WSIS+20 Forum High-Level Event: Open Consultation Process Meeting | IGF 2023 Open Forum #4

Arguments

Need to deal with implications of changes in digital society

---

Addressing the digital inequality paradox

---

Critical attention on digital rights, environmental sustainability, digital inclusion, and cybersecurity

---

Need for financial resources to build the digital future

---

Mandate of IGF and WSIS Forum has been extended

---

A call for outlining the future with ambition

---

Report

During the review of WSIS plus 20, it has been highlighted that addressing the implications of changes in the digital society is crucial. This is due to the fact that an increasing number of people are getting connected, leading to a rise in digital inequality.

The argument is that it is important to deal with these implications in order to ensure a fair and inclusive digital society. A key aspect emphasized during the review is the necessity for compromise and agreement in order to achieve the goals set by WSIS.

This is particularly important in relation to industry, innovation, and infrastructure, as well as peace, justice, and strong institutions. The focus is on identifying factors that will contribute to reaching compromise during the review process. Addressing the issue of digital inequality is another important aspect discussed during the review.

As more people become connected, digital inequality is amplified and continues to grow. The argument is that this paradoxical situation needs to be addressed in order to achieve SDG 10, which aims to reduce inequalities. The review acknowledges the need to find solutions to bridge the digital divide and prioritize digital inclusion.

Critical attention has also been given to other areas such as digital rights, environmental sustainability, digital inclusion, and cybersecurity. These are seen as significant factors that require careful consideration and swift action. The review highlights the importance of protecting digital rights, ensuring environmental sustainability in digital development, promoting digital inclusion for all groups, and prioritizing cybersecurity to safeguard digital systems.

The importance of financial resources in building the digital future is also highlighted. This neutral argument emphasizes the need for financial investments to support the development of digital infrastructure, innovation, and initiatives. The review recognizes that financial resources play a vital role in ensuring the successful implementation of the digital future.

One positive outcome mentioned in the review is the extension of the mandate of the IGF (Internet Governance Forum) and WSIS Forum. This is seen as a positive development, as these platforms facilitate discussions and collaboration on key digital issues.

The extension of their mandate reflects the recognition of their importance in shaping the digital agenda. However, the review also criticizes the lack of ambition in previous actions. It highlights that previous initiatives and resolutions, including those discussed in the UN General Assembly, did not adequately address crucial aspects such as artificial intelligence, social networks, and the Internet of Things.

This critical stance underscores the need for more ambitious and comprehensive actions to address emerging digital challenges. The review also emphasizes the importance of outlining the future with ambition. This calls for forward-thinking and proactive planning to adapt to evolving digital landscapes.

It is mentioned that the future needs to be thoughtfully and ambitiously defined to ensure progress and avoid falling behind. One observation made during the review is the uncertainty regarding the influence of the UN General Assembly due to political influences.

This neutral stance acknowledges that political factors can impact the decision-making process and the implementation of digital initiatives. It highlights the need for careful consideration of political influences and the importance of ensuring unbiased decision-making. In conclusion, the WSIS plus 20 review underscores the need to address the implications of changes in the digital society.

It emphasizes the importance of compromise and agreement to achieve goals, as well as the need to tackle digital inequality. Critical attention is given to digital rights, environmental sustainability, digital inclusion, and cybersecurity. Financial resources are deemed necessary for building the digital future, while the extension of the mandate of the IGF and WSIS Forum is considered a positive outcome.

Criticism is expressed regarding the lack of ambition in previous actions, and there is a call for outlining the future with ambition. However, uncertainty exists regarding the influence of the UN General Assembly due to political influences.

Arguments

Bangladesh has successfully integrated WSIS action lines with their 5-year plan.

---

Need for WSIS forum annually.

---

Call for a toolkit for parliamentarians and mayors from the WSIS Secretariat.

---

Need for WSIS action line localization and separate sub-regional open consultations.

---

Community media sector is under threat by social media and new tech.

---

Report

The analysis highlights several significant points regarding the integration of WSIS action lines in Bangladesh. Firstly, the government of Bangladesh, in collaboration with civil society organizations (CSOs), has successfully integrated the WSIS action lines with their 5-year plan. This integration demonstrates their commitment to digital transformation, as they have aligned their national development goals with the objectives set by the WSIS action lines.

This achievement is a positive indicator of Bangladesh's progress in promoting industry, innovation, and infrastructure, as outlined in SDG 9. Furthermore, the analysis emphasizes the need for an annual WSIS forum. This forum would serve as a platform for stakeholders to come together and discuss the latest developments in industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

By convening this forum, opportunities for collaboration, knowledge-sharing, and partnership-building can be created. This neutral argument recommends the regular organization of this forum, given the fast-paced nature of advancements in technology and the need for continuous dialogue among stakeholders. Moreover, the analysis highlights the importance of the WSIS Secretariat developing a toolkit for parliamentarians and mayors.

This toolkit would assist these key decision-makers in effectively implementing the WSIS action lines and promoting sustainable cities and communities, as outlined in SDG 11. By providing parliamentarians and mayors with practical resources and guidance, the WSIS Secretariat can contribute to the successful implementation of the action lines at the local level.

Additionally, there is a discussion around the need for the localization of WSIS action lines and the conduct of separate sub-regional open consultations. These measures would ensure that the WSIS action lines are adapted and implemented to suit the specific contexts and needs of different regions.

Localizing the action lines and facilitating sub-regional consultations can help address the diverse challenges and opportunities faced by different countries and communities. Moreover, the analysis raises concerns about the impact of social media and new technologies on the community media sector.

It argues that community media, which plays a crucial role in giving voice to marginalized groups, is under threat due to the dominance of social media platforms and advancements in technology. This negative sentiment calls for the protection of the community media sector as a voice for the voiceless.

The summary further highlights the supporting fact that community media is the only media ensuring voices for the voiceless from the ground. In conclusion, the analysis provides valuable insights into the integration of WSIS action lines in Bangladesh, emphasizing the successful alignment of the action lines with the country's 5-year plan.

It also highlights the importance of an annual WSIS forum, the development of a toolkit for parliamentarians and mayors, and the localization of action lines through separate sub-regional open consultations. Additionally, it highlights the challenges faced by the community media sector and advocates for its protection as a valuable platform for amplifying the voices of marginalized groups.

These findings underscore the significance of international cooperation and collaboration in achieving the sustainable development goals and promoting digital transformation.

Arguments

Desire to understand the collective global ambition for digital cooperation

---

Report

The analysis focuses on the frustrations expressed by Bertrand regarding the lack of global cooperation in digital matters. Bertrand expresses a desire to understand the collective global ambition for digital cooperation. The success of the technical architecture during the pandemic is mentioned as evidence of the potential for collaboration.

However, the absence of a collective decision is seen as a hindrance to achieving this ambition. The discussion also highlights Bertrand's negative sentiment towards WSIS Plus 20 being limited to a mere review. He believes that the event should be more than just a backward-looking examination of past achievements.

Rather, there should be a critical evaluation of the failings and missed opportunities to drive progress in digital cooperation. This stance suggests the need for substantial and meaningful action during WSIS Plus 20, rather than merely revisiting past discussions. The analysis further emphasizes the significance of transnational institutions in addressing the lack of cooperation.

It is argued that the absence of collaboration is a major obstacle to achieving digital cooperation goals. While the technical community is acknowledged for its successful contributions, it is believed that they do not have the authority to speak on policy matters.

Thus, the need for transnational institutions is highlighted to facilitate effective policy-making and decision-making processes. In conclusion, the analysis illuminates the frustration over the lack of global cooperation in digital matters. It emphasizes the importance of a collective decision on the ambition for digital cooperation and calls for WSIS Plus 20 to go beyond a mere review.

The significance of transnational institutions in fostering collaboration and addressing policy issues is underscored. Overall, the analysis highlights the need for concerted efforts and effective governance structures to achieve meaningful progress in digital cooperation.

Arguments

Need to focus and prioritize what WSIS wants to do in conjunction with other issues

---

Digital media agenda and economics of the digital transformation should be considered

---

Report

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) has made significant progress, operating in 182 countries and offering concrete solutions to address the challenges of today. The need to prioritize WSIS goals and align them with other important issues has been emphasized.

One argument put forward is that the focus on knowledge society and transformation should be reinstated, recognizing the importance of skills, competencies, democratic participation, and individuals' ability to tackle current and future challenges. It has been observed that the impact of digital transformation on traditional media and the public sphere is profound.

Legacy media has been significantly affected, and the public sphere has become fragmented due to the rise of various digital platforms and sources of information. This raises questions about the future of traditional media and the importance of ensuring a diverse and inclusive public discourse in the digital age.

Furthermore, there is a call for European Union (EU) countries to unite around a digital solidarity agenda. Digital solidarity is seen as a political agenda crucial for bridging the digital divide. Cooperation among EU countries is essential in addressing disparities in access to digital technologies and ensuring equal opportunities for all citizens.

In conclusion, the WSIS demands focused prioritization and collaboration with other areas of concern. Reinstating the focus on knowledge society and transformation is crucial, encompassing important aspects such as skills, competencies, democratic participation, and the capability to address current and future challenges.

The impact of digital transformation on legacy media and the public sphere is undeniable, highlighting the need for adaptation and inclusivity. Additionally, unity among EU countries on a digital solidarity agenda is necessary to address the digital divide, ensuring that no individual or community is left behind in the digital era.

Arguments

Inclusion of technical community in the process

---

Report

The analysis presented focuses on the contention surrounding the inclusion of the technical community in the process of internet governance. One of the speakers, Byron Holland, who represents CIRA, which operates the .ca domain, advocates for the involvement of the technical community.

Holland stresses that the technical community, distinct from academia and civil society, plays a crucial role in running the internet and should therefore have a voice in the governance process. Another speaker takes a neutral stance on the issue, arguing that the technical community should be recognized as key actors and stakeholders in internet governance.

It is important to note that the technical community comprises both for-profit and non-profit organizations. The overall sentiment towards the inclusion of the technical community leans towards negativity, indicating opposing views on their participation in internet governance. However, the neutral stance on their role as key actors suggests an acknowledgment of their significance and influence in the process.

The analysis lacks specific supporting evidence for the negative sentiment, making it necessary to further explore the reasons underlying this viewpoint. Delving deeper into this topic could provide insights into the concerns or reservations held by those who oppose including the technical community in the governance process.

In conclusion, the debate over the inclusion of the technical community in internet governance reveals differing opinions. The analysis raises important points about their role and underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of this issue.

Arguments

Starting of the first open consultation process meeting

---

It's a consultative process to listen from all stakeholders.

---

WSIS forum will take place in collaboration with the AI for Good Summit

---

The review of WSIS Plus 20 is a multi-stakeholder process involving voices from different sectors

---

WSIS discussions will focus on capacity building in public administrations

---

Technical community is an important part of the internet governance process

---

Report

The first open consultation process meeting for the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Forum has begun. This meeting marks the start of the consultative process and aims to develop the agenda and program for the event. The purpose of this open consultation process is to involve all stakeholders and encourage their active participation and feedback.

This inclusivity ensures that all voices are heard and taken into consideration. Furthermore, the WSIS Forum will be held in collaboration with the AI for Good Summit. The AI for Good Summit will take place in the CICG, while the WSIS Forum will be held in both the CICG and the ITU premises.

This collaboration emphasizes the importance of combining efforts in leveraging technology for the benefit of humanity. The review process of WSIS Plus 20 is a multi-stakeholder approach that involves the collection of perspectives from various sectors such as civil society, academia, and other stakeholders.

This process consists of different stages, including the SDG Summit, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in 2020, regional reviews by different commissions, and a high-level meeting in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in 2025. The aim of this review process is to ensure the continuous engagement of different stakeholders in shaping the future of WSIS beyond 2025.

The WSIS process strongly encourages cross-sectoral participation. Ministers from various sectors including environment, education, and climate are expected to engage in the process. Additionally, participation from heads of state, UN agencies, CEOs, ambassadors, mayors, and leaders from civil society is also invited.

The meeting also provides a provision for remote participation, allowing for wider inclusion. During the UNESCO General Conference, discussions will focus on the challenges surrounding digital transformation and capacity building in public administrations. This thematic focus highlights the need to address the obstacles faced during the process of embracing digital technologies in public administrations and the importance of enhancing capacity in this area.

Ensuring the smooth execution of both the WSIS and AI for Good conferences is a priority. Logistics for these conferences are currently under discussion, and efforts are being made to ensure that the venues for both events are adjacent. This will facilitate better coordination and alignment between the conferences, promoting a seamless experience for participants.

The role of the technical community in internet governance is crucial. However, it was noted that there was an oversight in one of the presentations, where the role of the technical community was not sufficiently highlighted. This was acknowledged as a human error, and Gitanjali Sah agreed with Byron Holland's suggestion of including the technical community as a prominent stakeholder.

This emphasizes the importance of recognizing and involving the technical community in shaping internet governance policies and practices. In conclusion, the first open consultation process meeting of the WSIS Forum has begun, focusing on developing the agenda and program for the event.

The WSIS process encourages the involvement of all stakeholders and aims to gather diverse perspectives for the review of WSIS Plus 20. The collaboration with the AI for Good Summit and the emphasis on cross-sectoral participation further highlight the collaborative approach of WSIS.

Additionally, discussions during the UNESCO General Conference will center around digital transformation challenges and capacity building in public administrations. The smooth execution of both the WSIS and AI for Good conferences is a priority, and the importance of involving the technical community in internet governance has been recognized.

Arguments

Justin Fair commends the coordination and maturity in the WSIS process

---

Justin Fair expresses the importance of taking stock and understanding the progress made and challenges faced

---

Report

Justin Fair, a prominent figure in the field, applauds the coordination and maturity displayed in the WSIS (World Summit on the Information Society) process. He notes a significant improvement in these areas, resulting in better outcomes. This positive sentiment signifies general satisfaction with the progress achieved in the WSIS process.

Fair also emphasizes the importance of conducting a thorough review of past progress and challenges in the WSIS. He highlights the WSIS Plus Forum as a valuable platform for retrospectively evaluating accomplishments and obstacles. Fair argues that understanding these experiences is vital for preparing for the future.

By drawing insights from past successes and challenges, stakeholders can develop more effective strategies to achieve greater outcomes. Furthermore, Fair seeks more information about an upcoming UNESCO conference scheduled for early 2025. He specifically wants to know if the conference is part of the WSIS Plus 20 review.

Fair also raises concerns about the logistics of merging two meetings in Geneva and managing a large number of attendees. These inquiries underscore the significance of detailed planning and efficient execution in organizing successful conferences and events. Overall, Fair's observations and insights highlight the positive developments within the WSIS process.

The coordination and maturity he commends serve as catalysts for achieving better outcomes. Additionally, his focus on reviewing past progress and challenges acknowledges the importance of learning from past experiences to shape future actions. Fair's inquiries about logistics and concerns about attendee management underscore the practical challenges organizers must overcome to deliver successful events.

Arguments

Importance of the WSIS plus 20 review process

---

The need for unrealizing the connectivity gap and evolving the WSIS action lines to complement the sustainable development goals

---

The importance of having a WSIS Plus 20 high-level track at the WSIS Forum

---

Report

The WSIS plus 20 review process was emphasised as being of great importance. The focus of this review process is on the process itself, ensuring that all stakeholders and diverse regions are included. This highlights the significance placed on inclusivity and collaboration in shaping the future of the WSIS.

The review process aims to examine not only past achievements, but also looks ahead to the future, considering the importance of the roadmap towards the UNGA discussions and the need to bridge the connectivity gap. The discussions also highlighted the need to bridge the connectivity gap, emphasizing its hindrance to progress in various areas, including achieving the sustainable development goals.

To achieve this, there is a call to evolve the WSIS action lines to complement the sustainable development goals. The linkage between the sustainable development goals and the matrix developed in 2015 was seen as important, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach that aligns various objectives to promote a more interconnected and sustainable world.

In addition, a recommendation was made to have ministers come to Geneva to discuss issues at a proposed high-level track during the WSIS Forum. This aims to facilitate more meaningful and impactful discussions, indicating the importance of preparation in advance to ensure that important topics are effectively addressed.

The analysis also revealed a positive sentiment towards the work done by UNESCO and ICANN on multilingualism, recognizing their efforts in reducing inequalities and fostering inclusivity in communication and internet accessibility. UNESCO's "Connecting the Dots" event was greatly appreciated, along with the recognition of ICANN and other areas' work in developing international domain names and furthering multilingualism.

Overall, the observations from the analysis indicate the recognition of the importance of the WSIS plus 20 review process, bridging the connectivity gap, and evolving the WSIS action lines to align with the sustainable development goals. The recommendation for a high-level track at the WSIS Forum, along with the appreciation for UNESCO and ICANN's work on multilingualism, further demonstrates the commitment towards promoting inclusivity, collaboration, and international cooperation in addressing global challenges.

Arguments

UNESCO is advancing substantial discussions on regulation, and supporting artists

---

The UNESCO General Conference will take place in November, where discussions related to WSIS are part of the roadmap.

---

The conference in February 2025 is part of the WSIS discussions and will have a thematic focus on capacity building in public administrations.

---

The February 2025 conference is meant to address challenges around digital transformation and digital governance.

---

The February 2025 conference is meant to engage multiple stakeholders and partners.

---

They are considering launching an IGF dynamic coalition on digital capacity building.

---

Report

UNESCO is actively driving discussions on the regulation of various aspects while also supporting artists. They have recognised the importance of information as a public good and have endorsed this concept. In order to ensure media pluralism and transparency in the digital realm, UNESCO has developed guidelines.

Additionally, they are actively engaged in strengthening Internet governance and promoting the proliferation of media. To enhance digital capacity within public administrations, UNESCO is working on various initiatives, including the exploration of digital capacity building programs and training opportunities. Moreover, UNESCO is planning a significant conference in February 2025 with a focus on addressing challenges related to digital transformation and governance.

This conference aims to bring together stakeholders and partners from diverse backgrounds to discuss and find solutions. Furthermore, UNESCO is considering establishing an Internet Governance Forum (IGF) dynamic coalition for digital capacity building. This demonstrates UNESCO's commitment to enhancing digital skills and knowledge across different sectors.

In November, the UNESCO General Conference will take place, where discussions related to the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) will be conducted. This highlights the importance UNESCO places on global cooperation and addressing digital challenges. Overall, UNESCO's active involvement in regulation discussions and support for artists signifies their commitment to fostering a fair and inclusive digital landscape.

By endorsing information as a public good, developing guidelines, and focusing on capacity building and engagement with multiple stakeholders, UNESCO strives to promote transparency, accessibility, and knowledge sharing in the digital domain.

Arguments

We are at a pivotal moment for the role of ICTs and digital technologies for the future of humanity

---

Broad recognition of the role that digital technologies can play in accelerating our progress towards achieving SDG

---

Report

ICTs and digital technologies are poised to play a crucial role in shaping the future of humanity. This recognition marks a pivotal moment in our understanding of their potential impact and significance. The speaker highlights the importance of these technologies in advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 9, which focuses on industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

There is widespread recognition of the transformative power of digital technologies in accelerating progress towards achieving the SDGs. The argument stresses the positive impact these technologies can have on various aspects of society. The SDG Digital Acceleration Agenda report, co-released with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), supports this argument by showcasing the numerous ways in which technology can contribute to SDG attainment.

It is seen as cause for celebration, as the potential of digital technologies to address the underlying challenges outlined in the SDGs is acknowledged. The speaker proudly mentions their role as a co-chair of the UN Group on Information Society.

Together with co-organizers UNCTAD and UNESCO, they actively contribute to the work of this group. The UN Group on Information Society is focused on SDG 17, which emphasizes partnerships for the goals. This highlights the importance of collaborative efforts in achieving the SDGs.

The speaker expresses gratitude towards the government of Switzerland for hosting the WSIS Forum this year. This serves as a platform for sharing ideas, insights, and experiences to further advance the information society agenda. In conclusion, ICTs and digital technologies have become vital tools for the future of humanity.

Their potential to accelerate progress towards the SDGs is widely recognized. The speaker's involvement in the UN Group on Information Society reflects a commitment to partnership and collaboration, as no one entity can achieve the SDGs alone. Finally, the speaker extends their gratitude to the government of Switzerland for hosting the WSIS Forum, a significant event for advancing the global information society.

Arguments

WSIS Plus 20 review process has begun with the first consultation held at the IGF

---

UNCTAD along with other agencies have issued a questionnaire to assess progress towards achieving a people-centred, inclusive, and development-oriented information society as envisaged in Tunis

---

Report

The WSIS Plus 20 review process has commenced with the initiation of the first consultation at the IGF (Internet Governance Forum). Adopting a multistakeholder approach, the process aims to evaluate progress in implementing the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes.

Furthermore, plans are in place to organise events in various regions in collaboration with the regional commissions or the IGF regional forums. This inclusive approach promotes diverse perspectives and contributions to shaping the information society. UNCTAD, together with other agencies such as ITU, UNESCO, UNDP, and DESA, has released a questionnaire to assess the advancement towards achieving a people-centred, inclusive, and development-oriented information society as envisaged in Tunis.

The objective is to gather comprehensive data for a meaningful review, which will be submitted to the General Assembly. This collaborative effort among agencies reflects the commitment to evaluating and fostering progress in the information society domain. UNCTAD's primary mandate revolves around leveraging international trade for development, with a particular focus on enabling developing countries to engage effectively in e-commerce and the digital economy.

To facilitate this objective, UNCTAD has conducted diagnostic assessments for approximately 39-40 countries to determine their readiness for e-commerce. Additionally, the E-trade for All Platform, a collaborative initiative involving 35 agencies, is working towards addressing the challenges and opportunities associated with e-commerce in developing countries.

UNCTAD's upcoming E-Week in Geneva will dedicate its focus to capturing the potential benefits of the digital economy for developing nations. However, despite the efforts being made, numerous developing countries, especially the Least Developed Countries (LDCs), face substantial obstacles that impede their ability to actively participate in e-commerce and the digital economy.

These challenges include insufficient connectivity, inadequate legal and regulatory frameworks, and inadequate logistics facilities. It is evident that addressing these issues requires a collective effort, as no single agency can single-handedly achieve the goal of inclusive participation in e-commerce for all developing countries.

In conclusion, the WSIS Plus 20 review process has commenced with the inclusion of multiple stakeholders, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of progress in implementing the WSIS outcomes. UNCTAD, in conjunction with other agencies, is working towards assessing the achievement of a people-centred information society through a questionnaire.

UNCTAD's primary focus on leveraging international trade for development aligns with its efforts to enable developing countries to embrace e-commerce and the digital economy. However, challenges persist, particularly in the case of developing countries and LDCs, in terms of connectivity, legal frameworks, and logistical capabilities.

Addressing these issues necessitates a collaborative approach involving various stakeholders to ensure meaningful and inclusive participation of all developing countries in the digital economy.

Arguments

The WSIS plus 20 process is complicated and different from 20 years ago due to the increase in events, structures, and overlapping structures

---

The existence of several tracks and parallel structures in the current system is similar to reality's diversity.

---

The WSIS process and the IGF have been instrumental in creating a more inclusive space within the UN and other institutions

---

The AI for Good Summit will be held during the WSIS Plus 20 High-Level Forum week.

---

The world has become more competitive, with a win-lose mentality rather than a focus on sharing and cooperation

---

Report

The WSIS plus 20 process has significantly evolved over the past 20 years, as there has been an increase in the number of events, structures, and overlapping structures. This complexity is seen as both a challenge and an opportunity. On one hand, the multitude of tracks and parallel structures can make the process more challenging to navigate.

However, on the other hand, it is seen as a positive reflection of the diversity of perspectives and interests involved in the process. The WSIS process and the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) have played vital roles in creating a more inclusive space within the United Nations (UN) and other institutions.

By giving voice to stakeholders from all over the world, these initiatives have helped ensure that diverse perspectives are represented and considered in discussions related to industry, innovation, and infrastructure (SDG 9) and reducing inequalities (SDG 10), as well as peace, justice, and strong institutions (SDG 16).

Switzerland is set to co-host the next year's WSIS event, which demonstrates its commitment to the process. Thomas Schneider, in particular, has shown his support for the actors driving the WSIS process and is excited about Switzerland's role as the co-host.

This involvement further underscores the importance of the WSIS process and Switzerland's dedication to fostering partnerships for the goals (SDG 17). The AI for Good Summit, a significant initiative in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), will be held during the WSIS Plus 20 High-Level Forum week.

This demonstrates the recognition of the interconnections between the advancements in AI, industry, innovation, and infrastructure. However, it is important to acknowledge that there has been a shift in the global landscape. 20 years ago, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, there was hope that technology would foster peace, freedoms, and sharing.

However, in the current environment, the focus has shifted towards competition, with a win-lose mentality prevailing over collaboration and sharing. This observation highlights the need for a renewed commitment to peace, cooperation, and collaboration in the face of these complex times.

It is essential to reinterpret the Vicious Vision, a concept associated with striving for peace and cooperation, in light of these challenges. Overall, the WSIS plus 20 process has become more intricate over the years, with an increase in events, structures, and overlapping structures.

However, the existence of several tracks and parallel structures is also seen as a positive reflection of the diversity of perspectives involved. The WSIS process, along with the IGF, has played a crucial role in creating a more inclusive space within the UN and other institutions.

Switzerland's upcoming role as co-host of the next year's event further demonstrates its commitment to the process. The AI for Good Summit, held during the WSIS Plus 20 High-Level Forum week, highlights the intersectionality between AI and the WSIS process. As the world becomes more competitive, it becomes increasingly important to strive for peace, cooperation, and reinterpret the Vicious Vision to address the challenges of the present times.

Arguments

World Summit on Information Society (WSIS) has been an important global platform for digital cooperation and development

---

70% of SDG targets could be boosted by digital technologies

---

The WSIS process plays a key role in harnessing the collective energy of a variety of stakeholders for the benefit of the humanity and the planet

---

Consultative meetings offer opportunities for diverse voices to shape policies, strategies and initiatives that will define our digital future

---

An invitation for all stakeholders to come together and participate in the Open Consultation Process (OCP)

---

Report

The World Summit on Information Society (WSIS) is a significant global platform for digital cooperation and development. It has been praised for its inclusive and multi-stakeholder nature, allowing various voices and perspectives to shape policies and initiatives that will define our digital future.

The WSIS process plays a vital role in harnessing the collective energy of stakeholders for the benefit of humanity and the planet. One noteworthy argument is that digital technologies have the potential to boost 70% of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) targets.

This highlights the transformative power of technology in achieving the SDGs, particularly in areas such as industry, innovation, and infrastructure. By leveraging digital technologies, countries can accelerate progress towards achieving the SDGs and addressing global challenges. The upcoming WSIS plus 20 high-level event, scheduled from 27th to 31st May 2024, is a special edition of the annual WSIS Forum.

This event will be co-hosted by the Confederation of Switzerland. It provides an opportunity for stakeholders to come together and discuss the future of digital cooperation and development. Such events allow for collaboration, innovation, and work towards creating more inclusive information and knowledge societies.

The Consultative Meetings within the WSIS process are highlighted as crucial platforms where diverse voices can shape policies, strategies, and initiatives. These meetings offer an opportunity for stakeholders to contribute their insights and expertise in defining our digital future. By taking an inclusive approach, the WSIS process ensures that the needs and perspectives of all stakeholders are considered.

Another notable aspect is the Open Consultation Process (OCP), which invites all stakeholders to participate. This process encourages individuals and organizations to share their views and ideas, fostering collaboration and engagement in digital cooperation efforts. It acts as a mechanism to gather input and promote a bottom-up approach to decision-making.

Furthermore, the importance of collaboration and partnership among stakeholders and UN agencies is emphasized. The WSIS plus 20 review calls for enhanced collaboration and partnership to strengthen digital cooperation and development efforts. The close collaboration among UN agencies such as UNESCO, UNDP, UNCTAD, CSTD, and UNDESA is cited as an example of the valuable partnerships that can be formed.

In conclusion, the World Summit on Information Society (WSIS) is a vital global platform that promotes digital cooperation and development. Its inclusive and multi-stakeholder nature allows for collaboration, innovation, and the shaping of policies and initiatives that will define our digital future.

Digital technologies have the potential to boost the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The WSIS plus 20 high-level event, Consultative Meetings, Open Consultation Process (OCP), and collaboration among stakeholders and UN agencies all contribute to the ongoing efforts in achieving digital cooperation and development goals.

Arguments

Digital inequality is increasing with more people getting connected

---

Compromises and inputs are needed to build processes addressing policy issues in the digital future.

---

Report

The analysis of the provided information reveals several important points made by the speakers. Firstly, it is highlighted that digital inequality is increasing as more people become connected. This amplifies and complicates existing disparities. The speakers argue that as technology becomes more accessible and prevalent, it is essential to address the growing digital divide to ensure equal opportunities and access for all individuals.

The second point raised is regarding the upcoming WSIS plus 20 review. The speakers pose the question of what we want to achieve and in which direction to go for building a digital society. This review serves as an opportunity to assess the progress made so far and to determine the future direction.

The speakers emphasize the importance of strategic planning and the need to identify the desired outcomes for building a digital society. Furthermore, the analysis highlights the significance of compromises and inputs in shaping policy processes for the digital future. The speakers argue that to address the complex issues surrounding digital advancements, it is crucial to arrive at agreements that consider multiple perspectives.

They stress the need for inclusive decision-making processes and the involvement of all stakeholders to ensure policies are effective and beneficial to society. Lastly, there is a call to strengthen the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) to operationalize global digital cooperation.

The IGF serves as a platform for dialogue and collaboration among different actors involved in internet governance. The speakers argue that by enhancing the IGF's mandate, there can be greater operationalization of global digital cooperation, leading to more effective and inclusive decision-making processes.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the increasing digital inequality resulting from the expanding number of people becoming connected. It emphasises the importance of strategic planning and goal-setting for building a digital society, as well as the need for compromises and inputs in policy processes addressing the digital future.

Moreover, there is a call to strengthen the mandate of the Internet Governance Forum to enhance global digital cooperation. These insights shed light on the challenges and opportunities in the digital realm and underscore the need for collaborative efforts to ensure a more equitable and inclusive digital future.

Arguments

Consideration and planning for long-term vision beyond 2025 is necessary.

---

Report

During the event, the speakers emphasised the importance of long-term planning and consideration beyond the year 2025. They suggested taking a preliminary 20-year view to better understand future needs and goals. This long-term vision is seen as necessary for effective preparation and decision-making.

A key aspect highlighted by the speakers is the need to define what is desired for the future. By clearly outlining the objectives, it becomes easier to work towards achieving them. This includes considering the future of visas, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and digital companies.

Involving a broad range of stakeholders allows for multi-stakeholder estimation, providing diverse perspectives and insights. The involvement of multiple stakeholders is regarded as essential in shaping the future of visas, SDGs, and digital companies. This approach enables diverse voices to be heard, ensuring that decisions are well-informed and inclusive.

The speakers believe that by soliciting input from various stakeholders, a comprehensive and holistic understanding of the future can be achieved. The speakers stated the importance of considering at least a preliminary 20-year view as evidence. This suggests that future planning should take into account long-term consequences and impacts.

Proactive measures can then be taken to address potential challenges and opportunities. Overall, the speakers expressed a positive sentiment towards long-term planning, multi-stakeholder involvement, and defining future goals. They emphasised the value of considering a broader perspective and seeking input from various stakeholders for a more inclusive and comprehensive decision-making process.

To conclude, long-term vision and planning beyond 2025 are crucial for effective preparation and decision-making. By involving multiple stakeholders and defining future objectives, a more inclusive and comprehensive understanding of the future can be achieved. This approach ensures that decisions regarding visas, SDGs, and digital companies are well-informed and aligned with desired outcomes.