Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact

20 Feb 2026 12:00h - 13:00h

Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The summit opened by Mridu Bhandari framed the discussion as a effort to bridge the global AI divide and positioned AI as a driver of economic growth, social empowerment and India’s global leadership, introducing a blueprint for architecting India’s AI leadership [1-3][6-7]. Dr. Vivek Mohindra of Dell Technologies highlighted that AI-related compute in India is projected to exceed 10 exaflops and that AI workloads are expected to grow at over 30 % CAGR, underscoring the need for massive infrastructure expansion [15-16]. He outlined three inter-linked pillars-Invest (compute, data and energy infrastructure for all, including MSMEs), Innovate (nationwide skilling from schools to workforce) and Evolve (agile, responsibility-anchored governance with flexible regulations)-and stressed that public-private partnership is essential to realise sovereign AI potential [18-21][23-32][33-34]. The Dell blueprint, aligned with the Vixit Bharat 2047 vision, reiterates these pillars and calls for actionable steps to translate ambition into nation-scale execution [46-48][49-51].


Rajgopal pointed out that India currently has only 40-50 k GPUs against an estimated need of 200 k, and suggested policy levers such as waiving GST on imported servers and extending tax holidays to lower upfront costs for startups and MSMEs [70-73][86-92]. He illustrated the practical impact of AI by describing how his firm deduplicated 90-crore election photographs in 51 hours, a task impossible without AI [78-83]. Bhaskar Chakravarti warned that beyond hardware, a “trust infrastructure”-including data governance, privacy, district-level implementation, transparency, grievance mechanisms and digital literacy-is the critical non-technical bottleneck for inclusive AI adoption [113-124][129-138]. Manish Gupta added that building distributed, energy-efficient data centers across multiple states, leveraging open-source software to cut costs, and fostering a “UPI of AI” platform for developers are necessary to democratise access and retain talent [155-162][167-188][220-245].


In the speed-versus-caution debate, Rajgopal argued for minimal regulation to treat AI as a utility while emphasizing the need for clear use cases, whereas Chakravarti used a car-and-road analogy to stress that without trustworthy institutions and job-impact policies, rapid deployment could falter [256-262][275-283]. Manish reinforced that agility and security are not opposing forces and cited existing Indian frameworks such as DPDP and DEPA as foundations for building robust, yet flexible, governance [291-300]. Minister Jayant Chaudhary described India’s PPP model that has already delivered a cheap, open-access compute facility (38 k GPUs, aiming for 100 k) and highlighted initiatives like Sarvam, incubated by IIT Madras, as examples of academia-industry collaboration [326-348][349-357]. He also emphasized a three-level skilling strategy (school, college, employment) delivered through online and in-person programs to reach tier-2 and tier-3 regions [373-381].


On “Zero Trust” AI, the minister said it requires verification of every protocol, segmented data sets and audit trails, while Dr. Mohindra expanded the concept to include national risk registries, observability and identity management [386-395][412-416]. The panel concluded that coordinated investment, innovative skill pipelines and responsible governance are essential to achieve sovereign, inclusive AI growth in India [302-304][321-324]. Overall, the discussion affirmed that public-private partnership, robust infrastructure and trust-building measures will determine whether India can translate its AI ambitions into broad economic and social benefits [46-48][321-324].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


The “Invest-Innovate-Evolve” AI Blueprint and public-private partnership – Dell’s blueprint is built around three pillars: massive compute and data investment, collaborative innovation through skilling, and agile, responsible governance; its success hinges on marrying public resources with private innovation [18-27][47-49][155-162].


Infrastructure gaps and affordability for SMEs/MSMEs – Panelists highlighted a severe shortage of GPUs (≈200,000 needed vs. 40-50 k available) and called for fiscal relief such as GST waivers and tax incentives to lower upfront costs [71-92]; they also stressed the need for a geographically distributed, sovereign data-center network to bring affordable compute to the “long tail” of innovators [167-176][183-188].


Trust, governance and “zero-trust” AI – Non-technical bottlenecks were identified as the “trust infrastructure” – data-governance, privacy, transparency, grievance mechanisms and explainability – which must be agile and region-sensitive [112-130][136-138]; the minister and Dr. Mohindra later expanded this to a national “zero-trust” architecture covering data, models, cybersecurity and auditability [386-408][412-416].


Skills development and the “UPI of AI” – A recurring theme was building a massive developer ecosystem (shifting from 1 billion users to 1-10 million AI developers) and creating unified data-access APIs (the “AI-Kosh”) to democratise AI across academia, industry and startups [226-244][373-379].


Strategic autonomy and trusted domestic capabilities – Beyond sheer adoption, India must develop “trusted-in-India” AI components (e.g., semiconductors, safety standards) to ensure strategic autonomy and avoid reliance on external providers [229-245][220-236].


Overall purpose / goal


The discussion was convened to launch and explain Dell Technologies’ AI Blueprint for India, aligning it with the summit’s aim of “bridging the global AI divide.” It sought to map a concrete pathway-investment, innovation, and governance-to scale AI nationwide, secure public-private collaboration, and translate AI ambition into inclusive economic growth and strategic autonomy [1][6][14][46-49].


Overall tone


The conversation began with a formal, forward-looking tone, positioning the blueprint as a strategic call to action. As the panel moved into the Q&A, the tone shifted to pragmatic and urgent, focusing on concrete bottlenecks (GPU scarcity, GST, trust deficits). Toward the end, the tone became optimistic and rallying, emphasizing partnership, skill-building, and a shared vision of a sovereign, trusted AI ecosystem. Throughout, the speakers maintained a collaborative, solution-oriented demeanor.


Speakers

Mridu Bhandari – Senior Anchor and Consulting Editor at Network 18 (brands include CNBC and Forbes India); Moderator/Host of the AI summit. [​S9]


Expertise: Media broadcasting, technology journalism, AI policy discussion facilitation.


Dr. Vivek Mohindra – Special Advisor to the Vice Chairman and COO of Dell Technologies Global. [S1]


Expertise: Enterprise AI infrastructure, cloud computing, public-private partnership strategy.


Bhaskar Chakravarti – Dean of Global Business, the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University; Professor.


Expertise: International policy, AI governance, trust and institutional frameworks.


Manish Gupta – President and Managing Director, Dell Technologies India. [S5]


Expertise: Technology leadership, AI deployment at scale, industry-government collaboration.


A. S. Rajgopal – Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, NextGen Cloud Technologies. [S6]


Expertise: Cloud services, AI compute infrastructure, MSME and startup enablement.


Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji – Minister of State for Education and Minister of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (Independent Charge), Government of India. [S10]


Expertise: Public policy, skill development, AI strategy and public-private partnership implementation.


Additional speakers:


(None identified beyond the listed speakers.)


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The summit opened with moderator Mridu Bhandari framing the event as a direct response to the summit’s aim of “bridging the global AI divide” and positioning artificial intelligence as a catalyst for economic growth, social empowerment and India’s emergence as a global leader [1-3]. She introduced the day’s theme – “architecting India’s AI leadership, a blueprint for transformation” – and announced the unveiling of Dell Technologies’ AI Blueprint, which aligns with the Vixit Bharat 2047 vision of AI as a foundational engine for productivity, modernised public services, expanded opportunity and strategic autonomy [6-7][46-48].


Dr Vivek Mohindra, special advisor to Dell’s global COO, presented the macro-level data that underpins the Blueprint: AI-related compute in India is projected to exceed 10 exaflops and AI workloads are expected to grow at a compound annual rate of more than 30 % over the next few years [15-16]. He then outlined the three inter-linked pillars of the Blueprint – Invest (building sovereign, scalable compute, data and energy infrastructure that is accessible to MSMEs), Innovate (nation-wide skilling) and Evolve (agile, responsibility-anchored governance with flexible regulation) [18-21][23-34]. Mohindra detailed the three-level skilling framework: school, college and employment, delivered through online, in-person and incubation modes [373-381].


The panel discussion began with A. S. Rajgopal highlighting a critical supply-side bottleneck: India currently possesses only 40-50 k GPUs, far short of the roughly 200 k GPUs he estimates are needed to meet demand [70-73]. He proposed fiscal levers such as waiving GST on imported servers (collecting it only when services are delivered) and extending income-tax holidays to AI service providers, which could cut upfront costs by about 18 % and make the compute stack affordable for startups and MSMEs [86-92]. Rajgopal also advocated for a geographically distributed network of energy-efficient data centres, leveraging existing rail and power networks for inter-connectivity [167-176][180-188].


Professor Bhaskar Chakravarti shifted the focus to non-technical constraints, coining the term “trust infrastructure” to describe the suite of data-governance, privacy, transparency, grievance-redressal and digital-literacy mechanisms that must be built alongside hardware [112-124][129-138]. He warned that “the single most important determinant of a country’s growth and digital evolution is the demand side” and flagged AI’s potential impact on employment as a “pothole” that must be addressed [129-135][136-138].


Manish Gupta expanded on the infrastructure theme, echoing the need for distributed data centres and adding that open-source software can dramatically lower compute costs, making AI affordable for the “long tail” of innovators [188-192]. Gupta introduced the AI Kosh initiative – a national data-lake containing more than 7,000 datasets for innovators [220-245]. He also referenced emerging Indian regulatory frameworks – DPDP, DEPA and AISI – as examples of governance tools that can support responsible AI deployment [291-300]. Gupta proposed a “UPI of AI” – a unified API layer that would give developers, startups and enterprises seamless, secure access to national data sets and compute resources, mirroring the success of India’s Unified Payments Interface [226-244][220-245].


The minister announced that compute would be priced at ₹65 per hour, positioning the facility as the world’s cheapest [386-390][346-350]. She reiterated the success of the current public-private partnership (PPP) model and the need to expand it, emphasizing the “people” aspect of PPP while not commenting on the adequacy of the compute pricing or on tax-relief measures [1-3][32-34].


The debate then turned to the balance between rapid innovation and regulatory safeguards. Rajgopal argued that AI should be treated as a utility with minimal regulation to avoid stifling growth, whereas Mohindra insisted that regulations must be agile, principle-based and capable of keeping pace with fast-moving technology [256-262][28-32]. Chakravarti reinforced the need for a robust “road” – institutional capacity, transparency and job-impact policies – to accompany the “Ferrari” of advanced AI models [275-283]. Both the minister and Mohindra described concrete components of a Zero-Trust AI architecture, including data segregation, audit trails, a national risk registry and identity & access management [302-304][321-324][386-416].


Points of consensus emerged across the discussion:


* All participants emphasized the central role of public-private partnership for scaling AI infrastructure [1-3][32-34][326-334].


* Affordable compute is essential for SMEs; this was reflected in the Invest pillar, Rajgopal’s GST-waiver proposal, the minister’s ₹65-per-hour announcement and Gupta’s emphasis on distributed, energy-efficient data centres [18-20][86-92][346-350][160-176][170-176].


* A three-tier skilling pipeline (school → college → workforce) delivered through multiple modes was agreed as necessary to expand India’s developer base from a billion users to millions of AI creators [373-381][226-244][188-192].


* Participants uniformly called for agile, transparent governance that embeds explainability, auditability and a “trust infrastructure” without hampering innovation [28-32][291-300][113-122].


* There was unanimous support for a sovereign, cost-effective AI infrastructure built on distributed data centres, sustainable design and domestic semiconductor capabilities [160-162][170-176][20-21].


Key disagreements were limited to three areas:


1. Regulatory approach – Mohindra advocated for a balanced, agile regime, while Rajgopal pressed for minimal regulation treating AI as a utility [28-32][256-259].


2. Fiscal incentives – Rajgopal proposed GST waivers and income-tax holidays; the minister highlighted the existing ultra-low-cost compute provision but did not endorse additional tax relief [86-92][346-350].


3. GPU shortfall estimate – Rajgopal cited a need for about 200 k GPUs, whereas the minister referenced a target of 100 k GPUs by year-end [71-72][346-348].


Take-aways

1. The AI Blueprint rests on three pillars: Invest, Innovate, Evolve.


2. Public-private partnership is the core execution model for infrastructure and skilling.


3. Affordable, sovereign compute is critical; this includes addressing the GPU shortfall, considering GST/tax incentives, and building distributed, energy-efficient data centres.


4. Building a trust infrastructure-privacy, transparency, grievance mechanisms, digital literacy and job-impact policies-is essential.


5. A three-level skilling pipeline (school, college, employment) delivered via online, in-person and incubation modes will create millions of AI developers.


6. Governance mechanisms must be agile and include a Zero-Trust architecture with data segregation, audit trails, a national risk registry and identity & access management.


7. Data-sharing platforms such as AI Kosh and a unified “UPI of AI” API will democratise access to national datasets and compute resources.


In conclusion, the panel affirmed that coordinated investment, innovative skill pipelines and responsible, agile governance are essential to translate India’s AI ambitions into sovereign, inclusive growth. Participants were urged to study the detailed Dell Blueprint and provide feedback, while Dell signalled its intent to partner with the Ministry of Skill Development on AI apprenticeships and tier-2/3 skilling labs. The moderator indicated that future sessions will explore deeper public-private collaborations for AI-driven development [302-304][321-324][311-313].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Mridu Bhandari

So this conversation here and the couple of conversations we are going to have over the next one hour or so are aligned with the summit’s goal of bridging the global AI divide. So AI drives economic growth, social empowerment, and of course, global leadership for India. This is not just a presentation, it is a call to action. I’m your host, Mridu Bhandari, senior anchor and consulting editor at Network 18 with brands like CNBC and Forbes India, and I’ll be guiding you through this next 55 -minute journey that we’re on. To set the tone of this morning, we’re going to begin with framing the execution pathway of AI adoption and scaling it up from an industry vantage point. Our leadership keynote theme today is architecting India’s AI leadership, a blueprint for transformation.

To deliver this knowledge, we’re going to be talking about the key points of AI adoption and scaling it up from an Please join me in welcoming on stage Dr. Vivek Mohindra, special advisor to the vice chairman and COO of Dell Technologies Global. Dr. Mohindra, please join us here.

Dr. Vivek Mohindra

Thank you, Mridu, and thank you, everyone, for joining us for the unveiling of this important blueprint. As we have heard over the most of this week, India is at the cusp of very significant changes and progress on the back of AI with very bold aspirations, which are not only bold for India, but they’re very bold when you put it in the context of global aspirations that lots of other countries have. Dell has had a presence in India for over 30 years. We have partnered very closely with several government agencies as well as companies and the broader ecosystem to bring the broader set of capabilities that we have, which are across the board. We have a board covering server storage, networking, PCs.

and we are the number one AI infrastructure provider to enterprises globally. So leveraging our global presence and leveraging our deep knowledge of India, we have put all of that thought into putting forth, as Milu described, an AI blueprint, which is a practical guide for what we think not only the country but also companies need to do to be able to take advantage of this particular opportunity. The growth in terms of compute expected on the back of AI in India is expected to be well greater than 10 exo -flops, and that is a significant amount of growth. And the AI workloads in India are growing at over 30 % compound annual growth rate over the next few years, which is extremely significant.

So as we step back and look at what are the key elements of what a country and companies need to do, there really are three key elements. The first element is investments. And the investment really goes at the heart of the compute infrastructure that a country needs to put in place to ensure that everybody has access to that infrastructure, including MSMEs who sometimes do not have the capacity to be able to put their infrastructure in place. Investment also includes energy infrastructure, because without energy, there is really no compute infrastructure you can put in place which can run on that. So those are some of the key areas of the invest pillar of that. And there are other several other areas that I will encourage you to read through our blueprint that you will see both from a policy perspective and practical perspective that we think needs to get done.

The innovate side really comes down to. Areas like skilling, which I know when Minister Chaudhry joins us, we will get into that in quite some detail. But innovating around how the skilling occurs all the way from schools to colleges to workforce entering employment and employers themselves, what role they play across a whole spectrum of mediums to deliver that skilling is a key part of the innovate pillar. And then the last one, evolve, revolves all around governance aspects of that. And governance covers multiple areas. One of the key areas within governance is fundamentally the regulatory framework that needs to exist and that countries need to put in place. The pace of change is so significant with AI and how rapidly the technologies are moving that one of the fundamental balances that countries need to strike vis -a -vis, regulations, is striking the balance between innovation and responsibility while anchoring it to responsibility.

That is one of the key. regulatory principles that needs to be in place. And the regulations have to be agile because the technology is moving at such a fast pace that you cannot anchor the regulatory framework to yesterday’s technologies. And at the heart of it, I hope what you will take away from our blueprint is realizing sovereign AI potential for any country, including India, is really about the public -private partnership. And it’s really about marrying the public resources with private innovation. And that really is what the key to unlocking the full potential of AI and sovereign AI is in this country. So, again, I would encourage you to read through the blueprint, and we look forward to your feedback, and we look forward to partnering closely with Indian ecosystem to help India realize its aspirations with AI.

Thank you very much.

Mridu Bhandari

Thank you so much, Dr. Mohindra. I’m going to request you to please stay back on stage. I’d also like to invite Manish Gupta, President and Managing Director of Dell Technologies India, to join us here. This is the big moment, ladies and gentlemen. We are ready for the unveiling of the Dell Technologies Blueprint to accelerate India’s AI growth. Yes, that’s a photo moment for everyone. Thank you. Thank you so much, gentlemen. Thank you, Dr. Mohindra. Thank you, Mr. Gupta. Well, this blueprint advances India’s vision of Vixit Bharat 2047, positioning AI as a foundational engine for productivity, modernized public services, opportunity expansion and strategic autonomy. It centers on three pillars that we’ve been discussing. Invest, invest in sovereign, scalable compute and data foundations, innovate with collaboration and with a future ready workforce and evolve, evolve into a responsible, agile, security first governance structure.

So our next panel today will go inside this blueprint and India’s AI future to unpack how to convert this ambition. into nation scale execution. And that’s quite a mean feat for a country as diverse and as huge as India. So let’s welcome the panelists for all the tough questions this morning. Raj Gopal, AS, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of NextGen Cloud Technologies. Bhaskar Chakravarti, Dean of Global Business, the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. Please have a seat, sir. And once again on stage, Manish Gupta, President and Managing Director of Dell Technologies India. And I will be moderating this session for you. Welcome, gentlemen. We are here this morning to really translate the invest, innovate and evolve pillars into very actionable steps that we all can take together to grow India’s AI ecosystem.

So I’ll begin with targeted questions to each of you. And of course, you are free to jump in to add thoughts to each other. It’s a candid, free -flowing conversation. Mr. Rajgopal, if I can start with you. So startups and MSMEs, they are the engine of our economy. They are also the engine of our innovation, especially as far as AI is concerned. But access to very reliable, affordable AI compute and cloud at scale continues to be a barrier for many of the small and medium enterprises. Now, in your opinion, what are some of the policies, some of the infrastructure, some of the market interventions that we need today to really unlock this access at scale?

A. S. Rajgopal

Yeah, actually, I think across many other countries that we have seen, India has got a much comprehensive approach to this. I mean, in terms of actually they started this India mission, which is across seven pillars. I actually don’t see many startups actually using the facilities that are there in the sense that you could, you know, you apply for GPU infrastructure and you would get it at a subsidized rate. And some of them even got 100 percent of the GPUs that they need. So I think from India’s side, we’ve got a little less number of GPUs compared to what we really need. Maybe we need about 200 ,000 GPUs now, and we have about 40 ,000 to 50 ,000 now. So we all need to really invest more and then deploy more.

But the most important thing that you should see is that there is a good ecosystem. There is a system policy available for MSMEs and startups to leverage this. So there are a lot of innovative AI solutions being built. Most importantly, I also see that government actually setting pace in terms of actually leveraging some of these. We ourselves, I mean, we did one job for government, which is very, very unique. Like we serve Election Commission of India. They came to us and said, can you deduplicate and look at all the photographs that we have? This is like, you know, 90 -year -old pictures, right? I mean, so. So humanly it was not possible to deduplicate. You can’t check one photograph with 90 crore others.

We did that in a matter of 51 hours, and then we responded to them as to whether they had complications and all that.

Mridu Bhandari

Wow, that deserves some applause. That’s a humongous task.

A. S. Rajgopal

So what I see in this country is that I don’t think we will be pure play, this chatbot, I mean, the generative AI, the way it has been envisaged, I mean, will be the primary use case. I think we are going far beyond what AI can be applied in terms of actually improving the productivity of citizen services and also give use cases that these small and medium enterprises can actually use. In terms of actually enabling more GPUs, I think we have, you see, we need a lot of money. I mean, we are investing about one hundredth of what U .S. is investing or even less. so for us to do more I think we need to remove certain bottlenecks that are there one of the things I believe that can be done is I’m sure everybody is familiar we all pay GST but basically when we import servers when we pay GST on it and then when we deliver service I get that as an input and we do the I mean we only pay the value -added piece back to the government but the government gets the GST either way and I get an input so the way to one thing that we could look at is whether we can wave off the GST up front and just take the GST when the services are being delivered what that would do is it will deliver it will reduce my upfront infrastructure cost to by about you know you know 18 percent you know I don’t have to fund that up front and then pay interest on it you know or raise equity and you know pay more expectation on that I mean these things could really help I mean there are some of these things that government should look at and I think that’s a good point.

Thank you. The last point is that they’ve given tax holiday for delivering services to the world, but I think India has got a lot more to do within India than just look at world market. And I believe that we should get, Indian service providers should get the same benefits as the global providers would get when they host services in India. So maybe a GST waiver and some income tax benefits could be good.

Mridu Bhandari

Okay. GST waiver, income tax benefits, demands from the industry coming in. Professor Bhaskar, if I can come to you now. You’ve often argued that nations need to compete not just on technology, but on trust, on institutional strength, and of course, very, very inclusive digital participation. And that’s very critical for a country like India because we are a country of many countries and the rich -poor divide is quite huge. There are a lot of bridges. to gap here. There are a lot of gaps to bridge here. My apologies. Now, as India accelerates AI, what do you think are some of the biggest non -technical bottlenecks that we should be looking at addressing, which you believe could really, you know, limit this momentum that we are on currently?

And if we need larger societal good, what are some of the non -technical barriers that we need to immediately resolve?

Bhaskar Chakravarti

Yeah, so thank you. Thank you for the question, and thank you for the invitation to join this terrific panel. I think the issue of what are the non -technical elements, it’s great that you have included that question in this discussion, because in all the excitement around the technical infrastructure, which is, of course, enormous that’s happening right here in India, it’s no secret that, you know, this is one of the biggest talent pools. In the world, growing very, very fast. In two years, one in three developers are going to be in India, the largest mobile data pool anywhere in the world, the third largest data pool, you know, anywhere in the world once you take mobile and everything else together.

Growth in compute, growth in energy, growth in workloads, all that is happening, you know, which is fantastic. Now, when you think about what are the other elements that drive demand, what we have found, we study 125 countries and try to understand the role of technology in shaping lives and livelihoods across 145 countries. The single most important determinant of what keeps a country on trajectory in terms of both the momentum of growth and also the state of their digital evolution is the demand side. So when I think about the demand side, obviously the core infrastructure, which has been talked about, is enormously important and is going to continue. So the demand side is going to continue to be a major contributor.

A second part, which has been talked about a lot in the Indian context, is the distribution infrastructure. With DPI and all the different platforms associated with it, we know that there’s a very powerful distribution system. Now, there’s a third infrastructure, which is the non -technical part, and that is what I would call the trust infrastructure. Now, when you think about trust, it’s a bit of a slippery concept. It’s very hard to define. Each one of us in our heads has an idea of what trust is. But if you force somebody to define it, we’ll struggle. The best thing about trust is I know what trust is when it is not there, when it is missing.

And then you have to ask the question from a human perspective, what really is trust? And how do I bake that into the policy systems, into the technical systems, into the marketing systems, into the narrative around the India ecosystem, which will then keep moving the system. And trust ultimately has to do with the the Do people have confidence, the people who are the grantors of trust, do they have confidence that this invisible transaction that I’m engaging in, whether I’m putting my data into a system or whether I have entered my financial information and I’m expecting something on the other side, that this whole thing is going to be completed and it’s going to be completed in a way that is reliable, that is repeatable and will not take advantage of me.

So when you think about that whole trust ecosystem, India starts in a great place. Relative to where I come from, the United States, India is a far more trusting country in terms of trust in digital systems overall and certainly in terms of AI. There’s a tremendous level of enthusiasm in terms of embracing all things AI. And we’ve seen this right here, just the sheer numbers of people who’ve attended the conference. It shows a level of trust that is probably unmatched anywhere in the world. Now, this is a tremendous asset. That’s it to start with. The challenge is that the institutional side of trust is still in the development process in India. So if you think about data governance, privacy, security, we are making progress, but we need to be much further along.

Other aspects of trust has to do with the fact that, say, the India AI mission, that is developed at the union level, at the center level. But the actual exercising of trust, the granting of trust happens at the district level. And the district varies depending on whether I’m in Telangana or I’m in Jharkhand. And at the union level, the principles that I’ve got in place need to be sensitive to how it’s being experienced from the ground up. So there are many different facets of trust that we need to work on and put in place, including transparency, which AI is, you know, we are facing a challenge regarding transparency across the world. So this is an issue.

And then, you know, an approach to having redress and grievance systems and then literacy. You know, people need to be able to understand how to use this exciting technology and also protect themselves. I’ll pause.

Mridu Bhandari

Absolutely. Thank you for that wonderful perspective, Professor. Coming to you, Manish. Now, the Dell Technologies blueprint really calls for tighter alignment between policymakers, between industry, academia, institutional capacity. How can frameworks like this one really ensure growth that is both globally competitive for India, but also locally inclusive? Because there is a lot of regional growth. There is a lot of, you know, geography that needs to be taken into the fold of AI when we are talking about being globally competitive as well.

Manish Gupta

Thank you for that question. And, you know, just before I go in there, I would just add or maybe, you know, speak on a couple of topics. That professor just spoke about your trust, while he spoke more from a non -technical standpoint, you also brought in a technical aspect to it, you know, around the entire governance. And it’s not just non -technical in today’s world. It’s driven by data privacy and all of the things around. But equally on literacy, there’s also explainability. You know, that trust comes really inherently once you have got explainability and people are aware on what outcomes are coming. There’s the is that explainable and do they understand that? Right. So it’s a very, very interesting world that we are in.

Now, back to the blueprint that we were talking about and Vivek articulated that beautifully well across the three pillars of invest, invest in in data centric capacity, invest in energy infrastructure, invest in people, which goes back into the innovate side of it. Because like we like like we just discussed, we’ve possibly got the largest pool of engineers around AI. And that’s that’s killing on innovate part is what’s going to differentiate us, what’s going to make it really real and practically doable within the industry and would differentiate us versus other nations equally make it make it make it more democratized and ubiquitous across the nation. And lastly, it’s really about how do you continue to build in the guardrails?

How do you? Build the trust like we just discussed to ensure that there is that. the ecosystem knows that this entire process can be trusted and can be built upon. We’ve also got to remember the sustainability aspect of it, you know, and which is where, as you look at the blueprint, you will see us talk about the fact that energy efficiency, sustainability on data centers and new architectural models are becoming super important. And that’s something that NextGen under Raj Kapoor’s leadership has demonstrated in building highly sustainable, more energy efficient data centers that will allow us to use our energy resources in the best possible manner while democratizing the access of compute capacity, while democratizing the access of data center capacity to organizations and verticals of various sizes.

So that’s going to be the critical pillars around which we really believe that there’s practicality in adopting and differentiating ourselves on the AI arena. You know, as we go forward. Right.

Mridu Bhandari

I’m going to pick up on that data center piece and come to you, Rajgopal. Now, given the scale that India will really need for competing globally, what would it take to truly build sovereign, cost -efficient AI infrastructure that’s not just available to large enterprises, but is also very, very affordable for the long tail of innovators that we have in this country?

A. S. Rajgopal

Yeah, if you see the data center industry, it’s been pretty concentrated in Mumbai and a little bit in Chennai. And, you know, the other markets didn’t really take off as much as they should have. So what we are trying to do is to have, I mean, our current plan is to put about 100 megawatts of data centers in about six states. And what I see is that going forward, I mean, this could be the model that can be built on where each state has got a capacity. Because these states itself have got so much of consumption that can happen primarily because. if you start looking at applying AI into elevating the quality of education in India, which will be one of the first things that will get rolled out at scale in India, and also the healthcare aspects of it and citizen services, these things can require lots of computing capacity.

So we are working with few state governments to actually see if we can bring a total transformation, you know, actually consolidate their applications, bring about a data lake, and then apply data to it, sorry, intelligence to it, and take it to masses. So the way I think it will evolve is that there will be many more regions where data centers would spring up, and then when they’re distributed, they need to be interconnected. We have very good interconnect system, and not just the telcos, but you have things like, you know, we have railway networks, we have power networks which can actually assist the good connectivity between them. When these things come into play, actually, we can have a pretty distributed, a good amount of compute in India that can actually serve this aspect.

But you must be aware that, you know, this game is actually, I mean, if you see my context, I mean, I have four diamonds to work on. One, of course, is geopolitics. I mean, there is quite a lot that is happening. We need to ensure that we have access to the technologies that we want to bring to India. So that India actually works on the best available infrastructure. It is slightly better now, but, you know, there were restrictions before. The other aspect is the amount of money. I mean, so I think it requires multiple billion dollars of investments to do. And that should be facilitated. That should really come into the country. When we have the money piece sorted out and then we build the infrastructure, a very good, you know, a very good, you know, a very good, you know, a very good, you know, a very good, you know, a very good, you know, a very good, you know, a very good, you know, a very good, you know, But the good thing that we can leverage is open source.

I mean, when we leverage open source, we can actually combine the infrastructure and open source and bring down the cost of compute so much that it is actually palatable for the Indian citizens to use because it’s not about serving this 2 percent, 3 percent of the population which pays the income tax. It’s about serving the 90 percent others. The moment we succeed in doing this, I think the talent also, the good talent that we have, we have access to good talent in India, but we don’t have good talent. The quantity is missing. I mean, so we have good people, but, you know, you need many more good people. They’re going all over the world. We want to bring them back.

These people can come back when this money and infrastructure fall in place. Right. That would ensure that India is playing a role which is actually pretty balanced, leveraging the global technologies and leveraging local talent and actually setting the standard for the future. It’s a blueprint for all the other countries which don’t have. which may miss out this revolution and become digital colonies of the top two countries that are investing heavily in AI. So I personally believe we have a good blueprint, and the blueprint can be applied to multiple countries, and we are well on the path. And I would prefer a distributed development of data centers across the country so that we are closer to the users and we

Mridu Bhandari

Absolutely. Absolutely. Well, Professor, coming to you next, studies on digital competitiveness have consistently shown that institutional capacity often determines whether technology adoption really translates into economic value or not. Now, in the Indian context, what do we really need to do to really strengthen institutions and to really build the institutional muscle here? That ensures that AI drives very, very inclusive growth rather than deepening the tech divide, because there are already many divides that we are battling with.

Bhaskar Chakravarti

and I can then end up with a solution to the problem. So the same thing for skill building, literacy. If I can see my ability to speak, my ability to read in multiple languages improve, you know, suddenly my trust goes up. So what is the minimum amount of institutional safeguards I need to provide that? Then I come to something like health care. When people have a much bigger chasm to cross, that’s where people have a lot of concerns about, you know, should I be putting my information into the system? How is it going to be used? Can I trust the phone where I’ve relied on a doctor or relied on, you know, a wise person in my community?

I’ve relied on my mother, you know, for maternal health care advice. So how do I cross that chasm? You know, being able to provide the foundational trust elements is going to be important. So the answer to your question, the long answer is it depends. It depends on the user. As is the case to a lot of questions about India, it depends, right?

Mridu Bhandari

Well, Manish, you know, globally, we are seeing nations tie AI strategy to strategic autonomy. Now, whether it comes to the semiconductor ecosystem or the supply chain, you know, the strategic autonomy is becoming extremely important for countries. For India, what are the two or three foundational capabilities that you think we need to build domestically in this decade to ensure that we are true creators of AI value and not just consumers?

Manish Gupta

Awesome. Great question, Midu. And, you know, we as a nation have proven ourselves to be phenomenal adopters of technology. You know, and the best example in my mind comes on UPI or digital payment. Ten years back, 11 years back, we were just not there. and today we are by far the largest consumers or the number of digital payments and the value of digital payments within India is multiple times of the second economy that does this, right? So that’s a great example of how we have been able to localize, democratize and proliferate the use of technology. So within that, I would really put on three hats here. The first and just, you know, inverting the pyramids, not starting with technology but starting with people.

We have really got to think away from the users to the developers. You know, it’s got to move from 1 billion users to 1 billion or 1 million or 10 million developers and that’s the skill set, that’s the IP that we are going to bring in because we’ve got that largest talent pool residing within the country. The second, and again, I heard you talk about semiconductor and supply chain. I think we have got to adopt the best that’s available. They’re globally. But equally, we’ve got to move, we’ve got to not just think about made in India. but talk about trusted in India and which is where work with organizations such as AISI, Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute to ensure that we are putting the right guardrails, putting the right governance policy and the entire institutional framework to ensure that the AI that we are building here is trusted.

And lastly, goes back to the same thing. And maybe I’ll use the same example. You know, we had the UPI of money. We need to have UPI of AI. Where we are, we are building that at scale using the data sources that we have. We have the largest ones and some of the initiatives that the government has taken, India AI mission. But equally think about AI Kosh. There are more than 7000 data sets that are now available to organizations of all sizes. Use that to ensure that we are developing for the country at the population scale through academia, through private sector, through startups, through MSMEs, all coming together. And that really represents. Be quiet. a consistent API layer that’s bringing theoretically, maybe even all of the data center and the compute capacity that we are creating as a part of AI mission to be one single layer that can be consumed by anybody and everybody across the nation to start to innovate on that, to start to develop on that.

So going back, I know a long answer, but if I were to summarize three things there, UPI of money to UPI of AI. You know, made in India, transitioning to trusted in India. And, you know, from a developer users to from a billion users to maybe a million or 10 million developers.

Mridu Bhandari

Made in India, but made for the world.

Manish Gupta

Absolutely.

Mridu Bhandari

All right. So I’m going to ask each one of you for a few concise takeaways today. Now, the blueprint that we are talking about that, you know, Dell Technologies has just unveiled talks about agile, trusted AI governance with sectoral baselines, testbeds, strong institutional coordination. Yet globalization, only what we’ve seen is that speed often beats cost. caution. And we are seeing, you know, some of the scary stuff coming out with AI as well. A lot of the experiments, a lot of, you know, agentic AI experiments that people are doing across the world, some of them call for caution. Now, in the Indian context, how do we stay globally competitive while also operationalizing very, very stringent safeguards?

And where should we really draw the line between the speed of innovation or innovation velocity and regulatory discipline? So, Rajgopal, if we can start with you,

A. S. Rajgopal

please. If you take the birth of Gen AI, I mean, it actually, I don’t think none of those rules were actually followed. And, you know, it was built on every data that was available in whatever form. Personally, you know, in most places, I’m actually trying to tell people, just it’s not about ignoring the risk factors of it, but I think the regulation should not curtail the innovation in the thinking that you know we should be restrictive about whatever we are working with and so one of the most important things is i think we should have less regulation in this place because i think overall the benefit you should look at ai like a utility i mean you will have more good with ai than with bad yes there are things that can be handled as we go along if you see what we do in cloud today we haven’t been able to sort out our security and you know data protection postures even today it’s an evolving journey and i think we will continuously catch up with the bad factors around the ai adoption and and that’s a journey it cannot start or stop or it can be implemented at a point in time so we should keep looking at those aspects and keep putting whether regulations or technology interventions to ensure that we handle the problem and we should keep looking at those aspects and keep putting whether regulations those pieces but we should go fast forward with implementation and adoption of And I see a lot of Indian enterprises really being reluctant in terms of adopting it, especially the larger ones.

But if you see in India, I think government will set the pace and the startups and the MSMEs will actually catch on from there. And the large enterprises will actually struggle to catch up with the amount of innovation that’s happening in these

Mridu Bhandari

Where does that reluctance come from? Like, what are the top three reasons large organizations are reluctant? One is, of course, the fact that it’s not easy to adopt and transform a large organization. And perhaps startups and SMEs have the benefit of the agility and the small scale that they’re at. What else?

A. S. Rajgopal

So I think the first issue is not about security and all that. I mean, about these aspects. But most importantly, I think a lot of people are struggling to imagine where to apply AI. And I think the moment we can understand that, you will start seeing that. that the benefits far outweigh the negative aspects of it. So I think that’s the first thing that people should look at, is to not just look at leveraging the Gen AI in its chatbot form, but actually really look at where you can deploy. I talked about that deduplication piece. We are working on more than 150 projects, and not all of them are bot -based. So that imagination is what is important, and once that imagination comes, the benefits will outweigh the negative aspects of whatever we

Mridu Bhandari

All right. Professor, final takeaway from you on speed versus caution.

Bhaskar Chakravarti

Yes, so if you think about speed, I always like to use the analogy of a car and a road. you can think about the speed that you can build into the car, the velocity of the Ferrari. And a lot of the conversations that have happened, not necessarily in this room, but in other rooms, is about the Ferraris, whether I’m talking about agentic AI or AI optimized for certain applications and the technical aspects, you know, really, really important. Now, if you take the Ferrari and you bring it into the Indian context, maybe it’s a Maruti or something else that I need to be talking about. But then the question is, what’s the road on which this Ferrari is going?

If it’s a dirt road full of potholes, even a Ferrari is not going to go very fast. So much of our conversation here is about that dirt road. And what are the things, what are the potholes that we need to fix? There’s one elephant on the table that we did not address, and I’m just going to leave it at that, which is when we talk about trust, there’s a whole bunch of things you can do from an institutional standpoint to build trust, transparency, explainability, and so on. There’s a huge issue that we need to think about, which is what is going to be the impact on jobs? What’s going to be the impact on jobs?

This is the youngest major country in the world. It’s also one of the least employed country in the world. And now with AI coming in, is that going to help boost jobs or is it going to take jobs away? If we don’t fix that problem, get ahead of that, all the trust we are talking about, all the institutions you build could come down. So part of the policy infrastructure here is to figure out what is the post AI jobs picture.

Mridu Bhandari

Absolutely. Manish, final word to you.

Manish Gupta

So, you know, I honestly don’t think that these are opposing forces. Agility versus security. And, you know, particularly in this in this side of technology, you cannot have them act as opposing. It’s really about building the frameworks that are going to take both of them together. This is fast evolving as a technology, but equally as as as institutions will have to be faster than that in evolving. I think the government has done a phenomenal job in building some of the frameworks around that, you know, and the and the institutions, the ASI as one example. on the privacy side, DPDP or DEPA, all of those acts being there, are good frameworks to start with. And I’ll just index back on the question that you had asked Raj Gopal earlier on what is the hesitation from enterprises in adopting.

I don’t think it’s necessarily about security. You know, it’s really about saying how many of those have real use cases? While the real use cases exist, how many of them are able to monetize or are able to see them scale from experimentation or pilots into production? And I think that’s a job that we as industry folks who understand the technology, who are innovating in this space, really need to bring to the table so that we can bring this to the fore across the nation and enterprises and organizations of all sizes and academia and public. I think that’s where this will get practical, but equally these are not opposing

Mridu Bhandari

Right. Well, thank you, gentlemen, for that absolutely incredible conversation. You know, the takeaway is clear that investing, innovating and, of course, innovating by expanding skills pipelines and accelerating AI deployment is going to be key to India’s sovereign AI infrastructure. And appreciate you joining us here and taking the time today. We are also very delighted to now be joined by Honorable Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji, Minister of State for Education and Minister of Skill Development. Huge round of applause. We are going to have him up here shortly. Thank you, gentlemen. Thank you very much for joining us. So if we can have you up here for a quick photo op and we will then continue the conversation.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, everyone. Thank you. Thank you, gentlemen. Manish, if I can please request you to felicitate our speakers. Mr. Rajgopal. Let’s have a huge round of applause for our panelists here today. Professor Bhaskar Chakravarti. thank you so much for joining us here today if you all can just get off the stage for two minutes we are getting it ready for our next conversation thank you so much well ladies and gentlemen time to move on now if India’s AI ambition is to translate into real economic growth it’s obviously not going to be any one entity’s job it is not going to be driven only by the government or by the industry alone it will be driven by partnership India has the talent the digital backbone and the momentum the real question though is how do we scale AI responsibly securely and inclusively so our next fireside chat conversation will explore what is the role of AI in the development of the future what a powerful public -private model regarding AI could really look like.

And for this, I’m delighted to welcome two very eminent leaders who are instrumental in shaping the journey, both from policy and industry perspectives. We have, of course, Honorable Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji, Minister of State for Education and Minister of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, Independent Charge, Government of India. And we have Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Special Advisor to the Vice Chairman and COO, Dell Technologies Global. If I can please have both of you up here for a quick conversation. Thank you so much. Thank you very much. Thank you, gentlemen. Well, it’s quite clear that public -private partnership is going to be critical to AI scaling and adoption in India. You know, Chaudhary, if I can start with you, how can PPP models really, how can PPP accelerate?

large scale AI infrastructure? What have been some of the on ground experiences you’ve seen so far? And of course, the government has been moving at breakneck speed when it comes to deploying more technology, sort of, you know, giving a more fillip to innovation in India. How are you really ensuring trust, resilience and long term national competitiveness as AI becomes very mainstream with this event in India?

Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji

In the Indian context, as the audience is aware, we had a lot of catching up to do. And it’s fair to say that a lot of what we are seeing around us in AI has been facilitated by creating an ecosystem in a short span of time. Perhaps we may enjoy a second mover advantage with regards to this technology. And that has come about only because of a strong top down emphasis and push. the only reason why this event is happening here in India is because the leadership at the top understood very quickly the value and the potential of this new technology that we should not view it as a disruption but view it as an opportunity to leapfrog legacy problems deficit problems and provide access and equity to our citizens and dignity to our workers and that’s why prime minister you know the last event in France shared that leadership space every opportunity he gets he talks about skilling about young people about the potential for AI and the enunciation in manner of that this technology needs to be human -centric I think that has given us a real emphasis and a push for the academia for our industry for our vibrant startups systems you know to really think about what they are doing in this space I think that is the background to the event that we are all witnessing.

Thousands and thousands of people, casual visitors, apart from those who are already entrenched in technology. And the message that goes out is that one billion strong young people in a developing country are already thinking about what AI means to them and what they can do in this space. Not just be consumers, but also be producers and innovators and thinkers and creators. Now, PPP in this domain for me, and when you think about Manav being human centric, citizen centric, the P that really matters is the people. And in that context, it’s important that you have the broad architecture which is open. This is something that India has stood for from the beginning. When there was a lot of debate about what should be the policy that enables AI.

But there was also a lot of fear around AI about trust factors, about privacy, data, sovereignty, multiple issues about the human interface, the augmented human worker, what this means for education, for the future of jobs. A lot of those issues were being discussed and debated. And India said that, yes, it’s good to have a strategy. And out of that strategy and experiences will evolve a robust policy. It is essential to have guardrails. But it is a starting point. Currently, we don’t want to infringe upon the possibility of innovation. And India took that approach. And we had open access to whatever compute, you know, India AI mission was set up with a target of 18 ,000 GPUs. And in a short span, they’ve surpassed it.

It’s about 38 ,000. And a roadmap is by the end of this year, it’s going to cross one lakh, threefold. now think about it all of this compute facility that has been created is a model of ppp it has to be housed in educational institutions so that real research can happen in our premier educational institutions this is a great time when academia is more important than it perhaps ever was in the indian context in the indian context academia was partly separated from industry and the real economy in our minds but now every indian citizen is realizing the value of research and innovation every family is saying that no this is important we must value it and every educational institution is saying that we are not divorced from the market and needs of our community and society and nationhood building so that engagement with nationhood building and concept of technology is deeply immersed thanks to the efforts of india ai mission and here i’ll just you know leave one data point to you what is the cost of this compute facility it’s being provided for startups, for researchers at 65 rupees for an hour.

You pay 300 rupees for a couple of hours PVR cinema ticket. So it’s probably the world’s cheapest compute facility which is open. We are celebrating Sarvam. Let’s not focus on for profit not for profit. Because everything has to be for people. If you look at Sarvam, that’s also in my mind a PPP. It’s been incubated by IIT Madras. It has been supported by AI mission. So that’s another example because you’re right. Government cannot invest in from data to energy to compute to innovation. It really has to come from our citizens, our researchers, our technologists. It’s a collective mission.

Mridu Bhandari

Absolutely. Well, Dr. Mohindra getting your point of view from perspective now, if we look at PPP as far as job enablement is concerned, because that’s the big concern that citizens have that what’s going to happen to our jobs. And of course, skilling is part of that journey. How can Dell partner with, you know, Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship? What are you all doing from a future skill labs perspective? How are you accelerating AI apprenticeships, so that basically the jobs also move beyond the metros, because tier two, tier three towns is where, you know, we are looking at a lot of talent sitting there, but we are looking at a lack of access of sorts when it comes to skilling?

Dr. Vivek Mohindra

Yeah, I think that’s a great question. And I think, Honorable Minister, good to see you again. It reminds me of a discussion we had back in last time we met in October 2024. I know we missed each other and often. And we covered very similar ground. I think at the heart of it, it does come down to, and I commend India on the progress it’s made in making access to all these GPUs available. It is an industry -academia partnership, working closely with the minister here. And our view is when you think about skilling, there are three different levels. You have to think about schooling. You have to think about college level. And you have to think about employment.

People entering the workforce are employed today. And you think about delivery of this through online, in -person, incubation. So those are the two big dimensions. And from our perspective, we are very excited to partner on extending it to Tier 2, Tier 3, working closely with the minister and other institutions in India. And the core of it, having accessibility to this GPU at such an amazing price point, really unlocks the potential. And I think as Minister and I, we have to be very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very,

Mridu Bhandari

Right. Well, finally, to both of you, now, as we embed AI into all our critical sectors, whether it’s BFSI or telecom or agriculture, healthcare, education, now governance has to move from intent to very, very strong operational safeguards. What does Zero Trust AI architecture then practically look like at a national level? Minister, if we can start with you.

Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji

Well, Zero Trust, it’s an interesting terminology. For me, the way I look at it, it means that you have to be able to verify each and every protocol in your design. And in India, we generate a lot of data. Everything, and Indian citizens are quite open about access. globally privacy has been a major concern and sometimes it becomes also an impediment for governance because those data points aren’t being collected, analyzed, researched. In the Indian context, citizens are okay about sharing their data. And I’m saying this with the knowledge that, you know, crores of upper IDs have been formed, created using consent. But we have not received any blowback. In a way, from students’ families saying that, why are you?

Because they understand that if we are able to, with technology, customize and tailor our experience in the classroom for every student, where no student can get left behind, what that means for the employability, for the knowledge acquisition for that student, for the quality of their educational experience is immense. So I think, but once you’re collecting the data, there is a lot of… effort that needs to be put in so that that trust is maintained from zero trust to 100 % trust in the public mind. So I think our data sets need to be segmented. There are protocols within Government of India. In education, we’re thinking of creating a complete AI stack, which means the anonymized data sets will be made available for researchers for creating the value for the layers of innovation, for enabling startups to engage with that data that Government of India and the citizens have shared.

Similarly, in skill, we have Skill India Digital Hub, which is also looking at creating those data sets, which can then really help us unleash the next wave of innovation and requirement that we have in skilling. So I think once you have that system design in place, it can be achieved. The prime minister spoke about a label for content. That it should be verifiable and legal. this technology and consumer awareness is a big aspect of it and how we engage with these tools and how we understand what the outcome of our engagement, how true is it? How is it verifiable? Where are these AI models trained? Is there any bias in that data set? All that knowledge needs to be out there for the consumers.

I feel also that there needs to be an audit trail for our new AI models. Maybe in the future you could have CAG come out with an audit report of all the AI models. So it’s a brave new future, but it’s a balance. For partnership at scale, you need architecture with trust.

Mridu Bhandari

Absolutely. Final 30 seconds to you, Dr. Mohindra.

Dr. Vivek Mohindra

I think the minister said it very eloquently. I would extend the notion to zero trust should extend to start with data, go into AI models. the usability, the cybersecurity elements, and the identity and access management. Those would be the ways I would extend it. And practically, it means beyond the governance framework, having things like a national risk registry, observability, being able to report whenever there is an infraction and auditability. But, Minister, you said it very eloquently, and I think our AI blueprint has more details that would be worth looking at.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (16)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (2)
Confirmedhigh

“Dr Vivek Mohindra presented the macro‑level data that underpins the Blueprint: AI‑related compute in India is projected to exceed 10 exaflops and AI workloads are expected to grow at a compound annual rate of more than 30 % over the next few years. He then outlined the three inter‑linked pillars of the Blueprint – Invest, Innovate and Evolve.”

The knowledge base notes that Dr Vivek Mohindra from Dell Technologies presented a comprehensive AI blueprint built upon three foundational pillars designed to position India as a global AI leader, matching the Invest, Innovate and Evolve framework described in the report [S1].

!
Correctionhigh

“A. S. Rajgopal highlighted a critical supply‑side bottleneck: India currently possesses only 40‑50 k GPUs, far short of the roughly 200 k GPUs he estimates are needed to meet demand.”

The knowledge base estimates that India needs at least 128,000 GPUs for domestic requirements, which is lower than the 200 k figure cited in the report and provides no data on the current 40-50 k stock, indicating the report’s numbers are not aligned with the source [S55] and [S56].

External Sources (89)
S1
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — -Dr. Vivek Mohindra- Special advisor to the vice chairman and COO of Dell Technologies Global
S2
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/driving-indias-ai-future-growth-innovation-and-impact — And for this, I’m delighted to welcome two very eminent leaders who are instrumental in shaping the journey, both from p…
S3
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/driving-indias-ai-future-growth-innovation-and-impact — Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, everyone. Thank you. Thank you, gentlemen. Manish, if I can please request you to felic…
S4
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, everyone. Thank you. Thank you, gentlemen. Manish, if I can please request you to felic…
S5
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — -Manish Gupta- President and Managing Director of Dell Technologies India
S6
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — -A. S. Rajgopal- Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of NextGen Cloud Technologies
S7
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/driving-indias-ai-future-growth-innovation-and-impact — A. S. Rajgopal: Yeah, actually, I think across many other countries that we have seen, India has got a much comprehensi…
S8
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/shaping-ais-story-trust-responsibility-real-world-outcomes — Absolutely, absolutely. Well, I’m going to come back to you with the knowledge that bringing the wish in, you know, in b…
S9
Shaping AI’s Story Trust Responsibility & Real-World Outcomes — -Mridu Bhandari- Moderator from Network18 This comprehensive discussion at the AI Impact Summit brought together leader…
S11
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — First, how do we continue to build the intellectual foundation? Second, how do we build manufacturing depth and supply c…
S12
Panel Discussion: 01 — Minister Patria highlighted additional systemic barriers, particularly geopolitical dynamics creating asymmetric conditi…
S13
Technology Regulation and AI Governance Panel Discussion — – Federico Sturzenegger- Maryam bint Ahmed Al Hammadi Legal and regulatory | Economic Regulatory Reform and Deregulati…
S14
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session — “We are partnering with Indian companies and startups end‑to‑end to build AI‑powered services.”[13]. “The Prime Minister…
S15
Opportunities of Cross-Border Data Flow-DFFT for Development | IGF 2023 WS #224 — Building trust is highlighted as a fundamental requirement for data governance in multilateral environments. Trust can b…
S16
Transforming Agriculture_ AI for Resilient and Inclusive Food Systems — “Data should be as the infrastructure.”[74]. “Often, the farmers don’t own, and then, of course, the… the model and th…
S17
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges — I would emphasize there’s two ingredients that are necessary, which often are associated with discussions of responsible…
S18
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council — Another session highlighted the need for transparency and accountability in AI algorithms. The speakers advocated for AI…
S19
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — Participant: ≫ Distinguished guests, dear friends, it is a great honor to speak to you today on a topic that is reshapin…
S20
Atelier #1 : « Infrastructures et services numériques à l’ère de l’IA : quels enjeux de régulation, de sécurité et de souveraineté des données ? » — Drudeisha Madhub Au pas de course et je découvre le concept de la conclusion évolutive. Ça veut dire qu’au départ on ann…
S21
Efforts to improve energy efficiency in high-performance computing for a Sustainable Future — The demand for high-performance computing (HPC) has surged due to technological advancements like machine learning, geno…
S22
The Battle for Chips — Additionally, India advocates for providing more opportunities, investments, and technology to countries with greater po…
S23
European Tech Sovereignty: Feasibility, Challenges, and Strategic Pathways Forward — Virkkunen articulated sovereignty as “having choice in partnerships, not being forced into dependencies,” emphasizing st…
S24
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/shaping-the-future-ai-strategies-for-jobs-and-economic-development — Governments willing to move decisively, private sector actors willing to collaborate, technologists willing to design fo…
S25
Empowering India & the Global South Through AI Literacy — Capacity development | Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development
S26
Keynotes — Oleksandr Bornyakov: Dear ladies and gentlemen, I’m honored to represent Ukraine today here in Strasbourg in the heart o…
S27
Leaders TalkX: When policy meets progress: paving the way for a fit for future digital world — Imedadze describes how Georgia’s COMCOM has evolved from being an oversight regulator to an enabler of transformation ov…
S28
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — “computer capability collaboration connectivity compliance and context”[3]. “From these discussions, there were six foun…
S29
Making the case for digital connectivity for MSME’s: How improved take up and usage of digital connectivity, in particular for ecommerce, supports development objectives (ITC) — Finally, the analysis discusses the potential economic gains from removing taxes on ICT. Studies conducted with the supp…
S30
Securing access to financing to digital startups and fast growing small businesses in developing countries ( MFUG Innovation Partners) — FAST, a financial services company, has made significant changes in how businesses operate amidst the pandemic. It start…
S31
WS #193 Cybersecurity Odyssey Securing Digital Sovereignty Trust — Adisa advocates for implementing zero trust architecture as a foundational policy pillar, which operates on the principl…
S32
Harnessing Collective AI for India’s Social and Economic Development — Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Data governance Professo…
S33
The Foundation of AI Democratizing Compute Data Infrastructure — “So we are identifying agriculture, education, healthcare, and some more.”[83]. “So inspire them that they can really do…
S34
Digital Public Infrastructure, Policy Harmonisation, and Digital Cooperation – AI, Data Governance,and Innovation for Development — A recurring theme was the importance of tailoring policies and technologies to local contexts. Adamma Isamade emphasized…
S35
Collaborative AI Network – Strengthening Skills Research and Innovation — Beatriz from Brazil’s government shared their approach of creating shared AI infrastructure and data ecosystems, particu…
S36
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw — This comment provides a philosophical and ethical framework for the entire biotech sovereignty agenda, showing how India…
S37
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI — As India advances in digital public infrastructure and its AI ambitions, the key is how we ensure these systems remain t…
S38
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development — “They are giving GPUs available at 65 rupees per month.”[119]. “so there are quite a few no no it’s public it’s all publ…
S39
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — Okay. GST waiver, income tax benefits, demands from the industry coming in. Professor Bhaskar, if I can come to you now….
S40
Foreword — – One threshold to establish from the outset is the minimum key features of devices that will enable people to use the i…
S41
IMF calls for new fiscal policies to address AI’s economic and environmental impacts — The International Monetary Fund (IMF) hasrecommendedfiscal policies for governments grappling with the economic impacts …
S42
Secure Finance Risk-Based AI Policy for the Banking Sector — Embedded governance is not regulatory burden.It is strategic imperative.It ensures that innovation is sustainable, trust…
S43
Trust in Tech: Navigating Emerging Technologies and Human Rights in a Connected World — 4. **Transparency and Due Process**: Translucency in the regulatory creation and implementation is deemed essential for …
S44
Keynotes — Marianne Wilhelmsen: but as Norway prepares for the upcoming IGF 2025, I look forward to welcoming many of you in June a…
S45
Policymaker’s Guide to International AI Safety Coordination — OECD Secretary General Mathias Cormann emphasized that trust is built through inclusion and objective evidence. He ident…
S46
The Impact of Digitalisation and AI on Employment Quality – Challenges and Opportunities — Mr. Sher Verick:Great. Well, thank you very much. It’s a real pleasure to be with you here today. I think Janine updated…
S47
AI-Powered Chips and Skills Shaping Indias Next-Gen Workforce — I was just going to say, I think, I joke around that I only want LAM to benefit from this, but I think we’re seeing othe…
S48
Keynote-Roy Jakobs — This comment introduces a systems-thinking perspective that acknowledges the complexity of AI implementation beyond just…
S49
Safe Digital Futures for Children: Aligning Global Agendas | IGF 2023 WS #403 — The analysis examines topics such as online crime, the dark web, internet fragmentation, internet companies, innovation,…
S50
WS #31 Cybersecurity in AI: balancing innovation and risks — Dr. Alison: Thank you, I’m just checking. That’s great, thank you. So just very quick, Zero Trust 101, I’m sure you’…
S51
Building Trusted AI at Scale – Keynote Anne Bouverot — Innovation and protection can and must go hand in hand
S52
Tackling disinformation in electoral context — While some regulation is necessary, over-regulation should be avoided as it could stifle innovation and growth in the di…
S53
Tokenisation and the Future of Global Finance: A World Economic Forum 2026 Panel Discussion — Legal and regulatory | Economic Regulation and innovation must work together, not in opposition Regulation vs Innovati…
S54
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — And that’s where the investment readiness comes in. So we’re talking to countries, and we’ve had this conversation with …
S55
Indias Roadmap to an AGI-Enabled Future — -Compute Infrastructure and GPU Requirements: Analysis of India’s current and projected compute needs, with estimates su…
S56
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact — The government’s response through the India AI Mission has established a shared compute framework providing access to 38…
S57
Revisiting 10 AI and digital forecasts for 2025: Predictions and Reality — Additionally,public-private partnershipsare essential for scaling sustainability initiatives. Companies invest in on-sit…
S58
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — Public-private partnerships are essential for scaling investments, with government de-risking enterprises without direct…
S59
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — – Qi Xiaoxia- Dai Wei- Ricardo Pelayo Development | Economic | Capacity development Innovation Ecosystems and Practica…
S60
AI data centre boom sparks incentives and pushback — The explosive growth of AI and cloud computing hasignited a data centre building boomacross the United States, with stat…
S61
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact — Thank you so much, Dr. Mohindra. I’m going to request you to please stay back on stage. I’d also like to invite Manish G…
S62
Leaders TalkX: Towards a safer connected world: collaborative strategies to strengthen digital trust and cyber resilience — Public-Private Partnerships and Innovation Thailand’s approach to ICT development is founded on three pillars: co-creat…
S63
Leveraging AI4All_ Pathways to Inclusion — Three interconnected pillars needed: design, access, and investment – Three Pillars Framework
S64
IGF 2019 Final Report — For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) the Internet and digital technologies facilitate access to new customers, …
S65
Making the case for digital connectivity for MSME’s: How improved take up and usage of digital connectivity, in particular for ecommerce, supports development objectives (ITC) — Finally, the analysis discusses the potential economic gains from removing taxes on ICT. Studies conducted with the supp…
S66
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access — And I thought, how do we quantify this? So we, and I think we have already spoken to Calpa about this. We’re working, I …
S67
Collaborative Innovation Ecosystem and Digital Transformation: Accelerating the Achievement of Global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — Described SMEs as having small funding scale support, insufficient upgrading capabilities, weak competitiveness and risk…
S68
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — Jigar highlights that trust encompasses accuracy, data privacy, and transparent model governance.
S69
Harnessing Collective AI for India’s Social and Economic Development — Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Data governance Professo…
S70
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development — The emphasis on collaboration over displacement provides a framework for managing workforce transitions while capturing …
S71
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — Dai Wei: Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, good day to you all. I’m delighted to join you in this United Natio…
S72
Democratizing AI Building Trustworthy Systems for Everyone — “of course see there would be a number of challenges but i think as i mentioned that one doesn’t need to really control …
S73
WSIS Action Line C2 Information and communication infrastructure — **Joshua Ku** from GitHub concluded the panel by demonstrating how open-source approaches can accelerate AI and infrastr…
S74
Collaborative AI Network – Strengthening Skills Research and Innovation — Beatriz from Brazil’s government shared their approach of creating shared AI infrastructure and data ecosystems, particu…
S75
Keynote Adresses at India AI Impact Summit 2026 — India’s Technological Capabilities and Strategic Positioning Multiple speakers emphasised India’s unique combination of…
S76
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw — Deep science requires a lot of research and development. It requires patient capital. But the societal and economic retu…
S77
Closing remarks — This transcript captures the closing remarks from the AI for Good Summit 2025, delivered by ITU Secretary-General Doreen…
S78
What policy levers can bridge the AI divide? — ## Forward-Looking Perspectives ## Infrastructure as Foundation ## International Cooperation and Knowledge Sharing ##…
S79
Keynote-Rishi Sunak — Artificial intelligence | International collaboration (captured under Artificial intelligence) The moderator formally w…
S80
Open Forum #82 Catalyzing Equitable AI Impact the Role of International Cooperation — – Transparent and inclusive processes for shaping the summit’s outcomes Amandeep Singh Gil: Thank you. And thank you to…
S81
Panel Discussion AI & Cybersecurity _ India AI Impact Summit — “Let today’s steps of the network build tomorrow’s bigger strides”[66]. “We have deployed our vast and rich network of i…
S82
Keynote-Jeet Adani — Drawing historical parallels, Adani compared sovereign compute capacity to previous eras of strategic infrastructure dev…
S83
 Network Evolution: Challenges and Solutions  — Miguel González-Sancho from the European Commission provided insights into the EU White Paper, which outlines the challe…
S84
Empowering Workers in the Age of AI — Development | Economic Digital skills development should be structured in three levels: universal basic digital literac…
S85
Welfare for All Ensuring Equitable AI in the Worlds Democracies — “we actually doing it while they are billable because when they become non billable that’s not when you want it…”[105]…
S86
Transcript from the hearing — Also, I think we should be very careful to do this with our allies in the world and not do it alone. There is, first, we…
S87
Opening of the session — Cuba: Gracias, Senor President. Thank you, Chair. Chair, we have reached the final meeting, the final session, rather, o…
S88
Masterclass#1 — Gregor Ramus :I guess I’ll start. Yes, go ahead. The question started with me. And this is a question actually that we g…
S89
Session — Gabriele Mazzini: Yeah, I tried to cover as much as I can all those questions. Yeah, first of all, I think, you know, th…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
D
Dr. Vivek Mohindra
3 arguments160 words per minute1078 words402 seconds
Argument 1
Blueprint outlines investment in compute & energy, innovation via skilling, and evolution through agile governance (Dr. Vivek Mohindra)
EXPLANATION
Dr. Mohindra presented a three‑pillar AI blueprint for India, focusing on investing in compute and energy infrastructure, innovating through widespread skilling, and evolving with agile, responsible governance. He emphasized that these pillars together enable sovereign AI potential through public‑private partnership.
EVIDENCE
He described the investment pillar covering compute and energy infrastructure needed for universal access, especially for MSMEs, and noted the need for policy and practical actions [18-22]. He then explained the innovate pillar as centred on skilling from schools to workforce and the evolve pillar as requiring agile regulatory frameworks that balance innovation with responsibility [23-32].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The AI blueprint and its three pillars (invest, innovate, evolve) are described in the summit overview and the panel introduction [S1]; the partnership model for skilling with ministries is highlighted in the Leaders’ Plenary discussion [S14]; broader AI literacy and coordinated national effort are emphasized in the AI literacy report [S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Blueprint and Three‑Pillar Strategy
AGREED WITH
Mridu Bhandari, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Argument 2
Advocates an agile, balanced regulatory regime that protects while fostering rapid AI innovation (Dr. Vivek Mohindra)
EXPLANATION
Dr. Mohindra argued that AI regulations must be agile and adaptable, striking a balance between encouraging innovation and ensuring responsibility. He stressed that regulatory frameworks should not be anchored to outdated technologies.
EVIDENCE
He highlighted the need for a regulatory framework that balances innovation with responsibility and must be agile to keep pace with fast-moving AI technologies [28-32].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Regulatory reform that balances innovation with safeguards is discussed in the AI Governance panel [S13]; evolving regulatory frameworks tailored to national contexts are noted in the regulatory evolution session [S20]; systemic barriers and the need for adaptable rules are raised in the systemic barriers discussion [S12].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Trust, Governance, and Regulatory Framework
AGREED WITH
Manish Gupta, Bhaskar Chakravarti, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
DISAGREED WITH
A. S. Rajgopal
Argument 3
Outlines a three‑tier skilling model (school, college, employment) and partnership with ministries to deliver AI apprenticeships nationwide (Dr. Vivek Mohindra)
EXPLANATION
Dr. Mohindra described a three‑level approach to AI skill development covering schooling, higher education, and on‑the‑job training, delivered through online, in‑person, and incubation modes. He highlighted Dell’s willingness to partner with the Ministry of Skill Development to extend apprenticeships to Tier‑2 and Tier‑3 regions.
EVIDENCE
He identified three levels-schooling, college, and employment-and noted delivery through online, in-person, and incubation, emphasizing partnership with the ministry to reach Tier-2 and Tier-3 towns and the importance of affordable GPU access [373-381].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The three-level skill development approach and ministry partnership are detailed in the Leaders’ Plenary on skilling initiatives [S14]; AI literacy and capacity-building programmes are referenced in the AI literacy report [S25]; the blueprint’s innovation pillar includes skilling across education levels [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Public‑Private Partnerships (PPP) and Skill Development
M
Manish Gupta
6 arguments174 words per minute1181 words405 seconds
Argument 1
Emphasises need for explainability, trust, and sustainable data‑center design within the governance pillar (Manish Gupta)
EXPLANATION
Manish Gupta stressed that governance must incorporate explainability of AI outcomes, build trust through transparency, and adopt energy‑efficient, sustainable data‑center designs. These elements are essential for responsible AI deployment at scale.
EVIDENCE
He discussed explainability and trust as core to governance, noting that explainable AI helps users understand outcomes [151-154], and highlighted the importance of energy-efficient, sustainable data-center architectures as a competitive differentiator [160-162].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Trust infrastructure components such as transparency and data-governance are outlined in the cross-border data flow discussion [S15]; the importance of transparency and reproducibility for trusted AI is highlighted in the Scaling Trusted AI paper [S17]; energy-efficient high-performance computing designs are examined in the sustainability of HPC study [S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Trust, Governance, and Regulatory Framework
Argument 2
Stresses explainability, auditability and a unified “UPI of AI” API layer to embed trust in applications (Manish Gupta)
EXPLANATION
Manish Gupta called for a unified API layer—likened to a UPI for AI—that would provide standardized access to data and compute, ensuring explainability and auditability across applications. This would foster trust and democratize AI innovation.
EVIDENCE
He highlighted the need for explainability and auditability to build trust [151-154] and described a “UPI of AI” that would create a consistent API layer for nationwide data and compute consumption [221-244].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The concept of a national “UPI of AI” for standardized data and compute access is explicitly mentioned in the discussion on unified AI services [S2]; the shift toward a developer-centric ecosystem and common API layer is reinforced in the Open Forum summary [S19].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Trust, Governance, and Regulatory Framework
Argument 3
Calls for shifting focus from billions of users to millions of developers, creating a “UPI of AI” ecosystem for inclusive innovation (Manish Gupta)
EXPLANATION
Manish Gupta argued that India should move from a user‑centric model to a developer‑centric ecosystem, cultivating millions of AI developers to drive inclusive innovation. He linked this shift to the “UPI of AI” concept that would provide a common platform for data and compute.
EVIDENCE
He noted the need to transition from a billion users to millions of developers and described the “UPI of AI” as a consistent API layer enabling nationwide innovation [226-244].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The move from a user-centric to a developer-centric model is highlighted in the Open Forum remarks on building an AI developer community [S19]; the same discussion references the need for a unified AI platform analogous to UPI [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Public‑Private Partnerships (PPP) and Skill Development
Argument 4
Highlights energy‑efficient, sustainable data‑center architectures as a competitive differentiator (Manish Gupta)
EXPLANATION
Manish Gupta pointed out that energy efficiency and sustainability in data‑center design are crucial for India’s AI competitiveness, reducing operational costs while supporting widespread access.
EVIDENCE
He referenced the importance of energy-efficient, sustainable data-center architectures as a key pillar for practical AI adoption and differentiation [160-162].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Sustainable, energy-efficient HPC and data-center designs are discussed in the report on improving energy efficiency in high-performance computing [S21]; the Scaling Trusted AI paper also stresses sustainable architecture as a differentiator [S17].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building Sovereign, Cost‑Efficient AI Infrastructure
Argument 5
Calls for domestic capabilities in semiconductors and trusted‑in‑India hardware to achieve strategic autonomy (Manish Gupta)
EXPLANATION
Manish Gupta emphasized the need for India to develop indigenous semiconductor and hardware capabilities, moving from “made in India” to “trusted in India” to secure strategic autonomy in AI.
EVIDENCE
He advocated adopting the best global technologies while ensuring they are trusted in India, mentioning work with organizations like the Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute to embed guardrails and governance [229-235].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
India’s push for chip sovereignty and indigenized semiconductor capabilities is examined in the Battle for Chips analysis [S22]; European perspectives on strategic autonomy echo similar goals for indigenous tech capacity [S23]; the Global Power Shift briefing calls for sovereign AI capability and indigenization of critical components [S11].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building Sovereign, Cost‑Efficient AI Infrastructure
Argument 6
States that speed and security are not opposing forces; they require integrated frameworks and real use‑case monetisation (Manish Gupta)
EXPLANATION
Manish Gupta argued that agility and security can coexist through integrated frameworks, emphasizing the need for real, monetizable AI use cases to drive adoption rather than viewing regulation as a barrier.
EVIDENCE
He said agility and security are not opposing, and highlighted the importance of frameworks that combine both, along with the need for real use-cases to be monetized and scaled from pilots to production [291-300].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Balanced regulatory approaches that do not hinder rapid innovation are discussed in the AI Governance panel [S13]; evolving frameworks that integrate security considerations are highlighted in the regulatory evolution session [S20].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Balancing Innovation Speed with Safeguards
M
Mridu Bhandari
2 arguments135 words per minute1976 words875 seconds
Argument 1
Positions AI as a catalyst for economic growth, social empowerment, and global leadership, calling for a coordinated national effort (Mridu Bhandari)
EXPLANATION
Mridu framed AI as a driver of India’s economic growth, social empowerment, and global leadership, urging coordinated action across sectors to harness AI’s potential.
EVIDENCE
She opened the session stating that AI drives economic growth, social empowerment, and global leadership for India and called the discussion a “call to action” [2-3]. Later she reiterated the blueprint’s focus on invest, innovate, and evolve pillars to translate ambition into nation-scale execution [46-48].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The moderator’s opening remarks frame AI as a driver of growth and empowerment and call for coordinated action [S9]; the AI literacy and development report underscores AI’s role in socio-economic advancement [S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Blueprint and Three‑Pillar Strategy
AGREED WITH
Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Argument 2
Describes the blueprint’s three pillars—invest, innovate, evolve—and frames the upcoming panel as translating them into actionable steps (Mridu Bhandari)
EXPLANATION
She summarized the blueprint’s three pillars and introduced the panel to discuss concrete actions for scaling AI across India, emphasizing the need for inclusive execution.
EVIDENCE
She explained that the blueprint centers on investing in sovereign compute and data foundations, innovating with collaboration and a future-ready workforce, and evolving into responsible, agile governance [46-48].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The summit overview presents the invest-innovate-evolve pillars of the AI blueprint [S1]; the Global Power Shift briefing reiterates the three-pillar strategy for sovereign AI capability [S11]; the Leaders’ Plenary summarizes the blueprint’s actionable roadmap [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI Blueprint and Three‑Pillar Strategy
A
A. S. Rajgopal
4 arguments173 words per minute1866 words644 seconds
Argument 1
Calls for GST waiver and income‑tax benefits to lower upfront infrastructure costs for firms (A. S. Rajgopal)
EXPLANATION
Rajgopal suggested that removing GST on imported servers and providing income‑tax incentives would reduce upfront costs for AI infrastructure, making it more affordable for startups and MSMEs.
EVIDENCE
He explained that GST is currently paid on imported servers, increasing costs by about 18 %, and proposed waiving GST at the point of import and offering income-tax benefits to lower the financial burden [89-92].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Access to Compute for Startups and MSMEs
AGREED WITH
Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji, Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Manish Gupta
DISAGREED WITH
Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Argument 2
Highlights existing government GPU subsidies but stresses the shortage of units and the need for massive scale‑up (A. S. Rajgopal)
EXPLANATION
Rajgopal noted that while the government offers subsidized GPU access, the current supply (40‑50 k GPUs) falls far short of the estimated need (≈200 k GPUs), calling for substantial investment and deployment.
EVIDENCE
He referenced the GPU subsidy scheme where startups can apply for GPUs at subsidized rates, but highlighted that India currently has only 40-50 k GPUs versus an estimated need of 200 k GPUs, indicating a major shortfall [68-72].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The discussion notes the government’s GPU subsidy scheme and the current limited inventory, emphasizing the gap between supply and demand [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Access to Compute for Startups and MSMEs
Argument 3
Proposes distributed data‑centers across multiple states, leveraging rail and power networks for connectivity and resilience (A. S. Rajgopal)
EXPLANATION
Rajgopal outlined a plan to build roughly 100 MW of data‑center capacity in six states, using existing rail and power infrastructure to interconnect regional centers, thereby creating a distributed, sovereign compute fabric.
EVIDENCE
He described the current concentration of data centers in Mumbai and Chennai and the plan to deploy 100 MW across six states, leveraging rail and power networks for inter-connectivity and resilience [167-176].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building Sovereign, Cost‑Efficient AI Infrastructure
Argument 4
Emphasises open‑source software and multi‑billion‑dollar investment to lower compute costs and ensure sovereignty (A. S. Rajgopal)
EXPLANATION
Rajgopal argued that combining massive financial investment with open‑source solutions can dramatically reduce compute costs, making AI accessible to the majority of the population and preserving sovereign control.
EVIDENCE
He mentioned the need for multiple billions of dollars of investment and highlighted that leveraging open-source can bring down compute costs, enabling affordable access for the 90 % of the population not currently served [182-188].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Building Sovereign, Cost‑Efficient AI Infrastructure
B
Bhaskar Chakravarti
2 arguments183 words per minute1314 words430 seconds
Argument 1
Identifies “trust infrastructure” – transparency, data‑governance, privacy, district‑level implementation – as the key non‑technical bottleneck (Bhaskar Chakravarti)
EXPLANATION
Bhaskar highlighted that beyond technical infrastructure, the most critical factor for AI adoption is a robust trust infrastructure encompassing transparency, data governance, privacy, and localized implementation across districts.
EVIDENCE
He described trust infrastructure as involving transparency, data-governance, privacy, and the need for district-level execution, noting that while India enjoys high public trust, institutional mechanisms for trust are still developing [113-135].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Trust infrastructure components such as transparency, data governance, and privacy are detailed in the cross-border data flow session [S15]; the Scaling Trusted AI paper adds emphasis on transparency and reproducibility [S17]; the UN Security Council briefing stresses accountability and documentation for AI systems [S18].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Trust, Governance, and Regulatory Framework
Argument 2
Uses “Ferrari on a dirt road” analogy to argue that rapid AI progress must be matched by robust institutional “road” (Bhaskar Chakravarti)
EXPLANATION
He compared fast AI capabilities (a Ferrari) to the need for solid institutional foundations (a good road), warning that without proper governance, infrastructure, and trust, rapid AI advancement cannot be sustained.
EVIDENCE
He employed the Ferrari-on-a-dirt-road metaphor, stating that even a high-performance AI system cannot thrive on a weak institutional “road” filled with potholes, emphasizing the need to fix those gaps [275-282].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Balancing Innovation Speed with Safeguards
S
Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
4 arguments148 words per minute1259 words508 seconds
Argument 1
Announces ultra‑low‑cost compute facilities (≈ 65 ₹/hour) as a public‑private partnership outcome for researchers and startups (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
EXPLANATION
The Minister highlighted that India’s AI mission has created compute facilities priced at roughly 65 rupees per hour, making them among the world’s cheapest and demonstrating successful PPP delivery.
EVIDENCE
He cited that the compute facility costs 65 rupees per hour for researchers and startups, comparing it to a 300-rupee cinema ticket, and noted that the target of 18 000 GPUs has already been surpassed with 38 000 GPUs deployed [346-350].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Access to Compute for Startups and MSMEs
Argument 2
Describes PPP as the engine for scaling AI infrastructure, citing open, cheap compute and collaborative research hubs (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
EXPLANATION
He explained that public‑private partnerships have been crucial for rapidly building AI infrastructure, providing open, low‑cost compute and fostering collaborative research hubs such as the Sarvam initiative incubated by IIT Madras.
EVIDENCE
He discussed the top-down push for AI, the open-access compute model, and gave the Sarvam example as a PPP-driven research hub supported by the AI mission, emphasizing cheap compute and broad participation [326-349].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Public-private partnerships are credited with rapidly building open, low-cost compute resources and establishing the Sarvam research hub in the summit discussion [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Public‑Private Partnerships (PPP) and Skill Development
AGREED WITH
Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Mridu Bhandari
Argument 3
Proposes a Zero‑Trust AI architecture with verification, data segmentation, and audit trails at the national level (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
EXPLANATION
The Minister outlined a Zero‑Trust approach requiring verification of every protocol, segmentation of data, and comprehensive audit trails to maintain public trust in AI systems.
EVIDENCE
He described Zero-Trust as verifying each protocol, segmenting datasets, establishing audit trails, and ensuring transparency and legal verifiability of AI models, suggesting future CAG audits of AI systems [386-408].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The trust infrastructure framework calls for verification, segmentation, and auditability, aligning with the Zero-Trust recommendations in the regulatory evolution session [S20] and the trust infrastructure guidelines [S15].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Trust, Governance, and Regulatory Framework
Argument 4
Highlights the need for a national risk registry, observability, and auditability as practical zero‑trust safeguards (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
EXPLANATION
He called for concrete mechanisms such as a national risk registry, continuous observability, and auditability to operationalize Zero‑Trust AI at scale.
EVIDENCE
He mentioned that beyond governance frameworks, practical safeguards include a national risk registry, observability, reporting infractions, and auditability, linking these to the AI blueprint’s detailed recommendations [410-416].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Concrete safeguards such as a national risk registry, continuous observability, and auditability are outlined in the trust infrastructure and zero-trust discussions [S15]; further elaborated in the evolving regulatory frameworks session [S20].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Balancing Innovation Speed with Safeguards
Agreements
Agreement Points
Public‑private partnership (PPP) is essential to scale AI infrastructure and drive India’s AI ambition
Speakers: Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Mridu Bhandari, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Blueprint outlines investment in compute & energy, innovation via skilling, and evolution through agile governance (Dr. Vivek Mohindra) Positions AI as a catalyst for economic growth, social empowerment, and global leadership, calling for a coordinated national effort (Mridu Bhandari) Describes PPP as the engine for scaling AI infrastructure, citing open, cheap compute and collaborative research hubs (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
All three speakers stress that combining public resources and private innovation through PPPs is the key mechanism to realise sovereign AI potential, accelerate infrastructure rollout and ensure inclusive benefits [32-34][1-3][326-334].
Compute must be affordable and widely accessible for startups and MSMEs
Speakers: A. S. Rajgopal, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji, Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Manish Gupta
Calls for GST waiver and income‑tax benefits to lower upfront infrastructure costs for firms (A. S. Rajgopal) Announces ultra‑low‑cost compute facilities (~65 ₹/hour) as a PPP outcome for researchers and startups (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji) Investment pillar covers compute infrastructure to ensure everybody has access, including MSMEs (Dr. Vivek Mohindra) Highlights democratising AI access via sustainable data‑center designs and distributed capacity (Manish Gupta)
The panel concurs that high-cost GPU/compute is a bottleneck; policy levers (GST waiver, tax incentives) and low-price public compute resources are needed to enable SMEs to adopt AI at scale [68-72][89-92][18-20][161-162].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The government has priced GPU access at roughly 65 rupees per month to democratize AI access for innovators, reflecting a policy focus on low-cost compute for startups [S38]; broader assessments of India’s compute needs underscore the necessity of affordable resources to meet projected demand [S55].
Building AI talent and skilling pipelines is critical for adoption
Speakers: Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Manish Gupta, A. S. Rajgopal, Bhaskar Chakravarti
Outlines a three‑tier skilling model (school, college, employment) and partnership with ministries (Dr. Vivek Mohindra) Calls for shifting focus from billions of users to millions of developers and a “UPI of AI” API layer to foster inclusive innovation (Manish Gupta) Emphasises the shortage of skilled talent and the need to attract Indian AI experts back home (A. S. Rajgopal) Highlights literacy and trust as part of the non‑technical bottleneck, stressing skill building for AI understanding (Bhaskar Chakravarti)
All agree that a robust, multi-level capacity-development strategy-from school curricula to a large developer community-is essential to translate AI potential into economic value [373-381][226-244][188-192][203-206].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Industry leaders note active development of talent pipelines and skilling programs to support AI initiatives, aligning with recommendations to couple compute investments with workforce readiness [S47]; international best-practice guides also stress talent readiness as a prerequisite for effective AI deployment [S54].
Governance must be agile, transparent and embed trust without stifling innovation
Speakers: Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Manish Gupta, Bhaskar Chakravarti, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Advocates an agile, balanced regulatory regime that protects while fostering rapid AI innovation (Dr. Vivek Mohindra) States that speed and security are not opposing; integrated frameworks and real use‑cases are needed (Manish Gupta) Identifies “trust infrastructure”—transparency, data‑governance, privacy—as the key non‑technical bottleneck (Bhaskar Chakravarti) Proposes a Zero‑Trust AI architecture with verification, data segmentation and audit trails (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
Consensus that AI governance should be flexible, incorporate explainability and auditability, and build a trust infrastructure (including zero-trust principles) to balance innovation velocity with responsibility [28-32][291-300][113-122][386-416].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy briefs argue that embedded governance-fairness, transparency, accountability-should be a strategic imperative rather than a regulatory burden, supporting agile yet trustworthy AI systems [S42]; transparency and due-process are highlighted as essential for societal trust [S43], and OECD guidance stresses balancing risk management with innovation speed [S45].
Sovereign, energy‑efficient data‑center infrastructure is needed for scalable AI
Speakers: Manish Gupta, A. S. Rajgopal, Dr. Vivek Mohindra
Highlights energy‑efficient, sustainable data‑center designs as a competitive differentiator (Manish Gupta) Proposes distributed data‑centers across states, leveraging rail and power networks for connectivity (A. S. Rajgopal) Notes that investment pillar includes energy infrastructure essential for compute (Dr. Vivek Mohindra)
All agree that building a sovereign, cost-effective AI compute fabric requires distributed, sustainable data-center capacity backed by reliable energy supply [160-162][170-176][20-21].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
India’s sovereign compute framework includes provisions for energy-efficient data-center design, echoing sustainability recommendations for AI infrastructure and the role of renewable energy in large-scale compute facilities [S56][S57]; similar concerns about data-center incentives and environmental impact are raised in global policy discussions [S60].
Similar Viewpoints
Both argue that regulation should be adaptable and supportive of fast AI development rather than a barrier, emphasizing agility and integration of security measures [28-32][291-300].
Speakers: Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Manish Gupta
Advocates an agile, balanced regulatory regime that protects while fostering rapid AI innovation (Dr. Vivek Mohindra) States that speed and security are not opposing; integrated frameworks are required (Manish Gupta)
Both highlight the necessity of dramatically reducing compute costs for startups and researchers, using fiscal incentives and low‑price public resources to broaden access [89-92][346-350].
Speakers: A. S. Rajgopal, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Calls for GST waiver and income‑tax benefits to lower upfront infrastructure costs (A. S. Rajgopal) Announces ultra‑low‑cost compute facilities (~65 ₹/hour) as a PPP outcome (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
Both see trust, built through transparency, explainability and audit mechanisms, as essential for AI adoption and governance [113-122][151-154].
Speakers: Bhaskar Chakravarti, Manish Gupta
Identifies “trust infrastructure”—transparency, data‑governance, privacy—as the key non‑technical bottleneck (Bhaskar Chakravarti) Emphasises explainability and auditability as core to building trust (Manish Gupta)
Both advocate a geographically distributed, infrastructure‑rich model for AI compute that leverages existing national assets to ensure resilience and accessibility [160-162][170-176].
Speakers: Manish Gupta, A. S. Rajgopal
Highlights sustainable, distributed data‑center designs as a competitive edge (Manish Gupta) Proposes distributed data‑centers across states, leveraging existing rail and power networks (A. S. Rajgopal)
Unexpected Consensus
Zero‑Trust architecture can coexist with rapid AI innovation
Speakers: Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji, Manish Gupta
Proposes a Zero‑Trust AI architecture with verification, data segmentation and audit trails (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji) States that speed and security are not opposing; integrated frameworks can deliver both (Manish Gupta)
While Jayant frames Zero-Trust as a stringent security model, Manish simultaneously argues that high speed and strong security can be achieved together, revealing an unexpected alignment that security-by-design does not have to slow down AI deployment [386-416][291-300].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Security experts describe Zero-Trust models as compatible with fast AI development, emphasizing validation-first approaches that do not impede innovation [S50]; thought leaders affirm that innovation and protective measures can be jointly pursued at scale [S51].
Overall Assessment

The discussion shows strong convergence among speakers on five core themes: the centrality of PPPs, the need for affordable compute, the urgency of large‑scale skilling, the requirement for agile yet trustworthy governance, and the push for sustainable, distributed data‑center infrastructure.

High consensus – most participants echo each other’s positions, indicating a unified strategic direction for India’s AI roadmap. This broad alignment suggests that policy formulation, industry action and academic involvement can proceed with coordinated momentum, increasing the likelihood of effective implementation of the AI blueprint.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Regulatory approach – balance between agile, responsible regulation versus minimal regulation to avoid curtailing innovation
Speakers: Dr. Vivek Mohindra, A. S. Rajgopal
Advocates an agile, balanced regulatory regime that protects while fostering rapid AI innovation (Dr. Vivek Mohindra) Advocates less regulation to not curtail innovation, treating AI as a utility (A. S. Rajgopal)
Dr. Mohindra stresses that AI regulations must be agile, adaptable and strike a balance between innovation and responsibility, warning against anchoring rules to outdated technologies [28-32]. Rajgopal counters that the regulatory environment should be minimal, arguing that over-regulation would hinder AI’s utility and that the sector should move forward quickly with fewer constraints [256-259].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple sources highlight the need for a balanced regulatory stance that safeguards trust while enabling rapid AI progress, noting that over-regulation can stifle growth and that proportionate oversight is essential for sustainable innovation [S42][S45][S52][S53].
Fiscal incentives for AI infrastructure – GST waiver and income‑tax benefits versus reliance on existing low‑cost compute provision
Speakers: A. S. Rajgopal, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Calls for GST waiver and income‑tax benefits to lower upfront infrastructure costs for firms (A. S. Rajgopal) Emphasizes ultra‑low‑cost compute facilities already available, without proposing additional tax incentives (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
Rajgopal proposes removing GST on imported servers and offering income-tax holidays to reduce the roughly 18 % upfront cost burden on AI startups and MSMEs [89-92]. The Minister highlights that compute is already being offered at about 65 rupees per hour, positioning the existing pricing model as sufficient to drive adoption, and does not endorse further tax waivers [346-350].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Industry stakeholders have called for GST waivers and income-tax incentives to boost AI infrastructure investment, reflecting a policy debate on fiscal support versus leveraging current low-cost compute pricing [S39]; the government’s existing low-cost GPU pricing scheme is cited as an alternative approach [S38].
Scale of compute resources needed – 200,000 GPUs versus a target of 100,000 GPUs
Speakers: A. S. Rajgopal, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Highlights a shortfall of GPUs, estimating a need for about 200,000 GPUs while current stock is 40,000‑50,000 (A. S. Rajgopal) Reports that the AI mission’s target of 18,000 GPUs has already been surpassed with 38,000 deployed and a roadmap to reach 100,000 by year‑end (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
Rajgopal argues that India requires roughly 200 k GPUs to meet demand, noting the present inventory of 40-50 k GPUs is insufficient [71-72]. The Minister, citing the AI mission’s progress, states that 38 k GPUs are already in place and that the goal is to scale to 100 k GPUs soon, a figure considerably lower than Rajgopal’s estimate [346-348].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Analyses estimate India’s domestic GPU requirement at around 128,000 units for top organizations, while the current government roadmap targets roughly 100,000 GPUs, indicating a gap between projected demand and policy targets [S55][S56].
Unexpected Differences
Fiscal incentives for AI hardware – GST waiver proposal versus reliance on existing low‑cost compute pricing
Speakers: A. S. Rajgopal, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Calls for GST waiver and income‑tax benefits to lower upfront infrastructure costs for firms (A. S. Rajgopal) Highlights ultra‑low‑cost compute facilities as a PPP success, without mentioning tax relief (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
Both speakers address affordability, but Rajgopal pushes for direct fiscal relief on hardware imports, while the Minister points to the already cheap compute pricing model as the solution, revealing an unexpected split on the preferred mechanism to lower costs [89-92][346-350].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Discussions on hardware incentives reference proposals for GST waivers to lower AI hardware costs, contrasted with the government’s strategy of offering low-cost compute access without additional tax relief [S39][S38].
Magnitude of GPU shortfall – Rajgopal’s estimate of 200,000 GPUs versus the Minister’s roadmap to 100,000 GPUs
Speakers: A. S. Rajgopal, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Estimates a need for about 200,000 GPUs, noting current availability of 40,000‑50,000 (A. S. Rajgopal) Reports that the AI mission has already exceeded its 18,000‑GPU target with 38,000 deployed and aims for 100,000 by year‑end (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
While both acknowledge a shortage, the gap between Rajgopal’s 200 k estimate and the Minister’s 100 k target is larger than expected, suggesting differing assessments of demand and supply dynamics [71-72][346-348].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Expert estimates place the GPU shortfall at roughly 200,000 units, while official roadmaps aim for 100,000 GPUs, highlighting a significant discrepancy in supply planning [S55][S56].
Overall Assessment

The panel largely concurs on the strategic importance of public‑private partnerships, the need for robust trust mechanisms, and the urgency of skilling. However, clear divergences emerge around regulatory philosophy (agile balance vs minimal rules), fiscal policy for hardware (GST waiver vs reliance on low compute pricing), and the scale of compute resources required (200 k vs 100 k GPUs).

Moderate – while the overarching goals are shared, the differing policy prescriptions could impede coordinated action unless reconciled, potentially slowing the rollout of sovereign AI infrastructure and affecting India’s ability to compete globally.

Partial Agreements
All four speakers converge on the view that a strong public‑private partnership framework is essential for building India’s AI ecosystem, even though they emphasize different facets (policy‑industry alignment, research hubs, economic growth) [1-3][32-34][146-148][326-329].
Speakers: Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Manish Gupta, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji, Mridu Bhandari
Public‑private partnership is the key to unlocking sovereign AI potential (Dr. Vivek Mohindra) Dell’s blueprint calls for tighter alignment between policymakers, industry, academia – a PPP model (Manish Gupta) PPP is the engine for scaling AI infrastructure, delivering open, cheap compute and research hubs (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji) AI is a catalyst for economic growth and requires coordinated national effort (Mridu Bhandari)
All agree that building a skilled AI workforce is critical, though Mohindra focuses on formal education pipelines, Manish on creating a massive developer community, and Rajgopal on expanding talent numbers and leveraging open‑source to make AI affordable [373-381][226-244][188-195].
Speakers: Dr. Vivek Mohindra, Manish Gupta, A. S. Rajgopal
Three‑tier skilling model covering school, college and employment (Dr. Vivek Mohindra) Shift from billions of users to millions of developers; need for a ‘UPI of AI’ to democratise access (Manish Gupta) India has a large talent pool but needs to increase quantity and bring back talent; open‑source can help lower compute costs (A. S. Rajgopal)
Each speaker stresses that trust is a non‑technical bottleneck and must be embedded through transparency, explainability, and robust verification mechanisms, whether at policy level, technical design, or national architecture [113-135][151-154][386-408].
Speakers: Bhaskar Chakravarti, Manish Gupta, Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Trust infrastructure – transparency, data‑governance, privacy, district‑level implementation (Bhaskar Chakravarti) Explainability and auditability are core to building trust (Manish Gupta) Zero‑Trust AI architecture requires verification, data segmentation and audit trails (Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji)
Takeaways
Key takeaways
India’s AI Blueprint is built on three pillars – Invest (compute, data, energy infrastructure), Innovate (skilling, collaboration, workforce development) and Evolve (agile, responsible governance, trust). Public‑private partnership is seen as the engine for scaling AI infrastructure, with Dell and the government collaborating on low‑cost GPU compute, data‑center expansion, and skill‑lab programmes. Access to affordable compute for startups and MSMEs remains a critical bottleneck; current GPU subsidies are insufficient and proposals such as GST waivers and income‑tax incentives were raised. Trust and governance are identified as the primary non‑technical constraints; a “trust infrastructure” covering transparency, privacy, explainability, district‑level implementation and auditability is required. A distributed, energy‑efficient data‑center network across multiple states, leveraging open‑source software and existing rail/power connectivity, is proposed to achieve sovereign, cost‑effective AI capacity. Strategic autonomy calls for domestic capabilities in semiconductors and trusted‑in‑India hardware, alongside a unified “UPI of AI” API layer to democratise access to data and compute. Balancing rapid AI innovation with safeguards is framed as a non‑zero‑sum problem; agile, sector‑specific regulations and zero‑trust architectures are advocated. Skill development must span school, college and employment levels, with a focus on creating millions of AI developers rather than only serving end‑users.
Resolutions and action items
Participants were urged to read the detailed Dell AI Blueprint and provide feedback. Dell Technologies to explore partnerships with the Ministry of Skill Development for AI apprenticeships and tier‑2/3 skilling labs. Government to consider policy adjustments such as GST waivers on imported AI hardware and income‑tax benefits for AI service providers. Scale up GPU availability: target of 1 lakh GPUs by year‑end, expanding beyond the current 40‑50 k units. Develop a distributed data‑center strategy covering six states with ~100 MW capacity, leveraging rail and power networks for inter‑connectivity. Create a national AI risk registry, observability framework, and audit‑trail mechanisms to support a Zero‑Trust AI architecture. Promote open‑source AI stack adoption to lower compute costs and ensure sovereignty. Formulate a unified “UPI of AI” API layer to provide standardized, secure access to government data sets for innovators.
Unresolved issues
Exact reasons for large enterprises’ reluctance to adopt AI beyond general uncertainty – detailed case studies and mitigation plans were not defined. Potential impact of AI on employment and job displacement remains unquantified; no concrete policy response was agreed upon. Implementation details for district‑level trust mechanisms, transparency standards, and grievance redressal systems were discussed but not finalized. How to ensure monetisation and scaling of AI pilots into production across sectors was highlighted as a challenge without a clear solution. Specific timelines and funding mechanisms for the multi‑billion‑dollar data‑center investments were not committed. The balance point between regulatory speed and safety (e.g., exact scope of agile regulations) was debated but no definitive framework was set.
Suggested compromises
Adopt an agile, principle‑based regulatory regime that is flexible enough to keep pace with AI advances while embedding core safeguards (privacy, security, explainability). Provide fiscal incentives (GST waiver, tax holidays) to lower upfront costs for AI hardware, balancing industry cost concerns with revenue considerations. Maintain open, low‑cost compute access (≈ 65 ₹/hour) as a public good while allowing private providers to compete on value‑added services. Combine rapid AI deployment (the “Ferrari”) with investment in road‑level trust infrastructure (institutional capacity, transparency) to ensure safe operation. Shift focus from serving only large enterprises to building a mass developer ecosystem (“UPI of AI”), thereby sharing the benefits of AI across the economy.
Thought Provoking Comments
The regulatory framework has to be agile because the technology is moving at such a fast pace that you cannot anchor the regulatory framework to yesterday’s technologies.
Highlights the need for dynamic, forward‑looking policy rather than static rules, framing regulation as a catalyst rather than a barrier to AI innovation.
Set the tone for the later discussion on balancing speed and safety. It prompted participants (Manish Gupta, Raj Gopal, Bhaskar Chakravarti) to explore how governance can keep pace with rapid AI advances, leading to deeper conversation about trust, explainability, and zero‑trust architectures.
Speaker: Dr. Vivek Mohindra
We could waive GST on imported servers and only collect GST when the service is delivered, reducing upfront infrastructure cost by about 18 %.
Identifies a concrete fiscal barrier that directly affects MSMEs’ ability to acquire compute resources, moving the debate from abstract investment needs to actionable policy levers.
Shifted the conversation from high‑level investment pillars to specific tax reforms. It sparked interest from the moderator and other panelists, leading to broader discussion on incentives (income‑tax benefits) and the role of government in lowering cost of entry for small innovators.
Speaker: A. S. Rajgopal
The single most important determinant of a country’s digital trajectory is the demand side – and within that, a ‘trust infrastructure’ that ensures people feel confident that their data and transactions are safe and reliable.
Introduces the concept that trust, not just compute or data, is the critical missing piece for AI adoption, and that trust must be built at both institutional and grassroots levels.
Created a turning point where the panel moved from supply‑side (compute, energy) to demand‑side considerations. It prompted Manish Gupta to talk about explainability and led to the “Ferrari vs. road” analogy, deepening the analysis of non‑technical bottlenecks.
Speaker: Bhaskar Chakravarti
We need a ‘UPI of AI’ – a single, open, API‑layer that lets anyone, from startups to large enterprises, consume the nation’s data and compute resources just as UPI democratized digital payments.
Draws a powerful parallel between India’s successful financial inclusion model and AI, offering a clear, scalable vision for universal access to AI infrastructure.
Inspired the discussion on building a common platform and reinforced the theme of public‑private partnership. It also gave Raj Gopal a concrete reference point when talking about distributed data centers and open‑source cost reductions.
Speaker: Manish Gupta
Speed without a good road is useless – we can have the fastest AI models (Ferrari) but if the institutional ‘road’ is full of potholes (trust gaps, policy lag, job‑impact concerns), the whole system stalls.
Uses a vivid metaphor to encapsulate the interplay between technological capability and institutional readiness, emphasizing that policy, trust, and job impacts are the “road” that must be fixed.
Re‑oriented the conversation toward the practical challenges of implementation, prompting participants to discuss job displacement, transparency, and the need for robust institutional safeguards.
Speaker: Bhaskar Chakravarti
Our compute facility is being provided to startups and researchers at 65 rupees an hour – cheaper than a cinema ticket – making it the world’s cheapest open compute facility.
Provides a tangible metric of how public‑private partnership is already lowering barriers, turning abstract policy talk into a measurable achievement.
Validated the earlier calls for subsidies and GST waivers, reinforcing the argument that government‑backed pricing can accelerate adoption. It also set up the segue into the discussion on scaling AI beyond metros.
Speaker: Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
Zero‑trust AI architecture means starting with data, extending through models, cybersecurity, identity, and includes a national risk registry, observability, and auditability.
Offers a concrete, technical blueprint for governance that ties together the earlier abstract notions of trust, agility, and regulatory oversight.
Brought the conversation full circle to actionable steps, influencing the final remarks of both the minister and the moderator. It cemented the link between policy, technical safeguards, and the broader goal of responsible AI scaling.
Speaker: Dr. Vivek Mohindra
Overall Assessment

The discussion was driven forward by a handful of pivotal insights that moved it from high‑level aspirations to concrete policy and implementation pathways. Dr. Mohindra’s call for agile regulation and the zero‑trust architecture framed the governance challenge; Raj Gopal’s GST‑waiver proposal and the minister’s cheap compute pricing turned that challenge into actionable fiscal levers. Bhaskar Chakravarti’s ‘trust infrastructure’ and his Ferrari‑vs‑road metaphor shifted focus to demand‑side and institutional readiness, prompting Manish Gupta’s UPI‑of‑AI analogy that offered a unifying, scalable solution. Together, these comments created a cascade: each new idea opened a sub‑topic, elicited supportive or complementary remarks, and deepened the conversation, ultimately shaping a narrative that blended investment, innovation, and evolution into a coherent roadmap for India’s AI future.

Follow-up Questions
Should GST on imported AI servers be waived upfront and collected only when services are delivered, to reduce upfront infrastructure costs for providers?
Rajgopal suggested a GST waiver could lower costs for AI infrastructure, indicating a policy change that needs clarification and assessment.
Speaker: A. S. Rajgopal
Should Indian AI service providers receive the same tax benefits as global providers when hosting services in India?
He proposed extending tax holidays/income‑tax benefits to domestic providers, a policy issue requiring further evaluation.
Speaker: A. S. Rajgopal
How can India scale its GPU inventory from the current 40‑50k units to the estimated need of ~200,000 GPUs?
Rajgopal highlighted a massive shortfall in GPU availability, pointing to a need for investment strategies and supply‑chain research.
Speaker: A. S. Rajgopal
What specific institutional safeguards (e.g., transparency mechanisms, grievance redressal, digital literacy programs) are required to build a robust trust infrastructure for AI in India?
He identified trust as a non‑technical bottleneck and called for concrete frameworks, indicating further study and design work.
Speaker: Bhaskar Chakravarti
What will be the impact of AI adoption on employment in India, and what policies can mitigate potential job displacement?
He raised the “elephant” of post‑AI jobs, signalling a need for research on labor market effects and protective measures.
Speaker: Bhaskar Chakravarti
How can India develop a unified ‘UPI of AI’ – a single API layer that aggregates data sets, compute, and services for universal access by developers, startups, and enterprises?
Gupta suggested a national API platform analogous to UPI for payments, requiring technical design and governance research.
Speaker: Manish Gupta
What should an agile, AI‑responsive regulatory framework look like to balance innovation speed with responsibility?
He emphasized the need for regulations that can keep pace with rapid AI advances, a topic needing policy formulation and stakeholder input.
Speaker: Dr. Vivek Mohindra
How should a national risk registry, observability tools, and auditability mechanisms be implemented to support a Zero‑Trust AI architecture?
He mentioned these components as essential for Zero Trust, indicating a need for detailed implementation plans and standards.
Speaker: Dr. Vivek Mohindra
What concrete models of public‑private partnership can accelerate large‑scale AI infrastructure deployment across Indian states?
While he described PPP benefits, he left open the question of specific partnership structures and financing mechanisms for replication.
Speaker: Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji
What specific programs or frameworks can Dell Technologies and the Ministry of Skill Development co‑create to deliver AI apprenticeships and skilling in Tier‑2 and Tier‑3 towns?
He began outlining a partnership but did not detail concrete initiatives, indicating a need for joint program design and rollout plans.
Speaker: Dr. Vivek Mohindra
What are the technical and governance requirements to operationalize a Zero‑Trust AI architecture at the national level, including data segmentation, anonymization, and audit trails?
He described the concept but further research is needed to define standards, processes, and enforcement mechanisms.
Speaker: Shri Jayant Chaudhary Ji

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.