The Role of Parliamentarians in Shaping a Trusted Internet Empowering All People

Knowledge Graph of Debate

Session report

Jeehan Mahmood, MP, Maldives, IPUs Democracy and Human Rights Committee

The analysis examined several important issues related to trust, online violence, elections, artificial intelligence (AI), and the role of parliaments in the Internet Governance Forum.

The first point raised was the lack of trust in politics, substantiated by polling data. This is a concerning trend as trust is essential in the political domain for effective governance and decision-making. Without trust, the legitimacy and effectiveness of political institutions are compromised. Therefore, efforts must be made to rebuild trust and restore confidence in political processes.

A significant concern highlighted in the analysis is online violence, particularly directed towards children and women within the political sphere. This form of violence presents a threat to both individual well-being and democratic processes. By targeting vulnerable groups, online violence undermines their ability to participate fully in political discussions and decision-making. It is imperative to combat this issue to ensure a safe and inclusive online environment for all.

The analysis also emphasised the need to safeguard the integrity of elections, given the prevalence of interference across the globe. Electoral interference undermines the principles of democracy and the credibility of electoral outcomes. Adequate measures must be put in place to protect the electoral process from external influence and manipulation, thereby ensuring fair and transparent elections.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) was another crucial topic discussed in the analysis. The potential risks and benefits associated with AI are significant. While AI holds promising prospects for various sectors, there are concerns regarding its ethical implications, data privacy, and potential biases. To address these issues and promote responsible AI development, a publicly trustworthy framework is necessary. This framework should encompass guidelines to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness in AI systems.

Lastly, the analysis outlined the positive role of parliaments in the Internet Governance Forum. Parliaments have a responsibility to create the legal framework and safeguard human rights within the digital realm. This role signifies the importance of parliamentary participation and decision-making in shaping internet governance policies. By actively engaging in the Internet Governance Forum, parliaments can contribute to a more inclusive and democratic digital landscape.

In conclusion, the analysis highlighted the pressing need to restore trust in politics, combat online violence, safeguard the integrity of elections, establish a publicly trustworthy AI framework, and acknowledge the valuable role of parliaments in internet governance. These insights call for concerted efforts to address these issues, promote transparency, and preserve democratic values in an increasingly digital world.

Junhua Li, UN Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs

Junhua Li emphasises the importance of effective data governance and the need for a balanced political direction to safeguard individuals’ rights, including privacy. He highlights the potential consequences of fragmented national approaches to data governance, such as exclusion and misalignment with global goals. Li advocates for a coordinated and unified approach to ensure that data governance protects people’s rights and promotes global objectives.

Additionally, Li promotes the development of new technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), in a trusted manner to foster innovation. He emphasises the importance of policies, laws, and regulations that facilitate collaboration among stakeholders, ensuring the responsible development of these technologies while upholding ethical considerations. By advocating for a trusted and responsible approach, Li envisions a future where innovation thrives without compromising individual and community well-being and values.

Furthermore, Li calls for the creation of a digital space that effectively addresses online misinformation and disinformation. He recognises the internet as a tool for individual and collective empowerment and emphasises the need to secure it to prevent the spread of false information. This highlights his commitment to fostering a digital environment where individuals have access to accurate and reliable information, promoting informed decision-making and an engaged citizenry.

Moreover, Li encourages lawmakers to consider recommendations from global-level discussions and apply them at the regional and national levels. By doing so, lawmakers can contribute to establishing an inclusive, safe, and secure internet governance structure. Collaborating with stakeholders, lawmakers can mitigate the risks of digitalisation and ensure that its benefits are accessible to all. Through these efforts, Li envisions an internet governance framework that empowers individuals and enhances opportunities for social, economic, and political participation.

In conclusion, Junhua Li’s viewpoints underscore the importance of robust data governance, responsible technological development, and the creation of a digital space that combats misinformation and disinformation. His advocacy for inclusive and secure internet governance reflects his commitment to safeguarding individuals’ rights and promoting global objectives. By implementing his recommendations, policymakers can contribute to a future where technology drives societal progress, innovation thrives, and the digital realm becomes a space for empowerment and engagement.

Sumana Shrestha, MP, Nepal

The speakers in the discussion focus on the regulation and policy development needed to keep up with the fast-paced advancements in technology. They highlight the importance of updating regulations to address the challenges posed by new technologies. While regulators and policymakers often manage to catch up, there is a need for proactive measures to ensure that regulations are not lagging behind.

Contextualising global frameworks is another key point emphasised by the speakers. They argue that countries should adapt global frameworks to their specific needs and unique conditions. This approach acknowledges that one size does not fit all when it comes to regulations and policies. By tailoring global frameworks to local contexts, countries can better address the challenges and opportunities presented by technology.

Child safety and digital literacy are also highlighted as critical areas that require attention. The speakers stress the need for basic minimum standards across the world to protect children online and ensure that they have access to essential digital literacy programmes. By establishing these standards, countries can provide a safer online environment for children and empower them with the necessary skills to navigate the digital world.

Learning from each other and replicating best practices is seen as another way to advance technology regulation and policy development. By sharing knowledge and experiences, countries can avoid reinventing the wheel and benefit from successful approaches implemented elsewhere.

Trust-building and cooperation among stakeholders are also emphasised for the optimal use of digital technologies. The speakers argue that collaboration between governments, private sector entities, and civil society is crucial to build trust and ensure that technology is used in a safe and responsible manner. They point out the implications of optimally using digital technologies to interact in a digitally safe space.

The migration of educated individuals and the resulting challenges in policy implementation are also discussed. The speakers highlight the need to address this issue and find ways to retain talent within the country, as the influx of skilled individuals can hamper policy development and implementation.

The importance of strong cooperation in policy implementation is emphasised. The speakers advocate for institutionalising efforts to strengthen cooperation, leveraging the network and knowledge gained from past experiences. By working together, countries can overcome challenges and ensure effective policy implementation.

Cooperation and generous knowledge and technology sharing are deemed necessary to ensure global digital safety. The sharing of advanced algorithms, for instance, can help combat digital challenges such as deep fakes. The speakers stress that global digital safety benefits everyone and that cooperation is essential in achieving this.

The speakers also touch upon the importance of contextualising technology for different countries and localities. They acknowledge that the level of digital literacy varies globally, and technologies should be people-centric and tailored to fit specific contexts. They provide an example of a pop-up alert that helps individuals discern internet information, illustrating the importance of user-centric design.

The need for globally agreed-upon minimum standards is highlighted, particularly in areas such as digital safety and accountability. The speakers argue that certain non-negotiable standards are essential for protecting minors and highlight the commendable work done by the EU in this regard.

The role of parliamentarians in the policy-making process and their potential collaboration with UN bodies and other platforms is highlighted. The stability and continuity provided by parliamentarians, especially in countries like Nepal where government changes frequently, make them valuable partners in achieving policy objectives.

Access to knowledge and the importance of learning from various countries and frameworks are emphasised. The speakers advocate for access to knowledge pots and stress the need to learn from each other’s experiences and customise frameworks for specific countries.

The speakers also discuss the importance of a unified approach to data management. They argue for uniformity and a minimum standard for handling data across different sectors. This collective approach allows for customisation while maintaining consistency and avoiding a fragmented approach.

The possibility of bringing regulations that deal with rapidly changing technology is mentioned. The example of Nepal, where the government can bring laws that are active for 60 days and replace them with permanent laws, is cited. The banning of cryptocurrency due to a lack of understanding of its volatility and technology is highlighted as an example where appropriate regulations need to be implemented.

The importance of staying proactive and connected with researchers, academia, and innovators to understand upcoming changes in technology is emphasised. By engaging with experts in the field, policymakers can stay informed and make well-informed decisions.

The speakers address the challenges posed by disinformation, misinformation, and fake news in the digital age. They emphasise the need for collective conversations to manage these social issues, as the internet knows no boundaries. Tackling these challenges requires a coordinated effort across countries and platforms.

Advocacy for minimum standards to protect citizens in low-resource settings is highlighted. Small companies often lack access to data and struggle to keep up with larger tech platforms. The speakers argue that regulations on content moderation are necessary wherever these platforms operate to ensure the well-being of citizens in low-resource settings.

The collective bargaining power of the EU is seen as influential in implementing regulations. The EU’s ability to negotiate and enforce regulations sets an example for other countries and regions.

Innovation and youth engagement in policy dialogues are encouraged. The speakers stress the importance of innovation, particularly in countries with limited resources, and the need to involve the youth in shaping policy decisions. They argue that the younger generation should set the narrative now to avoid difficulty in changing it in the future.

Government accountability and the role of parliamentarians are emphasised. Parliamentarians are seen as key players in holding the government accountable for its decisions. The speakers argue for a democratic process where fundamental rights are safeguarded and changes can be made through elections.

In conclusion, the speakers present a range of valuable perspectives on technology regulation and policy development. They highlight the need for proactive measures and contextualising policies to address the challenges posed by technology. The importance of basic minimum standards, knowledge sharing, cooperation, and public engagement are emphasised. Additionally, the speakers stress the importance of government accountability, youth engagement, and a unified approach to data management. The EU’s collective bargaining power and the need for innovation in low-resource settings are also discussed. Overall, the speakers provide valuable insights into the complex task of regulating technology and developing effective policies in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Vint Cerf, Chair, IGF Leadership Panel

The Internet is a powerful tool that has the ability to amplify both beneficial and harmful voices and behaviors. This presents a significant challenge in maintaining discipline and order in the online sphere. On one hand, the Internet allows for the rapid distribution of content and provides a platform for individuals who may not have been able to voice their opinions otherwise. This amplification of voices can lead to positive outcomes, such as spreading awareness about important social issues or giving a platform to marginalized communities. However, on the other hand, the Internet also amplifies harmful voices and behaviors, which can have serious consequences. Disciplining and regulating online content in order to mitigate the negative impact is a complex challenge that requires careful consideration.

Technologists play a crucial role in addressing this challenge. They have an obligation to assist lawmakers and parliamentarians in understanding how computer-based applications work and do not work. By providing insight into the technical aspects, technologists can help lawmakers create effective and constructive regulations. It is crucial to focus on the outcomes rather than specific technologies when developing rules and legislation in order to address the issues surrounding harmful online content.

The expansion of the Internet into interplanetary space brings forth a new set of challenges. The head of the Interplanetary Networking Chapter of the Internet Society, Yosuke Kaneko, has released a report on how the interplanetary internet would function. This expansion opens up opportunities for commercial activities on celestial bodies such as the moon. However, along with these opportunities arise legal and jurisdictional challenges. It is predicted that there will be commercial activity on the moon within the next two years, which will undoubtedly lead to questions regarding property rights, mining claims, and legal disputes. The current legal framework, including the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, only covers these issues in a modest way, leaving room for further exploration and development of regulations.

In conclusion, the Internet’s power to amplify both beneficial and harmful voices and behaviors poses a significant challenge in disciplining online content. Technologists have a responsibility to assist lawmakers in understanding the workings of computer-based applications to create effective regulations. Additionally, the expansion of the Internet into interplanetary space introduces new challenges, including legal and jurisdictional issues. As commercial activities on celestial bodies increase, questions regarding property rights and legal disputes are likely to arise. It is essential to address these challenges and develop appropriate regulations to ensure a safe and responsible online environment.

Moderator

In a recent discussion, various speakers expressed their perspectives on technology, governance, and societal issues. Vint Cerf, a prominent internet pioneer, revealed his preference for music composed before 1850, demonstrating his appreciation for classical music. On the other hand, Junhua Li advocated for a globally unified approach to data governance and emphasized the importance of developing artificial intelligence in a trusted manner. These different viewpoints highlight the diversity of opinions within the discussion.

The speakers also addressed the challenges and importance of trust in politics. Polling data from different regions highlighted the low levels of trust in politics, emphasizing the need for trust to be earned over time through transparent and ethical behavior. It was emphasized that people must have confidence in the fairness of electoral processes for trust to flourish in the political sphere.

Countering online violence, particularly towards women and children, emerged as a significant concern. The speakers unanimously agreed that legal and technical measures should be employed to combat this issue. Furthermore, creating a digital space that counters online misinformation was seen as crucial, with the internet being viewed as a tool for individual and collective empowerment.

The discussion also addressed the challenges posed by election interference and the threats it poses to democracy. New ways in which information circulates, along with the opportunities for micro-targeting audiences, were mentioned as factors that challenge democratic processes. It was argued that attempts to influence or interfere with the electoral process must be closely monitored and addressed to uphold the integrity of democratic systems.

One key theme that emerged throughout the discussion was the need for adaptable laws and regulations to keep pace with technological advancements. The rapid speed of technological change presents challenges for traditional legislative processes, requiring lawmakers to adopt agile governance measures. The focus should be on regulating the impact of technology rather than the technology itself.

The involvement of parliamentarians in global governance and the formulation of policies and regulations was highlighted as an essential aspect of decision-making. Collaboration between international organizations and parliamentarians was seen as crucial for ensuring the development of effective and inclusive governance frameworks. The input and participation of parliamentarians in specialized international organizations were seen as beneficial for policy-making and regulation.

The discussion also touched upon the importance of guidance from the UN system and other intergovernmental or international institutions, especially for smaller or developing countries. The expertise and resources provided by these organizations can help bridge the knowledge gap and enable these countries to navigate the complexities of technology governance.

Additional observations include the emphasis on proactively engaging with researchers, academia, and innovators to understand upcoming technologies and their potential impacts. It was also noted that the involvement of youth in policy-making and governance is crucial, as they comprise a significant portion of the population and provide unique perspectives and needs.

In conclusion, the discussion shed light on various aspects of technology governance and its impact on society. The speakers highlighted the need for trust, adaptable laws, collaboration, and guidance to address the challenges posed by technology. By considering these perspectives and working together, policymakers and stakeholders can navigate the complexities of technology governance and ensure that technology contributes positively to society.

Brando Benifei, Member, European Parliament

The analysis of the provided texts reveals several key points raised by different speakers. One important point is the need to strike a balance between legislation and technology developments in order to keep up with the fast-paced technological advancements. It is recognized that trying to legislate every aspect of technology can be challenging, and therefore, a balanced approach is required.

Another significant point raised is the importance of involving all stakeholders in the creation of legislation. It is argued that including different perspectives and expertise can lead to more effective and comprehensive legislation. This involvement can help ensure that the needs and concerns of various stakeholders, such as academia and representatives from international organizations, are addressed and taken into consideration.

The implementation of legislation is highlighted as a critical aspect that must be done properly and realistically. It is emphasized that legislation should be enforceable and not become obsolete. This suggests the need for careful planning and consideration during the legislative process.

Power imbalances, particularly in the context of technology, are another concern brought forward. It is crucial to be aware of these imbalances and strive for fairness and equity in legislation. This point underlines the importance of ensuring that legislative measures do not disproportionately benefit certain entities or further widen existing inequalities.

Legislating on complex issues like artificial intelligence (AI) requires in-depth understanding and detailed study. Several texts mention the need for comprehensive analysis and research before enacting legislation on such complex and rapidly evolving technologies. This argument supports the idea that legislation on AI and similar technologies should be based on a solid understanding of their potential impact, risks, and ethical considerations.

The involvement of different stakeholders, including academia and representatives from various international organizations, in legislative discussions is seen as essential to avoid making wrong decisions. It is argued that engaging experts and diverse perspectives can help identify potential pitfalls, unintended consequences, and alternative solutions.

Cooperation is highlighted as a fundamental element in defining issues related to technology, AI, and the internet. Global collaboration, common definitions, and standards are emphasized as crucial for establishing a trustworthy internet and facilitating the responsible use of AI. The importance of international organizations, such as the United Nations, is emphasized in establishing these common frameworks and promoting cooperation.

Fundamental rights and safety considerations are seen as a priority when addressing domestic issues of technology. Legislation should be implemented to protect safety, health, and fundamental rights in the context of technological advancements. This argument highlights the need for a balanced approach that considers both the benefits and potential risks of technology.

Parliamentarians are identified as having a unique perspective in understanding the impact of technology developments on individuals. They are seen as distinct from executive branches, as they focus more on the individual impact of tech developments. This point suggests that the involvement of parliamentarians in the legislative process can bring a more holistic and individual-centered perspective.

There is a call for multiple layers of regulation and legislation in terms of time spans. It is argued that sustainable, longer-term regulations should be used alongside shorter-term, experimental regulations to gain experience and adapt to changing circumstances. This approach recognizes the need for flexibility and the ability to respond to emerging challenges.

Effective legislative measures are seen as essential to avoid market fragmentation, particularly in the context of the European Union. It is argued that solid legislation is necessary to overcome fragmentation and ensure a harmonized market.

The analysis also highlights the importance of democracy keeping pace with modern challenges. It is suggested that democracy needs to adapt to emerging challenges to remain relevant and appreciated by the people.

The engagement of young people in political and social discussions is emphasized as essential. It is argued that their involvement is necessary to prevent others from making decisions on their behalf. The exclusion of young people from decision-making processes is seen as detrimental to public discourse and effective governance.

However, some observations suggest that the rhetoric about the importance of young people is often not reflected in reality. Politicians may use rhetoric to highlight the significance of youth, but their actual involvement in decision-making processes might be limited.

There is also strong support for youth participation in discussions about climate change and digital rights. The texts highlight the impact that young people have had in uniting globally and influencing politics regarding climate change. It is argued that young people should build momentum around digital citizenship and digital rights, recognizing their significance in the modern world.

The limitation of freedom on the internet is seen as a delicate topic. It is argued that restrictions should be proportional to significant reasons that justify limits on freedom of expression. This point suggests the need for careful consideration and balancing of freedom and security in the digital realm.

Finally, there is a strong call for a united internet that fosters a more united world. This perspective emphasizes the need to oppose efforts that aim to separate the internet and instead work towards global collaboration that can lead to a more interconnected and cooperative world.

In conclusion, the analysis of the provided texts highlights the importance of striking a balance between legislation and technology developments, involving all stakeholders in legislative processes, implementing legislation properly, considering power imbalances, and in-depth understanding before enacting legislation. It also emphasizes the significance of cooperation, fundamental rights, engagement of young people, and a united approach to address the challenges posed by technology and the interconnected world.

Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Assistant Professor of Computer Science, King Saud University

The analysis highlights the importance of adopting an innovative and agile approach to regulate new technologies. It argues that legacy regulatory practices are not suitable for the fast-paced nature of technology advancements. Responding to uncertainties and standards is crucial in effectively regulating new technologies.

Another key point is the need for regulators to engage with stakeholders and understand the ground realities of the industry. Isolation can hinder the effectiveness of regulation, and actively interacting with stakeholders allows regulators to gain better insights into the challenges and dynamics of the industry.

In terms of understanding the standards of new technologies and their development, the analysis emphasizes the importance of innovation. It suggests the establishment of policy labs within innovation centers and tracking the progress of new use-cases developed by entrepreneurs and companies.

The analysis also emphasizes the role of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in parliamentary affairs. Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, an AI and law professor, highlights the importance of AI tools for understanding and summarizing legal legislations. Collaboration with governments and parliaments across countries further emphasizes the significance of AI tools in this domain.

International cooperation and dialogue are crucial for various aspects such as cybersecurity, data flow, AI risks, data policies and principles, and public security. The Saudi Parliament’s involvement in AI governance and regulations demonstrates the need for regulatory frameworks in these areas.

On a global scale, discussions surrounding global digital trust involve bodies like the United Nations (UN) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The analysis suggests that global thinking on AI principles can be applied to national measures, taking into account cultural norms, values, and existing legislations.

Saudi Arabia’s implementation of UNESCO’s recommendation ethics on AI and the establishment of an International AI research and ethics center highlight the country’s commitment to ethical AI practices. The involvement of parliamentarians in global governance is also emphasized, urging global bodies to consider and involve them in decision-making processes.

The analysis identifies the need to speed up the lawmaking process to keep up with the rapid advancements in technology. Regulatory sandboxes are suggested as a means to bridge the gap between evolving technology and slow lawmaking. Engaging the opinions of the youth in decision-making processes is also highlighted, considering their representation in the population.

Lastly, the analysis touches on the issue of state-controlled internet accessibility. It argues against such control, referencing a case of internet shutdown in Pakistan due to political instability. It suggests that the International Parliamentary Union, along with countries facing similar problems, provide best practices and solutions related to internet accessibility.

Overall, the analysis presents a comprehensive overview of the regulation of new technologies and the involvement of parliamentarians in global governance. It provides evidence-backed arguments and suggests potential solutions for the challenges posed by technological advancements.

Audience

The speakers at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) highlighted several concerns regarding internet governance and trust, with a particular focus on the African continent. One major concern was that platforms based outside of Africa do not consider local values and norms, leading to a lack of trust among African internet users. The US Cloud Act was cited as an example of legislation that puts African internet users at risk.

To address this issue, it was argued that the African perspective should be taken into account when developing global internet standards. This is especially important as many African countries are set to hold elections in 2024, making trust in the internet crucial for these regions. It was emphasized that legislation should consider local African values, norms, and culture to ensure a trusted and inclusive internet.

Another concern discussed at the IGF was the potential threat of spreading disinformation by non-state actors linked to state actors during elections. It was noted that 70 democracies, including Ghana, are scheduled to hold elections in 2024, which creates a significant risk. Examples were given of countries such as North Korea, China, Russia, and the US, where non-state actors have been known to spread disinformation. It was argued that this poses a serious threat to the integrity of elections and highlights the need for measures to address this issue.

To achieve a safer and more trusted internet, it was proposed that the African continent should take a collective stand. Europe was cited as an example where a collective stand is taken instead of individual member states. The Pan-African Parliament and the African Union were called upon to take more action in this regard.

Youth engagement was highlighted as crucial in the creation of internet trust and security. It was emphasized that involving young people in the decision-making process is essential, and their participation would multiply the effect of actions taken. A speaker from Nepal raised the question of how policymakers plan to engage youth in enhancing internet trust.

Concerns were also raised about governments blacking out or shutting down the internet for political benefits. An incident in Pakistan was mentioned where there was a complete internet blackout for several days due to political reasons. It was suggested that internet governance bodies should take action in situations where governments violate the fundamental human right of internet access. The audience expressed opposition to state-induced internet blackouts and called for the implementation of regulations and laws by the IGF to prevent such actions.

Internet shutdowns by governments during times of political instability were another significant concern. It was proposed that parliamentarians should enact regulations or laws to prevent the state from cutting off internet access.

The importance of internet freedom and not degrading access under the guise of legitimate issues was also emphasized. It was argued that restrictions on internet freedom should be proportionate to significant reasons. There was a call for a common understanding and cooperation among stakeholders to define acceptable restrictions on internet freedom.

In conclusion, the discussions at the IGF highlighted the need for a more trusted and inclusive internet, particularly in the African context. The African perspective should be considered in the development of global internet standards, and measures should be taken to address the threat of disinformation during elections. Youth engagement, government accountability, and internet freedom were identified as crucial elements in achieving a safer and more trusted internet. The IGF was urged to take action by implementing regulations and laws to prevent government-induced internet blackouts. Overall, the discussions emphasized the importance of collective action and cooperation to create a more secure and inclusive online environment.

Tomoko Ukishima, MP, Japan

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Kyoto 2023, to be held in Japan, aims to foster an environment that promotes the principles of an open, free, and trustworthy internet. This forum acknowledges and appreciates the commendable efforts made by the United Nations and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) in this regard.

One of the key aspects of the forum is the parliamentary track, where members of parliament will engage in discussions about crucial matters related to the use and development of the internet. By sharing good practices and solutions, participants aim to implement effective and efficient policies through constructive dialogue with various stakeholders. This inclusive approach ensures that diverse perspectives and expertise are considered, leading to well-informed decisions.

The forum also places significant emphasis on shaping digital trust for the internet. This involves discussing topics such as data governance, artificial intelligence (AI), and disinformation. Participants will engage in constructive conversations about the challenges and opportunities associated with these areas to foster greater trust among users and stakeholders.

Additionally, the forum seeks to establish international guiding principles for all AI actors. This initiative began after the G7 Hiroshima Summit, and the goal is to establish a set of principles governing the usage and development of AI in a responsible and ethical manner. The engagement of various stakeholders in this development process is vital to ensure that the principles reflect a wide range of perspectives and are suitable for global adoption.

In conclusion, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Kyoto 2023 in Japan is a significant event that aims to promote an open, free, and trustworthy internet. Through the parliamentary track, discussions will be held on important internet-related issues, leading to the implementation of effective policies. The forum will focus on shaping digital trust by addressing challenges related to data governance, AI, and disinformation. Additionally, efforts will be made to establish international guiding principles for all AI actors. By fostering collaboration and dialogue, this forum plays a crucial role in shaping the future of internet governance and fostering a safe and inclusive digital environment.

Speakers