2nd meeting of the organisational session of the Global Mechanism on ICT security

Thank you very much. Se declara abierta. I call to order the second meeting of the Global Mechanism on Development in the Fields of ICT in the context of international security and advancing responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. The meeting is called to order. Let us continue with the general exchange of views under agenda item four. We will get back to our list of speakers. And as you’ll recall from this morning, we will give the floor. We have the first five this morning and we have a long list of requests for this afternoon. We’re delighted that we have all of this interest. In taking the floor under this agenda item. However, it is worth recalling that we only have two days.

for the organisational session. And we still have to deal with all of the other agenda items we haven’t dealt with yet, which is why we would be extremely grateful for your collaboration. So please make sure that your statements are brief and remember that you have other tools available so that you can submit the full versions of your statements and this way we can be more efficient with the time we have available. Please remind this request from the chair and I’ll just now repeat the first five speakers who will be given the floor. We’re going to begin with Chile, Nauru, Japan, Portugal and the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Chile, you have the floor.

Thank you very much Madam Chair First of all Chile wishes to congratulate you upon your election to head up this important process We fully trust in your capacity to lead our work in an exclusive transparent results focused manner We recognise the work and leadership of El Salvador during the negotiations of the open ended working group You can certainly count on our full support and commitment Madam Chair, the setting forth of this permanent mechanism is a fundamental milestone in the consolidation of a lasting institutional framework that will enable us progressively to address the challenges of security in cyberspace Chile particularly appreciates the fact that this mechanism plans to give continuity and to continue with the progress made within the open ended working group including the recognition of the framework for responsible state behaviour the strengthening of international cooperation and capacity building and the implementation of the the application of international law, the implementation of voluntary norms and confidence -building measures.

Madam Chair, for Chile, this new step must clearly be focused on the effective implementation of the already agreed commitments. In this context, we wish to emphasise how important it is to strengthen national capacities, which is an essential condition in order to ensure meaningful and equitable participation on the part of all states. Chile supports the work of the thematic group in this regard and considers that it’s fundamental for this to serve as a platform for an exchange of information on different programmes, initiatives, to share experiences, lessons learnt and good practices, and to identify areas of specific need to provide information on opportunity to build on existing capacities, and to foster inter -regional dialogue. considering the experiences of other regions among other things.

Further, Chile believes that analysing emerging challenges must occupy a central place in this endeavour. Rapid technological evolution including the development and growing use of artificial intelligence, the optimisation of cyber operations and the persisting interconnection between critical infrastructure is changing the nature, the scope and the sophistication of threats to cyberspace. We observe with concern the malicious use of this technology in order to carry out increasingly complex campaigns including attacks against the supply chain, exploiting large -scale vulnerabilities and other threats harnessing emerging technology. It is essential to strengthen our collective understanding of these threats alongside an updated analysis of them. What’s more, it’s crucial to promote the timely exchange of information and to move towards coordinated responses that uphold international stability and security and to have the joint capacity to respond to incidents.

Madam Chair, Chilli wishes to underscore that the added value of this mechanism lies precisely in its implementation focused approach. It’s plenary meetings and the dedicated thematic meetings that need to transform all of the discussions into tangible actions. In this regard, we believe that consensus is a fundamental pillar for this mechanism to be a success. The experience of the open -ended working group showed that agreements reached by consensus do not only strengthen the legitimacy of the results, but they also facilitate their effective implementation. In this context, we underscore the importance of ensuring inclusive and meaningful participation from all interested stakeholders. From civil society, academia, will enrich our debates and help us to overcome challenges in the digital environment.

By way of conclusion, Madam Chair, we reiterate the fact that my country stands fully ready and committed to work with all other delegations in order to ensure that the global mechanism is successful. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much to the distinguished representative of Chile, says the Chair, and I now give the floor to Nauru.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Congratulations on your election as Chair. Nauru aligns itself with the statement delivered by the Solomon Islands on behalf of the Pacific Islands Forum. We are in the process of developing national policies on cybersecurity and ICT governance. Our focus is on implementation, translating the commitments made under the OEWG into tangible outcomes for our people. For a small island developing state like Nauru, the promise of the global mechanism will be measured not by the breadth of its agenda, but by the equity of its process and the accessibility of its support. We face the same cyber threats as larger nations, but with a fraction of the resource to respond. We therefore call on the global mechanism to prioritize meaningful capacity building, not as an afterthought, but as a central pillar of its body work.

This includes ensuring that small delegations can participate effectively, that technical assistance reaches those who need it most, and that the voices of the most vulnerable are not lost in the procedural complexity. Nauru looks forward to engaging constructively in this process and to working with all member states towards a secure and inclusive digital future. Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the Delegation of Japan.

Thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair. At the outset, on behalf of the government, of Japan, I would like to express our strong support and heartfelt congratulations to you on your election as a new chair of the global mechanism. Japan attaches great importance to focusing on practical issues and aiming for concrete outcomes within the global mechanism. Building on the discussions and achievements of the GGE and OEWG, we intend to constructively engage in the future discussions under the leadership of Chair Lopez. Madam Chair, based on Japan’s basic position that existing international law, including UN Charter in its entirety, is applicable to cyberspace, I would like to highlight a couple of points that Japan considers important for the future discussions.

First, Japan hopes that upcoming discussions will deepen. The international consensus on how international law applies to cyber activities From this perspective, we place importance on DTG -1. Specifically, within DTG -1, we prioritize ransomware and attacks on critical infrastructure, and we think it is important to discuss, including sharing of best practices, how the so -called 11 norms, voluntary checklists, and existing international law can be specifically applied to concrete scenarios. We believe that the consistent implementation of international law and norms by all states will contribute to strengthening our collective cybersecurity and resilience, and we wish to deepen our understanding through discussions going forward. Second, from the perspective of strengthening the cybersecurity and resilience of the international community, as a whole, capacity building is essential.

Japan places a high priority on capacity building and will actively engage in DTG2. In this context, in implementing capacity building assistance, Japan prioritizes two points. Number one, it is essential to provide efficient and effective support while taking into account the needs of each country and avoiding duplication and seeking the most added value possible. Number two, given limited resources, to utilize the participation and proposals of stakeholders as well as regional cooperation would be worthwhile. Finally, in order to seek our objectives, we consider it is appropriate for the global mechanism to ensure that we are able to provide the necessary support for each country. The stakeholder participation as in the OEWG, which was endorsed under consensus. so let me conclude by saying that in the view of aiming to maintain and develop free, fair and secure cyberspace Japan is committed to participating actively in the global mechanism and the DTGs going forward thank you Madam Chair

I thank the distinguished representative for his statement I now give the floor to Portugal

Chair, Portugal congratulates you on your election to lead us for the next two years and wishes to assure you of our sincere cooperation the mandate of this permanent mechanism to promote responsible state behavior in cyberspace in the context of international security provides for regular institutional dialogue focused on the security of the environment and the implementation of the consensually agreed normative framework repeatedly endorsed by the General Assembly since 2015 The dialogue is meant to contribute decisively to upgrade national cyber capabilities across divides and to enable us to move on to a formal system of mutual accountability that levels up all member states’ contributions to peace and security in the digital space, so that all of them can peacefully and securely benefit from the digital transition.

The cross -cutting working group designed to address specific security challenges to an open, stable, accessible, peaceful and interoperable cyberspace, and the cross -cutting working group designed to accelerate cybersecurity capacity building in tandem with a global round table, have the potential to lead us towards action -oriented results and towards further layers of understanding of the applicability in cyberspace of the normative framework, including the UN Charter. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. such as the checklist of national implementation of voluntary norms or the national and regional positions already adopted on the applicability of existing international security, humanitarian and human rights law in cyberspace.

It goes without saying that the Member States should have been able to agree on more equitable and transparent modalities for the selection of contributing non -governmental interested parties, especially from the industry, given the private nature of the gatekeeping tech companies and of the vast majority of the critical infrastructures of our countries. But at the review conferences of the mechanism, Member States will of course remain free to, according to their evaluation of the results achieved, not only consensually revisit the initial cross -cutting working group structure, but also consensually improve the modalities of stakeholder participation. What we will achieve in these two years will be crucial to the contribution of the permanent mechanism of institutional dialogue to what we see as a desirable long -term voluntary universal system of periodic compliance reporting, which would involve all of us in monitoring and assisting one another to achieve a higher degree of accountability in ensuring peace and security all along the digital development of our nations.

Thank you, Chair.

I thank the representative of Portugal and give the floor to the delegation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Thank you, Madam Chair. At the outset, the Kingdom of the Netherlands would like to warmly congratulate you with your appointment as the Chair of this global mechanism. We are confident that under your leadership we can have a smooth transition and achieve significant progress in a neutral, transparent and inclusive manner. We would like to join others in expressing our gratitude to Ambassador Bollinger. Ambassador Bollinger, of Singapore, who has skillfully steered the cyber processes over the last years. Please be assured of our full support. Chair, the Kingdom of the Netherlands aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union. Please allow me to make some additional remarks in our national capacity. There has rarely been a more timely moment to discuss responsible state behavior in the cyber domain.

As the geopolitical landscape is ever -evolving, the need for structured and continuous dialogue on the implementation of cumulative and evolving framework for responsible state behavior, the norms, the application of international law, confidence -building measures, and capacity -building remain pressing still. It is clear that we have a great deal of work ahead of us. Adding to the points raised by the European Union, the Kingdom of the Netherlands wishes to highlight three central elements to the work of the UN Global Mechanism’s work. First, the Kingdom of the Netherlands stands for a practice -oriented, inclusive, and agile organization of the mechanism. To achieve concrete and effective results, it is essential to adhere to a structure that allows for all its elements to effectively play their part.

To the Kingdom of the Netherlands, this means that we make use of the both the structured and strategic role of the substantive plenary session, as well as of the informal and technical role of the DTGs. The substantive plenary session provides states with an opportunity to continue our work on the well -known five pillars of the framework for responsible state behavior and provide collective steering to the direction of the UN Global Mechanism. In the meantime, the DTGs are well positioned to become a platform for the in -depth, for informal discussion of the application of the normative framework to concrete cyber scenarios. In order for the DTGs to effectively align with the reality of cybersecurity, the full and meaningful participation of the multi -stakeholder community in accordance with the modalities as negotiated and agreed to by the last OEWG is and remains essential to the process.

Second, we prioritize concrete scenario -based exchanges on the application of international law and the 11 non -binding voluntary norms. Building on the framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace, S. achieved by consensus by the UN General Assembly, we collectively agreed that international law is in its entirety applicable to cyber domain. Now, the global mechanism should further discuss how international law, including international humanitarian law, international human rights law, and the law of state responsibility applies to cyberspace. We will continue to advocate for effective and open exchanges among member states with a view to fostering a common understanding and encourage all states to share or publish national positions on the application of international law in the cyber domain.

The Netherlands has done so already, and we stand ready to share our own experience and to cooperate with other states to help them move forward the process of drafting such national positions. At the same time, we attach great importance to deepening the collective understanding of the practical implementation of the 11 norms. While these norms are not legally binding, they establish a bond of mutuality. We have a mutual expectation regarding responsible conduct among states. We therefore view them as complementary. to international law and believe that their implementation should be central to the work of the UN global mechanism. Third, the Kingdom of the Netherlands advocates for a well -coordinated, demand -driven and responsive approach to capacity building.

Developments in the cyber domain are moving at a breakneck speed. With the advent of AI and the emergence of increasingly complex cyber threats, the need for capacity building is ever more evident. The global mechanism would benefit from strengthened coordination between existing initiatives, including those outside the remit of the UN global mechanism, such as the programs as administered by ITU and UNIDARE. New initiatives should be closely aligned with actual needs of recipient countries to enhance the efficiency and impact of programming. Thank you.

Thank you very much for that statement. I’ll now read out the next five speakers we have on our list. But before I do that, I’d also be grateful if we could use the e -statements platform. Like I said this morning, if you could send your full versions of your statements there, please. Having said that, the next five delegations on my list to take the floor are Pakistan, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States and Iraq. I give the floor to the delegation of Pakistan.

Madam Chair, on behalf of Pakistan delegation, I would like to congratulate you on assuming the chair of the global mechanism on ICT security. We hope that your leadership, Member States, will make further progress on this important file. With the establishment of the global mechanism, Member States have taken an important step to enable a cooperative ICT environment fully anchored in objectives and principles of the UN Charter. within fast -paced developments in the global digital space. And that is our precise challenge. While developments in emerging technologies often outstrip international response, the space for international harm and unintended consequences further increase. We hope that our deliberations in the global mechanism and collective understanding will contribute to ICT security strengthening, peace and security, as well as sustainable development.

Madam Chair, I would like to make following points. First, it is important to reaffirm the basis of global mechanism and the delicate balance achieved during the OEWG in previous years, but also in preceding initiatives. We must keep this balance while striving for a better future. We must keep this balance while striving for further progress. The inclusive and universal nature of this forum under the UN auspices provides sufficient legitimacy, experience, and collective institutional knowledge to achieve common objectives. Second, as we see it, geopolitical environment in the past few years has discernibly worsened, impacting the ICT landscape and its implications for the global peace and security. Despite a shared comprehension of this threat, global cyberspace continues to evolve as an emerging, rather an established arena of conflict.

These valid and consequential concerns must be responded to for global mechanism to prove as an effective and relevant platform. Third, In contemporary times, disinformation has emerged as a strategic tool capable of shaping perceptions, legitimizing actions, and influencing the trajectory of conflicts. Increasingly embedded within cyber and hybrid approaches, disinformation is implied to destabilize societies, erode trust in institutions and weaken parties to a conflict without direct kinetic engagement. At the same time, cyber capabilities have enabled the integration of disinformation into broader cyber warfare strategies, including coordinated influence operations, manipulation of information systems, and cross -border digital interference. Concrete. And coordinated action by member states in the global mechanism would be critical in strengthening information integrity and build societal resilience.

Force. The global mechanism should continue striving progress on emerging technologies. while further clarifying and solidifying legal development in this crucial area. We need to maintain a balance between application of international law and norms, particularly on the possible new norms, legally binding instrument, or a combination of these approaches. Pakistan will continue its constructive contribution to these deliberations, and we assure you of our support to realize common objectives. I thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the delegation of Switzerland.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Madam Chair, first of all, I would like to warmly congratulate you on your election as Chair of the Global Mechanism. The establishment of the global mechanism is an important step towards achieving our shared goal of promoting an open, secure, stable, accessible, peaceful, and interoperable ICT environment. And it also sends an important signal regarding international cooperation and the importance of multilateralism. No state can address the issues arising from irresponsible and malicious ICT use alone. We welcome your transparent, inclusive, and result -oriented approach to steering the process. Switzerland will participate actively and constructively in the process and support you, Madam Chair, in your efforts. Our work is based on a solid foundation, the reports of the GGEs and the two open -ended working groups.

Over the past 20 years, these groups have developed a framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace, which has been adopted by all states. The task now is to implement what has been achieved so far and build on it. The global mechanism provides us with the necessary tools. During the plenary session, we will have the opportunity to discuss the five pillars in more detail. However, we believe that the added value of this mechanism lies in the dedicated thematic groups. They allow us to hold more focused and structured discussions with the participation of experts and other interested parties and to make substantial progress on capacity building. In this context, we would like to thank France for its non -paper on the functioning of the DGTs.

Switzerland supports what many other delegations have already said. We need action -oriented discussions with concrete outcomes to implement the framework for responsible state behavior and that are relevant to the reality on the ground in membership. Particularly regarding capacity building. Madam Chair, for Switzerland, international law will remain a priority within the framework of the mechanism. In our view, the focus should be on the concrete application of existing international law, including international humanitarian law and human rights law. It is very encouraging that so many states have emphasized the importance of international law today and called for in -depth discussions on its application. It is also important that the outcomes of these discussions are reported and recorded in reports.

Many states have published their national positions on the application of international law in cyberspace. Many have also done so within the framework of regional organizations. These positions provide a valuable basis for our discussions, and we encourage those that have not yet published their positions to do so. We are ready to share our experience in establishing such a position. As other delegations have mentioned, we believe that close cooperation with regional organizations is in our interest and for our mutual benefit. These organizations already have considerable experience in areas such as capacity building, confidence building measures, implementing norms, and the application of international law in practice. A group of states has submitted a working paper to the Open -Ended Working Group last year regarding the role of regional organizations in implementing the UN Framework for Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace.

We invite all states, including you, Madam Chair, to consider the proposal set out in the paper. Thank you.

Muchísimas gracias. Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the delegation of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Madam Chair, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates thank you for the opportunity to present the United Kingdom’s views so firstly I congratulate you Ambassador Lopez on your election as Chair I assure you of the full support of our delegation moving forward we recognise the achievements of the open-ended working group and thank Ambassador Gafford for his leadership in reaching consensus outputs testament to the shared commitment of member states to responsible behaviour in cyberspace the UK aims to be a world-leading responsible and democratic cyber power it is vital that cyber actors of all kinds use cyber capabilities in a way that is legal responsible and proportionate to ensure cyberspace remains a safe and prosperous place for everyone the global mechanism is an opportunity to strengthen collective cyber security by advancing the development of a new cyber security system and by advancing implementation of the UN Framework on Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace The UK agrees with the consensus that international law applies in cyberspace.

We believe the global mechanism can strengthen and sustain robust engagement on international law by engaging with and applying existing international law to practical scenarios. We agree that cyber capacity building is essential to global peace and security. The UN should use its unparalleled convening power of all stakeholders, pulling in global expertise and acting as a catalyst for global capacity building. The global mechanism offers an opportunity to improve visibility of existing initiatives and streamline access whilst ensuring that discussions avoid duplication and optimize delivery in a context of UN80 and shrinking global resources. The dedication of the UN to the world of cyber security is essential. The United Thematic Groups offer an inclusive and action -orientated process through which we can examine concrete and practical cyber issues in greater depth and deliver action -orientated outcomes.

To achieve this, the topics selected must be focused, responsive to the priorities of Member States, and linked across DTGs to strengthen coherence and allow deeper exploration of issues. The UK reiterates its strong support for meaningful multi -stakeholder participation. Industry, civil society and academia bring indispensable expertise that contributes directly to more effective security outcomes. This is essential for achieving meaningful, practical and action -orientated discussions on cyber security, particularly given that industry and civil society often have to deal with the same issues. We often manage critical infrastructure or bring specialised expertise. we fully expect them to participate meaningfully in the DTGs consistent with the stakeholders modalities agreed by consensus in July in report A8257 Madam Chair, the global mechanism offers a chance to make real and measurable progress in promoting responsible behaviour in cyberspace the United Kingdom stands ready to contribute constructively to this work and we look forward to collaborating with all delegations to deliver a practical inclusive and effective mechanism.

Thank you

Thank you very much for your statement I now give the floor to the delegation of the United States Chair, first

let me start by congratulating Salvador and by thanking you for your willingness to take on this challenging and important task of serving as the first steward of the global mechanism the United States reads It reiterates its support for you and looks forward to engaging with you in this new permanent process. We appreciate your efforts as well as those from all member states to use our time efficiently during these two days and to remain focused on the key topic at hand, agreeing on the modalities to begin our substantive work in July. The beginning of the global mechanism marks a milestone in the 20 -plus years of discussions on cyberspace security that we have had in the UN First Committee.

The global mechanism offers an opportunity to engage in integrated and cross -cutting discussions on cybersecurity. This is the mandate that we all agree to in the OEWG. Chair, we are particularly pleased to hear support for the stakeholder modalities agreed by consensus in Annex I of the OEWG’s final report. The United States would like to underscore the critical role of interested stakeholders in the work of the global mechanism and in the DTGs in particular. While the United States would have liked more inclusive stakeholder modalities, in the spirit of consensus, we agree to those outlined in July. We maintain that support and caution all states against reopening this issue. Chair, the structure of the global mechanism and its modalities, as set out in the OEWG’s Consensus Annual Progress Report in 2024 and the final report in 2025, will enable us to discuss the most pressing cyber challenges.

At the same time, we have heard views in direct contradiction to this agreed mandate. This group is focused on implementation of existing agreements and on addressing concrete challenges. States should not seek to co -opt this group for their own political agenda. cause our discussions on this important topic to stagnate at a time when concrete progress is needed. Chair, the United States will not support any expansion of the mandate, specifically in any way that implies that there are gaps in existing international law or that would create new binding obligations. Further, as we made clear in July, the United States reiterates that it will not support references in this context to the term gender. We also view the SDG agenda to be inconsistent with U .S.

sovereignty and adverse to the rights and interests of Americans. We are disappointed that these terms remained in the final OEWG report and encourage everyone to remain focused on the issue of stability and cyberspace without drawing in unnecessary components which are not directly relevant to our mandate. Chair, we look forward to the remaining discussions in the organizational session and to getting started on the agenda.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the delegation of Iraq.

Thank you, Madam Chair. At the outset, we would like to congratulate you on your appointment as Chair of the Global Mechanism on Development in the Field of Information and Communications Technologies in the context of international security and advancing responsible state behavior in the use of these technologies for the period 2026 -2027. We wish you every success during this period ahead. Iraq aligns itself with the statement delivered by Algeria on behalf of the Arab Group. Madam Chair, Iraq expresses its appreciation for convening this organizational session, which is an important step after the conclusion of the OEWG’s mandate. We underscore here the importance of ensuring a smooth transition to the new mechanism while maintaining the… consensus outcomes achieved thus far.

Madam Chair, Iraq stresses the importance of organizing the substantive session as per the agreed pillars of the framework of responsible state behavior, ensuring balance among the various elements, including the rules, norms, and principles, international law, confidence building measures, and capacity building, while avoiding any reinterpretation or renegotiation of previously agreed elements. In this context, Iraq emphasizes the work of this mechanism must focus on achieving practical results, in particular as regards the implementation of the rules of responsible state behavior and the confidence building measures, thereby helping to reduce risks and enhancing stability in cyberspace. We further emphasize the importance of capacity building in developing countries through training programs. Exchange of expertise. and developing digital infrastructure. Such efforts will allow countries to confront the growing challenges in these domains and to narrow the digital divide between states.

Madam Chair, Iraq reaffirms international cooperation as a fundamental pillar in promoting security and stability in cyberspace, especially considering the transboundary nature of ICT threats. In this context, we stress the need to enhance existing cooperation frameworks and to promote the exchange of information, expertise, and best practices in order to build trust and improve our collective ability to address cyber challenges. With regards to the organization of work, we support the establishment of dedicated thematic groups, provided they enjoy clear, well -defined mandates and are able to address the challenges of cyber threats. We also support the establishment of a global framework and that they complement the plenary sessions in a manner that avoids duplication and guarantees efficiency. Madam Chair, Iraq also reiterates the importance of applying international law to the use of ICTs.

in a manner consistent with the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the principles of respect for sovereignty and the non -interference in the internal affairs of states. We further emphasize that cyberspace must remain an area devoted to the peaceful uses and that serves stability and security. We also underline the importance of confidence -building measures as a means to reduce risk of escalation and to promote trust among states. And we further stress the continued need for dialogue, cooperation, and exchange of information and best practices. In conclusion, Iraq reaffirms its commitment to constructive and active participation in the mechanism and to cooperate in good faith with all member states in order for us to achieve a peaceful, stable, and safe cyberspace that serves the shared interests of the international community.

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of Iraq and I will now read the next five speakers out we have Estonia, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Italy, Turkey and Israel Estonia has the floor, thank you

Thank you Chair for giving me the floor let me begin by warmly congratulating you Ambassador Lopez on your election and we assure you of our full support Estonia aligns itself with the statement by the European Union and that’s the following in its national capacity over the past decade UN member states have made important progress in developing a shared framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace reaching consensus on the final report of the open ended webinar and we are happy to welcome you to the working group and agree to establish a new national policy the global mechanism is a real milestone and reaffirms the continued importance of multilateral cooperation. With the launch of the global mechanism, we are now entering a new phase, a new chapter where what comes next depends on all of us.

The responsibility should now shift from frameworks to implementation, and our success will be measured not by what we agreed on paper, but by what we deliver in practice. The priority should be to translate existing commitments and understandings into concrete action, while continuing to deepen our shared understanding of how to address both current and emerging cyber threats. Dedicated thematic groups can play a key role in this regard. They provide a practical pathway forward, helping to turn activities principles into concrete steps. To ensure effectiveness and tangible outcomes, the work should remain focused. Concentrating on a limited number of priority topics, such as ransomware or the protection of critical infrastructure, would allow for more targeted discussions and measurable progress.

Also, we consider the French paper a valuable contribution in this regard. We also underline the importance of continuing discussions on how international law applies in cyberspace within the new mechanism. Building on the substantial body of work from previous processes, the global mechanism provides an opportunity to further develop shared understandings of the application of existing international law in cyberspace. At the same time, capacity building will remain central. It should be understood as an enabling function, not an objective in itself. One that keeps… States to implement commitments, strengthen resilience, and engage effectively in the international cybersecurity framework. Capacity -building efforts should be driven by states’ needs and priorities and focus on practical support, including training, the exchange of best practices, and the development of national frameworks.

In practice, resilience is not built in isolation. It is built through cooperation and trusted relationships. Fostering sustained connections and trusted networks among practitioners is therefore essential, as cooperation and information sharing are critical to effectively addressing cyber threats. Initiatives such as the Tallinn Cyber Diplomacy Summer School illustrate how capacity -building can simultaneously enhance expertise and build these networks. Chair, more importantly, we can use the global mechanism to build lasting partnerships, strengthen resilience, and improve implementation over time, something we very much need in today’s uncertain environment. Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you very much for your statement. I now give the floor to the delegation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Thank you, Madam Chair. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia aligns itself with the statement delivered by Algeria on behalf of the Arab group. And we would like to deliver the following remarks in our national capacity. At the outset, we congratulate you, Madam Chair, and we congratulate El Salvador on your appointment as Chair of the Global Mechanism Association. And we emphasize that we trust that your leadership will steer our mechanism towards success thanks to your expertise. In light of developments in cyberspace and increasing challenges that affect security, economy, and development, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia believes that the global mechanism is a very important platform as a unified UN process to address cybersecurity. The Kingdom emphasizes that it will contribute actively to the mechanism and its dedicated thematic groups.

It is important for the mechanism to base itself on a practical approach that allows it to address the fast -developing challenges and the changes in the field and allow it to achieve tangible results. We emphasize… that the mechanism must be based on transparency, confidence building, and consensus and respect for sovereignty in all of its work. With regards to the dedicated thematic groups, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would like to recall the importance of defining clear mandates and criteria for selecting the topics. This will allow for achieving tangible practical results. Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to Italy.

Thank you, Madam Chair, for giving me the floor. First of all, I’d like to express Italy’s sincerest congratulations on your appointment and your election. I wish you the very best of success. In your delicate and prestigious position. as first chair of this global mechanism. Thank you also for your introductory remarks, which we very much appreciate. Italy fully aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union and wishes to add a few considerations from its national perspective. Madam Chair, dear colleagues, the UAWG proved to be a very important body to collectively work and agree on many items and advance the framework of responsible state behavior in cyberspace. The five pillars helped us to deepen our common knowledge of several cyber threats, work together on voluntary norms and on the applicability of international law to cyberspace, design CBMs and strengthen CCB activities.

Now we have the extraordinary opportunity to make a step forward with a global mechanism for a better understanding of the role of the global system and the ICT topics the international community is confronted with. Italy calls for the global mechanism to be concrete, flexible, inclusive, transparent, and really action -oriented. Time has come to delve into the details of the many challenges our countries face when it comes to the ICT environment and to work together on possible solutions. As set out in the 2025 OEWG final report, we believe that it would be extremely important to avoid duplicative discussions among the different types of meetings we are going to have. In our view, plenary sessions should allow for a general round of interventions on general items, whereas DTGs should offer the opportunity for concrete and practical exchanges based on experts’ contributions and guiding questions drafted by co -facilitators.

Italy also considers cybersecurity. Cybercapacity building. to be a central and cross -cutting component of this global mechanism. In this context, it is essential for the discussions on CCB to be structured in a coherent manner, avoiding fragmented approaches and drawing on lessons learned through both multilateral and bilateral engagements. Madam Chair, dear colleagues, concrete and action -oriented processes can greatly benefit from the informed and technical contribution of multiple stakeholders from the private sector, academia, and civil society. Italy deems essential to open the accreditation window as soon as possible in order for a high number of interested parties to submit their requests, bearing in mind that stakeholders’ inputs and contributions are really an added value for the work of the global mechanism.

Without prejudice to the primary role played by government, in this mechanism, public -private partnership is key to effectively addressing many topics dealt with by the global mechanism, including cybercapacity building. Italy highly values also the participation of regional organizations whose concrete work in many areas, including cybersecurity and ICTs, can really help implement the UN Framework for Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace, offering models of cooperation, simulation exercises, and ideas on matters of common interest. Colleagues, there is a lot we can do together, and this mechanism can be a real game -changer. For your information, and as a concrete example, in 2026, Italy is going to review its national cybersecurity strategy, and we also aim to update our 2021 national position paper on the applicability of international law.

This means that we attach a great deal of importance to the role of cybersecurity in cyberspace. to the work and to the discussions of this global mechanism as a possible way to feed and enrich our own national processes. Madam Chair, the path in front of all of us is not a simple one, but something crucial is at stake. An open, secure, stable, accessible, peaceful, and interoperable ICT environment which our own peoples need for solid and sustainable growth. As someone says, Rome, my capital city, was not built in a day, and I can confirm that. This mechanism, too, cannot be built in one day. So we are confident that you will be able to guide us step by step, or better, brick after brick, through the different building stages of this mechanism, ensuring a smooth and seamless transition from the OEWG aiming to higher goals to the benefit of international cooperation in cyberspace.

Madam Chair, rest assured that you can always count on Italy’s constructive position, availability, and cooperation. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much for your statement. Now I give the floor to Turkey.

Thank you, Madam Chair. We extend our congratulations to your election as Chair of the UN Global Mechanism. We would like to express our confidence that under your esteemed chair’s personship, this process will foster seamless cooperation to advance the work on further developing the rules, norms and the principles of responsible state behavior. We believe your leadership will be instrumental in enhancing the implementation of these frameworks, thereby paving the way to ensure a secure and stable digital environment for the entire international community. The year 2026 marks an important step in strengthening Turkey’s national cybersecurity governance architecture. The Presidency of Cybersecurity of Turkey has been established as the central authority responsible for enhancing the security of Turkey. We are also responsible for enhancing national resilience in cyberspace, strengthening coordination among relevant stakeholders and supporting the protection of critical infrastructure and critical public services.

This institutional transformation reflects Turkey’s commitment to contributing not only to national but also international peace and security in the ICT environment and to supporting the effective implementation of existing UN framework. Turkey attaches particular importance to maintaining the continuity and effectiveness of the UN framework built over the years. In this regard, we believe that global mechanism provides an important opportunity to further strengthen practical cooperation and to advance implementation across all pillars of the framework in a balanced and inclusive manner. Madam Chair, we also welcome efforts aimed at structuring thematic discussions, including through dedicated seminars. We also welcome efforts aimed at structuring thematic groups in a way that supports focused and constructive engagement by all member states.

Turkey continues to observe the evolving nature of cybersecurity risks, including activities affecting critical infrastructure and essential services. In this context, we reiterate that international collaboration and cooperation remain essential for maintaining stability and security in the ICT environment. Accordingly, capacity building remains a cornerstone of the collective efforts, and Turkey prioritizes inclusive, demand -driven, and sustainable capacity building initiatives. Turkey, therefore, supports efforts to strengthen resilience and bridge digital divides across regions, including those related to emerging technologies and their implications for international security. Furthermore, we place particular… emphasis on strengthening national coordination mechanisms, advancing cybersecurity standards, and enhancing incident response cooperation, including through national and international coordination and information sharing among relevant stakeholders. In this regard, ensuring meaningful stakeholder engagement is considered essential, and further efforts should be made to encourage the exchange of experience between the public and private sector actors.

Turkey underscores that these efforts are most effective when supported by comprehensive initiatives undertaken within the framework of cyber diplomacy. We believe that the five pillars help to clarify the available means for ensuring international security and advancing responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. At the same time, cyber diplomacy provides strategic guidance on their application. This is an appropriate and timely deployment. In this regard, Turkey further notes that such a holistic approach may merit the dedicated concentration of cyber diplomacy as a separate agenda item, particularly in navigating the complex and evolving multi -stakeholder cyber ecosystem. Turkey believes that such efforts could contribute to the prevention of disputes and were necessary to mitigation of their adverse effects through a proactive, adaptive and forward -looking diplomatic approach.

In conclusion, Turkey remains committed to supporting an open, secure, stable, accessible and peaceful ICT environment through dialogue, cooperation, mutual trust and respect for the sovereign equality of states. We stand ready to work closely with the partners within the framework of the global mechanism. Thank you. Madam Chair.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to Israel.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Excellencies, distinguished delegates. Allow me to begin by warmly congratulating you, Ambassador, on your election as chair of this new global mechanism on developments in the fields of cybersecurity and advancing responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. We are confident that under your leadership and with the expert guidance of UNODA and your teams, this session will establish a constructive and effective path forward for collective efforts in cybersecurity domain. Israel welcomes the inauguration of this global mechanism. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, cyber threats are becoming increasingly complex and imminent. The need for a stable, inclusive, and transparent international framework has never been more vital. We are committed to engaging in this process in a spirit of cooperation and shared responsibility.

In this regard, Chair, I wish to reiterate Israel’s fundamental position regarding the governments of our work. For this mechanism and its subsidiary bodies to maintain their legitimacy and long -term effectiveness, all decision -making processes encompassing both procedural and substantive matters must be conducted strictly by consensus. As we have underscored many times in the past, the principle of consensus ensures that security concerns and perspectives of all member states are respected. This provides a necessary foundation for a framework that is truly global, equitable, and durable. Madam Chair, looking ahead, it is our hope that this new mechanism, which stands as a continuation of two decades of significant efforts within the GGEs and OEWGs, will be firmly anchored in the key we all work so hard to achieve.

We must focus our energy on further building and maintaining international relationships, while prioritizing practical and strategic solutions. capacity building efforts and the exchange of best practices. By doing so, we can move forward towards our common goal of strengthening global cyber resilience and ensuring secure and stable ICT environment for all. Israel stands ready to work closely with you, Madam Chair, and with all delegations to ensure the success of this important and timely mechanism. I thank you.

Muchísimas gracias. Thank you very much. Iíll read the next five delegations to take the floor. We have Australia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kazakhstan, Liberia, and China. Australia, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair, and good afternoon, colleagues, now. Australia aligns itself with the Pacific Islands Forum statement and wishes to make the following remarks in our national capacity. Australia warmly congratulates Ambassador Lopez in becoming Chair of the Global Mechanism. We have every confidence in the experience and expertise both the Chair and her team bring, and we assure you of Australia’s commitment to engage constructively to support the success of the Global Mechanism. We welcome the establishment of the Global Mechanism. The agreement by consensus to establish a new permanent mechanism to institutionalise UN discussions and advance the framework for responsible state behaviour in cyberspace represents a remarkable success for multilateral cooperation amid times of sharpening geopolitical tensions. We thank Ambassador Gawthor for her contribution to the Global Mechanism Forum and for his skilful chairing of the second OEWG.

Building upon our framework, implementing our framework, and doing so with a practical, action-orientated focus is a core element of our new mandate and will be essential for the success of the mechanism. We strongly support the global mechanism building upon the progress made in the OEWGs and GGEs. We also… look forward to a new approach in the dedicated thematic groups to complement and enrich the plenaries. We see the DTGs as an opportunity to deepen exchanges between experts on real -world cyber challenges and capacity -building needs, including expert briefings, lessons learned, best practices and practical support. The DTGs were designed to be cross -cutting across the framework’s five pillars. Identifying cyber threats sets the scene for our work on how norms and international law, as well as competence -building measures, can and should be used to address these threats, and capacity -building is essential to ensure all states can implement the norms, law and CDMs to address the threats identified.

It is only by keeping all pillars interconnected that states can effectively and collectively address cyber threats in the mechanism. Critical technologies are reaching the top. They are shaping our economies and societies at pace. Our dependence on digital platforms to operate critical infrastructure and deliver core government services is growing rapidly. At the same time, cyber threats are escalating sharply. Ransomware, phishing, distributed denial of service attacks are becoming more frequent, coordinated and disruptive. These risks are being amplified by the accelerating use of artificial intelligence, which is enabling threat actors to scale, automate and refine their attacks with alarming speed. International law must be a fundamental consideration in advancing responsible state behaviour in cyberspace, including responding to cyber threats.

All states agree that existing international law applies in cyberspace, and the OEWG provided space for states to reach more common understandings on how it applies. Considerable momentum on international law has also been a key factor in the development of international law. It has also been built up by the publication of national and regional positions on international law, representing the views of more than 100 states. The global mechanism presents an opportunity to build on this foundation. we also want to continue to build on the good work done by the OEWG cross regional groups on international law regarding the application of international human rights law the law of state responsibility and international humanitarian law the consensus ICT resolution of the 34th conference of the international red cross and red crescent is also of direct relevance to our work as are the ongoing discussions in the ICT work stream of the ICRC’s global initiatives galvanized political commitment to international humanitarian law strengthening the framework for responsible state behavior is ever more important but equally so is ensuring all states can translate the framework into cyber security and resilience at home as Australia knows well from our work in our region with our Pacific and Southeast Asian partners needs based sustainable capacity building provides the essential bridge between the two Australia sees a close link between DTG1 on cyber challenges and DTG2 on capacity building as well as the importance of engaging states, industry experts and other stakeholders on best practice to ensure that capacity building efforts are targeted, impactful and sustainable Capacity building also needs to be fiscally responsible by ensuring it is cost efficient leverages existing resources and is coordinated Australia reaffirms the critical importance of the full, equal and meaningful participation of women in all decision making processes related to the use, governance and security of ICTs including the global mechanism Women remain significantly underrepresented in international security forums including in the field of cyber security despite their essential contributions and expertise At the same time women and girls experience the impacts of cyber threats in distinct and often disproportionate ways Addressing these disparities is essential to ensuring inclusive, effective and responsive cyber policies and to strengthen global cyber resilience Australia together with Canada, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK continue to be long -term donors of the Women in Cyber Fellowship Since 2020 it has enabled 110 women from 55 countries from underrepresented small and developing states to attend UN cyber security meetings and related trainings so they can meaningfully engage and shape the process Fellows also take their expertise and networks gained through the program back to their governments where they can translate this knowledge into policy development Finally, Australia emphasises the critical importance of meaningful stakeholder engagement in the global mechanism Drawing on the diverse expertise, research, innovation and resources of academia, civil society, the private sector and the technical community enhances our collective ability to address evolving cyber threats and build resilience Australia reaffirms the consensus Consensus agreements made on stakeholder participation and looks forward to more inclusive and transparent processes.

In conclusion, the global mechanism represents a new opportunity for inclusive and practical cooperation on cyber security. We look forward to working together to advance our shared goals to protect and promote a peaceful, stable and interoperable cyberspace for all. Thank you.

Muchísimas gracias. Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the Delegate of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Thank you very much, Madam Chair. The Democratic Republic of the Congo would like to extend our heartfelt congratulations to you on your election to chair the global mechanism at its first biannual session, 2026 -2027. Rest assured, we will be cooperating constructively so as to promote the success of the global mechanism and the democratic system. My delegation would like to align itself with the statement delivered by Nigeria. on behalf of the African group we would like to make the following remarks in a national capacity Madam Chair the DRC welcomes the implementation of the United Nations Global Mechanism on developments in the field of ICTs as per resolution 80 -16 of the UNGA we welcome the convening of this organisational session which is an important stage on the way towards a multilateral governance framework in this particular sphere that is the use of ICTs this paves the way for the operationalisation of the permanent global mechanism all the while basing our work on the consensus -based conclusions of the OEWG which was active 2021 -2025 in 1998 the General Assembly expressed its commitment to debate on this issue following the adoption of a resolution submitted by Russia.

The OEWG, which was open to all member states, in addition to the work of the Group of Government Experts, the GGE, tasked with considering existing and emerging threats as regards ICTs, which was a limited membership expert process, the security of the use of ICTs has come a long way. There have been many difficulties, but we made it thanks to our resolve. We hope that the inclusive, transparent, and consensus -based nature of the work that guided the activities of the working group, the OEWG, will continue to guide exchanges, as part of the mechanism. We must therefore pay tribute. A well -deserved tribute to His Excellency Ambassador of Singapore, Mr. Bohan Gafoor, who deftly steered the work of the OEWG throughout its 11th session, substantive session, with the adoption of consensus of three annual reports as well as the final report.

The latter recommends the establishment of a permanent global mechanism tasked with ensuring an ongoing institutional dialogue on a regular basis as well as practical cooperation on ICT security. And this is what we’re rendering real here at this organizational session. Madam Chair, my delegation would like to recall first that through their consensus -based reports, member states have reiterated on numerous occasions that international law, in particular the UN Charter, applies to state behavior in cyberspace. Now, the aforementioned reports also reaffirmed the relevance in the cyberspace context of principles such as sovereign equality, the peaceful settlement of disputes. a ban on the threat of or the use of force and the non -interference in the internal affairs of states.

Second, this process came up with 11 non -binding voluntary norms governing responsible state behavior in cyberspace. On this note, my delegation remains disquieted by the scope, the sophisticated nature, and the growing diversification of the threats hanging over ICTs. These threats are continuing to pose a risk for all member states, all regions, with particularly serious ramifications for developing countries. Third, the various processes have helped us advance on CBMs with the establishment of a global directory of POCs so as to… communicate on ICT security incidents. While we welcome the implementation of this directory, which will help facilitate communication and the sharing of information between states, including when there are major cyber incidents, my delegation would like to reiterate its request to UNODA to assist states, especially states which are developing, to get to grips with this tool and the way it works through practical capacity building sessions.

We invite competent states and organizations who are well -placed to provide this kind of training to provide targeted support and capacity building so that developing countries can fully, effectively, and meaningfully participate in the POC directory. This is why we commend the establishment of a global portal for cooperation and capacity building on ICT security. We call for the swift and effective implementation thereof, all the while emphasising the importance of developing a United Nations Fellowship Programme that is dedicated to ICT securities, using existing programmes in other areas of disarmament as a template. This will ensure that diplomats, political decision makers, technical experts and other officials in developing countries, in particular small island developing states, will help them to develop knowledge, skills and the necessary tools to take effective action in this area.

Madam Chair, as regards the timeline of our work, we have taken note that the first substantive session will be held between 20 and 24 July of this year and the dedicated thematic groups will be meeting between the 7th and the 11th of December in hybrid format. We believe that this sequencing strikes the right balance between strategic deliberation and in -depth technical work. We also welcome the provisional draft agenda for the substantive plenaries structured around the five pillars of the Responsible State Behaviour Framework as set forth in Document A -80 -257. Now, this framework, the way we see it, is an essential foundation that will allow us to promote stability, trust and cooperation in CIDR states, especially within the framework of international security.

Regarding the dedicated thematic groups, or DTGs, my delegation recognises the key role they can play in complementing the work done in plenary sessions. We support… the establishment of two cross -cutting groups, a group that’s dedicated to challenges linked to ICT security with an integrated approach, a public policy -oriented approach, and a group that’s dedicated to accelerating capacity building on ICT security. We believe that the work of these groups will play a key role. They will help us to reduce the digital divide, provide developed technical capacity, and facilitate access to resources and best practices. Delegations have been invited to consider how best to organize the work of the dedicated thematic groups. On this note, the DRC would like to encourage the crafting of clear -cut programs of work, striking a balance in terms of the time allocated to each of the five pillars, as well as modalities for the effective participation of technical experts and other stakeholders.

To this end, my delegation would like to reiterate the need to promote and safeguard multilingualism, which guarantees that the mechanism will be inclusive. Multilingualism. is the way we can ensure effective participation of all regions on an equal footing. By way of conclusion, Madam Chair, my delegation would like to reiterate our commitment to actively participating in the entire process and constructively so. We stand convinced that the mechanism’s success will hinge on our collective ability to bolster trust, guarantee inclusion and produce concrete outcomes which will serve an ICT environment that’s open, secure, stable, accessible and peaceful. I thank you. Merci beaucoup.

Okay, so we have 21 delegations that have asked for the floor. And it’s 4 .20 p .m. So, again, my appeal to all of you, if you can deliver shorter statements and use the tools that we already have at our disposal to provide the longer versions, the complete versions. Otherwise, I’m afraid that we won’t finish the list of the speakers today. Thank you. So I give the floor to the representative of Kazakhstan.

Thank you, Secretary, for the preparation of this organizational session. documents circulated. Kazakhstan welcomes the launch of the global mechanism established first one to the United Nations General Assembly resolution as important standing platform for discussions on the international information security and for advancing responsible states behavior in cyberspace. We support the establishment of the thematic groups that can facilitate a practical dialogue on ICT security and promote international cooperation in the field of capacity building. In this regard, Kazakhstan would like to highlight the importance of the supporting developing countries including through strengthening expert capacities, sharing best practices and enhancing national capacities to respond to cyber incidents. In conclusion, Kazakhstan stands ready to engage constructively in the work of the global mechanism and look forward to its development as effective and inclusive platform for strengthening international security and advancing responsible state behavior in cyberspace.

Thank you.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the Delegation of Liberia

Thank you Madam Chair At the outset I congratulate you on your election and on convening this very important meeting a defining moment in our collective efforts to advance responsible state behavior in the use of information and communications technologies. Liberia aligns itself with the statement delivered by Nigeria on behalf of the African group which is to make the following remarks in its national capacity. We recall that this process is account in the work of the group of governmental aspects and the open and working group on developments in the field of ICDs. We believe this meeting is not a procedural checkpoint and Rather, it is where we shape the success or failure of what follows. Before positions are in plenary, before tests are bracketed and negotiated line by line, this is where we align expectations, structure engagement, and build the conditions for consensus.

You agreed that these processes give us a shared foundation affirming that international law applies, articulating norms of responsible state behavior, and recognizing the importance of confidence and capacity building. What is before us now is not to renegotiate that foundation, but to give it structure. Structure, continuity, and practical effect. Madam Chair, allow me to highlight what this organizational meeting matters as we prepare for future engagements. First, it brings discipline to our agenda by structuring our work around the five pillars, threats, norms, international law, confidence building, and capacity building. This clarity will be essential when we move into outcome -oriented negotiations. Second, it provides predictability in our working methods, agreed modalities, whether through semantic groups, intersessional engagements, or reporting lines.

It serves as an envelope of participation for smaller delegations, including meetings. Meeting from our region. Predictability is what makes meaningful engagement possible. Third, perhaps most importantly, a reaffirmed consensus as our operating principle, in a domain as sensitive as RCDs and international security, outcomes that are not collectively owned will not withstand. This meeting allows us to identify areas of convergence early, manage divergence with care, and avoid last -minute fractures in plenary. Chair, on RCD threats, the landscape is no longer emerging. It is present and accelerating. Attacks on critical infrastructure, financial systems, and public institutions are not enough. They are not imaginary risks. They are lived realities. For countries like Liberia, the consequences are immediate, affecting governance, economic stability, and public confidence.

This mechanism must therefore support practical cooperation, early warning, information sharing, and collective resilience. On norms of responsible state behavior, we believe the conversation must not shift from endorsement to implementation. The value of norms lies not in their articulation, but in their application. The structure we establish here must enable practical guidance, peer exchange, and measurable progress. On international standards, the law, Liberia, reaffirms its applicability, including the principles of sovereignty, non -interference, and peaceful settlement of disputes. At the same time, we recognize that differences in interpretation persist. What matters is that this mechanism provides a studied, inclusive space to narrow those differences without forcing a made -up convergence. On confidence -building measures, we see these as the quiet stabilizers of this domain.

Transparency, points of contact, and information sharing reduce the risk of miscalculation. But for CBMs to work, they must be usable. Simplicity and accessibility will determine whether they are implemented or manually referenced. On capacity -building, Liberia speaks with conviction. Capacity is not an issue of choice. It is the foundation upon which all other pillars rest. Without it, commitments remain aspirational. We therefore support sustainable, demand -driven approaches, including the establishment of a dedicated mechanism that reflects national ownership and priorities. Chair, as we look ahead to future engagements, three considerations should guide our actions. Let the clarity of today’s structure translate into focus in our negotiations. Let the inclusivity of this process ensure that all voices shape the outcome.

And let our commitment to consensus remain firm, even when the path becomes complex. In closing, Liberia approaches this process guided by the conviction that even in a domain defined by rapid, technological change, cooperation remains our most reliable tool. for stability. I thank you.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the delegation of China.

Madam Chair, colleagues, at the outset, I would like to congratulate Ambassador Lopez on her appointment as the Chair of the Global Mechanism. China will play a constructive role in supporting the Chair’s work. First, China believes that under the current circumstances, it is very critical for the Global Mechanism to get off to a good start by understanding the following three points. First, the Global Mechanism should fully build on the experience and achievements of the UN cybersecurity processes. It represents both a new face and a continuation of efforts over the past two decades. We must ensure that the framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace serves as the prerequisite and foundation for future work. as it is the cornerstone of the UN cyber security norms and order.

Also, at the same time, we must adhere to key principles, particularly consensus, while advancing the five pillars in a comprehensive and balanced manner. And equal emphasis on both implementation and development. These are time -tested lessons, and also essential prerequisites for achieving further progress. Second, we must value and strengthen the UN mechanism. Given the complex international environment, it is all the more significant that the global mechanism has been established against all odds. This not only reflects the high level of consensus among all parties on the seriousness and urgency of cyber security, but also underscores the shared experience and expectation that the United Nations will serve as the primary channel for building a global cyber security order.

In the face of new challenges arising from the rapid development of emerging technologies, we should seek common ground, unity and cooperation so as to deliver practical outcomes. Third, the plenaries and the DTGs must have clearly defined responsibilities and functions. The plenaries should, based on its mandate, focus on balanced discussions across the five pillars. While the DTGs should focus on specific outstanding issues and provide recommendations to the plenaries. The DTG on addressing threats, DTG 1, should prioritize discussions on data security and supply chain security based on the developments and evolving characteristics of cyberspace. And DTG on capacity building should focus on concrete measures to address the challenges of the plenaries and the plenaries. To help developing countries enhance their digital capabilities.

China has previously facilitated the adoption of the UN General Assembly resolution on enhancing international cooperation in AI capacity building and proposed an AI capacity building action plan for good and for all. These experiences can be drawn upon and shared. Cybersecurity is a global challenge. It requires all parties to work with each other on the basis of respecting each other on an equal basis so as to address these challenges together. China stands ready to work with all parties to ensure the conference is a complete success so that the mechanism can truly serve as a platform for jointly addressing cyber challenges, collectively shaping rules and order in cyberspace, and sharing the benefits and opportunities of digitization. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you very much. Let me read the next five speakers on the list. just like I said this morning, we would encourage you to make observations on the practical aspects and the organisation of work as well as procedural matters more than elements of substance. So we now have Antigua and Barbuda, Sudan, Albania and Tajikistan. Antigua and Barbuda, you have the floor

Thank you, Madam Chair. Antigua and Barbuda congratulates you, Ambassador Lopez, on your election as Chair of the Global Mechanism on Developments in the Field of ICTs in the Context of International Security and Advancing Responsible State Behavior in the Use of ICTs. Be assured, Chair, of our full support. Building on the foundation of past GGE and OEWG, we were able to make substantive progress in the last OEWG 2021-2025. The adoption of the final report of the OEWG 2021-2025 by consensus for the establishment of the global mechanism, including the modalities for the process, was not an easy feat. The establishment of the global mechanism, the Global Mechanism on Developments in the Field of ICTs in the Context of International Security and Advancing Responsible State Behavior in the Use of ICTs, is a critical process.

Through our discussions and consensus decisions, we as Member States will have the opportunity to shape this process into one that is neutral, inclusive and transparent. Madam Chair. For the DTG on capacity building, Antiguan Barbuda hopes that this global mechanism will provide for actionable deliverables that will meet the priority needs of developing countries to ensure that the weakest state among us has some basic level of resilience. We express our gratitude to the sponsors of the Women in Cyber Fellowship and advocate for sponsors to the initiative. The very nature of cyber threats prescribes that the fight against cyber threats cannot be done by states alone. And therefore, Antiguan Barbuda supports the engagement of multi -stakeholders whose technical knowledge and perspectives can aid us as states as we make our decisions by consensus.

Madam Chair, we are cognizant that… …cognizant that… …cognizant that this will not be an easy task. especially due to the global geopolitical tensions that currently exist. But we are even more convinced that this process is necessary as we endeavor to build a peaceful, safe and secure cyberspace for our people while ensuring that no state is left behind. Thank you, Madam Chair. Muchisimas gracias.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the delegation of Sudan.

Thank you, Madam Chair. And congratulations on your appointment as Chair of the Global Mechanism and rest assured of my delegation’s full support. My delegation aligns itself with the statements delivered on behalf of both Africa and Arab groups, respectively, and would like to make the following remarks on a national capacity. Preserving the peaceful, accessible, and cooperative global digital ecosystem requires the global mechanism to adopt a comprehensive approach which respects the fundamentals of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, together with respect for sovereignty, non -interference, and the peaceful coexistence. My delegation shares the view that discussions held in the plenary should not be duplicated in the dedicated thematic groups, and to ensure this separation, we emphasize the importance of thorough preparation.

This includes establishing a consensual agenda in advance, agreed upon by all participants to guide the proceedings and prevent overlap. Furthermore, utilizing a scenario -based discussion, within the DTGs, might be beneficial. This approach will help focus the conversation on specific issues and practical outcomes, avoiding repetition and promoting productive dialogue. distinct from the plenary. The capacity gaps remain a substantial obstacle to the international community’s initiatives aimed at establishing a transparent, secure, and cooperative cyberspace. Gaps hinder the progress towards effective global mechanism for cybersecurity and cooperation. Therefore, prioritizing international collaboration to bridge these divides remains essential. Adopting innovative, need -based approaches to capacity building grounded in a thorough diagnosis of the current state should guide future efforts. This strategy will ensure that the capacity development is tailored to actual needs and fosters a more secure and cooperative digital environment.

Furthermore, my delegation supports the proposal presented by the Arab group to build a more secure and cooperative digital environment. and encouraged by the African group to create a fellowship program under the auspices of the United Nations. My delegation supports the continued use of further development of the voluntary checklist of practical action to support the implementation of the norms. At the same time, it recognizes that member states should retain the flexibility to structure their national implementation efforts in accordance with their respective national circumstances, capacities, and priorities. Finally, Sudan retrades the intergovernmental and state -led nature of the global mechanism while acknowledging the value of the contribution from civil society, academia, and the private sector in enriching discussions.

My delegation underscores that the stakeholder engagement should be structured in a manner that supports the intergovernmental process and enhances the quality of its deliberations. I thank you, Chair.

Thank you very much and I give the floor to Vanuatu

Thank you Madam Chair Vanuatu extends its warm congratulations to you Ambassador Lopez on your election as Chair Vanuatu aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the Pacific Island Forum by Solomon Islands and adds the following in its national capacity Madam Chair Vanuatu like many other countries continues to face significant challenges in keeping pace with the rapidly evolving and increasingly complex cyber threat landscape For example, ransomware attacks are one of the fastest growing threats in Pacific Island states and we have witnessed firsthand its destructive power At the same time Vanuatu is a country that has been under the control of the United States for the last 10 years and has been the most important in the history of the United States development and deployment of artificial intelligence is reshaping the threat environment.

AI is not only expanding the scale and sophistication of cyber attacks, including ransomware, but is also enabling new forms of malicious activity, such as highly targeted disinformation, fraud and exploitation of digital systems. For countries like Vanuatu, these evolving threats interact with existing structural constraints, including infrastructure limitations, technical capacity and access to data and resources. In this context, Vanuatu also wishes to highlight the growing importance of secure and resilient cloud infrastructure. Many small island developing states increasingly rely on globally distributed cloud services to deliver essential government functions and economic activity. However, these systems are deeply interconnected and, as recent developments have shown, are not insulated from broader geopolitical dynamics. Disruptions to data centers, undersea cables, or other elements of digital infrastructure, whether through cyber operations or physical incidents, can have cascading global effects, impacting countries far removed from the source of the disruption.

For Vanuatu, this underscores the need to strengthen resilience, diversify dependencies, and ensure that discussions within the global mechanism take into account the systemic risks facing globally connected technologies. Addressing these conditions is essential to strengthening national capabilities for the prevention, detection, and response to both traditional and emerging ICT security risks. Madam Chair, Vanuatu sees the global mechanism as an opportunity to move from discussing these challenges to addressing them. lenses to actively addressing them. In this regard, Vanato suggests structuring discussions under dedicated thematic group one around specific pressing threats. For example, ransomware could be addressed in its biennial cycle, followed by the cybersecurity implications of AI in the second in line with its mandate. Such an approach would enable member states to examine how these threats intersect with existing norms of responsible state behavior, identify implementation gaps, and share practical experiences and lessons learned.

Building on this dedicated thematic group two should then play a complementary and action -oriented role by translating these threat -based discussions into targeted, demand -driven capacity -building efforts. In particular, DTG2 could serve as a platform to align identified needs with available support including by linking capacity building more directly to the specific challenges discussed under DTG1. This would help ensure that capacity building is not undertaken in isolation but is not responsive to real and evolving threats such as ransomware and AI -enabled risk and supports national efforts to prevent, detect, and respond. Madam Chair, Fanato believes that an approach which links threat -focused discussions with targeted demand -driven capacity building in the context of the dedicated thematic groups can help move the global mechanisms from dialogue to action.

In doing so, we can foster a practical and inclusive community of practice. Fanato stands ready to work with all partners in advancing this objective. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished permanent representative for that statement. And I now give the floor to Albania.

Madam Chair, Albania aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union and its member states and associates itself fully with its substance. But at this moment, allow me to congratulate you on your election as Chair and express our full confidence in your leadership in ensuring a smooth and effective transition from the Open Ended Working Group to the UN Global Mechanism. In the same way, please allow me to join many colleagues and thank Ambassador Gafour for his excellent work with the Open Ended Working Group and for allowing this platform to continue working on numerous agreed issues already. Albania reaffirms its strong support for the consensus report of the Open Ended Working Group, which constitutes a solid and balanced framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace.

We underscore the importance of preserving and building upon these previous agreed outcomes. as the foundation for our future work. We believe that the establishment of the UN global mechanisms provides a timely opportunity to move from consensus to implementation. Our collective focus should now be on practical, action -oriented discussion that enhance understanding of how international law applies in cyberspace, strengthen implementation of the agreed volunteer norms, operationalize confident building measures, and advance inclusive need -based cyber capacity building. In this regard, Albania attaches particular importance to cyber capacity building as a central pillar to the UN framework. We support the efforts of the global mechanisms to identify concrete gaps and needs, facilitate exchanges of best practices, and promote effective matchmaking mechanisms between capacity building providers and recipients.

Capacity -building efforts should be demand -driven, sustainable and complementary to regional, bilateral and multi -stakeholder initiatives, while avoiding duplication and ensuring inclusivity. In this context, Albania wishes to express its appreciation for the Women in Cyber Fellowship, specifically for us, thanks to the government of the Netherlands, which continues to support many of us in participating in this global forum and in bringing the voices of our countries to this table. Equally important are programs such as U .S.-Singapore initiatives, which provide valuable opportunities for all of those. Another essential dimension of capacity -building is sharing the national experiences, including those that countries like Albania can contribute. In this range of numerous advanced persistent cyber attacks my country has experienced since 2022, In March 26 alone, Albania has faced two significant cyber attacks, both of which were successfully addressed by the experts of the National Cyber Security Authority in support of the experts of the relevant institutions.

Confronted with persistent and sophisticated threats, our experts are often compelled to learn not only through training rooms, but through responding to real -world cyber incidents that happen. Those lessons are invaluable and we are ready to share. Again, Albania strongly supports a transparent, inclusive, and consensus -driven global mechanism, including through its dedicating thematic groups as a platform for exchanging best practices, peer learning, and concrete experiences at national, regional, and cross -regional levels. Madam Chair, as part of the Western Balkan, Albania wishes to emphasize also the importance of regional cooperation and coordination. We firmly believe that working together as a region, including through the development of joint perspectives or complementary approaches, enhances our collective contribution to global discussions on ICT security.

Building up through regional cooperation strengthens trust, builds resilience and supports more effective cybercapacity building outcomes by leveraging shared challenges and regional expertise. Albania remains committed to engaging constructively within the UN framework with the shared objectives to advancing international peace, security and stability in cyberspace. We look forward to actively contributing to the work of the UN global mechanism and to continued cooperation with all delegations in a spirit of openness,

Thank you very much for your statements and I now give the floor to Tajikistan

Thank you Madam Chair Allow me to congratulate you on your election and assure you of our full support Distinguished Delegates Tajikistan consistently advocates for strengthening multilateral cooperation to ensure a secure, stable and open information space We proceed from the understanding that states bear the primary responsibility for maintaining international security including in the digital domain We attach particular importance to promoting responsible state behavior in the use of information and communication technologies In this context we consider it is sent to strengthen confidence, transparency, and risk reduction measures, including the development of mechanisms for information sharing, incident prevention, and response. In support of these efforts, on 17 March 2026, Tadrykstan signaled the United Nations Convention Against Cybercrime. At the same time, we draw attention to the persistent capacity gaps among states, particularly developing countries in the areas of cybersecurity and digital risk management.

In this regard, we underscore the need to expand international technical assistance, knowledge transfer, and capacity building. Tadrykstan underscores the particular importance of further capacity building and the need to expand international technical assistance, knowledge transfer, and capacity building. and the national level, including the engagement of relevant international experts. and the expansion of technical assistance programs. Particular attention should also be paid to the risks associated with the use of artificial intelligence, including its potential application in cyber attacks and description to critical information infrastructure. At the same time, Tajikistan continues to promote the use of digital technologies and AI for peaceful proposals, including in health care, agriculture, and public safety. The country has established and operates centers for innovative technologies and AI, and we continue to actively participate in relevant international initiatives under the auspices of the United Nations.

We are convinced that the effective functioning of the global mechanisms should be based on the principles of inclusivity, transparency, and consensus. ensuring the equal participation of all member states. Tajikistan stands ready to contribute constructively to the further work of the mechanism and to the development of practical solutions aimed at strengthening international security in the digital age. In conclusion, we express confidence that the activities of the global mechanisms will contribute to fostering a more secure and predictable digital environment as well as to strengthening trust and cooperation among states. I thank you.

Thank you very much. I’ll now read the next five speakers. We have Canada. Vietnam. India. Greece. And Rwanda. Canada, you have the floor

Canada welcomes and congratulates Ambassador Lopez on her election to the position of Chair today. Canada believes that within the framework of the global mechanism we need to ensure that all of our efforts do bring about results. We’ve heard from over 12 delegations across all regions. These delegations stressed the importance of beginning substantive work without further ado. In order to do this, discussions must go beyond high level pronouncements. Rather they must tackle in a more concrete fashion the way in which the global mechanism can be implemented so as to ensure that the global mechanism is respond to the concrete challenges we’re facing. While plenary sessions contributed to each pillar can be useful, there is a genuine opportunity to go further within the dedicated thematic groups, the DTGs.

Canada welcomes the consensus -based agreements we reached with a view to establishing these DTGs. Now, these agreements call for the thematic groups to be facilitated by facilitators. Now, this is a deliberate choice. This recognizes that the co -facilitators will be acting on the responsibility of the chair. By way of conclusion, Canada stands ready to work constructively with you and the DTGs. as well as with member states from all regions as well as with the multi -stakeholder community with a view to advancing on our collective objectives. Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you very much for your statement. I now give the floor to Vietnam.

Madam Chair, as I said, my delegation would like to extend its warm congratulations to you on your election as the Chair of the Global Mechanism. We are confident that under your able stewardship, the mechanism will be guided in a balanced, transparent and effective manner, ensuring that the priorities and concerns of developing countries are duly reflected, particularly in advancing practical outcomes including capacity building and bridging the digital divide. My delegation warmly welcomes you. Here comes the convening of this organizational session of the mechanism which marks an important milestone in launching of a permanent and action -oriented platform for continued dialogue on ICTU security. In this regard, we would like to make the following points. First, the work of this mechanism must be built upon the achievements of the OEWG process, ensuring continuity, inclusiveness, and regular institutional dialogue on these critical issues.

It should be action -oriented and deliver practical outcomes that will foster common understanding, strengthen cooperation, and advance responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. Second, the work of the mechanism must be firmly grounded in respect for national sovereignty and the state -led and consensus -based nature of this process. At the same time, we recognize that the private sector, within agreed modalities and in a transparent and inclusive manner, consistent with its ICT expertise, can complement intergovernmental efforts and contribute to more effective and practical outcomes. Third, regarding the organization of work, we underscore the importance of ensuring a balanced and efficient allocation of time across various agenda items, particularly within the dedicated thematic groups. As envisaged in the structure of the mechanism, discussions should reflect the needs and priorities of member states while ensuring adequate attention to all five pillars of the framework for responsible state behavior.

Fourth, capacity building as a key pillar of the global mechanism is essential to effectively address growing cyber threats and bridge existing gaps among states. In this context, the Hanoi Convention marks an important contribution by strengthening capacity building, including through enhanced cooperation, information sharing, and mutual legal assistance. Vietnam Express is sincere appreciation to all states for their strong support. We encourage you to support and active participation in the signing ceremony of the convention in October 2025, and we encourage those that have not yet done so to sign right beside the convention at the earliest opportunity. Madam Chair, my delegation stands ready to engage constructively with all partners to ensure the success of this mechanism and to contribute to our shared objective of promoting an open, secure, stable, accessible and peaceful ICT environment I thank you

Thank you very much for your statement As I said, I have India, Greece and Rwanda but before I give the floor to these delegations we are seeing that it’s 5pm already we only have one hour left and if the next delegations all speak for four minutes we will be able to give the floor to everyone on the list therefore I’d be very grateful if you could act on the recommendations that we’ve been giving you throughout the day so that we can make the most efficient use possible of the remaining hour India you’re next please go ahead thank you

thank you madam chair India congratulates you on your election as chair of the global mechanism and assures you of your support to steer this important process in an inclusive transparent and balanced manner we also look forward to constructive work of the dedicated thematic groups which will be central to translating past agreements into practical steps we hope the DTGs will prioritize concrete action -oriented exchanges drawing on the five pillars of the existing framework so that discussions on norms international law confidence and capacity building are firmly anchored in real world challenges and solutions As the global mechanism begins its work, we expect that it will become a forum that is universal, inclusive and respectful of the sovereign equality of states, while remaining firmly focused on preventing conflict and promoting stability in cyberspace.

The mechanism should also avoid reopening settled understandings and instead concentrate on implementing the existing framework for responsible state behavior, including agreed norms and confidence -building measures, in a manner that takes into account different levels of digital development and capacity. We also believe the global mechanism should give due attention to issues of particular importance to the Global South, including bridging capacity gaps, protecting critical infrastructure, and ensuring that all states can detect, prevent and respond to malicious ICT activities. We particularly see DTG -2 as a key vehicle for advancing such capacity building in prevention, detection and response, and stand ready to share our own national experiences and to work with partners. to strengthen resilience, especially in developing countries.

In this regard, we take this opportunity to reiterate our sincere appreciation to all delegations that supported India’s proposal for an online portal as part of the OEWG’s work and which has emerged as one of the concrete outcomes of that process. We look forward to the portal’s early establishment and full operationalization and to its serving as a practical tool for sharing information, good practices and capacity building opportunities. Madam Chair, we hope that the global mechanism will become a central platform within the UN system for advancing responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs, avoiding duplication and fragmentation, and ensuring coherence with other relevant UN processes. We ensure to engage constructively and pragmatically, guided by our commitment to an open, secure, stable, accessible, peaceful and interoperable ICT environment for all.

I thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you. Muchísimas gracias. Thank you very much. I now get the floor to Greece.

Thank you, Madam Chair. I will be very brief. Madam Chair, Chris aligns with the statement made by the European Union. Please allow me to make the following remarks in my national capacity. Allow me to begin by congratulating you for your election as Chair of the Global Mechanism and assure you of our full support during your term and our confidence in your abilities to ensure a smooth transition from the OEWG. We would like also to extend our sincere appreciation to Abbas Durgafour, Chair of the OEWG, for his tireless efforts, leadership and dedication in steering us to concessions, a concession that led to the creation of the Global Mechanism, a milestone of multilateralism that reflects the collective commitment of UN member states to dialogue and cooperation.

Madam Chair, the importance of this new permanent mechanism cannot be overstated. Cyber security has become a defining element of international business security. The increasing frequency and sophistication of cyber attacks show that cyberspace has become… a strategic space with direct implications… for security, economic resilience and public trust. And in today’s complex geopolitical environment, it is more important than ever to address these challenges together by taking action and further advancing the implementation of the UN framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace that we all collectively developed. As stand supporters of the primacy of international law and the peaceful settlement of disputes, we have been strong supporters of the work accomplished at the UN level, a fact evident by our active participation since the beginning of the first OEWG.

We believe that this work has contributed to the advancement of business stability in cyberspace. space and it is of benefit for all countries. Madam Chair, we look forward for this new next chapter and we will work constructively within this new mechanism to support you in continuing the concession -based approach. It is a matter of political responsibility and collective security to preserve a digital environment that is open, stable, peaceful, accessible and secure, governed by international law and strengthened by cooperation and underpinned by our common commitment to peace. And Greece remains highly committed to this common goal. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to the delegation of Rwanda.

Thank you, Madam Chair. At the outset, Rwanda warmly congratulates you on your election as Chair of the Global Mechanism for its first binomial. We express our full support in your leadership and assure you of our constructive and continuing commitment as you guide this important process. Rwanda, I thank you. aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the African group and would like to make the following remarks in our national capacity. Madam Chair, the establishment of the global mechanisms represents a pivotal step in advancing the collective efforts of member states to promote the safety and security in the use of information and communication technologies. It is both a continuation and an evolution of the work of the OEWG, undertaken whose consistent outcomes reports provide a solid foundation for our future work.

In this regard, Rwanda underscores the importance of ensuring that the work of the global mechanism is firmly anchored in and guided by the work of the OEWG, preserving the continuity, particularly its inclusive, transparent, and consistent best nature, as well as a single -track approach. Madam Chair, as we commence the operational phase of the global mechanism, a structured, coherent, and action -oriented approach will be critical. Rwanda believes that a balanced approach is needed to maximize the mechanism’s effectiveness and relevance by focusing on the implementation of existing commitments and recommendations and to advance the elaboration of additional commitments. It’s needed to establish clear priorities for the mechanism work while ensuring that no precedent is created that could hinder inclusivity.

Identifying early derivatives across the five agreed pillars, ensuring that untouchable progress is made from the outside. Next is ensuring continuity within the OEGW outcome documents, thereby maintaining the legitimacy and coherence of our collective efforts undertaken so far. Madam Chair, Rwanda further welcomes the establishment of the two dedicated thematic groups and views them as the operational engine of the global mechanism. In this regard, it will be important to ensure a clear division of the OEGW outcome documents and the OEGW outcome documents between the plenary and the DTGs so as to avoid overlap and repetition of discussions. To fulfill this role, the DTGs must be explicitly outcome -oriented with a clear mandate to produce tangible deliverables that feed back into the broader mechanism.

This includes developing practical toolkits, voluntary guidelines, implementation checklists, and measurable cooperation frameworks that can be adopted. By embedding timelines, expected outputs, and monitoring mechanisms within the DTG workflows, the DTG can serve as the drivers of progress rather than an extension of debates. A core of Rwanda’s approach to strengthening cybersecurity is capacity building, which we regard as a cornerstone for long -term resilience and sustainable progress. Thus, capacity building is not just a supporting element, it is the foundation. Without it, our participation remains symbolic rather than substantive. If we are to close the digital divide, this pillar cannot be optional capacity. Building is the missing link, a bridge that connects innovation with inclusion. ambition with access and contribute to transforming the digital divide into digital opportunities.

In closing, Madam Chair, as we commence this new chapter, we must ensure that the global mechanism is not only a forum of dialogue, but a platform for delivery. I thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you very much for that statement. I will now read out the next few delegations to take the floor. We have the Philippines, Djibouti, the Dominican Republic, North Macedonia, Egypt, and Kiribati. The Philippines, you have the floor.

Madam Chair, my delegation congratulates you on your assumption as Chair of the Global Mechanism, please be assured of my delegation’s full support and cooperation. Madam Chair, the Philippines reaffirms its commitment to the United Nations. nation’s framework of responsible state behavior in cyberspace and to the implementation of effective cyber CBMs. As a developing country undergoing rapid digital transformation, cybersecurity represents not only a technical concern but also strategic development priority. Secure digital systems support economic growth, reinforce public trust, and enhance national resilience. The Philippines has adopted the National Cybersecurity Plan 2023 to 2028, advancing a whole -of -nation and whole -of -society approach to cyber resilience, protection of critical information infrastructure, and sustained capacity development. A key component of this framework is the National Cyber Intelligence Network, a cyber fusion center which strengthens coordination among government agencies, the private sector, academia, civil society organizations, and international partners.

The network enhances situational awareness, enables coordinated incident response, and promotes trusted information exchange. It reflects an evolving understanding that cybersecurity is no longer governed solely by a need -to -know principle, but increasingly by a responsible need -to -share approach. Cyber threats transcend borders. Therefore, strengthening national resilience contributes to the protection of all member states. The Philippines reaffirms that international law applies in cyberspace and that voluntary norms of responsible state behavior contribute to stability, predictability, and the prevention of conflict. We further underscore the importance of continuity in cybersecurity policy and implementation, aligned with UN frameworks and agreed norms, regardless of changes in administration. Sustained political commitment paired with operational implementation enables long -term resilience and credibility in multilateral cooperation.

We wish to emphasize four priorities. First, implementation must remain at the center of our work. Political commitments gain meaning when translated into operational outcomes. Norms, strategies, and agreements should result in practical cooperation, incident response readiness, workforce development, and measurable capacity building progress. Second, capacity building must be inclusive, demand -driven, and context -specific. There is no one -size -fits -all approach to cybercapacity development. National circumstances, levels of technological maturity, available resources, and development priorities differ among member states. Effective assistance should therefore remain flexible, sustainable, and responsive to nationally identified needs. Capacity building must also remain people -centered. Cybersecurity protection knows no age, sector, or gender. The Philippines promotes the meaningful participation of women in cybersecurity, recognizing that diversity strengthens innovation, decision -making, and resilience.

National initiatives increasingly support gender inclusion, digital literacy, and leadership opportunities for women and young professionals in cyber and emerging technologies, consistent with UN commitments on gender equality and capacity development. In parallel, the Philippines supports the integration of cybersecurity awareness and digital safety into educational curricula from basic education to higher learning and technical training. Building cyber awareness early fosters responsible digital citizenship and strengthens long -term national and global cyber resilience. Third, confidence -building measures and trusted information sharing remain essential. Cooperation among states, computer emergency response teams, and relevant stakeholders helps reduce misperception, prevent escalation, and strengthen collective preparedness. Fourth, inclusive multilateralism remains fundamental. The UNOEWG continues to serve as an important platform where all states participate on equal footing and contribute to shaping a peaceful and stable ICT environment.

Domestically, the Philippines continues to strengthen its legal and policy environment through the pending Cybersecurity and Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Act, which is part of the country’s priority legislation alongside the implementation of existing national strategies and operational frameworks aligned with international cooperation and existing international laws. The Philippines stands ready to work with partners in promoting a peaceful, secure, open and stable ICT environment that advances sustainable development and shared security for all. That is all. Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you very much for your statement. I now give the floor to the Delegation of Djibouti.

Madam Chair, at the outset, I would like to… extend to you our warmest congratulations on your election to chair this first biennial session 2026 -2027. we also congratulate the working group we are of course speaking about the championship of the global mechanism in the context of international security and responsible state behavior we trust that your leadership will steer us to a safe harbor and successful outcome Djibouti aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the African group and the Arab group in a national capacity I’d like to make the following remarks the full version will be uploaded to the website as requested this is an abridged version we reiterate our support and welcomes the global ICT mechanism which is the outcome of the OEWG which worked 2021 to 2025 on this occasion I’d like to use this opportunity to congratulate on behalf of the delegation of Djibouti His Excellency Ambassador Bohan Gafoor the PR of Singapore we commend your leadership throughout the 11 working group sessions we welcome the four reports being adopted by consensus madam chair in the current context which is characterized by geopolitical and strategic conflicts with the emergence of new technologies such as ai which could foster cyber threats the global mechanism that is human centered inclusive and permanent is a priority an overriding priority if we are to preserve personal data as well as critical infrastructure such as undersea cables and jabuti attaches particular importance to this undersea cables thus this new mechanism should help to promote the adoption of common norms governing the responsible behavior of states in cyberspace with full respect for international law and the united nations charter with a view to guaranteeing a digital environment that’s stable secure and resilient on this note we must ensure that all of our efforts again towards a balanced, conciliatory approach bringing together security imperatives and the protection of fundamental rights, all the while ensuring the resilience and continuity of essential digital services and critical infrastructure.

We would like for this mechanism to bolster international cooperation by facilitating the sharing of information about threats and enhancing coordination of the response when faced with cyber incidents, incidents, in particular those which could affect strategic infrastructure such as undersea cables into Alia. To this end, the mechanism should help to build trust, which is the bedrock of this global mechanism’s success and global ICT security. Tabuta remains fully committed to actively contributing to this collective momentum. We stand convinced that secure and resilient cyberspace is a fundamental pillar of sustainability, sustainable development, and international cooperation. Madam Chair, in a context where the digital transformation is accelerating at the global level national capacity building on cyber security so that we can address or tackle cyber threats that are increasingly sophisticated is an absolute priority for developing countries the digitalization of social services in which is only just beginning it seems vital to ensure that we place priority attention on capacity building by supporting developing countries efforts aimed at developing national capacity that’s robust as well as strengthening institutions and bolstering resilience in the face of cyber threats that are increasingly sophisticated and costly capacity building will thus allow us to guarantee a digital transformation that’s secure will allow us to protect sensitive data and ensure that we can address cyber threats and ensure the continuity of essential services helping to accelerate the digital transformation in our respective states, as well as to implement the 2030 Sustainable Development Program.

Indeed, capacity building will help us to consolidate the state responsible behaviour framework when it comes to using cyberspace, and to ensure that we have a digital environment that’s secure, open, stable and peaceful. On this note, we believe that the linguistic diversity of developing countries must be fully factored in when designing dedicated UN fellowships, to ensure that we lift barriers to access and encourage broader participation from national officials, participation in cyberspace training, that is, by way of conclusion, and in the hope that this new mechanism will be part and parcel of our common vision, and that the results of the OEWG… consensus -based results, that thanks to all of the above, we can find lasting, effective, and affordable solutions to tackle cyber threats.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you for listening to me so graciously.

Thank you very much. And I now give the floor to the Dominican Republic.

Muchas gracias, señora Presidenta. Thank you very much, Madam Chair. The Dominican Republic appreciates the convening of this meeting on the global mechanism on ICT security and responsible behavior in their use. And we congratulate you, of course, and El Salvador upon your election to head up this new process. Our delegation is absolutely delighted to have, at the helm of this mechanism, yourself, Madam Chair, and your whole team, who have all shown a great capacity for enthusiasm and leadership in the last steps of the OEWG. We reiterate the fact that we stand fully ready to work. constructively under your leadership to establish a results -focused, solid outcome. Madam Chair, for the Dominican Republic, the establishment of this mechanism is an historic step forward.

It’s the result of an accumulative process that was inclusive and consensus -based that, throughout the work of the OEWG, enabled substantive progress to be made around the threats, threats, norms of international law, confidence -building, capacity -building, and, of course, regular institutional dialogue. We must preserve these achievements and, above all, translate them into effective implementation. We’re not starting from scratch. We already have an agreed framework, and that’s why we believe that this new step should be focused, above all, on the application of the practice of the existing commitments, avoid unnecessary duplication, and prioritizing concrete, useful, action -focused discussions. In this regard, the Dominican Republic values the usefulness of a working structure that enables the substantive plenary meetings to provide general guidance and political coherence, while the thematic working groups serve as more focused technical spaces and pragmatic spaces for the exchange of experiences, lessons learned, good practices, and possible solutions to real challenges, including the protection of critical infrastructure, the growing threat of ransomware, and emerging risks associated with new technologies.

We also reiterate that international law, in particular the United Nations Charter, is fully applicable to cyberspace. We believe that this mechanism must continue to promote practical exchanges about its implementation. as well as efforts for legal capacity building to allow more states, in particular developing countries, to be able to participate fully and meaningfully in these discussions. In the area of capacity building, we wish to underscore that this must remain a founding and cross -cutting pillar of the mechanism. This cooperation must be on demand and it must be tailored to the real needs of states. Focused on concrete results and articulated in a way that it strengthens and not duplicates, like we said previously, existing initiatives both on a regional and international level.

In our opinion, the relationship between diplomats and technical communities is essential in order to achieve sustainable results. We also believe that it’s important for this conversation. The process to remain accessible, including through hybrid meetings, were applicable to facilitate… the attendance of delegations, including the ones that have difficulties accessing resources, and small states also. My delegation believes that the participation of stakeholders could provide a meaningful contribution to the mechanism, in particular when it comes to spaces devoted to specialised exchanges. In particular, industry can contribute with practical experience on incident management, the protection of critical infrastructure, security, design security, supply chains, and emerging technology trends. What’s more, academia can provide applied research, analysis, and information programmes that can strengthen national strategies without prejudice to the intergovernmental nature of the process.

We understand that a substantive structured inclusion of these actors would absolutely enrich the technical quality of the discussions and would support the real and measurable implementation of the agreed framework. Finally, and listening to your request to be brief, we reaffirm our commitment to the permanent mechanism, may it be transparent, practical and focused on actions. We urge all states to uphold the consensus achieved thus far and this, in our view, is the best way to move towards an open, safe, stable, accessible and peaceful cyber space for all.

Thank you very much to the delegation of the Dominican Republic and please also allow me to thank not only the Dominican Republic but also Djibouti. for making brief statements that are allowing us to make progress this afternoon. Thank you. I now give the floor to North Macedonia.

Madam Chair, Distinguished Delegates, North Macedonia aligns itself with the European Union statement delivered on these agenda items. In our national capacity, we would like to make the following remarks. Madam Chair, on behalf of my delegation, we congratulate you on your appointment and commend your willingness to lead this important process. We have full confidence in your leadership to ensure a smooth transition to the global mechanism and to support inclusive, action -oriented work. We also express our sincere gratitude to Ambassador Gafford for his exemplary leadership in guiding the work of the open -ended working group. My country stands ready to contribute. constructively to advance international security and stability in cyberspace. We see the global mechanism as a transparent, inclusive, a consensual -driven platform where states can exchange views, experiences, and best practices on implementing the UN Framework on Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace.

At the same time, we believe that priority should now be given to translating what we have agreed into concrete implementation. Our collective effort should therefore remain focused on a limited number of key priorities, including raising awareness, enhancing common understanding, and exchanging best practices to address current and emerging cyber threats, particularly those affecting critical infrastructure, ransomware, and the implementation of emergency technologies. In this context, the global mechanism should play an important coordinating role for advancing the practical implementation of international law in cyberspace, with the focus of translating agreed principles into operational guidance. Building on the roadmap provided by the final report of the open -ended working group, we underline the importance of continuing structured and inclusive discussions on how existing international law applies, including international humanitarian law and human rights law.

Confidence -building measures and cybercapacity building, particularly in support of developing countries, require needs -based and inclusive approaches. We highly value opportunities to learn from shared experiences, training, and technical assistance, which are crucial for strengthening our capacities and enabling us to act more effectively. The dedicated thematic groups should enable focused discussions, expert input, and exchanges. changes of best practices with the view to identify concrete solutions and capacity building needs. Meaningful engagement with the multi -stakeholder community remains essential to ensure inclusivity, facilitate the participation of smaller delegations, and enhance the overall effectiveness of the global mechanism. Finally, a word of gratitude to the donor countries supporting the Women in Cyber Fellowship, an important initiative that empowers women, enhances participation, and straightens global capacity building efforts.

We look forward to continued cooperation and meaningful progress. Thank you.

Muchísimas gracias por su intervención. Thank you very much for your statement. I now give the floor to the representative of Egypt.

Thank you, Chair. First, I wish to congratulate. Ambassador Agosalda for her official appointment as Chair of the Global Mechanism for the first biennium, 2026 -2027. We assure Her Excellency of Egypt’s full support and we’re confident that she will lead the process in a professional and transparent manner together with the ABLE team sitting behind her and as well the professional secretary she has Since it’s an organizational session, I’ll keep my points to three procedural issues First, the intersessional period for Egypt is as important as the substantive convening We see that we should make best use of this intersessional period and not waste it To make best use of it, we see that quick steps should be taken to appoint the co -facilitators of DTG 1 and DTG 2 in a way that ensures that there is balance between developing and developed countries This will enable the creation of a team to help that chair in preparation for the arduous tasks she has in preparation for the substantive session in July My second point Egypt views that the co -facilitators, and as per the reports we adopted the role is a kind of a support team or support staff for the chair their prerogative is to steer the discussions in DTG 1 DTG 2, prepare recommendations and send them to the chair who will in turn be responsible for deliberating upon those recommendations with the member states third and last point with that understanding Egypt’s reading to the reports and our understanding for what’s written in them is that those co -facilitators will work under the UN hat not under national capacities they will be responsible and accountable to the chair not the full membership accordingly, since now we have a chair in place, our focus should be on deliberating substantive issues and how to push forward our work rather than on procedural issues we look forward to working with you chair in the upcoming period and you have our support thank you so much

thank you very much Egypt for your statement I now give the floor to the delegation of Kiribati.

Thank you, Chair, for giving me the floor. At the outset, we congratulate you, Ambassador, on your election and assure you of Kiribati’s full support. Kiribati aligns itself with the statement delivered by the Solomon Islands on behalf of the Pacific Islands Forum. We welcome the establishment of this global mechanism as a timely and important step following the open -ended working group. It is essential that it remains focused on practical implementation, inclusivity, and tangible outcomes for all states. For small island -developing states like Kiribati, this mechanism represents more than an institutional development. It represents hope. As we navigate a rapidly evolving digital era, we face structural challenges. Including limited capacity, geographic isolation, i .e., connectivity costs and vulnerability to cyber threats.

This mechanism can help bridge capacity gaps, strengthen resilience, and expand assist to technical assistance. It also provides a platform for countries like ours to voice our priorities and call for more tailored support. As we work to bring more of our people online, we must ensure that digital transformation is safe secure, and inclusive. Addressing cybersecurity risks and closing the digital divide are urgent priorities to ensure that no one is left behind. The timing of this mechanism is critical. As digital transformation accelerates, the risk of exclusion for small and developing states grows. A global, inclusive, and action -oriented approach is therefore essential. Kiribati’s expectations are high. We look forward to discussions that recognize the needs of small highland developing states, particularly in capacity building, technical assistance, and implementation support.

We remain committed to working constructively with whole partners to ensure this mechanism delivers real and measurable outcomes for all. I thank you, Chair.

Thank you very much to the delegation of Kiribati. We’ve heard the last delegation speaking on behalf of member states, and I will now give the floor to the African Union, who will be followed by Interpol. The AU, please.

Thank you, Madam Chair, for giving us the floor. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the African Union Commission. At the outset, allow me to warmly congratulate you for the election as Chair of the Global Mechanism for the Biennium 26 -27. We express our full confidence in your leadership and assure you our constructive and committed engagement. For the African Union, our strategic priorities include protection of critical infrastructure, and information critical infrastructure, AI and imaging technologies in cybersecurity, digital sovereignty, and data governance, preventing cyber conflict escalation in fragile context. Following development of common African position and application of international law to the use of information and communication technology in cyberspace in 2024, the African Union has recently developed regional guidelines on implementation of UN norms of responsive state behavior.

The EU also commenced efforts to develop a new framework for the implementation of UN norms of responsive state behavior. with strategic partners to develop capacity for African Union member states to develop their national position on application of international law to cyberspace. Madam Chair, we still have challenges to that border on the responsive state behavior in cyberspace. We hope that normative priorities in the process of global mechanisms will also reflect development realities of Africa, non -interference in elections, protection of disinformation and cyber manipulation, and push for application of international law in cyberspace with African perspective. Through the process, we will continue to prioritize stronger AU coordination and common position in the global mechanism, especially aligning with the position of the European Union.

Thank you. needs in the global mechanism are not divergent but they complement each other. We hope for meaningful participation, support for African delegation to engage effectively and propose inclusion in agenda setting and thematic groups. The new UN mechanism plays strong emphasis in capacity building. This is where Africa should strategical position itself. As we move forward, the African Union wish to underscore the following key perspective to guide our collective work. The priorities must now shift from norms development to implementation. Regional organizations must be recognized as central pillars on the implementation. Capacity building must be predictable, sustainable, and aligned to national and continental goals. priorities. Moving beyond fragmented initiatives, we must invest in long -term international resilience, particularly in national service, critical infrastructure protection, and cyber diplomacy.

We also emphasize the increasing nexus between cybersecurity and peace and security. And also, in terms of confidence -building measures, we must be practical and operational. Final, we underscore the importance of bridging global discussion with national realities, ensuring that the outcome of this mechanism is accessible, implementable, and responsive to the needs of developing countries. Madam Chair, the African Union stands ready to contribute actively and constructively to this process. We will share with the Secretary the full written statement with additional detailed perspective. We thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you very much for your statement and I now give the floor to Interpol

Thank you Madam Chair As the world’s largest international police organization we work every day to help police in our 196 member countries cooperate across borders through secure communication channels shared databases, operational support and capacity building activities Madam Chair, at the outset Interpol congratulates you on your appointment as Chair of the Global Mechanism We also commend UN member states for establishing this permanent platform to sustain international cooperation on ICT security Interpol welcomes the Global Mechanism and sees potential to contribute its expertise particularly on the criminal dimension of ICT security In this context, we note the relevance of the agreed framework for responsible state behavior including the importance of cooperation to exchange information assist with the cooperation of the international police and the international community to protect the security of the United States and protect the security of the United States and protect the security of the United States and protect the security of the United States and protect the security of the United States and protect the security of the United States and protect the security of the United States and protect the security of the United States and protect the security of the United States Interpol’s perspective is grounded in the operational reality of transnational cybercrime.

A global criminal supply chain has developed, in which specialized actors provide initial access, infrastructure, malware, extortion, and money laundering as a service. Warningly, AI is increasingly supercharging this ecosystem, making operations more scalable, more resilient, and more dangerous. To directly tackle key enablers of cyber insecurity, such as bulletproof hosting services, residential proxies, phishing kits, ransomware as a service, and the misuse of generative AI, Interpol is launching Project Stardust. We invite UN member states to consider partnering with us on this initiative. Today’s cyber threat landscape demands international cooperation. This is at the core of Interpol’s mission. Based in Singapore, our Cybercrime Directorate works with police to identify offenders, dismantle malicious infrastructure, recover illicit proceeds, and support victims.

Operation Synergyator brought together law enforcement from over 70 countries to target phishing, malware and ransomware and led to 94 arrests and the takedown of more than 45 ,000 malicious IP addresses and servers. In this regard, Interpol welcomes the global mechanism emphasis on capacity building, including through one of the dedicated thematic groups. This is an area where Interpol is well -placed to contribute, drawing on practical experience in training, tabletop exercises, and technical assistance. An example is Project Symphony, which aims to protect critical infrastructure from threats, such as ransomware, by building an advanced training ecosystem and strengthening national coordination. We are actively looking for partners for this initiative. Madam Chair, Interpol stands ready to engage constructively with the global mechanism, including on threats and capacity building efforts, where our

Thank you very much. I now give the floor to International Chamber of Commerce.

Thank you, Madam Chair. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the International Chamber of Commerce as an observer to the UN General Assembly. First, my sincere congratulations to you, Madam Chair, on your election and to your team for their tireless efforts. We have strong confidence in your leadership and in your ability to guide this process in an inclusive and effective manner. The International Chamber of Commerce welcomes the launch of this new global mechanism on cybersecurity at a moment of profound geopolitical tension and accelerating cyber risk. Around the world, businesses are operating in an environment marked by conflict, economic uncertainty, and a sustained rise in malicious cyber activity, targeting governments, companies, and critical services alike.

In this context, the private sector views the success of this new mechanism not as a procedural exercise, but as a strategic necessity for global stability and economic resilience. Drawing on lessons from the open -ended working group, one message is clear. Cyber security outcomes improve when dialogue moves beyond abstract consensus and toward practical implementation. For this new global mechanism, the ICC encourages three priorities. First, stakeholder participation must be meaningful and predictable. Cyber security is not negotiated in isolation from the systems it seeks to protect. The absence of industry, civil society, and the technical community from these critical discussions undermines the quality and credibility of outcomes. especially on threats that directly affect cloud services, critical infrastructure, and global supply chains.

Second, the work of the dedicated thematic groups should be focused, solution -oriented, and connected to real -world risks. The DTGs should prioritize protection of critical infrastructure and essential services, coordinated vulnerability disclosure and systemic risk reduction, and capacity -building models that mobilize both public and private investment, rather than duplicating existing initiatives. Third, the mechanism must address emerging gaps left unresolved by the OEWG, particularly in uneven implementation of agreed norms in an ever -expanding threat landscape. In closing, Chair, we believe this global mechanism has a real opportunity to move from dialogue to delivery, and the ICC stands ready to support this ambition. Thank you.

Thank you very much for your statement well I also wanted to just thank everyone for the interest and participation on the part of the NGOs who have a standing invitation to participate to the General Assembly thank you very much to all of you for your interest in participating in this dialogue. I’ve been informed that the delegation of the Russian Federation wishes to make a second contribution. I will give them the floor for some very brief remarks

Thank you Madam Chair indeed I will be very brief I wanted to express our support for Iran’s position as regards the need to adjust the language on the five pillars as it’s currently worded in paragraph 9 of NXC to the third annual report the Russian Federation believes that this discrepancy needs to be corrected. We need to revert back to the consensus -based version. Thank you. Gracias. Thank you.

I see that no other delegation has requested the floor. May I take it that the mechanism wishes to conclude its consideration of Agenda Item 4? It is so decided. Very well. Distinguished delegates, we have run out of the time that we had available to us this afternoon. Once again, thank you very much to all of you for having listened to the Chair’s suggestions to make efficient use of the minutes we had available to us to finish our agenda. letter from this morning. There are just a few statistics that the Secretariat wanted to share with me that I think are very interesting. Four groups of member states took the floor. 61 states and three intergovernmental organisations with a standing invitation with observer status at the General Assembly also made statements.

Of all of these 68 statements, 34 were made by female representatives, by women. So that means that half of the speakers during this debate were women. And a lot of you are also beneficiaries of the Women in Cyber Fellowship Programme. I thought it would be beneficial to just highlight this because a lot of delegations emphasise this point in their statements. So with this good news, I think we’re finishing on a very positive note. I wanted to thank you all for your time. Thank you for your interest, your participation. I think that the global mechanism has got off to a very good start. And we’ll see each other back here tomorrow at 10am. And having said that, I wish you all a very good afternoon.

The meeting is adjourned. Thank you. Thank you.