Chipmaker Intel reportedly halts $25 billion Israel plant

Intel has halted its factory expansion in Israel, citing, raising concerns about future employment and the investment climate in the region.


In a significant development for both the technology and geopolitical landscapes, Intel has reportedly halted its plans to expand a factory in Israel, a project initially valued at $25 billion. That decision, first reported by Israeli media, comes as a blow to the Israeli tech industry and raises questions about the future of major international investments in the region.

Intel, one of the world’s leading semiconductor manufacturers, has a longstanding presence in Israel, with multiple facilities that play a crucial role in the company’s global operations. The proposed factory at Intel’s Kiryat Gat site was intended to be a crucial component of Intel’s strategy to strengthen the global supply chain, complementing investments in Europe and the United States. Intel’s Kiryat Gat plant, known as Fab 28, currently produces 10-nanometer chips, labeled as Intel 7 technology. The new Fab 38 plant was slated to open in 2028 and operate through 2035. Intel employs nearly 12,000 people in Israel, and the suspension of this project raises concerns about future employment and economic stability.

While Intel has not officially confirmed the reasons behind the halt, several factors are believed to have influenced the decision, such as geopolitical tensions, economic considerations, and regulatory environment. Despite the halt, Intel emphasized its ongoing commitment to Israel, stating that ‘Israel continues to be one of our key global manufacturing and R&D sites and we remain fully committed to the region.’ The company acknowledged that managing large-scale projects in the semiconductor industry requires flexibility in timelines, driven by business conditions, market dynamics, and responsible capital management.

Why does it matter?

Israeli officials have yet to comment on the reports, but there is likely to be considerable concern over the potential economic and reputational impacts. Efforts to negotiate and address Intel’s concerns might be on the horizon to revive the project or mitigate the fallout. For Intel, this move might be part of a broader strategic realignment. The company has been undergoing significant changes under the leadership of CEO Pat Gelsinger, focusing on boosting its manufacturing capabilities in the US and other regions. The shift could reflect a more cautious approach to international investments, prioritising regions with more predictable political and economic climates.