Spain calls for stronger AI rules in labour relations
Labour rights remain central as Spain advocates transparent AI and algorithmic decision making.
Spain’s Second Vice President and Minister of Labour and Social Economy, Yolanda Díaz, has called for stronger regulation of AI and algorithmic decision-making in the workplace.
Speaking at the University of Oxford, Díaz said the debate should no longer focus on whether AI should be used, but on how to organise its deployment so that labour rights and fundamental rights are protected.
She argued that AI and algorithms already influence recruitment, hiring, performance evaluation, promotion, contract changes, dismissals and pension-related decisions. According to Díaz, stronger oversight is needed to ensure transparency and accountability where algorithmic management affects workers.
Spain’s Rider Law was presented as an early example of algorithmic transparency in labour relations, requiring digital labour platforms to disclose information about algorithms that affect working conditions and access to work.
Díaz also criticised proposals to deregulate AI, arguing that technological development should serve the public good rather than concentrate power among a small number of technology companies.
Her intervention comes as the EU rules for high-risk AI systems in areas including employment are set to apply later than initially expected. The European Commission says these rules will apply from 2 December 2027 under the new AI Omnibus enforcement timeline.
Díaz said governments should actively shape how AI is used in the workplace through regulation and public policy, rather than leaving the future of work to market forces alone.
Why does it matter?
AI is increasingly used to manage recruitment, performance assessment, scheduling, promotion and dismissal decisions. Spain’s position places algorithmic transparency and worker rights at the centre of the European AI debate, especially as the EU’s employment-related high-risk AI obligations are delayed. The intervention also shows how member states may move ahead with stricter national rules when they believe EU-level protections are too slow or insufficient.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
