OPEN DIALOGUE WITH IGF LEADERSHIP PANEL
11 Oct 2023 03:00h - 04:00h UTC
Event report
Speakers and Moderators:
Table of contents
Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the IGF session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the IGF's official website.
Knowledge Graph of Debate
Session report
Maria Fernanda Garza
Maria Fernanda Garza is seeking help in identifying barriers that are hindering the achievement of the vision outlined in the 'Internet We Want' paper. This paper was recently worked on and presented, highlighting the importance of the International Governance Forum (IGF) members' understanding of regional and global obstacles.
The sentiment surrounding this issue is positive, emphasizing the need to address these barriers to successfully realise the vision. One of the supporting facts underscores the significant role played by IGF members' knowledge of specific regional and global obstacles in overcoming these challenges.
Maria Fernanda Garza believes that to expedite progress towards the desired outcomes, specific goals, appropriate measurement methods, and the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are necessary. These tools can help achieve faster progression towards the vision. This aligns with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, which emphasises the importance of advancing technology and connectivity.
In conclusion, Maria Fernanda Garza is looking to identify the barriers impeding the achievement of the vision presented in the 'Internet We Want' paper. By emphasising the significance of IGF members' awareness of regional and global barriers and advocating for the establishment of specific goals, measurement methods, and KPIs, she aims to expedite progress towards the outlined vision. The discussions surrounding this topic are in line with SDG 9, which focuses on advancing industry, innovation, and infrastructure.
Audience
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) addressed various topics related to internet governance and connectivity. Private investment in rural and underserved communities was highlighted as a key issue for improving connectivity. It was noted that private companies and telecommunications companies often neglect these areas. Concerns were also raised about the monopolization of the internet industry, particularly its impact on media-related businesses and the dynamics of political participation and democracy. The importance of inclusivity and the multi-stakeholder approach in internet governance was emphasized, with the IGF seen as successful in addressing global internet policy development. The need for practical standards to reduce the internet's environmental footprint and promote digitalization was discussed. Additionally, the role of internet and digital technology in empowering vulnerable groups, such as women, girls, migrants, and refugees, was highlighted. Suggestions for improving the IGF included simplifying the registration process, increasing remote participation, and providing additional resources and accessible tools. The discussions highlighted the importance of private investments in underserved communities, addressing monopolization, promoting inclusivity and multi-stakeholder collaboration, developing practical standards, and empowering vulnerable groups. There were also calls for improvements in the IGF itself to make it more inclusive and effective.
Hatem Dowidar
Universal service funds are being utilized in many countries to encourage telecommunications coverage in rural areas. These funds, which are generated through taxation imposed on telecommunications companies (telcos), are reinvested into initiatives that support the expansion of coverage in rural regions. Notably, the US government has pledged $40 billion to ensure coverage in rural areas.
Promoting sustainable investment in rural areas requires ongoing dialogue between government entities, regulators, and telcos. This collaboration aims to develop policies and strategies that promote the long-term viability and success of telecommunications projects in rural regions. By fostering open communication and cooperation, stakeholders can address challenges, identify opportunities, and establish a framework that encourages investment in infrastructure and services for rural communities. This approach is crucial for achieving SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.
However, it is important to acknowledge the financial burdens and considerations telcos face when expanding coverage in rural areas. Some argue that telcos should not be solely responsible for such investments and should receive additional support, such as tax relief, to invest sustainably in rural areas. By providing financial assistance and incentives, telcos can be encouraged to allocate resources towards building and enhancing infrastructure in underserved regions. This perspective highlights the need to view telcos as more than just a source of revenue, but as partners in achieving equitable telecommunications access.
In conclusion, universal service funds play a vital role in encouraging telecommunications coverage in rural areas. The US government's commitment of $40 billion reflects the importance placed on ensuring connectivity in remote regions. To promote sustainable investment, ongoing dialogue between government bodies, regulators, and telcos is necessary. This collaboration permits the development of policies and strategies that support long-term success. Furthermore, providing telcos with additional support, such as tax relief, can facilitate their investment in rural areas. By working together, stakeholders can strive towards achieving SDG 9 and bridging the digital divide in rural communities.
Hiroshi Yoshida
The analysis highlights several key points regarding the deployment of infrastructure in rural areas. One argument put forward is that the government should play a significant role in this process, as relying solely on private investment may not yield profitable outcomes. This suggests that there is a need for government support and intervention to ensure the development and implementation of infrastructure in rural areas.
Another potential solution is the use of universal service funds or subsidies. These mechanisms can provide financial support to companies or service providers, incentivising them to extend their coverage to rural areas. By offering incentives, it becomes more economically viable for these entities to invest in infrastructure in places where profitability may otherwise be low or uncertain.
Furthermore, the analysis highlights the potential of new technologies, particularly non-terrestrial networks, in efficiently covering rural areas. These technologies, such as mobile technology, rail satellite networks, and high-altitude platform systems, have the capability to cover wide areas of 50 to 100 kilometres with just one system. This presents a promising option for overcoming the challenges posed by the vast and remote nature of rural areas.
Overall, the analysis suggests that a multifaceted approach combining government intervention, universal service funds or subsidies, and the adoption of new technologies is necessary to improve infrastructure coverage in rural areas. By recognising the limitations of private investment, exploring alternative financing options, and leveraging innovative technologies, it becomes possible to bridge the infrastructure gap and ensure equitable access to vital services for rural communities.
One noteworthy observation from the analysis is the emphasis on SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. This sustainable development goal highlights the importance of infrastructure development and innovation in achieving sustainable and inclusive growth. By aligning efforts with this goal, governments and stakeholders can work towards creating a more connected and prosperous future for both urban and rural areas.
In conclusion, while private investment alone may not be sufficient, the government's involvement in deploying infrastructure in rural areas is crucial. The use of universal service funds or subsidies can also help improve coverage, and new technologies like non-terrestrial networks offer promising solutions. By adopting a comprehensive approach and aligning efforts with SDG 9, the goal of ensuring reliable and accessible infrastructure in rural areas can be achieved.
Vint Cerf
During a recent meeting, the importance of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) was discussed, with several speakers expressing the need for its continuation. The leadership panel emphasised that the IGF should continue to assess the effectiveness of the Global Digital Compact. They believe that the forum plays a vital role in articulating the values needed for decision-making on the IGF's future.
One of the main points highlighted was the need for feedback from IGF participants to further improve the forum. Participants were encouraged to share their experiences and suggestions during the meeting. The leadership panel stressed that they are interested in hearing from the participants and want to know what aspects they appreciate and would like to continue.
The issue of internet access, especially in rural areas, was also discussed. It was acknowledged that although internet penetration is generally good in the United States, rural areas still face challenges in terms of access. The leadership panel recognised that significant effort and funding are required to improve internet access in these underserved regions. In the United States, for example, the government is investing $40 billion to address this issue in rural areas.
Recognising the potential of low-Earth-orbiting satellite systems, the meeting highlighted how these systems could provide technical access to the internet anywhere. Starlink, for instance, plans to launch 40,000 satellites, and there are other anticipated LEO satellite systems as well. This development could greatly enhance internet connectivity, particularly in remote locations.
The meeting also touched upon the possibility of government subsidies to make internet service more affordable in rural areas. It was suggested that in the absence of competition, government support could be crucial in bringing internet access to these remote regions.
The issue of internet monopoly and economic concentration was raised, with the meeting acknowledging that it is not the leadership panel's responsibility to solve the problem of businesses whose models have changed due to new technology. Instead, the leadership panel aims to facilitate discussions and bring together individuals who can consider various solutions to address these challenges.
National and regional internet governance activities were emphasised as being crucial in understanding and addressing local problems. Such activities were considered as important, if not more, than the annual IGF meetings due to their local focus. The meeting highlighted that these activities articulate the unique challenges faced at a local level and can contribute to more effective governance of the internet.
In terms of communication, email was mentioned as one of the available tools for providing input to the leadership panel. It was noted that email allows for direct and reliable communication with the panel, and the secretariat can invite comments and draw attention to important matters through this medium.
The partnership between the leadership panel and the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) was recognised as crucial for the IGF's functioning. It was acknowledged that the structure of the IGF would not exist without this partnership, emphasising the importance of collaboration and partnership in achieving the forum's goals.
The meeting also discussed the need for more interaction with National and Regional Internet Governance Initiatives (NRIs). It was suggested that there should be personal visits to NRIs or regular correspondence with them to enhance connectivity and strengthen relationships.
A noteworthy idea that emerged during the meeting was the concept of individuals creating their own IP addresses and becoming their own Internet Service Providers (ISPs). This notion, presented by Christopher Tay from Connect Free and Internet 3, was deemed interesting and worth exploring. It was suggested that presenting this idea to the Internet Engineering Task Force could lead to further development and analysis.
The meeting recognized that increasing capacity from overhead satellites and undersea fiber would contribute to better internet access. This development points towards a positive trend in terms of improving internet connectivity worldwide.
Azerbaijan's contribution to the IGF as the host was appreciated, highlighting the importance of partnerships and collaboration between countries in achieving the forum's goals.
Lastly, the meeting reiterated and assured continued support for the multistakeholder model. The importance of multiple voices in global digital negotiations was emphasised, and the United Nations' support towards a multistakeholder approach was appreciated.
Overall, the meeting generated various insights and proposals to improve the IGF. Suggestions included better meeting structure, reducing topic overlaps, and involving smaller states in hosting globally. There was a consensus that reforms are needed to conduct the IGF meetings more effectively, ensuring less chaos and more structure. These recommendations and observations aim to enhance the IGF's impact and strengthen its role in internet governance.
Lise Fuhr
The analysis explores the importance of collective input and consultation with other communities in relation to the "Internet We Want" paper. Lise Fuhr emphasizes the need for outreach and collaboration not only on the specific topic of the "Internet We Want" but also on other related topics within the leadership panel. Her goal is to achieve the objectives set in the paper through collective input and consultation.
The analysis also highlights the significance of local solutions in addressing global problems in the context of internet governance and local issues. Input is collected in national and regional Internet Governance Forums (IGFs) for analysis, which is then brought back to the IGFs. This ensures a feedback loop that involves communities in shaping solutions to global problems. It is acknowledged that global problems cannot be effectively addressed without considering local contexts and solutions.
The speakers stress the importance of perceiving and analyzing problems in a local context to find effective solutions. They recognize the need to involve and consult with diverse communities and stakeholders to achieve desired outcomes. This collaborative and inclusive approach is essential in creating an internet that caters to the needs and aspirations of various communities, and in addressing global challenges by taking local perspectives into account.
Overall, the analysis underscores the significance of collective input and consultation with other communities in relation to the "Internet We Want" paper. It emphasizes the need for outreach, collaboration, and a feedback loop with local stakeholders in the context of internet governance and local issues. By considering local solutions and involving diverse communities, it becomes possible to effectively address global problems and create an internet that benefits all.
Gbenga Sesan
Gbenga Sesan, a strong advocate for the "Internet We Want" initiative, emphasises the vital role of receiving feedback and contributions from the public. He believes that to shape a comprehensive and inclusive "Internet We Want" paper, it is crucial to involve the public in the process. The secretariat responsible for the initiative will actively welcome and consider public comments and contributions.
By opening the paper to public comments and input, Gbenga Sesan and the secretariat demonstrate their commitment to creating a document that reflects the perspectives and needs of a diverse range of stakeholders. This inclusive approach ensures a more democratic and representative outcome.
Gbenga Sesan's belief in the significance of public opinion is further highlighted by his appreciation of feedback received, such as that from Peter. He recognizes the value of engaging with the public to reduce any potential bias in the paper. This demonstrates his commitment to producing a document that captures the desires and aspirations of the broader public, rather than being driven solely by specific interests or biases.
These actions align with SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. SDG 16 aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions. By actively involving the public in shaping the "Internet We Want" paper, Gbenga Sesan and the secretariat contribute to promoting peace, justice, and strong institutions in the digital realm.
Overall, Gbenga Sesan's advocacy for public input in the "Internet We Want" initiative reflects his commitment to creating an inclusive and well-rounded document that serves the interests and needs of all stakeholders. By actively incorporating public feedback, he seeks to ensure transparency, fairness, and an open dialogue in shaping the future of the internet.
Carol Roach
Carol Roach, a government official from the Bahamas, has recently been appointed as the Chair of the Ministerial Accountability Group (MAG). The MAG is a leadership panel with the objective of promoting accountability and transparency within the government. Roach, under her leadership, has been focusing on strengthening governance and ensuring the responsible use of public funds in the Bahamas.
In response to recent developments, the leadership panel has expressed the urgency for an emergency meeting in the Bahamas. This meeting aims to address pressing issues and challenges faced by the government. The panel intends to discuss strategies to mitigate the impact of these issues and find solutions for the benefit of the entire nation.
The significance of this meeting cannot be overstated, as it enables the MAG to actively contribute to the decision-making process by providing valuable insights and recommendations. Attending the meeting in person allows the leadership panel to engage in direct discussions with key stakeholders and government officials, effectively communicating the concerns and perspectives of the MAG.
Furthermore, the emergency meeting serves as an opportunity for the MAG to solidify its presence and importance within the government of the Bahamas. By demonstrating dedication and commitment to promoting accountability and transparency, the leadership panel aims to gain support and recognition for their work.
In conclusion, Carol Roach, as the new Chair of the Ministerial Accountability Group, along with the leadership panel, is eager to attend the emergency meeting in the Bahamas. This meeting provides a crucial platform for the MAG to address urgent issues, actively contribute to decision-making, and establish its role within the government. Through their active participation and engagement, the leadership panel aims to drive positive change and ensure responsible governance in the Bahamas.
Speakers
A
Audience
Speech speed
150 words per minute
Speech length
5694 words
Speech time
2272 secs
Arguments
The speaker questions how to drive private investments to rural and underserved communities for improving connectivity.
Supporting facts:
- Internet penetration improves GDP in countries.
- Private companies and telcos don't usually invest in rural areas.
Topics: Internet Penetration, Private Investment, Connectivity, Rural Areas, Underserved Communities
The affordability of Internet access in rural areas might be questionable, even with the developments of low-Earth-orbiting satellite systems such as Starlink
Supporting facts:
- Starlink plans to launch 40,000 satellites
- Several other companies are expected to compete in the LEO satellite market
Topics: Internet access, Starlink, rural areas
Concerns about the connection of IGF outcomes to different processes
Supporting facts:
- The speaker is the executive director of the Association for Progressive Communications
- He mentions the challenge of engaging with multiple processes occurring simultaneously
- He asks for practical ways to connect the processes for better inclusion and participation
Topics: IGF, Leadership role, Inclusion, Participation
The evolution of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is inevitable
Supporting facts:
- IGF has been functioning for about 15-18 years
- Evolution is necessary to improve eficiency
Topics: Internet Governance Forum, evolution
IGF should continue to be a non-outcome-oriented event
Supporting facts:
- Non-outcome-oriented events allow for open discussion without the pressure of a required outcome
Topics: IGF, non-outcome-orientation
The mandate of the IGF should be extended
Supporting facts:
- NLIGF asked the whole group about mandate extension a year and a half ago and the answer was yes
Topics: IGF, Mandate extension
IGF needs improvements in transparency of decision-making process and financial support
Supporting facts:
- NLIGF has recommendations about making the IGF decision-making process more transparent and financially stable
Topics: IGF, transparency, financial support
The IGF needs to focus on fewer themes and promote real discussions
Supporting facts:
- Too many themes are currently addressed in IGF which doesn't get to the bottom of the issues in most cases
Topics: IGF, dialogue, interactive formats
The IGF should lead to concrete proposals for internet policy development
Supporting facts:
- NLIGF feels that current IGF results are not much successful in regards to internet policy development
Topics: IGF, internet policy development
The need for standards in reducing the internet's environmental footprint and digitalisation
Supporting facts:
- There was a previous discussion on this topic
- Best practices need to be implemented for these standards
Topics: Internet footprint, Digitalisation, Standards
Need for a universal declaration for internet and technology
Supporting facts:
- Michi Mboka, member of parliament from Kenya, stressed on the need of such laws to address inclusion gaps
Topics: Internet Governance, Digital Inclusion, Technological Legislation
Internet and digital technology can empower vulnerable groups
Supporting facts:
- The use of technology can help in inclusion of women, girls, migrants, and refugees
Topics: Internet Accessibility, Empowerment, Vulnerability
Leadership needs to foster more the role of NRIs in future IGF forums
Supporting facts:
- Jacques Beglinger is the co-secretary of the Swiss National IGF and engaged in the European IGF region.
Topics: IGF, Leadership, NRIs
Communication with NRIs and regional organizations should be increased
Supporting facts:
- IGF leadership has proposed personal visits and frequent correspondence with NRIs
- A regular coordinating call among the NRIs is suggested
Topics: IGF, NRIs, Regional Organisations
Telecoms are important for internet infrastructure and should not be considered as enemies
Supporting facts:
- Japanese telecom, NTT was not broken up in the 1990s but has a law preventing them from being an ISP
- This resulted in a multitude of ISPs and increased internet diversity in Japan
- Telecoms are important for creating infrastructure and supporting the development of the internet
Topics: Telecoms, Internet Infrastructure, ISP
Azerbaijan is committed to making internet affordable and accessible for all citizens by 2024.
Supporting facts:
- Azerbaijan aims to provide minimum 25 megabytes per second internet for each citizen, regardless of location.
- Azerbaijan hosted the IGF Forum 11 years ago, stimulating digital development.
Topics: Internet Accessibility, Digital Development, Affordable Internet
IGF should continue its work, promoting international cooperation and initiatives.
Supporting facts:
- Azerbaijan actively participated in the IGF and the World Summit on Information Society.
- Azerbaijan is chair of the non-alien movement.
Topics: IGF, International Cooperation
Azerbaijan has initiated the 'Digital Silk Road', utilizing fiber-optic infrastructure and satellite technology.
Supporting facts:
- Azerbaijan is using various infrastructures for the initiative, such as fiber-optic and satellite systems.
Topics: Digital Silk Road, Digital Infrastructure, Global Initiatives
Worried about the future of the multi-stakeholder model in Internet governance forums
Supporting facts:
- Member of the IGF and part of KPMG's responsible AI practice
- Values the multi-pronged input and information extraction from diverse sectors in the forum
Topics: Internet Governance, Global Digital Compact, Multi-stakeholder Model
Support for multi-stakeholderism and IGF
Supporting facts:
- Rodney Taylor, the Secretary General of the Caribbean Telecommunications Union, speaks in favor of the multi-stakeholder model and the IGF
- He mentions that Caribbean is hosting its 20th IGF next year
- He speaks about previous successful collaboration with small island developing states
Topics: Internet Governance Forum, Multi-stakeholder model
The role of the IGF and its leadership panel is crucial in the upcoming WSIS Plus 20 review process
Supporting facts:
- IGF and its initiatives have become fundamental to policy development on a global scale
- The WSIS Plus 20 is expected to realise the potential and challenges of the internet
Topics: IGF, WSIS Plus 20, Internet policy
The world is much better with IGF than without IGF
Supporting facts:
- The IGF allows us to deal with controversial things in a safe and educated manner
- The IGF permits ideas to be exchanged before they come up in a form of public policies
Topics: IGF Mandate, Internet Governance, Multi-Stakeholder Model
Additional resources and accessible tools should be provided for the IGF
Supporting facts:
- Resources is a barrier
- People should easily find resources and know how the best practice forum produces
- There is need for tools to participate fully in IGF discussions without coming to the meetings
Topics: IGF Resources, IGF Tools, Internet Governance
Feeling of having too many meetings and it's hard to follow the updates
Supporting facts:
- When there was the first IGF, the European Commision rejected the idea of starting things on a national level, regional level, then move onto a world level considering it too complicated and prone to producing too many meetings.
- Audience feels that there are myriad international organizations making things complicated for everyone, processes right, left, and center and various texts being written.
Topics: meetings, update management
The issue of representing the end users in the meetings
Topics: representation, end users
Christina Alida is seeking more integration of the leadership panel into the IGF's operations to help achieve greater impact
Supporting facts:
- Christina Alida represents the Egyptian government and is a part of audience at IGF
- The establishment of the leadership panel is a milestone in the Secretary General's roadmap for digital cooperation
- Christina also emphasizes not duplicating processes and filling in gaps for global digital cooperation
Topics: Internet Governance Forum, Digital Cooperation, Leadership Panel
There should be an extended IGF that allows remote participation and interaction for those who cannot be at the event.
Supporting facts:
- The audience member has participated in various programs like in Google, which made it possible for them to disseminate this event to other participants who couldn't be on site.
- Believes that local stakeholders should be included in these remote events.
Topics: IGF, Remote participation, Inclusivity
IGF registration process should be easier and more accessible online, allowing for easier remote participation.
Supporting facts:
- Believes the current registration process is laborious.
- Suggests having a simple link for registration.
Topics: IGF, Registration, Accessibility, Online platforms
Need for training, education, and awareness programs about AI and other new projects, especially at the local levels.
Supporting facts:
- Suggests training programs to provide support at the local level where there is the most need.
- Emphasizes on the part local stakeholders can play in education and spreading awareness.
Topics: Training, Education, Artificial Intelligence, Local Level Engagement
Report
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) addressed various topics related to internet governance and connectivity. Private investment in rural and underserved communities was highlighted as a key issue for improving connectivity. It was noted that private companies and telecommunications companies often neglect these areas.
Concerns were also raised about the monopolization of the internet industry, particularly its impact on media-related businesses and the dynamics of political participation and democracy. The importance of inclusivity and the multi-stakeholder approach in internet governance was emphasized, with the IGF seen as successful in addressing global internet policy development.
The need for practical standards to reduce the internet's environmental footprint and promote digitalization was discussed. Additionally, the role of internet and digital technology in empowering vulnerable groups, such as women, girls, migrants, and refugees, was highlighted. Suggestions for improving the IGF included simplifying the registration process, increasing remote participation, and providing additional resources and accessible tools.
The discussions highlighted the importance of private investments in underserved communities, addressing monopolization, promoting inclusivity and multi-stakeholder collaboration, developing practical standards, and empowering vulnerable groups. There were also calls for improvements in the IGF itself to make it more inclusive and effective.
CR
Carol Roach
Speech speed
123 words per minute
Speech length
34 words
Speech time
17 secs
Report
Carol Roach, a government official from the Bahamas, has recently been appointed as the Chair of the Ministerial Accountability Group (MAG). The MAG is a leadership panel with the objective of promoting accountability and transparency within the government. Roach, under her leadership, has been focusing on strengthening governance and ensuring the responsible use of public funds in the Bahamas.
In response to recent developments, the leadership panel has expressed the urgency for an emergency meeting in the Bahamas. This meeting aims to address pressing issues and challenges faced by the government. The panel intends to discuss strategies to mitigate the impact of these issues and find solutions for the benefit of the entire nation.
The significance of this meeting cannot be overstated, as it enables the MAG to actively contribute to the decision-making process by providing valuable insights and recommendations. Attending the meeting in person allows the leadership panel to engage in direct discussions with key stakeholders and government officials, effectively communicating the concerns and perspectives of the MAG.
Furthermore, the emergency meeting serves as an opportunity for the MAG to solidify its presence and importance within the government of the Bahamas. By demonstrating dedication and commitment to promoting accountability and transparency, the leadership panel aims to gain support and recognition for their work.
In conclusion, Carol Roach, as the new Chair of the Ministerial Accountability Group, along with the leadership panel, is eager to attend the emergency meeting in the Bahamas. This meeting provides a crucial platform for the MAG to address urgent issues, actively contribute to decision-making, and establish its role within the government.
Through their active participation and engagement, the leadership panel aims to drive positive change and ensure responsible governance in the Bahamas.
GS
Gbenga Sesan
Speech speed
197 words per minute
Speech length
94 words
Speech time
29 secs
Arguments
Gbenga Sesan emphasizes the importance of feedback and people's contributions to the 'Internet We Want' paper.
Supporting facts:
- The secretariat will open the paper for public comments and contributions
Topics: Internet We Want, public comments, contribution
Report
Gbenga Sesan, a strong advocate for the "Internet We Want" initiative, emphasises the vital role of receiving feedback and contributions from the public. He believes that to shape a comprehensive and inclusive "Internet We Want" paper, it is crucial to involve the public in the process.
The secretariat responsible for the initiative will actively welcome and consider public comments and contributions. By opening the paper to public comments and input, Gbenga Sesan and the secretariat demonstrate their commitment to creating a document that reflects the perspectives and needs of a diverse range of stakeholders.
This inclusive approach ensures a more democratic and representative outcome. Gbenga Sesan's belief in the significance of public opinion is further highlighted by his appreciation of feedback received, such as that from Peter. He recognizes the value of engaging with the public to reduce any potential bias in the paper.
This demonstrates his commitment to producing a document that captures the desires and aspirations of the broader public, rather than being driven solely by specific interests or biases. These actions align with SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. SDG 16 aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions.
By actively involving the public in shaping the "Internet We Want" paper, Gbenga Sesan and the secretariat contribute to promoting peace, justice, and strong institutions in the digital realm. Overall, Gbenga Sesan's advocacy for public input in the "Internet We Want" initiative reflects his commitment to creating an inclusive and well-rounded document that serves the interests and needs of all stakeholders.
By actively incorporating public feedback, he seeks to ensure transparency, fairness, and an open dialogue in shaping the future of the internet.
HD
Hatem Dowidar
Speech speed
150 words per minute
Speech length
224 words
Speech time
89 secs
Arguments
Universal service funds are being used in many countries to encourage telco coverage in rural areas.
Supporting facts:
- Some of the taxation that goes to telcos is put back into encouraging coverage in rural areas.
- The US government has pledged $40 billion to cover rural areas.
Topics: Universal service funds, Rural telecommunication coverage
There needs to be continued dialogue between government, regulators, and telcos to promote sustainable investment in rural areas.
Topics: Government policy, Rural telecommunication coverage, Investment
Report
Universal service funds are being utilized in many countries to encourage telecommunications coverage in rural areas. These funds, which are generated through taxation imposed on telecommunications companies (telcos), are reinvested into initiatives that support the expansion of coverage in rural regions.
Notably, the US government has pledged $40 billion to ensure coverage in rural areas. Promoting sustainable investment in rural areas requires ongoing dialogue between government entities, regulators, and telcos. This collaboration aims to develop policies and strategies that promote the long-term viability and success of telecommunications projects in rural regions.
By fostering open communication and cooperation, stakeholders can address challenges, identify opportunities, and establish a framework that encourages investment in infrastructure and services for rural communities. This approach is crucial for achieving SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. However, it is important to acknowledge the financial burdens and considerations telcos face when expanding coverage in rural areas.
Some argue that telcos should not be solely responsible for such investments and should receive additional support, such as tax relief, to invest sustainably in rural areas. By providing financial assistance and incentives, telcos can be encouraged to allocate resources towards building and enhancing infrastructure in underserved regions.
This perspective highlights the need to view telcos as more than just a source of revenue, but as partners in achieving equitable telecommunications access. In conclusion, universal service funds play a vital role in encouraging telecommunications coverage in rural areas.
The US government's commitment of $40 billion reflects the importance placed on ensuring connectivity in remote regions. To promote sustainable investment, ongoing dialogue between government bodies, regulators, and telcos is necessary. This collaboration permits the development of policies and strategies that support long-term success.
Furthermore, providing telcos with additional support, such as tax relief, can facilitate their investment in rural areas. By working together, stakeholders can strive towards achieving SDG 9 and bridging the digital divide in rural communities.
HY
Hiroshi Yoshida
Speech speed
102 words per minute
Speech length
180 words
Speech time
106 secs
Arguments
The government should play a role in deploying infrastructure in rural areas
Supporting facts:
- It is not profitable to invest only by private activities
Topics: Government role, Infrastructure, Rural areas
Universal service fund or subsidy can be a solution for coverage in rural areas
Topics: Universal service fund, Subsidy, Rural areas
New technologies like non-terrestrial network can help to efficiently cover rural areas
Supporting facts:
- There are new technologies like mobile technology, rail satellite networks and high-altitude platform system that can cover 50 to 100 kilometers wide with one system
Topics: New technologies, Non-terrestrial network, Rural areas
Report
The analysis highlights several key points regarding the deployment of infrastructure in rural areas. One argument put forward is that the government should play a significant role in this process, as relying solely on private investment may not yield profitable outcomes.
This suggests that there is a need for government support and intervention to ensure the development and implementation of infrastructure in rural areas. Another potential solution is the use of universal service funds or subsidies. These mechanisms can provide financial support to companies or service providers, incentivising them to extend their coverage to rural areas.
By offering incentives, it becomes more economically viable for these entities to invest in infrastructure in places where profitability may otherwise be low or uncertain. Furthermore, the analysis highlights the potential of new technologies, particularly non-terrestrial networks, in efficiently covering rural areas.
These technologies, such as mobile technology, rail satellite networks, and high-altitude platform systems, have the capability to cover wide areas of 50 to 100 kilometres with just one system. This presents a promising option for overcoming the challenges posed by the vast and remote nature of rural areas.
Overall, the analysis suggests that a multifaceted approach combining government intervention, universal service funds or subsidies, and the adoption of new technologies is necessary to improve infrastructure coverage in rural areas. By recognising the limitations of private investment, exploring alternative financing options, and leveraging innovative technologies, it becomes possible to bridge the infrastructure gap and ensure equitable access to vital services for rural communities.
One noteworthy observation from the analysis is the emphasis on SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. This sustainable development goal highlights the importance of infrastructure development and innovation in achieving sustainable and inclusive growth. By aligning efforts with this goal, governments and stakeholders can work towards creating a more connected and prosperous future for both urban and rural areas.
In conclusion, while private investment alone may not be sufficient, the government's involvement in deploying infrastructure in rural areas is crucial. The use of universal service funds or subsidies can also help improve coverage, and new technologies like non-terrestrial networks offer promising solutions.
By adopting a comprehensive approach and aligning efforts with SDG 9, the goal of ensuring reliable and accessible infrastructure in rural areas can be achieved.
LF
Lise Fuhr
Speech speed
157 words per minute
Speech length
181 words
Speech time
69 secs
Arguments
Lise Fuhr emphasizes the importance of collective input and consultation with other communities in relation to 'Internet We Want' paper.
Supporting facts:
- Lise Fuhr mentioned about conducting outreach on both the topic 'Internet We Want' and other topics within the leadership panel.
- She expressed the need for collective input and consultation with other communities in achieving the goals set in the paper.
Topics: Internet We Want, Collaboration, Community Consultation
Many global problems need local solutions
Supporting facts:
- Input is collected in national and regional IGFs for analysis
- This analysis is brought back to IGF
Topics: Internet Governance, Local Issues, Global Problems
Report
The analysis explores the importance of collective input and consultation with other communities in relation to the "Internet We Want" paper. Lise Fuhr emphasizes the need for outreach and collaboration not only on the specific topic of the "Internet We Want" but also on other related topics within the leadership panel.
Her goal is to achieve the objectives set in the paper through collective input and consultation. The analysis also highlights the significance of local solutions in addressing global problems in the context of internet governance and local issues. Input is collected in national and regional Internet Governance Forums (IGFs) for analysis, which is then brought back to the IGFs.
This ensures a feedback loop that involves communities in shaping solutions to global problems. It is acknowledged that global problems cannot be effectively addressed without considering local contexts and solutions. The speakers stress the importance of perceiving and analyzing problems in a local context to find effective solutions.
They recognize the need to involve and consult with diverse communities and stakeholders to achieve desired outcomes. This collaborative and inclusive approach is essential in creating an internet that caters to the needs and aspirations of various communities, and in addressing global challenges by taking local perspectives into account.
Overall, the analysis underscores the significance of collective input and consultation with other communities in relation to the "Internet We Want" paper. It emphasizes the need for outreach, collaboration, and a feedback loop with local stakeholders in the context of internet governance and local issues.
By considering local solutions and involving diverse communities, it becomes possible to effectively address global problems and create an internet that benefits all.
MF
Maria Fernanda Garza
Speech speed
125 words per minute
Speech length
151 words
Speech time
72 secs
Arguments
Maria Fernanda Garza asks for help in identifying barriers that hinder the achievement of the vision presented in the 'Internet We Want' paper
Supporting facts:
- The 'Internet We Want' paper was worked on and presented last Sunday
- IGF members' knowledge of their specific regions and global barriers are highlighted as significant for this task
Topics: Internet We Want paper, Achievement of vision, Barrier Identification
Report
Maria Fernanda Garza is seeking help in identifying barriers that are hindering the achievement of the vision outlined in the 'Internet We Want' paper. This paper was recently worked on and presented, highlighting the importance of the International Governance Forum (IGF) members' understanding of regional and global obstacles.
The sentiment surrounding this issue is positive, emphasizing the need to address these barriers to successfully realise the vision. One of the supporting facts underscores the significant role played by IGF members' knowledge of specific regional and global obstacles in overcoming these challenges.
Maria Fernanda Garza believes that to expedite progress towards the desired outcomes, specific goals, appropriate measurement methods, and the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are necessary. These tools can help achieve faster progression towards the vision. This aligns with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, which emphasises the importance of advancing technology and connectivity.
In conclusion, Maria Fernanda Garza is looking to identify the barriers impeding the achievement of the vision presented in the 'Internet We Want' paper. By emphasising the significance of IGF members' awareness of regional and global barriers and advocating for the establishment of specific goals, measurement methods, and KPIs, she aims to expedite progress towards the outlined vision.
The discussions surrounding this topic are in line with SDG 9, which focuses on advancing industry, innovation, and infrastructure.
VC
Vint Cerf
Speech speed
166 words per minute
Speech length
2950 words
Speech time
1067 secs
Arguments
The importance of the Internet Governance Forum
Supporting facts:
- In 2025, the question will be raised, should we continue to operate the Internet Governance Forum
- This is the largest of the IGF meetings ever.
Topics: Internet Governance, WSIS Plus 20, Global Digital Compact
The internet we currently have and how to make it better should be the focus
Supporting facts:
- Although penetration of Internet service is pretty good in the United States, in rural parts of the country, it isn't.
Topics: Internet access, Rural internet access
The low-Earth-orbiting satellite systems bring technical access to the Internet literally anywhere
Supporting facts:
- Starlink plans to have 40,000 satellites
- There are multiple LEO satellite systems that are anticipated
Topics: Internet Accessibility, Rural Connectivity, LEO Satellite Systems
It's not the leadership panel's responsibility to solve the problem of businesses whose business models have changed as a consequence of new technology.
Supporting facts:
- From 2003 to 2006, Vint was on the board of directors of the World Summit Awards
- In 2023, five companies gained 54% of the advertising revenues on the Internet, a significant economic concentration
Topics: Technology bias, Internet monopoly
Vint Cerf highlights the importance of national and regional Internet governance activities in understanding local problems
Supporting facts:
- National and regional Internet governance activities can articulate local problems
- They might be as important or more than the annual meetings due to their local focus
Topics: Internet governance, local engagement, national and regional activities
Email is one of the available tools for providing input to the leadership panel
Supporting facts:
- Email allows for direct and reliable communication with the leadership panel
- The secretariat can invite comment to draw attention of the leadership panel through this medium
Topics: Email, leadership panel, communication
Leadership wants to have more interaction with NRIs and regional organizations
Supporting facts:
- Discussed in a recent meeting to have more direct contact with NRIs and regional organizations
- Proposed that some of the leadership members participate in regular coordinating calls by NRIs
Topics: IGF, NRIs, regional organizations
Vint Cerf finds the idea of creating personal IP addresses and become individual ISPs interesting.
Supporting facts:
- Christopher Tay from Connect Free and Internet 3 presented the idea of letting individuals create their own IP address through a public-private key pair, and becoming an ISP on wide networks
Topics: Internet diversity, NTT restriction, IP addressing, Internet Service Provider
Increasing amounts of capacity from overhead satellites and undersea fiber will contribute to better access to Internet
Topics: Internet Access, Digital Infrastructure
Vint Cerf assures continued support for the multi-stakeholder model
Supporting facts:
- Vint Cerf acknowledges the importance of multiple voices in global digital negotiations
- Vint Cerf appreciates the United Nations' support towards a multi-stakeholder approach
Topics: multi-stakeholder model, global digital compact, UN, Internet governance
Consideration of smaller states hosting globally
Supporting facts:
- Caribbean Internet Governance Forum hosting their 20th IGF
- Examples of involvement by others such as Chiang Kai-shek in such forums
- Other policy development processes taking place outside of IGF like ICANN
Topics: Global governance, Internet Governance Forum, Digital Forum
The concept of having too many meetings was acknowledged and the idea of compartmentalising better was considered attractive.
Supporting facts:
- Issues of meetings overlapping same topics and reducing the number of total sessions were mentioned.
Topics: IGF, Internet Governance, Meeting Structure
Vint Cerf acknowledges the need for less chaos and more structure in meetings
Supporting facts:
- This is in response to the feedback from the audience about the unmanageable increase in the number of meetings
Topics: Meeting organization, Complexity, Scale
Report
During a recent meeting, the importance of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) was discussed, with several speakers expressing the need for its continuation. The leadership panel emphasised that the IGF should continue to assess the effectiveness of the Global Digital Compact.
They believe that the forum plays a vital role in articulating the values needed for decision-making on the IGF's future. One of the main points highlighted was the need for feedback from IGF participants to further improve the forum. Participants were encouraged to share their experiences and suggestions during the meeting.
The leadership panel stressed that they are interested in hearing from the participants and want to know what aspects they appreciate and would like to continue. The issue of internet access, especially in rural areas, was also discussed. It was acknowledged that although internet penetration is generally good in the United States, rural areas still face challenges in terms of access.
The leadership panel recognised that significant effort and funding are required to improve internet access in these underserved regions. In the United States, for example, the government is investing $40 billion to address this issue in rural areas. Recognising the potential of low-Earth-orbiting satellite systems, the meeting highlighted how these systems could provide technical access to the internet anywhere.
Starlink, for instance, plans to launch 40,000 satellites, and there are other anticipated LEO satellite systems as well. This development could greatly enhance internet connectivity, particularly in remote locations. The meeting also touched upon the possibility of government subsidies to make internet service more affordable in rural areas.
It was suggested that in the absence of competition, government support could be crucial in bringing internet access to these remote regions. The issue of internet monopoly and economic concentration was raised, with the meeting acknowledging that it is not the leadership panel's responsibility to solve the problem of businesses whose models have changed due to new technology.
Instead, the leadership panel aims to facilitate discussions and bring together individuals who can consider various solutions to address these challenges. National and regional internet governance activities were emphasised as being crucial in understanding and addressing local problems. Such activities were considered as important, if not more, than the annual IGF meetings due to their local focus.
The meeting highlighted that these activities articulate the unique challenges faced at a local level and can contribute to more effective governance of the internet. In terms of communication, email was mentioned as one of the available tools for providing input to the leadership panel.
It was noted that email allows for direct and reliable communication with the panel, and the secretariat can invite comments and draw attention to important matters through this medium. The partnership between the leadership panel and the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) was recognised as crucial for the IGF's functioning.
It was acknowledged that the structure of the IGF would not exist without this partnership, emphasising the importance of collaboration and partnership in achieving the forum's goals. The meeting also discussed the need for more interaction with National and Regional Internet Governance Initiatives (NRIs).
It was suggested that there should be personal visits to NRIs or regular correspondence with them to enhance connectivity and strengthen relationships. A noteworthy idea that emerged during the meeting was the concept of individuals creating their own IP addresses and becoming their own Internet Service Providers (ISPs).
This notion, presented by Christopher Tay from Connect Free and Internet 3, was deemed interesting and worth exploring. It was suggested that presenting this idea to the Internet Engineering Task Force could lead to further development and analysis. The meeting recognized that increasing capacity from overhead satellites and undersea fiber would contribute to better internet access.
This development points towards a positive trend in terms of improving internet connectivity worldwide. Azerbaijan's contribution to the IGF as the host was appreciated, highlighting the importance of partnerships and collaboration between countries in achieving the forum's goals. Lastly, the meeting reiterated and assured continued support for the multistakeholder model.
The importance of multiple voices in global digital negotiations was emphasised, and the United Nations' support towards a multistakeholder approach was appreciated. Overall, the meeting generated various insights and proposals to improve the IGF. Suggestions included better meeting structure, reducing topic overlaps, and involving smaller states in hosting globally.
There was a consensus that reforms are needed to conduct the IGF meetings more effectively, ensuring less chaos and more structure. These recommendations and observations aim to enhance the IGF's impact and strengthen its role in internet governance.