Musk’s robotaxi ambitions threatened as Tesla faces a $243 million autopilot verdict
The verdict follows ongoing federal investigations and recalls concerning Tesla’s autonomous technology, adding pressure on the company as it seeks regulatory approval for its robotaxi expansion.
A recent court verdict has required Tesla to pay approximately $243 million in damages following a 2019 fatal crash involving an Autopilot-equipped Model S.
The Florida jury found Tesla’s driver-assistance software defective, a claim the company intends to appeal, asserting that the driver was solely responsible for the incident.
The ruling may significantly impact Tesla’s ambitions to expand its emerging robotaxi network in the US, fuelling heightened scrutiny over the safety of the company’s autonomous technology from both regulators and the public.
The timing of this legal setback is critical as Tesla is seeking regulatory approval for its robotaxi services, crucial to its market valuation and efforts to manage global competition while facing backlash against CEO Elon Musk’s political views.
Additionally, the company has recently awarded CEO Elon Musk a substantial new compensation package worth approximately $29 billion in stock options, signalling the company’s continued reliance on Musk’s leadership at a critical juncture, since the company plans transitions from a struggling auto business toward futuristic ventures like robotaxis and humanoid robots.
Tesla’s approach to autonomous driving, which relies on cameras and AI instead of more expensive technologies like lidars and radars used by competitors, has prompted it to start a limited robotaxi trial in Texas. However, its aggressive expansion plans for this service starkly contrast with the cautious rollouts by companies such as Waymo, which runs the US’s only commercial driverless robotaxi system.
The jury’s decision also complicates Tesla’s interactions with state regulators, as the company awaits approvals in multiple states, including California and Florida. While Nevada has engaged with Tesla regarding its robotaxi programme, Arizona remains indecisive.
This ruling challenges Tesla’s narrative of safety efficacy, especially since the case involved a distracted driver whose vehicle ran a stop sign and collided with a parked car, yet the Autopilot system was partially blamed.
Source: Reuters
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!