Scaling AI: Now Comes the Hard Part

20 Jan 2026 07:15h - 08:00h

Scaling AI: Now Comes the Hard Part

Session at a glance

Summary

This World Economic Forum panel discussion focused on scaling AI beyond pilot programs in large organizations, featuring CEOs from Philips, Visa, Aramco, and Accenture. The conversation revealed that while most companies have launched AI pilots, far fewer have successfully scaled them up, and those that have often encountered unexpected challenges.


The panelists emphasized that successful AI scaling requires focusing on concrete outcomes rather than just operational efficiencies. Roy Jakobs from Philips highlighted how AI in healthcare is reducing administrative burdens for nurses and clinicians, allowing them to spend more quality time with patients while improving diagnostic accuracy. Ryan McInerney from Visa discussed the emergence of agentic commerce, where AI agents will shop and purchase on behalf of consumers, requiring new trust mechanisms and payment protocols that Visa is developing through AI-ready cards and trusted agent protocols.


Amin Nasser from Aramco provided compelling evidence of AI’s business impact, reporting that the company achieved $6 billion in technology-realized value in recent years, with 50% being AI-related, through 500 use cases spanning from subsurface optimization to equipment reliability prediction. Julie Sweet from Accenture stressed that successful scaling requires viewing AI as “human in the lead, not human in the loop,” emphasizing that people must drive AI implementation rather than simply being part of the process.


Key barriers to scaling include the need for high-quality data foundations, reimagined business processes, and comprehensive talent development. The panelists agreed that scaling AI requires treating it as a business imperative rather than just a technology initiative, with strong leadership understanding and commitment being essential for enterprise-wide transformation.


Keypoints

Major Discussion Points:

Moving from AI pilots to scaled deployment: The discussion revealed that while most organizations have launched AI pilot programs, far fewer have successfully scaled them up, with those who have scaled encountering unexpected challenges along the way.


Focus on concrete outcomes rather than just productivity gains: All panelists emphasized the importance of measuring real business value and patient/customer outcomes, not just operational efficiencies. Examples included healthcare professionals getting more quality time with patients, pharmaceutical companies getting drugs to market faster, and energy companies achieving billions in measurable savings.


The critical role of data quality and infrastructure: Successful AI scaling requires robust data foundations built over time, proper technology stacks, and disciplined processes for moving from pilot to deployment. Companies without rich historical datasets face significant challenges in scaling AI effectively.


Agentic commerce as the next frontier: The emergence of AI agents that can shop, compare, and purchase on behalf of consumers represents a major shift in digital commerce, requiring new trust mechanisms, security protocols, and payment systems to enable autonomous transactions.


Human-centered AI implementation and talent development: Success requires “human in the lead, not human in the loop” approaches, with extensive leadership training, process reimagination, and collaboration across ecosystems. The technology must be understood deeply by leaders and practitioners to build trust and enable effective adoption.


Overall Purpose:

The discussion aimed to explore practical strategies and lessons learned for scaling AI beyond pilot programs in large organizations, focusing on real-world implementation challenges and measurable business outcomes across healthcare, financial services, and energy sectors.


Overall Tone:

The tone was consistently optimistic and pragmatic throughout. The panelists shared concrete examples and measurable results, demonstrating confidence in AI’s potential while acknowledging real implementation challenges. The conversation maintained a collaborative, knowledge-sharing atmosphere, with panelists building on each other’s insights and even expressing mutual admiration for approaches (as seen when Ryan McInerney joked about hiring Accenture after hearing Julie Sweet’s insights). The tone remained professional yet accessible, balancing technical depth with business practicality.


Speakers

Mat Honan: Moderator/Host of the panel discussion


Roy Jakobs: President and Chief Executive Officer of Royal Philips (Healthcare/Medical Technology)


Ryan McInerney: Chief Executive Officer of Visa (Financial Services/Payments)


Amin Nasser: President and Chief Executive Officer of Aramco (Energy/Oil & Gas)


Julie Sweet: Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Accenture (Technology Consulting/Professional Services)


Additional speakers:


None identified beyond the provided speakers names list.


Full session report

Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion

Executive Summary

This World Economic Forum panel discussion examined the challenge of scaling artificial intelligence beyond pilot programmes in large organisations. Moderated by Mat Honan, the conversation featured Roy Jakobs (CEO, Royal Philips), Ryan McInerney (CEO, Visa), Amin Nasser (CEO, Aramco), and Julie Sweet (CEO, Accenture).


Mat Honan opened with an audience poll revealing that while most attendees had AI pilots, far fewer had successfully scaled them enterprise-wide. The panellists shared concrete examples of how their organisations have moved beyond experimentation to achieve measurable business value through strategic AI implementation.


Key Discussion Themes

Moving from Pilots to Enterprise-Wide Implementation

The panel addressed the fundamental challenge highlighted by the opening poll – the gap between AI experimentation and successful scaling. Each speaker shared their organisation’s approach to bridging this gap.


Amin Nasser reported significant progress at Aramco, with over 500 AI use cases developed and 100 successfully moved from pilots to full deployment. He cited $6 billion in technology-realised value over 2023-2024, with 50% being AI-related, and projected $3-5 billion for 2025. Key applications include an intelligent earth model that increased productive drilling zones from 80% to 90%, corrosion prevention systems, and equipment reliability prediction.


Roy Jakobs emphasised the importance of process transformation rather than simply adding AI to existing workflows. He provided a specific example of ambient listening technology in patient rooms that automatically transcribes conversations, reducing administrative burden on healthcare workers who currently spend “15 to 20 minutes an hour on admin tasks” while patients receive only “five to seven minutes or three minutes” of quality time.


Julie Sweet shared an example from the pharmaceutical industry where AI reduced content compliance processes from months to days. She noted that over 90% of companies still need to complete foundational data work before effectively scaling AI applications.


Ryan McInerney discussed Visa’s development of AI-ready cards with user-defined parameters and trusted agent protocols to enable what he termed “agentic commerce” – AI agents that can shop and purchase on behalf of consumers.


Business-Led vs. Technology-Led Approaches

A consistent theme emerged around the importance of business leadership in AI initiatives. Amin Nasser emphasised that “it should be a business bull, not AI or IT bush,” meaning business units must drive AI projects rather than treating them as purely technical initiatives.


Julie Sweet stressed viewing AI through a business transformation lens rather than just technology implementation. She distinguished between “human in the lead, not human in the loop,” arguing that people must drive AI implementation rather than simply being part of the process.


Roy Jakobs noted that successful scaling requires equal investment in adoption as in technology development, stating organisations must focus on “spend at least as much time on the adoption as on the technology development.”


Focus on Outcomes Beyond Productivity

Julie Sweet challenged the prevailing narrative about AI being primarily a productivity tool, citing research showing that 78% of C-suite executives from last quarter believe AI helps growth more than productivity. She observed: “I think one of the things we’ve really learned is that we started a conversation around AI that was so focused on productivity and not actually the full outcome.”


Roy Jakobs provided healthcare examples demonstrating how AI creates value through improved patient care rather than just operational efficiency. He explained: “In healthcare, it’s all about how do you care better about the patient. The clinician wants to spend more quality time in also having the conversation, having the aftercare.”


Data Infrastructure and Quality

Multiple speakers emphasised data foundations as prerequisites for successful AI scaling. Julie Sweet noted that foundational data work remains incomplete for most companies, while Amin Nasser highlighted how Aramco’s 90-year history of high-quality data collection provides advantages in AI implementation.


The speakers agreed that organisations without rich historical datasets face significant challenges in achieving AI success comparable to companies with decades of structured data collection.


Future of Agentic Commerce

Ryan McInerney introduced the concept of agentic commerce, predicting that by 2026, AI platforms will have native buying capabilities. He argued this could “be an amazing leveller and empowerer for small businesses around the world” by breaking down discovery barriers that currently favour large corporations.


To enable this transformation, Visa has developed new infrastructure including AI-ready cards and trusted agent protocols for autonomous transactions while maintaining consumer protection.


Human-Centred Implementation and Standards

Roy Jakobs raised important questions about AI accuracy standards, noting: “We ask from AI before we adopt it in the practice, often that needs to be 95% accurate” while “a doctor gets his diagnosis right in 82% of the cases.” He argued for more realistic expectations and mentioned the National Academy of Medicine initiative for industry self-regulation.


All speakers emphasised that AI should augment rather than replace humans, requiring significant investment in training and talent development. Ryan McInerney shared that Visa found success through intensive, hands-on training for senior executives rather than broad democratisation of AI access.


Investment and Innovation

Amin Nasser mentioned Aramco’s venture capital arm with $7.5 billion available for investment, indicating the scale of commitment required for AI transformation. He emphasised the importance of third-party verification and measurement of AI value claims.


Key Takeaways

The discussion revealed several important principles for scaling AI:


Business Leadership: Successful AI scaling requires business units to lead initiatives rather than delegating to IT departments.


Process Transformation: Organisations must reimagine workflows rather than simply overlaying AI onto existing systems.


Data Foundations: Proper data infrastructure is essential, with most companies still needing to complete foundational work.


Realistic Standards: AI accuracy requirements should be contextually appropriate rather than arbitrarily high.


Human Augmentation: AI should enhance rather than replace human capabilities, requiring substantial training investment.


Outcome Focus: Success should be measured by meaningful business and human outcomes rather than just productivity metrics.


Final Insights

When asked about lessons learned that they wished they had known earlier, the panellists offered these key insights:


– Julie Sweet: “Human in the lead, not human in the loop”


– Amin Nasser: “It should be a business bull, not AI or IT bush”


– Ryan McInerney: Emphasised the critical importance of leader-led learning


– Roy Jakobs: “Spend at least as much time on the adoption as on the technology development”


Conclusion

The panel demonstrated that while technical capabilities are important, successful AI scaling depends primarily on organisational transformation, business leadership, and human-centred design principles. The concrete examples shared – from Aramco’s $6 billion in realised value to Philips’ ambient listening technology – show that moving beyond pilots requires fundamental changes in how organisations approach AI implementation.


The discussion highlighted that the future of enterprise AI lies not in replacing human capabilities but in augmenting them through thoughtful integration of technology with human expertise, supported by robust data foundations and business-led implementation strategies.


Session transcript

Mat Honan

Well, welcome, everyone. Welcome to our panel today on Scaling AI. Now comes the hard part.

This is part of the World Economic Forum’s AI Transformation of Industries Initiative. With $1.5 trillion in investment in 2025, the race to capture the full economic impact of AI is on. But scaling beyond pilots remains a major hurdle for many, many businesses.

It requires new strategies, new capabilities. We’ve got a great panel today who’s going to talk about that. Joining me, Roy Jakobs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Royal Phillips, Ryan McInerney, Chief Executive Officer of Visa, Amin Nasser, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aramco, and Julie Sweet, Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Accenture.

But before I start in with questions for you, I’ve got a question for the audience. How many people out here have tried, have launched a pilot program, an AI pilot program in your organization? Can I just see a show of hands from people who have?

That’s most of the people in the room. That’s definitely most people. And then if you have been able to scale those up, let me see those hands again.

A lot fewer, but more than I would have expected. Okay, okay. That’s about what I thought.

And then one more, just for those of you who have scaled up, how many of you ran into unexpected challenges? Same number. Okay, great.

So let’s talk a little bit today about scaling up AI. And I’m going to start off by, a lot happens every year. It seems like every year is 10 years in AI years.

And I’m wondering what’s possible with AI in 2026 that wasn’t possible a year or two ago. And Roy, I think we’ll start with you, and maybe I’ll ask that question about healthcare. Are there clinical, operational improvements that you’ve seen due to AI?

that it’s enabled in the past year or so?

Roy Jakobs

Yeah, I think actually AI in healthcare is going really fast. I think the need is urgent because we just don’t have enough people to take care of patients and people that need care. And therefore, I think the use of AI is finding its way and it’s finding its way to improve clinical outcomes.

For example, how can it help with better diagnosing a patient when you take an image, when you actually measure people through a monitor, how can you do better decision support for clinical interventions to make them more accurate, to prevent any mistakes to be made.

So actually augment the clinician with very fast and accurate data to support them in their daily work. And then there’s a big piece which is also about operational improvement because there’s a huge admin burden in healthcare and how can you actually take away some of those steps that nurses, technicians, doctors have to take that they really don’t want to spend their time on.

And that’s actually automating some of the workflow of the care pathways. And that’s where we see rapid improvement. For example, if you do ambience listening in a patient room, you don’t have to actually have the clinician taking notes.

It actually can be recorded at once. And then actually they can sign off the transcript and then actually they can move on in their job. If a nurse that actually spends 15 to 20 minutes an hour on admin tasks can be relieved by 10 or 15 minutes of that, she or he can spend that time on the patient.

So I think there’s real meaningful progress and you see rapid adoption as a result in healthcare of AI.

Mat Honan

I like this example of the nurse because that’s a concrete outcome that’s good for the patient, right? That’s not just something that’s good for the business, it’s good for everybody. Is that the way you view it?

Roy Jakobs

Yeah, I think. So we also describe it as how can you give time back to the practice, right? In healthcare, it’s all about how do you care better about the patient.

The clinician wants to spend more quality time in also having the conversation, having the kind of the aftercare from when you have a diagnosis, not only the hard fact of this is what you have, but also what does it mean?

How are we going to treat you? And the same with a nurse that wants to have. Actually quality time with the patient on average is five to seven minutes or three minutes that they can spend time That’s not a lot of time and actually patients need better quality time for them And that’s where we can give time back and AI and agents can give time back So it’s a different notion of you also improve productivity.

You also improve clinical outcomes But there’s also really quality aspect in giving something back to care that actually we have been Missing or it has become under bigger pressure because we just don’t have enough people to do the job

Mat Honan

And did you just go ahead Julie?

Julie Sweet

I would say Roy’s point is really important because I think one of the things we’ve really learned is that We started a conversation around AI that was so focused on productivity and not actually the full outcome So in a related industry in pharma We’re seeing the same thing where one of the biggest things when you take drugs to market is you have to comply all of the content to explain the drugs to Physicians you have to comply with lots of you know Regulations around the world most pharma companies have a lot of different, you know processes for that And so we are working with a pharma company where we standardize the processes.

We now have content They can do what took months to days so they’re able to get to market more quickly But actually the most interesting insight was that the people who used to spend time saying You know, how do I get legal approval are now spending time saying who needs this was the content helpful?

because before You know if once you got it approved the last thing you wanted to do was update the contents, you know And go through the same approval process and so much like the patient outcome. They’re spending more time Thinking about how to get the drug to the right places make sure they understand it, which of course helps revenue but it’s really helping patients and there are many examples of that across the globe in Different industries and different things where it’s not just productivity.

And in fact our latest survey. This is last quarter 78% of CEO the c-suite believe that AI is actually helping growth more than productivity like in terms of like the the value of it So I think it’s a really important part and that’s a learning over the last 12 months as you’ve started to see a lot of These things begin to scale

Mat Honan

Thank you, Ryan. I’m curious about agentic commerce. We’ve been hearing about it for a long time It seems like 2026 is the year that’s actually really going to take off or people are predicting it And I’m wondering what what you’re seeing is sort of the next big frontier there What are the what are the the challenges that you see coming with the with implementing that?

Ryan McInerney

So I think last year most users most consumers started to use these platforms and these AI’s to shop for things For discovery to look for, you know move off of maybe one of the search platforms or the commerce platforms But then they actually when they actually went to buy something they went to the native merchant seller site this year in 2026 I think most of us will continue to shop on our AI platform of choice But now we’ll be able to buy natively on the platform the buy button will be there.

I won’t need to leave Whether it’s you know, chat GPT or Gemini or Claude or a copilot or what have you? I think as we start to emerge from 2026 and look beyond That’s when you’ll start to see a shift of real agentic commerce. Not just me pressing the buy button on one of these platforms But me Empowering an agent on my behalf to go shop for something Find it and then buy it on my behalf, but for that to work to your question We need to invest in trust You need to trust your agent that they’re not gonna go crazy and buy something You don’t want to buy or spend more money than then you want to spend Merchants need to trust that if an agent is showing up You know at their digital doorstep that it’s actually there on your behalf and you’ve empowered it and your bank Needs to trust that when they get a request to authorize a transaction on your behalf that you really wanted that to happen So for that all to happen We are deploying AI ready cards AI ready visa cards around the world that empower users to set the parameters to so that they’ll trust their agent How much money can you spend?

What’s the size of the transaction? Where can you go buy? For how long do I want that open to buy to exist?

Things like that. We’ve rolled out a trusted agent protocol so that a merchant knows that if an agent is showing up on my behalf with a Visa card, that it’s a real one, with a real card. It’s actually empowered with the data payloads that I just described.

And that finally, we’ve rolled out a level of personalization so that all of us as Visa cardholders, if we choose, can empower our agent to look at our shopping history on my Visa cards and use that to personalize recommendations and shopping experiences and user journeys and those types of things.

So I think we’re on the brink of something that is gonna be very powerful. I think it’s gonna be a great time to be a consumer. Shopping’s gonna be easier, it’s gonna be more secure, it’s gonna be more fun, it’s gonna be more efficient.

And I think it’s gonna ultimately grow commerce and be a great thing for merchants around the world.

Mat Honan

Can I follow up a little bit on that last bit? When you’re talking about having an agent understand my purchasing history and transacting on my behalf, so would this be something like, it understands what I’m shopping for at the grocery store on a weekly basis or a monthly basis and goes out and does that for me?

It understands that, yes, it’s wintertime and maybe I’m starting to need a new coat. How far do you envision this going?

Ryan McInerney

Yeah, I think the collective data of your shopping history on your Visa card over time is very powerful. But historically, we haven’t had the tools and the surfaces to allow users to put that shopping history to work in a way that’s very empowering for the user. So imagine a world going forward where, for example, you go to your bank and you’re able to empower your agent via your bank to leverage your shopping history, to tailor those purchases.

What time of year do you make travel purchases? What are the type of restaurant purchases that you make? That allows, again, your agent to have much more context than what they’re able to do from your normal user profile.

Mat Honan

Amin, you were on a similar panel last year and I’m curious, compared to this time last year, were you seeing the most? meaningful change in what AI can support across your energy operations?

Amin Nasser

Absolutely. Last year I talked about 400 use cases that we came up with in Saudi Aramco. This year we’re talking about 500 use cases.

100 use cases went from the pilots to actual deployments. We measure our progress in terms of what we call a technology realized value every year. We used to have like $200 to $300 million in the previous years in terms of technology realized value.

In 2023 and 2024 we achieved $6 billion. 50% of that is AI related. 2025 we should publish our numbers next month after we finish the third party verification.

We’re looking at $3 to $5 billion. Also more than 50% is AI related. We’ve seen the benefits of the huge infrastructure that we have built over 90 years.

The 6,000 talents that we trained on AI. These are the subject matter experts that come up with the use cases. Not the data analysts.

We have a couple of hundreds of these. But it is the subject matter experts who understand where to create the pipeline for the opportunities. And the most important thing is we established the operation model.

Basically capitalizing on our digital company. We created a digital company. And the AI center of excellence which established the pathway for taking ideas from the front lines to full piloting and then full deployment.

Establishing the processes and taking it into account helped a lot in creating the pipeline. Now the pipeline keeps increasing year on year. We were looking at $2 to $4 billion a year.

Now the team is asking for a much bigger. target considering the pipeline of the opportunities. So I think the development, the training, we found out that we can scale much quickly.

And now the next step is working with the hyperscaler is how do we commercialize these outside Saudi Aramco to the market? Because this is very important and it has a significant impact. Everybody talks about AI, the impact of AI, but where is the value?

Where is in dollar figures? And this is what we are able to establish. We want to turn the energy sector to be more intelligent in terms of capitalizing on AI.

And we have the applications and the talents and the infrastructure. And the most important things in all of these is the data quality. If garbage in, garbage out.

If you don’t have the data quality, and we have built data quality over 90 years, we kept everything because we had the infrastructure that allowed us to scale now and be at this level. Another important element that also helped in all of these is we have a venture capital arm. That venture capital arm have more than $7.5 billion, approximately $7.5 billion for investment.

It find a lot of startups across the world. These startups, they want the injection of funds, but the most important things for them to buy it and scale their technology. And this is what we offer, not only funding, but we can scout for good technologies, a lot of it AI-related, and then help funding it and piloting it and scaling it up.

And this has really helped a lot. Without the venture capital, we could not scout around the world for a lot of opportunities and ideas.

Mat Honan

Can you talk at all specifically about where you found some of these savings, where you found some of this $3 to $5 billion you’re talking about?

Amin Nasser

Okay, a lot of the savings. See, upstream is a high cost, but the opportunities are huge. For example, if we use AI in…

on increasing productivity in the subsurface. We have what we call the intelligent earth model. We can basically increase the productive zone.

In the state of we used to have over 80%. Now we have over 90% of the productive zone. Capitalizing on AI.

We run in life, while we are geosteering the drill bits underground, the intelligent earth model, to understand where is the productive zone will be to replace our worlds. Increase the productivity in some worlds by 30 to 40%. That is huge.

It impacts not only your cost, it impacts also your emissions and how much you are emitting because you need less worlds. I talked last year about corrosion. It’s a $3 trillion market.

And it helped us a lot using AI to reduce the amount of corrosion inhibitors, the amount of pipeline failures, increased our reliability. If you look at AI used in equipment reliability and predicting failures and predicting when we need to take an equipment out of the surface before it has catastrophic failures, huge benefits in reducing downtime and increasing operation efficiency of our equipments.

If you look at pipelines in terms of inspections and how much we can save you to capitalize on AI, a lot of downstream, which is not as big as upstream, we created a system where it allows us to increase margin by looking at columns and maximizing the yield out of a column.

Instead of waiting for a console operator to make a decision, you can make the decisions in minutes and seconds now and change the yield. So there is a lot of opportunities that helped us, but each of them is treated like a project. with a timeline deliverable and the impact and this is what is important This is where we were able to scale because we can see the benefits and we can prioritize every use case before we take it from pilot to deployment and see the real value and when I mentioned the billions This is we didn’t even keep it for our team to decide.

This is how much we print for a third party They finish their work. As I said, we Hopefully next month they will give us the report in each item and how much is the saving that is AI related that is digital related or Is it captured right or it’s not captured right? so the real value is and of course the most important thing you need to reward the people and Recognizing them for all of these achievements and this is where the pipeline now is we just have to prioritize which one that we can take it to a pilot and to a deployment because the number of Ideas that came from these 6,000 that we trained is endless

Mat Honan

So I’m noticing a commonality here across all three of you which is that there is this real focus on outcomes that you mentioned versus, you know, just sort of Analyzing data and trying to find efficiencies where you can it’s it’s it’s interesting Julie You’ve got a unique view that’s brought across many companies And I’m curious since last year What would you say has changed the most and how Accenture and the large organizations that you work with are deploying AI at scale?

Julie Sweet

Well, you know, there’s a lot of insights actually in what Amin just said in terms of you know Where you know, where are we now in terms of scaling because there’s scaling Projects like an individual one and then there’s scale really across the enterprise And so Aramco is a great example of being able to scale across the company not only just you know a few projects And, you know, if you think about what Amin just said and you sort of extract that to industries what, you know, we’re helping clients do and I’ve got to see a lot of this firsthand with Aramco in terms of the discipline and what they do is that, first of all, they have the right technology stack.

And so AI has been a catalyst for companies to really look at their technology. Aramco couldn’t do what they did if they hadn’t been investing for years, right? And so the ability to, like, look at the tech stack and say, what do I really have to do?

And to do that at scale, data has been something that’s super expensive that for years people haven’t wanted to do and the companies that have done it early, like Aramco, think about a McDonald’s who, you know, created their data foundation very early and now they’re surging ahead in how they’re using it.

But in addition, it’s also about the operating model and the processes, which is what you also just heard. So now we’re working with a lot of clients who are saying, we have to really rethink, move from a project to how do we have to operate? How do we have to have our operations?

And then the biggest, one of the biggest barriers to scale has been the lack of discipline or willingness to say, I’m going to put a, I have to get a value on this. I have to be able to see it in my P&L. I have to be able to embed it in the objectives of my leaders.

All of these are like best practices where as companies have said, this is real, I’ve seen the value, you know, I really want to move ahead with that. And those are major transformations depending on where you start. And then when you think about what Ryan said, I mean, every place, every industry has battles that they must win.

So your best examples, I mean, we’re all in your core operations, subsurface, right? It’s not the, you’re doing plenty in the, you know, corporate functions, but that’s not where the real value is coming, right? If you are a consumer goods or retail, agenta commerce is a must win battle right now.

It’s a brand new channel. It’s rapidly evolving. It may be early because you can’t yet buy a ton in that way, but it’s going to move fast.

And so companies are looking at and saying, in many cases, there’s a huge opportunity before you get to advanced AI, right? Processes that aren’t standardized, too many spans and layers, but there are also must-win battles. And so there’s much more sophistication now and really not talking about AI, but going back to basics.

What’s my strategy? Are the basis of competition in my industry changing? And if so, I’ve got to focus there while I build out the foundation.

Mat Honan

All three of these companies that we – sitting to your left, or gentlemen sitting to your left – have these rich data sets that they’re able to dig into and look for places where they can find value.

What do you say to companies that are maybe newer, that don’t have those, or that – what’s the challenge for a company that doesn’t have that rich data set?

Julie Sweet

Well, keep in mind, the stats are pretty stark. Over 90% of the data work that companies have to do when you look across the globe is still to come. So we have to get very realistic about where we are.

And of course, the technology itself needs to continue to evolve. And so on the data foundation, though, it’s not optional, but it’s also – there’s brand new ways using AI to build a data foundation. But that work has to be done in order to scale.

And so when people say, why aren’t things scaling across the enterprise, you have to have the data. But there’s new ways to do it. And we are working with companies who are building up – creating investment capacity by doing what I said, like not – focusing on the basics.

I mean, things like fragmented processes, too many spans and layers in management, like too many people. Those are things that everyone could have been addressing over the last decade, and many companies have. But that’s a big opportunity today to make sure you’re doing that, to create the investment capacity to help fund this.

And we’re working with many companies where it’s two speeds. You get the foundation in place, make sure you’re using the technology you have, the AI that’s already built there, and then focus on where you need to have the data in the must-win battles.

Mat Honan

Ryan, I’m going to come back to you, if you don’t mind. I’m curious about agentic commerce, and I’m wondering what kind of opportunities that’s going to create for global payment systems that don’t exist right now.

Ryan McInerney

Well, I think Julie talked about must-wins for Visa. Agentic commerce is a must-win. You know, if you think kind of over the arc of time, like when e-commerce first happened, Visa was a huge part of making that happen.

Then you saw the rise of mobile commerce, and we put in place standards technology to make that happen, and now we see this kind of agentic commerce as this big third wave of digital commerce that will happen around the world.

I think it’s going to be an opportunity for a lot of different players to innovate, but, you know, you come back to this notion of truly scaling AI, that’s where we can play a unique role. You know, we have five billion Visa cards around the world. We have 175 million sellers on our platform.

We now have 13 or 14 billion Visa tokens in the digital ecosystem. That’s the kind of the basis of the platform on which we build this, and, you know, I think most people in the audience traveled here on Saturday or Sunday. They came up here to Davos.

They didn’t think about kind of how they were going to pay for stuff when they got here. They knew that they had a Visa card in their wallet, purse, or phone. They knew that it would work when they got here, and they, as they walk down the promenade and buy a coffee or a gift to bring home, they know that transaction’s going to work, and so does the seller.

They trust people from all different types of countries around the world. That’s the type of scale that we’re trying to put in place with agentic commerce in 200 countries and territories around the world, and, you know, when you ask about the opportunities, I have a thesis that agentic commerce could be an amazing leveler and empowerer for small businesses around the world.

Today most of our commerce happens as users on a small number of commerce platforms or search platforms. I believe once we all are using agents in the way that I described earlier to go search the world’s inventory to find the right item for my wife’s birthday, the right price for that maybe airplane ticket that I want to take or the right combination of features that I’m looking for, you have small businesses all around the world that have the ability to make their inventory available to make their services available and you know I think there’s a real chance that this third wave of digital commerce, this wave of agentic commerce will empower small businesses to grow significantly.

Small businesses in countries around the world I might not have found, a small business around the corner from where I live in my town in Northern California that I might not thought of to go buy running shoes because my default instinct was just to go to one of the larger commerce platforms.

So I think it’s a very, I mentioned earlier I think it’s a great time to be a consumer. I’m very excited about the rise of small and medium-sized businesses in this third wave of agentic commerce.

Mat Honan

Just to dig in on that a little bit, are you are you imagining a world where like I can understand the plane ticket example, you know I want to go to you know Ireland sometime in the early fall, please help me find the best week, identify the best week in plane tickets, but are you also saying that maybe agentic commerce will enable purchasing things that I don’t necessarily know about, like to the running shoes example, you know I don’t a brand that I’m not familiar with, you know something I wouldn’t even thought to ask it for?

Yeah absolutely.

Ryan McInerney

Speaking for myself as a consumer and I think on behalf of most consumers, our search window for the things that we buy is remarkably narrow given the availability of brands and inventory around the world.

Just think about your own user experiences and you know building on your running shoe example or whatever it is. Despite the fact of all these amazing brands and small businesses and products that are out there in the world, our search window remains remarkably narrow. With the power of AI, and with the proliferation of these platforms, users have the ability to search the world’s inventory in real time.

And I do think it’s gonna be a rise of brands that you and I might not otherwise have been aware of because of the narrowness of our search window. I think it’s gonna be the rise of small businesses like I was mentioning earlier, potentially even different types of trips that you might take. You know, you talked about kind of going to Ireland which week to go, but as you start to widen the aperture significantly on the different places that people could go, the different experiences that they might wanna go have, I think it’s gonna drive growth in commerce.

I think it’s gonna drive growth in spending. I think it’s gonna drive a much broader, if you will, democratization of spending, of all of our spending on goods and services around the world.

Mat Honan

Sticking with this idea of what’s coming next, Roy, I’m curious what breakthroughs in AI-enabled clinical insights or complex tasks, complex healthcare tasks that you see on the horizon that you think are coming.

Roy Jakobs

Yeah, maybe building on a theme of agents, I think the power of agents in the clinical practice will be really a breakthrough because there are so many tasks that currently have to be done that, as I said, are under time pressure.

There’s not a lot of data that can be put together easily and quickly. For example, if you’re a cancer patient, it starts with the scheduling, very mundane. How do I get into the system?

What is the information I need to get to? When you arrive in the hospital, how does the nurse or the clinician have the holistic patient view, pulling the data from all the different systems, not only the EMR, but then also the imaging data, then also the real-time data?

That can be done by an agent in preparation of the next step in the process. If you need to prepare a tumor board deliberation, currently it’s an extremely laborious process. Actually, that’s something an agent can do.

And I think, therefore, reimagining the future of healthcare is kind of how you work with workers and coworkers being agents together, because we just don’t have enough staff. We will not have enough radiologists, we will not have enough technicians, we will not have enough nurses. So we need to reinvent in the care pathway which are the tasks that actually we can give to an agent to reliably support the practice.

And actually that’s already being done now in smaller parts and what you will see this will grow in terms of which complete tasks they can do. They can do outbound calling. When you’re discharged and you’re at home, you’re recovering, there will be someone calling upon you.

Currently we don’t have the time to ask nurse to call you every day, every week. An agent can do that. That’s not a problem, right?

And they can actually exchange with you. They can listen to you. They can actually feed that back into the healthcare system to also, if you then combine it with monitoring on your body actually to have a more holistic view on how you are.

They can check in, but they also see the measurement. Now that actually will trigger a complete different system that becomes much more proactive than reactive. So I think the future of healthcare will be one in which we can be really much more at the forefront acting quicker because we can actually put the data together in a better way and then act upon it much faster.

But it does require to reimagine the process because we currently have, and I think that’s the big change and the big challenge. We really need to redefine how we work, right? When you are going to adopt new workers in your workforce, you need to rethink how the team is going to play together to do the same tasks.

And we have hardwired current tasks in processes, in IT systems, in standards, in job descriptions. So the real breakthrough in adoption will be actually adapting all of those because then you change the system versus changing one piece of it and then injecting AI and then, okay, if the person is open to AI, embraces it, goes with it, it will work.

But actually it should become a new way of working. And I think that’s where it’s turning to. And that’s a very, I think, interesting phase, but a hard phase because it requires all of us to do different things.

Breakthrough routines, and that’s the hardest thing, especially also if you talk about patients because you don’t want to break routines with a risk for patients, right? It needs to be reliable, it needs to be safe. So, that’s a component which really, of course, comes into this whole redefinition because you need to improve the practice from a reliability and a safety perspective, and I think you can.

But then you also need, and maybe that’s the last point, to be fair to AI. What we currently see is we are not always fair to AI. I’ll give you an example.

On average, a doctor gets his diagnosis right in 82% of the cases. We ask from AI before we adopt it in the practice, often that needs to be 95% accurate. That 13% gap between the AI accuracy and the clinician’s accuracy is a huge patient impact, right?

So, we need to find a trade-off in terms of where do you put the boundary about where AI kind of can be set free in a safe way versus kind of where you protect also patient interest, patient privacy. And that’s, I think, where we are moving towards learning together. With an ecosystem, and maybe building on what you said earlier, how can people that don’t have access to the data set contribute?

This is a real ecosystem play. As Philips, we cannot improve the healthcare practice alone. We are one of many actors in the system.

So, we need to work with open platforms, with open systems. We need to adopt others’ AI into our workflows, and we need to work very closely with regulators, with the clinicians, with the healthcare systems, and with other kind of companies that are innovating in this space to see what the best is, how we can move it forward in a more standardized way.

And I think that’s where we need to really collaborate. And that’s, I think, the other piece of AI where people often forget, okay, this is a technical play. No, it’s a collaboration.

It’s really a collaborative play, and the power of AI really comes forward if actually we rally around it together and not do our own technical stuff, because we can do that, but then actually we’ll not land, because the system only changes if you change all the parameters.

Mat Honan

I’m glad you came back to reliability so many times there. You spoke about it again and again, because I think that’s one of the concerns that… As a healthcare consumer, I’m going to have, right, it’s a natural thing that I want to make sure that these systems that you’re implementing are reliable.

How do you ensure that to patients, to healthcare consumers?

Roy Jakobs

Yeah, I think it’s extremely important we talk about trust and trust in AI. So as an example, we had the National Academy of Medicine building an initiative where we have worked across industry. Some are in this room as well.

We had Mayo, we had Google, we had Philips, we had patient advocate groups looking together at kind of what code of self-conduct we should apply in applying healthcare or AI into healthcare. Because what we also realize is regulation cannot keep up with the speed of technology. So we need to be ahead of regulation and self-regulate.

So we need to have our own kind of rules, how we test, how we validate, what is the level of kind of rigor we apply, what is the kind of the practices, but also from biases that we take into account. So actually this is something that we own. You have your own accountability, you have an accountability as an industry, so the healthcare industry together, and actually by applying and living that self-conduct, we can make sure that this actually lives by the practice of good data.

I will also give the other example. I often give the example of say, if you are a cancer patient, again, you’re in phase three or four, data privacy has a complete different meaning to you than if you’re healthy. That really, because when you’re there, I can guarantee you, you want every data set in the world to be used to find the cure for you.

So we also need to keep that perspective in mind of the patient that he also has a right to get access to the data of the world so that we can innovate on those data. And you can do that anonymously, you can do that in a way that actually it doesn’t touch in any way to privacy, but we need to break through. And that’s something we need to do in Europe, that’s something we need to do in the world, because the power of that data play is where we will find really the next frontier of solving healthcare challenges in the world.

Mat Honan

Excellent point. Mat Honan, can I? Please.

Julie Sweet

You know, one thing that, as you’re thinking about, what we haven’t talked about is talent because I agree with, I mean, Roy, like the point around process and having to reimagine things, the point around this collaboration, but to reimagine, you have to understand the technology in a depth because if you’re thinking about in healthcare and you say, I’ve hardwired this, I’ve done this for years, we know this works.

The doctors have to understand the technology, right? The regulators have to understand the technology and, you know, you have to have the leadership that is then going to embrace the innovation, right? And you know, when we talk about AI is hard, all of these things like rewiring the process is really hard, but you have to have a different level of understanding than you did in the digital era.

And that is a big barrier for organizations and it’s also a barrier to building trust because it’s hard to trust something, you know, whether you’re a consumer, a regulator, a doctor, a leader of a health system until you understand it.

And there’s a lot more that has to be done kind of at all levels of the corporate world, government, educational systems to, you know, really build in that kind of level of understanding. At Accenture, we talk about leader-led learning, like we started actually with our leaders because we said we can’t rotate our business if our leaders don’t understand the power of it. So there is still so much ahead to do at companies in order to ever be able to scale and to really get the value out of AI and to move away from what’s often very incremental.

And you know, companies ask me all the time, how am I going to operate in three years and five years? And the focus really has to be, are you able to do something you can’t do today? Or do you have insights that you can’t do today?

And that requires a depth of understanding of the technology and its power that a lot of us, you know, are still working on.

Mat Honan

I love that quote. I’m gonna come back to that at the end here. Amin, I’m gonna ask you the same question about looking towards the future.

One of the things that we’ve covered a lot in the past year, year and a half, are the energy demands of AI. You sort of have a maybe a different perspective on that and I’m curious where you see, you know, AI creating new opportunities for integrated energy systems in the coming years. To sort of take the, you know, I think a lot of what I see day-to-day, especially in the United States, is, you know, it’s concerns about data centers, concerns about about their power requirements, but maybe if you could talk a little about how AI is going to enable some new opportunities there.

Amin Nasser

I think the opportunities enabled by AI is endless, as I said. You know, the only issues you need to continue to train more people in terms of understanding AI, and I always say you cannot scale without scaling the talents and the people. It’s not about, it’s about creating value, it’s not about eliminating people.

This is the model that needs to be used when you look at the future and what needs to be done. And I think demonstrating is very important, the use cases, because a lot of people question what is the value. It’s not about buying ships and GPUs and it’s ensuring that you have the system, the data qualities.

People think that they can, by bringing ships and GPUs and installing them, you can create value. No, it’s about also creating the talents and making sure that you have the data quality that will help you. What we think of the future is that we will be working with Hyperscaler because the models and the use cases and the pilots that we scale can be adopted across the industry.

We can get to autonomous operation over in the future without losing control of our operation or safety, which is very important. We are running in a business that is very accident could happen. So I think demonstrating the value that can be created while maintaining operation control and the safety of the plants, you know, we are running and taking that with hyperscaler and also our planned investment now in Humane in the Kingdom, which will help not only nationally but internationally in terms of data centers on all of it.

I think the use of AI in every aspect of operation is there, but more value is not in finance or in translation or in legal. The more value that we see is in real operation when you look at the way you are doing certain things. This is where we put the billions of dollars in our operation.

You know, if you think about it, our capital program is 50 to 60 billion dollars. Today, I have 100 billion dollars under construction. Imagine the integration and the value that you can create across everything that you do by adopting AI.

But this is to create for the enterprise, for Aramco and Aramco Group. But for the future, you need to see that intelligence in terms of running the operation scaled up across the industry. I think we are better off working with hyperscalers who have the access to the global industries to scale.

Because a lot of what also we adopt and we scale is not only good for the energy industry. It’s good for other industries. It’s good for so many other industries.

But hyperscalers that have access to all of these industries other than our energy industry can play a role. But it is all about creating the right operation model. The pipeline.

the decision-making in terms of kill, pilot, or scale. You need to have a quick decision-making. Otherwise, if you don’t have the right process to review, prioritize, kill if need to be killed, if it’s not good to pilot or scale, or even during pilots, you know, you need to make decisions quickly.

But you need to create the right operation model in your establishment for you to be able to create the value that we are seeing today. And this is what we are hoping through working with hyberscalers in the industry. Accenture is a good example.

You know, we are trying to group our use cases and see which industry might be the best user of them and how we can scale this across.

Mat Honan

We only have a couple minutes or a few minutes left. And so I’m going to ask each of you to maybe answer the same question. And I’m going to start with you, Julie, which is, so what lessons have you learned, especially over the past year or two years, about scaling AI that you wish you had known earlier?

And please do answer quickly because we just have a couple minutes.

Julie Sweet

I think it’s about human in the lead, not human in the loop. We will inspire people and we will run companies with people and they will have a greater technology landscape. But we need to completely change the narrative to inspire people to paint the future.

It is human in the lead, not human in the loop.

Amin Nasser

It should be a business bull, not AI or IT bush. If the business is not involved, you can buy it, you can scale, but you cannot have it across the whole establishment. So the business needs to be involved from day one for it to capture the whole value across the establishment and the group.

Ryan McInerney

I didn’t realize it until 10 minutes ago, but I should have hired Accenture. What Julie said, it hit me like 10 minutes ago, what Julie said about leader-led is so true at Visa. Like, we went so fast by trying to democratize access to all of these LLMs across the company.

I preached it from the top. The whole leadership team, we talked about it for about 18 months. And we didn’t really see the breakthrough until we got our top 300 people in the room for two days, and we forced them to go through hands-on keyboard training, build agents, be supervised, be evaluated.

And to your earlier point, once those top 300 leaders had confidence to build, use agents, and then lead their teams, that was the unlock for us. And I wish I would have known it earlier. I heard it.

Julie Sweet

There’s still time, right?

Ryan McInerney

I know.

Julie Sweet

There’s still time.

Ryan McInerney

I’m learning. I’m always learning. And this panel was no exception.

Roy Jakobs

I would say spend at least as much time on the adoption as on the technology development. I think we’re overexcited often by technology, and we’re a technology company, so definitely speaking to myself. But actually, if you want to have a really driving impact, think about how you get it being worked with, which means that from the first moment you start to develop the technology, think about how it lands in the practice.

So adoption is ultimately where success is measured. And actually, you need to design that in from the get-go. And that is much less about technology, much more about understanding the practice that it will actually serve, and actually how we then indeed rally the humans around it that run that business or run that practice.

I think that’s something that we have been learning in the last few years.

Mat Honan

Well, thank you all so much. I think we kind of came back to the same place we started, about thinking about outcomes and not just operations. You said something that I wrote down because I thought it was so great, which is it is hard to trust something until you understand it.

I think we’ve all come away with a lot better understanding about scaling AI in large organizations. Thank you so much, everyone.

M

Mat Honan

Speech speed

192 words per minute

Speech length

1257 words

Speech time

392 seconds

Need for new strategies and capabilities beyond pilot programs

Explanation

Mat Honan introduces the panel by highlighting that while many organizations have launched AI pilot programs, scaling beyond pilots remains a major hurdle. He emphasizes that capturing the full economic impact of AI requires developing new strategies and capabilities specifically for scaling.


Evidence

Audience poll showing most people had tried AI pilot programs but fewer had successfully scaled them up, and those who scaled encountered unexpected challenges


Major discussion point

AI Implementation and Scaling Challenges


Topics

Economic | Development


Rich historical datasets provide competitive advantages in AI implementation

Explanation

Mat Honan observes that the three companies represented (Philips, Visa, and Aramco) all have rich datasets they can leverage for AI value creation. He questions what challenges face companies that don’t have access to such comprehensive historical data.


Evidence

Reference to the data advantages of the three companies on the panel and their ability to find value through AI applications


Major discussion point

Data Quality and Infrastructure Requirements


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Infrastructure


R

Roy Jakobs

Speech speed

198 words per minute

Speech length

1971 words

Speech time

595 seconds

AI addresses urgent healthcare staffing shortages by augmenting clinicians

Explanation

Roy Jakobs argues that AI implementation in healthcare is accelerating because of urgent staffing needs, with insufficient people available to provide patient care. AI serves to augment clinicians rather than replace them, helping address this critical shortage.


Evidence

Healthcare industry facing shortage of radiologists, technicians, and nurses; AI helping with better diagnosing through imaging and monitoring


Major discussion point

AI’s Impact on Healthcare Operations


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Julie Sweet
– Ryan McInerney
– Amin Nasser

Agreed on

Importance of talent development and human-centric approaches


Automation of administrative tasks gives healthcare workers more patient time

Explanation

Roy Jakobs emphasizes that AI can automate administrative burdens in healthcare, freeing up clinicians to spend more quality time with patients. This represents a shift from productivity gains to improved patient care outcomes.


Evidence

Nurses spending 15-20 minutes per hour on admin tasks could be relieved by 10-15 minutes; ambient listening technology for automatic note-taking; average patient interaction time of only 3-7 minutes


Major discussion point

AI’s Impact on Healthcare Operations


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Julie Sweet
– Amin Nasser

Agreed on

Focus on outcomes and value creation rather than just technology implementation


Disagreed with

– Amin Nasser
– Julie Sweet

Disagreed on

Primary source of AI value creation


AI enables better clinical decision support and diagnostic accuracy

Explanation

Roy Jakobs argues that AI provides clinicians with fast and accurate data to support daily work, improving diagnostic capabilities and clinical interventions. This augmentation helps prevent mistakes and improves overall clinical outcomes.


Evidence

AI assistance with image analysis, patient monitoring, and clinical decision support for more accurate interventions


Major discussion point

AI’s Impact on Healthcare Operations


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Future healthcare will use agents for complete task automation and proactive care

Explanation

Roy Jakobs envisions a future where AI agents handle complete healthcare tasks, from scheduling and data aggregation to outbound patient calling and monitoring. This will enable a shift from reactive to proactive healthcare delivery.


Evidence

Examples include tumor board preparation, holistic patient data aggregation, post-discharge patient calling, and integration with body monitoring for proactive interventions


Major discussion point

AI’s Impact on Healthcare Operations


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Need for industry self-regulation and trust-building in healthcare AI

Explanation

Roy Jakobs argues that the healthcare industry must establish self-regulation standards for AI implementation since regulation cannot keep up with technology advancement. Building trust requires fair evaluation standards and collaborative ecosystem approaches.


Evidence

National Academy of Medicine initiative with Mayo, Google, Philips, and patient advocates; example of doctors having 82% diagnostic accuracy while AI is often required to achieve 95% accuracy


Major discussion point

AI’s Impact on Healthcare Operations


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Disagreed with

– Amin Nasser

Disagreed on

Approach to AI safety and accuracy standards


Requirement to spend equal time on adoption as on technology development

Explanation

Roy Jakobs emphasizes that successful AI implementation requires dedicating as much effort to user adoption and change management as to the technical development itself. Technology companies often focus too heavily on the technical aspects while neglecting how the technology will be integrated into actual practice.


Evidence

Need to design adoption from the beginning, understand the practice the technology will serve, and rally humans around the technology


Major discussion point

AI Implementation and Scaling Challenges


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Julie Sweet
– Amin Nasser

Agreed on

Need for business-led rather than IT-led AI initiatives


J

Julie Sweet

Speech speed

182 words per minute

Speech length

1556 words

Speech time

510 seconds

Focus on growth outcomes rather than just productivity improvements

Explanation

Julie Sweet argues that the AI conversation has evolved beyond just productivity gains to focus on full business outcomes including growth. She emphasizes that 78% of CEOs now believe AI helps growth more than productivity, representing a significant shift in perspective.


Evidence

Pharma company example where AI reduced content compliance from months to days, allowing staff to focus on drug distribution and patient outcomes; latest survey showing 78% of C-suite executives believe AI helps growth more than productivity


Major discussion point

Measuring and Demonstrating AI Value


Topics

Economic | Development


Agreed with

– Roy Jakobs
– Amin Nasser

Agreed on

Focus on outcomes and value creation rather than just technology implementation


Disagreed with

– Amin Nasser
– Roy Jakobs

Disagreed on

Primary source of AI value creation


Over 90% of necessary data foundation work for companies remains to be done

Explanation

Julie Sweet points out that despite the focus on AI scaling, the vast majority of data infrastructure work that companies need for effective AI implementation has not yet been completed. This represents both a challenge and an opportunity for organizations.


Evidence

Statistic that over 90% of data work across companies globally is still to come; examples of companies like McDonald’s and Aramco who invested early in data foundations and are now surging ahead


Major discussion point

Data Quality and Infrastructure Requirements


Topics

Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Amin Nasser

Agreed on

Critical importance of data quality and infrastructure for AI success


Companies need proper technology stacks and data foundations before scaling AI

Explanation

Julie Sweet emphasizes that successful AI scaling requires companies to have the right technology infrastructure and data foundations in place. AI has become a catalyst for companies to seriously examine and upgrade their underlying technology capabilities.


Evidence

Examples of Aramco and McDonald’s who invested early in data foundations; emphasis on need for proper tech stack and data foundation as prerequisites for scaling


Major discussion point

Data Quality and Infrastructure Requirements


Topics

Infrastructure | Economic


AI should enable capabilities that weren’t possible before, not just incremental improvements

Explanation

Julie Sweet argues that companies should focus on whether AI enables them to do something completely new or gain insights that were previously impossible, rather than just making incremental improvements to existing processes. This represents a more transformational approach to AI implementation.


Evidence

Question posed to companies: ‘are you able to do something you can’t do today? Or do you have insights that you can’t do today?’


Major discussion point

Measuring and Demonstrating AI Value


Topics

Economic | Development


Human-in-the-lead approach rather than human-in-the-loop mentality

Explanation

Julie Sweet advocates for a fundamental shift in how organizations think about AI and human collaboration. Instead of viewing humans as merely part of the AI process, she argues for keeping humans in leadership roles while expanding their technology capabilities.


Major discussion point

Organizational Transformation for AI


Topics

Sociocultural | Economic


Agreed with

– Roy Jakobs
– Ryan McInerney
– Amin Nasser

Agreed on

Importance of talent development and human-centric approaches


Leaders must understand technology deeply to drive organizational transformation

Explanation

Julie Sweet emphasizes that successful AI scaling requires leaders to have a much deeper understanding of the technology than was needed in previous digital transformations. This understanding is essential for building trust, making informed decisions, and leading organizational change effectively.


Evidence

Accenture’s focus on ‘leader-led learning’ starting with company leaders; emphasis that leaders can’t transform business without understanding AI’s power; requirement for depth of understanding to build trust


Major discussion point

Organizational Transformation for AI


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Roy Jakobs
– Amin Nasser

Agreed on

Need for business-led rather than IT-led AI initiatives


R

Ryan McInerney

Speech speed

198 words per minute

Speech length

1558 words

Speech time

471 seconds

2026 will see native buying capabilities on AI platforms without leaving the platform

Explanation

Ryan McInerney predicts that 2026 will mark a significant shift where consumers can complete purchases directly within AI platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude, without needing to navigate to separate merchant websites. This represents the next evolution from discovery-only AI shopping to complete transaction capabilities.


Evidence

Contrast with current behavior where users discover products on AI platforms but must leave to complete purchases on native merchant sites


Major discussion point

Agentic Commerce and Payment Systems


Topics

Economic | Infrastructure


Future agents will shop and purchase autonomously on behalf of users

Explanation

Ryan McInerney envisions a future where AI agents will be empowered to autonomously search, evaluate, and purchase products on behalf of users without direct human intervention for each transaction. This represents true agentic commerce where agents act as trusted purchasing representatives.


Evidence

Vision of agents that can ‘go shop for something, find it and then buy it on my behalf’ with user-defined parameters and constraints


Major discussion point

Agentic Commerce and Payment Systems


Topics

Economic | Infrastructure


Trust infrastructure requires AI-ready cards with user-defined parameters

Explanation

Ryan McInerney argues that successful agentic commerce depends on building trust infrastructure including AI-ready Visa cards that allow users to set specific parameters for agent purchases. This includes spending limits, transaction sizes, merchant restrictions, and time-based controls to ensure agents operate within user-defined boundaries.


Evidence

AI-ready Visa cards with user-settable parameters for spending limits, transaction sizes, merchant locations, and time duration; trusted agent protocol for merchant verification; 5 billion Visa cards and 175 million sellers on platform


Major discussion point

Agentic Commerce and Payment Systems


Topics

Economic | Cybersecurity


Agentic commerce could democratize access for small businesses globally

Explanation

Ryan McInerney believes that agentic commerce will level the playing field for small businesses by allowing AI agents to search the world’s entire inventory rather than being limited to major commerce platforms. This could enable small businesses globally to compete more effectively with larger retailers.


Evidence

Current narrow search windows despite global inventory availability; potential for agents to discover small businesses and brands that consumers wouldn’t normally find; examples of local running shoe stores competing with major platforms


Major discussion point

Agentic Commerce and Payment Systems


Topics

Economic | Development


Consumers will have access to much broader inventory through AI-powered search

Explanation

Ryan McInerney argues that AI will dramatically expand consumers’ search capabilities beyond their typically narrow search windows, enabling discovery of products, brands, and experiences they would never have found through traditional commerce platforms. This will drive growth in commerce and democratize spending globally.


Evidence

Observation that consumer search windows remain ‘remarkably narrow given the availability of brands and inventory around the world’; potential for discovering new travel destinations and experiences


Major discussion point

Agentic Commerce and Payment Systems


Topics

Economic | Sociocultural


Need for leader-led learning and hands-on training at executive levels

Explanation

Ryan McInerney learned that democratizing AI access across the company wasn’t sufficient until top leadership received intensive, hands-on training. The breakthrough came when the top 300 leaders spent two days building agents and being evaluated, which then enabled them to confidently lead their teams in AI adoption.


Evidence

Visa’s experience with top 300 leaders receiving two days of hands-on keyboard training, building agents, and being supervised and evaluated; this was the ‘unlock’ for company-wide adoption


Major discussion point

AI Implementation and Scaling Challenges


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Roy Jakobs
– Julie Sweet
– Amin Nasser

Agreed on

Importance of talent development and human-centric approaches


A

Amin Nasser

Speech speed

150 words per minute

Speech length

1718 words

Speech time

685 seconds

High-quality data accumulated over decades enables successful AI scaling

Explanation

Amin Nasser emphasizes that Saudi Aramco’s success in AI scaling is built on 90 years of high-quality data infrastructure and collection. He stresses that without proper data quality, AI initiatives will fail regardless of investment in hardware and technology.


Evidence

90 years of data infrastructure at Saudi Aramco; principle of ‘garbage in, garbage out’ – emphasizing that data quality is fundamental to AI success


Major discussion point

Data Quality and Infrastructure Requirements


Topics

Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Julie Sweet

Agreed on

Critical importance of data quality and infrastructure for AI success


Concrete measurement of AI impact through third-party verified savings

Explanation

Amin Nasser demonstrates the importance of rigorous measurement by having third-party verification of AI-generated savings. Saudi Aramco achieved $6 billion in technology realized value in 2023-2024, with 50% being AI-related, and expects $3-5 billion in 2025.


Evidence

Specific figures: $6 billion technology realized value in 2023-2024 (50% AI-related), projected $3-5 billion for 2025; third-party verification process; growth from 400 to 500 use cases with 100 moving from pilots to deployment


Major discussion point

Measuring and Demonstrating AI Value


Topics

Economic | Legal and regulatory


Disagreed with

– Roy Jakobs

Disagreed on

Approach to AI safety and accuracy standards


Real value comes from operational applications rather than administrative functions

Explanation

Amin Nasser argues that while AI can be applied to administrative functions like finance and legal, the real substantial value comes from applying AI to core operational processes. This is where the billions of dollars in savings are generated.


Evidence

Examples include intelligent earth model increasing productive zones from 80% to 90%, 30-40% productivity increases in some wells, corrosion reduction, equipment reliability prediction, and downstream margin optimization


Major discussion point

Measuring and Demonstrating AI Value


Topics

Economic | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Roy Jakobs
– Julie Sweet

Agreed on

Focus on outcomes and value creation rather than just technology implementation


Disagreed with

– Julie Sweet
– Roy Jakobs

Disagreed on

Primary source of AI value creation


Importance of establishing proper operating models and processes for scaling

Explanation

Amin Nasser emphasizes that successful AI scaling requires establishing clear operational models, including processes for moving ideas from frontlines to pilots to full deployment. This includes having clear decision-making processes for prioritizing, piloting, or killing projects.


Evidence

Creation of digital company and AI center of excellence; established pathway from ideas to deployment; process for quick decision-making on kill, pilot, or scale decisions; $7.5 billion venture capital arm for scouting and funding AI startups


Major discussion point

AI Implementation and Scaling Challenges


Topics

Economic | Development


Talent development and training are essential for successful AI scaling

Explanation

Amin Nasser stresses that scaling AI requires scaling talent development, with 6,000 subject matter experts trained on AI at Saudi Aramco. He emphasizes that AI should create value and augment people rather than eliminate jobs, requiring continuous investment in human capability development.


Evidence

6,000 subject matter experts trained on AI; emphasis that ‘you cannot scale without scaling the talents and the people’; focus on creating value rather than eliminating people


Major discussion point

Organizational Transformation for AI


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Roy Jakobs
– Julie Sweet
– Ryan McInerney

Agreed on

Importance of talent development and human-centric approaches


Focus on business involvement from day one rather than treating it as an IT initiative

Explanation

Amin Nasser argues that AI scaling must be driven by business units rather than IT departments. Without business involvement from the beginning, organizations may be able to buy and implement technology but cannot capture value across the entire establishment.


Evidence

Emphasis that it should be ‘business bull, not AI or IT bush’; requirement for business involvement to capture value across the whole establishment and group


Major discussion point

AI Implementation and Scaling Challenges


Topics

Economic | Development


Agreed with

– Roy Jakobs
– Julie Sweet

Agreed on

Need for business-led rather than IT-led AI initiatives


Agreements

Agreement points

Focus on outcomes and value creation rather than just technology implementation

Speakers

– Roy Jakobs
– Julie Sweet
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

Automation of administrative tasks gives healthcare workers more patient time


Focus on growth outcomes rather than just productivity improvements


Real value comes from operational applications rather than administrative functions


Summary

All three speakers emphasized that successful AI implementation must focus on meaningful business and human outcomes rather than just technological capabilities or productivity metrics. They advocate for measuring real-world impact and value creation.


Topics

Economic | Development


Critical importance of data quality and infrastructure for AI success

Speakers

– Julie Sweet
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

Over 90% of necessary data foundation work for companies remains to be done


High-quality data accumulated over decades enables successful AI scaling


Summary

Both speakers strongly emphasized that proper data foundations are essential prerequisites for successful AI scaling, with Nasser highlighting Aramco’s 90-year data advantage and Sweet noting that most companies still need to build their data infrastructure.


Topics

Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory


Need for business-led rather than IT-led AI initiatives

Speakers

– Roy Jakobs
– Julie Sweet
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

Requirement to spend equal time on adoption as on technology development


Leaders must understand technology deeply to drive organizational transformation


Focus on business involvement from day one rather than treating it as an IT initiative


Summary

All speakers agreed that successful AI scaling requires business leadership and deep organizational involvement rather than treating AI as purely a technical or IT initiative. They emphasized the need for business-driven adoption and change management.


Topics

Development | Economic


Importance of talent development and human-centric approaches

Speakers

– Roy Jakobs
– Julie Sweet
– Ryan McInerney
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

AI addresses urgent healthcare staffing shortages by augmenting clinicians


Human-in-the-lead approach rather than human-in-the-loop mentality


Need for leader-led learning and hands-on training at executive levels


Talent development and training are essential for successful AI scaling


Summary

All speakers emphasized that AI should augment rather than replace humans, requiring significant investment in training and talent development. They advocate for keeping humans in leadership roles while expanding their technological capabilities.


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Similar viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized that successful AI adoption requires intensive, hands-on training for senior leadership, not just general awareness or delegation to technical teams. They both learned that democratizing AI access isn’t sufficient without deep leadership understanding and commitment.

Speakers

– Julie Sweet
– Ryan McInerney

Arguments

Leaders must understand technology deeply to drive organizational transformation


Need for leader-led learning and hands-on training at executive levels


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Both speakers emphasized the importance of establishing rigorous standards and verification processes for AI implementation, whether through industry self-regulation or third-party validation, to build trust and demonstrate real value.

Speakers

– Roy Jakobs
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

Need for industry self-regulation and trust-building in healthcare AI


Concrete measurement of AI impact through third-party verified savings


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Economic


Both speakers argued for transformational rather than incremental approaches to AI, focusing on breakthrough capabilities and core operational improvements rather than marginal administrative efficiencies.

Speakers

– Julie Sweet
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

AI should enable capabilities that weren’t possible before, not just incremental improvements


Real value comes from operational applications rather than administrative functions


Topics

Economic | Development


Unexpected consensus

Trust and reliability standards for AI systems

Speakers

– Roy Jakobs
– Ryan McInerney

Arguments

Need for industry self-regulation and trust-building in healthcare AI


Trust infrastructure requires AI-ready cards with user-defined parameters


Explanation

Despite coming from very different industries (healthcare vs. payments), both speakers independently emphasized the critical need for building trust infrastructure and establishing reliability standards. This consensus across such different sectors suggests trust is a universal challenge for AI scaling.


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Cybersecurity


Ecosystem collaboration and open platforms

Speakers

– Roy Jakobs
– Ryan McInerney
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

Need for industry self-regulation and trust-building in healthcare AI


Agentic commerce could democratize access for small businesses globally


Importance of establishing proper operating models and processes for scaling


Explanation

All three industry leaders emphasized the need for collaborative, ecosystem-wide approaches rather than proprietary solutions. This consensus on openness and collaboration was unexpected given their competitive business contexts.


Topics

Economic | Development


Overall assessment

Summary

The speakers demonstrated remarkable consensus on fundamental principles of AI scaling: focus on outcomes over technology, importance of data quality and business leadership, need for human-centric approaches, and requirements for trust and collaboration. Despite representing different industries, they shared similar lessons learned about the challenges of moving from pilots to scaled implementation.


Consensus level

High level of consensus with strong alignment on strategic approaches to AI scaling. The implications suggest that successful AI scaling follows universal principles regardless of industry, emphasizing the maturation of AI implementation best practices across sectors. This consensus provides a strong foundation for cross-industry learning and standardization of AI scaling methodologies.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Primary source of AI value creation

Speakers

– Amin Nasser
– Julie Sweet
– Roy Jakobs

Arguments

Real value comes from operational applications rather than administrative functions


Focus on growth outcomes rather than just productivity improvements


Automation of administrative tasks gives healthcare workers more patient time


Summary

Amin Nasser emphasizes that substantial value comes from core operational processes rather than administrative functions, while Roy Jakobs demonstrates significant value from automating administrative healthcare tasks, and Julie Sweet focuses on growth outcomes beyond just operational efficiency


Topics

Economic | Development


Approach to AI safety and accuracy standards

Speakers

– Roy Jakobs
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

Need for industry self-regulation and trust-building in healthcare AI


Concrete measurement of AI impact through third-party verified savings


Summary

Roy argues for industry self-regulation and questions overly strict accuracy requirements for AI (noting doctors are 82% accurate while AI is required to be 95% accurate), while Amin emphasizes rigorous third-party verification and measurement standards


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Unexpected differences

Role of administrative vs operational AI applications

Speakers

– Amin Nasser
– Roy Jakobs

Arguments

Real value comes from operational applications rather than administrative functions


Automation of administrative tasks gives healthcare workers more patient time


Explanation

This disagreement is unexpected because both speakers are from operational industries (energy and healthcare), yet they have opposing views on where AI creates the most value. Amin dismisses administrative applications while Roy demonstrates substantial patient care improvements through administrative automation


Topics

Economic | Development


Overall assessment

Summary

The speakers show remarkable consensus on the fundamental challenges and requirements for AI scaling, with disagreements primarily centered on implementation approaches and value prioritization rather than core principles


Disagreement level

Low to moderate disagreement level. The speakers largely agree on the need for proper data foundations, leadership involvement, and outcome-focused approaches. Disagreements are mainly tactical rather than strategic, focusing on where to prioritize efforts and how to measure success. This suggests a maturing field where practitioners are converging on best practices while still developing industry-specific approaches.


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Similar viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized that successful AI adoption requires intensive, hands-on training for senior leadership, not just general awareness or delegation to technical teams. They both learned that democratizing AI access isn’t sufficient without deep leadership understanding and commitment.

Speakers

– Julie Sweet
– Ryan McInerney

Arguments

Leaders must understand technology deeply to drive organizational transformation


Need for leader-led learning and hands-on training at executive levels


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Both speakers emphasized the importance of establishing rigorous standards and verification processes for AI implementation, whether through industry self-regulation or third-party validation, to build trust and demonstrate real value.

Speakers

– Roy Jakobs
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

Need for industry self-regulation and trust-building in healthcare AI


Concrete measurement of AI impact through third-party verified savings


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Economic


Both speakers argued for transformational rather than incremental approaches to AI, focusing on breakthrough capabilities and core operational improvements rather than marginal administrative efficiencies.

Speakers

– Julie Sweet
– Amin Nasser

Arguments

AI should enable capabilities that weren’t possible before, not just incremental improvements


Real value comes from operational applications rather than administrative functions


Topics

Economic | Development


Takeaways

Key takeaways

Successful AI scaling requires equal focus on adoption and technology development, with business leadership involvement from day one rather than treating it as purely an IT initiative


AI implementation should follow a ‘human-in-the-lead’ approach rather than ‘human-in-the-loop’, emphasizing human empowerment through technology rather than replacement


Data quality and infrastructure built over time provide significant competitive advantages – companies with decades of high-quality data can achieve billions in verified savings


Leader-led learning is critical for AI scaling – executives must have hands-on understanding of AI technology to effectively drive organizational transformation


AI’s greatest value comes from operational applications that enable new capabilities rather than just incremental productivity improvements in administrative functions


Trust and reliability are fundamental barriers to AI adoption, particularly in critical sectors like healthcare and finance, requiring industry self-regulation and transparent measurement


Agentic commerce represents the next major wave of digital transformation, potentially democratizing access for small businesses while requiring new trust infrastructure


AI scaling requires ecosystem collaboration and process reimagination rather than isolated technical implementations


Resolutions and action items

Aramco will continue expanding their AI use cases from 500 to potentially higher targets, working with hyperscalers to commercialize solutions beyond their organization


Visa has deployed AI-ready cards with user-defined parameters and trusted agent protocols to enable secure agentic commerce


Healthcare industry participants committed to self-regulation through codes of conduct developed with organizations like the National Academy of Medicine


Companies should prioritize building data foundations and technology stacks as prerequisites for AI scaling


Organizations need to establish proper operating models with clear processes for piloting, scaling, or killing AI initiatives


Unresolved issues

How to balance AI accuracy requirements with human performance standards – the gap between demanding 95% AI accuracy versus 82% human diagnostic accuracy in healthcare


Regulatory frameworks cannot keep pace with AI technology advancement, creating ongoing compliance and safety challenges


Talent development and training at scale remains a significant barrier for most organizations attempting to move beyond pilot programs


Data privacy regulations may conflict with the need for comprehensive data sharing to advance AI capabilities, particularly in healthcare


The challenge of reimagining hardwired processes, IT systems, and job descriptions while maintaining safety and reliability standards


How smaller companies without rich historical datasets can compete effectively in an AI-driven landscape


Suggested compromises

Self-regulation by industries ahead of formal regulation to maintain innovation pace while ensuring safety and trust


Balancing patient privacy concerns with the need for comprehensive data access by allowing anonymous data sharing for AI development


Two-speed approach for companies: focus on foundational improvements and existing AI capabilities while building infrastructure for advanced AI applications


Ecosystem collaboration where companies share AI developments and best practices rather than pursuing isolated technical solutions


Gradual implementation of AI agents in healthcare with careful boundary-setting between autonomous AI decisions and human oversight requirements


Thought provoking comments

So we also describe it as how can you give time back to the practice, right? In healthcare, it’s all about how do you care better about the patient. The clinician wants to spend more quality time in also having the conversation, having the aftercare from when you have a diagnosis, not only the hard fact of this is what you have, but also what does it mean? How are we going to treat you?

Speaker

Roy Jakobs


Reason

This reframes AI’s value proposition from pure efficiency gains to human-centered outcomes. Instead of just automating tasks, Jakobs presents AI as a tool that restores the human element in healthcare by freeing up time for meaningful patient interactions.


Impact

This comment established a crucial theme that influenced the entire discussion. It shifted the conversation away from technical capabilities toward human outcomes, which Julie Sweet immediately built upon, leading to a sustained focus on value creation rather than just productivity gains throughout the panel.


I think one of the things we’ve really learned is that we started a conversation around AI that was so focused on productivity and not actually the full outcome… 78% of CEO the c-suite believe that AI is actually helping growth more than productivity

Speaker

Julie Sweet


Reason

This challenges the dominant narrative about AI being primarily a cost-cutting tool and introduces empirical evidence that executives are seeing AI as a growth driver. It represents a fundamental shift in how AI value is conceptualized.


Impact

This comment validated and expanded on Roy’s human-centered approach, creating a new framework for the discussion. It led other panelists to focus on growth and value creation rather than efficiency, influencing how Ryan discussed agentic commerce opportunities and how Amin presented Aramco’s $3-5 billion in realized value.


I have a thesis that agentic commerce could be an amazing leveler and empowerer for small businesses around the world… Small businesses in countries around the world I might not have found, a small business around the corner from where I live in my town in Northern California that I might not thought of to go buy running shoes

Speaker

Ryan McInerney


Reason

This presents a counterintuitive perspective on AI’s societal impact. While many fear AI will benefit only large corporations, McInerney argues it could democratize commerce by breaking down discovery barriers for small businesses globally.


Impact

This comment introduced a social equity dimension to the AI scaling discussion that hadn’t been present before. It elevated the conversation from corporate benefits to broader societal implications, showing how AI scaling could reshape entire economic ecosystems rather than just individual company operations.


What we currently see is we are not always fair to AI. I’ll give you an example. On average, a doctor gets his diagnosis right in 82% of the cases. We ask from AI before we adopt it in the practice, often that needs to be 95% accurate. That 13% gap between the AI accuracy and the clinician’s accuracy is a huge patient impact, right?

Speaker

Roy Jakobs


Reason

This exposes a critical paradox in AI adoption – we hold AI to higher standards than human performance, potentially preventing beneficial implementations. It challenges the audience to reconsider their risk assessment frameworks.


Impact

This comment introduced a new dimension of complexity around AI adoption barriers. It shifted the discussion from technical capabilities to psychological and regulatory barriers, prompting deeper consideration of how unrealistic expectations might be hindering beneficial AI deployment.


It’s hard to trust something, you know, whether you’re a consumer, a regulator, a doctor, a leader of a health system until you understand it… companies ask me all the time, how am I going to operate in three years and five years? And the focus really has to be, are you able to do something you can’t do today?

Speaker

Julie Sweet


Reason

This identifies the fundamental barrier to AI scaling – the trust-understanding nexus. It also provides a clear litmus test for AI value: capability expansion rather than incremental improvement.


Impact

This comment crystallized the discussion’s emerging themes about human factors in AI adoption. It prompted Ryan’s immediate recognition about leader-led learning at Visa and influenced the final round of responses, where all panelists emphasized human-centered approaches to AI scaling.


It should be a business bull, not AI or IT bush. If the business is not involved, you can buy it, you can scale, but you cannot have it across the whole establishment. So the business needs to be involved from day one for it to capture the whole value across the establishment and the group.

Speaker

Amin Nasser


Reason

This succinctly captures a critical organizational insight – that AI scaling fails when treated as a technology project rather than a business transformation. The phrase ‘business bull, not AI or IT bush’ is memorable and actionable.


Impact

This comment provided a practical framework that synthesized much of the discussion’s learning. It influenced the final responses by emphasizing organizational change management over technical implementation, reinforcing the human-centered themes that had emerged throughout the conversation.


I think it’s about human in the lead, not human in the loop. We will inspire people and we will run companies with people and they will have a greater technology landscape. But we need to completely change the narrative to inspire people to paint the future.

Speaker

Julie Sweet


Reason

This reframes the entire human-AI relationship paradigm. Instead of humans being relegated to oversight roles (‘in the loop’), Sweet positions humans as the primary drivers with AI as an enhanced toolkit. This challenges the common narrative of AI replacement.


Impact

This comment served as a powerful synthesis of the discussion’s evolution from technical focus to human-centered outcomes. It provided a memorable framework that other panelists immediately adopted in their final responses, showing how a well-articulated insight can crystallize collective learning.


Overall assessment

These key comments fundamentally transformed the discussion from a typical technology-focused AI conversation into a nuanced exploration of human-centered transformation. The progression was remarkable: Roy’s initial focus on ‘giving time back’ established human outcomes as the primary value metric, which Julie reinforced with data about growth over productivity. This human-centered foundation enabled more sophisticated discussions about societal impact (Ryan’s small business democratization), implementation barriers (Roy’s fairness paradox), and organizational change (Amin’s business-led approach). The conversation evolved from ‘how to implement AI’ to ‘how to reimagine work and value creation with humans leading AI-enhanced capabilities.’ The final exchange, where panelists built directly on each other’s insights about leader-led learning and human-in-the-lead approaches, demonstrated how thoughtful comments can create a collaborative learning environment that generates insights greater than the sum of individual contributions.


Follow-up questions

How can companies without rich historical data sets effectively implement and scale AI solutions?

Speaker

Mat Honan


Explanation

This addresses a critical barrier for newer companies or those lacking extensive data infrastructure, which is essential for understanding how to democratize AI adoption across different organizational maturity levels.


What new opportunities will agentic commerce create for global payment systems that don’t currently exist?

Speaker

Mat Honan


Explanation

This explores the emerging landscape of AI-driven commerce and its potential to reshape financial infrastructure and payment processing on a global scale.


How can the healthcare industry balance AI accuracy requirements with current clinical practice standards?

Speaker

Roy Jakobs


Explanation

Jakobs highlighted the disparity between expecting 95% accuracy from AI while doctors achieve 82% accuracy, suggesting need for research on appropriate AI performance thresholds in healthcare.


How can healthcare data privacy regulations be reformed to enable better AI innovation while protecting patient rights?

Speaker

Roy Jakobs


Explanation

This addresses the tension between data privacy requirements and the need for comprehensive datasets to advance medical AI, particularly for critical conditions like cancer.


What specific processes and frameworks are needed for effective leader-led AI learning programs?

Speaker

Julie Sweet and Ryan McInerney


Explanation

Both emphasized the critical importance of leadership understanding AI technology, but the specific methodologies for achieving this at scale need further development.


How can AI use cases and solutions be effectively commercialized and scaled across different industries beyond their original development context?

Speaker

Amin Nasser


Explanation

Nasser mentioned working with hyperscalers to commercialize Aramco’s AI solutions across industries, indicating a need for research on cross-industry AI application frameworks.


What are the optimal decision-making processes for quickly evaluating whether to kill, pilot, or scale AI initiatives?

Speaker

Amin Nasser


Explanation

This addresses a critical operational challenge in AI scaling – having rapid, effective decision frameworks to manage the pipeline of AI opportunities.


How can organizations effectively measure and validate the true business value of AI implementations through third-party verification?

Speaker

Amin Nasser


Explanation

Nasser mentioned third-party verification of their $3-5 billion in AI-related value, suggesting need for standardized methodologies for AI ROI measurement.


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.