The US Court of Appeals has ruled that AI cannot be named an inventor
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that an artificial intelligence system can not be named as an inventor on a patentable invention. The US court ruled that the term “individual” in the Patent Act refers only to humans.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that an artificial intelligence system cannot be named an inventor of a patentable invention. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has confirmed that AI systems cannot patent inventions as the law grants intellectual property rights only to human beings.
The Court has ruled that the term ‘individual’ in the Patent Act refers only to humans.
The case was brought by AI systems developer Stephen Thaler, who sought patents on behalf of his AI system called DABUS. The decision is consistent with court rulings in the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Australia, which have all rejected Thaler’s claim. However, an intriguing development came from South Africa in 2021, where DABUS was given patent rights, as the first-ever country to do so.
About author
DW Team
The GIP Digital Watch Observatory team, consisting of over 30 digital policy experts from around the world, excels in the fields of research and analysis on digital policy issues. The team is backed by the creative prowess of Creative Lab Diplo and the technical expertise of the Diplo tech team.