Wikipedia publishes guide to spot AI-generated entries

The ‘Signs of AI Writing’ guide outlines how editorial commentary, promotional language and overused clichés betray AI-generated Wikipedia entries.
Wikipedia AI writing, Signs of AI Writing, detect AI content, WikiProject AI Cleanup, speedy deletion, editorial commentary, AI slop, content governance, volunteer moderation, generative text detection

Wikipedia editors have published a guide titled ‘Signs of AI Writing’ to support readers and contributors in detecting AI-generated content across the encyclopedia.

The field guide distils key linguistic and formatting traits commonly found in AI output, such as overblown symbolism, promotional tone, repetitive transitions, rule-of-three phrasing and editorial commentary that breaks Wikipedia’s standards.

The initiative stems from the community’s ongoing challenge against AI-generated content, which has grown enough to warrant the creation of a dedicated project named WikiProject AI Cleanup.

Volunteers have developed tools like speedy deletion policies to quickly remove suspicious entries and tagged over 500 articles for review.

While the guide aims to strengthen detection, editors caution that it should not be treated as a shortcut but should complement human judgement, oversight, and trusted community processes. Such layered scrutiny helps preserve Wikipedia’s reputation for reliability.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!