Upholding Human Rights in the Digital Age: Fostering a Multistakeholder Approach for Safeguarding Human Dignity and Freedom for All

Report

In a recent discussion on Internet Governance, Peggy Hicks emphasized the importance of diverse participation in conferences to obtain a variety of ideas and insights. She highlighted the need for representation from different regions and backgrounds to ensure a comprehensive approach in decision-making processes.

Carolyn Tackett also stressed the significance of providing meaningful access to these spaces for individuals whose voices need to be heard, particularly those from marginalized communities.

However, concerns were raised regarding the upcoming Internet Governance Forum (IGF) meeting in Saudi Arabia.

Carolyn Tackett raised questions about the compatibility of Saudi Arabia as the venue for this important forum, expressing concerns about potential implications for stakeholder involvement and safety. This raises questions about the adherence to principles of global representation and the ability to ensure a safe and inclusive environment for all participants.

The potential impact of artificial intelligence on job loss was also discussed.

There is a fear that the increasing use of AI could lead to a decrease in job opportunities, as tasks that previously required a team of multiple researchers can now be accomplished by a single application. This raises concerns about the future of employment and the need to ensure a balance between technological advancements and job security.

Cyber bullying, particularly targeting vulnerable groups such as women politicians, was highlighted as a prevalent issue in Kenya.

This highlights the urgent need to address this form of harassment, protect individuals’ rights to safety online, and implement effective policies and strategies to prevent and combat cyber bullying.

The incident involving WordCoin collecting data from Kenyan citizens without their awareness underscored the need for robust data protection and privacy regulations.

It is essential to ensure that individuals maintain control over their personal data and are aware of how it is being used, particularly by technology platforms or companies.

Furthermore, the lack of international regulation and oversight in areas such as artificial intelligence and data protection was identified as a concerning issue.

The incident with WordCoin highlighted the consequences of inadequate regulation, emphasizing the necessity for global standards and cooperation in addressing emerging technologies.

In the context of the Global Digital Compact, gender equality was highlighted as a cross-cutting theme.

Efforts are being made to promote gender equality in the digital space, with the Alliance for Universal Digital Rights (AUDRI) championing principles such as gender equality in the Global Digital Compact. Additionally, human rights should be a fundamental principle of the Compact, as outlined by AUDRI.

This emphasizes the need to prioritize and safeguard human rights in the digital sphere.

The exclusion of lived experience individuals and systemic issues like visa problems at conferences were identified as barriers that need to be addressed. The repeated issues with visa problems highlight the disparities in global mobility and the need for accessible processes that ensure equal participation for attendees.

Moreover, there was a call for conferences to address systemic issues and create a more inclusive environment for all participants.

The idea of decolonizing technology and including diverse representation, particularly from the queer community, in IGF debates gained attention.

The lack of representation from the queer community, especially transgender individuals, at previous IGFs was criticized. It was highlighted that the queer community faces violence both online and offline, making their representation in these discussions crucial. Additionally, the importance of including more youth perspectives was emphasized to ensure a fresh and inclusive dialogue in internet governance.

In conclusion, the discussions on Internet Governance covered various important topics.

The need for diverse and representative participation, addressing concerns about the selection of venues, understanding the implications of artificial intelligence, combatting cyber bullying, protecting data privacy, regulating emerging technologies, promoting gender equality and human rights, addressing systemic barriers, and inclusion of marginalized communities were identified as key areas for further attention and action.

Report

The concept of human dignity in relation to technology and human rights is a complex and often under-discussed issue. Conceptions of dignity vary by geography and are constantly evolving. However, questions surrounding the dignity of individuals and their place in society with regards to technology have become increasingly salient.

One of the main concerns is how technology, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), can infringe upon human dignity.

There are worries about AI tracking individuals without their consent, predictive content that can manipulate or harm individuals, the digital divide which widens inequality, ageism online, internet censorship, surveillance, and the spread of misinformation. These issues raise significant ethical and human rights concerns.

On a positive note, platforms like Wikipedia are built on the principle of human dignity.

Wikipedia is a place where everyone’s contribution is valued and not exploited. Volunteers curate the world’s knowledge and make decisions about content in good faith. The Wikimedia Foundation, which supports Wikipedia, also demonstrates firm commitment to human rights standards.

By allowing individuals to freely contribute to the world’s knowledge, Wikipedia’s contribution-based model is seen as a reflection of human dignity. It upholds values of inclusivity, collaboration, and the recognition that every individual has something valuable to offer.

It is argued that there is an urgent need to broaden the scope of human rights teams in tech companies.

Currently, these teams primarily focus on state-based violations, privacy, surveillance, and freedom of expression. However, there is a need to also address broader issues such as gender equity and queer representation. By considering a wider range of human rights concerns, tech companies can better promote inclusivity and equality within their platforms and services.

AI, despite generating skepticism, has the potential to be a valuable resource in providing access to information.

For example, AI can be beneficial in translating articles across different languages on Wikipedia, which supports over 300 languages. This has the potential to bridge gaps in knowledge and contribute to the democratization of information. By leveraging AI, platforms like Wikipedia can help overcome language barriers and ensure that knowledge is accessible to a broader audience.

While AI may disrupt labor, it is important to build opportunities for people and communities to contribute their knowledge and perspectives.

By allowing individuals to contribute in their own language, AI can potentially offset disruptions caused by automation and create a more inclusive and equitable technological landscape.

In order to protect individuals and uphold human dignity, there is a call for the establishment and enforcement of laws, regulations, and social norms around technology, particularly AI.

Governments have a responsibility to protect their citizens, which implies recognizing the intrinsic worth of all individuals. Such frameworks should be based on the fundamental concept of human dignity and aim to safeguard individuals from potential harm or exploitation.

In conclusion, the concept of human dignity in relation to technology and human rights is a complex and multifaceted issue.

Concerns about how technology affects human dignity, such as AI, surveillance, and internet censorship, have gained prominence. However, platforms like Wikipedia demonstrate a commitment to human dignity through their inclusive and collaborative model. It is important to expand the scope of human rights teams in tech companies to encompass broader issues like gender equity and queer representation.

AI has the potential to bridge knowledge gaps and democratize information, while also providing opportunities for individuals and communities to contribute. Ultimately, it is crucial to establish and enforce laws and regulations that uphold human dignity in the face of technological advancements.

Report

The analysis highlights several important points made by the speakers. Firstly, it emphasizes that the governance of AI is grounded in international human rights law. AI has implications for privacy, equal protection, non-discrimination, and freedom of expression, among other human rights considerations.

Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that AI development and implementation adhere to a framework that respects and upholds these fundamental rights.

Additionally, the analysis underscores the significance of digital inclusion. With 2.6 billion people still unconnected globally, the majority of whom are women and girls, there exists a significant digital and gender divide.

Bridging these gaps and ensuring equal access and participation for all individuals, regardless of their gender or background, becomes imperative.

The importance of striking a balance between protecting the integrity of information and safeguarding freedom of expression is also highlighted.

This requires taking into account the interconnected nature of human rights, human dignity in the digital context, and multi-stakeholder processes. It underscores the need to find a middle ground that respects both information integrity and the fundamental right to freedom of expression.

Additionally, the analysis emphasizes the essential role of multi-stakeholder processes in protecting human rights.

By ensuring the inclusion of diverse perspectives and interests from various stakeholders, these processes can effectively shape policies and practices that impact human rights. This highlights the importance of inclusive and participatory approaches to governance.

Elevating human rights throughout U.S.

cyber and digital policy is identified as a crucial objective. It is important to integrate human rights principles into U.S. policies and practices in the digital sphere to promote peace, justice, and strong institutions, as outlined in the relevant Sustainable Development Goals.

The analysis also highlights the increasing expertise of civil society in tech policy and internet governance.

Engaging civil society organizations and individuals in shaping technology-related policies and practices can lead to more inclusive and equitable outcomes, ensuring that human rights considerations are appropriately addressed.

The need to prioritize human rights and inclusion on the agenda of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), leadership panels, and the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) is emphasized.

Ensuring the accountability of these entities is crucial for incorporating human rights and inclusion considerations into internet governance. This underlines the importance of ongoing dialogue, collaboration, and monitoring to promote responsible and rights-based approaches to technology governance.

While technology inclusion offers numerous benefits, it also carries risks such as surveillance, censorship, and control of information by authoritarian governments.

Achieving a balance between the benefits and risks of technology inclusion presents a challenge that requires careful consideration and effective safeguards to protect individuals’ rights and freedoms.

Addressing gender issues in the technology and human rights conversation is also highlighted.

Women are most excluded from connectivity, and technology is often used in ways that specifically impact women and girls. Therefore, gender-sensitive approaches to technology development, deployment, and governance are vital, alongside efforts to address the gendered impacts of technology on individuals and societies.

The analysis also recognizes the need for further research and analysis regarding the impact of AI on labor displacement.

This under-explored area warrants attention to understand the potential effects on employment and develop strategies for mitigating any negative impacts. It also emphasizes the importance of considering the societal implications of technological advancements beyond immediate benefits and conveniences.

A better understanding of the decision-making process in technology governance is deemed necessary.

Transparent, accountable, and inclusive decision-making processes are advocated to ensure that technology-related decisions are made with democratic principles in mind.

The analysis further highlights the importance of tech regulation consistent with human rights, while also capable of limiting content-related harms.

Striking a balance between protecting individual rights and addressing the potential negative consequences of certain forms of online content is a key objective.

Technology is seen as a potential solution to address issues such as violence against women and human rights violations.

Utilizing technology as a tool can contribute to creating safer and more inclusive environments where individuals’ rights are respected and protected.

Finally, the analysis emphasizes the need for translation and understanding between the tech community and the norms community.

Bridging the gap between these two communities, which often have different perspectives and languages, is crucial for effective collaboration and the development of responsible and rights-based technology policies and practices.

In summary, the analysis highlights the interconnectedness of technology, human rights, and governance.

It underscores the need for inclusive and participatory approaches, where diverse perspectives are considered, and the rights and dignity of individuals are protected. The insights gained from the analysis provide valuable considerations for policymakers, advocates, and other stakeholders working in the fields of technology and human rights.

Report

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) served as a platform for discussions on a range of topics, including human rights, regulation, stakeholder collaboration, policy evolution, cyberbullying, inclusivity, and systemic problems. Frederick Rawski represented META at the IGF and expressed satisfaction with the significant focus on human rights in all panel discussions.

The argument was made for the need for consistent and principle-based regulations rather than individual companies developing their own rules.

META faced challenges in fulfilling its commitments due to inconsistent legal conditions. The company expressed support for the leadership of the United Nations (UN) in improving global cooperation.

The integration of human rights into business practices emerged as a key theme.

There was a call for human rights to be treated with equal importance as other business risks. It was observed that the roles of different risks were not balanced in decision-making processes. Stakeholders discussed the importance of harmonizing the concept of risk among all parties involved.

The discussions also highlighted the significant gap in understanding and applying human rights principles across stakeholders and the challenge of translating human rights language into actionable steps for engineers and software designers.

The need to address cyberbullying and ensure user control was emphasized.

META showcased its robust policies on bullying and harassment, and adjustments were made to provide additional protection for women public figures. The discussions also highlighted the role of language when discussing content-related issues.

The importance of inclusivity and addressing systemic problems was stressed.

Frederick Rawski suggested that more efforts could be made to ensure inclusivity at conferences and tackle the root causes of systemic problems.

META expressed its commitment to actively participate in the IGF and support its initiatives in the future.

The company had a high-level delegation at the event to demonstrate its dedication to the conversation. META expressed readiness to move forward and support the IGF in any way possible.

In summary, the IGF discussions focused centrally on human rights.

The challenges encountered in integrating human rights into business practices and the need for consistent regulations were recognized. The importance of addressing cyberbullying, ensuring user control, and promoting inclusivity was emphasized. META’s commitment to actively engage in future discussions and support the IGF demonstrates its dedication to building a more inclusive and ethical internet.

Report

The first argument asserts that multi-stakeholder conversations should be inclusive and incorporate all relevant stakeholders. It is important to address barriers to entry, such as visa issues, that prevent certain stakeholders from participating. In doing so, diverse perspectives can be represented, leading to more comprehensive and effective discussions.

The second argument highlights the importance of utilizing data and stories from civil society organizations concerning human rights. These organizations have been actively involved in various human rights issues, and their data can provide valuable insights to improve processes and gain a better understanding of the issues at hand.

By incorporating their data into policy-making, decision-makers can make more informed decisions and better address human rights concerns.

The third point emphasizes the significance of universal internet accessibility. Presently, around 2.6 billion people worldwide are not connected to the internet, and various factors, including government actions, contribute to these disconnections.

It is crucial to address these issues and ensure that everyone has equal access to the internet. Furthermore, the problem of internet shutdowns needs to be addressed, as they impede people’s access to information and communication.

The fourth argument highlights that human rights should be central to global policy processes.

It stresses that everyone, including states, civil society, the technical community, and the private sector, has a role to play in promoting and protecting human rights. Moreover, it is affirmed that respecting human rights is not only morally right but also beneficial for business.

The fifth point specifically focuses on the hosting of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) by countries that respect internet freedom.

It is stated that the previous IGF was hosted by a country that had shut down the internet, causing embarrassment. Therefore, it is argued that any country hosting the IGF should understand and uphold the principles of internet freedom.

The sixth argument emphasizes the need to raise concerns and demand guarantees from nations hosting the IGF.

As the IGF is a forum for discussing the internet, including human rights principles, it is crucial to ensure that the host country respects these principles. This is vital for maintaining the credibility and effectiveness of the IGF.

The seventh point stresses that the issue at hand is not tokenism but the genuine respect for rights.

It is stated that difficult conversations regarding human rights need to take place, regardless of the location. The emphasis is on truly respecting and upholding human rights rather than merely appearing to do so.

The eighth argument highlights the need to hold countries and platforms accountable for their actions.

This includes calling out those that speak the language of human rights but do not genuinely respect rights as they should. By doing so, it ensures that human rights are protected and upheld.

The ninth point addresses the issue of representation, particularly for young people and minority groups.

It argues that conversations regarding representation should continue as the concerns raised regarding the underrepresentation of these groups should not be ignored.

The tenth argument highlights the roles of different stakeholders in promoting human rights. The state is regarded as having an obligation to uphold human rights, while the private sector needs to understand that respecting human rights is beneficial for business.

Additionally, the technical community is urged to incorporate human rights principles into their work.

Lastly, civil society is encouraged not to shy away from speaking the truth, even to allies. It emphasizes that civil society should fearlessly raise concerns and advocate for human rights, regardless of any alliances they may have.

In conclusion, this summary underscores the importance of inclusive multi-stakeholder conversations, the use of data from civil society organizations, internet accessibility for all, human rights in global policy processes and IGF hosting, raising concerns, meaningful representation, stakeholder responsibilities, and the role of civil society in speaking truth.

These arguments and observations highlight the need for a comprehensive and inclusive approach to address human rights issues and ensure that rights are respected and upheld

Report

The analysis of the speeches highlights several important points regarding human rights, internet governance, and related issues. One of the main arguments made is that human rights serve as a crucial mechanism for addressing pressing social issues. It is emphasised that human rights are tangible and useful in discussing and addressing the most urgent challenges of today.

Furthermore, the relationship between the technical community and the human rights framework is examined.

It is noted that the technical community consists of various stakeholders, including industry and states, and it is important to establish their relationship to the human rights framework. This highlights the need to understand how the technical community can contribute to the promotion and protection of human rights within their respective domains.

Censorship and internet resilience are identified as significant concerns that need to be addressed.

The analysis suggests that censorship and internet resilience are recurring issues that are discussed in various forums and technical communities. This highlights the importance of actively engaging in conversations surrounding these topics and finding effective solutions.

The speakers emphasise the importance of placing human rights at the centre of engagement on internet issues.

They argue that considering human rights in all fora and in the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is essential. This includes bringing up human rights issues and teasing out the most important aspects for people worldwide. It is also noted that internet governance meetings have taken place in countries with questionable human rights records.

This serves to highlight the need to ensure that human rights remain a significant part of the conversation, regardless of the location or host.

The analysis also explores the issue of cyberbullying, emphasising the need for research, understanding, and a nuanced perspective to address such problems effectively.

The report by the Centre for Democracy and Technology on the experiences of women of colour in US politics is referenced, along with the requirement for platforms to open up their data to researchers. It is argued that empowering users with more agency and tools to block and report cyberbullying at scale is crucial.

Privacy emerges as a complex issue within the current internet landscape.

Despite technical progress, there is an ongoing privacy crisis. The impact of business models on end users and the potential for surveillance by regimes are highlighted. The analysis suggests that reviewing the business model and its impact on the end user is crucial in addressing these privacy concerns.

The internet governance landscape is observed to be increasingly complex, with new issues and dimensions coming into play.

The creation of new mechanisms within the United Nations to tackle these issues is proposed, highlighting the need for continuous adaptation and engagement to stay abreast of the evolving internet governance landscape.

Lastly, there is a warning against technocratizing all social issues and placing them solely within the technical bucket.

It is argued that not all social issues can be addressed solely through technical means, and a holistic approach is necessary to effectively tackle these challenges.

In conclusion, this comprehensive analysis of the speeches highlights the importance of human rights in addressing pressing social issues, the need to establish the relationship between the technical community and human rights, and the significance of addressing censorship, internet resilience, cyberbullying, and privacy concerns in internet governance discussions.

It also underscores the increasing complexity of the internet governance landscape and the importance of avoiding a purely technocratic approach to addressing social issues.

Report

During the discussion on digitalisation, several important points were raised. One of the key concerns was the uneven distribution of the benefits brought about by digitalisation. While digitalisation is advancing rapidly, not everyone is reaping its rewards equally. This inequity highlights the need for regulation in digital spaces to ensure that technology is used in a way that benefits all members of society.

Currently, there is a lack of regulation in digital ecosystems, particularly when it comes to social media and artificial intelligence (AI).

The absence of such regulation allows for potential misuse and harm. Recognising this, UNESCO considers regulation and standards crucial for ensuring oversight and protecting the public good. Countries at the forefront of digital transformation have acknowledged the need for the development and implementation of regulations in digital spaces and technologies.

However, to effectively address this issue, global standards and guidelines are necessary to facilitate collaboration between governments, the private sector, and civil society.

Another significant aspect of digitalisation is the importance of building and strengthening institutional capacities. Digitalisation requires individuals and organisations to possess the necessary competencies to harness the potential of digital technologies and platforms while also addressing the challenges they bring.

Media and information literacy plays a key role in equipping individuals with critical thinking skills, technical expertise, and knowledge to navigate digital information ecosystems and avoid falling victim to misinformation. UNESCO places priority on enhancing the capabilities of decision-makers, educators, judicial operators, and young people, recognising their potential to have the widest and deepest impact.

The discussion also shed light on the prevalence of online violence, particularly against women.

Women journalists, in particular, face significant harassment online, with a startling 73% experiencing such abuse. Disturbingly, a high proportion of those who suffer online harassment also suffer offline attacks. The session emphasised that online violence has become a new front line for professionals, and urgent action is needed to address this issue and ensure the safety and well-being of those affected.

Additionally, the negative impact of technology on labour protections was highlighted.

With the advent of artificial intelligence, jobs are changing, and there are concerns that labour protections are being stripped away. An example given was the hiring of nurses in a way similar to ride-hailing services, such as Uber. This precarious work arrangement has negative consequences for patient health and underscores the need to address the potential pitfalls of technological advancements to protect workers’ rights.

Lastly, the session stressed the importance of active participation from various stakeholders in meetings of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF).

Regulatory authorities, media representatives, and public prosecutors were specifically mentioned as actors who should actively engage in these meetings. This inclusive approach to governance aims to ensure that discussions on digital technologies and their impact are comprehensive, incorporating a range of perspectives and expertise.

In conclusion, the discussion on digitalisation highlighted the need for regulation and standards in digital spaces, the importance of building institutional capacities and promoting media and information literacy, concerns about online violence, the negative impact of technology on labour protections, and the call for active participation in the Internet Governance Forum.

Addressing these issues requires collaborative efforts from governments, private entities, civil society, and individuals to create an inclusive, equitable, and safe digital environment for all.

Report

During a discussion on the challenges of the digital age, the importance of a human rights framework was widely acknowledged. This framework serves as a universal agreement that guides ethical decision-making in relation to the internet, digital technology, and artificial intelligence.

It was recognised that these advancements present challenging issues that require careful consideration of their impact on individuals and society as a whole.

The human rights framework ensures that all voices, particularly those directly affected by digital technologies, are included and represented.

It promotes inclusivity and prevents the domination of certain regions or sectors in discussions about these issues. This is crucial for achieving a balanced and holistic perspective, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding and effective decision-making processes.

The discussion also highlighted the need for meaningful engagement from all communities and adequate resources for researchers.

This emphasised the importance of a multi-stakeholder perspective in addressing the challenges posed by the digital age. Including input from various stakeholders, such as individuals, communities, industry experts, and policymakers, ensures a diversity of perspectives, fostering solutions that are informed by the needs and concerns of all stakeholders.

Additionally, the issue of representation at global conferences and the impact of visa issues were discussed.

It was noted that there have been persistent issues with global perspective and participation at conferences, as certain stakeholders are absent due to visa limitations. This creates a disadvantage as valuable insights and experiences are missed, hindering the effectiveness of these conferences.

The need to address this issue and find ways to facilitate global representation and participation was underlined.

Furthermore, the topic of internet shutdowns was deemed relevant and should continue to be discussed. Internet shutdowns restrict access to information, impede freedom of expression, and have negative implications for individuals and societies.

The previous year’s Internet Governance Forum (IGF) also highlighted this issue, further emphasizing the importance of continued attention and action to address this concern.

Data protection, privacy, and transparency were identified as crucial elements in the discussions on artificial intelligence (AI).

It was recognised that the challenges related to AI primarily stem from data issues. Protecting personal data, ensuring privacy, and promoting transparency in the use of data are essential for addressing the ethical and societal implications of AI.

In conclusion, the extended summary underscores the significant role of a human rights framework in the digital age.

It highlights the importance of inclusion, representation, meaningful engagement, and a multi-stakeholder perspective for addressing challenging issues related to the internet, digital technology, and AI. The impact of visa issues on global representation, the need to continue addressing internet shutdowns, and the focus on data protection and transparency in AI discussions were also noteworthy points raised.

These discussions serve as a reminder of the ongoing importance of fostering dialogue and finding ethical and responsible solutions in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Report

The need for ethical regulation in AI, based on human rights, is highlighted as a crucial aspect to consider. It is argued that human rights can serve as a foundational framework for various initiatives related to AI and technology. This common framing allows for the promotion of human dignity and ensures that individuals can lead a life that respects their rights.

Furthermore, regulations based on human rights can also foster diversity, freedom of expression, and innovation.

There is a growing consensus on the requirement for a regulatory framework that specifically focuses on AI and is rooted in human rights.

Various global processes and consultations have indicated a convergence of ideas in this regard. A universal understanding is emerging that an institution or body, similar to the United Nations, should be established to enforce and implement this regulatory framework effectively.

Drawing from the success of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which played a crucial role in avoiding the worst-case scenarios in nuclear technology, it is proposed that a similar international agency should be established to handle AI ethics.

This agency would identify ethical opportunities and risks associated with AI, enhance international cooperation in addressing these issues, and ensure that AI benefits both humans and the planet.

In the realm of gender issues, it is acknowledged that technology-based solutions can play a vital role in addressing concerns such as gender-based hate speech and cyberbullying.

However, there is a lack of sufficient focus from states and the private sector in tackling these problems.

The impact of AI on human labor is another significant concern. It is observed that economic growth has been accompanied by increasing unemployment rates.

This phenomenon highlights the need for interdisciplinary debate and evaluation to better understand the effects of AI on work and employment.

The issue of visas and migration is also discussed, suggesting that a more systemic approach is required to address this matter.

It is argued that considering migration in a broader context is essential in effectively dealing with visa issues.

The importance of critically evaluating institutions, structures, and representation is emphasized. It is essential to assess these aspects closely to ensure justice, inclusivity, and reduced inequalities.

Finally, the practical application of the ethical discourse surrounding AI is deemed necessary.

The legal discussions and ethical considerations need to be translated into practical implementation, ensuring that ethical principles are upheld in AI development and deployment.

In conclusion, this extended summary highlights the importance of ethical regulation in AI based on human rights.

It emphasizes the need for a regulatory framework, the establishment of an international agency for AI ethics, technology-based solutions for gender-based issues, and the evaluation of the impact of AI on human labor. It also emphasizes the significance of addressing migration in a systemic manner, critically evaluating institutions and structures, and applying ethical discourse practically.