UK House of Commons backs amendments in lieu on Children’s Wellbeing Bill with online safety provisions

The UK House of Commons has backed government amendments instead of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, after insisting on its disagreement with the Lords’ amendments and proposing its own amendments in lieu. In the debate, ministers said the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill will place a statutory duty on the Secretary of State to act following the consultation, changing the wording from ‘may’ to ‘must’.

Education minister Olivia Bailey told MPs that the government is consulting on the mechanism, but that ‘under any outcome’ it will impose ‘some form of age or functionality restrictions for children under 16’. She added that curfews would be considered in addition to, not instead of, those restrictions.

Bailey said the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill now requires a statutory progress report three months after Royal Assent, with regulations to be laid within 12 months after that. She said the government intends to move faster and aims to lay the regulations by the end of the year, while describing any further six-month extension as a backstop for ‘exceptional and unforeseen circumstances’ only.

Opposition MPs and Liberal Democrats argued that the timetable remained too slow. Conservative frontbencher Laura Trott said the revised proposal was ‘a huge step forward’ but warned that ‘every month of delay just leaves children more exposed to the harms of social media online’.

Liberal Democrat spokesperson Munira Wilson said the overall timeline could still amount to 21 months before action. The House later voted by 272 to 64 to insist on its disagreement with the Lords’ amendments and to approve the government’s amendments in lieu. Lords amendment 105C was also agreed to, allowing the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to move forward with the revised online safety provisions.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!