AI & Diplomacy: Managing New Frontiers – ADF 2024

3 Mar 2024 10:00h - 11:00h

Event report

ADF PANEL

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Full session report

Experts Convene to Discuss Ethical AI and Its Role in Society at TÃœBÄ°TAK BÄ°LGEM Forum

In a comprehensive panel discussion at a forum on artificial intelligence (AI), moderated by Mehmet Haklidir of TÃœBÄ°TAK BÄ°LGEM, a diverse group of experts gathered to discuss the ethical, cooperative, and societal dimensions of AI. The panel included Sedef Akinli Kocak from the Vector Institute, Osman Gazi Gucluturk of Holistic AI, Manuel Muniz of IE University, and Ozcan Saritas from the Rochester Institute of Technology in Dubai.

Sedef Akinli Kocak addressed the gap between AI research and industry application, emphasizing the importance of AI literacy and workforce training. She discussed Vector Institute’s role in advancing machine learning and ensuring ethical AI use through collaboration with industry and the development of trust and safety principles.

Osman Gazi Gucluturk highlighted the challenges of harmonizing AI regulations across different jurisdictions. He argued for a nuanced approach to harmonization that respects regional and cultural differences and underscored the importance of diplomacy in establishing a common understanding of AI principles globally.

Manuel Muniz introduced the concept of tech diplomacy, comparing the need for AI regulation to historical regulatory successes. He outlined the necessary steps for foreign ministries to engage in the tech domain, such as developing human capital and creating platforms for engagement with the private sector. Muniz also discussed the potential of AI to enhance democratic processes and civic participation.

Ozcan Saritas focused on the importance of responsible technological development and anticipatory governance. He advocated for a systemic approach to AI that considers societal, ethical, and legal aspects from the outset and called for cooperative dialogue among all stakeholders to ensure AI’s future impact is positive.

The panelists also explored AI’s role in contributing to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Akinli Kocak shared examples of AI applications in energy reduction in data centers and wildfire resource optimization, highlighting AI’s potential for environmental sustainability. However, she cautioned against the negative impacts of AI, such as the resource-intensive nature of training large language models.

Muniz emphasized AI’s potential to enhance democratic life, sharing insights from a project on democracy-affirming technologies. He noted the vast innovation supporting democratic processes and the importance of properly geared technology.

Saritas discussed AI’s role in managing complex systems and anticipatory governance, emphasizing the need for early warning systems to understand emerging challenges and opportunities.

Gucluturk expressed concerns about the environmental impact of large AI models and the social implications of AI reliance, particularly for younger generations.

In conclusion, the panel reached a consensus on the necessity of balancing AI innovation with ethical regulation and the importance of international cooperation and dialogue in shaping the future of AI governance. The discussion highlighted AI’s potential to contribute significantly to societal goals, provided that challenges such as environmental impact and social implications are addressed. The panelists agreed that AI should be leveraged for social good, with a focus on harmonization of policies and regulations that consider the diverse needs and contexts of different nations.

MM

Manuel Muniz

Speech speed

196 words per minute

Speech length

2452 words

Speech time

750 secs


Report

The analysis explores the critical relationship between regulatory oversight and the advancement of technology, specifically focusing on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the governance surrounding it. The argument advocates for the necessity of regulations in guiding the path of research and innovation to foster societies that are not only equitable but also governed with effectiveness.

A key point made is that proactive regulation has historically played a role in enabling productive public discourse, as evidenced by the establishment of laws concerning libel and regulations governing media outlets. These frameworks are suggested as potential models for the regulation of contemporary platforms, including social media.

Several examples of regulation deemed advantageous are highlighted: 1. The GSM standards, set forth by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute, facilitated standardisation across European telecommunications, heralding an era of seamless international communication and technological progression. 2. The GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) is commended for its rigorous approach to personal data privacy and ownership within Europe, addressing the fine line between behavioural analysis and behavioural manipulation.

3. The emergent AI Act is presented as a timely and pioneering piece of legislation, ready to address the intricacies of AI as it becomes ever more entwined with societal functions. Drawing from personal encounters as the former State Secretary in the Spanish Government, the speaker introduces ‘tech diplomacy’ as an essential element of contemporary foreign policy, akin to the diplomatic evolution of climate change concerns.

Tech diplomacy is outlined with a tripartite focus: the shifting power dynamics it incites (including cybersecurity and space exploration), its economic impact (pertaining to economic activities and state taxation), and its implications for political systems and individual rights (such as surveillance and repression).

It is argued that foreign ministries need established strategies and structures to deal with the technological implications. Effective tech diplomacy should include a centralized ministerial authority, international networks operating in strategic locations, active engagement with the tech industry, and a deliberate cultivation of tech-savvy human capital within these ministries.

In addition, the talk touches upon the positive potential technology holds for democratic processes. It references a collaboration with Microsoft on the ‘tech for democracy’ initiative, which aims to leverage technology to enhance civic engagement, increase governmental transparency, and improve the delivery of public services.

The initiative showcases the often-overlooked positive intersection between technology and democratic systems. It is suggested that democratic nations, as the primary source of academic, financial, and consumer resources, are uniquely positioned to champion innovation that reinforces democratic principles and functions.

In conclusion, the speaker presents regulation not merely as obligatory but as a facilitator of progress, positing that judicious management of technology and AI can augment societal and democratic functions. The analysis posits that a balanced approach between freedom of innovation and the application of regulatory measures to safeguard and promote the public interest is essential.

MH

Mehmet Haklidir

Speech speed

131 words per minute

Speech length

1241 words

Speech time

567 secs


Arguments

The crucial part of AI implementation or usage is focusing on ethical recommendations and managing risks.

Supporting facts:

  • Ethical recommendations are pivotal in guiding the responsible use of AI.
  • Risk management is essential for the safe implementation of AI technologies.

Topics: AI Ethics, Risk Management


International data spaces need regulations to foster AI strategies and usage areas.

Supporting facts:

  • GDPR focuses on data privacy but is insufficient for regulating international data spaces.

Topics: AI regulation, International data spaces


Report

The dialogue presents a comprehensive view on the importance of ethical guidelines and risk management in the application and advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), aligning with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 9, which promotes industry, innovation, and infrastructure, and SDG 16, which focuses on peace, justice, and strong institutions.

There is a consensus that adherence to ethical recommendations is not merely beneficial but pivotal for responsible AI utilisation, with risk management being central to the technology’s safe deployment. In advancing the discussion, the text endorses the promotion of AI literacy and the initiation of dedicated training programmes.

These are aimed at bridging the existing gap between the rapid advancement of AI and its industry adoption, in keeping with the emphasis on quality education under SDG 4 and the push for ethical and effective AI adoption noted in SDG 9.

The limitations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the scope of data privacy are also highlighted, suggesting a deficit in the broader context of regulating international data spaces. The proposal advocates for regulations extending beyond GDPR, creating a structured approach to international data cooperation—an essential element for developing comprehensive AI strategies, supporting the objectives of SDG 16 for robust institutional frameworks.

Throughout the varied but interconnected themes, the sentiment remains positive, suggesting a proactive stance towards AI governance, proficiency, and education enhancements. The contributions not only support the strategic framework that would enable the widespread adoption of AI, but also emphasise the necessity for its informed and responsible usage, underscored by strong ethical principles and international collaboration.

The text forecasts an inclusive and well-defined AI future that suggests a global perspective on maintaining a balance between technological progression and ethical standards. It portrays a future where AI is leveraged as a force for good, in alignment with international developmental objectives, fostering an environment of AI-enhanced innovation while ensuring significant growth in ethical AI literacy, responsibly managed risks, and international cooperation in data governance.

OG

Osman Gazi Gucluturk

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

1585 words

Speech time

551 secs


Report

The roundtable discussion focused on the challenges of harmonising Artificial Intelligence (AI) regulations across differing global legal systems. Main regulatory players such as the European Union, the United States, Asian countries, and international organisations like UNESCO and the United Nations were identified.

Despite the existence of similar AI principles across these entities, their practical implementation and national-level interpretation vary widely. A key point of debate was the ambiguous nature of core AI principles, including transparency and fairness, with the consensus being that a lack of uniformity is exacerbated by cultural differences among countries.

The role of international diplomacy was emphasised as essential for establishing standardised, enforceable practices that could lead to a more unified regulatory environment. Participants acknowledged a need for a shared vocabulary concerning AI principles to help industries comply and exploit AI’s economic potential ethically.

It was proposed that harmonisation efforts should consider the developmental diversity of companies and sectors, suggesting that contextually adapted, rather than homogeneous, regulation would be more effective. The EU’s AI Act was highlighted as a benchmark for legislative frameworks, advising that while other regions could draw inspiration from it, they should tailor the regulation to their specific cultural and legal contexts.

Cultural integrity in AI applications was pinpointed as paramount, with the risks of applying uniform AI systems that overlook regional cultural nuances being discussed. This included the potential for biased outcomes and the necessity for region-specific data to enhance the accuracy and utility of AI systems.

Environmental concerns were also broached, with attention drawn to the substantial energy demands of large AI models and their environmental implications. There was deliberation over whether the accessibility of such energy-intensive systems should be restricted, as well as their potential impact on social sustainability, such as the diminishment of critical thinking skills in younger generations reliant on AI as a trusted knowledge source.

The discussion concluded that although regulatory frameworks recognise the importance of these issues, the gap between intention and actual practice needs to be urgently bridged. A call was made for proactive regulation that is culturally sensitive and environmentally conscious, urging action before the AI landscape becomes too complex to manage effectively.

OS

Ozcan Saritas

Speech speed

163 words per minute

Speech length

1860 words

Speech time

684 secs


Report

At a session organised by the Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs, participants explored the dynamic world of diplomacy, acknowledging the increasing importance of meta-politics. Discussions went beyond predicting technological advancements to stress the moral implications of their development. The responsible approach advocated includes considerations of scientific potential, economic feasibility, and societal acceptability.

The Foresight initiative, highlighted during the session, aims to integrate futures thinking into the core activities of policymakers, industries, and researchers. This forward-looking approach prioritises the ethical, legal, and social dimensions of technology, particularly AI. It encourages considering these elements at the earliest stages of technological development to ensure decisions that lead to positive and sustainable outcomes.

Attendees addressed the shift from conventional military capabilities to the strategic importance of information and intelligence. AI is a critical factor in this transformation, and two future scenarios were outlined. The first suggests a collaborative international effort towards a shared vision for AI’s future, reminiscent of the synergy that structured internet communication standards.

The second scenario predicts a competitive AI race, akin to historical arms races, with stakeholders pursuing disjointed, often conflicting agendas. The complexity of modern technological advancements, with a diverse array of players from multinational corporations to small businesses and individuals, makes achieving collective progress challenging.

The need for effective governance was emphasised, particularly to tackle systemic challenges related to the Sustainable Development Goals. The interconnectedness of water, energy, food, and climate requires the sophisticated management only AI capabilities can provide. AI’s role in anticipatory governance systems is critical, setting up early warning systems that identify “weak signals” in a variety of data streams to pre-empt future challenges.

Proactive governance could help mitigate shocks that might otherwise severely disrupt societies. In conclusion, the session highlighted the importance of international collaboration in AI governance to ensure the technology’s beneficial application while preventing misuse. By narrowing the gap between technology and regulation, and by promoting transparency and aligned objectives, the potential harms of competition and unilateral pursuit of advantage can be alleviated.

This measured strategy is crucial for building a foundation that supports the progressive, equitable utilisation of AI, promoting stability within the international community.

SA

Sedef Akinli Kocak

Speech speed

163 words per minute

Speech length

2327 words

Speech time

854 secs


Report

During a detailed discourse on artificial intelligence (AI) advancements in industrial sectors, an experienced AI expert highlighted the Vector Institute’s vital role. The Vector Institute, part of Canada’s Pan-Canadian AI Strategy, pushes the frontiers of machine learning, especially deep learning, while fostering industry synergies through educational programmes and skill development.

These practices bridge the gap between AI academic research and its industry applications. Internationally, 69 national AI strategies reflect economic goals and technological rivalry. Nevertheless, the challenge lies in executing these strategies effectively. For example, Canada’s strategy led to AI centres of excellence, including the Vector Institute in Toronto, Mila in Montreal, and AAMI in Edmonton, which bolster AI research, talent development, and workforce upskilling.

These hubs aid various regulated sectors, including manufacturing, finance, and healthcare, by tailoring AI solutions to their needs. The talk delved into AI’s role in sustainability, which extends beyond environmental effects to economic, technical, social, and environmental considerations. The expert advocated for an in-depth evaluation of AI’s long-term consequences on society.

Illustrating AI’s sustainability benefits, the speaker cited two case studies: a reinforcement learning project that reduced energy consumption at Telus data centres, and an AI-driven initiative for wildfire management in Alberta, created in collaboration with a small business, government authorities, and Microsoft’s AI for Good Lab.

In conclusion, the expert called for a balanced discussion about AI, acknowledging benefits and concerns, such as the resource-intensive nature of training large language models. Optimising existing models, instead of building new ones from scratch, was recommended to save resources.

A shared international AI taxonomy was also advocated for to harmonise global AI development efforts. This dialogue emphasised AI’s transformative potential within industrial and environmental spheres, the challenges of synchronising international AI strategies, and the need for a comprehensive sustainability approach in technology’s rapid progress.