AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders

20 Feb 2026 10:00h - 11:00h

AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The panel, moderated by Vedica Kant, examined how generative AI is reshaping consulting firms’ internal operations and client offerings [1-5]. Romal Shetty described AI as a “most disruptive” technology that forces firms to re-imagine their business models, moving from a traditional pyramid of one senior serving ten staff to an inverted model where a single employee can serve ten clients with 80 % of work done by machines [10-13][15-20]. He illustrated the impact with an audit-confirmation tool that automates up to 60 000 quarterly confirmations, saving roughly the same number of person-hours and freeing staff for judgment-focused tasks [23-27]. Similar productivity gains are being pursued in tax, where generative AI can draft opinions faster, and in consulting, where AI-driven simulations helped redesign an automobile plant and build a Jaguar jet flight simulator in just 40 days [30-31][32-39]. Shetty cautioned that human oversight remains essential to avoid serious errors [41].


Sanjeev Krishan framed AI as a utility, noting PwC’s early billion-dollar investment and the rollout of “Chat PwC” to all staff, which spurred the creation of the AI-driven Navigate Tax Hub [45-48][55-58]. He emphasized that the main barrier to enterprise adoption is change-management and integration, with only 12 % of corporations reporting both top-line and bottom-line benefits from AI pilots [113-120][120-121]. Both speakers agreed that AI will reshape the consulting “pyramid”: the middle layer may shrink while junior staff will need new capabilities such as critical thinking, judgment and empathy to work alongside machines, especially when targeting the 75 million Indian MSMEs [72-80][95-104].


They also highlighted the need to overhaul education, arguing that future curricula should prioritize problem-solving and orchestration skills over rote learning [268-276][289-298]. Regarding pricing, Shetty admitted that commoditisation of routine work creates pressure, but argued firms must adapt rather than resist, noting that cannibalising low-value services can protect higher-margin offerings [148-151][152-160]. He pointed to strategic partnerships with AI providers such as OpenAI-backed Harvey and Anthropic as a way to extend capabilities without building everything in-house [194-197].


In response to audience questions, Shetty described GovTech opportunities like AI-driven road-cost estimation and MSME credit scoring, and argued that SMEs can leap-frog regulatory cycles by adopting open-source LLMs, though data-security governance remains a concern [244-261][322-337][126-133]. He also warned that while some AI-focused companies will thrive, others will fail, reflecting the normal cycle of disruptive technology [307-311]. The discussion concluded that AI offers substantial productivity and market-expansion potential for consulting firms, but realizing this value will require workforce reskilling, robust governance, and collaborative ecosystems [41][113-120][72-80][194-197][322-337].


Keypoints

Major discussion points


AI is reshaping consulting business models and unlocking new market segments – Romal describes an “inverted” pyramid where AI lets a single person serve many clients, opening the MSME market that was previously out of reach [15-20]. He also cites concrete productivity gains such as automating 60,000 audit confirmations, speeding up tax opinions, and using AI-driven simulators for factories, hospitals and aircraft [23-27][30-36][38-40].


Firms are heavily investing in internal AI tools and upskilling their people – Sanjeev notes that PwC committed roughly a $1 billion to AI in 2023, built a firm-wide “Chat PwC” platform, and created the AI-driven “Navigate Tax Hub” after staff pilots showed its value [48-51][55-58].


Enterprise-wide AI adoption faces significant hurdles – Both panelists point to change-management and integration problems, low conversion of pilots to production, data-security and IP concerns, and the looming “token-price shock” that could curb usage [113-120][122-144].


The consulting talent pyramid and skill requirements are being re-engineered – Romal and Sanjeev discuss a shrinking middle layer, the need for new competencies (critical thinking, judgment, empathy, AI-augmented coding), and the push to redesign education curricula to match future AI-centric roles [72-81][90-94][95-104][289-298].


Pricing pressure, commoditization and strategic tech partnerships – Vedica asks how AI threatens pricing; Romal admits fear of commoditization and the need to rethink fee structures, while Sanjeev emphasizes a shift to value-based billing and partnerships with AI firms like OpenAI/Anthropic to stay competitive [148-151][152-160][162-188][194-196].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The panel was convened to surface how leading professional-services firms (Deloitte, PwC) are leveraging AI internally, transforming their service delivery models, addressing adoption challenges, and planning for future workforce and market dynamics. By sharing concrete use-cases, investment strategies, and strategic concerns, the speakers aimed to provide a roadmap for consultants and clients navigating the AI-driven evolution of the industry.


Overall tone and its evolution


– The conversation opens optimistic and forward-looking, with excitement about AI’s disruptive potential and tangible wins.


– It then moves to a cautiously realistic tone as speakers acknowledge practical obstacles-change-management, data governance, token economics, and low ROI in early pilots.


– Towards the end, the tone becomes pragmatic and reflective, focusing on strategic adjustments (pricing, talent reshaping, partnerships) and concluding with a tone of gratitude and measured confidence about the path ahead.


Speakers

Vedica Kant


Role/Title: Moderator / Host of the panel discussion


Area of Expertise: Facilitating AI and consulting discussions, panel moderation


Affiliation: Not specified in transcript


Source: [S1]


Romal Shetty


Role/Title: CEO, Deloitte South Asia (consulting leader)


Area of Expertise: Consulting, AI implementation, digital transformation, MSME strategy, tax, audit, simulation, GovTech


Affiliation: Deloitte


Source: [S10]


Sanjeev Krishan


Role/Title: Representative / Senior Leader, PwC (consulting firm)


Area of Expertise: AI adoption, AI-driven tax tools, change management, workforce upskilling, AI strategy for enterprises


Affiliation: PwC


Source: [S26]


Audience member 1


Role/Title: Founder, Corral Inc.


Area of Expertise: Entrepreneurship, AI-driven business growth, market sizing


Affiliation: Corral Inc.


Source: [S4]


Audience member 2


Role/Title: Consultant, Capacity Building Commission, Government of India


Area of Expertise: GovTech, AI applications in government, public-sector consulting


Affiliation: Government of India (Capacity Building Commission)


Audience member 3


Role/Title: Student (rural / Tier-3 background)


Area of Expertise: Education, AI skill development for underserved regions


Affiliation: Not specified


Audience member 4


Role/Title: Professional with GCC (Global Capability Center) background


Area of Expertise: Talent development, power skills, future-of-work, education alignment with AI


Affiliation: GCC sector


Source: [S20]


Audience member 5


Role/Title: Former Senior Director, American Express Bank; Founder, Access Cadets Technologies (≈ $100 M company)


Area of Expertise: Finance, technology entrepreneurship, AI investment outlook


Affiliation: American Express (former), Access Cadets Technologies


Audience member 6


Role/Title: Not specified (audience participant)


Area of Expertise: Questioned SME AI adoption, data residency, AI uncertainty for enterprises


Affiliation: Not specified


Audience member 7


Role/Title: Representative, Digivancy (Piyush)


Area of Expertise: MarTech, AI-driven market research, demand-supply analytics for SMEs


Affiliation: Digivancy


Additional speakers:


– None. All participants in the transcript are accounted for in the list above.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Vedica Kant opened the time-constrained panel by asking the two senior leaders how generative AI is reshaping consulting firms’ internal operations and client-facing services [1-5].


Romal Shetty framed AI as a disruptive “re-imagination” engine. He described an “inverted” pyramid in which a single employee can serve ten clients while a machine performs roughly 80 % of the work, unlocking the ≈75 million-firm MSME market that large consultancies have traditionally ignored [15-20][17-20]. He illustrated three internal use-cases in a parallel structure: in audit, a practitioner-built confirmation-automation tool now processes up to 60 000 quarterly bank, debtor and vendor confirmations, saving an equivalent number of person-hours; in tax, generative AI drafts opinions far more quickly [30-31]; in consulting, AI-driven digital twins have simulated a new automobile plant in Karnataka, a hospital ICU layout and a Jaguar jet flight simulator built in just 40 days [32-39][38-40]. He also highlighted a digital-marketing platform for MSMEs that creates multi-channel campaigns from simple prompts in any language, demonstrating a concrete AI-driven product for an underserved segment [215-218]. Throughout he warned that “you have to be careful that there has to be a human-led or human-in-the-loop” oversight [41][79-80].


Sanjeev Krishan positioned AI as a utility that firms must learn to harness. He noted PwC’s ≈$1 billion AI investment in 2023 and the firm-wide “Chat PwC” platform available to every employee [48-51][55-56]. Bottom-up experimentation produced the Navigate Tax Hub, an AI-driven tax-opinion platform launched after a 12-15 month internal pilot [57-58]. Krishnan argued that the chief barrier to AI’s promise is change-management and integration, not the technology itself; only 12 % of corporations report both top-line (vanity) and bottom-line (sanity) benefits, a figure from PwC’s global CEO survey launched in January [113-119][120-121]. He also emphasized that consulting has already moved toward value-accrual billing, with fees tied to outcomes rather than hours [181-184].


Both speakers agreed that the traditional consulting pyramid will be reshaped. Romal said the middle-management layer will shrink and that new hires must combine critical thinking, judgment and empathy with machine-assisted work [73-80]; he added that coding tasks can be accelerated by 80 % but true creativity-such as building a system like Aadhaar-still requires human ingenuity [81-88]. Sanjeev noted that managers’ routine work will migrate to associates or senior associates, freeing senior staff to validate assumptions, generate hypotheses and engage more deeply with client problems [95-99][100-104].


On talent and education, Sanjeev warned that many engineering curricula are 25 years out of date and called for a redesign that embeds AI literacy, power-skills and entrepreneurship from school onward [291-298][299-301]. Romal echoed this, stressing that future workers need “critical thinking, judgment capabilities and a little bit of empathy” and must be able to orchestrate multiple data points-a skill he likened to a “palmist” who feels the flow of information [268-276][260-265].


Pricing pressure surfaced as a tension point. Romal expressed personal concern that AI could erode fee structures for low-value services such as routine tax opinions, arguing firms must either cannibalise their own offerings or risk being out-priced [148-151][152-160]. Sanjeev framed the shift as an opportunity, noting that AI enables the broader move to value-accrual billing [181-184].


Both highlighted the importance of strategic partnerships with AI-native firms. Sanjeev cited PwC’s early alliance with the OpenAI-backed Harvey platform for tax and legal work and a newer collaboration with Anthropic, suggesting consultancies should focus on domain expertise while leveraging external LLM capabilities [194-197]. Romal agreed that firms must be selective, targeting high-value use cases rather than attempting to build every AI capability in-house [307-312].


Governance and token-economics challenges were also raised. Romal recounted an aerospace client whose proprietary designs appeared in ChatGPT after vendors uploaded them during an RFP, underscoring the need for robust data-security and IP governance [126-133]. He warned that the current subsidised token model could lead to “bill shock” once pricing normalises [136-138].


In the GovTech segment, Romal described AI-enhanced geospatial analysis to estimate road-construction costs and AI-driven credit-scoring that could lower MSME borrowing rates from ~24 % to 8-9 % by leveraging richer data [244-261]. Audience questions expanded the discussion: a query about MarTech for market research prompted Romal to explain how sentiment analysis can match demand and supply [230-235]; another asked about India’s potential to host a $100-500 billion AI-driven company, to which Sanjeev clarified that the United States currently leads AI capital but India may eventually produce the first few large AI firms [208-226] (attribution corrected to Sanjeev). An audience member’s concern about a possible re-rating of AI-centric valuations was met with Romal’s view that disruptive cycles produce winners and losers, and firms should focus on unique value rather than chasing hype [307-311].


Regarding SME adoption, Romal argued that smaller firms can “leapfrog” traditional technology cycles by using open-source LLMs to avoid heavy data-residency constraints, while regulated sectors will need a mix of proprietary and open-source models [322-337][324-332].


The panel concluded with a balanced perspective: AI is both a utility for optimisation and a catalyst for new business models, especially for underserved MSMEs. Concrete pilots-audit confirmation automation, AI-driven simulators, the Navigate Tax Hub, and the MSME digital-marketing platform-demonstrate measurable productivity gains. Heavy investment in AI platforms, upskilling programmes, and robust governance frameworks are essential. Consulting firms must reshape their pyramidal workforce, emphasising critical thinking, empathy and orchestration, and collaborate with AI-native partners rather than building every capability internally. Finally, pricing structures are shifting toward value-accrual models, and SMEs can leapfrog traditional cycles by adopting open-source LLMs, provided they manage regulatory and data-residency risks. Across the discussion, the speakers agreed that the future of consulting hinges on human-AI collaboration, continuous talent reskilling, strong governance, and strategic partnerships [41][113-121][152-160][194-197][322-337].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Vedica Kant

I think we are capped by time to a slightly shorter session today, but we’ll aim to get the most out of it, and I’ll open up to questions as well. I’d like to start off with a couple of common questions to both of you, just to get both your perspectives. I think one is to start with this question of, you know, what does AI mean for you internally? Would love to hear from you each. When it comes to using AI within Deloitte, within PwC, what are you seeing in terms of workflows, in terms of use cases, where you’ve really seen AI already move the needle for your organizations? I think it would be great to hear a couple of tangible examples.

I’ll start with you.

Romal Shetty

Thank you, Vedika, and good afternoon, everyone. It’s lovely to be here on this panel. For us, AI is, I mean, it is, and it is true that this is one of the most disruptive things that have happened, and it happens in a generation. Or more than a generation, something like this comes up. and what it means for us is to really, for us and for our clients, is to reimagine everything possible because this is the one part. AI can do a lot of optimization, but reimagination is an important part. And I’ll give you an example of, you know, because most people have predicted the demise of all of our firms, so it’s always good to hear when people talk about our early demise.

But how we’ve thought through this is part of AI is to relook at our business model. Our business model, largely in consulting, largely in consulting is a pyramid model, right? It’s one client, 10 people, that sort of the model. But if you really look at now, and we large firms, largely, we don’t service today probably the MSME as a segment. You know, we generally tend to do the top Indian corporates, the large multinational companies. But with the ability to have today generative AI and agent tech, and build it and combine it with digital, you can actually invert the business model of, you know, 1 is to 10 to 10 clients to 1 person, where 80 % is done by a machine, 20 % is done by a human being.

So really something for us, which, so we are going to access a market which we could have never done, right? So that is one part of it. The second part of it is to figure out everything that we do, can we do some things faster? To give you an example for in our audit business, in our audit business, we have something called confirmation of balances. That really means that, you know, you need confirmation from your bankers, from your debtors, from your customers, vendors, you know, so that your financial statements are properly stated. For some large clients, this could be like 50 ,000, 60 ,000 confirmations on a quarterly basis. So now, you know, we have actually built a tool, and built a tool not by an expert in tech, but a practitioner where we have democratized innovation.

where that individual now can save 60 ,000 hours for us so that we can spend a little bit more time on judgment -related matters. That is the second part. Third is just to bring in tax. I’m giving you different examples. In tax, to basically say that, can I give tax opinions now much faster by using Gen AI? Fourth, in terms of consulting, to say that, I’ll give you a classic thing. You have a large automobile manufacturer in the world. Who is building a plant in Karnataka where they will manufacture a car every 2 minutes 32 seconds. Now, what’s interesting is, when you digitally simulate this, you’re able to tell the automaker that your robots will actually have clashes, your kinetics will be a challenge, and your material flow will be a challenge, and therefore you cannot manufacture in 2 minutes 32 seconds.

Therefore, redesign your factory in this way. What’s interesting is that conceptually, this can be now taken to, hospitals, where you can say that in an ICU, where do you place the ICU in the best possible way so that there is absolute easy movement of patient flow. So we’re building simulators for the Jaguar jet aircraft. Now, if you said consulting companies would be building Jaguar jet flight simulators, that wouldn’t have happened and in 40 days. So our business models, the kind of work that we actually do, reimagine things for clients and of course within our bringing in our productivity. So all of that has actually helped from an AI perspective. And of course, you’ve got to be careful that there has to be a human -led or human in the loop because you can end up with some serious challenges as well.

Vedica Kant

Touch on some of those challenges and the implications of the use of AI. Sanjeev, good luck for you to chime in.

Sanjeev Krishan

Yeah, so once again, good afternoon and thank you for having me. See, I mean, you know, I look at AI as more as a utility, you know, and it’s something which most of us will embrace. The question is, what can we make out? of it. And that would be the differentiator from a value perspective because that’s what, because we speak about how consulting firms are going to deal with it. And that’s why I mean, if I were to go back in time in 2023, actually, I think we were amongst the first ones to actually commit almost a billion dollars to AI at that point in time, and that was a platform discussion that we had with one of the hyperscalers.

We also focused on, we also committed a significant amount of money for upscaling our people at that point in time. And I think that’s been a key driver for us that, you know, it’s there, it’s here to stay. What do we make out of it? And how do we make sure that we are working with it as opposed to necessarily trying to say that, okay, you know, we are working against it. That’s the first part. So the first part is adoption. And within the adoption journey, let me just say that, you know, now today, for instance, I would say all PwC personnel across the board would have access to what we call chat PwC. You know, which is where we work with AI in some ways to create efficiency, et cetera, et cetera.

and I can say that the human part is something that we at times miss because who’s using it? My people are using it, our people are using it and when they use this, they are the ones who actually came up with multiple things that they could do with it and that inspiration caused us to come up with, I mean, you know, just as an example that Romer gave, I would like to give a tax example, where they said that the manifestation of what they have seen with Chad PwC and others is to come up with how they can solve client problems, the ones which are the most sticky and that got us to actually come up with Navigate Tax Hub which is an AI -driven tax tool that we came up with which we launched about six or seven months back.

Now, let me tell you that it is the people who actually said that, okay, we want to work with it for 12 to 15 months before you actually take it to market and I think that’s how making sure that AI is one being leveraged, you work with AI, you get your people to embrace it. then I think automatically the outcomes for your clients and others will come through. And we can talk about multiple use cases. But I want to really say that it is about us embracing AI, working with it. The value that will come of it will be immense.

Vedica Kant

I want to touch just a follow -up question. You talked about the pyramid within consulting and the impact that AI has on productivity. I mean, as a consultant myself, I know that these conversations about how the pyramid is going to get restructured potentially are top of mind for all consulting leaders. How are you thinking about that? Do you see the pyramid becoming more distinctly shaped, a different shape, so to speak, where you have senior leaders and then fewer middle management, but then more junior people who are able to work with AI? And so that’s one question. How does the shape of the firms change? And the second question is how are you also communicating it to your own people?

I know the big four in India have a very, very large talent pool here. How are those conversations going?

Romal Shetty

Yeah, so we’re re -looking at every aspect of what we do and what that means at an entry level, middle level, and at the top level. And you’re right. So in some parts of it, it’s a clear indicator that the middle actually shrinks a little bit. In some part of it, it’s the juniors that actually get impacted. But the way, Vedika, I was looking at it is one part is this is the business of today. When I spoke about the MSME business, to give you a sense, there are 75 million MSMEs. I don’t service anybody or don’t service much just from a dramatic impact. If I service even one million MSMEs with the inverted business model, I need a lot more people and slightly different skills of human working with the business model.

So I’m working with the machine, having some critical thinking. judgment capabilities and also having a little bit of empathy as well. So I think that’s how we are re -looking at our workforce to bring in some of those skills which were not something that earlier that we looked at. Now, if you look at coding, coding can be 80 % done faster. But then I, when I look at a lot of what is being done in AI is all based on past inferences. Can, could AI have built an Aadhar? The answer is no. Today, can Aadhar suggest, can AI suggest an Aadhar? Right? It can. But it couldn’t have built something new. So can we be creative? And I’ll give you another example of digital marketing.

We’ve built something where, again I’m just taking MSMEs just as a common theme. They never could brand or market their products. We’ve created a platform today where in five minutes, you can actually have campaigns across Insta, across LinkedIn, across various social media channels, digital campaigns, by simple prompts. You don’t need to understand Java or anything else. You just need to know English or Hindi or any other language, Bhashani, any language that Bhashani will support. that’s all and you can actually have campaigns running so it’s about how you relook at your market size and scale how do you skill your people in today and you do reshape and it’s not one size fits all that this is exactly the pyramid model this is exactly the cylinder model it does vary depending on sometimes sector sometimes competency I’m

Sanjeev Krishan

I think since you asked the question about pyramid I mean honestly I don’t know the answer to the pyramid question all I would say is that I do believe however that the kind of people that we would hire would be very different our expertise is the client base that we have which is far beyond that any other firm could expect to have and the domain that we have and I don’t think those things go away so and also you know what is it that as I said what is it that whoever is there will do with the AI right I mean whether it is somebody on the manager level associate level whatever certainly I would expect the work of a manager today to be done by an associate or a senior associate and so on and so forth.

And hopefully they’ll be skilled enough to be able to do so. But I think the critical point for me is that you end up spending a lot more time not cleaning data, but making sure that you are validating multiple assumptions. And then you are actually simulating those to come up with, you know, potential hypothesis for your client and then actually getting into the execution of it once you have made a suggestion to them. So you are far more engaged. And that, I believe, will help us retain value, right? Because you know, I see a lot of work that we do currently could be data cleaning work. Maybe that will go away. But I do believe a lot of highly value -accredited work will come in.

And we will certainly need to have a different workforce.

Vedica Kant

A kind of different angle and a question to you. You know, you talked about how AI has impacted some of your work internally. We’ve when it comes to clients, we’ve recently seen a lot of studies which say, yes, AI is is great, but when it comes to an enterprise setting, it’s perhaps not giving the same kind of ROI that people expected. And enterprises are complex. Workflows are complex. I would love to hear from you, what are some of the challenges that you’re seeing when it comes to deploying AI in enterprises? And do you see that as just teething troubles? Do you see it as something that is just part of how enterprises work, so it’ll always be complicated?

We just love your perspective there.

Sanjeev Krishan

I think the problem is that humans oppose change, whatever that change may be, even though that change may be invented by them. So I think the problem is not with intelligence. It is about the change management and the integration pieces of it. And I do believe in every organization, whether a consulting organization or otherwise, there will be challenges when people are asked to adopt a particular use case, assuming that it has had success. and I think we will not be any different. I’m sure for us also, it will be a challenge. For our clients also, that will be the challenge. That is why you see a lot of people getting very happy with some pilots or doing some sandbox arrangements, etc.

But when you want them to scale, it becomes different because adoption and integration of that, the change management piece is the one that I think we haven’t even started testing it, to be honest. And possibly that is the reason I’ll be short here that when we actually launched our global CEO survey, just in January last month, it just said that only 12%, only 12 % corporations, in spite of having spent some money, or I would say significant amount of money, are saying that they have got both vanity, which is top line, and sanity, which is bottom line, through use of AI. Only 12%. So I think we have a way to go.

Romal Shetty

I agree with Sanjeev. I think just a couple of other points. Why are pilots not getting into sort of really, really production -grade? One is the governance over my data and security. I’ll give you an example. An aerospace company said suddenly they saw that their designs coming in chat GPT. Now, they say that they have never used chat GPT at all. So where are the designs coming into chat GPT? What they realized is when they were doing RFPs for their vendors, right, and they would give some designs, the vendors were uploading it in chat GPT to figure out a solution. So how are you actually managing your data and IP? Because if everybody uses AI, what is your IP?

So that’s the first one. The second one is everybody’s understanding in terms of tokens. Now, if you take the telecom parlance, you know, when 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G happened, you saw tremendous amount of data being downloaded with 5G, you know, because it was like a free -for -all and the price has gone down. Today, the way the token system is that you love it, and so you keep using as much as possible. but they are all subsidized today. The day this happens where they bring it to some reasonable price because everybody has to make money someday, there will be a bill shock, dramatic bill shock. So I think if you look at some of these aspects and third is, you know, again, new technologies coming again and again.

People don’t know, should I wait? You know, something else is coming. So should I then sort of implement that? So there is a bit of confusion and how does all this orchestration work? Five different things. So I think an adoption, I mean adoption and change management, whether with technology or without technology have been probably the biggest problems in humankind and any enterprise as well. So I guess that is also a big challenge because of why we are not seeing that scale up.

Vedica Kant

Romal, I’ll start with you kind of a couple of final questions before I open up to the audience. You know, we, you open up Twitter, there is always some kind of thread which is, I’m going to do this. And Claude has launched in PowerPoint, consultants are quaking in their shoes, you know, the skill set that you bring is seen to becoming like highly commodified, right? How scared are you of that disruption? That’s the first question. And how is AI also help, you know, forcing you or making you rethink your own pricing, your price points, et cetera, because, you know, our clients coming to you and saying, I can run this on ChatGPT, why do I need to pay you as much as I pay you?

So we just love your take on those two things.

Romal Shetty

Yeah, I think the first part is anything which is commoditized, I am scared, we are scared that that will completely go away. But can I do something? …So pretty cool. They saw a surge of demand, right, where people wanted to buy this stuff. But after some time, nobody was buying. So then they went in and figured out, you know, AI also did

Vedica Kant

On pricing.

Romal Shetty

On pricing. And the fact is that today, what I’m talking about the tax opinion, and we used to charge a particular sum of money, and we’ll charge a different sum of money. And people would say, hey, you know, you’re all cannibalizing stuff. But if I don’t cannibalize, or if I don’t do it, somebody else is going to do it anyway. so we’ve got to be open to it disruption is going to happen we can’t close our eyes but the fact is that also don’t get too hyped by every talk that the world will end tomorrow for all of you to the other extreme that nothing will happen I think the truth lies somewhere in between but keep looking at things to keep disrupting yourself and keep identifying newer sources of how your work can actually happen so I think that’s what it is

Vedica Kant

Can you just building on that how just given this point about pricing pressure etc how do you think about moving up the value chain are there other areas you think about going into and just when it comes to the model of consulting you’re seeing open AI, anthropic etc going saying we would want to we now need to implement our solutions we need to become consultants how much of a threat are you seeing from technology firms who are increasingly going down yeah yeah

Sanjeev Krishan

So maybe first thing first, I think this question is a bit unfair to consultants at large, right? Because I do believe, and we have seen multiple threats to consulting businesses in the past as well. I mean, forget AI. Over the last five years, every consulting firm, I’m sure yours included, would be saying that, okay, let me figure out, you know, how can I be more value -accurative to my client, right? What is the context of the client? What is the mindset of this client? I mean, are there generational issues? Are there succession issues? Are there technology issues? Are there business issues? Are there sustainability issues? Environmental issues? So on and so forth. And in a world which is so disrupted geopolitically and otherwise, supply chain, this, that, and the other, how do I either protect value or create value?

So from that standpoint, I think, you know, as I said, technology to me, or AI also, is a tool, is an enabler in that sense, right? It can help me contextualize better. It can help me simulate better. It can help me validate my assumptions a lot better. And in any case, over the last four to five years, as I said, most firms, most consulting, I’m not saying that there isn’t any time and material work for any of us. I’m sure there is. But let me also say that most of us actually have moved towards value accretion, value billing. And why would clients pay for something like that? I mean, that’s something which is getting commoditized.

In any case, I should feel threatened irrespective of AI. And today, in my mind, it is about how can I create value or defend my client’s value. So we ought to move up the value curve. A large part of billing for most consulting firms will come from the value that they create, whether it is simple cost optimization, whether it is some enterprise -wide transformation or segmental transformation, or indeed, you know, stuff like doing deals, raising money, and so on and so forth. So I do believe a lot of that has changed. The proportionality of that is possibly a little low on the lower side. It will possibly go up. So I think that’s the first thing.

To the second part of the question that you asked about, you know, about I think, you know, one has to acknowledge that we don’t need to do everything. I mean, if you think that we will be able to compete with a product firm, then I think we’re going down the wrong direction, in my mind at least. So certainly we want to work with a bunch of alliance partners, whether it could be, I mean, we were the first ones to partner with Harvey, for instance, which is OpenAI funded, and today a lot of our tax and legal work is actually done on the Harvey platform, for instance. So it is about how do we work with some of these disruptors or people who have taken pathways to the LLMs or so to speak.

And I do believe that, I mean, we recently are doing something with Anthropic now. So I think we will have to look at partnerships to be able to work with them. Again, as I said, the quantum of clients that we have globally is something which, you know, some of these disruptors will take ages to get to. And the context will require them to make very significant investments. So let me just round it off. I’ll have it once in the last point. you know people can say that there is disruption on tech and there is need for transformation but there is also disruption in trade yeah so today any tech transformation that you do let’s say on the supply chain side can you do it without a tax person involved can you do it without a trade specialist involved so it has to be trade and tech specialism which has to which has to come together to create value and that is why i don’t think that people who are writing obituary of the consulting model they’ll possibly have to wait so it’s a resilient model as you said has held its own for many years i’ll open up to the audience if we have any questions we can take a couple

Audience member 1

yeah thank you hi hi i’m the founder of corral inc and my question to romol and sanju and my question and both redefining country power and people productivity. Right now, of course, USA and China are leading the race, but India is third. Where do you think that, you know, the next probably $100 billion to $500 billion company

Vedica Kant

I think the question was about whether you’ll see AI creating, let me paraphrase, but AI creating more abundance and societal impact. And are we going to see another, from India, a trillion, a $500 billion company? Or a billion dollars?

Sanjeev Krishan

Well, first of all, I’ll say that it better come from the U .S. Otherwise, all the amount, all the leverage and capital which has gone in the U .S. markets will come to nothing. And I’m sure a lot of people will lose a lot of money and the financial markets will get shaken up. But, you know, I think I do believe, I do believe that, you know, some of these, you know, I think it’s very early days yet. And people who are putting capital to work, I’m sure know what they’re doing. You know, I’m sure many of these things may not work out. And that’s the nature of venture capital business, for instance. Right. But clearly, you know, I think one thing which we can be certain about is that this is an irreversible trend.

I mean, AI is something which is going to stay with us. It is only going to get better. I mean, you know, today we are talking about, you know, AGI, for instance. Right. And that, you know, I’ve felt so far in my non -technical mind that, you know, technology can never compete with humans. But with AGI, it can, you know, it can go beyond humans as well. I mean, depending on what it does serve. So I do believe that there will be winners which will come through. I think it will possibly take nine, you know. getting the, for instance, there is no real TAM in my mind. You know, if I can be honest, there’s no real TAM in any market other than the US at this point in time.

So this will take time, but this is going to happen for sure. When it can come from India, you know, it’ll possibly take time. But the question really is that what will cause those to come? It will not necessarily come through, you know, the businesses that possibly work in the US. In my mind, we will have to find our own pathways. And I think this summit is a great opportunity to create those pathways. And then you know that our ability to you know, in some way scale those is very, very high. So I do believe that, you know, it’s going to be sequential. It’s going to happen. It may not be the most value -accredited thing that will come from India, but possibly we will be the first few ones to be

Vedica Kant

I think we had a few questions. I think the gentleman in the back had raised his hand, and then we can have a few here. But Leanne,

Audience member 2

Hi, I’m Abhinav Saxena, consultant at Capacity Building Commission, Government of India. So we had a panel discussion, just thought of joining it, hearing from you. So I want to know how the GovTech space looks like, how the government consulting space looks like when we are seeing a lot of AI -based tools and AI -based interventions launched by the government. I would be happy to have your insights and share mine. I’ve recently had an entire state calibrated for an AI tool. It was a chaos, but somehow we managed. Yeah, your insights on this.

Romal Shetty

Yeah, so I mean, clearly I think it’s a big space for us. I think for all consulting firms, government is a big space where we’re all investing time and energy and we see very, very interesting propositions come out. I mean, to give you an example, one of the chief ministers told me that in the past, that, you know, Romal, I spent today on a road, on a stretch of road, which could be one kilometer. I could be spending 20 crores to 50 crores. Now, people tell me that maybe there’s topography, there’s demography, all of that stuff. And therefore, that’s the reason. But I’m not so sure. Can you help me assess through geospatial and AI? Can you estimate, for example, why should what should it cost to build a road or to repair a road?

I have a thousand crores loss. What is it that you can actually help me? So there are very different kinds of things coming from skilling to access to credit. Our MSME, for example, access to credit. I may get credit today at 8 percent. But if you take MSME, a lot of them may get 24 percent because they don’t have collaterals. But with the data that they have today, it may be much easier for financial institutions to give them at that 8 or 9 percent. So I think GovTech and in many places, and we clearly see India, for example, really pushing forward on that. And a lot of our solutions that we’re doing here. probably going elsewhere as well. So clearly huge potential, huge opportunity.

Audience member 2

We can expect your sample and collaboration with the giants for good sample and

Romal Shetty

Absolutely.

Audience member 3

Namaste sir. I am a student. So my question is that what should be the effective strategy that students from rural areas or tier 3 cities should follow so that they can take maximum leverage of AI and what do you think will be the future of degree courses or our education system as everything is being restructured and possibly it may become obsolete. So what are your thoughts on it?

Romal Shetty

So as I said, I think the skills of the future are a little bit different. So really, like I said, you know, critical thinking, right? Judgment capabilities, working with machines, including humanoids, we will have. And of course, the ability to have access to various kinds of information that will help, especially in the rural areas. Do you have more practical based, but with AI actually helping you, you know, learn concepts better? Because I think the conceptual knowledge is more important than the rote, which used to happen. And then how do you sort of apply that? One important thing, and we talk about it in consulting firms, the ability to orchestrate. You know, I always say that, I mean, I don’t believe in palmistry, but, you know, for an example, we say that a good palmist reads one line, a better palmist maybe reads two lines, but a great palmist is able to read all the lines and make sense of that.

And in some sense, that is sort of the skill that you’ll have to start building, considering all kinds of, you know, things that impact your life.

Audience member 3

So one more question is that. In fact, how humans and AI are…

Vedica Kant

Sorry, we have a lot of people who’ve raised their hands. I think we can just probably take a couple of questions. I think we had the lady here and then I think we can go to the gentleman in the back. Yeah. Please.

Audience member 4

Hi, my name is Geeta. So, following on from the talent question and more so I come from a sort of a GCC background as well thinking of talent. The critical thinking, the power skills, so to say. Picking a grad or an undergrad or even for that matter an ACC or a CA with the current sort of rigor and the qualification and all of that and then transporting that talent into the newer world. It’s a bit of a tussle between the skills that are required today, the skills of tomorrow and how is it that the talent the student should be thinking and how is it you guys are thinking about it?

Sanjeev Krishan

So let me just say, you know, and I’m glad that you raised that question. I mean, at least in the last nine months, I’ve been advocating at whenever the opportunity presents itself, the need for us to do a bit of a rehaul of our education system. Many of my engineering friends tell me that 95 % of what they learned in BHU, for instance, or many of our engineering institutes remains the same as what is being taught 25 years back and what is being taught today is the same. I would have thought that maybe it should be 75%, maybe 80%. I mean, you know, the skill sets of what, as you said very rightly, what will be required tomorrow is going to be very, very different.

I mean, we see, we certainly see that many students today are taking psychology, for instance, and sociology, etc., apart from, and that actually goes to the point that Romul made earlier. So I think some of the skill sets are going to be different. But I must say that working with technology as opposed to, you know, working with technology, at technology, which is like coding as we were talking earlier, is going to be very very different. And I do believe that it requires us to teach a different curriculum in our schools also, not just colleges, schools also, and that is going to be a starting point. I do also want to mention, you know, in respect to the previous question which came in, I think you know, the whole AI piece is going to enable, you know, like the GCC industry, I’m sure, you know, like this question could easily be asked to the GCC industry.

This session could easily be for the GCC industry that how is GCC industry going to get disrupted by AI? I do believe that one of the things that we you know, as a nation and civil society should be focusing on is what does it do to entrepreneurship? Does it enable entrepreneurship at scale? Just as we are saying that UPI has enabled a certain amount of entrepreneurship, I think AI will be a huge enabler for entrepreneurship to the question that was previously asked and I suppose to the leverage that education can have for us.

Audience member 5

yeah i am sudhakar gandhey former senior director american express bank and also build a technology company called access cadets technologies which is a hundred million dollar company in 10 years so i understand a little bit of finance and technology the question anybody can answer my question is lot of money has gone into ai a lot of coming whether it is google or microsoft and everybody raised billions of dollars and moved the market to trillions now one thing which is coming out we look at lot of wall street journals etc the money which is gone into these companies from there is gone to few companies to test it out ok so what is it possibly think this whole thing will be re -rated some of this the whole thing will be re -rated ok because first time google and microsoft both are going to debt market to raise hundred billion dollar which they never raised because they gone to debt because equity of money is going to be raised and they are going to raise hundred billion dollar almost dried up now So my question to any all the three of you who can answer this question, do you think this whole thing will be re -rated and you think some of these companies will go under the water or come down to half the value or one quarter of the value, then the real story starts.

That means this happening in next one year, two year, three years will be reworked into much longer time. So basically re -rating the whole thing, some of these companies going under the water. Thank you.

Romal Shetty

Whenever you work with any kind of disruptive technologies, there will be people who will go under the water, there will be people who sort of succeed and that’s a fact of life. So even in this cycle, I think you will have some companies that will do really well, some companies that may not do very well. I mean you see investments in data center for example, they are saying now you don’t need that much space, you probably need one third of this hall to have a good result. You have a pretty large data center. So I think that is possible. but as I said I always caution on doomsday scenario either ways this way or that way that everything will be everybody will make money and nobody will make money I think that’s not going to happen second is also as India we’ve got to figure out our own thing whether we focus more on the how to better use AI for different things whether society whether for government whether for our own enterprises not necessarily only build everything we do have people like Servam who built also phenomenal things at a lower cost but we’ve got to be very clear where we want to play and I think that is how we want to win I think that is what we should focus on but in these kind of things it happens we’ve also had that’s why if you look at the if you look at the SAP index you know last 25, 30, 40, 50 years those at 50 years back who are top companies don’t necessarily are there in the index now and that’s life that’s how evolution will always happen

Vedica Kant

I know we have a lot of questions but I think we all I don’t know if you have 5 minutes we’re going to take a short break Maybe we can take one more question because I think we also have to wrap up here quickly. I think we had one here and then one, the gentleman there. So I think we can do that as the last two questions.

Audience member 6

So my question builds on something Romal said earlier in the session that your serviceability for SME clients is going to rise. But do you think SMEs are also better positioned? So from a demand perspective, is a lot of demand going to come from there because they are better positioned to leverage this neural network -driven AI because they don’t have to necessarily comply with data residency because most of these highly capable LLMs are housed not in India but elsewhere. And also this technology essentially is very probabilistic. So outcomes are going to be uncertain. And so the enterprise AI adaptation is mostly going to come from smaller firms, less regulated firms? Or do you think that’s not going to be much of a challenge because of the…

Romal Shetty

No, see, I think the… There could always be speed when it comes to smaller companies but doesn’t mean that the enterprises are not actually adopting. In fact, enterprises are spending a lot more. Regulated industries comes with its own thing because you have very strong regulated financial services, healthcare. They’ll be very careful of what they do. But I don’t think anybody is going to be left in this race or wants to be left out in this race. And everybody should be looking at what’s best for them. You don’t necessarily always need to go for LLMs that are… You can also go for open -sourced LLMs. So you don’t need to necessarily… And it’s a combination. I don’t think today there’s one that can solve all your problems.

There could be 10 different kinds of LLMs as well. And you have to be careful and choosy of what you want to do. The good part about the SMEs is they can leapfrog and not necessarily go through a big… cycle where they have to wait for 10 years to do things. And I think that it levels the playing ground a lot.

Audience member 7

Hi, I am Piyush from Digivancy. My question is to Romul sir. As we talk about we can develop a campaign with an MNATS or something. So can we make a tool in terms of MarTech to find the right market for any of the new product line SKUs or for the SMEs because they do not have enough patience for like to do the research or some things even though big corporates as well.

Romal Shetty

Absolutely. So I mean if you do a sentiment analysis you can probably find markets where you think there is demand. I mean it’s like Google knows exactly when somebody is wanting a doctor, wanting something else. It knows actually right. How does it know? That’s the way it knows. So you can actually do some of these things and I do think especially in the SMEs side. the uberization of demand that is demand and supply we do it for taxis but really demand and supply for services or demand and supply for goods or whatever can be much much better because of this technology that we actually have

Vedica Kant

I just want to say thank you to everyone we had a really packed hall today thank you to our speakers for actually being very honest not all consulting leaders will necessarily be as honest also about how their consulting model is changing and shifting and the questions that they have to confront so thank you very much thank you thank you Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (31)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (4)
Confirmedhigh

“Vedica Kant opened the time‑constrained panel as moderator/host of the AI consulting discussion.”

The knowledge base lists Vedica Kant as the moderator/host of the panel discussion on AI transformation in consulting [S1].

Confirmedmedium

“The traditional consulting business model is a pyramid where one client is served by about ten people.”

A source describes the consulting pyramid model as “one client, 10 people” confirming the traditional structure referenced in the report [S15].

Additional Contexthigh

“AI deployments must include human‑in‑the‑loop oversight to preserve agency and accountability.”

The knowledge base emphasizes the need for human-in-the-loop systems and warns against losing human agency in automated decision-making [S112] and discusses the broader issue of human agency in automated systems [S30].

Additional Contextmedium

“Engineering curricula are outdated and need redesign to embed AI literacy, power‑skills and entrepreneurship from school onward.”

An expert notes that students should be taught how to use AI effectively across disciplines, supporting the call for curriculum redesign and AI literacy [S8].

External Sources (116)
S1
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — -Audience member 6- Role/title not mentioned -Vedica Kant- Moderator/Host of the panel discussion This comprehensive d…
S2
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups &amp; Digital Sovereignty – Panel Discussion Moderator Amitabh Kant NITI — <strong>Moderator:</strong> With a big round of applause, kindly welcome the panelists of this last panel of AI Impact S…
S3
The reality of science fiction: Behind the scenes of race and technology — ‘Every desireis an endand every endis a desirethenthe end of the worldis a desire of the worldwhat type of end do you de…
S4
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — -Audience member 1- Founder of Corral Inc -Audience member 6- Role/title not mentioned
S5
Day 0 Event #82 Inclusive multistakeholderism: tackling Internet shutdowns — – Nikki Muscati: Audience member who asked questions (role/affiliation not specified)
S6
Building the Workforce_ AI for Viksit Bharat 2047 — -Audience- Role/Title: Professor Charu from Indian Institute of Public Administration (one identified audience member), …
S8
Harnessing Collective AI for India’s Social and Economic Development — – Professor Manjunath- Audience Member 5
S9
Global Perspectives on Openness and Trust in AI — – Karen Hao- Audience member 1- Audience member 5
S10
Building Inclusive Societies with AI — -Romal Shetty: CEO of Deloitte South Asia, moderating the panel discussion This panel discussion, moderated by Romal Sh…
S13
Day 0 Event #82 Inclusive multistakeholderism: tackling Internet shutdowns — – Nikki Muscati: Audience member who asked questions (role/affiliation not specified)
S14
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — -Audience member 6- Role/title not mentioned -Audience member 7- Piyush from Digivancy
S15
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-transformation-in-practice_-insights-from-indias-consulting-leaders — There could be 10 different kinds of LLMs as well. And you have to be careful and choosy of what you want to do. The goo…
S16
Day 0 Event #82 Inclusive multistakeholderism: tackling Internet shutdowns — – Nikki Muscati: Audience member who asked questions (role/affiliation not specified)
S17
Global Perspectives on Openness and Trust in AI — -Audience member 2- Part of a group from Germany
S18
Day 0 Event #82 Inclusive multistakeholderism: tackling Internet shutdowns — – Nikki Muscati: Audience member who asked questions (role/affiliation not specified)
S19
The Arc of Progress in the 21st Century / DAVOS 2025 — – Paula Escobar Chavez: Audience member asking a question (specific role/title not mentioned)
S20
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — -Audience member 4- Geeta, from GCC (Global Capability Center) background -Audience member 6- Role/title not mentioned
S21
Global Perspectives on Openness and Trust in AI — -Audience member 4- Intellectual property and business lawyer
S22
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-transformation-in-practice_-insights-from-indias-consulting-leaders — Sorry, we have a lot of people who’ve raised their hands. I think we can just probably take a couple of questions. I thi…
S23
Global Perspectives on Openness and Trust in AI — – Alondra Nelson- Audience member 3
S24
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — -Audience member 3- Student -Audience member 6- Role/title not mentioned
S25
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-transformation-in-practice_-insights-from-indias-consulting-leaders — Absolutely. Audience member 3: Namaste sir. I am a student. So my question is that what should be the effective strateg…
S26
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — -Audience member 6- Role/title not mentioned -Sanjeev Krishan- Representative from PwC (consulting firm leader) This c…
S27
Emerging Markets: Resilience, Innovation, and the Future of Global Development — Can you explain what that is? MSMEs, medium and small enterprises. So that will be something that will be. So we are br…
S28
Digital policy at the WTO Public Forum: Summarising Day 3 — There are also concerns about thejob market. Some are worried that automation leads to job losses, while others point ou…
S29
Catalyzing Global Investment in AI for Health_ WHO Strategic Roundtable — He argues that AI should augment clinicians while keeping humans central to decision‑making, acknowledging the difficult…
S30
The fading of human agency in automated systems — In practice, however, being “in the loop” frequently means supervising outputs under conditions that make meaningful jud…
S31
Exploring Emerging PE³Ts for Data Governance with Trust | IGF 2023 Open Forum #161 — Certain barriers, such as low budgets, less technical focus in decision-making teams, and low priority given to smaller …
S32
How the Global South Is Accelerating AI Adoption_ Finance Sector Insights — Data residency requirements and lack of cutting-edge model infrastructure in India create deployment barriers Sharma id…
S33
AI governance struggles to match rapid adoption — Accelerating AI adoptionis exposingclear weaknesses in corporate AI governance. Research shows that while most organisat…
S34
AI’s rapid rise sparks innovation and concern — AI hastransformed everyday life, powering everything from social media recommendations to medical breakthroughs. As majo…
S35
Cambodia Rapid eTrade Readiness Assessment — | Issue (by order of importance) with 1 indicating ‘least important’ and 5 ‘most important’ | How importa…
S36
High-Level sessions: Setting the Scene – Global Supply Chain Challenges and Solutions — By aligning their financial services and efforts, these institutions aim to avoid confusion and conflicting initiatives …
S37
Hype Cycles and Start-ups — Founders and CEOs play a crucial role in navigating the hype cycle by staying grounded and maintaining proximity to the …
S38
IBM CEO’s take on AI’s influence on the business landscape — IBM’s CEO, Arvind Krishna, has left no room for doubt – AI is set to revolutionize the business world. Earlier this year…
S39
Planetary Limits of AI: Governance for Just Digitalisation? | IGF 2023 Open Forum #37 — A lot of investment is going into the development of technologies
S40
Skilling and Education in AI — I think I’m going back to my first point is on the flywheel. I think a lot of the investments are coming into the comput…
S41
Law firms continue to adopt legal AI tools drawing more investors to the industry — Legal Artificial Intelligence (AI) startup Harvey has raised $21m in a fundinground led by Sequoia Capital, with partici…
S42
ChatGPT: A year in review — As ChatGPT turns one, the significance of its impact cannot be overstated. What started as a pioneering step in AI has s…
S43
Laying the foundations for AI governance — Low to moderate disagreement level. The speakers largely agreed on problem identification but differed on solutions and …
S44
AI-Powered Chips and Skills Shaping Indias Next-Gen Workforce — These key comments fundamentally transformed the discussion from a conventional ‘skilling’ conversation to a more sophis…
S45
Need and Impact of Full Stack Sovereign AI by CoRover BharatGPT — I think that the maximum IT services in India are rated per mandate, per hour. Rates are there, right? $20 per hour, $40…
S46
Open Forum #53 AI for Sustainable Development Country Insights and Strategies — Oluwaseun argues that AI innovation needs patient capital and should not be rushed into commercialization. He emphasizes…
S47
AI industry warned of looming financial collapse — Despite widespread popularity and unprecedented investment, OpenAI may befacinga deepening financial crisis. Since launc…
S48
Projecting Digital economy rules on Global South’s AI regulations: what is needed to safeguard human rights? ( Data Privacy Brasil Research Association) — In conclusion, the analysis presents various perspectives on AI regulation and trade laws. The arguments touch on the ba…
S49
The Tokenization Economy — In summary, Anthony Scaramucci’s views on blockchain and Bitcoin have evolved from initial scepticism to recognition of …
S50
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — Both leaders acknowledged significant challenges in enterprise AI adoption, with Krishan noting that only 12% of corpora…
S51
Enhancing rather than replacing humanity with AI — Humans retain agency and choice regarding when and how to use the technology. Individuals remain accountable for the ou…
S52
The fading of human agency in automated systems — Crucially, a human presence does not guarantee agency if the system is designed around compliance rather than contestati…
S53
AI, smart cities, and the surveillance trade-off — The Barcelona model demonstrates that AI in cities doesn’t have to mean surrendering decision-making to algorithms. Mach…
S54
DCNN (Un)Fair Share and Zero Rating: Who Pays for the Internet? | IGF 2023 — Additionally, heavy sector-specific regulations and restrictions on mergers hinder the growth of European telecom operat…
S55
DISCUSSION PAPERS IN DIPLOMACY — Canada’s approach to pricing is not very well documented. The information presented in this section comes from the…
S56
Contents — 3 – Government agencies and businesses need to work more closely together and share knowledge and experience about threa…
S57
Revitalizing Universal Service Funds to Promote Inclusion | IGF 2023 — Ben Matranga:Absolutely. Thank you very much, Jane, and I think the reality is that universal service funds are, most go…
S58
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion — Key barriers to scaling include the need for high-quality data foundations, reimagined business processes, and comprehen…
S59
Global AI Policy Framework: International Cooperation and Historical Perspectives — Werner identifies three critical barriers that prevent AI for good use cases from scaling globally. He emphasizes that d…
S60
Generative AI: Steam Engine of the Fourth Industrial Revolution? — Additionally, reskilling the workforce is crucial to fully embrace new technologies. AI, for instance, has the potential…
S61
AI (and) education: Convergences between Chinese and European pedagogical practices — Norman Sze: Thank you for introduction. It’s my honor to join this forum and share insight from perspective of professio…
S62
Discussion Report: Sovereign AI in Defence and National Security — The discussion aims to present a comprehensive framework for how nations can maintain sovereignty over AI systems critic…
S63
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy — ## Introduction and Context Setting Alex Moltzau: Yes, thank you so much. My name is Alex Maltzau. And I work as a seco…
S64
Comprehensive Report: Preventing Jobless Growth in the Age of AI — High level of consensus with significant implications for policy and business strategy. The agreement across diverse sta…
S65
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — High level of consensus across diverse perspectives (World Bank, academia, legal scholarship, development practice) sugg…
S66
Practical Toolkits for AI Risk Mitigation for Businesses — Improving data representation is essential for enhancing the reliability of algorithms. Stakeholder consultations have r…
S67
How the Global South Is Accelerating AI Adoption_ Finance Sector Insights — Sharma identifies compute resources and research talent as the main barriers, suggesting regulatory issues are less sign…
S68
Comprehensive Report: “Factories That Think” Panel Discussion — This insight challenges the common assumption that financial resources are the primary barrier to technological adoption…
S69
WHO warns Europe faces widening risks as AI outpaces regulation — A new WHO Europe report warns that AI is advancing faster than health policies can keep up,risking wider inequalitieswit…
S70
Adoption of agentic AI slowed by data readiness and governance gaps — Agentic AI is emerging as a new stage ofenterprise automation, enabling systems to reason, plan, and act across workflow…
S71
AI Transformation in Practice_ Insights from India’s Consulting Leaders — Both speakers positioned AI as one of the most significant disruptive forces in a generation, requiring organisations to…
S72
IBM CEO’s take on AI’s influence on the business landscape — IBM’s CEO, Arvind Krishna, has left no room for doubt – AI is set to revolutionize the business world. Earlier this year…
S73
AI is transforming businesses and industries — I am so excited because next week OpenAI is launchingGPT-4– the next-generation large language model! It is going to be …
S74
A Look at the Exciting AI Tech Trends of 2023 — Google just invested up to two billion dollars in Artificial Intelligence company Anthropic. Its lots of money! They put…
S75
Skilling and Education in AI — I think I’m going back to my first point is on the flywheel. I think a lot of the investments are coming into the comput…
S76
Lower then expected capital investment in AI — To effectively incorporate AI into their production processes, companies need to make significant investments in new sof…
S77
Law firms continue to adopt legal AI tools drawing more investors to the industry — Legal Artificial Intelligence (AI) startup Harvey has raised $21m in a fundinground led by Sequoia Capital, with partici…
S78
ChatGPT: A year in review — As ChatGPT turns one, the significance of its impact cannot be overstated. What started as a pioneering step in AI has s…
S79
Fireside Chat Intel Tata Electronics CDAC &amp; Asia Group _ India AI Impact Summit — Bajaj’s perspective revealed significant challenges in translating AI potential into production-scale deployments. Despi…
S80
Leveraging AI4All_ Pathways to Inclusion — -Multi-layered Access Challenges in AI Implementation: The discussion emphasized that good technology alone doesn’t auto…
S82
AI for Safer Workplaces &amp; Smarter Industries Transforming Risk into Real-Time Intelligence — The panel reached consensus on the need for fundamental educational reform to prepare students for an AI-integrated futu…
S83
Need and Impact of Full Stack Sovereign AI by CoRover BharatGPT — I think that the maximum IT services in India are rated per mandate, per hour. Rates are there, right? $20 per hour, $40…
S84
FTC warns of risks in big tech AI partnerships — TheFederal Trade Commission (FTC)has raised concerns about the competitive risks posed by collaborations between major t…
S85
ChatGPT and the rising pressure to commercialise AI in 2026 — The moment many have anticipated with interest or concern has arrived. On 16 January, OpenAI announced the global rollou…
S86
Building Trusted AI at Scale – Keynote Anne Bouverot — This comment shifts the discussion from acknowledging competition to actively proposing strategic alliances. It introduc…
S87
Open Forum #53 AI for Sustainable Development Country Insights and Strategies — Oluwaseun argues that AI innovation needs patient capital and should not be rushed into commercialization. He emphasizes…
S88
Panel Discussion AI in Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) India AI Impact Summit — The tone was consistently optimistic and forward-looking throughout the conversation. Speakers expressed excitement abou…
S89
Emerging Markets: Resilience, Innovation, and the Future of Global Development — The tone was notably optimistic and forward-looking throughout the conversation. Panelists consistently emphasized oppor…
S90
Science AI &amp; Innovation_ India–Japan Collaboration Showcase — The tone was consistently optimistic and forward-looking throughout the conversation. The panelists demonstrated genuine…
S91
AI 2.0 The Future of Learning in India — The tone was consistently optimistic and forward-looking throughout the conversation. Speakers maintained an enthusiasti…
S92
Comprehensive Discussion Report: AI’s Transformative Potential for Global Economic Growth — The conversation maintains a consistently optimistic and enthusiastic tone throughout. Both speakers demonstrate genuine…
S93
Strengthening Corporate Accountability on Inclusive, Trustworthy, and Rights-based Approach to Ethical Digital Transformation — The discussion maintained a professional, collaborative tone throughout, with speakers demonstrating expertise while ack…
S94
Day 0 Event #257 Enhancing Data Governance in the Public Sector — The discussion maintained a pragmatic and collaborative tone throughout, with speakers acknowledging both opportunities …
S95
WS #187 Bridging Internet AI Governance From Theory to Practice — The discussion maintained a thoughtful but increasingly cautious tone throughout. It began optimistically, with speakers…
S96
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth — The tone was notably optimistic yet pragmatic, described as representing “hope” rather than the “fear” that characterize…
S97
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial &amp; Innovation Bridges — The discussion maintained a consistently optimistic and collaborative tone throughout, characterized by mutual respect b…
S98
WS #302 Upgrading Digital Governance at the Local Level — The discussion maintained a consistently professional and collaborative tone throughout. It began with formal introducti…
S99
Closing Ceremony — The discussion maintains a consistently positive and collaborative tone throughout, characterized by gratitude, celebrat…
S100
Bridging the Digital Divide: Inclusive ICT Policies for Sustainable Development — The discussion maintained a formal, academic tone throughout, characteristic of a research presentation or conference se…
S101
Transforming Health Systems with AI From Lab to Last Mile — The discussion maintained a cautiously optimistic and collaborative tone throughout. It began with enthusiasm about AI’s…
S102
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms — -Audience: Multiple audience members who asked questions during the panel
S103
Optimism for AI – Leading with empathy — will.i.am emphasized the importance of maintaining human creativity and traditional skills: “We are the ideators. It is …
S104
AI for Democracy_ Reimagining Governance in the Age of Intelligence — Authorities and independent media will lag behind while malicious actors remain behind. one step ahead. Accountability w…
S105
Brainstorming with AI opens new doors for innovation — AI is increasingly embraced as a reliable creative partner, offering speed and breadth in idea generation. In Fast Compa…
S106
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-driven-enforcement_-better-governance-through-effective-compliance-services — This is again another large Asian bank. This bank cares a lot about NPS, about Net Promoter Score. They consider that Ne…
S107
Law, Tech, Humanity, and Trust — Samit D’Cunha: Thanks, Joelle. That’s a really fair and, I think, necessary question. Maybe I’ll actually answer this qu…
S108
The IIA’s Three Lines Model — Effective governance requires appropriate assignment of responsibilities as well as strong alignment of activities throu…
S109
Day 0 Event #161 Preparing Your Internet to Power the Digital of Tomorrow — Rodrigue Guiguembde from Smart Africa described the organization’s work representing 40 countries and 1.6 billion people…
S110
Digitalization for development: Benefits for MSMEs in developing countries — Ms Clarisse Iribagiza(CEO and eTrade for Women Advocate for East Africa, Mobile technology company HeHe Limited) also ca…
S111
Making the case for digital connectivity for MSME’s: How improved take up and usage of digital connectivity, in particular for ecommerce, supports development objectives (ITC) — A significant difference in the use of voice and text and e-commerce platforms among micro enterprises. An operator in …
S112
Toward Collective Action_ Roundtable on Safe &amp; Trusted AI — Professor Jonathan Shock warned against the “Silicon Valley approach of move fast and break things” when dealing with go…
S113
National Disaster Management Authority — The Minister stressed the critical importance of creating digital twins and thermal maps for emergency response, but str…
S114
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups &amp; Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vivek Raghavan Sarvam AI — And it’s a core technology that a country like India must understand. from the foundational level. Otherwise, we will be…
S115
Open Internet Inclusive AI Unlocking Innovation for All — Anandan acknowledged the economic reality that makes open-source challenging: “if you invest a trillion dollars, you can…
S116
AI: The Great Equalizer? – Insights from World Economic Forum Session — At a session titled ‘AI: The Great Equalizer?’ during theWorld Economic Forum, speakers shared nuanced perspectives on A…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
R
Romal Shetty
11 arguments186 words per minute2717 words872 seconds
Argument 1
Inverted business model for MSMEs enables 10‑client‑per‑person scale
EXPLANATION
Romal explains that generative AI and agent technology allow consulting firms to flip the traditional pyramid model, enabling a single consultant to serve many more clients by automating most of the work.
EVIDENCE
He describes the traditional consulting pyramid as “one client, 10 people” and contrasts it with an inverted model where “10 clients to 1 person, where 80 % is done by a machine, 20 % is done by a human” enabling access to the large MSME segment that was previously untapped [17-20].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Business model inversion for MSME market
Argument 2
Audit confirmation automation saves ~60,000 hours, freeing judgment work
EXPLANATION
Romal details a tool built to automate the confirmation of balances in audit, dramatically reducing manual effort and allowing auditors to focus on higher‑level judgment.
EVIDENCE
He notes that large clients may require 50,000-60,000 confirmations quarterly, and the internally built tool saved roughly 60,000 hours of manual work, redirecting effort toward judgment-related matters [23-27].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Automation of audit processes
Argument 3
AI‑driven simulators for manufacturing, hospitals, aircraft accelerate redesign
EXPLANATION
Romal provides examples of how AI‑based digital twins and simulators help clients identify design flaws early, leading to faster redesigns across industries.
EVIDENCE
He cites a case where a plant designed to produce a car every 2 minutes 32 seconds showed robot clashes and material-flow issues in simulation, prompting redesign; similar simulations are applied to hospitals and a Jaguar jet aircraft, built in 40 days [32-39].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Simulation for operational redesign
Argument 4
Pyramid restructuring: middle layer shrinks, new skills (critical thinking, empathy) needed
EXPLANATION
Romal observes that AI will reduce the size of the middle management tier while increasing demand for junior staff with new skill sets such as critical thinking, judgment, and empathy.
EVIDENCE
He states that “the middle actually shrinks a little bit” and that new hires will need “critical thinking, judgment capabilities and also having a little bit of empathy” to work alongside machines [73-75][79-80].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The discussion notes a shrinking middle tier and the need for critical thinking, judgment and empathy when working with machines [S1], reinforced by broader workforce-skill concerns [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Consulting workforce re‑balancing
DISAGREED WITH
Sanjeev Krishan
Argument 5
Human‑in‑the‑loop essential for judgment and empathy
EXPLANATION
Romal stresses that despite automation, human oversight remains crucial to avoid serious challenges and to provide empathetic judgment.
EVIDENCE
He remarks that “you’ve got to be careful that there has to be a human-led or human in the loop because you can end up with some serious challenges” and later highlights the need for empathy when working with AI [41][79-80].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Need for human oversight
Argument 6
Data security, IP leakage, and token‑cost concerns hinder enterprise adoption
EXPLANATION
Romal points out that concerns over data governance, intellectual‑property leakage, and the future cost of token‑based AI services create barriers for large‑scale enterprise deployment.
EVIDENCE
He recounts an aerospace firm whose designs appeared in ChatGPT after vendors uploaded them, illustrating IP leakage, and discusses token-cost worries that could cause a “bill shock” when pricing changes [126-138].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Governance and cost barriers
DISAGREED WITH
Sanjeev Krishan
Argument 7
Governance and data residency issues complicate AI deployment
EXPLANATION
Romal adds that managing data residency and ensuring proper governance are major challenges that prevent pilots from moving to production‑grade deployments.
EVIDENCE
He mentions the need to manage data and IP when vendors upload designs to ChatGPT and highlights broader governance concerns that affect adoption [124-133].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Governance challenges and data-residency constraints that block production-grade AI deployments are described in the same sources on data security and governance [S15], [S31], [S32].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Regulatory and governance hurdles
Argument 8
Fear that AI commoditizes services, pressuring tax‑opinion pricing
EXPLANATION
Romal expresses concern that AI will make certain consulting services, such as tax opinions, commoditized, forcing firms to reconsider pricing strategies.
EVIDENCE
He says “anything which is commoditized, I am scared” and notes that tax-opinion pricing is being cannibalized, prompting a need to adapt pricing models [152-160].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The commoditisation of tax-opinion services and resulting pricing pressure are explicitly mentioned in the panel transcript [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Pricing pressure from commoditization
DISAGREED WITH
Sanjeev Krishan
Argument 9
AI can estimate road‑construction costs and improve MSME credit access
EXPLANATION
Romal illustrates how AI‑driven geospatial analysis can help governments assess infrastructure costs and enable better credit terms for MSMEs.
EVIDENCE
He describes a chief minister asking about estimating road-building costs using AI, and explains how AI can help MSMEs obtain lower-interest credit by leveraging data for better risk assessment [246-260].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
GovTech use‑cases for infrastructure and finance
Argument 10
Disruptive cycles mean firms must choose where to play and focus on use‑case value
EXPLANATION
Romal argues that firms need to be strategic about which AI opportunities to pursue, focusing on high‑value use cases rather than trying to do everything.
EVIDENCE
He notes that “we have to be very clear where we want to play” and references historical cycles like the SAP index to illustrate that firms must adapt to evolving value propositions [307-312].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need to pick high-value use cases amid disruptive cycles is linked to hype-cycle dynamics and market re-rating examples [S37] and the broader AI boom context [S34].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Strategic focus amid disruption
DISAGREED WITH
Sanjeev Krishan
Argument 11
SMEs can leapfrog larger firms, using open‑source LLMs and avoiding heavy regulation
EXPLANATION
Romal suggests that smaller firms can adopt AI more quickly by leveraging open‑source models and sidestepping the lengthy compliance processes that affect larger enterprises.
EVIDENCE
He explains that SMEs can “leapfrog” and use open-source LLMs, avoiding the need for extensive regulatory approvals, thereby leveling the playing field [322-337].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Smaller firms’ ability to adopt open-source models with fewer regulatory hurdles is noted, as are data-residency challenges that affect larger enterprises [S31], [S32].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
SME agility with AI
S
Sanjeev Krishan
10 arguments205 words per minute2578 words751 seconds
Argument 1
AI treated as a utility; $1 B investment and upscaling program launched
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev describes PwC’s early commitment of nearly a billion dollars to AI and a parallel program to upskill its workforce, positioning AI as a core utility.
EVIDENCE
He states that in 2023 PwC committed “almost a billion dollars to AI” with a hyperscaler and also “committed a significant amount of money for upscaling our people” [48-50].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Large‑scale AI investment and talent development
Argument 2
Chat PwC and Navigate Tax Hub tools create efficiency and new client solutions
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev highlights internal AI tools—Chat PwC for all staff and the Navigate Tax Hub for tax services—that have generated efficiency gains and novel client offerings.
EVIDENCE
He notes that “all PwC personnel across the board would have access to what we call chat PwC” and that the “Navigate Tax Hub” was launched six to seven months ago as an AI-driven tax tool [55-58].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑enabled internal platforms
Argument 3
Managers’ tasks shift to associates; focus moves to validation and hypothesis generation
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev predicts that AI will enable junior staff to perform work traditionally done by managers, freeing senior staff to concentrate on validating assumptions and developing hypotheses.
EVIDENCE
He says “the work of a manager today will be done by an associate or a senior associate” and that staff will spend more time on “validating multiple assumptions” and simulating hypotheses for clients [95-99].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Role reallocation within consulting teams
DISAGREED WITH
Romal Shetty
Argument 4
Current curricula are outdated; need a curriculum overhaul for future skills
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev argues that engineering and school curricula have not evolved in decades, necessitating a redesign to incorporate AI literacy and power skills for future work.
EVIDENCE
He observes that “95 % of what they learned … remains the same as 25 years back” and calls for a new curriculum for schools and colleges to address emerging skill needs [291-298].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for new curricula that embed critical thinking and AI literacy aligns with workforce-skill discussions in the panel [S28] and the broader call for updated education [S1].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education system modernization
Argument 5
Change resistance and integration hurdles slow AI scaling
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev points out that organizational change management and technical integration are major obstacles that prevent AI pilots from reaching production scale.
EVIDENCE
He mentions that “change management and integration of that… the change management piece is the one that I think we haven’t even started testing” and that pilots often fail to scale [113-119].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Pilots failing to reach production-grade due to governance and data-security concerns are cited [S15]; broader AI-governance struggles are documented [S33].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Adoption barriers
DISAGREED WITH
Romal Shetty
Argument 6
Only 12 % of corporations report both top‑line and bottom‑line gains from AI
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev cites a PwC global CEO survey indicating that a small minority of firms have realized both revenue growth and cost savings from AI investments.
EVIDENCE
He reports that the survey showed “only 12 % corporations… have got both vanity (top line) and sanity (bottom line) through use of AI” [120-121].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Limited ROI evidence
Argument 7
Shift toward value‑based billing and value accretion rather than time‑and‑material
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev notes that consulting firms, including PwC, are moving away from traditional billable hours toward pricing based on the value delivered to clients.
EVIDENCE
He states that “most of us actually have moved towards value accretion, value billing” and that billing will increasingly reflect the value created rather than effort [181-184].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Evolution of consulting pricing models
DISAGREED WITH
Romal Shetty
Argument 8
Partnerships with AI firms (Harvey, Anthropic) to stay competitive
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev explains that PwC is forming strategic alliances with leading AI platforms to integrate cutting‑edge capabilities into its service offerings.
EVIDENCE
He mentions being “the first ones to partner with Harvey” and recent work with “Anthropic” as part of the strategy to collaborate with disruptors [194-198].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Strategic AI partnerships
Argument 9
Need to revamp education system to emphasize power skills and AI literacy
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev stresses that schools and universities must redesign curricula to focus on critical thinking, AI literacy, and other power skills needed for the future workforce.
EVIDENCE
He argues that current engineering curricula are outdated and calls for new curricula in schools and colleges, highlighting the importance of power skills and AI literacy [291-298].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Curriculum reform for AI era
Argument 10
AI will be a major enabler for entrepreneurship at scale
EXPLANATION
Sanjeev likens AI’s potential to that of UPI, suggesting that AI will unlock large‑scale entrepreneurial opportunities across sectors.
EVIDENCE
He says “AI will be a huge enabler for entrepreneurship to scale” and draws a parallel with how UPI enabled new business models [300-302].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The panel draws parallels between AI’s transformative potential and previous digital enablers, echoing observations about AI’s rapid rise and innovation impact [S34].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI as catalyst for entrepreneurship
V
Vedica Kant
1 argument155 words per minute900 words347 seconds
Argument 1
AI is reshaping consulting models and requires honest discussion
EXPLANATION
Vedica prompts the panel to address the challenges and implications of AI, emphasizing the need for transparent conversations about how consulting practices are evolving.
EVIDENCE
She asks the panel to “Touch on some of those challenges and the implications of the use of AI” and notes the importance of honest discussion about consulting model changes [42-43].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The panel’s focus on AI’s impact on consulting models and the call for transparent dialogue are captured in the session overview [S10].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Open dialogue on AI impact
A
Audience member 1
1 argument96 words per minute60 words37 seconds
Argument 1
Possibility of a $100‑500 B Indian AI company; US currently leads the market
EXPLANATION
The audience member asks whether India could produce a massive AI‑driven firm comparable to US giants, noting the current US dominance in AI investment.
EVIDENCE
He asks about “the next probably $100 billion to $500 billion company” and whether it will emerge from India, while Vedica paraphrases the question about AI creating abundance and large Indian firms [202-207]. Sanjeev responds that the US leads and that AI is an irreversible trend, though Indian success may take time [208-214].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
India’s potential in the global AI market
A
Audience member 2
1 argument157 words per minute111 words42 seconds
Argument 1
GovTech initiatives face chaos but offer large consulting opportunities
EXPLANATION
The audience member describes a chaotic state‑level AI deployment and seeks insights on how government consulting can navigate such challenges.
EVIDENCE
He mentions a state AI tool that was chaotic and asks for insights [241-243]; Romal responds that GovTech is a big space with examples like estimating road costs and improving MSME credit, highlighting significant consulting opportunities [244-262].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
A chaotic state-level AI tool and the associated governance challenges are described [S15]; data-governance barriers for public-sector AI are further detailed [S31], [S32].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Challenges and opportunities in public‑sector AI
A
Audience member 3
1 argument155 words per minute84 words32 seconds
Argument 1
Rural students should adopt practical AI tools and focus on conceptual learning
EXPLANATION
The audience member asks what strategies rural or tier‑3 students should follow to leverage AI and how degree programmes might evolve.
EVIDENCE
He asks about effective strategies for rural students and the future of degree courses in a restructured world [265-274]; Romal replies that future skills include critical thinking, working with machines, and practical AI-driven learning, emphasizing conceptual over rote knowledge [268-274].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The audience’s question about rural learners and the panel’s response emphasizing critical thinking and practical AI use are recorded [S15]; skill-gap concerns for future work are highlighted [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education pathways for rural learners
A
Audience member 4
1 argument162 words per minute115 words42 seconds
Argument 1
Talent skill gap between existing qualifications and tomorrow’s requirements
EXPLANATION
The audience member raises concerns about the mismatch between current professional qualifications and the skills needed for future AI‑driven work.
EVIDENCE
She asks how to bridge the gap between “the current rigor and qualification” and the “skills required today and tomorrow” for talent [285-288].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The discussion of emerging skill needs, including critical thinking and empathy, underscores the qualification gap [S28].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Bridging current qualification gaps
A
Audience member 5
1 argument202 words per minute277 words82 seconds
Argument 1
Massive AI funding may be re‑rated; some firms could fail or be undervalued
EXPLANATION
The audience member questions whether the current high valuations of AI companies will be corrected, potentially leading to failures or significant de‑valuations.
EVIDENCE
He asks if the AI boom will be “re-rated” and whether some companies will go “under the water” after massive funding [303-306]; Romal answers that disruptive cycles will see winners and losers, citing historical examples like the SAP index [307-312].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The panel references disruptive cycles and market re-rating, mirroring analyses of hype cycles and winner-loser dynamics [S37]; the broader AI boom context is also noted [S34].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Potential re‑rating of AI valuations
A
Audience member 6
1 argument132 words per minute130 words58 seconds
Argument 1
SME demand for AI solutions is growing despite data‑residency and probabilistic concerns
EXPLANATION
The audience member wonders whether smaller, less‑regulated firms will drive AI adoption, given concerns about data residency and the probabilistic nature of AI outputs.
EVIDENCE
He asks if “enterprise AI adaptation is mostly going to come from smaller firms” and raises concerns about data residency and uncertainty [315-321]; Romal replies that SMEs can move faster, can use open-source LLMs, and that enterprises are also investing heavily, indicating growing demand across both segments [322-337].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Barriers for smaller organisations and data-residency issues are discussed [S31], [S32]; the panel also mentions rapid SME adoption of AI tools [S15].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
SME versus enterprise AI adoption dynamics
A
Audience member 7
1 argument154 words per minute75 words29 seconds
Argument 1
AI‑driven MarTech tools can quickly generate market‑specific campaigns for SMEs
EXPLANATION
The audience member asks whether AI can be used to build marketing technology tools that create rapid, targeted campaigns for small businesses.
EVIDENCE
He asks if a tool can be built to find the right market for new product SKUs for SMEs; Romal confirms that sentiment analysis and AI can identify demand and supply gaps, enabling fast market-specific campaigns [338-347].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI‑enabled marketing automation for SMEs
Agreements
Agreement Points
Adoption and change‑management challenges are the main barrier to scaling AI in enterprises.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Data governance, IP leakage and token-cost concerns hinder enterprise adoption (Romal) [122-124][124-133][143-144] Change-management and integration hurdles slow AI scaling; only a small minority see both top-line and bottom-line gains (Sanjeev) [113-119][120-121]
Both speakers agree that organisational and governance issues – from data security to change‑management – are the biggest obstacles to moving AI pilots to production‑grade deployments.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple policy analyses identify data readiness, governance gaps, and the need to redesign business processes and talent development as the chief obstacles to moving AI beyond pilot projects, echoing the EU-led AI scaling framework and World Economic Forum findings [S58][S70][S59].
Workforces need new skill sets (critical thinking, judgment, empathy) and curricula must be updated for the AI era.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
AI will shrink the middle tier and require juniors with critical-thinking, judgment and empathy (Romal) [73-75][79-80] Current engineering curricula are decades out of date; a redesign is required to embed AI literacy and power-skills (Sanjeev) [291-298][299-301]
Both panelists stress that the existing talent pool and education system are misaligned with AI‑driven work and must be re‑skilled or re‑designed.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Authoritative reports stress comprehensive reskilling and curriculum overhaul to equip workers with critical thinking, judgment and empathy, linking AI talent development to national education strategies and public-private collaboration initiatives [S58][S60][S61].
Human‑in‑the‑loop remains essential; AI augments but does not replace human judgment.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Human-led oversight is required to avoid serious challenges and to provide empathy (Romal) [41][79-80] AI shifts routine work to junior staff, freeing senior staff for validation, hypothesis generation and judgment (Sanjeev) [95-99]
Both agree that while AI can automate many tasks, human expertise and oversight continue to be critical for quality and ethical outcomes.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy guidance from AI ethics bodies underscores that human agency must be preserved, positioning humans as decision-makers who validate and contextualise algorithmic outputs rather than as mere formality [S51][S52][S53].
AI opens large opportunities for SMEs and GovTech, allowing firms to tap previously inaccessible markets.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Inverted business model lets consulting firms serve millions of MSMEs; SMEs can leap-frog using open-source LLMs (Romal) [17-20][75-80][322-337] AI will be a major enabler for entrepreneurship at scale, similar to UPI (Sanjeev) [300-302]
Both see AI as a catalyst for expanding into the SME segment and for government‑related digital services.
Consulting pricing models are shifting toward value‑based billing as AI commoditises routine services.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Commoditisation of tax opinions creates pricing pressure and forces re-thinking of fee structures (Romal) [152-160] Firms are moving from time-and-material to value-accrual billing, with billing increasingly tied to outcomes (Sanjeev) [181-184]
Both acknowledge that AI‑driven efficiency is compressing traditional fee models and pushing firms toward value‑based pricing.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Recent governmental reviews of professional services pricing note a trend toward value-based contracts as automation lowers the cost of routine deliverables, prompting regulators to consider transparency and fairness guidelines for consulting fees [S55][S64].
Similar Viewpoints
Both view organisational change and governance as the primary bottleneck for enterprise AI deployment.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Adoption and change-management hurdles limit AI scaling (Romal) [122-124][124-133][143-144] Change-management and integration are the biggest obstacles to scaling pilots (Sanjeev) [113-119]
Both stress that education and up‑skilling must evolve to match AI‑driven job requirements.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Need for new skill sets – critical thinking, empathy, judgment (Romal) [73-75][79-80] Curriculum overhaul and power-skills are required for future work (Sanjeev) [291-298][299-301]
Both agree that AI augments rather than replaces human expertise.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Human oversight remains crucial (Romal) [41][79-80] AI frees senior staff for higher-level validation and hypothesis work (Sanjeev) [95-99]
Both see AI as a catalyst for expanding services to SMEs and public‑sector clients.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
AI enables new SME and government market opportunities (Romal) [17-20][322-337] AI will be a major enabler for entrepreneurship at scale (Sanjeev) [300-302]
Both acknowledge that AI is reshaping consulting fee structures toward value‑based models.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Commoditisation creates pricing pressure (Romal) [152-160] Shift toward value-based billing and pricing (Sanjeev) [181-184]
Unexpected Consensus
AI is simultaneously viewed as a disruptive threat and a strategic opportunity.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Romal expresses fear that commoditisation will erode traditional consulting services (Romal) [152-160] Sanjeev frames AI as a utility and a massive enabler for new value creation (Sanjeev) [45][46][300-302]
While Romal focuses on the risk of disruption, Sanjeev highlights AI’s potential to unlock new markets and entrepreneurship, yet both recognise that the same technology drives both forces.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Broad consensus across policy forums characterises AI as both a competitive risk and a catalyst for growth, informing strategic roadmaps in the EU AI policy framework and World Bank economic-growth analyses [S64][S65][S68].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong convergence on four core themes: (1) adoption and governance challenges; (2) the urgent need to up‑skill and redesign curricula; (3) the continued necessity of human oversight; (4) AI’s role in opening SME and GovTech markets; and (5) a shift toward value‑based pricing as routine work becomes commoditised.

High consensus across speakers on the strategic implications of AI for consulting firms, indicating that future success will depend on addressing change‑management, investing in talent development, maintaining human judgment, and re‑orienting business models toward higher‑value services.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
How to address pricing pressure and commoditization of consulting services
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Fear that AI commoditizes services, pressuring tax‑opinion pricing Shift toward value‑based billing and value accretion rather than time‑and‑material
Romal warns that AI will make services like tax opinions a commodity, forcing firms to rethink pricing and expresses personal fear of this commoditisation [152-160]. Sanjeev, by contrast, argues that consulting is already moving toward value-based billing, where fees reflect the value delivered rather than the amount of effort, and sees this as the appropriate response to AI-driven change [181-184].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Discussions in national pricing reviews highlight growing pressure on consulting firms to justify fees amid AI-driven commoditisation, urging the development of sector-specific pricing standards and value-assessment tools [S55][S64].
What constitutes the primary barrier to enterprise AI adoption
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Data security, IP leakage, and token‑cost concerns hinder enterprise adoption Change resistance and integration hurdles slow AI scaling
Romal highlights governance issues – data residency, IP leakage (e.g., aerospace designs appearing in ChatGPT) and future token-price shocks – as key obstacles to moving pilots to production-grade deployments [126-138]. Sanjeev points to organisational change-management and technical integration as the main blockers, noting that pilots rarely scale because the change-management piece has not been tested [113-119].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy literature repeatedly cites data governance, talent gaps, and change-management as the top impediments to enterprise-wide AI deployment, aligning with global AI scaling barrier frameworks [S58][S70][S59].
Which tier of the consulting workforce will be most transformed by AI
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Pyramid restructuring: middle layer shrinks, new skills (critical thinking, empathy) needed Managers’ tasks shift to associates; focus moves to validation and hypothesis generation
Romal observes that AI will cause the middle management layer to shrink and that new hires will need critical-thinking, judgment and empathy to work alongside machines [73-80]. Sanjeev predicts that work traditionally done by managers will be performed by associates or senior associates, freeing senior staff to spend more time validating assumptions and building hypotheses [95-99].
Strategic approach to leveraging AI in consulting
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Disruptive cycles mean firms must choose where to play and focus on use‑case value AI treated as a utility; large investment and internal platforms (Chat PwC, Navigate Tax Hub) drive efficiency
Romal argues that firms should be selective, focusing on high-value use cases and clearly defining where they want to play, rather than trying to do everything [307-312]. Sanjeev frames AI as a utility, describing a near-$1 billion investment and the rollout of internal AI tools (Chat PwC, Navigate Tax Hub) to create efficiency and new client solutions [48-50][55-58].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Strategic guidance from AI policy panels recommends treating AI adoption as a core business imperative, with governance, risk, and value-capture models tailored for professional services firms [S58][S64].
Unexpected Differences
Concern over token‑price shock versus no mention of cost considerations
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Token‑cost concerns could cause a dramatic bill shock for AI services No discussion of token pricing or cost‑related barriers
Romal warns that when AI token pricing moves from subsidised to market rates, firms could face a sudden cost explosion [136-138]. Sanjeev never raises cost-of-tokens, focusing instead on change-management and integration, making this a surprising omission given the prominence of the issue in Romal’s remarks.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Consulting leaders have flagged unexpected token-based billing spikes-often termed ‘bill shock’-as a practical barrier to AI projects, prompting calls for clearer cost-transparency regulations [S50].
Different perception of AI’s threat level to consulting business models
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
AI commoditisation is a direct threat requiring defensive pricing strategies AI is an enabler that will shift billing to value‑based models without existential threat
Romal expresses personal fear that commoditised AI services could erode consulting revenue and force price cuts [152-160]. Sanjeev, however, treats AI as a utility that enables a transition to value-based billing, implying confidence rather than fear [181-184]. The contrast between viewing AI as a threat versus an opportunity was not anticipated given their shared industry background.
Overall Assessment

The panel shows substantive disagreement on how to navigate pricing pressures, the primary adoption barriers, workforce restructuring, and strategic focus for AI in consulting. While all participants acknowledge AI’s transformative potential, Romal adopts a more cautionary stance emphasizing governance, commoditisation risk and selective high‑value play, whereas Sanjeev adopts a utility‑centric, investment‑heavy, partnership‑driven outlook focused on internal tools and value‑based billing.

Moderate to high – the speakers share a common recognition of AI’s impact but diverge sharply on the most pressing challenges and the optimal strategic response, which could lead to differing implementation pathways within the consulting sector.

Partial Agreements
Romal stresses hiring junior staff with critical‑thinking, judgment and empathy to work with machines [73-80], while Sanjeev highlights that managers’ tasks will shift to associates and staff will focus on validation and hypothesis generation [95-99]; both agree on the necessity of new skill sets but differ on which roles will be most affected.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Both see the need to up‑skill the workforce for AI‑augmented consulting Both acknowledge that AI will change the nature of work and require new capabilities
Romal points to data governance, IP and token‑cost issues as the main hurdles [126-138], whereas Sanjeev emphasizes change‑management and integration challenges [113-119]; they share the goal of scaling AI but diverge on which obstacle to prioritise.
Speakers: Romal Shetty, Sanjeev Krishan
Both agree that adoption barriers must be addressed to realise AI benefits Both propose different primary levers to overcome those barriers
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI is being treated as a utility and a strategic lever that can both optimise existing processes and enable entirely new business models, especially for underserved segments like MSMEs. Concrete internal use‑cases demonstrated significant productivity gains: audit confirmation automation saved ~60,000 hours; AI‑driven simulators accelerated plant and aircraft design; tax opinion generation tools (e.g., Navigate Tax Hub) reduced turnaround time. Consulting firms are investing heavily in AI infrastructure and talent up‑skilling (e.g., PwC’s $1 B AI spend, Chat PwC, partnership with Harvey and Anthropic). The traditional consulting pyramid is being re‑examined – the middle layer may shrink, junior staff will work more with AI, and senior staff will focus on judgment, validation, and hypothesis generation. Human‑in‑the‑loop, critical thinking, empathy and “orchestration” skills are identified as essential complements to machine output. Adoption challenges dominate scaling: resistance to change, data‑security and IP governance, token‑cost volatility, and low reported ROI (only 12 % of corporations see both top‑line and bottom‑line gains). Pricing pressure is prompting a shift from time‑and‑material to value‑based billing; firms are exploring partnerships rather than direct competition with pure‑tech players. Government and public‑sector projects present large opportunities (e.g., AI for road‑cost estimation, MSME credit scoring) but also face coordination chaos. Education systems are lagging; there is a call for curriculum overhaul to embed AI literacy, power‑skills and practical problem‑solving, especially for students from tier‑3/rural areas. SMEs can leap‑frog larger enterprises by adopting open‑source LLMs and AI‑driven MarTech tools, though data‑residency and probabilistic outcomes remain concerns. Market dynamics suggest a possible emergence of a large Indian AI‑driven company, but the sector may experience re‑rating and failures similar to past technology cycles.
Resolutions and action items
Continue and expand up‑skilling programmes for all staff (e.g., PwC’s internal AI training, Deloitte’s democratised innovation approach). Scale successful pilots (audit confirmation tool, Navigate Tax Hub, AI simulators) into production‑grade offerings with proper governance frameworks. Establish data‑security and IP governance protocols for client‑facing AI deployments, especially in regulated industries. Pursue strategic partnerships with AI platform providers (Harvey, Anthropic, OpenAI) to integrate advanced models while focusing on consulting‑specific value creation. Develop a roadmap for re‑structuring the consulting workforce: define new junior roles centred on AI‑assisted analysis and senior roles centred on validation and client‑impact hypothesis generation. Create a cross‑functional task force to address change‑management and adoption barriers across client organisations, including pilot‑to‑scale transition plans. Initiate dialogue with academic institutions and government bodies to redesign curricula that emphasise critical thinking, AI literacy and practical problem‑solving.
Unresolved issues
How to reliably achieve enterprise‑wide ROI from AI beyond pilot phases; the 12 % success figure indicates a large gap. Standardised approaches for data residency, token‑cost management and long‑term pricing of AI services remain undefined. The precise shape of the future consulting pyramid (extent of middle‑layer reduction, new role definitions) is still uncertain. Extent and timing of large‑scale Indian AI unicorn emergence; factors that will enable or hinder such growth are not settled. Long‑term impact of AI‑driven commoditisation on traditional fee structures and how firms will protect margins. Specific mechanisms for integrating AI into heavily regulated sectors (healthcare, finance) without compromising compliance. Concrete steps for overhauling school and university curricula; who will lead and fund such reforms.
Suggested compromises
Adopt a balanced narrative: recognise AI’s disruptive potential while avoiding doomsday or hype extremes. Maintain human‑in‑the‑loop oversight to mitigate risks of fully autonomous outputs. Combine proprietary AI solutions with open‑source models to give SMEs flexibility and control over data. Shift from pure time‑and‑material billing to hybrid models that blend value‑based pricing with baseline service fees. Use AI to augment, not replace, existing consulting talent – re‑skill staff rather than downsizing outright. Implement incremental adoption: start with sandbox pilots, then scale with robust change‑management and governance structures.
Thought Provoking Comments
AI can do a lot of optimization, but reimagination is an important part… we can invert the consulting pyramid from 1 client‑10 people to 10 clients‑1 person, with 80 % of the work done by a machine.
It reframes AI not just as a tool for efficiency but as a catalyst to fundamentally redesign business models, opening entire market segments (e.g., MSMEs) that were previously inaccessible.
Shifted the conversation from incremental productivity gains to strategic market expansion. Prompted Vedika’s follow‑up about how the consulting pyramid will change and led Romal to discuss new skill requirements for a larger, AI‑augmented workforce.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
We built a tool for audit confirmations that saved 60,000 hours, letting auditors focus on judgment‑related matters.
Provides a concrete, high‑impact example of AI delivering measurable time savings, illustrating the ‘human‑in‑the‑loop’ benefit.
Grounded the earlier abstract discussion in a tangible use case, reinforcing the argument for AI‑driven productivity and prompting Sanjeev to mention similar practitioner‑led innovations at PwC.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
All PwC personnel have access to ‘Chat PwC’; it was the people themselves who identified use cases like the Navigate Tax Hub after 12‑15 months of experimentation.
Highlights a bottom‑up, democratized approach to AI adoption, showing that real value emerges when staff are empowered to experiment.
Supported Romal’s point about democratizing innovation, and steered the dialogue toward cultural and change‑management aspects of AI rollout.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
Only 12 % of corporations say they have achieved both top‑line (vanity) and bottom‑line (sanity) benefits from AI; the main barrier is change‑management and integration, not the technology itself.
Introduces hard data that challenges the hype around AI ROI and redirects focus to organizational readiness.
Created a turning point where the discussion moved from showcasing successes to confronting why many pilots fail to scale, leading Romal to add governance and token‑economics concerns.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
An aerospace company discovered its designs appearing in ChatGPT because vendors were uploading them during RFPs – raising serious data‑governance and IP protection issues.
Raises a critical, previously unaddressed risk of AI adoption: inadvertent leakage of proprietary information.
Expanded the conversation into security and compliance, prompting further dialogue on data residency, token costs, and the need for robust governance frameworks.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
The token model is currently subsidised; when pricing normalises, enterprises will face a ‘bill shock’, which could dramatically affect AI adoption.
Foresees an economic constraint that could curb AI usage, adding a layer of financial realism to the optimism.
Introduced a new dimension (cost sustainability) that influenced later audience questions about pricing pressure and the need to move up the value chain.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
We must partner with AI‑native firms (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic) rather than try to compete with them; consulting’s strength lies in combining domain expertise with these technologies.
Strategically reframes the threat of tech firms as an opportunity for collaboration, preserving the relevance of consulting services.
Redirected the narrative from fear of disruption to proactive partnership, influencing Romal’s later remarks on embracing disruption and reshaping pricing models.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
The education system is still teaching 25‑year‑old curricula; we need a wholesale revamp to teach critical thinking, judgment, and AI‑orchestration skills from school onward.
Identifies a systemic bottleneck—outdated talent pipelines—that could limit AI’s impact across industries.
Prompted Romal to elaborate on future skill sets (critical thinking, empathy, orchestration) and answered audience concerns about talent development for AI‑driven roles.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
SMEs can leapfrog traditional cycles and adopt AI faster, but they must choose the right LLMs (open‑source vs proprietary) and manage data residency concerns.
Balances optimism about SME adoption with practical cautions about data governance and technology selection.
Provided a nuanced answer to an audience question, reinforcing earlier points about governance while highlighting new market opportunities for AI services.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
Fear of commoditisation is real; if we don’t adapt, others will cannibalise our services. Yet we must avoid both doomsday hype and complacency, continuously disrupting ourselves.
Captures the paradox of AI disruption—simultaneous threat and catalyst—while advocating a balanced, proactive stance.
Served as a concluding thematic anchor, summarising earlier debates on pricing pressure, value‑chain movement, and the need for ongoing innovation.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
Overall Assessment

The discussion pivoted around a core tension: AI as a disruptive force that can both erode traditional consulting structures and unlock entirely new markets. Romal’s early framing of AI as a re‑imagining tool reshaped the dialogue from incremental efficiency to strategic business‑model overhaul, prompting deeper exploration of workforce redesign, data governance, and cost sustainability. Sanjeev’s data‑driven critique of ROI and emphasis on change‑management introduced a reality check that broadened the conversation to include adoption barriers and the necessity of partnerships with AI‑native firms. Audience questions about GovTech, education, and SME adoption reinforced these themes, while the speakers’ responses consistently linked back to the central ideas of democratised innovation, skill evolution, and collaborative disruption. Collectively, these pivotal comments steered the panel from abstract hype toward concrete strategic considerations, highlighting both opportunities and risks for consulting firms navigating the AI era.

Follow-up Questions
How are you communicating AI-driven changes to your own people?
Understanding internal change management and employee buy‑in is crucial for successful AI adoption.
Speaker: Vedica Kant (to Romal Shetty)
What specific challenges prevent AI pilots from scaling to production‑grade solutions?
Scaling pilots is essential for realizing ROI and broader enterprise impact.
Speaker: Vedica Kant (to Romal Shetty)
What governance frameworks are needed to protect data and IP when using AI, especially in regulated industries?
Data leakage and IP risks were highlighted (e.g., aerospace design appearing in ChatGPT).
Speaker: Romal Shetty
How will token pricing and potential bill‑shock affect AI usage costs for consulting firms?
Future cost sustainability of AI services depends on pricing models for token‑based usage.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
What best practices for change management are needed to drive AI adoption in enterprises?
Change‑management was identified as a major barrier to scaling AI beyond pilots.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan (also referenced by Romal Shetty)
How should education curricula be revamped to prepare students for AI‑augmented roles and future consulting work?
Both speakers noted that current curricula are outdated and need redesign to emphasize critical thinking, judgment and AI literacy.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan (also Romal Shetty)
What role can AI play in government infrastructure cost estimation and MSME credit access?
GovTech opportunities were mentioned, but detailed frameworks and impact studies are still needed.
Speaker: Romal Shetty (in response to Audience member 2)
How can SMEs leverage AI while managing data‑residency and regulatory concerns?
SMEs may face unique compliance and data‑sovereignty challenges that require further exploration.
Speaker: Romal Shetty (in response to Audience member 6)
What types of partnerships should consulting firms pursue with AI technology firms to stay competitive?
Strategic alliances (e.g., with OpenAI‑funded Harvey, Anthropic) were cited, but a systematic partnership model warrants study.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
What metrics should be used to evaluate ROI of AI deployments in enterprise settings?
Assessing true business value of AI remains an open question for many organizations.
Speaker: Vedica Kant (initial question)
How will AI impact the consulting pyramid and workforce composition across senior, middle and junior levels?
The reshaping of the traditional pyramid model was discussed but concrete workforce‑design guidelines are still needed.
Speaker: Vedica Kant (to panel)
How will AI commoditization affect consulting pricing models and the value chain?
Pricing pressure and the move toward value‑based billing were raised, requiring deeper analysis.
Speaker: Vedica Kant (to Romal Shetty) and Sanjeev Krishan
Impact of AI on the Global Capability Centers (GCC) industry and its disruption potential
The speaker suggested AI could reshape GCC services, a topic that needs systematic research.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
Effectiveness and adoption pathways of AI‑driven tax tools such as Navigate Tax Hub
Early success was mentioned, but broader evaluation of impact and scalability is pending.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
Use of AI in audit confirmation processes and associated risk mitigation
A tool that saved 60,000 hours was described; further study on accuracy, audit standards compliance, and risk is required.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
Scalability of AI‑enabled digital‑marketing platforms for MSMEs
A prompt‑driven campaign generator was showcased; research needed on adoption rates and ROI for small businesses.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
Potential of AI to enable entrepreneurship at scale similar to UPI’s impact
The speaker likened AI to a catalyst for new ventures, suggesting a need to investigate ecosystem effects.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
Long‑term valuation risks for AI‑focused companies and possible market re‑rating
Concern about over‑valuation and future corrections of AI‑centric firms warrants financial‑market research.
Speaker: Sudhakar Gandhey (Audience member 5)
Future of degree courses and higher‑education system in an AI‑restructured world
Both raised whether traditional degrees will become obsolete, indicating a need for curriculum reform studies.
Speaker: Audience member 3 (student) and Sanjeev Krishan
AI’s impact on data‑center utilization and infrastructure requirements
Comments on reduced data‑center space suggest a research avenue on infrastructure optimization.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
AI’s role in simulating manufacturing processes and design validation (e.g., Jaguar jet, automotive plant)
Rapid development of simulators was highlighted; further investigation into accuracy, cost‑benefit, and industry adoption is needed.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
AI’s impact on tax opinion pricing and service delivery models
AI‑generated tax opinions were mentioned as a pricing pressure point; systematic study of market effects is required.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
AI’s influence on the future competition between consulting firms and pure‑product technology companies
The speaker discussed threats and partnership models, indicating a need for strategic analysis.
Speaker: Sanjeev Krishan
AI’s effect on talent development, especially critical thinking, judgment and empathy skills
New skill sets were identified as essential; research needed on training programs and assessment.
Speaker: Romal Shetty
Open‑source versus proprietary LLM adoption strategies for SMEs and enterprises
The speaker noted multiple LLM options and the need for choosy selection, suggesting comparative research.
Speaker: Romal Shetty

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.