Educators question boundaries of plagiarism in AI era
Students are uncertain whether outlining with AI or editing via ChatGPT constitutes misconduct, as policies vary widely between classes.
As AI tools such as ChatGPT become more common among students, schools and colleges report that some educators see assignments done at home as almost sure to involve AI. Educators say take-home writing tasks and traditional homework risk being devalued.
Teachers and students are confused over what constitutes legitimate versus dishonest AI use. Some students use AI to outline, edit, or translate texts. Others avoid asking for guidance about AI usage because rules vary by classroom, and admitting AI help might lead to accusations.
Schools are adapting by shifting towards in-class writing, verbal assessments and locked-down work environments.
Faculty at institutions, like the University of California, Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon, have started to issue updated syllabus templates that spell out AI expectations, including bans, approvals or partial allowances.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
