Massachusetts court rules against student in AI cheating case
The court dismissed claims of unclear AI usage rules, stating the student knowingly violated academic integrity standards.
A Massachusetts judge upheld disciplinary measures against a high school senior accused of cheating with an AI tool. The Hingham High School student’s parents sought to erase his record and raise his history grade, but the court sided with the school. Officials determined the student violated academic integrity by copying AI-generated text, including fabricated citations.
The student faced penalties including detention and temporary exclusion from the National Honor Society. He later gained readmission. His parents argued that unclear rules on AI usage led to confusion, claiming the school violated his constitutional rights. However, the court found the plagiarism policy sufficient.
Judge Paul Levenson acknowledged AI’s challenges in education but said the evidence showed misuse. The student and his partner had copied AI-generated content indiscriminately, bypassing proper review. The judge declined to order immediate changes to the student’s record or grade.
The case remains unresolved as the parents plan to pursue further legal action. School representatives praised the decision, describing it as accurate and lawful. The ruling highlights the growing complexities of generative AI in academic settings.
About author
DW Team
The GIP Digital Watch Observatory team, consisting of over 30 digital policy experts from around the world, excels in the fields of research and analysis on digital policy issues. The team is backed by the creative prowess of Creative Lab Diplo and the technical expertise of the Diplo tech team.
