Balancing chaos and precision: The paradox of AI work

In a recent blog post, Jovan Kurbalija explores why working in AI often feels like living with two competing personalities. On one side is the explorer, curious, bold, and eager to experiment with new models and frameworks. That mindset thrives on quick bursts of creativity and the thrill of discovering novel possibilities.

Yet, the same field demands the opposite. The engineer’s discipline, a relentless focus on precision, validation, and endless refinement, until AI systems are impressive and reliable.

The paradox makes the search for AI talent unusually difficult. Few individuals naturally embody both restless curiosity and meticulous perfectionism.

The challenge is amplified by AI itself, which often produces plausible but uncertain outputs, requiring both tolerance for ambiguity and an insistence on accuracy. It is a balancing act between ADHD-like energy and OCD-like rigour—traits rarely found together in one professional.

The tension is visible across disciplines. Diplomats, accustomed to working with probabilities in unpredictable contexts, approach AI differently from software developers trained in deterministic systems.

Large language models blur these worlds, demanding a blend of adaptability and engineering rigour. Recognising that no single person can embody all these traits, the solution lies in carefully designed teams that combine contrasting strengths.

Kurbalija points to Diplo’s AI apprenticeship as an example of this approach. Apprentices are exposed to both the ‘sprint’ of quickly building functional AI agents and the ‘marathon’ of refining them into robust, trustworthy systems. By embracing this duality, teams can bridge the gap between rapid innovation and reliable execution, turning AI’s inherent contradictions into a source of strength.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!