Morning session

17 Dec 2025 15:00h - 18:00h

Session at a glance

Summary

This UN General Assembly meeting focused on the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Plus 20 review, marking twenty years since the original summit that established a vision for a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society. The session began with procedural matters, including a second vote on draft amendment A-80-L40 related to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which was adopted by a narrow margin of 81 votes in favor to 77 against. The Assembly then proceeded to adopt Draft Resolution 23 as amended with overwhelming support of 176 votes in favor.


The main discussion centered on evaluating progress toward WSIS goals and addressing persistent digital divides that continue to limit equitable access to digital technologies, particularly in developing countries. Multiple speakers emphasized that while significant advances have been made in connectivity and digital transformation, substantial challenges remain, including uneven access, cybersecurity threats, and the concentration of digital power among a few major companies and countries. Representatives from various nations, including Hungary, Cuba, Thailand, Austria, and others, shared their national experiences and priorities for digital development.


A recurring theme throughout the discussions was the importance of maintaining the multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance, which brings together governments, private sector, civil society, and technical communities. Many speakers praised the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) as a successful example of this collaborative model and welcomed its permanent mandate under the outcome document. The discussions also highlighted the need for better coordination between WSIS processes and the recently adopted Global Digital Compact to avoid duplication and ensure coherent implementation.


Several speakers addressed emerging challenges posed by artificial intelligence and the need for ethical frameworks to govern its development and deployment. The meeting concluded with statements from various UN agencies and stakeholder organizations, all emphasizing the continued relevance of the WSIS vision and the importance of international cooperation in building an inclusive digital future that leaves no one behind.


Keypoints

Overall Purpose/Goal

This transcript captures a UN General Assembly high-level meeting for the WSIS (World Summit on the Information Society) Plus 20 Review, marking 20 years since the original summit. The meeting aims to assess progress on building an inclusive, people-centered, and development-oriented information society, while addressing current digital challenges and establishing frameworks for future digital cooperation.


Major Discussion Points

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges: Multiple speakers emphasized persistent gaps in digital access, particularly affecting developing countries, rural communities, and vulnerable populations. Countries highlighted the need for universal, affordable, and meaningful connectivity as a foundation for digital transformation and sustainable development.


Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum (IGF): A central theme was strengthening the multi-stakeholder approach to digital governance, with significant focus on making the Internet Governance Forum permanent. Speakers consistently praised the collaborative model involving governments, private sector, civil society, and technical communities.


Human Rights and Ethical Technology Development: Extensive discussion on ensuring human rights protection in digital spaces, with emphasis on privacy, freedom of expression, and protection from online harms. Many speakers stressed that rights protected offline must also be protected online, particularly regarding AI governance and emerging technologies.


Artificial Intelligence Governance and Emerging Technologies: Speakers addressed both opportunities and risks of AI, calling for responsible development, ethical frameworks, and inclusive governance structures. There was recognition of AI’s transformative potential alongside concerns about bias, job displacement, and the need for international cooperation.


Implementation and Financing Mechanisms: Focus on translating commitments into concrete action, with discussions about sustainable financing for digital development, capacity building, and the need for coordinated implementation between WSIS outcomes and the Global Digital Compact.


Overall Tone

The discussion maintained a diplomatic and collaborative tone throughout, characterized by mutual respect and shared commitment to digital inclusion. Speakers were generally optimistic about technological progress while acknowledging serious challenges. The tone was constructive and forward-looking, with countries sharing both successes and concerns. There was notable appreciation for the co-facilitators’ work and broad consensus on key principles, though some speakers raised concerns about persistent inequalities and the need for more concrete action on financing and implementation.


Speakers

Speakers from the provided list:


Chair – Assembly President, presiding over the high-level meeting on WSIS Plus 20 review


Secretariat – UN Secretariat staff managing voting procedures and administrative functions


Hungary – His Excellency Péter Szijjártó, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary


Cuba – Distinguished Representative of Cuba


Thailand – Distinguished Representative of Thailand


Austria – Distinguished Representative of Austria


Colombia – Distinguished Representative of Colombia


Brazil – Distinguished Representative of Brazil


Italy – Distinguished Representative of Italy


Namibia – Distinguished Representative of Namibia


Costa Rica – Distinguished Representative of Costa Rica


Ethiopia – Distinguished Representative of Ethiopia


Ukraine – Distinguished Representative of Ukraine


Kuwait – Distinguished Representative of Kuwait


Eritrea – Distinguished Representative of Eritrea


Fiji – Distinguished Representative of Fiji


Malaysia – Distinguished Representative of Malaysia


Trinidad and Tobago – Distinguished Representative of Trinidad and Tobago


Holy See – Distinguished Representative of the Observer State of the Holy See


China – Distinguished Representative of China


International Committee of the Red Cross – Observer representing ICRC with humanitarian mandate


International Chamber of Commerce – Observer representing global business organization


International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance – Observer from intergovernmental organization supporting democracy


International Organization of la Francophonie – Observer representing French-speaking countries organization


Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights – UN entity focused on human rights in digital governance


United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization – UNESCO representative leading multiple WSIS action lines


United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – UNCTAD representative, current chair of UN Group on Information Society


United Nations Development Programme – UNDP representative, co-convener of WSIS Forum


United Nations Industrial Development Organization – UNIDO representative, Vice Chair of Working Group on Digital Technologies


Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers – ICANN representative for domain name system coordination


Meta – Technology company representative focused on global connectivity


Microsoft – Technology company representative


Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel – Representative of IGF Leadership Panel


Foundation Cibervoluntarios – Civil society organization promoting digital inclusion since 2001


Wikimedia – Representative of Wikimedia Foundation supporting Wikipedia and digital public goods


Association for Progressive Communications – Civil society network for ICTs and human rights, working in 70+ countries


HitRecord – Representative discussing AI and social media impacts


Global Partners Digital – Organization focused on digital governance and human rights


International Federation for Information Processing – IFIP, global federation of ICT societies from 40+ countries


Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network – Organization addressing transnational digital governance challenges


WSIS+20 Co-Facilitators Informal Multi-stakeholder Sounding Board – Multi-stakeholder advisory group supporting the review process


Additional speakers:


None – all speakers mentioned in the transcript are included in the provided speakers names list.


Full session report

WSIS Plus 20 Review: UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting – Comprehensive Summary

Introduction and Procedural Matters

The UN General Assembly convened a high-level meeting to conduct the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Plus 20 review, marking twenty years since the original summit established a vision for a people-centred, inclusive, and development-oriented information society. The session was co-facilitated by Kenya and Albania, with support from an informal multi-stakeholder sounding board that played a crucial role in the preparatory process.


The meeting commenced with procedural matters, including voting on amendments and resolutions, before proceeding to substantive discussions on the WSIS Plus 20 review. Representatives from numerous countries, UN agencies, and stakeholder organisations contributed their perspectives on digital governance and development, with the UN Group on Information Society (UNGIS) providing coordination support.


A significant milestone was achieved during the meeting with the decision to make the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) a permanent UN forum, representing a major institutional development in global digital governance.


Core Themes and Major Discussion Points

Digital Divides and Connectivity Challenges

The persistence of digital divides emerged as a central concern throughout the discussions. Despite two decades of technological advancement, speakers consistently highlighted that substantial gaps remain in digital access and meaningful connectivity, particularly affecting developing countries and marginalized communities.


Thailand’s representative noted how digital divides continue to limit equitable access in developing countries, while Namibia emphasized that universal, affordable, and meaningful connectivity must remain a global priority requiring investment in resilient infrastructure. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) provided concerning statistics, indicating that only one-third of people in low-income countries are online, with minimal e-commerce engagement.


Cuba presented a structural analysis of the problem, arguing that digital divides result from an unjust international economic order requiring fundamental changes rather than merely technical solutions. They emphasized how unilateral coercive measures prevent countries from accessing technology and participating in the global knowledge economy.


Ethiopia highlighted the financial constraints facing developing countries, noting that high costs of digital infrastructure and limited access to financing constrain digital development efforts. This concern was echoed by multiple speakers who called for enhanced international cooperation and dedicated financing mechanisms.


The Association for Progressive Communications advocated for recognizing community networks and alternative connectivity models as valid approaches to addressing connectivity challenges, emphasizing the importance of diverse solutions tailored to local contexts.


Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum

The multi-stakeholder approach to digital governance received overwhelming support across all stakeholder groups, with the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) receiving particular attention as the primary vehicle for inclusive digital governance discussions.


Brazil argued that the IGF should become a permanent UN forum with predictable resources to ensure effective functioning, a position that was ultimately adopted during the meeting. The Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel highlighted that the IGF’s network of 176 national and regional initiatives represents the most important vehicle for reaching underrepresented communities.


The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) emphasized that the multi-stakeholder model ensures the Internet remains unified, global, and resilient through shared responsibilities. Meta reinforced this view, noting that the IGF provides a unique space for dialogue among governments, business, civil society, and the technical community on equal terms.


Microsoft stressed the importance of balancing digital sovereignty and respect for national contexts with global connectivity benefits, highlighting the complexity of maintaining global interoperability while respecting national regulatory approaches.


The Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network called for clarifying the IGF’s institutional evolution and sustainable funding mechanisms, suggesting that while there was broad support for permanence, implementation details required further development.


Artificial Intelligence Governance and Emerging Technologies

The governance of artificial intelligence emerged as a critical priority requiring urgent international attention. Speakers addressed both AI’s transformative potential and the significant risks it poses without proper governance frameworks.


Costa Rica emphasized that AI governance requires clear accountability mechanisms and genuine collaboration among all stakeholders. Brazil specifically criticized the lack of attention to labour implications, arguing that the UN must address risks of job displacement and labour rights erosion in AI development.


HitRecord warned that AI has potential for good but risks creating new forms of exclusion if guided solely by market forces, highlighting the tension between market-driven innovation and public interest governance.


The International Federation for Information Processing stressed that ethical principles must be embedded by design in AI systems rather than retrofitted after deployment, emphasizing the need for proactive governance approaches.


Eritrea raised concerns about the pace of technological change potentially exceeding the adaptive capabilities of developing countries without adequate international cooperation, highlighting the need for inclusive AI development that considers varying national capacities.


The International Organization of La Francophonie raised critical concerns about linguistic representation, noting that more than 80% of AI training data comes from a single language, risking the erasure of hundreds of languages from the digital environment.


Human Rights and Digital Safety

The protection of human rights in digital spaces was consistently emphasized, with speakers calling for robust frameworks ensuring that rights protected offline are equally protected online.


Austria articulated this principle clearly, stating that the same rights people have offline must be protected online through robust legal frameworks. The International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance reinforced this view, arguing that a human rights-centred approach is essential to ensure the Internet remains an open, free, and secure space.


Colombia specifically addressed gender-based violence, emphasizing that technology-facilitated gender-based violence must be eradicated to ensure women’s full participation in the digital environment.


The Holy See took a broader philosophical approach, arguing that digital technologies must serve humanity through respect for human dignity and the common good, with adequate governance frameworks needed to protect users, especially children, from potential harms of ICT misuse.


The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights called for an enhanced role for the UN human rights architecture within the WSIS framework, suggesting that human rights considerations should be more systematically integrated into digital governance processes.


International Cooperation and Financing Mechanisms

The need for enhanced international cooperation and adequate financing for digital development was a recurring theme, particularly among developing country representatives and UN agencies.


Cuba called for concrete support through technology transfer, financing, and North-South cooperation, while Eritrea emphasized that international cooperation must prioritize capacity building and dedicated technology transfer for developing countries.


Colombia stressed that mobilization of adequate and predictable funding is required for digital infrastructure and capacity building. Austria highlighted the need for enhanced partnerships, especially with developing countries, to reduce inequalities and close digital divides.


The Association for Progressive Communications emphasized that financing mechanisms are a critical and non-negotiable component requiring serious consideration, while Eritrea specifically called for a working group on future financial mechanisms for digital development focused on the concrete needs of developing countries.


Key Agreements and Institutional Developments

IGF Permanent Mandate

The most significant concrete outcome was the decision to grant the Internet Governance Forum a permanent mandate within the UN system. This development received overwhelming support from diverse stakeholders, including governments, civil society, the private sector, and technical community representatives.


Multi-stakeholder Model Endorsement

There was universal agreement on the importance of the multi-stakeholder model for Internet governance, with speakers consistently emphasizing its role in maintaining the Internet’s global, unified nature while ensuring inclusive participation across all stakeholder groups.


Human Rights Principles

A clear consensus emerged around the principle that human rights must be protected equally online and offline, though implementation approaches varied among different stakeholders.


Digital Public Infrastructure

The concept of digital public infrastructure gained significant attention as a foundation for inclusive development. The United Nations Development Programme emphasized that digital public infrastructure must be deployed securely, interoperably, and rights-based with public interest governance.


Ethiopia highlighted how digital identity programs serve as a cornerstone of transformation strategy, closing gender gaps and empowering women, demonstrating practical applications of digital public infrastructure approaches.


Areas of Tension and Disagreement

State Regulation versus Market Forces

A significant tension emerged regarding the appropriate balance between state regulation and market forces in digital governance. Brazil argued for legitimate state authority to regulate the digital domain for information integrity and protection from disinformation, while civil society organizations warned about the risks of excessive market concentration and the need for alternative governance models.


Structural versus Technical Solutions

Different approaches to addressing digital inequalities created disagreement between those advocating for fundamental structural changes to the international economic order and those focusing on technical and policy solutions within existing frameworks.


AI Governance Priorities

Disagreement emerged regarding priorities in AI governance, with some emphasizing labour rights and economic impacts while others focused on broader human rights and accountability mechanisms, suggesting different priorities in developing comprehensive AI governance frameworks.


Geopolitical Dimensions

The meeting revealed geopolitical tensions, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Ukraine’s representative directly addressed Russian attacks on digital infrastructure and demonstrated digital resilience, while other speakers made more abstract calls for peaceful digital cooperation without specifically identifying aggressors.


These tensions highlighted how digital governance discussions cannot be separated from broader geopolitical realities and the need for frameworks that can function effectively despite international conflicts.


Climate Change and Sustainability

Several speakers highlighted the intersection between digital transformation and climate action. Fiji emphasized that ICTs serve as lifelines for climate adaptation, disaster preparedness, and early warning systems in vulnerable countries.


China called for digital and green transformations to progress synergistically to address climate change and resource scarcity, while Thailand stressed that environmental sustainability must be considered in digital transformation to ensure long-term viability.


Cybersecurity and Digital Trust

Cybersecurity emerged as a critical enabler for digital inclusion and development. Namibia emphasized that cybercrime requires concerted collective solutions and investment in capacity building for national resilience.


Malaysia stressed that trust and safety must be embedded across the digital ecosystem through regulation, accountability, and public education, while the International Federation for Information Processing highlighted that cybersecurity, privacy, safety, and resilience are prerequisites for meaningful inclusion and sustainable digital services.


Stakeholder Contributions

UN Agencies and International Organizations

UN agencies provided technical expertise and coordination perspectives. UNESCO, as the lead agency for multiple WSIS action lines, emphasized the need for sustained support and adequate resources from public and private partners. UNCTAD, as current chair of UNGIS, provided critical data on digital economy concentration.


The International Committee of the Red Cross brought a unique humanitarian perspective, discussing their digital emblem project aimed at ensuring humanitarian protections remain effective when ICTs are used in armed conflict.


Private Sector Engagement

Technology companies demonstrated strong support for multi-stakeholder governance models. Meta emphasized that if the Internet is a global public good, its governance must continue to reflect shared responsibility, while the International Chamber of Commerce focused on implementation, arguing that success will be measured by creating enabling policy environments that encourage investment and innovation.


Civil Society Perspectives

Civil society organizations brought critical perspectives on power concentration and inclusion. Foundation Cibervoluntarios warned about the concentration of technological power limiting the ability to imagine alternatives, while HitRecord provided critical insights into how technology platforms evolved from connection-focused to addiction-focused models maximized for user engagement and advertising revenue.


Implementation Challenges and Future Directions

Coordination with Global Digital Compact

Multiple speakers emphasized the need for better coordination between WSIS processes and the recently adopted Global Digital Compact. Brazil argued that the WSIS Plus 20 outcome document should align with the Global Digital Compact to avoid duplication and ensure coherent implementation.


Global Partners Digital called for system-wide coherence and implementation roadmaps to strengthen delivery of commitments, highlighting the challenge of coordinating multiple digital governance frameworks.


WSIS Action Lines and Forum

The WSIS Forum and action line roadmaps received attention as implementation mechanisms, with UNESCO emphasizing their role in translating high-level commitments into concrete actions. The launch of the UN Digital Cooperation Portal was mentioned as a tool for improving coordination and information sharing.


Cultural Diversity and Linguistic Rights

UNESCO complemented concerns about linguistic diversity by emphasizing that cultural diversity must be protected and fair remuneration ensured for artists and creators in AI-driven environments, highlighting the economic dimensions of cultural preservation in digital spaces.


This perspective reframed digital governance discussions from purely technical considerations to include fundamental questions of cultural preservation and linguistic diversity in an increasingly AI-driven digital environment.


Conclusion and Future Outlook

The WSIS Plus 20 review demonstrated both the continued relevance of the original WSIS vision and the emergence of new challenges requiring innovative governance approaches. The permanent mandate for the Internet Governance Forum represents a significant institutional milestone, providing a foundation for continued multi-stakeholder collaboration in digital governance.


While broad consensus exists on core principles such as multi-stakeholder governance, human rights protection, and addressing digital divides, significant challenges remain in implementation. These include developing sustainable financing mechanisms, balancing national sovereignty with global connectivity, and creating governance frameworks that can keep pace with rapidly evolving technologies like artificial intelligence.


The discussions revealed the intersection of digital governance with broader global challenges including climate change, geopolitical tensions, and cultural preservation. Moving forward, success will depend on the ability of stakeholders to translate consensus on principles into concrete action through enhanced international cooperation, adequate financing, and innovative governance approaches that ensure the benefits of digital transformation are shared equitably across all countries and communities.


The meeting highlighted both the achievements of the past twenty years in building global digital cooperation and the significant work that remains to fulfill the WSIS vision of a people-centred, inclusive, and development-oriented information society. The path forward requires sustained commitment to multi-stakeholder collaboration and continued adaptation of governance frameworks to address emerging challenges while protecting fundamental rights and promoting inclusive development.


Session transcript

Chair

Assembly is called to order. Before continuing with the high-level meeting on the overall review of the implementation of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society mandated for December 16th and 17th, 2025, the Assembly will now resume its consideration of the report of the third committee.

The documentation under this item is listed in the Journal of the United Nations. Members will recall at the 62nd plenary meeting on December 15th, 2025, the vote on draft amendment A-80-L40 to draft resolution 23, entitled Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol thereto, Amplified Barriers in Diverse Contexts, was equally divided.

Subsequently, at its 63rd plenary meeting on the same day, the Assembly decided to postpone consideration of the draft amendment instead of proceeding to the second vote on it that meeting. As members were informed at that time, in accordance with Rule 95 of the Rules of Procedure, I quote, if a vote is equally divided on matters other than elections, a second vote shall be taken at a subsequent meeting which shall be held within 48 hours of the first vote.

Accordingly, while briefly suspending the ongoing high-level meeting, members are now invited to proceed to the second vote on on the draft amendment to be immediately followed by the vote on draft resolution 23.

As announced in the Journal of the United Nations, action on the remaining draft resolutions and decision recommended by the Committee will be taken tomorrow afternoon. In accordance with Rule 95 of the Rules of Procedure, a second vote will now be taken on the draft amendment contained in Document A-80-L40. We will now begin the voting process.

Those in favour of draft amendment A-80-L40, please signify. Those against, abstentions. The Assembly is now voting for the second time on draft amendment A-80-L40.

This vote is not listed on the information note. Will all delegations confirm that the votes are accurately reflected on the screen? I repeat, will all delegations confirm that the votes are accurately reflected on the screen?

May I ask, we see some delegations in the corridor, should we take our time because this is our second vote. We want to be clear. So this is now the final call.

I hand over to the secretariat again to follow the rules of procedure.

Secretariat

For the final time, will all delegations confirm that the votes are accurately reflected on the screen immediately after which the voting machine will be locked. The voting has been completed. Please lock the machine.

Chair

The result of the vote is as follows, in favour 81, against 77, abstentions 15. Draft amendment A-80-L40 is adopted. I now put to the vote draft resolution 23 recommended by the committee in its report entitled Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol thereto, Amplified Barriers in Diverse Contexts, as amended.

We shall now begin the voting process. Those in favour of the draft resolution as amended, please signify those against abstentions.

Secretariat

The Assembly is now voting on Draft Resolution 23 as amended, entitled Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol Thereto Amplified Barriers in Diverse Contexts.

Will all delegations confirm that the votes are accurately reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the machine.

Chair

The result of the vote is as follows. In favour 176, against 2, abstentions 0. Draft Resolution 23 as amended is adopted.

Action on Draft Resolution 25 onwards in the report will be taken, as I said, tomorrow, Thursday, December 18, 2025, in the afternoon, as announced in the Journal of the United Nations. As mentioned at the 62nd Plenary Meeting, after action on all draft resolutions and decisions recommended by the Committee, there will be an opportunity for statements in explanation of votes after the vote on any or all of them in one intervention.

The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of the report of the Third Committee. I thank you. The Assembly will now resume its High-Level Meeting.

And if delegations have to change, because this is an important High-Level Meeting, I give a couple of seconds, but I would like to ask you to move, that we can restart with the High-Level Meeting. Thank you very much for the smooth process. Good morning and welcome to those who joined now for the high-level meeting.

The Assembly will resume its high-level meeting on the overall review of the implementation of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society under agenda item 15. Before proceeding further, I should like to inform members that action on the outcome document contained in A-80-L41 will be taken this afternoon following the conclusion of statements in plenary. The Assembly will continue to hear statements in plenary in accordance with Resolutions 79A.

stroke 277. Delegations are reminded that statements are limited to three minutes for individual delegations and five minutes for statements made on behalf of a group of states. Like yesterday, I would like to encourage all speakers to stay in this time limit.

Having said this, I would like to appeal to all speakers as well to deliver their statements at a reasonable pace to facilitate interpretations into the six official languages. I now give the floor to His Excellency Péter Szijjártó, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary.

Hungary

It is obvious that both the global economy and global politics have been entering into a new era. Simultaneously, we are living in the age of dangers and in a time of global technological revolution. And it is simultaneously true that we are being faced with the threat of the outbreak of the Third World War, and in the meantime, we see the way towards the most modern economy we could imagine.

This brings the world to face a tremendous question, may I say a dramatic dilemma. Whether we go for a peaceful global cooperation based on connectivity enjoying a sustainable growth of global economy and the modern economy, including information society, or we become the victims of a war fanatism in a world which might be divided into blocks, a world which might come into a war situation which would end up in destroying ourselves.

We Hungarians have been living in a neighborhood of a war in the heart of Europe for the fourth consecutive year now. We have been faced with tremendous political attacks for four continued years because of representing a position which can be described as pro-peace. And in the meantime, we have been witnessing hundreds of billions of euros being spent senseless on a war, on a corrupt state system, instead of spending money on peaceful economic development, taking advantage of the latest developments in global economy, including artificial intelligence, digitalization, and information society.

I would like to express our greatest respect to those who are standing up for peace, for peaceful cooperation, and a peaceful economic development. We show our greatest respect to the President of the United States for all his efforts in order to make peace all over the world, thus making the basis for an economic development all over. Hungary supports these efforts worldwide wholeheartedly.

We would like to welcome and encourage the highest possible level talks between the United States and the Russian Federation because we know that this is a very important issue. that this is the only way to solution. We all know that many try to undermine such kind of efforts.

We know that so far, many attempts have been made in order to undermine efforts towards peace. But we hope that those who have done such kind of attempts will not continue in the future. We Hungarians want peace.

We Hungarians want a peaceful development. We Hungarians have lost four decades in the last century as being on the wrong end of a world being divided into blocks. We know how war fanaticism can ruin those opportunities which are being offered by a global economic development, by modern technology, by information society, by digitalization and by artificial intelligence.

We Hungarians do not want to lose another decades in this century. We don’t even want to lose one single year anymore because we know how it feels. You can always count on us Hungarians when it comes to peace, when it comes to peaceful development, and when it comes to creating the most modern economy to the benefit of our people all over the world.

Thank you so much.

Chair

I thank the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary. I give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Cuba, followed by Thailand and Colombia.

Cuba

Madam President, Excellencies, the World Summit on the Information Society, and marking its 20th anniversary today, clearly established a connection between ICTs and development. Developing countries managed to have the digital divide recognized as a new form of structural inequalities. The summit raised this issue from the technical level up to the multilateral political agenda and today, two decades later, it has been shown without a doubt that digital technologies represent fundamental tools for countries’ development.

Nevertheless, we have, however, also confirmed that the positive impact of these technologies is considerably lower in developing countries compared to that in developed countries. This inequality is not accidental. It is the result of an unjust and undemocratic international economic order and also of the implementation of unilateral coercive measures which contravene international law and the charter of the United Nations, hindering the development in affected countries.

In the case of Cuba, the illegal economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed by the government of the United States for more than six decades constitutes the main obstacle to our technological, economic and social development.

It prevents us from acquiring technology, accessing financing and fully participating in the global knowledge economy. And we therefore underscore the urgent need for the structural barriers that prevent emerging digital technologies from contributing to the fulfillment of the 2030 agenda to be removed. To achieve this, the efforts of developing countries are not enough.

They must be supported by concrete actions that facilitate access to markets, financing on fair and preferential terms, unconditional transfer of technology and genuine North-South cooperation. Alignment in the implementation of the World Summit of the Information Society, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact offers an opportunity to move in this direction and to strengthen international cooperation.

However, it is crucial for the monitoring and review framework to be streamlined and inclusive, strengthening intergovernmental spaces so that all governments and especially those of developing countries can perform their roles and responsibilities with regard to digital governance at the global level.

It is imperative for the countries of the South to participate actively in discussions relating to decisions that affect us directly. President, Excellencies, the Declaration of Principles in the first phase of the World Summit on the Information Society established a shared vision to build a people-centred, inclusive and development-oriented information society where everyone has the opportunity to create, share and use knowledge to improve lives.

Regrettably, that noble purpose continues to be aspirational for a large proportion of humanity. It is now down to us to make the shared vision that we had 20 years ago a reality. Let us ensure that the Information Society does not become an empty promise but an effective right for all.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of Cuba. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Thailand.

Thailand

Madam President, at the outset I wish to extend, on behalf of my delegation, our sincere appreciation to you and the Secretary for organising this important and very timely meeting. 20 years ago in Geneva we came up with a shared vision through the Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action with the common objective of building a people-centred, development-oriented, equitable and inclusive information society that would enable all individuals and communities to benefit.

from the opportunities offered by information and technologies. Ten years later, the Tunis agenda further strengthened the foundations for addressing the evolving digital landscape, emphasizing international cooperation and enabling role of ICTs in advancing sustainable development and bridging the digital divide.

Now, as we approach the 20th anniversary of the WSIS process, are we collectively where we wanted to be? Madam President, the digital landscape has evolved at an unprecedented rate, driven by rapid innovation and technological development. Indeed, this process has demonstrated adaptability and continued relevance, but we must also be vigilant of the challenges that have emerged alongside this transformation.

Digital divides persist and in some cases have widened. Access remains uneven, inequalities are deepening, and technological developments remained unaffordable or inaccessible to many, many people. Thailand believes that this high-level meeting provides an excellent opportunity to reflect on how we can be more effective in addressing the structural and emerging challenges that may hinder the full realization of WSIS objectives.

Allow me to share a few points. First of all, innovation must be inclusive. Digital development should be designed to benefit people, bridging the digital divides required.

investment in connectivity, affordability, and digital skills as well as policies that promote universal and meaningful access to digital technologies. And at the same time, digital innovation must be sustainable in the long term. This includes ensuring that digital transformation supports environmental sustainability, promotes responsible use of resources, and contributes positively to economic and social development.

And secondly, digital development must be safe, equitable, and rooted in trust. Adequate, appropriate governance frameworks of digital development are essential to ensure transparency, accountability, and protection of users. Such governance should also promote broader participation and meaningful engagement of stakeholders in line with multi-stakeholder spirit of the RISD process.

Ensuring safe digital development also means addressing the increasingly serious and complex challenges related to cybersecurity and cybercrime. These threats undermine trust in the digital environment and can erode the socio-economic benefits of digitalization. Therefore, it is very essential, very crucial to invest in capacity building to enhance national and individual resilience against cyber threats.

Equally important is, of course, the promotion of digital literacy and digital awareness, empowering people with the skills to navigate the digital space safely, enable them to protect themselves from online fraud, misinformation, and cyber threats.

And lastly, multi-stakeholder cooperation remains. The complexity of cross-border nature of digital issues require inclusive collaboration among governance, private sectors, technical communities, civil society, academia, and of course international organizations.

Strengthened partnerships can foster innovation, share best practices, mobilize resources, and ensure that diverse perspectives contribute to shaping the future direction of digital development. Madam President, Thailand reaffirms our steadfast commitment to the WSIS vision. We also look forward to working with all partners to advance future digital transformation and to shape a digital future that empowers people, bridges divides, and strengthens trust which serve as a catalyst for sustainable development and prosperity for all.

I thank you so much for your kind attention.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of Thailand. May I remind delegations again of speaking limits of three minutes for individual delegations. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Austria followed by Colombia and the Federated States of Micronesia.

Austria

Madam President, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, let me begin by aligning with the statement made on behalf of the European Union. the World Summit on the Information Society, we came together with a shared vision of a digital space open to all and to promote sustainable development by ensuring that everyone, everyone can benefit from the opportunities of digitalization.

Since then, our phones got smart, an increasing number of jobs can be done remotely, and AI has entered our homes, offices, and classrooms. Yet while digital innovation is at full speed, digital divides persist. This makes it all the more important to strengthen our efforts for an inclusive and open information society for all.

Austria therefore welcomes the WSIS plus 20 review and supports the adoption of the outcome document. I would like to highlight four quick points. First, the strength of the WSIS process lies in its multi-stakeholder approach.

Austria has actively promoted this approach from the beginning, not least by the Austrian member of the IGF leadership panel, Governor Karoline Edstadler. We welcome the anticipated outcome document that the anticipated outcome document renders the Internet Governance Forum permanent. Second, digital transformation needs to be driven by a human-centric and a human rights-based approach.

This is also a necessity for sustainable development. Third, we need coherence in our approach and avoid fragmentation. Hence it is crucial to ensure a strong link between the WSIS processes and activities, the Global Digital Compact as our strategic guide, and the SDGs.

Fourth and last, Austria advocates for the strengthening of partnerships, especially with developing countries, to stay on track for sustainable development, reduce persistent inequalities, inequalities enclose all digital divides.

Madam President, Austria will continue to be actively engaged in the WSIS process. We will continue to strive for an information society in which everyone, everywhere can participate and benefit from the potential of digital transformation. In this context, I’m also proud to co-chair the next Forum for Science, Technology and Innovation together with my friend from Zambia in New York in May 2026.

I thank you under the time limit. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Austria. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Colombia.

Colombia

Madam President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, Colombia recognizes the importance of this 20-year review of the World Summit on Information Society. It comes at a critical juncture for us to reaffirm a person-centered, inclusive and development-oriented vision. Under the leadership of President Gustavo Petro, in Colombia we have adopted a national policy which links digital technologies to social justice, environmental protection and human dignity.

In this framework, we recognize that technology and innovation are essential tools for us to address global challenges, for us to close structural gaps and to achieve the full implementation of the 2030 Agenda.

We do not want to stay on the current course in which the countries of the South are trapped in technological dependence which will further deepen global asymmetries. We are grateful for the work of Kenya and Albania as the co-facilitators that carried out a broad consultation process with the interested stakeholders, stressing the multi-stakeholder governance model that has been strengthened through spaces such as the Internet Governance Forum.

Madam President, my country values the progress that has been achieved since Geneva and Tunis, such as the expansion of connectivity and access to the Internet. Today these are essential things for having access to essential services. However, digital divides and structural gaps remain, and they threaten to deepen inequalities, especially in developing countries and with a disproportionate effect on vulnerable groups.

For that reason, looking ahead, we need to adopt an articulated joint implementation of WSIS and the Global Digital Compact, and to coordinate these digital governance mechanisms and to avoid duplication, as well as strengthening interoperability and compatibility in regulatory terms between countries.

We trust that cooperation mechanisms will help ensure common principles and approaches that protect human rights, as well as advancing the development of local capacities and inclusive technologies and defending an open, secure and equitable digital infrastructure.

Madam President, we are aware of the risks associated with accelerated technological development and it is necessary that we protect privacy, the ethical processing of personal data and also that we combat disinformation, hate speech and human rights violations in digital environments.

We must act together to eradicate all forms of sexual and gender-based violence that are facilitated by technologies and which limit the full participation of women in the digital environment and prevent them from benefiting from it.

Lastly, we call for the mobilization of adequate and predictable funding for digital infrastructure and for capacity building, ensuring the effective participation of the Global South in the information society.

Thank you very much.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of Colombia. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Brazil.

Brazil

Madam President, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen, We believe in dialogue. We believe in diplomacy. We believe in the UN.

We are about to conclude the WSIS Plus 20 review process. These are the final moments of a long journey and not an easy one, trying to strengthen, make it more effective. and update the governance of the global digital ecosystem.

The results of this collective endeavor may not be the ideal outcome for many delegations. It was, however, the compromise that we, member states and other stakeholders, were able to achieve given the circumstance we had to face along the way. As a developing country, Brazil shares many concerns with countries in the Global South.

We seek, as a matter of priority, a development-centered approach to close the digital divides, promote digital inclusion, and reduce asymmetries. For this to happen, we need a multilateral system that is responsive to the demands of the global majority to ensure respect for international law, human rights, environmental sustainability, and digital sovereignty.

We believe the UN can play a key role in this regard. We believe emerging technologies should not become new drivers of exclusion or inequality. Digital tools should be harnessed to deliver tangible improvements in the quality of life of people worldwide.

Our goal here was to avoid duplication and strike a balance between new initiatives such as the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS architecture, making the most of positive results already achieved over the years.

We had to go the extra mile to advocating for human rights, the empowerment of women and girls, and the 2030 Agenda, the SDGs, just to mention a few, to prevent pushbacks in these crucial topics. And there is more. We attach great importance to the paragraphs related to artificial intelligence, a general-purpose technology that is at the center of the technological revolution.

The UN should not shy away from the challenges presented by AI systems, which bring great potential but also present new risks that need to be addressed. Despite efforts by the G7 to 7, the draft resolution on the table remains silent on the growing fragilization of the labor rights, driven by the widespread adoption of AI. This omission is particularly striking given the centrality of decent work and social inclusion to the information society agenda.

It risks disconnecting our efforts from the harsh realities of workers facing job displacement. Also, information integrity remains a top priority for Brazil. Clearly, very large online platforms have a systemic impact on the erosion of trustworthy information and the polarization of public discourse.

We believe states have the legitimate authority to regulate and enforce rules in the digital domain to protect our citizens. In a nutshell, what is illegal offline must be illegal online. We welcome the reference to the NetMundial Plus10 conference held last year in Brazil.

The São Paulo multi-stakeholder guidelines were adopted in a spirit of balanced representation and openness for the participation of all stakeholders in Internet governance and digital policy processes.

We fully support the implementation of the guidelines. the Internet Governance Forum as an inclusive venue for dialogue on global digital issues. The IGF should not only become permanent, but have a secretariat with predictable resources to ensure its effective functioning and continuity.

We encourage governments to have a more active role in the discussions with other stakeholders within the IGF and beyond. In the end, it’s a matter of better coordination among all interested parties. Our national delegation here today has members from all sectors of Brazilian society engaged in Internet and digital governance.

That’s the Brasilia effect, embracing diversity, building bridges, coming together as one. Why? Because we believe in dialogue.

We believe in diplomacy. We believe in the UN. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of Brazil. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Italy. Delegates are reminded that statements are limited to three minutes for individual delegations.

Italy

Thank you. Madam President, Distinguished Delegates, dear friends. Italy fully aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union delegations and wishes to adhere to what follows from the national perspective.

The World Summit on Information Society stands at the heart of global efforts to harness the power of information and communication technologies for social and economic development. Since its inception in 2003, WSIS has provided a vital platform for governments, private sectors, for civil society and technical communities to work together in shaping the future of the digital world.

The challenges and opportunities presented by the digital revolution are profound. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the need for policies that promote inclusive development, universal access to digital technologies, and the respect of human rights online is greater than ever.

Italy has been a firm advocate of this vision. We believe that technology must serve as a tool for empowerment, equality, and sustainability. For this reason, Italy remains deeply committed to fostering a digital ecosystem that is inclusive, accessible, ethical, and designed to benefit all people, in line with the achievements of the SDGs.

Central to the success of WSIS is the multi-stakeholder approach. The latter recognizes that no single group or sector can shape the future of the digital space alone. Governments, business, civil society, and technical communities must all come together to collaborate, share knowledge, and find solutions that are both effective and equitable.

Italy is an active supporter of this approach to ensure that digital policies reflect the diverse needs and priorities of all stakeholders. Furthermore, we recognize the crucial role of the Internet Governance Forum in supporting this inclusive model. The IGF was established to provide a platform for open and transparent discussion on the governance of the Internet that are not limited to governments.

The IGF ensures that all voices, from governments to civil society, are heard in shaping the rules and norms that guide the global digital landscape. Bearing in mind the importance of this approach, in 2023, Italy established a national IGF committee, which offers an opportunity for exchange of views to all relevant stakeholders. Being the IGF a very precious tool for the benefit of society, Italy welcomes the establishment of its permanent mandate through this outcome document.

In closing, Italy will continue to support the advancement of WSIS. We are committed to ensuring that by upholding fundamental principles, identifying appropriate resources and building capacity. Together, we can shape a secure and prosperous digital future for all people and communities, where no one is left behind.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Italy. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Namibia.

Namibia

Madam President, Namibia aligns itself with the statement delivered by the representative of Iraq on behalf of the Group of 77 and China. We reaffirm our collective commitment to building a people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented information society. Information and communication technologies play a central role in advancing education, improving health care delivery, strengthening public administration and expanding economic opportunities, particularly for youth, women and those in rural communities.

In this regard, Namibia emphasizes that universal, affordable and meaningful connectivity must remain a global priority. This includes investments in resilient digital infrastructure, particularly in underserved and remote areas, as well as policies that promote competition, innovation and affordability. At the same time, access must be accompanied by digital literacy and capacity building to ensure that all citizens can participate safely and productively in the digital economy.

While progress has been made regarding access, significant challenges remain. Persistent digital divides continue to limit equitable access to connectivity, digital skills and affordable technologies in developing countries. These challenges are compounded by constrained fiscal space, high cost of digital infrastructure, and limited access to concessional financing for digital development.

Cybercrime remains a serious concern that requires concerted collective solutions. Furthermore, there is a need to establish a global governance framework on artificial intelligence in order to mitigate associated risks. Madam President, in 2023, Namibia became the first country in southern Africa to launch the National Internet Universality Indicators Assessment as part of its commitment to building an inclusive, people-centered information society in line with the WSIS Plus 20 Action Lines and the objectives of the Pact for the Future Annex I, namely the Global Digital Compact.

The assessment provides an evidence-based framework to evaluate access, affordability, digital skills, and digital governance guided by the principles of human rights, openness, responsibility, and multi-stakeholder engagement.

In addition, Namibia has integrated WSIS principles into its national vision, Vision 2030, and policies for quality living, education, and health, leveraging ICTs. Namibia further highlights the critical role of international cooperation and multi-stakeholder partnerships in advancing the WSIS Plus 20 Action Lines. Governments, the private sector, civil society, academia, and international organizations must work together to mobilize resources, share knowledge, transfer technology, and support nationally driven digital strategies aligned with development priorities.

In conclusion, Namibia reaffirms her commitment to the WSIS vision and looks forward to continued collaboration to ensure that digital technologies serve as a force for inclusion, resilience, and sustainable development for all.

Costa Rica

Muchas gracias. Thank you very much, Madam President. The Geneva and Tunis architecture requires an update in light of the extreme concentration of digital power and the risks posed by increasingly complex artificial intelligence systems.

This is the challenge facing WSIS plus 20. Allow me to share three reflections. First, we must ensure identical protection of human rights in both digital and physical spaces.

This requires robust legal frameworks with binding force. Costa Rica has developed legislation on personal data protection and digital identity that meets international standards. Enhanced protection for children, youth and women constitutes an obligation under international law.

The digital ecosystem must be built on transparency, informed consent. And interoperability that respects national sovereignty. Second, we must strengthen multilateral governance with the effective participation of all stakeholders.

As co-facilitators of the International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence and the Global Dialogue on AI Governance, we know that legitimacy requires genuine collaboration among states, civil society, academia and the private sector.

The governance of emerging technologies. requires clear and transparent accountability mechanisms. Third, we must close digital divides through international cooperation and sustainable financing.

Our Hogares Conectados programme has connected hundreds of thousands of vulnerable families through targeted subsidies as well as collective procurement. This model works, but it requires international solidarity, effective technology transfer and South-South cooperation to be replicated at scale. Madam President, WSIS Plus 20 must deliver measurable commitments with verifiable indicators and align the summit with the Global Digital Compact.

Digital transformation must reduce structural inequalities and not deepen them. Only through effective multilateralism will we ensure that every person has access to the digital future. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Costa Rica. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ethiopia.

Ethiopia

Thank you. Thank you, Madam President, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen. Ethiopia aligns itself with the statement made by Iraq on behalf of G77 and China.

Allow me first to thank the co-facilitators, Kenya and Albania, and the UN Secretariat for Development. for their excellent work on the facilitation of the WSIS outcome document. At the time, some key goals of the SDGs are in reversal, ICT the major accelerator of the 2030 agenda.

Ethiopia has integrated the transformative role of the digital technologies into our economic transformation strategy that advances a people-centered, inclusive, and sustainable development. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, investment in people, innovation, and digital transformation is at the front and center of a digital Ethiopia that is strong, sovereign, and ready to seize future opportunities.

Our recently released Digital Ethiopia 2030 vision builds on past progresses while recognizing the major challenges facing the country. Ethiopia is already leveraging digital technologies across various sectors such as agriculture, energy, manufacturing, services, and tourism with scale and speed. Digital platforms are transforming public service delivery.

Over 800 services have been digitized under the massive one-stop service centers. Public administration is going digital as taxpayers now use e-filing systems and electronic single window program. Ethiopia is also driving a digital marketplace as we open our digital economy to global and regional investors.

Our digital payments ecosystem processed close to 4 billion transactions last year worth about 100 million US dollars. Ethiopia’s national digital ID program is a cornerstone of our digital transformation strategy with rapid enrollment anchored in inclusivity, rights protection, and integrity. The digital identity program is a key driver of our economic growth agenda.

Crucially, it is closing the gender gap. empowering women to access social protection payments and finance, ensuring full protection in the economy. While expanding, the program now services more than 25 million people, laying the groundwork for trust and efficiency in both government and business.

However, several challenges persist in key areas. This includes limited digital literacy, infrastructure and usage gaps, high logistics costs, cyber threats, and a digital economy contributing just a modest portion of gross domestic product. The government is aligning resources, partnerships, and national efforts in its commitment to drive meaningful, lasting, and human-centered progress.

Excellencies, as we look forward to the next two decades, global cooperation and governance must be focused on addressing the significant and persistent digital divides between and within countries and regions.

Ethiopia stands ready to work with all partners in fully utilizing the unprecedented potential of ICTs to contribute to prosperity and sustainable development. I thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Ethiopia. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ukraine.

Ukraine

Madam President, Ukraine aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union. Allow me to make a few additional remarks in our national capacity. Ukraine thanks the president of the assembly for convening this high level meeting.

I also express my appreciation to Kenya and Albania as co-facilitators of this meeting. facilitators and their teams for delivering the outcome document. Ukraine is proud of its digital transformation and a little self-aware, too.

After all, we are a country where Russian missiles and drones make headlines every night, but our Wi-Fi still works, proving that digital progress requires the resilience, creativity, and very often a sense of humor.

Digitalization is a powerful enabler of sustainable development, innovation, and inclusive growth. Despite the grave consequences of Russia’s ongoing war of aggression, Ukraine continues to advance its digital transformation. We are proud that Ukraine has moved from 102nd to the 5th place in the online service index of the UN e-government development index.

Our national digital platform, DIA, in English, Action, provides more than 100 public services to over 22 million users, ensuring access to documents, social support, and business services fully online.

We have learned that even under pressure of deadly Russian bombs and power cuts, Ukrainians can click, tap, and log in, often much faster than the hackers trying to disrupt us. This is digital resilience at its finest. To ensure uninterrupted education during wartime, Ukraine created MRIA, in English, The Dream, an online learning platform that allows millions of our children to study remotely despite Russia’s deliberate attacks on schools and the energy grid.

Let me tell you frankly, teaching remotely during feminine blackouts and air raid alarms requires more courage than any math test for both students and teachers. Another important initiative Strichka, in English, the ribbon or the band, especially for those who created this platform also enables to proceed. Ladies and gentlemen, let me stress that at the same time, Russian troops deliberately target civilian digital and energy infrastructure, including communication towers and data centers, while large-scale cyber operations and manipulations campaigns undermine trust in cyberspace.

But Ukrainian IT teams are relentless if countering counter-cyber attacks were an Olympic sport, our teams would surely be taking gold and still be polite enough to send you a smiling status update afterward.

In fact, all these challenges have taught us Ukrainians that resilience is not just about technology, it’s about teamwork and the occasional humor to get through the long nights. Madam President, despite all the challenges, Ukraine remains determined to use digital technologies for resilience, recovery, and sustainable growth, and to share its experience with partners pursuing inclusive and secure digital transformation.

We are committed to working closely with all partners to ensure the effective implementation of the WSIS plus 20 outcomes. Despite Russian deadly attacks, power outages, and struggles with understanding every new app update, Ukraine continues to innovate digitally, and perhaps one day an Ivy League university will offer a special course on how Ukraine mastered e-government and remote learning, all while dodging both missiles and pop-up alerts.

I thank you, Madam President.

Chair

Sorry, I thank the Distinguished Representative of Ukraine. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Kuwait.

Kuwait

Thank you, Madam President. At the outset, the State of Kuwait wishes to thank you for convening this meeting and we thank Member States and Kenya and Albania in particular as the co-facilitators. We deeply appreciate the efforts undertaken to arrive at this WSIS Plus 20 outcome document.

Madam President, my country finds the WSIS vision particularly important, a vision for an inclusive information society that is people-centered, also aligns with our national commitment to the SDGs and achieving them by 2030.

As set out in the outcome document, for inclusive connectivity, for reducing the digital divide and for building a safe digital ecosystem, development is accelerating and technologies are revealing challenges that require our cooperation given the deepening digital divides both within and between countries.

countries. We must protect private personal data and we must allow an opportunity for prosperity and at the same time, we must ensure that no one is left behind. In this regard, my country reiterates our attachment and the importance of international efforts to achieve digital cooperation in relation to digital governance as set out in the outcome document.

Madam President, my country is convinced that the digital transformation is a crucial goal for socio-economic development. This again is in line with our national development plan for 2035, which is based on knowledge, economy and creativity for development. This vision calls for resilient infrastructure for a better life and for sustainable development.

Nationally, my country believes that strengthening digital skills is particularly important, especially in the area of AI and also for the empowerment of women and young people. We believe that we must invest in skills. These are the main efforts we must undertake to close the digital divide.

Thanks to our fund, we have been able to mobilise resources for the sake of infrastructure in more than 100 countries. We do so because we believe that this kind of investment in the digital sphere is an investment in the future and in our populations. Madam President, we hail a strengthened role for the UN under WSIS and the Global Digital Compact.

AI governance, to put AI at the service of humanity, is necessary, and we must also ensure that human rights are respected. In conclusion, my country reiterates its commitment to work with all friendly and brotherly countries to ensure a sustainable transformation that will allow all countries of the world to make progress and to see prosperity for the future.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of Kuwait. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Eritrea.

Eritrea

Madam President, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, Eritrea aligns itself with the statements made by the Distinguished Delegates of Iraq on behalf of Group 77 in China and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on behalf of the Group of Friends in defense of the UN Charter.

We thank the Secretary General for his comprehensive report and welcome this review process. It’s crucial in assessing our collective journey towards an inclusive information society. The review process is a strategic opportunity to strengthen and redefine global digital cooperation.

Eritrea appreciates our collective commitment to the vision of the World Summit. information society to build a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society. We believe that digital technology are key for achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and welcome the nexus made with the Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact.

Eritrea remains deeply concerned about the ongoing and growing digital divides, this gap exacerbated by financial, technical, and infrastructural constraints severely limits the effective participation of developing countries, especially the LDCs in the global digital economy and digital governance.

Unilateral course of measures which impede economic and social development also impede progress in digital transformation in countries affected by these harsh measures. For Eritrea, national ownership and context-specific strategies are essential in this regard. Our approach prioritizes leveraging ICTs to achieve tangible development outcomes.

This approach aims to promote digital culture, expand government services, improve public administration, and exploit technology in vital sectors such as education, health care, and agriculture. We share the concern in the report about the speed of emerging technologies such as AI, this may exceed the adaptive capabilities of the countries like ours. International cooperation should prioritize capacity building, dedicated technology transfer, and financing of public digital infrastructure.

The establishment of a working group to study future financial mechanisms for digital development as proposed in the outcome document is a step in the right direction, provided that it focuses on the concrete needs of developing countries.

Eritrea emphasizes that an open, safe, and stable digital space must respect international law and the principles of the Charter of the United Nations. We must all commit to combating the misuse and exploitation of technology to spread violence, hate speech, and disinformation. We emphasize that the right to legitimate use of technology and the Internet must take into account the responsibilities associated with it and respect morality, social and cultural values, public order, and the general well-being of the people.

In conclusion, we hope that the WSIS Plus 20 review will rekindle our collective resolve to bridge the digital, technological, and economic divide and ensure that global digital governance is inclusive and share its benefits equitably.

Eritrea is ready to engage in genuine multilateral cooperation to build a digital future that leaves no one behind, promotes sustainable development, and respects the ownership, sovereignty, diverse interests, and priorities of all nations, regardless of their size or wealth.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of Eritrea. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Fiji.

Fiji

Madam President, Excellencies, Fiji stands firmly with the collective voice of Fiji 77 and China, as delivered by IRAG, and the Pacific Islands Forum members in New York, as delivered by Tonga. We wish to add a few comments in our national capacity. We extend our appreciation to Ambassador Janina of Albania and Ambassador Lokaale of Kenya, their teams, and the Secretariat for their excellent facilitation.

As an archipelago of more than 300 islands, the digital divide remains a lived reality. It shapes our ability to respond to climate change, deliver education and health services, and diversify our economies. ICTs are lifelines.

They power early warning systems, disaster preparedness, climate adaptation, and safeguard our people’s everyday lives. Digital transformation is no longer an option, it’s a necessity. It is the engine that will propel Fiji to a new era of prosperity, sustainability, and global competitiveness.

Fiji’s digital economy shows remarkable progress according to the ITU’s ICT Development Index. But for Fiji to develop far, all islands in the Pacific and beyond ICT should prosper together. In Fiji, over 85% of our people use the internet, well above the global average of 67.4%.

3G coverage reaches 96% of our population, and 4G coverage reaches around 92%. Yet our commitment remains clear, no community will be left behind. Guided by Fiji’s own National Digital Strategy Framework 2025-2030, we are connecting our nation from fiber and 5G to remote satellite access.

We are investing in digital literacy for vulnerable groups. We are fostering cyber hygiene. We are embedding resilience in green infrastructure.

We are harnessing AI responsibly. And we are empowering women and girls through ICT. Madam President, going forward, and as I conclude, WSIS must strengthen partnerships across all sectors.

It must translate commitments under the Antigua and Barbuda Agenda for SEADS. and the Pacific’s long-term declaration into tangible action to retail financing, capacity building, and technology transfer. Governments cannot do this alone, but partnerships can.

WSIS is our opportunity to reaffirm solidarity, strengthen cooperation, and secure a digital future that is inclusive, safe, and sustainable for all. I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of Fiji. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Malaysia.

Malaysia

Thank you, Chair. Malaysia aligns itself with the statement delivered by Iraq on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, and wishes to deliver this statement in its national capacity. Malaysia welcomes the convening of the WSIS Plus 20 High-Level Meeting and expresses its appreciation to Kenya and Albania for their able leadership as co-facilitators in guiding the negotiations on the outcome document.

Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, 20 years after the Tunis phase, the World Summit on the Information Society continues to provide a vital framework for building an inclusive and development-oriented information society.

This moment is not only an opportunity to reflect on the progress achieved, but also to consider how WSIS should guide global digital cooperation in the years ahead. In Malaysia, this progress is reflected through our National Digital Network Plan, Jindela, which has extended high-speed Internet connectivity to over 9.6 million premises and achieved near-universal coverage in populated areas.

WSIS has consistently emphasized that digital transformation must remain people-centered. Malaysia’s National Information Dissemination Centres, which was recognised as a WSIS Prize winner in 2025, demonstrates how community-based digital literacy, skills development and entrepreneurship programmes can uplift rural communities, women entrepreneurs, as well as vulnerable groups.

We have also launched initiatives such as the National Scam Response Centre, a fact-checking web platform, and National Online Safety Campaigns, which aim to protect users from misinformation, disinformation, online fraud and harmful content, while strengthening public awareness.

Chair, from these experiences, several key lessons emerge. First, connectivity alone is not sufficient. Meaningful participation in the digital economy requires skills, awareness and confidence.

Second, trust and safety must be embedded across the digital ecosystem through regulation, accountability and sustained public education. Third, digital challenges transcend borders. Effective responses to issues such as artificial intelligence governance, cyber security, online scams and disinformation require continuous global cooperation.

Chair, as we move forward, Malaysia believes global digital cooperation should prioritise four key areas. First, expanding universal, affordable and meaningful connectivity. Second, advancing human-centred governance.

Third, strengthening inclusive digital capacity building. And fourth, developing resilient and trusted digital infrastructure to support sustainable growth. Malaysia supports the continuation of the WSIS process as an inclusive, rights-based and technological-neutral multi-stakeholder platform that aligns digital development with the Sustainable Development Goals.

We also reaffirm our support to the ITU in continuing to play a leading role in steering the WSIS process. As digital technologies continue to reshape our societies, the WSIS vision remains deeply relevant. Malaysia stands ready to work with all partners in ensuring that no one is left behind.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of Malaysia. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Trinidad and Tobago.

Trinidad and Tobago

Madam President, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, Trinidad and Tobago aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the G77 and China and welcomes the convening of this high-level meeting and commends all stakeholders for sustaining a vision of an inclusive, people-centered and development-oriented information society.

For small island developing states, digital transformation is central to economic diversification, resilience building and improved access to public services. In this regard, Trinidad and Tobago has been advancing a national digital transformation agenda that places innovation, inclusion and trust at its core. At the national level, Trinidad and Tobago has expanded e-government platforms to enhance service delivery and transparency, including online business registration, customs and tax administration and digital public procurement systems.

We continue to invest in broadband expansion, secure government networks and the development of local data centers to strengthen digital sovereignty, improve service reliability. and support the growth of the digital economy. We are exploring interoperable, secure, and scalable digital systems that can support the development and use of digital identity management and verification mechanism systems, payments, and data exchange while respecting privacy and national context.

We see strong value in global initiatives such as the 50 in 5 campaign, which seeks to accelerate the adoption of digital public infrastructure as pathways to inclusive growth, particularly for developing countries and the SIDS.

Complementing this effort are efforts to build digital skills through coding and ICT training programs particularly for youth and public officers to ensure our workforce is prepared for a rapidly evolving digital economy.

Additionally, Madam Chair, we have initiated work toward a national framework for artificial intelligence, having recently launched a national artificial intelligence assessment initiative in collaboration with the UNDP and UNESCO.

This AI assessment serves to evaluate our readiness to adopt AI in six core areas, governance, digital infrastructure, policy, ethics, institutional capacity, and inclusion, a true AI sphere in its figurative sense.

This meeting provides a timely opportunity to reaffirm multilateral cooperation, strengthen capacity building for developing countries, and ensure that the digital and AI governance frameworks reflect the realities and priorities of SIDS.

Trinidad and Tobago stands ready to work with partners to ensure that digital transformation leaves no one behind and serves as a true enabler of sustainable development. I thank you, Madam Chair.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Trinidad and Tobago. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Observer State of the Holy See.

Holy See

Madam President, The Holy See delegation welcomes the opportunity to address this high-level meeting which marks ten years since the first review of the implementation of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society.

Advances in information technology, particularly in the digital sphere, offer opportunities for poverty eradication, economic growth, social development and sustainability. Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged that such advances are not without significant risks which are contingent upon the choices that are made in their development. This is particularly evident in the field of AI, where ethical reflection and safeguards are essential.

As Pope Leo said, artificial intelligence has certainly opened up new horizons for creativity, but it also raises serious concerns about its possible repercussions on humanity’s openness to truth and beauty, and capacity for wonder and contemplation.

Madam President, The Holy See appreciates the section of the outcome document that pertains to human rights and ethical dimensions of the information society. This section emphasizes the necessity of effective ethical management and regulatory frameworks to ensure the protection of all users, particularly children, from the potential harms associated with the misuse of ICTs.

It is also important that the benefits of the information society are accessible to all, particularly in developing countries. Enhance international cooperation. Conditions and policies that foster economic growth and development by facilitating investment, innovation, and effective governance and both financial and technological resources are therefore needed to address current digital divides.

Madam President, in conclusion, the OECD hopes that 10 years from now the impact of these technological developments will have served the interests of humanity as a whole. To achieve this, Pableo said, it is essential to remain oriented toward the dignity of the human person and the common good and to develop systems that reflect justice, solidarity, and a genuine reverence for life.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of the observer of the observer state of the Holy See. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the observer of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

International Committee of the Red Cross

Thank you, Madam President. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, the International Committee of the Red Cross is pleased to participate in this high-level meeting of the General Assembly for the WSIS Plus 20 Review. The mandate of the ICRC, as set out in the Geneva Conventions and in the statutes of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, is to provide humanitarian assistance to people affected by armed conflict and other situations of violence, and to promote laws that protect victims of war.

In today’s digital age, the ICRC’s mandate increasingly intersects with the evolution of global information and communication technologies. Twenty years after the original WSIS vision, digital technologies have become deeply embedded in the functioning of societies. War and conflict are no exception.

Digital technologies are increasingly used in the conduct of hostilities between warring parties, including the use of ICT infrastructure. As a result, the protection challenges we confront today in armed conflict are not only physical but digital. Medical services and impartial humanitarian operations are enabled by digital technologies.

They boost efficiency and extend reach. They now depend on data networks, cloud services, digital logistics, and remote diagnostic capabilities. When these systems are disrupted, whether intentionally or not, the humanitarian consequences can be immediate and severe.

I highlight for you today one specific project aimed at ensuring that the protections afforded under international humanitarian law remain effective when ICTs are used by parties to armed conflict. The digital emblem project does not create new legal protections. Rather, just as an emblem on a building or a vehicle in the physical world, the digital emblem is to provide a technical means of identification and authenticity in the digital sphere, enabling parties to armed conflict to recognize digital assets that belong to protected medical or humanitarian actors.

In other words, it is one measure to ensure the protection in the physical world is not lost in the digital sphere. In addition to technical work at both the Internet Engineering Task Force and the International Telecommunications Union, the ICRC appreciates that the WSIS Plus 20 process has offered opportunities for states and technical communities to engage on this topic, including at the high-level WSIS event in Geneva last July.

These discussions have underscored the importance of cooperation between diplomats, engineers, and humanitarian actors. The ICRC looks forward to continued collaboration with states, the private sector, and standard-setting bodies, which are essential to ensuring that any future digital emblem is technically robust and globally implementable.

Excellencies, as the international community charts the path forward for inclusive, secure, development-oriented, and resilient information societies, the ICRC stands ready to contribute its humanitarian expertise and to continue working with all stakeholders to prevent and mitigate harm to those most at risk during armed conflict.

Thank you, Madam President.

Chair

I thank the observer of the International Committee of the Red Cross. I now give the floor to the observer of the International Chamber of Commerce.

International Chamber of Commerce

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, I have the honor to speak on behalf of the International Chamber of Commerce, a global business organization that brings together companies of all sizes from across all regions and sectors of the world economy.

We express our sincere appreciation to the co-facilitators of the WSIS Plus 20 Review for their leadership, openness, and tireless efforts. in guiding this inclusive and constructive review process. We also thank all Member States for their engagement through the process and their shared commitment to a consensus based advancing a common vision for the digital future.

The WSIS Plus 20 review process placed the emphasis on the right foundation. It recognized that expanding meaningful connectivity is the base upon which all can benefit from the promise of the Internet and digital technologies. Connectivity enables participation in modern economies and societies, supports innovation and allows digital solutions to scale across borders and communities.

Without it, digital transformation cannot deliver on its potential to advance development and opportunity. From this foundation flows the need of trust. This review process rightly recognized that digital development must be grounded in respect for human rights.

States have the obligation to protect human rights also in the digital environment, while businesses have the responsibility to protect those rights in the design, development, deployment and use of technologies.

When these roles are clearly understood and aligned, they reinforce confidence in digital ecosystems and help ensure that innovation delivers long-term social economic value. Furthermore, the review process raised important questions about how global digital cooperation should be organized. By entrusting the Internet Governance Forum with a permanent mandate, member states can reaffirm their confidence in the multi-stakeholder model.

Over the years, the IGF has demonstrated that it is fit to discuss all public policy. in matters that are related to the Internet, providing a unique space for dialogue, learning, and cooperation among governments, business, civil society, the technical community, and international organizations.

This inclusive approach is essential in a digital environment that is evolving faster than any single actor can manage alone. Going ahead, the success of the WSIS Plus 20 review will ultimately be measured by implementation. So to translate our shared commitments into tangible outcomes, the most important task is to create enabling policy environments.

Such environments encourage investment, innovation, and responsible use of digital technologies. They are built on openness and coherence. They include policies that support the free flow of information across borders, avoid unnecessary fragmentation, and provide regulatory clarity and predictability.

They promote interoperability, foster competition and innovation, and enable digital solutions to scale globally. Crucially, they are developed through dialogue with stakeholders who design, build, and operate digital networks and services, ensuring that policies are practical, future-oriented, and grounded in real-world experience.

Business has a central role to play in this. Companies invest in digital infrastructure, deliver services that connect people, enterprises, and governments, and develop the skills that allow individuals and workforce to participate meaningfully in the digital economy.

These contributions are not made in isolation. They depend on partnership, trust, and policies that recognize the value of private sector expertise and investment. Let me conclude by emphasizing that the WSIS vision has always been rooted in collaboration.

The outcome of the 20-year review must also reaffirm that no single stakeholder can deliver digital development alone. Business takes its role in multi-stakeholder partnerships seriously, and we want to stand ready to work with governments and all stakeholders to ensure that the Internet and the digital technologies continue to serve as an engine of inclusive growth, innovation, and sustainable development for all.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Observer of the International Chamber of Commerce. I now give the floor to the Observer of the International Institute of Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

Chair

I thank the observer of the International Institute of Democracy and Electoral Assistance. I now give the floor to the observer of the International Organization of La Francophonie.

International Organization of la Francophonie

Madam President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Delegates, The International Organization of La Francophonie would like to express its most sincere gratitude to the co-facilitators Albania and Kenya for the exemplary, inclusive and rigorous conduct of the process that brought us to the draft decision before the Assembly today.

Their constant engagement in the service of dialogue and consensus deserves to be applauded, and we very much hope that this text can be adopted with the broadest possible support. We also welcome the next step that this renewal of the mandate of the World Summit on Information Society represents. It is a useful strengthening of the architecture of multilateral digital governance at a time when technological change is accelerating and is profoundly reshaping our societies.

In this regard, we would like to commend all of those stakeholders that contributed to this momentum, in particular the United Nations Secretary-General, his Envoy for Technology and the United Nations Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies that the envoy leads, for the driving force and the mobilizing capacity that they have demonstrated.

We would also like to underscore the remarkable investment shown both by states and also by multi-party stakeholders in this process. This collective engagement is essential because digital technologies now permeate all elements of economic, social, cultural and industrial development. They are shaping the way that we produce, learn, create and the way that citizens participate.

However, one thing is still all too broadly underestimated and that is the aspect of cultural and linguistic diversity in digital development and in particular in the development of artificial intelligence.

Today, more than 80% of generative AI training data comes from a single language and less than 5% of living languages are represented in large language models. And yet, nearly 450 languages around the world, of which nearly 150 in Africa, have more than a million speakers. This massive deficit of diversity and discoverability of multilingual data is a major civilizational issue and if we don’t respond to this, hundreds or even thousands of languages and cultures risk quite simply being erased from the digital environment.

Overcoming this challenge will require several concrete commitments. First of all, there must be a greater decentralization of calculating capacity and technical and financial capacities that are devoted to digital development. According to the figures from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 93% of the financial valuation of digital platforms is currently concentrated in the hands of two countries.

This leaves the rest of the world to share a small amount among themselves and this imbalance is deeply worrying. Next, there must be a determined commitment to digital common goods and to open source solutions, as well as a greater awareness of the need to digitize and to value written visual and oral resources, including those that constitute intangible heritage, both at the national as well as regional and international levels.

There must also be a significant effort to implement an ambitious strategy to finance digital development and artificial intelligence. building upon the proposals recently made by the Secretary General of the United Nations. And lastly, there needs to be an inclusive expansion and enlargement of digital governance bodies and structures, to include knowledge actors, university libraries, archives, cultural figures and public media, because we are no longer just talking about telecommunications or infrastructure, we are really talking about the status of knowledge in our societies.

To conclude, allow me to underscore the unique contribution of the United Nations to digital governance and artificial intelligence through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. More than ever, it is an essential roadmap for us to be able to reconcile the universality of rights and respect for the diversity of cultures, languages and peoples. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the observer of the International Organization of La Francophonie, distinguished delegates. In accordance with its Resolution 79-277 and Decision 80-524, taken at the 66th Plenary Meeting, the Assembly will now hear from representatives of the United Nations system entities and stakeholders. I now give the floor to the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights.

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Colleagues, thank you for the opportunity to address you at this historic moment. Twenty years after the Geneva and Tunis summits, digital technologies have become integral to our societies and economies. While technologies have empowered people in many positive ways, they also present profound challenges.

The increasing concentration of technological capacity and power raises critical questions about accountability and equity. Against the backdrop of algorithmic bias and mass data collection, protecting fundamental rights such as non-discrimination, privacy and freedom of expression is more critical than ever. A rights-based approach to digital governance ensures that people have a say in how technologies are shaped and regulated, that impacts are assessed through a human rights-centered lens, and that accountability exists for any human rights violations.

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ Human Rights Advisory Service and Digital Technologies provides guidance to governments, stakeholders, and the United Nations system in areas such as human rights due diligence and embedding non-discrimination across the lifecycle of digital technologies.

Technology and the policies adopted around its use have ripple effects across education, health, and social protection as services are increasingly digitized. Input and feedback from users, communities, and marginalized groups lead to better policies and help ensure that connectivity, algorithms, and digital services benefit the people. A strong multi-stakeholder approach is essential to deliver better outcomes.

Proposals such as the 2024 São Paulo Multi-Stakeholder Guidelines are a good basis for further deliberations. OHCHR welcomes the decision to make the Internet Governance Act. form permanent as an important step in this regard.

After a year of intense coordination, we have learned how to better align the WSIS and Global Digital Compact agendas. The UN Digital Cooperation Portal, launched last week, provides a granular overview of how UN and stakeholder initiatives advance, both in a complementary way. In this context, an enhanced role of the Human Rights Office within the WSIS architecture would be necessary to ensure the ability to respond to many regulatory and legislative requests, meet capacity development needs, and inject human rights consistency across WSIS action lines.

Excellencies, colleagues, as the UN Charter affirms, human rights are vital to ensuring that technological progress serves the public and reflects lived realities. Human rights are the guardrails needed to govern technologies and AI. While the WSIS Plus20 outcome takes some positive steps, strengthening the UN human rights architecture remains a glaring gap.

OHCHR will, within available capacity, strive to engage with all stakeholders to fulfill the promise of an online universe that advances human rights and benefits humanity. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. I now give the floor to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Chair

I thank the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. I now give the floor to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Thank you. Madam President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, over the past 20 years, information and communications technologies have contributed to transforming our world in many ways. This process continues at an accelerating pace.

As with any technological disruption, there are both opportunities and challenges. The development outcomes vary significantly between the most and the least digitally advanced economies. More than 6 billion people now use the Internet.

However, in low-income countries, only a third of people are online, and less than 10% use mobiles or the Internet to engage in electronic commerce. It’s important to enable more equitable sharing of the gains from digitalization. The digital economy has resulted in huge wealth creation, which is currently highly concentrated.

For example, the market value of the top 100 digital platforms is now almost $28 trillion, with companies from two countries, the United States and China, accounting for 93% of this value. The growing importance of data boosted by artificial intelligence explains much of this trend. Meanwhile, we are becoming more aware of the significant environmental footprint of the digital economy and of the formidable potential as well as challenges brought about by artificial intelligence.

This points to the need for policies, strategies and choices in the short term that can help secure both inclusive and sustainable development outcomes in the long term. The vision of the World Summit on the Information Society to establish a people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented information society remains highly relevant today. At UNCTAD, we are committed to contribute to achieving this vision, as the Secretariat of the ECOSOC’s Commission on Science, Technology for Development, as a member and current chair of the UN Group on the Information Society, as co-facilitator of the WSIS Action Line on E-Business, as co-organizer of the WSIS Forum, as co-leader of Subgroups 2 and 4 of the Global Digital Compact, and by contributing to the new UN Digital Cooperation Portal.

At the 16th UNCTAD Ministerial Conference, which took place last October in Geneva, Member States confirmed our mandate and their commitment to enhance UNCTAD’s contribution to the implementation of the WSIS architecture and the relevant commitments of the Global Digital Compact.

This work will be carried out in synergy with the UN system and other organizations, notably through the Working Group on Data Governance of the Commission on Science and Technology for Development. We very much look forward to deepening our collaboration with Member States and other stakeholders to seize opportunities presented by digitalization and addressing related challenges. Thank you very much.

Chair

I thank the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. I now give the floor to the United Nations Development Program.

United Nations Development Programme

Thank you, Madam President, Excellencies, dear colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for giving UNDP the opportunity to speak today. UNDP reaffirms our full commitment to the WSIS process as a cornerstone of the Global Digital Cooperation.

For 20 years, WSIS has provided a critical, people-centered, development-oriented and multi-stakeholder framework for the use of digital technologies. UNDP has been honored to play a key role in WSIS. We are one of the UN agencies originally mandated to lead WSIS implementation, a co-convener of the annual WSIS Forum, and part of the leadership of the United Nations Group on the Information Society.

Today’s WSIS Plus 20 outcome provides renewed momentum that must now be translated into concrete delivery and impact. Through UNDP’s presence in over 170 countries and territories, we stand ready to continue this important work. UNDP sees three priorities for implementation that are reflected in the outcome document.

First, capacity building for inclusive digital transformation. Countries worldwide face critical constraints in the areas of digital skills, institutions and governance capacity. Capacity building is the most consistent request that UNDP receives from our partners.

Second, building inclusive digital ecosystems through strong digital foundations. UNDP commends the references in the WSIS outcome document on digital public infrastructure and digital public goods as foundations for inclusion, innovation and public value. DPI must be deployed in ways that are secure, interoperable and rights-based, grounded in safeguards, open systems and public interest governance.

Third, financing digital transformation for delivery at scale. For sustainable impact, implementation requires moving beyond fragmented projects towards systems-level approaches in financing. UNDP works with partners to mobilize public and private investment, align financing with national priorities and link digital transformation to broader development outcomes across climate action, crisis resilience, governance, economic inclusion and prosperity, among others.

UNDP prioritizes these aspects in our delivery to countries. To date, we have supported over 130 countries in strengthening their digital ecosystems, including through our digital readiness assessments and shaping national digital strategies. We have trained over 4,000 policy makers representing over 100 countries globally and have advanced the design and implementation of digital public infrastructure in more than 30 countries.

And as AI reshapes development pathways, UNDP is working to narrow the AI equity gap. We have supported national AI landscape assessments in over 20 countries and have supported their AI strategies as well. Our AI Hub for Sustainable Development has launched a first wave of core initiatives designed to reimagine global AI partnerships and empower AI ecosystems within Africa.

At the global level, we are also advancing multi-stakeholder partnerships through initiatives such as the Hamburg Declaration on Responsible AI for the SDGs. And finally, to support this work, UNDP has recently established the Digital AI and Innovation Hub, a platform that reflects a holistic and transformative approach to digital development. Within the digital space, UNDP acts as a new kind of development partner, bringing public and private actors together on terms that are explicitly people-centered and focused on public purpose.

Looking ahead, UNDP supports strong alignment between WSIS and the Global Digital Compact, with WSIS serving as a backbone for implementation and the IGF playing a critical role. The WSIS framework, with UNGASS as its UN System Foundation, has proven essential in translating political commitments into coordinated action. We must build on this to accelerate achievement of the SDGs.

Excellencies, WSIS Plus 20 is not only a moment of reflection, but also a turning point for delivery. UNDP will continue to work closely with all stakeholders to ensure that the needs of developing countries remain at the centre of global digital cooperation. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the United Nations Development Program and now give the floor to the United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization

Madam President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, UNIDO welcomes this milestone moment for the Information Society. As we reflect upon 20 years of WSIS and have recently embarked on the implementation of the Global Digital Compact, we must be clear. Frameworks alone are not enough.

We must act. To deliver on the WSIS action lines, UNIDO is committed to advancing concrete solutions together with our partners. In our capacity as Vice Chair of the Working Group on Digital Technologies, we are co-leading efforts to expand inclusion in the digital economy for all, including through the UN Digital Cooperation Portal.

To advance WSIS, allow me to highlight three concrete sets of solutions that change industrial realities in developing countries. First, lighthouse solutions. Developers need proof of return on investment.

UNIDO thus implements technology demonstrations in developing countries that prove value in real-world scenarios and build momentum for larger investment in priority industrial sectors. We’re also joining hands with the private sector for this purpose. Second, centers of excellence for AI in industry.

Capacity building requires a home. Centers of excellence provide infrastructure and expertise which many countries cannot afford alone, particularly LDCs. LLDCs, and SITs.

Interest in such centers as hubs of technology adoption has been growing. We’re therefore establishing a network of centers of excellence across the global south, including in China, Ethiopia, the Western Balkans, Belarus, and Latin America. Third, governance of AI in industry.

Traditional regulation often lags behind rapidly emerging AI developments. UNIDO supports governments in evidence-based policymaking. We provide testbeds for policymakers to help them test regulatory approaches, de-risk innovation, and translate strategies into industrial applications.

So excellencies, to further advance these mechanisms, UNIDO has established the Global Alliance on AI for industry and manufacturing. As of today, the alliance convenes over 200 members from government, industry, academia, and civil society from more than 70 countries. Through AI in global and our related programs, we will continue to facilitate investments in and fast-track the adoption of AI in industry for economic development in developing countries.

Together, let us make sure that AI is a driver and not a divider, and supports the achievement of inclusive and sustainable industrialization and innovation in line with SDG 9. I thank you.

Chair

I thank the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. I now give the floor to Internet Corporation of assigned names and numbers.

Chair

I thank Internet Corporation for assigned names and numbers. And now I’ll give the floor to META.

Meta

Good afternoon, Madam Chair, Excellencies, Delegates. META’s core mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. To that end, we have made significant investments to advance global connectivity and Internet adoption around the world, from investing in infrastructure, subsea cables, data centers, to developing applications, wearable devices, and AI tools that accelerate inclusion globally.

As we work to connect people around the world, we are proud to have been a proactive and committed partner in the global governance and implementation of WSIS and its inception. The multi-stakeholder model has been proven to be a cornerstone of WSIS’s success. Its cooperation allows companies like Meta to gain deeper insights into the real-world challenges facing our users globally.

We must remain a trusted and integral partner in these discussions, so that we can implement effective solutions and partnerships that facilitate adoptions of new technologies. The convening power of WSIS has been pivotal, providing a neutral space for constructive dialogue. This is particularly true for the Internet Governance Forum, which allows all stakeholders to be heard on an equal footing.

Meta has been an engaged participant and a trusted founder of the IGF over the years, and we fully support the continuation of this annual and truly global and inclusive meeting. As the digital cooperation landscape continues to evolve and grow, we must be vigilant against greatest risks to implementation, fragmentation, and duplication of our efforts. Our collective resource, time, expertise, and funding are too precious to waste on duplicative processes.

That’s why we support the parallel yet aligned implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS Plus 20 Action Lines. We are looking forward to engaging on the GDC implementation, including a global AI dialogue and the scientific body on AI, to drive AI adoption around the world and advance economic growth. And we support initiatives like the WSIS Forum, where the WSIS Action Lines’ roadmaps are developed, aligning public and private sectors’ efforts with development priorities.

In closing, we remain committed to the effective implementation of the WSIS outcomes. and the multistakeholder approach to Internet governance and to the renewal of the IGF mandate permanently. We would like to thank the UN and the co-facilitators carrying out this review process and obtaining consensus successfully.

Let’s build on the two decades of RISA’s progress to champion the multistakeholder model and together work together cohesive, coordinated global processes that can promote innovation while keeping a resilient, secured and open Internet.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank Meta. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of China.

China

President, 20 years ago, the World Summit on the Information Society mapped out a vision for an information society that is people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented. Thanks to the concerted efforts of all countries, this vision is gradually coming to fruition. Over the past two decades, China has actively implemented RISA’s outcomes, promoted digital innovation, access and application, and shared digital dividends with the international community through open-source cooperation.

China has also fostered inclusive partnerships under the Belt and Road Initiative and the Global Development Initiative to help countries in the Global South implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Today, as the digital and smart transformations sweep across the world, it is necessary for the international community to coordinate actions and seize the opportunity to address challenges and shape a better, more prosperous and sustainable future.

First, we need an inclusive information society that delivers benefits to all. First, we wish to deepen cooperation with all partners to develop a new infrastructure such as 5G network, computing infrastructure, and satellite internet, enhance the resilience of international submarine cable, and strengthen capacity building for developing countries to bridge the digital divide.

Second, we need an open information society that is shared by all. We wish to work with all partners to foster an open and cooperative innovation ecosystem for digital industries, remove barriers that impede the flow of innovation inputs, further integrate innovation in emerging technologies such as AI with industrial innovation, and ensure that the benefits generated are shared by all people.

Third, we need an information society that is green and environment-friendly. We wish to work with all partners to advance the synergic progress of digital and green transformations to effectively address global challenges such as climate change and resource scarcity, and to harness ICTs to empower all countries, especially developing ones, to achieve SDGs.

President, the Global Governance Initiative proposed by President Xi Jinping advocates a five core tenets, sovereign equality, international rule of law, multilateralism, and people-centered approach and a focus on concrete actions, which are highly consistent with this consensus.

On December 9th, over 40 countries jointly established the Group of Friends of the Global Governance here at the UN headquarters. Six days ago, the ITU adopted a decision to hold the 2027 World Radio Communication Conference in Shanghai, China. China stands ready to work with all partners to uphold multilateralism and strengthen international cooperation to turn WSIS vision into reality and jointly build a community with a shared future for humankind.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of China. I now give the floor to Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel.

Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel

Madam President, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, I am grateful to be given the opportunity to speak on behalf of the Leadership Panel of the Internet Governance Forum. Internet governance is more important than ever, and that is why debates and resolutions like NetMundial plus 10 and WSIS plus 20 are important together with IGF. The multistakeholder model of IGF, the Leadership Panel, and Multistakeholder Advisory Group MAG, is a unique construct because of the diversity of voices it brings together.

Governments, technology experts, civil society, academia, and the private sector, all under the same umbrella. This model ensures that decisions are not made in isolation, but rather through dialogue among those who build it, regulate it, and most importantly, use it. Furthermore, increasing ubiquity and resilience of the Internet is vital to the goals of the WSIS.

A strengthened IGF, measuring the progress on digitalization, can support member states as the issues they grapple with become complex, interconnected, and central to sustainable development. The IGF’s ecosystem, with the active network of 176 national and regional IGFs, the NRIs, is the most important vehicle for reaching the world’s most underrepresented communities. And through them, voices from the remote and marginalized people can feed into global discussions either directly or digitally.

We saw that in the last IGF in Norway that reached more than 9,000 participants with 6,000 online. What began as a technical conversation in 2006 now draws upon representatives from groups interested in every aspect of our lives. Just as the Internet itself is woven into the fabric of modern society, its governance must be too.

The dialogue has an impact on how we shape the digital future. The IGF embodies those values. It is where global challenges meet local realities, where innovation meets accountability.

To continue or diminish this forum would be to shut out voices that matter the most. Voices shaping the future of a connected world. And I would like to thank the WSIS plus 20 co-facilitators for creating the informal multi-stakeholder sounding board and by this bringing in more voices to the debate around WSIS plus 20 resolution and the future of IGF and digital governance.

To conclude, on behalf of the leadership panel and the whole IGF, I thank you for the strong support for a permanent mandate to IGF and the multi-stakeholder approach it represents. Together we can ensure that the Internet remains a force for inclusion, development and human dignity. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Internet Governance Forum leadership panel. I now give the floor to Microsoft.

Microsoft

Thank you, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, WSIS Plus 20 is a moment to reflect on something far larger than any single institution or company. The open, global, and interoperable Internet has become one of humanity’s most important global public goods, a foundation for economic opportunity, scientific progress, and social connection. Microsoft is here because our work depends on that shared foundation, and because we recognize a responsibility to help protect and strengthen it for everyone.

As we look ahead, one principle remains essential. The governance of the digital environment works best when those who build it, use it, and regulate it are all part of the conversation. The multi-stakeholder model has helped the Internet remain stable and interoperable through periods of rapid technological and geopolitical change, and it has allowed countries to pursue their national priorities while still benefiting from a connected global system.

For Microsoft, the message is simple. If the Internet is a global public good, then its governance must continue to reflect shared responsibility. WSIS Plus 20 gives us an opportunity to reaffirm this approach in a way that respects national contexts while preserving the global connectivity that underpins development, innovation, and security for all.

The WSIS vision has always rested on a few essential pillars – people-centered, inclusive, and a development-oriented information society. This is best implemented through a predictable policy landscape that enables innovation and investment. These are the conditions that allow every country, regardless of size or level of development, to benefit from the digital economy.

Microsoft has engaged throughout this review in the spirit of genuine partnership. We have submitted detailed inputs, participated in every stakeholder consultation, engaged with the WSIS ecosystem, offering private sector expertise to ensure the WSIS process serves the international community well, as it has done for the last two decades.

In practice, we have worked alongside governments, international organizations, and civil society to align public and private sector efforts and deliver tangible progress on the WSIS action lines. This includes joint initiatives to expand connectivity, support digital skills development, and advance responsible AI adoption. Through collaborations such as the ITU’s AI for Good initiative, which complements WSIS efforts by bringing industry innovation into global dialogue, we have helped translate WSIS principles into real-world impact, demonstrating the value of sustained partnership across sectors.

Going forward, what matters most is ensuring that the next generation inherits an Internet that expands possibilities. Microsoft’s mission is to empower every person and every organization to achieve more, and that mission is only possible when the Internet remains open, secure, and accessible to all. We stand ready to work with all stakeholders to support a digital future where opportunity is not limited by geography and where the benefits of technology can reach everyone.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank Microsoft. I now give the floor to Foundation Cibervoluntarios.

Foundation Cibervoluntarios

I’m honored to be here after 20 years working with high-level institutions from WSIS in Tunis and Geneva. We’ve been giving a voice to citizenry and civil society in this process, and this is why our organization has been helping people understand technology since 2001. We highlight the need to be active agents, front-runners in building an open and transparent, ethical, sustainable and inclusive digital ecosystem.

We want and we claim a seat at the table for citizenry, a space where people can participate actively and where our voice is going to be critical in the decision-making for sustainability and development and use of technology.

We believe in the power of technology to address real needs, to reduce inequalities and to create new economic, social and cultural opportunities that previously were unthinkable. We believe in the power of a technology that was born open and decentralized and designed for sharing to ensure the utmost knowledge sharing in history. But we are also aware that we are at a time of a change of paradigms.

If we do not take action now, if we are not part of this process, this tool could become a new form of control. Today we have been witnessing with concern how technological power is being concentrated in the hands of a very small number and how the digital system in one form or another is being privatized. This technological concentration is creating subordination to interests that build wealth and endanger sustainability in the mid to long term of our identity and of our rights.

Above all, this limits our ability to imagine alternatives. and given all of the opportunities that technology offers us. If it is well designed, technology can promote greater equality and social justice and this is why we highlight our right to build a digital ecosystem that passes through every part of our lives and we must guarantee technology as a capacity, the ability to understand and use technology to broaden opportunities.

And to protect privacy, to ensure access to data and this right to decide and to be a part of this process. Technology can create inequalities or it can be a lever for social justice. The stakeholders must serve all of our interests and this is why our organization has decided to appropriate technology for the citizens.

We are choosing citizens’ sovereignty over technology and we say here that citizens must be and must have an active part in this process for technology to be a lever to help us build a better world. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Foundation Cibervoluntarios. I now give the floor to Wikimedia.

Wikimedia

Thank you, Madam President. Your Excellencies, distinguished delegates, colleagues, 20 years ago the World Summit on Information Society may have felt like an experiment. It may have felt risky to bring in stakeholders outside of government to discuss and shape Internet regulation, digital policy.

and the information society that we want to live in. But today, we see that what has started as an experiment has evolved into a very productive framework for effective collaboration between governments, the private sector, civil society, and the technical community.

Championing an open internet that supports freedom of expression and participation in culture, the economy, and society, these stakeholders have worked together to foster a mutually beneficial digital future for everyone.

However, in those 20 years, we’ve not only seen progress in digital policy, we’ve also seen the development of digital public goods, open source projects that further the sustainable development goals.

These digital public goods have been built by the stakeholders that the WSIS process has brought together. I’m honored to speak today on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, which supports a global group of volunteers who have built one such digital public good. It is called Wikipedia, and I’m sure everyone in this hall has used it.

I’m sure many of you continue to use it frequently. This open and free encyclopedia is the result of online collaboration across borders and across cultures. The Wikipedia article about the United Nations, for instance, exists in 292 different languages, a greater number than the countries represented here.

These are not just automatic translations, but they are individual articles that have in large parts been written from scratch using external verified sources in those specific local languages. This kind of volunteer work is only possible in an open internet that we must all support and defend. The people who build Wikipedia and other digital public goods and the digital commons that we all share and participate in.

Need a seat at the table of Internet governance. This is the essence of multi-stakeholderism for digital policy. Multi-stakeholderism is not just a hollow term, but a tool to involve the people who built the digital public goods that we need for a prosperous and peaceful future.

Member states have already committed to supporting digital public goods in the Global Digital Compact. Now they must create the conditions for continued success in the WSIS process as well. Thank you very much.

Chair

I thank Wikimedia. I now give the floor to the Association for Progressive Communications.

Association for Progressive Communications

Madam President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates from all stakeholder groups and colleagues. I speak on behalf of the Association for Progressive Communications, a civil society network dedicated to ICTs for development and human rights founded in 1990, working in more than 70 countries around the world.

We have been involved in WSIS since the prepcoms in 2002. While global Internet penetration is projected to reach 74% in 2025, this figure masks profound digital inequality. It includes anyone who has used the Internet once in a three-month period, thus giving a hyper-connected individual working on Wall Street the same statistical relevance as a farmer in a rural area who buys a small data bundle a few times a year.

We cannot afford to underestimate this divide. But at the same time, we must acknowledge that digitalization alone does not create equity. If equitable economic and social development are not placed at the heart of the next phase of WSIS, we risk perpetuating a new quality-based digital divide, and at the same time missing the opportunity to harness connectivity for a more inclusive and just world.

From this perspective, APC offers the following reflections on the outcome document. We congratulate all involved, but we must also raise concerns. We value in particular the continuation of the WSIS process itself and its integration with the global digital compact.

We also value the expanded consideration given to human rights in the context of digital development. We are very pleased with the permanent mandate granted to the Internet Governance Forum. And we are pleased at this recognition of alternative connectivity models, including community networks.

And we are pleased that the action lines are called on to address gender equality in the implementation. And we are very pleased with the support for an inclusive multi-stakeholder implementation and governance process and the recognition of the São Paulo multi-stakeholder guidelines. But we regret that financing and financial mechanisms are not given serious consideration, in spite of the interagency taskforce being convened by UNGASS.

Financing is a critical and non-negotiable component of implementing the WSIS vision. We also regret that the call for government participation in the IGF is directed primarily at developing country governments. We need equal footing participation from governments of all parts of the world in the IGF and its intersessional modalities for a sustainable IGF.

Going forward, we urge all stakeholders and member states to remember that WSIS is primarily about harnessing digital tools for people-centered development, not about developing digital tools and processes.

We urge all of you to work with UNGASS and the ITU as its secretariat to make the interagency task force inclusive of all stakeholder groups and member states and financing institutions, and to approach the IJF’s permanent mandate with creativity and courage, not complacency.

In closing, ABC and its members commit to be partners in this process and, when necessary, to also share constructive criticism with governments and with all other stakeholders. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Association for Progressive Communications. I now give the floor to HitRecord.

HitRecord

Good afternoon, Madam President of the General Assembly, Excellencies, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you so much for having me here at the United Nations for this World Summit on the Information Society. I want to acknowledge the co-facilitators of this year’s summit, Kenya and Albania, as well as the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

So this is a special milestone summit marking 20 years since the UN first adopted a shared set of principles for a human-centric digital world. And, certainly, a lot has happened in the digital world in these past 20 years. We’ve seen the rise of social media, which in so many ways made good on the promise of what the Internet could be a place where any voice could be heard and where anybody looking for connection and belonging could find their community.

But then market pressures set in and we saw social media gradually change. What had been about connection became more about addiction. Addiction to an algorithmic feed maximized for user engagement and ad revenue.

And the side effects of these profit-driven algorithms have been hugely damaging. We’ve seen a global crisis in mental health and loneliness, especially for younger people. We’ve seen a rise in extremism, polarization, authoritarianism, with the impacts often worst for people in developing countries.

So here’s my question. Looking back at the past 20 years, how are we going to learn from our mistakes? Because today we face a crossroads with a new revolutionary technology on the rise, AI.

And just like social media, AI has the potential to do so much good. But let’s be clear. Today’s biggest AI companies are running the same engagement-maximizing algorithms driven by the same advertising business models as the biggest social media companies.

So if we let the design and the deployment of this incredible new technology be guided solely by market forces, we can expect to see the same damaging side effects that we’ve seen with social media. I don’t think this is inevitable. I think the AI revolution can be guided by more than just market forces.

Governments need to get in the game. Now, for the past 20 years, governments have mostly stayed hands-off with digital technology. We’ve let these businesses run their experiment, deploying their products to billions of people with no practical guardrails.

It hasn’t worked out well, but I think things are changing. I just met with a gentleman here from the Australian government, and as you all know, Australia just enacted landmark legislation, standing up to these big social media companies to protect their youth against these predatory algorithms, and now more and more countries are moving in that direction.

So change is possible, and I really believe that it is you all here in this room and around the world. Civil servants who serve civilization, who don’t just serve a bottom line, who serve people, who serve everybody, especially the most vulnerable amongst us. Now’s your time to step up, to work together with business and industry, and to build a brighter future.

And so I just want to say thank you. As a father of three kids, as a citizen of a democracy, and just as a human being, thank you for all the work you are doing. Keep going.

It is greatly appreciated. Thanks again.

Chair

I thank the HitRecord. I now give the floor to Global Partners Digital.

Global Partners Digital

Your Excellencies, distinguished delegates, colleagues, we would like to thank the co-facilitators, all delegations, and the wider stakeholder community for the seriousness and openness with which this review process has been conducted.

Now, the consensus reached here today builds on months of substantive discussion and provides important grounding for how the WSIS framework continues to evolve. Twenty years on, the WSIS vision of a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society remains deeply relevant. It has helped guide national policy, shape the work of UN entities, and anchor digital cooperation in a shared set of goals and principles.

At a time of profound technological and geopolitical change, that common reference point matters more than ever. We particularly welcome the reaffirmation of two foundations without which the WSIS vision cannot be realized, the centrality of human rights and the multi-stakeholder character of digital governance. These are not abstract commitments.

They are practical conditions for ensuring the digital policy is credible, effective, and responsive to the people it is meant to serve. The conclusion from this review process reminds us that legitimacy in digital governance is not declared, it is built through inclusive processes, credible expertise, and the ability to translate principles into workable outcomes.

We also recognize the efforts made to strengthen implementation through greater system-wide coherence, implementation roadmaps, a strengthened role for human rights expertise within the UN system, and a renewed mandate for the Internet Governance Forum.

These steps reflect a shared understanding that legitimacy is reinforced through delivery. At the same time, as we’ve just heard as well, the challenges before us remain stark. Large parts of the world remain unconnected.

Freedom online is in decline and civic space continues to shrink. New technologies risk deepening inequalities rather than addressing them. Commitments on human rights and meaningful inclusion are essential, but they must translate into sustained action.

From the perspective of civil society and the broader stakeholder community, WSIS has always been more than an intergovernmental process. Its strength lies in the ecosystem it has enabled, one that brings together governments, technical experts, businesses and rights holders to solve shared problems. This review has shown, again, what becomes possible when that ecosystem is meaningfully engaged.

Looking ahead, the task is not simply to preserve the WSIS framework, but to reinforce it so that it continues to generate trust, enable participation and support effective problem solving in an increasingly complex digital environment.

As we move into the next phase, we call on delegations and the wider WSIS community to invest in inclusive implementation by resourcing participation, using the action line roadmaps as living tools and ensuring that human rights expertise meaningfully informs delivery.

We stand ready to continue contributing to that effort in close cooperation with all stakeholders. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Global Partners Digital. I now give the floor to International Federation of Information Processing.

Chair

I thank the International Federation for Information Processing and now give the floor to Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network.

Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network

Good morning, everyone, knowing that I’m probably the last person before lunch. I just wanted to share something, which is that we have a common problem, and not only problems with each other. This common problem is a civilizational challenge of how to organize the coexistence of billions of people in shared online spaces.

It is also the challenge of responsibly unlocking the value of data for all, not only the economic value of data, but also the social value of data. 21st century transnational problems need transnational structures and institutions. The IGF has been, in the last 20 years, the only true institutional innovation in our field.

It has evolved into a self-organized network of, as has been said, more than 170 national and regional IGFs. And generally speaking, the future of IGF has always been in the minds of everybody at the core of the discussion on the WSIS plus 20 review. And it is not a surprise that the final discussions are focusing on those very paragraphs about the future of the IGF.

It is a remarkable innovation, but it is, as we all know, far from fulfilling its complete potential. The good thing about the resolutions that you are considering adopting at the moment is that it says four things about the IGF. First of all, it recognizes that it is a network.

Second, it establishes, hopefully, that it is going to become a permanent forum of the United Nations. Third, it asks the forum itself to continue to improve its working modalities. And fourth, it asks the Secretary General to think about how to ensure the sustainable funding for the IGF, which, as we all know, has been plaguing this organization for basically since its inception.

The question of the institutional evolution of the IGF is closely interconnected with the question of its funding. If people don’t have a clear vision of where it is going to be and how it’s going to organize, there’s no reason why they would fund it, and if there’s no funding, there’s no way to improve it and make it fully functional.

So the final point is, 20 years in, it is now time for what could be called a constitutional moment for the IGF. It is time for the stakeholders to build and take the resolution that we will be adopting, that you will be adopting today, into a process in 2026 to report it at the next IGF, and it behooves all stakeholders to bottom up, take the initiative, to organize this structured discussion.

And in that regard, the Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network is willing, with others, to help facilitate those discussions. I thank you very much.

Chair

I thank the Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network. I now give the floor to WSIS plus 20 co-facilitators, informal multi-stakeholder sounding board.

Chair

I thank the WSIS Plus 20 co-facilitators, informal stakeholder Sounding Board. Distinguished delegates, we have heard the last speaker of this meeting. We shall continue this afternoon at 3 p.m.

in this hall. The meeting is adjourned.

M

Malaysia

Speech speed

125 words per minute

Speech length

425 words

Speech time

202 seconds

WSIS provides vital framework for inclusive, development-oriented information society that remains relevant after 20 years

Explanation

Malaysia argues that the World Summit on the Information Society continues to provide essential guidance for building an inclusive and development-oriented information society two decades after its inception. The framework has helped guide national policy and remains deeply relevant for digital cooperation.


Evidence

Malaysia’s National Digital Network Plan (Jindela) has extended high-speed Internet connectivity to over 9.6 million premises and achieved near-universal coverage in populated areas


Major discussion point

WSIS Plus 20 Review and Digital Governance Framework


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Digital transformation requires people-centered approach with focus on skills, awareness, and confidence beyond just connectivity

Explanation

Malaysia emphasizes that simply providing connectivity is insufficient for meaningful digital participation. True digital transformation requires comprehensive capacity building including skills development, awareness programs, and building user confidence in digital technologies.


Evidence

Malaysia’s National Information Dissemination Centres, recognized as a WSIS Prize winner in 2025, demonstrates community-based digital literacy, skills development and entrepreneurship programmes for rural communities, women entrepreneurs, and vulnerable groups


Major discussion point

Digital Divides and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


I

International Chamber of Commerce

Speech speed

118 words per minute

Speech length

604 words

Speech time

306 seconds

Success will be measured by implementation requiring enabling policy environments that encourage investment and innovation

Explanation

The International Chamber of Commerce emphasizes that the ultimate test of WSIS Plus 20 will be its implementation through creating policy environments that support investment, innovation, and responsible technology use. Such environments should be built on openness, coherence, and regulatory clarity while promoting interoperability and global scalability.


Major discussion point

Implementation and Accountability


Topics

Economic | Legal and regulatory


B

Brazil

Speech speed

112 words per minute

Speech length

626 words

Speech time

334 seconds

WSIS Plus 20 outcome document should align with Global Digital Compact to avoid duplication and ensure coherent implementation

Explanation

Brazil emphasizes the importance of coordinating the WSIS framework with the Global Digital Compact to prevent overlapping efforts and ensure efficient use of resources. The goal is to strike a balance between new initiatives and existing WSIS architecture while maximizing positive results.


Evidence

Brazil had to advocate for human rights, empowerment of women and girls, and the 2030 Agenda to prevent pushbacks in these crucial topics


Major discussion point

WSIS Plus 20 Review and Digital Governance Framework


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


IGF should become permanent UN forum with predictable resources to ensure effective functioning

Explanation

Brazil strongly supports making the Internet Governance Forum a permanent institution with sustainable funding mechanisms. They argue that the IGF should not only become permanent but also have a secretariat with predictable resources to ensure continuity and effectiveness.


Evidence

Brazil’s national delegation includes members from all sectors of Brazilian society engaged in Internet and digital governance, demonstrating the ‘Brasilia effect’ of embracing diversity and building bridges


Major discussion point

Internet Governance Forum and Multi-stakeholder Model


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Agreed with

– Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel
– Meta
– Association for Progressive Communications
– Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network

Agreed on

Internet Governance Forum should become permanent with sustainable funding


UN should not shy away from AI challenges and must address risks of job displacement and labor rights erosion

Explanation

Brazil criticizes the draft resolution for remaining silent on the growing fragilization of labor rights driven by widespread AI adoption. They argue this omission is particularly concerning given the centrality of decent work to the information society agenda and disconnects efforts from workers’ realities.


Evidence

Despite efforts by the G7, the draft resolution remains silent on labor rights issues related to AI implementation


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Emerging Technologies


Topics

Economic | Human rights


Disagreed with

– Costa Rica
– Austria

Disagreed on

Priority focus for AI governance – labor rights versus general human rights


Information integrity and protection from disinformation requires legitimate state authority to regulate digital domain

Explanation

Brazil argues that states have legitimate authority to regulate and enforce rules in the digital domain to protect citizens from misinformation and harmful content. They emphasize that very large online platforms have systemic impact on information erosion and public discourse polarization.


Evidence

Brazil references the NetMundial Plus10 conference and São Paulo multi-stakeholder guidelines as examples of balanced representation in Internet governance


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Safety


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


Disagreed with

– HitRecord
– Foundation Cibervoluntarios
– Microsoft

Disagreed on

Role of state regulation versus market forces in digital governance


I

International Federation for Information Processing

Speech speed

114 words per minute

Speech length

420 words

Speech time

220 seconds

Cyber security, privacy, safety, and resilience are prerequisites for meaningful inclusion and sustainable digital services

Explanation

IFIP argues that trust must be treated as a foundational enabler of digital transformation, with cybersecurity, privacy, safety, and resilience being essential rather than optional components. They advocate for systematic adoption of security and privacy by design principles to ensure sustainable digital public services.


Major discussion point

Cybersecurity and Digital Trust


Topics

Cybersecurity | Privacy and data protection


O

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Speech speed

118 words per minute

Speech length

426 words

Speech time

215 seconds

Enhanced role for UN human rights architecture is needed within WSIS framework

Explanation

OHCHR argues that strengthening the UN human rights architecture within WSIS remains a significant gap that needs to be addressed. They emphasize that an enhanced role would be necessary to respond to regulatory requests, meet capacity development needs, and ensure human rights consistency across WSIS action lines.


Evidence

OHCHR’s Human Rights Advisory Service and Digital Technologies provides guidance to governments, stakeholders, and the UN system in areas such as human rights due diligence


Major discussion point

WSIS Plus 20 Review and Digital Governance Framework


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Austria
– International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance
– Holy See

Agreed on

Human rights must be protected equally online and offline


U

United Nations Development Programme

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

602 words

Speech time

284 seconds

Digital public infrastructure must be deployed securely, interoperably, and rights-based with public interest governance

Explanation

UNDP emphasizes that digital public infrastructure should be implemented with strong safeguards, open systems, and governance structures that serve the public interest. They advocate for DPI deployment that is secure, interoperable, and grounded in human rights principles rather than purely technical or commercial considerations.


Evidence

UNDP has advanced design and implementation of digital public infrastructure in more than 30 countries and supported national AI landscape assessments in over 20 countries


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Innovation


Topics

Infrastructure | Human rights


T

Thailand

Speech speed

100 words per minute

Speech length

575 words

Speech time

341 seconds

Persistent digital divides continue to limit equitable access in developing countries despite progress

Explanation

Thailand acknowledges that while significant progress has been made in digital development over the past 20 years, digital divides persist and in some cases have widened. Access remains uneven, inequalities are deepening, and technological developments remain unaffordable or inaccessible to many people.


Major discussion point

Digital Divides and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Cuba
– Namibia
– United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
– Association for Progressive Communications

Agreed on

Digital divides persist and require urgent attention through international cooperation


Disagreed with

– Cuba
– United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Disagreed on

Approach to addressing digital divides – structural versus technical solutions


N

Namibia

Speech speed

117 words per minute

Speech length

405 words

Speech time

207 seconds

Universal, affordable, and meaningful connectivity must remain global priority with investment in resilient infrastructure

Explanation

Namibia emphasizes that achieving universal access to affordable and meaningful connectivity should be a top global priority. This requires significant investments in resilient digital infrastructure, particularly in underserved and remote areas, along with policies that promote competition, innovation, and affordability.


Evidence

Namibia became the first country in southern Africa to launch the National Internet Universality Indicators Assessment in 2023


Major discussion point

Digital Divides and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


Agreed with

– Thailand
– Cuba
– United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
– Association for Progressive Communications

Agreed on

Digital divides persist and require urgent attention through international cooperation


Evidence-based framework needed to evaluate progress on access, affordability, digital skills, and governance

Explanation

Namibia advocates for systematic assessment mechanisms to measure progress in digital development. They emphasize the importance of evidence-based frameworks that can evaluate multiple dimensions of digital progress including access, affordability, skills development, and governance structures.


Evidence

The National Internet Universality Indicators Assessment provides an evidence-based framework guided by principles of human rights, openness, responsibility, and multi-stakeholder engagement


Major discussion point

Implementation and Accountability


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


C

Cuba

Speech speed

138 words per minute

Speech length

466 words

Speech time

201 seconds

Unilateral coercive measures prevent countries from accessing technology and participating in global knowledge economy

Explanation

Cuba argues that unilateral coercive measures, such as economic blockades, constitute major obstacles to technological, economic, and social development. These measures prevent affected countries from acquiring technology, accessing financing, and fully participating in the global knowledge economy, contradicting international law and the UN Charter.


Evidence

The illegal economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed by the United States for more than six decades constitutes the main obstacle to Cuba’s technological, economic and social development


Major discussion point

Digital Divides and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Economic


Digital divides are result of unjust international economic order that must be addressed through structural changes

Explanation

Cuba contends that digital inequality is not accidental but stems from an unjust and undemocratic international economic order. They argue that addressing digital divides requires fundamental structural changes to the global economic system rather than just technical solutions.


Evidence

The positive impact of digital technologies is considerably lower in developing countries compared to developed countries due to structural inequalities


Major discussion point

Digital Divides and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Economic | Development


Agreed with

– Thailand
– Namibia
– United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
– Association for Progressive Communications

Agreed on

Digital divides persist and require urgent attention through international cooperation


Disagreed with

– Thailand
– United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Disagreed on

Approach to addressing digital divides – structural versus technical solutions


E

Ethiopia

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

434 words

Speech time

212 seconds

Digital identity programs are cornerstone of transformation strategy, closing gender gaps and empowering women

Explanation

Ethiopia describes their national digital ID program as fundamental to their digital transformation strategy, with particular emphasis on its role in promoting gender equality. The program empowers women by providing access to social protection payments and finance, ensuring full economic participation while maintaining focus on inclusivity and rights protection.


Evidence

Ethiopia’s national digital ID program services more than 25 million people and is specifically designed to close gender gaps by empowering women to access social protection and finance


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Innovation


Topics

Development | Gender rights online


I

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

466 words

Speech time

204 seconds

Multi-stakeholder model ensures Internet remains unified, global, and resilient through shared responsibilities

Explanation

ICANN argues that the multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance is essential for maintaining the Internet’s unity, global reach, and resilience. This model works because it distributes responsibilities among academia, civil society, governments, international organizations, the private sector, and the technical community in a collaborative framework.


Evidence

The Internet’s growth and resilience rely on shared responsibilities across multiple stakeholder groups, and this cooperative model has proven effective


Major discussion point

Internet Governance Forum and Multi-stakeholder Model


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel
– Meta
– WSIS+20 Co-Facilitators Informal Multi-stakeholder Sounding Board
– Microsoft

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder model is essential for effective Internet governance


I

Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel

Speech speed

115 words per minute

Speech length

408 words

Speech time

211 seconds

IGF’s network of 176 national and regional initiatives is most important vehicle for reaching underrepresented communities

Explanation

The IGF Leadership Panel emphasizes that the forum’s extensive network of national and regional IGFs serves as the primary mechanism for including marginalized and underrepresented communities in global digital governance discussions. This network enables voices from remote areas to feed into global discussions either directly or digitally.


Evidence

The last IGF in Norway reached more than 9,000 participants with 6,000 online, demonstrating the forum’s broad reach and inclusive participation


Major discussion point

Internet Governance Forum and Multi-stakeholder Model


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Agreed with

– Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
– Meta
– WSIS+20 Co-Facilitators Informal Multi-stakeholder Sounding Board
– Microsoft

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder model is essential for effective Internet governance


I

Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

451 words

Speech time

198 seconds

Constitutional moment needed for IGF to clarify institutional evolution and sustainable funding mechanisms

Explanation

The Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network argues that the IGF requires a fundamental restructuring moment to address its institutional development and funding challenges. They contend that without clear vision of the IGF’s future direction and sustainable funding, the forum cannot reach its full potential.


Evidence

The institutional evolution of the IGF is closely interconnected with funding – without clear vision there’s no reason for funding, and without funding there’s no way to improve functionality


Major discussion point

Internet Governance Forum and Multi-stakeholder Model


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Economic


Agreed with

– Brazil
– Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel
– Meta
– Association for Progressive Communications

Agreed on

Internet Governance Forum should become permanent with sustainable funding


W

WSIS+20 Co-Facilitators Informal Multi-stakeholder Sounding Board

Speech speed

107 words per minute

Speech length

423 words

Speech time

235 seconds

Multi-stakeholder sounding board demonstrates value of meaningful engagement across all stakeholder groups

Explanation

The Sounding Board represents an innovation in multi-stakeholder engagement, showing how diverse perspectives from around the world can be effectively incorporated into UN deliberations. This mechanism has enabled input from the Global South, youth, and marginalized communities to help craft consensus outcomes.


Evidence

The Sounding Board is made up of diverse stakeholders from the Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel and Multi-Stakeholder Advisory Group, and has facilitated stakeholder contributions at each stage of the review process


Major discussion point

Internet Governance Forum and Multi-stakeholder Model


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Agreed with

– Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
– Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel
– Meta
– Microsoft

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder model is essential for effective Internet governance


M

Meta

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

418 words

Speech time

183 seconds

IGF provides unique space for dialogue among governments, business, civil society, and technical community on equal terms

Explanation

Meta emphasizes that the Internet Governance Forum serves as a neutral platform where all stakeholders can participate on equal footing in discussions about Internet governance and digital policy. This inclusive approach allows companies to gain insights into real-world challenges while contributing to effective solutions.


Evidence

Meta has been an engaged participant and trusted founder of the IGF over the years, demonstrating the value of private sector engagement in the forum


Major discussion point

Internet Governance Forum and Multi-stakeholder Model


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Economic


Agreed with

– Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
– Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel
– WSIS+20 Co-Facilitators Informal Multi-stakeholder Sounding Board
– Microsoft

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder model is essential for effective Internet governance


C

Costa Rica

Speech speed

102 words per minute

Speech length

274 words

Speech time

160 seconds

AI governance requires clear accountability mechanisms and genuine collaboration among all stakeholders

Explanation

Costa Rica argues that governing emerging technologies like AI requires transparent accountability mechanisms and authentic collaboration between states, civil society, academia, and the private sector. As co-facilitators of international AI initiatives, they emphasize that legitimacy in AI governance requires genuine multi-stakeholder participation.


Evidence

Costa Rica serves as co-facilitators of the International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence and the Global Dialogue on AI Governance


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Emerging Technologies


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Agreed with

– HitRecord
– Eritrea
– Trinidad and Tobago

Agreed on

AI governance requires multi-stakeholder collaboration and accountability mechanisms


Disagreed with

– Brazil
– Austria

Disagreed on

Priority focus for AI governance – labor rights versus general human rights


H

HitRecord

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

557 words

Speech time

262 seconds

AI has potential for good but risks creating new forms of exclusion if guided solely by market forces

Explanation

HitRecord warns that while AI has tremendous potential for positive impact, allowing its development to be driven purely by market forces could replicate the harmful effects seen with social media platforms. They argue that the same engagement-maximizing algorithms and advertising business models that damaged social media are now being applied to AI development.


Evidence

Social media platforms gradually changed from connection-focused to addiction-focused due to market pressures, leading to global mental health crises, loneliness, extremism, and polarization


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Emerging Technologies


Topics

Economic | Human rights


Agreed with

– Costa Rica
– Eritrea
– Trinidad and Tobago

Agreed on

AI governance requires multi-stakeholder collaboration and accountability mechanisms


Disagreed with

– Brazil
– Foundation Cibervoluntarios
– Microsoft

Disagreed on

Role of state regulation versus market forces in digital governance


E

Eritrea

Speech speed

130 words per minute

Speech length

488 words

Speech time

224 seconds

Speed of emerging technologies may exceed adaptive capabilities of developing countries without international cooperation

Explanation

Eritrea expresses concern that the rapid pace of technological development, particularly in AI, may outpace the ability of developing countries to adapt and benefit from these technologies. They argue that international cooperation focused on capacity building and technology transfer is essential to prevent further marginalization.


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Emerging Technologies


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Costa Rica
– HitRecord
– Trinidad and Tobago

Agreed on

AI governance requires multi-stakeholder collaboration and accountability mechanisms


Working group on future financial mechanisms for digital development should focus on concrete needs of developing countries

Explanation

Eritrea supports the establishment of a working group to study financial mechanisms for digital development but emphasizes that it must prioritize the specific and concrete needs of developing countries. They argue that such mechanisms are essential for addressing digital divides and ensuring equitable participation in the digital economy.


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Financing


Topics

Economic | Development


T

Trinidad and Tobago

Speech speed

97 words per minute

Speech length

379 words

Speech time

232 seconds

National AI assessment initiatives help countries evaluate readiness and develop appropriate governance frameworks

Explanation

Trinidad and Tobago describes their national artificial intelligence assessment initiative as a systematic approach to evaluating AI readiness across six core areas: governance, digital infrastructure, policy, ethics, institutional capacity, and inclusion. This comprehensive assessment helps countries develop evidence-based AI strategies.


Evidence

Trinidad and Tobago launched a national AI assessment initiative in collaboration with UNDP and UNESCO, evaluating readiness across six core areas


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Emerging Technologies


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Agreed with

– Costa Rica
– HitRecord
– Eritrea

Agreed on

AI governance requires multi-stakeholder collaboration and accountability mechanisms


A

Austria

Speech speed

110 words per minute

Speech length

350 words

Speech time

190 seconds

Same rights that people have offline must be protected online through robust legal frameworks

Explanation

Austria emphasizes that digital transformation must be driven by human-centric and human rights-based approaches, ensuring that fundamental rights are equally protected in both physical and digital spaces. They argue that this protection is essential for sustainable development and requires strong legal frameworks.


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Safety


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance
– Holy See
– Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Agreed on

Human rights must be protected equally online and offline


Disagreed with

– Brazil
– Costa Rica

Disagreed on

Priority focus for AI governance – labor rights versus general human rights


Enhanced partnerships especially with developing countries needed to reduce inequalities and close digital divides

Explanation

Austria advocates for strengthening partnerships, particularly with developing countries, to maintain progress toward sustainable development and address persistent digital inequalities. They emphasize the importance of international cooperation in ensuring that digital transformation benefits all countries.


Evidence

Austria is proud to co-chair the next Forum for Science, Technology and Innovation together with Zambia in New York in May 2026


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Financing


Topics

Development | Economic


C

Colombia

Speech speed

99 words per minute

Speech length

421 words

Speech time

253 seconds

Technology-facilitated gender-based violence must be eradicated to ensure women’s full participation in digital environment

Explanation

Colombia calls for collective action to eliminate all forms of sexual and gender-based violence that are facilitated by technologies. They argue that such violence limits women’s full participation in the digital environment and prevents them from benefiting from digital opportunities, requiring coordinated efforts to address these challenges.


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Safety


Topics

Human rights | Gender rights online


Mobilization of adequate and predictable funding required for digital infrastructure and capacity building

Explanation

Colombia emphasizes the critical need for sufficient and reliable funding mechanisms to support digital infrastructure development and capacity building initiatives. They argue that without adequate financial resources, efforts to bridge digital divides and ensure equitable participation in the information society will be insufficient.


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Financing


Topics

Economic | Infrastructure


I

International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

490 words

Speech time

231 seconds

Human rights-centered approach is essential to ensure Internet remains open, free, and secure space

Explanation

International IDEA argues that protecting human rights online is fundamental to maintaining an open Internet that advances empowerment rather than control. They express concern about the drift toward Internet fragmentation and state-centric systems that pose risks to human rights, including privacy and freedom of expression.


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Safety


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Austria
– Holy See
– Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Agreed on

Human rights must be protected equally online and offline


H

Holy See

Speech speed

108 words per minute

Speech length

307 words

Speech time

170 seconds

Digital technologies must serve humanity through respect for human dignity and common good

Explanation

The Holy See emphasizes that technological development must be oriented toward human dignity and the common good, with systems that reflect justice, solidarity, and reverence for life. They stress the importance of ethical reflection and safeguards, particularly in AI development, to ensure technology serves humanity’s interests.


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Safety


Topics

Human rights | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Austria
– International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance
– Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Agreed on

Human rights must be protected equally online and offline


Adequate governance frameworks needed to protect users, especially children, from potential harms of ICT misuse

Explanation

The Holy See calls for effective ethical management and regulatory frameworks to ensure protection of all users, with particular emphasis on protecting children from potential harms associated with misuse of information and communication technologies. They stress the necessity of proactive protection measures.


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Safety


Topics

Human rights | Children rights


H

Hungary

Speech speed

121 words per minute

Speech length

522 words

Speech time

256 seconds

War fanaticism and global division into blocks threatens peaceful digital cooperation and development

Explanation

Hungary argues that the world faces a dramatic choice between peaceful global cooperation that enables sustainable economic growth and modern digital development, versus war fanaticism that could divide the world into blocks and destroy opportunities for progress. They advocate for peace as essential for digital and economic advancement.


Evidence

Hungary has been living in a neighborhood of war in Europe for four consecutive years and has witnessed hundreds of billions of euros spent on war instead of peaceful economic development


Major discussion point

Geopolitical Challenges and Digital Sovereignty


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Economic


U

Ukraine

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

518 words

Speech time

253 seconds

Russian attacks on digital infrastructure demonstrate need for resilience and protection of civilian systems

Explanation

Ukraine describes how Russian forces deliberately target civilian digital and energy infrastructure, including communication towers and data centers, while conducting large-scale cyber operations. Despite these attacks, Ukraine has maintained digital services and continued its digital transformation, demonstrating the importance of digital resilience.


Evidence

Ukraine moved from 102nd to 5th place in the UN e-government development index, with the DIA platform providing over 100 public services to over 22 million users, and created MRIA online learning platform for millions of children during wartime


Major discussion point

Geopolitical Challenges and Digital Sovereignty


Topics

Cybersecurity | Infrastructure


M

Microsoft

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

460 words

Speech time

216 seconds

Digital sovereignty and respect for national contexts must be balanced with global connectivity benefits

Explanation

Microsoft argues that while respecting national priorities and contexts is important, maintaining global connectivity and interoperability is essential for all countries to benefit from the digital economy. They emphasize that the multi-stakeholder model has helped preserve this balance through periods of technological and geopolitical change.


Evidence

Microsoft has engaged throughout the WSIS review process, submitted detailed inputs, and participated in stakeholder consultations, working alongside governments and organizations on initiatives like the ITU’s AI for Good


Major discussion point

Geopolitical Challenges and Digital Sovereignty


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Economic


Disagreed with

– Brazil
– HitRecord
– Foundation Cibervoluntarios

Disagreed on

Role of state regulation versus market forces in digital governance


F

Foundation Cibervoluntarios

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

426 words

Speech time

200 seconds

Concentration of technological power in few hands creates subordination and limits ability to imagine alternatives

Explanation

Foundation Cibervoluntarios warns that technological power is being concentrated in very few hands, creating a form of subordination to interests that build wealth but endanger long-term sustainability of identity and rights. This concentration limits society’s ability to imagine alternative approaches to technology development and governance.


Evidence

The organization has been helping people understand technology since 2001 and has been giving voice to citizenry in WSIS processes since Tunis and Geneva


Major discussion point

Geopolitical Challenges and Digital Sovereignty


Topics

Economic | Human rights


Disagreed with

– Brazil
– HitRecord
– Microsoft

Disagreed on

Role of state regulation versus market forces in digital governance


F

Fiji

Speech speed

114 words per minute

Speech length

349 words

Speech time

183 seconds

ICTs are lifelines for climate adaptation, disaster preparedness, and early warning systems in vulnerable countries

Explanation

Fiji emphasizes that information and communication technologies serve as essential lifelines for small island developing states, powering early warning systems, disaster preparedness, and climate adaptation measures. For archipelagic nations like Fiji, digital technologies are crucial for protecting people’s lives and responding to climate change impacts.


Evidence

As an archipelago of more than 300 islands, Fiji faces unique connectivity challenges, with over 85% of people using internet, 3G coverage reaching 96% of population, and 4G coverage reaching 92%


Major discussion point

Climate Change and Sustainability


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


C

China

Speech speed

125 words per minute

Speech length

418 words

Speech time

199 seconds

Digital and green transformations must progress synergistically to address climate change and resource scarcity

Explanation

China advocates for coordinating digital transformation with environmental sustainability efforts to effectively tackle global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity. They emphasize the need for an information society that is green and environment-friendly, leveraging ICTs to help all countries achieve sustainable development goals.


Evidence

China has actively implemented WSIS outcomes over the past two decades, promoted digital innovation and shared digital dividends through the Belt and Road Initiative and Global Development Initiative


Major discussion point

Climate Change and Sustainability


Topics

Development | Sustainable development


I

International Organization of la Francophonie

Speech speed

106 words per minute

Speech length

625 words

Speech time

352 seconds

More than 80% of AI training data comes from single language, risking erasure of hundreds of languages from digital environment

Explanation

The International Organization of la Francophonie highlights a critical issue in AI development where linguistic diversity is severely underrepresented. With less than 5% of living languages represented in large language models, despite nearly 450 languages worldwide having more than a million speakers, there’s a risk of cultural and linguistic erasure from the digital space.


Evidence

Nearly 450 languages around the world, of which nearly 150 in Africa, have more than a million speakers, yet are not represented in AI training data


Major discussion point

Cultural and Linguistic Diversity


Topics

Sociocultural | Multilingualism


Decentralization of computing capacity and greater commitment to digital common goods needed for linguistic diversity

Explanation

The organization argues that addressing linguistic underrepresentation in digital technologies requires decentralizing computing resources and making stronger commitments to digital common goods and open source solutions. They also call for greater efforts to digitize and value written, visual, and oral resources including intangible heritage.


Evidence

According to UN Conference on Trade and Development figures, 93% of digital platform financial valuation is concentrated in two countries, leaving the rest of the world to share a small amount


Major discussion point

Cultural and Linguistic Diversity


Topics

Economic | Cultural diversity


U

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

Speech speed

110 words per minute

Speech length

375 words

Speech time

203 seconds

Cultural diversity must be protected and fair remuneration ensured for artists and creators in AI-driven environment

Explanation

UNESCO emphasizes the importance of protecting cultural diversity and ensuring that artists and creators receive fair compensation in an AI-driven environment. They stress that technologies and AI must serve humanity through education, culture, science, communication, and information while upholding ethical standards with strong gender perspectives.


Evidence

UNESCO leads the largest number of WSIS action lines (six out of 11) and continues to co-lead the UN Group on the Information Society


Major discussion point

Cultural and Linguistic Diversity


Topics

Cultural diversity | Intellectual property rights


I

International Committee of the Red Cross

Speech speed

135 words per minute

Speech length

464 words

Speech time

205 seconds

Digital emblem project aims to ensure humanitarian protections remain effective when ICTs used in armed conflict

Explanation

The ICRC describes their digital emblem project as a technical solution to maintain humanitarian protections in digital warfare. Just as physical emblems identify protected medical and humanitarian assets, the digital emblem would provide technical means of identification and authenticity in cyberspace during armed conflicts.


Evidence

The project involves technical work at the Internet Engineering Task Force and International Telecommunications Union, with discussions at WSIS events including the high-level WSIS event in Geneva


Major discussion point

Cybersecurity and Digital Trust


Topics

Cyberconflict and warfare | Legal and regulatory


G

Global Partners Digital

Speech speed

132 words per minute

Speech length

460 words

Speech time

207 seconds

Action line roadmaps should be used as living tools with inclusive multi-stakeholder implementation

Explanation

Global Partners Digital calls for using WSIS action line roadmaps as dynamic, evolving instruments rather than static documents. They emphasize the importance of inclusive implementation that meaningfully engages all stakeholders and uses human rights expertise to inform delivery of commitments.


Major discussion point

Implementation and Accountability


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


System-wide coherence and implementation roadmaps needed to strengthen delivery of commitments

Explanation

Global Partners Digital welcomes efforts to strengthen implementation through greater UN system-wide coherence, development of implementation roadmaps, strengthened role for human rights expertise, and renewed IGF mandate. They argue these steps reflect understanding that legitimacy is reinforced through effective delivery.


Major discussion point

Implementation and Accountability


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


A

Association for Progressive Communications

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

493 words

Speech time

233 seconds

Community networks and alternative connectivity models should be recognized as valid approaches

Explanation

APC welcomes the recognition of alternative connectivity models, including community networks, as legitimate approaches to expanding digital access. They argue that these grassroots, community-driven connectivity solutions represent important alternatives to traditional infrastructure models and should be supported in digital development strategies.


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Innovation


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


U

United Nations Industrial Development Organization

Speech speed

114 words per minute

Speech length

370 words

Speech time

193 seconds

Centers of excellence for AI provide infrastructure and expertise that many countries cannot afford alone

Explanation

UNIDO argues that centers of excellence serve as shared infrastructure and expertise hubs that enable countries, particularly LDCs, LLDCs, and SIDS, to access AI technology and capacity building that would otherwise be unaffordable. These centers facilitate technology adoption and serve as regional hubs for AI development.


Evidence

UNIDO is establishing a network of centers of excellence across the global south, including in China, Ethiopia, the Western Balkans, Belarus, and Latin America


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Innovation


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


W

Wikimedia

Speech speed

140 words per minute

Speech length

403 words

Speech time

172 seconds

Digital public goods like Wikipedia demonstrate power of open collaboration across borders and cultures

Explanation

Wikimedia highlights Wikipedia as an example of successful digital public goods built through global volunteer collaboration. The Wikipedia article about the UN exists in 292 languages, demonstrating how open Internet enables cross-border, cross-cultural collaboration that creates valuable shared resources for humanity.


Evidence

The Wikipedia article about the United Nations exists in 292 different languages, more than the countries represented in the UN, with articles written from scratch using verified sources in local languages


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Innovation


Topics

Sociocultural | Cultural diversity


K

Kuwait

Speech speed

89 words per minute

Speech length

412 words

Speech time

277 seconds

Investment in digital skills and literacy essential for meaningful participation in digital economy

Explanation

Kuwait emphasizes that strengthening digital skills, particularly in AI, and empowering women and young people through skills development are crucial investments for closing the digital divide. They argue that investing in human capacity and skills development is fundamental to ensuring that digital transformation benefits all populations.


Evidence

Kuwait’s development fund has mobilized resources for infrastructure in more than 100 countries, demonstrating their commitment to digital investment


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Innovation


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


U

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

419 words

Speech time

183 seconds

Digital economy wealth creation is highly concentrated with companies from two countries accounting for 93% of top platform value

Explanation

UNCTAD highlights the extreme concentration of digital economy benefits, where the market value of top 100 digital platforms reaches $28 trillion but companies from just the US and China control 93% of this value. This concentration is driven by the growing importance of data and AI, pointing to need for more equitable sharing of digitalization gains.


Evidence

The market value of the top 100 digital platforms is now almost $28 trillion, with companies from two countries, the United States and China, accounting for 93% of this value


Major discussion point

Digital Divides and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Economic | Development


Disagreed with

– Cuba
– Thailand

Disagreed on

Approach to addressing digital divides – structural versus technical solutions


Digital divides persist with only one-third of people online in low-income countries and minimal e-commerce engagement

Explanation

UNCTAD emphasizes that despite 6 billion people now using the Internet globally, significant disparities remain in digital access and participation. In low-income countries, connectivity and digital commerce engagement remain extremely limited, highlighting the need for more inclusive digital development policies.


Evidence

In low-income countries, only a third of people are online, and less than 10% use mobiles or the Internet to engage in electronic commerce


Major discussion point

Digital Divides and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Thailand
– Cuba
– Namibia
– Association for Progressive Communications

Agreed on

Digital divides persist and require urgent attention through international cooperation


Environmental footprint of digital economy and AI challenges require policies for inclusive and sustainable development outcomes

Explanation

UNCTAD acknowledges the significant environmental impact of the digital economy and the formidable challenges brought by artificial intelligence. They argue that addressing these environmental concerns while ensuring inclusive development requires strategic policy choices and long-term planning for sustainable outcomes.


Evidence

We are becoming more aware of the significant environmental footprint of the digital economy and of the formidable potential as well as challenges brought about by artificial intelligence


Major discussion point

Climate Change and Sustainability


Topics

Development | Sustainable development


S

Secretariat

Speech speed

91 words per minute

Speech length

90 words

Speech time

58 seconds

Procedural compliance with UN rules requires confirmation of accurate vote reflection before locking voting machines

Explanation

The Secretariat emphasizes the importance of following proper UN procedural rules during voting processes, particularly ensuring all delegations confirm their votes are accurately reflected on screens before finalizing results. This procedural rigor is essential for maintaining the legitimacy and transparency of UN decision-making processes.


Evidence

For the final time, will all delegations confirm that the votes are accurately reflected on the screen immediately after which the voting machine will be locked


Major discussion point

WSIS Plus 20 Review and Digital Governance Framework


Topics

Legal and regulatory


I

Italy

Speech speed

154 words per minute

Speech length

429 words

Speech time

166 seconds

Technology must serve as tool for empowerment, equality, and sustainability aligned with SDG achievement

Explanation

Italy advocates for a vision where technology functions as an instrument for empowerment, equality, and sustainability rather than merely economic growth. They emphasize that digital ecosystems should be inclusive, accessible, and ethical, designed to benefit all people in alignment with achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.


Evidence

Italy remains deeply committed to fostering a digital ecosystem that is inclusive, accessible, ethical, and designed to benefit all people, in line with the achievements of the SDGs


Major discussion point

WSIS Plus 20 Review and Digital Governance Framework


Topics

Development | Human rights


National IGF committees provide valuable platforms for multi-stakeholder exchange and should be established by countries

Explanation

Italy highlights the importance of national Internet Governance Forum committees as mechanisms for facilitating dialogue among all relevant stakeholders at the country level. Their establishment of a national IGF committee in 2023 demonstrates how countries can create inclusive spaces for multi-stakeholder engagement on digital governance issues.


Evidence

In 2023, Italy established a national IGF committee, which offers an opportunity for exchange of views to all relevant stakeholders


Major discussion point

Internet Governance Forum and Multi-stakeholder Model


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


C

Chair

Speech speed

85 words per minute

Speech length

1652 words

Speech time

1162 seconds

Procedural efficiency requires adherence to speaking time limits to facilitate interpretation and maintain meeting flow

Explanation

The Chair emphasizes the importance of delegations respecting established speaking time limits of three minutes for individual delegations and five minutes for group statements. They also stress the need for reasonable speaking pace to facilitate interpretation into the six official UN languages, ensuring effective multilingual communication.


Evidence

Delegations are reminded that statements are limited to three minutes for individual delegations and five minutes for statements made on behalf of a group of states


Major discussion point

WSIS Plus 20 Review and Digital Governance Framework


Topics

Legal and regulatory


High-level meetings require smooth transitions and delegate cooperation to maintain momentum and importance

Explanation

The Chair requests delegate cooperation in managing transitions between different meeting segments, particularly when moving from voting procedures to high-level discussions. They emphasize the importance of maintaining the significance and momentum of high-level meetings through efficient procedural management.


Evidence

If delegations have to change, because this is an important High-Level Meeting, I give a couple of seconds, but I would like to ask you to move, that we can restart with the High-Level Meeting


Major discussion point

WSIS Plus 20 Review and Digital Governance Framework


Topics

Legal and regulatory


Agreements

Agreement points

Internet Governance Forum should become permanent with sustainable funding

Speakers

– Brazil
– Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel
– Meta
– Association for Progressive Communications
– Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network

Arguments

IGF should become permanent UN forum with predictable resources to ensure effective functioning


IGF’s network of 176 national and regional initiatives is most important vehicle for reaching underrepresented communities


IGF provides unique space for dialogue among governments, business, civil society, and technical community on equal terms


We are very pleased with the permanent mandate granted to the Internet Governance Forum


Constitutional moment needed for IGF to clarify institutional evolution and sustainable funding mechanisms


Summary

Multiple stakeholders strongly support making the IGF permanent with predictable funding, recognizing it as the most inclusive global platform for digital governance dialogue


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Multi-stakeholder model is essential for effective Internet governance

Speakers

– Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
– Internet Governance Forum Leadership Panel
– Meta
– WSIS+20 Co-Facilitators Informal Multi-stakeholder Sounding Board
– Microsoft

Arguments

Multi-stakeholder model ensures Internet remains unified, global, and resilient through shared responsibilities


IGF’s network of 176 national and regional initiatives is most important vehicle for reaching underrepresented communities


IGF provides unique space for dialogue among governments, business, civil society, and technical community on equal terms


Multi-stakeholder sounding board demonstrates value of meaningful engagement across all stakeholder groups


If the Internet is a global public good, then its governance must continue to reflect shared responsibility


Summary

There is strong consensus that the multi-stakeholder approach is fundamental to Internet governance, ensuring inclusive participation and maintaining the Internet’s global, unified nature


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Digital divides persist and require urgent attention through international cooperation

Speakers

– Thailand
– Cuba
– Namibia
– United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
– Association for Progressive Communications

Arguments

Persistent digital divides continue to limit equitable access in developing countries despite progress


Digital divides are result of unjust international economic order that must be addressed through structural changes


Universal, affordable, and meaningful connectivity must remain global priority with investment in resilient infrastructure


Digital divides persist with only one-third of people online in low-income countries and minimal e-commerce engagement


We cannot afford to underestimate this divide


Summary

Multiple speakers acknowledge that despite technological progress, significant digital divides remain between and within countries, requiring coordinated international efforts to address structural inequalities


Topics

Development | Economic


Human rights must be protected equally online and offline

Speakers

– Austria
– International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance
– Holy See
– Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Arguments

Same rights that people have offline must be protected online through robust legal frameworks


Human rights-centered approach is essential to ensure Internet remains open, free, and secure space


Digital technologies must serve humanity through respect for human dignity and common good


Enhanced role for UN human rights architecture is needed within WSIS framework


Summary

There is clear consensus that human rights principles must be consistently applied in digital spaces, with robust frameworks needed to ensure equal protection online and offline


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


AI governance requires multi-stakeholder collaboration and accountability mechanisms

Speakers

– Costa Rica
– HitRecord
– Eritrea
– Trinidad and Tobago

Arguments

AI governance requires clear accountability mechanisms and genuine collaboration among all stakeholders


AI has potential for good but risks creating new forms of exclusion if guided solely by market forces


Speed of emerging technologies may exceed adaptive capabilities of developing countries without international cooperation


National AI assessment initiatives help countries evaluate readiness and develop appropriate governance frameworks


Summary

Speakers agree that AI development and governance must involve all stakeholders with proper accountability mechanisms to prevent exclusion and ensure benefits are shared equitably


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Similar viewpoints

Both emphasize that effective digital transformation requires comprehensive approaches beyond technical infrastructure, focusing on human capacity building and supportive policy environments

Speakers

– Malaysia
– International Chamber of Commerce

Arguments

Digital transformation requires people-centered approach with focus on skills, awareness, and confidence beyond just connectivity


Success will be measured by implementation requiring enabling policy environments that encourage investment and innovation


Topics

Development | Economic


Both advocate for strengthening UN institutional frameworks and coordination mechanisms to ensure effective implementation of digital governance commitments

Speakers

– Brazil
– Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Arguments

WSIS Plus 20 outcome document should align with Global Digital Compact to avoid duplication and ensure coherent implementation


Enhanced role for UN human rights architecture is needed within WSIS framework


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Both emphasize the importance of digital public infrastructure as foundational for inclusive development, with particular attention to gender equality and rights-based approaches

Speakers

– Ethiopia
– United Nations Development Programme

Arguments

Digital identity programs are cornerstone of transformation strategy, closing gender gaps and empowering women


Digital public infrastructure must be deployed securely, interoperably, and rights-based with public interest governance


Topics

Development | Gender rights online


Both recognize the critical role of digital technologies in addressing climate change and environmental challenges, emphasizing the need for coordinated digital-green transformation

Speakers

– Fiji
– China

Arguments

ICTs are lifelines for climate adaptation, disaster preparedness, and early warning systems in vulnerable countries


Digital and green transformations must progress synergistically to address climate change and resource scarcity


Topics

Development | Sustainable development


Unexpected consensus

Private sector support for permanent IGF mandate and multi-stakeholder governance

Speakers

– Meta
– Microsoft
– International Chamber of Commerce

Arguments

IGF provides unique space for dialogue among governments, business, civil society, and technical community on equal terms


If the Internet is a global public good, then its governance must continue to reflect shared responsibility


Success will be measured by implementation requiring enabling policy environments that encourage investment and innovation


Explanation

It’s notable that major technology companies strongly support institutionalizing the IGF and multi-stakeholder governance, which could potentially constrain their autonomy. This suggests genuine recognition of the value of inclusive governance models


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Economic


Civil society and government alignment on digital public goods and community networks

Speakers

– Association for Progressive Communications
– Wikimedia
– United Nations Industrial Development Organization

Arguments

Community networks and alternative connectivity models should be recognized as valid approaches


Digital public goods like Wikipedia demonstrate power of open collaboration across borders and cultures


Centers of excellence for AI provide infrastructure and expertise that many countries cannot afford alone


Explanation

The convergence between grassroots civil society advocacy for community networks and UN agency support for shared infrastructure models represents an unexpected alignment between bottom-up and institutional approaches


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


Broad agreement on cultural and linguistic diversity in AI development

Speakers

– International Organization of la Francophonie
– United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
– Wikimedia

Arguments

More than 80% of AI training data comes from single language, risking erasure of hundreds of languages from digital environment


Cultural diversity must be protected and fair remuneration ensured for artists and creators in AI-driven environment


Digital public goods like Wikipedia demonstrate power of open collaboration across borders and cultures


Explanation

The strong consensus on linguistic and cultural diversity in AI development is unexpected given the technical complexity and economic interests involved, suggesting this issue has gained significant traction across different stakeholder groups


Topics

Sociocultural | Cultural diversity


Overall assessment

Summary

The WSIS Plus 20 review demonstrates remarkable consensus across diverse stakeholders on key digital governance principles. Major areas of agreement include: permanent IGF mandate with sustainable funding, multi-stakeholder governance model, urgent need to address digital divides, human rights protection online, and collaborative AI governance. There is also strong alignment on the importance of digital public infrastructure, cultural diversity protection, and coordination between WSIS and Global Digital Compact frameworks.


Consensus level

High level of consensus with significant implications for global digital governance. The broad agreement across governments, UN agencies, private sector, and civil society suggests strong foundation for implementation. However, consensus on principles may face challenges in practical implementation, particularly regarding funding mechanisms, enforcement of human rights standards, and balancing national sovereignty with global cooperation. The unexpected alignment between different stakeholder groups on issues like community networks and cultural diversity indicates potential for innovative collaborative approaches.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Role of state regulation versus market forces in digital governance

Speakers

– Brazil
– HitRecord
– Foundation Cibervoluntarios
– Microsoft

Arguments

Information integrity and protection from disinformation requires legitimate state authority to regulate digital domain


AI has potential for good but risks creating new forms of exclusion if guided solely by market forces


Concentration of technological power in few hands creates subordination and limits ability to imagine alternatives


Digital sovereignty and respect for national contexts must be balanced with global connectivity benefits


Summary

Brazil and civil society organizations argue for stronger state regulation to protect citizens from harmful content and concentrated tech power, while Microsoft emphasizes balancing national sovereignty with global connectivity and market-driven innovation


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights | Economic


Approach to addressing digital divides – structural versus technical solutions

Speakers

– Cuba
– Thailand
– United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Arguments

Digital divides are result of unjust international economic order that must be addressed through structural changes


Persistent digital divides continue to limit equitable access in developing countries despite progress


Digital economy wealth creation is highly concentrated with companies from two countries accounting for 93% of top platform value


Summary

Cuba advocates for fundamental structural changes to the international economic order, while Thailand focuses on technical and policy solutions, and UNCTAD presents data showing extreme concentration without explicitly calling for structural reform


Topics

Development | Economic | Legal and regulatory


Priority focus for AI governance – labor rights versus general human rights

Speakers

– Brazil
– Costa Rica
– Austria

Arguments

UN should not shy away from AI challenges and must address risks of job displacement and labor rights erosion


AI governance requires clear accountability mechanisms and genuine collaboration among all stakeholders


Same rights that people have offline must be protected online through robust legal frameworks


Summary

Brazil specifically criticizes the lack of attention to labor rights and job displacement in AI governance, while Costa Rica and Austria focus on broader human rights and accountability mechanisms


Topics

Human rights | Economic | Legal and regulatory


Unexpected differences

Linguistic and cultural representation in AI development

Speakers

– International Organization of la Francophonie
– United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

Arguments

More than 80% of AI training data comes from single language, risking erasure of hundreds of languages from digital environment


Cultural diversity must be protected and fair remuneration ensured for artists and creators in AI-driven environment


Explanation

While both organizations focus on cultural preservation, they emphasize different aspects – Francophonie focuses specifically on linguistic data representation in AI training, while UNESCO emphasizes economic rights of creators. This represents an unexpected split in cultural preservation approaches within the UN system


Topics

Sociocultural | Cultural diversity | Multilingualism


Geopolitical tensions affecting digital cooperation

Speakers

– Hungary
– Ukraine

Arguments

War fanaticism and global division into blocks threatens peaceful digital cooperation and development


Russian attacks on digital infrastructure demonstrate need for resilience and protection of civilian systems


Explanation

Unexpected disagreement on framing of current conflicts – Hungary presents an abstract call for peace without naming aggressors, while Ukraine specifically identifies Russian attacks on digital infrastructure. This shows how geopolitical tensions create different narratives even within digital governance discussions


Topics

Cybersecurity | Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory


Overall assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement center on the balance between state regulation and market forces, approaches to addressing digital divides (structural versus technical), and priorities in AI governance. There are also tensions around geopolitical issues and cultural representation in digital technologies.


Disagreement level

Moderate disagreement level with most conflicts being about means rather than ends. The disagreements reflect broader ideological divides between developed and developing countries, different stakeholder perspectives (government, private sector, civil society), and varying approaches to digital sovereignty. However, there is broad consensus on core WSIS principles, suggesting the framework remains viable despite implementation disagreements.


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Similar viewpoints

Both emphasize that effective digital transformation requires comprehensive approaches beyond technical infrastructure, focusing on human capacity building and supportive policy environments

Speakers

– Malaysia
– International Chamber of Commerce

Arguments

Digital transformation requires people-centered approach with focus on skills, awareness, and confidence beyond just connectivity


Success will be measured by implementation requiring enabling policy environments that encourage investment and innovation


Topics

Development | Economic


Both advocate for strengthening UN institutional frameworks and coordination mechanisms to ensure effective implementation of digital governance commitments

Speakers

– Brazil
– Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Arguments

WSIS Plus 20 outcome document should align with Global Digital Compact to avoid duplication and ensure coherent implementation


Enhanced role for UN human rights architecture is needed within WSIS framework


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Both emphasize the importance of digital public infrastructure as foundational for inclusive development, with particular attention to gender equality and rights-based approaches

Speakers

– Ethiopia
– United Nations Development Programme

Arguments

Digital identity programs are cornerstone of transformation strategy, closing gender gaps and empowering women


Digital public infrastructure must be deployed securely, interoperably, and rights-based with public interest governance


Topics

Development | Gender rights online


Both recognize the critical role of digital technologies in addressing climate change and environmental challenges, emphasizing the need for coordinated digital-green transformation

Speakers

– Fiji
– China

Arguments

ICTs are lifelines for climate adaptation, disaster preparedness, and early warning systems in vulnerable countries


Digital and green transformations must progress synergistically to address climate change and resource scarcity


Topics

Development | Sustainable development


Takeaways

Key takeaways

The WSIS Plus 20 review reaffirmed the continued relevance of the 20-year-old vision for a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society


The multi-stakeholder approach to digital governance was strongly endorsed as essential for effective Internet governance and should be preserved


The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) received a permanent mandate from the UN, marking a significant institutional milestone


Persistent digital divides remain a major challenge, particularly affecting developing countries and requiring sustained international cooperation


AI governance emerged as a critical priority requiring ethical frameworks, accountability mechanisms, and human rights protections


Human rights protection online must match offline protections, with particular attention to vulnerable groups including women and children


Digital public infrastructure and digital public goods were recognized as foundations for inclusive development


The need for adequate and predictable financing for digital development was emphasized across multiple interventions


Alignment between WSIS and the Global Digital Compact was identified as crucial to avoid duplication and ensure coherent implementation


Cultural and linguistic diversity in digital spaces, particularly in AI development, requires urgent attention to prevent digital erasure of languages and cultures


Resolutions and action items

Adoption of the WSIS Plus 20 outcome document (referenced as A-80-L41) scheduled for the afternoon following conclusion of statements


Establishment of permanent mandate for the Internet Governance Forum as a UN forum


Creation of a working group to study future financial mechanisms for digital development


Integration of WSIS implementation with Global Digital Compact commitments


Strengthening of the UN Group on the Information Society (UNGIS) for better coordination


Development of action line roadmaps for WSIS implementation


Launch of the UN Digital Cooperation Portal for coordinating digital initiatives


Continued support for the multi-stakeholder sounding board model for enhanced stakeholder engagement


Unresolved issues

Sustainable funding mechanisms for the IGF and broader WSIS implementation remain unclear despite acknowledgment of the need


Specific mechanisms for addressing persistent digital divides and ensuring meaningful connectivity for the 2.2 billion people still offline


Concrete frameworks for AI governance at the global level, particularly regarding accountability and human rights protections


Detailed approaches to address the concentration of technological power and digital platform market dominance


Specific measures to protect and promote linguistic and cultural diversity in AI development and digital spaces


Clear mechanisms for technology transfer and capacity building support for developing countries


Practical implementation of human rights protections in digital environments across different national contexts


Coordination mechanisms between WSIS and Global Digital Compact to avoid duplication while ensuring complementarity


Suggested compromises

Alignment and parallel implementation of WSIS Plus 20 Action Lines with Global Digital Compact commitments rather than creating separate processes


Recognition of both national sovereignty in digital governance and the need for global connectivity and interoperability


Balance between government regulation of digital spaces and preservation of the open, multi-stakeholder Internet governance model


Integration of existing UN agency mandates and programs rather than creating entirely new institutional structures


Streamlined monitoring and review frameworks that avoid duplication between different digital governance processes


Inclusive participation in IGF that encourages developing country government engagement while maintaining equal footing for all stakeholders


Recognition of both digital public infrastructure and private sector innovation as complementary approaches to digital development


Thought provoking comments

We Hungarians have been living in a neighborhood of a war in the heart of Europe for the fourth consecutive year now… We have been witnessing hundreds of billions of euros being spent senseless on a war, on a corrupt state system, instead of spending money on peaceful economic development, taking advantage of the latest developments in global economy, including artificial intelligence, digitalization, and information society.

Speaker

Hungary (Péter Szijjártó, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade)


Reason

This comment was provocative because it directly politicized what was meant to be a technical discussion about digital cooperation, introducing controversial geopolitical perspectives about the Ukraine war and characterizing Ukraine as a ‘corrupt state system’ while advocating for peace with Russia.


Impact

This comment created a stark contrast with later speakers, particularly Ukraine’s representative who directly addressed the war’s impact on digital infrastructure. It set a tone of geopolitical tension early in the meeting and demonstrated how global conflicts intersect with digital governance discussions.


More than 80% of generative AI training data comes from a single language and less than 5% of living languages are represented in large language models… This massive deficit of diversity and discoverability of multilingual data is a major civilizational issue and if we don’t respond to this, hundreds or even thousands of languages and cultures risk quite simply being erased from the digital environment.

Speaker

International Organization of La Francophonie


Reason

This comment introduced a critical perspective on AI development that goes beyond technical considerations to address fundamental questions of cultural preservation and linguistic diversity, highlighting how current AI development patterns could lead to cultural erasure.


Impact

This observation reframed the AI discussion from purely technical and economic terms to include cultural and civilizational implications, adding depth to conversations about inclusive digital development and challenging the assumption that technological progress is inherently neutral.


Despite the grave consequences of Russia’s ongoing war of aggression, Ukraine continues to advance its digital transformation… We are proud that Ukraine has moved from 102nd to the 5th place in the online service index… even under pressure of deadly Russian bombs and power cuts, Ukrainians can click, tap, and log in, often much faster than the hackers trying to disrupt us. This is digital resilience at its finest.

Speaker

Ukraine


Reason

This comment was remarkable for its combination of serious subject matter with unexpected humor, demonstrating how digital infrastructure can serve as both a target and a tool of resilience during wartime, while also showing how technology can maintain human dignity and normalcy under extreme circumstances.


Impact

This comment provided a powerful counterpoint to Hungary’s earlier remarks and demonstrated the real-world stakes of digital governance discussions. It shifted the conversation from abstract policy to concrete examples of how digital infrastructure supports human survival and resistance, adding urgency and human dimension to technical discussions.


The digital economy has resulted in huge wealth creation, which is currently highly concentrated. For example, the market value of the top 100 digital platforms is now almost $28 trillion, with companies from two countries, the United States and China, accounting for 93% of this value.

Speaker

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)


Reason

This comment provided stark quantitative evidence of digital inequality that went beyond the usual discussions of access and connectivity to address fundamental questions of economic power concentration in the digital economy.


Impact

This statistic reframed many subsequent discussions about digital cooperation and governance by highlighting the massive economic imbalances that underlie technical discussions, influencing how speakers addressed questions of sovereignty, development, and international cooperation.


What had been about connection became more about addiction. Addiction to an algorithmic feed maximized for user engagement and ad revenue… So here’s my question. Looking back at the past 20 years, how are we going to learn from our mistakes? Because today we face a crossroads with a new revolutionary technology on the rise, AI.

Speaker

HitRecord


Reason

This comment was uniquely direct in criticizing the business models that drive major digital platforms and explicitly connected past failures in social media governance to current challenges with AI development, challenging the tech industry’s narrative of inevitable progress.


Impact

This intervention brought a critical perspective on the technology industry that was largely absent from government and UN agency statements, introducing questions about whether current AI development is repeating the mistakes of social media and challenging participants to think more critically about the relationship between profit motives and public good.


21st century transnational problems need transnational structures and institutions. The IGF has been, in the last 20 years, the only true institutional innovation in our field… it is now time for what could be called a constitutional moment for the IGF.

Speaker

Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network


Reason

This comment reframed the technical discussion about the Internet Governance Forum’s future in constitutional and institutional terms, suggesting that digital governance requires new forms of transnational organization that go beyond traditional international cooperation models.


Impact

This perspective elevated the discussion about the IGF from administrative details to fundamental questions about how global governance should evolve for the digital age, influencing how other speakers discussed the significance of making the IGF permanent and the broader implications for international cooperation.


Overall assessment

These key comments transformed what could have been a routine technical review into a substantive examination of power, inequality, and governance in the digital age. The discussion was shaped by three major tensions: geopolitical conflicts over digital sovereignty and security (exemplified by the Hungary-Ukraine exchange), concerns about economic and cultural concentration in digital development (highlighted by UNCTAD and La Francophonie), and questions about whether current governance structures are adequate for emerging challenges (raised by civil society and technical community speakers). The most impactful comments challenged comfortable assumptions about digital progress and forced participants to grapple with uncomfortable realities about power concentration, cultural erasure, and the gap between digital governance ideals and implementation realities. The interplay between these perspectives created a more honest and complex discussion than typically seen in UN technical meetings, with speakers building on each other’s critiques to develop a more nuanced understanding of digital governance challenges.


Follow-up questions

How to establish a working group to study future financial mechanisms for digital development

Speaker

Eritrea


Explanation

Eritrea emphasized that financing is a critical component for implementing the WSIS vision, particularly for developing countries, and called for concrete mechanisms to address this need


How to ensure sustainable funding for the Internet Governance Forum

Speaker

Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network


Explanation

The speaker noted that lack of clear funding has been plaguing the IGF since its inception and is closely interconnected with its institutional evolution


How to organize a constitutional moment for the IGF in 2026

Speaker

Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network


Explanation

The speaker called for a structured discussion among stakeholders to take the resolution and organize a bottom-up process to improve IGF’s working modalities


How to address the massive deficit of linguistic diversity in AI training data

Speaker

International Organization of La Francophonie


Explanation

They highlighted that more than 80% of generative AI training data comes from a single language and less than 5% of living languages are represented in large language models, risking the erasure of hundreds of languages and cultures


How to implement evidence-based policymaking for AI governance

Speaker

International Federation for Information Processing


Explanation

They emphasized the need for governance of AI, data, and cyber security to be grounded in scientific rigor, independent expertise, and long-term societal impact


How to develop regulatory frameworks that keep pace with rapidly emerging AI developments

Speaker

United Nations Industrial Development Organization


Explanation

They noted that traditional regulation often lags behind rapidly emerging AI developments and called for testbeds for policymakers to test regulatory approaches


How to ensure meaningful participation of developing country governments in the IGF

Speaker

Association for Progressive Communications


Explanation

They regretted that the call for government participation in the IGF is directed primarily at developing country governments and emphasized the need for equal footing participation from governments of all parts of the world


How to address the concentration of digital platform market value

Speaker

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development


Explanation

They highlighted that 93% of the financial valuation of digital platforms is concentrated in two countries, leaving the rest of the world to share a small amount, which is deeply worrying for equitable development


How to protect cultural diversity and ensure fair remuneration for artists and creators in an AI-driven environment

Speaker

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization


Explanation

They emphasized the need to protect cultural diversity and ensure fair remuneration and rights for artists and creators as AI transforms creative industries


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.