Morning session

16 Dec 2025 15:00h - 18:00h

Session at a glance

Summary

The UN General Assembly convened a high-level meeting to review the 20-year implementation of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, marking a critical assessment of global digital transformation progress. The President of the General Assembly opened by emphasizing how digital connectivity has become essential for daily life, from remote healthcare consultations to online education during COVID-19, while acknowledging that the original WSIS vision of an inclusive, people-centered information society remains unfinished. UN Under-Secretary-General Guy Ryder highlighted both remarkable progress, with 93% of the global population now within reach of 4G signals, and persistent challenges, including over a quarter of the world’s population remaining offline due to affordability barriers and widening digital divides.


Multiple ministers and representatives from countries including South Africa, Switzerland, Germany, and others shared their national experiences and commitments to digital transformation. A recurring theme throughout the discussions was the persistent digital divide, with particular emphasis on the gender gap where men are 21% more likely to have internet access than women globally. Speakers consistently stressed the importance of multi-stakeholder governance models and human rights-based approaches to digital development. Many countries highlighted their national achievements in expanding connectivity and digital infrastructure while acknowledging ongoing challenges in reaching rural and marginalized communities.


Artificial intelligence governance emerged as a critical concern, with speakers emphasizing the need for ethical, inclusive, and transparent AI development that serves humanity rather than deepening inequalities. The European Union and various member states strongly advocated for maintaining an open, free, and interoperable internet governed through inclusive multi-stakeholder processes, while opposing centralized state control that could fragment the internet. Several developing countries, represented through groups like the G77 and China, emphasized the need for enhanced international cooperation, technology transfer, and financing mechanisms to bridge digital divides between developed and developing nations.


The meeting concluded with broad support for making the Internet Governance Forum a permanent UN body and strengthening coordination between WSIS processes, the Global Digital Compact, and Sustainable Development Goals. This review represents a pivotal moment for renewing global commitment to digital inclusion and establishing frameworks for governing emerging technologies in the next decade.


Keypoints

Major Discussion Points:

Digital Divide Persistence: Despite 20 years of progress since WSIS, significant digital inequalities remain both within and between countries, with only 67% global internet access (35% in developing countries) and 280 million more men than women having internet access worldwide.


Multi-stakeholder Internet Governance: Strong emphasis on maintaining the multi-stakeholder model for internet governance, with widespread support for making the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) a permanent UN forum with sustainable funding and enhanced participation from developing countries.


Artificial Intelligence Governance: Recognition of AI’s transformative potential alongside concerns about ethical risks, bias amplification, and the need for inclusive, human-rights-based governance frameworks to ensure AI serves humanity rather than deepening inequalities.


WSIS Plus 20 Implementation and Coordination: Focus on updating and strengthening the WSIS framework while ensuring coherence with the Global Digital Compact and Sustainable Development Goals, avoiding duplication and fragmentation across UN processes.


Human Rights and Digital Security: Consistent emphasis on protecting human rights online, combating disinformation, ensuring cybersecurity, and addressing gender-based digital violence while maintaining an open, free, and secure internet.


Overall Purpose:

This high-level UN meeting aimed to conduct a comprehensive 20-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, assess progress toward building an inclusive digital society, identify persistent challenges like digital divides, and establish a renewed framework for international digital cooperation for the next decade.


Overall Tone:

The discussion maintained a formal, diplomatic tone throughout, characterized by cautious optimism tempered with realistic acknowledgment of unfinished work. While speakers celebrated technological progress and increased connectivity, there was consistent recognition that the original WSIS vision of a “people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society” remains unfulfilled. The tone was collaborative and consensus-building, with repeated calls for multi-stakeholder cooperation, though some underlying tensions emerged around issues of digital sovereignty, internet governance models, and the impact of unilateral coercive measures on developing countries.


Speakers

Speakers from the provided list:


Chair: President of the General Assembly


Secretary-General: Under-Secretary-General for Policy, Mr. Guy Ryder, speaking on behalf of the Secretary-General


South Africa: His Excellency Solly Malatsi, Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies


Switzerland: His Excellency Bernard Maissen, State Secretary for the Federal Office of Communications, speaking on behalf of ITU member states


Germany: His Excellency Karsten Wildberger, Minister for Digital Transformation and Government Modernization


Lesotho: Her Excellency Nthati Moorosi, Minister of Information, Communications, Science, Technology and Innovation


Albania: Her Excellency Delina Ibrahimaj, Minister of Economy and Innovation


Slovakia: His Excellency Samuel Migaľ, Minister of Investment, Regional Development and Information


Saudi Arabia: His Excellency Abdullah Amer Alswaha, Minister of Communications and Information Technology


Ghana: His Excellency Samuel Nartey George, Minister for Communication, Digital Technology, and Innovations


India: His Excellency Jitin Prasada, Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting and Electronics and Information Technology


Kyrgyzstan: His Excellency Mambetaliev Mirbek, Minister of Culture, Information, and Youth Policy


Poland: His Excellency Rafal Rosiński, Deputy Minister of Digital Affairs


Lithuania: His Excellency Taurimas Valys, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs


Finland: His Excellency Jarno Syrjälä, Vice Minister for Internal Trade


Norway: Her Excellency Marianne Wilhelmsen, State Secretary


Russian Federation: His Excellency Grigory Borischenko, Deputy Minister of Digital Development, Communication and Mass Media


Japan: His Excellency Takuo Imagawa, Vice Minister for International Affairs, Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications


Estonia: His Excellency Rasmus Lumi, Vice Minister for International Affairs


Türkiye: His Excellency Omer Fatih Sayan, Deputy Minister of Transport and Infrastructure


Kenya: His Excellency Stephen Isaboke, Principal Secretary for Broadcasting and Telecommunications


European Union: Distinguished Representative speaking on behalf of the EU and its member states


Venezuela: Distinguished Representative speaking on behalf of the Group of Friends in defense of the Charter of the United Nations


Ireland: Distinguished Representative


Belgium: Distinguished Representative


Qatar: Distinguished Representative


Tunisia: Distinguished Representative


Iraq: Distinguished Representative speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 and China


Republic of Korea: Distinguished Representative


Sweden: Distinguished Representative


Lebanon: Distinguished Representative


Peru: Distinguished Representative


Latvia: Distinguished Representative


Indonesia: Distinguished Representative


Netherlands: Distinguished Representative of the Kingdom of Netherlands


Additional speakers:


None identified – all speakers mentioned in the transcript were included in the provided speakers names list.


Full session report

Comprehensive Report: UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting on the 20-Year Review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Outcomes

Executive Summary

The United Nations General Assembly convened a high-level meeting to conduct a comprehensive 20-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, bringing together ministers and senior officials to assess global digital transformation progress. The President of the General Assembly opened the session emphasizing how digital connectivity has transformed daily life while noting that the original WSIS vision of creating an inclusive, people-centered information society remains substantially unfinished.


UN Under-Secretary-General Guy Ryder, speaking on behalf of the Secretary-General, presented an assessment highlighting both technological progress—with 93% of the global population now within reach of 4G signals—and persistent challenges, including over a quarter of the world’s population remaining offline. The discussion featured representatives from diverse regional perspectives and development contexts.


Key themes emerged throughout the deliberations: the persistence of digital divides, particularly gender-based inequalities; artificial intelligence governance as a critical new frontier; and debates over internet governance models. The meeting concluded with broad consensus on strengthening multi-stakeholder governance mechanisms, particularly through making the Internet Governance Forum a permanent UN body, while ensuring coherent implementation of WSIS outcomes alongside the Global Digital Compact and Sustainable Development Goals.


Opening Statements and Framework Setting

Presidential Address

The President of the General Assembly established the meeting’s framework by presenting statistics illustrating both progress and persistent challenges. While celebrating technological advances, the President emphasized that digital divides have evolved into what was described as a “digital canyon,” with only 35% internet access in developing countries compared to 67% globally.


The President highlighted gender-specific challenges, noting that men are 21% more likely to have internet access than women globally, and presented the statistic that 96% of deepfake videos online target women in sexual acts as evidence of systematic bias in emerging technologies. The economic dimension was also emphasized, with the assertion that closing the gender digital divide could add over $100 trillion to the global economy by 2050.


UN Secretariat Perspective

Under-Secretary-General Guy Ryder’s assessment acknowledged significant technological progress, including 4G coverage expansion to 93% of the global population and the emergence of transformative technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and quantum computing. However, he highlighted persistent challenges including rising cyber attacks on critical infrastructure, the spread of misinformation and disinformation, and the environmental impact of digital transformation.


Ryder emphasized the concept of digital public infrastructure as a potential equalizer, noting that when governments build shared digital foundations—such as digital identity, payments, and data systems—in ways that respect rights and promote inclusion, they can transform service delivery and citizen engagement.


Regional and National Perspectives

African Contributions

South Africa’s Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies highlighted connectivity improvements, with almost eight in ten South Africans now connected compared to one in ten in 2005. The Minister emphasized the need for digital public infrastructure that serves as an equalizer and supports the broader Global South through people-centered approaches.


Ghana’s Minister Samuel Nartey George highlighted the adoption of a National Artificial Intelligence Strategy to guide ethical and responsible AI use across government, and the development of frameworks for addressing misinformation while respecting free speech rights.


Kenya’s Principal Secretary Stephen Isaboke provided a multidimensional analysis of digital divides, emphasizing that gaps span connectivity, affordability, skills, and meaningful participation. Lesotho’s Minister Nthati Moorosi emphasized building confidence and security in ICT use as crucial for innovation and sustainable development.


European Union and Member States

European representatives consistently championed the multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance. The European Union emphasized the complementary nature of WSIS+20 and the Global Digital Compact, advocating for strengthened coherence between frameworks.


Germany’s Minister Karsten Wildberger provided strong defense of the multi-stakeholder model, emphasizing that internet governance must remain rooted in international human rights law and warning against centralized and state-controlled approaches.


Switzerland’s State Secretary Bernard Maissen, speaking on behalf of ITU member states, raised questions about implementation, asking how commitments could be rapidly and resolutely put into action.


Nordic countries emphasized human rights and digital freedom. Finland’s Vice Minister Jarno Syrjälä highlighted the accelerating rise of digital repression, while Norway’s State Secretary Marianne Wilhelmsen emphasized that meaningful connectivity must include skills and locally relevant content, calling on states to refrain from internet shutdowns.


Middle Eastern Perspectives

Saudi Arabia’s Minister Abdullah Amer Alswaha introduced the concept of an “AI divide,” arguing that lack of access to AI means lack of access to job opportunities, digital education, and economic prosperity. Saudi Arabia also highlighted its progress in women’s digital empowerment, claiming to be the first success story globally with 36% female participation.


Turkey’s Deputy Minister Omer Fatih Sayan raised geopolitical concerns, asking: “How can we talk about inclusive, people-oriented information society for all knowing the situation in Gaza?” This intervention highlighted the disconnect between aspirational digital goals and geopolitical realities.


Asian Contributions

India’s Minister Jitin Prasada introduced the concept that “when digital systems are built as public goods, technology becomes an equalizer rather than a divider.” This principle guided India’s launch of the Global Digital Public Infrastructure Repository during its G20 presidency.


Japan’s Vice Minister Takuo Imagawa focused on maintaining an open, free, and secure internet while promoting innovation. Indonesia highlighted significant domestic progress with internet penetration exceeding 80% and 95% of populated areas covered by high-speed networks.


Latin American and Developing Country Perspectives

Venezuela, speaking on behalf of the Group of Friends in defense of the UN Charter, highlighted how unilateral coercive measures continue to be “one of the greatest obstacles to the equitable development of ICTs,” restricting access to modern technologies and digital platforms.


Iraq, speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, emphasized the need for enhanced international cooperation and technology transfer to bridge digital divides, while calling for respect for national sovereignty in digital governance.


Alternative Governance Perspectives

The Russian Federation’s Deputy Minister Grigory Borischenko provided a direct challenge to existing internet governance models, arguing that “the current model for Internet governance remains unjust and geopolitically vulnerable.” The Russian position advocated for internet management under universally recognized international organizations such as the UN.


Key Thematic Issues

Digital Divides and Inclusion

The persistence of digital divides emerged as the most consistent concern across speakers. Beyond simple connectivity metrics, speakers increasingly addressed complex dimensions including affordability, skills, and meaningful participation. The gender dimension received particular attention, with multiple speakers referencing the 21% gap in internet access between men and women globally.


The concept of “meaningful connectivity” represented an evolution in thinking about digital inclusion, emphasizing that access alone is insufficient without skills, relevant content, and safe environments necessary to benefit from digital technologies.


Artificial Intelligence Governance

AI governance emerged as a critical new frontier, with speakers expressing both optimism about AI’s transformative potential and concern about its capacity to amplify existing inequalities. Saudi Arabia’s “AI divide” concept reframed digital inequality discussions to include computational capacity and AI access as essential infrastructure needs.


Multiple speakers emphasized the need for human-centric, rights-based approaches to AI governance. Ghana’s National AI Strategy and India’s framework of AI serving “public purpose” provided concrete examples of how countries are approaching AI governance challenges.


Internet Governance Models

Internet governance discussions revealed fundamental disagreements about appropriate management models. The overwhelming majority of speakers supported the multi-stakeholder approach, with Germany providing particularly strong defense of this model as rooted in international human rights law.


However, the Russian Federation’s challenge to existing governance models created ideological tension, advocating for more state-controlled governance under UN auspices. The widespread support for making the Internet Governance Forum a permanent UN forum with sustainable funding represented one of the meeting’s clearest consensus points.


Human Rights and Digital Freedom

Human rights protection in digital spaces commanded broad consensus, with Estonia’s articulation that “the same rights that apply offline must also apply online” becoming a recurring theme. Finland highlighted accelerating digital repression as a threat to safe internet use, while Norway explicitly called for states to refrain from internet shutdowns.


Gender-based digital violence received particular attention, with the Chair’s statistics on deepfake abuse providing evidence of systematic bias in emerging technologies.


Cybersecurity and Digital Trust

Cybersecurity emerged as a critical enabler of digital transformation rather than merely a protective measure. The Secretary-General warned that rising cyber attacks and disinformation are “eroding confidence in the digital space,” highlighting the urgency of addressing these challenges.


Multiple speakers emphasized cybersecurity as fundamental to building trust in digital systems, with Lesotho framing it as “a crucial driver for innovation and sustainable development.”


Areas of Consensus and Disagreement

Strong Consensus

The multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance commanded overwhelming support from most speakers. Making the Internet Governance Forum a permanent UN forum with sustainable funding emerged as the clearest consensus point.


Human rights protection in digital spaces achieved broad consensus, with speakers consistently emphasizing that fundamental freedoms must be protected online. The urgency of addressing digital divides, particularly gender-based inequalities, achieved universal recognition.


AI governance emerged as a shared concern requiring ethical, inclusive, and transparent approaches, despite different national regulatory frameworks.


Significant Disagreements

The most fundamental disagreement centered on internet governance models, with Russia directly challenging the multi-stakeholder approach as “unjust and geopolitically vulnerable,” creating clear ideological tension with Western countries and many developing nations.


The impact of unilateral coercive measures on digital development introduced geopolitical dimensions, with Venezuela and Iraq emphasizing how sanctions restrict access to technologies and digital infrastructure.


Implementation Challenges and Future Directions

Institutional Coordination

The meeting highlighted challenges in coordinating multiple UN digital processes while avoiding duplication. The Secretary-General’s emphasis on ensuring WSIS+20 and the Global Digital Compact are “complementary and mutually reinforcing” reflected concerns about institutional fragmentation.


Switzerland’s question about ensuring commitments are “rapidly and resolutely put into action” captured widespread concerns about the gap between policy declarations and practical implementation.


Financing and Technology Transfer

Financing mechanisms for digital infrastructure emerged as a critical challenge requiring innovative approaches. The concept of digital public infrastructure as public goods offered alternative financing models, though implementation challenges remain significant.


Technology transfer emerged as a persistent concern for developing countries, with emphasis on building indigenous technological capabilities rather than remaining dependent on technology imports.


Governance Framework Evolution

Poland’s advocacy for “evolution not revolution” in updating WSIS frameworks reflected recognition that gradual adaptation may be more effective than wholesale restructuring. The need to make WSIS action lines “more agile, measurable, and responsive to country contexts” emerged as a key priority.


Conclusions

The 20-year review revealed both significant progress and persistent challenges in implementing the WSIS vision. While technological advancement has been remarkable, the fundamental goal of creating an inclusive, people-centered information society remains substantially unfinished.


The persistence of digital divides, particularly gender-based inequalities, highlighted the limitations of technology-focused approaches that fail to address underlying social and economic inequalities. The emergence of new challenges like AI governance, cybersecurity threats, and environmental sustainability demonstrated that the digital transformation agenda continues to evolve.


The strong consensus on making IGF a permanent UN forum represented a significant institutional outcome, though success will depend on securing sustainable funding and ensuring meaningful participation from all stakeholders. The emphasis on coordination between WSIS, the Global Digital Compact, and SDGs reflected growing recognition that fragmented approaches risk undermining effectiveness.


The meeting established a foundation for renewed international cooperation on digital issues, though significant challenges remain in translating consensus principles into effective action. The next decade will be critical for determining whether digital transformation serves to reduce or exacerbate global inequalities, making the commitments and frameworks established through this process essential for shaping a more equitable digital future.


Session transcript

Chair

meeting of the General Assembly is called to order. I declare open the High-Level Meeting on the Overall Review of the Implementation of the Outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society. This meeting is held in accordance with Assembly Resolution 70 Stroke 125 of December 16, 2015 and 79 Stroke 277 of March 25, 2025 and takes place under Agenda Item 15 entitled Information and Communications Technologies for Development.

The documentation under this item is listed in the Journal of the United Nations. I will now make a statement as the President of the General Assembly. Smartphone, laptop, smartwatch, I guess every morning we are kind of feeling the same.

If you cannot find your smartphone, we are panicking because for almost everybody from us, from email to virtual meetings, without these technological elements, we are almost incapable of working. In fact, some of us are so connected, we have to remind ourselves to put our devices down on occasions. In today’s world, connectivity is not just essential in big cities, at work, in our daily office.

It is also a lifeline for those in the most remote places. Imagine a midwife in a village, hours from the nearest hospital, who can, in these times, consult a specialist through telemedicine and save a newborn who would otherwise not survive the long journey. Or imagine a young woman with an idea for a business, but without an online identity, digital financial services or even the basic connectivity needed to apply for a loan.

With Internet access, that idea becomes a livelihood, not only for her, but for her community. And we all saw during COVID-19 that online education did more than keep children occupied. It saved the future of an entire generation.

Yet, those without connectivity were cut off from school entirely, widening learning gaps that many may never recover from. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t need to tell this room full of experts and digital ministers why access to the Internet is so important. We agreed on this vision 20 years ago at the World Summit on the Information Society, and we reaffirmed it through the 20-year review process, including during the negotiations expertly guided by His Excellency Mr.

Ekitela Lokaale, Permanent Representative of the Republic of Kenya, and Her Excellency Ms. Suela Janina, Permanent Representative of the Republic of Albania. I extend my sincere appreciation for their leadership and stewardship throughout this important and challenging process.

But what we must acknowledge today, two decades later, is that our shared vision of people-centered, inclusive, and development-orientated information society remains unfinished, and in some areas increasingly at risk.

As we take stock of the WSIS agenda and its 11 action lines today, allow me to highlight three priority areas for action identified for this month-long process. First, the digital divide remains a digital canyon for too many. Undoubtedly, we have made progress over the past two decades, but deep inequalities remain.

While global Internet access stands at 67% in developing countries, it is just 35%. This gap is not only morally unacceptable, it is also processing practical barriers to lifting societies out of poverty, expanding opportunity, improving health outcomes, and unlocking humanity’s full potential.

Second, the digital gender divide continues to deny women and girls equal access to opportunity. Globally, men are still 21% more likely to have Internet access than women. On the other hand, closing this gap is not only a question of fairness, it is plain economic sense.

It is estimated that closing the gender digital divide could add over 100 trillion US dollars to the global economy by 2050, more than the combined GDP of the United States and China today. When women are online, societies grow stronger, more prosperous, and more resilient. Third finding, access alone is not enough.

We must ensure responsible governance of emerging technologies. Artificial intelligence has immense potential to accelerate development gains, and these should be pursued. But in our haste to take use of new technology, we cannot ignore the red flags or risks, particularly when innovation outpaces regulation, oversight, and ethical safeguards, and as a result, amplifies gender bias online in an incredible dimension.

As many as 96%, so almost all, deepfake videos online are of women engaging in sexual acts. 96%, so this is no coincidence. It is systematic.

Without inclusive governance frameworks that keep the pace of technological advancements, such harms will only intensify. We must therefore harness AI’s potential, minimize this risk, and equalize its reach. Two decades after the World Summit on the Information Society, our work is far from finished.

Delivering meaningful, safe, and inclusive connectivity for all remains a defining challenge of our time. As we conclude the 20-year WSIS review process, we also open a new chapter of cooperation. This process has recognized that governments alone cannot deliver the digital future we need.

Instead, we have seen how partnership with the private sector and a strong civil society has created a truly participatory process, more than we have seen before, making our work, making our outcomes better.

This approach has strengthened trust, broadened ownership, and delivered an outcome that is both inclusive and transparent. And I encourage Member States to apply this model across other UN processes and high-level meetings to build a United Nation that is fit for purpose and fit for the realities of the digital age. I thank you.

In accordance with Rule 70 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly, I now give the floor to the Under-Secretary-General for Policy, Mr. Guy Ryder, to make a statement on behalf of the Secretary-General.

Secretary-General

Madam President of the General Assembly, Distinguished Ministers, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Twenty years ago, the World Summit on the Information Society set out a bold and hopeful vision, People-Centered, Inclusive and Sustainable Development-Oriented Information Society.

For this 20-year review of WSIS outcomes, I start by thanking the co-facilitators, Ambassador Suela Janina of Albania and Ambassador Ekitela Lokaale, of Kenya, for their inclusive consultation process.

They have engaged governments, academia, the private sector, civil society, and many others, reflecting the indispensable multi-stakeholder approach that has so well served the implementation of the WSIS action lines.

The outcome document would be a testament to their tireless work and to the efforts of all stakeholders, including in the UN system itself. All working together to deliver the inclusive, safe, and sustainable information society that the Tunis drafters envisioned. This WSIS Plus 20 review is therefore more than an anniversary.

It’s a moment of renewed commitment. The outcome document before you for consideration must reaffirm the WSIS vision, while providing clear direction for implementation in a digital landscape that has grown more complex, more powerful, and more consequential.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, The WSIS Plus 20 High-Level Meeting provides an opportunity to take stock of the incredible progress that has been made, but we must at the same time acknowledge that many challenges remain.

Since the General Assembly last reviewed WSIS outcomes ten years ago, the world has been in a state of crisis. has gone through considerable changes and, indeed, remarkable progress. Today, 93% of the global population lives within reach of a 4G signal.

But more than a quarter of the world’s people remain offline, and affordability remains a major barrier. And the barriers are widening digital divides. Rural communities lag far behind those of cities.

And 280 million more men than women have internet access worldwide. And these divides reinforce one another. Closing them within and between countries must remain our collective priority.

We would like to see this resolution help close these divides in line with the original WSIS vision for an inclusively governed, safe, and sustainable digital space. And to that end, your consideration to make the Internet Governance Forum, IGF, a permanent forum of the United Nations, would be a key achievement of this review. Since its inception, the IGF has embodied the spirit of this inclusive and collaborative approach to the internet.

Through close engagement across stakeholder groups, accelerated growth of the national and regional IGFs, the guidance of the multi-stakeholder advisory group, and coordination with technical entities, IGF has served as a durable global forum for internet governance dialogue.

Recognition is due here also to the work of DESA and the IGF Secretariat, whose sustained efforts are valued across the United Nations and throughout the digital governance ecosystem. The Secretary General welcomes a call for a strengthening of the IGF Secretariat. On a safe and secure information society, we are facing increased challenges.

Rising cyber attacks, including on critical infrastructure, coupled with the rapid spreading of miss and of disinformation online, is eroding confidence in the digital space. To combat these trends, we must strengthen international digital cooperation, support capacity building for cybersecurity skills, and sustain the sharing of best practices in digital governance. A safe and secure society will also seek to advance the protection of human rights in the digital sphere.

And it is encouraging to see such active engagement in the strengthening of human rights throughout the WSIS plus 20 consultations. We have a responsibility to prevent and to address digital harms, and to ensure that digital technologies uphold and advance the full enjoyment of human rights by all. On an information society that accelerates sustainable development, we need to accelerate our work to connect those who remain offline.

All stakeholders, including the private sector, share a responsibility to enhance financing mechanisms and incentives for connectivity. These initiatives, along with the call for resilient infrastructure, multilingual content, and enhancement of digital skills will be important accelerators for the achievement of the SDGs. And over the last 10 years, digital public infrastructure and digital public goods have become indispensable for the acceleration of sustainable development.

When governments and partners build shared digital foundations, such as digital identity, and payments, and data systems in ways that respect rights and promote inclusion, they transform how societies deliver services, offer opportunities, and engage citizens.

Digital public goods can help countries avoid social fragmentation, reduce costs, and adapt solutions to local needs. But we must also confront digitalization’s growing environmental footprint, including energy use, demand for critical minerals, and e-waste. A sustainable digital future requires global standards for sustainable digital products and greener infrastructure that lowers emission and protects ecosystems.

Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, as we look ahead, it is essential also to situate WSIS Plus 20 within the broader digital multilateral agenda. A key part of that is the Global Digital Compact. Adopted by the General Assembly last year, it offers a forward-looking framework to address emerging risks and opportunities of digital transformation grounded in human rights, international cooperation, and shared responsibility.

WSIS Plus 20 and the Global Digital Compact are complementary, and they are mutually reinforcing. WSIS provides the implementation, architecture, and development focus. The Global Digital Compact strengthens our collective capacity to govern digital technologies in an increasingly interconnected world.

They must be implemented together and in a coherent and coordinated manner if we are to deliver meaningful impact. And I’m confident that we are going to achieve that. We can harness this resolution to build an information society that is indeed inclusive, safe, secure, and driving sustainable development forward.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Undersecretary for Policy. I should now like to consult members with a view to giving the floor during this high-level meeting to representatives of the United Nations system, entities, and stakeholder organizations listed in my letter dated December 9, 2025, in accordance with paragraph 3 of Resolution 79-277.

May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly to invite the representatives of the United Nations system, entities, and stakeholder organizations listed in my letter dated December 9, 2025, to make a statement at this high-level meeting?

It is so decided. The Assembly will now hear statements in plenary in accordance with Resolution 79-277 before giving the floor to the first speaker on the list of speakers. Delegations are reminded that statements are limited to three minutes for individual delegations and five minutes for statements made on behalf of a group of states.

Given that this is a formal plenary meeting, the time limits will not be enforced automatically. However, you will hear little sound, and I would like to appeal to all speakers to deliver their statements in the time limit and at a reasonable pace so to facilitate interpretations into the six official languages.

I now give the floor to the first speaker, His Excellency Solly Malatsi, Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies of Kenya.

South Africa

Madam President, it’s South Africa, not Kenya. Excellencies, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, please allow me to express my gratitude first to the International Telecommunications Union and the UN General Assembly to address you today as the chair of the WSIS Plus 20 high-level event which took place earlier this year in Geneva.

The high-level event was an opportunity for over 11,000 participants from over 160 countries to collectively reflect on the impact of the WSIS over the past two decades and to engage on what is needed for WSIS to remain relevant in a world that is increasingly reliant on the information society.

What was abundantly clear from our engagements is that there remains widespread support for the continuation of the work of the WSIS architecture beyond 2025, provided that the process and the way we work together and the way we work evolves with changing times.

And I firmly believe that inclusivity must be the guiding principle in the new era of the WSIS process. The chair’s summit reflects thus a call for deeper and more practical inclusion. Participants reminded us that access alone is not enough.

And as we move forward, we must close all the remaining digital device, address affordability and equip people with the skills and capabilities to participate meaningfully in the information society, especially vulnerable groups like women, young people, people living with disabilities and communities in the global South.

We also had a strong message that WSIS must remain the primary and UN-anchored implementation framework for a people-centered digital future that respects human rights, even as the digital future evolves to respond to new realities, such as artificial intelligence and emerging technologies.

The WSIS action lines remain relevant, but they must be applied in ways that are more agile, more measurable and more responsive to country context. At the same time, we must use our resources wisely. The global digital compact should be a complimentary process and reinforce the WSIS and not duplicate it.

Our task is to improve coordination across UN processes, avoid parallel tracks and. the multi-stakeholder character that has made the WISEs a trusted space for dialogue and cooperation. The high-level event underlined that implementation happens where people live.

Local and regional governments, civil society, small enterprises are on the front lines of delivery. And therefore, strengthening their capabilities and investing in secure, resilient, and sustainable digital infrastructure services will determine whether our commitments translate into real change. And as the chair of the WISEs Plus 20 high-level, it is my great privilege to have submitted the chair’s report, the chair’s summary, to the General Assembly with the hope that it will inform your review on the broader WISEs mission and negotiations on the global digital compact.

I urge all the member states to use this moment to renew and modernize the WISEs framework so that together we can shape the next 20 years of digital global cooperation and achieve true, meaningful connectivity.

WISEs has been a compass for South Africa’s digital journey. In 2005, like many other countries, we faced fewer people. More specifically, one in ten South Africans were online.

Today, almost eight in ten are connected. 4G coverage is almost universal at 99%. 5G is available to half the population.

And more than a million kilometers of fiber meet our country. And while we are modernizing our legal framework, running out e-government services from text to civil registration, and aligning spectrum data and AI policies with a shared global vision. But our biggest shift, however, has been from isolated projects into building a digital public infrastructure.

And earlier this year, we launched the Digital Transformation Roadmap for Government, which is the clearest expression of our progress. But like many countries, our progress is still incomplete. 13 South Africans remain offline.

Devices, like in many other parts of the world, remain too expensive for many. And we used our G20 presidency to champion a people-centered approach to the digital public infrastructure that serves the global South. And we want Africa to move from adoption to contribution.

We therefore support the continuation of the WISEs work, and we stand ready to work with all partners so that the next phase of the WISEs helps every country to turn digital opportunity into real public value, and ensures that ultimately no one in any part of the world is left behind.

Thank you very much.

Chair

I thank the Minister of Communication and Digital Technology of South Africa. Very sorry for the mistakes on the speaking list. Speaking also on behalf of the International Telecommunications Union member states.

I give the floor to His Excellency Bernard Maissen, State Secretary for the Federal Office of Communications of Switzerland.

Switzerland

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, we warmly congratulate the co-facilitators for the constructive spirit that they’ve shown throughout this process. And we thank the many delegations ready to join the consensus. We also encourage all the other delegations to join the compromise text, which allowed for a consensus-based final document.

This is a crucial stage for all of us, which preserves the foundations of WISEs while recognizing the deep-seated changes that have reshaped the digital landscape since 2005. As we reflect on our achievements, we also need to recognize the challenges that remain. The digital divide remains a significant reality, but so do disinformation, artificial intelligence, data governments, and their impact on sustainability.

This all requires urgent attention. The process that we’ve undertaken here with the review of WISEs Plus 20 is therefore not only a celebration of progress achieved, but it is also a call to action to guarantee that digital technologies serve all of humanity and allow us to tackle new challenges that are emerging.

Switzerland welcomes, in particular, the reaffirmation that the digital space needs to remain open, free, globally connected, interoperable, inclusive, development-centered, and deeply rooted in human rights.

The challenge is now to ensure that the commitments contained in the final document are rapidly put into action and resolutely put into action. Switzerland stands ready to support these measures agreed upon in close cooperation with all of its partners. Over the next 10 years before the next review, it will be vital to keep the promises of digital technologies to ensure they benefit humanity while leaving no one behind.

We need an effective, efficient, open, and inclusive architecture for digital governance, and we cannot achieve this alone. We are eagerly awaiting the implementation of the vision of the WSIS Plus architecture that is strengthened and adapted to its goal, including a forum on internet governance, which is permanent and better financed.

We need a commission for science and technology for development, which is strengthened, a WSIS forum that is more targeted, and a set of guidelines for WSIS that are updated and made more dynamic. We’re also waiting for a United Nations system that functions as a whole and tackles the numerous challenges that we face, from connectivity to human rights to freedom online, including the establishment of AI governance for the service of humanity and strengthening the significant participation of all stakeholders for all citizens to ensure that they can reap the benefits of the present and the future of the digital sphere.

Thus, Switzerland is pleased to be hosting in Geneva a unique and dynamic ecosystem on digital cooperation. This ecosystem, for a long time, has supported the WSIS process, and we will continue to promote inclusive, human-centered, and rights-based digital governance. I’ll conclude by saying that we’re pleased to join this consensus, and we stand ready to actively participate in the next stages of the process in all of the multilateral platforms and all of the multi-stakeholder fora that are relevant.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the State Secretary for the Federal Office of Communications of Switzerland. I give the floor to His Excellency Karsten Wildberger, Minister for Digital Transformation and Government Modernization of Germany.

Germany

Madam President of the General Assembly, Mr. Under-Secretary General, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, I thank the Albanian and Kenyan co-facilitators for guiding us through the inclusive consultation process and bringing us to consensus.

Thank you. Germany wishes to add the following remarks in our national capacity. We are here to reaffirm our commitment to the free, open, and interoperable global Internet.

Its greatest strength is openness, connecting people across borders, enabling innovation, and expanding access to knowledge. An open Internet underpins modern societies, and is essential for prosperity and sustainable human-centered development. Its strength comes from a decentralization and cooperation amongst governments, civil society, business, academia, the technical community, and users.

This is a global endeavor. Open Internet infrastructure is built and maintained by contributors worldwide, often on a voluntary basis. Germany is committed to these open principles and supports the people behind the code.

Our sovereign tech agency maintains key open source components that underpin security, stability, competitiveness, and innovation. By strengthening essential elements of global digital infrastructure, we aim to improve security and resilience. Germany values the WSIS resolution because it is clear Internet governance is multi-stakeholder and rooted in international human rights law.

The resolution reaffirms this global consensus. It also makes the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum permanent. The IGF is the United Nations’ central platform for shaping the digital future.

It is where the world comes together. Nowhere else can we discuss such a range of issues so openly. The IGF continues to evolve.

To increase its impact, it must communicate its value and contribution more clearly. Germany will contribute one million euros to strengthen the IGF and its mission. WSIS asks us to choose a digital world shaped by a shared vision or by none.

Germany is clear. The Internet is strongest when it is shared, shaped, and safeguarded by all. WSIS is the right framework, and the IGF is the right venue.

I encourage all of us to be pragmatic and seek consensus. Let us choose cooperation for economic prosperity. and for sustainable development.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Minister for Digital Transformation and Government Modernization of Germany. I give the floor to Her Excellency Nthati Moorosi, Minister of Information, Communications, Science, Technology and Innovation of Lesotho.

Lesotho

Madam President, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen, The Kingdom of Lesotho extends its profound appreciation to the core facilitators for guiding this pivotal WSIS Plus 20 review. We reaffirm our unwavering commitment to the Geneva Declaration and Tunis Agenda as the enduring blueprints for an equitable information society. As a landlocked, least developed country, we celebrate two decades of collective strides in bridging digital divides, fostering innovation and empowering communities worldwide.

These outcomes have illuminated pathways for nations like ours to harness ICTs for enduring progress and shared prosperity. Lesotho fully endorses the WSIS Plus 20 review outcome document, recognizing its comprehensive reaffirmation of the WSIS vision and the value of multi-stakeholder cooperation. We particularly welcome the document’s focus on the persistent and critical digital divides between and within countries, which continue to constrain the achievements of WSIS goals.

Renewed impetus to close these divides, particularly for developing countries and marginalized groups, is essential for truly realizing the people-centered information society. We commend the outcome document’s strong emphasis on closing digital divides, which acknowledges the disparities in Internet access and use, which directly addresses the needs of remote communities in countries like Lesotho.

Capacity development, which stresses the importance of digital skills and literacy for all ages and backgrounds, as a lack of capacity remains a major barrier. And building confidence and security in ICT use, reaffirming this as a crucial driver for innovation and sustainable development consistent with international human rights law. Strengthened international cooperation, calling for enhanced collaboration, including north-south, south-south, and triangular cooperation, which are vital for investment in infrastructure in developing nations.

The Kingdom of Lesotho is proud to highlight its own contributions, exemplifying the WSIS action lines in practice. Information and communication infrastructure, which is C2, we have achieved over 95% mobile coverage across mountainous terrain, including early rollout of 5G in major towns. We have also integrated non-geostationary orbit satellite services, such as recent Starlink deployments, to extend high-speed broadband and enhance resilience in hard-to-reach areas.

Capacity building, which is C4, our ongoing digital skills development programs, including a community digital inclusive model, continue to build essential human capital. Building confidence and security in ICT use, which is C5, we recently established the Lesotho communication sector computer security incidents response team, CSET, as a national hub for proactive threat management and sector-wide protection.

Looking forward, Lesotho is leveraging its unique high-altitude location, natural quietness, and cool climate to attract investments in energy and data centers, and is expanding broadband connectivity to all schools and establishing satellite earth stations for environmental monitoring.

As we chart our way forward, Lesotho represents the interests of LDCs and LLDCs, raising a vital concern. While non-binding agreements foster creativity, the current architecture risks allowing technology concentration to remain unchecked, fueling an emerging AI and data divide. The non-binding nature of certain processes means smaller nations risk being sidelined, endangering our collective achievement.

The next decades depends on effective multi-stakeholder engagement that delivers on the principles of intelligence, investment, and inclusion. Our advocacy is a firm call to support the multilateral nature of WSIS, aiming to secure right-based digital inclusion, access, and uptake. To address this, Lesotho is advocating for a complementary strengthening of state-led mechanisms through a robust collaborative approach across the UN system.

We propose a joint mandate empowering the core WSIS facilitating agencies, the ITU, UNESCO, and UNDP, to spearhead the analytical and preparatory work required for a more recent and equitable digital architecture.

Madame President, Lesotho calls on all member states to embrace this balanced evolution. We support the permanence of IGF while advocating for the ITU-UNESCO-UNDP collaboration to undertake preparatory work for future treaties in critical areas like cybersecurity, digital rights, ethical AI, and fair allocation of global digital resources.

Together, let us forge frameworks that deliver not fleeting gains but enduring, equity and collective resilience. Lesotho stands ready to collaborate, drawing on our experiences to contribute to a truly universal digital future. I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Minister of Information, Communication, Science, Technology, and Innovation of Lesotho. May I remind again of the speaking time of three minutes. The next speaker is Her Excellency Delina Ibrahimaj, Minister of Economy and Innovation of Albania.

Albania

Madame President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, 20 years after the World Summit on Information Society, the question before us is no longer whether digital transformation matters. It clearly does. The question is how it is governed, who benefits from it, and who risks from being left behind.

WSIS Plus 20 therefore represents not only a review of past commitments but a test of our collective ability to adapt multilateral cooperation to a rapidly evolving digital reality. Throughout this review process, one message has been clear and consistent. While progress in connectivity and access is undeniable, digital inequality still persists, and it is increasingly in complex forms.

Today’s divides are shaped by infrastructure, by skills, affordability, trust, safety, and institutional capacity. Addressing them requires more than a national effort alone. It requires coordinated and effective international action.

For Albania, these issues are not abstract. As a country that has undergone rapid digital transformation over the past decade, we have seen firsthand both the opportunities and challenges that digitalization brings. Investment in e-governance and digital public services have improved efficiency, transparency, and access.

At the same time, they have underscored the importance of digital skills, institutional resilience, and public trust in digital systems. It is from this perspective that Albania believes that the outcome of WSIS Plus 20 must be guided by three essential principles. First, people and rights must remain at the center of digital transformation.

As emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, accelerate change, our collective response must ensure the protection of human rights, data privacy, and democratic values. For countries like Albania, safeguarding trust in digital public services depends on ensuring that innovation strengthens accountability and inclusion. Innovation must serve people, not the other way around.

Second, digital inclusion must be treated as core development objectives. Albania’s experience has shown that access alone is not enough. Sustained investment in digital literacy, education, and capacity building, particularly for women, youth, and marginalized communities, is essential to ensure the digital transformation becomes a driver of opportunity rather than a source of inequalities.

Third, strong multilateral and multistakeholder cooperation is of core importance. No country, regardless of size or level of development, can access today’s digital challenges in isolation. For Albania, multilateral cooperation has been central to advancing national digital priorities while aligning them with international reform norms.

The WSIS principles are openness, inclusiveness, and partnership that must therefore continue to guide future digital governance frameworks. Madam President, WSIS plus 20 should not result in a declaratory outcome. It should provide clear strategic direction, linking WSIS principles with the implementation of the digital compact.

and future UN digital processes in a coherent and complementary manner. It is as a role of co-facilitator that Albania engaged transparently and constructively with all delegation and stakeholders with the objective of delivering an outcome that reflects consensus, ambition and shared responsibility.

The discussions we make today and decisions we make today will define opportunities and inequalities for decades to come. That’s why they are very important. Our shared task is to ensure that this future remains inclusive, rights-based and firmly grounded into multi-stakeholder cooperation.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Minister of Economy and Innovation of Albania. I give the floor to His Excellency Samuel Samuel Migaľ, Minister of Investment, Regional Development and Information of Slovakia.

Slovakia

Madam President of the General Assembly, distinguished guests, the Slovak Republic fully aligns itself with the EU Statement, which will be delivered later today. In our national capacity, I would like to point out the following. We are honored to be part of this historic moment.

Twenty years ago, when the world embraced the principles of the World Summit on the Information Society, the digital revolution was just beginning. Today, in 2025, digital technologies are no longer peripheral. They are the heart and mind of our development.

Slovakia understands that digital transformation is not merely a technological challenge. It is imperative to ensure that digital opportunities reach everyone, regardless of where they live, of their social, economic status. The digital divide depends on inequalities.

Digital connectivity overcomes them. At this gathering, guided by the spirit of WSIS Plus 20, we must ask ourselves three fundamental questions. First, how do we bridge the digital divide?

Infrastructure alone is not enough. We need digital skills, security and trust. The ITU and its Partner to Connect Coalition show us the way through multitasker-holder collaboration involving business, civil society and communities.

Slovakia firmly supports this collaborative model. Second, how do we govern artificial intelligence for the benefit of all? AI for good is not just a slogan.

It is an imperative of our time. AI can help us solve global challenges from climate change to health to equality. But only if it is secured, trustworthy and sustainable.

Slovakia is proud to participate in this initiative. Third, what will our digital society look like in 2035? That is being decided now.

The United Nations General Assembly meeting in the coming days will conduct the WSIS review after 20 years. This is a moment for ambitious decisions. Decisions to support an inclusive human-centered and rights-respecting digital future.

Digital transformation is not about technology. It is about the people. It is about ensuring everyone can participate in the digital economy and society.

It is about ensuring no one is left behind. Thank you and let us together build a digital future for all.

Chair

I thank the Minister of Investments, Regional Development and Information of Slovakia. I give the floor to His Excellency Abdullah Amer Alswaha, Minister of Communications and Information Technology of Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia

In the name of God, most compassionate, most merciful. I give you greetings of peace. The greetings of Islam.

Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. In the past 20 years, together, at the Global Summit, we celebrated a number of achievements. And we noted a few challenges.

In the past 20 years, we’ve linked more than 6 billion people to the Internet. And this number increased from 800 million users. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ranked first globally in the ITU’s ICT Development Index.

At the social level, globally, women’s digital empowerment rose from 5% to a global average of 28%. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia celebrated the fact that it became the first success story worldwide in the digital empowerment of women, with a digital empowerment of 36%. However, this is insufficient today.

2 billion, 200 million people are still disconnected. Therefore, we must put mankind first. And we must focus on the segment of society that has been left behind.

Lack of access to the Internet worldwide is something we need to address. And this is what we’ve based our work on in healthcare and other sectors. This gap must be bridged if we wish to move forward towards AI society or AI-based society.

This is something we must work on as member states. And this can only be done if we work together collectively to bridge the AI divide. Lack of access to AI means lack of access to job opportunities, to digital education, and to a prosperous future and economy.

We must work together with concerted action. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, under the guidance of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques and His Highness the Crown Prince, looks forward to working with you to bridge the three main gaps of our world today.

The computing gap. Today, our world requires an additional 63 gigawatts. And we’ve employed our investments and capacities to provide 3 gigawatts at the cost of 11 cents for each 1 million token to protect mankind and the planet.

As for the algorithm gap, this, or rather misinformation, was identified by the SG as the greatest risk globally. And most recently, Professor Omar Yaghi, the Saudi American national, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for carbon sequestration and its employment for the protection of the planet and mankind. As for the data gap, more than 90% of language models today are trained in one language.

It is not the first nor the second language worldwide, but the third. Therefore, we’ve established the model Alam to provide access to more than 400 million users in the Arab world. Today, we must place mankind first.

We must bridge the digital gaps. We must work decisively, first and foremost, to concert our efforts and to unite to bridge the AI gaps to ensure that we place mankind first. And so that everyone can benefit from new job opportunities and the opportunities of this new economy for a prosperous future.

May the peace, blessings, and mercy of God be upon you.

Chair

I thank the Minister of Communications and Information Technology of Saudi Arabia. I now give the floor to His Excellency Jitin Prasad, Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting and Electronics and Information Technology of India. Sorry, there’s another mistake.

Sorry. I give the floor now to His Excellency Samuel Nartey George, Minister for Communication, Digital Technology, and Innovations of Ghana. I have the floor, sir.

Sorry about the mistake.

Ghana

Mr. President. Chairperson, Secretary General of the ITU, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates.

On behalf of the government and people of Ghana, I extend warm greetings and our appreciation to the United Nations and the host authorities for convening this high-level meeting of the WSIS Plus 20 Review.

The World Summit on the Information Society established a shared vision of a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society. Twenty years on, Ghana reaffirms its commitment to this vision and the principles that underpin it. Guided by the WSIS Action Lines, Ghana has implemented a comprehensive national digitalization agenda.

Significant investments in fiber infrastructure, expanded 4G coverage, and the deployment of rural telephony sites have extended meaningful connectivity to previously unserved citizens. These efforts reflect our conviction that universal access is fundamental to sustainable development. Ghana continues to advance digital public infrastructure, including the Ghana.gov platform, the Ghana Electronic Procurement System, the Ghana Integrated Financial Management Information System, the National Health Information Exchange, and the Ghana Health Information Management System.

These initiatives promote efficiency, transparency, and equitable access to public services. To foster trust in the digital ecosystem, Ghana has strengthened its cybersecurity and data protection frameworks and operationalized national and sectoral computer emergency response teams. We are modernizing legislation governing the digital economy as well.

We have equally adopted the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy to guide the ethical and responsible use of AI across government. We’re developing frameworks to deal with myths and disinformation while respecting the rights of free speech online. Digital inclusion remains a center pillar of our efforts.

Through nationwide digital literacy campaigns, community information centers, the One Million Coders Program, and the Girls in ICT Initiative, Ghana is expanding digital skills and empowering women, youth, and underserved communities to participate effectively in the digital economy.

Chairperson, as the global community charts the next phase of the WSIS process, Ghana underscores the need for enhanced international cooperation. We call for strengthened commitments to universal connectivity, robust digital public infrastructure, equitable AI governance, and increased capacity-building support for developing countries. Under the leadership of His Excellency President John Germani-Mahama, Ghana stands ready to collaborate with member states, the private sector, civil society, and development partners to build an inclusive, secure, and sustainable digital future aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals and aspiration of all people.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Minister for Communication, Digital Technology, and Innovation of Ghana, and now, yes, I give the floor to His Excellency Jitin Prasada, Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting and Electronics and Information Technology of India.

India

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I have the honor to deliver India’s national statement at the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the overall review of the implementation of the outcomes of the World Summit on Information Society.

Twenty years ago, WSIS was founded on a powerful idea that digital technologies, when guided by shared values, can advance development, inclusion, and human dignity. As my Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi Ji, has reminded us, global challenges demand that global action must be met by global ambition. For India, digital transformation has been a lived experience at population scale.

Over the past decade, we have built digital public infrastructure as a public good, open, interoperable, secure, and affordable by design. Digital identity, instant payments, digital documentation, telemedicine, online education, and grievance redressal today serve people across geographies, languages, and income levels. This journey is not about numbers alone.

It is about ensuring that technology reaches the last mile and empowers the last person. When digital systems are built as public goods, technology becomes an equalizer rather than a divider. This principle guided India’s launch of the Global Digital Public Infrastructure Repository during our G20 presidency.

Many countries are adapting to this digital public goods to their own national contexts, and India remains committed to sharing capacity, tools, and knowledge, guided by our ethos of one earth, one family, and one future.

Artificial intelligence now stands at the center of the next phase of sustainable development. Through the India AI mission, India is investing in responsible AI ecosystems, expanding national compute capacity, creating repositories of reusable data sets, which we call the AI Kosh, and building Bhashani, which is an AI natural language processing enabled real-time translation tool to make the content available in various languages spoken in our country.

Our focus is clear, AI must be inclusive, trustworthy, and oriented towards public purpose. In this spirit, India has proposed a global repository of AI applications to accelerate AI for social good. India also recognizes that the resilient semiconductor and electronic supply chains are functional to digital transformation and AI at scale.

We are strengthening domestic capabilities while deepening international partnerships to enhance global technology resilience. As we shape the WSIS plus 20 outcomes, India reaffirms its strong support for the multi-stakeholder model of internet governance, except on matters of national security, strengthening the Internet Governance Forum, advancing universal acceptance, multilingual access, open standards, DNS compatibility, and ensuring meaningful participation of the global south must remain central to our collective efforts.

Trust must be the bedrock of our digital future, balance innovation with safety, privacy, human rights, and sustainability. In this context, I warmly invite all member states to the India AI Impact Summit in February 2026, guided by the principle, quote, meaning, welfare for all and happiness for all. I also take the opportunity to appreciate Mr.

Ekitela Lokaale, permanent representative of the Republic of Kenya to the United Nations, and Ms. Suela Janina, permanent representative of the Republic of Albania, for their stewardship in delivering to us the WSIS plus 20 outcome document that we will hopefully adopt tomorrow. WSIS plus 20 offers a defining moment to ensure that digital processes, digital progress bridges divides, empowers societies, and reinforces human dignity.

India stands ready to work with all nations to build a future together where no one is left behind. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting and Electronics and Information Technology of India, and now I give the floor to His Excellency Mambetaliev Mirbek, Minister of Culture, Information, and Youth Policy of Kyrgyzstan.

You have the floor, sir.

Kyrgyzstan

Mr. President, distinguished delegations, at the outset, allow me to thank the organizers for convening today’s meeting and for the opportunity to share the practical experience of the Kyrgyz Republic in terms of the digital transformation.

The last two decades have clearly illustrated that information and communications technologies have become an integral part of socioeconomic development. For Kyrgyzstan, this path was not easy. However, we consistently moved forward, broadening access to the Internet, developing electronic state services, and bolstering digital infrastructure.

Today we view digitalization not as an end in itself, but rather as an instrument for sustainable development, economic growth, and improving the quality of life of our citizens. Precisely this application is what underpins the national digital policy of the Kyrgyz Republic. In that regard, an important step was the adoption of a digital codex, which systematized the digital legislation, cleared away legal barriers, and formed a transparent normative basis for developing digital services, telecommunications, and artificial intelligence.

The codex also strengthens the protection of the digital rights of citizens, and it fosters the harmonization of national governance with international standards. Right now, 98 percent of the cities in Kyrgyzstan have 3G networks, and 99 percent have 4G networks. That includes remote and mountainous regions.

An important role in this was played by the CASA project, that’s C-A-S-A, more than 3,000 kilometers of fiber optic cables were laid. That’s 60,000 kilometers throughout the country. That laid the groundwork for the development of our digital state and for our economy, the data economy.

This infrastructure is already working for citizens. The Tunduk system for the 11 months of 2025 has already developed more than 2.5 billion electronic transactions, ensuring real interaction between the state, business, and society. Over 2.7 million citizens are using digital services through a unified identification system.

We’re going to separately draw your attention to artificial intelligence. And in order to develop the digital codex, there’s also a normative basis being developed in order to ensure safe and ethical use of AI. In Bishkek, there was a forum of Turkic states on artificial intelligence.

That was in October of 2024, and that was an important step to implement these goals. At the same time, we’re aware that the digital divide is a key issue and a priority. Kyrgyzstan stands ready to constructively engage in intergovernmental processes to develop a coordinated outcome document.

It is our conviction that only through international cooperation, solidarity, and joint action that we can craft an inclusive, human-centered, and sustainable information society for everyone. Kyrgyzstan is open for international cooperation and stands ready to jointly form the digital future. I thank you for your attention.

Chair

I thank the Minister of Culture, Information, and Youth, Policy of Kyrgyzstan, and now I give the floor to His Excellency, Rafal Rosiński, Deputy Minister of Digital Affairs of Poland.

Poland

Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, Poland aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union and would like to offer the following remarks in national capacity. I am honored to share Poland’s vision for the WSIS Plus 20 review and the future of the global information society. But first, please let me thank the co-facilitators and the secretaries for the outstanding work on the outcome document, which reflects countless inputs of a wide range of stakeholders.

First and foremost, transparency and inclusiveness must be at the heart of this process. WSIS should stay open and participatory as it is, involving all stakeholders with special attention given to the developing countries. Together, we must prevent internet fragmentation and leverage emerging technologies to advance sustainable development and to leave no one behind.

At the same time, we believe in evolution, not revolution. Our approach supports gradual updates to the existing WSIS action lines. Any changes should align with the sustainable development goals and the post-2030 development agenda, ensuring continuity and stability.

Equally important is the defense of an open, stable, free, inclusive, equal, safe, global, reliable, secure, and environmentally sustainable internet. Governance of digital space must be rooted in human rights and driven by the multi-stakeholder collaboration. We oppose centralized control by any single state and advocate for collective mechanisms to address new technological challenges as they arise.

Looking ahead, we see a stronger internet governance forum as essential. After 2025, it should have sustainable funding and play a central role in the global digital dialogue. IGF must be more representative, particularly including voices from developing countries, youth, and marginalized communities, so that the forum reflects the diversity of the global digital space.

Crucially, human rights must remain at the center of all WSIS frameworks. Protecting privacy, combating censorship, and safeguarding children online are not negotiable priorities. Finally, we support multi-stakeholder approaches to digital governance within the UN.

This approach should be based on equality, cooperation, and inclusivity, engaging all stakeholders, especially from the global south. The principle of WSIS plus 20 should guide our work, ensuring a global, fair, and sustainable digital ecosystem. In conclusion, only through collaboration, inclusiveness, respect for human rights, and a human-centric approach to new and emerging technology can we build a secure, open, and sustainable information society that benefits everyone, everywhere.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Deputy Minister of Digital Affairs of Poland and now give the floor to his Excellency Taurimas Valys, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of Lithuania.

Lithuania

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, dear colleagues, 20 years ago, WSIS set a vision for a people-centered and exclusive society of information. Today, as we mark WSIS plus 20, Lithuania affirms that this vision remains vital, not only for digital transformation, but also achieving the 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development Goals. Digital technologies must boost education, health, climate action, and economic growth, but before they must serve humanity, not damage it.

First, Lithuania strongly supports multistakeholderism as the centerpiece of global digital governance. This approach ensures transparency, innovation, and trust. Attempts to impose centralized and state-controlled approaches create a risk of fragmenting the Internet and damaging democratic values.

We must resist such trends and keep governance an open and inclusive space for cooperation. Having such an approach can help countries achieve digital transformation. Lithuania exemplifies this perfectly.

We have digitalized public services through platforms such as e-Government Gateway, enabling citizens to get an access to more than 1,000 services without leaving their apartments. Our GovTech Lab fosters innovation by connecting startups with public sector challenges. Efforts like these demonstrate how technology can strengthen democracy and efficiency.

However, in turbulent times, when democratic values are at high risk, security and resilience are of utmost importance. Lithuania invests heavily in cybersecurity, operating a national cybersecurity center. We also lead initiatives to counter disinformation to safeguard democratic processes.

Cybersecurity has become extremely important in the age of artificial intelligence. Although AI brings vast opportunities, it also allows significant risks to emerge. Lithuania reminds that the AI governance must be human-centric and human-rights-based, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability.

Lithuania should balance innovation with human rights. Finally, we must all make great efforts to eliminate any digital divide. Lithuania is making sure that no one is left behind, offering digital skills programs for seniors and other vulnerable groups.

To ensure the execution for all these ideas, it is vital to have a unique platform for dialogue. A perfect example is the Internet Governance Forum. Lithuania supports strengthening IGF’s resources to ensure its sustainability and relevance.

IGF demonstrates that work for the digital community, openness, diversity, and shared responsibility. Dear colleagues, this is the moment when we move beyond declarations to concrete action. Lithuania calls for stronger integration of WSIS action lines with SDGS, continued commitment to digital inclusion, and reaffirmation that human rights online are not negotiable.

Lithuania stands ready to work with like-minded partners to ensure that digital transformation strengthens peace, prosperity, and trust. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs of Lithuania, and now I give the floor to His Excellency Jarno Syrjälä, Vice Minister for Internal Trade of Finland.

Finland

President, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. pleasure to deliver remarks on behalf of the government of Finland. Finland aligns itself with the statement to be delivered on behalf of the European Union and its member states.

Technology has emerged as a key question for global development. The digital transformation represents us with the wealth of opportunities that we need to grasp. At the same time, it presents us new risks that we need to act on.

The UN will have a key role in making sure we have the tools to manage this process in years ahead. Finland’s government sees technology a key issue for our foreign and security policy. We have a strong focus on digital development, including increased attention on private sector solutions and investments.

We believe that resilient and secure digital connectivity is the foundation of modern societies and economies. In our international cooperation, Finland is committed to advancing secure connectivity globally along with our partners and bringing our leading expertise to this work. The majority of the world’s population do not yet have a meaningful and safe access to the Internet, which requires urgent action.

Breaching the digital divide is not only about affordable connectivity. It requires investments in skills and competencies and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms online. Our goal is to make sure new technologies uphold and advance democratic values and principles.

We welcome the Vicious Plus 20 review’s focus on enhancing meaningful connectivity and supporting the multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance. The review is also an important opportunity to renew and strengthen the ITF mandate, including by making it a permanent forum and ensuring it a more sustainable financial basis that such a global inclusive effort deserves and needs.

We believe that everyone should have access to Internet as well as to digital services and skills. Inclusion and the multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance will remain essential in the future as well. The accelerating rise of digital repression poses a serious threat to the safe and reliable use of the Internet.

We must recognize the need to strengthen political and societal understanding how online censorship and the suppression of information operate and how technology is more broadly used as a tool of social control.

These phenomena must be addressed decisively so that we can defend digital freedom and democracy. Unfortunately, gender-based violence and harassment online are a growing and significant problem that prevent individuals from fully, equally and meaningfully participating in societal life. We must ensure that digital spaces are safe for everyone and that everyone can participate online without fear or discrimination.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Vicious Plus 20 review reminds us that digitalization must remain a force for inclusion, freedom and democracy. Finland stands ready to work with all partners in the next phase of Vicious to ensure that the Internet of the future is open, secure and empowering for everyone. This needs to be a true multi-stakeholder effort.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Vice Minister for International Trade of Finland for his statement and now I give the floor to Her Excellency Marianne Wilhelmsen, State Secretary of Norway.

Norway

President, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, Fellow Users of the Internet. Allow me first to warmly welcome Ambassador, warmly thank Ambassador Suela Janina of Albania, Ambassador Ekitela Lokaale of Kenya, their teams and the UN Secretariat for the excellent facilitation of the Vicious Plus 20 outcome document.

Norway urges all member states to show the outmost flexibility in order to arrive at a consensus document. President, while final draft is still pending, based on what we have seen and expect, we welcome an outcome document with a strong emphasis on human rights, including the freedom of opinion and expression, the right to privacy and the importance of gender equality.

In a time of increasing authoritarianism, on and offline, it is more important than ever to safeguard fundamental human rights also within the digital space. We would also welcome a clear call to the private sector to incorporate human rights in all their activities and to apply the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. Furthermore, we appreciate the equality, an equally clear call to states to refrain from Internet shutdowns and other measures that target Internet access.

Colleagues, we are living in a time of extraordinary technological change. Emerging technologies can create opportunities for development and innovation and help us solve some of the greatest challenges we face on this earth. At the same time, we see that deep digital divides remain within and between countries.

Closing these gaps, including through universal, meaningful and affordable connectivity, digital skills and locally relevant content, is of critical importance. Norway will continue to contribute to realizing this ambition. President, earlier this year, Norway had the honor of hosting the Internet Governance Forum in 2025.

That experience was yet another reminder of the unique value of the IGF as an open and inclusive space for collaboration and inclusive dialogue to address all digital challenges. We are highly committed to make the IGF a permanent forum of the United Nations. The forum is the primary global multi-stakeholder platform for discussions on digital governance.

Going ahead, Norway would like to see an IGF that produces more actionable inputs to policy processes and that further broadens participation from developing countries and underrepresented groups. As the recent host, Norway stands ready to share our experience to help achieve these goals. President, for 20 years, the WSIS framework has guided us toward a human-centric, inclusive and development-oriented information society.

We look forward to adapt an outcome document that updates this vision for a new era of digital interdependence. Norway remains firmly committed to an open, free, global, interoperable, secure and human rights-based digital order and to multi-stakeholder cooperation as the way to achieve it. Let us build on the WSIS Plus 20 outcome, the Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact, to close digital divides and to ensure that the benefits of the digital age are shared not by few, but by all.

The vision remains clear. To realize this vision is now our shared responsibility. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the State Secretary of Norway and now I give the floor to His Excellency Grigory Borischenko, Deputy Minister of Digital Development, Communication and Mass Media of the Russian Federation. You have the floor.

Russian Federation

President, Deputy Secretary General, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen, 20 years ago at the World Summit on the Information Society, which took place in two stages, the representatives of the world adopted a general concept of the Information Society.

Initiated and prepared by the International Telecommunications Union together with other UN system organizations and together with other stakeholders, the WSIS Summit was the first global event dedicated to building an information society as a new stage of development for civilization.

The main goal of WSIS was to build a human and development-centered information society in which everyone could create information and knowledge and have access to it. A separate focus was placed on bridging the digital divide between developed and developing countries. The review of WSIS clearly illustrated that the tasks set out in the Geneva and Tunis documents have not been resolved.

Work still needs to be done in order to resolve many key issues, which we spoke about 10 years ago in this hall, overcoming the substantial differences in terms of development both among countries and within countries, including in terms of broadband access and the introduction of AI and the ability to harness the opportunities of AI and to resolve the problem of privacy when using the Internet.

These are all issues that we discussed. One separate issue is international information security, IIS, with the UN playing a central role. We developed the creation of a permanent negotiating platform.

forum on IIS, the global mechanism with the participation of all UN member states, and also the Convention Against Cybercrime, which was developed upon my country’s initiative. That’s the first universal legally binding agreement on IIS. We’ve also seen a new dynamic in terms of the development of ICT, and this shows the formation of a new technological stage.

The introduction of AI, the circulation of 5G networks, the use of Internet of Things, cloud platforms, and it opens up new opportunities for improving lives, developing the economy, medicine, education, and also state administration.

However, these structural changes have opened up not only massive potential for growth and achievement of the SDGs, but they also have challenges, including data protection, achieving technological sovereignty, and the need to ensure trust in digital services.

The current model for Internet governance remains unjust and geopolitically vulnerable. This model requires further institutionalization and a legally binding basis. We believe that management of the Internet and its key infrastructure needs to happen on other bases, based on international legislation and cooperation of all stakeholders, considering their roles.

And of course, this should happen under the auspices of a universally recognized international organization, such as the UN. It is the UN that should play a key role in managing ICTs, primarily the Internet. This could be fostered by specialized institutions like the International Telecommunications Union, the UN Commission on Science and Technology for Development, and others.

We are prepared to engage with the relevant stakeholders in these formats. We also note the ongoing process of fragmentation of the digital space, and we express our concern about the lack of practical action being taken to preserve a unified global network. We commend the role of the WSIS Forum and the Internet Governments Forum, and we support the continuation of their annual conduct, including with regional and country-based forums.

At the same time, we note – we share the opinion of many countries about the need to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the IGF. It’s gratifying that the overwhelming majority of these points have been reflected in the outcome document, which we are going to be adopting soon. Like any compromised text, it isn’t ideal.

It contains some biased provisions that we can’t support. However, on the whole, the draft merits support. It sets out several overarching ideas, like the need to refrain from illegitimate unilateral economic measures, and it talks about the importance of overcoming the digital divide and setting the contours of the global governance for AI.

And it also has steps to ramp up the ICT capacity of developing countries, et cetera. This new document is a roadmap for our work in the next decade, and we are grateful to all the experts that were part of drafting it. The Strategy for Development of the Information Society of Russia sets out the goals, the tasks, and the measures in order to implement the domestic and foreign policy of our country in terms of the use of ICTs for the period up to 2030.

Our country has a modern telecommunications infrastructure, including 90 percent of households that have access to high-speed, low-cost fiber-optic internet. We’re actively developing and introducing artificial intelligence, and the Strategy for the Development of Communications in Russia up to 2035 seeks to craft a modern and protected telecommunications infrastructure and introduce technological areas and develop scientific and staff potential.

This and other facts clearly show that Russia stands ready to engage with our foreign partners to develop the Information Society, and we’re going to do this in full compliance with international law, with the UN Charter, and with respect for the national laws of other states.

Thank you very much.

Chair

I thank the Deputy Minister of Digital Development, Communication, and Mass Media of the Russian Federation, and now I give the floor to His Excellency Takuo Imagawa, Vice Minister for International Affairs, Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan.

Japan

Distinguished Delegates, esteemed guests, I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the United Nations Under-Secretary General for Policy, Guy Ryder, the WSIS-Plat 20 co-facilitator, Her Excellency, Suela Janina, and His Excellency, Ekitela Lokaale, and the WSIS Secretariat for their dedicated efforts in organizing this meeting.

WSIS has played a vital role in shaping global RCD policy and promoting the vision that everyone should benefit from the technologies. Over the past two decades, it has provided a unique platform for governments, international organizations, the private sector, academia, and civil society to work together toward an inclusive and sustainable information society.

This achievement deserves recognition. Japan is proud to have continuously supported WSIS since its inception, when Mr. Yoshio Utsumi, then ITU Secretary General, led its launch.

Yet, despite 20 years of progress, one-third of the world remains offline, and the spread of emerging technologies like AI has made remaining digital devices even more challenging. This WSIS-Plat 20 process reminds us of the need for deeper global cooperation under the WSIS framework to ensure that no one is left behind in the digital age. Allow me to highlight three priorities for the future.

First, we must strengthen the IGF as a platform for multi-stakeholder dialogue for digital cooperation, including on emerging technologies. Japan actively supports IGF, hosting the Kyoto meeting two years ago, where AI governance was one of the key topics. We believe IGF should play a critical role in fostering trust and collaboration, and we endorse not only its continuation, but also its institutionalization as a permanent UN forum.

Second, we should build on existing international efforts for digital cooperation. In AI, for example, initiatives under the Global Digital Compact, such as the Scientific Panel and Global Dialogue, should complement efforts by the AI Summit, Global Partnership on AI, and others. Avoiding duplication and leveraging existing expertise will be essential to ensure coherent and effective governance.

Third, we must enhance digital public infrastructure and digital public goods through innovative technologies. For instance, disaster response using digital tools can provide critical opportunities. With climate change increasing the frequency and magnitude of disasters worldwide, Japan has been contributing to ITU’s Connect2Recover initiative, promoting early warning systems and rapid infrastructure recovery.

This effort has evolved into the Global Early Warning for All initiative, and we strongly support deeper international collaboration to protect our lives. Finally, as we look toward WSIS plus 30, Japan remains strongly committed to advancing WSIS goals and working with all stakeholders to build an inclusive and sustainable information society. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Vice Minister for International Affairs, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication of Japan, and now I give the floor to my dear friend, His Excellency Rasmus Lumi, Vice Minister for International Affairs of Estonia.

You have the floor.

Estonia

Thank you, Chair, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, colleagues. First of all, Estonia aligns itself with the upcoming statement by the European Union, and I would like to convey the following in its national capacity. Let me begin by thanking the President of the General Assembly for convening this high-level meeting, and the co-facilitators for their efforts and steady leadership throughout this important process.

This year’s WSIS plus 20 review is a defining moment for the future of our digital world. Twenty years ago, the Geneva Declaration and the Tunis Agenda set out a shared vision of an inclusive and human-centered information society. They also established the multi-stakeholder approach that has guided digital cooperation for the past two decades.

That vision remains as vital today as it was then. The Internet has become the backbone of our economies, our democracies, and our daily lives. Its success depends on remaining open, global, secure, and decentralized.

No single country or actor should control it. Efforts to introduce centralized or state-led control would threaten the openness and integrity of the Internet and risk its fragmentation. The multi-stakeholder model, reaffirmed in the Global Digital Compact, has proven its value.

Governments, the private sector, civil society, academia, and the technical community must continue to work together in transparent, inclusive, and consensus-based ways. This approach ensures that the Internet remains resilient and that digital policy reflects the interests of all. Estonia believes that digital transformation must stay human-centered and rooted in human rights.

The same rights that apply offline must also apply online, including the rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and access to information. As chair of the Freedom Online Coalition, Estonia has worked to promote and advance this vision of the Internet. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, bring both new opportunities and new responsibilities.

responsibilities. We must ensure that artificial intelligence is developed and used in ways that respect human dignity, ethical principles, and the rule of law. Our policies should remain adaptable and technology neutral so that innovation continues to serve people and societies.

We see a practical way forward for addressing artificial intelligence within existing United Nations frameworks. The focus should be on building capacity, sharing knowledge, and improving coordination rather than creating new institutions. This approach allows us to respond swiftly to emerging technologies while keeping discussions inclusive and coherent.

Estonia supports the continued role of the Internet Governance Forum as the most inclusive global platform for digital dialogue. We support renewing and strengthening its mandate, ensuring sustainable funding, and expanding its scope to cover digital governance more broadly. We also welcome a stronger link between the WSIS process, the Sustainable Development Goals, and the Global Digital Compact to ensure coherence and reinforce the shared vision of an open, secure, and human-centered digital future.

Excellencies, as we look ahead to the next 20 years, Estonia calls on all partners to uphold the principles agreed in Geneva and Tunis, which are openness, inclusion, human rights, and multi-stakeholder cooperation.

Together, we can preserve a free, secure, and trusted Internet and shape a digital future that truly empowers people everywhere. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs of Estonia, and now I give the floor to His Excellency Omer Fatih Sayan, Deputy Minister of Transport and Infrastructure of Turkey.

Türkiye

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, it’s an honor to address this high-level meeting as we gather to mark the 20th anniversary of the World Summit on Information Society. This milestone offers us an important opportunity not only to reflect on collective achievements, but also to assess openly and sincerely the challenges that still remain. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Madam President, as well as the co-facilitators Kenya and Albania, for their leadership and constructive engagement throughout the WSIS Plus 20 process.

It’s an honor for me to return to this podium after 10 years. I stood here during WSIS Plus 10, and today I return with a clear message. Progress has been made, but it still remains uneven and, in many parts of the world, deeply unjust.

Guided by the Turkey National Technology Vision, under the leadership of our President, His Excellency Recep Tayyip Erdogan, we continue our efforts with unwavering determination. Over the past two decades, Turkey has expanded high-speed broadband infrastructure nationwide, strengthened its cybersecurity as a role model according to the ITU Global Cybersecurity Index, and made substantial investments in digital skills, research, and innovation.

As we enter the second century of the Republic of Turkey, we firmly believe in technology. When governed responsibly, it’s not merely a technical matter, but one of sovereignty, equity, and dignity. We aspire for the century of Turkey to be also the century of digitalization.

Digital transformation can lead to a stronger and more resilient future only when it is grounded in solidarity and in fair, secure, and equal rights, particularly for women, children, and persons with disabilities.

Technology must not become a new instrument of inequality. Technology should not deepen inequalities developing societies facing challenges. Rather, technology should empower people, multiply opportunities, and pave the way for inclusive progress.

We believe that global justice and equality for everyone, everywhere, including all conflict zones and Palestine, must be among the cornerstones of the digital future. How can we talk about inclusive, people-oriented information society for all knowing the situation in Gaza? An information society that ignores this reality is neither inclusive nor people-centered.

Dear colleagues, 20 years ago, we pledged to leave no one behind. Regrettably, this promise still remains unfulfilled. The digital divide persists between countries within societies and increasingly between those who shape technology and who are shaped by it.

While progress has been achieved, it’s evident that far more needs to be done to close all forms of digital divide and ensure that the benefits of the digital age are shared equitably. Let me underline one critical point. We must all participate, not merely observe.

Protecting children in the digital environment cannot remain a secondary concern, and stronger coordination with UNESCO and all other relevant stakeholders is no longer optional. It is an obligation. Turkey remains firmly committed to this vision.

As the host country to UN Technology Bank for Least Developed Countries, we contribute meaningfully to global capacity-building efforts, ensuring that digital opportunities genuinely support inclusive and sustainable development.

As President Erdogan stated in this very hall, justice and equality are not negotiable values. They are the foundation of any credible digital order. Dear colleagues, WSIS has been instrumental in setting norms and expectations, but the road ahead is long.

Today, new digital challenges are mostly coming around AI. Ethical concern is still questioned. There is huge expectation from us in WSIS on ethical issues and code of contact in AI, and our shared task for the next decade is to ensure that intelligence focuses on human, safeguards fundamental rights, strengthens trust, and supports global development goals.

Without clear principles, without accountability, and without a human-centered approach, AI will deepen distrust and inequality. The next decade will test our collective credibility. Either we ensure that intelligence serves humanity, or we allow technology to redefine humanity.

WSIS plus 20 must send a strong signal. Long-term responsibility must prevail over short-term interests. By 2035, technology must enhance human dignity, protect fundamental rights, and serve development, not power.

Turkey stands ready to contribute constructively, to challenge complacency, and to defend a fair, secure, and human-centered future. It is we, all of us here, who will continue to contribute constructively to WSIS processes, promote cooperation, and support efforts that advance a fair, secure, and human-centered digital future. We look forward to WSIS plus 30, not with complacency, but with responsibility.

Chair

Thank you. I thank the Deputy Minister of Transport and Infrastructure of Turkey, and now I’m going to give the floor to His Excellency Stephen Isaboke, Principal Secretary for Broadcasting and Telecommunications of Kenya.

Kenya

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, it’s an honor for Kenya to address this WSIS plus 20 Outcome Review High-Level Meeting, 20 years after the world committed to building a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society.

WSIS was not just about technology, it was about people, dignity, opportunity, and rights. Two decades on, technologies, especially artificial intelligence, are reshaping economies and societies at unprecedented speed, yet the central WSIS question remains unresolved. Who benefits and who is left behind?

Kenya comes to the WSIS plus 20 not only to take stock, but to also help shape the next chapter of the global digital cooperation. In this regard, Kenya has been honored, as you have heard, to co-facilitate the WSIS plus 20 review together with the Republican of Albania, and we thank Albania for its leadership and constructive partnership.

As co-facilitators, we encourage that WSIS plus 20 Outcomes places the closing of all the digital divides at its core, recognizing that these divides are multidimensional, spanning connectivity, affordability, skills, institutions, and meaningful participation, particularly in developing countries.

We also welcome the Outcomes emphasis on institutional continuity, including decisions to make Internet Governance Forum a permanent forum for the United Nations with enhanced modalities for governmental engagements.

This strengthens inclusive, multi-stakeholder digital governance at critical moments. Excellencies, Kenya’s own experience reflects this vision. Through our bottom-up economic transformation agenda, we expanded meaningful broadband connectivity to the last mile.

Our Universal Service Fund has bridged up and rural gaps, and we are actually scaling through 1,450 public digital hubs, one in every lowest administrative unit. These hubs are complemented by 150 innovation hubs, which are actually run by private sector young innovators, forming a nationwide public-private digital innovation ecosystem. This is how we continue to bridge the digital divide through multi-stakeholder collaboration, enabling environments and value creation.

As we enter the next phase of WSIS in the intelligent age, Kenya is clear, AI must serve development, inclusion, sustainability, not just deepen inequality. We also adopted an inclusive national artificial intelligence strategy anchored on people, public value and national capability. We are investing in AI skills, competence, and influence, not just for engineers or techies, but also for citizens, policemakers, regulators, and public servants, including through a center for digital AI at the Kenya School of Government.

Excellencies, ambition is not adequate without financing. WSIS plus 20 must move decisively from commitment to delivery through stronger, innovative financing mechanisms sustained in investment in digital public infrastructure and coordinated action across the UN system.

In this regard, the leadership of the United Nations and ITU and Partner to Connect and the UNGIC remains critical. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, WSIS plus 20 is a moment for renewal. Kenya stands ready to work with all member states and all the relevant stakeholders to define the next phase of digital cooperation, one that is people-centered, inclusive, rights-based, and firmly aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the Principal Secretary for Broadcasting and Telecommunications of Kenya, and now I’m going to give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of the European Union on behalf of the EU and its member states.

European Union

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, dear colleagues, I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the European Union and its member states, and the candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia, as well as Armenia, Andorra, and San Marino align themselves with this statement.

Let me start by thanking Ambassador Suella Janina of Albania and Ambassador Ekitela Lokaale of Kenya, as well as their teams, and the UN Secretariat for their excellent facilitation and for conducting the process in such an inclusive manner.

The European Union and its member states welcome this high-level meeting, and we look forward to the adoption of the WSIS Plus 20 Review Outcome Document, and we urge all UN member states to join consensus.

We are very, very close. We have the opportunity to deliver with the international community’s strong needs. We need stability to protect what works in the Internet.

We need a permanent Internet governance forum for inclusive multi-stakeholder dialogue, a stronger link between the World Summit on Information Society, the Sustainable Development Goals, and the Global Digital Compact, flexibility to adapt to new challenges, and partnerships to close all digital divides.

This is more than a procedural milestone. It is more than a diplomatic choice. In fact, the outcome document should reaffirm our sustained commitment towards a global digital future based on the principles of openness, interoperability, human rights, and inclusive multi-stakeholder governance.

For over two decades, these principles have sustained Internet governance and delivered proven benefits for the global economy and society. The European Union has consistently championed these principles, which align with our own Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles, and which resonate deeply with our legal and policy framework. We have the responsibility to provide the clarity and the stability vital to safeguard the digital ecosystem.

Making the Internet Governance Forum a permanent UN body is in our reach. We have long advocated for institutionalization so that it continues to be the cornerstone of inclusive digital governance. We will also welcome the renewed mandate for the YC’s Action Line facilitators to update roadmaps and align implementation with the SDGs and the Global Digital Compact, also to avoid duplications.

By linking YC’s with the post-2030 agenda, digital transformation remains a driver for sustainable development, a topic that has received so much attention in our debates. Stability is crucial, but it does not imply technological stagnation. Technologies like artificial intelligence, immersive environments, data-driven infrastructures, and new forms of connectivity are creating opportunities as well as challenges.

We share the concern that was expressed by many that technology should not create more divides. We are ready to work with partners to tackle these issues. We want new dependencies and new fragmented risks to diminish.

We want to promote digital sovereignty in Europe and across the globe. So where others are retreating, Europe will continue to promote an open, free, global, interoperable, safe, reliable, and secure Internet governed through an inclusive, human-centric, and human rights-based multi-stakeholder model.

Europe will continue to object Internet fragmentation and state-controlled alternatives. And we will continue to promote sustainability. Our initiatives, including the Global Gateway and our Tech Offer, deliver secure, resilient, and inclusive digital infrastructures worldwide, from connectivity to compute.

We are advancing open-source solutions, digital commons, cybersecurity, digital public infrastructures like our EU Digital Identity Wallet, and international standards for global interoperability. We want to support local skills and local AI ecosystems. And because we believe in partnership and in building technological sovereignty together, we want to support the WISE’s goals of bridging divides and fostering innovation.

Excellencies, the foundations are strong. The direction is clear. Our responsibility is shared.

The European Union is ready to work with all partners to turn this vision of positive digital futures into a reality for everyone, everywhere. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of the European Union. And now I give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on behalf of the Group of Friends in defense of the Charter of the United Nations.

Venezuela

Mr. President, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has the honor to take the floor on behalf of the Group of Friends in defense of the Charter of the United Nations. Mr.

President, as highlighted throughout the WISE’s Plus 20 review process, and as reaffirmed in several UN reports and different intergovernmental discussions, today’s digital landscape is marked by both major achievements as well as deep structural imbalances.

The WISE’s Plus 20 outcome documents underscore persistent divides when it comes to connectivity, affordability, infrastructure, content availability, and digital skills, divides that remain most severe in developing countries.

We thus reiterate that these disparities contradict the WISE’s vision of a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society. Moreover, we also emphasize that multilingualism remains essential for preserving cultural and linguistic diversity and for ensuring equitable access to digital knowledge and participation in global decision-making processes.

An information society that excludes languages, cultures, and identities is neither just nor sustainable. Mr. President, with regards to reducing the digital divide between developing and developed countries, the WISE’s is still far from delivering its mandate.

The digital divide continues to exist and is even widening, especially due to the robust development of new generation ICT data. The Tunis agenda made a specific call in paragraph 69 to 71 in order to recognize the need for enhanced cooperation to enable governments on an equal footing to carry out their roles and responsibilities in issues relating to international public policy on the internet.

Twenty years later, however, progress on this specific mandate on enhanced cooperation has been significantly blocked. Thus, it is imperative that the international community address effectively this main issue for WSIS. Another area of importance for developing countries that is part of the TUNIS agenda, which has also not been realized, is the issue of a more inclusive and transparent Internet governance.

The Internet Governance Forum, for instance, has been convened as a useful platform to expand multi-stakeholder policy dialogue related to key elements of Internet governance, as indicated in the TUNIS agenda.

However, in terms of the mandate, this forum is not in a position to enable governments on an equal footing to carry out their roles and responsibilities when it comes to international public policy pertaining to the Internet.

It is also not in a position to lead in international cooperation on inter-ally of the development of globally applicable principles on public policy issues associated with the coordination and management of critical Internet resources, as assigned to enhance.

Consequently, it is necessary to strengthen intergovernmental spaces to allow governments to carry out their roles and responsibilities in international governance when it comes to the digital world. Mr. President, across our deliberations, our group of friends has consistently stressed that unilateral coercive measures continue to be one of the greatest obstacles to the equitable development of ICTs.

These illegal measures restrict access to modern technologies, digital platforms, and essential ICT goods and services. They hinder efforts to update national telecommunications infrastructure, whether in terms of hardware or software. They worsen the digital divide between developed and developing nations, and they undermine the sovereign equality of states and the inalienable right to development of our peoples.

In this context, it is important to recall that such measures flagrantly violate the Charter of the United Nations and the norms of international law. They also have extraterritorial impacts. They distort supply chains and market order, and they exacerbate global crises in different spheres of life.

We thus reiterate our call for their complete, immediate, and unconditional lifting. Mr. President, our group is deeply concerned due to the misuse of ICTs.

These include social media platforms and emerging technologies for subversion, destabilization, the interference in the internal affairs of states, and attacks against critical infrastructure. Our group has condemned the proliferation of disinformation, misinformation, hate speech, racism, and extremist ideologies, both online and offline, a phenomenon that is amplified by irresponsible state and non-state actors.

Once again, we reject the malicious use of ICTs, and we call upon the international community to take urgent and coordinated measures to counter misinformation and disinformation campaigns, including as part of PSYOPs, such as the one that we are currently witnessing in the Caribbean and specifically around Venezuela, in order to protect the political sovereignty of states and promote a true culture of peace and mutual respect.

Mr. President, artificial intelligence demands particular attention. While AI holds enormous potential for sustainable development, its benefits are currently concentrated in a small number of countries and private companies.

This dynamic risks deepening existing global inequalities, fostering technological dependence, and undermining digital sovereignty. We therefore stress that AI systems must be developed, used, and regulated in accordance with national legislation and international law, including the Charter of the UN. Its governance must be grounded in the sovereign equality of states, inclusivity, transparency, trustworthiness, and respect for the right to development.

We should not allow that any private or state actor monopolize digital markets, exploit dominance when it comes to data or computational resources, or impose technological dependency on developing nations.

We also reaffirm that AI systems must uphold linguistic diversity, cultural pluralism, fairness, and respect for national legislation. Mr. President, as we mark 20 years since Geneva and Tunis, we call for the renewed strengthening of international cooperation, solidarity, and technology transfer, including initiatives related to capacity building, scientific exchange, and knowledge sharing upon request of states.

These are essential not only for bridging the digital divide, but also for enabling all nations to participate equally and meaningfully in global digital governance. We also welcome the adoption of the new UN Convention against Cybercrime, and we support international efforts to prevent and combat the misuse of ICTs for criminal purposes, including for spreading disinformation, undermining sovereignty, or destabilizing entire societies.

In conclusion, our group of friends would like to reiterate that the WSIS process must remain firmly anchored in the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, including sovereign equality, self-determination, noninterference, peaceful cooperation, and the right to development.

We will continue to defend a new, just, equitable, inclusive, and non-discriminatory information and communication order, free from technological domination, unilateral coercive measures, and digital inequalities.

We will remain firmly committed to ensuring that the digital transformation contributes to peace, sustainable development, cultural diversity, and the well-being of all peoples, in strict line with our pledge of leaving no one behind.

I thank you very much, Mr. President.

Chair

I would like to thank the Distinguished Delegate of Venezuela. I would like to thank the Distinguished Representative of Ireland.

Ireland

President, Ireland aligns itself with the statement by the European Union. We welcome this opportunity to contribute to the WSIS Plus 20 review discussion, and we express our sincere gratitude to Kenya and Albania for the constructive, transparent, and inclusive co-facilitation of this process.

Development in information systems since 2005 have gone beyond anything we could have imagined, and the scale and speed of change has been increasing exponentially since the advent of generative AI. It is incumbent on us as members of the UN to ensure the protection of the most vulnerable, bringing transparency, inclusivity, and accessibility into our approach. We believe that protecting human rights and adopting a human-centric approach to digital transformation is fundamental.

This means upholding human rights offline and online, including freedom of expression, privacy, access to information, and gender equality, while actively countering all forms of violence, including sexual and gender-based violence.

President, Ireland is a strong advocate for an inclusive, multi-stakeholder approach to Internet governance. We welcome the recognition of this approach in the outcome document, including establishing a permanent and stable mandate for the Internet Governance Forum, a vital forum for meaningful participation in Internet governance.

We were pleased to host our first national IGF earlier this year, and Dublin welcomed the ICANN 84 conference in October. We appreciate the emphasis in the outcome document of the global challenge of digital divides, both within and between countries. With the rapid acceleration of technology, these divides will only grow more acute unless we act to address them now.

This is essential for achieving the SDGs, for individuals and communities to fully participate in economic, social, cultural, and civic life, and for the empowerment of all women and girls in their participation in the digital space.

President, Ireland firmly believes in an Internet that is open, free, global, interoperable, secure, safe, stable, and human rights-based. We support capacity building for digital transformation in developing countries. We have supported and continue to support initiatives globally to combat misinformation and disinformation, and to protect information integrity.

This includes projects with African partner countries that enable the sharing of best practice in detecting and countering disinformation in elections. Ireland welcomes the efforts made through this review to strengthen synergies and to avoid duplication between the WSIS process, the Global Digital Compact, and other processes. This outcome document acknowledges crucial issues for our future, and we look forward to working with Member States and all stakeholders to translate the WSIS plus 20 commitments into action.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank Distinguished Representative Ireland. And now I give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Belgium. You have the floor.

Belgium

Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. First, I would like to thank the co-facilitators for having carried out the negotiations in an inclusive and transparent manner. My country aligns itself to the statement of the EU and would like to share the following national remarks.

Belgium hopes that we will be able to quickly conclude a global review document for WSIS plus 20 that will be ambitious and adopted by consensus, and that will reinforce the coherence between WSIS plus 20, the Pact for the Future, and the Global Digital Compact.

These frameworks recall that the digital transformation should adopt a human-centered approach. Belgium supports integrating this approach as a cross-cutting principle in the global review document. This challenge is even more crucial taking into account rapid technological changes currently taking place, especially when it comes to AI.

to keep an agile WSIS model, while we make sure that our rights continue to be protected online, especially for the most vulnerable groups. We must remain vigilant to any risk that these technologies might be used for censorship, mass surveillance, and an infringement on private life. This is why we call for integrating human rights principles throughout the life cycle of these technologies.

In Belgium, through the initiative AI for Belgium, we gather public and private actors in order to ensure the responsible deployment of AI, with tools such as ethical assessments, a competency center, and an AI observatory.

Excellencies, despite considerable progress, digital divides persist. We must act in order to ensure universal connectivity by mobilizing innovative financing, as well as public-private partnerships. Belgium supports the positive impact of the digital transformation for sustainable development.

Within our national strategy, we are working to ensure digital inclusion, paying special attention to girls and women through our intersectorial strategy, Women in Digital. We also are working toward this ambition through our cooperation for development, and we are actively contributing to the global digital compact, and we are acting on essential issues such as reducing the digital divide, data governance, and digital solutions for the climate, as well as food security.

Excellencies, Belgium strongly supports a multi-pronged model for internet governance, as well as the establishment of an internet governance forum as a permanent organ of the United Nations. Inclusive internet governance must be the result of dialogue and cooperation amongst governments, civil society, the private sector, and the technical community. Twenty years after WSIS, its vision of dialogue and collaboration continues to be relevant.

The challenges are serious, but opportunities are as well. Belgium will work with all partners for an inclusive digital society that is sustainable and respects human rights. Thank you.

Chair

I would like to thank the Distinguished Representative of Belgium and the Distinguished Representative of Qatar.

Qatar

Madam President, Your Excellency, USG, ladies and gentlemen, the State of Qatar welcomes the convening of the High-Level Meeting to review our collective achievements in the implementation of the WSIS agenda, and to reiterate our commitment to digital transformation as the driver for the implementation of the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda.

We thank the co-facilitators for their efforts in preparation for the meeting and for the holding of consultations on the consensus document, on the outcome document. We align ourselves with the statement made by the G77 and China. Madam President, we are working on the implementation of the Comprehensive National Agenda Qatar 2030 to strengthen digital transformation and innovation, and last year we’ve launched our 2030 Digital Agenda to develop digital infrastructure, improve government performance, accelerate economic growth, and establish a strong foundation in data and emerging technologies.

We are also seeking the development of the digital sector and the supporting of innovation through research and training and investments. In our digital governance, we focus on evidence-based policies as well as the responsible use of emerging technologies to improve public digital services and support sustainable development. The development of human capital in this regard is part and parcel of our development strategy.

Madam President, we’ve hosted the Web Summit for the first time in the MENA region in February 2024, and we will be hosting the third iteration of the summit in February 2026 to strengthen networking for startups and to introduce new technologies and their impact on business.

And we are gearing to host the ITU Planet Potentiary Conference in Doha in 2026. In conclusion, we reiterate the importance of strengthening international cooperation and science, technology, and innovation to bridge the digital gap between North and South. I thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Qatar. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Tunisia.

Tunisia

Mr. President, Tunisia aligns itself with the G77 and China Statement to be delivered by Iraq and looks forward to the adoption of the outcome document of this high-level review and reiterates its strong commitment to the world summit of the information society vision of a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society that supports sustainable development and fully respects international law and human rights for everyone equally with no exception.

The Tunis phase of the world summit on the information society in 2005 marked a historic moment in global digital governance. The Tunis agenda 20 years ago established principles of multilateralism, inclusiveness, and development orientation that remain highly relevant today. Tunisia stresses that digital transformation must respect national policy space, regulatory frameworks, and development priorities.

International cooperation is essential, but it must be balanced, inclusive, and aligned with the Charter of the United Nations, ensuring the digital progress reduces and not deepens global inequalities.

Excellencies, artificial intelligence holds significant potential to advance education, health systems, climate resilience, and public service delivery. At the same time, it poses risks related to bias, injustice, exclusion, surveillance, concentration of power, and global security. Therefore, we support governance frameworks that guarantee human oversight, transparency, and accountability.

I would like to highlight five key priorities for Tunisia, preserving state sovereignty and national ownership in digital policymaking, ensuring ethical and responsible artificial intelligence, promoting technology transfer on mutually agreed terms, enabling developing countries to move from consumption to innovation, strengthening capacity building and digital skills, including institutional and regulatory capabilities, mobilizing sustainable financing for connectivity and digital infrastructure to bridge digital divides and ensure meaningful access for all.

We remain fully committed to working with all partners to ensure that the legacy of Tunis 25 continues to guide global digital cooperation toward equity, inclusion, security, and shared prosperity.

Iraq

I thank you. Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

Since the adoption of the Geneva Declaration and Plan of Action, the Tunis Agenda, and the WSIS Plus 10 Outcomes, the World Summit on the Information Society has provided a unique multilateral framework for advancing a people-centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society.

The WSIS Plus 20 Review offers a critical opportunity to take stock of progress, address persistent gaps, and renew commitments in light of profound technological change. Over the past two decades, digital technologies have evolved at an unprecedented pace. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and advanced connectivity, are reshaping economies, transforming modes of production, and creating new opportunities for innovation.

For developing countries, these technologies hold significant potential to accelerate structural transformation, expand access to services, enhance productivity, and support the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.

At the same time, the group underscores that the WSIS process remains of vital importance for developing countries. Despite notable progress, many developing countries continue to face structural digital divides in access, affordability, skills, infrastructure, and meaningful connectivity. These divides risk reinforcing existing inequalities and limiting the ability of developing countries to fully benefit from digital transformation.

In this regard, the group notes with concern that many of the commitments contained in the Geneva and Tunis outcomes, particularly those related to means of implementation, have not yet been fully realized.

Financing remains a central challenge. Adequate, predictable, and affordable financing is indispensable to extend digital infrastructure, promote universal and meaningful connectivity, and close the digital divides within and between countries.

The group also wishes to draw attention to the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures which hinder the ability of affected countries to access technologies, digital infrastructure, and related services.

Such measures undermine international cooperation, impede sustainable development, and restrict the legitimate right of countries to harness technology for the benefit of their peoples. Furthermore, the group reaffirms the importance of digital sovereignty, including the right of states to exercise authority over their national data in accordance with their legal frameworks and development priorities.

India governments must support development objectives, ensure equitable benefit sharing, and respect national ownership. We recognize that no single country or stakeholder or small group, therefore, should be allowed to monopolize or control the internet core infrastructure. At the same time, we recognize that rapid technological progress also brings new and evolving risks.

These include ethical concerns, social disruption, labor market impacts, data misuse, and widening inequalities. Addressing these risks requires inclusive international cooperation, policy coherence, and a balanced approach that enables innovation while safeguarding development and human well-being. I thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Iraq, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Republic of Korea.

Republic of Korea

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, the Republic of Korea heavily welcomes the convening of this meeting to review the achievements of the World Summit on the Information Society over the past 20 years and provides guidance for the way forward.

We express our sincere appreciation to the co-facilitators, member states, and all stakeholders for their contributions to the outcome documented through extensive consultations and collective efforts.

Over the past two decades, the multi-stakeholder approach implemented by WSIS has served as a core foundation for advancing the Information Society. Beyond intergovernmental cooperation, we believe that the perspectives and expertise of diverse stakeholders, including the private sector, civil society, and technical community, and academia, who directly shape and experience global digital transformation are essential to effectively addressing the complex challenges arising from digital transformation.

In this regard, the Republic of Korea believes it’s important to reaffirm the multi-stakeholder model in the outcome document. We also welcome and support the establishment of the Internet Governance Forum on a permanent basis. A predictable and stable foundation will enable the IGF to respond more effectively to emerging challenges in Internet governance and to further develop as an inclusive platform, linking global discussions with regional and national implementation.

In this context, Korea continues to contribute through the Korean Internet Governance Forum and cooperation with regional IGF initiatives. The Republic of Korea agrees that international efforts to strengthen meaningful connectivity must continue and support the important role of the International Telecommunication Union in implementing WSIS outcomes.

With respect to artificial intelligence, we welcome the reflection of the international approach to AI governance under the Global Digital Compact in the WSIS outcome document. While AI presents significant opportunities, it also entails new challenges, and we believe that responsible and inclusive use of AI should be promoted through cooperation within the United Nations system.

Finally, we support strengthening coherence and alignment between WSIS and the GDC and underscore the importance of avoiding duplication and fragmentation across the UN system. In this regard, we believe the UN Group on the Information Society has an important role to play in facilitating coordination in line with the respective mandates and resources. The Republic of Korea remains committed to working closely with all stakeholders to advance an inclusive and sustainable information society.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the Distinguished Representative of the Republic of Korea, and now I give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Sweden.

Sweden

Mr. President, the possibility of digital technologies is enormous. For societies, it creates opportunities for increased economic and social growth and prosperity while giving individuals easier access to information and to education, as well as to health and medical services.

Multilateral and multistakeholder cooperation is crucial for our common digital future. An important milestone in this regard was last year’s adoption of the Global Digital Compact, the first comprehensive framework for global governance of digital technologies, including AI. Sweden is actively engaged in its implementation.

The UN Specialized Agency for Information and Communication Technology, the ITU, is an important arena for international cooperation. Being one of the founders of the ITU, Sweden has always been engaged in and contributing to the development of the organization’s mandate and objectives. We are also firmly supportive of the WSIS processes.

Digital transformation is not only a technical issue, but a fundamental requirement for participating fully in society today. Sweden has long supported and been a driving force in the development and expansion of telecommunications networks, broadband, and mobile telephony at national, regional, and global levels. Over the past 10 years, the Swedish Post and Telecom Authority has contributed to capacity building in more than 30 countries, providing assistance in knowledge building and advice with the aim of contributing to an effective digital infrastructure for all.

Sweden is convinced that the global digital divide must be bridged to realize the full potential of digital transformation. Both technical resources and digital skills are needed to bridge the digital divide. Sweden is actively involved in numerous international cooperation fora aimed at raising the level of digital skills.

Sweden strives to enhance digital inclusion at global level by working for greater connectivity and digital skills and know-how. This includes responsible data use, funding, and procurement, with a focus of leaving no one behind in strategic digital investments. Digital technologies are reshaping societies at an unprecedented level and speed.

They present both opportunities for enhanced respect for human rights and risks in terms of the right to privacy, surveillance, censorship, and digital exclusion. Increasingly, risks of cybersecurity and critical dependency need to be taken into account. We are committed to fostering an inclusive, open, safe, secure, and trusted digital space and digital connectivity.

connectivity for all that respects, protects, and promotes all human rights and fundamental freedoms. Through the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, SIDA, Sweden supports the broadband efforts to achieve universal access to information and communication technology and connectivity with a particular emphasis on reducing the digital gender divide.

Everyone must be included in the digital transformation. Everyone has the same human rights online as offline. I thank you.

Chair

And now I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Lebanon.

Lebanon

President, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, Lebanon has the honor to participate in this high-level meeting following the conclusion of the review of WSIS at its 20th year university university. We reiterate our commitment to the goals set out at the summit toward an inclusive information society which is human-centered and development-centered. Lebanon actively participated in the review process for WSIS Plus 20 throughout this year.

We’ve made our contributions to the open negotiations, and we engaged in in-depth discussions with stakeholders on the subsequent drafting of the document. We did so in partnership with Egypt and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, and we provided a joint written contribution to the deliberations. That shows our deep conviction that digital development can proceed only through collaboration in processes and through participation by stakeholders.

Lebanon is facing major challenges in terms of infrastructure and information and communications technology due to years of economic and financial pressure. However, these circumstances have bolstered our resolve to craft an environment, a digital, a modern, resilient, and secure digital environment. The Lebanese minister for communications ensured the creation of a ministry of information technology and for artificial intelligence, and for digital governance and our national strategy for artificial intelligence.

What’s more, the Internet Governance Forum for Lebanon has become a effective platform bringing together the government, the private sector, civil society, academia, and other stakeholders in open and constructive dialogue.

Thanks to this forum, Lebanon has contributed to the ecosystem of global governance forums, global Internet Governance Forums, conveying its national vision and ensuring the participation of stakeholders in the elaboration of digital policies.

This experience has strengthened our support for the processes of the WSIS Plus 20, aiming to ensure that this becomes a main UN effort. The review of WSIS reminds us that technology is not a privilege, and it’s not only a certain category or it’s not something for a certain region, but it’s for everyone, and developed countries and developing countries alike need to draw on the benefits of these technologies.

And developing countries risk being left out if there’s no international cooperation. Lebanon has firmly committed to the World Information Society Summit goals, and we will continue to work for a digital future that is more inclusive, secure, and multistakeholder. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Lebanon. And now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Peru.

Peru

Mr. President, Excellencies, Mr. Under Secretary General, first I would like to thank you for being here, and I would like to thank Albania and Kenya for their role as co-facilitators and for leading the negotiations of our outcome document, which I hope we will be able to adopt tomorrow afternoon.

For Peru, WSIS Plus 20 is a historic opportunity to renew our global commitment to digital transformation that will uphold development and reduce inequalities. This summit has a fundamental premise. The digital divide cannot be separated from the social divide.

The digital transformation cannot be limited to the rollout of technology. It should be people-centered. In that sense, Peru reaffirms the centrality of science, technology, and innovation as engines of the information society, with a clear emphasis on developing human capacities.

The goal is not just accessing information, but rather understanding it and transforming it into knowledge, productivity, and opportunities for economic and social development. Esteemed colleagues, WSIS Plus 20 should strengthen a structured and coherent international cooperation under the leadership of the United Nations system, avoiding fragmentation and aligning efforts, resources, and priorities.

Financing should be geared, among other things, toward public digital infrastructure, digital public goods, and capacities, ensuring thus significant and sustainable connectivity. We should boost demos and pilot projects in strategic areas, such as digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence for development, the digital transformation of the state, education, health, agriculture, among so many other spheres, with measurable results, as well as knowledge transfer and scalability.

For all of this, we must always bear in mind that inclusion and equity are not secondary concerns. The participation of countries with wider gaps, along with the strengthening of local capacities, is a structural condition for information societies. Peru will work constructively with all those that are working so that WSIS Plus 20 can offer results that are implementable, with measurable impacts, clear responsibilities, and concrete benefits for all.

The government of Peru, for instance, yesterday created a multi-sectorial working group in order to develop Peru’s digital agenda 2026-2030. And in that sense, we would like to join not just the consensus to approve the draft resolution, we would also like to highlight the indefinite renewal of the Internet Governance Forum and the call to support a wider participation of developing countries in its deliberations.

Thank you very much.

Chair

I would like to thank the Distinguished Delegate of Peru.

Latvia

Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, Colleagues, Latvia welcomes this high-level meeting on WSIS Plus 20 review and is delighted to share this occasion with a vibrant community of stakeholders. Latvia aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union. Latvia looks forward to the adoption of the WSIS Plus 20 review outcome document.

The outcome should reinforce what made WSIS visionary two decades ago and has since become indispensable. It must chart a path towards ensuring that the Internet develops as an open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure resource that is accessible and that benefits all humanity. It must reinforce the effective, trusted, and inclusive multi-stakeholder governance model and make the Internet Governance Forum permanent.

It must strengthen links and alignment between key development agendas for inclusive and sustainable digital future, WSIS vision and action lines, the global digital compact, and the sustainable development goals.

The outcome also must respond to challenges we are grappling with as communities whose private, work, and civic lives are increasingly dependent on digital infrastructure, services, and transactions. It is therefore critical that we anchor the next decade of the implementation of the WSIS outcomes in inclusive, human-centric, and human rights-based approach and multi-stakeholder cooperation. Information integrity is an area of particular concern.

It needs to be safeguarded and promoted, especially in the era of generative AI. Citizens need information ecosystems that they can trust to deliver knowledge and reliable information. Governments cannot do it alone.

Private companies, especially online platforms and AI companies, need to uphold and respect standards for transparency and accountability. They can also lead the way. For example, Latvian company Tilde just released a new open-source AI model.

particularly geared towards the need of smaller European languages and can be used by public administrations and businesses to deliver trustworthy and reliable information to the publics. The WSIS process remains critical to closing global digital divides and to making technological progress benefit all societies. To avoid new disparities, fragmentation and dependencies, we need active global outreach, multi-stakeholder partnerships for capacity building, financing for connectivity and digital skill development.

In Latvia we are focused on delivering fast internet connectivity, a complete array of digital public services and on upgrading the digital skills of our citizens. Latvia is open to share its experience and expertise as we already do through development cooperation initiatives in Ukraine, Africa, Central Asia and elsewhere. For instance, just recently our mission in New York partnered with the Latvian NGA Riga Tech Girls to organize an online webinar on digital literacy for small island developing states.

To conclude, you can count on Latvia remaining engaged in WSIS processes to support a digital transformation that is inclusive, human-centric and human rights-based and delivered through multi-stakeholder cooperation.

I thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Latvia and now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Indonesia.

Indonesia

Thank you, Mr. President. Indonesia wishes to begin by welcoming the convening of this high-level meeting of WSIS plus 20 review.

We also wish to extend appreciation to the permanent representative of Kenya and Albania for their able leadership in co-facilitating the outcome document of this process. Excellencies, Indonesia stands at the intersection of scale and speed. With a population over 275 million and more than 229 million internet users, we are among the world’s largest and fastest growing digital societies.

This scale presents both immense opportunity and profound responsibility. Digital transformation for us is not an abstract ambition but a reality that must deliver tangible benefits for all. Guided by the Asta Cita, the vision of President Prabowo Subianto toward 2045 golden Indonesia, Indonesia reaffirms its commitment to a people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented information society.

We also advocate for an equitable digital governance system that reflects the needs and realities of developing countries. We see digital transformation as a cross-cutting enabler, a means to expand economic opportunity, improve public service delivery, strengthen national resilience and accelerate progress toward the SDGs.

In this spirit, allow me to highlight three key areas where Indonesia’s national efforts feed into the WSIS vision and action lines. First, expanding connectivity and closing digital divides. For an archipelagic nation of more than 17,000 islands, connectivity is equity.

Indonesia’s internet penetration now exceeds 80% with more than 95% of populated areas covered by high-speed digital networks, spanning from 4G, 5G and broadband networks. National fiber optic backbone is stretching tens of thousands of kilometers, digitally linking and connecting more islands. These investments are complemented by sustained efforts in digital skills, literacy and community empowerment, ensuring that connectivity translates into meaningful access.

The goal is simple, no one left online and no one left behind. Second, harnessing the digital economy for inclusive growth. Indonesia’s digital economy is projected to exceed 300 billion US dollars by 2030.

To unlock this potential, we are aligning regulation, strengthening digital payments and accelerating MSME digitalization. Moreover, through partnership with stakeholders, we are turning connectivity and innovation into productivity and progress. Digital payments now account for a rapidly growing share of retail transactions.

As it develops, more than 22 million MSMEs are already on boarded onto digital platforms, driven by inclusive fintech ecosystems and interoperable quick response QR system, which has also been adopted by a growing number of partner countries, enabling seamless cross-border payments.

Third, promoting inclusive and trusted digital governance. The enactment of Indonesia’s personal data protection law aligns our national data governance with international standards and strengthen safeguards, including for children. These protections are embedded within Indonesia’s digital public infrastructure in the forms of secure digital payment, digital identity systems and integrated e-government platform, ensuring that digital progress is safe trusted and accountable.

At the same time, Indonesia is also preparing for the next frontier by advancing national frameworks on artificial intelligence governance, anchored in ethical, responsible and inclusive principles. Excellencies, in closing, Indonesia’s message is clear. Scale must serve people, speed must deliver inclusion and digital progress must earn trust.

We stand ready to collaborate with all member states and stakeholders in advancing the WSIS vision, reaffirming our commitment to leveraging digital transformation as a force for prosperity and sustainable development for all.

Thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of Indonesia, and now I give the floor to distinguished representative of the Kingdom of Netherlands. You have the floor, ma’am.

Netherlands

Thank you, Chair. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, colleagues, I’m delighted to be here at the WSIS plus 20 high-level meeting and to address you on behalf of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Let me begin by thanking the Albanian and Kenyan co-facilitators, as well as their teams and the UN Secretariat for their tireless efforts.

We are especially appreciative of your inclusive and open engagement with the multi-stakeholder community. The Kingdom of the Netherlands aligns with the EU statement and looks forward to the adoption of the WSIS plus 20 review outcome document. We urge all member states to join consensus.

This week’s outcome will reaffirm the principles that have guided WSIS since its inception, a shared commitment to a digital future grounded in human rights, sustainable development, openness, and inclusive multi-stakeholder collaboration.

For the Netherlands, the protection and promotion of human rights online, as well as offline, remains essential. We must ensure that human rights are embedded across the entire life cycle of digital technologies. We therefore underline the important role of the Office of the High Commissioner and the outcome documents human-centric and human rights-based approach.

The Netherlands firmly believe that internet governance must continue to be global and multi-stakeholder in nature for it to be the most effective, legitimate, and resilient. The full involvement of governments, the private sector, civil society, technical and academic communities, and all other stakeholders remain essential for the internet to be open, global, interoperable, stable, free, and secure.

We support the decision to establish a permanent mandate for a strengthened IGF, which has proven its value at the primary multi-stakeholder platform for discussion of internet governance issues. Sustainable funding for the IGF is essential to implement further improvements. The Netherlands will continue its long-standing financial support to the IGF, provided since its establishment in 2006, and will actively contribute to further strengthening its inclusive, bottom-up, and open character.

We thank fellow donors and all stakeholders for their continued commitment. We strongly call for continuing alignment of the WSIS and the Global Digital Compact implementation, as well as with the strong link with the sustainable development goals up to and beyond 2030. President, we have made tremendous progress these past two decades, yet a third of the world’s population is still not connected to the internet.

The Netherlands underlines the critical importance of closing digital divides, including the gender digital divide. Everyone should be able to have meaningful access to the internet and become digitally literate, so everyone can reap the benefits of digital transformation. Thank you.

Chair

I thank the distinguished representative of the Kingdom of Netherlands. We have heard the last speaker for this morning’s meeting. We shall continue this afternoon at three o’clock in this hall.

The meeting is adjourned.

C

Chair

Speech speed

117 words per minute

Speech length

2133 words

Speech time

1085 seconds

Digital divide remains a digital canyon with only 35% internet access in developing countries vs 67% globally

Explanation

The Chair highlighted the persistent and significant gap in internet access between developed and developing nations. While global internet access stands at 67%, developing countries lag far behind at only 35%, creating what the Chair described as a ‘digital canyon’ rather than just a divide.


Evidence

Global Internet access stands at 67% in developing countries, it is just 35%


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– South Africa
– Saudi Arabia
– Kenya
– Belgium

Agreed on

Digital divides remain a critical challenge requiring urgent action


Men are 21% more likely to have internet access than women globally

Explanation

The Chair emphasized the persistent gender gap in digital access, noting that globally men have significantly higher rates of internet connectivity than women. This disparity represents a major barrier to gender equality in the digital age.


Evidence

Globally, men are still 21% more likely to have Internet access than women


Major discussion point

Gender Digital Divide


Topics

Human rights | Development


Closing gender digital divide could add over 100 trillion US dollars to global economy by 2050

Explanation

The Chair presented the economic case for addressing gender inequality in digital access, arguing that closing this gap would generate massive economic benefits. The potential economic impact exceeds the combined GDP of major economies, making it both a fairness and economic imperative.


Evidence

It is estimated that closing the gender digital divide could add over 100 trillion US dollars to the global economy by 2050, more than the combined GDP of the United States and China today


Major discussion point

Gender Digital Divide


Topics

Economic | Human rights | Development


AI has potential to accelerate development but risks amplifying bias and inequality

Explanation

The Chair acknowledged AI’s transformative potential for development while warning about significant risks when innovation outpaces regulation. Without proper governance frameworks, AI could exacerbate existing inequalities and biases rather than solving them.


Evidence

When innovation outpaces regulation, oversight, and ethical safeguards, and as a result, amplifies gender bias online in an incredible dimension


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics


Topics

Human rights | Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– India
– Lithuania
– Ghana
– Kenya

Agreed on

AI governance must be ethical, inclusive, and human-centered


96% of deepfake videos online target women in sexual acts, showing systematic bias

Explanation

The Chair provided stark evidence of how AI technology is being misused to systematically target women through deepfake technology. This statistic demonstrates that the harm is not coincidental but represents a systematic pattern of gender-based digital violence.


Evidence

As many as 96%, so almost all, deepfake videos online are of women engaging in sexual acts. 96%, so this is no coincidence. It is systematic


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics


Topics

Human rights | Sociocultural


Multi-stakeholder approach has strengthened trust and delivered inclusive outcomes

Explanation

The Chair praised the collaborative approach involving governments, private sector, and civil society that has characterized the WSIS process. This participatory model has created more transparent and inclusive outcomes than traditional government-only processes.


Evidence

This process has recognized that governments alone cannot deliver the digital future we need. Instead, we have seen how partnership with the private sector and a strong civil society has created a truly participatory process, more than we have seen before


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum


Topics

Legal and regulatory


S

Secretary-General

Speech speed

112 words per minute

Speech length

939 words

Speech time

501 seconds

Internet Governance Forum should become permanent UN forum with sustainable funding

Explanation

The Secretary-General called for institutionalizing the IGF as a permanent United Nations forum, recognizing its crucial role in digital governance. This would provide the forum with stable institutional foundation and sustainable financing to continue its work effectively.


Evidence

Your consideration to make the Internet Governance Forum, IGF, a permanent forum of the United Nations, would be a key achievement of this review


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum


Topics

Legal and regulatory


IGF embodies inclusive collaborative approach and serves as durable global forum

Explanation

The Secretary-General highlighted the IGF’s success in bringing together diverse stakeholders in meaningful dialogue about internet governance. The forum has proven its value through sustained engagement across different groups and coordination with technical entities.


Evidence

Through close engagement across stakeholder groups, accelerated growth of the national and regional IGFs, the guidance of the multi-stakeholder advisory group, and coordination with technical entities, IGF has served as a durable global forum for internet governance dialogue


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum


Topics

Legal and regulatory


Rising cyber attacks and disinformation are eroding confidence in digital space

Explanation

The Secretary-General identified cybersecurity threats and the spread of misinformation as major challenges undermining trust in digital technologies. These issues require coordinated international response to maintain confidence in the digital ecosystem.


Evidence

Rising cyber attacks, including on critical infrastructure, coupled with the rapid spreading of miss and of disinformation online, is eroding confidence in the digital space


Major discussion point

Cybersecurity and Digital Trust


Topics

Cybersecurity | Sociocultural


Strengthened international cooperation needed for cybersecurity capacity building

Explanation

The Secretary-General emphasized that addressing cybersecurity challenges requires enhanced collaboration between nations, including sharing best practices and building technical capabilities. No single country can address these threats alone.


Evidence

We must strengthen international digital cooperation, support capacity building for cybersecurity skills, and sustain the sharing of best practices in digital governance


Major discussion point

Cybersecurity and Digital Trust


Topics

Cybersecurity | Development


Digital identity, payments, and data systems transform service delivery when rights-respecting

Explanation

The Secretary-General highlighted how digital public infrastructure can revolutionize how governments deliver services and engage citizens. However, these systems must be built with respect for rights and inclusion to avoid creating new forms of exclusion.


Evidence

When governments and partners build shared digital foundations, such as digital identity, and payments, and data systems in ways that respect rights and promote inclusion, they transform how societies deliver services, offer opportunities, and engage citizens


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Services


Topics

Development | Human rights | Infrastructure


Digital transformation must address growing environmental footprint including e-waste

Explanation

The Secretary-General acknowledged that digitalization comes with significant environmental costs that must be addressed for truly sustainable development. This includes energy consumption, resource extraction, and electronic waste management.


Evidence

We must also confront digitalization’s growing environmental footprint, including energy use, demand for critical minerals, and e-waste


Major discussion point

Sustainable Development and Climate Impact


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Sustainable digital future requires global standards for greener infrastructure

Explanation

The Secretary-General called for international coordination on environmental standards for digital technologies. This includes developing global standards for sustainable digital products and infrastructure that reduce emissions and protect ecosystems.


Evidence

A sustainable digital future requires global standards for sustainable digital products and greener infrastructure that lowers emission and protects ecosystems


Major discussion point

Sustainable Development and Climate Impact


Topics

Development | Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory


WSIS Plus 20 and Global Digital Compact are complementary and mutually reinforcing

Explanation

The Secretary-General emphasized that these two major digital governance frameworks should work together rather than compete or duplicate efforts. WSIS provides implementation architecture while the Global Digital Compact strengthens governance capacity for emerging technologies.


Evidence

WSIS provides the implementation, architecture, and development focus. The Global Digital Compact strengthens our collective capacity to govern digital technologies in an increasingly interconnected world


Major discussion point

WSIS Framework Evolution and Coordination


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


S

South Africa

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

734 words

Speech time

322 seconds

Almost eight in ten South Africans are connected, up from one in ten in 2005

Explanation

South Africa demonstrated significant progress in digital connectivity over the WSIS period, showing how sustained national effort can dramatically expand internet access. This represents a nearly eight-fold increase in connectivity rates.


Evidence

In 2005, like many other countries, we faced fewer people. More specifically, one in ten South Africans were online. Today, almost eight in ten are connected


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Chair
– Saudi Arabia
– Kenya
– Belgium

Agreed on

Digital divides remain a critical challenge requiring urgent action


WSIS should remain primary UN-anchored implementation framework for digital future

Explanation

South Africa argued for maintaining WSIS as the central framework for digital cooperation while ensuring it evolves with changing times. The framework should continue to be the main vehicle for implementing a people-centered digital future that respects human rights.


Evidence

WSIS must remain the primary and UN-anchored implementation framework for a people-centered digital future that respects human rights, even as the digital future evolves to respond to new realities


Major discussion point

WSIS Framework Evolution and Coordination


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Digital public infrastructure should serve global South through people-centered approach

Explanation

South Africa advocated for digital public infrastructure that specifically addresses the needs and contexts of developing countries. The approach should move beyond simple technology adoption to meaningful contribution and value creation for communities.


Evidence

We used our G20 presidency to champion a people-centered approach to the digital public infrastructure that serves the global South. And we want Africa to move from adoption to contribution


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Services


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


S

Switzerland

Speech speed

129 words per minute

Speech length

499 words

Speech time

231 seconds

G

Germany

Speech speed

110 words per minute

Speech length

346 words

Speech time

188 seconds

IGF is the primary global multi-stakeholder platform for digital governance discussions

Explanation

Germany emphasized the unique role of the Internet Governance Forum as the central venue where diverse stakeholders can openly discuss digital issues. No other platform provides the same breadth of participation and openness for addressing digital governance challenges.


Evidence

The IGF is the United Nations’ central platform for shaping the digital future. It is where the world comes together. Nowhere else can we discuss such a range of issues so openly


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum


Topics

Legal and regulatory


Internet governance must remain multi-stakeholder and rooted in international human rights law

Explanation

Germany reaffirmed the fundamental principles that should guide internet governance, emphasizing that it must involve all stakeholders and be grounded in human rights. This approach ensures legitimacy and effectiveness in digital governance.


Evidence

Internet governance is multi-stakeholder and rooted in international human rights law. The resolution reaffirms this global consensus


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Disagreed with

– Russian Federation
– Estonia
– European Union

Disagreed on

Internet governance model and state control


L

Lesotho

Speech speed

110 words per minute

Speech length

661 words

Speech time

359 seconds

Enhanced cooperation needed including North-South, South-South, and triangular cooperation

Explanation

Lesotho called for strengthened international collaboration across different partnership models to support developing countries in digital transformation. This includes traditional North-South cooperation as well as South-South and triangular partnerships that can provide diverse forms of support.


Evidence

Calling for enhanced collaboration, including north-south, south-south, and triangular cooperation, which are vital for investment in infrastructure in developing nations


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Technology Transfer


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Building confidence and security in ICT use crucial for innovation and development

Explanation

Lesotho emphasized that cybersecurity and trust in digital systems are fundamental prerequisites for digital innovation and sustainable development. Without security and confidence, people and businesses cannot fully embrace digital transformation.


Evidence

Building confidence and security in ICT use, reaffirming this as a crucial driver for innovation and sustainable development consistent with international human rights law


Major discussion point

Cybersecurity and Digital Trust


Topics

Cybersecurity | Development | Human rights


Digital technologies should support climate action and environmental monitoring

Explanation

Lesotho highlighted how digital technologies can be leveraged for environmental protection and climate resilience. The country is using its unique geographic advantages to support both digital infrastructure and environmental monitoring capabilities.


Evidence

Expanding broadband connectivity to all schools and establishing satellite earth stations for environmental monitoring


Major discussion point

Sustainable Development and Climate Impact


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


A

Albania

Speech speed

114 words per minute

Speech length

518 words

Speech time

271 seconds

Protection of human rights, data privacy, and democratic values is fundamental

Explanation

Albania emphasized that as emerging technologies like AI accelerate change, protecting human rights and democratic values must remain central to digital transformation. Innovation should strengthen rather than undermine accountability and inclusion.


Evidence

As emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, accelerate change, our collective response must ensure the protection of human rights, data privacy, and democratic values


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Freedom


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


S

Slovakia

Speech speed

89 words per minute

Speech length

346 words

Speech time

231 seconds

S

Saudi Arabia

Speech speed

115 words per minute

Speech length

505 words

Speech time

263 seconds

2.2 billion people still disconnected globally, requiring collective action to bridge gaps

Explanation

Saudi Arabia highlighted the massive scale of digital exclusion that still exists despite 20 years of WSIS efforts. The country emphasized that addressing this requires coordinated international action to ensure no one is left behind in the digital transformation.


Evidence

2 billion, 200 million people are still disconnected. Therefore, we must put mankind first. And we must focus on the segment of society that has been left behind


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Chair
– South Africa
– Kenya
– Belgium

Agreed on

Digital divides remain a critical challenge requiring urgent action


Saudi Arabia became first success story in women’s digital empowerment at 36%

Explanation

Saudi Arabia presented itself as a model for women’s digital inclusion, claiming to be the first country globally to achieve significant progress in women’s digital empowerment. This represents progress beyond the global average of 28%.


Evidence

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia celebrated the fact that it became the first success story worldwide in the digital empowerment of women, with a digital empowerment of 36%


Major discussion point

Gender Digital Divide


Topics

Human rights | Development


G

Ghana

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

387 words

Speech time

189 seconds

Strengthened commitments needed for universal connectivity and capacity building

Explanation

Ghana called for enhanced international cooperation to achieve universal connectivity and build digital capacity, particularly for developing countries. The country emphasized the need for robust digital public infrastructure and equitable AI governance.


Evidence

We call for strengthened commitments to universal connectivity, robust digital public infrastructure, equitable AI governance, and increased capacity-building support for developing countries


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Technology Transfer


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


National cybersecurity frameworks and data protection are essential

Explanation

Ghana highlighted the importance of establishing comprehensive cybersecurity and data protection frameworks to build trust in digital ecosystems. The country has operationalized national and sectoral computer emergency response teams as part of this effort.


Evidence

Ghana has strengthened its cybersecurity and data protection frameworks and operationalized national and sectoral computer emergency response teams


Major discussion point

Cybersecurity and Digital Trust


Topics

Cybersecurity | Legal and regulatory


National AI strategy focuses on ethical and responsible AI use across government

Explanation

Ghana has developed a comprehensive approach to AI governance that emphasizes ethical principles and responsible deployment across government operations. This includes frameworks to address misinformation while protecting free speech rights.


Evidence

We have equally adopted the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy to guide the ethical and responsible use of AI across government. We’re developing frameworks to deal with myths and disinformation while respecting the rights of free speech online


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


I

India

Speech speed

115 words per minute

Speech length

561 words

Speech time

290 seconds

Digital public infrastructure when built as public goods becomes an equalizer

Explanation

India argued that when digital systems are designed as public goods that are open, interoperable, and affordable, technology can reduce rather than increase inequality. This approach ensures that digital transformation serves the last mile and empowers the most marginalized.


Evidence

When digital systems are built as public goods, technology becomes an equalizer rather than a divider. This principle guided India’s launch of the Global Digital Public Infrastructure Repository during our G20 presidency


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure and Services


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


AI must be inclusive, trustworthy, and oriented towards public purpose

Explanation

India emphasized that artificial intelligence development should prioritize public benefit and inclusion rather than commercial interests alone. The country is investing in responsible AI ecosystems and building tools for multilingual access.


Evidence

Through the India AI mission, India is investing in responsible AI ecosystems, expanding national compute capacity, creating repositories of reusable data sets, which we call the AI Kosh, and building Bhashani, which is an AI natural language processing enabled real-time translation tool


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics


Topics

Development | Sociocultural | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Chair
– Lithuania
– Ghana
– Kenya

Agreed on

AI governance must be ethical, inclusive, and human-centered


K

Kyrgyzstan

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

443 words

Speech time

217 seconds

98% of cities have 3G networks and 99% have 4G networks including remote mountainous regions

Explanation

Kyrgyzstan demonstrated significant progress in expanding mobile network coverage across challenging terrain, including remote and mountainous areas. This achievement shows how targeted infrastructure investment can overcome geographic barriers to connectivity.


Evidence

Right now, 98 percent of the cities in Kyrgyzstan have 3G networks, and 99 percent have 4G networks. That includes remote and mountainous regions


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


P

Poland

Speech speed

99 words per minute

Speech length

387 words

Speech time

233 seconds

IGF should have sustainable funding and play central role in global digital dialogue

Explanation

Poland advocated for strengthening the Internet Governance Forum with stable financial foundation and enhanced representation, particularly from developing countries and marginalized communities. The forum should be more inclusive and representative of global digital diversity.


Evidence

After 2025, it should have sustainable funding and play a central role in the global digital dialogue. IGF must be more representative, particularly including voices from developing countries, youth, and marginalized communities


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Evolution not revolution needed with gradual updates to existing action lines

Explanation

Poland supported a measured approach to updating the WSIS framework that builds on existing foundations rather than creating entirely new structures. Changes should align with sustainable development goals while maintaining continuity and stability.


Evidence

Our approach supports gradual updates to the existing WSIS action lines. Any changes should align with the sustainable development goals and the post-2030 development agenda, ensuring continuity and stability


Major discussion point

WSIS Framework Evolution and Coordination


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


L

Lithuania

Speech speed

108 words per minute

Speech length

410 words

Speech time

226 seconds

Multi-stakeholder model ensures transparency, innovation, and trust in governance

Explanation

Lithuania emphasized that the multi-stakeholder approach to digital governance is essential for maintaining transparency and fostering innovation. Attempts to impose centralized, state-controlled approaches risk fragmenting the internet and undermining democratic values.


Evidence

This approach ensures transparency, innovation, and trust. Attempts to impose centralized and state-controlled approaches create a risk of fragmenting the Internet and damaging democratic values


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


AI governance must be human-centric, rights-based, ensuring fairness and transparency

Explanation

Lithuania called for artificial intelligence governance that prioritizes human rights and democratic values, ensuring that AI systems are fair, transparent, and accountable. This approach is necessary to balance innovation with protection of fundamental rights.


Evidence

Lithuania reminds that the AI governance must be human-centric and human-rights-based, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


Cybersecurity has become extremely important in the age of artificial intelligence

Explanation

Lithuania highlighted how the rise of AI has made cybersecurity even more critical for protecting democratic processes and institutions. The country operates national cybersecurity centers and leads initiatives to counter disinformation.


Evidence

Cybersecurity has become extremely important in the age of artificial intelligence. Lithuania invests heavily in cybersecurity, operating a national cybersecurity center. We also lead initiatives to counter disinformation to safeguard democratic processes


Major discussion point

Cybersecurity and Digital Trust


Topics

Cybersecurity | Human rights


F

Finland

Speech speed

113 words per minute

Speech length

492 words

Speech time

260 seconds

Digital repression and online censorship pose serious threats to safe internet use

Explanation

Finland warned about the growing threat of digital authoritarianism and the use of technology for social control. The country emphasized the need to strengthen understanding of how online censorship operates and to defend digital freedom and democracy.


Evidence

The accelerating rise of digital repression poses a serious threat to the safe and reliable use of the Internet. We must recognize the need to strengthen political and societal understanding how online censorship and the suppression of information operate


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Freedom


Topics

Human rights | Cybersecurity


Digital spaces must be safe for everyone without fear or discrimination

Explanation

Finland highlighted the growing problem of gender-based violence and harassment online, which prevents equal participation in digital society. The country emphasized that digital spaces must be inclusive and safe for all users.


Evidence

Gender-based violence and harassment online are a growing and significant problem that prevent individuals from fully, equally and meaningfully participating in societal life


Major discussion point

Gender Digital Divide


Topics

Human rights | Sociocultural


N

Norway

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

500 words

Speech time

220 seconds

States should refrain from internet shutdowns and measures targeting internet access

Explanation

Norway called for clear commitments from governments to avoid internet shutdowns and other measures that restrict internet access. In an era of increasing authoritarianism, protecting fundamental rights in digital spaces is more important than ever.


Evidence

We appreciate the equality, an equally clear call to states to refrain from Internet shutdowns and other measures that target Internet access


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Freedom


Topics

Human rights | Infrastructure


Meaningful connectivity must go beyond access to include skills and locally relevant content

Explanation

Norway emphasized that closing digital divides requires more than just providing internet access. True digital inclusion requires digital skills development and content that is relevant to local communities and contexts.


Evidence

Closing these gaps, including through universal, meaningful and affordable connectivity, digital skills and locally relevant content, is of critical importance


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


R

Russian Federation

Speech speed

139 words per minute

Speech length

861 words

Speech time

370 seconds

J

Japan

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

424 words

Speech time

199 seconds

E

Estonia

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

516 words

Speech time

244 seconds

Digital transformation must remain human-centered and rooted in human rights

Explanation

Estonia emphasized that digital transformation should prioritize human dignity and rights, ensuring that the same rights that apply offline also apply online. This includes rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and access to information.


Evidence

Estonia believes that digital transformation must stay human-centered and rooted in human rights. The same rights that apply offline must also apply online, including the rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and access to information


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Freedom


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


Same rights that apply offline must also apply online including privacy and expression

Explanation

Estonia reaffirmed the principle that human rights are universal and must be protected in digital spaces just as they are in physical spaces. This includes fundamental rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and access to information.


Evidence

The same rights that apply offline must also apply online, including the rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and access to information


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Freedom


Topics

Human rights


T

Türkiye

Speech speed

124 words per minute

Speech length

731 words

Speech time

351 seconds

K

Kenya

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

490 words

Speech time

231 seconds

Digital divides are multidimensional spanning connectivity, affordability, skills, and meaningful participation

Explanation

Kenya emphasized that digital inequality is not just about internet access but encompasses multiple interconnected challenges. These include infrastructure gaps, cost barriers, skills deficits, and institutional capacity limitations, particularly affecting developing countries.


Evidence

Digital divides at its core, recognizing that these divides are multidimensional, spanning connectivity, affordability, skills, institutions, and meaningful participation, particularly in developing countries


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Chair
– South Africa
– Saudi Arabia
– Belgium

Agreed on

Digital divides remain a critical challenge requiring urgent action


Support for permanent IGF mandate with enhanced modalities for governmental engagement

Explanation

Kenya welcomed the decision to make the Internet Governance Forum a permanent UN body while also strengthening how governments can participate in the process. This balances multi-stakeholder governance with appropriate governmental involvement.


Evidence

We also welcome the Outcomes emphasis on institutional continuity, including decisions to make Internet Governance Forum a permanent forum for the United Nations with enhanced modalities for governmental engagements


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder Governance and Internet Governance Forum


Topics

Legal and regulatory


AI must serve development, inclusion, and sustainability rather than deepen inequality

Explanation

Kenya argued that as the world enters the age of artificial intelligence, these technologies must be harnessed to promote inclusive development rather than exacerbate existing inequalities. AI governance should prioritize people, public value, and national capability building.


Evidence

As we enter the next phase of WSIS in the intelligent age, Kenya is clear, AI must serve development, inclusion, sustainability, not just deepen inequality. We also adopted an inclusive national artificial intelligence strategy anchored on people, public value and national capability


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Chair
– India
– Lithuania
– Ghana

Agreed on

AI governance must be ethical, inclusive, and human-centered


E

European Union

Speech speed

103 words per minute

Speech length

640 words

Speech time

369 seconds

Strengthened coherence needed between WSIS, SDGs, and Global Digital Compact

Explanation

The European Union emphasized the importance of ensuring that major digital governance frameworks work together coherently rather than creating duplication or confusion. This coordination is essential for effective implementation and avoiding fragmented approaches.


Evidence

A stronger link between the World Summit on Information Society, the Sustainable Development Goals, and the Global Digital Compact, flexibility to adapt to new challenges, and partnerships to close all digital divides


Major discussion point

WSIS Framework Evolution and Coordination


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


V

Venezuela

Speech speed

128 words per minute

Speech length

1072 words

Speech time

501 seconds

I

Ireland

Speech speed

147 words per minute

Speech length

420 words

Speech time

170 seconds

B

Belgium

Speech speed

124 words per minute

Speech length

439 words

Speech time

211 seconds

Universal connectivity requires innovative financing and public-private partnerships

Explanation

Belgium emphasized that achieving universal connectivity requires mobilizing diverse financing mechanisms and fostering collaboration between public and private sectors. Traditional funding approaches alone are insufficient to bridge remaining digital divides.


Evidence

We must act in order to ensure universal connectivity by mobilizing innovative financing, as well as public-private partnerships


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Development | Economic | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Chair
– South Africa
– Saudi Arabia
– Kenya

Agreed on

Digital divides remain a critical challenge requiring urgent action


Digital solutions needed for climate and food security challenges

Explanation

Belgium highlighted how digital technologies can contribute to addressing global challenges including climate change and food security. The country is actively working on these issues through its development cooperation and contributions to the Global Digital Compact.


Evidence

We are acting on essential issues such as reducing the digital divide, data governance, and digital solutions for the climate, as well as food security


Major discussion point

Sustainable Development and Climate Impact


Topics

Development


Q

Qatar

Speech speed

109 words per minute

Speech length

292 words

Speech time

160 seconds

T

Tunisia

Speech speed

110 words per minute

Speech length

302 words

Speech time

164 seconds

Technology transfer on mutually agreed terms essential for developing countries

Explanation

Tunisia emphasized that developing countries need access to technology transfer arrangements that respect their sovereignty and development priorities. This enables countries to move from being technology consumers to becoming innovators and contributors.


Evidence

Promoting technology transfer on mutually agreed terms, enabling developing countries to move from consumption to innovation


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Technology Transfer


Topics

Development | Economic


I

Iraq

Speech speed

90 words per minute

Speech length

454 words

Speech time

301 seconds

AI governance should be grounded in sovereign equality, inclusivity, and transparency

Explanation

Iraq, speaking for the G77 and China, emphasized that artificial intelligence governance must respect the sovereign equality of states and be inclusive and transparent. No single actor should be allowed to monopolize AI development or impose technological dependency on developing nations.


Evidence

Its governance must be grounded in the sovereign equality of states, inclusivity, transparency, trustworthiness, and respect for the right to development. We should not allow that any private or state actor monopolize digital markets


Major discussion point

Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


International cooperation vital for capacity building and knowledge sharing

Explanation

Iraq called for strengthened international cooperation, solidarity, and technology transfer to enable all nations to participate equally in global digital governance. This includes initiatives for capacity building, scientific exchange, and knowledge sharing upon request of states.


Evidence

We call for the renewed strengthening of international cooperation, solidarity, and technology transfer, including initiatives related to capacity building, scientific exchange, and knowledge sharing upon request of states


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Technology Transfer


Topics

Development


R

Republic of Korea

Speech speed

106 words per minute

Speech length

382 words

Speech time

214 seconds

S

Sweden

Speech speed

112 words per minute

Speech length

443 words

Speech time

235 seconds

L

Lebanon

Speech speed

125 words per minute

Speech length

380 words

Speech time

182 seconds

P

Peru

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

389 words

Speech time

184 seconds

L

Latvia

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

458 words

Speech time

214 seconds

I

Indonesia

Speech speed

111 words per minute

Speech length

547 words

Speech time

293 seconds

Internet penetration exceeds 80% with 95% of populated areas covered by high-speed networks

Explanation

Indonesia demonstrated significant progress in digital connectivity across its vast archipelago of over 17,000 islands. The country has achieved high internet penetration rates and extensive coverage of high-speed networks including 4G, 5G, and broadband infrastructure.


Evidence

Indonesia’s internet penetration now exceeds 80% with more than 95% of populated areas covered by high-speed digital networks, spanning from 4G, 5G and broadband networks


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Connectivity Challenges


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


N

Netherlands

Speech speed

119 words per minute

Speech length

423 words

Speech time

213 seconds

Human rights must be embedded across entire lifecycle of digital technologies

Explanation

The Netherlands emphasized that human rights protection cannot be an afterthought in digital development but must be integrated from the design phase through deployment and use of digital technologies. This comprehensive approach ensures that technology serves human dignity.


Evidence

We must ensure that human rights are embedded across the entire life cycle of digital technologies


Major discussion point

Human Rights and Digital Freedom


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


Agreements

Agreement points

Internet Governance Forum should become permanent UN forum with sustainable funding

Speakers

– Secretary-General
– Germany
– Poland
– Kenya
– European Union

Arguments

Your consideration to make the Internet Governance Forum, IGF, a permanent forum of the United Nations, would be a key achievement of this review


The IGF is the United Nations’ central platform for shaping the digital future. It is where the world comes together. Nowhere else can we discuss such a range of issues so openly


After 2025, it should have sustainable funding and play a central role in the global digital dialogue. IGF must be more representative, particularly including voices from developing countries, youth, and marginalized communities


We also welcome the Outcomes emphasis on institutional continuity, including decisions to make Internet Governance Forum a permanent forum for the United Nations with enhanced modalities for governmental engagements


We are eagerly awaiting the implementation of the vision of the WSIS Plus architecture that is strengthened and adapted to its goal, including a forum on internet governance, which is permanent and better financed


Summary

Multiple speakers strongly supported making the IGF a permanent UN forum with sustainable funding, recognizing its unique role as the primary global multi-stakeholder platform for digital governance discussions


Topics

Legal and regulatory


Multi-stakeholder governance model is essential for digital governance

Speakers

– Chair
– Germany
– Lithuania
– Netherlands
– Estonia

Arguments

This process has recognized that governments alone cannot deliver the digital future we need. Instead, we have seen how partnership with the private sector and a strong civil society has created a truly participatory process, more than we have seen before


Internet governance is multi-stakeholder and rooted in international human rights law. The resolution reaffirms this global consensus


This approach ensures transparency, innovation, and trust. Attempts to impose centralized and state-controlled approaches create a risk of fragmenting the Internet and damaging democratic values


The Netherlands firmly believe that internet governance must continue to be global and multi-stakeholder in nature for it to be the most effective, legitimate, and resilient


No single country or actor should control it. Efforts to introduce centralized or state-led control would threaten the openness and integrity of the Internet and risk its fragmentation


Summary

Speakers consistently emphasized that multi-stakeholder governance involving governments, private sector, civil society, and technical community is fundamental to effective and legitimate digital governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Digital divides remain a critical challenge requiring urgent action

Speakers

– Chair
– South Africa
– Saudi Arabia
– Kenya
– Belgium

Arguments

Digital divide remains a digital canyon with only 35% internet access in developing countries vs 67% globally


Almost eight in ten South Africans are connected, up from one in ten in 2005


2.2 billion people still disconnected globally, requiring collective action to bridge gaps


Digital divides are multidimensional spanning connectivity, affordability, skills, and meaningful participation


Universal connectivity requires innovative financing and public-private partnerships


Summary

Speakers acknowledged significant progress but emphasized that digital divides remain a major challenge requiring coordinated international action and innovative approaches to financing and implementation


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Human rights must be protected and promoted in digital spaces

Speakers

– Albania
– Estonia
– Netherlands
– Finland
– Norway

Arguments

As emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, accelerate change, our collective response must ensure the protection of human rights, data privacy, and democratic values


Estonia believes that digital transformation must stay human-centered and rooted in human rights. The same rights that apply offline must also apply online, including the rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and access to information


We must ensure that human rights are embedded across the entire life cycle of digital technologies


The accelerating rise of digital repression poses a serious threat to the safe and reliable use of the Internet. We must recognize the need to strengthen political and societal understanding how online censorship and the suppression of information operate


We appreciate the equality, an equally clear call to states to refrain from Internet shutdowns and other measures that target Internet access


Summary

Speakers consistently emphasized that human rights protection must be central to digital transformation, with the same rights applying online as offline, and called for protection against digital repression and internet shutdowns


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory


AI governance must be ethical, inclusive, and human-centered

Speakers

– Chair
– India
– Lithuania
– Ghana
– Kenya

Arguments

AI has potential to accelerate development but risks amplifying bias and inequality


AI must be inclusive, trustworthy, and oriented towards public purpose


Lithuania reminds that the AI governance must be human-centric and human-rights-based, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability


We have equally adopted the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy to guide the ethical and responsible use of AI across government. We’re developing frameworks to deal with myths and disinformation while respecting the rights of free speech online


AI must serve development, inclusion, and sustainability rather than deepen inequality


Summary

Speakers agreed that AI governance must prioritize human rights, ethics, and inclusive development, ensuring that AI serves public purposes rather than exacerbating inequalities or undermining democratic values


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights | Development


Similar viewpoints

Cybersecurity and building trust in digital systems are fundamental prerequisites for digital transformation and sustainable development, requiring coordinated national and international responses

Speakers

– Secretary-General
– Lesotho
– Lithuania
– Ghana

Arguments

Rising cyber attacks, including on critical infrastructure, coupled with the rapid spreading of miss and of disinformation online, is eroding confidence in the digital space


Building confidence and security in ICT use, reaffirming this as a crucial driver for innovation and sustainable development consistent with international human rights law


Cybersecurity has become extremely important in the age of artificial intelligence. Lithuania invests heavily in cybersecurity, operating a national cybersecurity center. We also lead initiatives to counter disinformation to safeguard democratic processes


Ghana has strengthened its cybersecurity and data protection frameworks and operationalized national and sectoral computer emergency response teams


Topics

Cybersecurity | Development | Human rights


Gender digital divide and online gender-based violence are significant barriers to equal participation in digital society that require targeted interventions and protection measures

Speakers

– Chair
– Saudi Arabia
– Finland

Arguments

Men are 21% more likely to have internet access than women globally


Saudi Arabia became first success story in women’s digital empowerment at 36%


Gender-based violence and harassment online are a growing and significant problem that prevent individuals from fully, equally and meaningfully participating in societal life


Topics

Human rights | Development | Sociocultural


Digital public infrastructure should be designed as public goods that promote inclusion and equality, transforming service delivery while respecting rights and serving development objectives

Speakers

– Secretary-General
– India
– South Africa

Arguments

When governments and partners build shared digital foundations, such as digital identity, and payments, and data systems in ways that respect rights and promote inclusion, they transform how societies deliver services, offer opportunities, and engage citizens


When digital systems are built as public goods, technology becomes an equalizer rather than a divider. This principle guided India’s launch of the Global Digital Public Infrastructure Repository during our G20 presidency


Digital public infrastructure should serve global South through people-centered approach


Topics

Development | Infrastructure | Human rights


Unexpected consensus

Environmental sustainability of digital transformation

Speakers

– Secretary-General
– Lesotho

Arguments

Digital transformation must address growing environmental footprint including e-waste


Sustainable digital future requires global standards for greener infrastructure


Digital technologies should support climate action and environmental monitoring


Explanation

Despite the focus on digital inclusion and development, there was unexpected consensus on the need to address the environmental impact of digitalization, including e-waste and energy consumption, showing recognition that digital transformation must be environmentally sustainable


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Coordination between WSIS and Global Digital Compact

Speakers

– Secretary-General
– European Union
– Poland

Arguments

WSIS Plus 20 and Global Digital Compact are complementary and mutually reinforcing


Strengthened coherence needed between WSIS, SDGs, and Global Digital Compact


Evolution not revolution needed with gradual updates to existing action lines


Explanation

There was unexpected consensus on avoiding duplication between major digital governance frameworks, with speakers emphasizing complementarity rather than competition between WSIS and the Global Digital Compact


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Overall assessment

Summary

Strong consensus emerged on core principles including multi-stakeholder governance, human rights protection, making IGF permanent, addressing digital divides, and ensuring ethical AI governance. Speakers consistently emphasized the need for inclusive, human-centered digital transformation.


Consensus level

High level of consensus on fundamental principles with broad agreement across developed and developing countries on the need for inclusive digital governance, though implementation approaches may vary. This strong consensus provides a solid foundation for moving forward with WSIS Plus 20 outcomes and suggests potential for effective international cooperation on digital issues.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Internet governance model and state control

Speakers

– Russian Federation
– Germany
– Estonia
– European Union

Arguments

The current model for Internet governance remains unjust and geopolitically vulnerable. This model requires further institutionalization and a legally binding basis


Internet governance must remain multi-stakeholder and rooted in international human rights law


No single country or actor should control it. Efforts to introduce centralized or state-led control would threaten the openness and integrity of the Internet and risk its fragmentation


Europe will continue to object Internet fragmentation and state-controlled alternatives


Summary

Russia advocates for more state-controlled, legally binding internet governance under UN auspices, while Western countries strongly defend the multi-stakeholder model and oppose centralized state control


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights


Enhanced cooperation mandate implementation

Speakers

– Venezuela
– European Union

Arguments

Progress on this specific mandate on enhanced cooperation has been significantly blocked. Thus, it is imperative that the international community address effectively this main issue for WSIS


Making the Internet Governance Forum a permanent UN body is in our reach. We have long advocated for institutionalization so that it continues to be the cornerstone of inclusive digital governance


Summary

Venezuela (representing Group of Friends) argues that enhanced cooperation mandate from Tunis Agenda has been blocked and needs addressing, while EU focuses on strengthening existing multi-stakeholder mechanisms like IGF


Topics

Legal and regulatory


Unexpected differences

Unilateral coercive measures impact on digital development

Speakers

– Venezuela
– Iraq

Arguments

Unilateral coercive measures continue to be one of the greatest obstacles to the equitable development of ICTs. These illegal measures restrict access to modern technologies, digital platforms, and essential ICT goods and services


The group also wishes to draw attention to the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures which hinder the ability of affected countries to access technologies, digital infrastructure, and related services


Explanation

This disagreement is unexpected because it introduces geopolitical tensions around sanctions and trade restrictions into what is primarily a technical and development-focused discussion. Most other speakers focused on technical and capacity challenges rather than political barriers


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Systematic gender bias in AI and deepfake technology

Speakers

– Chair

Arguments

96% of deepfake videos online target women in sexual acts, showing systematic bias


Explanation

This specific statistic about deepfake abuse was unexpected in a high-level diplomatic forum typically focused on broader policy issues. It represents a stark, concrete example of how AI can perpetuate gender-based violence, which most other speakers addressed in more general terms


Topics

Human rights | Sociocultural


Overall assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement center on internet governance models (multi-stakeholder vs. state-controlled), implementation of enhanced cooperation mandates, and the role of geopolitical factors like sanctions in digital development. Most speakers showed broad consensus on goals like closing digital divides, promoting AI ethics, and strengthening international cooperation.


Disagreement level

Moderate disagreement with significant implications. While there is strong consensus on development goals and the need for inclusive digital transformation, fundamental disagreements about governance models and the role of state sovereignty could impede effective implementation of WSIS outcomes. The divide between multi-stakeholder and state-centric approaches to internet governance represents a persistent challenge that could affect future digital cooperation frameworks.


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Similar viewpoints

Cybersecurity and building trust in digital systems are fundamental prerequisites for digital transformation and sustainable development, requiring coordinated national and international responses

Speakers

– Secretary-General
– Lesotho
– Lithuania
– Ghana

Arguments

Rising cyber attacks, including on critical infrastructure, coupled with the rapid spreading of miss and of disinformation online, is eroding confidence in the digital space


Building confidence and security in ICT use, reaffirming this as a crucial driver for innovation and sustainable development consistent with international human rights law


Cybersecurity has become extremely important in the age of artificial intelligence. Lithuania invests heavily in cybersecurity, operating a national cybersecurity center. We also lead initiatives to counter disinformation to safeguard democratic processes


Ghana has strengthened its cybersecurity and data protection frameworks and operationalized national and sectoral computer emergency response teams


Topics

Cybersecurity | Development | Human rights


Gender digital divide and online gender-based violence are significant barriers to equal participation in digital society that require targeted interventions and protection measures

Speakers

– Chair
– Saudi Arabia
– Finland

Arguments

Men are 21% more likely to have internet access than women globally


Saudi Arabia became first success story in women’s digital empowerment at 36%


Gender-based violence and harassment online are a growing and significant problem that prevent individuals from fully, equally and meaningfully participating in societal life


Topics

Human rights | Development | Sociocultural


Digital public infrastructure should be designed as public goods that promote inclusion and equality, transforming service delivery while respecting rights and serving development objectives

Speakers

– Secretary-General
– India
– South Africa

Arguments

When governments and partners build shared digital foundations, such as digital identity, and payments, and data systems in ways that respect rights and promote inclusion, they transform how societies deliver services, offer opportunities, and engage citizens


When digital systems are built as public goods, technology becomes an equalizer rather than a divider. This principle guided India’s launch of the Global Digital Public Infrastructure Repository during our G20 presidency


Digital public infrastructure should serve global South through people-centered approach


Topics

Development | Infrastructure | Human rights


Takeaways

Key takeaways

The digital divide remains a critical global challenge with only 35% internet access in developing countries compared to 67% globally, requiring urgent collective action


The gender digital divide persists with men 21% more likely to have internet access than women, but closing this gap could add over $100 trillion to the global economy by 2050


There is strong consensus on making the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) a permanent UN forum with sustainable funding to strengthen multi-stakeholder digital governance


Artificial Intelligence governance must be human-centric, rights-based, and ethical, with 96% of deepfake videos targeting women highlighting systematic bias concerns


Digital transformation must remain grounded in human rights protection, with the same rights applying online as offline


The multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance has proven effective and must continue, involving governments, private sector, civil society, academia, and technical communities


Digital public infrastructure, when built as public goods, can serve as an equalizer and accelerate sustainable development


International cooperation, technology transfer, and capacity building are essential for developing countries to participate meaningfully in the digital economy


WSIS Plus 20 and the Global Digital Compact are complementary frameworks that must be implemented coherently to avoid duplication


Cybersecurity threats and disinformation are growing concerns that require strengthened international cooperation and capacity building


Resolutions and action items

Establish the Internet Governance Forum as a permanent UN forum with enhanced modalities and sustainable funding


Strengthen coherence and alignment between WSIS action lines, the Global Digital Compact, and Sustainable Development Goals


Update and make WSIS action lines more agile, measurable, and responsive to country contexts


Enhance international cooperation including North-South, South-South, and triangular cooperation for digital development


Mobilize innovative financing mechanisms for digital infrastructure and connectivity in developing countries


Develop ethical AI governance frameworks that ensure human oversight, transparency, and accountability


Strengthen cybersecurity capacity building and international cooperation to combat cyber threats


Promote digital skills development and literacy programs, particularly for women, youth, and marginalized communities


Support technology transfer on mutually agreed terms to enable developing countries to move from consumption to innovation


Continue WSIS Forum and strengthen multi-stakeholder participation from developing countries


Unresolved issues

How to effectively bridge the persistent digital divide between and within countries, particularly in developing nations


Addressing the systematic bias in AI technologies, particularly the targeting of women in deepfake content


Balancing innovation with regulation and ethical safeguards as technology advances faster than governance frameworks


Resolving concerns about internet fragmentation and state-controlled alternatives to open internet governance


Addressing the impact of unilateral coercive measures that restrict access to technologies and digital infrastructure


Determining adequate and sustainable financing mechanisms for universal connectivity and digital infrastructure


Managing the environmental footprint of digital technologies including energy use and e-waste


Ensuring meaningful participation of developing countries in global digital governance processes


Addressing the concentration of AI benefits in a small number of countries and private companies


Combating the misuse of ICTs for disinformation, interference in state affairs, and attacks on critical infrastructure


Suggested compromises

Evolution rather than revolution approach to updating WSIS framework – gradual updates to existing action lines while maintaining core principles


Complementary implementation of WSIS Plus 20 and Global Digital Compact to avoid duplication while leveraging respective strengths


Balanced approach to AI governance that enables innovation while safeguarding development and human well-being


Multi-stakeholder model that respects different roles and responsibilities while ensuring inclusive participation


Flexible WSIS framework that can adapt to new challenges while maintaining stability and continuity


Strengthened intergovernmental spaces alongside multi-stakeholder forums to address sovereignty concerns


Technology-neutral policies that remain adaptable to emerging technologies while upholding human rights principles


Coordinated UN system approach that builds on existing expertise rather than creating new institutions


Public-private partnerships for digital infrastructure development that respect national policy space and development priorities


Inclusive governance frameworks that keep pace with technological advancement while minimizing risks


Thought provoking comments

As many as 96%, so almost all, deepfake videos online are of women engaging in sexual acts. 96%, so this is no coincidence. It is systematic. Without inclusive governance frameworks that keep the pace of technological advancements, such harms will only intensify.

Speaker

Chair (President of the General Assembly)


Reason

This statistic powerfully illustrates how emerging technologies can systematically amplify existing inequalities and gender-based violence. It moves beyond abstract discussions of AI governance to concrete, shocking evidence of how technology is being weaponized against women.


Impact

This comment established a critical tone for the entire discussion, framing AI governance not as a future concern but as an urgent present crisis. It influenced subsequent speakers to address gender equality and human rights protection as central themes rather than peripheral issues.


How can we talk about inclusive, people-oriented information society for all knowing the situation in Gaza? An information society that ignores this reality is neither inclusive nor people-centered.

Speaker

Turkey (Deputy Minister Omer Fatih Sayan)


Reason

This comment challenged the entire premise of the discussion by questioning how global digital inclusion can be discussed while ignoring ongoing conflicts and humanitarian crises. It forced participants to confront the disconnect between aspirational digital goals and geopolitical realities.


Impact

This intervention shifted the conversation from technical implementation to fundamental questions of justice and equity. It highlighted the tension between universal digital rights rhetoric and selective application based on geopolitical considerations.


We must work together with concerted action to bridge the AI divide. Lack of access to AI means lack of access to job opportunities, to digital education, and to a prosperous future and economy… Today, our world requires an additional 63 gigawatts [of computing power].

Speaker

Saudi Arabia (Minister Abdullah Amer Alswaha)


Reason

This comment reframed the digital divide discussion by introducing the concept of an ‘AI divide’ with specific technical requirements (computing power measured in gigawatts). It moved beyond connectivity to computational capacity as the new frontier of digital inequality.


Impact

This introduced a new dimension to the digital divide conversation, influencing subsequent speakers to consider not just internet access but computational resources and AI capabilities as essential infrastructure needs.


The current model for Internet governance remains unjust and geopolitically vulnerable… We believe that management of the Internet and its key infrastructure needs to happen on other bases, based on international legislation and cooperation of all stakeholders… under the auspices of a universally recognized international organization, such as the UN.

Speaker

Russian Federation (Deputy Minister Grigory Borischenko)


Reason

This comment directly challenged the existing multi-stakeholder internet governance model, proposing a more state-centric approach under UN control. It represented a fundamental ideological divide about how the internet should be governed globally.


Impact

This comment created a clear counterpoint to the prevailing multi-stakeholder consensus, forcing other speakers to more explicitly defend and articulate why the current governance model should be preserved and strengthened rather than replaced.


When digital systems are built as public goods, technology becomes an equalizer rather than a divider. This principle guided India’s launch of the Global Digital Public Infrastructure Repository during our G20 presidency.

Speaker

India (Minister Jitin Prasada)


Reason

This comment introduced a concrete alternative model for digital development – treating digital infrastructure as public goods rather than private commodities. It offered a practical framework for addressing digital inequality through public policy rather than market mechanisms alone.


Impact

This concept of ‘digital public goods’ became a recurring theme in subsequent statements, influencing how speakers framed solutions to digital divides and providing a policy framework that other developing countries could reference and adopt.


We are facing increased challenges. Rising cyber attacks, including on critical infrastructure, coupled with the rapid spreading of miss and of disinformation online, is eroding confidence in the digital space.

Speaker

Secretary-General representative (Guy Ryder)


Reason

This comment identified a fundamental paradox: as digital connectivity expands, trust in digital spaces is simultaneously eroding. It highlighted how technical progress and social progress are not automatically aligned.


Impact

This framing influenced the entire discussion by establishing that digital inclusion must be coupled with digital security and trust-building measures. It shifted focus from purely expanding access to ensuring the quality and safety of that access.


Overall assessment

These key comments fundamentally shaped the discussion by introducing critical tensions and complexities that moved the conversation beyond celebratory progress reports. The Chair’s stark statistics on deepfake abuse established an urgent tone around gender-based digital violence. Turkey’s Gaza reference forced confrontation with geopolitical selectivity in digital rights advocacy. Saudi Arabia’s ‘AI divide’ concept expanded the scope of digital inequality discussions. Russia’s governance challenge created ideological tension requiring defense of existing models. India’s ‘digital public goods’ framework offered concrete policy alternatives. The Secretary-General’s trust erosion warning highlighted the paradox of expanding but increasingly unsafe digital spaces. Together, these comments transformed what could have been a routine review meeting into a substantive debate about fundamental questions of digital justice, governance models, and the relationship between technological progress and human welfare. They forced participants to grapple with uncomfortable realities and competing visions rather than simply reaffirming consensus positions.


Follow-up questions

How can we ensure that the commitments contained in the final document are rapidly and resolutely put into action?

Speaker

Switzerland (Bernard Maissen)


Explanation

This addresses the critical gap between policy commitments and actual implementation, which is essential for achieving real progress in digital transformation.


How can the IGF communicate its value and contribution more clearly to increase its impact?

Speaker

Germany (Karsten Wildberger)


Explanation

This is important for strengthening the IGF’s role and ensuring it receives adequate support and participation from stakeholders.


How can we develop frameworks to deal with myths and disinformation while respecting the rights of free speech online?

Speaker

Ghana (Samuel Nartey George)


Explanation

This addresses the complex challenge of combating misinformation while preserving fundamental human rights and democratic values.


How can we bridge the AI divide to ensure equal access to AI opportunities, digital education, and economic prosperity?

Speaker

Saudi Arabia (Abdullah Amer Alswaha)


Explanation

This is critical for preventing AI from creating new forms of inequality and ensuring developing countries can participate in the AI economy.


How can we strengthen intergovernmental spaces to allow governments to carry out their roles and responsibilities in international governance of the digital world?

Speaker

Venezuela (on behalf of Group of Friends in defense of UN Charter)


Explanation

This addresses concerns about the current governance model and the need for more inclusive decision-making processes in digital governance.


How can we ensure that AI systems uphold linguistic diversity, cultural pluralism, fairness, and respect for national legislation?

Speaker

Venezuela (on behalf of Group of Friends in defense of UN Charter)


Explanation

This is important for ensuring AI development doesn’t lead to cultural homogenization and respects diverse national contexts.


How can we mobilize innovative financing mechanisms and incentives for connectivity to accelerate connection of those who remain offline?

Speaker

Secretary-General (Guy Ryder)


Explanation

This addresses one of the fundamental barriers to achieving universal connectivity and digital inclusion.


How can we develop global standards for sustainable digital products and greener infrastructure that lowers emissions and protects ecosystems?

Speaker

Secretary-General (Guy Ryder)


Explanation

This is crucial for addressing the environmental impact of digital transformation and ensuring sustainability.


How can we ensure coherent and coordinated implementation of WSIS Plus 20 and the Global Digital Compact to deliver meaningful impact?

Speaker

Secretary-General (Guy Ryder)


Explanation

This addresses the need to avoid duplication and ensure synergies between different UN digital processes.


How can we ensure that digital transformation becomes a driver of opportunity rather than a source of inequalities?

Speaker

Albania (Delina Ibrahimaj)


Explanation

This is fundamental to achieving the WSIS vision of an inclusive, people-centered information society.


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.