Special Address by Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America
21 Jan 2026 14:30h - 15:15h
Special Address by Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America
Session at a glance
Summary
This discussion features President Donald Trump addressing the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, introduced by Laurence Fink and moderated by Børge Brende. Trump delivered an extensive speech celebrating what he described as America’s dramatic economic turnaround during his first year back in office. He claimed the U.S. economy is experiencing unprecedented growth with 5.4% fourth-quarter projections, record-low inflation at 1.6%, and $18 trillion in new investment commitments. Trump attributed this success to his policies of deregulation, tax cuts, tariffs, and energy production increases, contrasting sharply with what he characterized as the failed policies of the Biden administration.
A significant portion of Trump’s remarks focused on his controversial demand for U.S. acquisition of Greenland from Denmark, which he framed as essential for national and international security. He argued that Denmark cannot adequately defend the territory and that America has historically protected it, particularly during World War II. Trump also discussed his efforts to negotiate an end to the Ukraine-Russia war, claiming to have settled eight other conflicts and expressing frustration with the ongoing bloodshed. He credited his administration’s military actions against Iran’s nuclear facilities as crucial to achieving the recent Gaza peace deal.
During the Q&A session, Trump addressed concerns about sustaining economic growth and managing the national debt, emphasizing that growth and fraud reduction would solve fiscal challenges. He expressed confidence about upcoming negotiations with China and Ukraine, while maintaining his criticism of NATO allies for not contributing fairly to collective defense. The discussion concluded with Trump reaffirming his commitment to ending global conflicts while strengthening America’s economic and military position.
Keypoints
Major Discussion Points:
– U.S. Economic Performance and Policies: Trump extensively detailed his administration’s economic achievements, claiming record growth (5.4% projected), 52 stock market highs, $18 trillion in investment commitments, massive deregulation (129 old regulations cut for every new one), and significant tax cuts including elimination of taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security.
– Energy Policy and European Criticism: Trump contrasted his pro-fossil fuel policies with what he called the “Green New Scam,” criticizing European nations for their renewable energy policies, particularly windmills, and claiming U.S. energy independence while European countries face higher prices and reduced production.
– Greenland Acquisition and NATO Relations: Trump argued for U.S. acquisition of Greenland for national security purposes, criticizing Denmark’s minimal defense spending on the territory while emphasizing America’s disproportionate NATO contributions and questioning European allies’ commitment to mutual defense.
– Ukraine War Resolution and Foreign Policy: Trump discussed ongoing efforts to negotiate peace between Ukraine and Russia, claiming to have settled eight other conflicts, and detailed military actions against Iran that he says enabled Middle East peace agreements.
– Immigration and Border Security: Trump highlighted his border policies, claiming to have created the “strongest border anywhere in the world,” discussed mass deportations of criminals, and criticized European immigration policies as destructive to their societies.
Overall Purpose:
The discussion served as Trump’s platform to showcase his administration’s achievements to global business and political leaders, justify his policies through economic results, and position America as the dominant global power while criticizing allies for unfair treatment of the U.S.
Overall Tone:
The tone was consistently boastful and confrontational throughout. Trump maintained an aggressive, self-congratulatory stance, frequently using superlatives to describe his achievements while criticizing predecessors, allies, and opponents. The tone remained combative even during the brief Q&A session, with Trump showing no diplomatic restraint when discussing sensitive topics like Greenland or NATO relationships. The moderator’s attempts to create a more conversational atmosphere were largely unsuccessful as Trump maintained his campaign-style rhetoric throughout.
Speakers
Speakers from the provided list:
– Donald J. Trump – President of the United States (mentioned as sitting president, in his second term)
– Laurence D. Fink – Role/title not explicitly stated in transcript, but appears to be in a leadership position at the World Economic Forum (referred to as having a “new role” and being the one who invited Trump to return to Davos)
– Børge Brende – Moderator of the discussion/interview session
Additional speakers:
– Marco Rubio – Secretary of State (acknowledged by Trump during his speech, noted as receiving 100% approval votes)
– Scott Besant – Role/expertise in economics/finance (referenced by Trump as someone who works with numbers and was “with me the other day” looking at economic figures)
– Chris – Described as “number one oil man in the world” by Trump
– Doug Burgum – Role/title not specified, but appears to be in Trump’s administration
– Steve Whitcoff – Working on international negotiations, particularly Ukraine-related matters
– Jared Kushner – Working on Middle East peace negotiations and other diplomatic matters
– Howard Lutnick – Referenced as being involved in making deals
– Susie – First female Chief of Staff
– President Sissi – Mentioned as sitting in the first row, appears to be a head of state
– Mark Zuckerberg – Referenced in context of AI plant development (though not directly speaking in transcript)
Full session report
Comprehensive Report: President Trump’s Address to the World Economic Forum in Davos
Executive Summary
This comprehensive discussion featured President Donald Trump addressing the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, with introductory remarks by Laurence D. Fink and moderation by Børge Brende. The session served as a platform for Trump to present his administration’s achievements to global business and political leaders while positioning America as the dominant global power. The discussion encompassed economic policy, international relations, energy strategy, and ongoing diplomatic efforts.
Key Participants and Their Roles
The session began with opening remarks by Laurence D. Fink, who provided framing around making capitalism more inclusive. President Donald Trump then delivered the main address and responded to questions, with Børge Brende serving as moderator. Fink noted this was supposed to be “a nice fireside chat” but Trump gave an extended speech instead.
Trump acknowledged several members of his administration present in the audience, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, economic advisor Scott Besant, energy expert Chris, Doug Burgum, Steve Whitcoff (working on Ukraine negotiations), Jared Kushner (handling Middle East diplomacy), Howard Lutnick, and Susie, described as the first female Chief of Staff. He also noted that President Sisi was in the audience and had spoken earlier about Gaza.
Economic Performance and Policy Framework
Economic Turnaround Claims
Trump opened his remarks by stating he had “inherited a terrible, terrible situation” including economic challenges, wars, and border issues. He presented extensive metrics to support his claims of economic success, including 5.4% projected fourth-quarter growth, 52 stock market record highs, and investment commitments that “we think when the final numbers come out, they’ll be closer to $20 trillion.”
The President attributed this economic performance to comprehensive policy reforms including massive deregulation, strategic tax cuts, and energy policy changes. He claimed his administration had eliminated 129 old regulations for every new one implemented and removed “over 270,000 federal bureaucrats” from government payrolls.
Tax Policy and Fiscal Strategy
Trump detailed his administration’s tax policy initiatives, which included eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits, alongside implementing 100% expensing for business investments. When questioned about the $37 trillion national debt, Trump dismissed traditional cost-cutting approaches, instead arguing that sustained economic growth would solve fiscal challenges naturally.
Trade Policy and Strategic Use of Tariffs
Trump defended his administration’s tariff policies, claiming they had reduced the monthly trade deficit by 77% while generating revenue and encouraging domestic manufacturing. He presented tariffs as both economic tools and diplomatic leverage, citing their use in forcing other nations to agree to most favored nation drug pricing arrangements that reduced prescription costs. Trump gave multiple percentage figures for these reductions, mentioning 90% and noting it could be calculated as “5, 6, 7, 800%” depending on the specific drug.
Trump provided a detailed story about Switzerland, claiming the country earned $41 billion annually from America through trade arrangements. He described a tariff negotiation with Switzerland’s Prime Minister, indicating willingness to use tariffs “judiciously” as negotiation tools rather than permanent punitive measures.
Energy Policy and Climate Change Approach
Rejection of Green Energy Policies
Trump characterized green energy policies as the “Green New Scam” and claimed that abandoning these approaches had restored American energy dominance. He argued that his administration’s embrace of oil, gas, and nuclear energy had driven gasoline prices to “now below $2.50 a gallon in many states, $2.30 a gallon in most states” while achieving record production levels.
Trump presented analysis of renewable energy economics, particularly regarding wind power, claiming that countries with more windmills consistently performed worse economically. He noted that China manufactures most wind turbines but deploys few domestically.
European Energy Policy Criticism
The President criticized European nations’ green energy policies, arguing they had produced reduced electricity generation and higher energy prices. He extended this to broader cultural concerns, arguing that European countries had become “unrecognizable” due to immigration and policy changes.
Immigration and Border Security
Border Control Achievements
Trump highlighted his administration’s border security policies, claiming to have created the “strongest border anywhere in the world” and detailed mass deportation efforts that removed 11,888 murderers from American communities. He specifically mentioned Washington D.C., claiming it had become the “safest place now in the United States.”
Fraud Prevention
Trump discussed a major fraud case involving Somalians, stating that “$19 billion was stolen” and that his administration was recovering these funds while implementing deportation measures for those involved.
International Relations and Security Issues
Greenland Acquisition Strategy
Trump demanded U.S. acquisition of Greenland from Denmark, framing this as essential for national and international security given Greenland’s strategic position between America, Russia, and China. He emphasized that he needed “ownership” of Greenland, not just a lease, arguing that Denmark could not adequately defend the territory and had failed to spend promised defense funds.
NATO Relations and Defense Spending
Trump criticized NATO allies for inadequate defense spending, arguing that America had been treated unfairly within the alliance, paying disproportionately while European allies contributed minimally to collective defense.
Venezuela Oil Deal
Trump announced a significant deal involving Venezuela, stating they would provide “50 million barrels of oil” as part of broader diplomatic arrangements.
Conflict Resolution and Diplomatic Efforts
Ukraine War Negotiations
Trump provided insights into his efforts to negotiate an end to the Ukraine-Russia conflict, describing casualty figures: “last week it was 10,000 soldiers, but last month it was 31,000.” He claimed that both Putin and Zelensky wanted to reach an agreement but noted that “tremendous hatred” between the leaders complicated settlement efforts. Trump indicated that a meeting with President Zelensky was scheduled for later that day.
Middle East Peace Achievements
Trump credited his administration’s military actions against Iran’s nuclear facilities as crucial to achieving recent Middle East peace agreements, including the Gaza ceasefire. He argued that destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities had removed obstacles preventing Arab nations from participating in peace negotiations. The Gaza deal involved 59 countries and required Hamas to surrender weapons within three weeks.
Trump claimed to have settled multiple conflicts, specifically mentioning resolving the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict “in one day” and stating he had settled “eight other conflicts” during his tenure.
Technology and Defense Policy
Artificial Intelligence Leadership
Trump highlighted America’s leadership in artificial intelligence development, noting the $500 billion AI investment and claiming America led China significantly in AI development. This technological leadership was presented as crucial for maintaining global economic dominance.
Defense Industry Reforms
Trump announced plans to ban stock buybacks for defense companies, indicating broader reforms to defense industry practices.
Military Equipment
Trump mentioned the F-47 fighter jet, stating “if I don’t like it, I’m going to take the 47 off,” suggesting potential renaming of military equipment.
Housing Policy and Financial Reforms
Addressing Housing Affordability
Trump outlined housing policy reforms including banning large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes and capping credit card interest rates at 10% for one year. He announced that government-backed institutions would purchase “up to 200 billion dollars” in mortgage bonds to reduce interest rates.
Economic Indicators and Inflation
Trump reported that core inflation was “just 1.6 percent” over the past three months, presenting this as evidence of successful economic management alongside other performance metrics.
Conclusion
This comprehensive discussion provided insights into the Trump administration’s policy approach across multiple domains. The President presented detailed economic achievements and policy initiatives while addressing international relations challenges and ongoing diplomatic efforts. The session demonstrated the administration’s focus on American economic dominance, strategic use of economic tools for diplomatic purposes, and efforts to resolve multiple international conflicts.
The format allowed Trump to present his administration’s record extensively, with the moderator facilitating discussion of key policy areas and international challenges. The session served to communicate the administration’s priorities and achievements to the global business and political leadership assembled at Davos.
Session transcript
Good afternoon, everybody, and welcome. I guess we don’t have enough seats today. Wow.
In the last quarter century, a sitting president of the United States has come to Davos only twice. Both times it was Donald Trump. So when I asked to serve in this new role that I have, he was one of the first leaders I called and invited to return.
I first met the president about 25 years ago, but I worked most closely with him during the early months of COVID. This was March 2020. Markets were under extreme stress.
Some economists were warning we could be headed towards a second Great Depression. What stood out to me during the extraordinary period was a president’s willingness to bring together people from governments, from business, across institutions, across perspective, to think differently, and importantly, to act decisively.
That instinct to act, especially in pivotal moments, is one reason I think he values the World Economic Forum. It is a unique institution that brings together the largest combination of government officials, business leaders, technology leaders, civil society and NGO leaders, anywhere in the world for a genuine dialogue, and particularly, importantly, this year.
Thankfully, this group is meeting under better economic circumstances than during the pandemic. But once again, we’re forcing very serious different economic conditions around the world. One of the central challenges that is impacting me is how capitalism can benefit more, and how can we broaden our global economy for greater and greater participation.
That is a question where the President has shown real leadership through investing in infrastructure, reducing barriers to growth, and initiatives like the Trump account, designed to give more Americans a direct stake in the growth of the U.S.
economy. As he enters the second year of his second term, we are interested in hearing his plans for 2026 and beyond, and will no doubt create more and more conversation. And that’s what the forum is about, a serious conversation in the spirit of dialogue.
Discussions where the world is headed, where are we going, and these discussions would be incomplete without the President of the United States, the most important leader in the world. We appreciate him here, so let me introduce and welcome back to Davos, the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
Thank you.
Well, thank you very much, Larry. It’s great to be back in beautiful Davos, Switzerland, and to address so many respected business leaders, so many friends, few enemies, and all of the distinguished guests. It’s a who’s who, I will say that.
I’ve come to this year’s World Economic Forum with truly phenomenal news from America. Yesterday marked the one-year anniversary of my inauguration, and today, after 12 months back in the White House, our economy is booming, growth is exploding, productivity is surging, investment is soaring, incomes are rising, inflation has been defeated, our previously open and dangerous border is closed and virtually impenetrable, and the United States is in the midst of the fastest and most dramatic economic turnaround in our country’s history.
Under the Biden administration, America was plagued by the nightmare of stagflation, meaning low growth and high inflation, a recipe for misery, failure, and decline. But now, after just one year of my policies, we are witnessing the exact opposite, virtually no inflation, and extraordinarily high economic growth, growth like, I believe you’ll see very shortly, a country has never seen before, perhaps no country has ever seen before.
Over the past three months, core inflation has been just 1.6 percent. Meanwhile, fourth quarter growth is projected to be 5.4 percent, far greater than anybody other than myself and a few others had predicted. Since the election, the stock market has set 52 all-time high records.
So that’s in one year, 52 records, adding $9 trillion in value to retirement accounts, 401ks, and people’s savings. People are doing very well. They’re very happy with me.
Since my inauguration, we’ve lifted more than 1.2 million people off of food stamps, and after four years in which Biden secured less than $1 trillion of new investment in our country. Think of that, $1 trillion, substantially less than that. In four years, we’ve secured commitments for a record-breaking $18 trillion, and we think when the final numbers come out, they’ll be closer to $20 trillion of investment.
That’s never been done by any country at any time, not even close. Just over one year ago, under the radical-left Democrats, we were a dead country. Now we are the hottest country anywhere in the world.
In fact, the United States economy is on pace to grow at double the rate that was projected by the IMF just last April. And with my growth and tariff policies, it should be much higher. I really believe we can be much higher than that.
And this is all great news, and it’s great for all nations. The USA is the economic engine on the planet, and when America booms, the entire world booms. It’s been the history.
When it goes bad, it goes bad. The whole — we all — you all follow us down, and you follow us up, and we’re at a point that we’ve never — I don’t believe we’ve ever been. I never thought we could do it this quickly.
My biggest surprise is I thought it would take more than a year, maybe like a year and one month. But it’s happened very quickly. This afternoon, I want to discuss how we have achieved this economic miracle, how we intend to raise living standards for our citizens to levels never seen before.
and perhaps how you too and the places where you come from can do much better by following what we’re doing because certain places in Europe are not even recognizable frankly anymore. They’re not recognizable and we can argue about it but there’s no argument. Friends come back from different places I don’t want to insult anybody and say I don’t recognize it and that’s not in a positive way that’s in a very negative way and I love Europe and I want to see Europe go good but it’s not heading in the right direction in recent decades it became conventional wisdom in Washington and European capitals that the only way to grow a modern Western economy was through ever-increasing government spending unchecked mass migration and endless foreign imports the consensus was that so-called dirty jobs and heavy industry should be sent elsewhere that affordable energy should be replaced by the Green New Scam and that countries could be propped up by importing new and entirely different populations from faraway lands.
This was the path that sleepy Joe Biden administration and many other Western governments very foolishly followed turning their backs on everything that makes nations rich and powerful and strong and there’s so much potential in so many nations the result was record budget and trade deficits and a growing sovereign deficit driven by the largest wave of mass migration in human history we’ve never seen anything like it quite frankly many parts of our world are being destroyed before our very eyes and the leaders don’t even understand what’s happening and the ones that do understand aren’t doing anything about it virtually all of the so-called experts predicted my plans to end this failed model would trigger a global recession and runaway inflation But we have proven them wrong.
It’s actually just the opposite. In one year, our agenda has produced a transformation like America has not seen in over 100 years. Instead of closing down energy plants, we’re opening them up.
Instead of building ineffective, money-losing windmills, we’re taking them down and not approving any. Instead of empowering bureaucrats, we’re firing them and they’re going out and getting jobs in the private sector for two and three times what they were making in government. So they started off hating me when we fired them and now they love me.
Instead of raising taxes on domestic producers, we’re lowering them and raising tariffs on foreign nations to pay for the damage that they’ve caused. In 12 months, we have removed over 270,000 bureaucrats from the federal payrolls. The largest single-year reduction in government employment since the end of World War II.
Nobody thought that was coming, but we had no choice. To make a country great, you can’t have all federal jobs. We’ve cut federal spending by 100 billion dollars and slashed the federal budget deficit by 27 percent in the single year.
It’s going to go down quite a bit more from that, driving inflation way down from the record highs of the Biden administration. Every month, they went up and up and up. I promised to cut 10 old regulations for every single new regulation, but instead I’ve cut, actually, till this point, 129 regulations for every one new regulation approved.
So every time they come in with a new regulation, we do at least 10, but so far it’s averaging out to 129, if you can believe it. In July, we passed the largest tax cuts in American history, including no tax on tips. No tax on overtime, no tax on social security for our great seniors.
We also provided 100% expensing, that’s the one they like. And bonus depreciation for all new equipment and capital investments to help companies expand and shift production to America. They are so in love with it.
They build a plant, they’re able to deduct it immediately, the whole thing, rather than waiting 38 to 41 years in the old days. This is a miracle taking place. Nobody thought it would ever be done by any country, but it’s done by us.
It was what made my first term the most successful four-year term that we’ve ever had from a financial standpoint. And now we’ve upped it. This is a 10-year program, not a one-year program, but you’re allowed to deduct everything in one year.
It used to be 38 to 41 years. With tariffs, we’ve radically reduced our ballooning trade deficit, which was the largest in world history. We were losing more than $1 trillion every single year.
And it was just wasted. It was going to waste. But in one year, I slashed our monthly trade deficit by a staggering 77%.
And all of this with no inflation, something everyone said could not be done. There were a couple of brilliant people that actually thought I was doing the right thing. I thought I was doing the right thing.
Now they all think I’m doing the right thing because they can’t believe the numbers. American exports are now up by more than $150 billion. Domestic steel production is up by 300,000 tons a month, and it’s doubling over the next four months.
It’s doubling and tripling. We have steel plants being built all over the country. Nobody thought they’d see that.
Factory construction is up by 41%. And that number is really going to skyrocket right now because that’s during a process. that they’re putting in to get their approvals and we’ve given very very quick fast approvals.
In the process we’ve made historic trade deals with partners covering 40 percent of all U.S. trade. Some of the greatest companies and countries in the world.
We have countries as our partner too. The European nations, Japan, South Korea. They’re our partners.
They’ve gone into massive deals with us especially on oil and gas. These agreements raise growth and cause stock markets to boom not only in the U.S. but virtually every country that came to make a deal because as you’ve learned when the United States goes up you follow.
It’s really become a staple. In America I’ve stopped the nation-wrecking energy policies that drive up prices while sending jobs and factories to the world’s worst polluters. They are indeed polluters.
Under sleepy Joe Biden new domestic oil and gas leases fell by 95 percent. Think of that. Then they wonder why was gasoline going up so fast.
The gasoline actually topped five dollars a gallon and some places seven dollars a gallon and more than 100 major power plants were violently shut down by incompetent people that had no idea what the hell they were doing.
Under my leadership U.S. natural gas production is at an all-time high by far. U.S.
oil production is up by 730,000 barrels a day and last week we picked up 50 million barrels from Venezuela alone. Venezuela has been an amazing place for so many years but then they went bad with their policies. 20 years ago it was a great country and now it’s got problems but we’re helping them and Those 50 million barrels, we’re going to be splitting up with them, and they’ll be making more money.
They’ve made it a long time. Venezuela’s going to do fantastically well. We appreciate all of the cooperation we’ve been giving.
We’ve been giving great cooperation. Once the attack ended, the attack ended, and they said, let’s make a deal. More people should do that.
But Venezuela’s going to make more money in the next six months than they’ve made in the last 20 years. Every major oil company is coming in with us. It’s amazing.
It’s a beautiful thing to see. The leadership of the country has been very good. They’ve been very, very smart.
The price of gasoline is now below $2.50 a gallon in many states, $2.30 a gallon in most states, and we’ll soon be averaging less than $2 a gallon. In many places, it’s already down even lower, $1.95 a gallon. Numerous states are at $1.99, numbers that nobody has heard for years.
Actually, since my last administration, we got it down to around those numbers. I’ve signed an order directing an approval of many new nuclear reactors. We’re going heavy into nuclear.
I was not a big fan because I didn’t like the risk, the danger, but they have what the progress they’ve made with nuclear is unbelievable, and the safety progress they’ve made is incredible. We’re very much into the world of nuclear energy, and we can have it now at good prices and very, very safe. And we’re leading the world in AI by a lot.
We’re leading China by a lot. I think President Xi respects what we’ve done, in part because I’ve allowed these big companies building these massive buildings. to build their own electric capacity.
They’re building their own power plants, which, when added up, is more than any country anywhere in the world is doing. I read recently an article in the Wall Street Journal that China’s creating so much energy, and they are. I’ve got to hand it to them.
But we’re creating as much or more, and we’re letting them do that. I’m very proud of it. It was my idea.
I said, you can’t create this much energy. We needed more than double the energy currently in the country just to take care of the AI plants. And they said, we can’t do that.
We have an old grid system. And I came up with the idea. You know, you people are brilliant.
You have a lot of money. Let’s see what you can do. You can build your own electric generating plants.
And they looked at me. They didn’t believe me. All of the names that are, I think, in the room right now, if you want to know the truth.
They didn’t believe it. They said, we thought you were kidding. I said, no, not only am I not kidding, you’re going to have your approvals within two weeks.
I always say, nuclear will take three weeks. But most ongoing, they’re going oil and gas. They’re even going coal in some cases.
Because of my landslide election victory, the United States avoided the catastrophic energy collapse which befell every European nation that pursued the Green New Deal which befell every European nation that pursued the Green New Scam.
Perhaps the greatest hoax in history. The Green New Scam. Windmills all over the place.
Destroy your land. Destroy your land. Every time that goes around, you lose $1,000.
You’re supposed to make money with energy, not lose money. Here in Europe, we’ve seen the fate that the radical left has on America. They tried very hard.
Germany now generates 22% less electricity than it did in 2017. And it’s not the current powerhouse. Chancellor’s fault.
He’s solving the problem. He’s going to do a great job. But what they did before he got there, I guess that’s why he got there.
And electricity prices are 64 percent higher. The United Kingdom produces just one-third of the total energy from all sources that it did in 1999. Think of that, one-third.
And they’re sitting on top of the North Sea, one of the greatest reserves anywhere in the world, but they don’t use it. And that’s one reason why their energy has reached catastrophically low levels with equally high prices. High prices, very low levels.
Think of that, one-third. And you’re sitting on top of the North Sea. And they like to say, well, you know, that’s depleted.
It’s not depleted. It’s got 500 years. They haven’t even found the oil.
The North Sea is incredible. They don’t let anybody drill. Environmentally, they don’t let them drill.
They make it impossible for the oil companies to go. They take 92 percent of the revenues. So the oil companies say, we can’t do it.
They came to see me. Is there anything you can do? I want Europe to do great.
I want U.K. to do great. Sitting on one of the greatest energy sources in the world, and they don’t use it.
In fact, their electricity prices have soared 139 percent. There are windmills all over Europe. There are windmills all over the place.
And they are losers. One thing I’ve noticed is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses and the worse that country is doing. China makes almost all of the windmills, and yet I haven’t been able to find any wind farms in China.
Did you ever think of that? It’s a good way of looking at it. They’re smart.
China is very smart. They make them. They sell them for a fortune.
They sell them to the stupid people that buy them. But they don’t use them themselves they put up a couple of Big wind farms, but they don’t use them. They just put them up to show people What they could look like they don’t spin.
They don’t do anything They use the thing called coal mostly China Goes with the coal they go with oil and gas They’re starting to look at nuclear a little bit And they’re doing just fine. They make a fortune selling the windmills. Oh and I think really that’s one that they wouldn’t be surprised if it stopped They would they are shocked that it continues to go.
They were very friendly with me They’re shocked that people continue to buy those damn things. They killed the birds. They ruin your landscapes Other than that, I think they’re fabulous, by the way Stupid people buy them.
The consequences of such destructive policies have been stark including lower economic growth Lower standards of living, lower birth rates, more socially disruptive migration, more vulnerability to hostile foreign adversaries and much much smaller militaries The United States cares greatly about the people of Europe.
We really do. I mean look I am derived from Europe, Scotland and Germany 100% Scotland, my mother. 100% German, my father.
And we believe deeply in the bonds we share with Europe as a civilization. I want to see it do great. That’s why issues like energy, trade, immigration and economic growth must be central concerns to anyone who wants to see a strong and united West Because Europe and those countries have to do their thing.
They have to get out of the Culture that they’ve created over the last 10 years. It’s horrible what they’re doing to themselves. They’re destroying themselves.
It’s beautiful, beautiful places We want strong allies, not seriously weakened ones. We want Europe to be strong. Ultimately, these are matters of national security, and perhaps no current issue makes the situation more clear than what’s currently going on with Greenland.
Would you like me to say a few words of Greenland? I was going to leave it out of the speech, but I thought I think I would have been reviewed very negatively. I have tremendous respect for both the people of Greenland and the people of Denmark.
Tremendous respect. But every NATO ally has an obligation to be able to defend their own territory, and the fact is no nation or group of nations is in any position to be able to secure Greenland other than the United States.
We’re a great power, much greater than people even understand. I think they found that out two weeks ago in Venezuela. We saw this in World War II, when Denmark fell to Germany after just six hours of fighting, and was totally unable to defend either itself or Greenland.
So the United States was then compelled, we did it, we felt an obligation to do it, to send our own forces to hold the Greenland territory, and hold it we did, at great cost and expense. They didn’t have a chance of getting on it, and they tried. Denmark knows that.
We literally set up bases on Greenland for Denmark. We fought for Denmark. We weren’t fighting for anyone else.
We were fighting to save it. For Denmark. Big, beautiful, piece of ice.
It’s hard to call it land. It’s a big piece of ice. But we saved Greenland and successfully prevented our enemies from gaining a foothold in our hemisphere so we did it for ourselves also and then after the war which we won we won it big without us right now you’d all be speaking German and a little Japanese perhaps after the war we gave Greenland back to Denmark how stupid were we to do that but we did it but we gave it back but how ungrateful are they now so now our country and the world face much greater risks than it did ever before because of missiles because of nuclear because of weapons of warfare that I can’t even talk about two weeks ago they saw weapons that nobody ever heard of they weren’t able to fire one shot at us they said what happened everything was discombobulated they said we’ve got him in our sights press the trigger and nothing happened no anti-aircraft missiles went up there was one that went up about 30 feet and crashed down right next to the people that sent it they said what the hell is going on those those defensive systems were made by Russia and by China so they’re gonna go back to the drawing boards I guess Greenland is a vast almost entirely uninhabited and undeveloped territory the sitting undefended in a key strategic location between the United States Russia and China that’s exactly where it is right smack in the middle wasn’t important nearly when we gave it back you know when we gave it back wasn’t the same as it is now it’s not important for any other reason you know to that one talks about the minerals there’s so many play there’s no rare earth no such thing as rare earth is rare processing but there’s so much rare earth and this to get to this rare earth you got to go through hundreds of feet of ice.
That’s not the reason we need it. We need it for strategic national security and international security. This enormous unsecured island is actually part of North America on the northern frontier of the Western Hemisphere.
That’s our territory. It is therefore a core national security interest of the United States of America and in fact it’s been our policy for hundreds of years to prevent outside threats from entering our hemisphere and we’ve done it very successfully.
We’ve never been stronger than we are now. That’s why American presidents have sought to purchase Greenland for nearly two centuries. You know, for two centuries they’ve been trying to do it.
They should have kept it after World War II but they had a different president. That’s all right. People think differently.
Much more necessary now than it was at that time however. In 2019 Denmark said that they would spend over 200 million dollars to strengthen Greenland’s defenses but as you know they spent less than one percent of that amount. One percent.
There’s no sign of Denmark there and I say that with great respect for Denmark whose people I love, whose leaders are very good. It’s the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it and improve it and make it so that it’s good for Europe and safe for Europe and good for us and that’s the reason I’m seeking immediate negotiations to once again discuss the acquisition of Greenland by the United States just as we have acquired many other territories throughout our history as many of the European nations have.
They’ve acquired there’s nothing wrong with it. Many of them, some went in reverse actually if you look some had great vast wealth, great vast lands all over the world. They went in reverse.
They’re stuck back where they started. that happens too, but some grow. But this would not be a threat to NATO.
This would greatly enhance the security of the entire alliance, the NATO alliance. The United States is treated very unfairly by NATO. I want to tell you that.
And when you think about it, nobody can dispute it. We give so much and we get so little in return. And I’ve been a critic of NATO for many years, and yet I’ve done more to help NATO than any other president by far, than any other person.
You wouldn’t have NATO if I didn’t get involved in my first term. The war with Ukraine is an example. We are thousands of miles away, separated by a giant ocean.
It’s a war that should have never started, and it wouldn’t have started if the 2020 U.S. presidential election weren’t rigged. It was a rigged election.
Everybody now knows that. They found out. People will soon be prosecuted for what they did.
It’s probably breaking news, but it should be. It was a rigged election. You can’t have rigged elections.
You need strong borders, strong elections, and ideally a good press. I always say it. Strong borders, strong elections, free, fair elections, and a fair media.
The media is terrible. It’s very crooked. It’s very biased, terrible, but someday it will straighten out because it’s losing all credibility.
Think of it. When I went in a landslide, a giant landslide won all seven swing states, won the popular vote, won everything, and I only get negative press. That means that it has no credibility, and if they’re going to get credibility, they’re going to have to be fair.
So you need a fair press, but you also need those other elements, and I inherited a terrible, terrible situation. If you look, the border was open. The inflation was raging.
Everything was bad with the United States when I came into office But I also inherited a mess with Ukraine and Russia something that would have never happened and I know Putin very well He and I would discuss Ukraine it was the apple of his eye, but he wasn’t gonna do anything.
I said Vladimir, you’re not doing it He would never have done it. It was terrible what happened. I could see it happening too after I left I could see it happening Biden had given Ukraine and NATO 350 billion dollars a staggering sum 350 billion dollars.
I Came in and just like the southern border Just like inflation just like our economy. I said wow This place is in trouble meaning our country all of these things were out of control But the border was out of control we fixed it with the strongest border anywhere in the world and I’ve now been Working on this war for one year during which time I settled eight other wars India Pakistan, I’ve been I settled other wars that were Vladimir Putin called me Armenian Aber by John He said I can’t believe you settled that one.
They were going on for 35 years. I settled it in one day and President Putin called me He said, you know, I can’t believe I’ve worked on that war for 10 years trying to settle and I couldn’t do it I said do me a favor focus on settling your war.
Don’t worry about that. What? What does the United States get out of all of this work all of this Money other than death destruction and massive amounts of cash Going to people who don’t appreciate what we do.
They don’t appreciate what we do talking about NATO I’m talking about Europe They have to Work on Ukraine. We don’t the United States is very far away. We have a big beautiful ocean separating us We have nothing to do with it Until I came along, NATO was only supposed to pay 2% of GDP.
But they weren’t paying. Most of the countries weren’t paying anything. The United States was paying for virtually 100% of NATO.
And I got that stopped. I said, that’s not fair. But then more importantly, I got NATO to pay 5%, and now they were paying, and now they are paying.
So something nobody said was possible. They said, we will never go up higher than 2%. But they went to 5%, and now they’re paying the 5%.
They didn’t pay the 2%, and now they’re paying the 5%. And they’re stronger for it, and they have an excellent, by the way, Secretary General, who’s possibly in the room. Mark, are you here?
Yes, he’s here. Hello, Mark. We never asked for anything, and we never got anything.
We probably won’t get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force where we would be, frankly, unstoppable. But I won’t do that, okay? Now everyone’s saying, oh, good.
That’s probably the biggest statement I made, because people thought I would use force. I don’t have to use force. I don’t want to use force.
I won’t use force. All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland, where we already had it. As a trustee, but respectfully, we turned it back to Denmark not long ago, after we defeated the Germans, the Japanese, the Italians, and others in World War II.
We gave it back to them. We were a powerful force then, but we are a much more powerful force now. After I rebuilt the military in my first term and continue to do so today, we have a budget of $1.5 trillion.
We’re bringing back battleships. The battleship is 100 times more powerful than the great battleships you saw in World War II, those great, big, gorgeous. ships, the Missouri, the Iowa, the Alabama, because I thought maybe we could take them out of mothballs.
They said, no sir, these ships are 100, think of that, 100 times more powerful than those big, big magnificent pieces of art that you saw so many times ago, that you still see on television. You say, wow, what a force. 100 times, each ship 100 times more powerful than the big battleships of the past.
So that was the end of the mothball story. So what we have gotten out of NATO is nothing except to protect Europe from the Soviet Union and now Russia. I mean, we’ve helped them for so many years.
We’ve never gotten anything except we pay for NATO. And we paid for many years until I came along. We paid for, in my opinion, 100% of NATO because they weren’t paying their bills.
And all we’re asking for is to get Greenland, including right title and ownership, because you need the ownership to defend it. You can’t defend it on a lease. Number one, legally it’s not defensible that way, totally.
And number two, psychologically, who the hell wants to defend a license agreement or a lease, which is a large piece of ice in the middle of the ocean where if there is a war, much of the action will take place on that piece of ice.
Think of it. Those missiles would be flying right over the center of that piece of ice. All we want from Denmark for national and international security and to keep our very energetic and dangerous potential enemies at bay is this land on which we’re going to build the greatest Golden Dome ever built.
We’re building the Golden Dome. That’s going to just by its very nature Going to be defending Canada Canada gets a lot of freebies from us by the way. They should be grateful also, but they’re not I watch your Prime minister yesterday.
He wasn’t so grateful They should be grateful to us Canada Canada lives because of the United States remember that mark the next time you make your statements What we did for Israel was amazing But that’s nothing compared to what we have planned for the United States Canada and the rest of the world We are gonna build a dome Like no other we did it.
We did it for Israel. And by the way, I told baby baby stop taking credit for the dome That’s our technology. That’s our stuff but they had a lot of courage and they were good fighters and they did a good job and we wiped out the Iran nuclear threat like nobody can believe Nobody’s ever seen anything like it that Venezuela taking down Salamani Wiping out al-baghdadi when he tried to reinstitute Isis.
We did a lot. I did a lot a lot of big things All perfectly executed. Everyone was perfectly executed.
Somebody told me that a military expert told me sir. Everything you’ve done has been Perfectly executed I said I know So other presidents have spent whether foolishly or not trillions and trillions of dollars on NATO and Gotten absolutely nothing in return.
We’ve never asked for anything It’s always a one-way street Now they want us to help them with Ukraine and let me say we’re going to you. I’m really helping not even them I want to see last week If you saw it was 10,000 soldiers, but last month it was 31,000 soldiers died 31,000 that’s this room times The number of people in this room times 30 Think of it 30,000 soldiers died in one month.
The month before it was 27,000. The month before that it was 28,000. The month before that it was 25,000.
It’s a bloodbath over there. And that’s what I want to stop. It doesn’t help the United States, but these are souls.
These are young, young people look like you, look like some of you right in the front row. They go to war. Their parents are so proud.
Oh, there he goes, comes back. Two weeks later, they get a call, your son’s head’s been blown off. I want to stop it.
It’s a horrible war. It’s the worst since World War II. They keep going, they’ll exceed World War II.
The numbers are staggering how many people they’ve lost. They don’t want to talk about it. Ukraine and Russia lost just tremendous amounts.
And I’m dealing with President Putin and he wants to make a deal, I believe. I’m dealing with President Zelensky and I think he wants to make a deal. I’m meeting him today.
He might be in the audience right now. But they got to get that war stopped because too many people are dying, needlessly dying. Too many souls are being lost.
It’s the only reason I’m interested in doing it. But in doing it, I’m helping Europe. I’m helping NATO.
And until the last few days when I told them about Iceland, they loved me. They called me daddy, right, last time. A very smart man said, he’s our daddy.
He’s running it. I was like running it. I went from running it to being a terrible human being.
But now what I’m asking for is a piece of ice, cold and poorly located, that can play a vital role in world peace and world protection. It’s a very small ask compared to what we have given them for many, many decades. but the problem with NATO is that we’ll be there for them a hundred percent but I’m not sure that they’d be there for us if we gave them the call gentlemen we are being attacked we’re under attack by such-and-such a nation I know them all very well I’m not sure that they’d be there I know we’d be there for them I don’t know that they’d be there for us so with all of the money we expend with all of the blood sweat and tears I don’t know that they’d be there for us they’re not there for us on Iceland that I can tell you I mean our stock market took the first dip yesterday because of Iceland so Iceland’s already cost us a lot of money but that dip is peanuts compared to what it’s gone up and we have an unbelievable future and that’s not that stock market is going to be doubled we’re gonna hit 50,000 and that stock market’s gonna double in a relatively short period of time because of everything that’s happening but there’s a good example after giving NATO and European nations trillions and trillions of dollars in defense they buy our weapons we make the greatest weapons in the world but now we’re gonna make them faster much faster you saw that I put a cap on the salaries then I put no buybacks no stock buybacks no various other things that they were doing I mean they were making 50 million dollars but it would take them three years to give you a Patriot missile I said that’s not good you my chauffeur can do a better job than that and he makes slightly less than 50 they make big salaries if they’re gonna make those big salaries they’re gonna have to produce a lot faster the good news is we have the greatest equipment in the world now we’re gonna start making it a lot faster they’re gonna build additional plants and all of the money that goes into stock buybacks is gonna go into building plants we’re not allowing stock buybacks by defense companies any longer they’re gonna build new plants to make Tomahawks, Patriots.
We have the best equipment. F-35s, F-47, the new one just coming out. They say it’s the most devastating plane, fighter jet ever.
Who knows? They called it 47. If I don’t like it, I’m going to take the 47 off.
And I wonder why they called it 47. We’ll have to think about that. But if I don’t like it, I’m going to take that 47 off.
But it’s supposed to be the stage six. It’s supposed to be the first stage six plane. Undetectable.
Like our B-2 bombers were undetectable. They flew right over Iran. They were undetectable.
And they did their job and they got the hell out of there. So we want a piece of ice for world protection. And they won’t give it.
We’ve never asked for anything else. And we could have kept that piece of land and we didn’t. So they have a choice.
You can say yes, and we will be very appreciative. Or you can say no, and we will remember. A strong and secure America means a strong NATO.
And that’s one reason why I’m working every day to ensure our military is very powerful. Our borders are very strong. And above all, our economy is strong because national security requires economic security and economic prosperity.
And we have the greatest that we’ve ever had. Biden and his allies destroyed our economy and gave us perhaps the worst inflation in American history. They say 48 years, I say forever.
But I think 48 years is the equivalent to forever, whether it’s 48 years or ever. It’s terrible. Costing the typical family $33,000.
What they did to this country should never, ever be forgotten. It’s early, but he has to be rated as the worst president we’ve ever had by far. The Autopen didn’t many of the, much of the damage.
The Autopen, he was the Autopen president. Because I don’t believe a sane president would have ever signed the kind of things that he signed. But now grocery prices, energy prices, airfares, mortgage rates, rent and car payments are all coming down and they’re coming down fast.
We inherited a mess. But we’ve done a hell of a job in 12 months. Under my most favored nation policy for drug prices, the cost of prescription drugs is coming down by up to 90%, depending on the way you calculate.
You could also say 5, 6, 7, 800%. There are two ways of figuring that. But we have a favored nations policy that every president wanted.
No president was able to get. I got it and other nations approved it. And I had to use tariffs in order to get it because they said no way.
In other words, a pill that costs 10% in London costs $130. Think it costs $10 in London, costs $130 in New York or in Los Angeles. And I’d say, boy, that’s bad.
Friends of mine would say, you know, we go to London, you can buy this stuff for nothing. We go all over the world, we can buy it for nothing. Because basically America was subsidizing every nation in the world because presidents allowed them to get away with it.
It became very tough. So when I called up Emmanuel Macron, I watched him yesterday with those beautiful sunglasses. What the hell happened?
But I watched him sort of be tough. But he was at $10 for a pill. And I said, Emmanuel, and I have all the big pharmaceutical companies are in total agreement.
It wasn’t easy, by the way. They’re tough, smart. They’ve been getting away with this scam for a long time, but they gave it up.
But they said, you’ll never get the countries to approve it. I said, why is that? Because they won’t.
They always said, we’re not paying any more. Get the rest for the United States. So over the years, they stayed the same.
We just went up, up, up. And I mean, we would pay 13, 14, 15 times more than certain countries would. So I said, no, they’ll approve it 100 percent.
So you’ll never get them to approve it. I said, I guarantee you. I actually started with Emmanuel, who probably is in the room, too.
And I like him. I actually like him. Hard to believe, isn’t it?
And I said, Emmanuel, you’re going to have to lift the price of that pill to $20, maybe $30. Think of that. That means it’s a doubling, a doubling of prescription drugs.
Might be a tripling, might be a quadrupling. It’s not easy. No, no, no, Donald.
I will not do that. I said, yes, you will, 100 percent. He said, no, no, no.
You’re asking me to double. I said, Emmanuel, you’ve been taking advantage of the United States for 30 years with prescription drugs. You really should do it.
And you will do it. I have no doubt. In fact, I am 100 percent sure you’re going to.
No, no, no. I will not do it. Because, yes, in all fairness to him, he has to double or triple, because the world being a bigger place in the United States, it’s not that you meet in the middle.
You just have to go up some. And we come down a lot. They go up a little.
We come down a lot. So we’re at $130, they’re at $10. So they may have to go to $20 or $30.
No more than that. I said, Emmanuel, are you going to be doubling or tripling? No, no, no.
He said, here’s the story, Emmanuel. The answer is you’re going to do it. You’re going to do it fast.
And if you don’t, I’m putting a 25 percent tariff on everything that you sell into the United States and a 100 percent tariff on your wines and champagnes. And that’s about 10 times more than what I’m requesting. And you’re gonna do it.
I don’t want to go public with it, but you may make me do that. No, no, Donald. I will do it.
I will do it. It took me, on average, three minutes a country saying the same thing. You will do it.
They all said, no, no, no, I will not do it. You’re asking me to double the cost of persuasion. I said, that’s right, because you’ve been screwing us for 30 years.
And they said, we will not do it. I said, that’s all right. On Monday morning, we’re putting a 25, 30, 50, I gave different numbers for different countries.
This is also national security we’re talking about. Can’t, not fair. We’re not going to subsidize the whole world.
And every one of those countries have agreed to do it. So one of the biggest things that I’ve done is the fact that we have now most favored nation. We will pay whatever the lowest price is in the entire world.
So our drug prices are going to be coming down by a staggering 90%. Again, you could say a thousand percent, two thousand percent, depends on the way you want to figure it. But we’ll go with the way the fake news likes it better, because it sounds, can you imagine a 90% reduction?
Sounds much worse. But drug prices are going to be coming down tremendously in all the nations, and I appreciate them doing it. But they did it, in all fairness, without tariffs, I wouldn’t have been able to get it done.
After declining $3,000 under Biden, real incomes are up in the United States by 2,000, 3,000, and even $5,000 and more. Homeownership has always been a symbol of health and vigor of American society. But that goal fell out of reach for millions and millions of people in the Biden era because interest rates went up so high.
Today, I’m taking action to bring back this bedrock of the American dream. In recent years, Wall Street giants and institutional investment firms, many of you are here, many of you are good friends of mine, many of you are supporters, sorry to do this to you, I’m so sorry, but you’ve driven up housing prices by purchasing hundreds of thousands of single-family homes, and it’s been a great investment for them, often as much as 10% of houses on the market.
You know, the crazy thing is a person can’t get depreciation on a house, but when a corporation buys it, they get depreciation. Okay, that’s something we’re going to have to think about too. I don’t know if too many people think about that.
You buy a corporation, they buy 500 houses, they buy hundreds of thousands, they buy 500 houses, they can take depreciation. A person sweats and works and buys one house, they can’t. But homes are built for people, not for corporations, and America will not become a nation of renters, we’re not going to do that.
That’s why I have signed an executive order banning large institutional investors from buying single-family homes. It’s just not fair to the public. They’re not able to buy a house.
And I’m calling on Congress to pass that ban into permanent law, and I think they will. One of the biggest barriers to saving for a down payment has been surging credit card debt. The profit margin for credit card companies now exceeds 50%, one of the biggest, and they charge Americans interest rates of 28%, 30%, 31%, 32%.
What ever happened to usury? So to help our citizens recover from the Biden disaster, all caused by this horrible, just horrible precedent, I’m asking Congress to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for one year. And this will help millions of Americans save for a home.
They have no idea they’re paying 28%. They go out there a little late in their payment, and they end up losing their house. It’s terrible.
To unleash innovation and savings and financing I’m also working to ensure America remains the crypto capital of the world and to that end last year I signed a landmark genius act into law. Now Congress is working very hard on crypto market structure legislation. Bitcoin, all of them, which I hope to sign very soon, unlocking new pathways for Americans to reach financial freedom and I did it for two reasons.
Number one I thought it was politically good and it was. I got tremendous political report support but more importantly China wanted that market too. It’s just like they want the AI and we’ve got that market I think pretty well locked up.
If I didn’t do it you know Biden was totally against it until before the election when they realized that you know there were millions of people voting against him over crypto and all of a sudden they loved it very much but it was too late they blew it.
But it is politically popular but it’s much more importantly we have to make it so that China doesn’t get the hold of it and once they have that hold we’re not going to be able to get it back. So I’m honored to have done it. Finally I’ve instructed government-backed institutions to purchase up to 200 billion dollars in mortgage bonds to bring down interest rates and I’ll be announcing a new Fed chairman in the not too distant future.
I think he’ll do a very good job. See I gave away some of it. He did give that away so we have something, got something.
But somebody that’s very respected. They’re all respected. They’re all great.
Everyone that I interviewed is great. Everyone could do I think a fantastic job. Problem is they change once they get the job.
They do. You know they’re saying everything I want to hear and then they get the job. They’re locked in for six years.
They get the job and all of a sudden let’s raise rates a little bit. I call them sir we’d rather not talk about this. It’s amazing how people change once they have the job.
It’s too bad. Sort of disloyalty but They got to do what they think is right. We have a terrible chairman right now Jerome, too late Powell.
He’s always too late and He’s very late with interest rates except before the election. He was just fine for the other side so we We’re gonna have somebody that’s great, and we hope he does the right job Last week the average 30-year mortgage rate dropped below 6% for the first time in many years Another major factor in driving up housing costs was the mass invasion of Our borders and and I have to say one thing about housing because nobody ever says this I am Very protective of people that already own a house of which we have millions and millions and millions and because we have had a Such a good run the house values have gone up tremendously and These people have become wealthy They weren’t wealthy they become wealthy because of their house and Every time you make it more and more and more affordable for somebody to buy a house cheaply You’re actually hurting the value of those houses obviously because the one thing works in tandem with the other And I don’t want to do anything that’s gonna hurt the value of people that own a house who for the first time in their lives are walking around the streets of Whatever city they’re in very proud that their house is worth five hundred six hundred seven hundred thousand dollars Now if I want to really crush the housing market I could do that so fast that people could buy houses but you would destroy a lot of People that already have houses in some cases.
They’ve mortgaged their house and the mortgage would be Very low and all of a sudden the mortgage without any changes becomes very high and they end up losing the house I’m not gonna hurt and I speak with Scott who’s doing a fantastic job and Howard who’s doing a fantastic job and all of my people.
And I always say, look, you know, I can crush the hell out of the market. We can drop interest rates to a level. And that’s one thing we do want to do.
That’s natural. That’s good for everybody. You know, the dropping of the interest rates, we should be paying a much lower interest rate than we are.
We should, we should be paying the lowest interest rate of any country in the world because without the United States, you don’t have a country. I mean, I had a case with Switzerland. We happened to be in Switzerland.
Maybe I’ll give you a quick story, but they were paying nothing. They make beautiful watches, great watches, Rolex, all of them. They were paying nothing to the United States when they sent their product in.
And we had a $41 billion deficit, 41 billion with this beautiful place, flew over it. Isn’t it nice? So I said, let’s put a 30% tariff on them so that we get back some of it.
Not all of it at all. We still have a deficit, big deficit. We had 40, 41 million.
That’s a big deficit. And I said, let’s put a tariff on different tariffs, different places. You’re all party to them.
In some cases, victims to them. But in the end, it’s a fair thing. And most of you realize that.
But we put a 30% tariff on Switzerland and all hell broke loose. They were calling, I mean, like you wouldn’t believe. And I know so many people from Switzerland, incredible place, incredible, brilliant place.
But I didn’t realize that they’re only good because of us. And there’s so many other examples. I mean, us and probably other places, but a majority of the money they make is because of us, because we never charged them anything.
So they come in, they sell their watches, no tariffs, no nothing. They walk away, they make $41 billion on just us. So I said, no, we can’t do that.
So I’m going to bring it up. would have a deficit pretty substantial, but I brought it up to 30% and the I guess Prime Minister, I don’t think President, I think Prime Minister called a woman And she was very repetitive She said no, no, no, you cannot do that 30% You cannot do that.
We are a small small country. I said yeah, but you have a big big deficit You may be small, but you have a bigger deficit than big countries. He said no, no, no, please you cannot do it Kept saying the same thing over and over.
We are a small country. I said, but you’re a big country in terms of and She just rubbed me the wrong way. I’ll be honest with you And I said, all right.
Thank you, ma’am. Appreciate it. Do not do this.
Thank you very much, ma’am and I made it 39% and Then all hell really broke out And I was paid visits by everybody Rolex came to see me. They all came to see me But I realized and I reduced it because I don’t want to hurt people. I don’t want to hurt him And we brought it down to him, you know Lower level doesn’t mean it’s not going up, but we brought it down to a lower level But they pay now Tara But but I realized that We have many places like that where they’re making a fortune because of the United States without the United States They wouldn’t be making anything think of it Switzerland made 41 billion dollars on us and as she said, it’s a small place and I realized with that.
I don’t know. I was so because she was so aggressive and Realized in that conversation that the United States is keeping the whole world afloat Many places I could give you Six seven places just in the people in this little area.
I know every one of them. They’re sort of They’re looking down, they don’t want to see me, they don’t want to stare me in the eyes. But they’re taking advantage of, everybody took advantage of the United States.
But I’ve been very fair and I gave them a tariff and it was fine. But I realized that without us, it’s not Switzerland anymore. Without us, it’s not any of the countries that are represented here.
And we want to work with the countries. We want to work with them. We’re not looking to destroy them.
I could have said 39, 40%. I could have said I want a 70% tariff, then we make money with Switzerland. But Switzerland would have been probably destroyed, financially destroyed.
I don’t want to do that. But we should be paying the lowest interest rate of everybody. I hope Scott’s listening to this, because we should be paying the lowest interest rate of everybody.
Without us, most of the countries don’t even work. And then you have the protection factor. Without our military, which is the greatest in the world by far, without our military, you have threats that you would never, you wouldn’t believe.
You wouldn’t believe. You don’t have threats because of us. And that’s because of NATO.
One other thing, and I have to say it so importantly, in the old days, and I used to say I’m the youngest in the room. Now I’m among the older, I hate to say it. I don’t feel old, but I’m among the older.
But I remember not long ago, 20, 25 years ago, when good news came out about, let’s say, the United States. The United States had a great quarter. The United States had a great month.
All the stocks went up. And that’s the way it’s supposed to be. Now when they say the United States had a record quarter, it’s unbelievable how well it’s doing.
All the stocks crash because they say, oh no, inflation, inflation, they’re going to raise interest rates. And they do. Some of these stupid people like Powell.
They raise interest rates, and what they do is they stop you from being successful. It used to be, when we had a great quarter, a great month, great earnings, great anything, any good news, the stock market went up. That’s the way it’s going to be.
We’ve got to do that again. Because that’s the way it should be. Now, when we have a great month, they want to kill it.
Like we did over 5%. People were surprised. We should do 20%.
We could do 25%. When we announce good numbers, and the reason is they’re so petrified of inflation. And growth doesn’t mean inflation.
We’ve had tremendous growth with very low inflation. In fact, growth can fight inflation. Proper growth.
So we want to get back to the days when we announced great numbers, because we’re going to be announcing phenomenal. You know, all these factories that are being built at record, thousands of businesses are being built right now. Remember, $18 trillion is invested.
I think the second number is three. And that was China many years ago. Investments in the country from outside.
$18 trillion, nobody’s ever seen that. That’s money coming in and building things, factories. Thousands of businesses are being built.
Thousands. Hundreds of big factories. Car plants are moving back to the United States.
They’re coming in from Canada. They’re coming in from Mexico, from Japan. Japan’s coming in and building plants here in order to avoid tariffs.
They’re coming in from China. They’re coming in from all over the world. We have more plants being built now, car plants, than we’ve ever had built, even in the heyday from the 1940s and 50s.
And they’re bigger. They don’t use renovations anymore, where they take an old plant, they rip it down, they build a brand new plant, super modern plant. But it’s happening at levels that nobody’s ever seen.
In 2024, the U.S. built less than 2 million new homes, but Biden admitted more than 8 million new migrants. And those days are over.
In 2025, for the first time in 50 years, the United States had reverse migration. Boy, that was nice. And these were criminals that were being taken out of our country because they allowed people to come into our country from jails, from gangs, drug dealers, murderers.
11,888 murderers. We’ve gotten most of them out. And then ICE gets beat up by stupid people from leadership in Minnesota.
We actually are helping Minnesota so much, but they don’t appreciate it. Most places do. You know, Washington, D.C.
is the safest place now in the United States. It was a very dangerous place to walk, and now you can walk with your wife, your kids, right through the middle of the city right now. Washington, D.C.
is as safe as it gets. It was one of the most unsafe. I had to admit, we sent in the military, the National Guard.
Within two months, it was great. Within three months, it’s like a really great place and a safe place and a beautiful place. It’s even been cleaned up.
The graffiti’s gone. Fences are gone. We don’t have to worry about fences anymore.
All of the places, the grasses are cut and replaced with new grass in many cases. It’s all going to happen in the spring. But Washington and D.C.
is beautiful again, and it’s safe. New restaurants are opening up. They were all closing.
Now you can’t get into a restaurant. Restaurants in Washington, D.C. are all opening.
Memphis also. Memphis, Tennessee. New Orleans.
Louisiana. We’re there for three weeks. We’ve cut the crime down by 64 percent within another month.
Virtually no crime there. We can do that all over. We’re going to help the people in California.
We want to have no crime. I know Gavin was here. I used to get along so great with Gavin when I was president.
Gavin’s a good guy. And if he needed it, I would do it in a heartbeat. I’d love to see.
We did help them a lot in Los Angeles, a lot with the early, early in my term when they had some problems. But we would love to do it. I would say this, if I were a Democrat governor or whatever, I would call up Trump.
I’d say, come on in, make us look good. Because we’re cutting crime down to nothing. And we’re taking people out, career criminals, who are only going to do bad things, and we’re bringing them back to their countries.
But where we’ve done it, it’s been amazing. And we have a capacity to do it at much greater levels. We’re cutting illegal aliens off welfare and other government benefits, and I have directed that starting immediately, there will be no more payments to sanctuary cities, because they are really just sanctuaries for criminals.
They’re really protecting criminals, and those are the ones we have to get out of the country. Murderers, drug dealers, the mentally insane. They emptied their mental institutions into the United States.
And despite that, we have the lowest crime numbers that we’ve ever had in the history of the country. Just came out. But equally importantly, we’re cracking down on more than $19 billion in fraud that was stolen by Somalian bandits.
Can you believe that Somalians, they turned out to be higher IQ than we thought. And we say, these are low IQ people. How did they go into Minnesota and steal all that money?
And we have, you know, they’re pirates. They’re good pirates, right? But we shoot them out of the water just like we shoot the drug boats out.
They’re not pirating too many boats lately, do you notice? When they go out into those boats, they want to take over a billion and a half dollar tanker loaded up with oil. And they say, we’re going to blow up your boat.
They have powerful weapons. You hit the side of the boat, you blow the whole thing up. The insurance companies are petrified.
So they say, just give them the boat. We’ll give them money instead. And I don’t do that.
We blow them right the hell out of the water. We see them going out, we blow them out of the water. We don’t have any pirates so much anymore.
If we do, they won’t be there long. We’ve cut down with the hitting of the boats that are loaded up with drugs, including submarines. Can you believe they actually buy small, they call mini-subs, very fast.
They’re meant for drugs. We’ve knocked out two of them. The Democrats say they were fishing.
You have ruined somebody’s fishing weekend, I would say. A submarine is not a fishing boat. You don’t fish.
But we’ve knocked down drugs by water, the oceans, the sea, by 97.2 percent. Think of that. And I actually say, who the hell are the 3 percent?
Because I would not want to be piloting one of those boats. We knocked them down and now we’re going to start on land. We’re going to knock it all out.
The land is the easy part. What we did on sea is incredible. And that’s our great military.
The situation in Minnesota reminds us that the West cannot mass import foreign cultures, which have failed to ever build a successful society of their own. I mean, we’re taking people from Somalia, and Somalia is a failed, it’s not a nation. Got no government, got no police, got no military, got no nothing.
And then we have this fake congressperson who they just reported is worth $30 million. You believe this? Ilhan Omar talking about the Constitution provides me.
She comes from a country that’s not a country and she’s telling us how to run America. Not going to get away with it much longer, let me tell you. The explosion of prosperity and conclusion and progress that built the West did not come from our tax codes.
It ultimately came from our very special culture. This is the precious inheritance that America and Europe have in common. We share it.
We share it, but we have to keep it strong. We have to become stronger, more successful, and more prosperous than ever. We have to defend that culture and rediscover the spirit that lifted the West from the depths of the Dark Ages to the pinnacle of human achievement.
We live in an incredible, changing period. It’s an unbelievable time, but we have to take advantage of the time that we’re in. In our hands are technologies that our ancestors could scarily have, I mean, they couldn’t have even dreamt some of the things that we see today.
And so rapidly they’re produced. I mean, AI, two years ago, nobody ever heard of the term, and now everybody’s talking about it. And it can have some very good purpose.
It could also have some dangerous purpose. And for that, we have to watch out. But some tremendous things are happening because of it.
And we’re leading by so much, we’re doing so well. But opportunities that are bigger and grander than ever before in human history are right before us. It is the pioneers in this room.
Many of you in this room are true pioneers. You’re two truly brilliant, brilliant people. Just your ability to get a ticket is brilliant because you have about 50 people for every seat.
I don’t know what, that’s Larry. Everything Larry touches turns to gold. He made this very successful.
But you’re in this room, and some of you are the greatest leaders anywhere in the world. You’re the greatest brains anywhere in the world. And the future is unlimited, and to a large part because of you.
And we have to protect you, and we have to cherish you. I always say we have to cherish our brilliant people, because there aren’t many of them. So together with confidence, boldness, and persistence, let us lift up our people, grow our economies, defend our shared destiny, and build a future for our citizens that is more ambitious, more exciting, more inspiring, and greater than the world has ever seen.
We’re in a position to do things that nobody else has ever even thought of before. And many of the people in this room are the ones that are doing it and I want to congratulate you and I’m with you all the way. You can do things that nobody else can even think about.
So I congratulate you on your tremendous success and the United States is back, bigger, stronger, better than ever before and I’ll see you around. Thank you all very much. Thank you very much.
This was supposed to be a nice fire chat, Mr. President.
Yes, good. I got set up. I did now.
You made the job for the moderator really easy. Thank you, Mr. President, for your speech.
I do have a few follow-up questions, if it’s okay. I don’t think I should start with Greenland, maybe. I’ll start with the economy.
The U.S. economy is doing really, really well, but how to sustain this growth moving forward? Because there’s always a recession looming around the corner.
Well, you know, the one thing about economies and recessions is sometimes you get hit unexpectedly and there’s nothing you can do about it. They’re all brilliant people, but there’s nothing. One example was COVID.
We had an economy going at levels like nobody had ever seen my first two and a half, three years, and then I heard the word pandemic, not COVID. They came up with that name over a period of time. We won’t get into that.
But I heard the word pandemic, and I had a poll come out that was so strong just prior to that, and I was with the two best pollsters, McLaughlin. Fabrizio and they said sir George Washington and Abraham Lincoln if they came back and ran as president and vice-president they couldn’t beat you and then what happened is the following day I was told to stay tuned because there’s something really bad happening in China there are bodies laying all over Wuhan right around that certain building that we talked about I always said it came from when it did come from Wuhan and they were body bags we saw it by satellite and they said there are strange things happening in China and so it began and we ended up with the COVID and the whole world suffered we did a phenomenal job I don’t think we got the credit we deserved we did something that Operation Warp Speed which some people say was one of the greatest military feats ever we did a great job use our military used a lot of people but sometimes you get hit with things nothing you can do you get hit with things like that unexpectedly and we got through it and when I left the stock market was higher than it was previous to the COVID coming up and that was I called it a great achievement but things happen bad things happen the things that we can stop our wars if we’re smart that we can stop those are a matter of being intelligent and having intelligent people on the other side because wars are the worst of all wars are worse than anything but we can stop wars because that’s sort of up to us but things like dust flying in the air wherever COVID comes from or whatever comes sometimes you have to be a little bit lucky but we are poised to have an economy like no other not only in this country but anywhere and you you know when you hear the kind of numbers that I can tell you that Scott Besant was with me the other day and he’s looking at numbers he said I can’t and that’s what he’s done his whole life, pretty much your whole life, Scott you weren’t going to be a football player, I don’t think Scott was not that great at football but he was always good at numbers, right?
and he was looking at numbers, he said I’ve never seen anything like this we’re poised to do things that no other country has ever done and, you know, luck I hate to say it, but we need a little luck we don’t want to get hit by something that nobody could have thought whoever thought we were going to get hit by a pandemic you know, when I heard the word pandemic, I said oh, that’s an ancient problem World War I, they lost a hundred million people it actually ended World War I, a lot of people don’t know the Spanish Flu and World War I ended because all the soldiers were sick the soldiers were so sick on both sides and that war was raging and they were all dying from the Spanish Flu, they were sick as dogs, they couldn’t fight so, you know, you don’t know how that would have turned out so we do, I mean, subject to that and I always have to put a caveat in for it but we’re poised to have the greatest growth of any large country I think any country that there’s been when you look at what’s happening in the United States it’s really amazing
thank you one thing that maybe keeps you up at night I know you don’t sleep that much anyway, Mr. President is the debt the U.S. debt is high is now the biggest expenditure on your budget how to get out of that impulse?
well, the big thing is growth I mean, growth is the way if we grow like this we go from having a 37, 36, 37 trillion dollars we go from having high debt to low debt but we also are cutting expenses, you know, the old-fashioned way we have extraordinary growth I think we’re going to be growing our way out I think we’re going to be paying off debt we’re taking in tremendous money from tariffs fairly and again, I’m using them judiciously you know, Switzerland’s a case study gotten much more I could have asked for much more but we’re using them judiciously but I think growth most importantly and then cutting costs now if you take a look at Minnesota 19 billion dollars in fraud and other things people going to airports they came into the country they don’t have ten cents and they’re leaving with hundreds of thousands of cash in their bags when we get to that and our DOJ Pam and Todd and all the people that work over there and all of the people that work in here I can tell you Scott Besant is working on that it’s a priority right you have your whole team we’re in there looking for where this money is coming from how much it is it could be more than 19 billion us can you believe that that’s just one state if we were able to cut out 50% of the fraud 50% that we should be able to do better than that we would have a balanced budget without having to talk about even growth so we have a lot of options but we’re working very hard on that that’s a big deal not just it’s not just the the protests a fake protest done by agitators and you know professional insurrectionists that’s what they are they’re professional troublemakers but we we are looking very strong at the money to in Minnesota and other places.
I think mr. president also the 500 billion US dollars invested in artificial intelligence and the frontier technologies last year also we’re driving growth exponentially in the US.
AI has been a big factor AI is massive I mean Mark Zuckerberg showed me a plant where he put it over a map of Manhattan and it was basically the size of Manhattan this is not I said you got to be kidding it’s a plant that was miles long miles wide very high I don’t think it was high like the Empire State Building but it was high and it literally covered most of the island of Manhattan.
That’s called a big plant and you know when I heard they’re going to spend 50 billion building and I said what you know if you spend 50 million you can build a nice little shopping center if you spend 500 million you can build a good shopping center but how do you spend 50 billion when I looked at this thing I said you think you’ll be able to do it for that it’s uh it’s amazing when uh you know some of the plants that I see and I see them all and again so big as we’re letting them build their own electric generation this way we have no problem and otherwise they’d be complaining there’d be nobody able to be you know we have an old grid system and not only that they’re going to sell at a very cheap price the excess electricity that they create back into our grid so that’ll solve some problems for certain states that don’t have enough electricity.
We also know that on the AI there is fierce competition between the U.S. as the largest economy in the world 27 percent of the global GDP and five percent of the global population not doing that badly and China and we know that that competition is very tough on AI. I know you’re heading to a state visit to China in April.
How do you see the U.S.-China relationship moving forward? Are you able to combine this tough competition with also collaboration?
So I’ve always had a very good relationship with President Xi and with President Putin. Talk about you know the larger powers but I’ve always had a very good relationship with President Xi of China. He’s an incredible man and what he’s done is amazing.
He’s highly respected by everybody and I do now I mean now I have good it was very severely interrupted by COVID. I used to call it the China virus but he said do you think you could use a different name? and I decided to do that because why should we have a problem over that but I would do that and they were a true diplomat I was I became a diplomat for the first time well you know who taught me that Marco Rubio Marco Rubio he said let me teach you about diplomacy hey any guy that gets approved by a hundred percent of the votes think of it he got liberal Democrats and radical right Republicans to approve him he’s the only one the next one was like lost 45 votes right but he got all 100 votes voting for him and at first I wasn’t happy about it I said wait a minute I don’t like that and now it turns out that the Democrats probably wish they didn’t do that and Marco has been fantastic Marco stand up please you have done a great job as Secretary of State he’s gonna go down as the best Secretary of State and Scott and we have Susie who’s the first female Chief of Staff and she’s the best Chief of Staff too and I see Howard Lutnick who I know spoke and Howard’s fantastic some of the deals we’re doing are great and I want to pay particular attention because we have Chris and Chris you got up and spoke I think you were he’s a number one oil man in the world because I was going to put Doug Burgum who’s fantastic I don’t know if Doug’s here is Doug here Doug Burgum is fantastic he said sir there’s one man better than me and he introduced me to Chris and he turns out to be so we’re drilling more oil and gas now that we ever have by almost double is that right Chris and on top of it we get a lot coming out of Venezuela so anyway so we’re doing we’re doing great the country is just doing great we have great people thank you and I see other people we have Steve Whitcuff we have Jared I got so many people I’m in trouble because when I go back they’re gonna be people with long faces sir you didn’t introduce I got so many people and we have a lot of the greatest people anywhere in the world I know I’m all So I won’t I won’t continue because we’d be here all day.
Thank you. Mr. President.
We also know that you’re a deal maker and then maybe coming back to Greenland and Ukraine What kind of deal in the end do you see between the US and? Denmark Because you know, I guess you see it now as a negotiation going on or well
It’s costing Denmark hundreds of millions a year to run it and Denmark’s a small country and it wonderful people But you know, it’s very expensive. It’s a very big piece of ice and It’s it’s very important. I mean, I don’t want to repeat the speech but it’s very important that we use that for national and international security that can create a power that will make it impossible for the bad guys to do anything against the perceived good ones and It’s a great block for Europe.
Just like you know, Denmark was supposed to spend hundreds of millions of dollars they didn’t spend the money they didn’t spend anything almost and We’ll see what happens. I just say this NATO has treated the United States of America very unfairly We never asked for anything. We never got anything We actually took care of the needs of NATO for years and years, which I felt was always unfair So I got NATO to pay because they’re rich countries, but I think it’s time that NATO step up We’re helping them with Ukraine without us.
I think Putin would have gone all the way. I think we have it I think Putin I think that could have been a World War three if you want to know the truth If if Kamala was elected or Joe any one of those, you know those thinkers I think you could have ended up in World War three and I will say Steve Whitcoff has been dealing incredibly with but we’re not gonna have World War three We want to get it stopped, but we’re not gonna have World War three.
I think if I wasn’t elected I think that could have evolved into World War three. It was a very very bad situation and it still is But it’s not that kind of bad. It’s bad because so many young people are being killed.
How close do you think there is on an agreement on Ukraine? I had the pleasure of speaking with Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner yesterday. I know they’re working hard on it.
I know that they’re also traveling now. Do you see this very close or still…?
Well, I hate to say it. I thought that was going to be… So I settled eight wars plus.
And I thought that was going to be one of my easier ones. It’s not the easiest. Some I settled in a matter of hours.
Because I’m good at that stuff. You know, the United Nations should be doing this. I shouldn’t be doing it.
But it doesn’t matter. It’s got to get done. Saving a lot of lives.
We’re saving millions of lives. With Ukraine, Russia, there’s tremendous hatred between President Zelensky and President Putin. That’s not good.
That’s not good for settlements. We know from dealing. There’s abnormal hatred.
With that being said, I think Russia wants to make a deal. I think Ukraine wants to make a deal. And we’re going to try getting a deal done.
We’re getting, I think, Steve, I think I can say that we’re reasonably close. What happens is oftentimes we’ll have a deal with Russia. Russia’s set and President Zelensky will not do it.
You saw that when he was in the Oval Office. I was not happy. And then we’ll have President Zelensky wants to make a deal and Putin doesn’t want to make the deal.
It’s a very difficult balance. And it’s big time. And it’s just, it is, you know, to use a word, it’s a bloodbath.
It’s horrible what’s happening. It’s a drone war. The drones are killing, you know, thousands of people a week.
Thousands. We have to get it stopped. So I believe they’re at a point now, I’m going to meet with President Zelensky later today.
I believe they’re at a point now where they can come together and get a deal done. And if they don’t, they’re stupid. That goes for both of them.
And I know they’re not stupid. But if they don’t get this done, they are stupid. So I don’t want to insult anyone, but you got to get this deal done.
Too many people are dying. It’s not worth it.
President Sissi is sitting on the first row here. He spoke earlier today and also complimented you on the Gaza deal. I think there will be a signing tomorrow.
Of course, there are different views on this, but how important do you think this signing is on the Board of Peace? And do you think this is going to sustain? Do you think we now will see Gaza reconstructed and billions of U.S.
dollars invested?
I do. I mean, I think we have peace in the Middle East. There are some little situations like Hamas, and Hamas has agreed to give up their weapons.
Now, you know, they were born with a weapon in their hands, so it’s not easy to do. When they were born, they were born with a rifle in their hand. It’s not an easy thing for them, but that’s what they agreed to.
They’ve got to do it. And we’re going to know, Jared, over the next two or three days, certainly over the next three weeks, whether or not they’re going to do it. If they don’t do it, they’re going to have – they’ll be blown away very quickly.
They’ll be blown away. You know, we have 59 countries that are part of that whole peace deal, and some of those countries aren’t even in – they’re near the Middle East, but they’re not in the Middle East traditionally. And they want to come in and take out Hamas.
They want to come – they want to do whatever they can. There’s a problem with Hezbollah in Lebanon, and we’ll see what happens there. But that’s a problem.
But there are these little flames. But there’s peace in the Middle East. Now, had we not gone in and knocked out with those big, beautiful – we just ordered 25 brand-new ones, the latest and the greatest – the B-2 bomber.
Think of them. They went in there at 2 o’clock in the morning with no moon, no light, no nothing, and every single one of those massive bombs hit its target – 100,000-pound bombs hit its target. Every one of them.
And then on top of it, from a submarine 300 miles away, we hit the sites with tomahawks, which is an unbelievable weapon. So, you know, we did our job. If we didn’t do that, you would have never had peace in the Middle East.
And the countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar could never have, and others, could never have signed anything because you would have had this dark cloud, and the dark cloud was Iran with nuclear. Iran, if we didn’t take them out, they would have had a nuclear weapon within two months. They were very close to having the nuclear weapon, and we hit them hard.
And it was a total obliteration. They may try again, but they’re going to have to try from a different area because that area was obliterated. Incredible thing we did, and because we did that, we were able to make peace.
If we didn’t do that, I would say, Jared and Steve, if we didn’t do that, there was no chance of making peace, because the countries I just named and other countries could have never signed off. They were afraid. They were afraid.
We had a bully. The bully was Iran, the bully of the Middle East. They used to call it for years they were the bully of the Middle East.
They’re not the bully of the Middle East anymore.
Mr. President, I know you even had to change plane last night, so I guess you didn’t have much sleep, but I think your energy is still there. I know you have several bilateral meetings.
I know you’re also hosting a reception. So, thank you so much for coming back to Davos. Thank you so much.
It’s highly appreciated.
Thank you very much. Thank you, everybody, very much.
Donald J. Trump
Speech speed
170 words per minute
Speech length
14306 words
Speech time
5040 seconds
America has achieved unprecedented economic turnaround with 5.4% growth, 52 stock market records, and $18 trillion in investment commitments
Explanation
Trump claims that after one year back in office, the U.S. economy is experiencing the fastest and most dramatic turnaround in the country’s history. He contrasts this with the Biden administration’s stagflation, emphasizing virtually no inflation with extraordinarily high economic growth.
Evidence
Fourth quarter growth projected at 5.4 percent, stock market set 52 all-time high records in one year, adding $9 trillion in value to retirement accounts, secured commitments for record-breaking $18 trillion in investment compared to Biden’s less than $1 trillion in four years
Major discussion point
U.S. Economic Performance and Policies
Topics
Economic
Agreed with
– Børge Brende
Agreed on
U.S. economic performance is exceptionally strong and needs to be sustained
Massive deregulation cutting 129 regulations for every new one and removing 270,000 federal bureaucrats has driven economic success
Explanation
Trump argues that dramatically reducing government bureaucracy and regulations has been key to economic transformation. He promised to cut 10 old regulations for every new one but exceeded this by cutting 129 regulations for each new regulation approved.
Evidence
Removed over 270,000 bureaucrats from federal payrolls – largest single-year reduction since end of World War II, cut 129 regulations for every one new regulation approved, cut federal spending by $100 billion and slashed federal budget deficit by 27 percent
Major discussion point
U.S. Economic Performance and Policies
Topics
Economic | Legal and regulatory
Tax cuts including no tax on tips, overtime, and social security plus 100% expensing for business investments are fueling growth
Explanation
Trump describes implementing the largest tax cuts in American history with specific benefits for workers and businesses. The 100% expensing allows companies to deduct entire plant costs immediately rather than waiting decades, which he calls a miracle that makes expansion attractive.
Evidence
Largest tax cuts in American history including no tax on tips, overtime, and social security, 100% expensing and bonus depreciation for all new equipment allowing companies to deduct entire plant costs immediately rather than waiting 38-41 years
Major discussion point
U.S. Economic Performance and Policies
Topics
Economic | Taxation
Growth is the primary solution to reducing the $37 trillion national debt rather than traditional cost-cutting measures
Explanation
When asked about the national debt, Trump emphasizes that economic growth is the main strategy for debt reduction. He believes the U.S. can grow its way out of debt while also cutting expenses through fraud reduction and other measures.
Evidence
References $37 trillion debt, mentions taking in tremendous money from tariffs, cites $19 billion in fraud in Minnesota alone that could be cut, suggests cutting 50% of fraud would create balanced budget
Major discussion point
U.S. Economic Performance and Policies
Topics
Economic
Abandoning the ‘Green New Scam’ and embracing oil, gas, and nuclear energy has restored American energy dominance
Explanation
Trump argues that rejecting green energy policies in favor of traditional and nuclear energy has been crucial to America’s economic success. He contrasts this with European nations that pursued green policies and suffered economically.
Evidence
U.S. natural gas production at all-time high, U.S. oil production up 730,000 barrels per day, picked up 50 million barrels from Venezuela, gasoline prices now below $2.50 per gallon in many states, signed order for new nuclear reactors
Major discussion point
Energy Policy and Climate Change
Topics
Infrastructure | Economic
European nations pursuing green energy policies have seen catastrophic results with reduced electricity generation and higher prices
Explanation
Trump provides specific examples of how European green energy policies have failed, citing Germany’s 22% reduction in electricity generation since 2017 and the UK producing only one-third of its 1999 energy levels. He attributes this to misguided environmental policies that prevent use of abundant resources like North Sea oil.
Evidence
Germany generates 22% less electricity than 2017 with 64% higher prices, UK produces just one-third of total energy from 1999 despite sitting on North Sea reserves, UK electricity prices soared 139%, oil companies can’t drill because they take 92% of revenues
Major discussion point
Energy Policy and Climate Change
Topics
Infrastructure | Economic
Windmills are economically destructive – countries with more windmills perform worse economically
Explanation
Trump argues that windmills are economically harmful, noting that China manufactures them but doesn’t use them domestically. He claims there’s a direct correlation between a country having more windmills and worse economic performance.
Evidence
China makes almost all windmills but hasn’t been able to find any wind farms in China, China puts up couple big wind farms for show but they don’t spin or do anything, windmills kill birds and ruin landscapes
Major discussion point
Energy Policy and Climate Change
Topics
Infrastructure | Economic
U.S. natural gas and oil production are at all-time highs, driving down gasoline prices below $2.50 per gallon
Explanation
Trump contrasts current energy production with the Biden administration, noting that new domestic oil and gas leases fell 95% under Biden while over 100 power plants were shut down. Under his leadership, production has reached record levels with significantly lower consumer prices.
Evidence
U.S. natural gas production at all-time high by far, U.S. oil production up 730,000 barrels per day, gasoline price below $2.50 in many states and $2.30 in most states, numerous states at $1.99 per gallon
Major discussion point
Energy Policy and Climate Change
Topics
Infrastructure | Economic
Tariffs have reduced the monthly trade deficit by 77% while generating revenue and bringing manufacturing back to America
Explanation
Trump argues that strategic use of tariffs has dramatically improved America’s trade position while encouraging domestic manufacturing. He emphasizes that tariffs are being used judiciously and fairly to correct longstanding trade imbalances.
Evidence
Slashed monthly trade deficit by 77%, American exports up by more than $150 billion, domestic steel production up 300,000 tons per month and doubling over next four months, factory construction up 41%
Major discussion point
Trade and Tariffs
Topics
Economic | E-commerce and Digital Trade
Strategic use of tariffs forced other nations to agree to most favored nation drug pricing, reducing prescription costs by up to 90%
Explanation
Trump describes how he used tariff threats to force countries like France to agree to higher drug prices in their markets, allowing the U.S. to pay the lowest global price for prescription drugs. This policy required threatening tariffs on wines and other products to achieve compliance.
Evidence
Example of calling Emmanuel Macron about $10 pill in London costing $130 in U.S., threatened 25% tariff on everything and 100% on wines and champagnes, every country agreed within average of three minutes, drug prices coming down by up to 90%
Major discussion point
Trade and Tariffs
Topics
Economic | Consumer protection
The U.S. has been unfairly taken advantage of in trade relationships, with countries like Switzerland making $41 billion annually from America
Explanation
Trump uses Switzerland as an example of how other countries have exploited the U.S. in trade relationships, with Switzerland paying no tariffs while generating massive trade surpluses. He realized during negotiations that many countries depend entirely on the U.S. market for their prosperity.
Evidence
$41 billion deficit with Switzerland despite them paying nothing in tariffs, Switzerland makes beautiful watches but was paying no tariffs to U.S., after putting 30% tariff all hell broke loose showing their dependence on U.S. market
Major discussion point
Trade and Tariffs
Topics
Economic | E-commerce and Digital Trade
Securing the border and ending mass migration has been essential for economic recovery and national security
Explanation
Trump argues that the open border under Biden contributed to economic problems and that securing the border has been crucial to recovery. He contrasts the previous administration’s policies with his approach of creating what he calls the strongest border anywhere in the world.
Evidence
Previously open and dangerous border now closed and virtually impenetrable, lifted more than 1.2 million people off food stamps, 2024 saw Biden admit 8 million new migrants while U.S. built less than 2 million homes, 2025 had reverse migration for first time in 50 years
Major discussion point
Immigration and Border Security
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Mass deportation of criminals including 11,888 murderers has improved public safety in cities like Washington D.C.
Explanation
Trump claims that removing criminal migrants has dramatically improved public safety in major cities. He provides specific examples of cities where crime has been reduced significantly through targeted deportation efforts and military/National Guard deployment.
Evidence
11,888 murderers removed from country, Washington D.C. now safest place in U.S. after being very dangerous, crime cut by 64% in Memphis within three weeks, virtually no crime in New Orleans after one month of operations
Major discussion point
Immigration and Border Security
Topics
Legal and regulatory | Cybersecurity
Western nations cannot successfully import foreign cultures from failed states without damaging their own societies
Explanation
Trump argues that mass immigration from failed states like Somalia damages Western societies and cultures. He uses the example of Somali fraud in Minnesota and criticizes Representative Ilhan Omar as representing this problem.
Evidence
$19 billion in fraud stolen by Somalian bandits in Minnesota, Somalia described as failed state with no government, police, or military, references to Ilhan Omar being worth $30 million despite coming from failed country
Major discussion point
Immigration and Border Security
Topics
Sociocultural | Cultural diversity
Greenland is strategically vital for U.S. and international security, positioned between America, Russia, and China
Explanation
Trump argues that Greenland’s geographic position makes it essential for national and international security, particularly given modern weapons and missile technology. He emphasizes that its strategic importance has grown significantly since World War II when the U.S. previously controlled it.
Evidence
Greenland sits in key strategic location between U.S., Russia, and China, missiles would fly right over center of that piece of ice in any war, American presidents have sought to purchase Greenland for nearly two centuries, U.S. defended Greenland in WWII when Denmark fell in six hours
Major discussion point
Greenland and NATO Relations
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Denmark cannot adequately defend Greenland and has failed to spend promised defense funds, making U.S. acquisition necessary
Explanation
Trump argues that Denmark lacks the capability to defend Greenland and has not followed through on defense spending commitments. He contends that only the U.S. has the power to properly secure and develop this strategically important territory.
Evidence
Denmark promised to spend over $200 million to strengthen Greenland’s defenses but spent less than 1%, Denmark fell to Germany in just six hours in WWII and was unable to defend Greenland, costs Denmark hundreds of millions per year to run
Major discussion point
Greenland and NATO Relations
Topics
Legal and regulatory
NATO has treated America unfairly, with the U.S. paying disproportionately while European allies contribute little
Explanation
Trump argues that NATO represents a one-way relationship where America provides protection and funding while receiving nothing in return. He claims to have increased NATO contributions from 2% to 5% of GDP but still considers the arrangement unfair to the United States.
Evidence
U.S. was paying virtually 100% of NATO costs before Trump’s involvement, got NATO to pay 5% instead of 2% that they weren’t even paying, NATO wouldn’t exist without Trump’s intervention in first term, unsure if NATO would defend U.S. if attacked
Major discussion point
Greenland and NATO Relations
Topics
Legal and regulatory
The Ukraine war is a preventable bloodbath with 30,000+ monthly casualties that must be stopped through negotiation
Explanation
Trump describes the Ukraine war as having staggering casualty numbers that represent unnecessary loss of life. He claims the war would never have started if the 2020 election hadn’t been rigged and emphasizes his motivation to stop it is purely humanitarian.
Evidence
31,000 soldiers died in one month, previous months were 27,000, 28,000, and 25,000 deaths, describes it as worst war since WWII, calls it a bloodbath with thousands dying weekly from drone warfare
Major discussion point
Ukraine War Resolution
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Both Putin and Zelensky want to make a deal, though personal hatred between them complicates settlement efforts
Explanation
Trump explains that while both leaders appear willing to negotiate, their personal animosity creates challenges for reaching agreement. He describes a pattern where one side agrees to terms but the other refuses, making the process difficult to balance.
Evidence
Tremendous hatred between President Zelensky and President Putin, pattern of Russia agreeing when Ukraine refuses and vice versa, Trump meeting with Zelensky during the forum, believes they’re reasonably close to a deal
Major discussion point
Ukraine War Resolution
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Agreed with
– Børge Brende
Agreed on
Ukraine peace negotiations are progressing and reasonably close to resolution
America is geographically distant from the conflict and shouldn’t bear primary responsibility for European security issues
Explanation
Trump emphasizes that the U.S. is thousands of miles away from Ukraine, separated by an ocean, while European nations are directly affected. He questions why America should lead efforts to resolve a conflict that primarily impacts Europe and NATO allies.
Evidence
U.S. is thousands of miles away separated by giant ocean, Europe should work on Ukraine not the U.S., Biden gave Ukraine and NATO $350 billion, questions what U.S. gets out of the work and money besides death and destruction
Major discussion point
Ukraine War Resolution
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities was essential for achieving Middle East peace and the Gaza ceasefire agreement
Explanation
Trump argues that military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities removed the primary obstacle to Middle East peace. He claims that without eliminating Iran’s nuclear threat, Arab nations would never have been able to participate in peace agreements due to fear.
Evidence
Iran would have had nuclear weapon within two months before U.S. action, used B-2 bombers at 2 AM with 100,000-pound bombs hitting every target, hit sites with tomahawks from submarine 300 miles away, total obliteration of Iran’s nuclear facilities
Major discussion point
Middle East Peace and Iran
Topics
Legal and regulatory | Cyberconflict and warfare
The Gaza deal involves 59 countries and requires Hamas to surrender weapons, with severe consequences for non-compliance
Explanation
Trump describes a comprehensive peace agreement involving dozens of countries, with Hamas agreeing to give up weapons despite being ‘born with weapons in their hands.’ He warns of severe military consequences if Hamas fails to comply with the agreement.
Evidence
59 countries part of the peace deal including some not traditionally in Middle East, Hamas agreed to give up weapons, will know within 2-3 days or 3 weeks if they comply, if not they’ll be blown away very quickly
Major discussion point
Middle East Peace and Iran
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Agreed with
– Børge Brende
Agreed on
The Gaza peace deal represents significant progress toward Middle East stability
Military action against Iran removed the primary obstacle preventing Arab nations from participating in peace agreements
Explanation
Trump explains that Iran was the ‘bully of the Middle East’ that prevented countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar from making peace deals. By eliminating Iran’s nuclear threat, these nations were freed from fear and could participate in peace agreements.
Evidence
Countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar could never have signed anything with Iran’s nuclear threat, Iran was called the bully of the Middle East for years, they’re not the bully anymore after U.S. action
Major discussion point
Middle East Peace and Iran
Topics
Legal and regulatory
America leads China significantly in AI development, with massive infrastructure investments creating new energy demands
Explanation
Trump claims the U.S. leads China substantially in AI development and describes allowing tech companies to build their own power generation to meet massive energy demands. He describes AI plants the size of Manhattan requiring more than double the country’s current energy capacity.
Evidence
Leading China by a lot in AI, Mark Zuckerberg showed plant covering most of Manhattan island, companies building own electric generation plants, need more than double current country’s energy just for AI plants
Major discussion point
Artificial Intelligence and Technology Competition
Topics
Infrastructure | Future of work
Agreed with
– Børge Brende
Agreed on
AI investment is driving significant U.S. technological and economic growth
Banning large institutional investors from buying single-family homes will help restore homeownership opportunities for Americans
Explanation
Trump argues that Wall Street firms and institutional investors have driven up housing prices by purchasing hundreds of thousands of homes, often 10% of the market. He signed an executive order banning this practice to ensure homes are built for people, not corporations.
Evidence
Wall Street giants purchasing hundreds of thousands of single-family homes, often 10% of houses on market, corporations get depreciation on houses while individuals cannot, signed executive order banning large institutional investors from buying single-family homes
Major discussion point
Housing and Financial Policy
Topics
Economic | Consumer protection
Capping credit card interest rates at 10% will help citizens recover from economic hardship and save for homes
Explanation
Trump proposes limiting credit card interest rates to help Americans save for home down payments. He notes that credit card companies have profit margins exceeding 50% while charging rates of 28-32%, questioning what happened to usury laws.
Evidence
Credit card companies charge 28%, 30%, 31%, 32% interest rates with profit margins exceeding 50%, asking Congress to cap rates at 10% for one year, people paying 28% often lose their houses when late on payments
Major discussion point
Housing and Financial Policy
Topics
Economic | Consumer protection
Housing policy must balance affordability for new buyers with protecting existing homeowners’ wealth
Explanation
Trump explains the challenge of making housing more affordable without hurting existing homeowners who have become wealthy through rising home values. He emphasizes protecting people who own homes and have mortgaged them, as making housing too affordable could destroy their equity.
Evidence
House values have gone up tremendously making people wealthy for first time, people proud their house worth $500-700 thousand, making housing more affordable could hurt existing homeowners’ values, some have mortgaged houses that could become underwater
Major discussion point
Housing and Financial Policy
Topics
Economic | Consumer protection
Børge Brende
Speech speed
148 words per minute
Speech length
453 words
Speech time
182 seconds
The U.S. economy’s strong performance needs to be sustained despite potential unexpected challenges like pandemics
Explanation
Brende acknowledges the strong U.S. economic performance but raises the practical question of sustainability, noting that recessions can appear unexpectedly. He seeks Trump’s perspective on maintaining growth momentum given economic cycles and unforeseen challenges.
Major discussion point
U.S. Economic Performance and Policies
Topics
Economic
Agreed with
– Donald J. Trump
Agreed on
U.S. economic performance is exceptionally strong and needs to be sustained
The Greenland issue represents a negotiation where America is asking for minimal compensation given decades of protecting Europe
Explanation
Brende frames the Greenland situation as a negotiation between the U.S. and Denmark, seeking Trump’s perspective on what kind of deal might be reached. He approaches it as a diplomatic matter requiring resolution between allies.
Major discussion point
Greenland and NATO Relations
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Progress toward a Ukraine peace deal appears reasonably close despite the complexity of negotiations
Explanation
Brende inquires about the proximity of a Ukraine agreement, referencing conversations with Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner who are working on the issue. He seeks to understand the timeline and likelihood of successful negotiations.
Evidence
References speaking with Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner about their work on Ukraine negotiations
Major discussion point
Ukraine War Resolution
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Agreed with
– Donald J. Trump
Agreed on
Ukraine peace negotiations are progressing and reasonably close to resolution
The Gaza peace signing represents a significant step toward broader Middle East stability
Explanation
Brende highlights the importance of the Gaza deal signing and seeks Trump’s assessment of its sustainability and potential for broader regional peace. He inquires about reconstruction prospects and U.S. investment in the region.
Evidence
References President Sissi’s earlier comments complimenting Trump on the Gaza deal, mentions signing scheduled for tomorrow
Major discussion point
Middle East Peace and Iran
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Agreed with
– Donald J. Trump
Agreed on
The Gaza peace deal represents significant progress toward Middle East stability
The $500 billion AI investment is driving exponential growth in U.S. technology capabilities
Explanation
Brende emphasizes the massive scale of AI investment in the United States and its role in driving economic growth. He positions this as a key factor in America’s technological leadership and economic expansion.
Evidence
$500 billion invested in artificial intelligence and frontier technologies
Major discussion point
Artificial Intelligence and Technology Competition
Topics
Infrastructure | Future of work
Agreed with
– Donald J. Trump
Agreed on
AI investment is driving significant U.S. technological and economic growth
U.S.-China competition in AI requires balancing tough competition with potential collaboration opportunities
Explanation
Brende acknowledges the fierce competition between the U.S. and China in AI development while questioning whether cooperation is possible alongside competition. He references Trump’s upcoming state visit to China as an opportunity to address this balance.
Evidence
U.S. as largest economy with 27% of global GDP and 5% of population, mentions Trump’s state visit to China in April
Major discussion point
Artificial Intelligence and Technology Competition
Topics
Infrastructure | Future of work
Agreements
Agreement points
U.S. economic performance is exceptionally strong and needs to be sustained
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
America has achieved unprecedented economic turnaround with 5.4% growth, 52 stock market records, and $18 trillion in investment commitments
The U.S. economy’s strong performance needs to be sustained despite potential unexpected challenges like pandemics
Summary
Both speakers acknowledge the exceptional performance of the U.S. economy, with Trump providing detailed metrics of success and Brende recognizing this performance while raising questions about sustainability
Topics
Economic
AI investment is driving significant U.S. technological and economic growth
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
America leads China significantly in AI development, with massive infrastructure investments creating new energy demands
The $500 billion AI investment is driving exponential growth in U.S. technology capabilities
Summary
Both speakers recognize the massive scale and importance of AI investment in driving U.S. technological leadership and economic expansion
Topics
Infrastructure | Future of work
Ukraine peace negotiations are progressing and reasonably close to resolution
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
Both Putin and Zelensky want to make a deal, though personal hatred between them complicates settlement efforts
Progress toward a Ukraine peace deal appears reasonably close despite the complexity of negotiations
Summary
Both speakers express cautious optimism about Ukraine peace negotiations, acknowledging progress while recognizing the complexity of achieving final agreement
Topics
Legal and regulatory
The Gaza peace deal represents significant progress toward Middle East stability
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
The Gaza deal involves 59 countries and requires Hamas to surrender weapons, with severe consequences for non-compliance
The Gaza peace signing represents a significant step toward broader Middle East stability
Summary
Both speakers view the Gaza agreement as an important achievement for regional peace, with Trump providing details of the comprehensive nature of the deal and Brende emphasizing its broader significance
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Similar viewpoints
Both speakers frame the Greenland issue as a legitimate negotiation matter involving strategic security interests, with Brende treating it as a diplomatic negotiation and Trump emphasizing the strategic necessity
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
The Greenland issue represents a negotiation where America is asking for minimal compensation given decades of protecting Europe
Greenland is strategically vital for U.S. and international security, positioned between America, Russia, and China
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Both speakers recognize the complex nature of international economic relationships, acknowledging competition while seeking areas for beneficial cooperation and negotiation
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
U.S.-China competition in AI requires balancing tough competition with potential collaboration opportunities
Strategic use of tariffs forced other nations to agree to most favored nation drug pricing, reducing prescription costs by up to 90%
Topics
Economic | Infrastructure | Future of work
Unexpected consensus
Diplomatic approach to international negotiations
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
Strategic use of tariffs forced other nations to agree to most favored nation drug pricing, reducing prescription costs by up to 90%
The Greenland issue represents a negotiation where America is asking for minimal compensation given decades of protecting Europe
Explanation
Despite Trump’s reputation for confrontational diplomacy, both speakers demonstrate a surprisingly measured approach to international negotiations, viewing contentious issues like Greenland as legitimate diplomatic matters rather than ultimatums
Topics
Legal and regulatory | Economic
Humanitarian motivation for conflict resolution
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
The Ukraine war is a preventable bloodbath with 30,000+ monthly casualties that must be stopped through negotiation
Progress toward a Ukraine peace deal appears reasonably close despite the complexity of negotiations
Explanation
Both speakers emphasize humanitarian concerns and the urgency of stopping casualties rather than focusing primarily on geopolitical advantages, showing unexpected alignment on prioritizing human life over strategic gains
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Overall assessment
Summary
The speakers demonstrate substantial agreement on major policy areas including U.S. economic performance, technological leadership, and the importance of diplomatic resolution to international conflicts. They share similar frameworks for understanding complex international negotiations and the role of American leadership.
Consensus level
High level of consensus with significant implications for policy continuity. The agreement between Trump and the moderator suggests broad international acceptance of American economic and technological leadership, while the shared emphasis on diplomatic solutions indicates potential for sustained international cooperation on major global challenges.
Differences
Different viewpoints
No direct disagreements identified
Speakers
Arguments
Summary
The format was primarily a speech by Trump with brief moderator questions. No opposing viewpoints were presented by other speakers.
Topics
Unexpected differences
No unexpected disagreements identified
Speakers
Arguments
Explanation
The format did not allow for substantial back-and-forth or challenging of positions that would reveal unexpected disagreements.
Topics
Overall assessment
Summary
The discussion format was primarily a presidential speech with supportive moderator questions rather than a debate. The few areas of potential disagreement were subtle differences in emphasis rather than direct opposition.
Disagreement level
Very low level of disagreement due to the format. The moderator asked probing questions about sustainability and implementation but did not challenge Trump’s positions directly. This limits the ability to assess genuine policy disagreements or alternative approaches to the issues discussed.
Partial agreements
Partial agreements
Similar viewpoints
Both speakers frame the Greenland issue as a legitimate negotiation matter involving strategic security interests, with Brende treating it as a diplomatic negotiation and Trump emphasizing the strategic necessity
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
The Greenland issue represents a negotiation where America is asking for minimal compensation given decades of protecting Europe
Greenland is strategically vital for U.S. and international security, positioned between America, Russia, and China
Topics
Legal and regulatory
Both speakers recognize the complex nature of international economic relationships, acknowledging competition while seeking areas for beneficial cooperation and negotiation
Speakers
– Donald J. Trump
– Børge Brende
Arguments
U.S.-China competition in AI requires balancing tough competition with potential collaboration opportunities
Strategic use of tariffs forced other nations to agree to most favored nation drug pricing, reducing prescription costs by up to 90%
Topics
Economic | Infrastructure | Future of work
Takeaways
Key takeaways
The U.S. has achieved unprecedented economic turnaround with 5.4% growth, 52 stock market records, and $18 trillion in investment commitments through deregulation, tax cuts, and energy policy changes
Growth is identified as the primary solution to reducing the $37 trillion national debt rather than traditional cost-cutting measures
Strategic use of tariffs has reduced the monthly trade deficit by 77% and forced other nations to agree to most favored nation drug pricing, reducing prescription costs by up to 90%
Greenland is strategically vital for U.S. and international security, positioned between America, Russia, and China, and the U.S. seeks to acquire it from Denmark
The Ukraine war represents a preventable bloodbath with 30,000+ monthly casualties that must be stopped through negotiation, with both Putin and Zelensky reportedly wanting to make a deal
Destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities was essential for achieving Middle East peace and enabled the Gaza ceasefire agreement involving 59 countries
America leads China significantly in AI development, with massive infrastructure investments creating new energy demands and driving exponential growth
Housing policy reforms including banning large institutional investors from buying single-family homes and capping credit card interest rates at 10% are proposed to restore homeownership opportunities
Resolutions and action items
Meeting scheduled with President Zelensky later that day to advance Ukraine peace negotiations
Gaza peace deal signing planned for the following day with Hamas required to surrender weapons within three weeks
New Fed chairman to be announced in the not too distant future
Congress asked to pass permanent ban on large institutional investors buying single-family homes
Congress asked to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for one year
Government-backed institutions instructed to purchase up to $200 billion in mortgage bonds to bring down interest rates
Immediate negotiations sought with Denmark for acquisition of Greenland
Defense companies prohibited from stock buybacks and required to build additional manufacturing plants
Unresolved issues
How to sustain economic growth long-term given that recessions can occur unexpectedly
The specific terms and timeline for any potential Greenland acquisition deal with Denmark
Whether the Ukraine peace negotiations will successfully conclude given the ‘tremendous hatred’ between Putin and Zelensky
How to balance tough competition with China in AI while maintaining potential collaboration opportunities
Whether Hamas will actually surrender weapons as agreed in the Gaza deal
How to balance housing affordability for new buyers with protecting existing homeowners’ wealth
The long-term sustainability of using growth alone to address the national debt
Suggested compromises
In tariff negotiations, Trump indicated using tariffs ‘judiciously’ and reducing them from initial higher levels (as with Switzerland from 39% to lower levels) to avoid destroying other countries economically
On housing policy, Trump acknowledged the need to balance making homes affordable for new buyers while protecting the wealth of existing homeowners who have seen their property values increase
On Greenland, the framing as a ‘negotiation’ suggests willingness to discuss terms rather than unilateral action
On drug pricing, the most favored nation policy represents a compromise where other countries increase prices moderately while the U.S. reduces prices significantly
Thought provoking comments
How capitalism can benefit more, and how can we broaden our global economy for greater and greater participation. That is a question where the President has shown real leadership through investing in infrastructure, reducing barriers to growth, and initiatives like the Trump account, designed to give more Americans a direct stake in the growth of the U.S. economy.
Speaker
Laurence D. Fink
Reason
This comment frames the entire discussion around a fundamental economic philosophy question – how to make capitalism more inclusive while maintaining growth. It’s particularly insightful coming from BlackRock’s CEO, as it acknowledges both the benefits and limitations of current economic systems.
Impact
This opening framing set the stage for Trump’s entire economic narrative, allowing him to position his policies as solutions to broader systemic issues rather than just partisan political positions. It elevated the discussion from simple policy talk to philosophical economic discourse.
I realized that without us, it’s not Switzerland anymore. Without us, it’s not any of the countries that are represented here… Without our military, which is the greatest in the world by far, without our military, you have threats that you would never, you wouldn’t believe.
Speaker
Donald J. Trump
Reason
This comment reveals a stark worldview about American hegemony and dependency relationships. It’s thought-provoking because it explicitly articulates what is often left unsaid in international relations – the extent to which smaller economies depend on U.S. economic and military power.
Impact
This comment shifted the discussion from economic cooperation to power dynamics, making the audience confront uncomfortable truths about global dependency. It reframed subsequent discussions about trade, NATO, and Greenland within this power structure context.
One thing I’ve noticed is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses and the worse that country is doing. China makes almost all of the windmills, and yet I haven’t been able to find any wind farms in China.
Speaker
Donald J. Trump
Reason
This observation, while controversial, presents a provocative economic paradox about renewable energy policy. It challenges the conventional wisdom about green energy by highlighting the disconnect between manufacturing and deployment, raising questions about who truly benefits from green transitions.
Impact
This comment forced a reconsideration of energy policy from a purely economic rather than environmental perspective, shifting the conversation toward competitive advantage and questioning whether environmental policies might be economically disadvantageous.
There’s tremendous hatred between President Zelensky and President Putin. That’s not good. That’s not good for settlements… It’s a very difficult balance. And it’s big time. And it’s just, you know, to use a word, it’s a bloodbath.
Speaker
Donald J. Trump
Reason
This candid assessment of the personal dynamics in the Ukraine conflict provides insight into why diplomatic solutions have been elusive. It’s thought-provoking because it reduces a complex geopolitical conflict to human psychology and personal relationships.
Impact
This comment humanized the conflict and shifted the discussion from abstract geopolitical strategy to the practical challenges of negotiation when personal animosity exists. It provided context for why previous peace efforts have failed and set realistic expectations for future negotiations.
In the old days… when good news came out about, let’s say, the United States… All the stocks went up. And that’s the way it’s supposed to be. Now when they say the United States had a record quarter… All the stocks crash because they say, oh no, inflation, inflation, they’re going to raise interest rates.
Speaker
Donald J. Trump
Reason
This observation identifies a fundamental shift in market psychology and monetary policy that affects how economic success is perceived and rewarded. It’s insightful because it highlights how fear of inflation has inverted traditional market responses to good economic news.
Impact
This comment introduced a sophisticated critique of current monetary policy and market dynamics, shifting the conversation toward the psychological and structural barriers to sustained economic growth, and questioning whether current Federal Reserve policies are counterproductive.
The situation in Minnesota reminds us that the West cannot mass import foreign cultures, which have failed to ever build a successful society of their own… The explosion of prosperity and conclusion and progress that built the West did not come from our tax codes. It ultimately came from our very special culture.
Speaker
Donald J. Trump
Reason
This comment articulates a cultural theory of economic development that goes beyond traditional economic factors. It’s provocative because it directly links cultural identity to economic success and challenges multiculturalism as an economic policy.
Impact
This shifted the discussion from purely economic and policy matters to deeper questions about cultural foundations of prosperity, forcing consideration of whether economic policies can succeed without cultural cohesion.
Overall assessment
These key comments transformed what could have been a standard economic policy discussion into a comprehensive examination of power, culture, and systemic dependencies in the global order. Fink’s opening framing elevated the conversation to philosophical levels, while Trump’s observations about American hegemony, energy policy contradictions, and cultural foundations of prosperity forced the audience to confront uncomfortable realities about global economic relationships. The discussion evolved from technical policy details to fundamental questions about how power, culture, and economics intersect in the modern world. The personal insights about conflict resolution and market psychology added layers of complexity that moved beyond typical diplomatic or economic rhetoric to reveal the human and psychological factors that drive global events.
Follow-up questions
How to sustain the economic growth moving forward, given that there’s always a recession looming around the corner?
Speaker
Børge Brende
Explanation
This addresses the sustainability of current economic performance and preparation for potential economic downturns
How to address the high U.S. debt, which is now the biggest expenditure on the budget?
Speaker
Børge Brende
Explanation
This concerns fiscal policy and debt management strategies for long-term economic stability
How do you see the U.S.-China relationship moving forward? Are you able to combine tough competition with collaboration, especially regarding AI competition?
Speaker
Børge Brende
Explanation
This explores the balance between strategic competition and cooperation between the world’s two largest economies
What kind of deal do you see between the US and Denmark regarding Greenland?
Speaker
Børge Brende
Explanation
This seeks clarification on the specific terms and negotiation framework for the proposed Greenland acquisition
How close is an agreement on Ukraine? Do you see this very close or still distant?
Speaker
Børge Brende
Explanation
This addresses the timeline and prospects for resolving the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict
How important is the Gaza deal signing for broader Middle East peace, and do you think this will sustain with Gaza reconstruction and billions in U.S. investment?
Speaker
Børge Brende
Explanation
This examines the long-term implications and sustainability of the Middle East peace agreement
Whether Hamas will actually give up their weapons as agreed, and what happens if they don’t comply within the next three weeks
Speaker
Donald J. Trump
Explanation
This concerns the implementation and enforcement mechanisms of the Gaza peace deal
How to address the situation with Hezbollah in Lebanon
Speaker
Donald J. Trump
Explanation
This identifies a remaining security challenge in the Middle East peace process
Investigation into the $19 billion fraud in Minnesota and potentially similar fraud in other states
Speaker
Donald J. Trump
Explanation
This involves identifying and recovering fraudulent government expenditures to help balance the budget
Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.
Related event

World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2026 at Davos
19 Jan 2026 08:00h - 23 Jan 2026 18:00h
Davos, Switzerland
