskilling initiatives.
Speaker: Mihir Shukla
I teach kids the five senses and nine emotions – heart intelligence – so they can stay human even as AI automates everything.
Introduces a holistic, human‑centric educational framework that balances technical skill with emotional and sensory awareness.
Opened a new thread on parenting and education, leading to multiple responses about resilience, curiosity, and the importance of soft skills in an AI‑driven world.
Speaker: Anurag Hoon
Investments in AI form a triangle: technology/models, infrastructure, and human intelligence. All three must grow together.
Provides a clear, actionable framework for scaling AI responsibly, integrating technical, physical, and human resources.
Guided the discussion toward concrete policy and investment recommendations, influencing later remarks on skilling, data readiness, and building AI‑ready ecosystems.
Speaker: Radha Basu
The power of the question – AI can give many answers, but it doesn’t know the right questions. Teaching people to ask better questions is the real leverage.
Elevates the conversation from tool‑centric to mindset‑centric, emphasizing critical thinking as the ultimate differentiator.
Prompted audience members and panelists to reflect on education curricula, leading to suggestions about curiosity, interdisciplinary learning, and the role of families in nurturing inquiry.
Speaker: Mihir Shukla
In a TCS hackathon, 1,200 women from non‑English backgrounds built brilliant solutions in four hours after a short training – the speed of learning is massive.
Demonstrates the rapid scalability of AI education when barriers are removed, reinforcing optimism about mass upskilling.
Supported the narrative that AI can democratise opportunity, bolstering arguments for large‑scale training programs and reinforcing the panel’s hopeful tone.
Speaker: Speaker 1 (unnamed senior executive)
We trained 700 women in Africa for six weeks and 500 got jobs within a week; AI can give high‑pay jobs without years of formal education.
Provides a powerful real‑world example of AI as a vehicle for socioeconomic mobility, challenging assumptions about required training length.
Strengthened the case for inclusive AI policies and rapid skill‑building initiatives, influencing later remarks about grassroots training and the need to bridge digital gaps.
Speaker: Mihir Shukla
Overall Assessment

The discussion was propelled forward by a series of pivotal remarks that moved it from abstract hype to concrete, human‑centred action. Kirthiga’s opening mindset question and the ChatGPT gender‑bias anecdote framed the need for bold reinvention and community‑driven correction of AI’s blind spots. Radha’s decentralised AI‑center model and Lakshmi’s call for inclusive design shifted focus to systemic equity, while Mihir’s emphasis on applied AI and the ‘power of the question’ reframed success as practical impact and critical thinking. Anurag’s heart‑intelligence perspective and the audience’s parenting query introduced a softer, educational dimension, prompting multiple speakers to stress resilience, curiosity, and interdisciplinary learning. Collectively, these comments redirected the conversation toward actionable frameworks—triangular investment, rapid upskilling, and regional empowerment—thereby shaping a narrative that balances technological ambition with social responsibility and human potential.

Follow-up Questions
What are the limiting factors or enablers (talent, capital, compute) for scaling AI in India and how do they interact?
Identifying constraints is essential for shaping policy, investment strategies, and ensuring sustainable AI growth in the country.
Speaker: Kirthiga Reddy
What kind of investments are needed to move people up the AI value chain in India?
Clarifies where funding should be directed—technology, infrastructure, or human talent—to accelerate AI adoption and create high‑value jobs.
Speaker: Kirthiga Reddy (to Radha Basu)
How can India ensure access to advanced chips for building powerful AI models?
Chip access determines a nation’s ability to develop and run large models, affecting competitiveness and innovation capacity.
Speaker: Kirthiga Reddy
What should parents teach their children over the next 15 years to thrive in an AI‑automated world, and what blind spots are they missing?
Guides parenting and educational curricula to equip the next generation with skills and mindsets needed for an AI‑driven future.
Speaker: Anupama (audience)
How can we protect children from AI‑related harms while still empowering them with AI capabilities?
Balancing safety with empowerment is critical for policy makers, educators, and platform designers to prevent misuse while fostering innovation.
Speaker: Hemendra (audience)
How should individuals prioritize what to learn first and next in the rapidly evolving AI landscape?
Helps learners navigate an overwhelming amount of information and choose pathways that maximize career relevance and personal growth.
Speaker: Anjali (audience)
How can we build trust and provenance on the internet when AI answers are increasingly relied upon?
Addressing credibility of AI‑generated content is vital for combating misinformation and maintaining public confidence in digital services.
Speaker: Bina (audience)
How can we bridge the digital gap for grassroots AI training, especially for low‑income or non‑digital populations?
Ensures inclusive AI adoption and prevents widening socioeconomic disparities by bringing AI literacy to underserved communities.
Speaker: Bina (audience)
How can we develop a wisdom cycle for youth to interpret information, ask the right questions, and apply AI responsibly?
Cultivates critical thinking and ethical AI use, which are essential for responsible innovation and societal resilience.
Speaker: Bina (audience)
Area for further research: Accurate data on representation of women in AI in India beyond current ChatGPT estimates.
Reliable gender‑representation metrics are needed to track progress, identify gaps, and design effective interventions for gender equity.
Speaker: Kirthiga Reddy
Area for further research: Strategies to bridge the AI divide between metropolitan and non‑metropolitan regions in India.
Understanding effective models for decentralised AI hubs can guide policy to ensure equitable access to AI opportunities across the country.
Speaker: Radha Basu
Area for further research: Application of AI in precision agriculture and its impact on crop‑failure detection.
Exploring AI‑driven agritech can improve food security and farmer incomes, making it a high‑impact research priority.
Speaker: Radha Basu
Area for further research: Development of AI models tailored for diverse demographic groups in healthcare (e.g., breast‑cancer screening across ethnicities).
Tailored models can reduce diagnostic bias and improve health outcomes for varied populations.
Speaker: Radha Basu
Area for further research: Effectiveness of AI‑driven upskilling programs for women and youth in low‑income settings (e.g., iMerit, Anudip).
Evaluating impact helps scale successful models and informs funding decisions for inclusive AI education.
Speaker: Radha Basu, Mihir Shukla
Area for further research: Role of arts and EQ development in AI education and its market potential.
Integrating creativity with technology may foster more holistic AI talent and open new economic opportunities.
Speaker: Anurag Hoon, Anjali
Area for further research: Impact of AI on future job structures – shift from ‘worker bees’ to ‘queen bees’ concept.
Understanding how AI reshapes labor markets is crucial for workforce planning, social policy, and education system redesign.
Speaker: Mihir Shukla

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.