IGF 2023 Global Youth Summit

Report

The discourse is principally centred on matters pertaining to youth empowerment, internet governance, and cybersecurity. Delegates underline the necessity of including youth in policy-making discussions at regional and national levels involving internet governance. The majority of the argument focuses on the fact that, despite being the chief stakeholders of the internet, young people lack a secure platform for policy discussions and policy creation at these levels.

Considerable attention is given to implementing capacity-building initiatives at national and regional levels to enable youth to have a place in policy-making discussions concerning the internet.

This concurs with the emphasised sentiment that young people are not just a potential for the future but are a resourceful and urgently needed influence in present policy formulation. The discourse highlights the involvement of young people in internet policy-making as a positive stride, particularly considering the areas of cybersecurity and advancing technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI).

Simultaneously, speakers stress the pressing need for improvements in internet accessibility, particularly in the global south.

The issue is further compounded by the existence of a digital divide that impedes those in less affluent regions from accessing the internet. Thus, numerous points emphasise the necessity for the development of cost-effective solutions to enhance internet connectivity in these areas.

Moreover, it underscores the importance of making the internet more open, accessible, and affordable overall.

A particular thread of discussion is maintaining a balance between AI usage for academics and security. Nonetheless, this strikes a note of dissension as there are diverse views.

Despite some universities forbidding the use of AI in academic writing due to security concerns, there is a reiteration that AI could serve as a valuable tool to augment learning among young people. Therefore, there is a call for better integration and regulation of AI usage in academia.

Debates on internet governance and social media practices draw attendees’ attention towards enhancing awareness about certain internet phenomena, such as privacy, online harassment and notably, cyberbullying.

Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of governance and moderation methods in managing the risks of social media use among the young and in combatting cyberbullying and harassment on social media platforms.

The discourse concludes by reasserting the need for greater youth representation in internet governance to bridge the gap between policymakers and the younger generation.

This is underscored by a call for increased youth involvement to address the critical issues related to internet usage. The conversation broadens towards environmental concerns, emphasising that while addressing issues concerning humans, we also need to make the internet safe for the environment, signifying the interconnectedness of environmental sustainability and internet governance.

Report

The analysis acknowledges an essential role that the youth play in moulding and evolving the digital landscape. Their involvement extends beyond simply utilising digital technologies; they are also creators and innovators, contributing new dimensions to the rapidly evolving field. The IGF Forum plays a facilitating role in this process, fostering an environment of collaboration that unites young people from around the globe to contribute collectively towards the digital future.

However, the transition into the digital age is far from seamless.

Numerous challenges have emerged along with the proliferation of digital technologies. Issues around cyber security, online harassment, and the spread of misinformation and disinformation present significant obstacles. Approximately one-third of the global population (equivalent to around 0.26 billion individuals) remain unconnected from these digital advancements, the majority of whom are from the least developed countries.

This emphasises the extent of the digital divide.

Taking into account these issues, the necessity for achieving universal and meaningful connectivity by 2030 is clear. Such efforts must be deliberate and sustained, focusing particularly on bridging the gap for those individuals hailing from the least developed countries and regions, such as Africa.

This global connectivity will play a pivotal role in reducing inequalities and ensuring collective industry innovation and infrastructure development.

Interestingly, there is a positive sentiment towards the intergenerational exchange of ideas in the digital realm. According to the insights gathered, the interaction between the youth and senior experts, including diplomats and cyber leaders, leads to more innovative and effective strategies for dealing with both current and emerging cyber challenges.

This collaboration, drawing on a combination of fresh insights from the younger generation and the wisdom and experience of established professionals, is instrumental in crafting a more inclusive and secure digital future.

In summary, the digital age, though filled with challenges such as cyber security and digital inequality, offers immense potential, especially when all sectors of society, including the youth and senior professionals, collaborate for collective improvement.

Insights garnered from this analysis underscore the need for more sustained efforts in improving digital literacy and connectivity, especially in underdeveloped regions while highlighting the value of intergenerational exchange in shaping a resilient digital world.

Report

The analysis underscores the crucial role that the internet plays in the contemporary lives of the youth, serving as a principal medium for an array of activities – from communication to work, education and socialisation. Evidently, the Internet has become intrinsic to young individuals’ daily life, reinforcing its prominent role in fostering infrastructure, industrialisation and innovation.

The notion of safeguarding young people online was another key theme, emphasising the necessity for intelligent implementation of content moderation on social networking platforms.

The goal suggests a need to strike a prudent balance between ensuring safety and preserving freedom of speech, thereby ensuring peace, justice, and robust institutional values. Importantly, this process should not limit the freedom of speech and association in the name of online safety.

Education initiatives that target the development of cyber skills among the youth were presented positively.

This argument is supported by a report prepared by the University of Kent, under the Global Forum on Cyber Expertise, highlighting the growing importance of integrating these skills into a quality education framework.

A dominant point of discussion was the essential inclusion of young people in policy discussions, a need magnified in the face of a constantly evolving digital landscape.

This underscores the importance of their unique perspectives and experiences in shaping future policies and fostering innovation and justice-focused institutions.

The dialogue also delved into internet governance, digital literacy, and cybersecurity, focusing on the issue of youth participation in decision-making processes.

The discussion emphasised that the inclusion of the youth’s voice in decision-making should no longer be a symbolic gesture. Instead, more effort is needed to genuinely integrate young viewpoints into decision-making, enabling substantial impact across non-governmental sectors, regardless of age.

The topic of access to the Internet and digital tools for protecting the youth was also examined.

It was asserted that access to these fundamental tools should not be curtailed under the guise of protecting young individuals. Policymakers were identified as responsible for finding the right balance, ensuring active youth participation in various forums.

The significance of sustained dialogue and meaningful participatory access was underscored as necessary for addressing youth issues in the digital landscape.

Open consultation at national or international levels, initiating programmes for youth participation, and bolstering coalition building amongst youth for enhanced collective voice power were advocated.

In conclusion, the analysis presented a compelling case for the engagement of youth in digital policy-making and governance.

It emphasised the need for a balanced, inclusive and sustained approach to youth participation, which could empower them, stimulate innovation, and bolster institutions.

Report

The Global Youth Summit is fervently initiating intergenerational dialogue to encourage the open exchange of ideas, experiences, and expertise, particularly between seasoned leaders and emerging young minds. The overarching goal is to stimulate youth participation in sculpting a safer digital landscape.

This is reinforced by a clear ambition to embrace robust digital policies, a concept that underscores the summit’s commitment to digital innovation and youth empowerment.

A strong focus is placed on cybersecurity, with the youth being urged to actively participate in evolving governance frameworks, predominantly in the realm of social media.

The speakers, including Ms Iheeta Gangavarapu, emphasised the need for effective governance of social media platforms to assure safety and security for younger users. Strategies such as proactive moderation mechanisms, clear guidelines, formal reporting structures, readily accessible support resources, and awareness campaigns have been identified as essential.

Education is recognised as a vital factor – comprehensive education and widespread awareness about online safety are highlighted, with special emphasis placed on the role of understanding in shaping the online behaviour of the youth.

Complementing this, the summit’s voices underlined the importance of digital literacy initiatives for the youth, projecting that an informed public can better safeguard their digital identities amidst an ever-maturing digital landscape.

There is a notable call for government to invest in education and awareness campaigns focusing on online privacy and cybersecurity best practices.

The guiding principle is that an informed public can guard against emerging technological threats more effectively, requiring government regulations to keep pace with the rapidly evolving digital environment.

Interestingly, ongoing dialogues concerning online trust were apparent, stressing the necessity of creating a trustworthy online space.

Vint Cerf’s discussion outlining the struggle to preserve the openness of the internet whilst ensuring security and privacy underscores this argument, reiterating the need for an environment which is open, trustworthy and usable for all.

Beyond safety, the need for accessibility to online platforms was identified as key to facilitating the sharing of ideas and discussions on a global level.

Consequently, the requirement for an open, global, interoperable internet has been recognised as a necessity.

The engagement of the youth is pivotal in promoting this envisaged safe digital future. Ongoing and effective involvement of young minds is deemed essential to drive the implementation and changes required to empower them in the digital landscape.

Throughout the analysis, there was an overwhelmingly positive sentiment, suggesting a widespread consensus on these significant observations.

Report

The pressing need for rigorous and effective governance of various social media platforms was emphasised, ensuring safety, trust and security, particularly for vulnerable groups such as young people. The escalation of online activities and corresponding cyber threats, for example, bullying, harassment and harmful content, necessitates robust governance to protect users.

Discussion extended to the topic of moderation. Current moderation mechanisms were primarily identified as reactive, potentially rendering them ineffective in promptly dealing with certain incidents. Hence, it was asserted that social media platforms must apply proactive moderation measures, utilising algorithms to effectively identify and eliminate harmful content in real time.

Transparency was regarded as a pivotal cornerstone of solid moderation practices. It was argued that utmost transparency should be maintained regarding the guiding principles, operational guidelines and moderation methodologies employed by social media platforms to enhance trust and reliability amongst users.

In addition, the creation of formal reporting structures and helplines for victims of bullying and harassment was proposed.

Based on existing legislation like India’s IT Act, requiring a grievance officer, similar mechanisms were advocated on a global scale.

A preventative approach to cyber abuse was also highlighted, calling for the promotion of awareness and careful design of platforms to deter online bullying.

The significance of intrinsic design measures was underscored, particularly as some young people may unintentionally bully others online without comprehending the harm being caused.

The narrative also incorporated the subject of emerging technologies and their potential to bridge the digital divide.

The accelerated adoption of these technologies could expedite progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in the provision of quality health care and education.

Despite this, a concerning awareness gap was identified amongst young people concerning discussions taking place in policy and tech forums.

This knowledge gap could result in a lack of confidence and participation, despite the notable relevance of their involvement.

The necessity of understanding the relevance of young people’s participation in decision-making was highlighted. Multilateral bodies, such as the International Telecommunications Union, have initiated programmes to boost youth participation, empowerment and engagement, pushing towards meaningful youth inclusion in decision-making.

To summarise, comprehensive and stringent management of social media platforms, robust and proactive algorithmic moderation methods, transparency and formal resolution mechanisms are critical in protecting users, particularly young people.

Education and awareness, paired with the strategic use of emerging technologies, can bridge the digital divide and accelerate progress towards SDGs. The inclusion of younger generations in discussions and decision-making is vital. Throughout the discourse, a positive sentiment was observed, painting an optimistic picture for future developments in media governance, tech utility and youth participation.

Report

The efficacy of online safety policies, notably those established to safeguard the youth, depends significantly on the presence of well-structured frameworks and robust enforcement mechanisms. The constitution and legislation surrounding such policies differ worldwide, as illustrated by the divergent implementation approaches adopted by Australia and Singapore.

The former utilises an industry-led approach, while the latter favours a more government-driven protocol.

The cultivation of such policy frameworks should be an all-embracing endeavour involving all stakeholders within the digital realm, emphasising collective effort. This collective approach should incorporate global public interests, thereby avoiding a single focus on corporate-led policies common in areas heavily influenced by Big Tech.

Achieving such multifaceted collaboration demands the involvement of diverse stakeholders, leading to a democratic approach to policy development.

To create effective policies across various jurisdictions, the establishment of international online safety standards is necessary. This approach promotes inclusivity and encourages a broad representation of voices in discussions on safety measures.

An education-centric approach is advocated, involving educating the younger generation and adults on online safety, thereby equipping them with the necessary knowledge and tools for online self-protection.

A vital aspect of inclusivity within the internet’s sphere is the prevailing language barrier.

Given that a significant percentage of internet users are not native English speakers, language presents a potential hindrance to the efficacy of interactive, inclusive and diverse online discourse.

Importantly, online safety policy should not solely enhance security measures, but should also protect privacy and uphold digital freedom—necessitating the need for a balanced approach in policy formulation and implementation.

Worthy of note is the call for greater inclusion of voices from the Asia-Pacific region within the internet governance community, as exemplified by the Hong Kong speaker’s personal perspective.

This commentary also underscores the importance of involving younger generations in policy and decision-making processes. However, a critique was levelled at the lack of open consultation available for the youth to contribute to policymaking in specific regions, particularly Hong Kong.

In conclusion, promoting ongoing dialogue among young people and fostering a culture of learning are key for them making valuable contributions.

This stresses the importance of policy literacy as a foundational competency for engaging in these discussions and contributing to legislation and policymaking. This process should extend beyond a one-off session and be established as an integral tenet for future generations in our increasingly digitised world.

Report

The Global Youth Summit fosters dialogue and seeks to encourage collaboration between young minds and experienced leaders. The objective is to create an equitable and safe digital landscape, promoting engagement and inclusivity. The importance of such a platform is emphasised, and it facilitates open exchange, allowing ideas, experiences and expertise to be freely shared.

This stance aligns firmly with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) of ensuring peace, justice and strong institutions (SDG 16), and promoting quality education (SDG 4).

Within the digital environment’s framework, the European Union (EU) is committed to the adoption of the Digital Services Act, which has the potential to dramatically change the digital landscape.

The Act places a particular emphasis on the safety and empowerment of children and young people online. It gives special consideration to youth, aiming to instil in them the power of the digital age, while strongly focusing on their digital rights and online privacy.

This commitment demonstrates the EU’s dedication to fostering good health and well-being (SDG 3), and promoting decent work and economic growth (SDG 8) especially for the youth.

In terms of education, the EU is pushing boundaries with the understanding that digital competence and critical thinking are essential components of the ongoing digital transformation.

Notably, the EU has initiated a £100 million teacher training programme across Africa, Nigeria, Uganda, Mozambique and Jamaica. These initiatives signify the EU’s unwavering commitment to improving the quality of education (SDG 4).

At a broader level, the EU fosters a platform that supports multi-stakeholder involvement and encourages youth participation in societal and regulatory discussions.

Organisations like the DG INPA have emphasised the creation of youth sounding boards, which enable the youth to engage directly with decision-makers. These initiatives align with the goals of building strong institutions (SDG 16) and effective partnerships (SDG 17).

The Summit witnessed several significant perspectives and ideas being presented.

Speakers highlighted the ongoing privacy invasions inherent in the digital age, proposing legislation to ensure and protect privacy as a fundamental right (SDG 16). They demanded a balance between assuring privacy and other facets, such as cyber security, which is a proven challenge in the digital world.

Furthermore, speakers called for policy-makers to uphold their oversight roles to ensure compliance with such protective laws.

The internet, an integral part of social interactions, demands specific attention. Smart content moderation was proposed as a means to balance privacy rights, human rights, free speech, and security.

Despite the benefits of such moderation, speakers warned against its misuse and underlined the importance of vigilance against any form of free speech suppression.

Young individuals are considered the future of the digital age and need to participate actively in policy-related discussions.

However, despite their current involvement in the digitised world, the youth lack access to secure spaces in policy discussions. This situation leads to their potential influence on digital transformation being underexplored. As a result, there is a call for improving youth representation, participation, and involvement (SDG 16, SDG 9), reflecting the sentiment of reducing inequalities (SDG 10) and fostering peace, justice and strong institutions (SDG 16).

There were also concerns raised regarding the increasing instances of cyberbullying and online harassment on social media platforms, which pose a serious threat to well-being (SDG 3).

Consequently, calls are rising for increased internet awareness at all levels of education, from schools to higher education institutions (SDG 4).

Finally, the International Telecommunications Union’s Generation Connect initiative highlights the significance of digital inclusion and connectivity. This initiative aims to connect youth globally, fostering their overall development and opportunities.

In summary, while the digital age requires understanding and utilising advanced tools, internet pioneer Vint Cerf reminds us of the enduring importance of cognitive abilities — an essential element regardless of our digital prowess.

Report

Throughout this deliberation, the fundamental importance of fostering cybersecurity awareness across all societal levels was emphasised. This involves integrating cybersecurity education into schooling and tertiary education schemes, thereby ensuring that crucial subjects, such as regular software updates, robust password protection and data backup, become commonplace educational topics which brew a culture of digital safeguarding.

Moreover, the necessity of engaging young individuals in cybersecurity issues was prominently stressed.

Given their inherent familiarity with the digital era, their insights and viewpoints were discarded as priceless. Offering these individuals opportunities like mentorships and direct inclusion in policy dialogues was suggested as a pragmatic strategy to accomplish this aim.

Technologies such as artificial intelligence and quantum computation were viewed as being a double-edged sword in the context of cybersecurity.

They were identified as noteworthy tools to augment cybersecurity yet also as potential sources of vulnerabilities. Importantly, neutrality remained the sentiment, suggesting a balanced viewpoint on these technological developments, fully acknowledging their advantages and pitfalls.

There was a potent call for policymakers to boost international cooperation to strengthen cybersecurity mechanisms.

Adopting standardised practices and fostering cybersecurity norms were deemed indispensable methods in this course. The creation of platforms to facilitate the exchange of best practices amongst nations was proposed for this purpose.

In stark contrast, significant concerns were raised regarding the limited participation of stakeholders within the realm of cybersecurity.

This lack of inclusivity was cast in a negative light, proposing that broader engagement in policy crafting could result in more comprehensive and sturdy policies.

With respect to privacy, it was unequivocally asserted that it should not be compromised, maintaining a firm stance that it is a fundamental pillar, regardless of the need for robust cybersecurity measures.

Insights garnered from the YouthLAC Workshop at the YouthLAC IGF underscored the necessity of striking a delicate balance in this area.

A secure digital space was championed as a call for genuine empowerment of internet users. Online safety was underscored as of paramount importance, particularly given the prevalence of severe problems like online harassment.

It was intimated that digital safety should ideally be integrated from the outset, referring to Utrecht’s lessons for validation. A strong argument was made that the internet should be as inherently secure as brakes in a car, emphasising the pressing need to create web spaces that are open and simultaneously secure for every user.

In summation, the dialogue underscored the requisite of collaborative education, international discussions and youth engagement, balanced against respect for privacy and wide-ranging stakeholder involvement to augment cybersecurity conventions.

Well-established practices and innovative solutions like artificial intelligence and quantum computing were pinpointed as instruments to bolster cybersecurity. However, a vigilant approach was advised to address potential vulnerabilities. The idea of the internet as a safe space was a recurring theme, highlighting online bullying as a serious concern that warrants proactive countermeasures.

Report

The analysis presents ample opportunities for individuals to influence critical discussions on digital and cyber policies. Recognised forums, such as the one led by Paola, and youth groups within international organisations like the Internet Society, were specifically highlighted for their mounting sway in this realm.

These platforms provide avenues for robust discussion and policy-making input.

A significant shift towards transparency in policy-making has also been observed. The argument espouses the principles of open government and corporate conduct, positing that formulated policies should be transparent and include citizen participation.

This approach advocates a more democratically inclusive model of shaping policies that will ultimately affect every user within the digital space.

There is a pronounced emphasis on maintaining an open and free internet, where users have the autonomy to select and access the content and services they desire.

This liberty forms the cornerstone of digital democratisation and promotes a measure of decentralisation in digital control.

In contrast, the report criticises the artificial limitation of services or imposition of filters on user content. These restrictions, it asserts, alter the dialogue and lead to a limited internet experience.

Instead of allowing users free rein, such artificial curtailments dictate preference and restrict choices.

Regarding internet governance and digital participation, the report expresses a favourable sentiment. Participants are encouraged to continue asking probing questions and identifying pressing issues.

This sentiment intimates that robust, inclusive discussions are essential for generating transformative solutions in internet governance.

Lastly, the report adopts an assertive stance, urging for a comprehensive method to address global internet issues. It notes that these problems cannot be solved piecemeal, advocating instead for a holistic approach to tackle the global challenges at hand.

It further emphasises the universality of internet use, stating, ‘we are all speaking on the same internet with the same voice,’ rallying for a more unified, collaborative tactic in devising solutions.

Report

The European Union (EU) is ardently working towards a human-centric approach in its digital transformation journey. A significant emphasis is placed on bolstering the safety and empowerment of children and young people, as part of its commitment to prioritising individuals.

This resonates with the Union’s core principles, endorsed by the recent adoption of a joint declaration on digital rights and principles.

In line with this, the EU has introduced the ambitious Digital Services Act to protect online privacy.

This robust legal instrument bans targeted advertising to minors, specifically those based upon personal data profiling. Such a measure reaffirms the EU’s determination to ensure a secure digital environment and manage issues related to users’ data security proactively.

Simultaneously, the EU recognises the imperative role of education in fostering digital competencies and skills, with a bias towards critical thinking.

The EU has therefore established a digital competence framework, a crucial step in successfully embedding digital skills within the education system. Moreover, teacher training programmes have been extended globally, explicitly targeting African countries including Nigeria, Uganda, Mozambique and Jamaica. Illustrating its commitment to youth engagement, the EU has instigated the creation of a youth sounding board.

The EU is also deliberating a significant shift in the digital landscape, from mere connectivity to fostering meaningful connectivity.

This concept encompasses integral aspects such as coverage, affordability, and digital skills, a topic discussed in a session at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF).

However, the challenge to remain a free and open internet, amid potential shifts towards a fracture in the global internet landscape, is significant.

Concerns are being raised that access to unfettered information may be under threat. Despite this, the EU heavily emphasises the pivotal role of education and critical thinking as staples in overcoming this predicament.

In conclusion, there is robust support for the Digital Services Act.

This stance underlines the need to regulate the tech industry effectively, a necessity in light of the insufficiency of self or voluntary regulation. The EU’s unwavering commitment to ensuring a harmonious relationship between digital transformation and the upkeeping of peace, justice, and strong institutional measures is thus underscored.

Report

Suzanne Dose, a distinguished member of parliament in Malawi, who holds an instrumental role in the media and ICT committee, also plays a pivotal part in the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC). She fervently advocates for the necessity of legislation specifically bound to protect privacy within the realm of digital technology.

This is in unison with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16, aiming to guarantee peace, justice, and robust institutions. Dose’s passionate advocacy underlines the burgeoning necessity for regulatory measures designed to safeguard user privacy in this progressively digital age.

Moreover, issues pertaining to the compliance of extant legislation have come to light.

It’s been observed that the implementation of laws becomes problematic after their enactment. This highlights the urgent need for parliamentarians to strengthen their oversight roles, ensuring laws are fully complied with and their underlying objectives reached. This tripartite duty of policymakers, encompassing legislation, representation, and oversight appears essential in actualising justice and peace (SDG 16).

Turning attention to cybersecurity, its crucial role in our digital era remains paramount.

Attaining a balance between safeguarding individual privacy and ensuring cybersecurity poses a formidable challenge. This equilibrium can be achieved through a harmonious blend of ethical principles guiding individuals and organisations, state-of-the-art technological solutions offering secure protection measures, and comprehensive legal frameworks providing a steady foundation for the coexistence of privacy and cybersecurity.

This dialogue is aligned with SDG 9, focussing on fostering industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

In summary, this detailed analysis highlights the significant roles and challenges current lawmakers face in safeguarding privacy whilst ensuring security in the digital era. The exploration also emphasises parliamentarians’ vital role of oversight, necessary for effective legislative compliance.

Furthermore, the analysis underscores the importance of striking a delicate balance between the assimilation of technology, ethical standards, and legislation to establish a secure, robust, and peaceful digital environment.

Report

The prevailing discourse centres on the alarming lack of meaningful youth participation in decision-making, an issue fostering an environment of intergenerational disconnection. This problem, deeply rooted in policy-making spheres, impedes the potential for progress that benefits all generations equally. It is particularly prevalent among youth in the Global South, where their geographical locations significantly restrict their opportunities to develop careers within the ICT industry and actively participate within their local and global communities.

A striking technological divide, worsened by a lack of internet access for those not connected online, exacerbates these inequalities.

This barrier limits their civic participation and further hinders their pursuit of quality education and equitable opportunities, in line with the aspirations of SDG 4 and SDG 10.

However, certain initiatives point to the potential benefits of including youth in significant decision-making processes.

There’s notable appreciation for the Schuman Traineeship, a European Union programme. This unique initiative affords young people a chance to spend up to five months at the European Parliament, gaining insights into its decision-making processes. Similarly, the Dynamic Teen Coalition encourages the inclusion of teenagers in discussions surrounding internet governance.

These efforts underscore the benefits of expanding youth inclusion in decisions geared towards peace, justice, and strong institutions, central to SDG 16.

The disturbing trend of escalating cybersecurity threats amplifies the importance of investments in youth education. This necessitates creating more ICT experts to counteract the weaponisation of cyber threats against civil society.

At the same time, the promotion of higher education and cross-continental exchanges in ICT degree courses is seen as essential for bridging inequalities and providing global opportunities.

A more granular approach towards youth engagement and participation is touted, aiming to address the unique circumstances of different communities.

Advocates propose equitable access to technology for marginalised and low-income communities, consistent with the strategies proposed as part of SDG 10 to reduce inequalities.

Advocates additionally call for the integration of youth issues into the development agenda, recognising young people as key stakeholders, and creation of specific consultation processes for their perspectives to be considered.

Additionally, the private sector is urged to invest in youth-led digital activism projects and mentorship programmes, aligning with SDG 8’s goals for decent work and economic growth.

To summarise, the discourse stresses the urgent need to empower youth in decision-making processes, discourse, and policies, respecting their perspectives across varied fields including cybersecurity and internet governance.

While acknowledging the current challenges, the dialogue also proposes promising solutions that could pave the way for a more inclusive and participatory future.

Report

The analysis underscores the internet’s pivotal role in fostering global connectivity, facilitating unimpeded communication, and promoting the democratic dissemination of information. It emphasises its essential contribution to Sustainable Development Goal 9 (SDG 9): Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. A key historical point recognises that efforts initiated in 1973 to establish a globally interconnected world have persistently sought to bridge the digital divide.

As we commemorate the significant 50th anniversary of internet design, it’s evident that the world wide web has become an imperative facet of our global society.

Despite the undeniable advancements, the report acknowledges the necessity to shield users from potential online harms.

It underscores that the same unrestricted liberty that ignites vitality in the online milieu can also expose unsuspecting users to unanticipated hazards. This necessitates a careful equilibrium: fostering online connectivity that enriches our lives, whilst ensuring digital rights and freedoms aren’t undermined.

This standpoint aligns with principles of SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, in addition to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being, advocating for an internet that serves users’ best interests.

Significantly, the analysis underscores the need for internet users to apply critical thinking when assessing online information.

The post-truth era demands discernment to distinguish factual information from the profusion of misinformation and disinformation that pervade the internet. Thus, promoting digital literacy becomes a pressing concern, echoing principles incorporated in SDG 4: Quality Education.

Furthermore, the report clarifies the intrinsic flexibility of the internet, emphasising that while the technology facilitates communication between any devices, it’s not a compulsory requirement.

This highlights the importance of respecting user autonomy within the digital sphere.

A sustained commitment towards an inclusive digital realm that guarantees equal access to information nudges us nearer to addressing the barriers created by inequalities. This unwavering commitment echoes the internet’s initial objective to democratise access to information, thereby contributing to SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities.

In conclusion, the report provides compelling insights into the internet’s evolution over the past half-century.

The continual pursuit of a balanced, inclusive, respectful, and critical digital world underscores the intricate relationship between our online lives and the overarching ambition of achieving the internationally agreed Sustainable Development Goals.