WSIS High-Level Dialogue: Multistakeholder Partnerships Driving Digital Transformation

Report

Lithuania is staunchly advocating for robust digital collaboration on a global stage, voicing robust support for the implementation of a multi-stakeholder model to achieve these objectives. The proven efficacy of such an approach is exemplified by its successful employment in the arena of legislation adoption within the European Union.

A tangible expression of the impact of this approach is visible in Ukraine’s circumstance, which demonstrates resilience against pressure, thanks to the formation of powerful alliances and partnerships.

In addition to these examples, Lithuania underscored the effectual initiative by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) ‘Partner to Connect’, which has been instrumental in advancing digital transformation worldwide.

Underlining the fundamental prerequisites for successful collaboration, Lithuania stressed the paramount importance of a coherent long-term vision, alongside the setting of common goals and the establishment of clear governance structures.

In their perspective, these factors are more than desirable – they are absolutely essential for meaningful and effective collaboration.

However, despite the positive advocacy for digital collaboration, Lithuania voiced considerable concerns about the possible amplification of digital exclusion and the deepening digital divide.

With the continuous development of emergent technologies, like artificial intelligence, there is a latent risk of unintended exclusion of certain segments of the population. Potential digital gaps could exacerbate disparities between urban and rural populations, among young and old, across genders, religions, regions and countries, and between ethnic groups.

In response to these encroaching challenges, the delegates espoused the imperative need for global cooperation.

They underscored the great import of sharing experiences and learning from various global counterparts. The EU’s transparent process of legislation adoption, which involves all stakeholders, was acknowledged as a laudable model of inclusive governance, which could serve as a superior benchmark in maximising the efficiency and inclusivity of digital collaboration.

Report

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) provides a valuable framework that underlines the critical role of civil society organisations. Dovetailed with SDG 17 on Partnerships for the Goals, this framework fosters cooperation amongst diverse civil society groups and governments, thereby creating a more comprehensive and inclusive approach.

Contrarily, the contemporary digital-focused paradigm is accused of majoring too much on potential harms while not sufficiently spotlighting the positive potential of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT).

This imbalanced perspective deviates from WSIS’s initial focus on constructive outcomes of ICT, aligning with SDG 9 relating to Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. Notably, this overlooks the fact that a third of the world’s population remains unconnected, leaving them bereft of significant potential benefits.

A prevailing standpoint advocates for the repositioning of civil society’s function within the Tunis agenda.

Far from confining civil society to merely a role of implementation, it should be incorporated into policy-making and accountability processes, echoing SDG 16’s ideals around Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. The inclusion of civil society at this policy-making level could potentially enhance policy efficacy and accountability checks on states and other entities.

While WSIS’s framework offers enough flexibility to accommodate updates, there is a sentiment that it needs more substantive revisions to encapsulate present-day global issues.

Key considerations such as climate change, financial challenges, and gender equality, in accordance with associated SDGs, warrant due attention within the scope of WSIS.

Finally, consensus points towards enhancing existing frameworks rather than introducing new ones on policy making and multistakeholder processes.

This notion aligns with SDG 17’s emphasis on constructive partnerships. However, multistakeholderism appears to be seen more as a brand rather than a transformative methodology, hinting at the need for better implementation and promotion of this approach, in realisation of its genuine transformative potential.

Report

The presented data affords a comprehensive overview of the crucial intersection between partnerships and digital transformation in progressive Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It is resoundingly illustrated that digital technologies hold the capacity to accelerate over 70% of SDG targets, backed by the instigation of an ambitious digital acceleration agenda.

These implications underline a strong necessity to uphold the momentum that digital transformation has gained during the challenging pandemic period.

Nonetheless, a significant barrier in the form of a ‘digital divide’ is acknowledged. Despite considerable advancements made since 2003 in uniting people via internet connectivity, nearly one third of humanity still remains disconnected from this digital network.

This stark reality points towards the remaining difficulties that need to be vanquished, in spite of gains made during the pandemic, with a laudable ‘COVID connectivity boost’ propelling an estimated 800 million individuals online.

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) emerges as a salient driver of digital cooperation.

Exemplifying multistakeholder cooperation, the WSIS framework is recognised for its broad partnerships with multiple UN bodies, inclusive of UNESCO, UNCTAD, UNDP, UNU, UNSCAP, FAO, DESA, UNHCR, and OHCHR. Reflecting the need for continual progress, suggestions are made for the WSIS process to place greater emphasis on environment, finance, and gender diversity issues, thereby enhancing their collaborative effectiveness.

One integral theme recurring throughout the analysis is the vital role of youth and inclusivity within the WSIS process.

Notably, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and Generation Connect stand out in successfully engaging younger individuals. This positive inclination towards greater involvement showcased by youth contributes to a balanced and future-facing outlook on the process.

There is a distinct call to fortify and expand meaningful partnerships, with an understanding that this could be key in molding a future digital framework that is inclusive, diverse, and genuinely beneficial to all societal sectors.

This vision is underscored by the necessity for fortified digital trust, accentuated by universal access to affordable technology and the skills required for its utilisation.

Inclusivity, identified as central to the discourse, is consistently reiterated and advocates for inclusive systems, participation and processes across every level of the digital transformation journey.

Taking a macro perspective, the discourse draws a connection to wider SDGs, cautioning against the risk of ‘siloing’ in UN endeavours.

In summary, the analysis provides a compelling case for the power of partnerships and digital transformation in propelling forward SDGs, whilst casting a spotlight on the hurdles to be overcome.

To ensure that no one is left behind, the future digital landscape must be inclusive and equitable – a goal that can only be achieved through sustained effort, collaboration, and meaningful partnerships.

Report

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) is poised to hold a high-level dialogue focusing on the implementation of multi-stakeholder partnerships to expedite digital transformation. This ethos has been a pivotal element of the WSIS procedure from its inception, underlining the significance and need for diverse viewpoints.

Notably, the Japanese government has been instrumental in organising this particular event, thus aiding in formulating and fostering the transformative sequence.

A fundamental facet of this dialogue is the robust advocacy for active participation from all parties in the discussions and decisive planning regarding digital transformation and information society development.

This democratic approach, wide-reaching in its scope, invites input not only from high-level stakeholders but also encourages grassroots level involvement. This pluralistic approach ensures that solutions are anchored in a range of experiences, thus fostering a comprehensive strategy for tackling challenges within the digital transformation sphere.

The success of these dialogues is further demonstrated through the active involvement of eminent figures, including WSIS gender trendsetters and prize winners, reflecting the wide-reaching influence and acceptance of these discussions.

Partnerships with global entities like the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the UN Pension Fund further underscore the credibility and effectiveness of the WSIS initiative.

The overwhelmingly positive sentiment toward WSIS and its inclusive initiatives is further evidenced by the anticipated video message from Mr.

Utsumi, the former Secretary-General of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). His contribution not only fortifies the credibility of the WSIS objectives but also reinforces a connection between past and ongoing initiatives, bolstering a sense of continuity and collective resolve in the quest for digital transformation.

In summary, the overwhelmingly positive sentiments towards WSIS’s multi-stakeholder method and digital transformation pursuits underscore its wide-ranging inclusivity and clear impacts.

Alongside strategic partnerships and remarkable individual contributions, it provides a firm foundation for its mission of championing sustainable digital change.

Report

The analysis predominantly revolves around Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, which stresses on the crucial role of fostering innovation and constructing resilient infrastructure. Among the noteworthy points in the discourse was the recognition of the critical role played by the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in setting definite and actionable directives for stakeholders worldwide.

These globally-minded action lines have allowed stakeholders to collaborate effectively towards a unifying objective, thus considerably contributing to the success and innovation in the realm of technology.

Throughout this process, the Internet Governance Forum’s role emerged as particularly significant.

It has been pivotal in shaping policies and practices around technology ecosystems, and guiding conversations on how to manage them ensuring equity and inclusivity.

The discussion brought to light the strides made in bridging the digital divide through capacity building efforts.

But a striking fact remained; despite such endeavours, a staggering 2.6 billion people around the globe are still unconnected.

The necessity to introduce new technologies as a tool to diminish this digital divide was emphasised. Innovations such as mobile technology have allowed a ‘leapfrog’ effect, connecting a vast sector of the population previously untouched.

Furthermore, the potential of non-terrestrial networks, designed to deliver connectivity to isolated and rural areas, proved promising in finding ways to connect the disconnected.

As the focus shifted towards the future, the upcoming WSIS+20 review in 2025 became a point of discussion.

The suggestion was made that this discussion should be future-focused, keeping up to date with rapid technological developments, and also grounded in the roots and principles of the original WSIS process. This balanced attention would ensure that foundational principles and goals are not disregarded whilst keeping pace with innovation.

In summary, technology, innovation, and sustainable creation and distribution of infrastructure emerged as key agents to bridge the digital divide and achieve global connectivity.

Nonetheless, the challenge of incorporating 2.6 billion unconnected individuals reiterates the continuous need for innovation and effort. Looking towards WSIS+20 review in 2025, it presents an opportunity to maintain alignment with initial principles whilst adapting effectively to rapidly evolving technological advancements.

Report

The analysis unveils a deeply-entrenched digital divide worldwide, emphasizing the harsh reality that 2.6 billion individuals are still bereft of internet connectivity. This is particularly alarming, considering that two decades ago, the World Summits on the Information Society (WSIS) envisaged the goal of a people-centric information society.

This impedes progress towards the attainment of SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), casting a disheartening and negative sentiment regarding the state of internet accessibility globally.

However, the private sector’s role in easing this digital divide emerges as a beacon of hope.

As pioneers in this field, private enterprises have significantly contributed to expanding meaningful connectivity and bolstering e-commerce abilities. This imparts a positive sentiment and accentuates the necessity for an environment conducive to businesses upscaling their investments unimpeded. This vital role aligns with SDG 9 and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals), emphasizing the need for further private sector investment in internet access.

Moreover, the importance of unrestricted cross-border data flows for fostering digital innovation has been highlighted.

Data restrictions currently in place paradoxically pose market barriers for Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs), fragmenting global value chains and stifling economic growth. This issue aligns intrinsically with SDG 9 and SDG 17, where partnerships and innovation are crucial for digital progression.

Lastly, the analysis hearteningly acknowledges the necessity for multi-sector stakeholder participation in policymaking.

It is advocated that businesses, as key actors in the digital space, must be comprehensively consulted during the incipient stages of policy creation. This approach would, it is maintained, ensure the crafting and implementation of relevant and fair policies in line with SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) and SDG 17.

In conclusion, the persisting digital divide is mitigated by the proactive role of the private sector, the necessity for seamless data flows, and the importance of a diverse spectrum of stakeholders engaged in crafting solid and inclusive policies.

Report

This comprehensive analysis underlines the significant implications of the rapid digital revolution and the key considerations required to fully harness its benefits. It illustrates clearly how the quick adoption of emerging technologies is transforming business and influencing everyday life, thus making society more dependent on digital infrastructure.

However, it also warns against potential disruptions that pose threats like disinformation and deep fake technologies, underscoring the need for robust preparation and safeguards to protect against harm and misuse.

The shift towards digital operations has revolutionised the landscape of competition, establishing new battlegrounds where businesses vie for success.

This could potentially lead to inequalities and unfair advantages, especially if some participants have more resources or access to technology than others. Therefore, the analysis argues for the establishment of a level playing field to ensure fairness in the competitive dynamics of the digital transformation.

Enhancing internet security is emphasised as another key issue.

The analysis signals the complex, overlapping and often conflicting interests within the internet ecosystem. To navigate these conflicts and foster a secure, balanced environment, the imperative for robust internet governance becomes crucial. Nations are urged to construct policies and mechanisms that strike a balance between diverse interests.

A fundamental shift toward prioritising local communities and promoting multi-stakeholder collaborations in the digital arena is additionally championed.

The potential role of a platform, such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), serving as a knowledge pool, is significant to facilitate these collaborations.

Finally, the analysis endorses a shift from competition towards collaboration in the face of digital transformation.

Instead of competition, digital technologies ought to be utilised as a catalyst for collaborative innovation. This viewpoint ultimately reflects positive advocacy for the development of more cooperative and mutually beneficial digital spaces.

In conclusion, this detailed analysis highlights the immense potential of the ongoing digital revolution, but not without a stark reminder of the need for proper guidelines, security measures, and a commitment to foster collaboration above competition.

By doing so, we can ensure that digital transformation becomes an enabler of fair competition, secure internet usage, and inclusive collaborations that prioritise local communities and their aspirations.

Report

The analysis accentuates the imperative call for comprehensive, modern and revised ICT legislation on a national level. Such initiatives are perceived as fundamental in fostering technological development, ensuring that emerging initiatives are not stalled by dated statutes. This point conforms to the goals of SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, underscoring the crucial function of legislative support for technological advancement and development.

Moreover, the analysis pinpoints an acute global requirement for assistance in the development of IT and telecommunication infrastructure.

A host of countries worldwide are identified as needing aid in this domain. The construction of such infrastructures, according to the summary, aligns with the pursuits of SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, signifying the global breadth of these developmental necessities.

The analysis further highlights the necessity to confront the issue of digital illiteracy.

It proposes an intensified effort toward spreading digital culture and awareness as cardinal. At present, digital illiteracy serves as an impediment, barring individuals from benefactoring from ICT services. This argument is in close alignment with SDG 4 – Quality Education, underscoring the closely knitted relationship between contemporary technology and education.

Another key point that emerges from the analysis is the recognition of digital content and documents.

The recognition of digital content including the application of digital signatures can facilitate the establishment of strong, integrated proof systems — an important stride in decreasing inequalities (aligned with SDG 10) and advancing a peaceful and fair society (aligned with SDG 16).

Lastly, the analysis illuminates the need for legislation orientated toward ensuring the security and privacy of both software and hardware solutions.

This includes imported and domestically developed solutions. The homologation and enhancement of these solutions are stressed as essential considerations. This facet of the analysis is congruent with the objectives of not just SDG 9 but also SDG 12 – Responsible Consumption and Production, underlining the importance of secure technological practices for sustainable global growth.

In conclusion, the elucidation provides a multifaceted understanding of the intersections between technology, legislation and societal needs.

It identifies the essential bridges required to be built, and the role of logical, legislative and educational reforms in advancing towards a digitally balanced, innovative and secure global society. The UK spelling and grammar has been adhered to throughout this summary.

Report

The forthcoming year heralds significant strides in digital discussions globally, marked notably by the advent of the global digital compact. This compact is seen as a paramount milestone on the digital front worldwide and meshes coherently with the agendas embedded in the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS).

Additionally, it intersects with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), signifying a key turning point for complex processes related to digitalisation and sustainable development.

Despite this promising trajectory, there are identifiable obstacles in the utilisation of technologies. Notably, there is an evident lack of an all-encompassing approach incorporating the government and wider society.

This is glaringly reflected in the disconnected functioning of various ministries, which consistently fail to adopt a unified approach. Moreover, seamless integration amongst civil society, other stakeholders and the private sector is largely absent, impeding significant progress.

Amid these challenges, the importance of technologies employing interoperable and open systems cannot be overstated.

A sound fusion of such technologies with system thinking and public infrastructure establishes a vital foundation for inclusive digital advancement. Recognising their utility, digital public infrastructure creates myriad opportunities for the private sector to stimulate innovation, while also ensuring space for civil society engagement.

This notion was a central discussion point in India’s leadership at the G20 summit.

A people-centred approach to technology use is undeniably the cornerstone for meaningful digital engagement. This approach necessitates that individuals are informed about their rights and understand how to safely and effectively engage with digital connectivity.

Critically, it needs to be supplemented by robust governance to ensure successful implementation. This perspective, emphasised by Robert Opp at the WSIS, reiterates the importance of human interactions with technology.

Expanding on this human-centric focus, wider viewpoints advocate for a human-centred, multi-stakeholder approach.

This concept aligns confidently with SDG 17, which promotes establishing partnerships for the successful attainment of the defined goals. This standpoint not only recognises the centrality of humans in technological undertakings but also emphasises the critical role of collaboration across various stakeholders in accelerating digital endeavours.

Report

The analysis underscores the crucial importance of trust within society and the methods by which it should be nurtured. It posits that trust must be earned, not artificially created, by governments and businesses. These bodies should earn social trust by focusing principally on addressing and resolving issues faced by citizens, rather than prioritising their hold on power.

Businesses should endeavour to be perceived as responsible entities, adhering to rules and norms, and behaving in a manner that aligns with societal expectations.

Significantly, the requirement for dependable and unadulterated information for citizens was underscored. The analysis emphasised the central role of an independent and efficient media system in achieving this objective.

The media, inclusive of social media platforms, should operate independently without being manipulated by those wielding power. The necessity for the control and operation of such platforms to be in the hands of citizens was also stressed. Within this framework, it is suggested that individuals can make informed decisions about who they deem trustworthy.

Regarding local communities, the analysis highlights the necessity for their voices to not only be heard but to influence political decisions.

The argument advocates for democratic engagement and participation, with local communities discussing and setting their own priorities. This grassroots-level engagement is viewed as vital for realising sustainable cities and communities, in alignment with UN’s SDGs.

Relative to inclusive debates on digital matters and participation in democratic processes, a supportive and positive stance was acknowledged.

Explicit support was noted for the fostering of a multi-stakeholder culture, crediting organisations such as the IGF, ITU, and UNESCO as key contributors to this culture. These inclusive debates are interpreted as a means of amplifying the voices of those who may otherwise lack access to power and media, thus promoting equitable representation and active participation across heterogeneous demographics.

This aligns with the notions of justice and strong institutions, integral components of the global SDGs.

Overall, these insights demand a call to action for governments, businesses, and media institutions to operate more responsibly, transparently, and inclusively. They underline the urgency of effective communication, dependable information, and community-led decision-making in the journey towards achieving the UN’s SDGs and enhancing societal trust.

Report

Umirbek Abdullaev, representing the Generation Connect programme, underscored the importance of digital inclusion and universal internet access for young people worldwide. Abdullaev’s central argument emphasises that for young people to fulfil their potential and contribute effectively globally, they must be granted full access to internet resources.

Abdullaev’s position is informed by data showing that 75% of the global youth population has internet access.

However, he brings awareness to the pronounced digital divide, particularly apparent in low-income countries. This imbalance in internet accessibility acts as a hindrance to these youths, putting them at a disadvantage and limiting their ability to engage fully in a digitalised world.

This calls attention to the UN’s SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities, underscoring the need for digital equity and inclusion to diminish disparities and foster a balanced digital society.

In a broader context, Abdullaev advocates for more significant youth involvement in high-level discussions.

He asserts that many young individuals possess innovative ideas with the potential to effect global change. However, these ideas are often stunted due to the lack of necessary internet access or digital platforms to share or realise their innovative concepts.

This strongly aligns with SDG 4: Quality Education and SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, reinforcing the necessity of investing in youth and innovation for societal betterment.

Abdullaev’s perspective is presented with a positive sentiment, indicating a focus on progress, inclusivity, and equitable growth.

This optimistic perspective contributes to an overarching narrative that fosters solutions, advancements, and a push for equality. Despite the obstacles presented by the digital divide, Abdullaev’s viewpoint provides a valuable outlook that champions youth involvement and their potential in driving societal transformations.

Report

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), unlike other UN summits, introduced a novel multi-stakeholder approach, thus distinguishing itself through its unique structure. The preparation of the summit was achieved by a specialised agency as opposed to the UN New York, marking a departure from traditional practices.

The summit comprised two distinct phases, inclusive of an array of preparatory conferences, regional and sectoral meetings, underscoring the enormity and intricacies associated with its planning and execution. These meticulous organisation processes, despite requiring substantial time, energy and financial inputs, were necessary for the success of WSIS.

The arrangement and execution of WSIS were fraught with challenges, anchored in the International Telecommunication Union’s (ITU) lack of resources.

Further dilemmas arose from the competition between Tunisia and Switzerland for hosting rights, showcasing the immense demand tied to participation in this comprehensive event.

Despite these obstacles, WSIS saw the institution of a unified vision amongst global leaders to leverage the potential of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to establish a people-centred, development-orientated and inclusive information society.

The summit facilitated an understanding of the capacity of ICTs to overcome traditional obstacles such as time and distance, hence enriching the lives of millions globally. This reinforced the recognition of education, knowledge, information and communication as the nucleus of human progression, shifting the paradigm towards progressive global evolution.

Corresponding with this ambition, it was agreed upon at WSIS that by 2015, more than half of the world’s inhabitants would have access to ICTs.

To realise this vision, the leaders outlined 11 critical action lines. Despite this consensus, disagreements arose on the creation of a new financial mechanism for ICTs and on matters of internet governance. Nonetheless, a collective decision was made to strengthen the existing financial mechanisms.

Even with the considerable technological advancement, some concerns persist.

The achievement of individual-level internet access courtesy of mobile networks far surpasses the initial WSIS objectives, spotlighting the rapid digitalisation of society. However, the ongoing existence of the digital divide is a major concern. The persistent inequality in the access and use of ICTs remains a paramount challenge, in spite of significant progress in this field.

Alongside these opportunities, the comprehensive usage of ICTs has led to the emergence of new challenges, such as issues associated with cybercrime, privacy, and a pronounced increase in election interference.

The potential threats imposed by the escalation of artificial intelligence technologies have also amplified, escalating apprehension surrounding this advancement. A call for a more efficient, solution-oriented approach with sharper mandates and expert consultation has been made to proactively handle these contemporary challenges.

The rapidly evolving digital landscape necessitates an innovative problem-solving approach, ensuring the safe and equitable utilisation of technology for global advancement.