Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge

20 Feb 2026 12:00h - 13:00h

Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The session focused on embedding artificial intelligence at the core of emerging 6G networks and how India can lead this transformation [10][27-30]. Ashok Kumar explained that, unlike earlier generations, the ITU’s 6G framework envisions AI as a native element across all system components, termed “ubiquitous intelligence” [27-30].


He outlined several government measures to build a robust 6G ecosystem, including subsidised TSDSI membership for startups to join 3GPP at a reduced fee of ₹10,000 [42]; the launch of a 6G Accelerated Research Program that has funded over 100 projects in terahertz, AI, semantic communications and related areas [45-48]; support through terahertz and AOC testbeds and a partnership with ANRF to evolve release-18 systems toward release-21, expected within two quarters [52-58]; and collaboration with the Bharat 6G Alliance, the DST’s RDI scheme, plus the rollout of 100 operational 5G labs across institutes to reinforce indigenous technology development [59-66][69-71].


Panelists highlighted that AI-enabled devices-from smart glasses to wearables-will generate far higher uplink traffic, shifting the traditional downlink-to-uplink ratio from around 10:1 to potentially 4:1 by 2033 [115-119][185-190]; AI-driven traffic could account for about 30 % of total data volume by 2033, demanding new network capacity and spectral efficiency [126-131]; AI techniques such as DeepRx/DeepTx can improve signal decoding in low-SNR conditions, offering 25-30 % capacity gains and enabling higher-order modulation [197-202]; Rajiv Saluja emphasized that most inference workloads will move to the edge, reducing centralized power consumption and creating a sovereign, end-to-end intelligence stack for every citizen [149-158][224-226][278-282]; and Sandeep Sharma added that latency, coverage and a token-economy model are critical performance dimensions, while national frameworks for data exchange, model auditing and safety guardrails are needed to scale AI responsibly [166-173][237-251][262-264].


The discussion converged on the need for an open, API-driven ecosystem-similar to India’s UPI model-to ensure interoperability of AI applications across devices and operators [311-320][330-336]. Participants agreed that building a sovereign AI infrastructure, while keeping certain components open for collaboration, will lower costs and support India’s goal of a wireless-first economy [267-276][286-287]. Overall, the forum concluded that coordinated government policy, industry research, and open standards are essential to realize AI-native 6G and deliver affordable intelligence to the entire nation [33-35][88-92][363-365].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Government-driven ecosystem building for 6G and AI – The Department of Telecom (DoT) outlined a suite of initiatives to nurture a home-grown 6G stack: low-cost TSDSI/3GPP membership for startups, the “6G Accelerated Research Program” with 100+ projects, test-beds (terahertz, AOC), collaboration with the Bharat 6G Alliance, and the rollout of 100 5G labs across institutes to seed 6G research [35-44][45-53][55-63][69-73].


AI-native design of 6G – Unlike earlier generations where AI was an after-thought, the ITU 6G framework (released two years ago) embeds AI as one of six usage scenarios and defines “ubiquitous intelligence” as a core design principle, meaning every element-from user equipment to core and applications-will have native AI capabilities [26-31][27-30][28-30].


Technical implications of AI-driven traffic – Panelists highlighted a projected shift toward far higher uplink demand (from a downlink-to-uplink ratio of ~10:1 to possibly 4:1) driven by AI-enabled devices and edge inferencing, requiring larger bandwidth (≈400 MHz) and AI-enhanced RAN functions such as DeepRx/DeepTx to boost spectral efficiency by 25-30 % [114-119][125-132][185-194][195-202][186-190][191-202].


Business, societal and sovereignty considerations – The discussion moved to the need to “democratise intelligence” (making AI affordable for every citizen), the emergence of new enterprise value pools (demand analytics, workflow automation, security), and the call for a sovereign, end-to-end AI ecosystem that is built and operated within India [149-158][267-276][278-286][289-292].


Coordination, standards and open-API ecosystems – Participants stressed the importance of national frameworks, sandbox environments, and open, API-driven architectures to avoid siloed pilots, ensure safety and auditability, and enable interoperability (e.g., across devices like Meta glasses) while leveraging India’s massive data assets [237-252][309-320][330-337][338-343].


Overall purpose / goal


The session aimed to align government, industry, and academia around India’s strategic roadmap for “AI at the Core, 6G at the Edge.” It sought to (i) showcase policy and funding mechanisms that will foster indigenous 6G research and standard-setting, (ii) articulate the technical shift toward AI-native networks, and (iii) explore how this convergence can create economic value, societal benefits, and a sovereign AI-telecom ecosystem for the country.


Tone of the discussion


The conversation maintained a formal, forward-looking tone throughout, marked by optimism and a collaborative spirit. Early remarks from the government highlighted opportunity and pride (“historic opportunity,” [33-34]), while later panel exchanges remained constructive, focusing on technical challenges, shared solutions, and collective action. There was no noticeable shift to contention; the tone stayed consistently positive and solution-oriented from start to finish.


Speakers

Sandeep Sharma – Vice President and Global Head of Emerging Technologies, Network Services at Tech Mahindra; expertise in AI, emerging technologies, and network services. [S1][S2]


Rajeev Saluja – Vice President, 5G Radio at Reliance Jio; expertise in telecommunications, 5G/6G technology development. [S2]


Moderator – (role: session moderator); no specific title or expertise mentioned.


Radhakant Das – Head of Technology Engineering and Innovation Function for Network Solutions and Services (NSS) at Tata Consultancy Services (TCS); expertise in technology engineering, innovation, and network solutions; served as panel discussion moderator. [S6][S7]


Ashok Kumar – Director General, Department of Telecommunications, Government of India; expertise in government policy and telecom regulation. [S8][S9]


Surojeet Roy – Senior Telecommunications Leader, Head of Technology, Technology and Solutions, COE, Nokia India; expertise in telecommunications technology and network solutions. [S10]


Audience – Unnamed audience members who asked questions; no specific titles or expertise provided.


Additional speakers:


Radhika – Mentioned only in the closing remarks for handing over a memento; role and expertise not specified.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Opening & Theme – The moderator opened the session by framing the theme “AI at the Core, 6G at the Edge” as a strategic opportunity for India to shift from a consumer of global technology to a leader in the next intelligence and connectivity frontier [1][2][10].


Keynote – Ashok Kumar


Ashok Kumar, Director-General of the Department of Daily Communication, delivered the keynote. He traced the evolution from 2G-4G (designed mainly to connect people) through NB-IoT (an after-thought machine-to-machine layer) to the 5G IMT-2020 framework, which embedded massive machine connectivity and ultra-low latency as core use cases [12-14][15-24]. He noted that AI was added retrospectively in the 5G release-15-to-release-18 cycle, whereas the ITU’s 6G framework (released two years ago) lists integrated AI as one of six usage scenarios and enshrines “ubiquitous intelligence” as a design pillar, meaning AI will be native to every element of the end-to-end system [26-30][28-30].


Government Initiatives – The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) outlined several measures to realise this vision:


* TSDSI subsidy – Start-ups can join the Telecommunication Standard Development Society of India and obtain 3GPP membership for a subsidised fee of ₹10 000 (instead of the usual ₹5-6 lakh) [42-44].


* 6G Accelerated Research Program – Launched two years ago, it has funded more than 100 projects covering terahertz hardware, AI/ML algorithms, semantic communications and advanced sensing [45-49][50-52].


* Test-bed ecosystem – Includes a terahertz test-bed, an AOC test-bed, and a partnership with ANRF to evolve a release-18 system through releases 19, 20 and the forthcoming release 21 (the first 6G-specific release), expected within the next two quarters [52-58][55-58].


* Bharat 6G Alliance – Coordinates working groups on technology, spectrum and devices [59-66][63-66].


* DST-RDI inclusion – The Department of Science & Technology’s Research, Development & Innovation scheme now explicitly includes the telecom sector, securing dedicated funding for 6G-related research [60-62].


* 5G laboratory network – 100 operational 5G labs have been rolled out in academic institutes, providing a platform for seeding 6G research; Ashok Kumar urged industry to adopt one or two of these labs for joint development [69-73][71-73][70].


Panel Introduction – The moderator introduced the panelists and set the focus on technical, business and policy implications of an AI-native 6G [80].


Device & Traffic Outlook (Surojeet Roy)


Roy highlighted a new generation of AI-enabled devices-smart glasses, wearables and body-patch sensors-that will off-load inference to edge or central data-centres, creating a substantial increase in uplink traffic [115-119][121-124]. He cited Nokia Bell Labs forecasts that AI-driven traffic could rise from the current 5 % to roughly 30 % of total data volume by 2033, and that the traditional downlink-to-uplink ratio of about 10:1 may compress to around 4:1, thereby demanding higher uplink capacity [126-132][185-190].


Intelligence-Utility Vision (Rajiv Saluja)


Saluja argued that “democratising intelligence” means placing most simple, latency-sensitive inference at the edge while reserving multi-step, multi-agent workflows for the core or cloud, thus distributing power consumption and avoiding concentration in large data-centres [149-158][158-162][224-226]. He emphasized the need to “build, not rent” intelligence and proposed a sovereign, token-based AI economy in which the entire end-to-end AI value chain is Indian-owned [154-157][278-282][284-287].


AI-6G Business Impact (Sandeep Sharma)


Sharma linked AI progress to business outcomes, redefining latency as a productivity KPI and stressing that AI-driven services must be delivered through an open, API-driven architecture modelled on India’s UPI system [312-319][330-336][262-264]. He called for national data-exchange platforms that enable secure, anonymised sharing of industry data for training large language models, and for safety guardrails, model auditability and sandbox environments to ensure responsible AI deployment within telecom networks [337-344][338-344][237-252][229-236][261-264]. Sharma also suggested placing GPUs at cell-tower sites to democratise AI compute and alleviate both latency and energy pressures [219-221].


Technical Enhancements for 6G (Roy continued)


Roy noted that 6G is expected to operate with up to 400 MHz of contiguous spectrum-four times the typical 5G bandwidth-requiring a five-fold increase in spectral efficiency to achieve the projected 20-fold capacity boost [202-206][203-205]. AI-enhanced radio functions such as DeepRx/DeepTx have already demonstrated 25-30 % capacity gains and enable higher-order modulation even under low signal-to-noise conditions [195-202][203-206].


Open vs Sovereign Ecosystem


The discussion contrasted Saluja’s vision of a sovereign token economy with Sharma’s advocacy for an open, interoperable AI layer. Both agreed that a hybrid model-open APIs for innovation combined with Indian-owned token mechanisms for critical services-would balance national interests and global collaboration [278-287][330-336].


Socio-Economic Context


Roy cited the Niti Aayog report that targets a ₹30 trillion economy by 2030 and highlighted the 490 million informal workers who could benefit from AI-driven tools in agriculture, skilled-trade assistance and other sectors [140-144].


Audience Q&A


* Interoperability & AI-API – Participants referenced the Meta glasses demo and called for an open, API-driven ecosystem akin to UPI [312-319][330-336][262-264].


* Data for LLMs – A request for a national data-exchange platform to feed large language models was echoed, with Sharma stressing anonymisation and security [337-344][338-344].


* OneEdge / Network-API Monetisation – An audience member asked about Jio/Airtel’s OneEdge initiative; Rajiv Saluja gave a brief answer and promised a detailed offline discussion [350-352].


* GPU-at-Cell-Tower – Sharma reiterated his suggestion to install GPUs at cell sites to democratise AI compute [219-221].


Unanswered / Open Issues – The panel did not quantify the exact split of AI inference across device, edge, core and cloud [120-124]; ROI metrics for AI-6G pilots in priority sectors remain to be defined [161-165]; the full 2030 roadmap-including release-21 timelines, token-economy mechanisms and sovereign data-exchange frameworks-was only sketched [55-58][277-287]; and concrete standards for interoperable AI APIs, safety guardrails and audit mechanisms are still pending [237-252][312-319][261-264].


Conclusion – The forum underscored a historic inflection point for India: AI is now embedded at the core of the forthcoming 6G architecture, and a coordinated ecosystem-spanning low-cost standards participation, research accelerators, test-beds, the Bharat 6G Alliance, DST-RDI support, 5G labs and open-API frameworks-is being assembled to realise this vision. While the panel largely agreed on the strategic direction, the debate over the balance between openness and sovereign token-based control highlights the need for a hybrid approach that safeguards national interests while fostering interoperable innovation. Next steps include finalising technical roadmaps, establishing national data-exchange and safety sandboxes, and aligning industry pilots with the imminent 6G standards to ensure affordable, AI-driven intelligence reaches every Indian citizen [27-30][88-89][45-53][55-62][330-336][262-264].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Moderator

opportunity, ensuring that India moves from being a consumer of global technology cycles to becoming a sharper of the world’s next intelligence and connectivity frontier. To kick off the discussion, I would like to invite Mr. Ashok Kumar, Deepthi Director General, Department of Daily Communication, Government of India, to deliver a keynote address. Thank you.

Ashok Kumar

So my colleague panelist, the expert panelist here, the distinguished dignitaries in the hall, and other participants gathered here, Thank you,

Moderator

Mr. Ashok. Thank you, Mr. Ashok. Thank you, Mr. Ashok. So it’s

Ashok Kumar

my privilege to deliver the keynote address before such a gathering. So although the hall is like empty, but I suppose many of our participants are online. The theme of this session, AI at the Core, 6G at the Edge, captures the transformative journey which we have started now. So let me go back slightly back in the history. When we rolled out 2G, 3G and 4G, the vision was to connect V, human beings, and as technology progressed, we started connecting machines and objects through innovations like NB -IoT, as all of us know. Although they were not part of the original vision and we can say that those were evolutions, extensions and maybe we can also call that as afterthought.

When the work on 5G started at ITU way back in 2012, if you recall, after three years of deliberations with all the state 190 plus countries and also the sector members like industry, academia. So ITU released a 5G framework, they call it IMT 2020. And for the first time. The usage scenario, the three usage scenario envisioned by ITU included support for massive connectivity of objects and machines and also the applications which required very, very low latency. So, what we should say that for the first time technology was designed, it was not an afterthought even for machines, not only for we humans but also for the machines. As we know that the 5G journey started with 3G BP release 15 and that was also delivered in three parts, right?

Just to start early, so they had three part of releases of release 15 and then every one and half years or two years we have the next evolution of the 5G technology. And when we reached to release 18 and that is also called 5G advanced. So, basically AI, artificial intelligence began to be integrated at part of 3G. To solve the network functions or to solve some of the network functions requirement. So again, this was some sort of an afterthought, right? Because we started, our vision was not the native integration of AI into the 5G system, but as technology evolved, we started doing that, perhaps the precursor of the 6G. The shift now which we are seeing in 6G, the story is different.

If you look at the ITU framework for 6G, which was released two years back, so that has got six usage scenarios, they have envisioned six usage scenarios, and one of the usage scenarios is integrated artificial intelligence and communications. So now, the artificial intelligence is part of the initial thought itself, and more important, along with those six usage scenarios, what ITU conceived is the four overarching principles, and the fifth is the three main principles, and the sixth is the three main principles, and the sixth is the three main principles, The four, the key design principle we can say, and one of the design principle if you read is ubiquitous intelligence. So when we say ubiquitous intelligence, what we mean is that every element of our end -to -end 6G system, be it the user equipment or be it the radio or be it core or be it applications, everyone will use AI embedded natively into the system.

So the earlier generations, if you talk about connected humans and objects or machines, 6G will actually correct the intelligence as it is envisioned in the ITU document. And of course, 3GPP has started working on all those aspects. So this is a kind of… It’s a historic opportunity for me in India, particularly for our… ecosystem, that is our MSME, startup, academia and everyone. So it’s an opportunity not only to like participate in the standard so that our technology, our innovations becomes part of the standard, but also to build our own end -to -end 6G technology stack. So what are the different government efforts since I come from government, Department of Telecom, so I would also like to touch upon what are different efforts the government is trying to do to create a robust ecosystem of 6G research and innovations.

Of course, government alone cannot do everything, but whatever effort we are trying. So one of the important aspects is about whatever technology we are trying to develop, right, whatever IP we are trying to create, if that enters into the standard, 3GPP standard itself, it’s good for us that we are shaping the standards. The India is also. So, I mean, we started doing such activities from 5G onwards. Before that, we were not at all participating in the 6G, I mean, telecom technologies standard making. So, to support our startup, et cetera, onto this, so if a startup company want to, say, participate in 3GPP standards, that company has to be member of first our TSDSI and also individual members of 3GPP and that’s a cost, right?

So, at DOT, we are supporting TSDSI so that our startups can be member of TSDSI and 3GPP at a very, very low cost of 10 ,000, not 5 lakh, 6 lakh, and they can participate. So, that’s, it’s a continuous thing which we try, trying and doing. Interesting. In addition to that, as we know that unless we do our own kind of a research and technology development, even before the standard starts, building up and then take it to the standard. So to support that activity, we had come out with a scheme called 6G Accelerated Research Program. So that was floated, I think, two years back. And we have selected 100 plus 6G related projects in different area. That includes terahertz technology, artificial intelligence, machine learning, semantic communications.

And every aspect of sensing, every aspect of the vision of the 6G. And those projects are progressing. And we are trying to help them also participate into the standard. In addition to that, we have also supported some 6G related testbed like terahertz testbed and one AOC testbed, which is doing very good work as of now. In addition to that, there are many other. Programs which are sort of in progress. For example, recently we worked with. ANRF wherein we are trying to come out with a scheme wherein we are trying to build end -to -end system based on release 18 and evolve it to release 19, 20 and 21. As you know that release 21 would be the first release of 60.

So we are trying to do that and perhaps that will come very soon, maybe in the next two quarters that will be out. In addition to that, I would also like to take name of Bharat 6G Alliance here because we are also closely working with Bharat 6G Alliance as government. So Bharat 6G Alliance has created multiple working group on technology, on spectrum, on devices and some of the members of the alliance have been working on the technology and some of the members of the chair of those working groups are here as part of this session also. So, basically, Bharat 6G alliance is kind of suggesting government that what next to be done to be leader in 6G and based on that, we are trying to, I mean, shape the policies of the government.

In addition to Department of Telecom, our other ministries like Maiti is also supporting various 6G related projects. I would take name of the scheme of DST, which is RDI. So, once you have a technology, perhaps you want to scale RDI will come handy. And we have taken up with DST that telecom sector should be included as part of the sector which will be supported. In the RDI and Secretary DST had agreed to this particular aspect and whenever the schemes are getting floated, our companies, our startup in the field of telecom can actually apply. As part of DST, they also have, they have been running cyber physical programs. So, they are also, they are supporting some of the.

5G and 6G related projects. One most important thing which DOT did previous years, which was actually announced in the budget and inaugurated by our Honorable Prime Minister was 100 5G lab in 100 different institutes across the country. Those labs are actually operational. So those are some of the points where actually 6G research has also started because once you have good knowledge of 5G and if you are able to develop use cases or 5G network elements itself, perhaps you are ready to do something on 6G. And so my request to industry here, those who are online, that please adopt one or two 5G lab and try to work with them that what more can be done in the technology area.

With this, I want to conclude my address by inviting the esteemed panelists to deliberate and provide some answers to your questions. Thank you. Thank you. not only to the government, but also to the industry, MSME and startup and academia on the way forward on this

Moderator

Thank you, sir. So now we are moving to our very next segment, the panel discussion. Our first speaker is Rajiv Seluja, Vice President, 5G Radio at Reliance Jio. Also joining us is Surojeet Roy, a Senior Telecommunications Leader, Head of Technology, Technology and Solutions, COE, at Nokia India. Sandeep Sharma, a technology leader and AI innovator, Vice President and Global Head of Emerging Technologies, Network Services at Tech Mahindra. The dialogue will be moderated by Radhakant Das, who heads the Technology Engineering and Innovation Function for Network Solutions and Services, NSS, at TCS. Before we start this panel discussion, I would like all the speakers to have group photographs, please. May I also request Ashok Kumar, sir, to be here?

Thank you. Thank you, sir.

Radhakant Das

Okay. Can we start? Great. So, good morning, our distinguished guests. My colleagues from the Government, Industry and Academy. All of you who are online, good morning to you all as well. So, this entire topic, which you can read out, A at the core and 6G at the edge, and Designing India’s Next Resilient, Innovative and Efficient Digital Frontier. We are at a historic inflection point where the intelligence is the basic infra. based on which the next evolution of this planet will actually continue. And we have seen until 5G, but in the 6G, a lot of hope. And we see that 6G not only emerges a faster network as an option, but as a distributed computer fabric.

It’s going to have a platform that enables the intelligence everywhere across radio, core, and age, including the satellite, which is non -terrestrial networks, and the sensor ecosystems. Devices in 6G and AI will take a major role. We’ll talk about how the 6G payloads or the designs will actually be AI -native, how it will drive the overall objective of bringing AI and 6G together. As a success. The professor has already pointed out the standards of already… will take in AI native to the 6G standards which is coming up in Magda’s next two quarters. It’s quite optimistic but yes, we are looking forward for the faster to come. And thanks for the government to give all the support to the industry, academia and the Vara 6G Alliance is also doing a great job and our Honourable Minister and Prime Minister are actually actively supporting and giving directions time to time to get this forward.

So we will focus on the edge interfaces at a scale. We’ll talk about semantic communications where like you would have seen India has really put a very strategic point of view that AI is, we will ensure that AI is kind of energy efficient. It will not be responsible for melting the data centres. It will be power efficient. And we will ensure that every compute capacity is being optimally utilized, not like we have enough compute and we will use it as much as possible. And data is a strategic fuel for this AI. And the networks, telecom networks, it’s not only 6G, but all kinds of connectivity networks, they will drive this data, this strategic fuel to the users, to the sensors, to the cloud, to the computing systems and deliver it.

So here we go. We start, I think, all our panelists are there. I think their names are already there in the backside of the screen. So I’ll just start with some of the questions. So maybe we’ll start with Surajit. Yeah. So Surajit, I have. I have the first question for you. The India in the context of India’s, in the context of 6G vision. where networks are expected to reason, self -organize and optimize across ecosystem, run, core, edge and of course when you say edge, it includes devices and the sensors. How do you see AI is transforming the RAN for the 6G in the day one? You may throw some light on that please.

Surojeet Roy

Yeah, sure. So, I think we can talk about it in few steps. For example, first one is on the devices. So, we have many form factor of devices coming up. We already have smart glasses launched. We had this AR, VR glasses earlier where we could not see outside, but then now we have glasses which look more like the normal glasses we wear. But those are having this AI functionalities, right? you can do lot many you know work in the background and nobody would know that you are actually looking at something else while you are talking to a person so I think from the device perspective the intelligence is being built up in the devices handsets there was a talk that maybe all these smart glasses and wearables will take away the handset but then I guess these handsets are going to stay for a while I don’t know till when but at least for the next 4 -5 years those are going to stay and we will also have lots of wearables right and maybe some you know body patches as well which can sense your heart rate so as a person as a user I see that we will be having multiple devices going forward not only one device we will have handset, we will have smart glasses, we will have wearables right and this all will be having AI enabled devices capabilities, but because of the form factor, these devices might not be able to do all the inferencing tasks on their own, which means that there will be some inferencing help needed from the data centers, whether it is centralized or edge data centers, which means there will be lots of traffic requirements towards the network, especially in the uplink.

Radhakant Das

Okay. So, Rojit, if you would like to expand it a little further, the inferencing is now tiered or distributed, as what I am mentioning. So, what percent is, maybe you can take an average application, will be there residing in the devices or sensor side? What percent is in the RAM? What percent is in the core of the network premises? And what will go to the cloud?

Surojeet Roy

Yeah, I think we do not have those exact numbers, but I think if I look at the data traffic as such, the WAN traffic. So, it is going to grow maybe six to nine times from now. till 2033 there is a position we have from Nokia Bell Labs and out of the total traffic in 2033 almost 30 % will be AI driven right. So 30 % traffic will be AI driven. It can be direct AI which can be slightly lesser but the indirect AI where you know once you use any application it drives you towards some other application and that increases your data. Maybe right now we have 5 % of the AI traffic it will go to 30 % in next 3 years. Not 3 years I think the projection is by 2033 around 2033.

So it might get to 30%. It is getting embedded to all our life faster than we have thought about.

Radhakant Das

So any of you would like to address this thing like how much of influencing would you like to see from the agency? Any of you would like to address this thing like how much of influencing would you like Like for example, of course, cloud has to do large part of it.

Surojeet Roy

Yeah, on that, what I can comment, maybe Sandeep and Rajiv can also add. So first thing is, you know, it really depends on the use case. Physical AI use cases like autonomous vehicles, robots, I think autonomous vehicles are definitely picking up in US and China. But if I look at India, I think it’s going to take some time because we don’t follow rules. You know, we have a bad habit of driving. You know, I think the AI models have to tune to understand how the drivers drive in India. Right. So I think autonomous vehicles will take some time. But those are the use cases, autonomous vehicles, industrial robots, maybe robotic surgeries, where you need much lower latency.

Those are the ones where the inferencing might be needed at the edge. But I think for normal consumers and normal use cases, we can still manage with the inferencing at the central location. Right. But the main problem is. having a centralized data center establishing that is a problem because I think the power consumption and the power requirements site infrastructure, those are a major challenge and that’s why we see a trend that the data centers are gradually moving towards the edge. Maybe not driven by only the use cases but maybe driven by the infrastructure.

Radhakant Das

Yeah, a lot of, a heavy dose of this data center related concerns were there for last four days in the summit. So Rajiv if I can come to you question for you is are you witnessing a shift from telcos as a connectivity providers to intelligence utilities and how does your organizations plan to deliver intelligence at the lowest cost?

Rajeev Saluja

Right, you know, so in the past decade like Ashok sir also mentioned was about democratizing the connectivity, right? Today more than 99 % of India’s population is connected by high speed broadband, right? The next decade is going to be about how can we democratize intelligence. So how can the last citizen of India have the strongest intelligence ecosystem built? That is the whole objective towards which we are working. And like our chairman said yesterday, you cannot rent intelligence. We cannot, as India, we cannot afford to rent intelligence. We need to build it. We need to scale it. And the complete infrastructure that we are building, we are building up from connectivity to the cloud, to the edge, and then the intelligence ecosystem on top.

So just to add to your previous question, we believe that most of the simple agentic and inferencing workloads will get handled at the edge. And only the multi -step, multi -agent, complex workflows. those are the ones which will get handled at the central location but our whole focus is how can we create an ecosystem an end -to -end ecosystem which can ensure all pervasive and an affordable intelligence to every citizen of this country that’s the whole focus

Radhakant Das

Thank you So Rajiv, what you are actually referring to is if we distribute the inferences and the processing across so the power requirement will get distributed and also we will not have a lot of concentration of power consumption and the data centers itself it’s a good thought so maybe Sandeep, we’ll just come to you how do you see AI and 6G anchor use cases can deliver the ROI within next, let’s say one and a half year from the India’s priority sectors such as BFSI, manufacturing, healthcare, mobility and how do you see that and how do you put the metrics as a success?

Sandeep Sharma

I think fairly good question honestly speaking and if you look at AI and 6G are two parallel things. They are going to merge but as on today we see lot of AI traffic is getting generated. Maybe it’s 6G or 5G or maybe on wireline. And the pattern is also evolving drastically the type of AI traffic that is running. So till now, till 2G, 3G, 4G we thought of only voice and data is the actual traffic for which network should be defined. But going further, depending on different type of use cases, different latencies use case need, network has to be defined for three parallel dimensions which is latency. Latency is there today in the network but we don’t take much of attention because most of the use cases are not latency sensitive.

The other thing is coverage. Coverage is equally important. reason being the uplink sensitivity of the traffic is getting more and more relevant in the AI type of traffic. And finally, one thing that we all should be aware of, the token economy is something which drives all the use cases. How much token you are going to consume, at what pace, at what latency, drives many of the use cases, efficiency or not. So if we bifurcate it from the industry to industry perspective, if you look at the industries which are more sensitive to delay, or maybe the robotic surgery, the hospital industry, and maybe the floor machines where robots are taking all the production control, their latency plays an important role.

So we should be using 6G -centric or the 5G -centric networks to realize as good as low latency, so that the tokens which are exchanged should be acknowledged well in time, and we have a faster time to resolve. And even we have observed that even if you reduce 10 to 20 % of latency, the efficiency improves drastically so it’s no more a network KPI it’s a productivity KPI for those use cases if we talk about the coverage perspective AI is going to be more uplink heavy more bursty and we need persistent traffic around it requests will keep on coming and that persistence in uplink will only be achieved if you have a good reliable coverage and the scenarios like when you have to do a lot of tracking of the assets lot of monitoring of the assets you need to have certain use cases realized on that those are the immediate use cases that industry will look at and finally all these AI specific things will only scale when you have some national framework around it you have certain national sandboxes around it so whatever is coming into the ecosystem it’s well tested across a diverse set of vendors diverse set of customers diverse set of ecosystem players because use cases for AI may not be related to the one use cases which we have seen so far so these three dimensions we should look at and once we look at the economics of the token then coming back to the question that you asked Rishabh where the influence should happen I think it’s not about only the where but at what cost so that defines how the influencing traffic will shape up

Radhakant Das

has also urged some of the industries to take over or adopt a couple of these labs. I think what you are suggesting as a part of sandbox on the applications, they are already happening. I think more the Department of Telecom and GOI should be working on that part. Okay, Surajit, we’ll come back to you again. Again, let’s say for the next four years, until 2030, how do you see the evolution, Surajit? And starting from the devices, use cases, traffic growth, and how do you see the impact of AI derived from the networks? One is tokens, the number of tokens, we’ll start using the KPI, which Sandeep has already mentioned about. So, what’s your opinion on that?

Yes.

Surojeet Roy

Yeah, I think we touched upon it, I think, but just to be more specific about it, So the uplink traffic is going to see a significant increase. So currently we see a downlink to uplink ratio of maybe 10s to 1 or 12s to 1. I don’t know the exact number, but that’s the range we’re talking about. But with this AI applications, we are predicting that this pattern will change to maybe 4s to 1, 4 in the downlink and 1 in the uplink. So what it means is that you need much higher data rates in the uplink. Today the networks are sort of not built for that, which means there will be lots of enhancements required in the network. This can come a bit from the 5G advanced, and then more enhancement will come when we go to 6G.

There will be lots of improvement on the spectral efficiency in the uplink, and then using AI in the RAN. We can improve the coverage. I’ll give you some example how that can be done. So, for example, you know, the communication between the transmitter and receiver, it involves the signal received, the interference, the noise floor, right, and the scheduling. And there is lots of data, huge amount of data which is involved there. So, I think with AI using the deep learning algorithms, we can create, you know, some logics which can help optimize this entire communication. So, and then with AI, this communication can be adaptive as well. So, we are talking about something called DeepRx, DeepTx, where Nokia is very much, you know, engaged.

And we have done some initial proof of concepts. And using that, what we have seen is that even in an environment where you have the signal to noise ratio, which is much worse than what, for example, 5G can decipher. using AI you can actually decipher those signals and that can give a capacity increase maybe 25 -30 % and what you can also do is you can have higher order modulation supported. So this is going to increase the capacity of the network and then as I mentioned the multitude of devices which will require lots of low latency use cases, much higher capacity, we are talking about minimum 400 MHz of bandwidth when we are talking about 6G. So today 5G networks are primarily running with say 100 MHz typical bandwidth.

We are talking about 400 MHz of bandwidth which might be required and we are talking about 5 times spectral efficiency. So which means 5 into 4, you are talking about 20 times more capacity coming out from 6G networks. But I think this is an evolution, right? So we are doing the standalone networks right now and you know this voice over NR, slicing, this will… you know, get, I would say, advanced and will have the entire network having slicing capabilities, voice will transform to voice for NR and then gradually you go towards 6G where you will be building the networks which are more AI native.

Radhakant Das

Very interesting point you brought in, Surajit. So what you mentioned is, it’s very interesting, I didn’t think about it earlier. You were saying even a single digit designer, I can extract more information. Actually, we are going to improve Sagan’s principle. That’s a good aspect, right? Exactly. And also, one thing if you can just throw on, the tokens are smaller packets. You just have instructions and some questions. Why it should increase the opening bust? Ideally, it should not. There are a lot of popular talks like it is going to the 6Gs or the AI is going to reverse the traffic pattern. But why? Just tokens.

Surojeet Roy

So I think it depends on the, because you have to send the contextual information, right? For example, you are standing somewhere and you want to send a 360 degree view of where you are and you want to send it to the inferencing application so that it can help you, you know, understand whatever question you have. So I think that contextual information, sending it upwards, right, it will take lots of data requirement and primarily we are not doing it today. That’s the main reason because and this type of tasks will increase and that’s going to increase the uplink requirement.

Radhakant Das

Rajiv, do you want to add something to this?

Rajeev Saluja

No, the only thing which I wanted to add on the uplink side was that, you know, there are going to be multi -modal agents. So right now the traffic that we see is which consumer initiates, right, but when the agents and then on top multi -modal agents who are orchestrating end -to -end workflows, then they start initiating the traffic, that’s when the uplink also starts. So you will have multiple agents.

Radhakant Das

A2A traffic.

Rajeev Saluja

Yep.

Radhakant Das

Good. So Sandeep, the next question for you, there are a lot of AI6Z pilots are happening. I think whatever the organizations we have seen in last four days of AI Impact Summit, a lot of them are there. And what specific coordination mechanisms or co -creation models do you think we all should work together as industry, academia, government to ensure that these pilots, they align to the standards, they just don’t build on the silos while 6Z standard is maybe two quarters or maybe couple of more quarters away. So how we put the standardization as a perspective which can be adopted later stage. Also safety guidelines. A lot of safety issues will come. The more we are excited about how great things can happen, also the more of the things are exposed.

And we have seen the goals. We have seen the work, what it’s doing and how things are really getting into out of control. and so any AI maybe outcome based AI native deployment if you just can throw some light on that

Sandeep Sharma

Frankly speaking your question is so long I am not sure how long should be the answer I got it I got it just kidding so I think if you look at the perspective lot many good things are being done in the country there are lot many good organizations as we heard in the keynote that there is a Biosense there is a DSDA as well so lot of coordination is already in place the problem is with the pilot and the scale gap is not a technology gap is basically a gap of how we put things together in the frameworks which are scalable and referenceable as well so as I mentioned in my previous response that we need to have some national frameworks around AI native architectures once that is in place I think the quicker thing can be done is that let’s align the fundamental what type of use case are being driven and how the data needs to flow around it.

Other part is that India, as a consumer, we have a huge amount of data across the industries. And data is like bread and butter for AI. There’s no AI if there’s no data. But the data today is either siloed within the industries. If you look at the sector, they don’t combine the data together. So a national framework of putting the data together creating national exchanges where data can come in and people or organizations are allowed to train the data, train the models with the data. And we can have certain models which are more industry specific. And that plethora of variation of data, putting it together gives a very useful reference of creating frameworks which can be referenced or replicated, not only in India, globally as well.

And certain organizations are already in place to take care of that. I think more and more efforts, more and more programs are needed. thirdly if you look at more and more the safety guardrails I think we need to have certain framework in place how the AI is audited monitored within the telecom network as well we can’t allow some model to take a change of any parameter in live traffic if we can’t audit it maybe policy frameworks for intervention if certain models are changing in network parameter how and why they are changing certain explanation needs to be brought in and it can’t be done in isolation reason being if you do it in isolation again there is no clarity will come in to have a national policy around it will improve the reliability or explainability of the models hence people will come together rather than creating a differentiation of another layer of security that may encompass certain things that should be known to the larger audience and certain things that we all should do as an industry that let’s contribute more and more in these forums which government has started like Bharat 6G Alliance.

I am part of the 6G use case group, work very closely with Shokji and I think many things are already in place. We drafted certain white papers which could be referenced around AI, what type of implications it will bring into the network and we collaborate well with the 5G 100 labs as well. The things that we have done already, we should encourage them to take these things to the next level. Certain things could be referenced, certain things could be evolved. Not everything may be done right, but there is an opportunity to do everything right in 6G in terms of coordination, in terms of national referenceable frameworks. Good. Have I missed anything? It was a long question.

Radhakant Das

No, no, no. Thanks for that answer. So what actually we are seeing is in the security perspective, we are seeing we have… already a work is happening on interest in terms of policy perspective. These are in place and typically what if I have to bring in the DPI stuff or public and digital public infrastructure. So you have a lot of learning from all these sectors and how to deal with it. Even in the telcos, even in all the industry sectors, how to keep that as a creative, how that particular data which is not been seen in the telco ecosystems but still we are all responsible to deal with that. I think with the AI coming in, maybe some way we need to understand the DPI of DPI.

Sandeep Sharma

And just to add here, you brought a very good point. I think whenever I give a reference, the importance of open ecosystem, interoperable ecosystem, I always give an example of UPI. UPI wouldn’t have been a success if we had not promoted the open ecosystem around it. I think same mindset is needed in the AI era.

Radhakant Das

Good, good. Thanks. So Rajiv, I have the next question for you. how does the AI native telco change the way enterprises consume technology and what are the new value pools that will emerge out of it?

Rajeev Saluja

I think it’s a very good question see Sandeep brought out a very important aspect of latency and the second was on the uplink so first of all 6G is the solution to both the problems right enterprises in particular will benefit a lot from the advent of and the confluence of 6G and AI so there are three major drivers of value pools which enterprises can derive from 6G and AI the first would be demand analysis so you know they will be able to analyze what kind of demand is coming today their entire data is limited to the research that they do right But with the new data streams flowing in, they will be able to understand what new services can they provide to their customers and how can they embed intelligence into those new services that they are able to deliver.

The second important value pool which enterprise would be able to deliver is the workflow automation. So today, a lot of work which is manual will get automated. They will be able to orchestrate end -to -end workflows and humans will go up the value chain. That is the second important value which enterprises can derive from the confluence of 6G and AI. The third most important part which enterprises can derive out of 6G and AI is how can they make their end -to -end processes, how can they make their end -to -end security framework more robust. And see, till now, whenever we used to speak about digitization of enterprises, it used to stop at ERP implementation. Or basic business process automation.

Now, AI and 6G are going to take it to a completely different level. India is a wireless economy we don’t have fiber penetration in this country so the only way enterprises can go and reach to the last mile in this country is through the confluence of 6G and AI

Radhakant Das

so another extension to this question so how do you see sovereignty of the entire ecosystem we should deploy when you say sovereignty it is a very complex question one side that we think that ok if we make it open only it will grow at the same time sovereignty is also asked for every country maybe you can actually make entire European continent will only have one sovereign stuff what do you see on that and how much we should make it as a sovereign how much we should make it open what is your viewpoint on this

Rajeev Saluja

see this token economy in which we are going to go in the next 5 to 7 years so sovereignty is going to be a token sovereignty right in my point of view it will be very important for us to build our own intelligence and then deploy and scale it. We cannot be dependent on the world to deliver the intelligence to us because that will simply be too expensive for us to handle. So in order to make sure that intelligence reaches the last person in the most remote area and the last remote enterprise in India, the most important thing we need to have is have a token sovereign. We need to have a sovereign AI ecosystem, an end -to -end ecosystem starting from device to the cloud to the edge to the intelligence layers on top.

This end -to -end ecosystem has to be sovereign and we don’t have an option in this.

Radhakant Das

So you are saying end -to -end ecosystem platforms or stacks are sovereign?

Rajeev Saluja

Yes.

Radhakant Das

Token may or may not be sovereign or you can classify as a sovereign or as a general public one?

Rajeev Saluja

Correct, but we are basically calling it as a sovereign token. What I basically mean is that right from the time the request gets initiated by an agent or by a human. to the time an inference happens and the value gets delivered to the human or to the enterprise, this entire value chain has to be made in India, has to be sovereign.

Radhakant Das

So you have some view on it?

Sandeep Sharma

I think I was just supporting him with the gesture, but honestly speaking, the level of intelligence that country needs may not be a priority for the intelligence for other regions who are creating their own intelligence. So having a sovereign AI has an economy sense as well and has an importance for our own social values that we build in the system. AI is not only about telecom, AI is a bigger base. What we are getting as a query output as a new generation, they should be very well aware of what is right and that can be ascertained only if we have certain sovereignty developed in the ecosystem for our own nation.

Radhakant Das

So while we are talking about sovereignty, we should be very specific about it. so there is something which we need to keep as a there are certain things which you need to keep it as open stuff for learning from each other community learning across the country across the planet and all so that’s something would you like to comment and maybe I would request Surajit to also comment on that as well

Sandeep Sharma

I think just to start and Surajit will elaborate more the era of going further will not be a abstract one or abstract zero we need to look over the hybrid ecosystem which works best as a mix of which type of AIs as a mix of which type of compute and mix of which type of influencing and industry or the economy is going to be more use case and I would say efficiency driven so we should be leveraging which is best for to satisfy that particular use case

Radhakant Das

Surajit thank you

Surojeet Roy

Yeah, I think just to add, I was reading one Niti Aayog report, you know, where we are aiming for a 30 trillion economy by 2047 as part of the Vixit Bharat initiative. So out there it was very much mentioned that there are approximately 490 million informal users, you know, workers. So for example, all these carpenters, drivers, so they are the informal users and they are not yet equipped with all the applications which might enhance their productivity. So I think from that perspective, AI use cases can be significantly helpful out here. We can have, you know, smart robots working in the, you know, fields for helping on the agriculture. then there may be use cases where maybe an electrician or carpenter, you send a video of your work and they can, that AI can generate a list of the tools they need, what all steps they have to come prepared with, right?

But for all this, I think the most important part is the model needs to be trained based on data which is coming from India. Because if you train the models based on data which is coming outside India, then maybe it is not tuned for, you know, the India specific use cases. There will be a bias there. So I think that’s why it is important.

Radhakant Das

So the cultural perspective you are hitting upon, the cultural perspective has to be understood by us. So there is a bell. So are we going to have some questionnaire sessions, Q &A sessions? Any questions? Maybe we have just two minutes left.

Audience

Can you hear? Yeah, we can. In fact, I had a lot of questions. Okay, so let me first, my question would be around interoperability. So in mobile world, we see that whatever user equipment you buy from the market, it works on all the operators, right? When we are moving towards having AI -related applications, we see there is some problem. So I was looking at meta glasses they were exhibiting. So basically, the meta glass being, say, coming out in the market will only work with the meta. So should we not think of creating some AI? API sort of architecture wherein a product created by one. user side should work in different applications. It should work with Google.

It should work with geo -applications sort of. That’s the first question which I have. The second question is about the model training which Surjeet was trying to address. So I mean the advantage of India is like any applications we can scale to a billion users. That is one. And the second advantage is that we have a huge data set on many aspects. So how to leverage these two for AI because although we may not be good at LLMs, various LLMs which we have today. Of course new companies have started. Servum and all have started working on. But we are good at having a data and the market. So how to leverage that so that. I mean models are trained here models are utilized here so these are the two questions which I have in mind thank you.

Rajeev Saluja

Sir I will try to attempt to answer your question the first part I think Sandeep also mentioned see this entire ecosystem end -to -end ecosystem has to be open has to be API driven and loosely coupled so that you know there is no proprietary interface from one point to another so the whole work which is going on right now at least in our organization is to make sure that how this end -to -end ecosystem can become open can become efficient and can scale you brought out a second very important point about India’s scale right and this scale is going to reduce the cost of intelligence and that affordability is a also a very important factor for us to deliver value to our you know 140 million sorry 140 crore people that reduction in cost is a very very important factor The third important point which I want to make here is that when you talk of LLMs, they are important.

But delivering intelligence is not about LLMs or training LLMs. It is about delivering this entire ecosystem to the last mile. When it comes to LLMs, the way we are building intelligence in India is in every language. These models have to be trained. So every person, whether it is from the south, from Kerala, or from Assam, or from any state in the northeast, they should be able to get this intelligence in their local language made. That is the whole work we are doing right now as part of Jio.

Sandeep Sharma

Thank you, Rajiv. I think just to answer the second part of the question, there is a lot of data, how we can ensure. I think a framework of having is centralized data exchanges and centralized processes. Training exchanges. where enterprise can port their data with a certain anonymization so that no confidential data passed out but industries can come and train the models specific with the data which is available from the enterprises or from the end users within India. But I think central exchange mechanism is need to be placed.

Surojeet Roy

So just to add, I think democratizing the AI is also very important. It should be accessible to everybody at much lower cost and I think in that direction putting GPUs at cell towers can be one way of doing it because what you can do is when the network is not very busy and the resources are free, those resources can be given to the users to train their models or do some inferencing functions because those resources are there at every site. So that can be one way of helping on this direction.

Radhakant Das

Thank you. So you have another question? All right.

Audience

Morning. My name is Sidhu. I’m from AT &T. One quick question, now that Rajiv is also here. See, across the world, telecom companies are realizing that not having a network API exchange and then monetizing that is becoming a problem for many of the large enterprise customer use cases. For example, if a bank wants to understand their customer behavior, customers have got multiple networks, so they don’t get the visibility, right? So with OneEdge, I think Jio and Airtel have also joined hands last year. On the U .S. side, some work is happening, but I wanted to understand how much of this monetization of the network API -centric economy is materializing from India’s standpoint. I know Jio covers almost, I don’t know, 40%, 50 % of the overall population in India, so you might throw some.

I don’t know if you’re going to throw some. I don’t know if you’re going to throw some. I don’t know if you’re going to throw some. I don’t know if you’re going to throw some.

Rajeev Saluja

I will try to answer this quickly because the time is up and we can take this discussion offline. But see, we are committed to an open AI ecosystem to drive value. And like I said, enterprise value cannot be delivered unless the end -to -end ecosystem is open and connected. I think we are ringing the bell, but I will take this discussion offline. Thank you, sir. Thank you.

Radhakant Das

So we

Moderator

have time to stop. Any other questions that we can remind of now? Thank you. Thank you, everyone. May I request Radhika and Das to hand over the memento to all our speakers? May I also request Ashok, sir, to please come on stage and kindly collect your memento? Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (16)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (5)
Confirmedhigh

“The moderator opened the session by framing the theme “AI at the Core, 6G at the Edge” as a strategic opportunity for India to shift from a consumer of global technology to a leader in the next intelligence and connectivity frontier.”

The knowledge base describes the discussion as focusing on India’s strategic approach to integrating AI with 6G under the same tagline, confirming the moderator’s framing.

Confirmedhigh

“AI was added retrospectively in the 5G release‑15‑to‑release‑18 cycle.”

Source S6 explains that artificial intelligence began to be integrated with the rollout of release 18 (5G‑Advanced), confirming the retrospective addition of AI.

Additional Contextmedium

“The ITU’s 6G framework (released two years ago) lists integrated AI as one of six usage scenarios and enshrines “ubiquitous intelligence” as a design pillar, meaning AI will be native to every element of the end‑to‑end system.”

S58 notes that the ITU introduced a new framework for 6G development, highlighting AI as a key component and emphasizing broader design considerations such as energy efficiency, providing additional context to the claim.

Confirmedmedium

“Bharat 6G Alliance – Coordinates working groups on technology, spectrum and devices.”

S17 confirms that the Department of Telecommunications launched the Bharat 6G Alliance to develop a roadmap for 6G, bringing together industry, academia, research institutions and standards bodies, which aligns with the claim of coordinated working groups.

Confirmedlow

“The moderator introduced the panelists and set the focus on technical, business and policy implications of an AI‑native 6G.”

S70 indicates that the session moderator introduced the panelists and managed the discussion format, confirming this aspect of the report.

External Sources (78)
S1
S2
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — -Rajeev Saluja: Vice President, 5G Radio at Reliance Jio – expertise in telecommunications and 5G/6G technology developm…
S3
Keynote-Olivier Blum — -Moderator: Role/Title: Conference Moderator; Area of Expertise: Not mentioned -Mr. Schneider: Role/Title: Not mentione…
S4
Keynote-Vinod Khosla — -Moderator: Role/Title: Moderator of the event; Area of Expertise: Not mentioned -Mr. Jeet Adani: Role/Title: Not menti…
S5
Day 0 Event #250 Building Trust and Combatting Fraud in the Internet Ecosystem — – **Frode Sørensen** – Role/Title: Online moderator, colleague of Johannes Vallesverd, Area of Expertise: Online session…
S6
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/designing-indias-digital-future-ai-at-the-core-6g-at-the-edge — Thank you, sir. So now we are moving to our very next segment, the panel discussion. Our first speaker is Rajiv Seluja, …
S7
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — -Radhakant Das: Heads the Technology Engineering and Innovation Function for Network Solutions and Services (NSS) at TCS…
S8
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — These key comments fundamentally shaped the discussion by elevating it from a technical conversation about 6G and AI int…
S9
Scaling Innovation Building a Robust AI Startup Ecosystem — -Shri Ashok Gupta: Title – Director STPI Gurugram; Role – Dignitary presenting mementos -Shri Atul Kumar Singh: Title -…
S10
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — -Surojeet Roy: Senior Telecommunications Leader, Head of Technology, Technology and Solutions, COE, at Nokia India – exp…
S11
WS #280 the DNS Trust Horizon Safeguarding Digital Identity — – **Audience** – Individual from Senegal named Yuv (role/title not specified)
S12
Building the Workforce_ AI for Viksit Bharat 2047 — -Audience- Role/Title: Professor Charu from Indian Institute of Public Administration (one identified audience member), …
S13
Nri Collaborative Session Navigating Global Cyber Threats Via Local Practices — – **Audience** – Dr. Nazar (specific role/title not clearly mentioned)
S14
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — Artificial intelligence and telecommunications complement each other to form the backbone for the intelligence era. Tele…
S15
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Cristiano Amon — The equipment was different. The use case is different. We’re heading to the next big transformation of the telecom sect…
S16
The geopolitics of digital standards: China’s role in standard-setting organisations — 5G, the fifth-generation mobile network, is key in unlocking the potential of advanced technologies such as AI, the IoT,…
S17
The Indian Department of Telecommunications launches Bharat 6G Alliance — The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) in Indiahas launched the Bharat 6G Alliance(B6GA) to develop a roadmap for 6G…
S18
Future Network System as Open Platform in Beyond 5G/6G Era | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #201 — Abhimanyu Gosain worked with National Science Foundation and 35 global industry member companies on a flagship project f…
S19
Global telecommunication and AI standards development for all — India has been chosen to host the distinguished World Telecommunication Standardisation Assembly (WTSA 2024), set to tak…
S20
IndoGerman AI Collaboration Driving Economic Development and Soc — Several emerging technology areas were identified as prime candidates for enhanced collaboration. India’s successful dev…
S21
India’s comprehensive strategy to revolutionise telecommunications and foster inclusive growth — The Indian government hasmadeconnectivity a cornerstone of its vision for a digitally empowered nation. The government i…
S22
AI for Good Technology That Empowers People — “So, you know, AI being available at the edge, not from, you know, the very basic thing that we all use every day is you…
S23
Artificial intelligence as a driver of digital transformation in industries (HSE University) — The analysis offers a comprehensive examination of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on various sectors. One s…
S24
Open Forum #75 Shaping Global AI Governance Through Multistakeholder Action — Suggests governments should use procurement to ensure companies provide safe products that have human rights as core des…
S25
Workshop 6: Perception of AI Tools in Business Operations: Building Trustworthy and Rights-Respecting Technologies — Angela Coriz: Thank you. I will try to be quick. So I work at Connect Europe. This is a trade association that represent…
S26
5G traffic surges under growing AI usage — AI-driven applications are reshaping mobile data norms, and5G networks are feeling the pressure. Analysts warn that upli…
S27
Partnering on American AI Exports Powering the Future India AI Impact Summit 2026 — This comment demonstrates sophisticated understanding that ‘AI sovereignty’ isn’t a monolithic concept but represents di…
S28
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI — This comment introduced nuance to the sovereignty debate and influenced the conversation toward finding balance between …
S29
Democratizing AI Building Trustworthy Systems for Everyone — “of course see there would be a number of challenges but i think as i mentioned that one doesn’t need to really control …
S30
Responsible AI in India Leadership Ethics & Global Impact — “Techniques you use for responsible AI should be interoperable, open, and standardized”[20]. “We are built on an open st…
S31
Sandboxes for Data Governance: Global Responsible Innovation | IGF 2023 WS #279 — Collaboration among different countries and stakeholders is seen as a key driver for advancing regulatory sandboxes and …
S32
Nepal Engagement Session — “So either from a technology point of view, we have the interoperability, the standards which we have chosen, the models…
S33
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — The discussion highlighted the importance of policy interoperability rather than uniform global governance, recognizing …
S34
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — “API sort of architecture wherein a product created by one.”[111]”… this entire ecosystem end -to -end ecosystem has t…
S35
Open Forum #26 High-level review of AI governance from Inter-governmental P — 5. Balancing Global and Local Needs: The discussion highlighted the need to balance global standards with local needs an…
S36
WS #97 Interoperability of AI Governance: Scope and Mechanism — Mauricio Gibson: Thank you. Yeah, I mean, just building on what Chet was saying, I think, and what you were saying, Olg…
S37
AI Meets Agriculture Building Food Security and Climate Resilien — Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis presented Maharashtra’s Maha Agri AI Policy 2025-2029, emphasizing the shift from demon…
S38
AI for agriculture Scaling Intelegence for food and climate resiliance — The policy adopts a government‑led, ecosystem‑driven approach to foster AI solutions for agriculture across Maharashtra….
S39
From Human Potential to Global Impact_ Qualcomm’s AI for All Workshop — It’s like shop something for me, check my bank balance. If I have enough over there, I want to buy that thing and then w…
S40
HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTE FOR DEMOCRATIZING ACCESS TO AI — Artificial intelligence | Information and communication technologies for development Arun advocates for moving inferenc…
S41
AI for Bharat’s Health_ Addressing a Billion Clinical Realities — Artificial intelligence | Data governance He explains that remote, low‑connectivity scenarios benefit from edge deploym…
S42
Opening remarks — Such an ecosystem should promote the development and application of technology within an environmentally conscious, fair…
S43
Panel Discussion Summary: AI Governance Implementation and Capacity Building in Government — And that promotes open… The third pillar is based on sovereignty of our infrastructure. The fourth pillar is based on …
S44
Powering AI _ Global Leaders Session _ AI Impact Summit India Part 2 — Good evening, distinguished guests. Welcome to the session on powering AI. As AI scales at speed, so does its infrastruc…
S45
Omnipresent Smart Wireless: Deploying Future Networks at Scale — An ethical and responsible approach to 6G technology is emphasized to ensure its positive use and avoid potential negati…
S46
Challenges and Opportunities: Emerging Technologies and Sustainability Impacts  — Concurrently, the importance of standardisation is being emphasised in the context of emerging technologies, particularl…
S47
Future Network System as Open Platform in Beyond 5G/6G Era | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #201 — Advocacy for alterative business models, drawing upon the S-line model by Docomo, were seen as more adaptable with the p…
S48
AI Infrastructure and Future Development: A Panel Discussion — -Audience- Audience member asking a question
S49
Main Session | Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence — 3. Interoperability and Global Cooperation Anita Gurumurthy: Sure, I can do that. Am I audible? Okay. Thank you. I jus…
S50
What policy levers can bridge the AI divide? — *This summary reflects the content available in the provided transcript, which contained significant portions of unclear…
S51
WS #208 Democratising Access to AI with Open Source LLMs — To improve AI models for specific regions, there is a need for high-quality local data. This includes data on local lang…
S52
Al and Global Challenges: Ethical Development and Responsible Deployment — Alfredo Ronchi:Most interesting presentation from the standpoint of China. Thanks a lot for this date. And now we will t…
S53
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge — “And we have selected 100 plus 6G related projects in different area.”[10]”So to support that activity, we had come out …
S54
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks — And let’s do it. India can show the direction forward. For whole world. There is a tradition for great. collaboration, g…
S55
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/designing-indias-digital-future-ai-at-the-core-6g-at-the-edge — As you know that release 21 would be the first release of 60. So we are trying to do that and perhaps that will come ver…
S56
Artificial intelligence as a driver of digital transformation in industries (HSE University) — The analysis offers a comprehensive examination of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on various sectors. One s…
S57
Open Forum #75 Shaping Global AI Governance Through Multistakeholder Action — Suggests governments should use procurement to ensure companies provide safe products that have human rights as core des…
S58
High-level dialogue on Shaping the future of the digital economy (UNCTAD) — As a result of these discussions, a treaty with a four-year effectiveness was established. In terms of future advancemen…
S59
5G traffic surges under growing AI usage — AI-driven applications are reshaping mobile data norms, and5G networks are feeling the pressure. Analysts warn that upli…
S60
Workshop 6: Perception of AI Tools in Business Operations: Building Trustworthy and Rights-Respecting Technologies — Angela Coriz: Thank you. I will try to be quick. So I work at Connect Europe. This is a trade association that represent…
S61
AI for Good Technology That Empowers People — “this is a use case … for a traffic prediction … predicting certain traffic spikes when they had a football match …..
S62
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem — This comment established a new analytical framework for the entire discussion. It shifted the conversation from traditio…
S63
Partnering on American AI Exports Powering the Future India AI Impact Summit 2026 — This comment demonstrates sophisticated understanding that ‘AI sovereignty’ isn’t a monolithic concept but represents di…
S64
Democratizing AI Building Trustworthy Systems for Everyone — “of course see there would be a number of challenges but i think as i mentioned that one doesn’t need to really control …
S65
Leaders’ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session — This comment introduced a crucial tension between the massive scale of change and the need for distributed, democratic a…
S66
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact — -Collaboration and Interoperability as India’s Strategic Advantage: Professor Ganesh Ramakrishnan highlighted interopera…
S67
Responsible AI in India Leadership Ethics & Global Impact — “Techniques you use for responsible AI should be interoperable, open, and standardized”[20]. “We are built on an open st…
S68
Nepal Engagement Session — “So either from a technology point of view, we have the interoperability, the standards which we have chosen, the models…
S69
Keynote-Rishad Premji — Opening framing by the moderator
S70
The Global Power Shift India’s Rise in AI & Semiconductors — -Moderator: Role not specified in detail, appears to be the session moderator who introduced the panelists and managed t…
S71
Media Briefing: Unlocking ASEAN’s Digital Future – Driving Inclusive Growth and Global Competitiveness / DAVOS 2025 — – Anwar Ibrahim: Prime Minister of Malaysia – Joo-Ok Lee: Head of Asia-Pacific from the World Economic Forum Anwar Ibr…
S72
High Level Session 2: Digital Public Goods and Global Digital Cooperation — Amandeep Singh Gill: I think cooperation, collaboration, that’s a no-brainer. In fact, the term digital cooperation is o…
S73
The WSIS Moon Shot: Celebrating 20 years and crystal-balling the next 20! — Intro:And I said coach, you are going to lose, and encourage them. And I said, no, coach. I’m free. I’ll do everything, …
S74
5G Transformation: The power of good policy  — The global rollout of5G networkshas been met with considerable excitement, and rightly so. While the promise of faster d…
S75
Bridging the Digital Divide: Achieving Universal and Meaningful Connectivity (ITU) — In conclusion, the South African government’s efforts to promote connectivity and economic parity are commendable. Initi…
S76
DoT and TRAI to enhance telecom services with new measures — The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) are taking significantst…
S77
The Ministry of Information, Communications, and the Digital Economy (MICDE) Strategic Plan for 2023-2027 — To realise these goals, several initiatives are planned, such as:
S78
Challenges and solutions for broadband infrastructure deployment in developing countries, rural and remote areas — Robin Zuercher:that also could be covered by wireless and also fiber ring topologies and then the breakdown for like the…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
A
Ashok Kumar
9 arguments129 words per minute1524 words706 seconds
Argument 1
AI as an after‑thought in 5G, becoming native in 6G (Ashok Kumar)
EXPLANATION
Ashok explains that AI was initially added to 5G as an after‑thought, but the design philosophy has shifted for 6G where AI is embedded from the outset. This marks a transition from retrofitting AI to making it a core component of the network.
EVIDENCE
He notes that AI began to be integrated as part of 3G releases and was considered an after-thought, whereas the 6G story is different with AI being part of the initial design. He references the evolution from 5G releases 15 to 18 and the emerging 6G vision. [22-27]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ashok’s claim that AI was an after-thought in 5G and is native to 6G is corroborated by the design narrative in the Indian 6G roadmap, which contrasts 5G releases 15-18 with the AI-native 6G vision [S1] and notes the early integration of AI starting only in later 5G releases [S6].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Shift from AI after‑thought to native integration
AGREED WITH
Radhakant Das
Argument 2
ITU’s 6G framework explicitly includes integrated AI and “ubiquitous intelligence” (Ashok Kumar)
EXPLANATION
Ashok points out that the ITU’s 6G framework lists integrated AI as one of six usage scenarios and defines “ubiquitous intelligence” as a key design principle, meaning AI will be embedded in every network element. This formal inclusion signals a strategic priority for AI in future standards.
EVIDENCE
He describes the ITU 6G framework released two years ago, which envisions six usage scenarios including integrated AI, and highlights the design principle of ubiquitous intelligence that requires AI in user equipment, radio, core, and applications. [27-30]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
ITU embeds AI in 6G design
Argument 3
Low‑cost 3GPP/TSDSI membership for startups to enable standard participation (Ashok Kumar)
EXPLANATION
Ashok explains that the Department of Telecom subsidises TSDSI and 3GPP membership for startups, reducing the fee from several lakh rupees to just 10,000 rupees, thereby lowering the barrier for Indian innovators to contribute to global standards.
EVIDENCE
He states that a startup wishing to join 3GPP must be a member of TSDSI and 3GPP, and DOT supports this by offering membership at a very low cost of 10,000 rupees instead of 5-6 lakh. [41-43]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The reduced 3GPP/TSDSI membership fee for startups is documented in the Department of Telecom’s support policy for standards participation [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Affordable standards participation for startups
Argument 4
6G Accelerated Research Program, testbeds (terahertz, AOC) and collaboration with Bharat 6G Alliance (Ashok Kumar)
EXPLANATION
Ashok outlines a suite of government‑backed initiatives: a 6G Accelerated Research Program that has funded over 100 projects across terahertz, AI, ML and semantic communications; dedicated testbeds; and a partnership with the Bharat 6G Alliance to shape policy and technology roadmaps.
EVIDENCE
He mentions the launch of the 6G Accelerated Research Program two years ago, selection of 100+ projects covering terahertz, AI, ML, semantic communications, and the establishment of terahertz and AOC testbeds, as well as close work with the Bharat 6G Alliance and its working groups. [45-53] and [55-62]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The 6G Accelerated Research Program, its terahertz and AOC testbeds, and partnership with the Bharat 6G Alliance are described in the government’s 6G strategy overview [S1] and the alliance announcement [S17].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Government‑driven research and testbeds for 6G
Argument 5
Expansion of 5G labs across institutes as a foundation for 6G research (Ashok Kumar)
EXPLANATION
Ashok notes that the government inaugurated 100 5G labs in 100 institutes, which are now operational and serve as a knowledge base and test environment for transitioning to 6G research and use‑case development.
EVIDENCE
He refers to the budget-announced initiative of establishing 100 5G labs across the country, which are currently operational and provide a platform for advancing to 6G. [69-72]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The establishment of 100 operational 5G labs across institutes is detailed in the national 5G rollout plan [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
5G labs as stepping stones to 6G
Argument 6
Industry should adopt existing 5G labs to accelerate 6G use‑case development and testing (Ashok Kumar)
EXPLANATION
Ashok calls on industry participants to partner with one or two of the operational 5G labs to co‑develop and test 6G technologies, leveraging existing infrastructure to speed up innovation.
EVIDENCE
He concludes his address by requesting industry players to adopt one or two 5G labs and collaborate on further technology development. [72-73]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Leveraging 5G labs for 6G innovation
Argument 7
Active participation in international standards is essential for embedding Indian innovations into 6G and building a domestic end‑to‑end stack.
EXPLANATION
Ashok stresses that joining standardisation bodies allows Indian technology to become part of global specifications and enables the country to develop its own complete 6G solution, rather than merely adopting foreign standards.
EVIDENCE
He says, “It’s an opportunity not only to like participate in the standard so that our technology, our innovations becomes part of the standard, but also to build our own end-to-end 6G technology stack” (sentences [34-35]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
India’s role in international standards, highlighted by hosting WTSA 2024, underscores the importance of active participation for embedding domestic innovations [S19]; the DOT’s emphasis on standards engagement is also noted [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Standard participation to embed Indian tech
Argument 8
Collaboration with the Bharat 6G Alliance and other ministries helps shape policy and accelerates India’s leadership in 6G.
EXPLANATION
Ashok notes that close work with the Bharat 6G Alliance’s working groups and coordination with ministries such as DST creates a policy framework that guides research, spectrum allocation, and device development, positioning India as a 6G leader.
EVIDENCE
He mentions, “we are also closely working with Bharat 6G Alliance… they have created multiple working groups… we are also working with DST RDI scheme” (sentences [60-62] and [63-68]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Collaboration with the Bharat 6G Alliance and ministries such as DST is outlined in the alliance’s charter and joint RDI initiatives [S17] and the broader 6G strategy document [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Policy co‑creation via Bharat 6G Alliance
Argument 9
The DST RDI scheme, now including the telecom sector, provides funding and support for scaling research, startups, and academia in 6G.
EXPLANATION
Ashok explains that the Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) scheme of the Department of Science & Technology has been extended to cover telecom, allowing companies and research institutions to apply for grants that accelerate 6G‑related projects.
EVIDENCE
He states, “We have taken up with DST that telecom sector should be included as part of the sector which will be supported. The RDI and Secretary DST had agreed… our companies, our startup in the field of telecom can actually apply” (sentences [63-68]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Inclusion of telecom in the DST RDI scheme and the associated funding mechanisms are mentioned in the government’s RDI expansion briefing [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
RDI scheme supporting telecom R&D
S
Surojeet Roy
7 arguments151 words per minute1614 words639 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑enabled devices (smart glasses, wearables) will generate heavy uplink traffic, requiring edge inferencing (Surojeet Roy)
EXPLANATION
Surojeet describes the emergence of AI‑powered wearables such as smart glasses and body patches, which cannot perform all inference locally and will therefore rely on edge or centralized data centres, creating substantial uplink traffic demands.
EVIDENCE
He lists various form-factors-smart glasses, AR/VR glasses, wearables, body patches-that embed AI functions but may need inferencing support from edge or central data centres, leading to high uplink traffic requirements. [115-124]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Uplink pressure from AI‑enabled devices
Argument 2
Projected shift from a downlink‑dominant ratio (~10:1) to a more balanced 4:1 ratio, demanding higher uplink capacity (Surojeet Roy)
EXPLANATION
Surojeet cites forecasts that overall traffic will grow 6‑9× by 2033, with AI‑driven traffic rising to about 30 %, and predicts the downlink‑to‑uplink ratio will move from roughly 10:1 to 4:1, necessitating significant uplink capacity upgrades.
EVIDENCE
He references Nokia Bell Labs projections of WAN traffic growth and AI traffic reaching 30 % by 2033, and later notes that the current downlink-to-uplink ratio of about 10:1 could shift to 4:1, implying much higher uplink data rates are needed. [125-132] and [185-190]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Changing traffic asymmetry toward uplink
Argument 3
AI‑driven techniques such as DeepRx/DeepTx can boost spectral efficiency and capacity by 25‑30 % (Surojeet Roy)
EXPLANATION
Surojeet explains that AI‑based signal processing (DeepRx, DeepTx) can decode signals under poor SNR conditions, increase spectral efficiency, support higher‑order modulation, and thereby raise network capacity by roughly a quarter to a third.
EVIDENCE
He details how deep learning algorithms can optimize communication parameters, improve decoding in low SNR environments, and deliver a 25-30 % capacity increase along with higher-order modulation support. [195-202]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑enhanced radio performance
Argument 4
Indian‑specific data is crucial to avoid bias and to tailor models to local contexts (Surojeet Roy)
EXPLANATION
Surojeet stresses that AI models must be trained on Indian data to reflect local usage patterns, languages, and conditions; otherwise they risk bias and poor performance for Indian users and informal sector workers.
EVIDENCE
He gives examples of AI assisting carpenters, drivers, and agricultural workers, and argues that models need Indian data to avoid bias and be relevant to local contexts. [300-304]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Need for domestic data in AI training
AGREED WITH
Audience
Argument 5
6G will require substantially larger bandwidth (≈400 MHz) and fivefold spectral efficiency to deliver roughly twenty‑times the capacity of 5G.
EXPLANATION
Surojeet outlines the quantitative leap needed in spectrum and efficiency, indicating that moving from typical 100 MHz 5G bands to 400 MHz for 6G, together with a 5× increase in spectral efficiency, will enable the projected 20× capacity growth.
EVIDENCE
He says, “we are talking about minimum 400 MHz of bandwidth when we are talking about 6G… we are talking about 5 times spectral efficiency… which means 5 into 4, you are talking about 20 times more capacity coming out from 6G networks” (sentences [202-206]).
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Bandwidth and spectral efficiency requirements for 6G
Argument 6
AI‑driven signal processing (DeepRx/DeepTx) can enable higher‑order modulation and increase network capacity by 25‑30 % even under poor SNR conditions.
EXPLANATION
He describes how deep‑learning‑based receivers and transmitters can decode signals that traditional methods cannot, supporting more complex modulation schemes and thereby boosting overall throughput.
EVIDENCE
He explains, “using AI you can actually decipher those signals… this can give a capacity increase maybe 25-30 % and you can also have higher order modulation supported” (sentences [195-202]).
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑enhanced radio performance
Argument 7
The shift toward AI‑enabled edge computing will invert traditional traffic asymmetry, creating a surge in uplink demand that requires network redesign.
EXPLANATION
Surojeet predicts that as more AI inference moves to the edge, devices will generate far more uplink traffic, changing the downlink‑to‑uplink ratio from roughly 10:1 to 4:1 and necessitating upgrades in uplink capacity and architecture.
EVIDENCE
He notes, “currently we see a downlink to uplink ratio of maybe 10s to 1… with AI applications we are predicting that this pattern will change to maybe 4s to 1… you need much higher data rates in the uplink” (sentences [185-190]).
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Uplink traffic surge due to edge AI
R
Rajeev Saluja
6 arguments163 words per minute1153 words423 seconds
Argument 1
Simple, latency‑sensitive inference should be handled at the edge; complex multi‑agent workflows remain in the core/cloud (Rajeev Saluja)
EXPLANATION
Rajeev proposes a split architecture where straightforward, time‑critical AI inference is performed close to the user at the edge, while more elaborate, multi‑step processes are processed centrally, balancing performance and resource use.
EVIDENCE
He states that most simple agentic inference workloads will be handled at the edge, whereas multi-step, multi-agent complex workflows will stay at the central location, aiming for pervasive and affordable intelligence. [158-162]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Edge-centric AI inference for latency-sensitive tasks and centralised handling of complex workflows are advocated in AI-at-the-edge studies and the Indian 6G vision, which emphasizes edge inference for low-latency services [S22] and the role of AI as the intelligence layer of telecom [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Edge vs. core AI inference split
Argument 2
Distributing inference reduces power consumption and eases data‑center load (Rajeev Saluja)
EXPLANATION
By moving inference tasks to the edge, power demand is spread across many devices, lessening the concentration of energy use in large data centres and improving overall efficiency.
EVIDENCE
He links the distribution of inference to reduced power consumption and alleviation of data-centre load, supporting the edge-centric approach. [158-162]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Energy-efficient AI deployment and reduced data-centre load are highlighted as design goals in the ethical AI framework for telecom [S14] and in edge-AI efficiency discussions [S22].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Power efficiency through distributed inference
Argument 3
India must “build, not rent” intelligence to ensure affordability and self‑reliance (Rajeev Saluja)
EXPLANATION
Rajeev argues that India cannot depend on foreign AI solutions; instead it must develop its own intelligence capabilities to keep costs low and guarantee widespread access.
EVIDENCE
He quotes the sentiment that “you cannot rent intelligence,” emphasizing the need to build and scale domestic AI for affordability. [154-157]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The call to ‘build, not rent’ intelligence aligns with India’s digital sovereignty agenda and initiatives to develop indigenous AI capabilities [S21] and with Indo-German collaboration emphasizing local AI development [S20].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Domestic AI development over import
Argument 4
A sovereign token‑based AI economy is required for end‑to‑end control of data, inference and value delivery (Rajeev Saluja)
EXPLANATION
Rajeev envisions a token‑driven AI ecosystem where every step—from request initiation to inference delivery—is owned and operated within India, ensuring sovereignty over data and AI services.
EVIDENCE
He describes a token-based sovereign AI economy where the entire value chain, from request to inference, is kept inside India to avoid dependence and high costs. [278-282]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sovereign token‑driven AI ecosystem
AGREED WITH
Radhakant Das
Argument 5
New value pools: demand analysis, workflow automation, and enhanced security for enterprises (Rajeev Saluja)
EXPLANATION
Rajeev identifies three primary benefits for enterprises from AI‑native 6G: better demand forecasting, automation of end‑to‑end workflows, and stronger security frameworks, all enabled by the high‑speed, low‑latency network.
EVIDENCE
He lists demand analysis, workflow automation, and improved security as the three major value pools enterprises can tap into with 6G-AI convergence. [267-273]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Enterprise value creation from AI‑6G
Argument 6
Open, loosely‑coupled API architecture is required so AI applications work across vendors and platforms (Rajeev Saluja)
EXPLANATION
Rajeev stresses that an open, API‑driven architecture, similar to the UPI model, is essential for interoperability, allowing AI services to operate across different devices, operators, and ecosystems without proprietary lock‑in.
EVIDENCE
He explains that the end-to-end ecosystem must be open, API-driven, and loosely coupled to avoid proprietary interfaces, citing the UPI example as a successful model. [330-336]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for an open, loosely-coupled API ecosystem mirrors the open platform approach promoted for future networks [S18] and the interoperable AI-telecom framework discussed in the AI-telecom synergy report [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
API‑centric open AI ecosystem
AGREED WITH
Sandeep Sharma, Audience
S
Sandeep Sharma
4 arguments165 words per minute1520 words551 seconds
Argument 1
Open, interoperable ecosystem (e.g., UPI model) is essential for scaling AI services (Sandeep Sharma)
EXPLANATION
Sandeep argues that, like the Unified Payments Interface, an open and interoperable framework is crucial for widespread adoption and scaling of AI services across the country.
EVIDENCE
He cites the UPI example, noting that its success hinged on an open ecosystem, and asserts the same mindset is needed for AI. [262-264]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of an open, interoperable ecosystem akin to UPI is discussed in the open platform vision for beyond-5G/6G [S18] and the AI-telecom synergy analysis [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open ecosystem model for AI scaling
AGREED WITH
Rajeev Saluja, Audience
Argument 2
Need for national frameworks, data‑exchange platforms, and audit mechanisms to align pilots with emerging standards (Sandeep Sharma)
EXPLANATION
Sandeep calls for coordinated national frameworks that provide data‑exchange mechanisms, auditing, and safety guardrails, ensuring AI‑6G pilots are interoperable, secure, and aligned with forthcoming standards.
EVIDENCE
He outlines existing coordination, the necessity for national referenceable frameworks, safety guardrails, and alignment with standards, emphasizing that pilots should not be siloed. [237-252]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
National coordination mechanisms, data-exchange platforms, and audit frameworks are recommended in the 6G policy documents and standard-alignment strategies [S18][S19].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
National coordination and safety for AI‑6G pilots
Argument 3
Avoiding siloed development by co‑creating referenceable frameworks and safety guardrails (Sandeep Sharma)
EXPLANATION
Sandeep stresses that collaborative, referenceable frameworks and clear safety guidelines are needed to prevent fragmented development and ensure trustworthy AI deployments.
EVIDENCE
He mentions the need for co-creation of referenceable frameworks, safety guardrails, and national policies to avoid isolated silos. [237-252]
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Co-creation of referenceable frameworks and safety guardrails to avoid siloed AI pilots is emphasized in the open-platform and governance recommendations for 6G [S18].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Co‑creation to prevent siloed AI development
Argument 4
Centralized data exchange enables secure, anonymized model training across industries (Sandeep Sharma)
EXPLANATION
Sandeep proposes a national data‑exchange platform where enterprises can share anonymized data, allowing cross‑industry model training while preserving confidentiality and security.
EVIDENCE
He describes a framework of centralized data exchanges and training exchanges that permit anonymized data sharing for model training across sectors. [338-344]
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Secure national data exchange for AI model training
M
Moderator
1 argument42 words per minute258 words364 seconds
Argument 1
India should transition from a consumer of global technology cycles to a creator of the next intelligence and connectivity frontier.
EXPLANATION
The moderator frames the session as an opportunity for India to move beyond merely using foreign technologies and to become a driver of future AI and communications innovations. This positioning sets a strategic agenda for the discussion.
EVIDENCE
In the opening remarks the moderator states that the goal is to ensure “India moves from being a consumer of global technology cycles to becoming a sharper of the world’s next intelligence and connectivity frontier” (sentence [1]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
India’s ambition to move from technology consumer to creator is reflected in its hosting of WTSA 2024 and leadership in 6G standardisation efforts [S19] and the national digital future roadmap [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Strategic shift from technology consumer to creator
R
Radhakant Das
7 arguments150 words per minute1679 words670 seconds
Argument 1
Intelligence should be regarded as the basic infrastructure for the next wave of digital evolution.
EXPLANATION
Radhakant describes intelligence as the foundational layer upon which future networks, services, and applications will be built, likening it to traditional physical infrastructure. This view underlines the centrality of AI in upcoming technology roadmaps.
EVIDENCE
He says, “We are at a historic inflection point where the intelligence is the basic infra. based on which the next evolution of this planet will actually continue” (sentences [88-89]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The positioning of AI as the foundational infrastructure is articulated in the ethical AI in telecom analysis, which describes AI as the intelligence layer of future networks [S14] and the Indian 6G vision [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Intelligence as foundational infrastructure
Argument 2
AI deployments must be energy‑efficient to avoid excessive power consumption in data centres.
EXPLANATION
Radhakant stresses that AI should not cause data centres to overheat or consume disproportionate energy, calling for power‑efficient AI designs. This reflects concerns about sustainability as AI scales.
EVIDENCE
He notes, “we will ensure that AI is kind of energy efficient. It will not be responsible for melting the data centres. It will be power efficient” (sentences [98-101]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Energy-efficient AI and avoiding data-centre overload are highlighted in the trusted AI guidelines for telecom [S14] and edge AI efficiency studies [S22].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Energy‑efficient AI
Argument 3
Semantic communications and AI should be strategically managed to maximise compute utilisation and minimise waste.
EXPLANATION
He argues that AI workloads need to be orchestrated so that compute capacity is used optimally, avoiding idle resources. This ties AI performance to overall network efficiency.
EVIDENCE
He adds, “we will ensure that every compute capacity is being optimally utilized, not like we have enough compute and we will use it as much as possible” (sentences [102-104]).
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Optimising compute utilisation for AI
Argument 4
Industry should adopt existing 5G labs to accelerate 6G use‑case development and testing.
EXPLANATION
Radhakant urges companies to partner with operational 5G labs, leveraging their infrastructure to fast‑track 6G research and prototype validation. This is a call for practical collaboration.
EVIDENCE
He says, “has also urged some of the industries to take over or adopt a couple of these labs” (sentences [176-179]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The recommendation to leverage existing 5G labs for 6G development is supported by the government’s 5G lab rollout description [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Leveraging 5G labs for 6G innovation
Argument 5
The emergence of small “tokens” (lightweight data packets) will reshape traffic patterns and must be carefully managed.
EXPLANATION
He highlights that token‑based communication could alter uplink/downlink dynamics, questioning why it would increase traffic burstiness. This points to a need for new traffic engineering approaches.
EVIDENCE
He discusses tokens, stating, “There are a lot of popular talks like it is going to the 6Gs or the AI is going to reverse the traffic pattern. But why? Just tokens” (sentences [208-217]).
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Impact of token‑based traffic on network design
Argument 6
A coordinated national framework, including safety guardrails and standard‑alignment mechanisms, is essential for AI‑6G pilots to avoid siloed development.
EXPLANATION
Radhakant asks how industry, academia, and government can co‑create referenceable frameworks and safety guidelines so that pilots are interoperable and ready for upcoming standards. This stresses governance and collaboration.
EVIDENCE
He asks, “what specific coordination mechanisms or co-creation models do you think we all should work together as industry, academia, government to ensure that these pilots, they align to the standards… also safety guidelines” (sentences [229-236]).
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
National coordination and safety for AI‑6G pilots
Argument 7
Sovereignty of the AI ecosystem should be achieved through a token‑based model that balances openness with national control.
EXPLANATION
He raises the question of how much of the AI stack should be open versus sovereign, proposing a token economy that keeps the entire value chain within India. This frames AI sovereignty as both technical and policy‑driven.
EVIDENCE
He asks, “how much of influencing would you like to see… sovereignty… token economy… we need a sovereign token” (sentences [277-287]).
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Token‑based AI sovereignty
A
Audience
3 arguments152 words per minute438 words172 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑related applications need interoperable APIs across devices and platforms to prevent vendor lock‑in.
EXPLANATION
The audience member points out that emerging AI hardware (e.g., Meta glasses) may only work within a single ecosystem, calling for a common AI API architecture that works across operators and service providers.
EVIDENCE
The audience asks, “Should we not think of creating some AI API sort of architecture wherein a product created by one user side should work in different applications… should work with Google, should work with geo-applications” (sentences [312-319]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for interoperable AI APIs across ecosystems is advocated in the open platform blueprint for 6G [S18] and the AI-telecom interoperability report [S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Interoperable AI API architecture
Argument 2
India’s massive data sets and market scale should be leveraged to train AI models locally, reducing dependence on foreign LLMs.
EXPLANATION
The audience highlights India’s advantage of a billion‑user market and abundant data, asking how to use this to train and deploy models domestically, emphasizing self‑reliance in AI.
EVIDENCE
The audience states, “the advantage of India is like any applications we can scale to a billion users… we have a huge data set… how to leverage these two for AI… models are trained here, models are utilized here” (sentences [322-328]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Leveraging India’s large data sets for domestic AI model training aligns with the digital sovereignty and Indo-German collaboration initiatives [S20] and the national AI strategy [S21].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Domestic training of AI models using Indian data
Argument 3
Monetisation of a network‑API economy is a priority; telecom operators need an open AI ecosystem to enable enterprise use cases.
EXPLANATION
Sidhu from AT&T asks how India is materialising revenue from network‑API exchanges, noting that enterprises (e.g., banks) need visibility across multiple networks, and queries Jio’s role in this emerging market.
EVIDENCE
He asks, “how much of this monetisation of the network API-centric economy is materialising from India’s standpoint… Jio covers… 40-50% of the population” (sentences [346-355]).
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Monetisation of network-API services and the push for an open AI ecosystem are discussed in the future network open platform proposals [S18] and the WTSA leadership context [S19].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Network API monetisation and open AI ecosystem
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI must be a core, native component of 6G networks rather than an after‑thought
Speakers: Ashok Kumar, Radhakant Das
AI as an after‑thought in 5G, becoming native in 6G (Ashok Kumar) Intelligence should be regarded as the basic infrastructure for the next wave of digital evolution (Radhakant Das)
Both speakers stress that AI is now embedded in the design of 6G – the ITU framework explicitly includes integrated AI and the principle of ubiquitous intelligence, and intelligence is described as the foundational infrastructure for future networks [27-30][88-89].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This view aligns with India’s 6G roadmap that positions AI as a native function of the network and stresses AI-at-the-core in standardisation work for future 6G systems [S34][S46].
An open, API‑driven and loosely‑coupled ecosystem is essential for scaling AI services and ensuring interoperability
Speakers: Rajeev Saluja, Sandeep Sharma, Audience
Open, loosely‑coupled API architecture is required so AI applications work across vendors and platforms (Rajeev Saluja) Open, interoperable ecosystem (e.g., UPI model) is essential for scaling AI services (Sandeep Sharma) AI‑related applications need interoperable APIs across devices and platforms to prevent vendor lock‑in (Audience)
All three emphasize that a UPI-style open API layer is needed so AI applications can operate across operators, devices and ecosystems without proprietary lock-in [330-336][262-264][312-319].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The call for an open, API-driven architecture matches recommendations from the Designing India’s Digital Future workshop and broader AI governance discussions that prioritize interoperable APIs across stakeholders [S34][S49][S33].
Domestic Indian data is crucial to train AI models that are relevant and unbiased for local use‑cases
Speakers: Surojeet Roy, Audience
Indian‑specific data is crucial to avoid bias and to tailor models to local contexts (Surojeet Roy) India’s massive data sets and market scale should be leveraged to train AI models locally, reducing dependence on foreign LLMs (Audience)
Both point out that AI models must be trained on Indian data to reflect local languages, behaviours and conditions, otherwise they risk bias and poor performance [300-304][322-328].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy papers on democratising AI stress the need for high-quality local datasets to build region-specific models, underscoring the importance of Indian data for unbiased AI outcomes [S51].
Edge‑centric AI inference reduces latency, distributes power consumption and eases pressure on central data‑centres
Speakers: Surojeet Roy, Rajeev Saluja, Radhakant Das
AI‑enabled devices will generate heavy uplink traffic, requiring edge inferencing (Surojeet Roy) Simple, latency‑sensitive inference should be handled at the edge; complex workflows remain in the core (Rajeev Saluja) Intelligence should be energy‑efficient and compute utilisation optimised (Radhakant Das)
All agree that moving inference to the edge improves latency, spreads power demand and makes better use of compute resources, while keeping more complex processing in the core/cloud [115-124][185-190][158-162][98-101].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Research on heterogeneous compute and edge-centric AI highlights latency reduction and lower data-centre load as key benefits of moving inference to the edge [S40][S41][S39].
A coordinated national framework—including standards participation, testbeds, funding schemes and safety guardrails—is needed to align pilots with emerging 6G standards
Speakers: Ashok Kumar, Sandeep Sharma, Radhakant Das
6G Accelerated Research Program, testbeds and collaboration with Bharat 6G Alliance (Ashok Kumar) Need for national frameworks, data‑exchange platforms and audit mechanisms to align pilots with standards (Sandeep Sharma) A coordinated national framework, safety guidelines and standard‑alignment mechanisms are essential for AI‑6G pilots (Radhakant Das)
Each speaker calls for a unified national approach-government-backed research programs, testbeds, data-exchange and safety frameworks-to ensure AI-6G pilots are interoperable and standards-ready [45-53][55-62][237-252][229-236].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This recommendation echoes calls for a national AI framework that integrates standards, testbeds and safety mechanisms, as emphasized in 6G standardisation and multi-stakeholder governance initiatives [S46][S45][S33].
A sovereign, token‑based AI economy is required to keep the entire value chain within India
Speakers: Rajeev Saluja, Radhakant Das
A sovereign token‑based AI economy is required for end‑to‑end control of data, inference and value delivery (Rajeev Saluja) Sovereignty of the AI ecosystem should be achieved through a token‑based model that balances openness with national control (Radhakant Das)
Both advocate a token-driven model that ensures AI services, data and inference remain domestically owned and controlled, framing it as essential for national sovereignty [278-282][277-287].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The emphasis on sovereignty mirrors AI governance discussions that balance open ecosystems with national control over AI infrastructure and data assets [S43][S33].
Similar Viewpoints
Both see the edge as the appropriate place for latency‑critical AI inference, while more complex processing can stay in the core/cloud [115-124][158-162].
Speakers: Surojeet Roy, Rajeev Saluja
AI‑enabled devices will generate heavy uplink traffic, requiring edge inferencing (Surojeet Roy) Simple, latency‑sensitive inference should be handled at the edge; complex workflows remain in the core (Rajeev Saluja)
Both stress the necessity of coordinated national programmes, testbeds and governance frameworks to steer AI‑6G development and avoid siloed pilots [45-53][55-62][237-252].
Speakers: Ashok Kumar, Sandeep Sharma
6G Accelerated Research Program, testbeds and collaboration with Bharat 6G Alliance (Ashok Kumar) Need for national frameworks, data‑exchange platforms and audit mechanisms to align pilots with standards (Sandeep Sharma)
Both propose a token‑centric model to achieve AI sovereignty, balancing openness with national control [278-282][277-287].
Speakers: Rajeev Saluja, Radhakant Das
A sovereign token‑based AI economy is required for end‑to‑end control (Rajeev Saluja) Sovereignty of the AI ecosystem should be achieved through a token‑based model (Radhakant Das)
Unexpected Consensus
Both the moderator (Radhakant Das) and industry speakers highlighted the impact of token‑based traffic patterns on network design, a topic usually reserved for technical specialists
Speakers: Radhakant Das, Surojeet Roy, Rajeev Saluja
Tokens may reshape traffic patterns and must be carefully managed (Radhakant Das) AI‑driven traffic will shift downlink‑to‑uplink ratio from ~10:1 to ~4:1, creating uplink pressure (Surojeet Roy) Token economy will drive AI‑based value creation and sovereignty (Rajeev Saluja)
The convergence of a high-level policy discussion on tokens with detailed technical forecasts about uplink traffic and economic token models was not anticipated, indicating a cross-disciplinary consensus on tokens shaping 6G architecture [208-217][185-190][278-282].
The audience’s concern about interoperable AI APIs found immediate resonance with the government’s and industry’s calls for open, API‑driven ecosystems
Speakers: Audience, Rajeev Saluja, Sandeep Sharma, Ashok Kumar
AI‑related applications need interoperable APIs across devices and platforms (Audience) Open, loosely‑coupled API architecture is required (Rajeev Saluja) Open, interoperable ecosystem (e.g., UPI) is essential (Sandeep Sharma) Government programmes aim to build an end‑to‑end 6G stack that can be open and collaborative (Ashok Kumar)
While audience members typically raise implementation questions, their demand for a common AI API aligned directly with the speakers’ strategic vision for an open ecosystem, showing unexpected alignment between end-user concerns and policy/industry strategy [312-319][330-336][262-264][45-53].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Audience demand for API-centric interoperability was explicitly voiced in the Designing India’s Digital Future workshop and aligns with global AI interoperability agendas [S34][S49].
Overall Assessment

The discussion revealed strong convergence around five major themes: (1) AI as a native, foundational element of 6G; (2) the necessity of an open, API‑driven ecosystem; (3) the importance of Indian data and sovereign token‑based models; (4) edge‑centric AI inference for latency, power and uplink efficiency; and (5) the need for coordinated national frameworks, testbeds and safety guardrails. These points were echoed across government, industry and academic representatives, indicating a high level of consensus on the strategic direction for India’s 6G and AI roadmap.

High – most speakers, including the moderator, aligned on the same strategic priorities, suggesting that policy, standards participation and industry investment are likely to move forward in a coordinated manner.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Openness vs sovereignty of the AI ecosystem (open, API‑driven architecture versus a sovereign token‑based model)
Speakers: Rajeev Saluja, Sandeep Sharma, Radhakant Das
Open, loosely-coupled API architecture is required so AI applications work across vendors and platforms (Sandeep Sharma) [262-264] Open, API-driven, loosely-coupled ecosystem similar to UPI is essential for scaling AI services (Rajeev Saluja) [330-336] A sovereign token-based AI economy is required for end-to-end control of data, inference and value delivery (Rajeev Saluja) [278-282][284-287] Sovereignty of the AI ecosystem should be achieved through a token-based model that balances openness with national control (Radhakant Das) [277-287]
Rajeev and Sandeep argue that an open, interoperable API ecosystem (like UPI) is crucial for scaling AI across devices and operators, while Rajeev also promotes a sovereign token-based AI economy that keeps the entire value chain within India, a view echoed by Radhakant. The two positions clash over whether openness or national sovereignty should dominate the AI stack design [262-264][330-336][278-282][284-287][277-287].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The tension between open API models and sovereign token-based approaches reflects broader AI governance debates that seek to reconcile global interoperability with local sovereignty objectives [S43][S33].
Allocation of AI inference workload between edge and core/cloud
Speakers: Rajeev Saluja, Surojeet Roy
Simple, latency-sensitive inference should be handled at the edge; complex multi-agent workflows remain in the core (Rajeev Saluja) [158-162] AI-enabled devices will generate heavy uplink traffic, requiring edge inferencing and a shift in traffic asymmetry (Surojeet Roy) [114-124][185-190]
Rajeev proposes a split where most simple AI tasks run at the edge and only complex workflows stay in the core, whereas Surojeet emphasizes that the surge in uplink traffic from AI devices will force a broader move of inference to the edge and redesign of the network, suggesting a more extensive edge shift than Rajeev envisions [158-162][114-124][185-190].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ongoing policy and technical discussions address how to split AI inference between edge and cloud, as highlighted in edge-centric AI workshops and analyses of cloud-edge workload balance [S39][S40][S41].
Unexpected Differences
Same speaker (Rajeev Saluja) simultaneously promotes an open API ecosystem and a sovereign token‑based AI economy
Speakers: Rajeev Saluja
Open, loosely-coupled API architecture is required … (Rajeev Saluja) [330-336] A sovereign token-based AI economy is required for end-to-end control … (Rajeev Saluja) [278-282][284-287]
It is unexpected that a single participant advocates both a fully open, interoperable API model and a closed, nationally‑controlled token economy, positions that are logically at odds. This internal tension highlights the difficulty of reconciling openness with sovereignty in the Indian AI‑6G strategy.
Audience raises concern about AI‑hardware interoperability (Meta glasses) while panelists focus on network‑level AI integration
Speakers: Audience, Panel (Ashok Kumar, Surojeet Roy, Rajeev Saluja, Sandeep Sharma)
AI-related applications need interoperable APIs across devices and platforms to prevent vendor lock-in (Audience) [312-319] Panel discussion centers on AI integration in the network, edge computing and standards, with no direct response to device-level API standardisation.
The audience’s request for a cross‑vendor AI API for hardware (e.g., Meta glasses) was not addressed by the panel, revealing an unexpected gap between hardware‑level interoperability concerns and the panel’s network‑centric focus.
Overall Assessment

The discussion shows broad consensus that AI must be native to 6G and that coordinated national effort is needed. However, substantive disagreements arise around the degree of openness versus national sovereignty of the AI stack, and the optimal placement of AI inference (edge vs core). These tensions reflect competing priorities of fostering an open, interoperable ecosystem while protecting strategic autonomy and managing infrastructure load.

Moderate – while participants share the same strategic vision, the clash over openness versus sovereignty and edge‑core allocation could slow consensus on policy and standard‑setting, requiring careful balancing in future road‑maps.

Partial Agreements
All speakers concur that AI must be a core, native component of future 6G networks, but they diverge on where the AI functionality should be placed (device‑level, edge, core) and on the balance between building domestic capability versus leveraging existing standards. The shared goal is AI‑native 6G; the disagreement lies in implementation pathways.
Speakers: Ashok Kumar, Surojeet Roy, Rajeev Saluja, Radhakant Das
AI is being embedded natively in 6G from the outset (Ashok Kumar) [27-30] AI-enabled devices will require AI at the edge and will change traffic patterns (Surojeet Roy) [115-124] Intelligence is the basic infrastructure for the next digital evolution (Radhakant Das) [88-89] India must build, not rent, intelligence to ensure affordability and self-reliance (Rajeev Saluja) [154-157]
All agree that a national coordination mechanism is essential for successful AI‑6G pilots, but Ashok focuses on funding and testbeds, while Sandeep and Radhakant stress the creation of referenceable frameworks, data‑exchange mechanisms and safety guardrails. The goal of coordinated development is shared; the means (funding vs framework design) differ.
Speakers: Ashok Kumar, Sandeep Sharma, Radhakant Das
Government-backed 6G Accelerated Research Program, testbeds and collaboration with Bharat 6G Alliance (Ashok Kumar) [45-53][55-62] Need for coordinated national frameworks, data-exchange platforms and safety guardrails to align pilots with standards (Sandeep Sharma) [237-252] Call for coordinated national framework, safety guidelines and standard-alignment for AI-6G pilots (Radhakant Das) [229-236]
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI transitioned from an after‑thought in 5G to a native, “ubiquitous intelligence” element in the emerging 6G standards (ITU, 3GPP). The Indian government is actively building a 6G ecosystem through low‑cost 3GPP/TSDSI membership for startups, the 6G Accelerated Research Program, terahertz and AOC testbeds, and the Bharat 6G Alliance, plus a network of 5G labs in academia. AI‑enabled edge devices (smart glasses, wearables, sensors) will generate much higher uplink traffic, shifting the traditional downlink‑dominant pattern (≈10:1) toward a more balanced ratio (≈4:1) and requiring new uplink capacity and spectral efficiency improvements. AI techniques such as DeepRx/DeepTx can increase spectral efficiency and overall capacity by 25‑30 % and enable higher‑order modulation, supporting the larger bandwidth (≈400 MHz) envisioned for 6G. Intelligence delivery will be split: latency‑sensitive, simple inference at the edge; complex multi‑agent workflows in the core/cloud, reducing data‑center power load and distributing energy consumption. India aims to “build, not rent” intelligence, creating a sovereign, token‑based AI economy that controls data, inference and value delivery end‑to‑end while keeping costs affordable. An open, API‑driven, interoperable ecosystem (similar to UPI) is essential for scaling AI services across vendors, devices and applications. National frameworks are needed for data exchange, model auditing, safety guard‑rails and alignment of pilots with forthcoming 6G standards to avoid siloed development. Enterprise value from AI‑native 6G will arise from demand analysis, workflow automation and enhanced security, especially for sectors like BFSI, manufacturing, healthcare and mobility. Leveraging existing 5G labs and testbeds is a practical pathway for industry and academia to prototype and validate 6G use‑cases.
Resolutions and action items
DOT to continue subsidising TSDSI and 3GPP membership for Indian startups (cost ~₹10,000). Maintain and expand the 6G Accelerated Research Program and associated testbeds (terahertz, AOC). Strengthen collaboration with the Bharat 6G Alliance and incorporate its working‑group recommendations into policy. Encourage industry participants to adopt one or two of the 100 existing 5G labs for 6G research and use‑case development. Develop a national data‑exchange platform to enable secure, anonymised sharing of industry data for AI model training. Create audit and safety‑guardrail frameworks for AI models operating within telecom networks. Promote an open, loosely‑coupled API architecture for AI applications to ensure cross‑vendor interoperability. Explore deployment of edge compute (e.g., GPUs at cell towers) to democratise AI inferencing and training resources.
Unresolved issues
Exact quantitative split of AI inference workload among device, edge, core and cloud (no definitive percentages provided). Detailed roadmap and timeline for the release 21 (first 6G‑specific) standard and its adoption. Specific mechanisms for governing the proposed token‑based AI economy, including pricing, settlement and regulatory oversight. Concrete standards or guidelines for AI safety, model explainability and real‑time intervention in live networks. Implementation plan for ensuring AI models are trained on India‑specific data to avoid bias, beyond the general call for a national data exchange. How to achieve full interoperability of AI‑driven applications across different vendor ecosystems (e.g., Meta glasses vs other platforms). Funding and resource allocation details for scaling the proposed national frameworks and sandbox environments.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a hybrid ecosystem: keep core AI infrastructure and token economy sovereign to protect national interests while maintaining open, API‑driven interfaces for broader innovation and interoperability. Balance edge and central processing by assigning latency‑sensitive tasks to the edge and more complex workloads to the core, thereby distributing power consumption and reducing data‑center load. Leverage existing 5G labs as a stepping stone to 6G, allowing immediate research while the full 6G standards and testbeds are still under development. Combine open‑source collaboration (e.g., UPI‑style model) with sovereign data‑exchange platforms to enable both innovation and control over sensitive data.
Thought Provoking Comments
Ubiquitous intelligence – every element of our end‑to‑end 6G system, be it user equipment, radio, core or applications, will have AI embedded natively into the system.
Marks a fundamental shift from treating AI as an afterthought (as in 5G) to making it a core design principle of 6G, redefining how the whole network will be built.
Set the conceptual foundation for the whole panel. It prompted speakers to discuss AI‑native RAN designs, edge inference, and the need for new standards, steering the conversation toward integration rather than retro‑fitting.
Speaker: Ashok Kumar
By 2033 about 30 % of traffic will be AI‑driven and the downlink‑to‑uplink ratio will change from roughly 10:1 to about 4:1.
Provides a concrete, data‑driven forecast that highlights a dramatic reversal in traffic patterns, emphasizing the upcoming uplink pressure caused by AI workloads.
Shifted the discussion from abstract AI benefits to concrete network engineering challenges. It led to deeper talks on uplink capacity, spectrum needs, and the necessity of edge compute to handle the surge.
Speaker: Surojeet Roy
We cannot rent intelligence. We must build and democratize it so that the last citizen of India has affordable, pervasive intelligence.
Frames intelligence as a public utility rather than a commercial service, introducing a policy‑level perspective on self‑reliance and inclusivity.
Redirected the conversation toward sovereignty, cost‑effective deployment, and the role of government‑backed ecosystems, influencing later remarks on sovereign AI tokens and open standards.
Speaker: Rajiv Saluja
Latency is no longer just a network KPI; it becomes a productivity KPI for AI‑driven use cases. We need a national framework, data exchanges, and safety guardrails for AI in telecom.
Re‑defines performance measurement, linking network metrics directly to business outcomes, and stresses governance, data sharing, and safety – dimensions often overlooked in technical talks.
Expanded the dialogue to include economic (token) models, regulatory sandboxes, and audit mechanisms, prompting other panelists to address sovereignty and open‑ecosystem concerns.
Speaker: Sandeep Sharma
The AI‑native telco must be a sovereign end‑to‑end ecosystem – from device to cloud to edge – we need a token sovereign.
Introduces the novel concept of a “token sovereign” where the entire AI value chain is domestically owned and controlled, blending technical, economic, and geopolitical considerations.
Created a turning point that sparked debate on openness vs. sovereignty, with other speakers (Sandeep, Surojeet) weighing in on hybrid models and the need for both global interoperability and national control.
Speaker: Rajiv Saluja
Putting GPUs at cell towers can democratize AI by letting idle compute be used for training or inference when the network is not busy.
Offers a concrete, infrastructure‑level solution to distribute AI compute, linking edge resources to the earlier discussed uplink surge and edge inference needs.
Provided a practical implementation path, reinforcing the earlier points about edge AI and influencing the conversation toward feasible deployment strategies.
Speaker: Surojeet Roy
We need an open, API‑driven architecture so AI applications created by one vendor can work across different platforms and operators.
Highlights interoperability as a critical barrier to AI adoption, calling for standardized, loosely‑coupled APIs rather than proprietary silos.
Re‑emphasized the theme of open ecosystems, tying back to earlier remarks on standards participation, and set the stage for concluding remarks about collaborative frameworks.
Speaker: Rajiv Saluja (answer to audience question)
Overall Assessment

The discussion was shaped by a series of pivotal remarks that moved the conversation from a high‑level vision of AI‑enabled 6G to concrete technical, economic, and policy challenges. Ashok Kumar’s framing of “ubiquitous intelligence” established AI as a native design pillar, which was then quantified by Surojeet Roy’s traffic forecasts, prompting a shift toward network capacity and edge‑compute considerations. Rajiv Saluja’s emphasis on building (not renting) intelligence and his later sovereignty argument introduced a national‑self‑reliance narrative, while Sandeep Sharma reframed latency as a productivity metric and called for governance frameworks. Together, these comments redirected the panel toward actionable topics—standard participation, open APIs, distributed compute at cell sites, and the need for a sovereign token economy—thereby deepening the analysis and steering the dialogue toward both technical implementation and strategic policy direction.

Follow-up Questions
What is the precise percentage breakdown of AI inference workloads across device, edge, core network, and cloud environments?
Understanding the distribution is crucial for capacity planning, resource allocation, and designing AI-native 6G architecture.
Speaker: Radhakant Das
How much influence or processing should be allocated to cloud versus edge versus other layers for AI-driven traffic?
Quantifying the influence of each layer helps optimize latency, power consumption, and cost efficiency.
Speaker: Radhakant Das
What specific ROI metrics and success criteria should be used to evaluate AI‑6G anchor use cases in priority sectors (BFSI, manufacturing, healthcare, mobility) within the next 1.5 years?
Clear metrics are needed to justify investments and track the economic impact of early 6G deployments.
Speaker: Radhakant Das
What is the detailed evolution roadmap for 6G (devices, use cases, traffic growth, token economy) up to 2030?
A forward‑looking roadmap will guide research, standardisation, and industry investment decisions.
Speaker: Radhakant Das
What specific coordination mechanisms, co‑creation models, and safety‑guideline frameworks should be established among industry, academia, and government to align pilots with upcoming 6G standards?
Ensuring pilots are standards‑compliant and safe prevents siloed development and accelerates scalable deployment.
Speaker: Radhakant Das
How can an interoperable AI‑API architecture be created so that AI‑enabled devices (e.g., Meta glasses) work across different platforms and applications?
Standardised APIs would prevent vendor lock‑in and enable a broader ecosystem of AI services.
Speaker: Audience (unidentified participant)
What framework should be used to leverage India’s massive data for training large language models locally, including data exchange, anonymisation, and governance?
A national data‑exchange framework would unlock AI potential while protecting privacy and encouraging domestic model development.
Speaker: Audience (unidentified participant)
What are the viable monetisation models for a network‑API‑centric economy (e.g., OneEdge) in India, and how are they being materialised?
Understanding monetisation pathways is essential for telecom operators to create new revenue streams from AI services.
Speaker: Audience (Sidhu, AT&T)
What national framework is needed for AI‑native architectures, including sandbox environments, reference models, and audit mechanisms?
A coordinated framework will ensure pilots are scalable, interoperable, and compliant with future standards.
Speaker: Sandeep Sharma
How should the concept of token sovereignty be defined and operationalised within India’s AI‑6G ecosystem?
Clarifying token sovereignty impacts economic models, data ownership, and regulatory policies.
Speaker: Rajiv Saluja
What is the optimal distribution of power consumption between centralized data centres and edge compute for AI workloads in 6G?
Balancing power use affects sustainability, cost, and network performance.
Speaker: Surojeet Roy
What are the projected uplink traffic growth rates and required spectral‑efficiency enhancements to support AI‑driven use cases?
Accurate traffic forecasts guide spectrum allocation and technology upgrades for 6G.
Speaker: Surojeet Roy
How will AI impact latency and coverage requirements for latency‑sensitive applications such as robotic surgery and autonomous vehicles?
Quantifying these impacts is necessary to design networks that meet strict performance guarantees.
Speaker: Sandeep Sharma
What are the bandwidth requirements (e.g., 400 MHz) and spectral‑efficiency targets (e.g., 5×) for 6G, and how can they be achieved?
Defining these technical targets is essential for hardware design and spectrum policy.
Speaker: Surojeet Roy
What AI use cases can be developed for India’s informal sector workers, and how should models be trained on India‑specific data to avoid bias?
Tailoring AI to the informal economy can boost productivity, but requires culturally relevant data.
Speaker: Surojeet Roy
What safety and audit frameworks are required for AI models operating within telecom networks to ensure explainability and prevent unintended parameter changes?
Robust governance is critical to maintain network reliability and public trust.
Speaker: Sandeep Sharma
Is it feasible to democratise AI by deploying GPUs at cell‑tower sites for distributed training and inferencing, and what are the associated challenges?
Edge compute could lower costs and increase accessibility, but needs evaluation of resource management and security.
Speaker: Surojeet Roy
How should the balance between open (interoperable) and sovereign (nationally controlled) AI ecosystems be defined, and what hybrid approaches are recommended?
Finding the right mix will enable innovation while protecting national interests and data sovereignty.
Speaker: Rajiv Saluja, Sandeep Sharma, Surojeet Roy

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.