AI 2.0 The Future of Learning in India
20 Feb 2026 10:00h - 11:00h
AI 2.0 The Future of Learning in India
Session at a glance
Summary
This discussion centered on the launch of a report examining AI adoption in school education and explored how educational institutions must reimagine themselves in the age of artificial intelligence. The Centre of Policy Research and Governance (CPRG) presented findings from their survey of Delhi private school students, revealing that nearly 50% use AI-based tools multiple times per week, primarily for academic information searching and writing assistance. The study found that while AI usage is high, students still prefer human interaction for learning and view AI as a supplementary tool rather than a replacement for traditional teaching.
The panel of distinguished educators and policymakers emphasized that AI represents a paradigm shift requiring fundamental transformation of educational institutions. Professor KK Aggarwal highlighted the need to ensure AI supplements rather than replaces creativity and critical thinking. Suresh Yadav stressed that this transformation goes beyond reform, requiring complete reimagining of education systems to position India as a global leader, potentially reaching a $70-150 trillion economy by leveraging its 1.5 billion population. Professor Pankaj Arora, as NCTE Chairman, emphasized that teachers must become AI leaders rather than followers, introducing programs like NPST and National Mentoring Mission on digital platforms.
Secretary Patil acknowledged significant challenges, including digital divides between urban and rural areas, with only 4 lakh of 15 lakh schools having adequate ICT infrastructure. Intel’s Aditi Nanda demonstrated industry solutions, including voice-to-voice translation and locally-running AI tutors that address language barriers and provide personalized learning. The consensus emerged that successful AI integration requires ethical usage, teacher training, infrastructure development, and maintaining human elements in education while preparing students for an AI-driven future economy.
Keypoints
Major Discussion Points:
– AI Adoption in Indian Education: The discussion centered around findings from a comprehensive survey report on AI usage among school students in Delhi, revealing that nearly 50% of private school students use AI-based tools multiple times per week, primarily for academic information searching and writing assistance.
– Challenges and Opportunities of AI Integration: Panelists discussed both the benefits and risks of AI in education, including issues with AI hallucinations, accuracy problems in numerical subjects, the digital divide between urban and rural areas, and the need for ethical AI usage while recognizing AI as a supplementary tool rather than a replacement for human teachers.
– Reimagining Educational Institutions for the Future: The conversation explored how educational institutions need fundamental transformation rather than mere reforms, emphasizing the shift from degree-awarding to problem-solving institutions, integration of school and higher education systems, and the development of AI-spine curricula across all educational levels.
– India’s Potential as a Global AI Leader: Speakers highlighted India’s demographic advantage with 140 crore population and 44 million students in higher education, discussing how proper AI adoption could position India as a dominant economic force, potentially reaching $70-150 trillion GDP if educational institutions effectively harness AI technologies.
– Practical Implementation Strategies: The discussion covered concrete steps being taken, including AI curriculum introduction from class 3, establishment of AI Centers of Excellence, development of local language AI tools, teacher training programs, and partnerships between government, academia, and industry to ensure equitable AI access across diverse Indian educational contexts.
Overall Purpose:
The discussion aimed to launch a research report on AI adoption in school education while bringing together key stakeholders from government, academia, and industry to explore how Indian educational institutions should transform to effectively integrate AI technologies and prepare students for a future where AI literacy is essential.
Overall Tone:
The tone was consistently optimistic and forward-looking throughout the conversation. Speakers maintained an enthusiastic and visionary approach, viewing AI as a tremendous opportunity rather than a threat. While acknowledging challenges like digital divides and implementation hurdles, the overall sentiment remained positive and solution-oriented, with participants expressing confidence in India’s potential to become a global AI leader through educational transformation.
Speakers
Speakers from the provided list:
– Speaker 1: Session moderator/host, appears to be from CPRG (Centre of Policy Research and Governance)
– Pranav Kothari: Researcher/analyst at CPRG, presented the AI in school education survey report
– Speaker 2: Former advisor to President Mukherjee, worked in finance ministry, expertise in educational innovation and policy
– Professor KK Aggarwal: President of South Asian University, former Vice-Chancellor who developed Indraprastha University during the IT movement
– Pankaj Sir: Chairperson of National Council of Teacher Education (NCTE), former head and dean at University of Delhi, expertise in curriculum development and teacher education
– Suresh Sir: Executive Director at Commonwealth Secretary, expertise in digital transformation and economic policy
– Patil Sir: Secretary of Higher Education, former Secretary of School Education, expertise in educational administration and technology implementation
– Speaker 3: Aditi Nanda – Director of Education and Industry at Intel, works with ecosystem and industry partnerships, expertise in educational technology and AI implementation
Additional speakers:
None identified beyond the provided speakers names list.
Full session report
This comprehensive discussion centred on the launch of a groundbreaking research report examining artificial intelligence adoption in school education, exploring how Indian educational institutions must reimagine themselves for the AI era. The Centre of Policy Research and Governance (CPRG) presented survey findings from Delhi private schools, revealing significant insights into student AI usage patterns that challenge conventional assumptions about technology adoption in education.
Research Findings on AI Adoption in Schools
The CPRG study, conducted by Pranav Kothari and his team, represents a survey-based report mapping AI usage among private school students in Delhi. The research revealed that nearly 50% of these students use AI-based tools multiple times per week, though this usage rate remains marginally lower than their college counterparts, suggesting rapid but measured adoption among younger learners.
The study uncovered specific usage patterns showing how students integrate AI into their academic routines. AI usage is primarily concentrated in searching for academic information and writing assistance, with notable variations across academic streams. Science students demonstrate high AI usage for learning complex concepts but show limited adoption for structured tasks such as calculations or problem-solving, primarily due to accuracy concerns. This selective usage pattern indicates that students are developing sophisticated understanding of AI’s strengths and limitations.
The research found high perceived helpfulness of AI platforms for both school examinations and entrance exam preparation. However, this creates challenges for traditional educational technology platforms as free generative AI tools compete with established paid services. Students report that AI tools help them learn complex topics, improve time management, and enhance academic performance, yet they simultaneously encounter regular issues with AI hallucinations and accuracy problems, particularly in logical and numerical subjects.
Student Preferences and Learning Approaches
Despite high AI usage rates, students demonstrate overwhelming preference for traditional learning methods. The research revealed strong student support for YouTube videos and ICT-based learning tools over AI platforms. When asked about AI’s potential for adaptive learning and addressing individual needs, students indicated that current AI tools are not providing sufficiently personalised solutions, likely because they primarily use free models of generative AI platforms rather than specialised educational AI tools.
Most significantly, students showed overwhelming support for traditional human interaction-based learning over AI tutors or AI-based teaching replacements. This finding suggests that while AI is emerging as a valuable supplementary tool, it is not viewed as a substitute for human instruction.
Institutional Transformation and Global Competitiveness
Suresh Yadav, Executive Director of the Commonwealth Secretariat, argued that this moment requires complete reimagining rather than mere reform of educational systems. Drawing parallels with India’s digital transformation success, he emphasised that AI represents a paradigm shift that will determine global competitiveness for the next century.
Yadav presented economic projections suggesting that India’s population could support substantial economic growth if educational institutions can produce appropriate skills and capabilities. He stressed that countries achieving global dominance do so through institutional excellence, citing how American higher education and Chinese research output in AI are reshaping global power dynamics.
The transformation vision extends to fundamental educational philosophy. Yadav advocated for shifting from degree-awarding institutions to problem-solving institutions where students earn credentials by addressing real-world challenges, better preparing graduates for economic contribution while addressing India’s societal challenges.
Teacher Education and Professional Development
Professor Pankaj Arora, Chairperson of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), provided insights into preparing educators for AI-integrated classrooms. He emphasised that AI poses both opportunities and challenges for cognitive development, requiring careful balance between technological assistance and human creativity development.
Arora introduced the distinction between AI followers and AI leaders, arguing that educational institutions must position themselves as leaders who shape AI usage rather than passive adopters. This perspective influenced the development of the National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST) and the National Mentoring Mission (NMM), both designed on digital platforms with AI assistance.
The teacher education transformation involves moving from treating technology as isolated workshops to implementing multi-semester AI spine curricula. Arora stressed the importance of transitioning from product-only evaluation to process-rich evidence of learning, enabling more comprehensive assessment of student development.
Infrastructure Challenges and Implementation Reality
Andrao B. Patil, Additional Secretary for Higher Education, provided statistics about implementation challenges across India’s educational landscape. With 25 crore children in school education and 4.6 crore in higher education, the scale of transformation is unprecedented. However, only 4 lakh of India’s 15 lakh schools currently have adequate ICT laboratories, computers, and tablets.
The digital divide between urban centres like Delhi and remote rural areas represents a fundamental challenge for equitable AI access. While central schools like Kendriya Vidyalayas and Navodaya Vidyalayas are adopting AI technologies, and states like Andhra Pradesh, Assam, and Tamil Nadu are implementing AI curricula, other regions lag significantly behind.
Patil highlighted rapid AI adoption rates, noting that ChatGPT reached 5 crore users in just 40 days compared to 75 years for telephone adoption to reach the same number. Currently, approximately 7-10 crore Indians use ChatGPT and Gemini, demonstrating remarkable adoption rates despite infrastructure limitations.
Industry Perspectives and Practical Solutions
Aditi Nanda from Intel identified language barriers as fundamental obstacles, noting that students often struggle with English-medium instruction when their native languages differ. AI’s translation capabilities could address this accessibility challenge, potentially transforming educational equity.
Intel’s initiatives include developing AI courses for workforce preparation, collaborating with CBSE on AI curriculum development, and creating locally-running AI solutions that function without internet connectivity. These offline-capable AI tutors could provide personalised assistance while reducing hallucination risks through locally-stored, curated content.
Nanda highlighted successful implementations where rural students developed AI-based solutions for local industries, such as defect detection systems for textile manufacturing, demonstrating how AI education can create immediate economic value while building practical skills.
Ethical Considerations and Human-Centred Education
Professor KK Aggarwal, President of South Asian University and former developer of Indraprastha University during the IT revolution, stressed that AI should supplement creativity rather than provide shortcuts that diminish thinking capabilities. He shared examples of cultural bias in education, emphasising the need for culturally appropriate AI implementation.
The ethical framework extends to institutional responsibility. Arora highlighted the need for AI supervision, arguing that AI cannot design curricula without human oversight. This establishes clear hierarchies where humans remain in control while leveraging AI capabilities.
Cultural preservation emerged as another consideration, with speakers emphasising using AI to promote Indian knowledge systems, languages, and traditions rather than allowing Western-oriented AI to dominate educational content.
Current Implementation and Future Vision
CBSE has introduced AI curriculum starting from class 3, focusing on AI literacy and ethical usage rather than technical training. Multiple IITs have established AI schools with partnerships involving Google, Microsoft, and other technology companies. The AI Centre of Excellence in education, hosted by IIT Madras, coordinates research and development efforts.
Integration initiatives include encouraging universities to engage with 100 schools each, facilitating teacher exchanges to break down silos between educational levels. The vision extends to regulatory transformation, with proposals for AI-oriented assessment systems, though this requires careful balance between automation and human judgement.
Ongoing Challenges
Despite optimistic visions, significant challenges remain. The infrastructure gap between urban and rural areas requires massive investment in electricity, internet connectivity, and hardware. Training teachers, many of whom lack technical backgrounds, presents enormous logistical challenges.
AI accuracy issues, particularly in STEM subjects, continue to pose risks to learning quality. While students’ ability to identify AI hallucinations provides some protection, systematic solutions are needed. The challenge of maintaining human creativity and critical thinking while leveraging AI assistance requires ongoing attention.
Conclusion
This discussion demonstrates remarkable consensus among diverse stakeholders about AI’s transformative potential for Indian education. The agreement spans fundamental principles: AI should supplement rather than replace human instruction, ethical oversight is essential, and India has significant potential for global AI leadership through educational transformation.
The path forward requires simultaneous attention to immediate practical challenges—infrastructure development, teacher training, curriculum design—and long-term strategic vision for institutional reimagining. Success depends on maintaining human-centred educational values while embracing technological capabilities that could position India as a global leader in the AI era, ensuring that technological advancement serves human flourishing rather than replacing it.
Session transcript
Thank you everyone for joining this session. Before we start the session, I would like to tell you about the joint initiative of CPRG and Future of Society. The Centre of Policy Research and Governance is a policy think tank that is continuously researching policy and governance issues in different fields. Two years ago, the Emerging Technology Centre was established by the International Cooperation Centre for the Development of Technology and the Relation of Technology and Society. We have developed a Future of Society project to study the relationship between technology a centre developed here. Under Future of Society, we are continuously working on the various sector, producing report, doing a lot of stakeholder consultation. In this light, just one year before, we have published one report usage of AI in higher education.
Now, we have just launched going to release one more report, usage of AI in school education. In next month, we are going again going to launch report, Future of Job. There is a lot of fear, and this fear is not just outside it is also coming in people’s minds. Whether their acquired skill will survive in the next 5 or 10 years or not, as emerging technologies are coming. Along with this, there is also a fear that it will not happen and the type of tool that is being developed, human skills or human mind will become irrelevant. By keeping all these things in mind, what kind of transformation is happening, what kind of future skills, what kind of future jobs are coming, and they are going to be transformed, we are going to launch a report on that.
But that is in the next month. But the report that we are going to launch now, that is AI in school education, and to launch that, I call all my guests and Mr. Pranav to the stage. Thank you.
Now we have a short presentation with some salient findings from our study. So AI in school education, this is a survey report that we have conducted late last year as part of our ongoing internal activities on mapping AI usage among students in India and various sectors in India. So over the past year, CPRG has now released two reports on AI adoption in education. So last year, we released a report on AI adoption in higher education. This was the first ever survey -based report in India on mapping everyday AI use among college students. Today, now we are launching our new report on AI adoption in school education. Both studies have been conducted in Delhi, where we have actually gone to students, interviewed them to understand what are they using AI for, how often they are using AI for, and what are various challenges and opinion on usage of AI.
So firstly, if we just compare our broad findings, what we find is that AI use among school students remains relatively high, though marginally lower than what we found among college students within the same city because both studies were conducted in Delhi. Yet, what we find is that nearly 50 % of students, and these are, of course, these are students from private schools in Delhi, that was our limited sample, almost 50 % of them use AI based tools. These could be generative AI platforms or other AI tools multiple times a week. What are patterns of AI or edtech use as per academic stream? So what we’re finding is that while AI use, especially generative AI platforms such as strategy, GPT, Gemini remains relatively high.
What this is also leading to is also leading to some sort of a challenge to traditional methods of learning. And edtech platforms that have become extremely prominent and widely used over the past few years. Then what are students using AI for? So apart from asking how often are students using AI, we also try to delve into what are they using AI for and what we find in our study is that AI use is essentially concentrated for generally searching for new academy for academic information while studying or writing assistance and this of course varies across streams because some students may be more into more engaged in practice solving, question solving and AI use depends on depends on usage but however what we find is that among science students for instance while there’s high AI usage for learning concepts there is very limited usage for structured tasks like calculations or calculations or solving questions because that is where various AI platforms still have relatively low accuracy.
Now what is perceived helpfulness of AI for school exams and exams? So what is perceived helpfulness of AI for school exams and exams? So what is perceived school exams and exams? So what is perceived helpfulness of AI for school exams and exams? So what is perceived helpfulness of AI for school exams and exams? So what is perceived helpfulness of AI for school exams and exams? So what is perceived helpfulness of AI for school There is relatively high perceived helpfulness of AI platforms for both studying for school exams and entrance exams. While especially for entrance exams, students who are in the science team are more likely to prepare for entrance exams are still more dependent on offline classes or edtech platforms.
Yet the level at which we are seeing perceived AI helpfulness, it means that there is an emerging challenge that is coming to edtech platforms through free usage of generative AI platforms. AI support in learning and performance. So how do students rate AI -based platforms or AI -based tools in terms of their actual impact? And what we find is that apart from, of course, learning complex topics, improving their time management, there is a substantial proportion of students who are actually attributing, improving their academic performance to use of AI platforms. At the same time, students report issues with accuracy and challenges in AI use. One of the major challenges with respect to AI use is that students, a significant proportion of students regularly encounter AI hallucination or are able to identify that they are getting incorrect information.
Then secondly, as I mentioned, when it comes to accuracy for logical or numerical subjects, there is relatively lower reported accuracy. Again, this is something that various platforms are still working on in terms of trying to improve their performance and accuracy. Next is apart from their overall planning and understanding overall AI uses, we also try to compare AI platforms and their performance. with other tools. So what we did was we asked students, number one, is our AI platforms better than YouTube or ICT based learning? And there what we find is that there’s still overwhelming support for YouTube video or ICT based learning tools. Secondly, there’s a whole question of adaptive learning and AI addressing individual needs.
Here, there is an overwhelming evaluation by students that while AI might tools might be helpful, they are not necessarily providing solutions that are specific to their needs. And this, of course, might be because of the nature of AI tools that students are using, which is in most cases free models of generative AI platforms, as opposed to specific AI tools that are actually able to undertake adaptive learning. And then finally, we tried to ask the we tried to ask about AI versus human interaction. So why? So the idea of AI tutors or AI based learning tools replacing in -person teaching, there again, there’s an overwhelming support to the essentially overwhelming support for the idea that students still prefer.
traditional human interaction based learning. So what we’re finding in our study is that while AI is definitely emerging as inter -AI use is definitely increasing significantly among students, it is still considered as a supplementary tool as opposed to a replacement or substitute for traditional teaching. So these were some of the findings. We have more detailed findings in our report and at the end I would just like to thank our team that worked on this report. I would like to thank Nitin, Mehta and Ms. Suchitra Tripathi for their guidance and oversee of this research and I would like to thank our team members Gauri, Shreya, Anupriya, Rashi, Mika and Shugal for their active involvement and participation in the study.
Thank you so much.
Thank you Pranav ji for the presentation. Today as a panelists now we have Professor KK Agarwal sir. President South Asian University We have Professor Pankaj Arora Sir Chairperson of National Council of Teacher Education Suresh Yadav Sir Executive Director, Commonwealth Secretary Andrao B. Patil Sir Adolescent Secretary, Higher Education And we have Aditi Nanda Director, Education and Industry, Intel And Agrawal Sir You have seen the transformation during IT movement And if I can align it correctly At that time you had developed Interpress University And maybe because at that time IT was also in the process of developing a new institution So you have seen the transformation during IT movement So when you are developing an institution At that time it must be happening in your mind For the how you know i .t is going to challenge those you know kind of uh traditional or conservative approach of you know institutions now again you are the president of south asian university it’s you know one of the iconic institution in india and again you are facing new challenge you know from the ai so how you are you know how you are finding this ai is different from the i you know past i .t because in your lifetime you have seen two movement first i .t now ai and at the same time you are developing two new institutions because before you saw was you not in that position but now so is leading so how you are finding
thank you for the question yes in a way when i was asked to develop the very first university Delhi, Indraprastha University, and it was a challenge because it was the first university in the country, and your very right IT movement was also in the offing. It probably happened by coincidence that the vice -chancellor, which is me, which was appointed at that time, belonged to the discipline of IT. This was probably never a calculation, but it happened. But it happened for the good of the country and the university, I believe, because you could get two in one kind of person to develop. So we made sure that right from the beginning, IT is… That was the time when, if you remember, I saw the students in Delhi.
Incidentally, I think this was the first university in Delhi for the students after Delhi University, who was an affiliated university. So I was seeing the student go to the Delhi University colleges. They had not said this before. with the employment and in the evening they go to a tech company and do a course there. Now that was very much disturbing to me why the students should feel not very satisfied at the end of the formal school or formal college and then try to do that. So my first thing was let’s combine the two. So our curriculum itself should integrate both. If the students have a job in IT sector, why should we not realize this and make sure that every subject is more IT saving and so on and so forth.
Now when I am here the challenge obviously as you say is AI. AI is fortunately being adopted by the youngsters even faster which was expected. IT was also adopted by them faster than the elders. AI is being adopted much faster than elders. Only thing which one has to see is as I said in the whole process of using AI let’s make sure it supplements our creativity it does not give us a shortcut to creativity and thereby reduce our thinking powers. That is a challenge which we have to face in academics. Short of that it is a good opportunity for all of us.
While working with President Mukherjee you have introduced a lot of technological tools and a lot of innovation not only in the field of finance ministry but as an advisor of President you have introduced a lot of educational innovation as well. And I think that was before time of 2014 and 2015. After the COVID -19 the educational institution has been changed and it is getting changed very fast. How you will analyze and how we will assess this kind of change and what will you suggest to education institution and to the head of the institution to address those challenges posed by AI and other emerging technology.
Thank you very much and first of all a big congratulations on this fantastic report which talks about the AI in school education and also your previous reports which talks about AI and I think it’s a very good documentation to understand where we stand as a society as a country, as an institution in the emerging landscape. COVID changed Ramananji drastically the way the world looks at the various ways of doing the things. I mean, going to the office was normal. Now, not going to the office is normal. So there is a fundamental shift. It’s very difficult to get the people back to office. And the argument is that if I can do my job better while sitting in my home, why do you want me to come to the office?
So these are the fundamental shifts which we have witnessed post -COVID. And then if you look at the artificial intelligence, it’s a paradigm shift. It’s not only 180 degree. It’s a 360 degree shift. We don’t know which direction and what direction we are going. Any organization, any society, any institution which is not live and kicking to this new emerging reality will be fossilized. Remember, we have in 180 controlling. The almost one -third GDP of the world. And it was not the country which was leading. It was the institutions. It was the institutions of that time which were producing the skill, which can produce the goods and services and the material, which can dominate the world.
So it was the role of the institutions. Of course, the government has now tried to recreate Nalanda, which is coming out very well. So the point I’m trying to emphasize is that the role of educational institutions is of paramount importance. No institutions can dominate the world. No country can dominate the world. Unless the institutions dominate the world. If you look today, the U.S. is dominating the world not because of the military power, but because of the higher education system. If you look at China, the Chinese universities are coming on the top. The number of research in the field of computer science, AI, machine learning, computer vision is dwarfing the research being done in the United States now.
So that’s the level of the ship. So when I’m talking about your topic. reimagining the education system in India, I’m not talking of today, I’m talking of India of 2050, India of 2100. And one thing I keep saying that India, a lot of people say it’s a $5 trillion economy. They are very happy that we are the third largest in PPP, fourth largest in the other term. But I’m not happy because India, as of now, of 1 .5 billion people, if you look at the European standard of GDP per capita, we should be more than $70 trillion. If you look at the American standards of GDP, we should be more than $150 trillion, more than the size of the world economy.
So that is the level, that is where we have to think that what kind of institutions we need, what kind of infrastructure we need, what kind of history we need. Is it the degree, the undergrad degree, master’s degree, PhD’s degree? I got all the degrees. I studied in India from IIT, Indian School of Business. I studied in US, UK, Germany, Sweden, everywhere I have just to educate myself that how the things are different, what are the fundamental differences. So that is something which we have to realize and not do the reforms. This is not the time for doing the reforms in the higher education system. It’s like reimagining. You see, what we reimagine India in terms of digital India, we are getting the dividend.
We are a country which is entirely on different level, generating billions of transactions on the digital UPI system, which was unheard. So similarly, we need a higher education system. We need a general education system which can give an exponential bump to India’s story. And that’s not going to be the normal system. It’s going to be something very, very different. And that is going to be based on the foundation of the technologies. We have been talking that this is the first time in the history of India, though it has been tried several times in the past, to link the north and south. Language barriers always exist. It’s very difficult to do it. but AI dismantles the barrier I was in my village we set up AI lab, we set up AI shop and my message to the villagers you can speak in your Bhojpuri to US, to Russia to Japan so that is the first time a fundamental shift in connectivity is happening around the world and India being a young nation a country of young people almost 44 million students in the higher education ecosystem almost running parallel to China we have that power and potential to change and the moment we are able to use this technology I am sure that we will realize the potential so I say in terms of potential I say I am number one economy India is number one economy not third or fourth so that is the mindset because I have to reach to my potential and I will reach the potential only when I know my potential what it exists so there is a huge responsibility of the Indians of the present generation not only for themselves but the Indians of 2100 Indians of 2050 And if we are not able to capitalize, this AI boom will be left behind.
If you see the geopolitics around the world, we say it’s a new war and all, but it’s the technology war. It’s the AI war. Countries are understanding that those who will dominate AI, they will dominate the world for the next century. So we have to love it. We have no option as a nation. And the education system, which is one of the biggest in the world, will have a very catalytic role in realizing that dream of India of 2100. Thank you and over to you, Ramananji.
Pankaj sir, as a head and dean, you have changed the curriculum of University of Delhi. You have also introduced a lot. You have introduced a lot of skill -based course during your time and make it outcome -oriented. But the AI challenge is new. And now as a chairperson of NCT, you also see a lot of diversity among the institutions, from the Jhabua to Delhi, and, you know, it’s a multi -layer system. And as a chairperson of NCT, how will you introduce, kind of, you know, ensure that all the institutions can respond in the same manner to the challenge of AI? Because there is a lot of diversity in India. And there is a lot of diversity, you know, about having those kind of resources.
Because AI also needs a lot of resources, not only in a financial term, but in the term of technology and kind of having electricity and other things. So how do you see and how will you ensure?
then we must say that structural and epistemic shift is not merely technological. It is fundamental change that how knowledge is produced, assessed, and evaluated in the day -to -day life of a student. If we look at teacher education, yes, in CI, during my headship, we brought new programs. We revised all the curriculums of BH, MAD, ITEP. And during those changes, our focus was to meet the expectations of young learners in 21st century. Young learner is into technology throughout. When I was doing my college, those days, computers came to the world. And we were very scared of computers. We were told that unemployment will increase because one computer will be… work in place of four or five people.
So as a young student, we protested. against this technology. But today, reality is different. Computer is giving us multiple new avenues of employment in our daily life. So when you revise curriculum, two things I would like to mention here. One, curriculum revision exercise at University of Delhi took place in 2019. And this entire exercise was techno -based. We did it through dashboard system without human intervention, intervention, without having formal meetings and budget of lakhs of rupees to meet, to eat, to TA, to DA, and everything. So zero penny was spent when 72 programs were revised for LOCF curriculum framework. And then in CI, when we took up this exercise, again I followed the same model.
Techno -oriented, technology -supported revision took place. In a record period of two months, we revised almost all the courses in education at University of Delhi. now if we look at role of a teacher what type of teacher we need to meet future generation in my family I have teachers who are dealing with class 3 students class 7 students and senior secondary classes as well as university teaching they all are saying AI is posing a threat to cognitive development of the learner yes it is posing a threat but at the same time we must realize that AI is not going to replace teachers teachers are always there and here I say they both complement each other no challenge no competition between two they complement because a teacher after the use of AI based technology or video or some other context a teacher is the person who can create sensitivity sensitivity in the class related to the topic as well as allow diverse opinions on the same topic So AI can assist.
AI cannot be a master. It is an assistant. If we use it for ethical reasoning, if we use it for creativity, collaboration, adaptability, I see teachers will increasingly function as mentors and learning designers, not learning followers. And ethical guides and facilitators of inquiry in a classroom situation as well as in writing textbooks and developing curriculum. AI -based output demands AI supervision. AI supervision, I mean, AI cannot be left free to design any curriculum. We need to supervise it. When I say we all know difference between governance and leadership. Governance, I call, like, governance means compliance manager. If whatever is coming to you, you are implementing it, you know. Organization, whether it is a college, university, or any other organization.
And if you are an academic leader, then you make a change in that compliance. Compliance will take place because governance is essential. But at the same time, you bring change according to the needs of your institution, needs of your students, needs of your financial resources, etc. Similarly, in education, we must not become AI followers. We should become AI leaders for the time. Yesterday, Honorable Prime Minister said we have tremendous potential to become AI leaders for the world. In those lines, as NCT Chairman, we have brought two new programs, NPST, National Professional Standards for Teachers, and NMM, National Mentoring Mission. Both are designed on a digital platform, on a digital world. And AI is helping us analyzing people’s queries, their questions, their anxiety, and helping them to identify the right mentor for them.
And mentor -mentee is always a guru -shishya context, which is very meaningful and useful. I will close this remark by saying, now we are moving away from treating technology as one -off workshop. Rather than, we should shift towards multi -semester AI spine. AI is spine of entire education system nowadays. And our new program, ITEP, have multiple contexts of AI -based technology. We must transit from product -only evaluation to process -rich evidence of learning. That is more meaningful. In 2012, CBSE brought continuous comprehensive evaluation. Now, AI is helping us to go for process -rich evidence in learning. Risk landscape is there. Bias, heliconations are there. But uneven access to technology is also a challenge that should be taken into consideration.
My last closing remark is, AI plus education can take us towards Vixit Bharat 2047. AI is not a choice. It is a part of our life and providing us multiple new methods of research, new methods of industrial internship. But education, which is providing culture, language and humanistic approach, both need to work hand in hand for better future, for Vixit Bharat 2047. Thank you.
Patil sir, as an administration secretary, school education, you have embedded technology and through technology, you have been in our track, not only Nipun, but other platforms have been transformed so much that the focus of the government on learning outcomes has improved a lot. Now, you are in higher education and higher education is a very diverse sector and the same time you know in contrast to school education higher education may up to pass controlling power be a critical to jada hoti school education is subject to some time you know in contract list so that’s why abhi aapka kya vision hai to you know to transform those higher education institution in the age of AI AI kya ek challenge hai lagataar aa raha hai not only for the students but as well administrator as well aur us time mein aap ki planning kar rahe ho ki how will you you know address those issues
thank you sir thank you so much for giving me the opportunity I would like to ask few of the I’m seeing a lot of students here so can somebody tell me that how much time telephone took to reach to five growth subscriber our users any guesses 30 years good guess anybody else quickly 50 years okay good some more yes here somebody sitting right of the stable 75 years yes so it took five crore people go your telephone my light it took 75 years it took 38 years to reach this radio took 38 years to reach to 5 crore people our charge gpt any guesses germany took for 60 days to do is to the 5 crore people whereas charge a pity to 40 days to reach to 5 crore people so this is the i think there is a quantum jump or whatever you say it is a huge jump and with this it is a big challenge for the educationists and both school and higher education.
I can just read some figures for benefit of you that in world we are having around say mobile users in the world there are 749 crore people whereas India 120 crore people. Internet 600 crore people they are using it in India it is 100 crore. In Google world 580 people 580 crore people are using Google whereas in India it is 80 crore and CharGPT world it is 80 crore this is last month’s data not this month. So around 7 crore people they are using CharGPT in India and 1 crore in Gemini. So around maybe by this time 10 crore people will be using CharGPT and Gemini here. Now the challenges what are coming up I will come to that I am not pessimistic at all but if you see in the education ecosystem as Suresh sir also has told and other speakers also have told.
This is very important to see how what is the this cohort, around 25 crore children are in the school education and 4 .6 crore children are in the higher education around 30 crore we can say now 15 lakh schools are there in India and right now if you see the infrastructure around 4 crore 4 lakh schools only having the computers ICT labs and tablets and other things so it is a huge challenge to take the AI revolution to last mile which is, we are aware as I also told you I worked in school education, now in higher education so we are having integrated approach and we are working on that but we need your help second one if you see in school education around 1 crore teachers are there right now and most of them are women so which is really good change is happening there but how many are AI savvy or AI literate we are working on that and And Sir NCT Chairman Sir has already told on that.
Pankaj Sir has told on that. Now, coming to the different digital divide. Delhi schools, if you say, and the remote area schools, the tribal areas or rural areas, you can see. Madam is also from Bangalore. I last week went there. There is huge development. So the cities, the way they are catching up here is huge. Humongous progress is there. But the rural area and other places, it is a big challenge. Central schools like KVS, NVS, they are doing really good in catching up with the AI, using the AI technologies. Even CBS is coming with the AI curriculum. Whereas in the report also I’ve seen, like Andhra, Assam, Tamil Nadu, and a few other states are using the AI curriculum and AI tools for implementation in the education system.
Whereas other states are here to catch up. so there is little bit divide in this and it will take time for India to catch up but yes all of us are now agreed that yes AI is not going anywhere, AI has to be used, AI is useful and at the same time AI is not enough we should treat AI as a machine not as a human being which is very very important AI if you started taking as a human being then it will be problem, it will be huge mental stress on the students and other users also so we are aware of this that’s why school education has taken very wise decision to introduce AI curriculum in third grade it is not to teach the AI it is to teach what is AI what are the uses of AI and whether it is good or bad so children should know about it which is very very important so coming generation, coming up generation new generation, young generation must learn AI because it is very very useful.
Yesterday as Pankaj sir has told that Prime Minister has told that AI, India has to become hub of AI and yesterday evening, yesterday full day we had the meeting with Spain universities. Today again we are having the meeting with the Spain universities like that lot of meetings are going on MOAs are happening. You may be knowing that IIT Madras has developed one tool where Dr. Kamakoti has spoken in Tamil and it has been translated in 11 languages of India as Suresh sir was also telling that when you speak in Bhojpuri, it can get translated in others. So there is huge potential I have seen from Siksha Lokam, they have shown me that again in Bihar, the villagers, the women, they are talking about dropouts, why I got dropout, why my daughter is getting dropout, what are the issues, they are talking in the local language and AI is actually summarizing in English and other languages.
so they are talking and with it that there is no typing nothing else it is getting summarized classified and as an administrator we can take decisions so AI is a boon if we are using it very properly and AI will become a bane if it is misused or unethically used. As sir you are asking me for the challenges in AI yes there are many challenges what we are doing right now is updating the curriculum we are doing educational governance such as coming up many IITs they brought AI schools in their campuses they are having MOUs with Google, Microsoft and various other places Wadhani Foundation has also started one AI school in one of the IITs.
Lot of investment is going on. We are already started AI COE in education and IIT Madras is hosting that. Lot of work going going on. Lot of work going on. Lot of work going on. Lot of work going going on. Lot of work going on. Lot of work going on. Lot of work going on. Sarvam is also helping us in those initiatives. but yes there is parity there is disparity we need to sort out those issues and AI is not only for the STEM that we understood and we are implementing that way everybody has to understand what is AI and how we can take it forward as Suresh has told about economy I think we both have worked previously in Ministry of Education Ministry of Finance together I got his guidance there so the way he has told you can see it is now we are talking about reimagining the education so whatever you imagine what is your vision you are going to achieve that so we should not limit our vision I think 140 crore population and plus it is coming up it is required to have really big vision but same time necessary skills skills are required and one of the report suggests that if one year of schooling is happening … the 24 % there is output increase in the labour output actually.
Labour can, the output will increase by 24%. And in India we are having these certain issues. If you see what labour force is giving the output in US, what is given in South Africa and what is given in India, there is, really we need to think about it. So year of schooling is very, very important. We are having challenges of dropouts also. Luckily, Vidya Samhita Kendra and other tools we are using to trace the dropouts and bring them in the mainstreaming. You can also see around 5 crore children are dropped out. And various state governments are working on that to bring it down. So European Union, few countries may be having this population of 5 crore.
So challenges in India are more, but much more. But as Madam was also asking me what will be the impact of AI, I think it will be huge impact on us. Next two years we can see the way India is going to change. As again I can say one last example and come back. When I was working in banking, department people said that there is something called payment through the mobiles. And when I was discussing with our CMDs of the banks, those were their CMDs, now it is MDs. And they told me that no, it is not going to work here. And South Africa started there. Airtel itself started it there. And 2016 when DMO has come, we can see the huge impact.
And now in PCI we can see the way it is happening. Around 50 % of digital transactions are happening from India, world’s transactions. There is huge change. I think another two years we can see there is huge change in AI adaptability and using it. But one caution is that AI has to be used as a tool. It has to be used ethically. And it has to be used for the work. For humanity. That is what I can say. Thank you so much. And we are getting prepared for that, sir. As IITs are far better. IIMs are far better. Whereas central universities are catching up with this AI. And we are trying to help with them, sir.
Thank you. Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir. Thank you.
Thank you, Dr. Namanan, and thank you for having me here. It’s been very interesting and it’s been a pleasure for me to listen to all the other panelists here. Got to learn quite a lot. And congratulations on the report. So very interesting and very pertinent point that you raised, that the industry also needs to work with different players, not just with the government but also academia, and create a change. So I have a very interesting job. I work with the ecosystem and industry. industry. And in that, I get to work with different startups, get to know different ISVs and really see the innovation that’s happening. And some of these innovations are interesting to see because they are cutting edge.
They are coming from India for India and then they go for the world. Like you just mentioned, sir, Patil sir was just talking about, you know, the digital payment. And I think you were mentioning M -Pesa from a net perspective. So how we have taken the UPI and other things that we are taking this to the world. It’s a very proud moment, but it starts with an idea and it starts with something that needs to be nurtured by everyone. If you have and that’s what the AI summit, it’s a great moment for all of us. We’ve put ourselves on the world map. We’ve shown the world that we can do great. And here is where the technology innovation is happening.
And from an Intel perspective, we work not just very closely with higher ed, but also K -12 and of late, we’ve been working with. startups to come up with solutions which impact the students at large. So I was talking to somebody the other day, and I think the stage server was talking about, you know, bhojpuri getting translated. So I was talking to somebody and said, why are learning outcomes in the Indian Tier 2, Tier 3 and rural areas not as great? You know, the response came ki, bache ko maths or physics nahi samajh mein aata, yeh problem nahi hai. Bache ko English nahi samajh mein aata, yeh problem hai. Kyunki hamara teaching medium, o bache ke language mein nahi hai.
And what we are doing today in terms of making sure that the content reaches everybody in the language that they understand, I think that is going to be a game changer. And that is coming from AI, and AI is coming from a combination of people. Folks like all of us in the room coming together and saying, okay, let’s make something that will have an impact at population at large. So those are things and I was talking to you just before this. He said, India mein aisa nahi hai ki people don’t want to buy technology. People don’t, they’re not afraid of technology. But the problem is and how many of us as parents will always say, laptop nahi, bachcha ko laptop nahi dana, bachcha bighar jayega.
But why are we not seeing the value? Why are we not seeing that a creation device like a laptop or something that is more than a consumption device, where is the value creation in that? Can we have AI courses, courses starting from class 3 onwards, going up to higher ed? And we have in fact worked, my colleague of mine has worked very closely with CBSC to create a curriculum which has gone into schools, right? And we’ve worked, Intel has worked together and helped put that together. We have a program called Unnati for higher ed. And now we are bringing in these… courses which are AI for future workforce under that umbrella which has courses like AI in manufacturing and we have put this out in Gujarat Technical University and recently we had somebody come in from there.
This girl was the first time, first generation to go to a college she went through this program and in this program we also had internship. So she had interned with a startup with an industry in Surat that was doing basically textile manufacturing and she created a project on defect detection using AI. So a kid from a rural area going to college for the first time as the first generation going to college being so confident about what she had created because it was being used in an industry and she could see the impact. I mean those are the stories and those are the things that make you feel like you want to work in this. The rewards are huge.
I think that is what is needed and Intel’s obviously a great job of bringing these things together and all the programs that we have, whether it’s Unnati, whether it’s Future for Workforce, whether it’s the stuff that we do in the K -12 space. We’ve got an ISV startup that we work with which is helping teachers become AI -enabled. So creating, and it’s all running locally. The content doesn’t even need to go into the cloud. We have solutions running on AI PC, which is what Intel is now bringing to the market. And I would invite you all to please come visit our booth at, of course, AI Summit, because that’s what has brought us all here.
And we’ll show you some of the really cool use cases and demos where voice -to -voice gets translated on the device. So you don’t even need to connect to the Internet. You don’t even need to connect to the cloud. Everything is happening on the device. The content is there. And I think I heard hallucination as one problem. that is what you also in the report identified. What if the content sits locally on the device itself? So you’re only looking at class 9 science. So when a child asks about a question, maybe they’re just wanting to know how do I get into NEET and JEE, the answer is coming from there, and it’s coming in a language that the child understands.
So what if that happens, and that exists today. We’ve worked on it. So think of it as a 24 -7 tutor. And one more thing, I don’t know how many of you will relate to this, but at least I used to. When the teacher is teaching, everything was clear. But when you go home and read the same concept, what happened? How did it disappear? So when this happens, and if you’re an introverted child, who do you go and ask? And how do you create that safe space of asking? You can have tuition teachers, you can have personalizers, but if there is a bot, that is not judging this child and is saying, hey, come here, I’ll teach you in the language you understand.
Mere se pucho. And you know as a parent that this is all happening on the PC. It is all safeguarded. Or at least there is lesser chance of hallucination. That is what we are working towards. And I’ll finish with because there are all esteemed panelists, I think I should finish with a quote. Arthur C. Clarke said technology, and I’m paraphrasing, technology done right is like magic. And if we bring that magic of technology plus AI to all kids in India, I think we’ve done our job. That’s what we are doing.
Thank you, Aditi. I think we have a few minutes more and we can have just, you know, a quick round intervention. Just on the issue when we are, you know, when we just try to reimagine institution. What are the two things that we want to see in the future of higher education? And, sir, if I may ask, what do you want to see in the future of higher education? What do you want to be?
Finally a girl raised her hand. She said, okay. At least somebody. She said, yes, come on. We’ll work it together. She said, sir, everything is fine. But firstly tell us what is a tile. See in that African area the tiles were never used. They were used for round rooms with round floors and square tiles or rectangular tiles were not in the dictionary. And on that basis we declare all that class failed in mathematics. That is what we are doing today with the help of simple test. So we have to find out what is the ground level situation and then go ahead on that to test the ingenuity of that. Lastly, we have not to teach the subjects.
We have to teach the students. And therefore for each student what can we do? Again I say AI is an opportunity, great opportunity. We are talking about reimagining, imagining hierarchical education in this summit and my request with all the persuasion is, let the youth assert themselves that we need these subjects to be taught for our degree. And technology enables us to do that. We will have to do that. That’s my call on this.
Thank you, sir. Suresh sir, in the same manner, when you reimagine institutions and you are heading up, you know, you are part of a global body, what kind of feature and what kind of, you know, I will say two or three things you want to see in the future, you know, futuristic educational institution.
Thank you very much. Quickly, three points I would like to say. First, that if you look back 10 years back when social media was in India, there was a talk that whether we want to be a download nation or we want to an upload nation. So there was a lot of emphasis on creating content and uploading on the internet and the media so that creativity flourished. now the conversation has moved whether we want to be again a consumption nation or we want to be producing nation, we want to be creative nations now this time the opportunity is phenomenal so we need to have a system where people create not consume, that’s the fundamental shift we need now the second thing I will say that university degrees masters, PhDs undergrad for the job we have the qualification for the job, in some of the countries only high school is good enough for getting the jobs in the government in the private sector high school diploma do we want only the students to be studying getting marks, getting distinction or do we want the students to be the problem solving young society so I think we have to shift from a you know degree awarding institutions to a problem solving institution.
India has millions and trillions of problems in each and every corner. You pick up one problem, solve it. You get your degree and go. You don’t need to pass all the examination. So that’s the fundamental shift India needs. If we want to go back to what I said in the beginning, that we want to be a nation where skill, capability drives the economy, not the other way around. So that’s the second. The third one you see, the 12th education system, the higher education system, the primary education system works in silos. We have to find and technology allow it to do it to interconnect the entire systems. And in the U.S., the higher education and the high school systems are very well connected in the part of ecosystem.
The moment we do that, we will have a thriving higher education, thriving education system. Thank you. pushing India into a very high growth trajectory and also to realize the dream which I talk about, a number one nation, not by 2050, 2070, but very soon. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Pankaj sir, as a chairperson of NCT, when you reimagine a teacher education institution or think about how a teacher education institution will be in the future, what are the two or three features that come to mind that you think should be the future of a teacher education center?
Yes, as a regulator for teacher education, now Vixit Bharat Adhishthan is coming where it has been proposed to go with AI -oriented regulator. That regulator is not supposed to have a lot of human working for it. But 70 to 80 percent assessment will be done through AI. So, it is a very good thing. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. So AI is going to play an important role, not only as a regulator, but also as a norms and standard developer for the nation, for academic programs also and for teachers also. I think the responsibility to promote research ethics among young people is very, very critical at the moment. Somebody is writing a letter to his wife and asking AI to give me a letter.
So this is ridiculous. It cannot give you emotion into that, personalized flavor to that. So research ethics, when you are doing any research for any class level, then we need to think of assessment devices, evaluation and assessment, which is lacking behind. We are developing content through AI, but we are not doing assessment through AI. This year, CVSC is trying to. Assess class 12 answers script through technology, but those would be only scanned documents. will check by teachers from their own remote place. But that is the beginning of bringing technology into assessment. And my last point would be Indian knowledge, Indian languages. We must start working very, very hard on this because if we actually want to pass on Indian tradition to the next generation, AI can become an important tool for that.
If we take AI out of Western knowledge, if we promote AI in Indian knowledge, Indian context, Indian languages, then we will really solve the next generation. And as the Prime Minister said, we have two AIs, as Pride India and Artificial Intelligence. So we must take both of them to optimum use. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Patil sir, from the ministry perspective, how you visualize future universities, and what kind of change you want to bring higher education institutions? which we want to build for the future.
Again, same thing that Sir has told that it should be integrated. School and higher education, I would like to say that few universities have agreed to reach out to 100 schools. In Pune, there is one university called COEP. So they are telling that every day one school will come, visit, see their libraries, see their laboratories, meet their teachers. The teachers will go to the schools, they will interact. Because many of them are not knowing what is the present school. And what I was in the school and today’s school, there is huge change. Really huge change is there. So that has to be seen and it should be integrated. One more point that NEP says there is innate talent among the students.
So students should understand that and work on it, on your skills and meaningfully contribute to the economy which is very, very important. So once 140 crore population of India started contributing to the economy means above the income tax level, I am telling that the minimum 5 lakhs or 6 lakhs. It is going to be huge change here. Third point is brick mortar schools are going, universities are going. That is already we are seeing this huge change. But same time, teachers cannot be removed actually. The teachers, mentors, facilitators has to be there. And even we requested, even Intel we had last time meeting also with the companies to be mentor actually. You should also tell kids enough is enough.
One hour up you are playing with the games or you are using these things. So stop it there, which is really required. So ethical use is very, very important. Yes, we need to create a platform where all of the people can come. That is what EI, COE in education happening with Madras IIT where schools and higher educations are coming together, higher institutions are coming together, private players are also coming together. I recently seen one startup in IIT Delhi. where they don’t like this hotel rooms and all that. So he not want any hotel rooms at all. Like that, these startup don’t have any classrooms, they don’t have any infrastructure at all. But they teach in medical education actually with this permission from the regulator, paramedician basically are working it.
Youngsters are here, lot of youngsters are there, friends. Their annual turnover is 200 crore in just last two years. They are telling another one year will reach 400 crore. So I think there is huge opportunity for all of us. We should work on it. Thank you so much.
Thank you, sir. Aditi, your comment on future of institution.
I think everybody has done a great job of articulating that. I think everybody has done a great job.
Thank you everyone for joining us and thank you for our eminent panel to put light on reimagining the institutions. And I think that what we are thinking about how the future institutions will be, when we start thinking about it, it will start to grow. And thank you everyone. Thank you.
Speaker 1
Speech speed
68 words per minute
Speech length
1284 words
Speech time
1122 seconds
Launch of AI adoption report for school education
Explanation
Speaker 1 announced the release of a new report that maps AI usage among school students in India, signalling a formal effort to document and share findings on AI adoption in education.
Evidence
“Now, we have just launched going to release one more report, usage of AI in school education” [15]. “Today, now we are launching our new report on AI adoption in school education” [85].
Major discussion point
AI adoption and perceived impact in school education
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Capacity development
Pranav Kothari
Speech speed
160 words per minute
Speech length
1084 words
Speech time
404 seconds
High usage of AI tools among private‑school students
Explanation
Kothari reports that roughly half of the surveyed private‑school students in Delhi use generative‑AI tools multiple times per week, indicating a strong penetration of AI in school settings.
Evidence
“Yet, what we find is that nearly 50 % of students, and these are, of course, these are students from private schools in Delhi, that was our limited sample, almost 50 % of them use AI based tools” [1]. “These could be generative AI platforms or other AI tools multiple times a week” [3].
Major discussion point
AI adoption and perceived impact in school education
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Closing all digital divides
Primary purposes of AI use and limited calculation support
Explanation
Students mainly use AI for searching academic information and writing assistance, while science students avoid AI for calculations because of reported low accuracy in logical or numerical tasks.
Evidence
“AI use is essentially concentrated for generally searching for new academy for academic information while studying or writing assistance” [8]. “…among science students … there is very limited usage for structured tasks like calculations or solving questions because that is where various AI platforms still have relatively low accuracy” [8].
Major discussion point
AI adoption and perceived impact in school education
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Capacity development
AI seen as helpful for exam prep but as a supplementary tool
Explanation
Students consider AI useful for preparing for school and entrance exams, yet they view it as an aid rather than a replacement for traditional teaching methods.
Evidence
“So what is perceived helpfulness of AI for school There is relatively high perceived helpfulness of AI platforms for both studying for school exams and entrance exams” [16]. “While AI is definitely emerging … it is still considered as a supplementary tool as opposed to a replacement or substitute for traditional teaching” [14].
Major discussion point
AI adoption and perceived impact in school education
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development
Frequent AI hallucinations and accuracy concerns
Explanation
Kothari highlights that many students encounter AI hallucinations or incorrect information, especially in logical or numerical subjects, undermining trust in AI outputs.
Evidence
“One of the major challenges with respect to AI use is that students, a significant proportion of students regularly encounter AI hallucination or are able to identify that they are getting incorrect information” [11]. “Then secondly, as I mentioned, when it comes to accuracy for logical or numerical subjects, there is relatively lower reported accuracy” [70].
Major discussion point
Challenges and risks of AI implementation in education
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs
Professor KK Aggarwal
Speech speed
150 words per minute
Speech length
573 words
Speech time
227 seconds
AI should augment creativity, not shortcut thinking
Explanation
Aggarwal cautions that AI must be used to enhance creative processes rather than provide easy shortcuts that diminish critical thinking abilities.
Evidence
“Only thing which one has to see is as I said in the whole process of using AI let’s make sure it supplements our creativity it does not give us a shortcut to creativity and thereby reduce our thinking powers” [22].
Major discussion point
AI versus traditional teaching and human interaction
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society
Teachers need to become AI‑savvy mentors focusing on ethics and creativity
Explanation
Aggarwal emphasizes that educators should evolve into mentors who supervise AI outputs, guiding students in ethical reasoning and creative problem‑solving.
Evidence
“We are talking about reimagining, imagining hierarchical education in this summit and my request with all the persuasion is, let the youth assert themselves that we need these subjects to be taught for our degree” [64].
Major discussion point
Curriculum reform and teacher empowerment through AI
Topics
Capacity development | Artificial intelligence
Pankaj Sir
Speech speed
132 words per minute
Speech length
1189 words
Speech time
536 seconds
AI cannot replace teachers; teachers remain essential mentors
Explanation
Pankaj Sir stresses that AI is a tool, not a master, and that teachers continue to play a pivotal role as designers of learning experiences and ethical guides.
Evidence
“AI cannot be a master” [27]. “AI supervision, I mean, AI cannot be left free to design any curriculum” [30].
Major discussion point
AI versus traditional teaching and human interaction
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Capacity development
Tech‑driven, dashboard‑based curriculum revision without extra budget
Explanation
Pankaj Sir describes a rapid, technology‑enabled overhaul of 72 programmes using a dashboard system, achieving curriculum updates without additional financial outlay.
Evidence
“So zero penny was spent when 72 programs were revised for LOCF curriculum framework” [100]. “We did it through dashboard system without human intervention, without having formal meetings and budget of lakhs of rupees…” [101].
Major discussion point
Curriculum reform and teacher empowerment through AI
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Enabling environment for digital development
AI as a spine of the education system and need for supervision
Explanation
He positions AI as central to modern education while warning that AI outputs require supervision to mitigate bias and hallucinations.
Evidence
“AI is spine of entire education system nowadays” [38]. “AI -based output demands AI supervision” [72]. “Bias, heliconations are there” [95].
Major discussion point
Challenges and risks of AI implementation in education
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs
Patil Sir
Speech speed
151 words per minute
Speech length
2136 words
Speech time
847 seconds
AI must be treated as a tool, not a human being
Explanation
Patil Sir warns against anthropomorphising AI, insisting that it should be regarded as a machine to avoid mental stress and misuse.
Evidence
“AI has to be used as a tool” [26]. “…we should treat AI as a machine not as a human being which is very very important AI if you started taking as a human being then it will be problem, it will be huge mental stress on the students and other users also” [32].
Major discussion point
AI versus traditional teaching and human interaction
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society
Introducing AI curriculum from grade 3 to build foundational literacy
Explanation
Patil Sir notes that the school system is introducing an AI curriculum starting in third grade to teach students what AI is, its uses, and its ethical implications.
Evidence
“…school education has taken very wise decision to introduce AI curriculum in third grade it is not to teach the AI it is to teach what is AI what are the uses of AI and whether it is good or bad” [32].
Major discussion point
Curriculum reform and teacher empowerment through AI
Topics
Capacity development | Artificial intelligence
Equity challenges: bias, uneven access, rural and tribal gaps
Explanation
Patil Sir highlights that bias in AI models and the digital divide—especially in remote, tribal, and rural schools—pose significant obstacles to equitable AI adoption.
Evidence
“Bias, heliconations are there” [95]. “But uneven access to technology is also a challenge that should be taken into consideration” [76]. “Delhi schools, if you say, and the remote area schools, the tribal areas or rural areas, you can see” [77]. “But the rural area and other places, it is a big challenge” [79].
Major discussion point
Challenges and risks of AI implementation in education
Topics
Closing all digital divides | Artificial intelligence
Collaboration with government and industry for AI labs and MOUs
Explanation
Patil Sir mentions ongoing initiatives such as AI schools on IIT campuses, MOUs with Google and Microsoft, and partnerships with foundations to embed AI in education.
Evidence
“…we are updating the curriculum we are doing educational governance such as coming up many IITs they brought AI schools in their campuses they are having MOUs with Google, Microsoft and various other places” [86].
Major discussion point
Industry and government collaboration to drive AI integration
Topics
Enabling environment for digital development | Artificial intelligence
Speaker 3
Speech speed
168 words per minute
Speech length
1256 words
Speech time
447 seconds
AI as a 24‑7 offline tutor with locally stored content
Explanation
Speaker 3 describes AI functioning as an always‑available tutor that can operate without cloud connectivity, reducing hallucination risk by keeping vetted content on the device.
Evidence
“So think of it as a 24 -7 tutor” [39]. “You can have tuition teachers, you can have personalizers, but if there is a bot, that is not judging this child and is saying, hey, come here, I’ll teach you in the language you understand” [41]. “What if the content sits locally on the device itself?” [92]. “Or at least there is lesser chance of hallucination” [74].
Major discussion point
AI versus traditional teaching and human interaction
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Closing all digital divides
Industry collaboration: Intel partnerships delivering AI PCs and curriculum co‑creation
Explanation
Speaker 3 outlines Intel’s work with startups and ISVs to provide offline AI PCs, translation tools, and joint curriculum development for K‑12 and higher education.
Evidence
“We have solutions running on AI PC, which is what Intel is now bringing to the market” [121]. “We’ve got an ISV startup that we work with which is helping teachers become AI‑enabled” [87]. “And we’ve worked, Intel has worked together and helped put that together” [123].
Major discussion point
Industry and government collaboration to drive AI integration
Topics
Enabling environment for digital development | Artificial intelligence
Speaker 2
Speech speed
162 words per minute
Speech length
1035 words
Speech time
382 seconds
Reimagining education for 2050/2100 with AI as a catalyst for exponential growth
Explanation
Speaker 2 envisions a future Indian education system that leverages AI to propel the nation toward a leading global economy by 2050‑2100, emphasizing AI’s role in breaking connectivity barriers and driving economic transformation.
Evidence
“reimagining the education system in India, I’m not talking of today, I’m talking of India of 2050, India of 2100” [44]. “We need a general education system which can give an exponential bump to India’s story” [45]. “…AI dismantles the barrier I was in my village we set up AI lab… you can speak in your Bhojpuri to US, to Russia to Japan… that is the first time a fundamental shift in connectivity is happening” [46].
Major discussion point
Reimagining higher education and future skill development
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development
Suresh Sir
Speech speed
154 words per minute
Speech length
395 words
Speech time
153 seconds
Shift higher education from consumption to creation and problem‑solving
Explanation
Suresh Sir calls for Indian universities to transition from degree‑granting, consumption‑focused institutions to creation‑focused hubs that solve real‑world problems, aligning education with national growth goals.
Evidence
“…we want to be creative nations now this time the opportunity is phenomenal so we need to have a system where people create not consume, that’s the fundamental shift we need” [56]. “So that’s the fundamental shift India needs” [53].
Major discussion point
Reimagining higher education and future skill development
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development
Agreements
Agreement points
AI should supplement rather than replace human teachers and traditional education
Speakers
– Pranav Kothari
– Pankaj Sir
– Professor KK Aggarwal
Arguments
AI is emerging as a supplementary tool rather than a replacement for traditional teaching methods
Teachers will function as mentors, learning designers, and ethical guides while AI serves as an assistant, not a master
AI should supplement creativity rather than provide shortcuts that reduce thinking powers
Summary
All speakers agree that AI should enhance and support traditional education rather than substitute for human instruction, with teachers evolving into mentoring and guidance roles
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development | Capacity development
Need for ethical AI usage and human oversight
Speakers
– Patil Sir
– Pankaj Sir
– Professor KK Aggarwal
Arguments
AI must be used ethically and for humanity, treating it as a machine rather than a human being
AI plus education requires human supervision and cannot be left free to design curriculum without oversight
AI should supplement creativity rather than provide shortcuts that reduce thinking powers
Summary
Speakers consistently emphasize the importance of maintaining ethical boundaries in AI usage and ensuring human oversight to prevent over-dependence and misuse
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Capacity development
Digital divide and infrastructure challenges need to be addressed
Speakers
– Patil Sir
– Pankaj Sir
– Speaker 1
Arguments
Digital divide exists between urban schools like Delhi and remote/rural areas, with infrastructure challenges in reaching AI to the last mile
Uneven access to technology and disparity between different regions poses significant implementation challenges
Educational institutions need to reimagine themselves to address AI challenges, moving beyond traditional approaches to embrace technological transformation
Summary
All speakers acknowledge the significant challenge of unequal access to technology and infrastructure across different regions and institutions in India
Topics
Closing all digital divides | Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development
Integration and collaboration across educational levels and stakeholders is essential
Speakers
– Patil Sir
– Suresh Sir
– Speaker 1
Arguments
Integration of school and higher education systems is essential, with universities reaching out to schools for better connectivity
Need to shift from degree-awarding institutions to problem-solving institutions where students solve real problems to earn degrees
Integration across educational levels and collaboration between different stakeholders is essential for effective AI implementation in education
Summary
Speakers agree that breaking down silos between different educational levels and fostering collaboration between various stakeholders is crucial for effective AI implementation
Topics
Social and economic development | The enabling environment for digital development | Capacity development
India has significant potential to become a global leader in AI
Speakers
– Speaker 2
– Patil Sir
– Speaker 3
Arguments
India has potential to become a $70-150 trillion economy if educational institutions can produce the right skills and capabilities
Around 7-10 crore people in India are using ChatGPT and Gemini, showing rapid adoption comparable to global trends
Technology innovation starting from India for India can then be taken to the world, similar to digital payment systems
Summary
Speakers share optimism about India’s potential to become a global AI leader, citing its large population, rapid adoption rates, and successful track record in technology innovation
Topics
Artificial intelligence | The digital economy | Social and economic development
Similar viewpoints
Both speakers recognize the current limitations and accuracy issues with AI tools, emphasizing the need for caution and proper understanding of AI capabilities
Speakers
– Pranav Kothari
– Patil Sir
Arguments
Students regularly encounter AI hallucinations and identify incorrect information, with lower reported accuracy for logical and numerical subjects
AI must be used ethically and for humanity, treating it as a machine rather than a human being
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs
Both speakers view AI as a transformative force that requires India to fundamentally change its approach from consumption to creation and innovation
Speakers
– Speaker 2
– Suresh Sir
Arguments
AI represents a 360-degree paradigm shift that will determine which countries dominate the world for the next century
India must shift from being a consumption nation to a creative, problem-solving nation in the AI era
Topics
Artificial intelligence | The digital economy | Social and economic development
Both educators emphasize the need for student-centered, personalized education while maintaining human elements like creativity and ethical reasoning
Speakers
– Pankaj Sir
– Professor KK Aggarwal
Arguments
Focus should be on teaching students rather than subjects, with AI enabling personalized learning approaches
Need to promote research ethics among young people and prevent over-dependence on AI for personal tasks
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development | Capacity development
Both speakers highlight how AI can bridge traditional barriers (language, institutional) and create new opportunities for connectivity and collaboration
Speakers
– Speaker 2
– Patil Sir
Arguments
AI can dismantle language barriers, allowing communication from rural areas to global markets in local languages
Multiple IITs have established AI schools with MOUs with Google, Microsoft, and other tech companies
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Closing all digital divides | The enabling environment for digital development
Unexpected consensus
Students prefer traditional learning methods over AI despite high AI usage
Speakers
– Pranav Kothari
– Professor KK Aggarwal
– Pankaj Sir
Arguments
There is overwhelming student preference for YouTube and ICT-based learning tools over AI platforms
Students show overwhelming support for traditional human interaction-based learning over AI tutors
Teachers will function as mentors, learning designers, and ethical guides while AI serves as an assistant, not a master
Explanation
Despite the focus on AI adoption, there is surprising consensus that students still prefer traditional and human-centered learning approaches, suggesting AI’s role as supplementary rather than transformative
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development | Capacity development
Need for preserving cultural and linguistic diversity through AI
Speakers
– Pankaj Sir
– Speaker 2
– Speaker 3
Arguments
AI can help preserve and promote Indian knowledge, languages, and traditions for future generations
AI can dismantle language barriers, allowing communication from rural areas to global markets in local languages
Local AI solutions running on devices can provide 24/7 tutoring without internet connectivity, reducing hallucination risks
Explanation
Unexpectedly, speakers from different backgrounds converge on using AI not just for modernization but for cultural preservation and local language empowerment
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Social and economic development
Rapid institutional transformation is both necessary and achievable
Speakers
– Speaker 2
– Patil Sir
– Suresh Sir
Arguments
AI represents a 360-degree paradigm shift that will determine which countries dominate the world for the next century
Multiple IITs have established AI schools with MOUs with Google, Microsoft, and other tech companies
Need to shift from degree-awarding institutions to problem-solving institutions where students solve real problems to earn degrees
Explanation
Despite typically slow institutional change, there is consensus that rapid, fundamental transformation of educational institutions is both necessary and possible in the AI era
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development | The enabling environment for digital development
Overall assessment
Summary
The speakers demonstrate strong consensus on key principles: AI should supplement rather than replace human education, ethical oversight is essential, digital divides must be addressed, and India has significant potential for AI leadership. There is also agreement on the need for institutional transformation, integration across educational levels, and maintaining human-centered approaches to learning.
Consensus level
High level of consensus with remarkable alignment across diverse stakeholders (government officials, academics, industry representatives, and researchers) on fundamental principles and strategic directions. The consensus suggests a mature understanding of AI’s role in education and provides a solid foundation for coordinated policy and implementation efforts. The agreement spans both opportunities and challenges, indicating realistic and balanced perspectives that could facilitate effective collaboration in transforming India’s educational landscape through AI.
Differences
Different viewpoints
Student preference for traditional learning tools versus AI adoption rates
Speakers
– Pranav Kothari
– Patil Sir
Arguments
There is overwhelming student preference for YouTube and ICT-based learning tools over AI platforms
Around 7-10 crore people in India are using ChatGPT and Gemini, showing rapid adoption comparable to global trends
Summary
While Pranav’s research shows students still prefer traditional digital learning tools like YouTube over AI platforms, Patil Sir emphasizes the massive and rapid adoption of AI tools by millions of Indians, suggesting a contradiction in how AI acceptance is being measured and interpreted
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development
AI’s role in replacing versus supplementing traditional education
Speakers
– Pranav Kothari
– Professor KK Aggarwal
Arguments
AI is emerging as a supplementary tool rather than a replacement for traditional teaching methods
AI should supplement creativity rather than provide shortcuts that reduce thinking powers
Summary
Both speakers agree AI should supplement rather than replace, but Aggarwal expresses more concern about AI potentially reducing human thinking capabilities through shortcuts, while Pranav’s research suggests students naturally view AI as supplementary
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society | Capacity development
Approach to AI implementation – gradual integration versus transformational change
Speakers
– Pranav Kothari
– Speaker 2
Arguments
Students show overwhelming support for traditional human interaction-based learning over AI tutors
AI represents a 360-degree paradigm shift that will determine which countries dominate the world for the next century
Summary
Pranav’s research suggests a more gradual, supplementary integration of AI based on student preferences, while Speaker 2 advocates for radical transformation and reimagining of institutions to compete globally
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development | The enabling environment for digital development
Unexpected differences
Assessment of AI accuracy and student awareness
Speakers
– Pranav Kothari
– Speaker 3
Arguments
Students regularly encounter AI hallucinations and identify incorrect information, with lower reported accuracy for logical and numerical subjects
Local AI solutions running on devices can provide 24/7 tutoring without internet connectivity, reducing hallucination risks
Explanation
This disagreement is unexpected because both speakers are discussing AI in education, but Pranav’s research highlights ongoing accuracy problems that students are aware of, while Speaker 3 from Intel presents technological solutions that claim to address these very issues, suggesting a gap between current student experience and available technology solutions
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs
Pace and nature of required educational transformation
Speakers
– Professor KK Aggarwal
– Speaker 2
Arguments
Focus should be on teaching students rather than subjects, with AI enabling personalized learning approaches
The role of educational institutions is paramount – no country can dominate without institutions that dominate globally
Explanation
Unexpectedly, the experienced educator (Aggarwal) advocates for a more student-centered, personalized approach enabled by AI, while the policy expert (Speaker 2) emphasizes institutional dominance and global competition, representing different philosophies about whether education should focus on individual student needs or national competitive advantage
Topics
Social and economic development | Capacity development | Artificial intelligence
Overall assessment
Summary
The main areas of disagreement center around the pace and extent of AI integration in education, with some speakers advocating for gradual supplementary adoption based on current student preferences, while others push for transformational change to maintain global competitiveness. There are also tensions between individual student-centered approaches versus institutional/national competitive strategies.
Disagreement level
Moderate disagreement with significant implications – while all speakers agree AI is important for education, their different approaches could lead to very different policy directions. The disagreements reflect broader tensions between preserving human-centered education and embracing technological transformation, between gradual adoption and revolutionary change, and between individual learning needs and national economic competitiveness.
Partial agreements
Partial agreements
Both speakers agree on the need for ethical AI usage and preventing over-dependence, but Patil Sir focuses more on treating AI as a tool rather than human, while Pankaj Sir emphasizes specific boundaries like not using AI for personal emotional tasks
Speakers
– Pankaj Sir
– Patil Sir
Arguments
AI must be used ethically and for humanity, treating it as a machine rather than a human being
Need to promote research ethics among young people and prevent over-dependence on AI for personal tasks
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Human rights and the ethical dimensions of the information society
Both speakers agree on India’s enormous economic potential through education transformation, but Speaker 2 focuses on institutional capacity building for global competition, while Suresh Sir emphasizes shifting from consumption to creation and problem-solving approaches
Speakers
– Speaker 2
– Suresh Sir
Arguments
India has potential to become a $70-150 trillion economy if educational institutions can produce the right skills and capabilities
India must shift from being a consumption nation to a creative, problem-solving nation in the AI era
Topics
Social and economic development | The digital economy | Artificial intelligence
Both speakers agree on the need for better integration and India’s potential for global technology leadership, but Patil Sir focuses on institutional connectivity within India, while Speaker 3 emphasizes developing local solutions that can be exported globally
Speakers
– Patil Sir
– Speaker 3
Arguments
Integration of school and higher education systems is essential, with universities reaching out to schools for better connectivity
Technology innovation starting from India for India can then be taken to the world, similar to digital payment systems
Topics
Social and economic development | The enabling environment for digital development | Artificial intelligence
Similar viewpoints
Both speakers recognize the current limitations and accuracy issues with AI tools, emphasizing the need for caution and proper understanding of AI capabilities
Speakers
– Pranav Kothari
– Patil Sir
Arguments
Students regularly encounter AI hallucinations and identify incorrect information, with lower reported accuracy for logical and numerical subjects
AI must be used ethically and for humanity, treating it as a machine rather than a human being
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs
Both speakers view AI as a transformative force that requires India to fundamentally change its approach from consumption to creation and innovation
Speakers
– Speaker 2
– Suresh Sir
Arguments
AI represents a 360-degree paradigm shift that will determine which countries dominate the world for the next century
India must shift from being a consumption nation to a creative, problem-solving nation in the AI era
Topics
Artificial intelligence | The digital economy | Social and economic development
Both educators emphasize the need for student-centered, personalized education while maintaining human elements like creativity and ethical reasoning
Speakers
– Pankaj Sir
– Professor KK Aggarwal
Arguments
Focus should be on teaching students rather than subjects, with AI enabling personalized learning approaches
Need to promote research ethics among young people and prevent over-dependence on AI for personal tasks
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Social and economic development | Capacity development
Both speakers highlight how AI can bridge traditional barriers (language, institutional) and create new opportunities for connectivity and collaboration
Speakers
– Speaker 2
– Patil Sir
Arguments
AI can dismantle language barriers, allowing communication from rural areas to global markets in local languages
Multiple IITs have established AI schools with MOUs with Google, Microsoft, and other tech companies
Topics
Artificial intelligence | Closing all digital divides | The enabling environment for digital development
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI adoption in Indian education is rapidly growing with nearly 50% of private school students using AI tools multiple times weekly, though primarily as a supplementary tool rather than replacement for traditional teaching
Students prefer AI for academic information searching and writing assistance but still overwhelmingly favor human interaction-based learning and YouTube/ICT tools over AI platforms
Major challenges include AI hallucinations, accuracy issues in numerical subjects, digital divide between urban and rural areas, and infrastructure limitations in reaching AI to the last mile
AI represents a paradigm shift that could transform India into a global leader, with potential to become a $70-150 trillion economy if educational institutions can produce the right skills
Educational institutions need complete reimagining rather than just reforms, shifting from degree-awarding to problem-solving institutions where students solve real problems
AI can dismantle language barriers and enable local language communication globally, particularly benefiting rural and marginalized communities
Teachers will evolve into mentors, learning designers, and ethical guides while AI serves as an assistant requiring human supervision
Integration of school and higher education systems is essential, with technology enabling interconnected educational ecosystems
Ethical usage of AI is paramount – it must be treated as a machine/tool for humanity rather than a replacement for human creativity and thinking
India must shift from being a consumption nation to a creative, problem-solving nation to realize its full potential in the AI era
Resolutions and action items
CBSE has introduced AI curriculum starting from class 3 to teach students about AI and its ethical usage
Multiple IITs have established AI schools with MOUs with Google, Microsoft and other tech companies
AI Center of Excellence in education established with IIT Madras as host institution
NCT has introduced two new programs: NPST (National Professional Standards for Teachers) and NMM (National Mentoring Mission) on digital platforms
Universities are being encouraged to reach out to 100 schools each for integration, with daily school visits and teacher exchanges
Intel has developed AI courses for future workforce and worked with CBSE to create AI curriculum
Government is working on updating curriculum and educational governance with AI integration
AI-oriented regulator proposed for Viksit Bharat with 70-80% assessment done through AI
Development of local AI solutions running on devices to provide 24/7 tutoring without internet connectivity
Unresolved issues
How to bridge the significant digital divide between urban schools and remote/rural areas lacking basic infrastructure
Addressing uneven access to technology across different regions and socioeconomic groups
Resolving AI accuracy issues, particularly for logical and numerical subjects where students report lower reliability
Managing AI hallucinations and ensuring students can identify incorrect information
Developing true adaptive learning capabilities in AI tools that can address individual student needs
Scaling AI literacy training for 1 crore teachers, most of whom are not currently AI-savvy
Ensuring ethical usage and preventing over-dependence on AI for tasks requiring human creativity and emotion
Integrating AI with Indian knowledge systems, languages, and cultural contexts rather than relying on Western-oriented AI
Addressing the challenge of 5 crore school dropouts while implementing AI-based education systems
Balancing AI implementation with preserving human thinking powers and creativity among students
Suggested compromises
AI should be used as a supplementary tool alongside traditional teaching methods rather than a complete replacement
Implement AI gradually starting with basic awareness (class 3) rather than immediate full integration across all levels
Focus on AI literacy and ethical usage training before widespread implementation
Combine AI tools with human supervision and oversight, particularly for curriculum design and assessment
Use local AI solutions running on devices to address connectivity issues while maintaining some AI benefits
Integrate both traditional assessment methods with AI-enabled process-rich evidence of learning
Balance Western AI technologies with development of Indian knowledge-based AI systems
Allow students to use AI for information gathering while maintaining human interaction for complex learning and emotional development
Implement AI in urban areas first while simultaneously working on infrastructure development for rural areas
Encourage AI as a creativity supplement rather than a shortcut, maintaining focus on developing human thinking capabilities
Thought provoking comments
AI is fortunately being adopted by the youngsters even faster which was expected. IT was also adopted by them faster than the elders. AI is being adopted much faster than elders. Only thing which one has to see is as I said in the whole process of using AI let’s make sure it supplements our creativity it does not give us a shortcut to creativity and thereby reduce our thinking powers. That is a challenge which we have to face in academics.
Speaker
Professor KK Aggarwal
Reason
This comment introduces a crucial distinction between AI as a supplement versus a replacement for human creativity and critical thinking. It frames the fundamental educational challenge not as whether to adopt AI, but how to adopt it responsibly without diminishing cognitive development.
Impact
This perspective set the tone for the entire discussion, establishing that the conversation should focus on ethical and pedagogically sound AI integration rather than debating AI adoption itself. It influenced subsequent speakers to address the balance between AI assistance and human development.
This is not the time for doing the reforms in the higher education system. It’s like reimagining. You see, what we reimagine India in terms of digital India, we are getting the dividend… Similarly, we need a higher education system. We need a general education system which can give an exponential bump to India’s story.
Speaker
Speaker 2 (Suresh)
Reason
This comment reframes the entire discussion from incremental change to fundamental transformation. The distinction between ‘reform’ and ‘reimagining’ is profound, suggesting that current challenges require systemic overhaul rather than adjustments to existing structures.
Impact
This shifted the conversation from tactical discussions about AI implementation to strategic visioning about India’s educational future. It elevated the discourse to consider India’s global positioning and long-term economic potential, influencing other speakers to think more ambitiously about institutional transformation.
AI cannot be a master. It is an assistant… AI-based output demands AI supervision… We must not become AI followers. We should become AI leaders for the time.
Speaker
Pankaj Sir
Reason
This comment establishes a clear hierarchy and relationship between humans and AI in education. It addresses the critical issue of agency and control, emphasizing that humans must remain in the driver’s seat while leveraging AI capabilities.
Impact
This perspective provided a framework for understanding the human-AI relationship in education that other panelists built upon. It helped establish principles for AI integration that maintain human agency and educational values while embracing technological capabilities.
Bache ko maths or physics nahi samajh mein aata, yeh problem nahi hai. Bache ko English nahi samajh mein aata, yeh problem hai. Kyunki hamara teaching medium, o bache ke language mein nahi hai.
Speaker
Aditi Nanda
Reason
This comment identifies a fundamental barrier to learning that AI can uniquely address – the language gap in education. It reframes learning difficulties from subject-matter issues to accessibility issues, highlighting how AI’s translation capabilities could be transformative.
Impact
This insight shifted focus from AI as a content delivery tool to AI as an accessibility enabler. It connected the technical capabilities of AI to real educational equity issues, making the discussion more grounded in practical challenges faced by Indian students.
We have not to teach the subjects. We have to teach the students. And therefore for each student what can we do? Again I say AI is an opportunity, great opportunity… let the youth assert themselves that we need these subjects to be taught for our degree.
Speaker
Professor KK Aggarwal
Reason
This comment fundamentally challenges the traditional subject-centered approach to education, advocating for student-centered learning enabled by AI. It suggests a paradigm shift where students have agency in determining their learning paths.
Impact
This perspective introduced the concept of personalized, student-driven education as a key benefit of AI integration. It influenced the discussion toward considering how AI could enable more flexible, responsive educational systems that adapt to individual student needs rather than forcing students to adapt to rigid curricula.
Do we want only the students to be studying getting marks, getting distinction or do we want the students to be the problem solving young society… we have to shift from a degree awarding institutions to a problem solving institution.
Speaker
Suresh Sir
Reason
This comment challenges the fundamental purpose of educational institutions, questioning whether the current focus on credentials serves society’s needs. It proposes a radical shift toward outcome-based, problem-solving education.
Impact
This reframing influenced the discussion to consider how AI could enable more practical, application-oriented education. It connected educational transformation to broader economic and social development goals, making the case for why reimagining institutions is essential for India’s future.
Overall assessment
These key comments collectively transformed what could have been a technical discussion about AI implementation into a profound examination of educational philosophy and institutional purpose. The speakers moved beyond surface-level concerns about AI adoption to address fundamental questions about the relationship between technology and human development, the purpose of education, and India’s aspirations as a global leader. The discussion evolved from reactive concerns about AI’s challenges to proactive visioning about how AI could enable more equitable, personalized, and effective education. The interplay between these insights created a comprehensive framework for understanding AI in education not just as a technological upgrade, but as a catalyst for reimagining the entire educational ecosystem to better serve students and society.
Follow-up questions
How can educational institutions ensure equitable AI access across diverse socioeconomic and geographic contexts in India?
Speaker
Speaker 1 and Patil Sir
Explanation
This addresses the significant digital divide between urban centers like Delhi and rural/tribal areas, where infrastructure, electricity, and financial resources vary greatly, potentially creating unequal opportunities for AI-enhanced education.
What specific mechanisms can be developed to prevent AI from reducing students’ creativity and critical thinking abilities?
Speaker
Professor KK Aggarwal
Explanation
This is crucial for ensuring AI serves as a supplement to human creativity rather than a replacement, maintaining the development of essential cognitive skills in students.
How can AI assessment and evaluation systems be developed and implemented effectively in education?
Speaker
Pankaj Sir
Explanation
While AI is being used for content creation, assessment through AI lags behind, representing a critical gap that needs to be addressed for comprehensive AI integration in education.
What strategies can address the accuracy issues and hallucination problems in AI platforms, particularly for STEM subjects?
Speaker
Pranav Kothari
Explanation
The report findings showed students regularly encounter AI hallucinations and lower accuracy in logical/numerical subjects, which poses risks to learning quality and academic integrity.
How can AI be leveraged to preserve and promote Indian knowledge systems and languages in education?
Speaker
Pankaj Sir
Explanation
This is essential for maintaining cultural identity and ensuring AI development is not dominated solely by Western knowledge systems, particularly important for India’s diverse linguistic landscape.
What models can effectively integrate school and higher education systems using AI and technology?
Speaker
Suresh Sir and Patil Sir
Explanation
Breaking down silos between different education levels could create a more cohesive learning ecosystem and better prepare students for transitions between educational stages.
How can teacher training programs be redesigned to prepare educators for AI-integrated classrooms?
Speaker
Patil Sir
Explanation
With 1 crore teachers in India’s school system, ensuring they are AI-literate and can effectively integrate AI tools while maintaining their role as mentors and facilitators is critical for successful implementation.
What ethical frameworks and guidelines need to be established for AI use in education?
Speaker
Multiple speakers (Pankaj Sir, Patil Sir, Aditi)
Explanation
Ensuring responsible AI use, preventing over-dependence, and maintaining research ethics are fundamental concerns that require clear guidelines and frameworks.
How can educational institutions transition from degree-awarding to problem-solving focused models using AI?
Speaker
Suresh Sir
Explanation
This represents a fundamental shift in educational philosophy that could better prepare students for real-world challenges and economic contribution.
What impact will AI have on employment and skill requirements in the next 5-10 years, and how should education adapt?
Speaker
Speaker 1
Explanation
This addresses widespread concerns about job displacement and skill obsolescence, requiring educational institutions to prepare students for an AI-transformed job market.
Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.
Related event

