Cyber Costs Reframed: The Human Costs of Cyber Insecurity

Arguments

Phones, tablets and laptops are most vulnerable to malicious cyber activities as they are closest to humans

---

Healthcare system is vulnerable to cyber attacks which can have direct human harm

---

Privacy protection, especially among young people, presents a significant challenge

---

Young people's proficiency in technology leads to a paradigm shift in knowledge transfer

---

Regulatory measures are crucial for combatting cyber crime, but technology will always be one step ahead

---

Improving the education and resilience of regular internet users is necessary to reduce cyber crime

---

Difficulty in cascading down the decision of not paying ransomware at individual or organizational level

---

Report

Phones, tablets, and laptops are considered the most vulnerable devices to cyber attacks because they are in close proximity to humans. The aggressive digital transformation in recent years has resulted in the installation of numerous applications and tools on these devices, making them prime targets for malicious activities.

These devices also contain a significant amount of data and are constantly used, further increasing their susceptibility to cyber threats. Protecting personal devices from such threats is crucial as any negative impacts can have serious consequences on productivity, finances, and daily activities.

The healthcare sector is another area particularly vulnerable to cyber attacks. The consequences of such attacks can have a direct and harmful impact on human lives. There have been documented cases, such as a hospital in Germany being subjected to a ransomware attack, which resulted in a patient's death.

The potential disruption caused by cyber attacks on healthcare systems can render hospitals unable to handle patient cases, leading to tragic outcomes. Consequently, there is a need for greater investment and focus on improving the cybersecurity of healthcare systems. The healthcare sector, being relatively less mature from a cybersecurity perspective, requires increased financial resources to ensure the safety and well-being of patients and medical professionals.

It is recommended that the cybersecurity of healthcare systems should be given priority by national competent authorities. Privacy protection, especially among young people, presents a significant challenge. While young people are often proficient in using digital technologies, they tend to overlook the regulatory landscape.

However, it is noteworthy that young people also play a vital role in knowledge transfer to older generations when it comes to online safety. They are often the ones teaching their parents and grandparents how to behave safely online, as they possess more experience and understanding of digital technologies.

Consequently, there is a call to invest more in educating young people about cybersecurity, given their proficiency and their potential to bring about a paradigm shift in the dissemination of digital knowledge. Regulatory measures are crucial in combatting cybercrime; however, the ever-evolving nature of technology poses a constant challenge in enforcing effective measures.

Cyber criminals exploit the vulnerabilities of technology, causing harm that is often difficult to prevent and mitigate. It is recognized that the education and resilience of regular internet users play a significant role in reducing cybercrime. With millions of users directly or indirectly needing protection, their behavior on the internet, as well as the resilience of critical infrastructures, become crucial factors in preventing cyber attacks.

In order to achieve this, there is a need to improve the education of internet users and enhance their ability to respond effectively to potential threats. Dealing with the ransomware phenomenon is an intricate issue that presents complex problems with no clear or effective solution at present.

There are debates surrounding whether paying ransoms to cyber criminals should be prohibited or encouraged. It is acknowledged that paying ransoms can perpetuate the cybercrime economy; however, finding alternative solutions to tackle ransomware remains a challenge. There are difficulties in cascading down decisions of not paying ransomware at an individual or organizational level, highlighting the complexities of addressing this issue.

In conclusion, protecting personal devices from cyber threats and ensuring the cybersecurity of critical sectors like healthcare is of paramount importance. Education and awareness, particularly among young people, play a crucial role in combating cybercrime. Regulatory measures need to be continually updated and enforced to keep up with the ever-evolving nature of technology.

Additionally, efforts to deter cybercrime include the banning of ransomware payments to discourage the growth of the cybercrime economy. Overall, a comprehensive approach that combines investment, education, regulation, and cooperation is essential for effectively addressing the challenges posed by cyber threats and protecting individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.

Arguments

Cyber attacks can have both direct and indirect impacts on human beings

---

The psychological impact of cyber attacks and digital dependency

---

Increased dependency on mobile phones

---

The importance of awareness in combating cybercrime

---

Child Online Protection strategy to help children access the internet safely

---

AI complicates threats in cybersecurity

---

The issue of nations trying to control ransomware is significant, with losses increasing to three trillion US dollars last year.

---

Data has become the most important asset, akin to oil in the global economy.

---

Organizations that do not back up their data will, as punishment, have to pay the ransomware to retrieve it.

---

Dr. Ahmed Abdel Hafez is not satisfied with the current level of international collaboration in combating cybercrime

---

Report

Cyber attacks have both direct and indirect impacts on humans, affecting both individuals and digital services. Individual loss of control over data, such as banking credentials and social engineering details, can greatly affect individuals. Furthermore, cyber attacks on digital services like healthcare, intelligent transportation systems, and other emerging service systems that are being digitised can have direct or indirect impacts on human beings.

The psychological impact of cyber attacks and digital dependency is becoming prevalent. The fear of losing a mobile phone, known as "nomophobia," is a psychological issue that is on the rise. In addition, issues such as cyber bullying cause harm to people, particularly vulnerable individuals like young girls.

The increasing dependency on mobile phones is a concern as well. People's lives are now heavily reliant on their phones, which contain their bank details, personal information, and social accounts. Even the loss of battery life in a phone can cause stress in individuals.

Awareness plays a crucial role in combating cybercrime. Dr Hafez suggests that teaching people how to handle digital transformation safely is crucial and can reduce cyber attacks by 80 to 90 percent. This highlights the importance of educating individuals about cybersecurity risks and best practices.

Strict regulations and laws are necessary to control cybercrime. Dr Hafez believes in implementing strict rules and regulations that should be followed by individuals and government officials. In Egypt, for example, anti-cybercrime laws and data privacy laws have been enacted.

A Child Online Protection strategy is essential to help children access the internet safely, especially considering that 40% of the population in Egypt is under 18. This underscores the need to protect vulnerable individuals from the potential harms of the internet. The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in cyber attacks is significant.

AI can be used to invent new sophisticated attacks, including zero-day attacks, which complicates the task for cybersecurity professionals. Additionally, the scope of potential attackers has expanded with AI, as individuals do not need to be cybersecurity experts to use it.

The ethical use and control of AI are important considerations. Currently, AI is seen as an uncontrollable technology, leading governments and organizations like the United Nations to work on managing its use in an ethical manner. Ransomware attacks pose a significant issue, with losses reaching three trillion US dollars last year.

Nations' efforts to control ransomware have become crucial in mitigating the impact of these attacks. Data has become the most important asset in the global economy, on par with oil. As such, responsible data management and protection are essential for economic sustainability.

Strong data backup control measures and international collaboration are necessary to effectively combat cybercrime. Dr Hafez emphasizes the importance of a three-to-one backup for data assets to prevent ransomware attacks. Furthermore, increased collaboration among nations is necessary since cybersecurity is a cross-border activity that requires cooperation and collaboration.

Overall, cyber attacks and their various impacts on human beings are significant considerations in today's digital world. From the direct impact on individuals to the societal implications of digital dependency, it is crucial to address these issues through awareness, regulation, protection strategies, and international collaboration.

Arguments

Health care sector is a high asset and frequently targeted by ransomware attacks

---

Emerging technologies are escalating the assets' vulnerability to attacks

---

Oil sectors are also frequent targets of high asset attacks

---

The impact of cyber threats on countries with poor infrastructure is devastating

---

Awareness training and capability building in cyber space are critical

---

Cybercrime is a debilitating threat and needs adequate budgetary allocations

---

Cybersecurity is now one of the top three priorities for any country

---

Regulating AI is not an easy job due to its fast-changing nature

---

Whether a country or its citizens should pay ransomware depends on the value and impact of the data stolen

---

Report

The analysis reveals that the healthcare sector, emerging technologies, and oil sectors are highly susceptible to high asset cyber attacks. The healthcare sector has become a prime target for ransomware attacks, disrupting surgeries and compromising patient data. Similarly, emerging technologies, such as IoT systems, are connected to wide networks, making them attractive targets for cyber attacks.

Additionally, systems holding sensitive or valuable information, including government entities, are frequently targeted. Countries with poor infrastructure face significant challenges in protecting their cyber space due to budgetary constraints and lack of resources. A global effort is needed to protect these countries from cyber threats.

Awareness training and capability building in cyber space are crucial in enhancing cybersecurity. Adequate budgetary allocations are necessary to combat cybercrime and protect institutions and citizens. Cybersecurity is now one of the top three priorities for any country, and countries need to invest more in cybersecurity.

Regulating artificial intelligence (AI) is complex due to its fast-changing nature. However, it is important to establish and adapt regulations to ensure ethical and safe use of AI. The decision to pay ransomware depends on the value and impact of the stolen data, and each country has the right to make decisions based on national interest.

In conclusion, this analysis highlights the vulnerability of various sectors and systems to high asset cyber attacks. The importance of global collaboration, awareness training, budgetary allocations, and investments in cybersecurity is emphasized. Adequate regulation of AI and thoughtful decision-making regarding ransomware are crucial in ensuring cybersecurity.

By addressing these issues, countries can protect their institutions, citizens, and national interests in the digital landscape.

Arguments

Rising costs of dealing with cybercrime globally and in specific countries

---

AI is being used by attackers to create sophisticated, zero-day attacks

---

AI regulation is not an easy job due to its fast-changing nature

---

Need for nations to control the problem of cyber crimes

---

A concerted international effort is being made to refuse to pay ransoms during cyber-attacks

---

Report

The discussions revolved around several key topics related to cybercrime and AI. Firstly, the rising costs of combating cybercrime were a cause for concern. The former president of Estonia expressed worries about the escalating expenses in fighting cybercrime globally and specifically in his country.

In Estonia, the budget for combating cybercrime has grown five-fold over the past five years. This highlights the financial strain that governments face in dealing with the ever-evolving nature of cyber threats. Another area of discussion focused on the use of AI by attackers to create sophisticated, zero-day attacks.

Zero-day attacks refer to attacks that have no prior fingerprint, making them difficult to detect and defend against. It was noted that attackers do not need to be cybersecurity experts to utilise AI in their attacks. New attacks using AI are being invented on a daily basis, posing a significant challenge to cybersecurity professionals and organisations.

To address the potential misuse of AI, there was a consensus that regulation is necessary. Notably, AI is considered an uncontrollable technology, and there are ongoing efforts by the UN and governments to find ethical ways to regulate it. The goal is to prevent malicious actors from harnessing AI for nefarious purposes, while still allowing for its beneficial applications.

However, regulating AI is not an easy task due to its fast-changing nature. AI technology evolves rapidly, and as a result, regulations need to be constantly updated to keep pace. There was expressed doubt about whether enough time exists to develop comprehensive AI regulations, as it took the European Union nine years to create GDPR regulations.

The need for international cooperation in addressing cybercrime was emphasised. It was highlighted that 40 countries have agreed not to pay ransom during cyber-attacks, showcasing a concerted effort to refuse ransom payments. This unity in refusing to pay ransoms aims to discourage cybercriminals and reduce their financial incentives.

One of the notable points of discussion was the practical implications and boundaries of banning ransom payments. Ryan Chilcote questioned whether a policy of banning ransom payments would also apply to individuals who are threatened with the release of sensitive personal information.

This raised considerations about striking a balance between protecting individuals and preventing further harm caused by ransomware. In conclusion, the discussions brought attention to the challenges posed by cybercrime, the use of AI in sophisticated attacks, the need for regulation to prevent AI misuse, the difficulties in regulating a fast-changing technology, and the importance of international cooperation to counter cyber threats.

The rising costs of combating cybercrime were seen as a pressing concern, while the practical implications of banning ransom payments highlighted the complexities of finding effective solutions. The analysis shed light on the ongoing efforts to tackle cybercrime within the framework of peace, justice, and strong institutions.